Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live

No pay cut for junior civil servants re-hired at 62

$
0
0
But some senior officers will have salaries reduced by up to 15 per cent
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2013

FROM next month, junior officers in the public sector who turn 62 will not suffer a pay cut when they are re-employed, a move that the labour movement had called for a week ago.

These Division III officers, who do mostly clerical and front-line customer service work in ministries, earn between $1,300 and $2,100 a month.

There are about 11,700 of them in the public sector, but most are below the retirement age of 62.

However, the policy change that aims to coax older workers to continue working does not automatically apply to senior officers.

The Public Service Division (PSD) said yesterday that while more senior officers at Division I and II will continue at the same grade and salary, some will have their salaries reduced by up to 15 per cent.

The cut for these officers, who include teachers and management support officers, is in line with private sector practices, said the PSD, the human resource arm of the Government.

It also disclosed yesterday that the no-pay-cut policy was first applied to the lowest Division IV rung of officials like filing clerks since April last year.

About 130 of them were re-hired at their existing pay between April and December last year, it told The Straits Times.

As for senior officers, it gave figures to show that most did not suffer steep pay cuts.

Fewer than one in five of about 1,150 re-hired at lower pay last year had their salaries cut by more than 20 per cent. Only 1 per cent bore the full brunt of the 30 per cent reduction.

"With the revised terms (from next month), we hope to encourage more able officers to continue working after they turn 62," said Mr Tan Hoe Soon, a PSD director.

The National Trades Union Congress, in calling for the change, produced its poll of 118 unionised companies to show that eight in 10 did not reduce the pay of re-employed workers doing the same job.

Unionists yesterday cheered the PSD's move.

"The NTUC and public sector unions are happy that the PSD has responded positively to our feedback and calls to review its re-employment pay policy," said the labour movement's deputy secretary-general Heng Chee How.

Added the Amalgamated Union of Public Employees' general secretary Ma Wei Cheng: "Any employee who is offered a lower grade and lower pay has to have his roles and responsibilities reduced accordingly."

The chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Manpower Zainudin Nordin described the change as a "positive step", but urged the PSD to continue to review the 15 per cent pay cut for senior officers. "The principle must still be to pay according to the job, not age," he said.

A school clerk in her 50s, who cannot speak to the media without permission, said she would now consider working after 62, since there is no pay cut.

"For those re-hired earlier at lower pay, I hope their salaries will be adjusted," she said. "Otherwise, it is unfair."




RE-EMPLOYING OLDER PUBLIC OFFICERS
Salary for staff already re-hired to be reviewed
Govt will ensure they are not worse off when new pay terms kick in
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Straits Times, 31 Jul 2013

THE public officers re-hired before the latest change in rules will not be short-changed.

The Government will review the salaries of some 1,150 officers who were re-employed when they turned 62 between July 2011 and December last year.

This is to ensure that they are not worse off when the new pay terms kick in tomorrow.

"Their salaries will be aligned to the new guidelines," a Public Service Division (PSD) spokesman told The Straits Times last night.

The PSD had announced on Monday that junior officers, such as clerks in the public sector, will not suffer a pay cut when they are re-employed at 62 years old.

Some senior officers like teachers and management support officers will still have their salaries reduced, but the cut will be capped at 15 per cent, down from 30 per cent now.

It is the right move to equalise the pay between existing officers and those re-hired under the new rules, said human resource analyst David Leong.

"It is good human resource practice to do so, otherwise some (workers) in the same cohort can feel disgruntled," said the managing director of recruitment firm PeopleWorldwide Consulting. "Disgruntled employees can affect productivity."

But while the change is apace in the public sector, some private firms told The Straits Times yesterday that they will not take their cue from the Government's latest move. This is because some did not cut the pay of their re-hired workers in the first place.

A check with more than 20 large companies found that some re-employ their workers on the same terms after they turn 62 if they continue to do the same jobs.

These firms included ComfortDelGro Corp, DBS Bank, OCBC Bank, StarHub, CapitaLand and Marina Bay Sands.

The companies cite various reasons for not slashing the pay of older workers. Re-hiring workers at the same terms provides "added certainty and peace of mind" to them, said a DBS spokesman.

Singapore National Employers Federation executive director Koh Juan Kiat added: "Companies do not cut (the) salaries of workers who are in short supply."

But others, like Resorts World Sentosa and Sheraton Towers Singapore Hotel, preferred to wait and see, saying they may make changes.

Among those that did not reply to The Straits Times were SingTel, Singapore Airlines and United Overseas Bank. PSA Corp and SMRT Corp declined to comment, with the latter citing a Singapore Exchange gag order as its reason. The transport firm released its quarterly financial results yesterday.

For Dr Moh Chong Tau, president and chief executive officer of precision engineering firm Makino Asia, the question of cutting older workers' pay should not have arisen at all. About 20 of the firm's 500 employees were re-hired at 62 without pay cuts.
"An employer who cuts the pay of older workers should remember that he will also grow old one day," said the 62-year-old.




WHAT EMPLOYERS SAY

Older colleagues tend to have lower absentee rates than younger ones. Some of them also possess the ability to mentor and coach younger workers.
- Ms Tammy Tan, ComfortDelGro's group corporate communications officer. Workers in the transport firm can work until 67 with no change to their employment terms.



Regardless of age, as long as they are willing and able to contribute in the same capacity, we want to be fair to them by offering the same remuneration.
- Ms Chan Hoi San, StarHub's senior vice-president of human resource



The decision to re-employ workers should be based on individual capability and skill sets, job function and health condition rather than solely on the age factor.
- Mr Thomas Chua, president of the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry



Related


New family pledge emphasises the importance of family values in society

$
0
0
By Joanna Seow, The Straits Times, 31 Jul 2013

WE, THE people of Singapore... may sound like the National Pledge. But it is actually the beginning of a new pledge which encourages individuals to strengthen their commitment to family.

The Family Pledge, which was launched yesterday by the National Family Council, urges people to "affirm the commitment of marriage between husband and wife" and "take responsibility to nurture our children, and respect our elders".

Council chairman Lim Soon Hock said it was introduced because research showed that when people make a pledge, they tend to stay more committed.

"In today's avalanche of distractions, conflicting demands, noise, pressure of work... I think it is even more imperative that we go back to the basics," he said.

"The basics refer to the family as our source of values, identity, love, care, concern, enjoyment, celebration and our higher purposes."

More than 250,000 personal family pledges were collected during the Singapore Family Pledge movement in 2010, but this is the first time a nation-wide version has been introduced. It will be distributed by volunteer welfare organisations and through social media platforms.

Acting Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing believes that the pledge is "a very good ground-up initiative".

"We hope that more people will get to know this pledge, read it, reflect upon it and then act upon the pledge," he said.

Earlier, he spoke about the importance of family during an appreciation lunch which he hosted for people involved in the organisation of last month's National Family Celebrations.

The lunch at Sheraton Towers was attended by over 200 members and partners of the National Family Council, including Mr Joshua Yeo, 31, a lecturer at Republic Polytechnic, who was there with his wife and baby daughter.

He thought that the pledge's message was especially relevant in today's world, and hopes there will be an event for young families to come together to say the pledge on a national platform.

"Especially being a young father right now, I realise it's very, very challenging and I think the family pledge reminds me about the importance of marriage and also of showing love and concern."



Other reactions to the pledge were lukewarm. "It feels a bit forced," said Miss Jillian Chim, 23, a graduate associate working in a bank. "It's a concept that should be automatically or naturally instilled within the family, rather than an organisation telling you a family should be a certain way."

Harsh reality of slower growth

$
0
0
TO WHAT extent is our fast pace of life attributed to the fast pace of economic growth ("Much to gain from slower pace of life" by Ms Catherine Ho Shull; July 18)? Are gross domestic product (GDP) figures a bundle of irrelevant numbers?

GDP data reflects the extent of work we have put in to generate consumption and the public services we utilise, the exports for earning foreign exchange, and the savings we can accumulate each year.

Lower GDP growth means one or more of these components are growing at a slower pace, or even shrinking.

When we had good growth in some years, some remarked that we achieved it "at all costs" and blamed the Government.

To survive, every company has to set a reasonable growth target. Would employees suggest to their bosses to lower the target?

Should a company cut its target, its competitors would be keen to take away its market share. Its workers may have to accept smaller bonuses, or worse, no bonus at all and pay cuts. The self-interests of the company and its workers would not allow a voluntary slowdown to happen.

To slow down the economy, the Government could raise interest rates, tighten money supply, trim public expenses, scale down or delay infrastructure projects, further restrict the supply of foreign labour, or raise consumption or income taxes.

Growth that is too slow, whether voluntary or forced, would weaken our economic efficiency and global competitiveness.

Most people may not worry about this - but certainly not those who are responsible for ensuring the long-term survival of the country.

With no natural resources, we have to make as much "hay" as possible while the sun shines. We need to strike a balance to avoid economic overheating - but it is not an easy task.

For us as individuals, we aim to achieve a good work-life balance but we have to accept the trade-offs it entails. It requires us to re-prioritise our goals, which may mean adjusting expectations and cutting down on non-essential consumption.

The harsh reality is that work-life balance, standards of living and GDP are all entwined.

Ng Ya Ken
ST Forum, 31 Jul 2013










Much to gain from slower pace of life

AT A recent forum, Law and Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam painted a "stark picture" of the future of Singapore if we should adopt a slower pace of life ("Slower pace of life comes with trade-off, says Shanmugam"; last Saturday).

The problem is that the picture is incomplete.

Our leaders have constantly reminded us that "no one owes us a living". This is why we work tremendously hard to be No. 1, and then work even harder to maintain this position. But what is the unquantifiable price we have paid?

Singapore has the highest number of millionaires per capita, yet our happiness levels are low. Our suicide rate is also at a 20-year high ("Suicide cases rise nearly 30% to hit 20-year high"; last Saturday).

The rich-poor divide is growing, with the poor seeing their incomes rise only 0.1 per cent each year between 2002 and last year ("Real incomes for low-wage earners 'have continued to rise'"; Feb 6).

Last year, we had the highest gross domestic product per capita in the world, yet couples have no confidence to have children, causing the fertility rate to fall below the replacement level.

Our education system churns out students with top grades, but we are low in innovation and creativity.

It seems that the current picture is already stark.

Singapore cannot keep pursuing economic growth at all costs, when this method has already fallen short. Is it not time to try something different?

Teachers should be able to truly nurture young minds, and children should grow up loving to learn and discover.

Parents should be able to spend more time with their children, rather than just ferry them from one enrichment class to another.

Couples should be able to make babies - and not just a living. Adult children should be able to live with their ageing parents and not abandon them.

All this requires a slower pace of life and a commitment to people, not numbers.

Quality of life may be lower, but the gains could far outweigh the costs.

Catherine Ho Shull (Ms)
ST Forum, 18 Jul 2013


What the world’s middle classes are really protesting

$
0
0
By Ruchir Sharma, Published TODAY, 31 Jul 2013

Still-smouldering protests from Egypt to Brazil have set off a race among scholars and journalists to identify the roots of this summer of discontent in the emerging world. Each major theory starts at the bottom, with the protesters on the street, and notes a common thread: Young, Twitter-savvy members of a rising middle class.

In this telling, the protests represent the perils of success, as growing wealth creates a class of people who have the time and financial wherewithal to demand from their leaders even more prosperity and political freedom as well.

This is a plausible story, often well told. Yet, it is a bit too familiar to be fully persuasive.

The middle class has been rising for many decades; in the last 10 years, rapid economic growth has spread with rare uniformity across most nations in the emerging world. So why are protests erupting now, and in only a scattered selection of emerging countries?

FIGURES DON’T TALLY

The middle class was not rising particularly fast in the countries recently hit by protests. According to data from the Brookings Institution, in 20 of the largest emerging nations, the middle class has grown over the last 15 years by an average of 18 percentage points to comprise a bit more than half the population.

However, since 2010, protests have broken out in countries where the Brookings data identify the middle class as growing most rapidly, such as Russia — and least rapidly, such as India.

The biggest protests have struck in countries where growth of the middle class is near the average: Egypt (14 per cent), Brazil (19 per cent) and Turkey (22 per cent).

There is also no clear link between the protests and dashed middle-class fortunes. Since 2008, the average growth rate in emerging nations has slowed to 4 per cent from 8 per cent, so virtually every new middle class has cause for disappointment.

Some protest-stricken nations have seen particularly severe slowdowns, including Brazil recently and Russia before it. But others were growing faster than their emerging-world peers, including Turkey and even Egypt before the fall of former President Hosni Mubarak in 2011. So why are these nations among the cauldrons of middle-class rage?

LONG TIME IN POWER

Maybe the place to start searching for a common thread is not in the streets, but in the halls of power.

Among the 20 largest emerging nations, the ruling party has now been in power for slightly more than eight years on average, or roughly double the average 10 years ago. Of the nine countries where the ruling party has held office for longer than eight years, there have been significant protests targeting the national leadership in at least six: Argentina, Brazil, Turkey, Russia, South Africa and India.

Of the 11 countries in which the ruling party has been in office for less than eight years, there have been major protests in only one: Egypt. And, in Egypt, liberals protested against the Muslim Brotherhood for bringing back the economic stagnation and political autocracy of the previous leadership — in essence, a revolt against the character of the old dictatorship. Now, with Islamists challenging the military “coup”, the middle class feels caught in the same conflict that has long haunted Egypt.

These are revolts against the ancient regimes, revealing the peril of staying in power too long, a familiar risk since the days of France’s King Louis XVI.

Often, even successful leaders have gotten complacent or overconfident, failing to enact reforms fast enough to sustain a balance of growth across different regions and classes. Eventually, enough people get fed up with the old regime that the population turns on even the giants of post-war economic development, such as former President Suharto in Indonesia or former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad in Malaysia.

In the end, wrote Ralph Waldo Emerson, every hero becomes a bore.

LOSING PATIENCE WITH LEADERS WHO DON’T ADAPT

It is not clear why so many older regimes are in power now, but the last decade was a great one for emerging economies, with rapid growth in virtually all 150 developing countries. That gave many ruling parties the momentum to stay in office. Today, as growth slows, many populations are losing patience with leaders who are not adapting to a tough post-crisis world.

In Brazil, the Workers’ Party has been in power for 10 years and, under President Dilma Rousseff, follows the statist approach to development set by her predecessor, even as falling commodity prices depress growth in a commodity-dependent economy.

Similarly, in Russia, protests erupted in 2011 and last year against President Vladimir Putin and his party, motivated in part by the failure to diversify its oil-focused economy after 13 years in power. In Turkey, the issue is the overconfidence of a ruling party that is pushing the same model that has produced strong growth for the last 10 years. In South Africa, the mine strikes that first flared in 2010 remain a simmering threat to the 20-year reign of the African National Congress.

In India, protests against corruption and mishandled rape cases have given voice to deep frustrations with the nine-year rule of the Congress-led coalition government.

The potential for these protests to reignite depends, at least in part, on whether people have the power to change old regimes. In genuine multiparty democracies such as India and Brazil, coming elections provide that opportunity. But, in countries such as Russia and South Africa, where there is no clear alternative to the ruling regime, the risk of protests recurring is much greater.

If protests have been erupting primarily against older regimes, the reverse is also true: New regimes are getting a free pass from the rising middle class. In Mexico, the Philippines, Nigeria and even Pakistan, relatively fresh leaders are using their political capital to push needed reforms.

In these countries, the young, the educated, the newly prosperous have no reason to tweet their friends and hit the streets. For now, they are content to watch politics unfold on TV.


Ruchir Sharma, the author of Breakout Nations, is head of emerging markets and global macro at Morgan Stanley Investment Management.

More help for low-income singles to buy new flats

$
0
0
Up to $30k extra subsidy if applying alone, and $60k for joint applicants
By Daryl Chin, The Straits Times, 31 Jul 2013

LOW-INCOME singles looking for their first new Housing Board flat will now be able to get up to $30,000 in extra subsidy if they apply on their own.

The grants double to $60,000 if two or more singles apply together, pushing a two-room flat's price to as low as $16,000.


Previously, singles could buy only resale flats.

But with this launch, first-timer singles aged 35 and up, with a monthly income of $5,000 or less can, for the first time, apply for a new two-room flat in non-mature estates.



HDB may relax its policy even further. National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan told The Straits Times that offering two-roomers was just "a start", and bigger flats may be available to singles in the future.

For now, up to a third of the 519 two-roomers which have been made available in Sengkang and Yishun will be reserved for singles. Coming in 35 sq m and 45 sq m sizes, they are priced between $76,000 and $133,000.

Singles who apply on their own, however, will have to pay an extra $15,000 on top of the selling price, but the money will be returned as a $15,000 grant if they get married later.

To ensure low-income families are not squeezed out of these new two-roomers, their qualifying income ceiling has been raised from $2,000 to $5,000.


Singles who earn up to $2,500 and apply on their own can get an Additional CPF Housing Grant (AHG) of up to $20,000. Those who take home $1,125 a month or less get a Special CPF Housing Grant of $10,000.

The numbers are doubled for those applying under the Joint Singles Scheme, which means a new two-roomer in Yishun can be bought for as low as $16,000.

In comparison, the price tag of a four-room unit in a mature estate such as Bukit Merah starts from $430,000 with grants.

Low-income singles can also avail themselves of the AHG when they buy five-room or smaller resale flats.

Another change which kicked in was to keep first-timers who marry someone who had bought a flat in the past, for instance a divorcee, in the priority queue.

Previously, these couples would have been considered second-timers, and have a tougher time getting a new unit. Now they will be treated as first-timers, for whom the bulk of new flats are reserved.

The effect of all these changes, said ERA Realty's key executive officer Eugene Lim, could see more turn away from the resale market. "Singles and second-timers will find it easier to apply for new flats. Coupled with cooling measures earlier and a ramp-up of new flat supply, this could lead to less demand on the resale market."





New BTO launch attracts many singles
Five applications from singles for every 2-room flat set aside for them
By Daryl Chin, The Straits Times, 31 Jul 2013

WITHIN hours of yesterday's Build-To-Order (BTO) launch, the Housing Board received five applications from singles for every two-room flat that had been set aside for them.

Property analysts, reversing their previous expectation of a poor take-up, said numbers will rise because the latest offer is too good to pass.

Yesterday's launch marked the first time singles, who had previously been restricted to the resale market, were allowed to buy new two-room flats, starting with those in Sengkang and Yishun.


But making it even sweeter are grants which are now being offered to low-income singles to buy new two-roomers.

The Government announced yesterday that those earning $1,125 a month or less can get as much as $30,000 in subsidies. It rises to as much as $60,000 if two singles apply under the Joint Singles Scheme.

National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan yesterday made clear his concern for helping the lower-income become home owners. "With housing grants of up to $60,000, these two-room flats will only cost as little as $16,000 for low-income families... We are on the right track."

PropNex chief executive Mohamed Ismail said singles now have an alternative to having to fork out cash premiums paid above a resale flat's valuation in the open market.

"Another pull factor is that some of the flats are already being built, and would be ready soon."

The 108 two-roomers in the Orchid Spring @ Yishun, for instance, are expected to be completed by the end of next year.

Civil servant Fiona Tan is keen on the new 35 sq m and 45 sq m units in Yishun, where prices start from $76,000, saying the grants are attractive. But she is hesitant due to their small size.

"Ideally I would want something bigger," said the 42-year- old single, who currently lives in a rental flat in Queenstown.

Mr Khaw added yesterday that the number of two-room flats available to singles this time round is just "a start", and that other types of flats may be made available in future.

The Government yesterday also extended the Additional CPF Housing Grant of up to $20,000 to singles who are looking to buy a resale flat, but have a monthly income ceiling of $2,500 or less.

Low-income singles buying a property under the Joint Singles Scheme get double the amount.

This is on top of the $15,000 all singles earning less than $5,000 get when buying their first flat in the resale market.

"There is a small group of buyers who have fallen through the cracks. The added funds would help mitigate the impact of cash premiums, and would push for home ownership," said SLP International's head of research Nicholas Mak.




More qualify as first-timer couples for new flats
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 31 Jul 2013

SECOND-TIME buyers will stand more chance of bagging a flat under the new rule changes.


This means they move up in the queue.

The policy change, which kicked in yesterday, will help divorcees and those who have previously bought a flat with a sibling or parent.

In the past, they would have been considered second-timers and less likely to get a unit during a launch.

Project engineer Zheng Kai Ling said that she and her fiance were at a disadvantage when they applied for a flat together last year, because he was a divorcee on his second purchase.

"It was quite unfair," added the 30-year-old.

"I was a first-timer, but we were categorised as second- timers.

"In terms of priority we were far behind first-timer couples, so we were left with flats which were not in good locations."

In the end, they managed to get a new unit in Sengkang's Rivervale Delta, which was not one of the most popular projects.

"It's too bad for me that this move didn't come sooner, but I think it's good for couples in similar circumstances," said Ms Zheng.

Yesterday's new Build-To- Order exercise is due to close next Monday.




Improvements over the years
By Daryl Chin, The Straits Times, 31 Jul 2013

REGULAR reviews have been carried out over the years to ensure that housing policies for single people have remained relevant to Singaporeans.

1990 - Introduction of the Joint Singles Scheme (JSS), which allowed two to four singles to pool together and purchase a resale flat.

1991 - The Single Singapore Citizen Scheme meant that singles could buy their own resale flats.

However, these were restricted to three-room flats or smaller, in all but the central areas.

There was no income ceiling.

1998 - Singles could get a grant of $15,000 for resale flats, if they had not received a housing subsidy before and if they earned $3,000 or less a month.

Two singles could get up to $30,000 under the JSS.

2001 - Singles could now buy any three-room or smaller resale flat in any location.

2004 - They were allowed to buy resale flats of any size. But to qualify for a Housing Board loan, their monthly income could not exceed $3,000 and their flat of choice could not be larger than a five-roomer.

2011 - The income ceiling for singles to qualify for the grant was raised from $3,000 to $5,000 a month.

2013 - First-time buyers who are single and earn no more than $5,000 a month can apply for new two-room, Build-To-Order flats in non-mature estates.

They also qualify for the additional housing grants and special housing grants, although the amount allowed will be half of that which families receive.

They will also get an additional housing grant of up to $20,000, if they opt to buy a resale flat in the open market.

However, they would need to earn less than $2,500 a month to qualify.


Related

New PE syllabus to promote sports for all

$
0
0
Aim is to encourage kids to be active after leaving school, inculcate values
By Stacey Chia, The Straits Times, 1 Aug 2013

SCHOOL life is about to get more active for secondary students.

From next year, every student has to take part in friendly matches with their schoolmates, under a new physical education (PE) syllabus whose goal is to encourage recreational sports.

The game can be in such sports as badminton, football and volleyball, but they must do battle in at least three intra-school competitions during their four or five years in school.

The move to get physical applies to primary pupils and junior college students as well, with the changes to be rolled out in stages in the next three years.

The programmes will be different for the primary, secondary and junior college levels.

But they will share one common aim: to spur students to continue being active after they leave school and to inculcate values through sports.

The stepped-up pace was announced yesterday by Education Minister Heng Swee Keat at a Physical and Sports Education conference attended by over 1,250 teachers.

Explaining its motivation, he said: "The value of such competitions lies not in winning the game.

"It is about the friendships that are forged when a team is formed and challenged to work towards a common goal. It is about the discipline and courage that competition requires, especially in facing our fears and our limitations, and working hard to overcome them."

The need for students to enjoy sports as a recreational activity, not just for competition, had been highlighted by people who took part in the ongoing Our Singapore Conversation discussions.

The ministry, too, had begun to take steps last year to provide sports for all, by first getting rid of an award system for schools that excel in areas like sports.

The pressure to win prizes has led some schools to shun sports in which they do not excel, or to train only those gifted in sports.

The new PE curriculum, however, is not all about sports.

Health education and sports sciences will also be taught at all levels.

Another common feature in all the programmes is outdoor education, where students will learn navigational skills and route planning. It will make up 10 to 20 per cent of curriculum time for primary schools and secondary schools, while the schedule for junior colleges has yet to be finalised.

Mr Heng said studies have shown students with the skills to be comfortable outdoors "would engage in higher level of physical activities as adults".

With these extras, PE curriculum time will double to two hours a week.

Teachers and principals yesterday cheered the changes, saying they will help build interest and confidence in sports.

But Mr Muhammad Suhadi Hassan, PE teacher at Si Ling Secondary, urged teachers to find out the sports their students are keen on and not insist they take up any game just to meet the new rules.

"If not, those less inclined towards sports may not participate to the best of their best abilities," he added.

Secondary1 student Nur Atiqah Mohamad, from Xinmin Secondary, said she is looking forward to competing in badminton.

"I was disappointed when I was not good enough for my school's badminton club, and it's one reason I haven't played the game in a while," said the 13-year-old member of the St John Ambulance Brigade.




Parents welcome new PE syllabus
But there are concerns over training hours and stress
By Stacey Chia, The Straits Times, 2 Aug 2013

PARENTS yesterday welcomed a new plan to have every secondary student take part in school sports competitions - despite concerns that it could add to children's already high stress levels.

They said the revised syllabus would give all young people the chance to improve their physical skills, not just those with natural talent.

Housewife Chee Yunn Tyan, 33, who has a son in primary school, told The Straits Times they are more likely to "discover that they are good at sports than if they did not try at all".

Others pointed out that the move would provide more opportunities for children to take part in team games.

"As a family we play badminton, but it's difficult to find other people to play bigger group sports," said 45-year-old procurement manager Tio Chong Heng, who has two daughters in Primary 6 and Secondary 2.

But there were also concerns about the extra hours children might have to spend training for the contests, and the intense rivalry they could cause.

"The teacher really needs to manage the competition and ensure there is no negative energy," said Mr Tio. "They need to point out that this is about challenging oneself and not about thrashing each other."

Dr Inez Perera, a 48-year-old psychiatrist and mother of two, said: "We all have a finite amount of time. This, coupled with studies and tuition classes, is likely to add to the stress levels."

The changes, to be introduced from next year, mean students will have to take part in at least three intra-school sports competitions during their time at secondary school.

Education Minister Heng Swee Keat said the events are not just about winning, but also promote qualities such as discipline and courage.

The competitions are intended to be "motivational, fun and part of their learning process," said a Ministry of Education (MOE) spokesman.

Students also welcomed the revised physical education (PE) syllabus.

When Nicole Lee, 13, applied to take badminton as a co-curricular activity this year, she was told she was not good enough.

She tried her second favourite sport, floorball, but found out it was for boys only.

Eventually, she had to choose the rather less athletic option of joining the Girls' Brigade at Northbrooks Secondary School.

"I like sports and to be better, you need to compete," she said.

Nicole - who now wants to take part in badminton, basketball and football contests - added that the changes are likely to encourage her less sporty friends to take PE lessons seriously.

"Because there is something we have to train for, we'll become better players."

Last year, MOE tried to make sports more accessible to all by abolishing an award system for schools that excel in areas such as sports. It followed complaints that pressure to win prizes had led some schools to shun games they did not do well in or to train only the physically gifted children.

"When I was a student, if you're interested in a sport, you join it and you get trained to take part in competitions," said Madam Chee. "But for a long time, it seemed that only certain kids are groomed for competitions."

Children will now spend two hours a week on the PE curriculum, twice as long as before.

Secondary 1 student Low Jia Hua, 13, said he was worried that preparations for the contests could drag on way beyond lessons. He added: "Training for competitions will take a lot of practice, and that may affect the time we have for other things."

If you build it well, they will come...

$
0
0
Patrick Chan, a community volunteer in Taman Jurong, was convinced that an extreme sports park he successfully pushed for would draw youth-at-risk to hang out. He tells Susan Long how he hopes to make them stay.
The Straits Times, 2 Aug 2013

ON THE surface, Mr Patrick Chan hardly has anything in common with the poor kids of Taman Jurong he cares so much about.

The great-grandson of Chinese philanthropist Tan Kah Kee speaks with a crisp, pedigreed accent that drips with irony. The Anglo-Chinese School boy studied abroad and lived in bungalows in Cairnhill and Bukit Timah. Growing up, he only ever ventured to Taman Jurong to go to the skating rink or Chinese Garden.

But today, the 51-year-old has made the largely working-class constituency his home in every way. He lives there in an old Jurong Town Corporation flat. He is an unpaid community volunteer. And he's totally consumed by the fate of its young denizens.

Throughout the four-hour interview, he is concise but can't stop reeling off evidence to highlight the lousy odds for poor kids breaking out of that classification, and harps on how stopping school radically boosts their chances of winding up in jail.

Mr Chan cares very deeply. So deeply that he's turned his company Ergos International Sales, a high-tech woodworking business, into a not-for-profit that hires ex-inmates. Since 2008, it has helped train and turn around over a dozen former offenders, one of whom is now a social worker on his way to getting a degree.

He cares so deeply, he's spent the last two years tirelessly persuading the authorities to give him the north-western shore of Jurong Lake to build an extreme sports park that will be largely free, so that poor kids have a fun, safe place to hang out.

What he has in mind is a state-of-the-art park with skating, rock climbing and mountain biking facilities, "designed and built by young people for young people, as opposed to places designed by old people imagining what a young person would want to have".

He envisages a clubhouse and 24-hour cafe for kids to play, socialise, study and get tutored by volunteers. The sole condition: They have to adhere to strictly-enforced rules - no smoking, no alcohol and no drugs.

First, he identified a narrow strip of land along Yuan Ching Road and Boon Lay Way, across from Lakeside MRT. Fringing the water catchment Jurong Lake, with the MRT tracks running above, he argued it had little alternate viable use. Spanning about 6ha (the size of over 60 soccer fields) and easily worth a billion dollars, it was no small victory that the authorities recently approved the use of land there for an extreme sports park.

He's now working with Singapore Sports Council on how best to fund the building of the park so that it will be free for users as far as possible. He hopes it will be up and running by 2016.

Mr Chan is also trying to organise some 50 skaters in the neighbourhood, mostly aged 15 to 25, to "teach the authorities what they want", and help design their dream park. He wants to give them the facilities to train and to excel at something, which he hopes will help them build up other skills that are financially viable: "There's a huge correlation between someone willing to train to do something well and being able to use that same tenacity to achieve a better life."

He cares so deeply about how the environment shapes them that he's spent the last seven years looking after the infrastructure of Taman Jurong as a town councillor. It is a thankless job that sees him getting some 20 complaints daily about the height of grass, leaking toilets and the like. But he shrugs and says: "I like fixing stuff." He considers himself a repairman.

And a repairer of broken things and people, too, if you like.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who is MP for Taman Jurong and has worked with Mr Chan over the past nine years, says that his strength is helping people to make things improve for themselves.

He relates: "I recently asked him to help a resident who was feeling down, had withdrawn into himself, and let his house fall into disrepair. Within days, Patrick had got him to repair and paint the house together with him. He can be tough, he takes no excuses, but people know he really believes in them, and he ends up earning their trust."

Complainer to volunteer

IRONICALLY, Mr Chan's social conscience was pricked in 2004 by the most Singaporean of pursuits - complaining to his MP about how he was denied a training grant due to a technicality.

After he shot off an irate e-mail to a statutory board, cc'ing Mr Tharman, he received a phone call the next day at 8am. "The way was cleared," Mr Chan deadpans, in his sardonic way.

Grateful, he decided to help make a similar difference in other people's lives. He showed up at the next Meet-the-People Session (MPS) to offer his help. And he continued turning up - rain or shine or surgery - for the next six years. Even when he was diagnosed with nose cancer in 2009 and had to undergo radio therapy, he showed up.

Former IT executive Ang Thiam Hock, 50, who helps out in Taman Jurong, recounts Mr Chan's "selfless" dedication. "Instead of recuperating at home afterwards, he was helping needy residents at MPS, with a mask on. I will never forget his 'burnt' face during the treatment process."

The sessions opened Mr Chan's eyes to the dismal plight of some of the estimated 700 families who live in three rental blocks and two interim housing blocks in Taman Jurong. Week after week, he saw parents with no money for milk powder or bus fares, struggling to keep their kids in school. There was even a case where the mother came to beg for stay of execution for her son, which was due to happen the next day.

He notes that most delinquency cases usually start off innocuously with a bit of smoking, then escalate to sniffing glue and taking drugs. "The next thing, the kid is stealing bicycle parts, then robbing someone on the street," he says. "If you have a kid that drops out in Secondary 1, chances are he's going to be in jail by the time he's 20. In fact, probably before that. And he's probably going to spend 10 to 20 years in jail for robbery, theft or drugs."

His hope is to intervene through various programmes, to increase these kids' chances of staying in school and breaking out of the poverty trap. He chairs Beacon Of Life, a self-help group of ex-offenders who have turned their lives around, which is based in Taman Jurong. It trains poor kids in soccer in an outreach programme, with the intent of cautioning them not to throw away their lives. It was set up two years ago by a man he's mentored over the past five years, Mr Kim Whye Kee, 34, an ex-gang leader who spent 10 years behind bars for drug and gang activities, who has since graduated with second upper honours from Lasalle College of the Arts.

Mr Kim relates how Mr Chan personally drove him to get art materials for school, made him dinner during term time, and even paid for his fees when his bursary fell through. "He is like a father to me. I was someone who didn't dare to dream of a future, but I met this man who not only taught me to dare to dream but who also walked with me throughout the journey to realise my dream," says Mr Kim, who now works for Mr Chan as a product designer and followed in his footsteps to become a grassroots volunteer in Taman Jurong.

Broke for years

MR CHAN was born to an architect father and civil servant mother. His elder sister is a lawyer and his elder brother a doctor. He gained early entry to Iowa State University in the US at 16 to read mechanical engineering, then returned to a plum job with a multinational as a computer engineer, and five-star business travel.

Five years later, he received a call from his absentee father, who has since died, to help him get his latest venture off the ground. Since Mr Chan enjoyed woodworking, he agreed and relocated to Kuala Lumpur to run the 50-man factory making high-end ergonomic office furniture. But he soon realised - too late - that the business wasn't getting off the ground. "It was somewhere stuck in the mud. It was a few hundred thousand dollars underwater. It was a sophomoric attempt at business," he relates.

The first five years, he got stomach ulcers, maxed out his credit cards, lived off the charity of friends, not knowing where his next meal was coming from. "Coming from plenty, to nothing, it was painful," he remembers, with his trademark grimace.

Then, just as things turned a corner in 1996, the Asian financial crisis hit. All orders dried up overnight. Suddenly he was over a million bucks in debt, and starting his ascent from rock-bottom again. He diversified into making children's furniture, musical instruments and laboratory furniture. At the peak, he was making a few hundred thousand in profit a year.

He spent it on a University of Chicago Booth School of Business master's degree in business administration here in 2001, hoping to decipher the mysteries of business cycles. Instead, he emerged in 2003 utterly convinced how unimportant money really was. He sums up: "I learnt that you can work hard all your life and still end up with nothing, or you could do nothing and end up with lots… It's better to do something that is actually meaningful to you, and hopefully also pays the bills."

All the boom, bust, penury and cancer he has been through, has re-ordered his priorities. "You don't need a lot of money to have a decent quality of life. It just depends how you define what's important to you," says the agnostic.

The man who has now become the father he missed to many Taman Jurong kids calls himself a "low rent guy". Since 2001, together with his wife Betty, 51, an airbase facility manager, he has lived in the three-bedroom JTC flat, with kitchen cabinets he built himself, a hand-me-down dining set and a discarded TV. He drives a 14-year-old van.

Apart from his four-man woodworking outfit at Toh Guan Road, he does some small-scale electronics component procurement, cleaning chemicals and aircraft jet engine servicing business in Belgium and Hong Kong.

"My philosophy of life is, if you have been there, done that and you have enough, why do you need more? You might as well do what you like to do. Something that's meaningful to you and hopefully also useful to society at large. And I find great satisfaction in being able to help people turn their lives around."




Patrick Chan on...

His dream for Singapore

“What I would like to see is Singaporeans having a first-world mentality to match their wealth. We are so caught up with I, me, my, mine, and I is more important than We. How do you lead a meaningful life when you're so concerned with being ahead of the Joneses?”


What he wants to change

“What I'd like to see is poor kids having a better chance at making it out of the bottom of society. There's always going to be somebody at the bottom but it doesn't mean that if you're born there, you're going to stay there. That's just wrong.”


How delinquency starts

“If you look at the reasons why a lot of the kids drop out of school, they might be naughty, the teacher can't spend enough time with them, they get ostracised from their peers, feel bodoh (stupid) and want to escape from school. They start sniffing glue, playing truant and before long, their life is over. They've no skills, no education. They roam around aimlessly with a bunch of buddies. At the end of the day, its go straight to jail, do not pass Go, do not collect $200. And unfortunately these kids have a very healthy libido. So they are going to have kids, sometimes lots. And the cycle repeats in the next generation.”


How society often doesn't help

“Most of these guys who come out from jail are offered jobs that pay maybe $600 a month. Like cleaning fast food restaurant cooker hoods at 3am. One particular case sticks in my mind: The guy couldn't even get to the job because there's no bus that takes him there at the time, so he ends up going there before midnight to wait for hours to do this horrendous job, the only one he could get. How is that going to keep him out of jail? I just couldn't see the logic. The first thing he does is he quits the job and goes back to his gang. A few months later, he's back in jail. You want to keep these guys out of jail, you have to create more and better options.”


How Meet the People Sessions opened his eyes

“It's a side of Singapore that most people don't see. It's jarring. Here we are sending our kids to Vietnam and Cambodia to help out. You can do all that right here in Singapore. You don't need to leave this country.”

Inequality and 'conscience laundering'

$
0
0
By Peter Buffett, Published The Straits Times, 1 Aug 2013

I HAD spent much of my life writing music for commercials, film and television and knew little about the world of philanthropy as practised by the very wealthy until what I call the big bang happened in 2006. That year, my father, Warren Buffett, made good on his commitment to give nearly all of his accumulated wealth back to society. In addition to making several large donations, he added generously to the three foundations that my parents had created years earlier, one for each of their children to run.

Early on in our philanthropic journey, my wife and I became aware of something I started to call philanthropic colonialism. I noticed that a donor had the urge to "save the day" in some fashion. People (including me) who had very little knowledge of a particular place would think that they could solve a local problem. Whether it involved farming methods, education practices, job training or business development, over and over I would hear people discuss transplanting what worked in one setting directly into another with little regard for culture, geography or societal norms.

Often the results of our decisions had unintended consequences; distributing condoms to stop the spread of Aids in a brothel area ended up creating a higher price for unprotected sex.

But now I think something even more damaging is going on.

Because of who my father is, I've been able to occupy some seats I never expected to sit in. Inside any important philanthropy meeting, you witness heads of state meeting with investment managers and corporate leaders. All are searching for answers with their right hand to problems that others in the room have created with their left.

There are plenty of statistics that tell us that inequality is continually rising. At the same time, according to the Urban Institute, the non-profit sector has been steadily growing. Between 2001 and 2011, the number of non-profits increased 25 per cent. Their growth rate now exceeds that of both the business and government sectors. It's a massive business, with approximately US$316 billion (S$400 billion) given away in 2012 in the United States alone and more than 9.4 million employed.

Philanthropy has become the "it" vehicle to level the playing field and has generated a growing number of gatherings, workshops and affinity groups.

As more lives and communities are destroyed by the system that creates vast amounts of wealth for the few, the more heroic it sounds to "give back". It's what I would call "conscience laundering" - feeling better about accumulating more than any one person could possibly need to live on by sprinkling a little around as an act of charity.

But this just keeps the existing structure of inequality in place. The rich sleep better at night, while others get just enough to keep the pot from boiling over. Nearly every time someone feels better by doing good, on the other side of the world (or street), someone else is further locked into a system that will not allow the true flourishing of his or her nature or the opportunity to live a joyful and fulfilled life.

And with more business-minded folks getting into the act, business principles are trumpeted as an important element to add to the philanthropic sector. I now hear people ask, "What's the ROI?" when it comes to alleviating human suffering, as if return on investment were the only measure of success. Micro-lending and financial literacy (now I'm going to upset people who are wonderful folks and a few dear friends) - what is this really about? People will certainly learn how to integrate into our system of debt and repayment with interest. People will rise above making US$2 a day to enter our world of goods and services so they can buy more. But doesn't all this just feed the beast?

I'm really not calling for an end to capitalism; I'm calling for humanism.

Often I hear people say, "If only they had what we have" (clean water, access to health products and free markets, better education, safer living conditions). Yes, these are all important. But no "charitable" (I hate that word) intervention can solve any of these issues. It can only kick the can down the road.

My wife and I know we don't have the answers, but we do know how to listen. As we learn, we will continue to support conditions for systemic change.

It's time for a new operating system. Not a 2.0 or a 3.0, but something built from the ground up. New code.

What we have is a crisis of imagination. Albert Einstein said that you cannot solve a problem with the same mindset that created it. Foundation dollars should be the best "risk capital" out there.

There are people working hard at showing examples of other ways to live in a functioning society that truly creates greater prosperity for all (and I don't mean more people getting to have more stuff).

Money should be spent trying out concepts that shatter current structures and systems that have turned much of the world into one vast market. Is progress really Wi-Fi on every street corner? No. It's when no 13-year-old girl on the planet gets sold for sex. But as long as most folks are patting themselves on the back for charitable acts, we've got a perpetual poverty machine.

It's an old story; we really need a new one.

The writer is a composer and chairman of the NoVo Foundation.


Related


Unemployment rate up despite strong job growth

$
0
0
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 1 Aug 2013

UNEMPLOYMENT rose to 2.1 per cent and more workers lost their jobs in the second quarter of the year, even as employment growth stayed strong, according to a Manpower Ministry (MOM) report released yesterday.

Economists said the labour market remains tight - perhaps even too tight, with Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin stressing the need for job growth to slow.

In a Facebook post, he wrote: "We need to moderate employment growth to a more sustainable pace, and encourage companies to move towards manpower-lean growth."



Employment grew by 32,500 in the second quarter - more than in the quarter before (28,900) and the same period last year (31,700).

This brought total employment to 3.4 million in June, 4 per cent up from a year ago.

That growth rate is more than double the Government's target of 1 to 2 per cent for the decade, noted Mr Tan. "As you can see, our businesses are still relying too heavily on labour."

Yet unemployment also rose. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 2.1 per cent in June, up from 1.9 per cent in March.

The resident unemployment rate rose to 3 per cent from 2.9 per cent before, and the citizen unemployment rate to 3.1per cent from 2.9 per cent before.

Layoffs also went up. There were 2,900 workers losing their jobs, higher than in the quarter before and the same period last year.

In its report, MOM said that the tight labour market showed signs of easing as layoffs rose.

But experts disagreed, pointing to different labour market conditions across economic sectors.

"A rise in unemployment in certain sectors does not translate to an easing in the labour market in other sectors," said Mr Mark Hall, vice-president and country general manager of recruitment firm Kelly Services.

Services drove the rise in employment growth (21,700), with manufacturing and construction seeing slower growth instead.

Layoffs also fell in services, and job losses were instead led by manufacturing.

This mismatch in demand and supply across sectors means that the labour market is tight even though unemployment rose, said Barclays economist Joey Chew.

In his Facebook post, Mr Tan said more redundancies can be expected as Singapore's economy restructures. Job creation, training and job matching will thus be important, he added.

On restructuring, UniSIM economist Randolph Tan worried that strong employment growth might hamper productivity. He said the only good news is that the second quarter's high GDP growth - 3.7 per cent - should still mean an improvement in productivity.






Beware job-skill mismatch: Swee Say
Labour chief calls on firms, workers to tackle structural unemployment
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 3012

STRUCTURAL unemployment may rise in Singapore and requires the special attention of companies and workers, warned labour chief Lim Swee Say.

The mismatch between jobs created and the skills needed to do them is harder to fix than the seasonal job churn in the labour market, he said yesterday.

And a developed economy like Singapore faces a greater threat of it happening, said the secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress.

"Structural unemployment affects workers at all levels, including professionals, managers and executives (PMEs)," he added. "It doesn't matter whether you are young or old, rank and file or PMEs."

Mr Lim's comments came two days after the Manpower Ministry released data that showed unemployment rising in the second quarter of the year even as more jobs were created.

He noted that the mismatch between jobs and skills can happen in all sectors, and called on workers and employers to work together with unions and the Government to tackle it.

Workers should be adaptable and keep upgrading their skills, while firms can tap government schemes to raise their productivity to create better jobs, he said.

The labour movement sounded the alarm bells even as it kicked off a series of 23 National Day celebrations at the former Singapore Conference Hall.



In his written National Day message to unionists, Mr Lim pointed out that many countries face the problems of youth unemployment, inadequate pay rises for working adults and dwindling retirement funds for retirees - what he calls the problem of "three not enough".

Singapore is spared this triple whammy, with low unemployment, steady wage gains and a rising re-employment age.

But the country faces its own challenges, he noted.

"Besides countering the global threat of 'three not enough', we also have to tackle the issues of a widening income gap, an ageing workforce and the potential rise in structural unemployment."

He laid out some areas where Singapore must do better. One of them is transforming the economy to be more productive, even if it means slower growth.

It is better to grow at 3 per cent a year with productivity gains of 2 per cent, than at 4 per cent a year but with productivity gains of just 1 per cent, he said.

Companies facing labour shortages and rising business costs must become "leaner, greener and cleverer", he added.

But even as it looked forward, the NTUC retraced its history with a display of 48 old photographs at the former Singapore Conference Hall, where the union movement first started in 1961.

NTUC's youth chapter member Clarence Ngoh was one of the unionists who enjoyed looking at the old pictures.

Said the 20-year-old full-time national serviceman: "I am a nostalgic person, so old pictures remind me of how far the NTUC and Singapore have progressed."

6 in 10 here feel they have good jobs: Survey

$
0
0
They also think a university degree is not essential to secure a good post
By Goh Chin Lian And Andrea Ong, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2013

A STRAITS Times job survey throws up some surprises, with six in 10 people saying their jobs are good and holding the view that a university degree is not needed to snag a good post.

They associate a good job with pay and benefits, work-life balance, good bosses and colleagues, and career advancement.

As for the future, the people polled are less certain about what it holds for the next generation of workers. There are as many pessimists as there are optimists among the 501 surveyed, with the majority citing competition from foreigners and the young's poor work attitude as the two biggest obstacles between future workers and a good job.

These were among the key findings of the survey on people's job perceptions as Singapore wrestles with a stressful pace of life while striving to keep ahead of global competition.

The Straits Times survey of citizens and permanent residents was done with Degree Census Consultancy from June 20 to July 2.

Yesterday, both Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin and Education Minister Heng Swee Keat were cheered by the findings.

Mr Tan said he was heartened that six in 10 workers said their job is good or very good.

He was also not worried that pay and work-life balance outranked job security. This is more a reflection of the current full employment situation than a sign that Singapore workers were complacent, he said.

But he cautioned: "We've done well so far, but we should be mindful of stiff global competition."

Similarly, Mr Heng welcomed the finding that six in 10 say a university degree is not necessary to get a good job. He said: "I am encouraged that many Singaporeans recognise that getting a good job depends on many factors, and not just on paper qualifications."

Chief executives have told him that they look for qualities like integrity, creativity and the ability to communicate clearly, he said.

Like Mr Tan, Mr Heng also underlined the need for continuous learning, which is essential for maintaining a quality workforce.

As for the paper chase, the 20-somethings are the ones set to race for it, with more than half linking degrees to a good job.

Those who are older, better off and with more work experience tend to put less store by it.

The finding, said sociologist Paulin Straughan, reflects the pressure for paper qualifications younger Singaporeans face compared to the lower barriers of entry for workers in the past.

The survey also shows people respect self-made entrepreneurs, as well as those who work with their hands to serve others such as cleaners and waiters, over white-collar jobs.

Mr Heng, who has advocated different definitions of success, is glad.

"We need to highlight more the paths less trodden, to stimulate the imagination of our young and encourage them to venture out," he said.

The survey, however, shows four in 10 of those without a degree plan to get one in the future.

Regional logistics manager Firdaus Abdul Samad, 37, studied part-time for a degree "to be on a par with my team who are mostly graduates". He got a business degree from UniSIM last year.

"In this world, you need to be competitive, you can't be contented, you have to upgrade yourself," said the father of three.






THE SINGAPORE WORKER
20s go-getters, 30s & 40 in lower gear
A Straits Times jobs survey smashes the stereotype of young workers in their 20s as taking it easy and lacking ambition. It finds those in their 30s most prize work-life balance, and the 40-somethings in a comfort zone.
By Goh Chin Lian And Andrea Ong, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2013

SINGAPORE'S young workers have been called the strawberry generation: easily bruised by work and life.

On the other hand, the older 30- to 40-somethings like to think of themselves as tough nuts who are hardworking and know what it is like to struggle for a job.

But a new survey commissioned by The Straits Times on job perceptions throws these assumptions out the window. The young are more rooted in reality and have more grit than the general perception would suggest.

The survey findings showed that - surprise, surprise - pay and benefits matter most to the 20-somethings in a good job, only then followed by the much-touted work-life balance.

They are also the most likely to value career advancement than other age groups.

In the same vein, eight in 10 will work overseas compared with six in 10 for other age groups - the desire for personal growth is the strongest motivator.

As for those older workers - who often gripe about young workers' lack of commitment and tendency to job-hop - they are the most satisfied with their lot, with around seven in 10 saying they have a good job. Combined with their reluctance to work overseas, a question arises as to whether they are comfortable to the point of being complacent.

The survey of 501 Singaporean residents aged 16 to 62 covered what they value in a job and how they perceive the next generation's prospects, among other things.

Their responses in phone interviews by Degree Census Consultancy, from June 20 to July 2, provide snapshots of the Singapore worker's priorities and concerns as society wrestles with the tensions of easing the stressful pace of life and staying ahead amid global competition. These are all issues that have surfaced in the Our Singapore Conversation.

The findings also come amid a recent debate sparked by commentaries in, and letters to, this newspaper, on whether Singapore workers deserve their fairly high wages.

Insight delves into the nitty-gritty of this new picture of the Singapore job landscape, and what it means for the future.


Young go-getters

INCREASINGLY filling positions at work are the post-1980 generation known as Gen Y. Those aged 20 to 29 formed 17 per cent of the resident workforce last year, and made up a quarter of associate professionals and technicians.

The picture that emerges is one quite different from the strawberry analogy of cosseted youth with little experience of hardship.

Far from wanting to slack off or quit on a whim for greener pastures, half in their 20s are happy at work, with just 6 per cent saying they did not have a good job.

And their idea of work-life balance would give sneering mature workers set in their routine a pause. Take graduate Jason Ne Win, 26, who is clocking 12-hour days, six months into his first job as a recruitment consultant.

Work-life balance to him is not about working eight hours a day, which he feels cannot be achieved in his line of work. "But I don't take work home on weekends and I have enough annual leave to travel," he says. With 20 days of annual leave lined up, he has set his sights on a holiday in the Greek islands of Santorini.

Indeed, Gen Y are more educated than their predecessors, more tech-savvy and plugged into the world, and have more overseas exposure, from overseas school trips, university internships and study exchanges.

Leaving next Saturday to join Internet search giant Google in the United States as a software engineer, Mr Muhammad Mohsin, 30, recalls that it was a six-month exchange at Carnegie Mellon University in 2008 that led him to venture abroad.

Meeting many students at the American campus who had started their own companies inspired the Singapore Management University graduate to set up two start-ups developing iPhone and iPad applications, leading now to a job offer from Google.

This willingness to venture overseas for personal growth has been identified by other reports.

Sure, Gen Y appreciates a performance bonus. But an earlier study commissioned by the Tripartite Alliance for Fair Employment Practices (Tafep) of more than 3,500 people from 30 organisations here found the Gen Y bunch sees additional annual leave as important, such as for travel and other personal pursuits, while those who are older value extended medical coverage for themselves and family members.

Other surveys like the Kelly Global Workforce Index 2012 report found that when choosing between jobs, younger workers here placed importance on personal growth (41 per cent) and personal fulfilment (29 per cent).

Tafep's study also found that Gen Y ranks opportunities for career development and training higher than other generations.

One implication is that employers have to find ways to retain them, harness their strengths and gel them into a multi-generational workforce.

However, some still worry that the new generation of workers is turning soft and complacent, a product of the succession of good years and near-full employment Singapore has enjoyed.

This is reflected in how few ST survey respondents of all ages - but especially the 20s and below - put job security as a factor in a good job. The 20-somethings ranked it seventh out of nine factors; those aged 16 to 19, the last. The older groups placed it fifth or sixth in importance.

One worry, ironically, lies in the fact that the 20-somethings are the most optimistic about job prospects for the next generation. If good times are all that the emerging generation has experienced, their picture of their prospects may be too rosy.

Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin writes via e-mail: "While our labour market is tight, good jobs are available and it is a happy situation to be in as an employee. But, there are worries about how this impacts our work ethic and values for the longer term.

"Many employers have highlighted that job-hopping takes place, applicants are choosy and can be demanding in their salary expectations."


Gen O for Older

HAVING reached senior positions or attained a level of seniority, older workers are at a different stage of the life cycle and have different requirements.

Those in their 40s were more likely than those in their 20s and 30s to rate good bosses and colleagues as important for a good job, the survey found. While it is understandable, the flip side is some may be coasting in their jobs and not raring for new challenges - probably to the frustration of the young bloods under them.

Some employers see those in their 40s as having more commitment to the company, but others say they may just be reluctant to take on new challenges.

Chemical Industries Employees' Union president Rajendran Govindarajoo says of the workers he knows: "Most of them in the 40s are already stable and don't want to quit. Even though the pay may not be so good, they're willing to work all the way. It's an easy-going life."

This bears out a finding in the survey that those in their 40s are just as likely as the 20s lot to disagree that they want to earn as much money as possible without needing to be happy in their jobs - seven in 10 in both groups say so.

And for those in their 40s and 50s who will not work overseas, family commitment is not the only reason. While that was the first reason given by those in their 50s, a significant 20 per cent said they also feel satisfied with where they are in their life.

Indeed, while the young generation looks driven now, observers say the odds are that their priorities will change as they age, especially in Singapore. Much of the drive is due to their life stage, starting out in their career and wanting to buy their first car or save up for their first house.

IT engineer Rahman Abdul, 37, recalls: "When you are young, all you think about is money and that with money, you can buy a lot of stuff."

His perspective changed three years ago when at 34, he wed Ms Rosita and Natasha arrived, now four months old. He clocks nine to 10 hours a day at work, leaving the office by 7pm. He says he would take a 10 per cent pay cut for more family time.

Dreams and realities

AS THE 20-somethings settle down, will the stress of caring for their children and elderly parents blunt their drive, so they become complacent mature workers? Or will more stay single or have no children, retaining their original work priorities?

Sociologist Paulin Straughan thinks they will "very likely" go the way of the life cycle, but expects more people to remain single and delay marriage, with family size shrinking as a result.

"The danger here is that young adults believe that (they should) focus on work demands when they are young and single. So they over-invest in work, and neglect social relations."

But the need for more meaning in life is rearing its head. The ST survey found the 20-somethings in particular would give up higher pay for a job with meaning and purpose, with 67 per cent saying so.

The costs of not finding a good balance could mean emigration for some, disenfranchisement for others. A new normal that holds together these concerns will benefit society in many ways, as Ms Sim Chunhui, 29, discovered after slogging for 10 years in events planning and venue management, clocking 12-hour work days.

Not long after she married a business development manager, she quit her job last year and took a one-third pay cut - and made changes to her lifestyle, from shopping to dining out - to work as a programme executive for Habitat for Humanity Singapore.

The non-governmental organisation builds homes for the needy abroad and here, and organises clean-ups of houses of the elderly and families in need.

"What I want in a job has changed over time. At first, it was a lot about myself. But after a while, that felt hollow. But now I find the small changes I make for others more important than thinking about myself in a big way.

"The young people who volunteer with us sometimes say that this is the first time they know that one-room flats exist - I like the idea of changing the lives of the elderly living alone and at the same time getting the youth of today to think of something bigger than themselves."

Googler-to-be Mr Muhammad expects to find his "intrinsic motivation" from creating a product that has wide reach.

He says: "Previously, I thought I will like to make a game that's really successful - not in the financial sense but a lot of people playing and enjoying it. Now it's shifted to (creating) a product that affects the lives of a lot of people... like Gmail."

But for the idealistic young, there is the harsh reality of the working world - one increasingly globalised. Like other age groups, the 20-somethings rated competition from foreigners as the biggest obstacle between the next generation and good jobs.

Also looming is competition from other countries. But significantly, only those in their 50s and up were more seized by the possibility of a slowdown in economic growth leading to fewer jobs, jobs created being too low-paying, and changing demands in the job market - all of which economists say are real threats.

Labour MP Patrick Tay says the older group may be more apprehensive because they have witnessed how jobs like typists and photo-laboratory technicians became obsolete, while jobs that did not exist a decade ago have appeared. In the face of global competition, some like Mr Tay advocate acquiring a second set of skills, say, in a different profession like counselling, where demand is likely to rise.

Whatever the future holds, one thing is clear from the survey - old stereotypes of the Singapore worker no longer exist, and the challenge is to meet the expectations of this new reality.




S'poreans not hung up about paper chase
By Andrea Ong and Goh Chin Lian, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2013

LEAVING the paper chase behind and pursuing your passion is all well and good, but once people hit their 20s, reality bites. A degree has its uses, after all.

Take Ms Chew Wan Yi, 23, who started a fashion blog shop in 2010 after her A levels in 2008.

Five years on, she has closed the shop and is doing a business degree part-time at UniSIM while working as an administrative assistant. She still dreams of running her own business - a cafe that will also sell clothes and works by local artists. Her degree will equip her with important skills for this dream job, she says.

And yet, she maintains that a degree is not a must for a good job, but is "definitely a bonus".

Singapore has long valued a university education, so Ms Chew's laid-back approach may seem unusual.

However, the survey by The Straits Times and Degree Census Consultancy found that 56 per cent of 501 respondents of working age feel that people do not need a degree to get a good job.

However, of the minority who believe a degree is needed, it was young folk with under three years of work experience (plus permanent residents) who tended to place more value on a degree. Over half of the respondents in their 20s felt this way - the only age group to buck the overall trend.

UniSIM president Cheong Hee Kiat, who sat on a government committee which produced a report last year on the future of university education here, notes that UniSIM is getting more young students in the 24 to 29 age band who have some work experience.

Indeed, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told polytechnic students a few months ago they need not just aim for a degree. By working for a few years or starting a business, "you will gain experience and understand yourself better, and then be better able to decide what the next step will be".

Prof Cheong says UniSIM students with some work experience tend to be "more mature, more motivated and hungry" and have a clearer idea of what they want.

Ms Chew's story reflects this and the survey's findings about the growing aspirations of the young. Of 307 respondents without a degree, four in 10 plan to get one in the future. They were mainly under 40 years old.

It may reflect the reality of the working world, where young workers are likely to meet a glass ceiling in terms of promotion and pay if they do not have a degree.

The survey, for example, found that those without a degree but with some years of work experience were more likely to cite better pay as a reason to get a degree in the future, compared to those who got a degree before working.

Medical technologist Raudhatuljanna Hod, 30, started work immediately after graduating with a diploma in biotechnology in 2002, as she had to support her family.

After about two years at a hospital, she decided to pursue a part-time degree with Curtin University because of the better pay and prospects: After getting her degree, she got a $600 pay rise.

Then there are diploma holders like Mr Jeffrey Ng, 28, a supervisor at a biopharmaceutical firm, who fear they may not be able to move on to managerial positions without a degree.

National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser also points to the fear of losing out, with the degree seen as "insurance". "It can be helpful, or maybe not quite, but not having one may put one at a disadvantage unless one is well to do," he says.

Ms Chew, for instance, says one reason for getting her degree was the competitive environment where "people all have at least one degree".

Still, the survey also shows that some of those going to university do so to follow their dreams.

Respondents who got a degree before starting work and those who hope to get one in the future both cited career advancement and personal enrichment and knowledge or personal growth over factors such as social expectations and better pay.

Take Mr Goh Mingwei, 25, who became a military officer after graduating with a diploma in chemical process technology in 2008. He quit this year to do a part-time degree in psychology while performing in bands and doing freelance photography. "I took the degree without looking at it as a career, but as knowledge - why humans do what they do."

The question, however, is how to find that sweet spot between people's aspirations and the reality of the job market.

One way, which the government committee had emphasised, is to ensure the quality of university education and graduates.

Mindsets will also have to change. Prof Cheong calls for continual learning that does not stop at university. Labour MP Patrick Tay suggests that "skills are more important than anything else: the ability to adapt to change and having niche skills to survive new kinds of jobs".

Just ask Ms Chew. She says the communication and planning skills she picked up on her degree course are invaluable.




Entrepreneurs and service staff are valued: Poll
By Andrea Ong and Goh Chin Lian, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2013

A COMMON gripe among employers is that Singaporeans shun work that gets their hands dirty.

A survey by The Straits Times, however, throws up a surprising finding: It suggests Singaporeans have a healthy respect for those who do such jobs.

They tend to value entrepreneurs and jobs either requiring manual labour or in the service industry over white-collar ones.

Some 501 respondents of working age were asked to pick the jobs they respect or value more out of five pairs in a more light-hearted section of a survey on job perceptions.

Each job pairing compared how people felt about certain job traits.

It turns out that Singaporeans may not be as conscious about prestige and job image as some might think.

Asked if they respected a self-made entrepreneur with no degree or an economist with a master's degree more, an overwhelming 81 per cent plumped for the entrepreneur.

Calling this a positive sign, economics professor Hoon Hian Teck of the Singapore Management University says those who dare to take the plunge should be celebrated, as innovative start-ups will be a key job generator in the future.

Association of Small and Medium Enterprises president Chan Chong Beng, 59, says people tend to recognise the gumption needed to be an entrepreneur, especially in Singapore where "there's very little tolerance for failure". Mr Chan, who dropped out of university to start his business, says: "When you are an entrepreneur, the future is always uncertain. You have to admire those with the guts to think differently."

In another job pairing where respondents had to choose between two types of blue-collar jobs, 62 per cent said they would respect a cleaner over a factory worker, which is also a finding that will surprise some observers.

Office cleaner Abdul Kabir Mohamed Mydeen, 51, says friends asked why he switched from being a medical orderly to a cleaner earlier this year. His response: "Why not? A cleaner is a very good job. Without us, offices will not be clean, toilets will not be clean, Singapore will not be clean."

Others feel the survey's findings paint an overly rosy picture of an occupation which has hogged headlines for stagnant wages and lack of appeal to locals.

Executive director of the Restroom Association (Singapore) Emerson Hee notes that cleaners are more likely to be viewed as making a public contribution compared to factory workers, whose perceived contributions are restricted to their company.

But many toilet attendants still do not feel respected or appreciated for their efforts, he says.

Madam Lim Ai Lee, 78, who won an award from the association last year for keeping Queenstown Polyclinic's toilets spick and span, says some people leave toilet paper on the floor and ignore her when she asks them to use the bins.

The survey respondents' respect for more manual or frontline jobs is also evident in other pairings. Between a waiter and a clerical assistant, 61 per cent value the service job over the white-collar job, which pay roughly equivalent amounts.

Some 70 per cent also value a machine operator over a clerk.

Labour MP Zainal Sapari, who champions low-wage workers, is heartened that Singaporeans appear to value the work done by workers in service sectors.

But there is a distinction between the jobs people appreciate and the jobs they are willing to do, he notes.

Adds sociologist Paulin Straughan: "We respect those who are doing the hard work, but would rather not have to suffer those work conditions ourselves."

One reason is that the pay is not attractive enough. This is supported by survey findings that Singaporeans are not averse to working in blue-collar jobs if the pay is right.

Only 32 per cent agree or strongly agree with the statement "regardless of salary, a white-collar job is always better than a blue-collar job".

S’pore must be on guard against online threats

$
0
0
False information could spread far and wide, causing confusion: Defence Minister
By Xue Jianyue, TODAY, 3 Aug 2013

There is a new threat on the horizon that could hamper Singapore’s Total Defence efforts: The distorted or false information, rumours and smears that emanate from the Internet.

Warning against these yesterday, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said such distortions could spread far and wide and even cause confusion and chaos, weakening the country’s resolve and causing disunity.

“You would think that in this day and age, where information could be sent out, it would be easier to communicate,” he said at the Total Defence Symposium. “It is actually the reverse.”

Identifying information management as one key area in Total Defence, he said the authorities must have a quick response plan, but at the same time, Singaporeans themselves must be more discerning about information on the Internet.

Dr Ng’s comments came after Communications and Information Minister Yaacob Ibrahim criticised blogger Ravi Philemon in Parliament last month for making a misinformed post about delivery of masks to the public during the haze crisis. In response, Mr Philemon said he was not asserting a fact, but only seeking more information on the haze as the Government’s assurances about the masks “did not tally with the situation on the ground”.

At the event yesterday, Dr Ng said the over four decades of peace enjoyed by Singapore also meant that the Republic has to manage the “complacency that can set in”.

Noting that Total Defence campaigns have been conducted “every year for many years”, he asked the over 900-strong audience — which consisted mainly of employers — how the effectiveness of the efforts and plans for Total Defence could be assessed.

Dr Ng highlighted two “minor battles” — the SARS outbreak in 2003 and the worst haze episode that hit in June — which tested Total Defence efforts. In both cases, people from all walks of life, from employers to grassroots volunteers, non-government organisations and individual Singaporeans, rallied to help one another, he said.

“Youth groups, for instance, bought masks and distributed them to the elderly and the needy in the society. Others willingly opened up their air-conditioned homes for strangers to take refuge from the haze,” Dr Ng added.

While Singapore can take “great assurance” that these efforts in Total Defence are “bearing fruit”, Dr Ng said one area needed to be improved on is in information management.

“In a tense and volatile situation, DRUMS (Distortions, Rumours, Untruths, Misinformation and Smears) can spread very far and wide and even cause confusion and chaos. Those who would do us harm will purposely start DRUMS to weaken our resolve and cause disunity,” he said.

“We have to learn how to respond to DRUMS, both as a Government and the people. The authorities must have a quick response plan. At the same time, the people themselves must be more discerning about the information that they read on the Internet. Singaporeans themselves can respond or counter and stop the spread of DRUMS.”

Dragon kilns given new lease of life

$
0
0
Last two such kilns can stay put in Jurong for initial 3-year term, which is renewable for another two terms
By Melody Zaccheus, The Sunday Times, 4 Aug 2013

Operators of the two remaining dragon kilns here that were slated to make way for redevelopment can now breathe easy, knowing that they can stay put at their homes in Jurong.

The Singapore Land Authority (SLA) will extend the leases of Thow Kwang Industry and Focus Ceramic Services for an initial term of three years. These will be renewable for another two terms of three years each.



The fate of the kilns has been hanging in the balance for the last 20 years.

It was previously reported that the sites on which the two kilns sit, at 85 and 97L Lorong Tawas, formed part of the government land bank awaiting long-term development.

The National Heritage Board (NHB), which was approached by SLA in May to conduct an assessment of the heritage value of the site, had championed the tenure extensions of the kilns.

NHB group director of policy Alvin Tan said the two dragon kilns - from the 1940s and 1950s - are a unique part of Singapore's pottery history.

"The kilns are also of artistic value as they are presently used by local artists to provide a unique glaze for their works which could only be achieved through traditional wood-firing," said Mr Tan.

The SLA will facilitate the continued on-site operations of the kilns.

The news comes as relief for second-generation owner Tan Teck Yoke, 58, of Thow Kwang Industry. "With nine more years, we can do even more to promote the heritage and culture of the kilns."

Mr Tan, who currently pays $5,000 in rent to the SLA for the 5,000 sq m site, added that he has plans to set up a heritage gallery as well.

The extended tenure means that his neighbour, Focus Ceramic Services, will also get to go ahead with a $50,000 upgrading plan for its pottery equipment.

The operator of Singapore's longest dragon kiln, it had earlier this year finalised the extension of its lease for another two years, till 2015.

Artist Steven Low, 47, said another nine years on the tenure will help the local ceramic scene.

"Without our own kilns in Singapore, artists like myself would have to travel overseas to fire up our work," he said. "It would also have been an incredible loss of heritage."




National Day Message from Safra Toa Payoh

$
0
0
Venue where PM Lee's speech is recorded this year is a nod to NSmen's contributions
By Jeremy Au Yong, The Sunday Times, 4 Aug 2013

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's National Day Message this year will be delivered from SAFRA Toa Payoh, in a nod to the contributions of NSmen.

He recorded his speech there yesterday morning during a tour of the recreational club for NSmen.

The message, which usually focuses on economic issues, is normally recorded ahead of time and then telecast on the eve of National Day.

PM Lee posted a series of pictures of the visit on his Facebook page yesterday, saying: "I came to Safra for the Message this year as a way to thank our NSmen and their families for their contributions and sacrifices."



The revamped Safra Toa Payoh, which was officially opened in February, joins a growing list of locations that have served as backdrops for the National Day Message.

The speeches used to be recorded at the Istana but in recent years, PM Lee has chosen a variety of settings: the 51st floor of the Pinnacle@Duxton, the Marina Bay floating platform and inside the Toa Payoh HDB estate.

Last year's message - where PM Lee first announced the national conversation exercise - was filmed in Bishan Park.

Yesterday proved to be a day full of National Day festivities for PM Lee. Later in the evening, he was the guest of honour at National Day celebrations in his Teck Ghee ward in Ang Mo Kio GRC.

PM Lee, together with wife Ho Ching, spent some three hours at the event, first watching a street parade put on by Teck Ghee schools and grassroots organisations, and then visiting a flea market and other exhibits.

He also contributed a few crochet stitches to the "Knit With One Heart" project that has the stated aim of creating a closely knit society through knitting.

The project, which comes under the Community Engagement Programme, hopes to involve as many Singaporeans as possible in knitting tapestries to be displayed at the Chingay Parade in February next year.



Yesterday's parade will serve as Teck Ghee's National Day celebration this year with grassroots leaders choosing not to have a National Day dinner this year.

"(By having a street parade), we can get more people coming to celebrate together," said Madam Noelene Defoe, 60, chair of the Teck Ghee Community Club Management Committee. About 7,000 residents are estimated to have participated yesterday.

After the parade, PM Lee thanked the performers and said that the diversity of performances was a "reminder that we are one Singapore".

Woodlands to get 'vertical kampung'

$
0
0
Multi-agency project brings together public facilities, housing under one roof
By Salma Khalik, The Sunday Times, 4 Aug 2013

Residents in Woodlands will be the first in Singapore to experience the community feel of an integrated building with public facilities such as housing, health care and hawker centres all under one roof.

Planned, built and run by multiple government agencies - a first - this vertical "urban kampung", as National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan calls it, will bring together the young and old to live, eat and play together.



At the bottom of the building will be a massive "town square" or community plaza, and at the top, 100 studio apartments for elderly singles or couples.

In between will be a medical centre with about 35 consultation rooms and options for day surgery, senior activity and childcare facilities, shops and watering holes, as well as roof-top decks that residents can turn into community gardens.

Next door is the Admiralty MRT station, plus a basement carpark for 300 cars, and bicycle racks.

In an exclusive interview with The Sunday Times, Mr Khaw said more integrated buildings will be built if this one is successful.

Work will start next year, with the building ready by 2017. It is being developed by HDB and the Ministry of Health in partnership with the Ministry of Social and Family Development, National Environment Agency, Alexandra Health System and the Early Childhood Development Agency.

Leading them are HDB's deputy chief executive officer Yap Chin Beng, and Alexandra Health chief executive officer Liak Teng Lit.

The groundbreaking concept will hinge on how well the agencies work together. Said Mr Khaw: "A traditional approach is for each agency to carve out a plot, and make plans based on its needs. We will end up with several standalone buildings - workable but not outstanding."

An integrated complex, on the other hand, maximises land use and has been shown to work in other countries, such as Japan.

It all started "quite fortuitously", he told The Sunday Times, when a piece of prime land next to the MRT station became available and was sought by various agencies for their own purposes.

Mr Khaw said he decided to try "a holistic planning approach" instead, focusing on residents' needs.

"We're breaking some new ground," he said. "It is an experiment to create a modern urban kampung within a busy city - one that can pull people together and create a sense of community."

On his blog, he said he was "struck by the level of like-mindedness among the inter-agency stakeholders".

"The design has reflected the tireless effort to develop not a disparate but an integrated development that gels together," he said.

The project created a buzz among architects, with 22 firms submitting concepts.

Home-grown award-winning firm Woha, whose projects include School of the Arts and Stadium MRT station, won with its submission depicting a large "town square" on the ground floor for community activities and for residents to mingle.

Dr Mary Anne Tsao, chairman of the Tsao Foundation which provides a host of services for the elderly, applauded the initiative. She called it "truly a city of all ages where people, young and old, across the generations can work, play, learn, grow and be cared for in an integrated manner".




Health care key to good mix at new complex
Panel keeps medical centre at integrated building as it would benefit all residents
By Salma Khalik, The Sunday Times, 4 Aug 2013

The service mix at the new integrated building to be built in Woodlands would have looked a little different if some residents had had their way.

Said the MP for Sembawang GRC (Woodlands) Ellen Lee: "Some of my grassroots leaders asked, Instead of a medical centre or senior care services, why not build cinemas, a theatre or karaoke lounges to attract youngsters?"

In the end, the steering committee stuck to its guns. The medical centre would benefit all residents of Woodlands and not just the elderly, said Mr Liak Teng Lit, head of Alexandra Health.

Within three years of the opening of the Khoo Teck Puat Hospital in Yishun, 28 per cent of residents in the GRC, including children, have used its services.

A satellite centre at Admiralty means residents would not need to go all the way to hospital to see a specialist or for simple day surgery.

The multi-agency committee had consulted widely before deciding on the mix for the building. They tried hard to have a library there because residents wanted one, but the National Library already has a Sembawang branch.

Ms Lee said a few residents also asked for religious services as "most elderly persons go to church, temples or mosques regularly". Overall, she is delighted with the concept. Not only would elderly residents be self-sufficient, with a supermarket, medical centre, hawker centre, senior activities centre and shops in the building, but young working families would also benefit from the amenities.

In fact, it has the right elements for fostering a vibrant community spirit, said Housing Board chief executive Cheong Koon Hean.

Her deputy, Mr Yap Chin Beng, who co-chairs the steering committee with Mr Liak, said it "pushes the boundaries by bringing multiple agencies together to collaborate and co-create a quality living environment that best serves the community".

Another agency involved is the Ministry of Health's (MOH) Ageing Planning Office, which oversees and implements strategies in response to the needs of the greying population. In 20 years, one million people will be 65 or older.

Ms Teoh Zsin Woon, a deputy secretary at MOH, said the concept of the integrated building would enhance inter-generational bonding and promote active ageing.

"It is designed to provide a green and liveable living environment, with a range of social, health-care, commercial and other amenities in close proximity to support ageing in place."

Woodlands resident Eric Foo, 56, welcomed the idea, saying that running errands would be more convenient. "But hopefully the hawker centre and other noisy places will not be placed too close to the apartments," he said.

Associate Professor Johannes Widodo from the National University of Singapore's Department of Architecture added that such all-in-one developments were "good and necessary" for ageing populations. "This type of building has been widely used in Japan's big cities. They combine a hospice with kindergarten, wards, shops, clinics and more in one block in the middle of the city.

"The impact for the elderly and kids is very positive," he said.


When not battling a national crisis, family comes first

$
0
0
Environment and Water Resources Minister Vivian Balakrishnan has been in the thick of the action over the last few months. His ministry has had to deal with two national crises - dengue and haze - and a hawker centre cleaning spat with the Workers' Party town council in Aljunied. Elgin Toh met up with him over supper this week, in the first instalment of a new series called The Supper Club. These interviews with political figures will take place at the end of a day's work, a time for them to reflect on changes in Singapore and their own lives.
The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2013


Do you have supper here often?

I'm here more than once a week. My Meet-The-People session is not far away, so I come to hang out and meet people.

Does someone cook at home?

Yes. But probably one-third of our meals come from Ghim Moh Market and Hawker Centre. I suspect this is quite a common phenomenon in Singapore - eating takeaway local food regularly.

That is why one of the first things I did when I came to the Ministry was to revise the policy on building hawker centres. We had not built any for nearly 20 years. I persuaded my colleagues that hawker centres are a unique identifying mark of Singaporean society.

Some would call these past few months for you a perfect storm - dengue, haze, hawker centre cleaning.

Flooding hasn't occurred yet. Then we would have a perfect storm!

What does it feel like to be under pressure like this?

I must confess to being quite energised by crises. Maybe to some extent, it is due to my medical and surgical experience. There's no such thing as a routine operation. Every surgeon, mentally before he starts, has already considered all the complications.

And the most harrowing period in my last 12 years in politics is not this year. It was those two months in 2003 when (as part of the Ministerial Sars Combat Unit) I was tasked to go to the Singapore General Hospital, put on a mask and help restore confidence and resolve the problems there.

I spent two months at the hospital, doing Cabinet meetings through video conference, and having a colleague - Dr Alex Chao - die. Can you imagine, every day we met in the morning, sat around the table wearing masks, and if one of us had a fever, he was whisked off to Tan Tock Seng Hospital. So you're wondering, when's your turn? During those two months, I slept in a separate room because I didn't want to risk infecting my wife or my children.

What do you make of the reaction of the public to the haze and dengue crises?

Frankly, each time we've gone through a crisis, I've emerged more confident about Singaporeans. I've been impressed by how Singaporeans are calm, collected, looking out for each other, and cohesive. I think in many other societies, it would have led to either panic or rupture, and we haven't.

What do you make of public reaction to the hawker centre cleaning saga?

Just one point. PM (Lee Hsien Loong), in fact the entire Cabinet, including me, wanted to affirm that integrity is sacrosanct in our political system.

What do you do for fun?

For fun, I assemble computers. And because I don't get to operate on eyes any more, my latest thing is to assemble watches because I get to wear magnifiers and work with very fine tools.

You joined politics 12 years ago. Has anything about you changed?

I was recruited by former prime minister Goh Chok Tong. And I never forgot his key message to me when he was encouraging me to come in. He said: "You must hold fast to your values. If you have to compromise your values in order to join us, you lose your value to us."

He added: "You come in. It doesn't matter if your beliefs or views are different from ours. If you can convince us, we will make changes. But on the other hand, if we show you that this is the right thing to do, you must be intellectually honest enough to admit it."

So how much was there of you convincing them, and how much was it them convincing you?

I don't think I can quantify. You must appreciate how seriously we take collective responsibility in the Cabinet. Collective responsibility doesn't mean all Ministers agree on everything. But it requires us, after we have argued it and arrived at a decision, to collectively bind ourselves to that decision, to defend it, implement it and to make it happen. That is what Cabinet government means.

In 2011, former minister Lim Boon Heng broke down talking about Cabinet deliberations on the casinos. It was a sign that such collective responsibility can bear very heavily on the individual.

Yes.

Has there been such a point for you?

There are individual decisions which I would have made differently but I have not been put in a position where my conscience was on the line.

And if that point comes?

If that point comes, the Minister has to, first, do his best to persuade his colleagues.

Failing which?

Failing which, if it is really such a fundamental point of conscience, then he should ask to step down from Cabinet. But a fundamental point, a difficult point, a controversial point and a divergent point are different points on the scale.

You recently posted a picture of you taking your son to school. Is that what you do every day?

Yes. For 25 years, I've done all the night feeds, I've done all the nappy changes, and I've sent all four children to school.

Why do I do that? Because it meant, the last thing and the first thing my children saw each day was me. So no matter how busy I have been, all my four children know how much they mean to me.

Everything else will pass: your job, politics, position. The only thing that you are forever is a son, a brother, a husband, a father, a grandfather.



What's for supper

Senja-Cashew Community Club 101 Bukit Panjang Road
- Fish head curry: $18
- Roasted Pearl Milk Tea, two cups: $5.40
- Total (including GST): $23.40




Free shopping for 3,000 Singaporeans

$
0
0
By Vimita Mohandas, Channel NewsAsia, 3 Aug 2013

Over 3,000 Singaporeans from low-income families enjoyed a free shopping experience at Chong Pang Community Club on Saturday.

The event is part of ongoing National Day celebrations.

Called the "HOME for National Day", the two-day shopping event allows underprivileged Singaporeans to shop for a set of brand new clothes for free.


The community club was converted into a 'shopping centre', complete with refreshment areas, dressing rooms, mannequins, mirrors and photograph booths for an enhanced experience.

The clothes are donated by a retail franchise which wants to remain anonymous.

Female shoppers will be able to pick three items, while male shoppers can choose two.

Each shopper was also surprised with a "hongbao" (red packet) of $100 cash.

Foreign Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam, who is an MP for Nee Soon GRC, said: "We identified over 3,000 residents and we got together the donation and new clothes from various people from various companies.

"So, we brought the residents here, let them shop and surprised them with a S$100 'ang pow' as well.

"The residents are very happy. You can see the joy in their faces. It's also unique in the sense we are trying to get together the various community groups."

Book on land reclamation dispute between Singapore and Malaysia launched

$
0
0
Besides recalling drama, it serves as reminder of issue of conflicting legal rights
By Grace Chua, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2013

ONE September day in 2003, Mr Lionel Yee was on a plane coming in to land at Changi when it flew over Pulau Ubin and Pulau Tekong.

Then a legal officer in the Attorney-General's Chambers, he was returning from Hamburg after presenting Singapore's case at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). It involved a dispute with Malaysia which alleged that land reclamation at Tekong was harming the environment and causing navigation problems.

Mr Yee, now Judicial Commissioner in the Supreme Court, passed the islands in an instant. "That's what we had been fighting for, for so many weeks and months," he said.

Last night, he and his co-authors, Ambassador- at-large Tommy Koh and Ministry of National Development deputy secretary Cheong Koon Hean, launched a book on the landmark case.

All three were key members of the Singapore team at the tribunal.

Malaysia & Singapore: The Land Reclamation Case - From Dispute To Settlement, was launched at the National Museum by Minister for Law and Foreign Affairs K. Shanmugam.

It details the dispute over reclamation projects at Tuas, Pulau Ubin and Pulau Tekong when in 2003, Malaysia took Singapore before the Itlos in a bid to halt reclamation work that had started in 2000.

The dispute raised a larger issue of conflicting legal rights - Singapore's to reclaim part of its sea for national needs, and Malaysia's to protect its maritime environment from harm.

It was resolved when international experts showed the reclamation was not causing major environmental damage. Both countries agreed on minor changes to the Tekong reclamation and to monitor the area's ecology.

Mr Shanmugam said the case should be captured for posterity, and remarked on what it reflected about ties between the countries: "When we agree that we can go to third party adjudication, it doesn't hold any particular issue as so central that it holds the entire relationship hostage."

The $26.75 book is published by The Straits Times Press and the Centre for International Law and the Institute of Policy Studies at the National University of Singapore. All royalties will be donated to The Straits Times School Pocket Money Fund.




A chapter in the history of bilateral relations
By Grace Chua, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2013

SINGAPORE has reclaimed land at its edges for decades, expanding its land area by more than a fifth since the 1960s.

The land includes spots that most people take for granted, such as Marine Parade and East Coast Park.

So it was no surprise that this reclamation activity eventually rubbed its closest neighbour the wrong way.

In 2002, Malaysia objected to reclamation works at Pulau Tekong and Tuas, two years after the work had started. It claimed the projects damaged the environment, affected fishermen's livelihoods and caused navigation difficulties.

The case was heard at the International Tribunal For The Law Of The Sea in 2003, where the two countries agreed to a full scientific study. It was resolved after a team of independent experts found that the Tekong reclamation project had no major impact on the environment.

A decade on, three key members of the Singapore team - Professor Tommy Koh, Dr Cheong Koon Hean and Mr Lionel Yee - have written a 128-page volume on the experience, giving a sense of the drama in and out of the courtroom. It details Malaysia's complaints and Singapore's legal preparations, a tense week in Hamburg before the tribunal, a joint study by international experts, arbitration at The Hague and a settlement between the countries.

The Singapore team had a keen eye for anything that would help - such as photos of a container vessel breezing through the Elbe River channel in Hamburg to show navigation channels near Tekong would be wide enough even after reclamation.

The book also documents lighter moments. For example, one of the Joint Working Group meetings in Putrajaya ended so late that a Singapore delegation, including Prof Koh, was unceremoniously dumped at a petrol kiosk in Johor on the way back as the coach driver was late for another assignment.

The easy-to-read volume is targeted at laymen interested in international law and international relations. It charts a key moment in the history of bilateral relations between Singapore and Malaysia, and serves as a reminder how vital reclamation is to Singapore and how careful it must be about reclaiming land.




High sense of unity, high morale
A new book, Malaysia & Singapore: The Land Reclamation Case - From Dispute To Settlement, by Cheong Koon Hean, Tommy Koh and Lionel Yee, will be launched by guest of honour, Law and Foreign Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam, at the National Museum of Singapore on Monday at 6pm. The book tells a memorable story of Singapore's first experience of having to defend its legal rights before an international tribunal, namely the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos). Malaysia in 2003 took Singapore before Itlos in order to stop its reclamation works around Pulau Tekong and Pulau Ubin that had been going on openly since November 2000. We publish here two excerpts.
The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2013


WE WOULD like to record our reflections and lessons learnt. We shall begin with our reflections.

Reflections

FIRST, this case has reinforced the merit of Singapore's longstanding policy of adhering to international law. International law is important to all states. It is especially important to small states. International law levels the playing field on which big and small states interact with one another. Adhering to international law puts Singapore on a moral high ground.

Second, this case also vindicates another pillar of Singapore's foreign policy. Singapore believes in the peaceful settlement of disputes. The first priority is to settle a disagreement or dispute through negotiations.

However, if negotiations should prove to be ineffective, Singapore's consistent policy is to refer such a dispute to a third-party process.

In this case, there were three modalities of a third-party process, namely, the Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) and the Group of Independent Experts.

The wisdom of referring a dispute to a third-party process is to move it from the political arena to a more objective and fact-based one.

Third, this case demonstrates the importance of good interpersonal relations between negotiators. This reflection should not be surprising since negotiators are human beings. Negotiators interact with one another not only intellectually, but also emotionally.

Thus, the good interpersonal relations between the two agents, between Mr S. Tiwari and the Malaysian Attorney-General, and between the two liaison officers, Mrs Cheong (Koon Hean) and Madam Rosnani Ibarahim (director-general of the Department of Environment), created goodwill which in turn enabled the two delegations to seek win-win compromises. This would not have been possible if the relations between the principal actors were bad.

Lessons learnt

WHAT are the most important lessons which the Singapore team learnt from this case? The following are some of the most important.

First, an important, perhaps even decisive, determinant on the outcome of the case was the state of bilateral relations between the two countries. The bilateral relationship had gone through a difficult period.

The then Prime Minister of Malaysia could also have received optimistic advice from his foreign legal advisers that Malaysia had a much better case for provisional measures against Singapore than things turned out to be. Bilateral relations had, however, improved significantly by the time the Settlement Agreement was negotiated and signed.

Second, the Singapore delegation was pleased with the competence and integrity of Itlos. The decision of Itlos, to require the two governments to appoint a group of independent experts to ascertain the facts, was a wise one.

This is because the dispute revolves around questions of fact more than questions of law. Once the facts had been ascertained by an impartial third party, the two sides were able to negotiate a settlement based on those facts.

Third, as a maritime nation and state party to the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (Unclos), Singapore should actively cultivate a keen awareness of its rights and responsibilities under the convention. It is also important for Singapore to take an interest in and, when Singapore's core interests are at stake, participate actively in the negotiation and drafting of international agreements and treaties.

The leadership role which the Singapore delegation played in Unclos gave the Singapore team both knowledge and credibility.

Fourth, the Itlos hearing in Hamburg underlined the importance of meticulous preparation and an intimate familiarity with every point in one's case as well as that of the opposite party. Nothing can substitute the need for hard work and careful preparation before one appears before a court of law or an arbitral tribunal.

The excellent work done by the young legal officers in the team was highly commended by our international counsel.

Finally, the Singapore team of more than 30 members, coming from different ministries, agencies as well as academia, had a high sense of unity. The members of the team treated one another not only as colleagues, but as friends. The morale of the Singapore team was high, even when it was faced with difficult challenges.

We look back on the two intense years we worked together with satisfaction and pleasure.




Scramble to meet short deadline

Bringing the dispute to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)

IT WAS late afternoon on Friday, Sept 5, 2003. At the Attorney- General's Chambers (AGC) in Singapore, the International Affairs Division had gathered for a departmental tea to mark the Chinese Mooncake Festival when information was received that Singapore's High Commissioner in Kuala Lumpur had been summoned to Malaysia's Foreign Ministry. It did not take long for the purpose of that meeting to be known.

Malaysia had at around 11am Hamburg time filed a request for provisional measures with Itlos and had, at about the same time, handed to our High Commissioner in Kuala Lumpur a diplomatic note attaching the request it had submitted.

Malaysia was seeking the prescription of the same four provisional measures which it had sought unsuccessfully from Singapore earlier, including suspension of the reclamation work. The latter meant that the stakes were very high for Singapore.

Although the legal and technical teams in the Singapore Government had anticipated this eventuality, it still came as a bit of a shock as the implications of what had happened and the many tasks which now needed to be done sank in.

We knew that things would move very quickly.

The very nature of a provisional measure meant that the tribunal had to deal with the request as soon as possible.

The tribunal would, in the next few days, be giving Singapore a short deadline to file its written response and this would be followed soon after with an oral hearing in Hamburg.

There was not much of a Mooncake Festival to celebrate as the legal team spent that weekend and every day thereafter preparing for the case.

Arrangements were made for one of our counsel, Professor Vaughan Lowe, to come to Singapore as soon as possible. Meetings were held to strategise the next steps, divide the work and set down timelines before the matter was to be litigated. Prof Lowe arrived in Singapore over the weekend to assist the legal team in preparing the written response and in preliminary work on the oral arguments to be made.

While Professor (Michael) Reisman could not come to Singapore at short notice, he was nevertheless fully involved through e-mail and teleconferencing.

Time limits was one of the early issues that had to be resolved with the Registrar of Itlos. It went without saying that Singapore wanted as much time as possible to prepare our response and our case.

Malaysia, on the other hand, wanted an earlier hearing date. After some informal contacts between the tribunal and the representatives of both Malaysia and Singapore to fix the dates of the hearing, Sept 25 to 27, 2003 was accepted as a compromise.

Subsequently the deadline for Singapore's response was fixed for Sept 20, 2003.

Singapore therefore had 15 days to prepare its written response. However, in reality, some five to six days had to be set aside for the printing of the documents and their physical transmission to Hamburg.

Attorney-General Chan Sek Keong chaired very lengthy inter-agency meetings where everyone went through the response, paragraph by paragraph. The annexes and graphics that accompanied the text of the response were also prepared concurrently. These included a short video clip on land reclamation in Singapore, so that the judges of the tribunal could visualise the reclamation process as well as understand the physical constraints Singapore faced which necessitated land reclamation.

After the drafts were finalised, there was one round of proofreading at AGC all day on Sunday, Sept 14, 2003 before it was sent to the printers.

The proofs from the printers came in very late on Tuesday night, Sept 16, 2003 and the team spent some time doing a further round of proofreading.

This was the first time that Singapore was preparing a written response to a legal case at an international level, and as we wanted the documents to look and feel professional, the team had chosen to print Singapore's response on slightly thicker paper of relatively good quality, with a slight gloss.

This was a decision we would regret, as it made for a very heavy set of documents, which we had to carry around with us for reference over the next few years. The glossy paper also made it difficult to make notes in the margins.

These lessons did not go to waste - when it came time to prepare Singapore's written submission for the Pedra Branca case at the International Court of Justice, lighter paper with a matte finish was used.

Once the documents were ready, an MFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) officer, Mr Shivakumar Nair, flew up to Berlin with one batch of the response documents on Wednesday night, Sept 17, 2003, arriving in Berlin on Thursday, Sept 18, 2003. We had arranged for him to arrive two days in advance of the Saturday deadline because if anything untoward happened, there would still be time to send back-up documents the next day. With support from our Berlin Embassy staff, the documents were kept under vigilant supervision over the next two days.

On the morning of Saturday, Sept 20, 2003, Singapore delivered its response to the Registrar of Itlos in Hamburg.

SDP youth arm's article 'misleading'

$
0
0
'Mischievous' post caused Pulau Ubin residents undue anxiety, says SLA
The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2013

THE Singapore Land Authority (SLA) has accused the youth arm of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) of posting a "mischievous" article online "to mislead the public" on Pulau Ubin's development and cause undue anxiety to the island's residents.

The article, on the Young Democrats' visit to the island in May, was uploaded on the party's website last Wednesday.

Yesterday, the SLA, custodian of state land, denied its claim that the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) had approached resident Chua Bing Qing in 2009 to evict him, but later charged him rent for using the land after learning that the house he lived in was his mother's.

The URA did not approach him, "much less to evict or charge him rent as claimed", the SLA said on its Facebook page.

It added that Mr Chua confirmed this to SLA officers who visited him after the article appeared. Separately, his brother Peng Hong corroborated it.

Another claim in the article was that a "Madam Samiyah" at Kampong Chek Jawa was evicted from her house 15 years ago, and was paid $400,000 for her land.

SLA said its records show there "never" was an owner by that name whose land was affected by any land acquisition exercise.

It also denied that resident Lim Cho Tee received a slew of SLA notices demanding rent payment.

The family had paid up promptly every month through Giro, the SLA said.

These latest rebuttals by SLA follow a scare in April when residents thought they were given an eviction notice.

The letter was actually to inform them of a census survey to decide their resettlement benefits and how much they need to pay to keep living on the island.

Noting media reports of the Government's plan to keep Pulau Ubin rustic for as long as possible, the SLA said: "It is mischievous and irresponsible for the article... to mislead the public and cause undue anxiety to the residents in Pulau Ubin."


Related

Home Team urged to uphold professionalism, integrity

$
0
0
When officers fall short, reflect on what went wrong, reminds DPM Teo
By Jalelah Abu Baker, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2013

THE Home Team should reflect on what went wrong when officers "fall short" of standards, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said yesterday.

Speaking at an award ceremony for those who had made large contributions to Singapore's safety and security, he called on officers to uphold "professionalism and integrity".



Staff from Home Team agencies such as the Singapore Police Force, Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) and the Singapore Prison Service were honoured at the event.

Mr Teo said: "From time to time there may be individual officers who fall short of the high standards that we have set for ourselves, and which Singaporeans expect of Home Team officers."

His comments came after officers made the news for the wrong reasons. Last month, a policeman was charged with the high-profile double murders of a father and son in Kovan, while a prison officer was found guilty of causing the death of an inmate by negligence. Both men were veterans.

Some 104 officers were honoured with this year's Minister for Home Affairs National Day Award at the ceremony at the police headquarters in Novena.

Among them was Superintendent Lim Sze Yuk, senior assistant director of intelligence operations at the CNB.

In his 14 years in the service, the 41-year-old has planned the islandwide dragnet operations, in which officers conduct regular three- to five-day operations to arrest drug offenders. He has also initiated tactical training for the bureau's arm of volunteer officers.

"The award was surprising because this is what we do as officers, with no expectations," he said.

Another recipient was Staff Sergeant Quan Soo Cheng, 31, a neighbourhood crime analyst from Pasir Ris Neighbourhood Police Centre.

She has served the area for 11 years and analyses local crime trends so that officers can conduct more focused patrols.

Mr Teo, who is also the Coordinating Minister for National Security, said Singapore is ranked 16th among 162 countries in the 2013 Global Peace Index published by the Institute for Economics and Peace, largely because of the safety and security enjoyed here.

He said that this would not be possible without the community.

Among 10 volunteers honoured was Staff Sergeant (V) Tommy Chu. The 37-year-old independent financial adviser spends 12 hours a week at Woodlands Fire Station as an ambulance medical orderly, attending to emergency calls. He has been with the Civil Defence Auxiliary Unit for seven years, and joined to save lives.

Mr Chu, who also teaches first aid, said: "Time is a critical factor and we have to react very fast."

Singapore a small but relevant dot in the world: Shanmugam

$
0
0
By David Ee, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2013

BEING a small dot on the world map may make Singapore "intrinsically not relevant". But it has overcome this handicap by succeeding both economically and politically, said Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam yesterday.

Singapore's geographical size "means that people will talk to us only if we are relevant. We are only relevant if we are successful".

The country's relevance is seen in the active roles it plays in international and regional forums like the United Nations and Asean, despite its size, added Mr Shanmugam at this year's Foreign Service Scholarship Awards.

For instance, he cited Singapore's role in establishing more than 30 Free Trade Agreements with other countries, and having defence arrangements with Asean nations.

Having a voice at these multilateral discussions is "far more important for us than for a bigger country", he explained.

He noted that global decisions, whether in the United Nations or the World Trade Organisation, can have serious impact on the country, because of Singapore's size and openness to trade.

"Diplomacy is our first line of defence ... I tell all of our officers: 'If you're not at the table, you could end up being on the menu'," he told about 100 guests, including scholars old and new.

"We as a small country need international order that is governed by (the UN's) framework.

"(And) if something changes in the international trading system, that impacts on us, right?

"But you think anybody cares whether (it does)?"

Four scholars, selected from hundreds of applications, received their awards yesterday at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Tanglin.

Mr Lian Kay Hian, 19, received the Overseas Merit Scholarship (Foreign Service).

Mr Leon Lau, 21, and Ms Natasha Rodrigues and Ms Natasha Sim, both 19, all received the Singapore Government Scholarship (Foreign Service).

Mr Lau, who through his wide travels and interest in languages was drawn to a career with the foreign service, was acutely aware of the importance of diplomacy to Singapore.

"If overnight we are wiped out, the world moves on," said the Raffles Institution graduate, who speaks French and will be studying under the Europe-North America Programme at Sciences Po in France.

"(But) we create a very good name for ourselves overseas. We punch above our weight."

Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>