Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live

NUS to offer free online courses to public

$
0
0
By Amelia Teng, The Straits Times, 22 Feb 2013

THE National University of Singapore (NUS) is joining other schools worldwide to offer free online courses to the public, with the first two to be rolled out in January next year.

It is partnering United States-based online education company Coursera to do this, and the plan is to offer two to three new courses each year on the firm's website.

The first two courses - Unpredictable? Randomness, Chance And Free Will and Write Like Mozart: An Introduction To Classical Music Composition - will run for eight and six weeks respectively.

Each weekly session - consisting of video presentations, guided exercises and peer-to-peer assessment - will last from 11/2 to three hours.

The courses will be taught by Professor Valerio Scarani from the Centre for Quantum Technologies and Associate Professor Peter Ivan Edwards from the Yong Siew Toh Conservatory of Music.

Prof Edwards has incorporated online instruction in his modules for more than five years.

"There are people out there who are intelligent and want to learn things. It's not too much work for me to reformat my lessons and put them online," said the 40-year-old.

Prof Scarani, who is also 40, said: "I think these courses are not about grades or certification; it's about putting NUS out there globally and telling people about its quality education."

NUS is among 29 universities from 13 countries which have inked new agreements to offer courses using Coursera's platform, bringing the company's total number of university partnerships to 62. Other schools include Rutgers University, the University of Tokyo and Leiden University.

Coursera is one of the major providers of free online learning, alongside others such as edX and Udemy.


The trend took off in the US last year, though some people have questioned the value and effectiveness of online lessons, noting that there is no face-to-face interaction between students and lecturers.

But NUS provost Tan Eng Chye said technology-enhanced learning is here to stay.

"Online learning is not perfect. But it doesn't mean that we don't do anything until the perfect system comes along," he said. "We see this as an opportunity to extend our education. We like the idea that our audience is the world."

NUS is also planning to offer existing modules that are popular among its students online, using Coursera's platform. Pilot programmes will start in August.

Nanyang Technological University and Singapore Management University are also exploring the possibility of offering free online courses in the future.



Stanford Don's Singapore Connection

By Amelia Teng, The Straits Times, 22 Feb 2013

COURSERA, an online education company launched by Stanford University computer professors Andrew Ng (right) and Daphne Koller in April last year, has a Singapore connection.

Professor Ng, 36, who is British, lived here from the time he was in Primary 2 till the end of his junior college education. He enrolled in Anglo-Chinese School (Primary), Raffles Institution and Raffles Junior College.

He has since moved to the United States. The holder of a PhD in computer science from the University of California, Berkeley, is now an associate professor of computer science at Stanford.

"Growing up in Singapore had a huge influence on how I think about education. It was really Singapore's education system that showed me what impact a great teacher can have," he said in an e-mail interview.

He added that, since 2007, he has been working on free online education at Stanford.

After the successful launch of the first three courses, each of which drew an enrolment of more than 100,000 students, he decided to partner Prof Koller to start Coursera. It has registered more than 2.7 million students.

Currently, 15,555 of the students are from Singapore.

Several Singaporeans also work in the firm, including third-year Stanford undergraduate Frank Chen, 24, who is a part-time software engineer.



Singapore's leap into the space industry

$
0
0
New office to research, develop sector, grow talent pool and related business
By Grace Chua, The Straits Times, 22 Feb 2013

SINGAPORE announced a new push into another potentially lucrative economic sector yesterday - this time setting its sights as far as outer space.

The Government will set up a new office to research and develop the futuristic space industry, particularly the manufacture and launch of satellites.

Called the Office for Space Technology and Industry (OSTIn), it will also work with universities to develop the talent pool for the industry, help satellite companies grow their business here and collaborate with other countries' space agencies.

Two Singapore companies also announced ambitious new plans for Singapore's fledgling space programme.

ST Electronics, an arm of mainboard listed ST Engineering, said it has started the design and development of the first made- in-Singapore commercial satellite.

Images from the satellite, to be launched in 2015, could be used for disaster and environmental monitoring, agriculture, resource exploration and maritime observation and security.

Meanwhile, local technology firm IN.Genius outlined plans to send the first Singaporean into space on National Day 2015.

The formation of the space office, which will come under the control of the Economic Development Board, was announced by Second Minister for Trade and Industry S. Iswaran at the annual Global Space Technology Convention at the Sheraton Towers hotel.

"Singapore (has) good reasons to be excited by the promising potential the space industry has for our economy," he said.

Space could ignite interest in science and engineering among the young and provide knowledge-intensive jobs that the country wants, said Mr Iswaran.

And the industry's growth will spill over to other economic sectors here, such as transport and precision engineering, he added.

The global space economy was worth US$290 billion in 2011. Its growth has been driven by the satellite industry, which has been expanding at 11 per cent annually.

Satellites are increasingly in demand, especially in affluent Asia, because of the rapid growth of services such as imaging and communications for cellphones.

"It's a logical extension from a number of industries already existing in Singapore," said Barclays Capital economist Leong Wai Ho.

Mr Gian Yi-Hsen, the director of OSTIn, said Singapore's nascent satellite industry will build on Singapore's existing capabilities in electronics, precision engineering and the aerospace sector.

For a start, it will focus on manufacturing small satellites weighing less than a tonne that have commercial applications, plus other activities that include receiving, processing and analysing satellite data.

Singapore's universities currently train about 80 students a year in satellite-related work.

Nanyang Technological University, which has already launched one 100kg research satellite, said yesterday that it will send up a second in 2016. This will also scan equatorial regions and send data about temperature, humidity and pressure back to researchers.

Meanwhile, the National University of Singapore plans to develop a 50kg microsatellite - its first - which will carry low-cost, lightweight hyperspectral imaging technology developed by its electrical and computer engineering department.



Wanted: S'porean to fly 20km above Earth
By Feng Zengkun, The Straits Times, 22 Feb 2013

APPLICATIONS to become Singapore's first citizen to pilot a vessel into space are now being accepted.

The Science Centre Board, the Singapore Space and Technology Association (SSTA) and local technology firm IN.Genius signed a deal yesterday to launch a Singaporean from a pad on the island on National Day, Aug 9, 2015.

The adventurer - who must be Singapore-born and hold a pilot's licence - will fly more than 20km above Earth into its stratosphere, which is the second layer of the atmosphere. Outer space is usually considered more than 100km above sea level.

Most commercial planes cruise at about 10km to 12km above Earth, about half the height of the planned flight.

The partners declined to give more details about the space vessel and training, which they said will be revealed later.

Mr Martin Robillard, 41, general manager of the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS) subsidiary Astrium's Singapore branch, said that training astronauts usually takes years.

"Given the deadline and targeted height, it could be several options such as a fighter jet or the technology used in the recent Red Bull challenge," he said.

In that challenge, which took place last October, Austrian skydiver Felix Baumgartner flew 39km above Earth in a helium balloon before free-falling in a pressure suit.

IN.Genius director Lim Seng was previously head of the Ministry of Defence's Defence Technology Office in Europe. He was also executive adviser to the chief technical officer of the global EADS.

He set up IN.Genius in 2009 and left the EADS last April. Mr Lim said his company is in talks with government agencies to help plan the flight.

"We are pioneering to open up a whole new space business sector and the minds of our youth," he said.

A Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) spokesman said: "IN.Genius has approached the CAAS on this matter and discussions are at an exploratory stage."

Science Centre Singapore chief executive Lim Tit Meng said the three partners will put together a proposal with budgets for the space flight and a space science education programme.

This will be submitted along with the Science Centre Board's input to the Ministry of Education (MOE), which oversees the centre.

Once the MOE has given its approval, the three partners will look for sponsors and investors, said Science Centre's Associate Professor Lim.

All three partners said it is too early to estimate the space flight's cost.

SSTA president Jonathan Hung hopes the mission will attract students to space science and create new high-tech jobs.

Astrium's Mr Robillard added that the project is likely to reflect well on Singapore. "It's a good first step towards entering space," he said.

Suitable applicants must send their curriculum vitae by May 30 to INGenius.GoSpace@gmail.com



Existing businesses could benefit from space venture
By Grace Chua, The Straits Times, 22 Feb 2013

SINGAPORE'S venture into space is not a long shot, but a move existing businesses can take advantage of, said firms and economists about news that the Republic aims to enter the satellite industry.

Yesterday, Second Minister for Trade and Industry S. Iswaran announced the setting up of an Economic Development Board programme office to oversee the push, while Singapore-listed firm ST Electronics announced plans to build a small, commercial remote-sensing satellite.

Mr Iswaran said the industry's growth would spill over to local businesses. For instance, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) like Loop Electronics and Wizlogix have already tapped their radio frequency and printed circuit board design expertise to build satellite components for other companies.

Mr Lim Guan Choon, managing director of radio frequency technology firm Loop Electronics, said the growth of the industry could benefit his firm and other SMEs in terms of "more business opportunities and contacts, especially from overseas satellite service providers and companies, and more collaborations with local institutions like A*Star, National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in space-grade components and subsystems development".

But space SMEs might need government help to build up their facilities and capabilities, he said, as the heavy upfront investment required is a barrier to entry.

While Singapore universities do not have dedicated satellite-engineering degrees, NTU and NUS have satellite-engineering programmes that train about 80 students a year between them.

In NTU's undergraduate satellite programme, students "have the chance to build satellites that are slated for actual launch", said NTU president Bertil Andersson.

Barclays Capital economist Leong Wai Ho cautioned: "We've got to quantify at the end of the day whether it will add value and can replace some of the (sunset) industries."

If satellite components and manpower are imported and the satellites merely assembled here, he said, little value is added to the economy.

Still, Singapore could help fill the Asean demand for satellite services, as the regional market is still relatively undeveloped, he said.

New coins to feature local icons

$
0
0
By Magdalen Ng, The Straits Times, 22 Feb 2013

A NEW series of coins depicting Singapore landmarks is due out in the middle of the year.

The new coins, designed by Singaporean designer Fabian Lim, will look and feel quite different from existing ones.

Their appearance will be essentially Singaporean, featuring the Merlion, Port of Singapore, Changi Airport, public housing and the Esplanade.


They will be made of multiply plated steel, a steel core with other alloys plated on it. This material is lighter and cheaper to produce than that used for existing coins, bringing savings of 35 per cent to 40 per cent, compared to the cost of production last year.

Mr Lim is a designer with home-grown agency Royal Fly, and has previously designed commemorative coins for the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

The new series will be sized progressively by denomination, so the five-cent coin will be the smallest and the $1 coin the biggest. The $1 coin will retain its octagonal shape but will become bigger than the 50-cent coin. It will also be bimetallic and will have two colours - a silver middle and gold on the rims. The one-cent coin - which has not been issued since April 2002, partly because it costs more than its face value to mint - will not be re-introduced.

Each coin will have a different edge pattern to help the visually impaired better distinguish between them. The denomination numerals will also be larger for easier identification.

Each coin denomination also has a unique electro-magnetic signature, an anti-counterfeiting measure. The $1 coin has an extra security feature - a laser mark micro-engraving of the Vanda Miss Joaquim orchid, Singapore's national flower.

There are about 4.4 billion coins in circulation, with a face value of about $1 billion. Each year, about 150 million new ones are issued.

The new coins, known as the Third Series, will gradually replace the current collection, which depicts local plants and flowers, over four years.

The Garden Series, as these coins are known, was issued in 1985 and is fast approaching the 30-year tenure for coins.

All past and current series of coins can be used for payment alongside the new ones.

MAS managing director Ravi Menon said yesterday that coins reflect a nation's significant events, people and symbols.

The central bank will ensure that new and existing coins will be accepted at ticketing machines at MRT and LRT stations.

Vending machines, payphones and supermarket trolleys will be calibrated in phases.

The Association of Banks in Singapore said machines at the banks will be ready to accept the new coins by the time of issue.

Ms Lui Su Kian, managing director and head of deposits and secured lending at DBS Bank, said: "In addition to coin exchange services over the counter, DBS receives an average of 12 million coins each month via its coin deposit machines islandwide... For our customers' convenience, these machines will also accept the new coins when they are in circulation."

Mrs Foo-Yap Siew Hong, assistant managing director at the MAS, said: "There will be a period of adjustment as we all get comfortable with the new coins."

Counsellor Cheethow Weiliat, 27, likes the idea of lighter ones. "I'm pretty used to the fact that a dollar coin is smaller, but I guess with time, I'll adapt."

Spend more, to keep healthcare affordable

$
0
0
By Jeremy Lim, Published TODAY, 22 Feb 2013

Singapore’s health system is lauded internationally for its ability to achieve outstanding health outcomes at very low national spending. Yet, 72 per cent of Singaporeans believe “we cannot afford to get sick these days due to high medical costs”, according to a 2012 Mindshare survey.

How can this be? Our low national spending on healthcare is the envy of the world and yet Singaporeans are so worried about healthcare costs.

What makes a great healthcare system? Healthcare planners the world over dream of the ideal health system: High quality, low cost and universal access for all citizens. How would Singapore rank along these dimensions?

The quality of Singapore healthcare is top-notch; 850,000 medical tourists in 2012 is testament to our high standards.

What about access? Geography advantages us and, unlike many large countries which need extraordinary measures to provide for far-flung populations, Singaporeans are hardly a stone’s throw from a doctor and barely a 15-minute drive from a hospital.

Our weakness lies in affordability, or at least the perception of affordability. Ironically, why we spend so little may account for why there is so much anxiety.

INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD

In many developed countries, healthcare is funded collectively. Citizens are enrolled into a national health scheme and funds drawn based on individual need. These “solidarity” schemes are designed to offer medically necessary care without consideration of the ability to pay.

Singapore has eschewed this path, with then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew asserting: “Subsidies on consumption are wrong and ruinous ... for however wealthy a nation, it cannot carry health, unemployment and pension benefits without massive taxation and overloading the system, reducing the incentives to work and to save and care for one’s family — when all can look to the state for welfare.”

The Government declared health an “individual responsibility” in the 1980s and established Medisave and MediShield, enabling individuals to finance and hence be “responsible” for personal healthcare.

The principle of emphasising the private financing of healthcare through individual responsibility supported by family has been praised for helping Singapore achieve remarkable cost constraints, but there has been a human cost. While the Government has successfully mitigated the risk of wanton state spending, the consequence arguably is that financial risk from medical catastrophe has been passed to individual citizens and their families, with resultant anxiety.

Support from Medifund is possible, but only upon application and on a case-by-case basis with no certainty of coverage, complete or otherwise. C-class wards provide subsidies which can be as high as 80 per cent, but paying even the remaining 20 per cent may be impossible for hefty bills; 20 per cent of S$50,000 is still too heavy a burden for low-income Singaporeans.

THE GERMAN EXAMPLE

And healthcare costs can be very unpredictable.

While virtually every country imposes co-payments to guard against over-consumption, many countries, especially European nations, operate on the reverse principle to Singapore. Co-payments are preserved as with Singapore, but the individual’s share of the total bill is capped — for instance, in Germany at 10 per cent of monthly income — with the government assuming the financial risk for unexpectedly large bills. No need to apply for special dispensations or subsidies.

Princeton University economist Uwe Reinhardt, speaking of the German health system, declared about medical bankruptcy: “That’s almost impossible … I have not ever read of Germans going bankrupt over healthcare.”

In Singapore, MediShield lifetime dollar coverage is capped at S$200,000 (soon to be S$300,000) with high deductibles and sub-limits on what clinical services can be covered. All these collectively enable relatively low premiums to be imposed and render MediShield financially very healthy — but similar to the structuring of subsidies, financial risk is borne by individuals and their families, with no certainty of help from Medifund or other schemes.

The theme is consistent: In our healthcare financing model, safeguards are built first and foremost to ensure system financial viability and sustainability.

A HUGE MIDDLE GROUND

Defenders of the system will point out the many financially struggling “welfare states” and proclaim Singapore must never go there. But it should be noted that between where we are today and the “fiscal extravagance” of the welfare states, there is a huge middle ground.

Singapore’s total public spending as a proportion of gross domestic product is only 13 per cent, a far cry from the 40 per cent that Finland spends. Singapore’s government spending on healthcare is just above one-third the total, with a long way to go before even sniffing the four-fifths that is the case in the United Kingdom.

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong’s commitment following the release of the Population White Paper— to “look at how we can restructure our primary care sector, our hospitals including our intermediate long-term care sector”, that is, the entire healthcare landscape — is reassuring, especially when juxtaposed against earlier comments on looking at healthcare affordability from the patient’s perspective. Times are changing.

“To live well, live long & with peace of mind” is the mission of the Ministry of Health. How can we balance “individual responsibility” with ‘peace of mind’? Between 13 per cent and 40 per cent, between one-third and four-fifths, where do we want to be?

Dr Jeremy Lim has held senior executive positions in both public and private healthcare sectors. He is currently writing a book on the Singapore health system. This is part of a series on health policies in Singapore.

Frontline Connects《前线开讲》Singapore’s Population Issues

$
0
0




《前线开讲》

播出日期:2013年 2月22日晚上10点30分 8频道

《新加坡人口问题》

政府公布了有关我国未来人口政策的白皮书,勾勒出到2030年新加坡的人口估计发展的趋势。

有关白皮书引起全国民众高度关注,70多名议员也在国会中热烈辩论,最终议员们以大多数赞成票,通过了由议员、连荣华所提出的修正动议。

虽然如此,李显龙总理还是希望新加坡人继续关注和讨论这些问题,为新加坡将来的发展做好充分的准备。

在第一期的《前线开讲》节目,受邀上节目的嘉宾包括总理公署部长傅海燕、学者符诗专博士、电影人孙立人、资深社工黄明德、女企业家林如玉。他们将针对人口未来的发展进行分析和讨论。

节目主持是琪琪和王德明。

A plan to house 2m more people

$
0
0
Veteran architect proposes building up southern coast
By Leonard Lim, The Straits Times, 22 Feb 2013

Even as the debate continues over the 6.9 million figure in the population White Paper, veteran architect Tay Kheng Soon said at an industry lecture last night that Singapore can accommodate a population increase of up to two million.

All two million would be housed on a 2,187ha swathe of land along the southern coastline, stretching from Pandan Reservoir in the west to the East Coast Park beach.

Land where the Keppel and Marina Bay golf courses are currently sited would make way for housing, as would the port area once container port functions are consolidated in Tuas in the long term.

Space around the Gardens by the Bay would cater to the super-rich, with homes built on the sea to entice those keen on waterfront living. Some parts of the south would also be for schools, offices and factories.

And while this might mean Singapore loses its biggest beach, he said all other areas, including green and heritage spaces, need not be "disturbed".

Mr Tay's "southern intensification" proposal comes two weeks after an intense parliamentary debate over the population White Paper that projects Singapore's population rising by 1.6 million by 2030.

"What I hear is a lot of grumbling (about the White Paper), so let us as a profession contribute," said the former president of the Singapore Institute of Architects who is known for his outspoken and at times radical views.

The 73-year-old said his ideas came about before the policy document was unveiled, and were several years in the making. "I've been wanting to know the density limit for Singapore."

Unlike the Government Land Use Plan which also proposes reclaiming more land and consolidating military activities onto Tekong Island, his proposal focuses on the single large strip of land, building more densely on it.

Based on an assumption of 50 sq m of floor area per person that is comparable to a region in Virginia on the East Coast of the United States, a gross plot ratio of 4.5 can accommodate 1.968 million, he said. If this ratio is lowered to 4, then about 1.75 million people can be housed in the south.

Gross plot ratio is a measure of the density of building units in a given space. He said that the highest ratio here currently is 3.24, in Punggol.

Meanwhile, he proposed restructuring estates in other parts of Singapore, by having a central corridor in each. Schools, businesses and other amenities would be located along it, to build social cohesion and bonding.

The lecture drew a crowd of about 100 guests, including vice-president of the Economic Society of Singapore Yeoh Lam Keong.

Despite the seemingly controversial nature of the southern intensification plan, no one raised questions about it during a question-and-answer session after the lecture, at the Singapore Institute of Architects' premises in Tanjong Pagar.

Mr Yeoh, who has been following the population White Paper debate, told The Straits Times later: "Physically you might be able to squeeze in another two million... but it doesn't fully measure or avoid the negative impact on social well-being from increase in income and wealth inequality and overcrowding in common facilities."

Responding, Mr Tay said: "That's why I proposed not intensifying land use in other parts of Singapore, so that we can build social cohesion there. It will be like New York in the south of the country, and Bali in the north."


Related

Keep kampung spirit, even in a big city

$
0
0
Pioneering Singapore architect Tay Kheng Soon says the real concern for any society isn't overcrowding, but how cohesive and trusting the community will be.
By Cheong Suk-wai, The Straits Times, 23 Feb 2013

WHILE many Singaporeans are complaining of cramped and intense city living these days, pioneering architect Tay Kheng Soon is confident that Singapore still has room for two million more people - and keep the kampung community spirit.

The solution is to house them compactly within a 2,187ha stretch of land in southern Singapore, from Pandan Reservoir in the west to East Coast Park, he said.

This was his startling proposal at a talk on Thursday night to about 100 people here, as part of an ongoing lecture series by master architects organised by the Singapore Institute of Architects.

Singaporeans fed up with crowded trains and public spaces flinched at the projection in the recent population White Paper that the 5.3 million-strong population here may burgeon to 6.9 million in 2030. The Government's Land Use Plan then detailed how it would reclaim more land and consolidate military training grounds to free up more space for all.

But disquiet continued, even after a five-day debate on the issue in Parliament.

Mr Tay however thinks "if it has to", the city-state can accommodate two million more residents comfortably.

He elaborates on his proposal: The southern coastline will house homes, offices, schools and factories for the extra two million residents. Places like the Keppel and Marina Bay golf courses there would have to go, along with the port, whose operations will be consolidated in Tuas in future.

The area around Gardens By The Bay could feature waterfront homes, he suggested.

Interestingly, no one at the talk challenged his proposal. The audience posed only three questions: whether or not women should do national service; how to deepen the dialogue between architects and city planners here; and if a research institute for architects should be set up.

Mr Tay, 73, is well-known for thinking out of the box or, as his detractors might say, throwing a spanner in the works.

But the respected architect said that his proposal was not in response to the White Paper; he had, in recent years, been trying to determine the density limit in Singapore.

The limit proved a hard nut to crack, he added, because very few places, including Singapore, publish or even track total floor area, which is necessary to calculate density.

"At the moment," he noted, "because we do not know how much floor space there is, we just add more floor area here and not put so much there. Such over- developing is wrong."

Fortunately, one place that did track total floor area was Fairfax County, just outside Washington, DC in the American state of Virginia, which has a population of one million and is 11/2 times the size of Singapore.

Mr Tay thought Fairfax's figures instructive for Singapore because it also grew rich via the aviation industry and was a hub for many multinationals, including Innova, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman.

He settled on 50 sq m as the "magic figure" of comfortably habitable total floor area per person, which is about half the size of the average HDB flat.

The method for planning space for each person in society takes into account every building in which he or she would likely be in, so that would include one's entire workspace, from office desk to boss' room to office corridor, and one's entire living space from bedroom to bathroom. But it would exclude recreational space.

With that 50 sq m criterion, and with a gross plot ratio (GPR) of 4.5, Mr Tay calculated that the southern strip he proposed for denser build-up would house 1.97 million people comfortably. This, he said, would result in an estate that would look like a cross between the 50-storey blocks of Pinnacle@Duxton and the quite dense Punggol estate, which has the highest GPR in Singapore today, that is, 3.24.

GPR is a measure of density of building units in a given space.

If that ratio dropped to four, then a cosier number would be 1.75 million. If it was lowered further to three, the optimal population density for that space would be 1.31 million.

Mr Tay said he suggested what he called "southern intensification" so as to leave the rest of Singapore today untouched in future.

That meant no cementing over nature reserves, public parks or other spaces to breathe.

Speaking to The Straits Times right after the talk, he said: "It's about not aggravating the rest of the island, and helping us plan in detail how to make everything here super-accessible."

But wouldn't building over East Coast Parkway, Singapore's biggest beach, take yet another beloved place away from Singaporeans? That, he said, could be replaced with man-made lagoons, filtered by rock bunds, along the southern coastline that could function as public swimming pools.

Mr Tay, who teaches architecture at the National University of Singapore (NUS) twice a week, said his deeper concern was how to reconfigure Singapore's neighbourhoods so that the people who live there could build their resilience, learn to look out for one another and, ultimately, be much happier.

His ideal HDB estate would have a spine running right through the centre of the neighbourhood, on which will be shops, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), civic space and individual classrooms - as opposed to fully built-up schools - which children could go in and out of for lessons, like undergraduates on campus.

While some may find this suggestion not very different from the rows of shops and amenities that already exist in their estates, Mr Tay said these would be much more stretched out in his plan.

"The spine would be a 1.5km necklace on which will be strung shops, schools, civic spaces and arts and culture spaces to encourage residents to walk in the streets and make the estate abuzz.

"This would enable successful sharing," Mr Tay said, "which would break down walls, including prejudice."

As for encouraging SMEs in neighbourhoods, he said the entrepreneurial spirit was crucial to build resilience. He cited Spain's Mondragon cooperative whose owner-workers ran their own banks, grew their own food and provided for the community in general.

"We should not be producing employees, we should be producing employers," he stressed, adding that housewives could earn money by taking turns to deliver meals to the elderly within the estate, give them massages or run errands for them.

Might it not be too late to put such kampung spirit back into HDB neighbourhoods? Surely it is dissonant to be talking about kampung-like living in the 21st century, when the IT-weaned youth live in their minds?

"That is why schools should be integrated within the community," he pointed out. "Children should live in the real world, not the abstract."

He added that the way forward, perhaps, was to build a test neighbourhood, say, at MacPherson, one of the oldest estates here - and one with many old people - where, since 2011, he and his team of 20 NUS students have been researching how to turn a big, old housing estate here into a "modern kampung" that can accommodate toddlers as well as their grandparents-cum-babysitters.

He recalled how old folk in MacPherson were initially chary of his idea to bond the community, that is, by getting them to plant fast-growing greens like chye sim for sale and their own consumption, in the passageways between their HDB blocks.

He even designed a waist-high table for the elderly so that they would not have to bend over for long minutes while tending their mini vegetable plots set in polystyrene boxes.

But when Mr Tay showed the elderly there that they could actually make $500 a month from cultivating vegetables for only two hours a day, they were all for it.

While Mr Tay had all these ideas, he was also a realist. "For all this to work, we will need solidarity and trust, but we are still far from that.

"But we should start somewhere, otherwise, we will only be fighting gridlock."



WRONG WAY
At the moment, because we do not know how much floor space there is, we just add more floor area here and not put so much there. Such over-developing is wrong.
- Pioneering architect Tay Kheng Soon (right), on how very few places, including Singapore, publish or track total floor area, which is necessary to calculate density

PLAN IN DETAIL
It's about not aggravating the rest of the island, and helping us plan in detail how to make everything here super-accessible.
- Mr Tay, on what he called "southern intensification" so as to leave the rest of Singapore today untouched in future

SAF officer's sterling Afghan service

$
0
0
He is 1st S'porean awarded US Bronze Star, at end of memorable 6 months there
By David Ee, The Straits Times, 23 Feb 2013

ON A clear, moonlit night last August, Major Cai Dexian was cycling home from work when sirens abruptly pierced the silence. It was close to midnight.

Diving behind the nearest shelter, his mind raced: Which direction was the rocket headed? Where would it land?

He was not in Bukit Timah where he lives in a condominium. The 28-year-old was in a military base in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar, assisting the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF.

Taleban insurgents had just fired a mortar at his base. Luckily for him, the rocket landed harmlessly on the base's southern fringe.

Over the six months he spent there, not a week would go by without incoming rocket attacks. Fortunately, there were no casualties among the several thousand strong contingent of coalition soldiers there.

Despite the relative safety of the base, these moments drilled in him the need to be always on full alert. "There is that moment of apprehension when you're uncertain of your safety," recalled Maj Cai, who returned from his tour of duty last October. "If the rocket lands directly on you, there's no shelter that would protect you."

The officer is among more than 470 Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) servicemen who have served in Afghanistan since 2007.

Two weeks ago, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen announced that all troops would be home by June, ending the SAF's six-year deployment there, as Afghan forces begin to take over responsibility for their country's security.

As executive officer to ISAF's director of operations for southern Afghanistan, Maj Cai, who enlisted in 2003, coordinated information crucial in helping commanders decide how and where to deploy tens of thousands of troops on any given day.

From infantry units to combat engineers and medical evacuation airlifts, the Stanford graduate's work helped make sure soldiers were quickly deployed where they were most needed. The soldiers came from countries such as the United States, Britain, Australia, Romania and Slovakia.

For his dedicated service, Maj Cai was awarded the US Bronze Star, the American military's fourth highest combat decoration, before his return - the first Singaporean to be so honoured.

Maj Cai worked 16-hour days, seven days a week. In a combat zone, the concept of weekends did not exist. He learnt to make the best use of any spare moment.

Each evening, he would race to the mess for dinner and spend a precious hour or so catching up with his wife, 28-year-old lawyer Lynette Ooi, over Skype while eating.

He also called his parents once a week. His father is retired; his mother, a civil servant.

Each month, he would eagerly anticipate a food package sent by the SAF and his family, filled with goodies like pineapple tarts and chicken bak kwa.

His birthday, spent alone at the base, came with a more poignant surprise. Tucked into that month's food package was a scrapbook made by his wife, with messages and photographs from family and friends.

"Every single moment (like those) was very precious," he said. "I've learnt now never to take my loved ones for granted."

On rare forays off-base to join commanders for meetings with the Afghan army or tribal elders, he also met the local residents, and their life stories gave him another perspective on life.

One Afghan man's brother was killed by the Taleban but he did not harbour hatred or yearn for revenge. Instead, the man was filled with a determination to help rebuild his country, Maj Cai said.

It is an encounter that has stuck with him even months after his return. "They are a very resilient people. Despite their personal hardship, they're still enthusiastic and very optimistic about the future," he said. "They have to work so hard to achieve just a very basic level of security. I came away very grateful for the peace and security that Singapore enjoys - we should never take it for granted."


Measuring cost-of-living changes: MTI replies

$
0
0
THE article ("Poorest households hardest hit by inflation", Feb 6) noted that if imputed rentals on owner-occupied accommodation (OOA) are excluded from the Consumer Price Index (CPI), inflation for lower-income households last year would be lower than that for other groups.

However, the article also cited views that "CPI-All Items" provides a better picture of cost-of-living changes than the measure excluding imputed rentals on OOA, since rentals and mortgages are significant expenditures. Allow us to clarify.

First, rentals paid by tenants are separate from imputed rentals on OOA, and are fully reflected in both the CPI indices.

Second, imputed rentals are not a good reflection of mortgage payments. As housing market cycles and interest rate cycles can differ significantly, the trend in imputed rentals often deviates from that in mortgage payments. For example, while rental costs have increased, mortgage interest rates have remained low in recent years.

The measurement of the cost of OOA is internationally recognised as the most difficult aspect of measuring CPI.

While measuring accommodation costs of rented homes is straightforward, home owners do not pay rent and, thus, their housing consumption is unobserved.

To address this, statisticians have developed several methods to measure the cost of OOA. Each has its pros and cons.

Singapore uses market rentals of similar homes as a proxy for the costs of OOA.

However, because our rental market has seen significant fluctuations, the methodology results in a highly cyclical CPI. The fluctuations in imputed rentals do not reflect the actual expenditure of owner-occupiers, who in Singapore comprise the large majority of households.

This is why the Department of Statistics also compiles the alternate measure of "CPI less imputed rentals on OOA", which relates more directly to households' actual cash spending.

Several other countries do likewise. In Britain, the CPI excludes OOA, while the Retail Prices Index includes it. Some other European countries exclude OOA altogether from the CPI.

An alternative measure of OOA is based on mortgage payments. However, mortgage payments reflect both the investment value of a home and its consumption cost.

Separating the investment component, which is not part of the CPI, from the cost of consumption is a difficult matter, involving onerous data requirements. Few countries have chosen this approach.

We are continuing to review the measurement of OOA in the light of these considerations, including possible ways to minimise the cyclical component of imputed rentals that has no bearing on actual expenditures.

Cindy Keng (Mrs)
Director, Corporate Communications Division
Ministry of Trade and Industry




Poorest households hardest hit by inflation
Rising housing and health-care costs pushed up their living costs by 5.6%
By Fiona Chan, The Straits Times, 6 Feb 2013

SINGAPORE'S poorest bore the brunt of inflation last year, as higher housing and health-care costs hit them particularly hard.

Households in the bottom one-fifth income bracket were hit by a 5.6 per cent rise in their cost of living, higher than the 4.6 per cent average increase for the whole country, according to figures released by the Singapore Department of Statistics (DOS) yesterday.

For the richest one-fifth of households, the cost of living rose by only 4.2 per cent.

This is a turnaround from 2011, when the lowest-income households enjoyed lower inflation than the average.

Rising housing costs were the main reason for the change, as these tend to take up a larger proportion of poorer households' incomes. From 2011 to last year, they were the only group that saw a rise in housing inflation.

If imputed rentals from housing costs had been excluded, however, inflation for the poorest households would have been slightly lower than for other groups. Imputed rentals are the Statistics Department's own estimate of home values and do not actually figure in home-owners' cash spending.

But economists think the overall inflation figure, including imputed rentals, provides a better picture of the true cost of living.

"Housing is the largest expenditure item most households will have to spend on, be it in the form of rentals or mortgage payments," said Barclays economist Joey Chew.

The lowest-income group spends more than a third of their total expenditure on housing, while other groups spend about a quarter.

Excluding imputed rentals thus "runs the risk of underestimating the full extent of the inflationary impact of the property market on the cost of living", said DBS economist Irvin Seah.

Health care was another relatively bigger burden on lower-income earners last year.

Not only did they see the sharpest percentage rise in health-care costs across all income groups, they also felt it more acutely as they spend a bigger proportion of their income on health care, said UOB economist Francis Tan.

"Health-care costs are on the rise due largely to labour cost pressures," said Ms Chew, who expects inflation in this area to remain "stubbornly high" this year.

She noted that the rise in health-care costs accelerated last year from 2011. On average, consumers paid 4.5 per cent more for health care last year, compared with 2.4 per cent more in 2011.

But the news is not all bad for lower-income households. They saw a smaller rise in food and transport prices than richer households last year, and the gap between their inflation levels and the overall average also narrowed in the second half of the year.

Inflation in July to December last year was 4.8 per cent for the poorest one-fifth of households, down from 6.3 per cent in the first half. The average rate for the country overall was 4.1 per cent in the second half, compared with 5.1 per cent for the January to June period.

27 sites ordered to stop work

$
0
0
Firms also fined over $350,000 after safety inspections beefed up
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 23 Feb 2013

TWENTY-SEVEN sites were slapped with stop-work orders after workplace safety and health inspectors stepped up checks late last year.

Firms were also given fines totalling more than $350,000 by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).

Targeted at the construction industry, the inspections - jointly dubbed Operation Talon - covered 529 worksites run by 378 firms.


The blitz came in a year which registered several high-profile accidents, such as a scaffolding collapse at the Bugis Downtown Line site that killed two people and the tilting of an oil rig in Jurong Shipyard which injured 89 workers.

The ministry ramped up safety inspections from August last year. But so far this year, eight workers have died in work accidents, compared with seven in the same period last year.

Operation Talon dished out 1,093 fines and notices of non-compliance, or warnings, with the most common lapses involving working at heights.

For instance, at one worksite of a five-storey apartment block development, barricades were not set up on the third storey. A floor down, only "ineffective" plastic tape was used as barricades for gaps in the scaffolding.

Work-at-height safety violations were present at 19 of the 27 sites which received stop-work orders, and accounted for more than a fifth of all fines and warnings.

Also common were lapses connected with scaffolding. These were found in 14 of the 27 sites.

At one site, a work platform was not secured to the scaffolding on which it rested.

Other common shortcomings were linked to excavation and formwork.

Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin, who revealed these details at the annual bizSAFE Convention yesterday, raised the point that it does not pay to rush to meet deadlines and neglect safety.

"The fact is, by being fast, you end up being slow," he said, noting that almost 400 workdays were lost due to stop-work orders under Operation Talon. Apart from simply being "the right thing to do", good workplace safety can also boost staff retention and morale, and build a firm's reputation.

Yesterday, 11 companies received awards for their commitment to the bizSAFE programme, which helps firms raise workplace safety and health standards. There are now 14,000 companies on the scheme.

One award recipient is LSK Engineering, whose managing director Roger Heng said: "Safety will definitely help to ensure that you deliver good projects on time, and with less disruption."

Workplace Safety and Health Council chairman Lee Tzu Yang also announced three enhancements to bizSAFE.

An e-learning option may be made available for top management taking the level 1 workshop.

Two bizSAFE courses are now aligned with the Singapore Workforce Development Agency's Workforce Skills Qualifications framework, letting firms tap funding of up to 90 per cent.

Guidelines for the programme's risk management audit have also been tightened.

New pre-school scheme to help the disadvantaged

$
0
0
By Sandra Davie, The Straits Times, 23 Feb 2013

CHILDREN of disadvantaged families will have access to high-quality pre-schooling under a scheme that aims to close the gap between them and better-off pupils.

They will be monitored by a social worker and educational therapist as part of the Circle of Care programme, started by a local philanthropic group and a welfare organisation.

This will allow staff to identify problems and address them quickly - meaning families who need help are spared the lengthy process of dealing with various organisations and agencies.

The programme will be run at two centres operated by Care Corner, with the help of $1.8 million pledged over four years by the Lien Foundation. It aims to be up and running by next month.

At the moment, children and families who need additional help sometimes face an uphill struggle.

Problems that are often multifaceted have to be identified by a social worker or pre-school teacher. The family will then be directed to various centres run by government agencies and welfare organisations.

Care Corner chief executive officer Yap Poh Kheng said the new scheme will streamline the process by making help available at the project, which will be run in Leng Kee and Admiralty.

"Let's say a pre-school teacher notices that a child is overly anxious," he said. "She can bring in the social worker who will go and meet the families, investigate the matter further and bring together different aspects of help and care. These could range from educational therapy to nutrition, counselling and financial aid."

Lien Foundation officials said various studies show high-quality early education provides a good foundation for academic achievement later on.

Early childhood expert Khoo Kim Choo will review the centres' curriculum to make sure it boosts the children's holistic development. Talks, workshops and support groups will also be set up to enhance parents' skills.

"Research has shown children's sustained gains in development are closely associated with parental involvement," said Dr Khoo.

Lien Foundation chief executive Lee Poh Wah said: "Young children are most vulnerable to the harmful effects of poverty. They often lag behind their peers in social and intellectual development as they do not have access to the same educational and developmental resources."

The Government has taken several steps to raise the quality of pre-schooling and is looking into how it can be made more accessible to children from low-income families. Mr Lee said more help such as counselling and educational therapy must be made available within easy reach.

One mother, whose husband is a lorry driver, said she hopes that an educational therapist can help her four-year-old. "I cannot get my son to do his homework," said the 34-year-old housewife, who asked not to be named. "I really don't know what to do."




Children's learning gap: A study in contrasts
Early intervention before Primary 1 can help low-income kids to level up Is it nature or nurture that leads to children from poor homes lagging behind in school? Sandra Davie delves into research to look at the causes and solutions.
The Straits Times, 23 Feb 2013

PRE-SCHOOL teacher Daphne Teo smiles as she looks through five-year-old Elvis Lim's workbook.

The talkative, curious boy has improved by leaps and bounds. A year ago, he could not even count from one to 10 or recite the alphabet.

But like many of the children at the Care Corner childcare centre in Leng Kee, Elvis still lags behind the rest of his age group in reading, writing and numeracy skills.

Mrs Teo, who is in her 50s and used to teach at Nanyang Kindergarten in Bukit Timah, says she was shocked when she started work at Care Corner last year.

"My K1 kids at Nanyang were reading simple story books and could do addition and subtraction. Here, I worry because many of them can't count from one to 10."

But she is also aware that many of the children have home circumstances that are less than ideal.

Elvis' single-parent father is a 22-year-old hawker assistant who works nights and fathered him at the age of 16, while awaiting his N-level results. The boy is now cared for by his 56-year-old grandmother Chua Lee Kwee in the family's cluttered one-room rental flat in Lengkok Bahru.

Shaking her head, she says it is not a good area for children. "I see police every day." Madam Chua realises that education is important and tries her best to get Elvis to watch English TV shows and learn his alphabet and numbers. But she is unable to help him because of her own limited command of the language.

"Elvis always tells me... Nai Nai (grandma in Chinese), your English wrong," she says in her halting English.

With her son's meagre earnings of about $1,000 a month, she is unable to afford tuition for Elvis. But the childcare subsidy given to low-income families allows her to pay only $5 a month for him to attend Care Corner.

Nature or nurture?

SHE hopes that the teachers at the centre will be able to prepare her grandson well for primary school in two years. With the additional funding from philanthropic organisation Lien Foundation, Care Corner also hopes to close the gap for children such as Elvis, before they enter Primary 1.

Emerging research is starting to shed light on why poor children quickly fall behind rich and middle-class children, and stay there.

Is it nature - for example, the parents' IQ - or nurture?

Or is it because rich parents place more importance on education and provide their children with more books and educational toys?

What about the massive doses of early enrichment activities that children from richer homes receive, such as speech and drama, phonics and art classes?

Studies around the world have highlighted some possible reasons for the learning gap. Much of the evidence points to the quality of the nurturing environment.

For example, a 1995 study of 42 American families showed that by the age of three, children of professionals had vocabularies of about 1,100 words, compared to 525 words for those whose parents were on welfare.

The study also found differences in the kinds of words and statements that children heard. By age three, the average child of a professional had heard 500,000 encouragements and 80,000 discouragements. For the welfare children, the situation was reversed. They had heard an average of 75,000 encouraging phrases and 200,000 discouraging ones.

The researchers Betty Hart and Todd Risley concluded that professional parents were giving their children an advantage with every word they spoke, and the advantage just kept building.

Another researcher, American sociologist Annette Lareau, peered into the homes of poor and rich children, and found that middle-class parents practised a different kind of child-rearing - one she termed "concerted cultivation" and which built various abilities and skills.

Middle-class children grow up with a sense of entitlement. They expect people to take their concerns seriously. This builds a confidence that less wealthy children lack. According to Professor Lareau, the differences translate into a distinct advantage in school, and, later in life, in the workplace.

All these studies suggest the disadvantages that poverty imposes on children are not primarily about a lack of books or the absence of speech and drama classes.

Overcoming disadvantages

THE real advantages that middle-class children gain come from something far less tangible - the language that their parents use and the social skills and confidence they build in their children.

"The research is quite clear," says pre-school operator Denise Lai, 42, who is enrolled in the National Institute of Education's doctorate in education programme.

"Middle-class parents bring up their kids differently - and they give their children a definite edge."

The question then arises - can these disadvantages be overcome and, if so, how? Can poor families be taught to bring up their children differently? If so, how can this be done and who should take on the responsibility?

Many countries, including Singapore, have schemes to help children who lag behind. Every year, about 10 per cent of the Primary 1 cohort in Singapore attend an English learning support programme and 5 per cent attend a maths one. The results have been positive.

About 65 per cent of pupils who have gone through the English programme in the past few years are able to read at their age level and pass their end-of-year school examinations, said the Ministry of Education.

But does it come too late?

Many child experts looking at the wealth of research overseas would argue that the gap has to be closed much earlier.

Various studies in the United States and Britain show that early intervention - at pre-school level - produces more positive and lasting effects on children from disadvantaged families.

The most reliable data comes from two experiments carried out in the US - the Perry Pre-school Project in Michigan in the 1960s and the Abecedarian experiment performed in North Carolina in the early 1970s. They are particularly revealing as they follow children into their adult years.

The Perry Pre-school Project involved providing high-quality pre-school education to a group of three- and four-year-olds living in poverty and assessed to be at high risk of school failure.

The pupils were taught by certified public school teachers with at least a bachelor's degree. The average child-teacher ratio was 6:1 and the curriculum emphasised active learning.

These children were tracked for decades after leaving preschool. Not only did more of them go on to complete high school and enter college, they also had better jobs and earned higher salaries.

Renowned American economist James Heckman said every dollar invested in the programme produced a 7 to 12 per cent return.

He has argued that early intervention programmes have a much greater economic and social impact than the later interventions being carried out in school systems, such as reducing pupil-teacher ratios.

Advocates of early intervention such as Lien Foundation chief executive Lee Poh Wah acknowledge that in recent years, the Government has taken steps to improve the quality, accessibility and affordability of pre-school education here. But Mr Lee argues that high-quality childcare and pre-school are still not available to children from low-income families.

These children and their parents also need help in many other areas, and at the moment, they have to go to various agencies and welfare organisations.

"I feel there is currently a certain poverty of ambition on the issue," he says. "We cannot afford to be stingy or short-sighted to deliver on greater equality of opportunity, as persistent poverty and social immobility are ultimately extremely expensive for society."

Different schemes can be tried out by philanthropic groups and welfare organisations working hand in hand.

Says Mr Lee: "Early childhood poverty is a complicated issue and we must try new approaches. If it is shown to work, then the Government can come in and scale it up to make it available to more children."

He adds: "Many children begin life at a disadvantage. Unfortunately, we can't change that. But we can change other things, such as providing quality pre-school education and helping poor families provide a more nurturing environment. That would change the equation for children like Elvis."



LAGGING BEHIND
My K1 kids at Nanyang were reading simple story books and could do addition and subtraction. Here, I worry because many of them can't count from one to 10.
- Care Corner teacher Daphne Teo, who is in her 50s and used to teach at Nanyang Kindergarten in Bukit Timah


MIDDLE-CLASS ADVANTAGE
The research is quite clear... Middle-class parents bring up their kids differently - and they give their children a definite edge.
- Pre-school operator Denise Lai, 42, who is enrolled in the National Institute of Education's doctorate in education programme


OVERCOMING DISADVANTAGE
Many children begin life at a disadvantage. Unfortunately, we can't change that. But we can change other things, such as providing quality pre-school education and helping poor families provide a more nurturing environment.
- Lien Foundation chief executive Lee Poh Wah, an advocate of early intervention

From covert vigilantism to communal vigilance

$
0
0
By Carol Soon, Published The Straits Times, 23 Feb 2013

THE recent tragic deaths of two young brothers involved in a road accident in Tampines triggered an avalanche of online responses, which is to be expected these days. The responses ranged from deep sympathy for the boys and their family to outrageous claims and accusations. Sadly too, graphic photos of the victims were thoughtlessly circulated.

The insensitivity and callousness of some online outbursts led to an immediate response - voicing opprobrium - from the Prime Minister, several MPs, academics and the public.

Although new technologies and social media give voice to the voiceless and help "level" the communication landscape, the ugly side of the Internet rears up whenever complete lack of civility and decorum occur online. What is more, people can be uncivil anonymously, without bearing any responsibilities that go with such actions.

Although uncivil behaviour, propelled either by sheer ignorance or a deliberate intent to provoke, is not unique to cyberspace, the ubiquity of high-tech communication devices and high-bandwidth connections have exacerbated the reach and effects of such acts on an unanticipated scale.

Infocomm Development Authority surveys point to a 150 per cent penetration rate for mobile phones and 80 per cent for broadband connections. Singaporeans can now reach one another with ease and speed.

Although new technologies and social media have galvanised like-minded individuals for the greater good, they have also been used to inflict harm and distress on others.

One example is the practice of "naming and shaming", where people take photos of "bad behaviour" and post these online. The subjects of such exposes run the gamut from the inappropriately dressed and cars parked illegally, to commuters not giving up reserved seats in MRT trains.

At its worst, such tracking down of alleged "perpetrators" by netizens has gone awry, such as a wrongly identified Filipino boy. He was mistaken for another person who had disturbed his neighbours with his drum-playing despite complaints.

In the case of the Tampines accident, the cement truck driver, initially labelled a foreigner, is another example of naming and shaming gone wrong.

Some of these actions may be motivated by a desire to right a perceived wrong, but they often smack of what may be called "covert vigilantism".

Pre-Internet, when a person felt strongly about an injustice which he had just witnessed, he would either confront the offender face-to-face or record relevant details for the purpose of lodging a police report. However, with the cloak of anonymity, ease and speed provided by new technologies, people have taken to exposing bad behaviour without revealing their own identity.

Such covert vigilantism is counterproductive to building a gracious society.

Subjecting others to public ridicule not only smacks of bullying but is also inimical to fostering a more compassionate and cohesive society.

An ominous outcome of such covert vigilantism is a heightened sense of mistrust among citizens who feel that they are under constant surveillance that's not imposed by the authorities but by ordinary people.

However, the alternative to covert vigilantism is not stoic silence. The same technologies can be used to cultivate "communal vigilance". On the basic level, vigilance requires circumspection - being mindful of the consequences of our actions. On another level, it requires us to be watchful of disruptive behaviours that can be harmful to the community, to step out and to speak up against the perpetrators.

Communal vigilance channels our collective concerns and energies to a more productive and sustainable outcome for society.

The swift lambasting by some online citizens of the circulation of pictures of the Tampines accident is an example of communal vigilance. Soon after the photographs were posted, prominent bloggers and forum participants questioned the motives and the need for sharing such pictures. They called on the online community to show greater respect to the family of the boys who died.

In response to an article on a self-purported "site for every Singaporean to express themselves" that wrongly reported on the cement truck driver's nationality, several visitors left comments which highlighted the inaccuracy of the information and questioned the writer's motive.

Last year, communal vigilance countered the anti-foreigner tirade that took place online. Netizens spoke up against anti-foreigner posts through blogs and Facebook pages, with some starting their own blogs (such as "Every cloud has its silver lining") to expose how some websites fan xenophobic sentiments.

Could communal vigilance ultimately be a long-term and more sustainable solution to the current conundrum concerning Internet regulation?

Guided by a shared vision of the type of online culture we want for ourselves and those we care for, and defined by users themselves, a greater clarity of what are acceptable and unacceptable online practices will emerge over time.

In so doing, we may be able to strike a fine balance between upholding the sanctity of freedom of expression and preserving social harmony in society.

The writer is a research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies and works in the area of arts, culture and media at IPS.

CDCs to create platforms to integrate existing and new citizens

$
0
0
By S Ramesh, Channel NewsAsia, 23 Feb 2013

Singapore's Community Development Councils (CDCs) plan to create platforms for new and existing citizens to come together to forge friendships.

The aim is also for them to have a better appreciation and understanding of one another.

In an interview with Channel NewsAsia, Dr Amy Khor, who is the Coordinating Mayor of the five CDCs, said one way will be to create interest groups that all would be keen to take part in.


The topic of integration has been in the air recently, especially during the debate on the White Paper on Population.

Sharing some of his experiences, North West CDC Mayor, Dr Teo Ho Pin said interest groups have been a successful way to integrate existing and new citizens.

Dr Teo said: "A very good example is brisk walking. The spin-off from there is once you provide a platform, a sustainable platform, where people can come together on a regular basis they will develop friendships and there will be bonding."

Central Singapore CDC Mayor Sam Tan added that Singaporeans have been forthcoming in welcoming their new friends. 

Mr Tan said: "Singaporeans actually are very generous and warm at heart, although some of us may not be expressive in expressing our warmth toward new comers and foreigners. But if you have time and when people work together on a certain meaningful project, you actually discover a lot of Singaporeans are actually kind hearted and they can be quite warm to other people."

But Dr Khor, who is also the mayor of Southwest CDC Mayor emphasised that integration is a "work-in-progress" and something which cannot be taken for granted.

"Many grassroots leaders in fact most of them do welcome the new citizens because they are a step forward to volunteer to help out in the grassroots organisations so I think many of them are accepting and are open to getting new citizens in their midst and working with them," explained Dr Khor.

She added: "But new citizens also must make effort to want to reach out and integrate with the community, to want to get to know to the locals better and forge friendships with them. So I think it is mutual. We hope that existing local Singaporeans will continue to be open and accepting of new citizens, new citizens must also put in effort to get to know Singaporeans."

Dr Khor added that constituencies can tap on funds such as the National Integration Fund to organise the programmes.

The CDCs said they are prepared to chip in with funding for programmes if needed.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the People's Association said the CDCs have no plans to tap on funding for this year.

One CDC that had tapped on the fund was North West CDC in 2010 for the 'Culture & Food Appreciation @ North West' programme.

The CDC received some S$8,000 from the National Integration Fund for the programme.

The programme aimed to integrate new citizens into Singapore's local culture by introducing them to a local culture and religion.

Held at the Jurong Bird Park, the programme attracted over 800 North West District residents.

Participants enriched their understanding of the rich unique cultures through traditional Malay dance performances, tried on the baju kurung and sarong kebaya, enjoyed Malay culinary delights and learnt how to make ketupat through hands-on sessions.

WP releases own population paper

$
0
0
Counterproposal puts focus on raising total fertility rate and resident labour force participation rate
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 24 Feb 2013

The Workers' Party (WP) yesterday issued its population paper as a counterproposal to the Government's.

It criticised what it called the Population White Paper's model of immigration-driven growth, and said that the focus should instead be on raising the total fertility rate (TFR) and the resident labour force participation rate.

The 38-page document, titled A Dynamic Population For A Sustainable Singapore, fleshes out points made by the nine WP MPs during this month's parliamentary debate on the White Paper, which they also voted against.



WP secretary-general Low Thia Khiang said in a statement that the party hoped the paper "will enable Singaporeans to better understand the rationale and computations behind WP's proposals".

The paper argues that the best way to maintain a Singaporean core is by raising fertility rather than relying on new citizens. The WP has proposed taking in 10,000 new citizens a year compared to the Government's 15,000 to 25,000.

It believes that in granting citizenship, priority should be given to non-citizen spouses of Singaporeans. Its figure of 10,000 new citizens a year is based on a trend of more such marriages, which numbered more than 9,000 in 2011.

It identifies several structural obstacles to raising TFR, which it said the Government had not done enough to address in its latest enhanced Marriage and Parenthood Package. These are: a lack of work- life balance, rising housing costs, income inequality leading to anxiety over economic risks, lack of gender equality in the family and a stressful education system.

The paper also argues that pro-natalist policy should not privilege higher-income families, nor should it withhold benefits from single parents.

Another key part of the WP's plan is growing the resident workforce at 1 per cent a year. If this target is met, the WP proposes to freeze foreign worker numbers at the current level.

To do this, the WP proposes getting more women and older Singaporeans into the workforce. Its target is for 85 per cent of women aged between 25 and 54 to be in the workforce, up from 76.6 per cent now. It points out that in Denmark, Finland and France, both TFR and the women's labour force participation rate are higher than Singapore's.

Meanwhile, older Singaporeans should not be seen as "dependants", but as "golden resources" and a vital part of the labour force.

And as Singapore's economy restructures, the WP suggests the Government "address the rental, capital and energy costs" that are holding back entrepreneurial small and medium enterprises.

On urban planning, the WP is against higher population density, and wants 10 per cent of total land area kept as land reserves, up from the Government's proposed 4 per cent in 2030. This would give the future generation more leeway in dealing with "economic and demographic exigencies".

Apart from hard policy, the paper also tackles issues of identity. On the idea of the "Singaporean core", the WP said that there is consensus on the need for one, but disagreement over its definition.

On Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's point that the Singaporean core is "not just about the numbers, but about the spirit", the WP said the proportion of Singaporeans is still crucial. The WP proposal will keep the share of citizens at around 60 per cent of the total population, as compared to 55 per cent by 2030 in the White Paper.

The more non-Singaporeans there are compared to Singaporeans, the higher the chances of "an ambiguous and indistinct national identity developing", it said.

The party also took issue with the use of a quote by the late deputy prime minister S. Rajaratnam: "Being a Singaporean is not a matter of ancestry. It is conviction and choice."

Using this to argue in favour of being more open to new citizens is a "misunderstanding", said the WP. Mr Rajaratnam was making the point that other cultural identities had to be abandoned before national identity could be developed.

The WP said the best way to build a Singaporean core is to "ensure that more Singaporeans go through shared experience like in schools and family life and national institutions like national service".


WP'S IDEAS ON...

RAISING THE TOTAL FERTILITY RATE

Introduce regulations on work-life balance or give firms incentives to offer flexible working schemes

Housing grants of $10,000 for the birth of the first child, $15,000 for the second and $20,000 for the third

Government should give the Enhanced Baby Bonus without the family having to make matching contributions

Two-week "bonding leave" for fathers, on top of paternity leave

Same parenthood benefits for single parents and married couples


RAISING THE LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE

With existing programmes as a basis, encourage more flexi-work schemes and tailor them to mothers' needs

Get more firms to set up workplace childcare centres

Redesign jobs and work processes to adapt to elderly workers' needs

Stronger administrative and legislative measures against workplace gender and age discrimination, including discrimination against pregnant women and mothers with infants



Grace Fu: Govt studying paper
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 24 Feb 2013

Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Grace Fu responded to the Workers' Party's (WP's) population paper on Facebook last night.

The Government was "studying the paper", she said. She noted that the report appeared to be a collation of what the party had raised in Parliament. Many points had been responded to.

She noted the WP's agreement with the Government on the need to make marriage and parenthood a priority, increase productivity and raise labour participation among older Singaporeans and women.

"These are priorities that the Government has been pursuing vigorously for some time," she said.

The key difference was in approach, she added, with the WP wanting to freeze foreign workforce numbers immediately, whereas the Government wants to tighten inflows but give businesses time to adjust.

The WP's stance on foreign labour "will cause great hardship to Singaporeans and SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises)". Health care and the construction of flats and train lines will also be badly affected, she added.

Ms Fu also asked how adding women and senior citizens to the workforce, as WP proposed, could fill the need for foreign workers "where we need them most - such as construction and cleaning/ maintenance".

As for the WP paper's look at South Korea as a model for fertility policy, Ms Fu said the Government studied many countries before coming up with its policy package.

She noted that South Korea's recent total fertility rate was 1.23 and Seoul's 1.02, "lower than Singapore's despite having implemented the package since 2005".

WP’s Population Policy Paper detrimental to businesses: SBF

$
0
0
Channel NewsAsia, 23 Feb 2013

CEO of the Singapore Business Federation (SBF), Ho Meng Kit said the proposal in Workers' Party's Population Policy Paper to keep foreign workforce constant and to rely on a one per cent growth in resident workforce has broken no new ground.

Mr Ho said the federation's position remains that a freeze in the growth of foreign workforce will be detrimental to businesses.

He added that it is too risky to bet that improvement in Labour Force Participation Rate will offset the real need for more foreign workers in some domestically oriented sectors such as construction where demand is growing.



Mr Ho said in the 2012/2013 SBF National Business Survey of a thousand of its members, mostly SMEs, 14 per cent of those surveyed said that they are considering relocating out of Singapore, as a result of the government's policy to tighten foreign workers in 2012.

As for manufacturing companies, the proportion is 28 per cent.

Mr Ho said the Workers' Party's proposal tightens foreign workforce further and this could have serious impact on jobs and the well-being of Singaporeans.


Related
WP releases own population paper
Grace Fu: Govt studying paper
WP's Population Paper lands new blow to local SMEs: ASME
White and Blue: A Tale of Two Papers

WP's Population Paper lands new blow to local SMEs: ASME

$
0
0
Channel NewsAsia, 24 Feb 2013

The Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (ASME) said it views the Workers' Party's Population Policy Paper as another blow to the local SME community.

The association said it is already facing a severe manpower crunch from the government's tightening of foreigners and now the Workers' Party is proposing an even more drastic deceleration.

The association said the construction industry, the F&B industry and others in the service sector simply cannot recruit enough Singaporeans.

It added that as these SMEs throw in the towel, Singapore Professionals, Managers and Executives will soon find the upward spiralling effect of less manpower to manage, fewer companies to serve, to audit and to provide financial services to and that will lead to reduction in jobs for Singaporeans.


The association said it supports the view that the government should encourage resident workforce growth, however, not at the expense of simply cutting it down to zero foreign workforce growth.

ASME added that increasing resident workforce growth should complement a gradual tightening of the inflow of foreign workers. It said the tightening of inflow of foreign worker should be done progressively, together with more incentives and aid to help SMEs in the face of the current economic transition.

As seen with the recent abrupt changes in foreign worker reduction policy, this has already caused many SMEs to relocate or close down, causing a loss of income and jobs for Singaporeans as well.


Related

Diners feeling the staff crunch

$
0
0
The dining experience has been marred by poorer service and higher food prices brought on by the manpower crunch in the food and beverage industry
By Rebecca Lynne Tan, The Sunday Times, 24 Feb 2013

Modern Singaporean restaurant Wok & Barrel will be shutting its doors for good next Sunday.

The main reason for its closure is one that ripples through the food and beverage industry: a shortage of manpower.

Staff would routinely not show up for work at Ms Shen Tan's 50-seat restaurant in Duxton Hill.

The manpower issue, coupled with other factors such as rising costs of labour and rental, has led her to call it quits.

Last December, two of her four full-time staff resigned, leaving her with just one cook in the kitchen and another running the front of house operations. Part-time service crew who did not turn up for work did not help matters either.

To cope, she would double as cook and server almost every day, running to and from the kitchen.

Ms Tan, 40, says: "I feel bad for the customer but I can't do anything about it if someone doesn't turn up for work. I am frustrated that I can't meet diners' expectations of service."

A busy night at the restaurant can look like this: irate customers waving frantically for their orders to be taken, dirty plates waiting to be cleared and empty glasses in need of topping up.

This is a common scene at many other restaurants here.

Diners who do not understand the situation become angsty and annoyed. Some even end up leaving the restaurant because of the lack of service.

The rising costs of manpower, rental and raw ingredients are also translating to higher menu prices.

While the labour crunch is perhaps the biggest headache, businesses are also grappling with increasing rents in land-scarce Singapore and paying more for ingredients, which cost more because of increasing freight charges and scarcity brought on by natural disasters, among other factors.

Restaurants bear the majority of these costs. In some instances, about 5 to 10 per cent is passed on to consumers through price increases.

Also, the fewer the number of staff, the lower the productivity, which also means restaurants do not turn tables as quickly as they would like to.

The result is worsening dining experiences and pricier meals for customers.

Restaurants that cannot cope with the labour shortage then close as a last resort.

And Ms Tan's restaurant is not the only casualty.

Others, such as Japanese restaurant group RE&S, and the TungLok Group, which runs mostly Chinese restaurants, have had to close some of their eateries because of the lack of manpower.

TungLok Group, for example, closed its Lao Beijing outlet at Tiong Bahru Plaza last December due to a "severe manpower shortage".

Singapore's food scene is becoming increasingly vibrant, with a growing number of restaurants and food and beverage outlets here.

But restaurateurs say the industry has never seen worse times.

The lack of staff, as well as the Ministry of Manpower's tightening of foreign worker dependency ratio ceilings from 50 to 45 per cent, are making it tougher for restaurants to operate.

A check with 15 restaurants and restaurant groups found that they need between 10 and 40 per cent more staff to function optimally.

According to the most recent economic survey on F&B services by the Department of Statistics released earlier this month, Singapore had 2,317 restaurants in 2011, which employed 43,500 workers in 2011.

And still, more workers are needed to fill jobs in this sector.

Restaurateurs whom SundayLife! spoke to also need additional staff to operate new restaurants they plan to open this year.

These were planned for and committed to in 2011 and early last year, before the manpower situation worsened in the middle of last year.

Figures from the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority show that 686 restaurants were set up last year, which translates to an average of just under two restaurant openings a day.

A total of 537 restaurants closed last year, which equates to a nett increase of 149 restaurants last year, more than double the increase in 2011.

Together, the restaurateurs whom SundayLife! spoke to say they plan to open 30 more restaurants this year.

For example, Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts will be opening four restaurants this year and is looking to hire 150 more staff.

The Paradise Group, behind restaurants such as Canton Paradise and Paradise Inn, has five new restaurant openings this year and will need another 100 or so employees.

Meanwhile, hotelier-restaurateur Loh Lik Peng, whose restaurants include Pollen and Esquina, needs at least another 25 service and kitchen staff for his two new restaurants, slated to open in the next few months.

The Deliciae Hospitality Management Group, behind restaurants such as &Made and Sabio, will be opening three restaurants at the revamped Suntec City Mall later this year and will require another 80 staff.

But the overall annual average unemployment rate remained at a low of 2 per cent last year.

Restaurateurs say it is a case of too many jobs and not enough eligible applicants, as restaurants must first hire Singaporeans workers before they can employ foreigners, in order to meet quotas.

New Manpower Ministry measures took effect last July to regulate Singapore's increasing dependence on foreign manpower.

The tighter dependency ratio means that a company with 10 local workers, which could previously hire up to 10 foreign workers, now has to cut its foreign workforce by two if it retains 10 local workers.

Companies have been given a "transition period" until June next year to comply with the new regulations.

But currently, companies which hire new foreign workers will not be allowed to exceed the new dependency ratio ceiling.

The manpower crunch and more stringent government regulations are forcing restaurateurs to think twice about growing their restaurant businesses here, restaurateurs say.

Of the F&B groups SundayLife! spoke to, many are opening fewer outlets even though there are good opportunities.

Others are halting expansion plans here altogether and are instead looking to overseas markets, where labour is more accessible.

A common thread among restaurateurs is this: They do not want to compromise their customers' dining experience due to a lack of staff.

But sometimes, it cannot be helped.

POORER SERVICE

The noticeable lack of staff at restaurants - both local and foreign - is frustrating, diners say.

One exasperated diner who had a recent unpleasant dining experience is Mrs Audrey Soh, 34, who teaches pilates. Dining at a new restaurant on Sentosa on Valentine's Day, she says it took more than 20 minutes for her and her husband just to catch a server's attention to take their orders.

The celebratory meal turned into a frustrating one.

She says: "I felt as if there was just too much happening in the kitchen. The staff were so busy serving food to tables that they forgot about the new customers."

Extended waiting times for food and service at under-staffed restaurants are also another gripe, but some customers remain understanding.

Bank employee Alex Quek, 31, who has dined at sharing plates eatery Morsels in Mayo Street several times, says: "Waiting time for food there is, at times, twice as long as at other restaurants, but I think it is worth it because the food is made from scratch and tastes good, as opposed to being pre-prepared."

Housewife and mother of two young children Anne Lim, 36, says she was close to "tearing her hair out" when she had to wait 20 minutes for her bill earlier this month at a casual Western chain, but says she empathises with staff.

She says: "My kids were whining and wanted to go home. But it is hard to blame the restaurant when you see only a handful of staff already stretched to full capacity, and a manager walking around the restaurant briskly with beads of sweat on his brow.

"I feel sorry for them - it must be stressful working in an environment where everyone demands your attention."

She adds that service from grouchy workers who are snappy and disgruntled can also mar the dining experience. That happens sometimes, restaurateurs say with regret, because when restaurants are short of staff, existing ones take on longer shifts to alleviate the situation and become over-worked and tired in the process.

To manage the labour crunch, what some restaurants such as Vietnamese noodle chain Nam Nam and casual Japanese restaurant Ichiban Boshi end up doing during peak periods is limit the number of diners who enter their restaurants.

A queue forms outside the restaurant and customers wonder why they are standing in line when there are empty seats in the restaurant.

Ms Winnie Loo, 37, senior marketing communications manager of RE&S Enterprises, which owns Ichiban Boshi, says: "We are sorry that our customers may have to wait during peak times due to the staff shortage. As we want to maintain higher standards, we do not want to compromise this by rushing our staff which would let our customers down."

Indeed, restaurateurs are more than aware of the effect the lack of service staff has on patrons, and it saddens them because a restaurant sells more than just food - it offers a dining experience.

Mr Olivier Bendel, 40, chief executive of the Deliciae group, says: "I feel bad. Pleasing people is our main goal - it is about good food and good service."

He has stepped in countless times to serve guests and clear tables at his restaurants, which include French steak and fries restaurant L'Entrecote in Duxton Hill.

Mr Bendel is certainly not the only boss serving customers because restaurants are short handed.

Last August, owners and investors of Uma Uma Ramen at Forum The Shopping Mall had to roll up their sleeves for weeks until they could find more staff, while owners and shareholders of Lolla in Ann Siang Hill had to wash dishes at night for several weeks despite having day jobs when the restaurant first opened last September.

Over at Chui Huay Lim Teochew Cuisine restaurant in Newton, Mr Ang Kiam Meng, chief executive of the Jumbo group, which runs the restaurant, as well as other top-level management staff helped out with service over the first two days of Chinese New Year because the restaurant needed extra hands.

They say they have no qualms doing it but add their pitching in does not solve their manpower issue in the long term.

With the opening of more restaurants, restaurateurs worry that they will not be able to find enough staff to fill new positions, which may then affect the quality of service.

Recruitment has become so competitive, with restaurateurs desperate to attract more staff ahead of scheduled openings, that some are even going beyond conventional advertising to hire the help they need.

The Spa Esprit Group, which owns eateries such as Skinny Pizza and Tiong Bahru Bakery, will be hosting a recruitment party with a free flow of food and drinks next Thursday night hoping to attract 200 staff for its six to eight new restaurants this year.

Its managing director and founder Cynthia Chua, 41, says: "It is really, really difficult to get local staff. Traditional methods of recruitment often see 100 foreign applicants and perhaps just three locals."

She adds that very often, when interviews are scheduled with local applicants, none show up, a scenario many restaurateurs, including Lolla's managing director Pang Hian Tee, have experienced.

PRICIER FOOD

Higher operating costs that include increased labour costs, rising rentals and the increasing costs of ingredients, have also led to higher prices of food for diners.

Restaurateurs say overall costs have gone up at least 20 to 30 per cent over the last year, and they have little choice but to pass on some of it to consumers.

Some of the restaurateurs SundayLife! spoke to admit raising prices by about 5 to 10 per cent and absorbing the rest. They say it is not possible to raise prices by too much in a competitive restaurant environment as customers will go elsewhere.

For example, TungLok Group's executive chairman Andrew Tjioe says menu prices, in some cases, are up about 10 per cent, but the group tries to streamline processes such as producing more items such as stocks and marinades in the central kitchen to keep costs down.

To attract and retain talent, many restaurants have resorted to offering higher salaries. Starting pay for service staff with little or no F&B experience or training can go as high as $2,000, depending on the employer. This is about $800 to $1,000 higher than two years ago, restaurateurs say.

They are also increasing salaries of current employees to keep them from crossing over to competitors.

Ms Bernadette Wong, 27, spokesman for Creative Eateries, which runs Bangkok Jam and Boston Seafood Shack among other restaurants, says: "We would rather pay to retain our good staff, than lose them and train new staff from scratch. Therefore, on average, salaries will increase between $500 and $1000 each worker depending on the level."

And when workers leave, more time needs to be spent on training new employees, which is a hidden cost. This process can affect service standards and also be disruptive to productivity flow.

Other increases in manpower costs also stem from increased foreign worker levies and increases in application, issuance and renewal fees for work passes.

CHANGING DINING EXPERIENCE

If manpower issues continue to plague restaurants here, diners may have to adapt to new and less familiar dining experiences.

For one thing, interactive menus in the form of iPads, tablets and iPod touches might become the norm rather than a novelty.

These help businesses reduce reliance on manpower as well as streamline orders, which can be sent directly to kitchens from the devices.

Already, restaurants such as sushi eatery Genki Sushi (right) and Indian restaurant Gayatri are using such devices, while groups such as Lo & Behold will be introducing them soon.

Also, diners may have to get used to more self- service restaurants. Creative Eateries' self-service eatery Boston Seafood Shack at The Star Vista in Buona Vista was specifically conceptualised with the manpower crunch in mind. Diners order at the counter and are then presented with a buzzer that notifies them when food is ready for collection.

Most of all, diners here, restaurateurs say, will need to learn to be a little more understanding and gracious when it comes to waiting times for food and service.

However, diners such as Ms Lim worry that if customers become overly understanding, their graciousness might be taken for granted.

She says: "I understand the situation, but at the same time, I don't want slow service to perpetuate. If restaurants think it is okay for diners to have slow or bad service, then what is the point of dining at a restaurant and paying for it? I might as well have fast food."

However, conditioning diner mindsets on what to expect here, if possible, will be a gradual process, restaurateurs say. But they also express concern over how Singapore is to keep up with other international cities on the service front.

Spa Esprit Group's Ms Chua says: "It will be very difficult for Singapore to compete internationally as a gastronomic city.

"People are more demanding as to how they spend their dollar these days. If the reputation for poor service in Singapore becomes ingrained in the mindset of travellers, it will take a long time to reverse it."



No more new TungLok restaurants

Who: Mr Andrew Tjioe, 54, executive chairman of TungLok Group, which runs 25 restaurants islandwide including Tung Lok Signatures, Tong Le Private Dining, My Humble House and Lao Beijing.

To cope with the manpower shortage, the TungLok Group closed its casual restaurant Lao Beijing at Tiong Bahru Plaza last December.

A sign on the shutters reads: "We regret to inform that Lao Beijing at Tiong Bahru Plaza will cease operations with effect from Dec 26 due to severe manpower shortage."

Diners after the chain's Northern Chinese cuisine now have to head to Lao Beijing's three other outlets.

The restaurant at Tiong Bahru Plaza still had another four months left on its lease, but Mr Tjioe and his team did the calculations and says it made more sense to close the restaurant and re-deploy the 16 staff to his other restaurants.

Part of the reason he is not renewing the lease there is due to a lack of manpower. Other factors include rising rentals.

He says: "It was a trade-off - we did the sums. It was better to pull the staff over so that we would be able tooperate our new restaurants TungLok Xihe and Modern Asian Diner at The Grandstand than to continue at Tiong Bahru Plaza. So I decided to close."

The average spend at Lao Beijing there was about $20 to $25 a person, but at the two new mid- to upper-mid-tiered restaurants, the average cheque is about $30 to $35 for lunch, and $50 to $55 for dinner.

The TungLok Group operates on "a skeleton workforce", says Mr Tjioe.

Even with the group's 700-strong workforce, which is equally split between kitchen and service staff, it is still about 20 per cent short of staff.

And when the Ministry of Manpower's revised dependency ratio ceiling kicks in next year, the group may find itself with about 30 foreigners too many if it does not ramp up the hiring of Singaporeans.

But that is proving to be a challenge.

This year, the plan is to consolidate and strengthen the running of existing outlets, focus on its catering arm and plan for overseas expansion in cities such as Jakarta and Beijing. The group has one restaurant in Beijing and three in Jakarta.

He does not face the same manpower issues overseas as he does here. He says: "As long as you are willing to pay, you will get the manpower you need."

In Singapore, he adds, it is a different story. The starting pay for service staff without experience is $1,800, by far one of the highest in the market. Recently, the company received 20 applications from Singaporeans, but only one person took up the position.

"The problem is choking," Mr Tjioe says of the manpower crunch in the restaurant scene. "We have been doing business overseas anyway but perhaps now, that is the way to go - to spend more time exploring overseas markets than wasting time here.

"I will not be opening any more restaurants for a while. I have to stop, not because there are no opportunities but primarily because of the labour shortage. The market can definitely afford to have more restaurants."

The company has already spent about $2 million to $3 million on machines over the last two years to help with automation to reduce the reliance on manpower at restaurants.

For example, TungLok's popular pork shank, which is available at many of its restaurants, is marinated in bulk at the group's 20,000 sq ft central kitchen in Bukit Batok. In fact, Mr Tjioe says, for some items such as the pork shank, preparing them in bulk adds to intensity of flavour to the dish.

Aside from machines for sauces and marinades, he also has one that can make superior stock in one hour, as opposed to the usual eight hours it would take to prepare it at an outlet.

While technological advancements and machines such as these aid productivity, he insists that it is not always achieved through these means.

"When you have more manpower, you can send some staff for training and they can take turns. You will then have much better quality staff in the long run," he says, adding that well-trained staff lead to better efficiency and more sales.

But he says, sending staff for training can be tough "when you are tight on manpower".

Profits are also shrinking, with manpower and rental and the costs of ingredients on the rise. But these costs cannot be passed on in full to customers, because of the competitive restaurant market.

A whole fried chicken, Mr Tjioe gives as an example, typically costs $40 at most Chinese restaurants, and if a restaurant is to increase this price, diners will go elsewhere for the same dish.

What can be done, he says, is to create different "value-added" dishes by adding additional ingredients so that the dish changes into something new and a higher price may be warranted.

Chinese restaurants also function differently from Western ones in terms of culture. Meals typically call for more plate changes and more frequent topping up of small tea cups, and for managers to mingle with diners, offering a more personalised service.

He adds: "We are not just competing locally, we are also competing on an international level.

"When those who have been served in Chinese restaurants in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Taipei come to Singapore, they expect exactly the same experience, and we cannot be too far off."



Longer wait for food, no time to create new dishes

Who: Bryan Chia and Petrina Loh, both 31, chef-owners of 11/2-month-old restaurant Morsels at 35 Mayo Street.

Casual eatery Morsels has been open only two months and already, two cooks have left and its restaurant manager has quit.

The restaurant now has one full-time service staff member and three part-timers, of whom, one is a cook who starts working in the kitchen only at dinner time, after service has begun.

"We definitely need more help," says Ms Loh of her 40-seat restaurant, located on the fringe of Little India.

It offers dishes such as scallop ceviche, squid ink risotto with salted egg sauce and grilled octopus and sweet clams in a milky and flavoursome fig and kim chi broth.

The two are culinary school graduates. Mr Chia attended the Culinary Institute of America in Greystone, Napa Valley, while Ms Loh went to the California Culinary Academy - Le Cordon Bleu in San Francisco.

Restaurants they have worked in include Mosimann's in London, Bouchon in Yountville in the Napa Valley and Spruce in San Francisco, all of which are run by famed Michelin-starred chefs, as well as other popular restaurants such as Delfina in San Francisco and Oenotri Restaurant in Napa.

And in those restaurants, and others they have dined at, staffing never seemed to be a problem.

Ms Loh says: "In San Francisco, for example, it did not seem hard to hire - the restaurants always had staff in the kitchen. Over there, there are plenty of locals who want do the job. In Singapore, we don't have enough locals who want to do the job, yet the Goverment still sets a foreign worker quota."

She adds that on the service front in the United States, staff work hard for tips, so the lack of service staff has never been an issue.

They had heard stories about the food and beverage industry's tough manpower situation here, but still decided to go ahead with their dream of running an eatery, because they thought that, as chef-owners, they would not be held ransom to chefs leaving or not having enough waitstaff.

Still, the situation is proving to be challenging.

For now, it is just Mr Chia and Ms Loh who prepare all the ingredients, stocks and sauces from scratch, in time for dinner service.

Ms Loh says: "I hope this doesn't have to be compromised as it is fairly time consuming."

Mr Chia runs the kitchen and cooks the food during service, while Ms Loh handles the orders, prepares salads and the ceviche, and adds the final touches to dishes.

So, when one of them falls ill, it gets tough. In fact, just last week, Ms Loh had a migraine but could not afford to rest.

Operations in the kitchen could go further south. Diners might have to wait longer for food, for instance, should one of them becomes too sick to work.

Ideally, she says, the restaurant needs at least three more kitchen staff: a cook to help with preparations and two line cooks.

The couple thinks the restaurant will be able to manage with the lean service staff team it already has, provided the staff they have turn up for work.

Morsels is open for only dinner but there are plans to open for lunch on Saturdays, if they can find the staff. There are no plans to open for lunch on weekdays.

On the manpower crunch, Ms Loh says: "Our kitchen won't shut down because both of us can cook, but that being said, it means we will be working longer hours than we already are."

As it is, they get to the restaurant in mid-morning after going to the market to shop for ingredients, and do not leave until about 2am.

She says that labour-intensive dishes, such as the tomato tofu salad, where the grape and cherry tomatoes need to be scored, blanched and iced before the skin is removed, might have to be taken off the menu because of the manpower crunch.

And if the situation does not improve, they may need ramp up the preparation processes by using their combi-oven and sous vide machine more extensively. For example, the grilled beef may not be cooked to order in the future. It may have to be cooked sous vide ahead of time, and seared on the grill just before it is served.

Also, with longer hours spent on preparation, the duo may not be able to change their menu every eight weeks, as they had planned, as more time spent on preparation means less time for creating new dishes. They say that at this rate, they will also not be able to add new dishes to their existing menu.

New staff can also affect service time and consistency, they add.

Ms Loh says: "The food might come out slower than usual. Also, with the high staff turnover, it is hard to keep quality consistent so it is more work for us to train and retrain."

Customers at Morsels have been "fairly understanding" so far.

On two occasions, diners have had to wait about 30 minutes for food, but Ms Loh says they were "nice about it".

She adds: "We train our servers to make sure they let the kitchen know when to fire up the food.

"But it helps to let our customers understand the situation, and we throw in some munchies so that they can keep busy while they wait for their food."

Minister's health vow to the needy

$
0
0
Medifund scheme will be strengthened to ensure aid is available to cover medical bills
By Salma Khalik, The Sunday Times, 24 Feb 2013

No Singaporeans will be denied health care because they cannot afford it, the Government vowed yesterday.

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong gave that assurance as figures for the last financial year up to March 2012 showed that Medifund, the Government endowment fund to help needy citizens cover their medical bills, paid out more than its income for the first time since it was set up in 1993.


Despite the $1.8 million shortfall, Mr Gan told The Sunday Times that the Government will continue to strengthen Medifund to ensure there is enough money to help the needy - especially the elderly.

He said: "The ability to afford medical care is understandably something that may concern our elderly. We recognise this and have tried to provide our senior citizens with more peace of mind."

This is why, he said, the ministry has "given hospitals a lot of flexibility in deciding on Medifund disbursements".

He added: "This helps to ensure that those who genuinely need help are able to receive it and will not fall through the cracks, especially our elderly."

In the last financial year, the Government put $600 million into Medifund's capital sum which now stands at over $3 billion. The money given out by Medifund is the income earned on this capital sum.

Medifund received $82.4 million in earnings in that period and gave out that amount plus $2 million to health-care institutions.

These bodies approved 518,389 applications and gave out $90.8 million to patients, up from 480,869 applications which received $78.7 million the previous year. These institutions were able to pay out more to patients, thanks to Medifund money they had not used in the past.

Only around 1 per cent of applications were rejected - mainly those from people who can afford to pay their bills or with enough money in Medisave accounts.

Some 96 per cent of applications were for outpatient bills, although they accounted for only 66 per cent of the money given out.

Almost 94 per cent of successful applicants had the entire portion of their subsidised bills taken care of.

On average, an inpatient received $1,295 while an outpatient got $103. A needy patient may make several applications to Medifund in a year.

For the past two decades, Medifund has always had more money than the amount it has given to health bodies.

Before a general election, all surplus is added to the capital sum, which cannot be touched. This surplus now stands at $78 million.

In 2007, Medifund Silver was set up to cater specifically for people aged 65 and older. The capital sum for this stands at $740 million. Last year, 20 per cent more money was given to the elderly from this fund than in the 2010 financial year.

Said Mr Gan: "We will continue to do more to provide the elderly with added peace of mind when it comes to health-care services."

A similar fund for children called Medifund Junior will be launched next month that gives parents of young children easier access to financial aid when faced with hefty treatment costs.




Medifund Silver to the rescue
Divorcee received help with $2,500 hospital bill, which was already heavily subsidised
By Salma Khalik, The Sunday Times, 24 Feb 2013

Madam Sam Ah Mui, 67, fractured her ankle and damaged her spine when she fell in the toilet of her rented flat in February last year.

She was taken to Tan Tock Seng Hospital for treatment, before being admitted to Ren Ci Community Hospital, but could not afford to pay even the $100 deposit. It was then waived by the Buddhist charity running the hospital.

The divorcee was living with her daughter, who had been retrenched from her job because she had been taking too much time off to look after her mother, who suffers from heart problems and asthma.

Madam Sam's final bill, after 75 per cent of it was subsidised, came to $2,483. But her daughter, Ms Yee Li Nah, 43, had only $205 in her Medisave account. Fortunately, they were able to turn to Medifund Silver, which picked up the rest of the tab.

Ren Ci patients received more than $1.5 million in Medifund help last year, second only to Bright Vision Hospital's $2.1 million among step-down care facilities for recovering patients.

In the 2011 financial year, 118,337 applications from older patients were approved by health-care institutions.

They received a total of $24 million from Medifund Silver.

Ms Esther Lim, who heads the medical social workers team at the Singapore General Hospital - which gave out more than $5 million from Medifund Silver to the elderly - said the fund's criteria for help are less stringent than those of the main Medifund.

She said: "An elderly patient who might not qualify under Medifund, but who gets help from siblings who are also old and may have medical needs of their own, can get help from Medifund Silver."

Ms Lim said that unlike some younger patients, most of the older ones feel responsible about paying bills.

She added: "Every time elderly patients get a bill, they feel nervous and upset."

Ms Lim, who has been a medical social worker for 17 years, has told her team of social workers to make elderly patients more aware of the help available to them.

She said: "We don't want them to stop getting treatment because they are afraid they can't pay the bill."


Help available to elderly

"We don't want them to stop getting treatment because they are afraid they can't pay the bill."
- MS ESTHER LIM, who heads the medical social workers team at the Singapore General Hospital. She has told her team of social workers to make elderly patients more aware of the help available to them.

S'pore's best-kept secrets: Its virtues

$
0
0
Time to reboot Singapore brand and showcase achievements to the world
By Parag Khanna, Published The Straits Times, 23 Feb 2013

SINCE relocating to Singapore six months ago, I've continued my travels to the Middle East, Africa, South America, Europe, the United States and elsewhere in Asia.

Unlike in the past, however, when asked where I come from and where I live, I answer "Singapore". Imagine my shock when so many people around the world respond with almost Pavlovian reflex: "Ahh, chewing gum!" Or: "Of course, caning!"

It's striking how the image of Singapore lags two decades behind the reality. While the monikers of trivial incidents are passed down over generations, many of Singapore's virtues remain its best-kept secrets.

This neglect of Singapore's brand threatens to perpetuate itself. A small handful of Yale University's liberal arts faculty seem not to know the difference between Singapore and Saudi Arabia; most of their vituperative assaults on the Yale-NUS partnership have gone unanswered.

No Singaporean has stood up and stated the obvious: Yale - or any other university - would be lucky to have an outpost in the thriving heart of Asia. These students might go back to Yale with worldly and practical perspectives that could enlighten the more myopic professors on campus.

In fact, Singapore's star is rising fast. Just last month, two Harvard professors published a set of conversational reflections on the career of the "grand master" Lee Kuan Yew - but pointing as much to what one can learn from Singapore's past as its vision for the future as the unofficial capital of Asia. Indeed, its only rival for this title, Hong Kong, has made itself practically unliveable due to political capture by mainland China and horrendous air pollution.

Meanwhile, Singapore is becoming every day more and more the "Global Asia" hub for Asians looking to invest abroad as well as Western and other multinationals seeking a greater Asian presence.

All of this hints at the emergence of a new phase in how Singapore perceives itself - and how the world could appreciate it. A visit to the Singapore Discovery Centre reminds one of the first phases of Singapore's modernisation: independence, nation-building and internationalism. What must come next is leadership.

Today, Singapore is the only truly successful post-colonial nation in the world. It is also a role model as an agile entrepot in a turbulent world economy, a smart city in an age where sustainable urbanisation is the paramount priority, and a pioneering "info-state" in an era where data plays as much a role in governance as democracy.

Singapore is not immediately replicable, but that won't stop increasing swathes of the world from trying once they see its accomplishments. It is time, therefore, to reboot Singapore's brand.

Each agency responsible for promoting Singapore does its job exceptionally well. The Economic Development Board (EDB) smoothly brings in leading multinationals to establish regional headquarters and R&D facilities. Changi Airport is indisputably the world's best, and the Singapore Tourism Board is ensuring steadily growing visitor traffic.

Sentosa Island and Marina Bay Sands, which has replaced Raffles Hotel as the iconic image of Singapore, are buzzing with tourists and gamblers. With its expansion beyond China and South-east Asia, Singbridge will speed up other countries' infrastructural modernisation and economic growth.

But the whole is not yet greater than the sum of its parts. No single agency is tasked with crafting an overarching strategy for Singapore's international profile. Because there is no meta-image of Singapore, the rest of the world falls back on chewing gum and caning. Singapore has to make it easier for others to understand what it is.

Mr Simon Anholt, founder of the nation-branding field, has convincingly demonstrated that the positive (or negative) image of a country correlates very little to what it has done for itself, and much more to its contributions to the world. Singaporeans need to start singing from a similar sheet of music - and also go on a world tour. Exporting Singapore itself is the best thing Singapore can do.

Consider how Britain has pursued enhancing its global reputation. There have been widely recognisable campaigns such as "Cool Britannia" and "THIS IS GREAT Britain". The Olympics and Paralympics were stellar in execution, and the Diamond Jubilee and royal wedding were made to feel like global events.

In addition to successfully promoting these events, London & Partners has overseen a streamlined visa policy, more Asian students enrolled in universities, and an uptick in foreign investment. With this single agency coordinating diverse activities, Britain topped Monocle magazine's 2012 soft power index. The lesson is that every agency needs to know where it fits into a broader policy. Coordinating such a strategy is a role Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister for Communications and Information, should be empowered to play.

Some would argue that Singapore lacks the size or clout to compete with the likes of New York and London. But this misses the shifting foundations of influence in the 21st century. Singapore represents not only itself but Asia, the region to which all powers and regions, not just America, are "pivoting". Singapore also has other assets these great global English- speaking cities lack: superior infrastructure and quality of life. Singapore is cleaner, greener and safer than any other major city. After a brief lapse due to rapid growth and rising expectations, the Government is again on track to build infrastructure ahead of demand.

Many of Singapore's nascent investments and priorities should be considered pillars of its long- term strategic vision. The EDB and the Energy Market Authority are providing substantial new incentives for the private sector to finance industrial conversion to lower emissions, while backing advanced efforts in waste-to-energy such as Alpha Biofuels. More than $16 billion will be spent from 2010 to 2015 to support innovative R&D and enterprise.

The major investments in upgrading Singapore's towns from Jurong West to Changi into leading-edge clusters will go a long way towards decongesting the Central Business District and making Singapore what Mr Boris Johnson aspires for London: to be a charming "city of villages". Only then can the heated debates over population targets be resolved in a win-win fashion: A more populous and diverse nation, but one in which there are affordable housing, decent work and desirable lifestyles for all stakeholders in society, indigenous and foreign.

As the Singapore Institute for International Affairs' "Future 50" project highlights, the population issue is more than just demographics: It is fundamentally about Singapore's competitiveness and image as an inclusive city of opportunity, essential for any top-tier world capital.

There are also many things Singapore can do to surprise, excite and inspire. Imagine if Newater, Singapore's recycled answer to commercially bottled water, were itself bottled and distributed for free? An informally named "Evian Tax" would be levied on imported bottle water, a reminder of their highly impure supply chains. Such a bold move would immediately spark a movement among the world's progressive leaders.

As important as efficient mobility is to Singaporeans, the country should also become the first major test-bed for Google's driverless car technology, leveraging and expanding the road sensor networks already in place.

With skills-focused education becoming the new norm for a globally competitive labour force, Singapore's vocational institutes and polytechnics should become not only physical but also virtual hubs for workers seeking the most up-to-date curricula for rapidly shifting supply chains.

Just as importantly, Singapore can lighten up culturally, with more skateboarding parks and street art. If Beijing can have an avant garde arts district such as Zone 798, then surely the Gillman Barracks can be a bit messier and edgier as well. All of these would show a Singapore that can lighten up without letting down its guard, a country that is not just smart but also sexy.

The writer is director of the Hybrid Reality Institute and author of the new e-book Hybrid Reality: Thriving In The Emerging Human-Technology Civilisation (TED Books, 2012). The Hybrid Reality Institute is a research and advisory group focused on human-technology co-evolution, geotechnology and innovation.

Picking up the pieces after the protests

$
0
0
No running away from ageing society, and the need to take steps to deal with it
By Warren Fernandez, The Sunday Times, 24 Feb 2013

The large turnout at the protest rally two Saturdays ago against the Population White Paper culminated in calls from some participants for a referendum on the issue.

Judging by the anger that has raged against the paper's proposals, the outcome of such a poll seems a no-brainer. It is as clear as day that the White Paper has gone down badly.

Congestion on the roads and trains, skyrocketing property prices, heightened competition for jobs, schools and other amenities, have all combined to make the idea of having almost two million more people added to this tiny island seem like one of those "foolhardy" or "courageous" suggestions that politicians make at their peril.

It all made me wonder how a similar proposal to boost the population might have gone down in the 1980s, when the quest for economic growth was not as unfashionable as it is today. Would the population, which then hovered around 2.5 million, have come out in support of doubling this in a few decades?

Even then, it would have been a hard sell.

One reason stems from what psychologists call the "end of history illusion".

A recent New York Times report citing a study in the journal Science noted: "When we remember our past selves, we seem quite different. We know how much our personalities and tastes have changed over the years.

"But when we look ahead, somehow we expect ourselves to stay the same... we underestimate how much we will change in the future."

The same might apply to societies. So, just as it was difficult for anyone living in the 1980s to picture the Marina Bay of today, a spaghetti network of MRT lines running across the island, or three terminals at Changi Airport, most people extrapolate from their experiences today to form a picture of what the future might be like, as if society has reached its zenith and "history" has ended.

Little wonder then that all the grand plans unveiled recently for new homes, more MRT lines, additional parks and recreation options seemed remote. At best, the proposals were plausible; at worst, just so much political pie in the sky.

Most of us live in the here and now. Quite naturally, people want to see their current concerns being addressed, bottlenecks fixed, runaway costs checked, before they will believe that things might get better, as promised.

So, ironically, the upshot of this is that the White Paper, which was meant to make the case for a more moderate and calibrated pace of immigration, has ended up making the idea of further inflows of people all the more unpalatable politically.

Singapore, someone pointed out to me, is living through another Howe Yoon Chong moment.

Remember Mr Howe? He was the top civil servant-turned-minister mostly known for an ill-fated report in 1984. Like the recent White Paper, it too was focused on the challenges faced by the ageing of Singapore society.

By most accounts, the report contained some sensible ideas. But one controversial proposal to raise the Central Provident Fund withdrawal age from 55 to 60 sparked a furore. It proved so politically toxic, tarnishing the entire report, that few can recall anything else in it.

There was much dark talk of "betrayal" by the Government of the day, and murmurings about a backlash at the next polls. Politicians beat a hasty retreat, and it was only several years later that they took another stab at the underlying issue of people needing more retirement savings, when the CPF Minimum Sum scheme was introduced in 1987.

Then, as now, the idea that you could simply set out the facts, make a rational argument and win people round to the need for "painful but necessary" measures, proved overly optimistic. As was the case then, the latest White Paper has made tackling Singapore's rapidly ageing society more - not less - challenging politically.

Worst of all, the strong reactions to the recent proposals have emboldened latent xenophobes, who now see an opportunity to whip up public unhappiness for their own ends. Today, it is not uncommon to hear people say: "I am really not against foreigners, but...", before launching into a tirade against immigrants, or spewing some racial stereotype, and leading up to an anti-government diatribe.

Some have begun to mouth empty slogans such as "Singapore for Singaporeans" or "born and bred Singaporeans". There was even one outlandish posting on Facebook calling for "ethnic cleansing of FTs from Singapore".

The idea is absurd. Where would we draw the line separating "born and bred" Singaporeans from others to be spurned - 1965? If so, many of us would have to disavow our own parents or grandparents as interlopers. Or should we push it back to 1819? In that case, most of us, except for a few Malay families, would have to pack up and ship out to wherever our ancestors came from.

Let me be clear: It is perfectly legitimate to debate, and disagree with, the government's proposals. Like many others, I share the unease over the ramping up of immigration that led to the current infrastructure bottlenecks, and fed the collective angst over the White Paper.

But it is a fine line between this and vilifying foreigners to use xenophobia for political ends, wittingly or otherwise. Right-minded Singaporeans will have to guard, and speak out, against this.

For, when the political heat cools, Singaporeans are going to have to pick up the pieces and figure out a way forward. To my mind, finding common ground is likely to entail the following:
- Coming to grips with the fact that Singapore has an ageing population. No doubt, some will blame this on past government policies. Even so, there's just no running away from the problems that loom. Most of us around today are likely to live through the effects of a major slowdown in our society and economy in the decades ahead. Either we do something about it now, or rue the consequences later.
- Dealing with this will require efforts to boost our birth rate, raise productivity and move the economy up the value chain. And yes, it is likely to call for some degree of immigration. The precise number is worthy of debate, but clearly the doors will have to be kept open, and the population will continue to grow.
- After all, Singapore was not built just by "born and bred" natives. It owes its success to our disparate immigrant ancestors' willingness to work together. It also took investments, skills and ideas from people from all round the world - such as Dutch economist Albert Winsemius for several years from the 1960s - as well as the sweat and toil of foreign construction workers, nurses, service staff, maids and cleaners, without whom this city would grind to a halt.
- So, those who speak disparagingly of "foreigners" or "FTs" (short for foreign talent) do a grave injustice to the founding ideals our forefathers held dear - of equality and meritocracy, "regardless of race, language, or religion".
- Ultimately, being Singaporean is as much an act of faith and will, rather than any geographical or ethnic lineage. Most Singaporeans, I believe, accept this and do not share the "little islander" mentality that some now espouse so vociferously and venomously.
But, unfortunately, recent events have raised the political temperature, and stakes. It is going to take much effort all round to ensure that Singapore remains open to the world and yet coheres internally, and to prevent that age-old refrain that haunts all fledgling and disparate societies - "things fall apart, the centre cannot hold" - from becoming a dreaded reality.


'End of history' illusion

Just as it was difficult for anyone living in the 1980s to picture the Marina Bay of today, a spaghetti network of MRT lines running across the island, or three terminals at Changi Airport, most people extrapolate from their experiences today to form a picture of what the future might be like.

Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>