Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live

Care models should go beyond domestic help: Chan Chun Sing

$
0
0
By Siau Ming En, TODAY, 18 Mar 2015

With the Republic facing the challenges of changing family structures and an ageing population, Singaporeans need to look beyond care models of having foreign domestic helpers at home or having institutionalised homes, said Social and Family Development Minister Chan Chun Sing yesterday.

Speaking to some 500 social workers at the annual Social Workers’ Day Symposium at Concorde Hotel Singapore, he suggested piloting “self-organising” models that are somewhere in between relying on domestic helpers and on institutionalised homes.

With people living so close to each other here, such as in towns and precincts — unlike in the United States, where communities tend to be spread out — these new models may be able to tap economies of scale, said Mr Chan, in what he deemed as the last formal occasion, for the social work sector, that he was attending as part of the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF).

Mr Chan, who in January was appointed Deputy Secretary-General of the National Trades Union Congress, is scheduled to join the labour movement full time next month.

In his speech, Mr Chan said he hopes to see the improvements in the area of local social science research. Reflecting on his ministry’s work after being in office for about four years, Mr Chan said while a lot of the research work tends to come from overseas, he urged the sector to not shy away from sharing its own work. This may include sharing Singapore’s experience in trying to move beyond providing basic subsistence, such as money transfers, by allowing families to have a sense of ownership through accumulating some assets to plan for the future. Most countries used money transfers to address poverty, Mr Chan noted.

The MSF, he added, has also tried to “bootstrap” standards and protocols so that people beyond the sector will listen to the views of social workers.

During the parliamentary debate on the ministry’s budget last week, the MSF said it would work with the family services sector to implement a Code of Social Work Practice. The code will be enacted across all social services organisations to ensure common professional standards.

Professionals in the sector told TODAY they had noticed improvements in the sector in recent years.

Mr Isaac Teo, from the Ang Mo Kio Family Service Centre Community Services, said the improvement in social workers’ remuneration had been “heartening” for the sector.

Mr Alvin Chua, president of the Singapore Association of Social Workers, noted that interest in social work had grown, with more mid-career professionals making the switch to become social workers.







MSF work plans 'will go on under new minister'
The Straits Times, 18 Mar 2015

THE work initiated by the Minister for Social and Family Development, Mr Chan Chun Sing, in his four years heading the ministry will continue after his departure.

The minister, who joins the National Trades Union Congress full-time as deputy secretary-general on April 1, gave the assurance at a symposium for Social Workers' Day yesterday.

"Whatever we have done in MSF (the ministry) is not because of me; it's not because of one or two persons. It is because, collectively, within MSF (and) together with you, we believe in what we do. And because we believe in what we do, I'm very confident that we will continue to do all that things that we've set out to do," he said.

Mr Chan has been at NTUC part-time since January. He is expected to take over the helm from current Secretary-General Lim Swee Say before Mr Lim turns 62 in July next year.

Yesterday, he highlighted some initiatives of his tenure:
- National database Social Service Net will be rolled out by the second half of the year to enable sharing of information in the social service sector;
- A code of social work practice, announced in Parliament last Friday, to give the sector common protocol.
Mr Chan also said he was confident the sector would teach and train the incoming minister the way it had him.

"You've done so much for me that you will certainly do for the new minister," he said, evoking laughter that who it is, is the "$6 million question".

He said: "In front of me, these 500 people here, and another 1,000 out there who are not here with us today - we have the basic ingredients to be ready for challenging times."

Social worker Isaac Teo from AMKFSC Community Services praised Mr Chan's foresight, saying the pay raises he initiated were "heartening".



MSF Assistive Technology Fund to cover more people: DPM Tharman

$
0
0
The fund will expand its scope to cover persons with disabilities at all ages and for all purposes, such as those in therapy, rehabilitation and seeking more independence in daily living, says Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam.
By Sara Grosse, Channel NewsAsia, 17 Mar 2015

To encourage the adoption and use of assistive technologies, the Government will be making enhancements to the Ministry of Social and Family Development's Assistive Technology Fund come August.

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced this at the 63rd anniversary charity banquet of the Singapore Association of the Visually Handicapped (SAVH) on Tuesday (Mar 17).



The fund currently provides means-tested financial assistance to students with disabilities in mainstream and special education and adults with disabilities in open employment to acquire assistive equipment, such as hearing aids.

Going forward, the fund will expand its scope to cover persons with disabilities at all ages and for all purposes, such as those in therapy, rehabilitation and seeking more independence in daily living.

The means-tested subsidies for the fund will also be revised. The monthly per capita income cap for eligibility will be raised from S$1,500 to S$1,800, to enable more families in the middle-income group to benefit from subsidies. The lifetime cap for subsidies of S$20,000 from the fund will also be doubled to S$40,000 per beneficiary.

About 400 beneficiaries are expected to benefit from these enhancements each year, once they kick in.

Mr Tharman said the Government is also improving the development of new and innovative solutions to help persons with disabilities through the Tote Board-Enabling Lives Initiative, which was launched last year.

"We will make use of this new fund to support the design and piloting of new solutions that improve the lives of persons with disabilities and their caregivers," he said. "It can be in a whole range of areas, whether it has to do with mobility or navigation or working more productively and independently, or simply having a more independent life."

Mr Tharman encouraged all voluntary welfare organisations to take advantage of this initiative and work together to co-create solutions in the interest of persons with disabilities.

About 500 guests were present at the banquet. The aim of the event is to raise awareness of the visually impaired, as well as raise funds for SAVH’s operations, services and programmes.


CPF retirement planning pilot to start in July

$
0
0
After three-month trial, service to extend to 6,500 individuals turning 55 this year
By Matthias Tay, TODAY, 18 Mar 2015

With three children and a career as a retail manager, retirement planning was the last thing on Ms Aisah Bakri’s mind.

But a one-on-one retirement planning session by the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board — part of a trial for a fully fledged programme to be rolled out early next year— was a “wake-up call” for Ms Aisah, who turns 55 in November.



While she had previously not given the issue much thought, receiving the invitation to take part in the trial got her thinking about her financial status, said Ms Aisah. She went for the session hoping to find out more about how to manage the investments she had made using her CPF monies, as well as why only S$5,000 can be withdrawn unconditionally from her account when she turns 55.

“I think that this is one of the ways you can make people understand (better) ... The technical terms (explaining CPF matters) can be long and wordy. Getting someone to explain to you is easier than reading from the Internet or papers,” said Ms Aisah.

Plans to introduce a retirement planning service for Singaporeans were announced during the Ministry of Manpower’s Committee of Supply debate last week. The three-month trial was conducted with 50 participants who were turning 55 this year. A pilot will be launched in July to reach out to an estimated 6,500 individuals in the same age group.

The scheme is aimed at this group because 55 is the age when CPF members will see the creation of Retirement Accounts, said CPF Retirement Management Office senior manager Dorcas Fong.

“Because at age 55, we transfer (funds) from Ordinary Account (OA) and Special Account savings to create the Retirement Account. This reduces the Ordinary Account savings available for payable obligations such as the housing loan,” said Ms Fong.

The decrease in the OA accounts often shocks people, she said, noting those who took part in the trial were generally ignorant of the implications of the creation of the Retirement Account on their financial obligations.

Having one-on-one exchanges with a consultant makes it easier for CPF members to understand the CPF mechanism, compared to trawling the Internet for information. “With a person, you can ask any question. You don’t have to spend the effort to click here and there, Google around and pour through all the things ... You also feel trustworthy as there is a person you can latch on to,” said Ms Fong.

The duration of each consultation session depends on a client’s questions, and can range from 30 to 45 minutes.

CPF consultants prepare for the session by collating the members’ CPF information. The consultants then help them understand the impact of their decisions better through projected figures. For example, members who wish to withdraw their CPF monies if they meet the Minimum Sum will be presented with two sets of projections: The projected monthly payout they would receive at age 65 if they were to keep all their money intact, and another payout figure should they choose to keep only the Minimum Sum, which is set to be replaced by the Full Retirement Sum.

“This allows them to consider the implications of their actions and decide for themselves,” said Ms Fong.

Ms Aisah said from the session, she found that the amount of money in her CPF accounts, together with her investments, would help her meet the current Minimum Sum. This has spurred her to contact her financial adviser to find out more about the investments she had made over the past 20 years. “I am more knowledgeable and now see the need to think about it (retirement) more seriously,” she said.


Past Forward: Memory Project to feature 74 works evoking S’pore’s past

$
0
0
By Matthias Tay, TODAY, 19 Mar 2015

From enjoying “kopi” at a pop-up coffee shop to watching films about forgotten islands, Singaporeans will have a chance to revisit the lesser-known slices of the nation’s past as part of the SG50 celebrations.

From April till August, the National Library Board’s Singapore Memory Project (SMP) will showcase Past Forward, comprising 74 projects of forgotten memories through various media, such as films, books, websites and 3D-printed installations.



Hands-on activities, including dialogue sessions and workshops, will also be featured, allowing visitors to participate in creating their own stories through the use of media such as lego bricks.

A preview of 20 of the projects was launched yesterday by Minister for Communications and Information Yaacob Ibrahim at the National Library building in Victoria Street.

The exhibition will be open to the public until tomorrow.

The people behind the 74 projects, who are funded by the irememberSG Fund, include film-makers and ordinary individuals.

The organisers said Past Forward was opened to anyone with ideas that meet its aim of presenting various stories and revealing aspects of Singapore’s past that are lesser known.

“This time around, we are saying anyone can be a memory maker, anyone can do documentation and do it in a way that is befitting to their community and to their story,” said SMP spokesman Yee Yeong Chong.

For artist Jahan Loh, his Singapore Kopi Culture project, one of the 20 featured at the National Library preview, provided him with an opportunity to preserve Singapore’s unique coffee-drinking culture.

Mr Loh, 38, described the traditional way of roasting coffee here as a “dying trade”. For his project, Mr Loh and his team interviewed Hainanese settlers who started Singapore’s first coffee shops to better understand the origins of the beverage.

The team’s efforts revealed interesting facts about the local “kopi” culture, including its “cosmopolitan” nature. For example, furniture for traditional coffee shops, such as wooden chairs, were imported from Europe, while the white marble tables came from Italy.

A book documenting the team’s findings will be launched at a pop-up stall during their exhibition at the National Library building on July 26.

Other teams involved in the showcase went for a more nostalgic touch. The artist behind Moving Home, Ms Alecia Neo, 29, said one reason the team decided to focus on the rituals that people associated with their homes is to better understand how people react when they have to leave their abode, which can be difficult for them especially if they had lived there for a long time.

“... I myself had moved home for about 12 times around the neighbourhood, to different estates, to different blocks, so the idea of moving home was quite special to me,” said Ms Neo.

Moving Home will hold its exhibition from April 3, also at the National Library building, with activities such as a dialogue session to engage participants in sharing what moving home means to them.

Most of the events will be held at the National Library and its branches across the island.





Project reunites islanders on St John's after 4 decades
Photographers set up homecoming to capture history not recorded in textbooks
By Melody Zaccheus, The Straits Times, 19 Mar 2015

LATE last year, 80 former island-dwellers returned to their home on St John's Island for their first reunion in four decades.

They spent a day swimming in its familiar waters and tracing the winding paths they once took to get to school. Many took their grandchildren along to give them a glimpse of kampung life, pointing out familiar sites along the way.

The islanders were reunited on the initiative of photographers Edwin Koo, 36, Zakaria Zainal, 30, and Juliana Tan, 25, for their project Island Nation, which documents life on 12 of Singapore's Southern Islands.

It took them almost four months to piece together the name list of St John's Island residents who now live on mainland Singapore.

Mr Koo said they had set out to "capture a part of history not recorded in textbooks and to reunite forgotten communities". The end result will be a multimedia website.

Their work is one of 74 irememberSG fund projects that will go on show from next month till August as part of the National Library Board (NLB) Singapore Memory Project's Past Forward event, launched yesterday by Minister for Communications and Information Yaacob Ibrahim.

The fund offers each project up to $50,000 and projects can take the form of short films, photo exhibitions, publications, websites, digital games and animation. A preview of 20 projects, including Island Nation, is on at the National Library's plaza in Victoria Street until tomorrow.

NLB chief executive Elaine Ng said Past Forward showcases the curated stories of the man in the street.

"We hope the memory movement that the Singapore Memory Project helped to generate will inspire more Singaporeans to capture memories for posterity," she said.

Dr Yaacob said: "This year, as our nation celebrates SG50, it is timely to reflect on our past, appreciate the progress we have made, and look forward to the future with confidence."

Another project on show involves Singapore icons made of Lego bricks, including the Merlion, a conserved shophouse and a double-decker bus.

Dr Yaacob said his ministry, together with its statutory boards, has planned a series of events to mark Singapore's jubilee year. These include the Singapore Memory Project's film festival in May, screening of films from the 1940s to 1960s at the newly restored Capitol Theatre by the Media Development Authority in August, and the Infocomm Development Authority's festival of technology the following month.


Rail Corridor on track to be continuous 24km green stretch

$
0
0
Six areas earmarked for special attention as URA calls for proposals
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 19 Mar 2015

SIX areas along the Rail Corridor are to be given special attention when it is finally developed, and the 24km path will be restored to be a fully continuous green stretch.

Under a request for proposal launched by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) yesterday, four areas have been earmarked as "activity nodes" and gateways to the former railway track.

These are the former Bukit Timah railway station, the old Bukit Timah fire station, and two areas near the Kranji and Buona Vista MRT stations.

There will also be two areas of special interest - the former Tanjong Pagar Railway Station, and the stretch near Sungei Pang Sua canal in Choa Chu Kang.

The pre-qualification stage of the request for proposal began yesterday. Design teams have until April 23 to submit a statement of intent, bearing in mind these planning goals, which were drawn up after more than three years of consultations over the path's future. The path runs between Tanjong Pagar and Woodlands.

No timeframe has been set for the development. When it was first announced in 2011 that the Rail Corridor would be developed, there were fears that its unique nature as an island-spanning green stretch would not be preserved.

However, the URA has based its planning and design goals on feedback received, and proposals should ensure that the Rail Corridor is continuous and seamlessly connected, reflect its heritage as a former track for Malaysia's Keretapi Tanah Melayu railway, and preserve its green nature.

"The quality of the space is really defined by the greenery," said URA senior director of physical planning Tan See Nin.

Teams should even have a "landscape strategy". The URA noted that some stretches of the route are quite bare, while others have trees with weak branches.

The URA also wants the Rail Corridor to be inclusive and accessible, for instance, with the addition of shelters and toilets, while the lighting has to be sensitive to the surroundings.

Retiree Tan Cheng Hui, 57, noted that some stretches are muddy and impassable after rain. "These can be improved so that more people can enjoy the green corridor."

Editor Choo Lip Sin, 44, said making the track more user- friendly could be done sensitively - such as by adding shelters that "reflect the heritage of what the Rail Corridor used to be".

In May, up to five design teams will be shortlisted to develop the concept master plan and specific proposals. A public exhibition will be held from October to December to get feedback on the ideas of the successful team or teams.

From March to May next year, they will come up with a preliminary design for a 4km "signature stretch" of the Rail Corridor, which has yet to be revealed.

URA chief executive Ng Lang said: "Our intention is to continue to sensitively stage the development of this project with the community, and not rush into developing the whole stretch at one go."


P-Max – WDA’s Enhanced Place-and-Train Programme for SMEs

$
0
0
Boost for scheme to draw professionals into SMEs
By Lim Yi Han, The Straits Times, 19 Mar 2015

A SCHEME to draw more professionals into small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will get a boost from the authorities.

More modules will be added to the Workforce Development Agency's P-Max programme - formerly known as Max Talent - to help professionals, managers and executives (PMEs) who are unemployed or looking to switch careers make a better transition into SMEs.

Supervisors from SMEs will also be able to sign up for a workshop to improve human resource practices and learn communication skills.

The changes will benefit companies and also help PMEs excel in SMEs, said Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin yesterday at the launch of the enhanced initiative. "The intent really is to help support our PMEs in their effort to continue to improve themselves," he said. "For those who may be finding difficulty seeking employment, we help place them and equip them with... skills."

P-Max aims to train and place more than 3,000 PMEs in SMEs by end-2017. Mr Kurt Wee, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises, said: "P-Max is much stronger in its programme offerings as it gets SMEs on board to adopt progressive HR practices. This is crucial to retain workers."

For professionals, such a course will help them to adapt to a new work environment.

Account executive Gerald Chan, 32, attended the Max Talent programme in 2012. The former police officer joined interior furnishings firm Goodrich Global that year, but found the high sales targets daunting. He said: "It sounded like a big amount... but I learnt how to set progressive goals and break down the target. It's actually achievable."


Learning for life? Policies, parents need to change too

$
0
0
The Government must review gifted education, direct school admissions and the PSLE; parents, too, must learn to look beyond grades.
By Sandra Davie, Senior Education Correspondent, The Straits Times, 19 Mar 2015

EDUCATION Minister Heng Swee Keat's recent call for a transformation in Singaporeans' attitude towards learning has resonated with many.

Mr Heng, who was speaking at the Ministry of Education's (MOE) Budget debate in Parliament earlier this month, urged students, parents and employers to move their focus away from exams and grades towards acquiring deep skills.

He said this was necessary as jobs will keep changing in the future, and people will need to keep learning, mastering skills and learning for life.

He warned that not doing so could lead to a dystopian future where stress levels climb, and "the system churns out students who excel in exams, but are ill-equipped to take on jobs of the future, nor find fulfilment in what they do".

Several parents who responded to his speech agreed with his predictions, and said there was an urgent need to transform the system.

However, more than a dozen parents who e-mailed and wrote in to The Straits Times Forum Page also pointed the finger at MOE, commenting that several of its policies - such as the continuation of the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) - are partly the cause of students' and parents'"obsession with grades", as Mr Heng termed it.

A typical comment came from Madam Carrie Tan, who said: "It is one thing asking parents, students and employers to change their mindsets. But what is the ministry doing to encourage this change? It should lead the way in relooking some of its policies."

To give the ministry some credit, over the past decade it has changed - and even done away with - some policies that skewed priorities in education.

Two notable changes were dropping the ranking of secondary schools and streaming of children in primary school. From 2008, pupils were instead banded according to their strengths in different subjects.

In recent years, it has also done away with exams for lower-primary children. It is in the process of making further adjustments to some policies, including how the PSLE is being used for progression into secondary school.

But perhaps the ministry could go further and be bolder in bringing about the shift that Mr Heng called for.

I am reminded of a comment made more than a decade ago by then Education Minister Teo Chee Hean when he changed the way schools were appraised by MOE: "Unless we change what counts, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to change the orientation and focus of our education system."

GEP ripe for changes

SO, WHAT are some of these policies and schemes that can be revisited?

First, there is the three-decades-old Gifted Education Programme (GEP) that, through a screening test at the end of Primary 3, selects the top 1 per cent of the cohort - about 500 pupils a year - for a special scheme that aims to stretch them to the fullest and make them "responsible leaders" of society.

GEP pupils are supervised closely by teachers in smaller classes. They cover the same syllabus as their peers in the regular mainstream programme, but in greater depth and with more emphasis on creativity, critical thinking and problem-solving.

However, a Straits Times report on the programme last year revealed that the majority of primary-level GEP pupils were taking supplementary tuition lessons outside of school.

It led to many asking if the scheme just served to extend the advantages of these bright pupils, most of whom came from well-off backgrounds.

One must question the relevance of a scheme that applies the term "gifted" to 1 per cent of students - and only to those who are academically gifted. It skews the perceptions of children and parents that academic achievement is the only measure of "success".

This goes against the grain of what Mr Heng is pushing for - to recognise the unique gifts inherent in all children, in other areas such as music, the arts or sports.

Many have suggested that the programme can be broadened to nurture talents in all fields and be made available in all schools as enrichment programmes.

Another often-heard criticism of the GEP is that it has become a conduit for the Integrated Programme (IP) in the top secondary schools.

Most GEP pupils gain places in the IP at such schools through the Direct School Admission scheme, even before they take the PSLE.

This, in turn, has partly fuelled a demand for GEP preparation and tuition - that is, the idea that a child can be "drilled" into being "gifted".

This leads to another policy that needs to be reviewed - the Direct School Admission scheme.

Here, MOE has already taken steps in the right direction.

Currently, students get in for exceptional academic ability, or for sports or artistic skills. The ministry has said it will broaden the scheme to include pupils with special qualities such as resilience and character. While this is a good thing, it needs to go further.

It should return to the core objective of the scheme, to recognise a diverse range of talents in non-academic areas.

The way it has been implemented by top schools, it appears to have become yet another route that gives the academically bright an advantage.

Parents are right to ask: "Why should children in the gifted programme compete for places through this scheme when, by all accounts, they would do well enough in the PSLE to get into the secondary schools of their choice?"

The ministry also needs to be bolder with the changes to PSLE.

In recent years, more parents have called for it to be done away altogether, saying it just places extra stress on pupils.

However, MOE, which announced a review of the PSLE two years ago, said the exam is still needed to assess pupils' educational standards and provide a fair basis for secondary school admission.

It has not said exactly how the exam will change, other than saying the PSLE T-score would be replaced by wider grade bands similar to the A1 to F9 grades for the O levels. These grades will be converted into points for admission to secondary school.

The problems with PSLE

WHILE this is a step in the right direction, it does not go far enough.

MOE should look at ways in which the exam can be made less of a high-stakes exam. Right now, for most pupils, the PSLE aggregate score is all that counts in determining which secondary school they will go to.

A child may perform well above average throughout the year, but if he is unable to handle the stress of the exams, he may end up in a school or even a stream he may not be suited for.

Perhaps MOE should consider including continual assessment test results, project work and co-curricular activities as a component of the PSLE score.

A more holistic PSLE assessment would encourage children to develop all-important life skills such as communication, creativity and teamwork.

But all these tweaks still mean that the PSLE remains.

The big question, of course, is whether a national examination at age 12 is necessary at all. After all, Singapore is one of the few countries in the world to have such a crucial exam for children as young as 12.

There is sound research showing the negative effects of test-taking on young children. High-stakes tests do not promote curiosity or critical thinking, but instead engender a narrow focus on getting the right answer, as well as curricula tailored to deliver that.

Subjects such as art, music and physical education, which education experts see as vital to growing 21st-century skills such as teamwork and thinking out of the box, inevitably get sidelined.

Indeed, as Mr Heng said, a transformation of the education system is required. To make it happen, the ministry must change what counts in the PSLE and what it counts for.

But even if the ministry shows the political will to slaughter more scared cows in education, nothing will change unless parents play their part.

I am reminded of the MOE's announcement in 2010 to do away with exams for children in lower primary. It said children would instead go through "bite-sized forms of assessment" such as "show and tell", drama sessions or journal writing.

While many parents welcomed the move, many others went into panic mode, fearing their children would not study as hard, and began buying up the soon-to-be-defunct exam papers of top primary schools. Some parents even enrolled their children at tuition centres that conducted mock exams.

This one-step-forward, two-steps-back dance cannot continue. The bold transformation of the education system, as Mr Heng said, will need the collective will and action of employers, teachers, parents and students.

Parents will need to recognise their children's strengths and build their character instead of being preoccupied with grades; employers will need to hire based on skills, not degrees; and teachers should strive for all-round development of their students.

The Government must adjust, tweak and even do away with policies that stand in the way.

All must be ready to take the necessary steps to forge a new school system that will serve Singapore - celebrating its golden jubilee this year - for the next 50 years.


More constructive dialogue needed on contentious topics: Baey Yam Keng

$
0
0
Mr Baey, speaking in his personal capacity at a Social Policies Forum, says that it is important to proactively seek out the "middle spectrum" of those who hold moderate views. "Only when there is cordial and respectful dialogue can we move forward."
Channel NewsAsia, 20 Mar 2015

Mr Baey Yam Keng, one of three speakers at a forum meant to explore the definition of a family unit in Singapore yesterday (March 19) called for more "cordial and respectful dialogue" between groups debating hot-button social issues.

Noting that the other two invited speakers at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Political Association's "Our Families" Social Policies Forum "roughly stands on the same side of the fence", the Tampines GRC MP said that there was a danger of groups falling into an echo chamber in which their own views were reinforced.

The other two speakers yesterday were AWARE programmes and communications senior manager Jolene Tan and LGBT counselling group Oogachaga's deputy executive director Leow Yangfa.

"Let the discussion not be limited to one end of the spectrum, or have separate forums focusing on one specific segment of the spectrum," said Mr Baey.

"I understand that a discussion just between the extreme ends of the spectrum may become heated and non-constructive. That is why it is also important to proactively seek out those who hold more moderate views in the middle spectrum, and hear their views.”

"We need to build trust among the different parties, and this takes time and sincerity. We also need maturity to accept that we will disagree, and agree to disagree. Only when there is cordial and respectful dialogue can we move forward."

Singaporeans must be prepared to respect the decisions made and accommodate one another, he added. "Without this social compact, it would be very difficult to stay united as a people and build a harmonious nation."

"A MAN IS NOT A MOTHER, A WOMAN NOT A FATHER"

Speaking in his personal capacity, Mr Baey said he was not in support of same-sex marriage.

"Man and woman are just made differently. While two men or two women can love and care for a child as good as, or even better than a man-woman couple, we have to understand that a man is not a mother and a woman is not a father," he told the audience at UTown in NUS.

"I may cook better than my wife but I will never be a mother to my three children. Even if my wife becomes the breadwinner, she cannot be their father. To be fair to the child who is innocent and cannot choose, I am not for same gender couples to have and raise children.”

"Likewise, I do not support people wanting children and choosing to do so as a single parent, not because of divorce or bereavement. The child is missing something in such a family."

S377A: MOVING WITH THE TIMES?

At the forum, Mr Baey called for continued discussion on Section 377A of the Penal Code which criminises gay sex between men, saying that policies needed to reflect societal sentiment.

“I want to especially encourage voices from individuals, organisations and institutions, so that the discussion will not be driven to periphery,” said Mr Baey, who had spoken in favour of repealing S377A in 2007.

“Hopefully the discussion will be ongoing and not just during the next review of the Penal Code. Hopefully the review will happen earlier rather than another 23 years later, which was the period between 2007 and the previous review of Penal Code.”

"No policy should or needs to remain the same forever, it must move with times.”

"How is the Government to make sense of all the different views and perspectives? Policies and decisions should not be based on who speaks the loudest, the most frequently or even the most eloquently. The Government must know when to take the lead to shape sentiments and make difficult choices if necessary, and when to realise that the landscape has shifted and policies need to reflect changing demographics and worldwide trends."



Related

Approach to ageing can alter future of S'pore: Gan Kim Yong

$
0
0
Nation may either succumb to silver tsunami or ride high on strengths of seniors
By Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 20 Mar 2015

WHAT Singapore will look like in the next 50 years depends partly on the approach it takes to ageing, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said yesterday.

It might succumb to a "silver tsunami", in which the young people in a shrinking workforce shoulder the heavy burden of supporting the old.

Or Singaporeans can change their mindsets about growing older and age gracefully by playing to the strengths of a greying population.

"Older persons can be an engine for national development, contributing to our community, our society and to our economic growth, for many years," said Mr Gan, who is also Minister- in-charge of ageing issues.

"Our society can be older but no less dynamic and cohesive."

He was speaking at the Gerontological Society of Singapore's annual conference on ageing at the Marina Mandarin hotel.

Speakers addressed the issues surrounding the next 50 years of ageing in Singapore.

For the nation to age successfully, Mr Gan said that both individuals and companies must first rethink their attitudes towards work.

"Some seniors we spoke to told us that they would like to take on a mentoring or coaching role in their current companies," Mr Gan said. "Others tell us that they would like to have more flexible work arrangements... so that they can spend time with family, volunteering, or learning new things."

For employers, the challenge is to "redesign the workplace into one that is suitable for all ages", including in areas like job roles, work hours, and the work culture.

He highlighted the example of engineering firm Federal Hardware, which re-employed eight of its older staff who had reached the retirement age of 62.

Ms Tina Ng, the company's general manager of group human resources and quality logistics, said: "Some of them have been with us for years, and we find that they are still capable of performing their duties."

She said that some had also been shifted to lighter duties or more flexible hours to accommodate their wishes.

Mr Gan said the healthcare system must focus increasingly on preventive health and providing care within the community.

"By working together, we can push back the need for seniors to be institutionalised in hospitals and nursing homes for as long as possible," he said.

Most important, he concluded, is developing an "ageless mindset" in which growing old is not seen as something negative.

"The critical determinant of whether ageing will be positive for individuals and our society is in the mindset.

"We have a much higher chance of achieving successful ageing if individuals do not associate ageing with mere decline, loss of value, or worse, disability," he added.





Active ageing: Time to step it up
The Gerontological Society of Singapore held a conference this week to discuss the future. Four older citizens set out what they hope to see.
By Chiang Hai Ding, Rosemary Khoo, Lim Siahoe And Philbert Chin, Published The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

THE Government has stepped up boldly to serve more love to older Singaporeans.

The introduction of Medishield Life - universal life insurance without an age limit and including pre-existing diseases - protects all Singaporeans against large health costs by the pooling of risks.

The Government's cash payouts under the new Silver Support Scheme to the 20 to 30 per cent of older but poorer citizens (numbering 150,000) assure them of a modicum of comfort and dignity. It is no fun to be poor anywhere, but especially in a rich country. The enhancements to the Central Provident Fund (CPF) system will benefit future older persons.

To celebrate Singapore's first 50 years as an independent nation, the Government gifted all older citizens with the Pioneer Generation Package, which will benefit 450,000 pioneers and cost Singapore $8 billion.

This sea change in social policy set off the expected cautionary voices - that the country could go down the slippery slope of welfarism, like in the West. We could, but there is neither reason nor evidence to believe that we are headed in that direction.

On the contrary, Singapore as a country has benefited from what economists call the "demographic bonus" of those who were previously young and productive and who contributed to its high national savings and investment rates. The Government is paying back that population now grown old.

What more can be done

THE Government has taken giant steps for senior citizens but there are still other steps, including some which the people have to take themselves. We four (aged from 50-plus to 80-plus) share what we would like to see next.


First, the Government should consolidate the gains of our first 50 years. Singapore enjoys excellent public housing and healthcare. So, the good problem is how to assure older Singaporeans that they can age-in-place, or age together with their peers in a new and dedicated type of senior housing that comes with its own healthcare plan.

What is needed is a "whole-of-government" approach, led by the Housing Board and the Ministry of Health, to tackle this good problem. The two parties can also be partners in offering long-term care to the many Singaporeans of the future who will need it.

Healthcare and eldercare, as such, should be community- based and decentralised. This means "gatekeeper" general practitioners or family physicians, deploying case managers and bringing home nursing to patients in the community.

Promoting value in older people

WITH a large aged population will come a proportionately large number of dementia cases. The number of cases of depression, often a precursor to dementia, is also on the rise. But depression can be treated. Better still, its precursor, loneliness, can be avoided. Older people who stay active and engaged, through participation in programmes organised by the People's Association, voluntary welfare organisations and faith groups, have a better chance of remaining mentally healthy.

Second, Singapore should promote the mindset, among the young as well as the old, that there is value in older people. For example, to reduce our dependence on foreign workers, employers should consider tapping the resource in 230,000 people outside our workforce, mainly older persons and women.

Older folk should be appreciated as guardians of the flame. Younger persons "network", whereas older persons are "kin keepers" who preserve family ties, and represent and uphold values that we hold dear for family, friends and country. We four tell our family and friends that when young ones want to give us a treat or hongbao, we should not demur ("spend it on yourself"), but should encourage them and praise them for practising filial piety.

On our part, as older people, we must strive to remain independent for as long as we can, take responsibility for our own health and well-being, keep connected with family and friends, and try and keep abreast of developments in society and technology, in this digital age.

Third, Singapore should continue to invest in older persons. The Government has launched the SkillsFuture Credit initiative - announced in the Budget - to promote life-long learning. All workers need to continually learn to earn. This applies to older persons who wish to keep working, but they should also learn to live. There is a saying in Chinese: Live till old, learn till old! So older persons should be allowed to use their credits under the SkillsFuture scheme to take courses and remain active and engaged.

Here, we may take lessons from Western countries which have "Universities of The Third Age" or U3A. There are two models. The British U3A operates with Third-Ager volunteers in the community who teach and learn from each other. The French U3A is university-based and involves its teaching staff. There can be other U3As, including those which are virtual. In China today, there are close to 20,000 U3As with a membership approaching two million.

In Singapore, there is a successful Young At Heart! Community College based at the Marine Parade Family Service Centre, which conducts courses for older persons in the Chinese language.

Moreover, there is a prototype Singapore U3A in the form of the National University of Singapore (NUS) Senior Alumni. This group has been meeting for over five years on campus, involving alumni and friends as well as retired academics who share fellowship, expertise and experience.

These U3A-style meetings - loosely based on the British approach - involve monthly two- hour chat sessions with speakers. Topics have ranged from medicine, culture, heritage, the arts, nutrition, technology and politics to gambling addiction.

Speakers are drawn mainly from senior alumni, and the talk is followed by a robust Q&A session. Through these sessions, many NUS seniors are updated on current developments in a non- threatening atmosphere. They are mentally engaged and, better still, those who have had a stroke can muster enough confidence to speak and participate again.

Just last month, our seniors enjoyed a tea and chat session at Parliament House hosted by Speaker Halimah Yacob, who talked to us about Parliament, the Speaker's role and CPF.

The group also visited the College of Alice and Peter Tan at NUS to be acquainted with the developments at U-Town and innovations in learning styles.

Fourth, after helping Singaporeans meet the challenge of the first of life's "knowns", namely change, the Government should help older Singaporeans meet that of another of life's knowns, namely death. Contrary to popular belief, older persons do not fear death. They have encountered it enough times in their lives. Where do they find answers to the practical questions that must loom large? They need to know how to tap provisions such as the Lasting Power of Attorney, Advance Medical Directive and palliative care to avoid unnecessary suffering, and enjoy peace of mind and dignity.

That leaves the existential question: What is the meaning of life? That is the question to which, through their faith system, in the company of their peers, or in solitude, they look for answers. While they search, some find solace in service to others.

Finally, we would like to see Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong appoint a minister of ageing, with his or her own ministry, to embed seniors in our inclusive society.

Dr Chiang was a historian, Dr Khoo an applied linguist and founding president of NUS Senior Alumni, and Dr Chin a GP and founding president of RSVP (The Organisation of Senior Volunteers).

Ms Lim is the executive director of the Centre For Seniors.

The first three writers co-authored two chapters in a book, Ageing In Singapore: The Next 50 Years, on sale at $10. For more details, go to the Gerontological Society of Singapore, www.gs.org.sg


Musings on Lee Kuan Yew's legacy from ordinary people he touched

$
0
0
People in Singapore and overseas reflect on his contributions to nation
By Zakir Hussain, Deputy Political Editor, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

LIKE many Singaporeans, Madam Ranjani Rangan has been closely following news of former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew's health in recent days.

Yesterday, the 38-year-old banker felt so strongly about the negative comments from some netizens that she wrote a heartfelt Facebook note on Mr Lee's contributions to Singapore.

She expressed the hope that those who had criticised him for what they see as a "dictatorship" will hopefully appreciate what he and his team of leaders had done for the country.

"We may not be able to afford big homes or have large cars, our country is too small for long drives, there is less freedom of speech, the work culture may not be as flexible as in the West, and the weather is a bit too warm with a lack of the four seasons - however, where it truly matters, we have it all laid out for us," she wrote, citing Singapore's quality education, healthcare, infrastructure, transport and security.

"We don't understand how good we have it here," Madam Rangan said when contacted. The fourth-generation Singaporean lived and worked in Britain and the United States for 12 years before returning home in 2008.

Like her, others have written commentaries on Mr Lee's legacy. Several mentioned that some of Mr Lee's decisions and views remain controversial, but pointed out that on balance, his leadership was critical to Singapore's progress.

Miami-based Beverly Murray, who grew up in Singapore, wrote about Mr Lee on her blog earlier this month, and titled her post The Most Brilliant Politician You Never Knew.

In her post, which has been circulating on social media, she highlighted how former US president Richard Nixon once described Mr Lee as a man who "might have attained the world stature of a Churchill, a Disraeli, or a Gladstone" were he born in another country. She also described how his push for what is the best - not just the individual's best - was an ethos instilled at school throughout her growing-up years in the 1980s, even as she and her classmates felt alienated by this focus on the practical over the poetic.

They have since relocated to Shanghai, Perth, New York and London, but she feels they too are likewise pensive about Mr Lee's impending departure.

"No display of gratitude seems excessive in (the) light of your tremendous legacy. But I'm happiest to report that your people - scattered and disparate as they may be - have indeed found poetry," she wrote. "In doing so, they may have uncovered the spirit of what it really means to be Singaporean at heart."

Mr Daniel Wagner, chief executive of Country Risk Solutions, who had lived in Singapore, wrote a piece on The Huffington Post about his time as an expatriate.


"Say what you will about the type of democracy LKY created, and nurtured, after stepping down as prime minister in 1990, the net result is an economic miracle unrivalled in South-east Asia that has punched way above its weight for decades," he wrote.

Mr Wagner noted that many people have criticised Singapore's political system, but said Mr Lee and his People's Action Party "have consistently delivered the goods - in a big way".

"If you ask me what LKY's legacy is, I would say it is a textbook case about how to make something really meaningful out of very little - how to transform a tiny island nation into an economic goliath," he said.

"How to create a safe haven in a region filled with churning waters. And how to constantly evolve in order to survive and thrive."





Extracts from three commentaries on Mr Lee Kuan Yew in recent days:


"Lee Kuan Yew's Legacy" - Daniel Wagner, writing in The Huffington Post

"Many people have criticised Singapore's political system, characterising it as a 'one party state' masquerading as a democracy.

They note the restrictions on freedom of speech, the severe penalties for criticising the government or its officials, the latent or overt discrimination of Malay and Indian minorities, and the overly paternalistic nature of the 'nanny' state. Depending on your vantage point - as a Singaporean, expat, minority or overseas foreign worker - some or much of this will ring true, or simply not be perceived as relevant or necessarily important.

It is all part of the Singapore story.

What is certainly true, however, is that LKY and his People's Action Party have consistently delivered the goods - in a big way. If you ask me, I don't particularly care if a government has a small 'D' in its 'democracy', or whether it listens to my phone calls, or makes laws against jaywalking and chewing gum...

What matters to me is whether I can live in a place that is safe, clean, efficient, and gets the job done. On that score, Singapore's government gets an A+.

Having moved from Singapore to Manila, I can tell you, I missed much about Singapore for a long time.

Even today, having been back in the States for eight years, I wish much of what works so well in Singapore could be transported to the US.

We could learn a lot from 'the Singapore way'."



"A letter to our founding father, from a returning Singaporean" - Ranjani Rangan, in a Facebook note and e-mail

"Today I feel proud to call myself a Singaporean, to sing our national anthem loudly at every opportunity I get, that my children today are citizens, when my expat colleagues rave about Singapore and want to make Singapore their home, that I am living in a little red dot First World country that is envied by so many around the world, and feel extremely proud to produce my red passport to the overseas immigration officers whenever I travel.

And all this pride is only possible because of you, our founding father, Mr Lee, and your A team of leaders who had developed and shaped Singapore to what it is today and continue to do so."



"The most brilliant politician you never knew" - Beverly Murray, who moved from Singapore to the United States when she was 16

"Singapore needed doctors, engineers, teachers, and lawyers.

There was no room for whimsy or creativity, a perspective neatly summed up by Lee's maxim that 'poetry is a luxury we cannot afford. What is important for pupils is not literature, but a philosophy of life'.

Therein lay my big unspoken conflict. As a Singaporean, I revelled in our shared destiny, fiercely protective of my beloved little country that not only survived, but (also) thrived against all odds.

Yet the writer and dreamer in me felt cast out to sea, mere flotsam in the gritty ocean of nation-building practicalities. It is one thing to speak of my American immigration experience at 16 years of age. It is quite another to realise that at 11 years old, I already felt like an immigrant in my own country of birth.

To experience this so viscerally as a child was simultaneously liberating and devastating.

It all but sealed my fate as a perpetual nomad...

Now, decades later, an old man lays dying while I - 10,000 miles away - am strangely, deeply moved. My instincts tell me that I am not the only one...

You gave us a republic, Mr Lee. No display of gratitude seems excessive in (the) light of your tremendous legacy.

But I'm happiest to report that your people - scattered and disparate as they may be - have indeed found poetry."


Places to leave good wishes for Mr Lee
By Fiona Chan And Tham Yuen-c, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

SPECIAL areas are being set up for well-wishers to leave cards, flowers and gifts for Mr Lee Kuan Yew, who remains critically ill in the intensive care unit of Singapore General Hospital (SGH).

The hospital yesterday designated an area outside Block 7 for these expressions of concern, in response to people trying to leave them with hospital staff or in the building's public spaces.



Grassroots leaders at Tanjong Pagar GRC, where Mr Lee is an MP, have also set aside the Tanjong Pagar Community Club art gallery as a space for residents to place get-well cards and gifts.

More than 100 residents have left cards at the gallery, which will be open over the weekend from 9am to 10pm.

By last night, about 80 cards and gifts had been left at SGH's designated area for Mr Lee, 91, who was hospitalised on Feb 5 with severe pneumonia.

Concern over his health has escalated since Tuesday, when the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said his condition had worsened.

Mr Patrick Ang, 41, who has cerebral palsy and uses a motorised wheelchair, travelled from Clementi to leave a card. He said Mr Lee helped him move to a new flat after he was robbed in his Jalan Bukit Merah rental flat in 2012.

Mr Ang, who sells Singapore Sweep tickets, had written to Mr Lee for help through the PMO.

Within two weeks, Mr Ang was moved to a new rental flat of his choice in Clementi. He said: "If not for Mr Lee, I would still be living in the other flat."

A group from social enterprise Positive Intentions, which helps disadvantaged groups get back on their feet, came with flowers and placards covered with sticky notes. They had spent two hours outside Ngee Ann City getting 200 people to write good wishes for Mr Lee.

Real estate agent Kathy Ng, 53, left a daisy and a card for Mr Lee, saying she cried on Wednesday after seeing an announcement of Mr Lee's death, which later turned out to be a screenshot of a hoax website with the false news.

Police yesterday said a male Singaporean student below the age of 16 is suspected of having created and circulated photos of the fake website, which bore the PMO logo. The student, who is believed to have operated alone, is assisting in police investigations.

In an update on Facebook yesterday, Mr Lee's son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, thanked people for their "good wishes and prayers" for his father, saying he was "deeply touched".

Posting a black-and-white photograph of himself as a child being carried by his father, PM Lee said he had been looking at old family snapshots.

"So many happy memories over a lifetime," he added.





Outpouring of good wishes for Mr Lee on social media
By Chong Zi Liang, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

ONCE a week, undergraduate Doris Kwoh, 23, visits a group of elderly residents in Commonwealth to check on them.

But on Thursday, aside from keeping them company, she recorded videos of five of them with her smartphone, thanking Mr Lee Kuan Yew for his contributions to Singapore.

At home, she edited the videos into a single clip and uploaded it on Facebook, where it garnered more than 13,400 views as of 10.30pm last night and was shared by Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin.

"These seniors, who went through Singapore's tough times with Mr Lee, have always been telling me how grateful they are to him. I wanted to capture and share their feelings," she said.

"I hope that somehow, Mr Lee and his family will be able to see the video and feel encouraged."

Like Ms Kwoh, many Singaporeans have been expressing their good wishes to Mr Lee - who remains critically ill at the Singapore General Hospital - by using social media's multimedia capabilities and reach to convey their feelings.

Artists produced portraits of Mr Lee and posted their works online. Ms Pepperika See shared a painting captioned as her "tribute to our charismatic leader", while Mr Lawrence Koh uploaded a video of a sand painting with the words "father of Singapore".



Many netizens tweeted photos of Mr Lee taken during different stages of his life as they reflected on his role as the country's first prime minister.

"The truth is, many of us won't be able to build our dreams without him," said one tweet, which was accompanied by a photo of Mr Lee and his late wife, Madam Kwa Geok Choo, during their time as students in Britain.

Others simply expressed their emotions using just words.

Bangkok-based former opposition politician Nicole Seah wrote on her Facebook page: "Even though I am not in Singapore with all of you right now, I feel the same trepidation as if I was right there, refreshing all the news sites and keeping close tabs on any development. Whether we agree or disagree with what he has done, we cannot deny that this is a man of great intellect, talent and ambition to give Singapore the profile that it has and moulded it into what it is today...

"Whatever the outcome, LKY has led a full life dedicated to doing the best he could for us, and I hope that people will know better and have the sense to respect that, and to respect him for the years he has given, than to bay for blood or cast stones."

Taxi driver Ganesh Sundram's March 18 Facebook note, which reminded Singaporeans of what they can be grateful for because Mr Lee "had a vision and he went about executing it", has been shared by nearly 16,300 people.

"That man... whether u like it or not... was a key installation to the life we have today... not sang nila utama... or that tengku... or stamford raffles... The name is LEE KUAN YEW... and if he is no longer ard... i WILL feel sad..." said part of his post.

Speaking to The Straits Times, he recalled picking up a South African couple at the airport.

During the drive, he noticed the wife clutching her handbag tightly and keeping it hidden from view. "But the husband, who worked here for a few years, told her, 'Darling, this is Singapore, you don't have to do that.'

"At that moment, I felt so proud of my country and so lucky to have been born here," Mr Ganesh said.

The outpouring of sentiments online was no surprise to Nanyang Technological University associate professor Augustine Pang, who studies public communications.

He said: "Mr Lee is someone who attracts adoration and respect, and social media allows people to participate collectively and yet express themselves individually."

He said Singapore's celebration of its 50th anniversary was also a reminder that "Mr Lee's narrative has always been intertwined with that of Singapore's. It's part of the increasing participatory climate, people want to have their say and want to be heard".



Student suspected to be behind hoax
By Charissa Yong And Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

A MALE Singaporean student below the age of 16 is suspected of having posted a fake announcement on the supposed death of former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew on Wednesday.

Police said in a statement yesterday that he is assisting them with investigations.

Screenshots of the bogus announcement, purportedly from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) website, were circulated on social media on Wednesday night. It was picked up and reported as fact by several foreign media outlets, only to be retracted later.

Police, who were alerted at about 10pm on Wednesday that multiple messages with the hoax announcement were circulating, established the suspect's identity within 24 hours. He was not named in yesterday's statement.

Police said preliminary investigations found he was believed to have modified a 2010 media statement that was hosted on the website. He then sent out a photograph of the modified content.

The statement added that he is believed to have operated alone.

Police are investigating whether the suspect committed the offence of access with intent to commit or facilitate the commission of an offence. Under the Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act, anyone found guilty of the offence can be fined up to $50,000, jailed for up to 10 years, or both.

Assistant Commissioner of Police Sekher Warrier, acting director of the Criminal Investigation Department, advised the public not to spread falsehoods, saying: "The police take a very stern view against anyone who doctors a government website to spread false information to deceive the public. Individuals who do so must be prepared to face the consequences under the law."

Mr Lee remains critically ill and has been warded at the Singapore General Hospital since Feb 5.

Separately, Communications and Information Minister Yaacob Ibrahim yesterday denounced rumour-mongers and said people should be respectful during these trying times for the Lee family.

Speaking after visiting a Punggol mosque, he addressed the online rumours about Mr Lee's health: "These are irresponsible acts. We know that Mr Lee is undergoing a tremendous challenge now which is also affecting his family. We have to respect that.

"It is also part of our moral and religious obligation to a fellow human being, especially an elderly statesman who has contributed so much to our country. We must also respect the feelings of his family.

"I don't think that this is something that we should condone. What we can do is to keep him in our thoughts and prayers. He has led us, fought for our independence and paved the way for Singapore's success, which we are benefiting from today and are proud of. We should continue to wish him and his family well. We owe it to him and we should, in fact, protect his good name and be sensitive to the feelings of his family during these times."


Punggol mosque to open in time for Ramadan

$
0
0
Yaacob pays tribute to Mr Lee's role in creation of Mosque Building Fund
By Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

IN THREE months' time, Muslim residents in Punggol will get a mosque near their home when the Al-Islah Mosque opens in time for the fasting month.

It is the 24th mosque to be built under the Mosque Building Fund, which turns 40 this year.

Yesterday, Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Yaacob Ibrahim highlighted the role former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew played in giving the idea for the fund, which was formed in 1975.

"We're grateful to him for allowing us to use the CPF system to collect money from Muslim workers to build our new-generation mosques," he said after visiting the mosque. "With that support we've been able to build 24 mosques." Muslim workers' contributions to the mosque fund are deducted by the Central Provident Fund Board when it deducts CPF contributions from their pay.



During Singapore's urbanisation after independence, many settlements had to make way for flats and industrial estates, and several mosques and prayer houses were similarly cleared. While the Government recognised the need for new mosques, it could not build or fund them.

At a meeting with Malay leaders in 1974, Mr Lee suggested setting up a fund to which every Muslim worker would make a small monthly contribution. Said Dr Yaacob: "He gave us a wonderful idea which you can never find anywhere else in this world where, using a government system, a minority community can raise funds almost automatically to build 24 mosques."

Mosque committee chairman Wan Rizal Wan Zakariah said the community has been very supportive, and the Al-Islah Mosque has raised $4.5 million for interior furnishings and operating costs.

He said the mosque will hold a tour for nearby residents when it opens in June.

The mosque has room for 4,000 worshippers, with facilities that reflect Punggol's young residential profile. These include areas for students, children and parents. "With better customisation to the needs of the community, we can better fulfil the demands of the Malay-Muslim community," said Dr Yaacob.


Investing for the future: GIC's long-term view

$
0
0
For Singapore's sovereign wealth fund, taking the long view is fundamental.
By Lim Chow Kiat, Published The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

IN SINGAPORE, long-termism is our national ethos. A willingness to forgo short-term gratification and keep faith with the fundamentals has served us well. It has been at the heart of our mission since the beginning of GIC, which was created out of a need to manage the precious savings that were set aside from limited financial resources in the early years of Singapore.

As Dr Goh Keng Swee, the former deputy chairman who conceived the idea of GIC, put it then: "There is no real secret about the way in which most nations and individuals grow rich. They must save a good part of their income, and be wisely and profitably invested. The more you save and the more wisely you invest, the faster you get rich."

GIC was set up in 1981 to benefit from that perspective. Specifically, GIC's mission is to invest for the long term so as to generate a good return over and above global inflation.

Three decades later, GIC's performance has indeed benefited from a long-term perspective. Our investment return gained substantially from the compounding of returns, the patient harvesting of long-term risk premiums, the countercyclical rebalancing of our portfolio, the ability to take advantage of short-term dislocations in financial markets, and our longstanding relationships with many investees, external fund managers and other partners. Enduring the short-term uncertainty, and occasional short-term pain, has paid off.

Over the years, we have learnt that it is actually not the time horizon that matters most, but rather the mindset and discipline to consistently invest based on fundamentals and valuations. In particular, it is important to have the ability to assess value and maintain price discipline in the face of market fluctuations and uncertainty. Having a long time horizon enhances this ability, especially in a world full of short-term investors. Professional investors like to bank on skill rather than luck. At GIC, we add long-termism to our formula.

In theory, long-termism should give investors a big edge. The reality, however, is that even investors with explicit long-term mandates find it hard to put long-termism into practice.

In our experience, the organisation's entire "ecosystem" must have a long-term mindset for it to work. Both investment and organisational practices need to be supportive. From clients to employees, from front office to back office, and from internal investors to external managers, we try to ensure that long-termism permeates our practices.

We break the necessary discipline down into five areas: the investment philosophy, governance framework, investment mandate, organisational practices and communication.

1. Investment philosophy

AT THE heart of GIC's investment philosophy is our value discipline. We look for the compounding of fundamental value and opportunities in price-value divergence. Both require a long-term orientation. We are also mindful that long-term investing does not oblige us to buy and hold for long periods. The holding period depends more on price and value than time. At the same time, while we obviously prefer market prices to move up quickly to reflect our assessed valuations, we are prepared to wait longer for the convergence than most investors.

Translating this philosophy into practice requires constant, concerted effort. We start with an articulation of our investment principles, which we vigorously promote through multiple channels and constantly assess to make sure they drive our decision processes.

Our investing principles are:
- Pursue intrinsic value and maintain price discipline
- Practise long-term investing
- Pick our spots: Be focused and leverage our strengths
- Pay attention to risk control
- Prepare for the future.
It is critical to create an investment process that holds us to a value discipline, which includes assessment rigour, a target buy list, premortem analysis, rebalancing, and monitoring of portfolio turnover, among other measures.

Having the mindset to look beyond marked-to-market prices and instead at fundamental developments in the assets has proved useful for this purpose. In equities, for example, it is critical to look beyond stock prices to actual business performance. When done well, this is a source of competitive advantage, given how rarely investors take such a disciplined approach. In recent years, we have also extended the advantage into the area of providing bespoke capital for investees. Our long-term and flexible capital has added to our opportunity set.

One of the most difficult investment decisions to make is one that forces you to stand apart from the crowd. In fact, the largest investment losses tend to arise from procyclical decisions.

"Marked to peers" can be a powerful (and damaging) psychological driver of such flawed decision-making. As the veteran investor Howard Marks puts it, "looking wrong" can destroy careers in most organisations. Yet the ability to make those difficult decisions is an important part of successful investing. That is why a clear articulation of a value discipline and long-term orientation is so important.

2. Governance framework

A WILLINGNESS to wait for the fundamentals to eventually play out does not mean there is no need for checks and balances.

Assuring stakeholders that our portfolio is managed according to our mandate is essential. We have a "no surprises" policy, which means we are proactive in raising issues relating to risks and future challenges as a way of building and maintaining the confidence of our clients and board of directors.

Our governance design also addresses potential agency problems through clear approval authority, regular reporting, and separation of conflicting roles. At the board level, there are several committees to oversee such critical areas as investment strategies, risks, active management, audit and human resource practices. To ensure that we keep an eye on the really long horizon, we also have an advisory board that examines trends that span multiple decades, for example, new technologies and demographics.

3. Investment mandate

WHETHER it is our client's mandate to us or our mandate to external managers, we look for clarity. Clear statements on the return objective, risk capacity, and scope of authority give fund managers the confidence to construct the best portfolios for delivering sustainable results. In particular, the appropriate time horizon for evaluation should be discussed and agreed on upfront.

GIC manages Singapore's reserves on behalf of the Government. The Government's investment mandate to GIC is to preserve and enhance the international purchasing power of the funds over the long term. That directive is set out clearly in an investment-management agreement with GIC.

At the aggregate-portfolio level, the 20-year rolling real rate of return - that is, the return above global inflation - is the key investment metric for GIC. Within the aggregate portfolio, we have a policy portfolio comprising several asset classes and an active portfolio made up of several active strategies. Each portfolio and strategy, at every level, has a clear set of objectives, including a return objective, risk capacity, and scope of authority.

The minimum time horizon for performance measurement is five years. In addition, we work hard to prepare expectations for potential return paths. This is to avoid surprises and allow our investors to act in a long-term manner.

4. Organisational practices

AS IN any organisation, the culture at GIC emanates from the top. Senior management takes every opportunity to advocate the importance of a long-term approach.

Besides regular public articulations of this, we demonstrate resolve through our decisions in human resource practices, resource allocation, and other business areas. We want to ensure that there can be no doubt about our seriousness regarding these issues.

5. Communication

THERE are two aspects to highlight in this area.

First, communication is important to surviving the long and often bumpy ride. Long-term investors not only need to get the investment call right but also need to maintain stakeholder confidence that the investment strategy will most likely turn out right, even if current market prices indicate otherwise.

Second, we are conscious that nomenclature is destiny. The right word engenders the right attitude and the right behaviour. From how a report is presented to how a concept is described, we are meticulous about word choice, as well as how we deliver the message. For example, we avoid displaying only short-term performance results, especially at important forums. This is to prevent the perception that we emphasise short-term results.

We avoid using phrases such as "consistent results" so that our teams do not wrongly focus on quick bets and quarterly gains. We prefer to say "sustainable results". We find that a nice saying such as "the long term is but a series of short terms" is extremely harmful. In our view, it is not true - at least not for investing. We would correct someone in our organisation if he or she used that phrase or one like it. The drivers of short-term investment outcomes and the drivers of long-term investment outcomes are very different. In most cases, the former have to do with market emotions, while the latter have to do with fundamental developments such as competitiveness. Think of Benjamin Graham's "voting" and "weighing" machines. The wrong words can corrode, if not corrupt, our process.

Long-termism and a value orientation are at the heart of all we do, but to put these principles into practice requires constant vigilance and discipline.

The entire ecosystem must share the same orientation, especially in the areas of investment philosophy, governance framework, investment mandate, organisational practices and communication. If we get those things right, however, we believe we will be rewarded with achieving the investment goals we have set for ourselves.

The writer is the group chief investment officer for GIC, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund. A compilation of Perspectives On The Long Term is available at the website of the Focusing Capital on the Long Term initiative at http://www.fclt.org/en/ourthinking/perspectives.html


Getting better at discussing population issues

$
0
0
A promised review of the Population White Paper is due before 2020 but in terms of fallout, it need not be deja vu.
By David Chan, Published The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

IT HAS been two years since the Government released the Population White Paper. Singaporeans would remember the anxiety and angst its projections provoked.

It is understandable to want to avoid revisiting the population debate, especially in the year Singapore celebrates its Golden Jubilee. But this is also a year to ask questions on the country's future, the kind of society that Singaporeans want, and how the city-state can remain a place that citizens are proud to call home.

These questions should drive population policies, which have significant impact on Singaporeans' way of life and quality of life.

In the parliamentary debate in February 2013, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong indicated that the Population White Paper will be reviewed nearer to 2020. This means there are less than five years left to conduct studies or implement and evaluate initiatives to inform the review. And to engage the public.

The review of the White Paper is critical because population policies have many consequences. So, it is timely to reflect on some questions.

How has the Government responded to the reactions to the White Paper? What could have been done better in public communication, and how can it be improved? Can Singapore review its population challenges constructively, in order to tackle them effectively?

Adaptive responses

THE strong negative public emotions experienced and expressed since the release of the Population White Paper did yield much good.

First, the demographic challenges were made clearer in policy deliberations and public discourse.

Second, many deeper issues were raised. Examples include sustainable economic models, urban planning, manpower management, fair employment practices, social mobility, and social cohesion.

Overall, the Government responded swiftly and adaptively to the public reactions and the deeper issues. There were investments in improving infrastructure, economic restructuring, tightening of foreigner inflow, and steps to assist more Singaporeans and raise social mobility.

It is easy to label these responses as populist because of the large expenditures involved.

Indeed, it would have been populist had the policy responses been simply pandering to prevailing public sentiments without regard to their quality and sustainability.

But the citizen-centric actions were also principled - directed at the pain points but guided by meritocracy, fairness, accountability and pragmatism.

For example, the inflow of foreign manpower was tightened by slowing the growth rather than turning off the tap. Housing supply was dramatically ramped up, but housing policies were adapted in stages to calibrate the impact on demand and property prices.

The Fair Consideration Framework ensures citizens are aware of job vacancies and signals the importance of fair employment practices. It does not mandate hiring Singaporeans in ways that go against meritocracy. University places for Singaporeans were increased, but scholarships for foreign students were not done away with.

Rather than labelling them as populist, it is fairer to see post-Population White Paper initiatives as sustained and sustainable principled efforts to develop the Singaporean core.

But it is probably fair to say that the strong reactions to the White Paper had fuelled the urgency and creativity underlying many citizen-centric policies.

Strategic communications

INADEQUATE public communications contributed to part of the negative reactions to the White Paper.

The Government has acknowledged that communications should have begun much earlier - to engage Singaporeans on the demographic challenges. And the importance of Singapore staying open could have been discussed more effectively.

But there is also the issue of strategic communications. This is not about using the right words or framing issues in simple language. It involves judgments on how to integrate public discussions and policy announcements.

Take, for example, the announcement of the Land Use Plan, two days after the release of the Population White Paper.

There were many ideas in the Land Use Plan on optimising land use to support a range of population sizes and ensure a high quality of life. These could have generated discussions on how Singapore can be highly liveable, as both a city and a country. Such discussions did not occur. The debate was fixated at the 6.9 million population figure in the White Paper.

Negative reactions came fast and furious. Several ministers took pains to explain that 6.9 million was the upper limit of a range of population projections by 2030 needed for planning infrastructure, and not a target to achieve.

But confusion continued in public debates. Are the population figures hypothetical situations, plausible possibilities, best- versus worst-case scenarios, planning parameters or population targets? And what do all these terms mean?

Releasing the White Paper prior to the Land Use Plan resulted in a negative outcome. For the public and even Members of Parliament debating the White Paper, the unexpected population projection numbers evoked more than a negative reaction. The numbers activated what behavioural scientists call a prevention focus.

In prevention focus, one's thoughts and feelings are focused on preventing adverse consequences, such as those that easily come to mind when thinking of a large and rapid population growth.

The public attention was fixated on the negative outcomes of population growth. No attention was given to the ideas and opportunities for a good quality of life from optimal land use.

A strategic approach would have, prior to releasing a Population White Paper, presented a draft general development plan for public discussion on land use and liveability.

The plan would focus on ways to ensure a good quality of life in high-density living. This would allow various ideas on land use to receive a fair hearing in terms of constraints, opportunities, innovations and implications.

At the same time, the country's demographic challenges, including issues of local-foreigner relations, could have been raised and honestly discussed at the then ongoing National Conversation.

The Population White Paper would be formulated and refined based on inputs from the public discussions on land use and demographic challenges. The release of the White Paper would occur after the National Conversation exercise, rightly so as an outcome of discussions among Singaporeans.

Such a strategic approach would be respectful of the National Conversation exercise, which was to discuss the kind of society that Singaporeans want and reflect on shared core values such as meritocracy, respect for diversity, and social harmony.

It would also be aligned with citizen-centricity in population priorities. This is the idea that Singaporeans' interests, including their concerns and aspirations, should be the driver of population policy, and not the population numbers.

Challenges, opportunities

IN ADDITION to public communication, policy content can be improved. For example, more attention should be given to the quality of the foreigner inflow, not just the quantity. And too much attention may have been given to the old-age support ratio.

It is important to treat ageing as an asset and not just a liability, with seniors able and willing to contribute economically and socially well beyond the arbitrary cut-off age of 65 years old that represents dependency.

Individuals need to adapt to the environment as they age. But jobs, organisations, urban planning and policies also need to adapt to seniors and the changing population profile. When there is two-way adaptation to changes, ageing can paradoxically increase economic capital and social capital.

So, ageing is part of demographic challenges, but also part of demographic opportunities. The term "ageing problem" should be replaced by the term "ageing issues".

Moving forward, major changes to population policies will have wide-ranging effects on people and society. Which is why the review of the Population White Paper needs to be honest and genuine, taken seriously, and proceed constructively.

This applies to all parties - politicians, academics, public intellectuals, civil society activists, and anyone advocating a position. No one party has a monopoly on wisdom. And in the light of clear contrary evidence, one should have the intellectual honesty and political courage to revise his position.

Singapore's population policies are not inherently flawed. Many economic and social fundamentals in population matters have been taken care of. But policies can certainly be improved to yield more good.

If a whole-of-society approach is adopted, Singaporeans can be confident that population challenges can be tackled. They will have hope that their goals and aspirations can be achieved, and be optimistic that the future will be better. Resilience develops when they recover from adversity and adapt to changes. This positivity mindset among Singaporeans will build psychological capital in Singapore.

When the Population White Paper is reviewed, the debate should not be deja vu for Singaporeans. It must not be driven by political correctness or populist concerns. Everyone gains from paying attention to policy content, public communication and psychological capital.

The writer is director of the Behavioural Sciences Institute, Lee Kuan Yew Fellow and Professor of Psychology at the Singapore Management University.


Study what makes people tick to effect change, says NUS prof

$
0
0
By Siau Ming En, TODAY, 20 Mar 2015

When construction work begins in a particular area, residents living nearby use about 6 per cent more electricity, as they shut their windows and turn to air-conditioning to block out the noise and pollution. And increases in consumption persist, even after the construction work concludes.

Citing this observation from a study looking at the monthly electricity bills of 5,321 public housing blocks and date and location data for 322 construction projects from 2009 to 2011, National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School economist and Low Tuck Kwong Professor Sumit Agarwal said such behaviour should be studied by policymakers. This will allow them to better assess which policy tools to wield to achieve their desired outcomes.

In this case, for example, they could raise electricity prices to discourage consumption, or ask construction firms to plant greenery outside the homes to get people to open their windows again.

“We do some studies to learn behaviour, and if we (want to) change behaviour, then in the future we want to use (those findings) as well,” said Prof Agarwal, who was speaking to TODAY after giving a talk at the Think Business speaker series held at Shangri-La Hotel yesterday.

Prof Agarwal, who joined NUS Business School in 2012, felt that not enough research on behavioural change is being conducted in Singapore. “If we just think about financial literacy, health literacy, if we understand why these literacies are not there, a lot of them are behavioural reasons,” said Prof Agarwal, previously a senior financial economist in the research department at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

He added: “Why do you get into credit card debt? Why do you sleep with the air-conditioning (running) and the comforter? A lot of them are purely behavioural explanations but we just don’t devote enough resources and time to understanding the deep-rooted problem.”

In particular, Prof Agarwal found that Singaporeans take for granted public goods such as water, electricity and transportation, and over-consume them. This is where policymakers can study behaviour and try to get the society to consume less, he said.

For example, in an ongoing study with national water agency PUB, they hope to understand the behaviour of water usage during shower times in different households by using a device to produce data of such water usage. A similar study in Switzerland found that such information leads to reduction in water usage.

Other studies Prof Agarwal has done include one based on expenditure data from some 6,000 individuals. After withdrawing money from their Central Provident Fund (CPF) accounts, he found that most chose to leave a sizeable portion of it in low-interest bearing savings accounts, instead of in their CPF accounts, which offer higher interest rates. Such behaviour could be due to members not being aware of the better rates offered by the CPF Board, he said.

Prof Agarwal is also studying why Singaporeans are making short trips on public transport instead of walking. Based on data provided by the Land Transport Authority, about 12 per cent of the bus trips here are short ones, such as single-stop rides.

“It sounds like it’s a waste of resources. Especially during peak times, we have a lot of people who want to take longer rides, but these short-ride people are just blocking the buses,” he said. “The question is how can we get people who take single-stop rides to walk?”

One agent of change he has observed is the effect of children on their parents. As part of the National Environment Agency’s Project Carbon Zero, an energy-saving contest for schools here, students were asked to track their electricity bills and convince their parents to reduce their electricity consumption. Prof Agarwal found that even after the campaign was over, the effects of lowered electricity consumption persisted.

A particularly effective tool is pricing mechanisms, which is more effective than non-monetary methods such as public education. The impact of non-financial methods of persuasion varies from person to person, making it expensive as different incentives have to be provided.

But small changes in pricing can result in bigger changes in the population “because everybody responds to money”, he said.


Smear campaign sparks calls for stricter ad rules

$
0
0
Singtel marketing fiasco a good wake-up call for industry: Experts
By Irene Tham, Technology Correspondent and Lim Yi Han, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

STARHUB and M1 have accepted a public apology by Singtel group chief executive Chua Sock Koong for a smear campaign that ran last year.

StarHub chief executive Tan Tong Hai said in a statement: "We note and accept Singtel group CEO's apology."

An M1 spokesman said: "We accept Singtel's apology and will not be taking further action."

The Infocomm Development Authority is still investigating whether Singtel breached the Telecom Competition Code, which is imposed on all telecommunications licensees.

Last Saturday, blogger Wendy Cheng, better known as Xiaxue, blew the whistle by posting on her website a leaked 2014 e-mail from social media agency Gushcloud that gave instructions to its bloggers on how to complain about StarHub and M1's network connections and services.

Gushcloud was employed by Singtel in June last year to manage its e-campaign to promote a youth mobile plan. The social media agency's bloggers could receive up to $4,000 in cash incentives, among other benefits, for successful sign-ups.

Ms Cheng also posted many samples of the online complaints from Gushcloud bloggers targeted at the rival telcos.

Singtel apologised for the marketing campaign on Tuesday.

The company explained that its marketing standards that forbid negative campaigns had not been followed, and that the incident was an "isolated" one.

On Thursday night, the telco posted a second apology, this time on Facebook. It was signed off by Ms Chua, who pledged that the company would reinforce its "high standards and values" internally and with its business partners.

Singtel also terminated Gushcloud's services and said the employee involved in the campaign was no longer with the company.

So far, at least two bloggers have apologised for posting negative comments in the Singtel marketing campaign, although they insisted their comments were not fabricated.

Experts said this incident provides a good wake-up call.

Dr Ang Peng Hwa, legal adviser at the Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore (Asas), said: "Consumers cannot be taken for granted. Fake comments or Facebook 'likes' cannot be passed off as genuine ones."

Asas is planning to roll out new guidelines for interactive advertising, such as those on social media or blog sites. These will specify that advertorials must be clearly marked as such, and discourage advertisers from buying fake Facebook "likes", said Dr Ang.

The Consumers Association of Singapore's executive director, Mr Seah Seng Choon, said advertisers should include these guidelines and the Singapore Code of Advertising Practice into their contracts with social media agencies.

"Companies must also supervise what social media agencies do," said Mr Seah.

Dr Adrian Yeow, a senior lecturer at SIM University, said unethical practices, including paid content not being disclosed, may have surfaced due to rising competition among social media agencies.

Dr Terence Heng, an assistant professor at the Singapore Institute of Technology, said: "The ethical values surrounding blogging or tweeting as a form of marketing are still relatively new as opposed to, say, television or print advertisements."

He is confident that a better understanding of values that underscore traditional journalism will "gather pace" after this scandal.

Mr Alvin Lim, 35, who runs a blog called Alvinology, said a lot of bloggers are very young and do not have the experience to turn down dubious requests from advertisers.

Gushcloud chief executive Vincent Ha yesterday also apologised to M1, StarHub and the public for the campaign.

He said: "We regret the recent incidents and how it has affected the industry, our influencers and our clients... We are disappointed in ourselves for the way it turned out.

"We have started a process of auditing our practices, processes and people, to ensure that we can be a good agency and partner to our present and future clients."

Ms Cheng said: "I'm kind of surprised that it has blown up to be so big. I never expected that. I think it's very gracious of Singtel to apologise."

She said it had come as a shock to her when there was talk of legal action being considered in connection with the episode.

"Personally, I don't really want to see the bloggers get sued," said Ms Cheng. "A lot of them are very young."





It all started with an anonymous e-mail
Blogger Xiaxue set out to expose smear campaign but did not expect storm that followed
By Lim Yi Han, The Sunday Times, 22 Mar 2015

The Gushcloud-Singtel scandal all began with an anonymous e-mail to Ms Wendy Cheng, the blogger better known as Xiaxue.

The e-mail, which she received on March 11, contained a link to a website which had posted leaked documents from social media agency Gushcloud.

The documents included a brief by the agency, asking its bloggers to smear rival telcos M1 and StarHub, as part of a Singtel digital campaign last June to promote a mobile plan for youth.

"I couldn't believe my eyes. I've never, ever seen a brief like that... asking to trash a competitor," said 30-year-old Ms Cheng in an interview with The Sunday Times.

She started doing research to confirm the allegations, going through Gushcloud bloggers' various platforms, including Twitter and Instagram. She found that the brief had been followed.

After getting three lawyers to look at her material, she put everything up on her blog on March 14. Little did she realise the storm it would cause.

The Infocomm Development Authority opened an investigation into whether Singtel had breached competition rules. StarHub said it was exploring its legal options.

Last Thursday, Singtel's group chief executive officer Chua Sock Koong apologised to M1 and StarHub. The telco also parted ways with an employee who had been involved in the campaign, and cut all ties with Gushcloud.

But the damage was done. Netizens came out to slam both Singtel and Gushcloud, which apologised as well, for the negative marketing campaign.

Social media experts described the incident as a wake-up call for the industry.

Ms Cheng, who studied media and communication at Singapore Polytechnic, said: "I'm kind of surprised that it has blown up to be so big. I never expected that."

Many also wondered if her post was simply a way to discredit Gushcloud, a rival to Nuffnang, the social media company she belongs to. In December, she also put up an "expose" alleging that Gushcloud inflated its bloggers' page views.

"There is criticism that I 'punish' people by blogging about them based on my own warped sense of morals... People think that I'm very arrogant," said Ms Cheng,

"But I don't do that, unless they personally challenge me or insult me until I really buay tahan (Hokkien for 'cannot endure it') already."

That was part of the reason for her first expose, she said. She was offended when Gushcloud co-founder Vincent Ha disputed one of her posts last March, she added.

Ms Cheng has in the past also named and shamed commenters who posted derogatory remarks about her and her friends on the Facebook page of sociopolitical blog Temasek Review.

Earlier this year, she took out a protection order against the satirical Facebook page SMRT Ltd (Feedback) for harassing her.

But she said her latest post had as much to do with the importance of holding the industry to certain standards.

She also realised that the possible fallout could hurt Nuffnang and the social media advertising industry in which she was an early pioneer, as clients and netizens may lose confidence in bloggers.

Said Ms Cheng, who started her full-time blogging career in 2005 and now earns as much as "five figures" a month: "But in the long term, it will probably improve the industry."



AHPETC: MND applies to court to appoint Independent Accountants to safeguard S&CC funds

$
0
0
MND seeks court's nod for independent accountants to be sent to AHPETC
Only then will it release $14m in grants to town council
By Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

THE Ministry of National Development (MND) has applied to the High Court to appoint independent accountants to oversee government grants given to the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) run by the Workers' Party (WP).

Only when the court gives the nod will it release about $14 million in grants to AHPETC, money it disburses to all town councils but which it has withheld from the opposition town council for a year now, owing to serious lapses in governance and compliance.

In addition, MND said it has a duty to make sure AHPETC has taken steps to recover any money that might have been wrongly paid out, and so has asked the court to empower the accountants to look at past AHPETC payments and take appropriate action to recover any losses suffered by AHPETC and its residents.



Analysts said this unprecedented move is likely to mean a full-blown financial investigation into whether AHPETC overpaid its managing agent, and whether any unlawful conduct was involved.

During a heated parliamentary debate last month over AHPETC's lapses, People's Action Party (PAP) ministers charged it was paying its managing agent $1.6 million more per year than what other town councils pay theirs.

AHPETC's managing agent, FM Solutions & Services (FMSS), is majority-owned by AHPETC's secretary Danny Loh and general manager How Weng Fan, a married couple. The longtime WP supporters were found to have approved payments from the town council to the company they own.

PAP ministers questioned the propriety of these arrangements.

The WP's MPs replied in Parliament that they were aware of the conflict of interest and isolated the staff, including the couple, from financial decisions.

The WP maintained there was no criminal wrongdoing or lost money, just errors of inexperience. WP chief Low Thia Khiang said FMSS was the only company that bid for AHPETC's business.

The WP did not respond to requests for comment on the court documents, which were served on AHPETC yesterday. A pre-trial conference is set for next Friday.

During the Parliament debate, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said the grants would be withheld until "AHPETC cleans up the mess".

MND's court application makes clear the Government is now willing to disburse the grants - $7 million each for FY2014 and FY2015 - as long as "there are adequate safeguards". These are that AHPETC keeps the grants in segregated accounts, and that payments above $20,000 from these accounts are co-signed by the independent accountants.

Replying to media queries, MND said last night that it has proposed major accounting firm PwC's partners Ong Chao Choon and Chan Kheng Tek as the independent accountants to the court. It added that it will pay the costs.

Observers said MND's move was likely motivated by frustration that the WP has not done what Mr Khaw suggested its leaders do last month: Conduct a forensic audit of its accounts to see if payments to FMSS were correct and lawful, and take action to recover any lost public money.

"AHPETC has not indicated that it is willing to take these actions," said MND yesterday.





Independent accountants 'will reassure residents'
MND move seen as necessary to safeguard public funds: Analysts
By Walter Sim And Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

A COURT application by the Ministry of National Development (MND) to appoint independent accountants to the only opposition- run town council here will help residents by ensuring that government grants given to the town council are properly used, analysts said yesterday.

But some called this a "patchwork" measure, saying that a larger overhaul of the town council structure is needed to avoid any future mismanagement of funds.

The ministry said yesterday that it has applied to the High Court to appoint accountants to safeguard government grants given to the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), which is run by the Workers' Party (WP).

The ministry also wants the accountants to have the power to look at past payments made by the town council and to take action to recover any losses that may have been suffered by the AHPETC and its residents.

This comes after accounting and governance lapses were found at the town council, following a special audit that was concluded earlier this year.

Of particular concern were some relatively high payments made by the AHPETC to its managing agent, which is majority- owned by the AHPETC's secretary and general manager, who are married to each other.

Corporate lawyer Robson Lee said that, with taxpayers' money involved, the MND "has a legitimate duty and interest to seek the assistance of the court" to make sure the AHPETC's payments are in order.

Associate Professor Eugene Tan, a Singapore Management University law don and former Nominated MP, said the MND's move may have been prompted by the "non-committal" attitude of the WP towards calls for it to conduct a forensic audit of the AHPETC's accounts.

National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan had called for such an audit in Parliament last month and said his ministry will withhold grants from the AHPETC until it sets its house in order.

The grants amount to about $7 million a year.

But the MND said yesterday that, if the court grants the application, it will disburse the funds to the AHPETC for financial years 2014 and 2015.

The town council will have to keep the money in separate accounts, and payments above $20,000 will have to be co-signed by the independent accountants.

Prof Tan said the MND's move removes the Government from a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" situation.

The Government is reluctant to disburse the grants as it fears misuse of the funds, but withholding the grants may lead to the perception that "the Government is penalising voters of AHPETC", he said.

Having accountants safeguard the grants "ensures the Government's interests are not compromised by WP's intransigence", he added.

"It's also probably not inaccurate to say that WP's ability to manage its forensic audit will be taken away" if the court application is granted.

If the AHPETC's books are found to be in order, residents will benefit from the reassurance, Prof Tan said.

National University of Singapore accounting don Mak Yuen Teen, who specialises in corporate governance, said it is not clear if the AHPETC has suffered any losses.

"Even if the rates charged by the managing agent in AHPETC are higher, they may argue that, since they have to set up this company specifically to service the town council because they cannot get others to do it, there are high start-up costs and no economies of scale," he said.

Mr Sidney Lim of business consulting and internal audit firm Protiviti said the measure is at best a stopgap one, because having to obtain the accountants' approval for each payment will not be cost-efficient in the long run.

"This may lead to a disruption of the town council's ability to get certain things done. The accountants will need to do their own due diligence and so payments may not be approved in a timely way."

Associate Professor Mak called the measures "patchwork", and urged a full review of the regulatory framework of town councils, given their "political nature".




Key aspects of ministry's application

The Ministry of National Development (MND) last night spelt out key aspects of its application to the High Court to appoint Independent Accountants (IAs) to Aljunied-Hougang- Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), in response to media queries.


What is the role of the IAs?

If the court grants the order, the IAs will be empowered to co-sign payments from the segregated accounts holding the service and conservancy charges (S&CC) grants and to look at past payments made by AHPETC and to take appropriate action to recover losses.


Must IAs complete a review of past payments before S&CC grants are disbursed?

Once the court grants the order, MND will be able to disburse S&CC grants to AHPETC. There is no need for the IAs to complete its review of past payments before MND can disburse the grants. The court application is to enable MND to disburse the grants with the proper safeguards to ensure they will be properly managed and spent, without the need to wait till AHPETC has fully rectified its lapses and weaknesses.


What are the thresholds for which payments from the accounts need to be co-signed by IAs?

Amounts in excess of $20,000.


Do past payments refer to all payments or just those made to the managing agent FMSS?

It is not restricted to payments made to FMSS.


Who might be appointed as independent accountants?

MND has proposed Mr Ong Chao Choon and Mr Chan Kheng Tek (partners of PwC), or any other that the court deems fit and proper.


Is this the first time that MND has made such a court application with regard to a town council?

Yes.


Who will pay for the appointment?

MND





Depoliticising AHPETC saga may be court move’s aim: Analysts
Independent accountants, court to ultimately protect residents’ interests, says observer
TODAY, 21 Mar 2015

Apart from acting to protect residents’ interests, the Government’s unprecedented move in seeking to appoint independent accountants to safeguard its grants for Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) could also be a way of depoliticising the saga, said political observers.

Going through the courts process to apply for independent accountants would help allay accusations that the spotlight on AHPETC is politically motivated, Singapore Management University law lecturer Eugene Tan said. “I don’t think anyone would have any basis to say that the courts are being used,” he said.

By doing this, the Ministry of National Development (MND) is “demonstrating their resolve” to assure residents that this was not a political battle. “Whether it is politically motivated or not, we can’t run away from the fact that there are real issues raised by the Auditor-General’s report,” he added.

National University of Singapore (NUS) Institute of Policy Studies sociologist Tan Ern Ser said independent accountants are expected to be professional and non-partisan, and therefore objective and unbiased, thus helping to snuff out rumblings that the episode is a political attack on the Workers’ Party.

However, Associate Professor Bilveer Singh, from NUS’ Department of Political Science, felt that despite such efforts, the political overtones will never be removed from the saga, as it involves “politicians, political parties and the public’s money”.

Associate Professor Eugene Tan also said the MND’s hands are “tied” due to the Auditor-General’s report on the AHPETC’s accounts, detailing governance lapses at the town council. “The MND has to follow up on the remedial action ... because if they do nothing, (the MND) would be accused of failing in their duties,” he said.

He added that the move would ultimately serve to safeguard residents’ interests. “They would get the government grants they are entitled to, and if there were any wrongful payments made, then those would be made good,” he said.

Any measure taken to enhance governance, accountability and transparency is a good thing, said Dr Tan Ern Ser, while Dr Singh said this would remind other town councils to be more careful and transparent in their operations.

Corporate governance expert Mak Yuen Teen said the MND should be “cautious” in giving independent accountants powers to approve expenditure beyond a certain amount. “If we are talking about them just making sure that the spending is broadly within the (confines of) the Town Councils Act (TCA) and the Town Council Financial Rules (TCFR), then fine.

“But you certainly cannot have the accountant making the decision on spending — because then, you cannot hold the town council accountable if they cannot decide on how to spend the money within the broad guidelines set out in the TCA and TCFR.

The independent accountants who are signing off cannot be the independent auditors — that would be a conflict of interest,” said the NUS Business School associate professor.

He added that all town councils should be subjected to more regular compliance and performance audits conducted by the Auditor-General’s Office.

“There are regulatory and oversight gaps when it comes to town councils and other institutions such as public universities, which are subject to less scrutiny than public companies, charities, and most statutory boards and government departments or ministries. Whenever you have regulatory and oversight gaps, things are likely be go wrong,” he said.





Having independent accountants at AHPETC will let residents continue enjoying government grants: DPM Teo
By Fiona Chan And Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

SINGAPORE - Appointing independent accountants to safeguard government grants at the Workers' Party-run town council will allow residents there to continue benefiting from such grants, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said on Saturday.

His comments come a day after the Ministry of National Development (MND) asked the High Court to appoint independent accountants to oversee government grants at the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), where accounting and governance lapses were found after a special audit that ended earlier this year.

"There are a lot of unanswered questions and the MND does want to make sure that the residents continue to enjoy the benefits of the grants that MND is giving to every town council," said Mr Teo, who is also Home Affairs Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security.

"And I think this is one way in which MND can continue to give grants but in a way which safeguards public funds," he told reporters on the sidelines of a recruitment drive organised for heartland merchants at Rivervale Mall in Sengkang.

"I think it's a fair way of doing so, and I hope the town council accepts it."

AHPETC, the only opposition-run town council in Singapore, came under the spotlight in February after an audit by the Auditor-General's Office found problems in accounting, governance and compliance.

During a debate in Parliament on these lapses, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan had said his ministry would withhold grants until "AHPETC cleans up the mess". The grants amount to $7 million each for FY2014 and FY2015.

On Friday, however, the MND said it would release these funds to the town council provided the Court agreed to appoint independent accountants to safeguard the use of the grants.

If the Court application is allowed, AHPETC must keep the government grants in segregated accounts, and any payments above $20,000 from these accounts must be co-signed by the independent accountants.



Related




Jamaica went for sprints, S'pore goes the distance

$
0
0
A journalist from the Caribbean island looks at the two former colonies' differing fortunes in search of lessons for his country
By Garfield Higgins, Published The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

TWO weeks ago, the head of Jamaica's Planning Institute, Mr Colin Bullock, announced that the economy was in recession following two consecutive quarters of decline in GDP. Since then, a puerile tug-of-war as to what constitutes a recession has started among Finance Minister Peter Phillips, a few pundits, spin doctors and operatives of an administration that has not demonstrated the ability to grow the economy after being in power for 21 of the last 25 years.

Ordinary Jamaicans do not question whether the economy is in recession. Thousands are feeling the pangs of hardship, inability to take care of daily obligations, such as buying food, and paying rent, mortgage and bus fare. We know that the country is in recession because we live and feel it every day.

Jamaica has truly squandered a glorious opportunity called independence. Often, where there was no great struggle, there is no great pride. Independence was given to us by Britain.

A day before I began to write this piece, I heard an interesting news feature on the BBC: Singapore is celebrating 50 years of independence.

Let's contrast Jamaica and Singapore. In the 1960s, Jamaica started off the running blocks as fast as lightning, like sprinter son Usain Bolt. Today, we are limping like a "tyad" and fatigued marathon runner, reduced to haggling over whether our economy is in recession and the benefits of 0.5, 0.8, 1.6 per cent possible growth in the future. In the tiresome polemic about anaemic growth, I could not help but hear the recurrent argument, albeit implied: Jamaica cannot do any better at this time. Such dwarfed confidence in our abilities reminds me of anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's words: "The great are only great because we are on our knees. Let us rise!"

Home-made problems

OUR economy is now the sick man of the Caribbean. "In real terms, Jamaicans are no richer today than they were in the early 1970s. And most of the island's enduring problems, like its public finances, are home-made". (The Economist, July 2012.)

There are many important lessons to be learnt from the rise of the most powerful of the Asian Tigers and the rapid diminution of Jamaica, once the most beautiful Pearl in the Caribbean - devalued to an ordinary bead. Indeed, while former Jamaica prime minister Michael Manley was gallivanting with Dr Fidel Castro, Mr Lee Kuan Yew was busy building a nation that would achieve developed-country status in less than 45 years.

How did Singapore rise from rags to riches? "In 1959, Britain took the first steps towards granting independence by allowing Singapore to govern itself. The charismatic Lee Kuan Yew of the People's Action Party won a landslide victory in the first fully elected Parliament. In August 1963, Singapore joined the Federation of Malaysia. It was made up of four countries and territories - Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore," according to the BBC.

The members of the federation disagreed on fundamental issues, like who should control the finances of Singapore. Racial tensions led to riots between Singaporean Chinese and Malay groups that peaked in 1964. In 1965, Singapore was forced to leave the Malaysian Federation.

"We had a huge task when we first started in 1960. At that time, our population size was 1.6 million; out of that, 1.3 million lived in squatters, not to count thousands of others living in slum areas and old buildings," says Mr Liu Thai Ker, who was known as Singapore's "master planner" in the 1970s and 80s. The new Housing and Development Board (modelled somewhat on our National Housing Trust) was developed. The high-rise buildings introduced many Singaporeans to the miracles of flushing toilets and clean water at the turn of a tap.

"But the housing policy was not just about bricks and mortar, it was also about nation-building. Each HDB block of flats would have a quota system that encouraged a mix of different races... The whole idea was to have the Chinese not thinking that they were Chinese, or the Malays thinking they were Malay, or Indians thinking they were Indian." The objective was to have everyone thinking and behaving like Singaporeans.

"Nation-building also took the form of a campaign to instill more courtesy, prevent spitting in public or stop 'killer litter'. These campaigns dominated the airwaves, schools and billboards of the nation," reported Sharanjit Leyl of BBC Singapore earlier this year.

While Singapore was struggling to build its economy in the 1960s, Jamaica was sprinting. We had one of the fastest-growing economies in Latin America and the Caribbean (6 per cent growth per annum on average). Scores of international companies flocked to Jamaica's shores. Factories were opened in quick succession. Local small and medium-sized businesses sprang up in appreciable numbers. Former prime minister Bruce Golding recounted that when he graduated from the University of the West Indies at Mona, companies literally were lined up to employ fresh graduates and competed to offer many incentives to attract the best and brightest of them.

The Jamaican economy in the 60s was like a "stepping razor", to borrow a phrase from reggae singer Peter Tosh. Lee Kuan Yew, who led Singapore (a country slightly larger than St James in terms of area, but now with a population in excess of four million) for 31 years and is credited with turning a "resource-poor, malarial island into a modern financial centre" with one of the highest per capita incomes in the world, was initially in awe at the stories of the then miracle called Jamaica and followed its development keenly. Alas, when he visited Jamaica for the Commonwealth Conference, a different reality hit him.

Lee Kuan Yew in Jamaica

"AT KINGSTON, Jamaica, in April 1975, Prime Minister Michael Manley, a light-skinned West Indian, presided with panache and spoke with great eloquence. But I found his views quixotic. He advocated a 'redistribution of the world's wealth'. His country was a well-endowed island of 2,000 sq miles, with several mountains in the centre, where coffee and other sub-tropical crops are grown. They had beautiful holiday resorts built by Americans as winter homes... One Sunday afternoon, when Choo (Mrs Lee) and I walked out of the barbed-wired enclosure around the hotels used for the conference to see the city on foot, a passing car came to a halt with the driver shouting, 'Mr Lee, Mr Lee, wait for me!'

"A Chinese Jamaican, speaking Caribbean English, came up. 'You mustn't forget us. We are having a very difficult time.' He gave me his card. He was a real estate agent. Many professionals and business people had left for America and Canada and had given him their homes and offices to sell. He had seen me on Jamaican television and was anxious to speak to me. Chinese, Indians and even black Jamaican professionals felt there was no future under the left-wing socialist government of Michael Manley. The policies of the government were ruinous... Thereafter, I read the news of Jamaica with greater understanding." That was what Mr Lee wrote about Jamaica in his book, From Third World To First.

Yes, there were serious social disparities throughout Jamaica, as was the case in Singapore in the 1960s. In Singapore, the social inequalities were tackled through improvements in the economy, development of human resources and national infrastructural reconfigurations. In Jamaica, we adopted a crazy approach grounded in envy and "bad-mindednesses", predicated upon a redistribution of income patterned on the buffoonery of Fabian Socialist principles. The disastrous effect of Mr Manley's rendezvous with democratic socialism is the capital reason for the failure of Jamaica to be where Singapore is today. What is democratic socialism? This expression best encapsulates both communism and socialism: A cow of many, well milked and badly fed. This single-handedly destroyed our economic trajectory and development momentum and planted seeds of long-lasting discord among Jamaicans.

Mr Edward Seaga rescued the fortunes of a fledgling economy in the 1980s and brought back real growth. The process of economic downturn was continued by Mr P. J. Patterson and Mr Omar Davies in the 1990s. Singapore, on the other hand, capitalised on its natural advantages and united its people.

Talent played a big part

SINGAPORE'S port is still among the world's top three today. In the 1960s, it really tapped on its location, along the Strait of Malacca, where most US and Europe trading ships had to stop to refuel to get to Asia. Singapore was the Suez Canal of Asia, without all the politics of the former.

"Talent played a big part too. Lee Kuan Yew aka LKY (despot, some might say) was an earlier version of Steve Jobs, with a keen eye for intellectual excellence and zero patience for mediocrity.

"A fresh lawyer out of Cambridge, LKY had this amazing Dutch adviser to lean on for experience." (Bjorn Lee, Singaporean journalist, Oct 11, 2012.)

"When Dutch economist Albert Winsemius arrived in Singapore in 1960, tasked by the United Nations with salvaging the struggling island economy, he gloomily remarked upon 'this poor little market in a dark corner of Asia'. Over five decades later, Singapore's market is neither poor nor little. The country sports the world's seventh-largest GDP per capita and more than one in six households has US$1 million in cash savings. In the past decade alone, the number of Singaporeans running their own business has doubled, giving the city-state the world's second-most entrepreneurs per capita, behind only the US." (Forbes Magazine, July 10, 2014.)

"Plugging into global trade as a high-income country requires high-level skills and that's what the Government has achieved by upgrading the skills of the workforce through investing in expanding higher education and training. Singapore has some of the top secondary schools in the world, and the Government has recently targeted teaching design to imbue every profession, such as engineering, with some element of creativity. It helps to increase the skill base.

"Manufacturing accounts for more than one-fifth of the economy, which is a larger share than in Britain. But, how does a rich country remain integral to a cost-competitive global production chain? The answer is by producing at the high end: Half of its exports are high-tech goods. Singapore started at the low end of manufacturing but managed to upgrade its skills so that it didn't fall out of the regional production chain as its incomes rose." (Linda Yueh, BBC's chief business correspondent, Oct 21, 2013.)

A former colonial outpost now has the third-highest average income in the world. A country where the official languages are English, Tamil, Malay and Chinese is rather useful for global business. It is not accidental.

Today, Singapore has an average per capita income of US$50,000 (S$69,500) - Jamaica's is under US$6,000 - compulsory voting, a highly educated citizenry and its people enjoy First World living standards.

Of course, not all is perfect in Singapore. Press freedom is scarce and many governmental systems are semi-autocratic, some might even say repressive. There are concerns over congestion in public transport and housing.

I anticipate that some will say, "Well, you could not write this article in Singapore." My response to that is simple: I would have no need to, since Singapore does not have an incompetent administration such as ours, with chronic underdevelopment.

Jamaica could have been the Singapore of the Caribbean. With visionary leadership, we can still achieve that. But as Einstein said, "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them."

I would add "with the same people".

This article was first published in the Jamaica Observer.


Thousands send good wishes to Lee Kuan Yew

$
0
0
As former PM's health worsens further, people gather at SGH, Tanjong Pagar
By Fiona Chan, Deputy Political Editor, The Sunday Times, 22 Mar 2015

Thousands of Singaporeans took time out from their weekend plans yesterday to drop off cards and gifts for ailing former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, as word came that his health had weakened further.

A one-line statement from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) yesterday afternoon said Mr Lee's condition had deteriorated again. An announcement last Tuesday said he had taken a turn for the worse and daily updates since Wednesday said he remained critically ill.

About 1,000 people were at the art gallery of the Tanjong Pagar Community Club (CC) to leave cards and gifts and write messages on a giant banner that said: "Get well soon, Mr Lee Kuan Yew."

Mr Lee, 91, is an MP for Tanjong Pagar GRC, having represented the area since he won the 1955 legislative assembly election.



His son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, arrived at the CC in the afternoon with his wife, Ms Ho Ching, to thank those present and add their signatures to the hundreds covering the banner. It was PM Lee's first visit to the CC since he accompanied his father there as a child.

He took photos of the cards, soft toys and flowers people had left. He also penned a short message on the banner: "Dear Papa, Hope you get better!"

Well-wishers lined up to take photos with him and to say that they were concerned for his father.

Senior Minister of State for Law and Education Indranee Rajah, an MP for Tanjong Pagar GRC, also signed the banner yesterday. She said Singaporeans are worried about the health of the elder Mr Lee as they feel a bond with him "that goes beyond policies". Older citizens see him as a pioneer and comrade-in-arms, while younger ones grew up reading about him in the news every day. "He gave this nation pride," she said.

Travel agent James Wong, 55, and his wife wrote good wishes for Mr Lee on the banner before heading to the Singapore General Hospital (SGH), where another area has been set up for people to leave flowers and messages. "We want to wish Mr Lee well as much as we can - going to both places is like double insurance," said Mr Wong, who lives in the Pinnacle@Duxton development in Mr Lee's ward of Tanjong Pagar-Tiong Bahru.



At SGH, where Mr Lee has been warded with severe pneumonia since Feb 5, hundreds of visitors added to a growing array of bouquets, balloons, handmade cards, children's drawings and boxes of paper cranes at a designated area outside Block 7. The hospital erected tentage with lights over the outdoor area just before it started to rain in the evening, giving the space a warm glow.

A few visitors were teary-eyed, such as sales manager Cindy Ang, 34, who brought her sons Lennon, seven, and Lewis, four, to tell them about Mr Lee's life and work. "It's the last thing we can do for him, to come here, to pray for him," she said.

Another four-year-old, Lim Kai Jun, skipped his English tuition class to visit SGH with his family and leave a daisy for Mr Lee. His father, Mr Adrian Lim, said: "I want my son to understand that we have to be grateful for what Mr Lee, our founding father, has done."

Grassroots leaders in Tanjong Pagar GRC and neighbouring Radin Mas ward told The Sunday Times they are making preparations for various activities. Said Mr Tan Bok Seng, a Radin Mas grassroots leader: "I go regularly to the temple and I pray for Mr Lee's recovery."

Ministers also said Mr Lee was in their thoughts. "We wish him well. We are all rooting for him," said Trade and Industry Minister Lim Hng Kiang at the Chingay Heartlands celebration in West Coast GRC, where he is an MP.

At another event at Rivervale Mall, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean told reporters he had met PM Lee on Friday. "He really appreciates the outpouring of good wishes for Mr Lee and also for himself and his family. He thanks everyone for the good wishes," he said.

Additional reporting by Tham Yuen-C, Walter Sim, Rachel Au-Yong and Charissa Yong




Clean rivers, thanks to Mr Lee
Ailing former PM lauded for his foresight at World Water Day events
By Melissa Lin and Pearl Lee, THe Sunday Times, 22 Mar 2015

Former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew's vision and role in cleaning up Singapore's rivers and starting the push towards water self-sufficiency decades ago were highlighted as World Water Day was celebrated here yesterday.

At the Singapore Sports Hub, where activities ranged from kayaking to Zumba, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said the country's clean rivers were a result of Mr Lee's determination and vision.

Referring to the Kallang River next to the Sports Hub, Mr Teo said: "Right here on this river in the 60s and 70s, where the water was black, oily and dirty, he had the vision to think of this place as a beautiful bay that we could clean up and enjoy."

Mr Lee is seriously ill at the Singapore General Hospital and yesterday, thousands of people went there and to the Tanjong Pagar Community Club to leave flowers and good wishes for him.

At the Sports Hub, Mr Teo said: "Let us all wish Mr Lee strength for his recovery."

At Jurong Lake, where people took part in a 2km walk and qigong, Ms Grace Fu, Second Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, said: "We owe it to Mr Lee that we can proudly say today that through 30 to 40 years of research and development, as well as hard work, we have almost reached water self-sufficiency."

She urged Singaporeans to continue to keep all the country's water sources clean, conserve water and treat it as a special resource.

"If we are able to carry on this good work, Singapore would have a bright future from where Mr Lee has left us," she added.

Ms Fu also announced that from October the minimum water-efficiency standards for washing machines will be raised from one tick to two ticks. Compared with one-tick models, two-tick washing machines can save more than 20 litres of water per wash on average.

Mr Teo urged visitors at the Sports Hub to practise simple water-saving habits, such as washing clothes on a full load at home.

In Singapore, each person consumes 150.4 litres of water per day on average. "We aim to lower this, slightly, to 147 litres per day by 2020," he said.

He pointed out how Singapore experienced a significant dry spell last year, with February 2014 being the driest month in almost 150 years. There was a repeat of dry weather earlier this year, although it was less severe.

Water demand is also expected to almost double by 2060 from the current 400 million gallons a day (mgd).

Singapore is investing in infrastructure ahead of demand, he said.

A second Newater plant at Changi, when completed next year, will see Newater capacity increase by another 50mgd.

A third desalination plant in Tuas, scheduled to be completed in 2017, will add another 30mgd to Singapore's water supply.




Aspiring artist writes Mr Lee Kuan Yew's name 18,000 times to create this amazing portrait
By Lee Min Kok, The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

From a distance, Ong Yi Teck's A2-sized portrait of former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew appears to be a nicely drawn work of art.

But look closer, and the amount of effort - and creativity - that went into this aspiring artist's labour of love will astound you.

Armed with only drawing pens and his own imagination, the 20-year-old, who is waiting to enrol in Nanyang Technological University's School of Art, Design & Media, spent 15 painstaking hours writing Mr Lee's name roughly 18,000 times.

The result is a portrait of Singapore's founding father, who was admitted to Singapore General Hospital on Feb 5 for severe pneumonia.


The portrait, along with videos detailing the drawing process, was uploaded on his Instagram account over the past two days. It has since gone viral.

In one Instagram post, he wrote that he was reminded of two things while drawing it - success requires dedication and perseverance, and mistakes are inevitable.

"Whatever wrong decisions Mr Lee has made in the past (if any) does not change the fact that he dedicated his life into building this small nation since independence and brought us to where we are now. We should be appreciative of that, certainly."

Mr Ong told The Straits Times in an e-mail interview that he had been caught off-guard by how quickly his portrait was spread on social media. It was shared by, among others, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's wife Ho Ching on Facebook.

"I decided to do a drawing of Mr Lee on bigger canvas as a symbol to a great leader," said Mr Ong. "To make it more challenging, I wanted to try name-writing as a way to shade his facial features." 

He revealed that the portrait is not for sale, despite strong interest from several buyers.

"I would prefer the focus to be on Mr Lee at this point of time," he added. "He is still in critical condition and we should all pray for his recovery."


Singapore’s founding father Lee Kuan Yew dies aged 91

'Moral values among religions are similar'

$
0
0
The Inter-Religious Organisation (IRO) turned 66 on Wednesday. In 2012, it moved into its first permanent HQ in Palmer Road, nestled between a Chinese temple and a mosque. IRO president Gurmit Singh, a Sikh, tells Lim Yan Liang about the group's role in promoting religious harmony.
The Straits Times, 21 Mar 2015

Why is there a need for greater awareness about IRO? Extremism today seems not just an abstract concept, but is here in our own backyard, with organisations like the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria aiming their crosshairs at South-east Asia?

To defeat extremism, we need to educate people. This means bringing about awareness of the fundamental beliefs of each religion. We do this through lectures, inter-faith dialogues and exhibitions.

These outreach programmes aim to educate Singaporeans of different faiths on the teachings of different religions.

If you attend some of our sharing sessions, you will realise that the moral values found in the 10 religions are extremely similar.


One way some extremist organisations have amplified their voice is through the Internet. How has IRO entered this space to create its own voice?

When you go online, you get a lot of nonsense. People put up all kinds of stuff. 

It's up to the individual to want to find out more about each religion. Which means, if people know about the existence of IRO, they can come here and verify things, instead of taking what they read on the Internet lock, stock and barrel.


So not so much by using the online space but trying to connect people with experts?

Yes, because words online can be interpreted in different ways. But when you speak, and let's say you have a different perspective, I can immediately explain things to you. Whereas with words, any individual can interpret it in 101 ways.


Can you share an example of interfaith collaboration with the help of IRO?

In collaboration with Singapore Buddhist Lodge (SBL), IRO organised a large-scale Ramadan charity project.

In 2013 and 2014, it was done for the benefit of the Muslim community and involved a donation of $69,000 and 20 tonnes of rice by SBL and it was for all 69 mosques in Singapore.

This was proposed by one of the IRO council members who's also the chairman of SBL: Mr Lee Bock Guan. So he worked with the Muslim council members, and working hand-in-hand with the rest of the IRO council there was rice distribution, and it was spearheaded by one of our Muslim council members, Imam Syed Hassan Alatas, head of the Ba'alwi mosque.





Interview with Gurmit Singh -RazorTV


How did you first get involved in IRO?

I was introduced to IRO by my father, Dr Mehervan Singh, one of the founder members of IRO.

Members would take turns volunteering their homes and places of worship and the meetings would be held there.

Once, the former Catholic Archbishop Michael Olcomendy arrived early at my home for one of these meetings, and my father tasked me to look after him as a guest.

Being young and impressionable, I asked the Archbishop what he thought about a chain of natural disasters that was happening to the region: If God is fair, why is he punishing people and taking innocent lives?

He told me, God is trying to tell us that you guys are not supposed to kill each other: Only I give life, and I take away life. So now I'm going to take away some of your lives.

It was such a simple, layman's way of putting it across. I found it fantastic, just having a different way of looking at things.

So I had the good fortune of being exposed to this multifaith environment from a young age.


What did you hope to achieve when you first joined IRO?

I became a member when I was 19 years old, which was when I first started teaching in school. I decided that I was going to be very open-minded, that I would learn to accept people's different perspectives on religion.

If it was about my own religion, I would explain to them what I knew.

It's important because how many places are like Singapore, where we live so close together? So we need understanding and racial harmony.


Were there any occasions that showed you why we need religious harmony in Singapore?

The 1964 racial riots. I was in Secondary 2 then, and my father, being in IRO, had the permit to go out during the curfew to mediate between the groups.

I would hear about people getting killed and so I would pray for his safety. By God's grace, he got home every evening.

But that really made an impact on me: that we need to have some form of harmony or Singapore would suffer.


IRO members represent 10 different faiths. Is there the occasional disagreement when you have religious discussions? What are some ground rules?

First, whoever comes to these sessions must come with an open mind.

There can be disagreements, but then the person who is running the dialogue will mediate.

Let's say religion X's representative is conducting the dialogue session. When an alternative view is brought up, the representative will say, "Okay, that's how you feel. According to my religion, this is what we interpret it as."

There have been times when people misunderstood. But as humans, we have a choice in how we voice it out.

I can bang the table and say you are wrong, but who am I to say that? I am not practising that religion. So if I'm willing to listen, if I want to make myself more aware, I can find a place where the two perspectives meet and get rid of the misunderstanding in my mind.

At least you go away with greater awareness, and not just with your own interpretation.


We see IRO at national ceremonies, and the consecration of memorials, including the recent marker to remember Konfrontasi victims. But the average Singaporean doesn't seem to know much about its work.

There was a time when IRO used to work unobtrusively. Now, there is a greater need to make people aware of the need for peace and religious harmony.

Last year, we distributed our inaugural interfaith journal, which is a diary of events we have planned for the year. We're doing it again this year.

IRO also organised 12 lectures last year, when in the past it was two to three a year. We intend to keep up this momentum.

We're also planning an exhibition looking back on IRO's activities since 1949. It will be a year-long affair - a mobile, travelling exhibition.


Is there a fear that IRO, which is older than Singapore itself, is losing its relevance?

I don't think there was ever a fear that we are losing relevance. We've not had anyone coming in to say that they don't agree with what IRO does.

But now we need to nurture the next generation of IRO leaders, and we've been encouraging the 10 religious members in the council to encourage their flocks to participate.

It's like disseminating information: The 10 send it back to their fold, which then send it down to their followers.


But with the growing population, is there a sense that there's not only less physical space but also less religious space?

This is why it's critical for the next generation of religious leaders to continue to have close bonds with each other, so that this interfaith spirit - patience, goodwill, fellowship - can be kept alive, so that long-term religious harmony can be attained in our country. It's for the younger generation to do so.

We're working on it now: We have young persons coming in, we have introduced younger members into IRO.

It's about always bringing in the next generation. Only then can we sustain our peace and harmony.


In 2006, the idea was mooted that Singapore could become an interfaith hub, where different religious groups can iron out their differences and reach common ground. But momentum seems to have tapered off. Is it still possible?

It might have tapered off, but we cannot stop just because there is no rah-rah about it.

When I went for a holiday to the Maldives some years back, somebody thought I was from India - maybe because of the turban and beard.

I said "I'm actually from Singapore", and he said he knew about IRO - and I never mentioned to him that I'm in IRO.

He had heard that we are able to get along so well, and asked me: "How do you all do it?"

My answer to him was that we work at it.

No doubt, there's a lull in things, but you still work at it.

For example, IRO has had sharing sessions where schools invite us and we put together a panel of religious people from the different faiths, and they do sharing with the students.

We've come a long way from just tolerance to acceptance, but there is no end point.


Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>