Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live

The lion, the haze and the people

$
0
0
By Pravin Prakash, Published TODAY, 23 Jul 2013

Civil society in Singapore stands at a crossroads. Sociopolitical issues are actively debated, opinions are readily offered and there is, in general, a constant clamour for increased engagement and space for debate in the public sphere. But, for all the noise, is there real impetus towards taking the initiative on action?

Over a month ago, for instance, there was much furore over the resignation of Singa, the mascot of the Singapore Kindness Movement (SKM). Singa’s “resignation letter” noted that he was “too tired to continue facing an increasingly angry and disagreeable society” and that “it (was) time for real people to step up and for the mascot to step aside”.

The campaign polarised public opinion, with criticism directed at the SKM for Singa’s cynicism. While the dust has since settled, it is worth revisiting matters through the lens of civil society in Singapore. Why not, for instance, interpret Singa’s “resignation” as a shift away from government-initiated and run campaigns?

One critic had fretted that Singa the Lion was setting a bad example for his young son by “giving up”. If a make-belief mascot has more influence on the personal development of a young boy than do his parents, family and greater society, well, it is a damning indictment of our social responsibility.

Some also argued that Singa was a failure because he was a plastic representation of a top-down movement that lacked connectivity. So should we not then celebrate the fact that Singa’s inability to relate to a different generation has been recognised, and the responsibility of making this society a gracious one passed on to “the real people”?

FILLING UP SOCIAL SPACES

Civil society in Singapore is evolving and, in many ways, in a positive fashion. People are coming together, mobilising to react to issues, policies and events. This is to be lauded and is a phenomenon that must continually evolve as people seek a place in the country’s sociopolitical sphere.

However, it is also worth wondering if this evolution has been rather limited to a possibly vocal minority, or to issues that are pressing or generate a certain amount of political controversy.

A politically active and reactive civic society will be taken more seriously when it makes itself more socially relevant and assertive. As we demand more political space, it is good to also see social spaces being filled with initiatives that have taken on life apart from state-prescribed campaigns and programmes.

Individuals and groups have been mobilising to address social issues such as (and this makes Singa’s exit timely) advocating graciousness and kindness. Groups such as Mission: Singapore and Project Awareness organise activities to raise awareness, aid those in need or simply bring a smile to people’s faces through flash mobs, giving out free hugs and other fun programmes.

The Stand up for Singapore movement holds various events to “build a culture of love, gratitude and graciousness”. Last National Day, for instance, volunteers travelled on MRT trains distributing red and white badges with the slogans “Stand up for our Elderly” and “Stand up for our Mothers”.

Student initiatives, too, are on the rise. The Singapore Management University’s Initiatives for Social Enterprise, for example, comprises students who use their business knowledge to nurture social enterprises, by teaching members finance, marketing and other business skills.

The Tamil Language Society at the National University of Singapore runs the Saadhana tuition programme in collaboration with the Singapore Indian Development Association (SINDA) and the Singapore Indian Education Trust, offering subsidised high-quality tuition to junior college students.

The scope for student initiatives is growing and no longer limited to small-scale activities, and young people are increasingly showing a keen interest in being part of a civil society that takes ownership of issues.

This dynamism often does not make the headlines and many Singaporeans may remain unaware of the shifting sands in society.

During the peak of the haze last month, as PSI readings reached previously unimaginable levels, it was met with alarm and the expected panic. The Government moved to address concerns and to reassure Singaporeans that it was doing all it could.

There were those, though, who thought action was not being taken swiftly enough. As has been well-publicised, netizens and groups of people mobilised and helped get N95 masks to those who needed them the most, or even offered up air-conditioned rooms to those without that benefit at home.

A group of undergraduates from the National University of Singapore’s Tembusu College gave out masks to underprivileged families; other student groups distributed masks to elderly people and children.

These are encouraging signs that civil society in Singapore is capable of social action while also functioning as critics. While the haze was a temporary crisis, the clarity it offered must be permanent.


Pravin Prakash is a political science graduate of the National University of Singapore. He currently tutors there and works at the Institute of South Asian Studies.


PM lauds effort put into Our Singapore Conversation

$
0
0
By Andrea Ong, The Straits Times, 24 Jul 2013

PRIME Minister Lee Hsien Loong hosted about 30 members of Our Singapore Conversation (OSC) to tea yesterday, to thank them for their efforts and good work over the past year.

His chat with members of the OSC committee and secretariat and volunteer facilitators lasted for over two hours.

"Cheered that the OSC dialogues have been meaningful, and have produced many good ideas," he said in a Facebook post last night. "The sessions helped Singaporeans understand others' aspirations and concerns."

Mr Lee unveiled the national conversation on Singapore's future at his National Day message last August. He has pledged to talk about some issues raised through the OSC dialogues at the National Day Rally on Aug 18.

Committee members at yesterday's tea said Mr Lee was keen to find out more about their experiences and what they learnt from the sessions.

Fresh graduate Stanley Chia, 25, felt the OSC differed from previous exercises as it was not just about "us listening to what the Government has to say about policies" but people engaging and learning from each other.

Noting that the OSC is the largest government engagement effort so far with some 46,000 participants, MP for Moulmein-Kallang GRC Denise Phua said the process reflected the need to continue engaging and encouraging "citizen-driven solutions".

Some members asked Mr Lee about what comes next. Singapore Muslim Women's Association board member Noorul Fatha As'art said: "There is a certain degree of expectation from the public for something concrete."

Now that the OSC has raised the bar on government-people engagement, the process should not stop, said Dr Noorul, 34. "Trying to make our country a better place is an ongoing process."

CPIB officer accused of embezzling over $1.7m

$
0
0
Graft agency veteran said to have used siphoned-off funds to gamble
By Bryna Singh, The Straits Times, 25 Jul 2013

AS A department head in the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), Edwin Yeo Seow Hiong was entrusted with public funds earmarked to support the agency's war on graft.

But yesterday, the 15-year CPIB veteran appeared in court accused of misappropriating more than $1.7 million from the bureau, among other related offences.

He faces a total of 21 charges: eight for criminal breach of trust as a public servant, one for forging a payment receipt and 12 counts of using the proceeds of his crimes to gamble.



The CPIB said in a statement yesterday that Yeo's ruse was uncovered on Sept 14 last year. He was suspended from duty and interdicted the next day.

The Straits Times understands it was a whistle-blower who alerted the bureau to the case, before it was referred to the police Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) for investigation shortly after.


The court heard that Yeo - who headed the bureau's field research and technical support branch - had between 2008 and last year, siphoned off funds meant for CPIB operations.

He also misappropriated two Honda Civics and two motorcycles belonging to the anti-graft agency, and forged a receipt that claimed a payment of $370,755 had been received by a supplier when this was not the case.

Yeo, 39, was said to have gambled away more than $240,000 of the money he had siphoned off, at the casino in Marina Bay Sands between last May and September.

It was not clear what the rest of the funds went into but prosecutors told the court that of the $1.7 million Yeo misappropriated, $67,000 had been recovered.

Speaking from the dock yesterday, Yeo told the court that he did not intend to engage a defence lawyer and asked for an adjournment of eight to 10 weeks to "settle family problems".

He also said the CAD had served him the charges only on Tuesday. "I need some time to prepare my representations and mitigation plea," he added.

The judge agreed but called for Yeo's passport to be impounded before he was released on bail of $500,000 in the afternoon.

The case will be heard again on Aug 21.

Commenting after the case was heard in court, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who is in charge of the civil service, said: "This case is particularly serious because it involved a senior officer in the CPIB, which is entrusted with the mission of maintaining the integrity of the system."

CPIB director Eric Tan yesterday apologised in a statement and said the bureau would learn from the case and strengthen its safeguards.

Recommendations to prevent a recurrence of such an incident, submitted by an independent review panel appointed by the Prime Minister, are also being implemented, said the Prime Minister's Office.






1 in 5 of CPIB cases involves public officers
By Bryna Singh, The Straits Times, 25 Jul 2013

THE Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) conducts an average of 39 graft probes involving public officers each year.

These make up about one in five of all CPIB cases, said Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean.

His comments came in a statement released by the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) yesterday, shortly after CPIB assistant director Edwin Yeo Seow Hiong was charged in court with misappropriating more than $1.7 million from the bureau, among other offences.

The case was handled by the police Commercial Affairs Department (CAD), which primarily investigates white collar crimes.

DPM Teo said that earlier this year, CAD and the anti-graft agency were asked to conduct a study of public officers they investigated for corruption and financial crimes over the last five years, "to see whether there was any change in their number or profile".

"About two-thirds of the investigations involving public officers led to prosecution or disciplinary proceedings," he added.

While DPM Teo noted that the number of cases involving public officers has remained "low and quite stable" over the last five years, Yeo's case was particularly serious because it involved a senior CPIB officer.

"Public institutions and public officers are held to the highest standards of integrity and conduct," he said.

"It is vital to have in place systems and practices to ensure integrity in the public service."

Also weighing in on the case yesterday was Law and Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam, who said that "the allegations (against Yeo) if true, are deeply disturbing and disappointing".

"I think every time you get this, you need to deal with it decisively and firmly," he told reporters on the sidelines of this year's Singapore Law Week at the Supreme Court.

"What we need to do is always be vigilant, be on top of it, and make sure these are the exceptions and they don't become the norm."

There have been two previous cases involving errant CPIB officers in the last two decades.

In 1997, Chan Toh Kai, a senior special investigator, was jailed for a year for cheating a businessman.

In 2002, Sogamaran Gopal Ramachandran, a senior research officer, was jailed two years after he leaked information to corrupt policemen on how they were being investigated.

DPM Teo said strong measures will be taken to tighten up processes.

"PMO is examining whether any supervisory lapses may have contributed to this incident. If so, it will take action against the officers responsible."

A silver lining, however, was that many graft probes involving public officers were started after members of the public or fellow officers blew the whistle, he said.

"This suggests a strong culture in Singapore and in the public service which rejects corruption."




GOVT WILL TIGHTEN UP PROCESSES

This case is particularly serious because it involved a senior officer in the CPIB, which is entrusted with the mission of maintaining the integrity of the system... We will take strong measures to tighten up processes. PMO is examining whether any supervisory lapses may have contributed to this incident. If so, it will take action against the officers responsible.



VIGILANCE THE KEY

Inevitably with human nature, you will have people who succumb to temptation, who do things they aren’t supposed to do – whether in the civil service, banks, law firms or in institutions – despite having the best controls. What we need to do is always be vigilant, be on top of it, and make sure these are the exceptions and they don’t become the norm.

– Law and Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam





Yeo allegedly started by taking $1,200 from CPIB
Officer then allegedly took bigger sums each year, rising to $1.2m last year
By Bryna Singh, The Straits Times, 25 Jul 2013

IT ALL started with $1,200 from the coffers of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB).

Apparently when Edwin Yeo Seow Hiong allegedly took the money in 2008, no one noticed. That only made the CPIB officer more brazen.

The sums he allegedly misappropriated ballooned from year to year - from $95,000 in 2009, to $106,000 the next year, and $320,000 in 2011. Last year, he allegedly siphoned about $1.2 million.

The total came to more than $1.7 million, a sum he was yesterday charged with misappropriating from the anti-graft agency.

The 39-year-old was caught after someone within the bureau blew the whistle on him.

When he was released on $500,000 court bail and left the Subordinate Courts at about 7pm yesterday, he was heard saying "game over, game over" as photographers snapped his picture.

Yeo faces 21 charges in total, with the misappropriation of the money forming the first eight.

The 15-year CPIB veteran is also accused of one count of forgery, and 12 counts of using the fruits of his crime to gamble.

The CPIB said in a statement yesterday that it was alerted to the case on Sept 14 last year. Following preliminary investigations, he was suspended from duty and interdicted the next day.

The matter was handed over to the Commercial Affairs Department for an "independent, impartial and thorough" investigation to be conducted.

The bureau's statement added that Yeo had "circumvented" Civil Service rules meant to ensure financial accountability and propriety, which included filing annual declarations regarding one's financial liabilities.

CPIB director Eric Tan yesterday said he was "deeply sorry" for the loss of public funds as a result of Yeo's actions. "As the most senior officer in the agency, I accept responsibility for any lapses or deficiencies which allowed a senior staff's actions to go undetected for four years."

He promised that CPIB would strengthen its safeguards and improve its processes to prevent a repeat. "CPIB will learn from this," he added.

When Yeo first siphoned the $1,200 in 2008, he was heading the bureau's field research and technical support branch.

By 2011 - a year after receiving the Pingat Kepujian (Commendation Medal) from the Prime Minister's Office - he was emboldened to misappropriate more than $320,000. The amount was "intended to be used for the purchase of goods and services required" by his branch for its operations, court papers said.

He also apparently forged a payment receipt sometime in March 2011 to make it seem as though an equipment supplier had received $370,755 from the CPIB, when in fact, no such payment was received.

Last year allegedly brought Yeo his biggest illegal haul - $1.2 million.

Part of this came from the misappropriation of four CPIB vehicles that had been entrusted into his care: two Honda Civics, a Honda Hornet 250cc motorcycle, and a larger 900cc bike of the same make.

These were valued at $46,676.

The same year, Yeo was said to have frequented the casino at Marina Bay Sands, where he allegedly gambled away more than $240,000 of his ill-gotten gains between last May and September.

During this period, he withdrew sums ranging from $6,950 to $45,550 from his POSBank account.

His case will be heard again on Aug 21. Yeo may be jailed for life, or given a jail term of up to 20 years, and a fine if he is convicted of criminal breach of trust as a public servant.

Coping with foreign labour cuts

$
0
0
New foreign labour cuts since July 1 put even more pressure on firms here. But companies are coping. In a five-part series starting today, The Straits Times looks at how they are doing it.



Help yourself, please
By Amelia Tan, The Straits Times, 22 Jul 2013

SOUP Restaurant executive director Wong Chi Keong admitted he would have pooh-poohed opening a self-service Chinese restaurant when he entered the food business two decades ago. To him, it was a fast-food concept.

But he changed his mind a year ago, and in March this year, the chain opened two self-service eateries - Potluck and Cafe O - in Jurong East's IMM mall.

"The rules of the game have changed. If you want to continue to play, you have to adapt," he said.

Restaurateurs have been pushed to embrace self-service because the food and beverage sector is buffeted by higher levies and stricter quotas for foreign workers.

From this month, the maximum proportion of foreigners in a service firm is 40 per cent, down from 45 per cent before - although this applies only to new hires.

To combat this squeeze, at least five restaurant groups have launched, or are in the midst of starting, manpower-light concepts.

The aim is to let workers spend less time attending to customers so they can multitask and do other tasks more efficiently.

For instance, at Potluck, which serves Chinese claypot dishes, customers make their own way to the tables instead of being led by a waitress.

Staff are freed up to clear tables and take food out from the kitchen to the tables.

Customers also order and make payments with a cashier and help themselves to cutlery, rice and drinks at a self-service station in the middle of the restaurant.

Snack chain Old Chang Kee and casual dining Han's Cafe are going one step further.

They are doing away with cashiers altogether by installing electronic ordering and payment kiosks.

Diners at Old Chang Kee's two-month-old restaurant Curry Times Tingkat at Alexandra Retail Centre, which serves curry rice dishes, pay with Nets ATM or FlashPay cards at the kiosks and collect food from the counter. The food comes in paper boxes to save time spent on washing.

Han's Cafe has plans to install these kiosks at all its 23 outlets by the middle of next year, and is looking at getting customers to clear their own tables to lighten the workload of staff.

Restaurant bosses revealed that going self-service took some convincing. This is because many of them believed that diners go to restaurants to be served.

"But the reality is if we continue using the labour-intensive model, we will be finished," said Chinese restaurant chain Paradise Group chief executive Eldwin Chua.

The group opened halal self-service nasi lemak restaurant My Nasi in Sembawang Shopping Centre two weeks ago, and will open two more by the end of the year.

Restaurants are hopeful that customers will embrace the changes - especially since the food is cheaper.

Prices have been lowered, and many do not charge for service, evidently.

For example, diners spend an average of $12 each at Potluck compared with $22 at Soup Restaurant.

Customers like software engineer Loke Ee Foong, 37, are embracing the self-service concept.

He spent about $30 when he dined with his family of three at Potluck, and said: "I find that it is value for money to eat here.

"I will definitely come back again."




Small savings in time, work can reap big dividends
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 23 Jul 2013

AS THE labour crunch bites, some firms are willing to do a lot to save a little manpower - shaving off a few minutes here and there in the hope that it will add up.

Take the time workers spent waiting around at construction sites for materials such as ready-mixed concrete or asphalt premix to be delivered.

To save those wasted minutes, construction firm Samwoh Corporation spent more than $300,000 fitting its 300-odd trucks with Global Positioning System units.

"We can monitor all our trucks on the road on the computer screen at any time, and hence optimise the delivery speed and reduce waiting time," said chief operating officer Ho Nyok Yong.

This way, workers could be deployed to do other work first.

As the tight labour situation persists, productivity is valuable not just to boost business but as a way to cope with staff scarcity.

The construction industry has seen its quotas or man-year entitlements slashed by 45 per cent since 2010, and levies are set to rise steadily in the next two years.

So even tasks as peripheral as clearing debris from a work site can be improved.

At the D'Leedon condominium construction site, each 36-storey block has refuse chutes with openings on every floor. Debris is thrown down these chutes into a disposal area, which builds up and must be cleared.

When this happens, all chute openings must be temporarily closed so that workers in the disposal area are not hit by debris.

Previously, workers went from floor to floor to close all the openings. Though this took only 5-1/2 minutes for each level, seven 36-storey blocks meant some 22 man-hours' work.

Earlier this year, site contractor Woh Hup hit on a solution.

When an infrared sensor detects that the disposal area is being cleared, a pneumatic tube system makes the chute covers swing shut.

Costing $6,000 per block to install, the system "saves" 2.46 men per day. This is a fraction of the 2,100 or so workers on-site each day, but every bit counts.

"This means that the two men can be tasked to perform other activities on site, which will aid in the progress of the site," said Woh Hup Workplace Safety, Health and Environmental manager Don Wilson Paua.

Construction firms are not the only ones seeking to save time and manpower. The services industry has also faced waves of foreign labour curbs in the form of higher levies and tighter quotas.

From July, the maximum proportion of foreigners in a service firm is 40 per cent, down from 45 per cent before.

The good news is that this applies to new hires, with firms not having to shed existing workers until 2015. Such lead-times have been the norm for foreign labour tightening measures - and Holiday Inn Singapore Atrium has made the most of it.

"We mapped out our people strategy more than 18 months ago," said executive assistant manager Kung Teong Wah.

Passport and credit card scanners at reception, for instance, have cut check-in times from five minutes to three.

At Royal Plaza on Scotts, even rubbish gets renewed attention. Before, two stewards would push bins up a slope to the garbage disposal - a 10-minute trudge - six to eight times a day.

But after a rail conveyor was installed, it takes five minutes and one worker to do the job.

The savings may be just five minutes each time, but general manager Patrick Fiat noted that this means 10,800 minutes a year.

"Since only one steward is required to do the job... the other employee can be deployed to cover other duties," he added.

As the labour crunch continues, saving man-hours, every micro second of it, counts.







Good service is all in the details: Labour chief
Govt fund to help firms boost service pays off with more happy customers
By Amelia Tan, The Straits Times, 23 Jul 2013

WHEN labour chief Lim Swee Say goes to Chinese restaurant Din Tai Fung, he is not eyeing its world-renowned dumplings and noodles. Instead, he looks out for the toothpicks.

They are well-designed and of good quality, he said. And in what he calls a "confession", he admits to pinching half a box during each visit.

"It's so good I can never resist," he said, while fishing for a toothpick from his pocket to illustrate his point. "They (the restaurant) really pay attention to all the finest details. Even to the small things like providing you with the toothpick.

"Many restaurants give you toothpicks but the toothpick is so big it can never go through. But this one is so fine that whatever is inside... can surely come out," he said to much laughter from the audience, made up of chief executives of food and beverage companies and reporters.

When asked, a Din Tai Fung spokesman said toothpicks are placed on tables and customers are free to use as many as they like.

Such attention to detail is the reason for a business' success, as it adds a gloss to good service, Mr Lim said on a tour of Din Tai Fung's parent company BreadTalk Group's new Tai Seng headquarters yesterday.

And it is the objective of a Government fund aimed at helping companies in sectors such as retail, food and beverage, and hospitality to improve their service standards.

Based on a survey by Spring Singapore last year, the results have been positive.

Thirty-five food and beverage companies, which tapped the Customer-Centric Initiative administered by Spring Singapore, were asked how they have benefited. The firms received grants of between $50,000 and $150,000 each.

The firms reported an average 23 per cent increase in customer satisfaction levels and a 35 per cent average increase in revenue.

Higher earnings have also helped to push up staff salaries by an average of 17 per cent for each worker.

Mr Lim said the survey also showed that good leadership and an employee-centric culture determine a company's success.

BreadTalk chairman George Quek agreed that getting workers to feel that they matter is important.

He reduced the staff training period from eight to four months at Din Tai Fung so they can start earning their full pay sooner.

Mr William Cheng, chief executive of BreadTalk's restaurant division, said the company's management also used employees' feedback to design the central kitchen at the new headquarters which opened last month.

He said: "The workers tell us where and how we should place the machines. They are doing the work, so they know best."

Mr Cheng said BreadTalk hopes to use Spring Singapore's grant to organise more training programmes for staff.

The company has already used the grant to develop a mobile application and website for customers to order pastries and cakes from the company's bakeries.




Foreign labour from new places
By Amelia Tan, The Straits Times, 24 Jul 2013

THE squeeze on foreign labour is driving companies to look for, well, more foreign labour.

But instead of pounding the same old ground overseas, restaurant and construction bosses are exploring new territories.

Due to a mix of hiring restrictions and dwindling supply, firms in Singapore have found it necessary, and useful, to recruit workers of different nationalities.

In the food and beverage sector, for instance, the trend in recent months has been to go Taiwanese.

Six restaurant groups, including Tung Lok and Jumbo, will each hire a handful of waiters and cooks from the island in the coming months, and are hoping for more.

The reason is a quirk in the ruling. There are no specific caps on Taiwanese workers because they are classified as a North Asian source, along with those from Hong Kong, Macau and South Korea. So restaurants only have to pay heed to the 40 per cent maximum proportion of foreign workers that is allowed for service firms.

In comparison, the Manpower Ministry limits the proportion of such companies' mainland Chinese work permit holders to only 8 per cent of the firm's strength.

"There isn't an additional quota for the Taiwanese. So there are slightly fewer restrictions," said Mr Eldwin Chua, chief executive of Chinese restaurant chain Paradise Group, which employs six Taiwanese workers.

But restaurants emphasised that a key reason for hiring Taiwanese is to improve service standards, said the Restaurant Association of Singapore.

Its assistant honorary secretary Wei Chan explained that the manpower crunch in restaurants has led to a vicious circle: Service standards have dropped and eateries cannot send workers for training because there are just not enough of them around.

"We hope that the workers can learn on the job by watching how the Taiwanese serve with a smile and show this genuine warmth," he said.

Taiwanese are keen to come here because of bleak job prospects at home due to a lacklustre economy, said restaurateurs.

Taiwanese waitress Chen Yea Ru, 18, who is working at Jumbo Group's steamboat restaurant Jpot, said: "I could work in a restaurant in Taipei, but I think I can learn more here because the hospitality sector seems more vibrant with the new hotels and integrated resorts."

Similarly, construction firms are venturing to new lands for workers.

They are finding it harder to attract Chinese and Indian nationals who make up the bulk of the nearly 300,000 construction workers here, along with Bangladeshis.

The Chinese and Indian workers increasingly prefer to stay at home where the economies are booming.

Construction bosses hope to make up for the expected shortfall by hiring workers from Sri Lanka and the Philippines.

They have started to recruit and train workers from these two countries and expect about 400 workers to arrive every month by October.

The two countries also offer plenty of experienced workers who have returned home from the Middle East after the property boom some five years back.

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) is helping with the search.

It has appointed six Singapore construction companies to run eight test centres in Sri Lanka and the Philippines, where workers will undergo a training course and take a compulsory skills certification test.

Mr Neo Choon Keong, BCA's group director of manpower and strategic policy, said it is wise for Singapore to focus on attracting experienced construction workers in the long run.

"We will need fewer workers if more of them are experienced. They need less training and can start work from day one," he said.




Firms hiring more ex-offenders, disabled
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Straits Times, 25 Jul 2013

CAR workshop TyreQueen found a novel way to beat the labour shortage: Hire ex-offenders.

When it opens at Bukit Timah's Turf City in September, all of its 10 workers trained to fit tyres onto customers' cars will be former prisoners.

They are a lifesaver for workshop owner Valerie Tan who was worried that she could not hire enough local workers due to a lack of labour.

So when a church friend with experience counselling ex-convicts suggested hiring them, she said "yes" immediately.

"Without them, I would not have been able to get the new business up and running since I started planning for it three months ago," said Ms Tan who recruited them this month.

She is not the only one turning to former offenders to cope in the tight labour market due to curbs on foreign worker numbers. More companies are now tapping these unlikely pools of workers - former prisoners, the disabled and students.

The trend does not surprise human resource analyst Martin Gabriel from HRMatters21: "In a way, this is how firms are forced to adapt with the local and foreign manpower pool drying up."

This is good news for ex-offenders, with the latest statistics showing that more are getting a second chance with a new job.

In the first six months of this year alone, 1,110 found jobs with help from Singapore Corporation of Rehabilitative Enterprises, compared to 1,344 in 2009 and 1,637 in 2010, before the inflow of foreign workers was tightened.

Another group of workers - the disabled - also saw a spike in interest from employers.

Bizlink, a non-profit body which helps those with disabilities find work, said the number of firms hiring them is growing by 10 per cent annually. It now has 6,000 companies on its database.

At Holiday Inn Singapore Orchard City Centre, about one in eight of its 270 employees has disabilities and the hotel plans to hire more. By 2016, they will form 20 per cent of the hotel's staff strength, said its general manager Jagdeep Thakral.

Students working part-time are also providing a lifeline for some restaurants.

When the House of Seafood opens its fourth branch at Tanjong Katong tomorrow, four of its 12 waiters on weekends will be part-timers, two of whom are students. These students who work during weekends fill the shortage of workers when the restaurant is the busiest, owner Francis Ng told The Straits Times.

Local manpower firm TCC Solutions also saw a surge in firms hiring students this year.

The number of firms that sought to hire student part-timers grew from about 100 last year to over 150 this year.

To meet the increase in demand, the agency added 2,000 students to expand its pool of part-timers to 7,500 this year, said its general manager Frey Ng.

Member of Parliament Denise Phua said it is a "good outcome" that firms are looking to hire more ex-offenders and workers with disabilities as fewer foreigners are allowed to work here, but these workers have to be treated well.

Employers should not "exploit them and treat them as lesser second-class employees simply because they are more vulnerable and perhaps less mobile due to their special backgrounds".

"They deserve the same opportunities in terms of pay, benefits and training as typical employees."

Bosses such as TyreQueen's Ms Tan agreed. "They will be trained and paid market rate, which can be more than $2,000 each month including commission," she said.

UN declares Nov 19 as World Toilet Day

$
0
0
Resolution is the first that S'pore has tabled in 48 years as UN member
The Straits Times, 25 Jul 2013

SINGAPORE made a big splash at the United Nations last night: Its move to promote good sanitation for all was such a hit that the world body wasted little time in passing its resolution to declare Nov 19 World Toilet Day.

The success was all the more sweet as the resolution is the first Singapore has ever tabled in its 48 years of being a UN member.

The subject, however, is sure to flush out some potty names for the event and off-colour jokes.

But Singapore officials hope that the chuckles will get the issue out of the water closet, because good sanitation is more than just a matter of hygiene.

Singapore's UN deputy permanent representative Mark Neo told the UN General Assembly: "We need to first seize the world's attention through humour and a catchy phrase like World Toilet Day, before we can inform and educate.

"You have to find a pivotal issue, like toilets, which by focusing all your attention and efforts on, you can achieve many disproportionate and positive outcomes in terms of health, gender equality, economic prosperity and the personal dignity of many of the poorest people in the world."

Each year, about 760,000 children under the age of five die from diarrhoea caused by dirty water and poor sanitation habits.

The economic loss is also huge, shrinking a country's gross domestic product by up to 7 per cent.

The UN estimates that 2.5 billion people worldwide lack access to better sanitation.

While the triumph of Singapore's "Sanitation for All" resolution was swift, with the 193-member UN General Assembly adopting it within minutes, the road to success was long and rocky.

It took almost four years, starting in 2009 when Singapore's famed "Mr Toilet" Jack Sim sent his idea by e-mail to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA).

Mr Sim is the founder of World Toilet Organisation, a non-governmental body that has championed good sanitation and clean toilets for more than a decade.

But his idea was deemed "inappropriate" by Singapore's man at the UN Mission in New York, Mr Vanu Menon.

Two years later, however, Mr Menon, who was back at MFA as deputy secretary for South-east Asia and International Organisations, had a change of heart.

A face-to-face meeting with Mr Sim, initiated by former foreign minister George Yeo, was the clincher.

Mr Yeo had met Mr Sim towards the end of 2011 at the annual World Toilet Summit in Hainan island, and was bowled over.

"Jack has a passion which is infectious," he told The Straits Times.

Over the next 11/2 years, MFA's intense lobbying got 120 countries to co- sponsor the resolution.

But there were difficult moments, said Mr Sim.

Monaco, for instance, wanted the event moved to Nov 20, to avoid clashing with its National Day. But Nov 19 is the date of birth of Mr Sim's World Toilet Organisation, and the day on which World Toilet Day is already unofficially observed in many countries.

"There are 193 countries in the UN and everyone likes to negotiate," he said. "In order not to get off track, we said at the start that the date and name are non-negotiable."

The adoption of World Toilet Day is important for Singapore too.

Improving sanitation "made a major difference for our public health and hygiene", said Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Vivian Balakrishnan.

In independent Singapore's early years, more than half the population did not have proper toilets, and used latrines that hung above rivers or buckets filled with soil.

By 1997, after extensive cleaning of rivers, modernising of infrastructure and building of Housing Board homes, sanitation was no longer a problem.

On Nov 19, the Environment and Water Resources Ministry, National Environment Agency and national water agency PUB will mark World Toilet Day in Singapore, with partners such as the Restroom Association of Singapore, Lien Aid and Mr Sim's World Toilet Organisation.

For Mr Sim, the achievement is testament to what cooperation between the Government and civil society can accomplish.

"We have a lot of people who want to do good both in our country and outside. If this could be an example, it would be nice."




A PASSION FOR SANITATION

Jack (Sim) has a passion which is infectious. Toilets are so important to our everyday life, but everywhere we encounter inadequate toilets. Many people, especially women, avoid drinking too much water to reduce the need to use toilets. This is harmful to health.

The cost of providing good toilets is far below its utility to all of us. Yet, for a variety of reasons, there is market failure. The way to solve this problem is to make toilets a legitimate subject of attention by everybody, by managers and by users. Then everybody benefits.

World Toilet Day will help us achieve an important Millennium Development Goal, and I'm so happy that Jack and Singapore have played a leadership role in this.

– Mr George Yeo, vice-chairman of Kerry Group and former Singapore foreign affairs minister








Hundreds of millions have no toilets to use
The Straits Times, 25 Jul 2013

IN THREE of Asia's biggest countries, hundreds of millions of people are still defecating in the open due to the lack of toilets.

Throw in the poor state of public toilets, and observers say this could lead to outbreaks of diseases such as typhoid and diarrhoea.

In Indonesia, sanitation campaigners say two out of every five Indonesians lack proper facilities to answer the call of nature.

"And as many as 63 million Indonesians still defecate in the open," Ms Naning Adiwoso, chairman of the Indonesian Toilet Association, told reporters.

These include one million of Jakarta's 10 million residents, many of whom live in slum areas by the capital's rivers, Antara News Agency reported.

In China, there were just 118,000 public lavatories in cities, as recorded at end of 2009.

China usually hogs pole position for having Asia's dirtiest loos, according to rankings by the World Toilet Association.

Last year, the capital of Beijing tried to reduce the stink by holding toilets to a higher standard - one rule says that each restroom should have no more than two flies.

In India, a new slogan has been adopted to bring about change: No toilet, no bride.

In central India's Madhya Pradesh state, where the government organises mass wedding ceremonies in poor villages, prospective grooms must show a photo of themselves before a toilet in their house to qualify for marriage.

According to government data, only 25,000 of India's 600,000 villages are considered officially "clean", meaning these places have achieved total sanitation: no open defecation, safe drinking water for every household, and a working drainage system.







'Don't pooh-pooh S'pore's push for World Toilet Day'
Basic sanitation still scarce in poor countries: Experts
By David Ee, The Straits Times, 26 Jul 2013

POLITICAL commentators, aid groups and MPs yesterday cheered the country's decision to make improving sanitation the aim of its United Nations resolution, even as it quickly became the butt of jokes among sections of the public.

Proper sanitation, they sought to remind critics, remains a basic right still out of reach of many in poorer countries, impacting their hygiene and in turn their health.

Singapore's choice to champion at the UN an issue faced not by its own people but by others also marks it out as a "responsible and global" nation-state, said Dr Lim Wee Kiak, chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Defence and Foreign Affairs.

"People will have their own opinions, but I would say please don't downplay the importance of sanitation," he said.

"It is quite clear-cut."

Political scientist at the National University of Singapore and former diplomat Reuben Wong added: "It might be a non-issue in Singapore, but it's a big issue in much of the Third World."

According to UN estimates, about 2.5 billion people - more than a third of the world's population - still lack access to improved sanitation.

Singapore's "Sanitation For All" resolution was adopted by the 193-member UN General Assembly on Wednesday.

It calls for greater attention to be paid to the global sanitation crisis, through the marking of World Toilet Day each Nov 19.

The resolution had been co-sponsored by 120 countries.

Mr Koh Lian Hock, the chief executive of Lien Aid, a non-governmental organisation that helps improve sanitation in poor communities in Asia, was proud to see Singapore taking the lead to raise awareness about the problem.

"People's perception is that Singapore is always (focused on) the economy, on ourselves... It's good that the Government is doing something for humanity," he said.

But his sentiments were not shared by some members of the public, who struggled to see the point of World Toilet Day.

"We are probably the most developed and modern country in the world... and what we can offer as our resolution to the world is 'clean toilets'?" a user commented on The Straits Times report online.

Another user, Terence Wee, wrote: "What the crap! Singapore - Loo-sers of the world!"

Student Vo An Nhien, 18, felt that the choice of name probably led some people to that misunderstanding.

"The name World Toilet Day is a little weird. Perhaps they could have chosen something else."

Singapore's deputy permanent representative to the UN Mark Neo had anticipated the reactions.

In remarks before the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, he said: "I am sure there will be laughter among the press and the public when it is reported that the UN is declaring a World Toilet Day.

"Their laughter is welcome, especially if they recognise the prevailing and unhealthy taboo that prevents an open and serious discussion of the problems of sanitation and toilets globally."

Showing Singaporeans that, for example, there are some just a two-hour flight away in Cambodia without basic sanitation will help people see the scale of the problem, said Lien Aid's Mr Koh.

Lien Aid has helped improve sanitation and water access for about half a million people since it was founded in 2006, building more than 21,000 toilets in countries such as Cambodia, China and Vietnam.

"It's a larger issue than just us," said Mr Koh. "It is our responsibility to advocate for this."




Charities cheered by UN 'toilet' resolution
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 26 Jul 2013

SINGAPORE'S efforts to improve sanitation in poorer countries will help to mobilise resources and raise awareness of related projects, charities said yesterday.

Lien Aid's chief executive Koh Lian Hock, who was involved in lobbying for the United Nations resolution, said it would help to legitimise the issue and provide a springboard for it and other non-government organisations (NGOs) to approach potential benefactors and mobilise manpower.

Meanwhile Ms Jean Tan, executive director of Singapore International Foundation, said: "We are heartened by this development which will spur our long-running efforts to bring to others what we in Singapore are so fortunate to have as a given - clean water access and sanitation."

Mrs Foo Pek Hong, chief executive of World Vision Singapore, said the resolution "reinforces our resolve to continue to promote hygiene and access to water".

The organisation sends its trained staff members overseas, while Lien Aid, the Singapore International Foundation and some schools also hold volunteer trips.

The projects involve building infrastructure, such as toilets and water tanks, and teaching good hygiene habits like washing hands properly and not defecating in the open. Lien Aid has completed 22 such projects to date and has another 88 under way.

Last year, Singapore Polytechnic students visited a fishing village in rural Cambodia to design and install floating toilets.

These toilets can float during floods when much of the village is underwater, including its only public toilet. They can also convert the waste into fertiliser.

But charities said there is still much to be done. The UN estimates that 2.5 billion people lack access to "improved sanitation" - meaning separation of human excrement from human contact.

In Cambodia, 70 per cent of people practise open defecation, which can be particularly unsafe for women if carried out after dark, said Ms Aisha Abdul Rahman from Lien Aid.

Behavioural changes do not happen overnight, she added.

Meanwhile, Ms Tan urged people to "contribute funding, resources, expertise and volunteer service to the cause of uplifting regional communities faced with these challenges, which Singapore too faced in its early days".

Contempt of court action against cartoonist

$
0
0
Man behind online comic strip accused of 'scandalising judiciary'
By Walter Sim, The Straits Times, 26 Jul 2013

THE Attorney-General has taken legal action against cartoonist Leslie Chew Peng Ee, the man behind online comic strip Demon-cratic Singapore, for contempt of court.

The High Court has allowed its application for an order of committal against the 37-year-old, who is accused of "scandalising the judiciary" in comics he posted on Facebook.

An order of committal is the typical procedure for instituting action against contempt of court.

If given, the order will find Chew guilty of contempt and set out the punishment, which could either be a jail term, a fine or both. The punishment is left to the discretion of the court.


Explaining its move yesterday, the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) said: "The present legal proceedings are aimed at protecting the administration of justice in the Republic of Singapore and upholding the integrity of one of our key public institutions."

On Tuesday the AGC asked the High Court for permission to apply for an order of committal against the self-employed Chew on five comics he had posted on Facebook. The High Court gave the nod for four. One was posted on July 20, 2011, and the rest last year, on Jan 3, Jan 5 and June 16.

On the Facebook page which he started in May 2011, Chew claims Demon-cratic Singapore is the "full name" of a fictional country, "often referred to as Singapore for short". It also says the series is "a totally fictional comic with entirely fictional characters based on wholly fictional events".

But the strips are said to bear a strong resemblance to actual situations here. The comics singled out allege preferred treatment by a kangaroo court to foreigners and high-profile personalities.

In 2010, Briton Alan Shadrake, 78, was sentenced to six weeks' jail and fined $20,000 for saying in his book that Singapore courts bowed to pressure from foreign governments, favoured the rich and privileged, and were used as a tool by the ruling party to muzzle political dissent.

Chew's brush with the law first took place in April this year when he was investigated for sedition.

A member of the public had made a police report about a "racially insensitive" cartoon he posted on March 27 this year, about the Malay population.

The AGC said the sedition issue is still under consideration. The police said investigations are ongoing on the matter of sedition.

But before the police report, the AGC had written to him last December about another cartoon that "scandalises our courts through allegations and imputations that are scurrilous and false". The cartoon was not taken down and no apology was made.

Chew's case will be heard in the High Court on Aug 12. He is co-represented by lawyers M. Ravi of LF Violet Netto and Choo Zheng Xi of Peter Low LLC.

Mr Ravi said papers were served on his office yesterday. He is taking instructions from his client. "To succeed in our defence, we must show there is no real risk in the public confidence of the independence of the judiciary."

AGC clarifies why no Coroner's Inquiry was held for prison inmate's death

$
0
0
By Jalelah Abu Baker, The Straits Times, 26 Jul 2013

THERE was no coroner's inquiry into the death of prison inmate Dinesh Raman Chinnaiah because criminal proceedings had already shown how he died, the Government's main legal adviser said yesterday.

The 21-year-old suffered breathing difficulties after being placed chest down on the ground in an isolation cell.

Senior prison officer Lim Kwo Yin, 36, was later fined $10,000 for causing death by negligence. The coroner's inquiry was then discontinued - prompting questions online and in media reports about why this happened.

Yesterday, the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) released a statement saying that some of the commentators "appeared to have misunderstood" how the process works.

It said the coroner is required to hold an inquiry into any death that occurs in official custody.

But if criminal proceedings have already shown the cause of death and circumstances surrounding it, he can bring the inquiry to an end.

"The coroner has a discretion to discontinue the proceedings before him if he determines that there is no longer a need for an inquiry to take place to determine the cause of and circumstances connected with the death," it said.

Dinesh died on Sept 27, 2010, while being restrained after he carried out an unprovoked attack on an officer at Changi Prison.

The inquiry was discontinued after his family's lawyer and officers from the AGC met State Coroner Imran Abdul Hamid in his chambers on Tuesday.

This led to questions in the media over why the proceedings were halted, with one commentator describing the way the case unfolded as "quite uncommon".

Yesterday, however, the AGC said it is not unusual for inquiries to be adjourned or discontinued when someone is prosecuted over the death - although the prosecution has no powers to compel the coroner to do this.

It added that the coroner will then consider the findings of the criminal proceedings, and decide if an inquiry is still needed.





Resetting mindsets about disability

$
0
0
By Alvan Yap, Published TODAY, 25 Jul 2013

Nine days after Singapore celebrates its 48th birthday, the local disability community will mark its own momentous milestone.

On Aug 18, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) comes into effect in Singapore. This follows the Ministry of Social and Family Development’s (MSF) announcement last Friday that the Government has ratified the convention (which it signed last November).

For people with disabilities in Singapore — numbering about 100,000 —this is welcome news and a giant step towards equal rights and access in all aspects of life.

However, real progress towards a truly inclusive society depends not only on what the Government does in adhering to the letter of the CRPD, but also on whether society adopts the spirit of the convention. In other words, how society as a whole perceives people with disabilities is crucial.

A large proportion of the general public, corporations and policy-makers tend to think of people with disabilities using two common, entrenched models. Let’s look at them and then examine a third, seldom-considered model — which might make all the difference.

AS ‘CHARITY’ OR ‘MEDICAL’ CASES

The Charity Model is encapsulated by the oft-used words “less fortunate”, “underprivileged” and “needy” to describe people with disabilities, especially in conjunction with fund-raising efforts. No doubt, such charity initiatives stem from good intentions and hearts.

The problem arises when it becomes the primary lens through which the entire disability community is viewed — as pitiful, helpless and financially dependent. Naturally, being stereotyped as welfare recipients or associated with tales of tragedy is humiliating. This is also not a positive or accurate portrayal of the vast majority of people with disabilities.

The Medical Model is another widespread societal perspective of the disability community. This pertains to the medical issues and biological “defects” linked to the particular disability and the corresponding cures — via medical procedures, therapies or drugs. Such a narrow focus on making the person with disability as “normal” as possible can become misguided at times.

True, medical intervention is crucially important in reducing pain, in mitigating the severity of disability-related conditions, in prolonging life, and so on.

But these have limitations too. For many disabilities — whether physical, sensory, intellectual or neurological in nature — there is no fix to be found in medicine or technology; they are incurable, lifelong conditions.

It is more pertinent, then, to accept and adapt to the disability. The questions that should be asked take on a different slant: How can persons with disabilities be included in the family, in schools, in society? What kind of attitudes and measures are needed — both on the part of the individuals with disabilities and society at large — to improve their lives and accord them dignity?

‘DISABILITY’ LIES IN THE ENVIRONMENT

This brings us to the Social Model of disability, which finds explicit expression in the CRPD. It says that disability does not lie in the person himself, but in his social and physical environment. It focuses on enabling the person with disability. How? By removing the physical barriers around him and changing people’s negative attitudes towards him.

Take the example of a student in a mainstream school who has a physical disability and uses a wheelchair. When his class goes on an outing to a park, he is able to join in because a wheelchair-accessible bus is available, and there are ramps, wheelchair lifts and wide paved paths at the park. His classmates and teachers also cheerfully help to push his wheelchair up the steeper slopes. Here, can we say the wheelchair-using student is “disabled”? After all, he is able to go where his classmates go, and take part in the activities they participate in, and everyone welcomes him.

One can just as easily imagine the opposite scenario, though — a lack of wheelchair-friendly transportation, inaccessible park facilities, and classmates and teachers who regard him as a hassle, all of which result in him having to miss the outing. Now he definitely is disabled — being limited in what he can do, where he can go.

More instances of how a Social Model of disability leads to more positive outcomes: A person with autism performs well with a customised, structured regime at the workplace. A student with profound hearing loss who uses sign language thrives in school with the aid of note-takers or sign language interpreters.

Wheelchair users and people with visual impairment are able to access public places with the provision of accessible transportation and facilities which adhere to Universal Design principles. Workers with intellectual disabilities are competent and productive at work because the job scope is tailored to their capabilities.

By enabling these supposedly disabled folks to function to their full potential, they can study, work, be independent, lead dignified and meaningful lives — just the same as their non-disabled peers.

COMMON-SENSE, NOT SPECIAL, RIGHTS

Reading through the 50 articles of the CRPD, one realises that it is not demanding special, extra or extraordinary rights for people with disabilities.

It is actually asking governments to commit to a commonsensical stance — that people with disabilities are entitled to the legal rights, privileges and protection already enjoyed by the non-disabled. What can be fairer or more logical if we truly wish to forge an inclusive, just and moral society?

So let’s cast off the rusty clanking chains of seeing disability as inferiority, tragedy or victimhood. Let’s look at it afresh, with open minds and without constraints.

Let’s adopt the Social Model of disability and be enlightened about what disability really is — a normal part of the human condition as well as a testimony to the wondrous diversity of humanity itself.


Alvan Yap, who is hearing impaired himself, has worked as a special education teacher and as an editor with a publishing company. He is currently an advocacy executive with the Disabled People’s Association (Singapore).


Clan bodies throw open their doors to visitors

$
0
0
Artefacts go on display to showcase rich culture and heritage
By Melody Zaccheus, The Straits Times, 26 Jul 2013

"ALL are welcome."

For the first time, nine clan associations in Chinatown are rolling out the red carpet for the public to explore their buildings and share their culture and history as part of the Singapore HeritageFest (SHF).

"We've had a lot of curious visitors walking past who never dared to come in. Now we've put up a sign to say that we are open and all are welcome," said Mr Lawrence Sew, secretary-general of Kong Chow Wui Koon, a Cantonese clan.

Its 89-year-old, four-storey building has been transformed into a living museum for more than $600,000.

Other clans have also been shaking off the dust for a fresh look. Three clan buildings along Bukit Pasoh Road have been refurbished over the past few years. Centuries-old artefacts and photos are now displayed with labels, and lifts have been installed, along with interactive kiosks.

"For many years, artefacts with more than 100 years of history were just lying around with no write-ups and explanations. We are glad that we finally got around to fixing up the place," said Mr Sew, 55.

It all points to the role of clans being "slowly redefined", said Ms Lim Boon Tan, executive director of the Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations (SFCCA).

"What started out as associations formed to feed the basic needs of the Chinese immigrant community is transcending into a higher purpose - the preservation of our rich Chinese heritage."

In the past, clan associations focused on helping members of the community in their daily lives, setting up schools and hospitals, and driving charity efforts.

Their numbers grew from about 32 in the 1800s to more than 120 by 1941. Today, there are around 300 clan associations registered with the Registrar of Societies.

But the lack of young people joining these clans has become a worry. Hence the new look, open-door policy and outreach efforts to engage youth.

Siong Leng Musical Association has, for instance, fused elements of contemporary dance with traditional Nanyin and Liyuan opera. And instead of playing mostly at wakes, the association has performed at the Esplanade, the Singapore Arts Festival and various international venues over the past few years.

"Our audience make-up is getting younger and we've also seen a 50 per cent increase in bookings over the past 11 years," said artistic director Lin Shao Ling, 48.

At its clubhouse in Bukit Pasoh Road, old handwritten score sheets and a gold-plated crown won in a 1953 floating parade festival celebrating the crowning of Queen Elizabeth II are on display.

There is much to preserve.

The Hok San Association, a Cantonese clan, has the oldest lion dance troupe in Singapore which specialises in the southern school of lion dance.

The Poon Yue Association is home to six rare stone inscriptions, the earliest of which is dated 1879.

At the Ee Hoe Hean Club, a manuscript of the memoirs of prominent businessman Tan Kah Kee is among the artefacts on display. Opera costumes, lion dance heads and Qing Dynasty guard of honour weapons are featured at Kong Chow Wui Koon.

The chance to visit these sites and traditional buildings, most of which have been gazetted as conservation buildings by the Urban Redevelopment Authority, has been embraced by the public.

Two SHF tours of some of these associations which ran last weekend were fully booked. Some of the associations will hold their own programmes this weekend.

Ms Angela Ling, a managing director for a brand consultancy, who joined a tour last Sunday, believes it is important for clans to open up.

"We tend to be more dismissive of the roles and functions of these historic establishments in our younger days. But I'm glad they continue to exist today so I can play catch-up with a crucial part of our heritage," said the 31-year-old.

The clans told The Straits Times their premises will stay open even after the SHF is over on Sunday.

The four clan associations along Bukit Pasoh Road have also expressed interest in working together to organise a consolidated tour for the public.

"We are looking forward to possibly establishing regular monthly tours of the clans and clubs in the area," said Mr Lim Chin Joo, 76, vice-president of Ee Hoe Hean Club.

"It's important that we share with young Singaporeans the success stories of our pioneers."







Gan Clan on mission to woo youth
By Melody Zaccheus, The Straits Times, 26 Jul 2013

IT'S gunning for Gans, and sparing no effort. From getting on Facebook, to a $500,000 renovation, the Gan Clan is on a mission to get younger people to join.

There may be some 30,000 Gans in Singapore, but the association has just 700 members, 65 per cent of whom are aged 60 and above.

"We hardly get any young Gans joining us and it's a problem," said Ms Gan Ee Bee, 38, curator of a new Gan Heritage Centre at the association's building in Bukit Pasoh Road. "So we hope that the heritage centre will help get them more interested."

Over the past year, she and seven others from the clan worked to piece together a comprehensive account of the Gan lineage.

Their effort, which took them back to Shandong, the hometown of the Gans, will be showcased at the new centre starting tomorrow, as part of the Singapore HeritageFest.

Sombre ancestral photos have made way for artefacts and multimedia displays detailing the history of the Gan surname, the migration of its people and their contributions. For instance, younger Gans may be surprised to learn that one of their ancestors, Yanzi, is considered Confucius' best disciple, said Ms Gan.

It cost $500,000 to renovate its 47-year-old building and install the exhibits, which include a tile from the roof of Confucius' grandfather's house.

It was partially funded by the National Heritage Board's Heritage Industry Incentive Programme. The rest came from members. For the first time, members of the public can take a tour of the building. Admission is free.

Dr Gan See Khem, 67, president of the Gan Clan, said clans have a part to play in keeping alive Singapore's rich heritage.

"With more than 2,500 years of history, the Gan Clan has a lot to share with everyone. If all the clans do their part and tell a good story, the heritage scene will be more interesting."

Bringing back the kampung spirit

$
0
0
Engaging and empowering Singaporeans can reinforce a sense of ownership in the community
By Laurence Lien, Published The Straits Times, 27 Jul 2013

THREE years ago, I spent seven weeks in the United States on a fellowship programme meeting leaders in the non-profit and community sector.

One highlight was a visit to Boston's Dudley Street Neighbourhood Initiative (DSNI), a celebrated example of community development.

DSNI had done something remarkable: turning around a devastated neighbourhood that resembled bombed-out Beirut in the 1980s, into a thriving and engaged community today.

They did this progressively by empowering residents to organise, plan for, create and control the neighbourhood they lived in.

What can we in Singapore learn from successes like theirs?

The key ingredients for successful community building are not specific programmes or initiatives, but a process-driven approach that values and believes in people.
- First, we need strong belief in the strengths of people in the community to initiate positive action, without reliance on state help or resources from outside the community. The approach must be entirely bottom up.
The ground-up engagement promotes a sense of agency in individuals and reinforces a sense of ownership in the community.

At DSNI, every board member was made up of only residents, and staff members were only facilitators who did not make decisions on behalf of residents.
- Second, there entails genuine belief in empowerment, going well beyond consultation which does not change the power relationship. Empowerment means growing and sharing power, and passing on some control over one's own destiny. Authorities must learn to work with - not for - citizens.
For example, citizens should directly help impoverished citizens in their communities, rather than relying on government and institutional financial assistance schemes to do all the work.

There is a need to strengthen people's confidence in their own capacities and in taking action. This must arise from a community vision that is positive and not driven by anger and complaints.
- Third, good community leadership and facilitation is a requirement. Leadership should come from within the community. Outside expertise can be brought in but they should not lead.
The community organiser at DSNI who hosted me was clear that her role was merely as a facilitator. She and her colleagues were focused on putting power back to the people and empowering them to make good decisions for the benefit of all.

In Singapore, we talk about creating a society with a greater sense of togetherness. But the most we see are sporadic sparks of the kampung spirit, hardly the bonfire that we desire.

Instead, there are increasing incidents of neighbourly disputes and lower levels of trust. A silver lining, however, is a recent rise in informal volunteerism. A good example of this is the SG Haze Rescue.

This group used online platforms to mobilise community efforts to channel manpower and resources to those in Singapore that needed help most during the haze. It showed that ground-up initiatives can be even more effective than agency-driven efforts.

A kampung spirit is not simply something nice to have. Dynamic communities are critical to our personal well-being as well as social cohesion.

Reviving our kampung spirit is a key theme of Our Singapore Conversation. With more complex social challenges emerging, like ageing and families increasingly unable to be the first line of care and support, communities must step in.

For example, Singapore has some 150 psychiatrists serving 500,000 who are likely to suffer some mental health problem in their lifetime. Community support is critical to shore up mental wellness in our population.

But in Singapore, many agencies, whether from the public or people sector, do not know how to lead by stepping back. Currently, government agencies often practise consultation, but retain decision-making powers.

Government agencies are concerned about handing over ownership for many reasons. These include public pressure to act and take control, anxiety about appearing weak, and the need to be accountable to their superiors.

But this entraps citizens in an unhealthy and unsustainable dependency on a higher authority to solve all problems.

Messy inefficiency first

THERE is also a low tolerance for messiness and perceived inefficiencies. Yet, messiness and uncertainty are a necessary part of a community's growing-up process.

Developing empowered communities may be inefficient in the short run, but would be more efficient in the long run.

Imagine if solutions to neighbourhood parking woes and noise pollution were a result of community problem-solving rather than bureaucratic intervention?

For example, a special residents' task force could be formed and entrusted to decide on the permissible decibel levels in their neighbourhood and organise volunteer groups to monitor and encourage compliance.

Common problem solving is more likely to build bridges, while bureaucratic intervention tends to displease at least one party.

Political leaders have also said they would be keen to step back and to allow for communities to self-regulate.

They are, however, concerned that many Singaporeans have contradictory expectations. They want the Government to be more empowering and less intrusive. Yet when things go wrong on the ground, the first instincts are to blame the Government and expect it to fix things - a "Catch-22" situation.

Power to citizens

WHAT concrete steps can we take to develop confidence and competence in our people to take on more community ownership?
- First, we need to progressively empower people to design their future and take charge of what affects their daily lives. This includes how to design neighbourhoods, use common spaces, site facilities, restrict noise levels and other negative externalities.
We should devolve power to elect resident leaders in HDB estates to work on behalf of all residents.

Neighbourhoods should be allowed to choose their leaders, just like residents in condominiums choose their management committees.

If leaders are properly elected, rather than appointed, they would engender more trust from residents. They should be empowered to engage residents to make meaningful decisions and set rules on how their neighbourhood should evolve and be uniquely organised.

We can experiment with giving small grants for residents to invest in prototyping community solutions.

Seattle has a successful Neighbourhood Matching Fund programme which has been running for 25 years and has provided neighbourhood groups with US$49 million (S$62 million) for more than 4,000 community-driven projects to enhance their neighbourhoods.

More than resource provision, such programmes can help provide a positive sanction and impetus for residents to start initiating.
- Second, we need resident leadership programmes to develop community facilitators.
There are many process tools to learn, particularly in designing communal areas and creating the space for meaningful conversations. In such conversations, facilitators must start with where people are, and not where they wish the people were. Listening, in such a context, is often an under-rated competency.

But ultimately, it depends on citizens stepping forward to take on community ownership. Citizenship atrophies when it is not exercised.

On the flip side, like picking up a sport, one gets continuously better through practice. Confidence is enhanced through continuous actions and building on past successes.

In Singapore, we must stop ourselves from becoming a nation of people with pent-up angst. Sure, the Government has to step back. But, more importantly, the citizens must step forward.

When each of us starts contributing meaningfully to the communities we live in, we feel more fully citizens of this country, and it naturally becomes more of a home.


The writer is a Nominated Member of Parliament, chief executive of the National Volunteer and Philanthropy Centre and chairman of the Lien Foundation.

By Invitation features expert views from opinion leaders in Singapore and the region.

Narrowing the empathy gap

$
0
0
To be more empathetic, PAP may need to swerve from core beliefs
By Rachel Chang, The Straits Times, 27 Jul 2013

IN 2006, then United States Senator Barack Obama said that America's "empathy deficit" was as pressing as its federal deficit.

He defined empathy as "the ability to put ourselves in someone else's shoes; to see the world through those who are different from us - the child who's hungry, the laid-off steelworker, the immigrant woman cleaning your dorm room".

Empathy deficits can be seen all over the world as societies stratify along income lines, including in Singapore.

The Our Singapore Conversation exercise was an attempt to narrow the empathy gap by bringing citizens of different backgrounds and profiles together. If they got face-to-face, it was hoped, it would be easier to see through one another's eyes.

But the empathy gap here has another dimension: the one between the Government and the people. It is an issue that the People's Action Party (PAP) has been grappling with since the bruising 2011 General Election.

Party leaders have urged the rank-and-file to change the perception that MPs do not listen and have no empathy.

Last year, Senior Minister of State for Law and Education Indranee Rajah said that what people want from ministers "is a sense of empathy. They really want to feel that you feel for them. They also want to feel that you're one of them".

This past week, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean took the empathy imperative to young scholarship recipients, telling them that civil servants must have a deep understanding of the public's needs; empathy and ability are equally important to reach the top echelons of the public service, he said.

That the Government is attempting to close its empathy gap is evident.

But honing a more empathetic form of governance requires more than just dialogues, consultations and mass-engagement exercises, where a show is made of enacting uncontroversial suggestions from members of the public into policy.

It requires more than preventing grassroots activists from lining up to receive an MP at a community event; it requires more than slashing ministerial salaries.

As a closer look at empathy studies around the world reveals, it might actually require the PAP to swerve away from some of its core principles of governance.

In the past few years, researchers have found that empathetic reactions can conflict with rules-based reasoning and long-term thinking.

Empathy, after all, is the ability to put oneself in another's shoes and see things from the other person's perspective. This is easier when that person is good-looking or from the same community. It becomes harder when the victims of a situation are theoretical or distant in space or time. So when people are told the story - pictures included - of a cute young girl with a heart condition, they support moving her to the front of the transplant list, despite the cost to those who have been on that list much longer.

Similarly, empathy is why people traditionally reach out to help victims of shock events like a tsunami or a mass shooting but are relatively indifferent to causes - such as child vaccination programmes in developing countries - that actually save more lives.

Because empathy relies so much on identification with another, academics have also argued that it can explain the lack of momentum behind issues such as climate change.

The plight of unborn generations of human beings hence is ineffective in the face of the pleasures of carbon-emitting behaviour now.

In essence, an excess of empathy can lead to short-term calculation, rules-bending and the prizing of powerful personal narratives over systemic thinking.

This is all exactly the opposite of what we know the modern PAP to believe in and to stand for.

Take the safeguarding of the national reserves or social welfare.

In the first case, the Government's reluctance to tap on a bigger portion of the national reserves to fund social spending now signals that it places future generations and unanticipated "rainy days" on a par with present-day discomfort.

In the second, it hews closely to the principle that a generous social safety net gives rise to moral hazard despite heart-breaking instances of poverty in Singapore.

This is not to say these choices are bad ones or to discount the huge amounts of social assistance the Government gives to both low- and middle-income Singaporean families.

It is merely to point out that the PAP's core ideology is one that values long-term thinking and principled, measured action over emotions, narratives and short-term relief.

The Government has always prided itself on its practicality. As the research shows, such a world view can sometimes be opposed to empathy.

Truly becoming a more empathetic government might actually come at the cost of compromising qualities once thought of as the PAP's greatest strengths.

The Population White Paper is a good example of how, in trying to balance its insistence on forward thinking with this new-found demand for empathy, it can achieve neither but rack up ill will in the process.

The White Paper was written and released with the well-intentioned purpose of delineating the Government's population strategy to Singaporeans fed up with enduring unanticipated and rapid population growth.

It was a forward-thinking document released at a moment that revealed a profound lack of empathy - a fact several PAP MPs pointed out. No one wants to imagine a 6.9 million population when it already feels like the island is bursting at the seams.

In the end, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that the issue would be revisited in 2020; the prospect of 6.9 million was a projection, not a promise.

This empathetic capitulation came, perhaps, too late.

The desire for an empathetic PAP is understandable from a more assertive electorate unhappy with recent policy missteps.

But watching Cabinet ministers trying to be empathetic can sometimes be uncomfortable in the way that watching someone earnestly, but badly, playing the piano is.

Many have noted that empathy is not in the PAP's DNA. But sometimes I wonder, why should it be?

In a more pluralistic age, the days of being something to everyone are over. Its perceived lack of empathy will cost it votes just as its vaunted pragmatism and long-term policymaking will gain them from elsewhere.

Instead of trying to dilute its beliefs to canvass support from across the political spectrum, why doesn't the ruling party just sharpen its brand, confidently proclaim what it stands for and let Singaporeans decide if that's what they want in a government?

Some might argue that this would leave those desiring a more empathetic government in the lurch but it is no longer true that we have no other political options, nascent though they may be.

Perhaps a viable opposition that can take over the Government is decades away but an important step in the process of political maturation is the differentiation of ideologies and value systems among competing parties.

Over the past few years, the PAP, in spite of its still-dominating position, has been in a self-flagellating moment of soul-searching and inner transformation. As part of that exercise, it should consider if sticking to its strengths may ultimately be more productive than trying to be what it is not.

Public service graft cases: Half were in enforcement

$
0
0
Most offenders were male and money was most common bribe: PMO study
By Bryna Singh, The Straits Times, 27 Jul 2013

ENFORCEMENT officers, nearly all of whom were men, made up half of public officers investigated for graft and similar misconduct over the past five years.

Money was also the most common type of bribe, with cases involving sex accounting for just 11 per cent.

This is what a new study, prompted by the recent spate of high-profile cases involving public officers, established.



Commissioned by the Prime Minister's Office, it was meant to see if there were widespread issues in the public service system. The study was initially "classified" but the PMO made it public yesterday due to "public interest".

It showed that of the 996 cases handled by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), 197 or about one in five cases involved public officers. This works out to an average of 39 cases each year between 2008 and last year.

A third of these cases saw no need for further action after the officer was cleared, investigations proved inconclusive or the Attorney-General decided there was a lack of evidence. The rest of the cases led to criminal prosecution or disciplinary proceedings.

Male officers were the bulk of offenders, forming 92 per cent of those prosecuted or disciplined.

Half of these offenders, or 51 per cent, were also front-line officers whose job was to enforce laws. They included police and anti-narcotics officers and officials from the Housing Board, National Environment Agency and Manpower Ministry, among others.

The other half, or 49 per cent, consisted of those in technical and support roles, as well as those working in administration.

About 30 per cent of those prosecuted or disciplined were A-level or diploma holders; those with degrees accounted for 23 per cent. Close to half had O-level certification as their highest qualification.

The most common accusation against those investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act was showing unwarranted leniency when doing their job (53 per cent). Twenty-one per cent gave unauthorised services and information, and 15 per cent granted favour in the form of employment and other opportunities.

In return, 6 per cent received sexual favours and 5 per cent got a combination of sex and money.

In 65 per cent of the cases, money was the sole form of illegal gratification. The amounts were usually less than $1,000, which was so for 40 per cent of cases. Cases involving bribes of over $100,000 made up 6 per cent.

Commenting on the results, head of the civil service Peter Ong said in an e-mail sent to the 136,000-strong public service that he was reassured by the findings as they show that "our system as a whole remains sound".

Indeed, Singapore was in fifth place in last year's Corruption Perceptions Index compiled by Transparency International, which measures perceived levels of public sector corruption.

"We have a strong culture which rejects fraud and corruption," said the PMO yesterday, while highlighting how half the cases which led to prosecution and disciplinary action came from complaints within the civil service. About a third came from members of the public, and the rest from anonymous tipoffs.

These show that existing channels for reporting suspected wrongdoing "have proven useful in many cases", added the PMO.




No room for complacency: Civil service chief
By Bryna Singh, The Straits Times, 27 Jul 2013

ALTHOUGH a study of investigations against public officers for corruption and other financial crimes has found that such cases remained low, the Public Service has said it cannot be complacent.

This is because public officers are in a position of trust and authority, said civil service head Peter Ong in an e-mail sent to the entire service yesterday.

"We owe it to our fellow Singaporeans to carefully guard their trust in us and the Public Service," he wrote. "Trust takes years to build, seconds to break, and a long time to repair."

Mr Ong's comments come after a spate of high-profile cases involving errant public officers, which he said raised questions over the integrity of the Public Service. This includes the latest one involving Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) officer Edwin Yeo, who was charged in court on Wednesday for allegedly siphoning funds from the agency and other related offences.

The study Mr Ong referred to was commissioned by the Prime Minister's Office to examine cases involving public officers opened by the CPIB and the police Commercial Affairs Department.

It found that the number of cases against errant officers has remained low and fairly stable over a five-year period.

The CPIB, for instance, conducts an average of 39 investigations involving public officers each year. These make up about one in five of all graft cases.

Said Mr Ong: "I am reassured by these findings as they show that our system as a whole remains sound. But we cannot be complacent. Every case is one too many."

He added that the Public Service has "zero tolerance for corruption" and said its leaders must lead by example and ensure that their actions are beyond reproach.

"The fact that senior officers have been charged in the courts for corruption and other financial crimes is a matter of concern, but it also underscores our deep resolve and commitment to bring all wrongdoers to justice and uphold integrity in the Public Service at all levels," he said. "We will not hesitate to take action against a corrupt officer, no matter how senior he or she might be."

MP Hri Kumar Nair, the chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Home Affairs and Law, agreed.

"People don't expect perfection from public officers, but when they fall, then firm and decisive action needs to be taken," he said. "The Public Service needs to uphold its integrity, and public officers are expected to conduct themselves at a higher standard than most others."




Review of casino rules for public officers
By Bryna Singh, The Straits Times, 27 Jul 2013

THE issue of whether tighter rules on public officers visiting casinos are needed has been included in the latest review of the public service code of conduct.

This was revealed by civil service head Peter Ong yesterday in an e-mail to the 136,000-strong public service, days after one of its own was hauled up to court for fraud and related offences.

Edwin Yeo, an assistant director from the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), was charged on Wednesday with siphoning funds from the anti- graft agency and using them to feed his gambling habit at the casino in Marina Bay Sands.

Mr Ong said he was disappointed by Yeo's case, and such incidents "cast a pall over the honest work done by the majority of public officers every day".

But he said the Public Service Division (PSD) will learn from the incident and tighten its processes.

"To this end, PSD will review if tighter rules with regard to visiting casinos should be put in place for the public service, especially those who work in areas where potential conflict of interest may arise or where there is a high risk of them becoming susceptible to being exploited," he added.

Responding to queries from The Straits Times, the PSD said there is no "across-the-board ban" on officers going to the casinos here. "Generally, public officers may visit casinos when they are off duty," it said. "However... some agencies have imposed restrictions."

Casino Regulatory Authority officers, for instance, have been banned from visiting casinos - both here and abroad - belonging to the parent companies of the two operators here since 2008.

Since 2009, the police have also instituted a ban on visits to the casinos for officers from its Casino Crime Investigation Branch and those in Central and Clementi police divisions, who cover both integrated resorts.

Other police officers and those from the Central Narcotics Bureau are required to declare casino visits to their supervisors within seven days of each visit.

The Straits Times understands that CPIB will follow suit with its own restrictions soon.


Related

Online sources of information: Navigating the maze

$
0
0
Online posts that spread misinformation have heightened concerns over how this can cause panic and erode trust in public institutions. Tessa Wong surveys the changing landscape and suggests ways to address the problem.
The Straits Times, 27 Jul 2013

LIKE many Singaporeans these days, Mr Nicholas Lauw keeps himself informed by reading both mainstream and online news.

But the 32-year-old lawyer is careful about trusting what he reads online as he finds some local blogs and sociopolitical sites to be less reliable and more polarising than mainstream outlets.

One example that pulled him up short was The Real Singapore (TRS) website's article last month attributed to Tampines GRC MP Irene Ng and which criticised government actions during the haze. It later emerged that she had not written it, and the site had not checked if she was the author.

Says Mr Lauw: "It emphasises that you shouldn't take at face value everything you read from online sites that is not mainstream media. I read everything with a pinch of salt. But for some sources, I read them with a larger dose than others."

This issue of online credibility has become more acute as more turn to blogs, websites and social media as sources of information, and more cases have arisen where false news and rumours have spread quickly online.

How can the public navigate this new information landscape? What can be done to ensure news put out there is accurate?

A shifting landscape

BACK when the news was largely provided by print and broadcast companies staffed by professional journalists, editors acted as gatekeepers to ensure standards of accuracy and balance. Often, they were backed by support staff trained to check facts.

But now, blogs, sociopolitical sites, Facebook pages and Twitter accounts have blossomed into news sources.

They now play a small but significant role in public discourse. Beyond airing views and shaping public opinion, they have done their fair share of uncovering issues that have in turn earned them some measure of trust.

Last year, sociopolitical website TR Emeritus (TRE) triggered one of the biggest political scandals in recent years when it reported that then Hougang MP Yaw Shin Leong from the Workers' Party (WP) allegedly had an affair with a married woman from the same party.

Mr Yaw ended up being expelled from the WP. He vacated his seat in Parliament and fled the country, which in turn led to a by-election in Hougang - the first in Singapore in 20 years.

Last year, blogger Alex Au posted an item on his blog Yawning Bread that led to a discussion in Parliament, where Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean emphasised the need to keep religion and politics separate. Mr Au wrote that the then Archbishop of the Catholic Church Nicholas Chia had written a letter to activist group Function 8 supporting a rally against the Internal Security Act, and added that the letter was retracted following a meeting with Mr Teo.

The archbishop later said he withdrew it because he feared it would be used in a way he did not intend. The Home Affairs Ministry, which Mr Teo heads, said it was a longstanding practice for government ministers to meet regularly with religious leaders as part of efforts to maintain religious harmony.

But false news and speculation are also rampant online, and some sources have been called out for inaccuracies.

Earlier this month, Minister for Communication and Information Yaacob Ibrahim spoke in Parliament about the spread of false information online during the recent haze crisis, which he said led to unnecessary anxiety. Among the examples he cited was a screenshot showing the wrong PSI reading; blogger Ravi Philemon reposting a friend's allegation that the Government's stockpile of N95 masks was not for the public; and TRS' false attribution of its article to Ms Ng.

Mr Au and TRE have also had to apologise in the past for untrue and defamatory remarks about Cabinet ministers, while TRS was last week found to have published false allegations made by a woman about the Chua Chu Kang Town Council.

Incidents like these have contributed to the perception that while blogs and websites may seem more independent-minded than mainstream media, the Internet is still less trustworthy.

An Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) survey of more than 1,000 people in 2010 found that on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is untrustworthy and 5 is very trustworthy, the Internet received 2.82 on average while television scored 3.55 and newspapers 3.58.

But the same study found that about half of the respondents felt there is too much government control over the media. About half also felt that newspapers and media are biased in their political reporting. Such findings show that credibility is a complex creature.

Research has found that people make credibility judgments based not just on objective factors, such as whether a source has expert knowledge and gets its facts right, but also subjective factors such as perceptions of bias, whether the source's view fits their world view and whether a website is visually attractive.

Whose responsibility is it?

IN THE new media environment, the onus for fact checking seems to have shifted to a large extent from professional gatekeepers to individual users of information.

There is little governments around the world can do to keep out every piece of misinformation online, given the porous nature of the Internet where anyone with online access can set up a blog or Twitter account and become an instant pundit.

Indeed, Singapore is not alone in dealing with rampant misinformation online. In the United States, concern about this issue has risen especially after false rumours and images were spread during the Boston bombings and Hurricane Sandy.

But government regulation of the online space has largely been rejected in several countries in the West, because of concerns that it would lead to censorship. For example, a recent attempt in Australia to introduce an independent council to set journalistic standards and handle public complaints for all media, including online outlets, was blocked in Parliament.

In Singapore, the Government has tried to counter the problem through a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches. It suggested that bloggers self-regulate by drawing up a code of conduct but this proposal was rejected.

It also set up a Media Literacy Council and introduced an individual licensing framework for online news websites.

On bloggers' rejection of the proposed code of conduct, IPS special research adviser Arun Mahizhnan says: "No one can impose a common standard on all bloggers... The simple fact is that the blogosphere is made up of numerous individuals who act on their own beliefs. They play by their own rules. And they represent no one but themselves."

Mr Philemon, in a recent public statement, described himself as "an ordinary citizen" who is "not in a position to verify what is truth and what is not". In a recent interview with The New Paper, he also sought to make a distinction between journalists and bloggers, as the latter are still, in his view, "amateurs". But Dr Yaacob noted that Mr Philemon's allegations had "no basis", and that the blogger's post about N95 masks being kept out of the public's reach had come after the Government had announced it would be giving out one million N95 masks free to lower-income households.

Syracuse University researcher R. David Lankes has argued that Internet users are now moving away from an "authority-based" approach to credibility to a "reliability approach".

The first is where individuals rely on trusted sources to vouch for the credibility of information, such as a trusted TV news programme. By contrast, a "reliability approach" sees individuals seeking multiple sources and assessing for themselves over time those that deliver accurate information. It is also defined by its openness, what Professor Lankes calls "the credibility conversation", where people actively exchange information to verify if something is true or not.

Indeed, just as the Internet empowers anyone to post, it also empowers readers to question and correct misinformation when they spot it.

One recent local example was when a rumour surfaced online that the Cannes prize-winning film Ilo Ilo had been refused government funding. Some netizens found information on the Media Development Authority's website stating that the film had received grants, and pointed this out in discussion threads.

Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong posted a clarification on Facebook which was quickly circulated by netizens. Some sites which had posted the rumour, such as The Online Citizen, later apologised.

But there are media watchers who believe that the Government and bloggers themselves must do their part to counter misinformation.

The Government can be more proactive in providing accurate information on a consistent basis, especially in a crisis, says former Nominated MP Calvin Cheng. This counters the tendency of people latching on to non-official sources, which may spread misinformation.

Dr Lim Sun Sun, deputy head of communications and new media at the National University of Singapore, says: "When official bodies are more responsive and forthcoming, people will begin to distinguish between the messages from official sources and those that are not, and decide for themselves which updates they want to pay heed to."

With Singaporean readers becoming more discerning, it is also in bloggers' own interests to raise their standards, says Nominated MP Eugene Tan,"particularly in terms of being objective and balanced with the political agenda... Otherwise, they will find themselves remaining marginal to the public discourse".

Mr Cheng says: "Nobody has a free pass as the Internet is also bound by the same laws as real life."

These include defamation laws and the Telecommunications Act, which makes it illegal to transmit or cause to transmit a message known to be false or fabricated.

But readers' best defence against being misled remains their own level of digital literacy, experts say, and it is thus important to equip them with the skills and savvy needed to evaluate information, whatever the source. Some observers believe Singaporeans are already developing these skills.

Mr Devadas Krishnadas, founder of risk management and advisory consultancy Future-Moves, says there was calm even when the rumour mill over former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew's state of health went into overdrive last year.

He also notes that Mr Philemon's post about the masks was not shared widely on Facebook, and prior to the Government's chastisement, there was hardly any backlash against his post. "One way to look at it is that in the first instance, not many read his post, and of those who did, few took it seriously while others cross-checked with other sources," says Mr Devadas.

Dr Michael Netzley, assistant professor of corporate communication education at the Singapore Management University, says that as with any new medium, it is inevitable that consumers become more savvy over time. This change takes place in tandem with public institutions moving to increase digital literacy courses, governments designing and putting in place new regulations, and citizens themselves learning from their mistakes. "So the pendulum may swing for a while but will always settle in the middle with time... Consumers will become better at spotting fakes, rumours and conjecture," he says.




A checklist to help sort fact from fiction
With the torrent of views available online daily, there is a temptation to dismiss the need to sort fact from fiction as too troublesome. To combat this, one suggestion is that individuals use short and simple checklists to help them navigate. An example is the Media Literacy Council's (MLC) list posted on its website, which has five elements:

WHO/WHERE

Look at who created or uploaded the piece, whether the author can be trusted, and whether it is an authoritative source and there is a potential conflict of interest.

WHEN

Check when it was published, and if it is up-to-date and relevant.

WHAT

Check if the piece has an agenda and whether it offers more than one perspective. Cross-check with multiple sources if possible.

WHY

Ask yourself why you are reading that media, and consider that people tend to go to information sources that depict or are in line with their own beliefs and perceptions. To be objective, seek out other sources of information.

THINK

Always have an inquiring mind and remember: Photographs, videos and texts can be manipulated and taken out of context to distort or influence perceptions.

The MLC suggests a short cut to assess the credibility of an online source: Browse through the site first to understand its purpose, and read the website's terms of service. Using quick and reliable ways to assess credibility is important because people often do not want to take the time to make in-depth assessments.

A 2003 Stanford University study found that the biggest factor people use in assessing a website's credibility is its presentation and visual design, while a 2007 University of California study found that people take the time to make a full assessment only when they are highly motivated to do so, such as a patient researching medical information.

Singapore Management University assistant professor Michael Netzley said research has also shown that people tend to have "increasingly tribal" habits, and tend to interact online with other like-minded people in what is known as the "echo chamber" effect. Thus, the need to critically compare information across various sources is diminished.

But what will also help users is that over time, blogs and websites will develop their own reputations and reporting styles that readers will come to recognise, said communications and new media professor Lim Sun Sun of the National University of Singapore.

"Consumers can then decide for themselves whether these different news sources are worth their time or if they prefer to access more credible sources," she said.




The main online players

THE ONLINE CITIZEN

Who: Set up by lawyer Choo Zheng Xi and blogger Andrew Loh. The latter has since left. Mr Choo now oversees the website as consultant editor, while its executive editor Terry Xu is the site's sole full-time employee.

Founded: 2006

Known for: One of the more established sites, it features mostly commentaries on current affairs and is also known for hosting offline events such as debates in the lead-up to the 2011 general and presidential polls. It became the first and so far only political website to be gazetted as a political association that same year. In May, it said it meets the requirements for an individual licence under the new Media Development Authority licensing framework for news websites, but the MDA has disagreed.



TR EMERITUS

Who: It has a group of about five editors, of whom only one has identified himself to be the face of the site: IT consultant Richard Wan.

Founded: 2011

Known for: It had its origins as Temasek Review, a site highly critical in tone, publishing speculative pieces. But it toned down somewhat when it turned into TR Emeritus under a new editorial team, and also after it was sent lawyer's letters last year from Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his brother, then Fraser & Neave chairman Lee Hsien Yang, for hosting defamatory content. It apologised and removed the content. It is also known for surfacing issues of public interest such as an alleged affair by former Hougang MP Yaw Shin Leong, which led to his expulsion and a by-election.



THE REAL SINGAPORE

Who: Founded by systems engineer Alex Tan with a couple thought to be based in Australia; now headed by chief editor Mohd Farhan, who declined to reveal further details about himself.

Founded: 2012

Known for: Speculative pieces on current affairs and plagiarising content from other sites, often without permission or attribution. The site was criticised recently for falsely attributing an article to PAP MP Irene Ng, who has lodged a police report, and for publishing a woman's allegations about Chua Chu Kang Town Council which she later admitted were false.



NEW NATION

Who: The site was founded by Mr Terence Lee, who is also the editor of Sgentrepreneurs.com, freelance writer Belmont Lay, and a third friend, Ms Fang Shihan, who has since left.

Founded: 2011

Known for: Satirical takes on current affairs and news stories, in the vein of popular US website The Onion.



YAWNING BREAD

Who: A sociopolitical blog by Mr Alex Au, who is also known for his gay rights activism.

Founded: 1996

Known for: Analyses on current affairs and politics. Has brought to light matters of public interest, disclosing last year that the then Archbishop of the Catholic Church here had withdrawn a letter he sent to activist group Function 8 after a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean. Last year, Law and Foreign Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam sent him a lawyer's letter regarding defamatory comments which someone else posted on Yawning Bread, which Mr Au removed. Mr Au also apologised last year to the courts for writing a piece alleging plastic surgeon Woffles Wu received special treatment.



RAVIPHILEMON.NET

Who: A former editor of The Online Citizen, Mr Ravi Philemon now mainly blogs on his site. He is also among the very few bloggers who are also political party members, having joined the opposition National Solidarity Party last year.

Founded: 2009

Known for: Sociopolitical commentaries that tend to have a critical take on the Government. He made the news recently when Minister for Communications and Information Yaacob Ibrahim took him to task for reposting false information during the haze that the Government's stockpile of N95 masks was not for the public.



PUBLICHOUSE.SG

Who: Started by Mr Andrew Loh after he left The Online Citizen. He also blogs on his personal site andrewlohhp.wordpress.com

Founded: 2011

Known for: Public House carries stories on current affairs, sociopolitical issues, the arts and music, while Mr Loh's personal blog tends to have critical views of the Government and the mainstream media. He recently apologised for an expletive-filled tirade on his Facebook page against the President.

'Toilet Man' Jack Sim has the last laugh

$
0
0
Ridiculed and scorned by some, he gets the world to focus on dire sanitation crisis
By Robin Chan, The Sunday Times, 28 Jul 2013

Oddball. Joker. Troublemaker. Toilet cleaner. Jack Sim has been called all these names and more.

But it doesn't bother him. In fact, he wears the words proudly. After all, he has spent years of his life being rejected, laughed at and even shunned.

Now he is having the last laugh.

"Bad things can become good," he said, chatting in the living room of his two-storey home on Meyer Road in Katong last Thursday.

The night before, the United Nations General Assembly had agreed to adopt a resolution to mark Nov 19 as World Toilet Day.

It was the result of a long and often dirty journey for Mr Sim, founder of the World Toilet Organisation, a non-governmental group that has championed clean toilets and sanitation for over a decade.

Once ridiculed and avoided by Singaporeans and some in the establishment, he is now embraced by them and celebrated.

His idea for a worldwide day devoted to toilets was rejected the first time he suggested it to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) four years ago. But it finally got the Government's support and was taken successfully all the way to the UN.

Last Wednesday in New York, the 193 members of the General Assembly adopted by consensus the three-page resolution, formally known as "Sanitation for All".

A helping hand

Mr Sim first approached the MFA with his idea in 2009.

The UN had adopted 2008 as the Year of Sanitation but once that was over, he noticed interest in sanitation wane. What the world needed, he felt, was an annual event to keep an important issue in view.

His e-mail request to the MFA was rejected - the man heading the UN Mission in New York was Mr Vanu Menon and he deemed the suggestion "inappropriate".

"Vanu said he didn't want it. A toilet didn't sound like something Singapore would stand for," Mr Sim recalled.

But that changed a few years later. Former foreign affairs minister George Yeo attended an annual World Toilet Summit in Hainan in November 2011, and after three days seeing Mr Sim in action, left infected by his passion.

To help, he put Mr Sim in touch directly with the same Mr Menon, now deputy secretary for South- east Asia and International Organisations at MFA.

"He called Vanu and he said to him, 'Just give half an hour to Jack, and if you still don't like it, it is ok. But just give him an audience. And then you decide'," said Mr Sim.

After that face-to-face meeting, Mr Menon was persuaded that there was something worth pursuing. Thus began an unlikely partnership between the diplomat and the Toilet Man.

And that was just the start.

Over the 11/2 years, Singapore's small team of UN permanent missions officers began lobbying representatives of more than 100 countries big and small for support.

They drafted a three-page resolution to capture the dire urgency of tackling a global sanitation crisis, and explained that it was not getting enough attention.

Not only did they eventually get 120 countries, including China, Japan and Britain, to add their voice to the initiative, but also in the process they caught the eye of UN deputy secretary-general Jan Eliasson, who is leading the world body's advocacy campaign for sanitation.

Mr Sim got to know the UN's alphabet soup bureaucracy well over the period - he met the secretary- general's advisory board on water and sanitation, and representatives of UN Habitat, UNEP, UNDP and Unicef.

"There is even such a thing as the president of the General Assembly office!" he said.

Growing pains

When the day of the UN General Assembly meeting came and passed, Mr Sim was a happy man. "I feel like I've won the Nobel Prize for sanitation."

Indeed, his satisfaction comes not only from putting toilets on the world calendar officially, but also from showing that oddballs do have their place in Singapore.

"Before, I felt my work was not in sync with the Government. The most recognition I got was from outside. I have a lot of traction outside. So having this level of cooperation and support from my own government, I feel very, very appreciative as a citizen," he said.

A self-proclaimed kaypoh (busybody), it is not difficult to see why Mr Sim may have felt excluded or indeed rubbed some people the wrong way. He speaks his mind openly, without filter, and is often critical of the Government.

He has a list of ideas ready to roll. For example, a 12-page report on how to improve tray return in Singapore's food centres. He has also tried getting a fort in Katong Park restored, and to encourage car sharing.

"I think young people here like my work, and adults too. But the Government is afraid of disruptive people. Innovation equals challenging the status quo," he said.

This sense of being on the outside looking in started from young. As a child, he was frequently hauled up on stage in school to be caned - for talking too much and distracting the class.

With a restless mind and poor O-level results, he could not get into university, and so went straight to work. He started out as a construction site supervisor at Swiss company Diethelm (now Diethelm Keller), then transferred to be a salesman.

He liked sales better, but always felt that his lack of paper qualifications would be held against him.

"I felt like they were only interested in people who studied. To me that is not a business. You pay for someone who can make you money," he said emphatically.

His early experiences taught him he was not made to follow a traditional path. After three years, he started his first business.

But his restlessness continued. In 16 years, he founded 16 different businesses, and they made money, he said. He married and started a family. And still, he always felt that something was missing from his life.

When the Asian financial crisis struck Singapore in 1997, things took a turn for the worse. "I was gloomy, I was quite depressed, because business was bad."

With unemployment soaring, the economy tanking and business unsatisfying, he became a volunteer. He did some time with the suicide prevention agency, Samaritans of Singapore, and also the Heritage Conservation Centre.

In it, he found some satisfaction. "If I didn't find my self worth, I would have been driven crazy. But doing volunteer work gave me a sense of purpose again, and kept me sane. That was important."

Realising that changed him.

In 1998, inspired by then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong's call for clean public toilets as an indicator of social graciousness, Mr Sim started the Restroom Association of Singapore because it seemed like something nobody else would do.

As the economy recovered, he began intensifying his fight against dirty toilets: "I wanted to make Singapore home to the cleanest toilets in the world."

In 1999, he learnt about the Japan Toilet Association, and when he found out there were more such associations out there, he mooted the idea of a central headquarters in Singapore.

On Nov 19, 2001, the World Toilet Organisation was founded. The name was chosen deliberately, and he was keenly aware that there was another WTO already - the World Trade Organisation.

"It was guerilla marketing. Whether they sue or don't sue us, there is no downside," he said, as the group would have benefited from the media attention either way.

There was no trouble from the other WTO in the end. In fact, at a chance meeting with the world trade body's director-general Pascal Lamy, he was delighted to be told: "Your WTO is more famous."

His new organisation focused initially on toilet cleanliness, but Mr Sim said he quickly realised that "what is worse is not even having a toilet".

He began to find out more about sanitation issues, visited villages in remote areas in Cambodia and Rwanda, and discovered the dire sanitation crisis in the world.

Today the numbers roll off his tongue - 1.1 billion people still defecate in the open; 40 per cent of the world's population do not have a proper toilet.

His advocacy led to him being featured as Time magazine's hero of the environment and Reader's Digest's Asian of the Year. And organisations like World Economic Forum and Synergos have made him a fellow. He has even published a book, titled Simple Jack.

Seeing him succeed this way is satisfying for his wife Julie, 52, who said she has encouraged him to find happiness. "I always tell him as long as you feel it is right, go and do it," she said.

But perhaps what is most rewarding is that he feels he has made a breakthrough for Singapore's fringe players.

He opens his laptop to show an e-mail from Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong congratulating him on the UN resolution. "You showed perseverance and went to places others feared to tread (pun intended)," Mr Goh wrote.

Having made a dent all the way to the UN, what next for the Toilet Man?

"The next step is to work at the country level to let it trickle down to provinces and villages, to let each person in each country take action for himself. If you don't use the legitimacy, it will go to waste."

He is in the midst of planning a big event in New York to mark the inaugural World Toilet Day. He hopes to attract sanitation celebrities like actor Matt Damon, who founded non-profit Water.org, and Liberian President and Nobel Peace Prize winner Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.

He has a song ready, in what is likely to be a British-Argentinian- Singaporean collaboration, but is still looking for a singer.

"If I can get a Singapore singer, I would be very happy. But we can't pay. Actually you should write that I am looking for a singer!" he said.

Despite last week's UN milestone, Mr Sim does not expect the teasing to end. He lets on that his four children - aged 16 to 22 - are sometimes mocked in school for having a Toilet Man for their dad.

Not embarrassed, he tells them to embrace his achievements. He said he tells them: "If they say I am a toilet cleaner, just say yes, he is. And it is a very good job."







12 YEARS OF AGITATING FOR BETTER LOOS

The Man

Who: Jack Sim, 56

Education: Kim Keat Primary School; Whitley Secondary School; Hotel management at the former Vocational and Industrial Training Board; Masters in Public Administration, National University of Singapore

Income: Not from the World Toilet Organisation. Draws $11,000 a month as chairman of his company Besco Building Supplies, a provider of construction materials for restrooms.

Family: Married to Julie Teng, 52. Four children Earth, Worth, Truth and Faith, aged 16 to 22.


The Cause

Founded: Nov 19, 2001

Members: 235 chapters in 58 countries

Key activities
World Toilet Day: Nov 19. The UN has now made it official.
World Toilet Summit: Brings together experts and advocates on sanitation. This year's summit will be held in Solo, Indonesia.
World Toilet College: Provides professional training courses for sanitation and the restroom industry.
SaniShop: Provides support for design of low-cost toilets through social franchises.

Meritocracy works but beware of elitism: ESM Goh

$
0
0
Top schools can help ensure bright students avoid having a sense of entitlement, he says
By Goh Chin Lian, The Sunday Times, 28 Jul 2013

The danger of Singapore's best and brightest young people thinking they are naturally superior and entitled to their success worries Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong.

Singapore needs to guard against such elitism in schools, public institutions or society at large, because it can divide the inclusive society the country is trying to build, he said yesterday.



To guard against that, he recommended sticking with meritocracy, which has served the country well. But there is a need to adapt and strengthen meritocracy to ensure everyone in society benefits.

"What we need is to get the successful to understand that they have a responsibility to help the less fortunate and less able with compassion," he said. They can do this through cash donations, sharing skills and knowledge, and serving the country.

At the same time, the Government needs to continue to help families that have fallen behind, through its policies and programmes, he added.

"Together, these efforts will ensure that our brand of meritocracy remains compassionate, that it is fair and inclusive for all - not just those who are lucky in their backgrounds or genetic endowments."

He was speaking at the 190th anniversary dinner of his alma mater, Raffles Institution, which honoured him with the Gryphon Award for distinguished alumni. It is named after the mythical creature on the school crest.

He is the second recipient after former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew in 2011, who had urged RI then to maintain its longstanding traditions of meritocracy and multiculturism.

Mr Goh made a similar call yesterday, saying: "Our top schools, including RI, must play a key role in ensuring that elitism and a sense of entitlement do not creep into the minds of their students.

"Those of us who have benefited disproportionately from society's investment in us owe the most to society, particularly to those who may not have had access to the same opportunities. We owe a debt to make lives better for all, and not just for ourselves."

Recalling his schooldays more than half a century ago when RI was in Bras Basah, Mr Goh, 72, said it was then a melting pot of the best male pupils from primary schools all over Singapore, boys of different races and religions, rich and poor.

Like him, most were poor or from lower-income homes, and meritocracy worked for them, leading them into the top boys' school.

But as society matured and became more stratified, families who had done well could give their children a head start.

"It is not surprising that many who have not done so well see meritocracy as a system that is biased towards those with better resources, and one which impairs their social mobility," he said.

He recalled that as far as 30 years ago, Singapore's leaders recognised such downsides of meritocracy.

He had listened in as then PM Lee, in a discussion with Dutch economist Albert Winsemius and then labour MP Devan Nair, argued that ideally and philosophically, all wealth should revert to the state on the owner's death so that each successive generation would start on an equal footing, and success would depend on hard work and ability, not inherited wealth.

But that idea was impractical, Mr Goh recalled.

Instead, the Government has tried to level the playing field by putting more resources into education, including pre-schools, and giving financial aid to needy students.

Mr Goh also launched a Raffles Community Initiative to provide seed money for students, alumni and parents to do community projects locally and in the region.



Beware of elitism

"When society's brightest and most able think that they made good because they are inherently superior and entitled to their success; when they do not credit their good fortune also to birth and circumstance; when economic inequality gives rise to social immobility and a growing social distance between the winners of meritocracy and the masses; and when the winners seek to cement their membership of a social class that is distinct from, exclusive, and not representative of Singapore society - that is elitism."

- MR GOH, in his speech last night




Adapt, strengthen meritocracy

"We must adapt and strengthen our practice of meritocracy to ensure that it continues to benefit the whole of society, and not just those who are bright and able. The solution is not to hold back the able or pull down those who have succeeded. Nor is it to replace meritocracy with another system - there is no better and fairer alternative."

- MR GOH





'Medisave, Edusave reflect ESM's care for Singaporeans'
By Goh Chin Lian, The Sunday Times, 28 Jul 2013

Two entrenched schemes are testimony to the deep concern Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong has for the welfare of Singaporeans, said Professor Tan Ser Kiat, president of the Singapore Medical Council.

These are Medisave and Edusave.

Medisave, introduced in 1984 when Mr Goh was Second Minister for Health, is a national medical savings scheme in which people set aside part of their income to meet future hospitalisation, day surgery and outpatient expenses.

Reading a citation last night for Mr Goh's award from his alma mater, Raffles Institution (RI), to honour his contributions to society, Prof Tan called Medisave a "revolutionary and innovative concept" in Singapore's health-care financing co-payment policy.

In setting up Edusave to fund enrichment activities for children, Mr Goh "tried to ensure a level playing field for all", he noted.

Edusave was introduced in 1993, and two years later, Edusave Merit Bursaries were given to bright but needy students.

When Mr Goh was Singapore's Prime Minister between 1990 and 2004, he brought a "new leadership style that was more inclusive, consultative and open and ensured that policies are made with inputs from all sectors of society", Prof Tan noted.

Mr Goh's humility and caring nature were legendary, added the orthopaedic surgeon, citing an incident during a visit the then-PM made to his clinic in the late 1990s.

They had heard a loud noise and saw Mr Goh's security officer had fainted and cut himself on the lip.

Mr Goh helped him up, arranged for him to be admitted to hospital and accompanied him to the ward to ensure he was taken care of, Prof Tan recalled.

And a few weeks ago, he added, Mr Goh helped raise about $800,000 for Canossaville Children's Home that had taken in two orphans from his ward in Marine Parade GRC.

These were among the highlights of the citation, underlining a point raised by RI principal Lim Lai Cheng in her speech at the school's 190th anniversary dinner.

She said she wished to see in all Rafflesians "a heart of gratitude instead of a sense of entitlement", and a sense of social responsibility at the core of a Raffles education.

Mr Goh, in his speech later, urged Singaporeans to guard against elitism and give back to society.

His call resonated with Rafflesians like Dr Lim Kuo-Yi, 44, chief executive officer of Infocomm Investments, the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore's venture capital arm.

Dr Lim, from the class of 1987, mentors students in entrepreneurship: "I truly believe in entrepreneurship being the tool to ensure success, regardless of background."

Another Rafflesian, Mr Colin Low, 37, director of business development at Frasers Hospitality, said he and a few school mates got their class of 1992 together last year to raise $30,000 for RI, specially for needy students.

Current and former politicians at the dinner also shared Mr Goh's social concerns.

Workers' Party MP Png Eng Huat, 51, from the class of 1977, encouraged students to help in his Hougang ward to give back to society. He believes integration should start at a young age, in schools: "That's the best time to weed out elitism."

Former presidential candidate and MP Tan Cheng Bock, 73 - whom Mr Goh described in his speech as one who "stood for the underdog and still does" - returned the compliment, saying his "good friend" is a genuine person who cares for Singapore.


Social safety nets being strengthened: PM Lee

$
0
0
By Vimita Mohandas, Chennel NewsAsia, 28 Jul 2013

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has said the government is strengthening national safety nets and reviewing policies to help vulnerable groups more.

He added that the community is also rallying together to address social needs and reaching out in ways that the government cannot do.

On the individual level, Mr Lee stressed the importance of being self-reliant and working together to build a better tomorrow.

He said that working together is even more important in our new phase as Singaporeans are living in a time of rapid change and uncertainty.

While this will be an invigorating time for the young and people with skills (as there are more opportunities), there will be others who need more help.



Mr Lee said: "There will be some who will find it difficult to adjust, especially the older Singaporeans and perhaps also, the lower income Singaporeans. They will need help to overcome the challenges they face. Whether it's cost of living, the cost of healthcare, the widening income disparities, we need to focus on these people who need help and make sure that when we advance and move into the future, we all go together."

He was speaking on Sunday at the official opening of the Pek Kio Community Centre, the first community centre to be co-located with a school - Farrer Park Primary School.

PM Lee added that community centres act as a bridge to the community and to build community ties.

Community centres are also a bridge to the future with brand new facilities such as a performing theatre, dance studios and an indoor sports hall.

The Pek Kio Community Centre, which is also the first CC to have a 200-seater performing theatre, will maximise community resources while promoting greater involvement in community activities by students and residents/parents in Pek Kio.

Residents can also look forward to using the school's indoor sports hall, concourse and field after school hours for community activities such as badminton, wushu and briskwalking.

The new performing theatre, besides providing Farrer Park Primary School's drama club with a well-equipped venue for performances, will also bring residents together through community arts and cultural activities and workshops.

The new CC is also equipped with facilities, such as badminton courts, two dance studios, culinary room and music rooms.

The indoor sports hall, badminton courts and field will be open to residents after school hours, and students in turn will be able to use the CC's dance studios and other facilities during school hours.

Students and residents will also be able to benefit from the new spacious culinary room and its stations, where they will be able to have hands-on sessions instead of watching demonstrations by the trainers.

Easier for needy elderly to apply for help

$
0
0
By Lim Min Zhang, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2013

NEEDY elderly people in Singapore are finding it easier to apply for wheelchairs and other aids they require.

Before July 1, all applications for subsidies under the Seniors' Mobility and Enabling Fund had to be approved by the Agency for Integrated Care (AIC).

However, under enhancements that kicked in at the start of this month, there are now 114 places where they can get approval for various subsidies under the fund.

These include National Kidney Foundation dialysis centres, community hospitals like the Ang Mo Kio-Thye Hua Kwan Hospital and senior activity centres.



The move has cut processing time from two weeks to about one.


Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong and Dr Amy Khor, Mayor of South West District, visited three families who have benefited from the scheme in Marine Parade yesterday.

There have been 702 beneficiaries since the start of the month, which also saw 130 per cent more applications than last month.

"I'm pleased that we are able to provide more assistance to the seniors," said Dr Khor. "We want to continue to work to review our assistance schemes to make help more accessible and easily available to them."

The fund stood at $10 million before being topped up with $40 million, announced in February's Budget.

Elderly people living in three room or smaller flats are automatically eligible for a 90 per cent subsidy on devices that cost $500 or less. They pay the remaining 10 per cent of the cost of the device.

Others can apply if their monthly household income per capita is $1,800 and below. The fund also subsidises transport and consumables like catheters and wound dressings.



Mr Yasmuddin Rasul, 92, has weak knees and moves around in a wheeled office chair at home. He received a new aluminium shower chair yesterday after applying at the nearby GoodLife! Centre in Marine Parade, a new centre that has come on board.

"I haven't tried the chair yet, but I am looking forward to it," said Mr Yasmuddin, who has to sit on the toilet bowl while he takes a shower. The padded chair with non-slip legs will make it easier for him to sit while showering.

ESM Goh said that growing old "should not be a cause for anxiety", adding: "If we can remove this worry of getting old... Singapore would be a good place to grow old in."

For more inquiries about the scheme, call AIC at 6603-6800.

Best to leave CPF Special Account money untouched

$
0
0
Many commercial funds find it tough to beat the return guaranteed by Govt
By Goh Eng Yeow, The Straits Times, 29 Jul 2013

RECENTLY, a study commissioned by the Singapore Exchange (SGX) throws up an interesting poser: Can the guidelines on investing the monies locked up in the Central Provident Fund (CPF) be relaxed to get higher returns?

The argument in the paper released by the SGX and consulting firm Oliver Wyman is beguiling: Based on its calculations, Singaporeans can achieve returns that hit 79 per cent of their pre-retirement income.

That will be considerably higher than the 68 per cent level which they can expect to get currently.

But to get the higher returns, they will have to put their CPF monies into "life-cycle funds" which invest in higher-risk assets when they are younger that then switch automatically to safer but lower-risk assets as retirement approaches.

Now, most Singaporeans use the bulk of the monies they keep in their CPF Ordinary Accounts for housing. That leaves only the monies in the Special Accounts for investments.

Even so, this is no trifling sum to sneeze at. The study estimates that there is a staggering $15 billion lying idle in the CPF Special Accounts earning the default interest rates offered by the CPF Board.

But there is a snag: CPF members must keep at least $40,000 in cash in their Special Accounts. They can use the remaining balance in excess of the threshold amount for investments.

That, said the paper, is a big dampener. The average Singaporean will reach the minimum $40,000 threshold in their CPF Special Accounts only when they reach 40. "This is a much later age to start investing in equities, compared to retirement saving schemes in many other countries," it said.

Currently, the CPF Ordinary Account pays a return of 2.5 per cent, while the Special Account pays 4 per cent. In addition, the first $60,000 of each person's CPF balance will get an extra 1 percentage point in interest.

But last year, if CPF members channelled their monies into funds under the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS), that had been established with a view to give people more investment options for their CPF savings, they could have done better.

Lipper, the fund ratings company, noted that CPFIS investors made an average gain of 10.35 per cent last year.

Those who put their money on CPFIS equity funds enjoyed a 12.27 per cent growth, while bond funds rose an average of 4.73 per cent.

So at first glance, it would seem that taking an active investment approach may be more sensible than leaving the funds idle in the CPF account.

But there are powerful arguments to be marshalled against any relaxation in the CPF investment rules.

Some will say that the SGX may have its commercial interests in mind in trying to get the guidelines relaxed on the use of Special Account monies.

As CIMB Research analyst Kenneth Ng noted in a recent report, SGX had been pushing a lot of initiatives to spur retail participation in the stock market, but so far, that had not seemed to push up the frequency of shares traded.

There is also no way to tell if Singaporeans will do any better putting their money into the so-called life-cycle funds proposed by the SGX-commissioned paper, as compared with the investments now available in the CPFIS scheme.

Statistics show that between 1993 and 2004, nearly three in four people who invested under CPFIS ended worse off than if they had just parked their money in the CPF.

This explains why many financial advisers tell their clients to leave their monies in the CPF Special Account.

Many commercial funds find it difficult year after year to beat the 4 per cent return in the Special Account, which is guaranteed by the Government.

There is also the virtue of compounding. Using a back-of-the-envelope calculation, a 40-year-old Singaporean, with $40,000 untouched in his Special Account, will find the sum growing to about $95,000 by the time he retires at 62, if the interest rate stays at 4 per cent.

If the bonus 1 percentage point in interest is thrown in, the sum adds up to $117,000.

The Finance Ministry was also remarkably prescient when it explained the importance of safeguarding CPF members' monies in a letter to this newspaper in 2007.

This is considering the many financial upheavals we have encountered since then.

It said: "The past two decades have been an exceptional period for global financial markets. Looking ahead, we cannot rule out protracted market downturns, lasting several years. Most CPF members have small balances and will not welcome these risks. Neither will older members waiting to withdraw their retirement funds."

The current CPF arrangement enables all CPF members to earn fair and risk-free returns on their retirement savings, while benefiting from the good performance of GIC and Temasek Holdings through the annual Budget, it added.

The letter concluded: "This is the right way to help Singaporeans save for their old age, and enjoy peace of mind in their golden years."

Many of us would agree.


News website told to register under MDA licence rules

$
0
0
In complying, The Independent agrees not to accept foreign funds
By Tessa Wong, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2013

A NEWS and current affairs website called The Independent, due to launch officially on Aug 9, will comply with a Government request to register under the Broadcasting (Class Licence) Notification.

As part of its registration, the online site agrees not to take foreign funds for its provision, management and/or operation.

The Media Development Authority (MDA), which asked the site to register, said yesterday the Government has "received specific information which gives it cause for concern over foreign interest to fund The Independent".

It did not elaborate.

But the registration would "not in any way" affect what it can publish, the MDA said in a statement.

"However, it will prevent The Independent from being controlled by, or coming under the influence of, foreign entities or funding, and ensure that Singapore politics remain a matter for Singaporeans alone," it said.

When contacted, the website's five-member management team said they had agreed at an early stage they would be a "purely Singaporean-funded media operation which does not accept foreign funds".

This is documented in their founding shareholder's agreement of April 19, it added in a statement last night.

"The Independent has not and will not ever come under the influence of foreign entities or funding," they said, adding they are "pleased" to register with the MDA.

The statement did not address queries from The Straits Times on whether it ever sought foreign funding and how it is currently funded.

Its team comprises Mr P. N. Balji, former editor-in-chief of the Today freesheet, former The Online Citizen editor Kumaran Pillai, lawyer Alfred Dodwell, research and consulting agency chief executive Leon Perera, and design agency owner Edmund Wee, a former design editor with The Straits Times.

The site is owned by local company Protegesoft, whose director is Mr Pillai.

Since 1996, all websites and Internet service providers (ISPs) automatically come under the Class Licence scheme, which subjects them to rules banning offensive content.

But not all are required to register.

Those asked to do so tend to include ISPs like SingTel, religious discussion sites, or political websites.

Sites that provide a subscription-based online newspaper could also be asked to register.

The Independent, whose web address was registered last month, states that it covers current affairs, economics and politics in Singapore, and plans to offer paid subscriptions to readers.

Registration does not impose any extra restrictions, except for those sites run by organisations classified as political parties or political associations.

These groups are prohibited from receiving foreign funding under the Political Donations Act and the MDA registration imposes the same restriction on their sites.

The Independent's case is unique because though it is not run by a political entity, it is subject to funding restrictions.

This is possible because the law states a site must register "in such form and manner as the authority may determine".

The MDA's statement yesterday said it is a "firmly established principle" that foreign entities cannot engage in Singapore's politics nor influence local media platforms, which are "prime vehicles for political influence".

Hence, laws such as the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act and the Broadcasting Act let the Government restrict ownership of newspapers and broadcast media.

The MDA said the need to prevent foreign influence on local politics through Singapore's media "remains the same whether in print, broadcast, or online", and it will look into incorporating more comprehensive safeguards when it reviews the Broadcasting Act next year.



A louder, uncensored discourse on censorship

$
0
0
By John Lui, The Straits Times, 29 Jul 2013

COMPLAINTS still dog Singapore's film censorship policy, more than 20 years after a ratings system was put into place.

Earlier this year, there was some online grousing accompanying the release of A Good Day To Die Hard, the fifth in the Die Hard action movie franchise starring Bruce Willis.

This "international version" of the film, according to the Media Development Authority's film classification online database, had come from the film distribution company with the swearing already muted. It was therefore "passed clean" and given a PG13 rating, meaning that parental guidance was suggested for viewers aged 13 and below.

Fans were upset that the colourful swearing, a signature of the films, was gone. As is often the case, some said they would boycott the film. Once again, film distributors have proactively self-censored so as to get a lower age rating, they said. Others said they would turn to the Internet and, via illegal methods, watch the uncut American version.

It is hard to quantify just how many films come into Singapore via the Internet. But the number cannot be small, given that 85 per cent of households here have broadband Internet access, according to an international survey taken in 2011.

The issue of movie-watching via illegal downloads or streaming has not escaped official notice.

Last year, the Government convened a 12-member Media Convergence Review Panel to look into, among other things, how to make Singapore's content classification systems more meaningful when it is so easy to view unclassified material on sites such as YouTube.

Singapore takes a symbolic stand by requiring Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block a list of 100 or so websites containing objectionable material.

Speaking on the issue of digital piracy, Mr Koh Boon Hwee, chairman of the Nanyang Technological University's board of trustees, and chairman of the Media Convergence Review Panel, said: "Anyone who is technologically sophisticated would know that you can get around it... But it is symbolic. It is a signpost of what our society stands for."

The authority, summing up the panel's recommendations, has a section tellingly called Pragmatic Considerations, which recognises that online content is now both "borderless" and vast in volume. Rather than prune and corral, the panel suggests steps such as user education and acting when someone flags the content.

That pragmatism is justified. There are countless sites containing videos that would never get past the censors here that are left unblocked, among them well-known file-sharing sites such as The Pirate Bay. Among the films available for download on that site: A Good Day To Die Hard, presumably the version with full swearing.

Singaporeans with virtual private networks (VPNs) can also watch legally streamed movies not released here.

Newer Singapore-based ISPs ViewQwest and MyRepublic offer a geographical cloaking service called a VPN, allowing subscribers to pay for United States-only video services such as Netflix, Apple iTunes and Hulu.

Festivals in Singapore are held to a more relaxed film classification standard, allowing them to screen films that would otherwise need trimming.

Last year, distribution company Cathay-Keris Films submitted the drama Shame (2011) to the authority in the hope of exhibiting the film in mainstream cinemas. The distributor was told that the film would get an R21 rating, on condition that a scene involving group sex was edited. Director Steve McQueen refused, and the film was withdrawn.

But in January this year, the film, acclaimed by critics and winner of several prizes, was re-submitted for classification by the Singapore Film Society. This time, the authority gave it an R21 rating, without cuts.

The MDA said that the uncut version had been passed because of the special circumstances of the screening.

"For film festivals, we do allow some leeway during classification as they attract a niche audience for their limited screenings and the primary purpose of such events is to promote film appreciation," said the spokesman.

That a film like Shame, with its graphic scenes of sex, can be shown, reflects the changes that have occurred in film censorship policy in the last three decades.

In an interview with The Straits Times last year, the former Board of Film Censors chairman Amy Chua gave figures showing how much things have changed.

Twenty-one per cent of film titles were rated R(A) in 2003, the year before M18 was introduced.

In 2011, the number of R21 titles was just 8.4 per cent and M18 titles were at 13 per cent.

In other words, the finer slicing of age groups had allowed more young adults to watch films they could not have under the cruder R(A) regime, she said.

She added that the board has over time become more sensitive to scenes that might look objectionable but which actually fit into the context of a story and should be left intact.

This contextual awareness came into play when the acclaimed period drama Lust, Caution (2007), directed by Ang Lee, was released here in two versions - an edited NC16 version that was nine minutes shorter and another that was R21-rated and uncut.

Explaining the no-cut version, Ms Chua said the sex scenes featuring the two lead characters were relevant to the story as "the relationship did start as lust, but as the movie progressed it changed to a closer bond, and in a way, that was reflected in how the sexual scenes were filmed and portrayed".

While it seems that censorship is less of a factor pushing users towards Internet sources, the Government is still exercising greater caution on issues that it considers particularly troubling, such as Singapore politics, homosexuality, youth gangs, race, religion and the use of Chinese dialects.

The drama Black Swan (2010), for example, was passed with an M18 rating, but only after a scene showing a lesbian sexual act was cut.

In 2011, the Oscar-nominated drama The Kids Are All Right (2010) was given an R21 rating and restricted to one screen because it portrayed two lesbians raising children.

The film had actually exceeded what is allowable under R21 because it appeared to normalise a homosexual lifestyle, but was given a one-print condition because the MDA took into account the higher level of interest in the film following its Oscar nominations.

The Singapore film, Sex.Violence.FamilyValues, was banned last year following complaints of racist speech in a trailer for the film.

The comic satire was later given an R21 rating, following edits to one segment in which two men, one Chinese and one Indian, insult each other with racial slurs.

The episode tested the limits of racial speech in film here and was widely reported in the local and international press, and generated much online debate. Those in support of the ban called it prudent, while the film's backers argued that the ban was bad for the arts in Singapore.

Besides allowing for the purchase and viewing of unapproved materials, the Internet allows film-makers and supporters to create communities that support change. Recently, an online petition was created to "support the reintroduction of dialects on local TV and radio in Singapore".

Aimed at the MDA, it has collected about half of the 2,000 signatures it is asking for.

The ban on satellite dishes was relaxed in 1991 so that financial institutions could get news at the same time as those in other countries.

Traders here had been slower than those elsewhere in finding out about the start of the Gulf War.

On television, the most heavily pirated show on the Internet is the violent and sexually explicit fantasy drama Game Of Thrones.

A trimmed, all-ages version is available here on cable television channel HBO.

Straits Times writer Sherwin Loh in a commentary earlier this year asked what is being done to help traditional commercial entities such as HBO, who could be losing subscribers to piracy, or to newer services such as Netflix, because of HBO's adherence to censorship guidelines.

These examples encapsulate the forces at work in film censorship today. There are now more grassroots discussions on Facebook, film enthusiast sites and online forums on the issues of censorship.

Added to this are the forces of civil society, represented by arts personalities speaking on the issue of artistic freedom. And, in the background, are the online outlets for uncensored film and television shows that Singaporeans can access, if they know how.

The push and pull between the forces of openness and censorship has been going on long before the arrival of worldwide electronic networks. But as the Internet generation comes of age, that dialogue will take place more often, and become louder.




THE SINGAPORE PERSPECTIVE
Film classification comes of age
By John Lui, The Straits Times, 29 Jul 2013

IN 1989, in an angry note to The Straits Times letters page, reader T.A. Song said: "It would be appreciated if the censors could give more respect to the mentality of adult Singaporeans. The absence of a system of film classification reduces everyone to the lowest level - that of primary school and kindergarten children."

The cause of Song's ire was a cut. The Board Of Film Censors had deemed the gang rape scene in The Accused (1988) to be too explicit and the five-minute segment was chopped.

The snip led to letters such as the one from Song and at least three others, all decrying the board's actions, which they said removed an element essential to the story.

The other cut that made the news: The fake orgasm performed by Meg Ryan in the romantic drama When Harry Met Sally (1989). Those scenes and others depicting sex, drug-taking and foul language fell to the censor's scissors before age-appropriate film classification was introduced in 1991.

The first steps to relaxation had been taken in 1981 with the release of the Jayakumar Report. The six-person group led by then Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs S. Jayakumar supported existing standards, but suggested that the Board of Film Censors "move towards a less strict censorship policy, (but) gradually and with caution".

Then, in 1991, age-appropriate classification arrived. Films were classified as either G (General) or R (restricted to those over 18). Cinema distributors and operators swamped the market with soft-core movies, leading to replacement of the R rating with R(A), for Artistic, and the raising of the age threshold to 21.

The first Censorship Review Committee was formed in 1991, and its findings, released in 1992, were based on discussions with cinema operators and a survey of moral attitudes, among other sources.

Its recommendations led to the further refinement of age-based classification through the NC16 (no viewer below 16) category, among others.

The next Censorship Review Committee report, in 2002, led to the creation of the M18 (no viewer below 18) category. It also recommended that the "limited use" of Chinese dialects be allowed in movies and on cable television shows.

A mid-term review committee was appointed in 2009 and the report, released in 2010, recommended the creation of the PG13 film rating (parental guidance for those under 13) to alert parents to the mature nature of the content.

It also recommended a lifting of the ban on material flagged as R21 on platforms that can be controlled by adults such as cable television.

The following year, in 2011, the PG13 rating was announced for film, television and video.

In October last year, R21 content began to become available through SingTel's mio video-on-demand service.


This is the final primer in a series of 12 on various current affairs issues, published in the run-up to The Straits Times-Ministry of Education National Current Affairs Quiz.


Related
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>