Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live

Golden Jubilee Weekend: SG50 surprise holiday on Aug 7

$
0
0
Four-day weekend packed with Parade, concerts and discounts at major attractions
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

The National Day long weekend just got longer. In a move which surprised many, Aug 7 was yesterday declared a public holiday by the President, as part of Singapore's 50th birthday celebrations.

The extra holiday falls on a Friday. With Monday already a holiday since National Day falls on a Sunday this year, Singapore will have a four-day Golden Jubilee weekend from Aug 7 to 10.



President Tony Tan Keng Yam shared his hope on Facebook that Singaporeans will use the time to take part in the many activities lined up and "come together to commemorate this special milestone year in our history".

This year's National Day Parade will be the biggest ever, with a main parade at the Padang and a bayside show at Marina Bay.

Aug 7's main attraction will be the Sing50 mega concert at the National Stadium to celebrate the best songs and music composed, performed or made popular by Singapore artists.

The weekend will also feature carnivals and picnics, special bus tours, free admissions to places such as the Science Centre and even free cable car rides at Sentosa on Aug 10.

Attractions such as the Jurong Bird Park, and the Flower Dome and Cloud Forest at Gardens by the Bay will halve their admission prices that weekend. Museums will stay open all four days.

Besides the myriad activities, all Singaporean and permanent resident households - about 1.2 million in all - will each receive a National Day Parade funpack.

The extended break will also allow Singaporeans to show their appreciation to the pioneer generation and celebrate the nation's multicultural and multiracial heritage, said Mr Heng Swee Keat, who chairs the committee overseeing the SG50 celebrations.

He urged Singaporeans to spend "this special time with your loved ones".

Mr Heng, who is the Education Minister, spoke to reporters before a concert at Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park - the first of a series organised by the National Parks Board to mark SG50.

Singapore has 11 public holidays in a typical year - cut from 16 in 1968 to boost the country's economic competitiveness.

Since then, extra public holidays have rarely been declared, except for elections.

Member of Parliament Yeo Guat Kwang (Ang Mo Kio GRC), who has been in Parliament since 1997, applauded the move to have a special holiday, saying: "It is meaningful to have it with SG50."

Singaporeans were quick to share the news online after it was announced at around noon yesterday, and some were soon making plans to take advantage of the break for a quick trip abroad. Travel agents said they expect a boost in business.

Others, however, were happy to have more time to celebrate the jubilee. "My wife and I will try to join in the free activities," said contractor Andy Ng, who is in his 50s and has two grown-up children.

Retailers and food and beverage outlets can expect more business that weekend, although some said the extra holiday will mean having to pay their workers more.

But Mr Wei Chan, business development director of The Pine Garden bakery, said: "One day in 50 years - we can absorb the costs and celebrate with the country."





Planning starts for extra-long weekend
MPs hope Singaporeans would stay and celebrate Jubilee weekend
By Lester Hio, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

At first, some thought it was an early April Fool's joke. Then, as the news spread that Aug 7 will be a public holiday to mark the country's 50th birthday, the planning started.

For some, the extra-long weekend - four days stretching from Aug 7 to 10 - promises a welcome break from work and school, and for others a chance to go on SG50 outings with their families or even a trip abroad.

Ms Lee Bee Wah, an MP for Nee Soon GRC, hopes Singaporeans would stay and celebrate the Jubilee Weekend.

She said her residents were surprised by the news yesterday. "They are happy, and some were even asking if it's true or not," she said, laughing. "I hope people will take the time to celebrate National Day with their friends and family - at home, in Singapore."

Freelance writer Geraldine Wee, 34, is looking forward to taking advantage of the various activities planned for the weekend. "The holiday means more time for family bonding. The discounts and free admissions to attractions will be appreciated by families as well."

Medical sales representative Jace Tan, 31, is already planning four days of unwinding at home. "It will be like an extended rest for me," she said. "I'll watch TV, do yoga, maybe do some shopping."

Travel agencies are confident their business will get a boost. "I think we will definitely see people make use of long weekends for impromptu travel plans," said Ms Alicia Seah, director of marketing communications at Dynasty Travel.

She pointed out that with just four days of leave from Monday to Thursday, one can enjoy a 10-day holiday from Aug 1 till Aug 10.

Engineering businessman Frederick Wong, 40, said: "I'll probably take my family on a short trip within the region, maybe to a nice beach in Thailand."

While it may be inevitable that some will go away, Mr Zainal Sapari, an MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, urged Singaporeans to stay and celebrate SG50 as one nation. "This is Singapore's 50th birthday - it's not every year we have such an occasion - and I'd like to see Singaporeans show solidarity and celebrate as a nation," he said.

Singapore Management University associate professor of law Eugene Tan saw the additional holiday as a nice gesture to mark the occasion.

"The Jubilee celebration is a special occasion, and I see the holiday as a very nice gesture," he said. "The many positive reactions to the holiday reflect the very hectic pace of life in Singapore, and this provides a rare opportunity for people to spend more time with their families."

The news set social media abuzz yesterday, with many netizens cheering the unexpected gift, even as some grumbled that they will have to work on Aug 8, a Saturday, and so will not get a four-day break.

With a whole host of activities taking place across the island during the Jubilee weekend, some were already anticipating a crush. Sales executive Francis Tan, 46, said: "I would like to take advantage of the discounts and free admissions to places, but I'm worried about the crowds."

Some parents went to Education Minister Heng Swee Keat's Facebook page, where he announced the holiday as chairman of the Singapore 50 (SG50) steering committee, to point out that students have common tests soon after the National Day break. They urged him to tell teachers to give less homework and let children enjoy the special weekend.

For 66-year-old Mogan Kali, a food stall helper, the extra holiday is a chance to reflect on Singapore's progress into a safe, advanced country. "It's good that there is a holiday - there should be something special for Singapore's 50th anniversary. It is a chance to enjoy ourselves but also remember what the founding fathers have done. I'm proud to see how Singapore has grown over the 50 years."



Seniors get priority and seating in bus queues

$
0
0
Yishun's temporary bus interchange makes life a bit easier for elderly and those with special needs
By Audrey Tan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

A temporary bus interchange in Yishun that has priority queues for the likes of seniors and pregnant women roared to life on its opening day.

It is the first bus interchange in Singapore to have priority queues - areas next to each bus berth with seats for those who need them.

Depending on the response, public transport operator SMRT said it will look into having such priority queues at its four other bus interchanges, if space permits.

"The (priority queue initiative) is part and parcel of our successful ageing plan," said Associate Professor Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim, an MP for Nee Soon GRC and Parliamentary Secretary for Transport and Health. He and fellow Nee Soon GRC MP Patrick Tay launched the interchange yesterday.

In 2013, the proportion of people aged 65 and above was about 11.7 per cent. This rose to 12.4 per cent last year, Prof Faishal said.

"I hope Yishun residents will play their part, to show kindness and graciousness to their seniors and those with special needs," said Prof Faishal.

The temporary structure is located at the junction of Yishun Central and Yishun Central 1, next to the site of the original interchange.

The 28-year-old bus facility said its goodbye at about 1.30am yesterday morning. About 60 passengers on SMRT service 812, the last bus to get back to the old interchange, were presented with a certificate to mark the occasion.

In its place will be a new Yishun integrated transport hub slated to open in 2019.

The 236,800 sq ft hub will include an air-conditioned bus interchange, with an underpass link to Yishun MRT station. It will also be connected to the upcoming Northpoint City, a commercial and residential development.

The area's residents will be served in the meantime by the temporary bus interchange.

Yesterday, retired lift repair technician Mak Yew Lam, 77, was one of the first to try out the priority queue areas.

He said: "It is more comfortable because I can sit, and from here, I can wait for two buses at different berths instead of having to queue up for just one."

Singaporeans pack JB nursing homes

$
0
0
Homes expanding to meet demand as families send chronic sick and old folk there
By Janice Tai And Toh Yong Chuan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

In a quiet private estate within Taman Johor, a 30-minute drive from the Causeway, there is a large two-storey bungalow with high ceilings and a lush garden.

At first glance, it looks like a typical suburban residence. But it is really a nursing home, and Singaporean Andrew Tan is one of its residents.

The house is part of a cluster of 10 bungalows within the estate, making up the City Heart Care Nursing Home.

"There are computers for me to check my Facebook page, my own TV to watch the news and I can even go to the coffee shop outside for noodles," said Mr Tan, 43, who is paralysed from the chest down after a car accident 20 years ago.

His family, who lives in Singapore, sent him there as his ageing parents no longer have the strength to care for him.

After visiting more than 10 nursing homes in Singapore and Malaysia, the former electrical technician, who is single, chose City Heart Care as "it does not feel or smell like a hospital".

"I also have my own room, which means I have privacy when my diapers need changing," he said.

He is one of a growing number of infirm Singaporeans who have been admitted to nursing homes in Johor Baru, where prices can be as low as half those in Singapore.

Mr Tan's family pays $900 a month for a two-bedded private room. A similar room in Singapore would cost more than double.

The growing influx is convincing major nursing home players to expand in Johor Baru.

Singapore company Econ Healthcare Group, which runs eight nursing homes here, opened a 57,000 sq ft, four-storey home in Taman Perling this month. The 199-bed centre is a 30-minute drive from the Causeway.

Spring Valley Homecare, believed to be Johor Baru's largest nursing home operator, with 210 beds, recently bought an 8,000 sq ft piece of land in Johor Baru.

Its Singaporean-Malaysian owners want to build a three-storey, 84-bed home by the end of the year.

City Heart Care is also looking to buy more bungalows.

Said Econ group executive chairman Ong Chu Poh: "There is potential in Johor Baru because of lower land and labour costs, which mean lower fees."

Three residents from Econ's nursing homes in Singapore have already moved over to its new Taman Perling home.

At Spring Valley, more than 40 per cent of its 150 residents are Singaporeans, compared with a fifth five years ago. At City Heart Care, the number of Singaporeans has doubled in the last two years to make up 20 per cent of its residents.

Affordability is the key pull. Nursing home fees in Singapore range from $1,200 to $3,500 a month. This is before government subsidies of between 10 per cent to 75 per cent. But those with per capita household incomes of above $2,600 do not qualify for these subsidies.

In Johor Baru, nursing home fees start from $600 a month, making them attractive to middle-class Singaporeans.

Mr Frankie Ker, director of Spring Valley, said most of his Singaporean residents come from the "sandwiched middle class".

He said: "If you are poor, the Government will look after you. If you are rich, you can afford three maids to look after you 24 hours. If you're middle-class, it's tough."

Spring Valley offers basic, spacious open wards for $600 a month. Those who prefer more privacy can pay $900 for a two-bedded room in City Heart Care's bungalows.

"Singaporeans are very price-sensitive and will bargain for even $20 off," said City Heart Care's Malaysian owner, Mr Jeremy Yeo.

Econ's homes target those with higher spending power, charging up to $2,500.

Besides offering single rooms with attached toilets, it has barbecue pits and outdoor exercise gardens. Still, its fees are up to a third lower than its Singapore rates.

The space crunch in homes in Singapore is another reason more are heading across the Causeway.

There are 10,000 beds now and the Health Ministry is pushing to increase this to 17,150 by 2020. Work on seven new nursing homes began this year.

Operators said demand for nursing home space here will only grow, given Singapore's ageing population, creating a spill-over effect across the Causeway.

For some though, being in Johor can be a more lonely experience as the hassle of crossing the border deters some families from visiting, said operators.

Retired labourer Seow Teck Beng, who has been living at Spring Valley for three years, sees his children every three months. "I miss them," the 89-year-old said.

Operators said that they try to encourage family visits.

Econ's Mr Ong said: "Singaporeans can combine the visit with weekend shopping. Johor Baru is not that far away - it's like an MRT trip from Jurong to the airport."

For Mr Tan, who said he is now good friends with the Indonesian staff at City Heart Care, Johor Baru has become a long-term choice.

He gets visits from his family several times a year, but he said: "This is my home now."




Stuck in middle

"If you are poor, the Government will look after you. If you are rich, you can afford three maids to look after you 24 hours. If you're middle-class, it's tough."

- MR FRANKIE KER, director of Spring Valley



Added incentive

"Singaporeans can combine the visit with weekend shopping. Johor Baru is not that far away - it's like an MRT trip from Jurong to the airport."

- MR ONG CHU POH, Econ group executive chairman, who wants to encourage family members to visit residents in the nursing homes across the Causeway





RESIDENT

No one told him he's in JB
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

Retired goldsmith Sim Ah Chew has been living at Spring Valley Homecare in Johor Baru (JB) for the last three years.

But when asked by The Sunday Times if he knew that he was living outside of Singapore, he was surprised.

He said in Hokkien: "Malaysia? This is Malaysia? No one told me."

The 71-year-old used to work at a jewellery shop in Geylang. He was living with his wife and the family of his eldest son in a three-room HDB flat in Hougang until three years ago.

Mr Sim has two other children - a son and a daughter - and four grandchildren.

When the eldest son, a delivery driver, upgraded to a larger flat in Sembawang, Mr Sim was moved to the nursing home.

At first, Mr Sim was reluctant to say why. But he later admitted that there were some family problems, including with his wife.

"We could not get along," he said.

Mr Sim added that it was four to five months since they last came to visit him.

Now he spends most of his time sleeping on a bed in a large room without air-conditioning, with at least 20 other residents, similar to the layout of a C-class ward in a Singapore government hospital.

"I am lucky to have a window," said Mr Sim, adding: "The staff here take care of me well."

He spends his days talking to other residents in the home, sleeping, watching TV and having meals.

When asked what he misses most about his family, he said: "My grandchildren. But what is the point of thinking about them? There is no use."




OWNER

Singaporeans value privacy
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

Mr Frankie Ker, 60, runs the largest nursing home in Johor Baru. The Malaysian, a Singapore permanent resident, is married to a Singaporean and they are the majority owners of the 210-bed Spring Valley Homecare at Kempas Baru, a 30-minute drive from the Causeway.

They have also bought an 8,000 sq ft plot nearer the Causeway, to build a three-storey, 84-bed nursing home by the end of the year. "The new location is nearer town and easier for Singaporeans to find," he said.

He opened Spring Valley in 2006 after seeing the potential in Singaporeans' demand for nursing homes. He had been working in construction and had no experience in running nursing homes.

Singaporeans now make up about 40 per cent of the 160 residents at Spring Valley, though at one point Singaporeans made up half the residents.

His new building will be better designed, he said.

"I will have partitions between beds so that there is more privacy," he said. "Singaporeans value privacy."

Mr Ker and his wife have three children and live in Ang Mo Kio.





More S'porean men than women in JB homes
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

The residents in Singapore nursing homes are evenly split between men and women. But in homes across the Causeway, there are about twice as many men as women.

At Spring Valley Homecare nursing home, 36 of the 62 Singaporean residents are men.

Over at City Heart Care nursing home, the number is 13 out of 20.

Mr Frankie Ker, director of Spring Valley Homecare, said families find it easier to care for their elderly women relatives at home.

"It is tougher to take care of men if they cannot walk. Because of their size, maids may not be able to handle them," he said.

"Another reason is that it is easier for the woman to live with her daughter's family, but harder for the man."

Mr Jeremy Yeo, owner of City Heart Care nursing home, offers a more direct explanation.

"It's simple," he said.

"People love their mothers more. That's why they send their fathers to the nursing homes farther away, but not the mothers."


Jack Sim: Why We Give a Shit about Toilets

Floating casino draws Singaporeans loath to pay $100 levy at home

$
0
0
Gambling on the high seas
By Theresa Tan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

It is a weekday afternoon and the Lido casino is packed with at least 500 people. There is hardly a seat available for those who also want to gamble.

There are about 40 tables offering games such as roulette, baccarat and poker. Two other rooms have more than 200 jackpot machines between them, but the crowd is thinner there.

This is the scene at the casino on board the Leisure World cruise ship, which sails in international waters off the Indonesian island of Batam and is thriving once again.

Floating casinos offering gamblers a "cruise to nowhere" took a big hit when Singapore's two casinos opened in 2010.

But the crowds have returned to the Leisure World, and they appear to be mostly elderly Singaporeans unwilling to pay the $100 levy to enter the casinos here.

A spokesman for New Century Tours, the ship's Singapore-based tour operator, told The Sunday Times: "Our business dropped drastically after the casinos opened. We had fewer than 500 passengers on some days. But as the (Singapore) casinos lost their novelty, the crowds started to come back in 2013."

Now, the spokesman said, it gets between 600 and 700 passengers daily, four in five of whom are Singaporeans, and the rest, Malaysians.

The spokesman said the Leisure World cruises "very slowly" in international waters near Batam, and has been there since the early 2000s. It is owned by Queenston Maritime, a company registered in the British Virgin Islands. New Century Tours is a Singapore travel agent.

There used to be three such floating casinos in recent years, but Leisure World is the only one known to be operating close to Singapore now.

The Sunday Times joined the crowd heading to Leisure World on a recent weekday.

Eight ferries leave the Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal every day between 8am and 8.30pm, with an additional trip on weekends.

For $43, you get a return ticket which includes free buffet meals on board the Leisure World. Those over 55 years old get a weekday discount and pay $23.

The ferry takes 40 minutes to get to the Nongsapura Ferry Terminal in Batam. Passengers then switch to a domestic ferry that takes them to the Leisure World in 20 minutes.

The whole trip takes about one hour and 15 minutes, including transit time at Nongsapura.

On the domestic ferry ride, about a dozen senior citizens chose to stand at the exit throughout, just to be the first to board the ship and get to the casino tables.

Most of the patrons on the casino ship appeared to be in their 50s and older, with a good mix of men and women.

Those who spoke to The Sunday Times said they usually visit the ship once a week, arriving in the morning and leaving by evening.

The Singaporeans said they frequent Leisure World because they prefer not to pay the $100 levy to enter the Singapore casinos. Besides, the ferry ticket is affordable and takes care of their meals.

Another draw: Minimum bets are relatively low. The bets start at $2, compared to $25 for most table games at the Singapore casinos.

A retired shipyard worker in his 60s said he visits Leisure World at least once a week as he is "bitten by the gambling bug".

He brings $700 to gamble, and loses more often than he wins.

A cabin on board the ship costs $40, but most passengers do without it as they come for a day trip, some staying for just two hours of gambling.

A part-time factory worker, 60, said he gambles for two or three hours in the morning and leaves by lunch-time to go to work. He visits the floating casino once or twice a week, hoping to win a few hundred dollars.

Some of those The Sunday Times spoke to said their families had no idea they spent their day gambling at sea.

A businesswoman in her 40s said she told her husband she was staying overnight with a friend, then took the evening ferry to the Leisure World and booked a cabin to sleep over.

She had lost more than $3,000 by the next afternoon when she was heading home.

Another woman, a 70-year-old former hawker, started visiting the casinos after retiring two years ago. She visits the Leisure World once a week.

She said: "There is nothing to do at home, and it is very boring."





Last resort for some after getting banned
By Theresa Tan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

Some gamblers head for the floating casino after getting banned from entering Singapore's two casinos.

A 43-year-old sales consultant, who declined to be named, told The Sunday Times that he applied for a self-exclusion order after losing at least $50,000 in the Singapore casinos over just a few months.

He owed more than a dozen loan sharks and licensed moneylenders more than $20,000, plus hefty interest.

"It is very hard to quit," he said. "I kept thinking of winning back all the money I had lost."

He then started going to the Leisure World floating casino.

He would head to Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal after work, take the 8.30pm ferry to Batam and reach the floating casino by 10pm. He would then gamble into the wee hours, and take the first ferry back to Singapore at 6.15am, and report for work by 9am.

At one point last year, he was at the floating casino three to four nights a week and chalked up losses of at least $20,000.

His wife divorced him because of his gambling. He is finally seeking help, and has asked his counsellor at Blessed Grace Social Services to keep his passport, so he cannot travel to Leisure World any more.

Another man, a 35-year-old former bank employee who used to earn $150,000 a year, told The Sunday Times that over the past five years, he got himself banned from the Singapore casinos three times and revoked the ban twice.

After he applied for his third self-exclusion order, he started going to Leisure World. He stopped only when no one - not even loan sharks and licensed moneylenders - would lend him any more money to gamble.

He said he had lost at least $500,000.

He quit his well-paid job after being hounded by licensed moneylenders at work. He now drives a taxi and is also seeking help to quit gambling.

Asked why he could not stop going back to his habit, he said: "I wanted to win back my losses to settle my debts, which kept getting bigger."





1 in 4 under self-exclusion order gets ban revoked
By Theresa Tan, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

About one in four gamblers who banned themselves from the two casinos here subsequently got the ban revoked.

The National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) told The Sunday Times that since self-exclusion orders were introduced in 2009, over 75 per cent of those who banned themselves continued to stay out of the casinos.

But the group who got the ban revoked has worried counsellors, who found the proportion high, and said that these gamblers often ended up deeper in debt after heading back to the casinos.

They felt that more could be done to help those seeking self-exclusion orders, and suggested compulsory counselling to help them quit gambling. They said many gamblers ban themselves to appease family members, such as wives who threaten to divorce them or family members who refuse to pay their debts until they get the exclusion order.

"When people ban themselves, they are very motivated to quit at that point. But if their addiction is not treated, they will definitely go back to gambling after some time," said Mr Billy Lee, founder of Blessed Grace Social Services which counsels gambling addicts.

Counsellors said some of those banned from the casinos here head for the Leisure World cruise ship, a floating casino off Batam, or gamble in other ways.

As of the end of last year, 14,877 Singaporeans and permanent residents remained barred from the casinos under self-exclusion orders.

Once a self-exclusion order is granted, the person must stay on the ban for at least a year before he can apply to have it revoked.

While about 25 per cent of this group end up getting the ban revoked, the picture is different for gamblers who are banned from the casinos because their families took out family exclusion orders.

Some 1,912 people remained banned by their families as of the end of last year. Only 2 per cent of those barred by their families have had those bans revoked.

The NCPG spokesman said revoking a family exclusion order is a "rigorous process". Among other things, the gambler must prove that his circumstances have changed significantly enough to warrant a review of the ban.

Generally, he goes through at least two assessment and counselling sessions with NCPG-appointed counsellors before a decision is made. The Sunday Times understands his family is consulted too.

The NCPG explained that the process of revoking a self-exclusion order is different from that for a family exclusion, as the self-imposed ban is voluntary.

Still, a person wishing to rescind his self-exclusion order is interviewed by NCPG-appointed counsellors, who ask about his gambling behaviour and how it has affected himself and his family. If required, he is referred for treatment or further counselling, the spokesman said.


PAP activists give out fliers on problems at AHPETC

$
0
0
By Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

People's Action Party (PAP) activists in Aljunied GRC, Hougang and Punggol East are going door-to-door to hand out fliers highlighting problems at the Workers' Party-run town council.

HDB households in two of Aljunied GRC's five wards - Bedok Reservoir and Paya Lebar - have received fliers in English and Chinese urging residents to ask WP Members of Parliament questions about the management and financial health of the town council.

The remainder of the initial print run of 35,000 fliers will go out to the other wards this week.

The aim, said PAP Paya Lebar branch chairman K. Muralidharan Pillai, is to reach all 55,000 HDB units under the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) and remind them to hold the WP to account.

The fliers come one month after a two-day debate in Parliament over the Auditor-General's Office (AGO) report on the troubled accounts of AHPETC.

The fliers do not have a PAP logo or say who printed them.

But volunteers distributing them wear party badges, and pictures of the fliers and of activists giving them out have been posted on the PAP Paya Lebar branch's Facebook page, said Mr Pillai.

"There should be no confusion that they are from the PAP," he told The Sunday Times yesterday.

WP chairman Sylvia Lim did not respond to a request yesterday to comment on the fliers.

The two-page flier informs residents that after AHPETC's own auditors refused to give a clean opinion on its accounts,"the AGO stepped in and found serious problems that will affect you".

The Government requested the AGO audit in February last year. In its report released last month, the AGO found lapses in governance and compliance at AHPETC. These findings were endorsed by Parliament - including the nine WP MPs - after a heated debate.

The flier gives a run-down of the most significant findings against AHPETC, highlighting improper governance, overcharging, and turning the surplus accounts into a "major deficit" in two years.

The flier says AHPETC awarded more than $25 million in contracts to run the estate to FM Solutions and Services (FMSS), and notes, in bold lettering, that FMSS was "set up just seven days after GE2011", when the WP won Aljunied GRC.

It also says, in bold, that FMSS is owned by a "husband and wife team" who are friends of WP leaders and who also work in AHPETC.

"They bill AHPETC for FMSS services, certify their own work, and pay themselves, with little checks."

FMSS is majority-owned by AHPETC general manager How Weng Fan and secretary Danny Loh, her husband.

The flier also says AHPETC had "overpaid its friends at FMSS by at least $6.4 million", and now runs a deficit - despite the fact that the PAP had handed over a town council whose accounts were in surplus.

"We do not know how bad the situation is because AHPETC has not submitted clean accounts since 2012," the flier adds.

It suggests several questions that residents should pose to their MPs, such as: "How much did FMSS and other businesses owned by the AHPETC employees earn from AHPETC?" and "What is the latest financial situation at AHPETC?"



During the Parliament debate, the WP said that there had been no criminal wrongdoing or loss of money in its contracts with FMSS.

It said the WP MPs knew of the AHPETC staff's ownership of FMSS and that the said staff had no role in the contract tender deliberations.

The WP also acknowledged lapses in management, but said these were largely borne of inexperience and human error, and that the party has since put in place safeguards to rectify the situation.


Yesterday, Paya Lebar Young PAP chairman Abner Koh, 32, said residents he met while handing out the fliers were "generally friendly and curious".

As for the fliers, he said: "I personally think residents are rational and could be quietly thinking about the implications."

Residents had mixed reactions. "I don't really have time to think about town council management as long as the situation doesn't personally affect me," said customer service manager Jackie Quey, 56, who lives in Kovan.

"Elections are coming," was the conclusion of sales executive Lim Hongmin, 26, who lives in Bedok Reservoir.








Related




Youth 'must be wary of ISIS rhetoric'

$
0
0
Be on guard against terror group's social media reach: Maliki Osman
By Lim Yan Liang, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

Youth in Singapore have a part to play in countering the threat posed by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), given the unprecedented social media savvy shown by the terrorist outfit, said Minister of State for Defence and National Development Maliki Osman yesterday.

Besides guarding themselves against the terrorists' rhetoric, youth here should also be watchful for peers who may appear to have fallen under the influence of extremist ideology, Dr Maliki told 350 students yesterday, at a convention organised by Muslim group Taman Bacaan and the Inter-Agency Aftercare Group, which helps to reintegrate terror detainees.

He urged them to be on guard against the terrorist group's social media reach.

"The videos and images that we view from our palms, through our tablets and smartphones, may shape perception and thinking and influence us," he said.

"But, please remember, our multiracial, multi-religious nature of our society will not change. Neither will the need for tolerance, respect and sensitivity in preserving our racial harmony."

Individuals may become self-radicalised by material they view online, and like-minded "lone wolves" could also come together to commit acts of terror, said Dr Maliki.

He called on the participants to look out for one another, watch for tell-tale signs like increased isolation and more dogmatic religious views in their peers, and alert the authorities or adults early.

Participants also had a closed-door dialogue with several terrorism experts.

The questions students raised included how prepared Singapore was to manage the social fallout of a terror attack.

How a country reacts to a terrorist attack determines whether it will survive one, said keynote speaker Rohan Gunaratna, who heads the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

"A terrorist attack, by itself, cannot really destroy Singapore," he said. "It is only a communal riot, (that may) happen after the attack, and the suspicion and the hatred that we develop - that is what can damage Singapore."

Only individual Singaporeans, and not the Government, can ensure that society remains peaceful and resilient even if an attack occurs, said Professor Rohan.

Students said the session reminded them to be wary of ISIS propaganda and question the purpose of materials released by the terrorist group.

Ms Monessha Nair, a 20-year-old Republic Polytechnic student, talked about watching a recent shocking video of a Jordanian pilot being burned alive by ISIS. She said: "The video really captured my attention and I watched the whole thing from the start to the end... I'm definitely more on guard against their propaganda."

Dr Maliki said he was glad that the participants included young people from various ethnic groups.

"It's not about Islam; it's a political ideology that is being framed in the context of a religion," he said. "And for non-Muslim students to be able to hear and appreciate the actual content is very important."


Jeremy Clarkson fans show racism is alive and kicking

$
0
0
By John Lui, The Sunday Times, 15 Mar 2015

Last week, I caught up with the times. I Ubered a car in Los Angeles. I'm usually on the tail end of trends, so it felt really good to be on the cutting edge of what's called the "sharing economy".

A nice man in a silver Toyota Prius drove up to my hotel five minutes after I tapped the Confirm button on my phone.

His name was Alan and he was grey-haired, with a neat grey moustache.

For 20 minutes, he talked about leaving Iran for Germany, getting married, divorced, coming to the United States, getting married and divorced twice more.

He was still in love with each of his former wives, he claimed. He blamed himself for being too selfish to make the compromises that keep marriages going.

Alan shares his ride, for a fee, when his Uber app pairs him with people headed in his direction. He drives around LA a lot because he is a property agent.

The boom in legal marijuana has driven up demand for industrial spaces for planting. He gets a good commission from selling or renting these spaces. This is why, among other reasons, he thinks legalisation is a great idea.



I Ubered twice more during my three-day stay and, each time, the driver was an immigrant. One used to teach philosophy in a South Korean university but now owns a mini-mart. His family runs the shop, so he drives to make a few extra dollars.

He, like Alan, had an accent and both, in several ways, conform to immigrant stereotypes - they hold two or more jobs, do not seem to be interested in the things that occupy the average American and are just trying everything they can to make a go of life in a new land.

I wonder what Jeremy Clarkson might make of them. I can imagine a "bit", probably one of the cross-country races they like to hold. Clarkson competes with fellow presenters Richard Hammond and James May.

Clarkson might try to give instructions to his driver, let's say the South Korean, and fail to understand the reply because of the strong accent.

Frustrated, he would look into the camera with an expression that says everything you have ever wanted to say about foreigners but cannot in public.

The presenter of the BBC motoring show Top Gear is known for his mockery, a trait that has made him one of the broadcaster's highest-paid stars and his show a global hit.

Clarkson now looks likely to part ways with the BBC, after the last in a string of acts that have outed him as a petulant man-child. In the latest incident, he is supposed to have wanted to hit a producer who failed to produce a hot dinner after a long day's shooting.

I was a fan of Top Gear partly because Clarkson was different from other presenters. More than almost anyone else on television, he lacked a filter. He was dangerous - not just with car stunts, but socially.

That was the show's appeal. There was some stuff about cars, and other stuff about what it feels like to be a white, middle-class Western European stuck in Argentina, Myanmar, Mexico, India or deep in the Southern United States.

He would do and say the things you might expect a crabby Englishman abroad would say but cannot any more because of political correctness. He was the living, walking embodiment of a complaint posted on a Web forum for expatriates in China ("The spitting... the staring... the guy who took a live chicken into the subway.")

You got the sense that he exaggerated that ugly part of himself for the camera, as all entertainers do with that aspect of their personality that resonates with the audience.

As Clarkson got richer and the show became a flagship, the heart seemed to go out of the xenophobia. I guess it's hard to sing the white man's blues in an air-conditioned Range Rover. He started manufacturing his own casual racism. I stopped watching after that.

It is one thing to have a reality show in which the host drowns in the incompetence of silly foreigners. But it is another to throw the first punch, which is what he did with a licence plate that referred to the war in the Falklands while driving in Argentina, or putting a toilet in a car designed for India.

This is low-effort, kindergarten- level race- and foreigner-baiting. It is not just beneath a clever man like Clarkson. It's also boring, and no different from what the people behind "alternative" Singapore news websites do.

Clarkson's online supporters have held him up as a free speech hero, a man's man hounded by the frilly-pantied milquetoasts of the leftist BBC, a scapegoat for do-gooders and feminists looking to destroy the last free man on TV, and that if you are offended, change the channel. (Really? What if there were a channel for sympathisers of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria?) There is an online petition seeking his reinstatement.

Mainly, what I read from those supporting him is that racism is alive and well, only wearing nicer clothes. By saying "I'm not personally offended by it, so he should be allowed to keep saying it," the commenters show how bad the problem is. But I suppose empathy is just too hard for some people.

Clarkson's supporters shouldn't worry. He can move to another station, where he can ride into a golden sunset, his herd of followers behind him. There is a whole world of obvious and lazy ethnic stereotypes waiting to be tapped, and he has found his niche.



How to build a ‘rational’ cyberspace

$
0
0
By Carol Soon, Published TODAY, 12 Mar 2015

Last month, the Media Literacy Council (MLC) launched a campaign to spur pro-social online behaviour. The campaign, timed to mark the Safer Internet Day, celebrates individuals and groups that exhibit responsibility and empathy in their online interactions and those who use the Internet to encourage others or promote social causes.

The Internet as a rational space has become an ideal that is much sought after. This is understandable, as what goes on online often has offline repercussions.

In 2013, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen coined the term DRUMS (distortions, rumours, untruths, misinformation and smears) to describe how inaccurate information on the Internet could cause undue panic and divide communities, threatening Singapore’s multiracial and multicultural society. The most recent example is the implication of a Filipino family in the altercation at a Thaipusam celebration.

However, negative or antisocial speech can also be unintentional when people make casual utterances and engage in what they feel is harmless venting of frustration at specific groups of people or policies. Some post comments in the heat of the moment, while others feel they are merely expressing their personal opinions.

While “irrational” speech is sometimes unpalatable, it is a useful signpost of how different segments of society feel about issues affecting them.

Regardless of the intent or lack thereof, irrational speech, especially sensational and provocative comments, tends to “stick”. When these messages are replicated and transmitted to many others online, they create the illusion that many share similar views, when the opinions are held by only a minority.

WHAT IS RATIONALITY?

So how do we cultivate rationality online and improve the tenor of online discussions in Singapore? Such contemplation is futile without questioning what we understand by rationality.

What constitutes rationality has been contested for centuries past. The Greek philosopher Aristotle described man as a rational animal who possesses the ability to reason, reflect and think. He believed that ethically desirable behaviour could become our second nature through practice. On the other hand, Scottish historian and philosopher David Hume argued that reason was inadequate to motivate behaviour and that passions drove human action.

In Asian philosophy, Confucian philosopher Xunzi viewed man as innately evil and believed he would use reason to guide his actions in advancing his own interests, while Mengzi believed that man was predisposed to being moral and good and that this innate quality could be further developed.

The recent controversy surrounding the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo and its infamous cartoons has generated impassioned debates on wide-ranging issues such as free speech and censorship, media freedom and responsibility as well as the rights of the minority and of the majority. The aftermath, which is still unfolding in different parts of the world, undoubtedly shows that different groups hold different views on what is rational.

The search for the elusive rationality is further complicated by the diversity in humankind across cultures, societies and politics. The contesting philosophies and human diversity shed light on the wide range of online behaviour.

Thus, perhaps the focus should not be on the type of rationality we should strive for, but on how to find common ground where different reasons, passions and ends can be accommodated.

The findings of a recent Institute of Policy Studies study on the rationality of the online political space are encouraging. Based on a snapshot of blogs with political content in June and July last year, the study analysed the blogs’ content for their rationality, based on objectivity and emotionality.

Most blogs presented ideas in a calm way, though there were several that ranted and raved or used expletives when they discussed hot-button issues. A large majority also presented the alternative side — sometimes multiple sides — to the issues, albeit to different extents.

COMMON SPACE

The government, the private sector and the public at large all have vital roles to play in creating a space that befits the social and cultural landscape we inhabit. It will be a space within which people accommodate one another, agree to disagree and thrive.

Through official discourse and legislative mechanisms such as the Penal Code, Sedition Act and the Protection from Harassment Act, the Government has implicitly and explicitly set the norms for acceptable and unacceptable discourse and behaviour. Besides providing legal recourse for victims, the law sets standards for acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.

Private institutions and non-governmental organisations, through their organisational ethos, transmit values that shape corporate practices and how their stakeholders behave online. Educational institutions and commercial entities, by decrying uncivil or disrespectful speech from students and staff, send a message to not only their internal audiences, but also the larger public on what constitutes punishable offences.

By standing up against racist and xenophobic speech, cyber-lynching and online vigilantism, citizens defend on behalf of different communities the sanctified principles on which the Singapore society is built. These ground-up efforts demonstrate people’s conviction to take action against perpetrators of offensive speech and mistruths.

Cross-sector initiatives involving the community, industry and the government, such as the MLC, promote collective efforts across different segments of society to build a vibrant yet safe online space.

A rational cyberspace for Singapore would eventually be a common space that evolves through speech and counter speech, through pushing and redefining boundaries. We all have a role to play in building the rational space that we want for our society, offline and online.

Carol Soon is a research fellow with the Arts, Culture and Media cluster of the Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore. She is a member of the Media Literacy Council.


Can Singapore survive? The Big Tent approach to increasing the Republic's chances

$
0
0
Kishore Mahbubani asks: Can Singapore survive?
His take: There are good reasons to answer "yes", "no", or "maybe".
The Straits Times, 14 Mar 2015


YES, WE CAN

SINGAPORE'S survival is by no means guaranteed. Historically, city-states have not lasted long.

Venice, Athens and the Rakhine state, just to name a few, have long fallen into the musty annals of history. Singapore, a small city-state without any hinterland, is not an exception by any measure. As Mr Lee Kuan Yew said: "When I project myself forward 100 years for Singapore, I cannot tell you that it will exist."

Singaporeans must continue to be alert to threats which could lead to Singapore's fall.

On the other hand, our founding fathers have placed us in a wonderful position to succeed. One of their most important contributions was to institute governing principles of meritocracy, pragmatism and honesty. These principles have driven our first 50 years of extraordinary success, and will continue to do so in the years to come.

Meritocracy has ensured that our key institutions are run by truly talented individuals. Our selective government scholarship schemes, for example, attract top talent to key leadership positions. Our army, air force and navy are among the best in the world. This raw talent is further augmented by the best training and equipment - Singapore has the fifth largest military spending per capita in the world.

The spirit of pragmatism was driven in no small part by Dr Goh Keng Swee. He had no qualms about modernising Singapore by copying best practices from other countries, just as Japan modernised by learning and copying from the rest of the world during the Meiji Restoration.

Dr Goh used to say: "Kishore, no matter what problem we encounter, somebody, somewhere has found the solution. Let us find that solution and adapt it intelligently to Singapore."

Honesty was the most difficult trait to develop in Singapore's culture. In the 1960s, corruption was rampant. School examination papers and driving licences could be bought under the counter.

By prosecuting people for corruption even at the highest levels, the Government sent the message that no one was immune. Today, Transparency International ranks us among the top 10 most honest countries.

Singapore also invested greatly in physical and human infrastructure, such as our world- class education system. Our children continue to score well in maths and science compared to those in other countries. As a result, Singapore ranks as one of the most competitive countries in the world.

We also promoted racial and religious harmony by treating all ethnic groups equally. The move to make English Singapore's common language was also inspired - choosing Mandarin, Malay or Tamil would have been divisive. Our English proficiency has made us a great place to do business for the international community.

Regionally, Singapore is also blessed by the presence of Asean, which acts as a protective umbrella for us. In 1967, when Asean was first formed, the region was a hotbed of tensions and unrest. As South-east Asia is incredibly diverse in its racial and religious composition, this was unsurprising. What is surprising is that there is now remarkable peace in the region, as a result of the culture of musyawarah and mufakat (consultation and consensus in Bahasa Indonesia) which Asean has carefully cultivated.

Another positive force that will drive Singapore's future success is the fact that the centre of gravity of the world's economy is shifting inexorably to Asia.

China's share of the global GDP (in purchasing power parity terms) exceeded America's share just last year. If Singapore plays its cards right, it could well become the new Asian capital in the coming Asian century.

After all, it is culturally well-connected to both the West and the rest of Asia. It is also a relatively short flight away from major Chinese and Indian cities. It is no wonder that Singapore ranked third in PwC's 2014 Cities of Opportunity report, after London and New York.

It is clear from these few examples that if we can grasp the wonderful domestic, regional and global opportunities which will be presented to us, the answer to the question of whether Singapore can survive will be a resounding "Yes, we can".



NO, WE CAN’T

ON THE other hand, much has been said about Singapore's vulnerability as a small state. If a cat has to live in the same enclosure as an elephant, it has to remain nimble and alert in order to avoid being stepped on. Similarly, Singapore has to be careful around its bigger neighbours. However, the biggest threat to Singapore's survival could actually come from inside Singapore.

The political environment in Singapore is rapidly changing. Though the ruling party has long been the People's Action Party (PAP), its support has gradually been waning in recent elections. In May 2011, in fact, the PAP saw its lowest-ever percentage of votes - 60.1 per cent. In the presidential election in August 2011, Dr Tony Tan Keng Yam scraped through with only 7,382 more votes than his nearest rival, Dr Tan Cheng Bock. The idea that the PAP could

lose an election was previously inconceivable. Now, it is no longer so.

One big danger to Singapore's political stability could be the emergence of a populist party. The reason we face this danger is that we have accumulated huge reserves, which includes about US$250 billion (S$347 billion) in official foreign reserves as declared by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

In per capita terms, we likely have the most foreign reserves in the world. A populist politician can easily promise to draw on these funds to give each of Singapore's 1.17 million citizen households $10,000 for 21 years.

It would be unwise to assume the Singapore electorate would not vote for such a politician. Even the leading modern Western democracies have been providing fiscally unsustainable subsidies to their populations.

The European Union, for example, spends about €58 billion (S$85 billion) on farm subsidies annually. Furthermore, such subsidies are very difficult to remove because over time they come to be seen as "entitlements". It would be political suicide for any politician to remove such "entitlements", however necessary it might be to do so.

A populist government would erode both our savings for a rainy day and our credibility with the international business community, leading Singapore into ruin.

External dangers will always remain a concern for Singapore, especially in the coming decades. The biggest emerging geopolitical threat to us is rising great-power rivalry between the United States and China. The most dangerous moments in history are when the No. 1 emerging power is about to pass the No. 1 power. That moment is happening now.

In October last year, the International Monetary Fund's World Economic Outlook Database showed that China had already overtaken the US in terms of its share of the world GDP: Last year, China's share was 16.4 per cent while the US' share was 16.2 per cent.

Surprisingly, the US-China relationship has been remarkably calm. However, this unusual state of affairs cannot last forever. Rising competition and rivalry between the US and China could rend Singapore apart. Already, China has expressed concerns about our close defence relationship with the US. Meanwhile, the US has concerns about our close economic relationship with China, such as our participation in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which the US opposes.

Many leaders and thinkers in the US also see Singapore as a US ally, even though we are not technically treaty allies with the US. This places Singapore in a difficult position. Though most Singaporeans' identities are based on their citizenship first and their ethnicities second, Chinese Singaporeans would understandably be uncomfortable if Singapore were to take a strong pro-American stance in the event of a US-China split.

Finally, Singapore's survival could be threatened by "Black Swan" threats. As the world becomes increasingly complex and unpredictable, previously inconceivable threats are likely to emerge. While it is futile to predict the inconceivable, I will try to suggest some possible "Black Swan" events.

The first possibility is Singapore could go the way of Malacca. Malacca was a thriving port for 200 years, but eventually fell into complete obscurity. This can happen to Singapore as well. As Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong pointed out in his speech at the NUSS 60th Anniversary Lecture on Oct 3 last year: "The climate is changing and the Arctic Ocean is melting. New sailing routes are opening up, the North-east Passage via the Arctic Ocean from Europe to the Far East. Not all the ships will go there but some will and bypass Singapore and PSA." Singapore's port could diminish in importance as a result.

The second possible threat is technology. New technology is destroying jobs in the manufacturing and service industry. According to a 2013 McKinsey report, by 2025, automated tools and systems could handle a volume of output which would normally require 110 million to 140 million full-time staff. Singapore will need to ensure that its workers will be able to handle these profound shifts in labour needs.

A third category of unexpected threats to Singapore is pandemics. In 2003, the severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) claimed 33 lives. It also inflicted a great deal of economic damage as tourists and businessmen would not come to Singapore. Our GDP contracted by 4.2 per cent in the April to June quarter. The recent Ebola crisis is another clear example of pandemics spiralling out of control. As of early last month, there have been 22,500 known cases and nearly 9,000 known deaths. A small, densely populated island like Singapore could easily be wiped out by such a virus.

It is clear that there are many ways in which Singapore could be overwhelmed. If we lose our current traits of remaining vigilant and shrewd, it is possible that the answer to the question "Can Singapore survive?" may well be "No, we cannot".



MAYBE

HAVING discussed the reasons why Singapore might or might not survive, let me now suggest three concrete ways in which Singapore can increase its chances of survival.

First, Singapore can take the "Big Tent" approach that its founding fathers adopted. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Dr Goh Keng Swee and Mr S. Rajaratnam were the pioneers of this approach. As Singapore is small, its pool of top talent is naturally also small. Hence, our founding fathers knew that they must be prepared to work with all Singaporeans, even those who had been critical of the PAP and its leaders.

As an undergraduate at the National University of Singapore, I myself had written several articles criticising the Government and its leaders. These included a very strongly worded piece which warned that Mr Lee could be on a "slippery slide to dictatorship". (Those who are interested in witnessing this youthful indiscretion can read this article in Can Singapore Survive?) Even so, Dr Goh offered me a place in the Defence Ministry (which I turned down in another act of folly).

Professor Tommy Koh, my predecessor as Singapore's ambassador to the United Nations, and Professor Chan Heng Chee, my successor, also wrote articles criticising the Government in their youth. Prof Koh challenged the PAP's claim that a political union with Malaysia was necessary for Singapore's survival. He also advocated that an ombudsman be set up in Singapore "because in Singapore, the exercise of discretionary power by the Government is not subject to judicial review", and spoke out in defence of The Necessary Stage in the wake of Josef Ng's arrest. Meanwhile, Prof Chan's first book was seen as an attempt to discredit Mr Lee. Her second book criticised the PAP for weakening democracy in Singapore in order to consolidate its own power.

Many other critics of the PAP and its policies have been invited to join the "Big Tent" over the years. These include Mr David Marshall, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan and Mr Raymond Lim. I firmly believe that we must continue with this "Big Tent" approach to politics. If not, Singapore society is likely to become more politically fractious and divided in the coming decades.

Second, the survivability of Singapore can be enhanced if we become the biggest cheerleader of Asean. It is truly sad that so few Singaporeans are aware that one reason Singapore remains so peaceful and safe today is because a giant political umbrella called Asean has been erected over South-east Asia, including Singapore. South-east Asia is incredibly diverse. In a relatively small geographical space, we can find Muslims, Christians, Hinayana Buddhists, Mahayana Buddhists and Hindus. This range of religious diversity is remarkable.

Given this diversity, wars of separation should have emerged as a natural consequence in South-east Asia. As the Balkans of Asia, it should have been the natural epicentre of separatism and conflict. Instead, over the past five decades, it has emerged as one of the global epicentres of peaceful resolution of conflicts. Any objective audit of Asean and its contribution to South-east Asia would show that Singapore is probably the biggest beneficiary from Asean's success.

As a small state, Singapore has benefited the most from the culture of peace Asean has introduced into the region.

On the economic front, Singapore may have also benefited the most from the gradual opening up and liberalisation of the Asean economies. Singapore's trade with the nine other Asean member states is larger than that of any other Asean country. Therefore, given the huge political and economic benefits that Singapore gets from Asean, Singapore should become the chief cheerleader and champion of Asean.

Historically, Singapore has played a pivotal role in championing the success and survival of Asean. History books will eventually reveal that one reason Asean survived those early scary years when the spectre of communism loomed over South-east Asia was because of the close friendship that had developed between Mr Lee and former Indonesian president Suharto. When two strong leaders trust each other and work well together, there are bound to be positive results. Behind the scenes, the quiet and forceful leadership of Mr Lee led to the extraordinary success of Asean. We need to maintain and strengthen the tradition. To prepare for this championship of Asean, each Singaporean child should be taught in school the importance of Asean for our long-term survival and prosperity. Additionally, in all global fora, Singapore should also speak out in support of Asean.

The third thing that Singapore can do to enhance its long-term survival is to go back to its roots, follow the examples of its founding fathers and go for bold, even risky, public policies. Our founding fathers were prepared to take big risks because they knew Singapore had no choice. Instead of being paralysed with fear, they displayed extraordinary courage. As a result of their courage, we have succeeded. Success, in turn, has led to a natural result of success: a culture of risk aversion. Indeed, this culture of risk aversion is one of Singapore's biggest challenges in the coming years.

The best way to change this culture of risk aversion is to launch bold, iconic and heterodox policies that will catch the attention of our entire planet.

This is one reason I have advocated in my Big Ideas series that Singapore should strive to be the first city in the world to move towards a zero-car ownership city. This world of zero-car ownership is already on the way.

Well-known futurist Paul Saffo said in the National Geographic that within just five to 10 years, "Driverless cars will share roadways with conventional cars. This will happen in urban areas first and will take a decade to fully diffuse. In the long run, people will not own cars at all. When you need to go somewhere, you will have a subscription to an auto service, and it will show up at your door".

By displaying extraordinary courage in going for such a bold new policy, Singapore will also help to ensure its long-term survivability because it would demonstrate that the culture of risk-taking was not confined just to the generation of the founding fathers of Singapore. Instead, it would demonstrate that the culture of risk-taking has been hardwired into the DNA of Singapore.

This culture of risk-taking may well be the best way to ensure Singapore's long-term survivability as many new challenges will come our way. We must develop the culture of courage to respond boldly to each new wave of challenges. If we do so, the final answer to the question

"Can Singapore survive?" may well be "Yes, we can".


This essay is adapted from the introduction to the latest book by Kishore Mahbubani, Can Singapore Survive? Published by Straits Times Press, Singapore Press Holdings, it retails for $25 before GST and is available at leading bookstores or from the website www.stpressbooks.com.sg. The writer is dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.


Could manpower squeeze stall S'pore economy?

$
0
0
Local employment growth set to slide: MOM
By Joanna Seow, The Straits Times, 14 Mar 2015

THERE are limits to how much more Singapore can tap the local workforce to grow the economy.

This is because more than eight in 10 residents between the ages of 20 and 64 who are willing and able to work are already doing so, a rate that is one of the highest in the world.

The strong labour force participation rate helped drive local employment growth to a record high of 96,000 last year.

This is almost twice the average increase of 50,900 per year from 2010 to 2012, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said yesterday.


Efforts to re-employ older workers and bring housewives back to work have paid off, and the country's labour force participation rate is ahead of other developed countries such as the United States and Denmark.

At the 65 and over age group, the rate is even ahead of fast-greying Japan - the Singapore figure last year stood at 25.2 per cent to Japan's 20.5 per cent in 2013.

But it is unlikely this figure can climb much higher. So, as society ages, employment growth will drop off a cliff by the end of the decade, MOM said. "The demographic effect will fade as the growth in the local working-age population starts to stagnate... further improvement in (the labour force participation rate) is likely to be muted," the ministry said.

Fewer people will reach working age each year, while more baby boomers will hit retirement. The ministry estimates that in 2020, for every one local exiting working age, only 1.1 locals will enter, down from 1.6 last year.

Taken together with slower foreign workforce growth, economists said Singapore's competitiveness is likely to be hit, unless there is a surge in productivity.

"There are fears that Singapore's economy could mimic Japan's stagnation and lose its shine," said Bank of America Merrill Lynch economist Chua Hak Bin.

But the extent of the impact depends on where the shortfall in manpower is.

"If the labour crunch is more severe in certain sectors where demand is slowing down too, then it won't affect (growth) that badly," said OCBC economist Selena Ling.




Jobs lost and found in a hurry amid labour market churn
Local employment rises, but so do vacancies; productivity stalls
By Joanna Seow, The Straits Times, 14 Mar 2015

THE number of workers who lost their jobs last year was the highest since the 2009 recession, as businesses adjusted to difficult economic conditions.

But retrenched workers were also able to find jobs quickly amid a labour crunch.


"It paints a picture of an economy still very much in transition," said Credit Suisse economist Michael Wan. "The rise in redundancies is probably due to less efficient companies being weeded out in the process."

The number of retrenchments has been climbing steadily since 2010, reaching 10,910 last year, up from 10,540 the year before, data from the Manpower Ministry showed yesterday.

More than four in 10 of Singaporeans and permanent residents laid off last year were degree holders.

The good news for those who lost their jobs is that the majority managed to find a new one.

Some 59 per cent of workers managed to find employment within six months of being laid off, the highest rate since June 2012.

Local employment also grew by 96,000 last year, the highest on record, as companies continued to tap local workers to compensate for slower foreign manpower growth.

But foreign employment growth, excluding maids, slowed to 26,000, the lowest level since the 2009 recession.

The seasonally adjusted number of job vacancies also shot to a record high of 65,600 as at December last year, up from 60,700 a year earlier.

It is a sign of churn in the labour market, which is forcing some businesses out but opening up opportunities for some firms to expand, said Nanyang Technological University economist Walter Theseira. "In the tight labour market, bosses may not be able to find locals to take up certain jobs at current wages," he said.

Unemployment remained low last year at 2 per cent overall and 2.9 per cent for Singaporeans.

But even as businesses felt the squeeze, real median income of full-time employed Singaporeans rose by 1.4 per cent.

This is lower than the 4.7 per cent of 2013.

"However, these wage increases can only be sustained in the long term through productivity growth," the ministry said.

Productivity fell into negative territory, contracting 0.8 per cent last year, as less productive sectors such as construction took up a bigger share of the workers.

Manufacturing was the only sector which saw productivity rise, and it could do well this year.

Barclays economist Leong Wai Ho said: "The weaker Singapore dollar... will help export-oriented manufacturers, who may perform better in the second half of the year when the oil dividend comes through from the G-3 economies."





Could manpower squeeze stall S'pore economy?
Dramatically fewer local workers coming on stream for jobs; productivity growth sputtering, despite efforts to rev it up. This, even as the Government makes it clear it won't turn the foreign worker tap back on. Insight examines a sobering scenario for businesses and ordinary Singaporeans.
By Toh Yong Chuan, Amelia Tan, Joanna Seow And Aw Cheng Wei, The Straits Times, 14 Mar 2015

FOR the better part of the last 50 years, Singapore's economy has been racing ahead.

Rising from Third World to First, Singapore managed to beat many countries in the global economic stakes. But in recent years, the economy has started to sputter. Growth in the five years to 2010 averaged a robust 6.9 per cent a year but since then, average growth a year has fallen to about 4.2 per cent.

One of the main reasons: manpower resources, which help power the economy, are starting to dry up quickly.

On Monday, Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin warned that local employment growth will drop to about 20,000 per year in the last part of this decade - less than a quarter of the 95,000 growth figure last year.

The number of local job entrants will plateau and, in the worst scenario, more may eventually exit the workforce than those entering.

The other source of manpower, foreign workers, has also slowed considerably, the result of a deliberate policy decision to wean companies off cheap foreign labour.

Last year, foreign employment excluding maids grew by 26,000, down from 80,000 in 2011.

"Taken together with the slowdown in our local workforce growth in these coming years, companies must note that we will experience a very significant tightening of the labour market going forward," said Mr Tan in Parliament, during the debate over the Manpower Ministry's budget.


The drag on the economy from the shrinking labour force will be so bad that one analyst, Bank of America Merrill Lynch economist Chua Hak Bin, warns that the Singapore economy will "grind to a virtual standstill".

Whether that dire outcome is on the cards remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the tightening will affect both companies and individuals.

Already, construction projects, such as roads and buildings, are taking longer, while many restaurants and shops, without enough workers, are reducing levels of service or even closing down.

However, incentives to increase productivity in innovative ways were unveiled in the Budget, and automation is gaining a hold in replacing some jobs, even as economists warn that things may get a lot worse if nothing is done to avert a grim scenario.

Too fast, too furious

ECONOMIC restructuring and the tightening of the foreign manpower flow has been gathering pace since it began in 2010.

But the speed at which it is now moving is what alarms Mr Kurt Wee, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises.

The local labour force grew 1.9 per cent per annum in the last five years, down from 3.2 per cent per annum from 2004 to 2009, as foreign worker hiring rules were tightened.

The Government tightened the flow of foreign workers here, in a bid to restructure the economy and get companies to adopt more productive means of doing business.

To help offset the declining numbers of foreign workers, a range of incentives were rolled out to encourage companies to hire from untapped pools of workers, namely women and older workers.

As a result, participation rates for women workers rose from 51.3 per cent in 2004 to 58.6 per cent last year while that for workers aged between 65 and 69 grew from 18.9 per cent in 2004 to 41.2 per cent last year.

But these are at its limits.

Labour participation rates for women and the elderly are among the highest in the world, which means that the growth of the local workforce in the next few years will start to slow significantly.

This means that local employment growth of 20,000 in 2019 will be just half of the average rate over the past ten years.

The adjustment will be even more painful given that the years between 2004 and 2008, and leading up to the restructuring, saw a sharp increase in manpower.

The total labour force swelled by 600,000 workers from 2.34 million in 2004 to 2.94 million in 2008. More than 400,000 of the increase came from foreign workers.

For the supply of workers to drop off in just a matter of years is simply "too fast and too furious" for firms to handle, says Mr Wee.

The impact has already been felt. Many multinationals have thrown in the towel - closing down and looking for greener pastures outside of Singapore.

In January, the National Trades Union Congress said eight firms, which were not named, shut down their manufacturing operations last year and moved to Malaysia, China and Thailand.

Big names such as American hard-disk maker HGST and Japanese chemicals company ISK have already moved and more could be expected to follow, warn business leaders.

"As an economy, Singapore's growth will slow, businesses may uproot, with competitiveness impeded," says Singapore Business Federation chief operating officer Victor Tay.

For local firms, many continue to struggle with the lack of manpower, even as they start to adjust and adopt more productive ways of doing business.

Mr Mun Kok Woh, managing director of automation equipment provider ASTech, says he has given up 10 projects in the past year and has postponed overseas expansion plans because he does not have workers.

"Singaporeans don't want to do the job of engineers. I also do not have the quota to hire foreigners," he says.

Productivity has gone up 13 per cent since 2009 although the gains have been patchy, a point highlighted by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam during his Budget speech last month. "All of this gain was achieved in 2010 (11.6 per cent) and 2011 (2.3 per cent) as we recovered from the recession, and growth has been negligible in the three years since then," he said.

Mr Tharman, who is also Finance Minister, noted that those competing internationally, such as those in the manufacturing sector, are doing much better than domestic-oriented industries like retail and food and beverage.

Technology is a game changer for the economy and some big companies such as banks and hospitals are using supercomputers to help their human workers make better decisions about anything from investments to medicine.

Things are changing but bosses say it is not easy to transplant technology into their processes.

Singapore Food Manufacturers' Association president Thomas Pek says that in recent years many of his association's members have invested in manpower-cutting machinery. Automated assembly lines for food packaging manned by eight workers do the work of 30 previously.

Mr Pek says: "However, introducing machinery and training workers need time. Easing up on foreign worker quotas and levies will help firms to cope better in the meantime."

For those which cannot cope or adapt, the result may be one of attrition, with many closing down or shipping out. "Some lower-end businesses such as packaging, moulding in the manufacturing sector and retailers may have to move rather than compete for the manpower," says Mr Tay.

For those that remain, they will have to completely rethink their business model.

Good, bad and the ugly

FOR locals, the tight labour market is a boon, at least for the short term. Median incomes have risen by 16 per cent since 2011 while citizen unemployment rates have dropped to 2.9 per cent, one of the lowest in the world.

For low-income workers, the shortage of workers has benefited them greatly. Those at the bottom 20th percentile have seen real incomes rise by 12 per cent over the past five years.

Graduates also have no shortage of job offers.

The latest graduate employment survey released last month showed that the class of 2014 enjoyed a higher median salary than earlier cohorts, with close to nine in 10 finding jobs within six months of graduation.

Says Ms Femke Hellemons, country manager of Adecco Singapore: "The continuing tight labour market means that most companies will likely continue to face fierce competition in securing talent."

Vacancies stood at more than 65,000 last year, a record high.

But over the longer term, should the productivity push fail, the situation for workers is also likely to turn ugly.

Without productivity paying for the higher wage gains, inflation will kick in.

Inflation over the past few months has been negative, as a result of the sharp drop in oil prices. But core inflation, which excludes private road transport and accommodation, still rose 1 per cent on the back of higher wage costs.

At the same time, Singaporeans are also starting to suffer direct effects of the labour shortage.

Signs are popping up at restaurant cashier counters across the island warning customers of slower and poorer service because of the labour crunch.

The labour shortage also means that services which require high manpower resources will start to cost significantly more in the coming years.

This could lead to stratification in society, as those with the means to pay for these services will be able to get them, says Nanyang Technological University economist Walter Theseira.

"We may see the scenario where only the upper middle class can afford services like renovation and beauty care on a regular basis. Painting your house may have to be done once every 15 years instead of once every five years," he says.

"Any industry which relies a lot on labour to provide a service is a luxury in most developed countries."

The ageing population will exacerbate the problem because the sectors that will grow are those which are, by nature, manpower- intensive.

For instance, there will be a huge demand for healthcare workers such as doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals like physiotherapists.

Singapore will need 91,000 healthcare workers in 2030, up from 50,000 in 2011.

Political watchers note that one solution to these woes is to once again tap foreign labour.

But while Singaporeans may accept having some foreigners fill jobs in these sectors, political watchers noted that the bruising public reaction to the 2013 Population White Paper will make it difficult for the Government to sell the idea of allowing a large influx of foreigners again.

That year, the Government put out a road map for Singapore's long-term population strategy, but one figure in the paper became a lightning rod for anti- foreigner sentiments - the 6.9 million population projection by 2030.

"At this stage, my sense is that the population is not receptive to any attempt to increase the foreign manpower numbers at all levels," says Singapore Management University law professor Eugene Tan.

But he adds: "I won't be surprised if pragmatism and economic necessity prevail and the population becomes less wedded to the idea of less foreign manpower."

Member of Parliament Inderjit Singh is hopeful that Singaporeans may accept some increase in the number of foreigners to ease the impact of the local labour shrinkage.

He points out that Singaporeans' biggest grouses are against new citizens, permanent residents (PRs) and those who compete with locals for professional, executive and managerial jobs, not workers in cleaning and construction sectors.

"There is room for the Government to review the Population White Paper to allow more than (the) planned transient workers without possibility for these workers to convert to PRs," he says.

For the next lap of growth, Singapore's emphasis is to last the distance. Winning the race is a bonus. For this to happen, tough choices must be made.

Firms will need to shape up and individuals will need to steel themselves for the difficult path ahead.

This is the only way to ensure that whatever is left in the fuel tank can keep the country going.





Banking on 'Watson' saves time for managers
By Aw Cheng Wei, The Straits Times, 14 Mar 2015

IN THE depths of a DBS data centre, "Watson" goes about his job of remembering an estimated 800 reports of financial information that the bank produced for the year's quarter. Watson can ingest thousands of documents a day, at superhuman speed.

Watson is a cloud service that can understand human language and context, and deliver insights, saving bank relationship managers at least two hours of reading each day, says Mr Olivier Crespin, managing director and head of digital bank at DBS, who initiated the project last year.

Before this, bankers had to identify investment ideas from a wide body of financial reports.

On Monday, Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin mentioned Watson in Parliament as an example of how automation is changing jobs at a faster pace than before.

While there has been a push for automating blue-collar jobs, technology is seeping into white-collar ones, reducing the reliance on brainpower. For the latter, the trend is towards deeper co-existence between man and machine as such jobs require discretion and judgment.

"You still need someone to input information or check the finished product," says Frost & Sullivan analyst Mark Koh. He added that in most industries, users make the final call after consulting the likes of Watson.

Globally, machines are moving into white-collar roles. Last year, news outlets such as the Associated Press and Los Angeles Times started using algorithms to write financial, disaster and sports articles.

Artificial intelligence is also used to scour legal documents for anomalies, draft contracts and collate data for lawyers.

In the region, oncologists at Bumrungrad International Hospital in Thailand began using Watson last year to devise treatment plans based on patient profiles, medical evidence and published research.

At home, the medical sector, too, appears to be taking the lead. Insight understands that a local cancer centre will begin to use big data in its research later this year. Oncologist Iain Tan, from the National Cancer Centre Singapore, says: "The accumulated knowledge from thousands of like patients becomes available as powerful support tools for doctors to choose the best treatment for each patient."

Currently, oncologists rely mostly on their previous experience in treating similar patients. At Tan Tock Seng Hospital, nurses upload pictures of wounds and sizes into a software called eWound Clinical Decision Support System.

Set up in 2013, it provides diagnosis and suggests treatment options. Previously, the nurses would wait for a specialist to decide on treatment.

Nurse manager Betty Khong says: "This process lowers the risk of wound infection or deterioration."

In education, to prepare the country's labour force for the growing emphasis on data analytics, the Infocomm Development Authority piloted a training course in data sciences last year with online course provider Coursera.

Mr Deepak Ravindran, partner and managing director of The Boston Consulting Group, says humans will need to become more skilled and educated in order to use, programme and co-exist with machines: "Though machines can recognise pattern, there is huge effort required by humans to programme them."





Making drivers 'service partners' in road to success
By Amelia Tan, The Straits Times, 14 Mar 2015

WHEN school-bus company boss Roger Shin failed to attract drivers despite frequent newspaper ads and offering good salaries, he went for a different strategy.

In 2012, he implemented a new business model for his company, Kim Way: drivers would be made "service partners" who owned buses they could use for extra jobs with other companies.

They would pay for the buses either with their own savings or a loan from Kim Way. The vehicles are second-hand, costing about $15,000 each, and the drivers are guaranteed a monthly income from Kim Way of at least $3,000. If they were not tied to a firm, such drivers would have to rely on ad hoc jobs which bring irregular income.

Schools are also less ready to offer contracts to independent bus drivers as they are seen as less reliable.

The new business model was a hit. Kim Way has hired six "service partner" drivers who own buses. It also has seven drivers who do not own vehicles. The men are aged 50 to 63.

Having more workers has allowed the company to expand from serving four pre-schools in 2012 to eight now. "The drivers feel a sense of ownership because the vehicles are theirs. Importantly, they have the freedom to use the buses during their free time," says Mr Shin. Kim Way's model was adapted from Mr Shin's former employer, an international logistics company where he spent 10 years.

The company's courier staff owned the motorcycles and vans they used to deliver goods. Mr Shin says that they felt "they need to be punctual and help the business to do well so that they can earn more and cover the cost of their vehicles. The workers would also stay on longer with the company, too".

Indeed, tardiness of drivers and high staff turnover made it difficult for Kim Way to grow initially when it was set up in 2011. Mr Shin says he would receive frequent complaints from the pre-schools about drivers who were late or did not turn up. Now, Kim Way's drivers are generally on time. Some have been with the company for four years.

On top of offering fixed monthly salaries, the drivers also get commission for introducing clients to Mr Shin.

Kim Way "service partner" Tan Ngee Heong, 62, says being able to own a bus is a draw. He can use it during school holidays on extra jobs or to ferry his family members.

"Older workers like myself are looking for jobs which are flexible and can give us fixed income to cover our living expenses. We want to be financially independent," he says.





Diners adjust to self-service model
By Aw Cheng Wei, The Straits Times, 14 Mar 2015

AT CURRY Times Tingkat, it is possible to order a meal without human interaction.

A patron goes up to a self-service kiosk and taps in his order, choosing from some 15 dishes, including curry chicken, nasi lemak and dry laksa goreng. And with drinks, he can select options like kaw (thick), po (thin) and less sugar.

Then he pays with his Nets ATM or FlashPay card.

The decisive diner can complete his order in about 30 seconds. When Insight visited the eatery at Kallang Wave mall one quiet Thursday afternoon, food was served up in about three minutes at a counter.

Eateries such as Curry Times Tingkat can be a new reality in a tight labour market.

Old Chang Kee, which owns the Curry Times brand, decided to set up the self-service eatery because of the "manpower crunch and rising labour costs", says its marketing manager Ng Bee Lin.

She adds: "We developed the concept after conducting market research locally."

As an incentive, the eatery and its sister outlet at Alexandra Retail Centre - the first of the two to open, in May two years ago - give a $1 discount on set meals to patrons using the self-service kiosks, which cost $27,000 each. Those ordering and paying via a cashier pay the full price.

During busy periods at the Kallang Wave mall eatery - which opened in September last year - about three to five people man the 1,500 sq ft outlet which seats about 60 customers. If it were a full-service restaurant, the staff count would need to be three times more.

Meals are packed in takeaway containers to reduce the number of cleaning staff, and stickers on tables remind diners to clean up after themselves. The stickers exhort: "The simple task of returning your own tray is a gracious gesture for the benefit of the next diner."

Diner Jessica Lee says: "The concept is new and interesting. I thought I wouldn't get used to doing everything myself but it's okay and really convenient."

The 32-year-old accountant adds: "Everything, from chilli to cutlery, is within reach so I don't need to trouble anyone."


Working to keep buses and trains going

$
0
0
Long after the last commuter taps his card on the card reader, engineers and technicians are still hard at work. Under their charge are trains and buses - these are industriously cleaned and maintained before they return to service the next day.
By Danson Cheong, The Straits Times, 16 Mar 2015









Changes to Medisave: Budget 2015

SG Heart Map - 50 First Kisses by Royston Tan

Grassroots leader still active after 50 years of service

$
0
0
His contribution in Jalan Besar was lauded by PM Lee recently
By Leong Weng Kam, Senior Writer, The Straits Times, 16 Mar 2015

RETIRED businessman Phang Tai Heng has been a volunteer in Jalan Besar for more than 50 years.

The 86-year-old, who spent many years as chairman of the Jalan Besar Community Club management committee and Citizens Consultative Committee (CCC), is probably Singapore's oldest and longest-serving grassroots leader.

His connection to the area began when at 19 he started working in an engineering workshop that his father owned. "After all these years, I know both the people and place very well and have seen how the area has grown," said Mr Phang, who is patron of both the community club's management committee and the CCC.

His years of service were acknowledged by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at a Chinese New Year party for more than 4,000 community and grassroots leaders at the Istana earlier this month.

PM Lee gave him a special SG50 ez-link card with a handwritten "thank you" note on its red pocket- sized folder. "May you always be blessed with health and happiness and thank you for 50 years of service to our nation," wrote PM Lee, a surprise guest at the party.

Another veteran grassroots leader, Mr Phua Him Ko, 74, of Kampong Glam CCC, received the same token of appreciation.

Mr Phang, who took over his father's engineering business, operated a foundry as well before moving into the real estate and cinema businesses in Queenstown. He was awarded the Public Service Star for social and community service in 1997.

Although he retired about five years ago, he is still very active in community work. A Justice of the Peace since 1994, Mr Phang has solemnised at least a hundred marriages a year for more than 20 years.

He lost his wife to liver cancer about 15 years ago, but has five grown-up children - two sons and three daughters - 11 grandchildren and a great-grandchild.

He said he first got involved in the community in 1957, when former senior parliamentary secretary Chan Chee Seng was contesting the city council elections as the People's Action Party candidate in Jalan Besar.

"Mr Chan came to my engineering workshop in Kallang one day to borrow my car, a green Morris 8, to ferry voters to and from polling stations on polling day," he recalled.

After Mr Chan won the election and became the ward's legislative assemblyman, he got Mr Phang involved in setting up the community club and CCC in the early 1960s.

And after Mr Chan retired from politics and stepped down as MP for the ward in 1984, Mr Phang continued to serve his successor, Dr Lee Boon Yang, who was an MP there from 1984 to 2011. Dr Lee was followed by Mr Edwin Tong, the third MP of Jalan Besar, now a division of Moulmein- Kallang GRC.

"All the MPs and grassroots advisers for the ward trusted me mainly for my years of experience, and I find it hard to leave because of the support I get from the residents too," said Mr Phang, who still drives to the community club whenever he is needed.

His greatest reward, he said, was seeing young people who had received financial help returning to serve as volunteers.

In the early days, he recalled, there were no government funds, so grassroots leaders and MPs often had to help the poor out of their own pockets. "We also gave loans to tertiary students who could not afford to pay for their school fees."

Most grassroots leaders in the past, he noted, were older businessmen willing to spend both time and money on community work. He is glad to know that today, many younger and better- educated ones, including university graduates, are coming forward. "This is a good sign as it shows that some of our young people also see meaning in community work."

As for himself, he has no plans to stop. "My work for the community has kept me happy and healthy and I will continue as long as I am able to."



Singapore Red Cross delivers final rebuilding project in Japan after 2011 disaster

$
0
0
TODAY, 16 Mar 2015

Four years after an earthquake and tsunami struck Japan, the Singapore Red Cross (SRC) has delivered its final rebuilding project to the community: A multi-purpose community hall that will serve more than 20,000 residents of Rikuzentakata City, Iwate Prefecture.

The community hall was one of the four major rebuilding projects undertaken with donations from the Singapore public following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.

Formally opened today (March 16) by the SRC, together with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and local Rikuzentakata City officials, the 2,000 sqm hall, costing S$11.1 million, is the single largest reconstruction projects of the SRC in Japan, said the SRC in a statement today.

Built on elevated grounds and housing a community hall, meeting rooms and exhibition spaces, among others, it is also designed to enhance Rikuzentakata City’s disaster preparedness by integrating with the city’s fire and police departments, and serving as a Disaster Relief Centre.

Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for Law K Shanmugam, who was the Guest-of-Honour at the ceremony, said: “Our sympathy and unity with Japan led to a tremendous outpouring of support and contribution to help the victims of the disaster. The donation drive supported by the government and launched by SRC raised over S$35 million.

“This is either the largest or second largest amount ever contributed by Singaporeans for a disaster in a foreign city. We decided that our contribution should be channelled to projects that would benefit the local community.”

Mr Benjamin William, Secretary General of SRC, said: “I still recall with a certain pride the overwhelming response from the people of Singapore when Singapore Red Cross launched the appeal. It was this show of solidarity and enduring friendship by the people of Singapore towards the affected communities, that made the reconstruction and other relief efforts possible.”

“Even though this is the final major project to be handed over, SRC continues to work with our local partners in japan to see how we can enhance some of the completed projects, as well as, embark on additional projects to serve the affected community,” he added.

Mayor of Rikuzentakata Futoshi Toba said: “The aid we received from people throughout the Japan and around the world truly sustained us after the disaster. We lived in a city where we did not even have one piece of bread to hand out to our citizens.

“Our city has recovered and will continue to do so because of the aid we received, and for that I am truly grateful. To have this friendship with the people of Singapore, to have received this aid from your country is a sign of the best humankind has to offer and for that as well I extend my thanks.”

In the aftermath of the earthquake, SRC launched an appeal and received S$35.7 million from the Singapore public, including S$500,000 seed money contributed by the Singapore Government.

SRC has funded the construction of other facilities in the affected Tohoku region, including the Taro Support Centre in Miyako City that was completed in November 2011 and serves 1,700 residents monthly, the 90-student Shichigahama Toyama Nursery School that was officially opened in May 2013, as well as the Isobe Community Centre, that was up and running in July 2013.


What it takes to keep S'pore in good fiscal health

$
0
0
A closer look at the numbers that matter in balancing the Budget, both now and in the future.
By Wong Wei Han, The Straits Times, 17 Mar 2015

IF A company runs into deficit more often than not, the concern is that the management is losing the plot.

The same scrutiny can be trained on Budget 2015, which the Government tabled along with its latest fiscal position data on Feb 23.

The Budget this year outlined initiatives to strengthen the social safety net, build up infrastructure and develop the local workforce, but these programmes come with a hefty price tag.

Since the financial year 2009, the nation has run into basic deficit four times in six years. A basic surplus or deficit is the figure after taking into account the revenue from taxes and deducting expenditure such as spending by ministries on operations and development, plus special transfers, which range from the typical annual handout of GST Credits and Central Provident Fund (CPF) top-ups, to the money forked out for recent initiatives such as the Productivity and Innovation Credit scheme and the Pioneer Generation Package.

With the special transfers amount rising - from 2009's $5.48 billion to an estimated $11.67 billion this year - Singapore may be hit by a basic deficit of $9.62 billion in 2015.

The more important figure, however, is the overall surplus or deficit figure, arrived at after investment returns and dividends from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), GIC and Temasek Holdings - which are tasked with managing Singapore's reserves - are taken into account. After an overall deficit of $0.13 billion last year, the figure is estimated to widen to $6.67 billion for 2015, the largest deficit on record if realised.

As government spending is expected to rise to between 19 and 19.5 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) on average over the next five years, the Government has moved to boost its future revenues.

Running out of financial levers?

THE latest change, announced by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam in Budget 2015, seeks to include Temasek Holdings within the Net Investment Returns (NIR) framework. Introduced in 2009, the NIR framework allows the Government to spend up to 50 per cent of long-term expected real returns - which include realised and unrealised capital gains - generated from the assets managed by GIC and MAS.

Currently, Temasek's contribution to the Budget comes from its dividends paid to the Government, which is its sole shareholder. The move to put Temasek under the NIR framework will likely yield a larger pool of returns that the Government can tap for its funding needs.

This change - with a Constitutional Amendment Bill to be presented later this year - has some Members of Parliament concerned about fiscal sustainability

Among them is Mr Hri Kumar Nair (Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC), who said: "Every additional dollar spent today simply means more than a dollar less for the future. More importantly, we are running out of levers to pull. After Temasek, there is no next."

Net Investment Returns and fiscal stability

ONE issue related to this upcoming NIR change is whether the contribution from Temasek will be a stable source of revenue for government coffers. After all, returns from equities are bound to be more volatile than assets such as bonds.

The Government has explained that the NIR is based on long- term expected real returns which are compounded and averaged out with a 20-year view.

The resulting rate - which will be reviewed by GIC, MAS and Temasek boards annually - of any given year will mean a steady stream of returns regardless of gains and losses in the portfolios. In other words, the Government will not have to cut its spending when markets are bad, allowing for better long-term planning.

The framework is also meant to be prudent and forward-looking, Mr Tharman noted in his speech to Parliament in 2008 when presenting the amendment Bill for the NIR framework: "We will retain the 50 per cent cap on the amount of returns that can be taken out for spending. This is in addition to setting aside the full inflation component of our returns in past reserves. In this way, the real returns on investments will be shared between the current Budget and past reserves. This allows the past reserves to grow in real terms, and thereby provide for a growing economy in the years to come," he had said.

To illustrate - in a year when return is 10 per cent and inflation rate is 3 per cent, that 3 per cent will be set aside for the reserves, and only the remaining 7 per cent will be available for spending, again subjected to the 50 per cent cap under the NIR framework.

Beyond issues of stability around the NIR framework, another perennial question is how Singapore is to fund increasing social spending, when its capacity to raise taxes is limited by the need to remain competitive.

The bulk of Singapore's annual spending is still funded by tax income.

Operating revenue has grown every year since 2009's $39.55 billion to $61.35 billion last year. Its top three tax revenue sources are corporate and personal income taxes, and goods and services tax (GST).

Last year, corporate income tax yielded $13.46 billion, GST revenue was $10.11 billion, while personal income tax contributed another $8.94 billion to the government coffers. Together they accounted for around 53 per cent of last year's total operating revenue of $61.35 billion, which came in slightly more than the total operating expenditure of $57.20 billion.

Is there more tax revenue to be tapped? Already, the Government has moved to augment tax income. A key change announced in Budget 2015 is a higher personal income tax rate for top earners that will bring in an estimated $400 million extra revenue. The change will take effect in 2017.

Further and gradual steps to adjust the current tax regime can be a viable move if and when the Government needs to broaden its tax revenue stream. But the approach can be more nuanced than just raising income tax rates.

A 2 percentage point increase in GST can be considered in the coming years, which can raise tax revenue while the impact on poorer households can be offset by GST vouchers, PwC's head of tax Chris Woo said.

"But a more meaningful change is to look at the Government's approach of growing Singapore companies and attracting higher-value foreign investments with corporate tax incentives. Without changing tax rates, we can perhaps tweak our requirement to ensure greater benefits - by having these companies hire more locals for senior positions, by having them develop their intellectual properties here, which in turn create more jobs for locals.

"That's the key for better sustainability in corporate revenue - to bring in new industries and capabilities, create long-term, intrinsic value to the economy and the local workforce, and, ultimately, to increase GDP and the overall tax base," Mr Woo said.

KPMG Asia Pacific chairman and managing partner Tham Sai Choy agreed that, while raising GST can be an option, higher tax rates may be counterproductive for Singapore. Singapore's competitors, such as Hong Kong and Ireland, already have lower corporate tax rates, and the top line personal income tax rate will rise to 22 per cent in 2017, way above Hong Kong's 15 per cent, Mr Tham said.

"The best option is to focus on growing Singapore's economy. A growing economy directly increases the takings from taxation without the need for excessively high tax rates, while sharing the fruits of economic growth with everyone, including taxpayers."

Singapore also has the option of implementing capital gains tax as a means to broaden tax revenue if indeed necessary, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy research fellow Christopher Gee said. Currently capital gains through sales of assets such as property is not taxable here.

Government spending: Is it justified?

THE other way to ensure fiscal sustainability is by trimming expenses.

The Budget's estimated deficit of $6.67 billion this year is not a result of profligate spending - but a case of canny investment in the future.

A big chunk of that deficit is due to setting aside a $3 billion development fund for Changi Airport's fifth terminal. Another $3 billion will be used to fund the Productivity and Innovation Credit scheme and top up the National Productivity Fund, which will in turn drive the SkillsFuture initiatives in the coming years.

The latest Budget retains past years' emphasis on boosting public infrastructures, improving business productivity and helping local workforce upskill, as the nation continues its economic restructuring.

If executed properly, these projects could strengthen the foundation for this multi-year transformation that Singapore is going through. As for what the Government should spend on, that is an inherently political question that depends on its vision for Singapore, said Mr Gee.

"It can take a short- term populist approach, a hard-headed long-term approach, or something in between. Perhaps that's the national debate that we need to have," he added.

As for the state of Singapore's finances, Standard & Poor's sovereign credit analyst Phua Yee Farn explained why S&P reaffirmed Singapore's AAA credit rating in February despite the deficit projected for 2015. "Singapore has been rated AAA with a stable outlook since 1995 without any movement in between. That is an indication of its extremely strong fiscal position," he said.

"Items that are counted as revenue by other countries are not booked above the line in Singapore's case. For instance, unlike Hong Kong, Singapore does not count capital receipts, which include land sales, as revenue. That amount was $14.6 billion last year and $22.9 billion in 2011 during the height of the property boom - and that's a huge chunk that would have left the Government with a substantial surplus every year," Mr Phua said.

Instead, capital receipts automatically become part of Singapore's past reserves. As well, there are checks and balances such as the constitutional requirement that prohibits a government from running an overall deficit by the end of its term in office.

Looking at the systems, principles and fundamentals in place, one can still make a strong argument for the current strength of Singapore's fiscal health.

In the end, long-term fiscal sustainability depends on whether reserves can be built up - through prudent investments and above all through growing the economy - while meeting operating and development needs. Only then can a country safely be sure of long-term fiscal sustainability.


Singapore 'will have to ease immigration laws to stay competitive': EIU

$
0
0
Curbs on immigration will hurt business: EIU
Govt will have to lift curbs, given low birth rate and productivity
By Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 18 Mar 2015

DESPITE Singapore's moves to tighten immigration in recent years, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) yesterday said it believed the rules would have to be eased in the future for the country to stay economically competitive.

This is because efforts to incentivise family formation and boost productivity among businesses have proved disappointing, the research unit said in a new report.

"In the long run, the changing population profile and the need to remain competitive will lead the Government to ease its immigration laws," said the 10-page special report on the state of affairs in Singapore in its 50th year of independence.

Given low unemployment, continued restrictive labour practices will "hurt business efficiency, as well as Singapore's competitiveness and reputation for openness", it said.

The report, released yesterday, also highlighted the challenge of political succession in Singapore, citing in particular its readiness for a "post-Lee Kuan Yew future".

The EIU noted that the PAP remains popular with the majority as it has managed to deliver "rising prosperity and far-sighted policies".

Overall, the report struck a largely positive note on Singapore's prospects, predicting "the tiny island city-state will retain its allure".

"It will continue to consolidate its position as a financial services hub, enhance its tourism infrastructure, strengthen its manufacturing base, aspire to become Asia's liquefied natural gas hub and deepen its diplomatic engagement."

Sounding an optimistic note, the report said: "Years of prudent policymaking will ensure that Singapore retains its competitive edge and continues to draw business from across the world."

It also pointed to the discrepancy between the "huge majority" of 81 out of 87 seats controlled by the People's Action Party (PAP) and its 60.1 per cent share of the vote at the 2011 General Election. It said that in the long term, the "mismatch" between the PAP's parliamentary dominance and its declining popular support "seems politically unsustainable".

"Besides trying to alter its governing style, the PAP may also support modest electoral reforms, but wholesale changes are unlikely," it said.

Political observer Zulkifli Baharudin yesterday disputed that the "mismatch" between the PAP's parliamentary representation and its share of the popular vote was a pressing concern among Singaporeans.

"It's not the political structure in Singapore that people have issues with, but economic and social issues. They want to know that their views are being heard by the Government," he said.


HDB to further assess feasibility of elderly monitoring, alert system

$
0
0
By Olivia Siong, Channel NewsAsia, 17 Mar 2015

The Housing and Development Board (HDB) will further study whether the Smart Elderly Monitoring and Alert System should be made available in suitable HDB flats in the future.

This was after 12 households completed a trial of the system. In a survey of the participating households, HDB said all were supportive of using the system in their daily living. Ten agreed or strongly agreed that it is an elderly-friendly and easy-to-use system. The other two households were neutral.

It was also observed that the longest time taken for the elderly's loved ones to make a phone call to check on them, after receiving an SMS notification, was 5 minutes.



The Smart Elderly Monitoring and Alert System was test-bedded in 12 HDB rental flats in Woodlands, Yishun, Clementi and Marine Parade from June to November 2014. HDB worked with four small- and medium- enterprises, that were awarded a grant by SPRING Singapore, to develop and test-bed the system.

The monitoring system comprises various components like motion and door sensors that are installed within the flat. These sensors then collect information and "learn" the living habits of the elderly residents in their homes. It then provides alerts to their caregivers and family members, via SMS notifications, when irregular patterns in behaviour are detected. For example, an alert would be sent if no movement is detected for a period of time.

The system also includes a panic button, which seniors can carry around at home, so they can alert their next-of-kin in times of need.

GREATER PEACE OF MIND

Ms Mabel Chen, 78, was one of the participants to test the system. She spends most of her time alone in her one-room flat in Yishun. This worries her daughter, who is at work for a large part of the day.

"She fell once before," said her daughter Doris Oo. "So we might worry for her that she might have fall badly while bathing, or here and there."

However, with the new system installed, there has been greater peace of mind for Ms Oo.

Motion sensors 'learn' the living habits of the elderly at home, including their sleeping hours and time taken in the bath.

"With this system, I feel so much relief," said Ms Oo. "I don't need to call my mother as and when, because of this beeping sound. Once it beeps, I know my mother is having problems or in trouble already."

According to a survey done by HDB, all 12 households that took part in the trial were supportive of using the system in their daily living. Many of them said the system did not compromise their privacy.

HDB also observed that the longest time taken for the elderly's next-of-kin to make a phone call after receiving the SMS notification and to check if the elderly is fine, was five minutes.

Said Mrs Chen: "They told me 'Mum, don't be scared, you'll be all right'. If you learn the system slowly, you'll know what the benefits are."

SMART HDB TOWN FRAMEWORK

The Smart Elderly Monitoring and Alert System is part of HDB's Smart HDB Town Framework, which was unveiled in September last year.

HDB hopes to collaborate with industry professionals to harness ideas and capitalise on their experience to develop a Smart Urban Habitat Master Plan. It will guide the implementation of smart solutions on a town-by-town basis starting with Punggol Eco Town.

Industry partners will also be invited to give ideas where new smart technologies can be used in areas like water, energy, waste, security and maintenance.

With more of such technology being used, HDB is also looking at building and operating a 'Smart Hub' - with the help of industry professionals and companies - to integrate, manage and analyse data centrally.

HDB's first smart homes will also be launched in two housing projects at Punggol Northshore in its upcoming May sales exercise.


Big relief for young scoliosis patients

$
0
0
Technique used at NUH does away with need for multiple invasive surgery
By Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 18 Mar 2015

YOUNG scoliosis patients usually have to undergo surgery twice a year to adjust the rods that are keeping their curved spines straight.

But the National University Hospital (NUH) has done away with the need for that.

It has started to implant rods that can be adjusted with magnets in a matter of seconds, saving these patients the pain of a 11/2 hour operation.

"Each time you do (conventional surgery), you worry about the risk of infection, the pain, the time lost, the anxiety for patients and their parents," said Associate Professor Gabriel Liu, who carried out Singapore's first such procedure last year.



Scoliosis is a condition where the spine curves sideways. Although it may not cause pain, it can affect lung function.

Those with a curve of 45 degrees or more usually require surgery, said Prof Liu, who is deputy head of the University Spine Centre.

The centre's specialists see an average of 700 children for scoliosis every year.

For those who require surgery, the rods in their backs must be periodically lengthened to accommodate their growing spines.

A seven-year-old, for example, may have to undergo as many as eight spinal operations until he reaches adolescence and is ready for the final surgery to fuse his adult spine in place.

Implanting the rod and each subsequent adjustment used to involve making a long cut down from the top of a patient's spine.

But the new technique at NUH is less invasive. The magnetically controlled rods are put in via smaller incisions, and subsequent adjustments can be carried out in the doctor's clinic.

"This method reduces the complications of multiple repeated surgery," Prof Liu said.

Adjustments can also be made more frequently, he added, which could help the spine to grow better.

The first person to undergo this new surgery is 12-year-old Joycelyn Ng.

Since going under the knife nine months ago, she has been coming back for adjustments of a few millimetres each time at three-month intervals.

Her mother, Madam Esther Chow, said she had concerns over how new the procedure was, but also wanted to save her daughter the pain of frequent operations.

"Before it, her back would hurt," said the 43-year-old housewife. "We are very comforted now."


Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>