Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live

Kuala Lumpur-Singapore High Speed Rail project terminated; Malaysia has to compensate Singapore for costs incurred

$
0
0
They fail to agree on Malaysia's proposed changes; both countries commit to maintaining ties
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 2 Jan 2021

The twice-delayed high-speed rail (HSR) project between Singapore and Malaysia will no longer go ahead, after both countries were unable to reach an agreement on changes proposed by Malaysia.

The termination of the agreement was announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his Malaysian counterpart, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, yesterday, and came amid recent rumours that Malaysia had decided to build the line alone.

Negotiations hit an impasse after Malaysia proposed changes due to the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.

In their joint statement, the prime ministers, who had spoken via videoconferenceonDec 2, said: "Both governments had conducted several discussions with regard to these changes and had not been able to reach an agreement. Therefore, the HSR agreement had lapsed on Dec 31."

Malaysian Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Mustapa Mohamed said yesterday that his government had wanted to bring forward the construction phase and also proposed a new project structure which would have provided more financing options.

He added that Malaysia will honour its obligations and both countries will initiate the necessary procedures to determine the amount of compensation.

PM Lee and Mr Muhyiddin also said: "Both countries remain committed to maintain good bilateral relations, and cooperate closely in various fields, including strengthening the connectivity between the two countries."


The writing was on the wall after Malaysian news reports in recent months suggested that the Malaysian Cabinet was planning to continue on its own and end the line in Johor instead of Jurong.

Yesterday's statements did not detail the compensation amount that Malaysia has to pay Singapore.

Singapore's Transport Ministry said that as Malaysia allowed the agreement to lapse, it will have to compensate Singapore for costs already incurred.

Based on earlier estimates, Singapore had already spent more than $250 million for design, manpower and land acquisitions by the end of May 2018, then Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan told Parliament in July that year.

He also said Singapore would continue to incur costs - over $6 million each month in June and July, and at least $40 million from August to the end of 2018.


When Singapore agreed to Malaysia's request for a suspension in August that year, more costs were incurred to compensate contractors for breaking contracts, and to fill back sites already excavated, for instance. Malaysia had agreed to reimburse Singapore $15 million for these abortive costs.

The 350km rail line, which Malaysia mooted and both sides agreed to build in 2013, was to have run from Bandar Malaysia in downtown Kuala Lumpur to Jurong East.

It would have had seven stations, and would have cut travel time between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore, one of the busiest air routes.

The trip would have taken 90 minutes on the HSR, compared with over four hours by car and about five hours end to end by air.


Singapore commenced work on the project, appointing a firm to design infrastructure and calling an international joint tender with Malaysia for an assets company, after both countries signed a legally-binding bilateral agreement in December 2016.

The project was put on hold following a change in the Malaysian government in May 2018. The two-year suspension was set to expire in May last year and extended for a second and final time till Dec 31.

The latest development has come under criticism by some in Malaysia, among them former prime minister Najib Razak, who said yesterday that a domestic line was not economically viable.

Meanwhile, observers do not expect a significant impact on bilateral ties, saying that the joint statement indicates a mutual agreement was reached on the termination.
















KL-Singapore High Speed Rail cancellation will have little impact on other plans for Jurong: Experts
Area's status as social and economic centre in the west will be maintained, they say
By Justin Ong, The Straits Times, 2 Jan 2021

The axing of the Kuala Lumpur-Singapore High Speed Rail (HSR) will have no immediate bearing on development plans for the Jurong region, which was slated to host the project's southernmost terminus, experts said yesterday.

Jurong's status as the economic and social centre in the west predated the HSR and will survive it, said Singapore University of Social Sciences' associate professor of economics Walter Theseira.

He said: "I believe our plans to continue developing the Jurong region remain unchanged; they were not contingent on the HSR being built."

The 350km line would have run from a terminal station in Bandar Malaysia, downtown Kuala Lumpur, to a terminal in Singapore's western Jurong area.

The surrounding Jurong Lake District was positioned, in 2017, as Singapore's future second Central Business District (CBD), with an ambitious 20-year blueprint for commercial, housing, nature and transport developments, along with the potential for creating some 100,000 new jobs.

Two years later, the Government announced that the district would include a new 7ha integrated tourism development from 2026.

Flexibility was worked into plans for the district, to cater for changing circumstances such as this, said the National University of Singapore's Assistant Professor Raymond Ong, who researches transport infrastructure.

"So the land that was acquired for the HSR can easily be reconfigured or redeployed to align with the long-term vision of the region."


Prof Theseira said that Singapore could wait and see how Malaysia progresses with reported plans to continue with a domestic, "downgraded" version of the HSR connecting KL to Johor Baru.

"(If) there is a realistic prospect that the system could be extended to Singapore and provide the same quality of service between Singapore and KL as originally planned... then we could always hold the land in reserve, or lease it out on a short-term basis," he said. "(Otherwise) we should just proceed with longer-term redevelopment with the land."

Mr Harrison Cheng, associate director of consultancy Control Risks, said the silver lining was that the JB-Singapore Rapid Transit System (RTS) Link rail shuttle service remains on track.

The first civil contract for its construction was awarded in November last year, with the second due in the first quarter of this year. The RTS Link should be operational by end-2026.

"There is much stronger consensus in Putrajaya, Johor and Singapore to implement this in time… HSR, by comparison, was far more contentious a proposition since Najib fell," said Mr Cheng.



















Timeline of events for terminated KL-Singapore HSR project
The Straits Times, 2 Jan 2021

In 2013, Singapore and Malaysia agreed to build a 350km high-speed rail (HSR) line between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore that would have cut travelling time to 90 minutes, compared with more than four hours by car.

Both countries announced yesterday in a joint statement that the HSR has been terminated, after an agreement could not be reached on changes proposed by Malaysia by the deadline of Dec 31.

Here is a timeline of key milestones in the now-defunct project.

FEB 19, 2013

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and then Malaysian PM Najib Razak agree to build a high-speed rail link between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore after meeting at the Singapore-Malaysia Leaders' Retreat in Singapore.

OCT 9, 2015

Singapore and Malaysia jointly launch a request for information for the high-speed rail project.

JULY 19, 2016

PM Lee and Najib witness the signing of a memorandum of understanding for the HSR.

DEC 13, 2016

Singapore and Malaysia sign a legally binding bilateral agreement to build the new rail line, with a target to have trains running by Dec 31, 2026. The HSR is hailed as a "marquee project".


DEC 20, 2017

Singapore and Malaysia call an international joint tender for an assets company that will be responsible for designing, building, financing and maintaining all rolling stock as well as rail assets for the HSR.

MAY 28, 2018

New Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, whose coalition defeated Najib's in the May election, says the country has made "a final decision" to drop plans for the HSR.

He says the project would cost Malaysia RM110 billion (S$36 billion) and will not earn it a single cent.

JUNE 11, 2018

Tun Dr Mahathir backtracks on his earlier comments, and says the HSR is temporarily shelved due to its high costs.

SEPT 5, 2018

Malaysia and Singapore sign an agreement to postpone work on the HSR for about two years, up to May 31, 2020. The HSR is now expected to commence by Jan 1, 2031.

Under the deal, Malaysia agrees to reimburse Singapore $15 million by end-January 2019 for abortive costs incurred by the deferment of the mega project.

The deferment also sees both sides call off the ongoing international joint tender for the assets company.

MAY 31, 2020

Singapore agrees to further suspend the HSR project for seven more months till the end of the year. Then Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan says the Republic agreed to Malaysia's request in the spirit of bilateral cooperation.

NOV 26, 2020

The Ministry of Transport says Malaysia has proposed changes to the HSR, and Singapore has been discussing them in good faith.

DEC 2, 2020

PM Lee and new Malaysian Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin discuss the project via videoconference.

JAN 1, 2021

The HSR project is terminated, after both countries fail to reach an agreement on changes proposed by Malaysia by the deadline of Dec 31.













Majority of 80 staff affected will remain in roles at LTA
By Justin Ong, The Straits Times, 2 Jan 2021

Out of 80 staff affected by the termination of the Kuala Lumpur-Singapore High Speed Rail (HSR) project, the majority will remain in roles at the Land Transport Authority (LTA), where they were deployed when the project was suspended in 2018.

The 80 employees worked for SG HSR, an infrastructure company under LTA which will assist the rest of the officers in transitioning to other suitable roles within either the authority or the wider public service, said LTA yesterday.

It also confirmed that no new tenders have been called since the suspension of the project in September 2018.


In July 2018, then Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan told Parliament that SG HSR had formed a team of more than 100 specialists to build, own, fund and maintain the HSR civil infrastructure in Singapore. SG HSR had called five tenders to construct civil infrastructure within Singapore.

A few months later in September, a two-year delay was agreed on. SG HSR then said that its staff of more than 100 would be offered alternative jobs in LTA, with the company's work to be scaled down until the project resumed.

Under the terms of the deferment in 2018, both sides called off the ongoing international joint tender for a company to oversee rolling stock and rail assets for the HSR.

In agreeing to the suspension, Singapore also incurred more costs in compensation to contractors for breaking contracts, Mr Khaw told Parliament.

Malaysia had agreed to reimburse Singapore $15 million for these abortive costs.

In May 2018, Mr Khaw noted that Singapore had already racked up an estimated bill of more than $250 million for work on the project, and would continue to incur costs of more than $6 million in June, more than $6 million in July, and at least $40 million from August to the end of 2018.













How COVID-19 killed the Kuala Lumpur-Singapore HSR project
By Shannon Teoh, Malaysia Bureau Chief, The Straits Times, 2 Jan 2021

Malaysia's decision on Friday (Jan 1) to cancel the High-Speed Rail (HSR) project with Singapore was a painful one, say analysts, but a necessary move to shore up its domestic economy against the more immediate onslaught of the coronavirus pandemic.

The 350km link between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore costing an estimated RM60 to RM80 billion (S$19.8 billion to S$26.3 billion) would have slashed travel times between the countries, ramped up trade and boosted tourism when completed in 2031. Towns situated at key stops along the line in Malaysia had been expecting to welcome millions of ringgit in development and investment.

"The decision to terminate must have been a painful one at least on the Malaysian side, given that expeditious transport linkage with Singapore was viewed as transformational for the economy. But the slump brought about by the pandemic makes other domestic socio-economic priorities more urgent, leaving Malaysia in no position to proceed with the HSR at the moment," Singapore Institute of International Affairs' senior fellow Oh Ei Sun told The Straits Times.

The project, agreed to in 2013 and signed on in 2016, was temporarily shelved in 2018 by then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, citing the high debt - over RM1 trillion - left behind by the previous administration of Najib Razak, which had initially pursued the rail link with Singapore.

The deadline to proceed was shunted further from May 2020 to December 2020, as both countries reeled from the coronavirus outbreak. But while Singapore could dip into its reserves to weather the downturn, Malaysia has had to borrow to fund stimulus packages that are expected to push the fiscal deficit to 6.0 per cent in 2020 and 5.4 per cent in 2021.

The recession from shutdowns to curb the spread of the coronavirus is set to cause Malaysia's economy to contract by 3.5 to 5.5 per cent in 2020. Kuala Lumpur had hoped to achieve a fiscal balance by 2023, a goal it has since abandoned.

Moreover, the sudden collapse of international travel during the pandemic would have given policymakers pause in investing to increase such capacity.

"It's a setback to medium-term aspirations of deeper Asean integration, but also a nod perhaps to the realisation that borders can be shut with startling speed and as seen with the aviation industry, result in dire circumstances for such transnational links," said Barclays' regional economist Brian Tan.


On Friday Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Mustapa Mohamed said the project was terminated after both countries failed to agree on changes proposed by Malaysia in light of the global outbreak.

He said "a number of alternatives to reduce the cost" explored since late-2018 had "become more urgent with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic" that "adversely affected Malaysia's fiscal position".

"More importantly, the proposed changes to the project structure would have allowed us to leverage on the HSR project to accelerate Malaysia's economic recovery post the Covid-19 pandemic, by bringing forward the start of the construction phase by almost two years. This would have provided a much-needed boost to our construction sector and its supporting ecosystem," said Datuk Seri Mustapa, who is in charge of the Economic Planning Unit that oversees megaprojects like the HSR.

Official sources told The Straits Times that Malaysia's wish to accelerate the project's construction phase by two years implied removing the need for international tenders, and ensuring the RM60 billion or more it was ploughing in from public coffers would be mostly reaped by local contractors.

Firms from China, Japan and France had shown interest in bidding for HSR contracts but should a domestic tender be called, they would likely have to form JVs with Malaysian partners.

Mr Mustapa had said "a detailed study to explore all possible options" would now be conducted and explained "the new project structure" that could not be agreed with Singapore would have provided "the government the flexibility in financing options, such as deferred payments, public-private partnerships and the possibility of accessing financing at favourable rates". He did not provide further details.

However, Malaysian news reports have quoted unnamed sources as saying the Cabinet is looking at implementing the HSR without Singapore's involvement and terminating the line in Johor, just across the border with Singapore. Sources with knowledge of the matter have confirmed this option, telling The Straits Times that the existing Express Rail Link (ERL) that connects Kuala Lumpur to its international airport in Sepang some 57km away, could be extended with a potential station at Senai Airport, which serves Johor.


Former prime minister Najib slammed the decision to derail the HSR - a marquee project of his administration - saying "the dream of joining two of the largest economies and capitals in Asean will not be achieved" and "economic benefits for Malaysia from this project will shrink by trillions of ringgit".

Claiming the estimated tourism spend of Singaporeans in Malaysia was RM25 billion annually, Najib said "if the HSR can increase tourists from Singapore by just 50 per cent, the amount spent by Singaporeans could increase by RM12.5 billion per year". This would more than pay back the cost of the project within a decade, he concluded.

The former premier, who has been convicted of graft relating to the 1MDB scandal, also implied that cancelling the HSR and investing in a domestic alternative gave the current government free rein to award construction contracts.

"One of the benefits for the Malaysian government is that it can make all procurement decisions to hand contracts to any party compared to the JV model previously where all procurement and vendor selection must be evaluated, executed and supervised by both countries," he said in a Facebook post on Friday.













Related


Singapore's Parliament begins live-stream of sittings for the first time on 4 January 2021

$
0
0
By Justin Ong, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

Parliamentary proceedings were live-streamed to the public for the first time yesterday.

In a statement, the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) announced that live streaming would begin with yesterday's sitting, which started at 1.30pm.

It will be available to members of the public via MCI's YouTube channel, in both the original language and English-translated versions.

The public can also access parliamentary proceedings via video clips of all speeches and exchanges, which are recorded and uploaded online within hours of each sitting.

They can also choose to read the Hansard - a written record of all parliamentary proceedings - online, or attend sittings in person.


During the sitting, Ms Tin Pei Ling (MacPherson) asked how the Government could mitigate concerns about the potential impact of live streaming on the quality and tone of debates.


Mr Louis Ng (Nee Soon GRC) asked if sign language would be available in the live stream.

Mr Iswaran said that while there were no such provisions at this point, the YouTube streams would have auto-captioning to make them more accessible for the hearing-impaired.


The Government had, in September last year, first agreed in principle to live-stream the proceedings.

Mr Iswaran said then that the Government had so far been reluctant to implement live streaming due to both practical and policy reasons, including the risk of MPs playing to the gallery instead of seriously debating national issues.

But he acknowledged that global trends have made online streaming commonplace, with legislatures in other countries also live-streaming proceedings. The Government would thus study how to implement live streaming, in the spirit of engaging with Singaporeans, he added.


His announcement came months after previous Leader of the House Grace Fu had said no to calls from former Nominated MP Anthea Ong and Workers' Party MP Leon Perera for Parliament proceedings to be live-streamed.

Mr Perera had also raised the matter back in 2017, with then Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information Chee Hong Tat saying in response that there was low demand for a live feed of parliamentary proceedings.



















Keeping the integrity and dignity critical as Parliament goes live
By Grace Ho, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

Yesterday's Parliament sitting was notable for two "firsts" - it was the first one this year, and also the first to be live-streamed.

The public could follow the proceedings in real time on the Ministry of Communications and Information YouTube channel, a move several months in the making. It was flagged last September by Minister for Communications and Information S. Iswaran.

Once the veil of mystery was lifted from the chamber, the session followed a well-trodden path. The big concerns of the day came up for discussion, including Covid-19, social support, the elderly, and the economy.


On Covid-19 vaccines, those who tuned in would have drawn four key points from Health Minister Gan Kim Yong's ministerial statement.

First, there will be enough free vaccines for all Singaporeans and long-term residents in Singapore. They will not, however, be able to dictate their choice of vaccine.

Second, current vaccines will likely be effective against the new strain.

Third, prior bookings to get vaccinated will be necessary; and finally, all who are vaccinated will be issued a vaccination card to remind them of follow-up appointments.

But the larger, more important message was that Singaporeans must not let their guard down.

Like Mr Gan, Education Minister Lawrence Wong warned that vaccination is "not a silver bullet". Global cases continue to escalate rapidly, he said, and in Singapore alone there have already been two family clusters in recent days.

Another hot button issue was the termination of the Kuala Lumpur-Singapore high-speed rail (HSR) project. The deal-breaker for Singapore, explained Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung, was that it could not accept Malaysia's proposal to remove the requirement for a jointly appointed Assets Company - the systems supplier and network operator of the HSR - a "fundamental departure" from the original agreement.

Given that neither country has the expertise in operating the HSR, said Mr Ong, both sides had earlier agreed to appoint a best-in-class industry player through an open and transparent international tender. The goal was to have a single train system operating between Singapore and Kuala Lumpur that would be accountable to both sides.

Given accelerated digitalisation due to Covid-19, members also addressed the need to ensure that the elderly are not left behind.

Responding to a question from Workers' Party's Mr Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC), Foreign Minister and Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation Initiative Vivian Balakrishnan said that despite the discontinuation of the OneKey token from April 1, residents who do not own a mobile phone will still be able to access government e-services using SingPass.

He gave the assurance that there is no timeline to phase out physical counters to access these services, including government agency service centres and libraries.

But bridging the skills gap and helping the elderly to cross this hurdle is critical, he added.

This is where the SG Digital Office - which has digital ambassadors present to help seniors with services - is useful, said Dr Balakrishnan. He also took note of Mr Giam's suggestion that physical counters be extended to social service offices.

Ongoing concerns over data privacy and the use of TraceTogether were also raised.

Responding to a question from Mr Christopher de Souza (Holland-Bukit Timah GRC), Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan clarified that the Singapore Police Force is empowered under the Criminal Procedure Code to obtain any data.

"We do not preclude the use of TraceTogether data in circumstances where citizens' safety and security are or have been affected, and this applies to all other data as well," said Mr Tan, in response to a supplementary question from Mr Giam who asked if use of the data would violate the TraceTogether privacy statement.

Also mentioned was a Ministry of Social and Family Development study released last month, which showed that children of divorced parents tend to earn less, and are more likely to get divorced, than their peers from intact families.

On the support available to these children, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office and Second Minister for Education Maliki Osman said school counsellors are on hand for students who exhibit emotional distress or social and behavioural changes due to their parents' divorce. Teachers also proactively look out for any changes in behaviour, and financial assistance is available to those who need it, he added.

The issues raised yesterday are not new. But they will sharpen against the backdrop of the uneven trajectory of the pandemic and its uncertain impact on the economy, as well as a rapidly ageing population and changing social trends.

Concerns over a growing fiscal burden, inequality and intergenerational mobility have already come to the fore.


As for live-streaming Parliament proceedings, the authorities have long been reluctant to do so, citing reasons such as the risk of MPs playing to the gallery. Retired diplomat Bilahari Kausikan reiterated these concerns in a Facebook post yesterday, calling the move a "mistake" that could change the political dynamic in such a way as to incentivise "a certain sort of personality to enter politics and not the kind who ought to be a political leader".

As Mr Iswaran said yesterday, the integrity and dignity of Parliament as a forum for serious debate on national issues must be preserved. "Ultimately, the responsibility rests with all members of this House, present and future, who must continue to uphold the highest standards of conduct and decorum, as we engage in the cut and thrust of parliamentary debate," he said.

Was this opening session the lull before the storm?

Whether Mr Kausikan's comments will prove prescient is anyone's guess, but the measured tone of yesterday's debate gave little cause for alarm.

For every rogue politician who sees this as an opportunity to let loose, one can imagine many others who would choose their words more carefully in front of a nation of live viewers.

As for critics who placed their bets on huge pent-up public interest, it may have been a case of "too early to call".

The number of viewers on MCI's live stream hovered below 4,000 most of the time and dipped to around 500 by the close of day, lending credence to the authorities' earlier observation that public demand for a live stream - at least for now - is not all that high, notwithstanding its public education and engagement value.



















COVID-19 Vaccinations a key focus for Singapore this year: Health Minister Gan Kim Yong in Ministerial statement on 4 Jan 2021

$
0
0
All who take COVID-19 jabs will get physical vaccination card, cannot choose which vaccine to take

Singapore to offer financial support to those who suffer serious side effects from COVID-19 vaccines

More COVID-19 vaccines to arrive in Singapore soon, including those by Moderna, Sinovac
By Audrey Tan and Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

The national effort to vaccinate the population will require considerable resources and will be one of Singapore's key focus areas this year, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong as he fleshed out the country's vaccination strategy yesterday.

"Vaccinations will be a key enabler allowing us to return to normalcy," he told Parliament yesterday. He said this is a new line of defence that Singapore must put in place while the global situation remains volatile, and it involves a massive logistical exercise.

"We have secured enough vaccines for the whole population. Every vaccine approved for use will meet all our safety and efficacy requirements," he said.

Sharing some details of the programme, Mr Gan said people will need to make a booking before visiting vaccination centres for the Covid-19 shot, and will not get to choose the vaccine they want.

Vaccinated individuals will get a physical card, but can also check their vaccination status online.


Following the first shipment of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine last month, Mr Gan said, more vaccines are expected to arrive here in the next few months, including those by United States firm Moderna and China's Sinovac.

"If all goes according to schedule, we will have enough vaccines for everyone by the third quarter of this year," said the minister.

Healthcare workers and other Covid-19 front-line staff will be first in line for the vaccine, followed by the elderly, those at greater risk of severe disease, and those in jobs or settings where risk of a super-spreading event is high, including migrant workers. Vaccinations will then be progressively broadened to include other Singaporeans and long-term residents.


Mr Gan urged people to get vaccinated, though vaccination is voluntary. "This will not only protect yourself, but also indirectly protect others who cannot be vaccinated due to medical reasons. This collective protection will be more effective the more people are vaccinated."

To ensure vaccine access, Mr Gan said Covid-19 vaccination will be free for all Singaporeans, permanent residents and long-term residents - about 5.7 million people.


He urged people not to dawdle: "The best time to vaccinate is now. If people wait until an outbreak has happened to get themselves vaccinated, it will be too late, both to protect themselves and to prevent the outbreak in the first place."

He stressed that the Health Sciences Authority will allow a Covid-19 vaccine to be used only if it is assessed to be sufficiently efficacious and safe for use, and only if the benefits are assessed to outweigh the risks of any potential adverse effects from the vaccination.


To further give people peace of mind, the Health Ministry will also introduce a vaccine injury financial assistance programme to provide support for people who suffer serious side effects related to Covid-19 vaccines administered here.

In response to 14 MPs who raised questions on Singapore's vaccination strategy, Mr Gan and Education Minister Lawrence Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force on Covid-19, said that vaccination is not a silver bullet for tackling the pandemic.


For example, while the Government may consider relaxing some rules for those vaccinated - such as doing away with testing before events or changing quarantine rules for returning travellers - existing rules will still apply until more data is available, said Mr Wong.

"So until we understand the effects of the vaccine, I think we will not be able to make any changes to our measures, be it domestic or travel measures," he said.





Safety is top priority in COVID-19 vaccine roll-out
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

Safety must be ensured for people receiving the Covid-19 vaccine, and that will include having a proper queueing and registration system, and ensuring their data is captured accurately.

All of these will have a bearing on how quickly vaccinations can be rolled out, Parliament heard on Monday (Jan 4).

"So it is quite a complex situation," said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong in response to Dr Lim Wee Kiak (Sembawang GRC), who had expressed his view that the nationwide vaccination effort should be rolled out more quickly.


In his ministerial statement on Singapore's response to the pandemic, Mr Gan acknowledged that many questions had been raised on vaccine safety and efficacy.

"These concerns are understandable, given the extraordinary speed at which the Covid-19 vaccines have been developed and brought to market," he said.

"Let me assure you that the safety and well-being of Singaporeans is top priority in our vaccination efforts."

In response to Mr Melvin Yong (Radin Mas), who had asked if there is any data to show that existing vaccines are effective against the new, more transmissible strain of the coronavirus from Britain, Mr Gan added that there is currently no evidence that shows they are not.

Vaccine manufacturers Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have publicly stated that their vaccines are likely to protect against the new strain, and are undertaking studies to formally confirm this.

The Ministry of Health (MOH) will evaluate the data as it emerges and review Singapore's vaccine strategy and border measures accordingly, Mr Gan said.

"Mutations occur in viruses naturally and different strains can emerge from time to time, especially in a long-drawn pandemic," he said. "Experts have said that it is unlikely that these mutations would impact effectiveness of current vaccines."


The Health Minister also detailed the rigorous review process that Covid-19 vaccines have to undergo before being approved for use here.

First, they are studied by experts from the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) under the Pandemic Special Access Route. The vaccines are held up against strict international standards of quality, safety and efficacy.

These standards are the same as those used for full vaccine evaluations, except that longer-term data from clinical trials will be evaluated only later, as more data becomes available.

As part of its review process, the HSA looks at data from pre-clinical studies in laboratories, clinical trials on human volunteers, manufacturing and quality controls, as well as countries' ongoing experiences with the actual use of the vaccine.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine underwent this process before being authorised for use, while the Moderna and Sinovac vaccines are currently being reviewed.

"HSA will allow a Covid-19 vaccine to be used only if it is assessed to be sufficiently efficacious and safe for use, and only if the benefits of the vaccine are assessed to outweigh the risks of any potential adverse effects from the vaccination," Mr Gan said.

Following HSA's approval, the independent expert committee appointed by MOH also reviewed clinical data on the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

"In assessing the suitability of vaccine candidates for specific population groups, the expert committee took into consideration four key criteria - vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy, vaccine tolerability, and data adequacy of clinical trials," Mr Gan added.





More COVID-19 vaccines to arrive in Singapore soon, including those by Moderna, Sinovac: Gan Kim Yong
By Audrey Tan, Science and Environment Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

More vaccines are expected to arrive in Singapore in the next few months, including those by American biotechnology firm Moderna and China's Sinovac, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong yesterday.

The Republic received its first shipment of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine last month.

Mr Gan said in Parliament that there will be enough Covid-19 vaccines for everyone in Singapore by the third quarter of this year if all goes according to schedule.

"The vaccines will arrive in Singapore in batches, given high global demand, especially from countries with high rates of infection," he said.


Pharmaceutical companies will also need time to scale up vaccine production and distribution, Mr Gan added in his ministerial statement on the Covid-19 situation here.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the first vaccine against the coronavirus that has been approved for use in Singapore.

The nation's vaccination drive is kicking off first with healthcare workers and staff in the healthcare sector as they work in the direct care of patients or in supporting roles, Mr Gan said.

Other front-line and essential personnel will also be prioritised for receiving the Covid-19 vaccine, he said.

These include swabbers hired by the Health Promotion Board, as well as staff working in government quarantine facilities, community care facilities, and dedicated stay-home notice facilities.

For example, 40 staff from the National Centre for Infectious Diseases were the first to receive doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on Dec 30 last year, including Professor Leo Yee Sin, the centre's executive director.

Mr Gan added that the elderly and those at greater risk of severe disease from the coronavirus will be vaccinated from next month, beginning with seniors aged 70 and above.

Those in jobs or settings where the risk of a super-spreading event is high - such as the construction, marine and process sectors - including migrant workers, will also be prioritised.

"Thereafter, we will progressively broaden our vaccinations to include other Singaporeans and long-term residents who are medically eligible," the minister said.

Mr Gan added that as more vaccines are approved for use, Singapore will adjust its vaccination programme depending on vaccine supply and disease epidemiology.

He told the House that the Government had started planning for the Covid-19 vaccination programme "very early on", and that it has in place end-to-end processes to meet the cold-chain logistics requirements.

These include delivery and receipt of the doses at the airport, storage and transport to vaccination sites - so that the quality and efficacy of the vaccines are not compromised.

In response to Ms Foo Mee Har (West Coast GRC), who wanted to know how Singapore was mitigating the risk of non-delivery of vaccine orders, Mr Gan said Singapore is in close contact with the manufacturers that it has signed contracts with and that it is monitoring the delivery schedule.

"We are also looking forward to more vaccines being approved so we have alternatives," said Mr Gan.

He said diversification of vaccine sources will ensure that Singapore has access to other supplies, even if one shipment is delayed.

"This way, we ensure that we have adequate vaccine supplies for the whole of Singapore," he added.





Health minister sets out Singapore's criteria for COVID-19 vaccine approval
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

Singapore, like the World Health Organisation and the United States, will only approve Covid-19 vaccines that are at least 50 per cent effective, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong.

He was responding yesterday to Workers' Party chairman Sylvia Lim (Aljunied GRC), who had asked if the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) has any threshold for efficacy before it approves any vaccine.

At the same time, other criteria must also be considered before approving a vaccine in a crisis situation like the pandemic, Mr Gan noted.

HSA's experts will weigh the benefits and risks, and conduct a holistic assessment before concluding whether a vaccine will be approved for use, he added.

This includes factors such as the potential risk of adverse incidents.

"So it is not a clear-cut threshold that once (the efficacy) is 50.1 per cent, we will approve it. If there is greater uncertainty, then we will require a higher level of efficacy for us to be assured of the benefits versus the risks," Mr Gan said.

Also, the severity of the health crisis will have to be taken into account.

A lower threshold of efficacy may be accepted in the event of a very severe pandemic that requires the population to be vaccinated as quickly as possible.

The Covid-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer and BioNTech - the first one to be approved here - has demonstrated an efficacy rate of 95 per cent in clinical trials on more than 40,000 participants aged between 16 and 91 years old.

Ms Lim noted that HSA's approval for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is an interim authorisation, and asked what additional information will need to be submitted in order for the vaccine to receive full registration.

In response, Mr Gan said the authorities will have to monitor how the vaccine is administered in real life, given that it has been rolled out for only a couple of months.

The manufacturers are also required to report any adverse incidents that happen so that Singapore can keep track of the vaccine's performance on the ground, as well as the potential risks that it may carry.

"We need to do this continuously for a prolonged period of time, usually one year, two years or maybe longer, so as to give us the assurance of the long-term effect of this vaccine," said Mr Gan, adding that this is partly why HSA has not yet given full authorisation to the vaccine.

A full authorisation will require long-term data to be available.

"But in view of the pandemic that we are facing today, HSA has given the interim approval for the use of this vaccine, accepting the fact that long-term data will only be available in the long term," said Mr Gan.





Singapore govt to offer support to those with serious side effects from COVID-19 vaccines
By Audrey Tan, Science and Environment Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

A new programme will be introduced to provide support for those who experience serious side effects related to Covid-19 vaccines administered here.

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong announced this in Parliament on Monday (Jan 4), saying that the programme by the Health Ministry will give peace of mind to those receiving the vaccines, although few are expected to need this.

More details on the vaccine injury financial assistance programme will be announced later, he said.


"As with all medications and established vaccines, there is a small risk of very rare but serious adverse events that may occur post-vaccination, including allergic reactions," he said.

He added that those who receive the Covid-19 vaccine should be observed on-site for 30 minutes after they receive the jab, so that any severe allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis can be detected and treated promptly.


The Health Sciences Authority had earlier said that certain groups of people, such as those with a history of anaphylaxis or the rapid onset of severe allergic reactions, should not receive the vaccine as a precautionary measure.

Pregnant women, immunocompromised people and those under the age of 16 should also not receive the vaccine, as the safety and efficacy data on these groups of people is not available yet.





All who take COVID-19 jabs will get physical vaccination card, cannot choose which vaccine to take
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

People who opt to take the Covid-19 vaccine will receive a physical vaccination card, and will be able to check their vaccination records online, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong on Monday (Jan 4).

He noted that nearly 60 per cent of people indicated through surveys and other government outreach methods that they will get inoculated once a vaccine is available, while around a third said they would wait for more data before deciding.

Mr Gan also told Parliament that people will not be able to choose which vaccine they want.

He said the vaccination card will indicate which vaccine was administered and the appointment dates for the second vaccine dose, and will also provide brief post-vaccination advice.

Some vaccines, such as the one developed by Pfizer-BioNTech, require two doses to be administered 21 days apart, and an additional 14 days after the second dose to reach maximum protection against the virus.

Vaccine records will be updated in the National Immunisation Registry, the minister added.


Mr Louis Chua (Sengkang GRC) asked if individuals will be allowed to choose which vaccine they wish to take, when more than one has been approved for use.

Mr Gan said allowing individuals to choose will "unnecessarily complicate the already complex vaccination programme".

Instead, the allocation of vaccines will largely be based on the medical indications of the different vaccines and the suitability of a vaccine for different sub-groups in the population, as well as vaccine availability.

"Anyway, in the immediate term, only the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been approved for use," Mr Gan said. "So there is no choice."





Prior bookings will be required before COVID-19 vaccination: Gan Kim Yong
By Audrey Tan, Science and Environment Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

Prior bookings will be required before people head down to the vaccination centres to receive their Covid-19 shot, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong on Monday (Jan 4).

This is necessary given the cold-chain requirements at the vaccination sites and multi-dose vials of the vaccines, he said.

"It will also ensure operational efficiency and minimise individual wait times," said Mr Gan in Parliament, adding that more information on how to make the bookings will be provided later.


Mr Gan said that the Government is concurrently readying clinics and vaccination centres for people to be vaccinated when it is their turn, even as healthcare workers are receiving their vaccinations within their healthcare institutions.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the first one against the coronavirus that has been approved for use in Singapore, with vaccines by other pharmaceutical companies Moderna and Sinovac expected to arrive in the months ahead.

BioNTech had said that once removed from the freezer, the vaccine can be stored for up to five days at between 2 deg C and 8 deg C and up to two hours at temperatures up to 30 deg C, prior to use.

The vaccine, which uses new mRNA technology, must be stored at ultra-low temperatures of about minus 70 deg C before being shipped to distribution centres in specially designed cool boxes filled with dry ice.


Forty staff from the National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID) were the first to receive doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on Dec 30, including Professor Leo Yee Sin, the centre's executive director.

The remaining NCID staff will be progressively vaccinated, with the rest of the National Healthcare Group management and staff from this month.

Mr Gan said that experts consulted by the Government have recommended that the nation prioritise vaccinations of groups that are most at risk. This is also in line with the guidance issued by the World Health Organisation, he added.

The nation's Covid-19 vaccination drive is kicking off first with healthcare workers and staff working in the healthcare sector as they work in direct care of patients or in supporting roles, he said.

Other front-line and essential personnel will also be among the first to receive the Covid-19 vaccine, Mr Gan said. This includes swabbers hired by the Health Promotion Board, as well as staff working at government quarantine facilities, community care facilities and dedicated stay-home notice facilities.

Mr Gan added that the elderly and those at greater risk of severe disease from the coronavirus will be vaccinated from next month.

This phase will begin with seniors aged 70 and above and those in jobs or settings where the risk of a super-spreading event is high, such as the construction, marine and process sectors, including migrant workers.

"Thereafter, we will progressively broaden our vaccinations to include other Singaporeans and long-term residents who are medically eligible," he said.

Mr Gan added that as more vaccines are approved for use, Singapore will adjust its vaccination programme, depending on vaccine supply and disease epidemiology.

He told the House that the Government had started planning for the Covid-19 vaccination programme "very early on", and that it has in place end-to-end processes to meet the cold-chain logistics requirements.

This includes delivery and receipt of the doses at the airport, storage and transport to vaccination sites so that the quality and efficacy of the vaccines are not compromised.





COVID-19 vaccines should protect against new, more transmissible strain from UK: Gan Kim Yong
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

There is currently no evidence that existing Covid-19 vaccines are less effective against the new, more transmissible strain of the coronavirus, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong on Monday (Jan 4).

He noted that vaccine manufacturers Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have publicly stated that their vaccines are likely to protect against the new strain, and are undertaking studies to formally confirm this.

The Health Ministry (MOH) will evaluate the data as it emerges and review Singapore's vaccine strategy and border measures accordingly, Mr Gan said.

The minister was responding to a parliamentary question from Mr Melvin Yong (Radin Mas), who had asked if there is any data to show that existing vaccines are effective against the new virus strain from the United Kingdom.

"Mutations occur in viruses naturally and different strains can emerge from time to time, especially in a long-drawn pandemic," Mr Gan said. "Experts have said that it is unlikely that these mutations would impact effectiveness of current vaccines."





Employees can retain job scope even if not getting COVID-19 vaccine, says Gan Kim Yong
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

People who choose not to get the Covid-19 vaccine will not need to have a change of duties at their workplaces, unless there is a resurgence in the number of local cases, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong yesterday.

He was responding to Mr Yip Hon Weng (Yio Chu Kang), who had asked if those who are not vaccinated will have their job scopes reviewed in order to reduce exposure to the virus.

All workers should continue to take necessary precautions such as wearing masks, and where required, don personal protective equipment and undergo rostered routine testing, Mr Gan added.

He noted that there are certain groups of employees, such as researchers or laboratory staff, who may be working directly on the Covid-19 virus or face high risk of exposure to infected individuals.

The Ministry of Health (MOH) and Ministry of Manpower are reviewing the issue of vaccinating workers in such workplace settings and will provide further advice later, he said.

In his ministerial statement on Singapore's response to the pandemic, Mr Gan said MOH will also introduce a vaccine injury financial assistance programme.

This scheme will support those who suffer a serious adverse event that is assessed to be related to Covid-19 vaccines administered in Singapore.

"While we expect few to need this, the programme will give peace of mind to those taking the vaccination," he said. "Further details on the programme will be provided in due course."

Mr Gan said the Health Sciences Authority and an independent expert committee appointed by his ministry have studied the data on potential side effects caused by the Covid-19 vaccine. The data includes information from clinical trials as well as the actual experience of countries where vaccination efforts are under way.

"They have factored this into their evaluation before granting authorisation or making a recommendation on the use of Covid-19 vaccines," he said.

People who get the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may experience side effects such as pain at the injection site, fatigue, fever, muscle aches or headaches.

The authorities have recommended that those with known severe allergies should not be vaccinated. People will also be observed on site for 30 minutes post-vaccination, so that any severe allergic reactions, such as anaphylaxis, can be detected and treated promptly.







Vaccinated travellers to Singapore to face same measures as non-vaccinated travellers for now: Lawrence Wong
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

Singapore is monitoring studies on the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, and will consider relaxing stay-home measures for vaccinated travellers if the shots significantly curb the spread of the disease, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong.

But for now, the Government will continue to take a cautious approach, and vaccinated travellers will continue to be subject to the same border measures and stay-home requirements as non-vaccinated travellers, added Mr Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force on Covid-19.

His remarks came amid the roll-out of vaccinations in some countries, including Singapore, after governments around the world approved the emergency use of several newly developed vaccines.

But it is unclear how this might impact travel, since much is still not known about how much the vaccines can reduce transmission and infection, and how long their effects will last.

Yesterday, Ms Foo Mee Har (West Coast GRC) asked if vaccination may become a key requirement for travel to Singapore in future and how it might feature at the upcoming World Economic Forum slated to be held here in May.

Giving updates on Covid-19 in a ministerial statement, Mr Wong said that while vaccines benefit those who have been immunised, there is still not enough clarity on how they protect others from the Sars-CoV-2 virus.

The Government is closely monitoring several ongoing studies on how effective the vaccines are in this respect.


When there is clear evidence that the risks of transmission can be lowered significantly by the use of vaccines, Singapore will be open to adjusting measures imposed on travellers, said Mr Wong.

He added that while the Government may not require travellers to be vaccinated, those who are may be subject to relaxed stay-home conditions when they return from overseas, for instance.

As for the World Economic Forum, those travelling here to attend the meeting will be subject to prevailing measures, unless new data on vaccines has emerged by then, he said.





All hotel staff in contact with people on SHN to be tested for COVID-19 every 14 days: Education Minister Lawrence Wong
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

All hotel staff in contact with people serving stay-home notice (SHN) will now be placed on a rostered routine testing regime, where they will be tested for Covid-19 every two weeks, Education Minister Lawrence Wong said in Parliament yesterday.

Doing so will provide an additional layer of safeguards in hotels which are used as SHN facilities, said Mr Wong, noting that a recent incident at the Mandarin Orchard Singapore hotel has highlighted how the risk of Covid-19 transmission remains despite safety measures that have been put in place.


In a ministerial statement, he said the authorities had not identified breaches in SHN protocols in the incident at the hotel, based on preliminary investigations.

But the investigations suggest that infection prevention protocols can be improved, such as through better crowd regulation, as well as having good ventilation systems to circulate more fresh air.

"We will continue to work closely with all SHN hotels to ensure that infection prevention protocols are robust."

On Dec 19, the Ministry of Health (MOH) announced that it was probing 13 cases of Covid-19 among people who had served their SHN at Mandarin Orchard Singapore.

The National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL), which conducts whole genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis on all Covid-19 cases, found that the 13 imported cases - who were confirmed to be infected in early November last year - were infected by coronavirus strains that have high genetic similarity.

This was despite the guests flying in from different countries, implying that the infections may have come from one source.

Last Friday, MOH said it had concluded its investigations into the 13 cases and found there was no transmission beyond them, and that other Covid-19 cases who served the SHN at the hotel were not linked to those 13.

No staff tested positive through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, though 11 had positive serology test results, indicating that they were infected in the past.

Dr Tan Wu Meng (Jurong GRC) asked if MOH will consider establishing capability for scaled-up rapid whole genome sequencing of the virus from clinical samples, including nose swabs, so as to complement existing genome sequencing done on cultured virus.

It currently takes about four weeks to culture the virus and complete the genome sequencing.

In response, Mr Wong said that this is an established capability within the NPHL and, where possible, whole genome sequencing can be performed rapidly and directly on clinical samples of Covid-19-positive cases.

However, in samples that have low viral loads, it may be necessary for the virus to be cultured before the sequencing can be run, he said.

"We will continue to assess available and emerging laboratory technologies so we can improve our capabilities and enhance our responses."





Less than 1% of travellers entering Singapore without pre-departure tests found to have COVID-19
So far, only around 100 out of over 12,000 such travellers have tested positive
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

More than 12,000 travellers from higher-risk countries or regions entered Singapore without pre-departure tests from Nov 18 to Dec 27 last year, Education Minister Lawrence Wong said yesterday.

These are mostly Singapore citizens and permanent residents (PRs).

So far, around 100 - or 0.85 per cent of these travellers - have tested positive for Covid-19. None of these cases has resulted in local transmission, said Mr Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force tackling Covid-19.

While Singapore has required travellers from higher-risk places to take a pre-departure test since Nov 18 last year, this rule does not apply to citizens and PRs.

"We do not want to place additional barriers for them to return home if they have urgent need to do so," Mr Wong said.

As paediatric testing services may not be so easily available in some countries, those aged six and below are also exempted from such tests, he added.

"But through the stay-home notice, we ensure that community transmission risks for these travellers are minimised," said Mr Wong in response to a question by Workers' Party's Mr Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) on how the Government manages the risk of incoming arrivals.

Mr Giam asked if there were any travellers in the 12,000 who were not Singaporeans, PRs or children under six. He also asked if any of the 100 or so people who later tested positive had not taken pre-departure tests even though they were supposed to do so.

Mr Wong said he has not looked at the data in great detail. But he stressed that travellers from such high-risk territories arriving in Singapore have to serve the stay-home notice, and cases that emerge are isolated and ring-fenced so that they do not leak into the local community.

While Singapore has been able to bring the virus situation under control and enter phase three of its reopening on Dec 28, the country cannot let its guard down, he said.

He noted that Covid-19 cases continue to climb in many countries.

In Singapore, there have been two family clusters due to marine workers who had been infected on board ships and spread the virus to their family members.

"It is a sobering reminder of how easily new infection clusters can break out," said Mr Wong, stressing that Singapore must continue to stay alert.

"The emergence of new viral strains that may be more infectious, such as the B.1.1.7 variant, is indeed very worrying," he said.

Singapore will tighten border restrictions where necessary and practical to limit the risk of imported cases, he said.

For instance, additional testing requirements have been introduced for travellers from Britain and South Africa, where the new strain has been circulating.

The testing regime and safe management measures for those working in the aviation and maritime sectors have also been tightened.

Singapore takes a calculated risk-based approach in how it manages its borders, Mr Wong noted.

Special travel arrangements with certain countries and territories have been set up to facilitate essential business and official travel, with the number of travellers controlled tightly. Travellers also have to stick to a controlled itinerary and strictly limit interactions with the wider community.

Responding to Ms Cheng Li Hui (Tampines GRC), he cited how about 500 travellers have arrived from China through the fast lane that was established between Singapore and six provinces and municipalities in China last June.

On a daily basis, a far larger number of travellers entering Singapore are returning Singaporeans, PRs and long-term pass holders, he said. There are also new migrant workers - mostly construction workers and foreign domestic workers.

"We need them to build our homes and infrastructure, and to support the caregiving needs of our families," said Mr Wong.

The entry of returning residents and essential workers is allowed on a controlled basis, he added, with those from higher-risk nations placed on a 14-day stay-home notice at dedicated facilities and tested at the end of their quarantine.





COVID-19 rapid testing cost drops from $80 to under $50 per person
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

The cost of rapid Covid-19 testing has dropped from $80 per person - when such test kits were first deployed - to under $50 now, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong yesterday.

The costs of the antigen rapid testing, which include operation and manpower costs, are likely to come down further, he added.

"Over time, we can expect more innovative rapid test kits that are cheaper, faster and more convenient to administer," Mr Wong told Parliament in a ministerial statement on Singapore's response to the coronavirus pandemic.

"These will enable us to test more extensively and conveniently, to detect positive cases and protect our population more comprehensively."

Antigen rapid testing has been used as a pre-event safety measure for large-scale activities. It complements the more sensitive, but slower polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests.

Mr Wong noted how concerns had emerged among various groups when Singapore first deployed testing in a significant way.

Some people thought it would be a hassle, he said, while others felt there would be a stigma associated with being identified for testing.

"But I hope by now we can all appreciate and understand the reasons why testing is important and necessary."

The minister stressed that frequent and widespread testing is an important enabler for Singapore to detect coronavirus cases early, adding that testing will be ramped up in the coming months.

Singaporeans must start getting used to the idea of regular testing being a part of their lives during the pandemic, he said.

At present, anyone who sees a doctor with an acute respiratory infection or flu-like symptoms will be advised to take a PCR test, Mr Wong said.

On average, last month, more than 14,000 individuals were tested every week. This was how several recent cases were picked up, he added.

"It is very important for anyone who feels unwell to see the doctor immediately," Mr Wong said. "And if the doctor advises you to be tested, please comply with the doctor's instructions."

Mr Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force in charge of tackling the Covid-19 crisis, also underscored the importance of sticking to safe management measures, even as Singapore is in phase three of its reopening.

Strict social distancing measures were eased on Dec 28, meaning that Singaporeans could gather in groups larger than five - but not more than eight - for the first time in months.

Capacity limits at attractions, malls and places of worship also went up, while rules for marriage solemnisations and live performances were relaxed.

Mr Wong said: "Unfortunately, there are a few who persist in pushing their luck and disregarding the rules.

"We have stepped up checks over the festive period. Firm enforcement actions have been and will continue to be taken against any breaches."

He urged Singaporeans to keep up the good habits cultivated over the past few months, such as wearing masks, practising good hygiene, washing their hands regularly and not touching their faces with their hands.

Added Mr Wong: "Let's not forget the basic measures."





Over 4.2 million, or 78% of residents, using TraceTogether
Community centres that ran out of tokens to resume distribution soon: Lawrence Wong
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

More than 4.2 million people, or about 78 per cent of residents here, are now using TraceTogether, Education Minister Lawrence Wong told Parliament yesterday.

Of these people, about two million use only the TraceTogether phone app. But there has been strong demand for the tokens, and community centres that had run out of them are set to resume distribution soon, he added.

Mr Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force in charge of tackling the Covid-19 crisis, said the Government had initially not expected such a strong demand for the tokens, given that people can download the app.

Responding to MPs' questions about the TraceTogether programme, he also said there were some delays in the manufacturing schedule, which caused a delay in the distribution of tokens.

Mr Wong reiterated that after all residents who need a token have one, TraceTogether will have to be used at all SafeEntry checkpoints, either via the token or the app.

"We will give further information on this once the details and timelines are firmed up, and will provide adequate advance notice to all the affected establishments, so they can gear up and prepare," he said. Mr Wong added that the tokens will be distributed to school students who have not yet collected them.

Distribution of the tokens started last September at 38 community centres, but some venues ran out of stock after demand spiked, following the announcement that TraceTogether would be made mandatory to enter places such as restaurants and shopping malls.

Yesterday, Mr Lim Biow Chuan (Mountbatten) expressed dismay that even those who have downloaded the app are collecting the tokens, lamenting that it is "really quite a waste of resources".

He called on fellow MPs to encourage residents who already have the app to use it instead.

Thanking Mr Lim for making a plug for the app, Mr Wong said the Government will try to make the app more useful, with more features to encourage its use.

"But to the extent that Singaporeans want to collect the tokens, I think we do want to make them available, reduce any anxieties associated with the roll-out of TraceTogether-only SafeEntry, and that's why we are doing this one-time distribution," he added.

TraceTogether and SafeEntry will continue to be a key part of contact tracing operations as the country moves into phase three of its reopening, he said.


Asked by Mr Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) if the cost of developing the tokens is justified, Mr Wong said that of the $10 million spent to date, "the results speak for themselves - TraceTogether has stopped the transmission of the virus in many instances, and has helped save many lives. So I have no doubt about the cost-effectiveness of this programme".

Previously, it took contact tracers two days to interview an infected person before they could establish his close contacts. Now they can rely on TraceTogether data and it takes only hours.

Mr Dennis Tan (Hougang) had asked if it would have cost less to issue rechargeable tokens instead of the current ones that go flat after about six months.

Mr Wong said that given the need to roll out the tokens quickly, the Government had chosen the current design, which uses off-the-shelf components and requires less complexity, time and costs to make. He added that some of the tokens will have to be replaced, but some will need to have only their batteries replaced, and a process will be put in place for people to do so easily.

All the associated costs had been considered, he said, adding: "Overall, we still think that this approach, given the circumstances, given the urgency of rolling out the tokens, was a better approach."





Police can use TraceTogether data for criminal investigations
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

The police can obtain any data under Singapore's jurisdiction for the purposes of criminal investigations, and this includes TraceTogether data, Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan told the House yesterday.

Mr Christopher de Souza (Holland-Bukit Timah GRC) had asked if data collected under the programme will be used for criminal investigations, a concern expressed by some online.

Mr Tan replied that TraceTogether was conceived and implemented for contact tracing to fight Covid-19, and measures had been put in place to protect the data. But this does not preclude its use in criminal investigations as the police are empowered under the Criminal Procedure Code to obtain the data for such probes, he added.

In this regard, he said, data collected by TraceTogether is treated like any other data under Singapore's jurisdiction.


Asked by Workers' Party's Mr Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) if this is in violation of the TraceTogether privacy statement, Mr Tan said that other than for such investigations, the data is "indeed to be used only for contact tracing and for the purpose of fighting (the) Covid situation".

As custodian of the TraceTogether data, he added, the Government has put in place stringent measures such as allowing only authorised officers to access it, using it only for authorised purposes and storing it on secured servers. Under the Public Sector (Governance) Act, public officers who recklessly or knowingly disclose the data without authorisation or misuse it may be fined $5,000, jailed for two years, or both, he said.

His reply sparked debate online about whether this was an about-turn. Some cited past remarks by Education Minister Lawrence Wong and Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan on TraceTogether data being used only for contact tracing.

Mr Wong's office has clarified that he did not say such data would be used only for contact tracing.

What he had said, in June, was: "There is no intention to use a TraceTogether app or TraceTogether token as a means of picking up breaches of existing rules... The app and the device, plus SafeEntry, combined are meant to provide us with information in a timely manner so that we can do speedy, and fast and effective contact tracing."


Yesterday, the TraceTogether Privacy Safeguards page was updated to reflect how the Criminal Procedure Code applies to the data. It states that data shared with the Health Ministry will be used for Covid-19 contact tracing.

This note was added: "Also, we want to be transparent with you. TraceTogether data may be used in circumstances where citizen safety and security is or has been affected.

"Authorised police officers may invoke Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) powers to request users to upload their TraceTogether data for criminal investigations. The Singapore Police Force is empowered under the CPC to obtain any data, including TraceTogether data, for criminal investigations."








Related





Singapore to enter Phase 3 of Re-Opening on 28 Dec 2020; COVID-19 vaccines will be free for Singaporeans



TraceTogether data will be used with utmost restraint, say ministers Balakrishnan and Shanmugam in Parliament

$
0
0
Police will access TraceTogether data to help investigate only very serious crimes, Parliament told
COVID-19 contact tracing programme to be stood down when pandemic ends
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 6 Jan 2021

The data collected by TraceTogether will be used with utmost restraint, two ministers said yesterday, as they underscored the importance of maintaining trust in the contact tracing system to curb the spread of Covid-19.

Even though the police have the powers to access the data for criminal investigations, they will do so only for very serious offences, such as murder, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam told Parliament.



Their remarks come after Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan affirmed, in response to a parliamentary question, that TraceTogether data is not precluded from provisions under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) that allow the police to access data needed in criminal investigations.

This had sparked criticism, with some pointing to remarks made in June by Dr Balakrishnan, who oversees the Smart Nation drive, that TraceTogether data would be used "purely for contact tracing, period". "Frankly, I had not thought of the CPC, when I spoke earlier," he admitted yesterday.

He added that he was mindful of the trust reposed in the Government, adding that the cooperation of Singaporeans and their willingness to use TraceTogether have been key to Singapore's fight against Covid-19.

"The reason I asked Speaker's permission to make this clarification is precisely because of this. If there's disquiet, if there's uncertainty, we must answer it, and I must answer it openly, transparently," he said.


Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh said it was important to clarify the issue, noting it had caused consternation. He and Workers' Party MP Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) also said TraceTogether should be widely adopted in the interest of public health.


Citing that 78 per cent of people here have chosen to download the TraceTogether app or collect the token, Dr Balakrishnan said the Government was conscious of the need to protect the personal privacy of these users, and had built it into the design of the program.

He assured Singaporeans that the app collects only Bluetooth proximity data and not GPS location data, and said: "The TraceTogether app and the token were not designed to allow any government agency to track the user."


But TraceTogether data is not exempt from the provisions under Section 20 of the CPC, said Dr Balakrishnan, noting that it would not be reasonable to say that certain classes of data should be "out of reach of the police", especially if they could potentially give leads on, say, terrorism activities and save lives. He disclosed that TraceTogether data had been used in a murder case.

If data is not used in such instances, it would not sit well with Singaporeans at large, added Mr Shanmugam. He also said that the police would delete the data if it was no longer needed for use in court or for trial purposes.


Dr Balakrishnan also said that when the pandemic is over, the TraceTogether programme would be stood down, and much of the data would be deleted.

He said the Ministry of Health may retain epidemiological data, but that it should be stripped of identifying details.


He added: "We do not take the trust of Singaporeans lightly. We cannot prevail in the battle against Covid-19 if Singaporeans did not trust the public health authorities, and the Government of Singapore...

"I want to again assure Singaporeans that your confidence is not misplaced. We will protect your privacy."













Police will restrict use of TraceTogether data to 'very serious offences', says Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam
By Hariz Baharudin, The Straits Times, 6 Jan 2021

The police will restrict the use of data collected in Singapore's national contact tracing programme TraceTogether to "very serious offences", Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said yesterday.

Addressing concerns raised in Parliament about the data being accessed for criminal investigations, the Minister said: "While that requirement is not in the legislation, it will be carefully considered within the police, and discretion will be exercised in seeking this information."

Yesterday, Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation Initiative Vivian Balakrishnan also revealed to the House that data meant for contact tracing had been used once in a murder investigation.

He made his unscheduled remarks a day after Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan said the police had the power under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) to obtain TraceTogether data in carrying out a criminal investigation.

Mr Tan's statement prompted widespread reactions online.


After Dr Balakrishnan's remarks about the matter, Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh (Aljunied GRC) asked under what circumstances the police would call on TraceTogether data.

The Workers' Party chief said: "Some clarification of this would be quite important for members of the public because everybody wants TraceTogether to succeed, in view of the public health considerations. But this particular point has caused consternation and that also probably explains why Minister has decided to make this clarification."

In his response to Mr Singh, Mr Shanmugam noted that the police have a duty to use the powers vested in them under the CPC.

"To give you an example, let's say there is a murder... and information is available on the TraceTogether token," the minister said.

"If police chose not to seek that information, you can imagine how the victim's family and indeed the rest of Singapore might react to that situation. You could even argue that there can be a judicial review application in such a situation."


On the murder case where TraceTogether data was used, Dr Balakrishnan, who is also Foreign Minister, said he was not privy to operational details and not in a position to comment further on the investigation.

Mr Murali Pillai (Bukit Batok), chairman of the Home Affairs and Law Government Parliamentary Committee, noted that in the general data protection regulations of the European Union, the police may access personal data in relation to detection, prevention, investigation as well as prosecution for criminal offences.

"So, in a sense, there is parity in relation to the Singapore situation with that of the situation in the EU," he said.

Dr Balakrishnan also brought up a dispute between technology giant Apple and the United States' Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to highlight the potential imbalance between the authorities' investigative power and an individual's right to privacy.

In 2016, the FBI took Apple to court after the company declined to create new software for it to unlock an iPhone recovered from a terrorist who, in a December 2015 attack in San Bernardino, California, killed 14 people and injured 22. The FBI later found a third party to assist in unlocking the iPhone.

Mr Vikram Nair (Sembawang GRC) said he supported the use of TraceTogether in such investigations because it is not only helpful in finding out who may have been near the scene of the crime, but could also exonerate people who are wrongly accused.










Contact tracing programme to be stood down when pandemic ends
Much of data collected will be deleted, says Vivian; MOH may retain anonymised epidemiological data for research
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 6 Jan 2021

The TraceTogether programme will be stood down when the Covid-19 pandemic ends, and much of the data collected will be deleted, said Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan yesterday.

He added that the Ministry of Health (MOH) may want to retain epidemiological data for research purposes, but that "it should be anonymised, it should not be personalised, it should not be individualised".

He gave this assurance yesterday as he told Parliament that the purpose of the TraceTogether programme is for contact tracing so that any chains of transmission of Covid-19 can be quickly broken.

The issue of how the data can be used came up for discussion in the House yesterday, after a reply to a parliamentary question the day before sparked a furore.

Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan had said in a response to a question from Mr Christopher de Souza (Holland-Bukit Timah GRC) that under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), the police have the power to obtain data for criminal investigations, and TraceTogether data is not exempt.

Some had asked if this was inconsistent with what Dr Balakrishnan had said before - that the programme was to be used for contact tracing only.


Dr Balakrishnan, who is Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation Initiative, acknowledged that he had misspoken. "After I realised that the CPC applied to this, I did have sleepless nights wondering: Should I try to persuade my colleagues to change the law?" he added.

"But having thought about it, discussed, consulted people both within and outside this House, I've come to the conclusion that right now we are doing well. We are able to keep Singapore safe, we are able to deal with the current crisis," he said.

"And so long as this Government is able to maintain our reputation for openness, transparency, reliability, I think we are still on the right track."

Several MPs, such as Ms Tin Pei Ling (MacPherson), Mr de Souza, and Mr Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) had asked yesterday how the police would handle the data used for criminal investigations.

To this, Dr Balakrishnan and Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said the police would obtain the data only for investigations into serious offences, such as murder or terrorism.

Separately, a Ministry of Home Affairs spokesman said the powers under the Criminal Procedure Code will have to be exercised if the data cannot be obtained voluntarily, such as when the data belongs to a suspect in a case.

The spokesman noted that it is common for witnesses and victims to volunteer data to the police.

TraceTogether, developed for contact tracing during the coronavirus pandemic, relies on a smartphone app or tokens to collect Bluetooth proximity data to establish who people have come into physical contact with.

Yesterday, Dr Balakrishnan stressed that this data is kept on people's phones or TraceTogether tokens and is automatically purged after 25 days if not used for contact tracing purposes.

He also noted that MPs and others have suggested on numerous occasions before that TraceTogether should be made compulsory, since Covid-19 presents a clear and present threat.

But he had pushed as much as possible to make it voluntary because he believed that the programme could achieve success only if people fully understood its purpose and voluntarily cooperate, he said.

Describing TraceTogether as "perhaps the world's most successful contact tracing programme", Dr Balakrishnan credited this to people's willingness to participate in it, and thanked them for their trust and understanding and for taking collective responsibility.

He added that this is why the Government had wanted to be completely above board and transparent in addressing the use of TraceTogether data in Parliament.

Noting that each society has had to find a balance between protecting public health during the pandemic on the one hand, and personal privacy on the other, Dr Balakrishnan said: "I believe it is possible to find that optimal point - by being transparent, by being open, by being diligent, disciplined and doing our best all the time collectively."










Parliament: Police's ability to use TraceTogether data raises questions on trust
By Hariz Baharudin, The Straits Times, 6 Jan 2021

The revelation that TraceTogether data can be used for police investigations has raised questions over trust in government, especially in relation to data privacy, said observers yesterday.

Associate Professor Eugene Tan from the Singapore Management University (SMU) said the news came across as the Government backtracking on its earlier assurance that TraceTogether would be used only for contact tracing.

"It clearly undermines their trust and credibility," said the former Nominated MP.

"This damage could undermine its future efforts, given its reiteration that Singapore has only managed to keep Covid-19 under control due to the people's trust in the Government's measures."

Former Nominated MP Calvin Cheng said in a Facebook post that the Government "should have been upfront that some privacy will be sacrificed for safety and security".

After Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan on Monday said police are empowered under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) to obtain TraceTogether data for criminal investigations, netizens were quick to cite remarks by Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation Initiative Vivian Balakrishnan during a June 8 press conference.

He had said then that TraceTogether data would be used "purely for contact tracing, period".



National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser noted that Singaporeans generally have a high degree of trust in the Government.

But he suggested that an additional layer of safeguards should be created to allay concerns about data privacy, and make sure such data is not misused.

This could come in the form of a committee comprising prominent public figures to which the police would be accountable to, should they plan to use the TraceTogether data, he said.

"I don't think there's an easy, straightforward response to this issue," he added. "The best safeguard, in my view, is the degree to which citizens trust the Government and police that any data collected would only be used to protect citizens, rather than against them."

Ms Sheena Jacob, a partner at law firm CMS Holborn Asia, said that people's concerns about how their TraceTogether data could be used is a communications and public relations issue.

She called for better clarity around how this data will be used, to provide assurance to Singaporeans and encourage them to participate in the national contact tracing programme.

SMU's Prof Tan suggested that the Government exclude TraceTogether data from the CPC's ambit, given its original intended use for contact tracing as well as the need to convince as many people as possible to get on it.

He added: "A by-the-way or incidental use of TraceTogether should be resisted because it is far more important to have many people use the programme."

But others noted that TraceTogether data is not the only piece of information that the authorities can request, and that the law allows the police to ask for any document or data they deem necessary for investigations.

Mr Gilbert Leong, a senior partner at law firm Dentons Rodyk & Davidson, said it was not practical for the Government to review the law and declare to the public the effect of existing laws on new initiatives each time it launches something like TraceTogether.

He added that there was no backtracking of previous assurances from the Government.

While the Government only uses TraceTogether data for contact tracing, it cannot ignore provisions in the law to use the data for law enforcement, he said.

Lawyers who spoke to The Straits Times echoed a point that Dr Balakrishnan made on how the CPC applies not only to TraceTogether, but to other kinds of sensitive data protected by privacy laws such as phone or banking records.

Mr Jonathan Kok, a technology lawyer at Withers KhattarWong, said that the police have always been empowered under the CPC to issue a written order to require a person to produce any document or data they believe is necessary for their investigations.

"So if the police require a person to produce his TraceTogether device for their investigations, they are already empowered to do so under the CPC," he said.

Additional reporting by Kenny Chee and Jean Iau










Parliament: MPs query when and how TraceTogether data might be used by police, and if confidence will be affected
The Straits Times, 6 Jan 2021

Several MPs yesterday had questions for Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation Initiative Vivian Balakrishnan and Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam following the disclosure in Parliament on Monday that TraceTogether data can be used in police investigations, and yesterday's clarification on how it will be used judiciously. Here are edited excerpts of the exchange.




Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh (Aljunied GRC):

(On the) comment Minister made about the police judiciously using information collected by TraceTogether, can the Minister further explain under what circumstances the police would be calling on that information?

The expectation cannot be that this information would be used at first instance whenever a police investigation commences.

Some clarification of this would be quite important for members of the public because everybody wants TraceTogether to succeed in view of the public health considerations.

But this particular point has caused consternation and that also probably explains why Minister has decided to make this clarification.

Mr Shanmugam: Under Section 20 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), the police are authorised to recover, seek any information within the possession of a person.

Let's say there is a murder and information is available on the TraceTogether token. If police choose not to seek that information, you can imagine how the victim's family and the rest of Singapore might react to that. You could even argue that there can be a judicial review application in such a situation.

However, given that this TraceTogether token is necessary for dealing with the epidemic and it is of national importance and its purposes are to help us deal with the pandemic, the police approach has been - and will be - that it is pretty much restricted to very serious offences. And while that requirement is not in the legislation, it will be carefully considered within the police, and discretion will be exercised in seeking this information.

Mr Christopher de Souza (Holland-Bukit Timah GRC):

Will the data be deleted at the end of the investigations if it doesn't yield anything, or at the end of the case?

Mr Shanmugam: If the data is of no particular use, yes, it will be deleted, otherwise it will have to be produced in court... or used for trial purposes even if not produced in court.

Mr Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC):

Minister Balakrishnan just said that once the pandemic has passed, the TraceTogether programme will be stood down. Will the data that is collected, including data that is beyond 25 days, will that be stored on a server and will that still be accessible by the police if they invoke the CPC?

And has the Government considered the impact that yesterday's clarification would have on the adoption and the usage of the TraceTogether app as well as the token, because although we might have 78 per cent adoption, there is no real way of finding out whether people are actually using the system?

Dr Balakrishnan: First, let me deal with the data in your phones and in your tokens. All that is encrypted and it is auto purged after 25 days. So, you don't need to wait for the end of the pandemic before your longer-term historical data, beyond 25 days, is auto deleted.

Second, what impact does all this open discussion have on participation and on the way we handle the pandemic itself? There were people who said: "Well, you have got a tool, make it compulsory, just enforce it. This is a clear and present emergency." And Members will recall that on numerous occasions in this House and outside, I have asked that to the maximum extent, I am going to try to make this voluntary - a much harder target, an approach which requires constant explanation, and sometimes I will get it wrong. And when I get it wrong, I will just come clean and say so.

You should be asking me: Why do you take such a leceh, laborious approach? And that is because I believe that our victory over this pandemic is not by us sitting up here issuing rules and edicts, but that our people must understand not only the measures that we are implementing, but why we are implementing it, the spirit behind it, so that with their understanding and voluntary and full cooperation, we can achieve success.

And the reason we are now in this happy situation, in stark contrast to virtually anywhere else in the world, is not just because we have got two wonderful co-chairmen, Minister Gan (Kim Yong) and Mr Lawrence Wong, and it is not because we have got such technological wizardry, but it is trust, it is understanding, it is cooperation and it is collective responsibility.

So, the purpose of the answer to the question yesterday by Minister of State (for Home Affairs) Desmond Tan is that we want to be completely above board and transparent. The reason I asked Speaker's permission to make this clarification is because of this.

If there is disquiet, if there is uncertainty, we must answer it. We must be forthright, honest, open, transparent... It is in that spirit that we have these open discussions and why I remain confident that the participation rate in contact tracing using the latest tools that we have will remain high, and why I hope we will continue to be one of the bright spots in the world.

I appeal to you, by all means, continue to push us, ask us, question us, disagree with us. This is the attitude by which we will make progress and overcome.

Ms Tin Pei Ling (MacPherson):

The TraceTogether token does not have the GPS function and the data will be deleted after 25 days.

For the handphone app, because the handphone itself has GPS function, would this also apply to the TT applications on phones?

Next, the police have a range of ways of collecting the data or information that they need for criminal investigations. Given the exchanges of Bluetooth information, how is the data from TraceTogether useful to police investigation into crimes?

Lastly, I would like to ask Minister for his reaffirmation that the vast majority of Singaporeans will not be affected by this.

Dr Balakrishnan:

First, the token has no GPS chip, and we have opened it up, we have allowed external parties to dissemble it. So, there is no way the token can keep track of location. Ms Tin makes the point that most smartphones nowadays do have a GPS chip. But we have been very careful in our coding for the TraceTogether app that it does not keep a record of GPS locations.

The only thing the TraceTogether app keeps track of is proximity on the basis of Bluetooth data.

On your second question whether this is useful, that is an operational question which I will leave to the police - whether proximity data is useful or not, and how they would use it.

Your final question was on the assurance that the majority will not be affected. The vast majority of Singaporeans are not involved in or assisting in criminal investigations. In that sense, they are not affected.

But TraceTogether, and its success, affects the welfare and the public health of all of us.

And in that sense, confidence in this programme makes a difference to all of us.

Non-Constituency MP Leong Mun Wai:

How many instances are there where the police have tapped the data from the TraceTogether app?

I would also like the Minister to clarify further, when did he discover that his statement (on TraceTogether being used only for contact tracing) is going to be affected by the CPC?

Two, his message today, is it (that) he wants to apologise that the Government or the Minister had made an oversight, or is he telling us that in Singapore, we should just take it that under the CPC, they will be able to access all the information they have on us?

Dr Balakrishnan:

As far as I am aware, there has been only one, which involved a murder case. But I am not privy to operational details, and I shouldn't be, and therefore I am not in a position to comment further on the investigations.

(When) I made the comments and statements earlier, the CPC was not in my mind. Subsequently, we have been having discussions, especially over the last few weeks, as to whether we should in fact change the law or whether we continue as we are now. In any case, we decided it is better to be upfront.

That is why we are very glad Mr de Souza asked the question and Minister of State Desmond Tan answered it yesterday.

I have been in the House now for almost 20 years and all the staff who have worked with me over the years will know that I am obsessively concerned with accuracy, needless to say, absolute adherence to honesty. And that means over the years, from time to time, when I have misspoken, I have said so.

I have never shied away from saying so because, as I said, it is far more important to maintain trust. And I might be right or I might be wrong or I might have mistaken something or overlooked something, but rest assured when I discover it, I will say so, and to the best extent possible, we will find a solution together.

That is my approach, and I don't see any need to change from that, and I hope you understand.

Mr Murali Pillai (Bukit Batok):

I recall Mr Giam, in the debate on the Personal Data Protection (Amendment) Bill, raised the possibility of linking the standards under the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and the government standards in relation to data protection with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union.

Now, as far as the general data protection regulations of the EU are concerned, there is a carve-out in relation to police investigations.

In fact, police may access personal data in relation to detection, prevention, investigation as well as prosecution for criminal offences. So, in a sense, there is parity in relation to the Singapore situation with that of the situation in the EU.

Mr Giam:

My purpose for raising that intervention yesterday was mainly in the interest of maximising the adoption of TraceTogether.

I have been a strong advocate of it on the ground with my residents, in the face of quite a bit of scepticism about the system. And I have actually tried to convince people to not only use the token, but also use the app, and use the app instead of using the token if they have a mobile phone. I just want to put on record that I do support the TraceTogether system and I do encourage Singaporeans to use the token or the app as much as they can.

In response to Mr Murali's point about the GDPR and the PDPA, I don't intend to open up a whole debate about this, but just to clarify that what I said during the debate was that the GDPR does have carve-outs for security purposes.

So, it is possible to have a PDPA that has carve-outs that allow the police to do certain things and access certain data. So, it is not incongruent to what I said earlier on.







Police can use TraceTogether data for criminal investigations
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 5 Jan 2021

The police can obtain any data under Singapore's jurisdiction for the purposes of criminal investigations, and this includes TraceTogether data, Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan told the House yesterday.

Mr Christopher de Souza (Holland-Bukit Timah GRC) had asked if data collected under the programme will be used for criminal investigations, a concern expressed by some online.

Mr Tan replied that TraceTogether was conceived and implemented for contact tracing to fight Covid-19, and measures had been put in place to protect the data. But this does not preclude its use in criminal investigations as the police are empowered under the Criminal Procedure Code to obtain the data for such probes, he added.

In this regard, he said, data collected by TraceTogether is treated like any other data under Singapore's jurisdiction.


Asked by Workers' Party's Mr Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) if this is in violation of the TraceTogether privacy statement, Mr Tan said that other than for such investigations, the data is "indeed to be used only for contact tracing and for the purpose of fighting (the) Covid situation".

As custodian of the TraceTogether data, he added, the Government has put in place stringent measures such as allowing only authorised officers to access it, using it only for authorised purposes and storing it on secured servers. Under the Public Sector (Governance) Act, public officers who recklessly or knowingly disclose the data without authorisation or misuse it may be fined $5,000, jailed for two years, or both, he said.

His reply sparked debate online about whether this was an about-turn. Some cited past remarks by Education Minister Lawrence Wong and Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan on TraceTogether data being used only for contact tracing.

Mr Wong's office has clarified that he did not say such data would be used only for contact tracing.

What he had said, in June, was: "There is no intention to use a TraceTogether app or TraceTogether token as a means of picking up breaches of existing rules... The app and the device, plus SafeEntry, combined are meant to provide us with information in a timely manner so that we can do speedy, and fast and effective contact tracing."

Yesterday, the TraceTogether Privacy Safeguards page was updated to reflect how the Criminal Procedure Code applies to the data. It states that data shared with the Health Ministry will be used for Covid-19 contact tracing.

This note was added: "Also, we want to be transparent with you. TraceTogether data may be used in circumstances where citizen safety and security is or has been affected.

"Authorised police officers may invoke Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) powers to request users to upload their TraceTogether data for criminal investigations. The Singapore Police Force is empowered under the CPC to obtain any data, including TraceTogether data, for criminal investigations."


Matched Retirement Savings Scheme: 440,000 CPF members eligible for new scheme with government matching retirement account top-ups

$
0
0
Govt will match cash top-ups of up to $600 a year in their Retirement Account for 5 years from 2021 to 2025
By Sue-Ann Tan, The Straits Times, 7 Jan 2021

Thousands of people are set to get matching sums of up to $600 a year to top up their Central Provident Fund (CPF) Retirement Account, under a new scheme which kicks off this year.

The move to help more older CPF members attain the Basic Retirement Sum and provide them with retirement adequacy comes through the Matched Retirement Savings Scheme, which will benefit some 440,000 people. They account for about 53 per cent of CPF members aged between 55 and 70, said the CPF Board yesterday.

The scheme allows anyone, including family members, employers or members of the community, to make top-ups to a person's Retirement Account. Each dollar of cash top-up will be matched by the Government for the next five years, capped at $600 per year.

Top-ups can be made on the CPF website or mobile app. They also do not have to be made in a lump sum. This means that those who make small and regular top-ups throughout the year using Giro can receive the matching grant.

CPF Board chief executive Augustin Lee said: "About half of CPF members turning 55 today have yet to attain the Basic Retirement Sum. This matching grant by the Government will encourage them to save more with CPF.

"There's no better savings interest rate than what CPF pays now. We hope their loved ones and the wider community can also pitch in. Even small amounts saved consistently can go a long way in securing CPF members' retirement needs."


Those who are eligible for the scheme must be between 55 and 70 years old, and have less than the Basic Retirement Sum of $93,000 this year in their Retirement Account.

Other criteria include average monthly income, annual value of their residence, and property ownership.

Eligible members will be notified by the CPF Board this month. They can also check their eligibility on the CPF website.

Ms Selena Ling, OCBC Bank's head of treasury research and strategy, said: "Retirement adequacy concerns are increasingly pertinent for an ageing population like Singapore's... While current inflationary pressures are mild due to the pandemic, nevertheless, inflation levels are expected to return to positive territory this year and Singaporeans are also living longer."

Associate Professor Lawrence Loh from the National University of Singapore Business School added: "The matching incentive will help develop a habit of augmenting the retirement funds early in the CPF contributor's life."

The CPF Board is also partnering grassroots leaders to encourage the community to build up the retirement savings of the vulnerable.

Donors from Bukit Timah pitched in to help 100 residents, with the first batch of top-ups made yesterday.

Ms Sim Ann, adviser to Bukit Timah grassroots organisations, said: "Not everyone might have the cash to do the top-up. This is the reason why I feel there is a part for kind strangers to play in this process."

Ms Sim, who is also Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information, and National Development, made a top-up to the account of Madam Salmiah, a 62-year-old hawker.

Another beneficiary, Mr Lau Eng Kwee, 67, stopped work as a hawker in 2019 due to cancer. He has to support two adult children with learning disabilities and his wife. He said: "My family depends on me so these CPF payouts are useful in helping me to go on."




























Is the COVID-19 Vaccine safe for me?

$
0
0
More frequent tests, additional requirements likely for those who do not take COVID-19 vaccine: Lawrence Wong
By Ang Hwee Min, Channel NewsAsia, 8 Jan 2021

Individuals who choose not to take the COVID-19 vaccine may need to go through “more frequent testing”, said Minister for Education Lawrence Wong on Thursday (Jan 7). 

In an interview on CNA’s Talking Point, the co-chair of the COVID-19 multi-ministry task force spoke of "tangible benefits" for those who choose to get vaccine shots.

“It may well be, if the data validates all the hypotheses, that transmission risk can be significantly reduced. It may well be that travellers coming back need not serve SHN (stay-home notice) or will serve a shorter SHN. So those will be the benefits of getting a vaccination besides the fact that you are protecting yourself and your loved ones,” he added. 

“There will be these tangible benefits and those who choose not to be vaccinated, well, then you have to live with more frequent tests, you have to live with quarantine, you have to live with all of these other additional requirements.”


EARLY BETS TO SECURE VACCINES

Mr Wong also explained why the vaccine made by the Chinese biopharmaceutical company Sinovac was picked as one of the three vaccines to be used in Singapore.

The vaccine is 78 per cent effective in protecting against the coronavirus, according to the results of a study announced on Thursday by Brazilian state health officials. More than 12,000 health workers in Brazil participated in the study.

The Government convened an expert panel to look at making early purchases of vaccines “as early as April”, Mr Wong said.

“We have to make early bets in order for Singapore to be near the front of the queue for vaccines. And that's what is happening today.”

At the time, there was no clinical data or “full-fledged information” available from any vaccine company, said Mr Wong.


With only "very early stage clinical information" available, the committee and experts narrowed down the selections to 35 vaccine candidates. They eventually decided on the three vaccines - Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinovac - based on safety and effectiveness based on the preliminary data that was available then, he added.

“And that's the three that we have made advanced purchases for, with the aim of building a diversified portfolio of vaccines that will be safe and effective for use in Singapore,” said Mr Wong.

When asked by Talking Point host Steve Chia if this approach by Singapore could be characterised as "hedging (its) chances", Mr Wong replied: "Very much so."

According to the Economic Development Board (EDB), the vaccine panel made its first advance purchase agreement with Moderna in June, securing it with a downpayment. In August, it bought the Sinovac vaccine and was in advance talks with Pfizer-BioNTech.

Singapore’s Health Sciences Authority (HSA) eventually approved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine first. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced in a televised address on Dec 15, 2020 that the first shipment would arrive by the end of December, with other vaccines expected in the coming months. 


The panel intends to continue to see whether it can make further purchases to add to the vaccine portfolio, said Mr Wong.

“That's our overall approach. It's not to make a single bet, we know that we've made some early bets, some may turn out positive as I think Pfizer has now been authorised, Moderna looks like it's going to be, it has been approved in America,” he added.

“We are looking at the data, we will await that data full data from Sinovac and then the process will continue for other vaccine candidates.”

VACCINE SAFETY

The Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines use the new messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, while Sinovac is a traditional inactivated virus vaccine.

mRNA vaccines teach our cells to make a protein that triggers an immune response inside our bodies, said director of communicable diseases at the Ministry of Health (MOH) Associate Professor Vernon Lee. This is different from traditional vaccines that put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies.


“This is basically the key - the actual mRNA degrades very quickly in the body, so body temperature will only remain for about 48 hours. And thereafter, there's no additional component of the vaccine that remains in the individual,” added Assoc Prof Lee, who was also speaking on Talking Point.

Although the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the only one approved so far, as additional vaccines come onboard, there will be some vaccines that can or cannot be used in certain subpopulations, he added.

For example, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine cannot be used in people who have severe allergic reactions or a history of anaphylaxis, said Assoc Prof Lee. For now, children under 16, pregnant women and individuals who are severely immunocompromised are also excluded from using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

“Other vaccines might be able to be used in different populations. So we need to wait for more information, and it is which vaccine is more ... applicable or relevant to that particular population if it's offered, we will encourage people to get that vaccine,” he added.

The third guest on Talking Point, Associate Professor Benjamin Ong, senior vice president (Health Education & Resources) at the National University of Singapore (NUS), said the data for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is “most complete”, and experts are “confident enough” to recommend its use in Singapore’s setting.


CHOICE OF VACCINE

On the subject of whether people would be allowed to choose their vaccine, Mr Wong said that the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines worked similarly, and efficacy rates from evidence around the world were “all about the same”.

“So really, there's not much to differentiate between these two vaccines. I think at this point in time, we have Pfizer only, there's nothing to choose from. So let's go with Pfizer, get people vaccinated on the Pfizer vaccine,” he added.

“If later on other vaccines are authorised, be it Moderna or Sinovac, then we have to think about whether choice may be extended. Or perhaps some vaccines work better for certain sub-segments of the population, and then we might allocate vaccines differently as well.”

VIRUS MUTATIONS

When asked about the new strain of COVID-19 that surfaced after the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were approved around the world, Assoc Profs Ong and Lee said mutations occur “all the time”, and are part of "natural evolution”.

Prof Lee likened the mutations to a car getting a different licence plate or colour.

“The same make, same model, different licence plate, we see many of them all around the time. And sometimes you might have a car with new tires, it might be a bit more efficient, move faster, and so on, but it's still the same make,” he added.

“At this point, there's no evidence that it (the virus) has changed to another make, another model, another brand. And we, of course, will be looking out for different strains, different variants that occur all the time.”

From the mutations that have been studied so far, it seems like the vaccines “probably would still work”, said Assoc Prof Ong, adding that this is being actively tested.

“The areas that pertain to the spike protein, for example, are conserved. So from the basic scientific principles, it should still work. And we will know very soon because more than two, three million people now in the UK in the US have received a vaccine. And if it is not going to work, in the next few weeks to months, we will know,” he said.

The variants that have been reported are only those that have been detected, and there may be others that have yet to surface, said Assoc Prof Lee.

“Actually what's important is in addition to the vaccine, we have a very strong border, you know, control regime, plus all the same management measures wearing of masks or contact tracing,” he added.


UNVACCINATED INDIVIDUALS STILL SUSCEPTIBLE

Acknowledging that many people hope to return to a pre-pandemic normal, Mr Wong said that even in a post-COVID-19 world, there would be pandemics with more virulent diseases that arise in the future. 

“I think rather than thinking about let’s go back to life before COVID, I think we should be thinking now about what are the things that we have done during this period that really ought to be permanently part of our new daily routines,” he added.

“And how can we raise our levels of defences, our levels of protection, our levels of hygiene so that we can be more prepared and more resilient in the future?”


Assoc Prof Lee also stressed that individuals who do not get vaccinated are “still susceptible” to being infected with COVID-19.

“Even if we reach that sort of herd immunity or collective protection level, it does not mean that there will be no cases and that’s the same for all other infectious diseases. And the risk of cases occurring in Singapore is not just what we do here but what’s happening in the rest of the world,” he said, adding that an open economy, travel and trade would result in imported cases.

“If we are not vaccinated, every single individual who is not vaccinated, is another naive susceptible individual who then can get infected by those diseases. To protect yourself, you should get vaccinated and then there’s the other benefit of protecting your loved ones and those around you,” said Assoc Prof Lee.

“It is very important for that reason because even if we have a high vaccination coverage, it does not mean no disease. It is not possible to wipe COVID-19 from the face of the earth. We’re going to see this recurring from time to time, so it is important for that personal protection reason.”










COVID-19 vaccine could mean shorter stay-home notice for those who take it: Lawrence Wong
Govt will consider it if data shows vaccination significantly reduces the transmission risks
By Rei Kurohi, The Straits Times, 9 Jan 2021

Travellers who have been vaccinated against Covid-19 may avoid having to serve a lengthy stay-home notice (SHN) when they return to Singapore in the future, Education Minister Lawrence Wong has suggested.

Mr Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry coronavirus task force, said the Government would consider drastically reducing or even doing away with the two-week quarantine requirement if data shows vaccination significantly reduces transmission risks.

He said this was one of the potential "tangible benefits" for those choosing to be vaccinated, besides protection against the virus. "Those who choose not to be vaccinated, you have to live with more frequent tests, you have to live with quarantine, you have to live with all of these other additional requirements," he said on Thursday in an interview on CNA's Talking Point.

"If you have the vaccination, you travel to a high-risk place, you come back, can that SHN be shortened, or even done away with completely? That is the big question," said Mr Wong. "We still don't know the extent to which a vaccination can completely - or how significantly - help reduce transmission risk. So, those studies are still pending. If indeed the data shows that transmission risks can come down significantly with vaccination, then certainly, we will consider reducing drastically the SHN or even doing away with it."

Being vaccinated may also make it possible to travel abroad more freely, depending on the requirements in other countries, Mr Wong noted. "Even without a vaccine today, many Singaporeans can already travel freely to other countries without a quarantine there because they regard Singaporeans as coming from a low-risk jurisdiction," said the minister.

"I think with a vaccination, it will certainly help, but those are regulations that are outside of our control."


The discussion, hosted by CNA presenter Steven Chia, also featured Associate Professor Vernon Lee, director of the communicable diseases division at the Ministry of Health, and Associate Professor Benjamin Ong, who chairs the expert committee on Covid-19 vaccination convened by the MOH.

Prof Lee debunked a number of rumours about the vaccine, including one that it can cause cancer.

"At this point, there is no evidence that this vaccine will result in such a side effect," he said in response to a question from a viewer. He added that most of the known side effects are mild, but the vaccine can cause severe allergic reactions in some people. The messenger RNA used in the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, currently the only one being administered here, also does not incorporate itself into human DNA, Prof Lee noted. "In fact, after about 48 hours, it just dissipates in the body and it disintegrates, so there is no evidence at this point that there is any such concern," he said of the cancer rumour.

There is also no evidence that a patient who receives the vaccine will have difficulty getting pregnant, Prof Lee said in response to another question.

Prof Ong said the likelihood that the vaccine will cause long-term issues is "very remote". Nonetheless, he said the expert committee decided to play it safe and has recommended pregnant women should wait until after they have given birth before being vaccinated.

Asked about the new strain of the virus that has emerged in Britain and spread to various countries, including Singapore, Prof Ong said mutations occur all the time, adding that the vaccine is likely to still work on the new strain. This is because the mutated virus features the same spike protein as the earlier strain.


Singapore has also purchased a vaccine developed by US pharmaceutical firm Moderna, which similarly uses mRNA technology to introduce the genetic code to the body to produce a piece of the coronavirus known as a spike protein, thereby helping the patient's cells recognise and develop an immune response to Covid-19. The Republic has also bought stocks of a more traditional inactivated virus vaccine produced by China's Sinovac.

Mr Wong said Singapore had to make "early bets" on these vaccines as long ago as last April, before there was extensive clinical data on their efficacy, to ensure Singapore would be near the front of the queue.


























Related






PM Lee Hsien Loong receives COVID-19 vaccine on 8 January 2021 as Singapore starts nationwide vaccination drive

$
0
0
Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong receives first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, urges others to follow
PM Lee is the first Cabinet member to be vaccinated
By Joyce Teo, The Straits Times, 9 Jan 2021

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong rolled up his sleeve for the Covid-19 vaccine injection yesterday, as the nationwide vaccination effort to combat the coronavirus swung into high gear.

A left-hander, PM Lee was administered the shot in his right arm by nurse Fatimah Mohd Shah, and experienced no side effects despite a 30-minute precautionary wait.

"It is painless, it is effective and it is important," he told reporters at Singapore General Hospital (SGH), where he received his first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the only one to be approved here so far.

"I hope that Singaporeans will take it up as we roll it out."


The Health Ministry's director of medical services Kenneth Mak, as well as 88 healthcare staff, also received their shots yesterday, as the vaccination drive for healthcare workers and front-line staff gets under way.

The vaccine is free and will be rolled out progressively, with most people here able to get vaccinated by the end of the year.

The elderly, those at greater risk of severe disease and those in jobs or settings with a high risk of super-spreading events will be able to receive the Covid-19 jabs from next month.


Widespread vaccinations will be critical in ending the pandemic and allowing life to become more normal around the world.

While Covid-19 numbers in Singapore remain low, they have been inching up as measures were relaxed since phase three of reopening started on Dec 28.

Imported cases, in particular, have been on the rise, as more people are allowed into the country.

There were eight new cases in the community in the past week, and 10 the week before.


Yesterday, 8 Jan, there were 23 new coronavirus cases, taking Singapore's total to 58,836.

As the pandemic continues to rage around the world, countries are urgently rolling out Covid-19 vaccinations, with Britain the first to start a mass vaccination drive with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on Dec 8.


PM Lee will be taking his second dose of the vaccine in three weeks.

"We have got ample vaccines coming in, we ordered them early. We have enough for everybody in Singapore, all the residents, all the citizens and even the non-citizens who are staying here," he said yesterday.

He added: "It will make us safer, and it will make you and your loved ones safer too. So, please take it when you get it."


Senior staff nurse Fatimah, 41, a veteran of almost 20 years at SGH, learnt the night before that she was going to be the one administering PM Lee's injection.

She was "a bit nervous", but said she felt honoured, her smile shining through her mask in the wefie that PM Lee took with her later.

PM Lee, who posted photos of his experience on Facebook, wrote: "In the gentle and capable hands of Senior Staff Nurse Fatimah. I barely felt the needle!"

Ms Chang Yan Jun, 25, a radiographer in SGH's emergency department, also got vaccinated yesterday. "At first, I was a bit nervous, but then, after taking the vaccine, I feel like actually, it is (okay). I don't have any (discomfort)," she said.

The vaccine was also rolled out to the staff at other public healthcare institutions such as Changi General Hospital and Sengkang General Hospital yesterday.

Staff at private healthcare group Parkway Pantai and Mount Alvernia and Farrer Park hospitals will get their shots starting today.

The Government has said that more vaccines are set to arrive soon, including those by American biotechnology firm Moderna and China's Sinovac.


















































Related








Singapore to enter Phase 3 of Re-Opening on 28 Dec 2020; COVID-19 vaccines will be free for Singaporeans


In silencing President Donald Trump, Twitter and Facebook show where power lies

$
0
0
The muzzling of a president by Twitter and Facebook will stoke free-speech debate and deepen conservatives' grievance over Silicon Valley's political bias
By Kevin Roose, Published The Straits Times, 11 Jan 2021

In the end, two billionaires from California did what legions of politicians, prosecutors and power brokers had tried and failed to do for years: They pulled the plug on President Donald Trump.

Twitter's decision to permanently suspend Mr Trump's account on Friday "due to the risk of further incitement of violence", after a decision a day earlier by Facebook to ban the President at least to the end of his term, was a watershed moment in the history of social media.

Both companies had spent years defending Mr Trump's continued presence on their platforms, only to change course days before the end of his presidency.

Why these companies' chief executives - Mr Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Mr Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook - decided to act now is no mystery. They have been under pressure for years to hold Mr Trump accountable, and that pressure intensified enormously this past week, as everyone from Ms Michelle Obama to the companies' own employees called for a permanent ban in the wake of Wednesday's deadly Capitol riot.


These companies, corporate autocracies masquerading as mini-democracies, often portray their moderation decisions as the results of a kind of formulaic due process, as if "don't incite an insurrectionist mob" had been in the community guidelines all along.

But high-stakes calls like these typically come down to gut decisions made under extreme duress. In this case, Mr Dorsey and Mr Zuckerberg considered the evidence, consulted their teams, weighed the trade-offs and risks of inaction - including the threat of a worker revolt that could damage their ability to attract top talent - and decided that they'd seen enough.

Journalists and historians will spend years unpacking the improvisational nature of these bans, and scrutinising why they arrived just as Mr Trump was losing his power and Democrats were poised to take control of Congress and the White House.

The bans have also turned up the heat on a free-speech debate that has been simmering for years. On Friday night, pro-Trump Republicans raged, claiming Twitter's move was an example of Silicon Valley's tyrannical speech controls.


THE SHAPERS OF PUBLIC DISCOURSE

And while many liberals cheered Twitter's decision as an overdue and appropriate step to prevent more violence, some also cringed at the thought of so much control resting in so few hands. "We understand the desire to permanently suspend him now," Ms Kate Ruane, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, wrote in a statement on Friday. "But it should concern everyone when companies like Facebook and Twitter wield the unchecked power to remove people from platforms that have become indispensable for the speech of billions - especially when political realities make those decisions easier."

Above all, Mr Trump's muzzling provides a clarifying lesson in where power resides in our digital society - not just in the precedent of law or the checks and balances of government, but in the ability to deny access to the platforms that shape our public discourse.

Mr Dorsey's and Mr Zuckerberg's names have never appeared on a ballot. But they have a kind of authority that no elected official on earth can claim.

This power appears mostly in subtle and unspoken ways - like the eerily calm, hostage-like video Mr Trump filmed on Thursday, hours after Twitter and Facebook threatened to delete his accounts.

In the video, he conceded that he had lost the election and condemned the Capitol attack, two things he had stubbornly refused to do even as Congress talked of impeaching him a second time and his own Cabinet members discussed invoking the 25th Amendment to remove him from office.

Legal and political concerns certainly pressured the President to adopt a more conciliatory stance. But there was another interpretation of his change of heart: Mr Trump would rather lose his presidency than his posting privileges.

In some ways, the President - who used to boast that the platforms "would never" ban him - would be correct to make his social media accounts a priority over his remaining days in office.

A successful impeachment would be an embarrassing end to his political career. But losing his huge online following - 88 million followers on Twitter, and 35 million on Facebook - would deprive him of cultural influence long into the future.

It takes away the privilege he seems to covet most: the ability to commandeer the world's attention with the push of a button.


LIMITATIONS OF ALT-PLATFORMS

Mr Trump is no ordinary inmate in Twitter jail. Unlike other de-platformed partisans, he has a huge right-wing media apparatus that will follow him wherever he goes, and legions of followers who will amplify what he says, no matter where he says it.

His followers have pledged to decamp to so-called "alt-platforms" like Gab and Parler, which have less stringent rules. But these apps are tiny by comparison and, because they are largely unmoderated, often amount to last-resort echo chambers for noxious extremists. If none of the alt-platforms suffices, Mr Trump may well start his own social network, one where he can post with abandon. And if all else fails, he can always call into Fox News.

But rebuilding a huge audience on a new platform is no simple thing, even for a former president, and these alt-platforms face their own legal and technical battles. Parler itself suffered a major blow on Saturday when Apple joined Google in blocking it from their app stores, citing the app's lax moderation policies.

No matter where he ends up posting, it's doubtful that Mr Trump will ever have what he had in Facebook and Twitter - a frictionless soapbox, where he could joust with his enemies as well as bask in the adoration of his fans, and a direct line to every newsroom in the country.

In some ways, Mr Trump's social media dominance was an accident of history. In 2009, when he first joined Twitter, he was a reality TV star looking for attention, and Twitter was a fledgling social network that needed high-profile celebrities to attract growth. It was a perfect match, and he soon began honing the freewheeling, stream-of-consciousness style that would become his signature.


For years, he used the platform to weigh in on everything from wind turbines (ugly) to president Barack Obama's birth certificate (fake) to writer-producer Jon Stewart's comedy (overrated). Mr Trump's filter-free musings turned out to be engagement gold for Twitter, which recommended his tweets to millions of new users through its algorithms.

Social media became an even more powerful asset for him when he turned to politics. And after he got elected president, thanks in large part to his dominance on Twitter and Facebook, he used his accounts in ways no world leader ever had: to announce major policies, bully foreign governments, whip up votes in Congress, hire and fire senior officials, and interact with a motley crew of racists and cranks.

In time, we learnt that the version of Trump we saw on our feeds was, in many ways, more real than the flesh-and-blood human who occupied the Oval Office. People who wanted to know what Mr Trump actually thought about kneeling NFL players or House Speaker Nancy Pelosi didn't watch him read a prepared speech or hold a news conference. They looked to @realDonaldTrump, the most honest representation of who he was.

The most predictable result of Mr Trump's dismissal from Twitter - and, most likely, a similar ban he'll face from Facebook after Inauguration Day - is that it will become a rallying cry for conservatives who see themselves as victims of Silicon Valley censorship.

"We are living Orwell's 1984," the President's son Donald Trump Jr fumed on his (still operational, 6.5 million-follower) Twitter account. "Free-speech no longer exists in America. It died with big tech."

No serious thinker believes that Twitter and Facebook, as private companies, are obligated to give any user a platform, just as no one doubts that a restaurant owner can boot an unruly diner for causing a scene.

But there are legitimate questions about whether a small handful of unelected tech executives, accountable only to their boards and shareholders (and, in Mr Zuckerberg's case, to neither) should wield such enormous power.

These actions also raise longer-term questions, such as whether the business models of social media companies are fundamentally compatible with a healthy democracy, or whether a generation of Twitter-addicted politicians can ever be untaught the lesson that racking up retweets is a surer path to power than governing responsibly.

Mr Trump's ban will have tangible effects on the spread of disinformation about the 2020 election, much of which originated on his accounts.

SPLINTERING OF AMERICAN INTERNET

It will also probably accelerate the splintering of the American Internet along partisan lines, a process that was already under way, and intensify calls on the right for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields social media companies from legal liability for their users' posts.

In the short term, people worried about a slippery slope of censorship on Twitter and Facebook can take some comfort in the fact that Mr Dorsey and Mr Zuckerberg appear to hate playing the role of speech police, and avoid doing it whenever possible.

For them, Mr Trump's case is unlike any other - a celebrity who rode their platforms to the presidency, then used them to stage an attack on American democracy itself - and their decisions to ban him aren't likely to set much of a precedent.

But that will be cold comfort to Mr Trump, who now finds himself on the wrong side of the bright line these companies have drawn. The President railed against Twitter's ban on Friday night, releasing a fiery statement through the White House press office that claimed, "We will not be SILENCED!" But in the ways that matter most to him, he already had been.

NYTIMES







COVID-19 vaccinations for seniors in Singapore will begin in late-January 2021

$
0
0
8 vaccination centres will be set up by the end of February as Singapore ramps up vaccine roll-out

More than 6,200 people in Singapore have received their first doses of the COVID-19 vaccine so far

Letters will be progressively sent to seniors to invite them to book an appointment for their vaccination
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 14 Jan 2021

Singapore's vaccination programme is kicking into high gear, as it expands its scope and increases its pace, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said yesterday.

Eight vaccination centres will be set up by the end of February, including two centres at Changi Airport Terminal 4 and Raffles City Convention Centre that are already operational, as well as two more at the former Hong Kah Secondary School and Woodlands Galaxy Community Club, which will begin running next week.

Another four centres will be ready next month, and more centres will be progressively opened as Singapore expands its vaccination programme, added Mr Gan, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force tackling Covid-19.


Shots will also be given at polyclinics and general practitioner clinics, as well as at healthcare institutions.

Speaking to reporters during a visit to Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital yesterday, Mr Gan said the pace of vaccination is being ramped up from this week, with close to 2,800 vaccinated on Tuesday alone.


More than 6,200 people here have received their first doses of the Covid-19 vaccine so far, and this figure is expected to rise substantially in the coming weeks.

"We are planning to continue to expand the scope of vaccination and to increase the pace of vaccination eventually to cover the whole population in Singapore," he said.

Mr Gan and task force co-chair, Education Minister Lawrence Wong, also received their first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine yesterday.

Mr Wong also announced that the elderly will start receiving their Covid-19 vaccinations from this month. The Government had previously announced that seniors aged 70 and above would start getting jabs from next month.

Letters will be sent out to inform the elderly of when they can make bookings for their vaccinations.


Since Singapore kicked off its vaccination drive on Dec 30, vaccines have been administered to healthcare workers in public and private healthcare institutions.

Front-line workers, including those at airports and sea ports, as well as swabbers and workers in community care facilities, are also being vaccinated.

Letters will be progressively issued to other Singapore residents when their turn to be vaccinated comes. Mr Wong said this expansion of the vaccination programme will be timed together with the arrival of vaccine shipments.


Mr Gan urged Singapore residents to go for the vaccination when they are offered one, stressing that it will collectively provide protection against the coronavirus to the whole population if a high vaccination rate is achieved.

"This, in turn, will allow us to recover from the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic more quickly. It will allow our economy to recover faster, it will also allow us to resume our community activities faster," he said.


If all goes to plan, Singapore will have enough vaccines to vaccinate everyone by the third quarter of this year.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine - the only one approved here to date - requires two injections, given 21 days apart. Singapore is expecting more vaccine deliveries in the next few months, including from American biotechnology firm Moderna and China's Sinovac.

The Sinovac vaccine has yet to be approved, said Mr Gan. The Moderna vaccine, which has a similar efficacy rate as Pfizer's, is under review, Mr Wong said.







The locations of vaccination centres
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 14 Jan 2021

By the end of this month, four Covid-19 vaccination centres will be operational, and two of them started running yesterday.

There will be four more centres by the end of next month, making it possible to vaccinate large numbers of people.

More centres will progressively be opened as Singapore expands its vaccination programme.

This is where the first four are located:

1 South: Raffles City Convention Centre (252 North Bridge Road)

2 East: Changi Airport Terminal 4 (10 Airport Boulevard)

3 North: Woodlands Galaxy Community Club (31 Woodlands Avenue 6)

4 West: Former Hong Kah Secondary School (931 Jurong West Street 42)





Volunteers to help seniors make bookings for their COVID-19 jabs
Those aged 70 and above to get letters on the process; they will start getting jabs later this month
By Hariz Baharudin, The Straits Times, 14 Jan 2021

Seniors will get help to make bookings for their Covid-19 jabs as the Government steps up its roll-out of the vaccine, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong.

Mr Wong, who co-chairs Singapore's multi-ministry task force tackling Covid-19, announced yesterday that the elderly will start receiving their shots from later this month.

Letters will be sent out to inform them when they can make bookings for their vaccinations.


Volunteers will be trained to help seniors make online bookings via a booking system, and information in different languages will be given out at Housing Board estates.

"This process will take a bit of time. So, we will also step up our outreach and engagement efforts, particularly to the elderly across all our HDB estates, to let them know what this is about... and also to help them with the booking because not everybody will be familiar with the IT system," Mr Wong said.

The Government had previously announced that seniors aged 70 and above would start getting jabs from next month, but this has been brought forward.

Mr Wong said seniors will be invited to go to a polyclinic, Public Health Preparedness Clinic or vaccination centre nearest to them for their jab.

The booking system is required to avoid a wastage of vaccines, where the jabs are prepared but no one is there to receive them, added Mr Wong, who spoke to the media after receiving his Pfizer-BioNTech jab at Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital yesterday.

After the elderly, vaccines will be progressively made available to other segments of the population.

Mr Wong said this will be done in phases, and timed together with the arrival of vaccine shipments.

"We do expect a significant ramp-up from now onwards, and once again, we would encourage everyone to step forward, be vaccinated when you are offered the chance to be vaccinated," he added.

In a statement yesterday, the Ministry of Health said residents and clients in the community care sector will also progressively be vaccinated. Nursing homes have begun engaging residents and their next of kin on the vaccinations, added the ministry.

Singapore has about 80 nursing homes, housing some 16,000 residents.

More details on the vaccination for seniors will be provided later.

Singapore's Covid-19 vaccination exercise began on Dec 30. Since then, more than 6,200 people have received the vaccine.

Eight vaccination centres will be set up by the end of next month. Two centres - at Changi Airport Terminal 4 and Raffles City Convention Centre - are already operational.


In a Facebook post, Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung said vaccination for air crew and front-line airport workers began at T4 yesterday, and for marine pilots, crew and workers who have to go on board ships, at Raffles City.

The workers were vaccinated in small groups as an "operational warm-up" before full-scale operations next week, Mr Ong said.

"I will be at T4 with the CEOs of key aviation companies next Monday to explain the significance of this exercise," he added.







Get vaccinated promptly, don't wait for preferred COVID-19 vaccine brand: Lawrence Wong
By Hariz Baharudin, The Straits Times, 14 Jan 2021

People here should get vaccinated as soon as they are given the chance to do so, urged Education Minister Lawrence Wong yesterday, as he cautioned against waiting for one's preferred vaccine choices.

While the Government has made purchases and assured that there will be enough for everyone, there is uncertainty about the brand availability of vaccines, said Mr Wong, who is also co-chair of Singapore's multi-ministry task force tackling Covid-19.

He added that there is no way of knowing when one's preferred brand might be available, but gave his assurance that Singapore's vaccines are safe.


"What we have today is an authorised vaccine that is safe, that's effective," he said.

"And when the time comes, just come forward and get yourself vaccinated, rather than waiting for some other brand that may or may not materialise down the road."

Mr Wong was speaking to reporters after receiving his Pfizer-BioNTech jab at Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital. Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, who also co-chairs the Covid-19 task force, was vaccinated yesterday as well.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the first Covid-19 vaccine that has been approved for use here.

Vaccines by other pharmaceutical companies, Moderna and Sinovac, are expected to arrive in the months ahead.

Singapore's Covid-19 vaccination exercise began on Dec 30 last year with 40 healthcare workers at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases. Since then, more than 6,200 people have received the vaccine.

The roll-out of the jabs here will be done in phases that will be timed together with the arrival of Singapore's vaccine shipments.

The Government is setting up vaccination centres that will allow a large number of people to be vaccinated daily, and vaccinations will also be carried out at polyclinics and general practitioner clinics.

Yesterday, Mr Wong said there will be a significant ramp-up of vaccinations here, and added that it is important for front-liners like those working at Singapore's border entry points to get vaccinated as early as possible so that they can continue doing their job safely.

"That's the new front line, if you will, where the workers, crew and staff at these areas are potentially interacting with travellers and crew from overseas. So I think it's important that they get vaccinated early," he said.

"They are doing very important roles to keep our economy going, to keep Singapore going, and they are also an important part of our overall plan to contain the spread of the virus."





Singapore will review Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine carefully before possible roll-out: Health Minister Gan Kim Yong
By Clara Chong, The Straits Times, 14 Jan 2021

A coronavirus vaccine developed by China's Sinovac Biotech will have to go through regulatory scrutiny and authorisation by Singapore's Health Sciences Authority (HSA) before it can be rolled out to the public, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said yesterday.

This comes on the back of data released from a Brazilian trial on Tuesday, which showed that the Sinovac vaccine was just 50.4 per cent effective in preventing symptomatic infections. This is barely enough for regulatory approval and well below the rate announced last week.


The Sinovac vaccine has yet to be approved, Mr Gan told reporters after receiving his first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the only authorised one in Singapore.

He said: "We will go through the data carefully when it comes, rather than depending on reported numbers. It's better to rely on official data that we receive from Sinovac itself."

HSA will assess the data when it has been obtained and the nation's Covid-19 expert committee will also evaluate whether it is suitable for vaccination in Singapore, Mr Gan explained.

"We will share more details when they are available," he said.

Another vaccine candidate, developed by United States firm Moderna, has also submitted its data and is currently being reviewed by HSA, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong, who also received his first shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine yesterday.

"If and when the Moderna vaccine is authorised for use, then we will also use it for the vaccination programme," he said.

Both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are mRNA vaccines and have similar efficacy rates of around 95 per cent. mRNA is a genetic material that cells read to make proteins. After injection, cells in the body read this mRNA sequence to build spike proteins, and these protruding spikes and spike protein fragments can then be recognised by the immune system.

"I would think, between the two (Moderna and Pfizer), it's quite straightforward. Either one will do," Mr Wong said.

The Sinovac vaccine is an inactivated vaccine, a platform that has been used in many other shots, such as the polio vaccine.

"But we still need to look at the data, we still need to see if it's more efficacious - for example for specific sub-segments, we don't know yet," Mr Wong added, stressing that a detailed and comprehensive review will need to be done.

He urged the public to come forward to get vaccinated, instead of waiting for a specific brand of vaccine to get authorised, something which may or may not materialise.

"So, rather than hold out and wait, I think what we have today is an authorised vaccine that is safe and effective, and when the time comes, just come forward and get yourself vaccinated," he said.








Related








Singapore to enter Phase 3 of Re-Opening on 28 Dec 2020; COVID-19 vaccines will be free for Singaporeans

Making ours an uplifting society: Tharman Shanmugaratnam

$
0
0
One that uplifts everyone through opportunities in life, uplifts the low-paid, and uplifts the spirit
By Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Published The Straits Times, 16 Jan 2021

Covid-19, like an X-ray beamed into societies all over the world, has exposed many fractures. It has also widened them, as the pandemic and economic crisis hit those already disadvantaged the hardest.

Governments with the capacity and finances have been able to soften these unequal blows. However, as we now rebuild, we must do more than recover from this crisis. We must tackle the longer-term, more embedded challenges that will outlast Covid-19.

Many advanced nations have seen decades-long stagnation in standards of living for the majority. What's equally troubling has been the loss of relative social mobility: where you end up in life relative to others depends on where you start, and especially on how poor or well-off your parents are. As a result, faith in meritocracy, or in how people can advance in life through education and better jobs, is also on the wane.

These trends have weakened the sense of togetherness in many societies. Where there was once a strong sense of "we", there is now "them versus us". In some places, "them versus us" is not only about the rich or highly educated versus the rest. It also taps into racial or religious antipathies, which then have a life of their own. We have to recognise these changes happening around the world, and prevent them from taking root in Singapore.

We must do the utmost to make ours an uplifting society - one that uplifts everyone through opportunities in life, one that uplifts the poor and vulnerable, and one that uplifts the spirit.


Keeping society fluid

It requires a strong sense of collective mission, and continuous refreshing of strategies. But we should keep two issues foremost in mind. First, to achieve relative social mobility, with people being able to move up in life and exchange places with others, we must also have absolute mobility, where everyone can see things getting better. We must have that escalator that takes everyone up. It helps everyone accept that no one's place on the escalator is fixed, and others may catch up from below or move ahead of them. It also supports a sense of solidarity, because people can see that life is not a zero-sum game, and are willing to have more done to help those in greater need. As many societies are seeing, once that escalator is broken, everything begins to fray, and people turn resentful.

Second, to tackle inequality on any lasting basis, we must address unequal opportunities, above all, and not just unequal outcomes. Surveys around the world show that most people accept some inequality of outcomes, if it reflects differences in effort, ability or entrepreneurial contributions. But the inequality of opportunities is a different matter. It is the bad cholesterol in the system. We have to be especially concerned about unequal opportunities early in life, as they have a way of ingraining advantages and disadvantages that last through life.

However, we do need to temper unequal outcomes as well - and in particular, avoid people getting trapped in a permanent underclass. When parents have weak and unpredictable incomes, their children tend to have a less secure upbringing, and can easily fall behind and lower their own aspirations. In other words, outcomes in one generation shape opportunities for the next.

Furthermore, in no society can we say that unequal outcomes are entirely to do with ability and effort. They often have something to do with how people started out, and the social networks that give them different scaffoldings in life. For both these reasons, it is only right that we tilt our policies in favour of those with lower incomes, and ensure they have full and fair opportunities in the employment market.

The challenges of social mobility and inequality will get sharper everywhere. We are tackling them in Singapore. But we are not starting from a bad place. We have seen significant increases in real incomes in all segments of the workforce over the last decade. Relative social mobility in Singapore also remains higher than in most nations, although the big solution in the one-off phase after independence, when education and jobs led to a huge wave of mobility, is no longer there.

Our level of income inequality is in the middle of the range among advanced nations (based on the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates of Gini coefficients), before taxes and transfers are taken into account. After taxes and transfers, Singapore's inequality is about the same as in places like the United Kingdom, and lower than in the United States. However, we are nowhere near as equal as the Nordic societies and several others in Europe. The Nordics are the most equal in the advanced world, achieved in large part through high tax rates - even median income earners pay about 40 per cent of their incomes in taxes, mainly through income and value-added taxes. They have a stronger culture of solidarity than most, built up over several centuries of living together as close-knit peoples. There are several things we should admire in the Nordics, but their model of redistribution through very high taxation, including of the middle-class, cannot be easily transported to societies with very different histories.

Watch the middle

However, the real challenge is not just to reduce inequality. We must also ensure that the broad middle of society is doing well - the failure of which explains the growing discontent in many places, and political disorder that comes with it.

Among the relatively advanced nations, we have been one of the few where people in the middle have experienced large increases of incomes in the last 20 years. Median wages went up by 65 per cent in real terms. As a result, the middle-income group in Singapore now has higher real incomes than in most societies, a fact that is not often recognised but matters more than our high level of per capita gross domestic product. The Norwegians and Swiss are at the top. However, median real incomes in Singapore are higher than in the US and most other European societies, and well above that in other advanced Asian societies like Japan, Hong Kong and South Korea. (This is even if we give large allowance for any imprecision in the "purchasing power parity" measurements that statisticians use to compare real incomes across countries.)

But remember this too: that same, large lift in incomes in the middle also means we have had a bigger gap in incomes to close below. To illustrate, the gap between the lowest quartile of wage earners and the median is wider in Singapore than in Japan, Hong Kong and South Korea. This is despite our lowest quartile of workers having higher incomes than in those countries in real terms. We have greater wage inequality, but higher real standards of living for most of the population.

Three key planks of solidarity

Covid-19 brought a renewed spirit of solidarity that we must now keep and grow. We must take bold steps to build a society that uplifts. There are no quick fixes. It requires intensive, collective effort by the Government, educationists and social workers, employers, unions, community bodies of many stripes, and of course individuals and families themselves.

The first plank is the most important: keeping social mobility alive and well in Singapore, so we are a place where your destiny never depends on where you start and what your parents do. Second, we must help people bounce back from tumbles in life, and not be set back permanently. And third, we must make further headway in uplifting lower-income Singaporeans and reducing inequality.

Early lives matter

The science and evidence are clear: the first few years matter greatly in shaping a child's potential in life. Through a combination of government and community initiatives, we have to do a lot more to help families and kids during those early years, so that starting disadvantages can be overcome and do not multiply as the kids go through school. KidStart, and the scaling up of quality in our pre-school system, is showing promise. But we still have a long journey ahead.

The gaps between children from different family backgrounds are wide and multifaceted - more so than in Singapore's early decades when the majority of parents had little education or incomes. Even childhood obesity, which unfortunately has a strong influence on both health and achievements through life, is more prevalent among kids from lower-income backgrounds.

The evidence from initiatives in the US and elsewhere shows that it takes both early interventions and programmes sustained over many years to reduce the gaps due to social backgrounds - including the gaps in non-cognitive capabilities that make a difference in life. But each time I am asked, I say that tackling the early gaps in children's lives is the most important of our strategies to secure a more cohesive society. Early Lives Matter.

We must also do more to develop the basic capability of mutual respect from a young age, and a comfort with social diversity. It does not come automatically. Nor can we impart much of it through classroom teaching. It comes mainly through social mixing as we grow, starting from pre-school and all the way through life. Our system of pre-schools has been market-based, and seen less social mixing than our primary schools. The Government is now having a larger hand in the system, and trying to achieve greater diversity through our Ministry of Education kindergartens and the anchor operators.

We have to find more opportunities for social mixing as the kids grow up - not just within schools, but across schools. Co-curricular activities are a major and natural opportunity - training with each other a few times a week, winning and losing together, and staying in a network of friends well after leaving school. Respect for others with different social backgrounds cannot be tested or measured, but it must be a key outcome of a Singapore education.

Bouncing back

We greatly reduced job losses during Covid-19 through the Jobs Support Scheme and other initiatives. Still, even with a smaller increase in unemployment than most other countries, many Singaporeans have been displaced. We have been doing our level best to help people get back into work - into permanent jobs wherever possible, or into short-term jobs and traineeships while we wait for the job market to pick up.

But matching people to jobs is not about getting the fastest possible match. We have to help them secure jobs that make use of their skills, so they do not lose the human capital they have built up, and do not take too large a pay cut. And we have to help them to top up or upgrade their skills to meet the needs of new jobs, so they can get back onto a promising career trajectory. Achieving all three objectives is in practice difficult, but it is what our whole system of active, tripartite partnerships seeks to achieve, sector by sector. We have enhanced this during Covid-19 - how we coordinate more tightly, encourage and lean on employers to take mature Singaporeans seriously, and coach job seekers to help them stay motivated and rebuild their careers.

It is a system that must outlast Covid-19. Helping people to get back into work has to be a key capability everywhere in the world. We cannot leave it to the market - many people will get jobs that are a poor match for their skills, or be left jobless for too long and find their skills fading. Both ways, they lose their dignity, and their human capital - and society loses it too. That is one of the reasons why countries that have allowed unemployment to rise sharply and stay high for a period after each crisis, have also seen income growth weaken over the longer term.

Critically too, we have to shift to higher gear in lifelong learning. We are providing strong government support for both individuals and employers to invest in upskilling, through SkillsFuture. It is our best chance for ensuring good jobs for all, even as increasingly sophisticated forms of automation take over more human tasks in future.

But there is another logic to this. Constant upskilling in normal times, when the economy is healthy and people still have their jobs, is also what also helps us prepare for the next downturn when it comes - which it surely will. Like sports - if you have not been training regularly, your chances of getting injured when you take a fall are much higher, and it is that much more difficult to get back up and continue playing as normal. It is the players who have been continually training who are best able to avoid the sprains and pulls, and to spring up, and to carry on the game.

It also illustrates why this is not just about individual resilience, but a whole system of collective resilience - the coaches and trainers, the team-mates that work out together and find ways to up their game, the mentors, and everyone around them who lends support. It is this collective capability that helps people bounce back each time a crisis hits their lives, and it must be a core Singapore strength.

Revaluing blue-collar jobs

Many lower-income workers saw their pay grow rapidly in the last decade. However, the gaps between our lower income and those in the middle are still large, given especially the sustained growth of incomes in the middle over a longer period. We should find ways to reduce these gaps.

It basically requires that we revalue lower-paid blue-collar jobs. Everyone will have to accept a slight increase in what we pay for various services, but that is the cost of achieving a fairer and more cohesive society.

Our basic approach is a combination of strategies: the Progressive Wage Model (PWM) or a "minimum-wage plus", applied on a sectoral basis; the Government topping up wages of lower-income workers through Workfare; and economic strategies that create a broader distribution of good jobs over time.

The PWM is not different in principle from a minimum wage. It is applied sector by sector, with a different minimum wage rung in each, whereas a national minimum wage cuts across sectors. Some other countries like the Nordics too have the former without the latter. What matters in both cases is the actual level of the minimum rung, and in particular how we ensure that it improves pay meaningfully without leading to our more vulnerable workers being displaced. The best studies of experience abroad find that higher minimum wages have reduced work opportunities for the least skilled workers over time, even when overall employment levels remain largely unchanged.

We must ensure in particular that our older workers get higher wages, without losing their place in the workforce. In most advanced countries, it is typically the youngsters they are concerned with when they talk about the minimum wage. In Singapore, it is the other way round. Amongst the bottom 10 per cent of our workers, about half are aged 55 and above. And most of them - two thirds of this group of older, low-wage workers - did not complete secondary school in their time. They missed out on the transformation of our education system. Most have done simple jobs all along. Now in the latter part of their careers, they are still diligent workers but with limited capacity to switch to better jobs if they are displaced from their current ones.

A national minimum wage does have the merit of simplicity. But it also requires getting that single minimum level for all sectors just right, which is more complicated than it looks. Hong Kong, even after several revisions over the years, has a minimum wage set at HK$37.50 (S$6.40) per hour, which covers only 1 per cent of the eligible workforce. South Korea went for a more ambitious target in recent years, as part of the government's political manifesto. But it had to step back from the target in 2019, apologising for the difficulties the higher minimum wage had caused to SMEs, as well as to lower-income workers themselves, who lost jobs or saw their earnings fall as employers cut working hours to save costs.

We have started with a more calibrated approach, with the PWM wage rungs in each sector being negotiated among the tripartite partners. The median pay of our older cleaners (aged 55 and above), went up from $850 in 2012 to $1,350 in 2019 - before counting Workfare. It was in good part because of the PWM. Including Workfare, their median pay was $1,560. All that in seven years, and without job losses. We will extend the PWM to more sectors, once we get past the Covid-19 crisis.

Fundamentally though, we must have an economy that creates enough jobs for Singaporeans, including those with lower skills. The basic challenge is that the competition for our higher-skilled, knowledge-based jobs is global, and mainly among economies with relatively high incomes, whereas lower-skilled jobs are at risk of work being outsourced to lower-cost labour forces in Asia. Our basic strategy therefore must be to compete on the basis of a whole ecosystem, not each segment of the workforce on its own, so that we create greater "stickiness" of middle- and lower-skill jobs in Singapore. We are doing this by providing businesses the advantages of first-class logistics and other services, a strong R&D infrastructure, access to specialist capabilities sourced globally or in Singapore, and significant support for reskilling and upskilling their workforces. This broader ecosystem is critical to ensuring good jobs for all our workers.

Uplifting the spirit

The traditional strategies of both left and right in the advanced societies have lost their appeal. But we need more than ever the core values of the left, of social empathy and solidarity. We also need the core ethic of personal responsibility and effort that the conservatives have always espoused. These values are not at odds with each other.

They form a compact at the heart of how we make ours an uplifting society. Where individuals put effort into learning and improving, and want to contribute what they can in life. Where unions, community organisations and non-governmental organisations look out for those with less, and help them make the most of opportunities. Where employers take the high road, give mature workers fair chances to restart their careers and invest continually in their people. Where the Government itself is an activist in support of social mobility, helping people bounce back when they fall, working towards fair rewards at work, and integrating people of different backgrounds in the same, continually upgraded neighbourhoods. And underlying all of these: where we treat each other as equals in the to and fro of daily life, never excluding anyone, regardless of the jobs we do or our social and ethnic backgrounds. It's how we uplift the spirit.

Tharman Shanmugaratnam is Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for Social Policies. This article is based on talks at the IPS Singapore Perspectives 2021 Conference on Jan 12 and to public servants at the launch of the Civil Service College's Social Economic Nexus Speaking Engagement Series in October last year.


One year of COVID-19 in Singapore: Interview with Ministers Gan Kim Yong and Lawrence Wong

$
0
0
Singapore may tighten COVID-19 rules ahead of Chinese New Year 2021, will also prioritise vaccine roll-out, say multi-ministry task force co-chairs
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2021

The battle against Covid-19 this year will be fought on two fronts: speeding up the nationwide vaccination programme, and keeping the slate of safeguards finely tuned.

This could mean implementing further restrictions ahead of Chinese New Year next month, when more social interaction is expected to take place, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force tackling the pandemic.

He pointed out that the number of community Covid-19 cases has been inching up, roughly two weeks after the year-end festive period.

"We are concerned that if we continue in the same sort of situation, (if) we don't do something more, then this continued creep in the cases may end up in new clusters emerging that may be beyond our control later," said Mr Wong.

"So, we are considering very carefully now whether additional measures may be necessary."


He added: "Exactly what these are - whether they pertain to house visitations, what kind of measures - we are still studying. And when we are ready, we will highlight them."

Mr Wong and task force co-chair, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, were addressing reporters on Tuesday in an interview to mark one year of Covid-19 in Singapore.

The 90-minute interview covered topics ranging from the challenges faced over the past 12 months to the prospects ahead.


The country's response to the crisis reflected the resilience of its society, Mr Gan said, adding: "When the challenges come our way, we are able to come together, look after one another, support one another and to emerge stronger at the end of the crisis."

Mr Wong said that in many ways, Singapore is in a stronger position to tackle the virus than it was before. It now has better healthcare capabilities, improved testing and tracing capabilities, and is rolling out vaccinations.

On the other hand, the situation remains highly unpredictable because the virus is still spreading in the wider world, he added. The number of community cases is going up, and there is a sense of fatigue with all the rules in place.


Mr Gan also said that much remains unknown about the virus.

Mr Wong said that from that point of view, Singapore is still in a vulnerable position. In fact, he added, it is almost as though the country is back where it started a year ago.

"We have to think through, all over again, what is the right calibration of measures (and) how far do we want to go in terms of the restrictions," he said.


He stressed that Singapore's safeguards are not watertight.

As long as there is a weakness in any line of the country's defence - for example, someone who feels ill but does not see a doctor - a super-spreader event with multiple virus clusters could emerge. "And then, we will be running around trying to chase after the virus all over again, like what happened at the beginning of last year," Mr Wong said.


Both ministers stressed that Singapore must remain vigilant, even though the end is in sight with the vaccination programme well under way. If all goes according to plan, Singapore will have enough vaccines for all citizens and long-term residents by the third quarter of this year.

"But between now and the third quarter of this year, there are many months, and many things can happen during this period," Mr Wong said. "So, let's stay alert, let's stay vigilant, let's rally together and complete our mission to defeat Covid-19 together."








COVID-19 vaccine will not be reserved for Singaporeans who choose to wait and see: Lawrence Wong
Jabs will go to those next in line, may not be readily available in future for people who wait
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2021

Supplies of the Covid-19 vaccine will not be reserved for people who choose to wait when their turn to get the jab comes, said Mr Lawrence Wong, co-chair of a multi-ministerial task force tackling the pandemic.

Instead, the vaccines will go to whoever is next in line.

This is because Singapore's aim is to get everyone vaccinated as soon as it can, said Mr Wong, who is also Education Minister.

"For those who choose not to take (it) up, it is your choice. But we will roll out and push out the vaccines regardless," he added in a media conference on Tuesday.

"If you want to wait, you must accept the consequence that perhaps if you wait... and you want to take it up later on, we may not have a ready supply."


Singapore's nationwide vaccination effort is now well under way, with priority going to healthcare staff, as well as those working in the aviation and maritime sectors.

It has received several shipments of Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine, and expects to get more vaccines from other manufacturers in the coming months.

If everything goes according to plan, the country will have enough vaccines for all citizens and long-term residents by the third quarter of this year.

Addressing reporters to mark one year of Singapore's battle with Covid-19, Mr Wong said Singapore sends out each batch of vaccine as soon as it gets a fresh supply.

"We are not trying to hold back or ration the supply. It is not in Singapore's interest to do that," he said. "Our interest is to get as many people vaccinated as soon as possible."

Added Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, the task force's other co-chair: "We are not going to reserve some for you if you decide not to be vaccinated."

If the scientific evidence indicates that vaccines significantly reduce the risk of transmission, the Government could make changes to existing rules, Mr Wong said.

For example, the stay-home notice period for travellers might be reduced or eliminated, while workers who currently have to undergo routine testing could have this requirement reduced.

Singapore might also further relax its safe management measures.

At present, however, it is not yet known by how much the vaccine can reduce the risk of viral transmission, so the tangible and concrete benefits of vaccination - like being able to travel without quarantine - cannot be reaped while the information is still pending, said Mr Wong.

When asked how the Government would convince reluctant Singaporeans to take the vaccine, Mr Gan stressed the importance of public education.

For seniors, the authorities will probably go from house to house, explaining the benefits of getting vaccinated and helping people to make bookings, he said.

Mr Gan urged Singaporeans to think hard about holding back on vaccination.

"Today, our number of cases is low. Some may have the misperception that it is quite safe, so it really doesn't matter," he said.

"But we must remember that the rest of the world is still burning up.

"We still have new cases every day and new records being set almost every other day."

Vaccinations will also help speed up Singapore's progress towards a more substantial reopening, added Mr Gan.

Both ministers were also asked how they felt after getting vaccinated earlier this month.

"I feel perfectly fine," Mr Gan replied. "That is why we are here."

"Kim Yong texted me, 'Is your arm sore?'" Mr Wong added.

"I said: 'Yah, mine is quite sore. So, we both had sore arms. That is all."





Fighting the unknown: COVID-19 task force co-chairs Gan Kim Yong, Lawrence Wong sum up challenges
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2021

Over the course of the past year, the Covid-19 pandemic has changed the way Singaporeans live, work and play.

In a 90-minute interview on Tuesday at the National Press Centre in Hill Street, the two ministers jointly chairing the task force tackling the crisis summed up the challenges they faced over the past 12 months.

These included dealing with uncertainty, implementing their ideas and communicating the reasons for their decisions.


Facing the unknown

When Covid-19 cases first began emerging in Singapore, most people who showed respiratory symptoms were given a five-day medical certificate. Return to get tested only if your symptoms persist, they were told.

This advice was later proved wrong when scientific evidence showed that the coronavirus can be transmitted even when a person appears perfectly healthy.

That misstep taught Singapore that it cannot rely entirely on lessons learnt from earlier outbreaks, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) crisis, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said. Instead, the country had to adapt its modus operandi very quickly to the reality on the ground as more data emerged.

"One thing we have to bear in mind is that the next outbreak will, again, be very different from this one," Mr Gan added. "If we simply replicate what we do today and assume that we have already learnt the lesson... I think the outcome would probably again be different."

Mr Lawrence Wong, who was appointed the Education Minister midway through the pandemic in July last year, after being the minister for national development since September 2015, said that "bumps along the road" were inevitable when faced with so many unknowns.

"Clearly, if we had a better picture then, you know, we would have taken different measures," he said. "The key, as I have said before, is that we have to be quick to adapt, to adjust, to be nimble, put things right, recover from setbacks and move forward. And that is the attitude we have."

When asked which decisions they felt the greatest uncertainty about making, the ministers brought up the circuit breaker, which kicked in on April 7 and was lifted on June 2.

This drastic measure would significantly impact livelihoods and individuals' well-being, while the benefits were uncertain, Mr Wong said, on weighing the decision. "On balance, would it do more harm than good? Or would we be able to address effectively (and) slow down the transmission?"

The timing of the circuit breaker was also a matter of much debate.

If it was called too soon, Mr Gan said, Singapore might have faced the prospect of a second circuit breaker later that year. But put in place too late, and Covid-19 clusters could have shot up.

"We needed to time it, but we can never be perfect in timing," he added. "So, we just had to have a sense, make a judgment."


When Singapore first began its gradual reopening, the opposite debate took place. In particular, the task force was leery of allowing people to visit one another's homes, especially when these visits involved the elderly.

"We were initially unsure. What if we allowed it and something happened?" Mr Wong asked. "On the other hand, if you don't allow and people remain isolated, is that good for their well-being? So, it was a very difficult judgment call either way."

The Government will be doing a full review of its systems and processes after this pandemic is over, he added.

"Just as we have learnt from Sars... after Covid-19, we want to learn from this experience, to do even better and be better prepared for the next pandemic - and for Disease X in the future."

Implementing the rules

Each time the task force briefed the Cabinet on measures it intended to take, it would receive a flurry of ideas and suggestions.

But on one occasion, Mr Wong recounted, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told him: "You know, we can give you ideas. But in the end, you have to decide what can be executed, what can be implemented."

His advice encapsulated one of the task force's key challenges: Translating plans into reality given the limited resources on hand, and making rules that would be easily applied across the board.

One example was the rule on social gatherings, which are currently limited to eight people.

Mr Gan pointed out that a household of 10 would face no increased risk of contracting the virus if they shared a single table in a restaurant, given that they already lived together.

"But at the same time, it is very difficult to enforce on the ground, very difficult to explain to the table next door that you are from the same family," he said. "And it is very challenging for waiters to have to check your NRICs to make sure that you stay together."

The task force opted for measures that were simple to understand and implement, Mr Gan said.

The ministers faced a similar problem when dealing with the issue of widespread infections in migrant worker dormitories, where case numbers rose quickly and went into the thousands.


Asked what they would have done differently, Mr Wong replied: "We would have done what we are doing today in the dorms."

In other words, migrant workers would have been put on a regular Covid-19 testing regime, he said, adding: "We would have taken far more measures than we had at that time, obviously."

The challenge was that Singapore did not, at the time, have the capability to test at the level it is doing today.

"We had limited test kits, we had limited resources in terms of manpower," Mr Wong said.

"Each time you deploy a resource to a particular area, it means that you don't have resources to deploy to another area. So, it is one thing to wish to do everything, but it is another to have the resources to execute and implement it well."

The country is now in a stronger position, with better defences and improved testing and tracing capabilities, but it must remain vigilant, Mr Wong said. "Better doesn't mean perfect," he hastened to add. "Better doesn't mean you will be 100 per cent foolproof."

The art of communication

It was one thing to implement plans, but another thing to convince people of their necessity - especially when these decisions proved unpopular.

For one thing, as more was learnt about the disease, Singapore had to continually adjust its approach and communicate the reasons for the new measures, Mr Gan said.

He gave the examples of the implementation of the circuit breaker and the raising of the Disease Outbreak Response System Condition level to orange, both of which were addressed by PM Lee in separate speeches to the nation.

Communication became especially challenging when people became caught up in the prevailing mood of the time, Mr Wong added.

Early last year, for instance, some segments of the public called for the Government to impose very strict safe distancing measures, in the hope that life would return to normal a month later.

"We had to tell people, 'No, look, this is a long fight. It is a marathon, and whatever we do has to be sustainable, and our measures are based on data, based on evidence,'" Mr Wong recalled.

Then, the pendulum swung the other way in October, after Singapore saw no community cases for a sustained period.

"The mood was: Why don't we open up faster? Why are we still doing all these phase two measures? When can we get to phase three?" Mr Wong said.

"And we had to explain the opposite, that... we are doing okay, but the virus is still circulating. And if we were to relax too quickly, it is very easy for a resurgence of cases to come back."

These shifts in public sentiment are not unique to Singapore. But they pose a continuing challenge even today, as the country works to chart a steady course based on scientific evidence, he noted.

Did public opinion have an impact on the task force's decision-making process?

Mr Wong said that in coming up with measures to keep Singapore safe, the task force first has to take into account public health requirements. A decision is made after experts are consulted and the scientific evidence is studied.

Public sentiments are considered later, when the discussion turns to communicating what has to be done.

"How do you explain why we may not be able to move on something even though the public demands it? Or why, you know, we may have to do certain things that may not be so readily acceptable or so readily understood?" Mr Wong said.

"So, the challenges are in that area - rather than influencing what is necessary and the right thing to do from a public health point of view."





Overseas travel to remain difficult even after all in Singapore get COVID-19 vaccine: Gan Kim Yong
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2021

International travel will not revert to normal even after everyone in Singapore has been vaccinated as travel depends on the global Covid-19 situation, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong.

When it does resume, it is likely to take place progressively, through bilateral arrangements, which could then expand into regional arrangements, he added.

"This is a bit like a circuit breaker," said Mr Gan, who co-chairs the multi-ministerial task force handling the crisis. "It is not going to be, flip a switch and (it is) free for everybody to travel."

He was responding to a question on whether Singaporeans can expect to travel in the next 12 months, during a media conference to mark one year of Singapore's battle with Covid-19.

Education Minister Lawrence Wong, the task force's other co-chair, acknowledged that many people hope that vaccination will allow them to travel without quarantine restrictions.

But at present, Singapore is still studying the evidence and is not yet ready to change the rules, he said.

In any case, the country is likely to be in "pandemic mode" for the next 12 to 18 months, even if certain safe distancing measures are eased in that time, Mr Wong added.


"Even if the majority of people in Singapore get vaccinated, it is impossible for the world to be vaccinated by this year," he said. "Which means that all around us, there will be countries where the virus may very well still be raging."

He also pointed out that the International Air Transport Association has predicted that passenger volumes are not expected to return to pre-coronavirus levels until at least 2024.

"The whole recovery is not a one-year issue... it is more like a four-year affair before you see some of these industries recovering back to where they were before," Mr Wong said.

"So, that is the picture for aviation and travel, and we have to be realistic that this is what it is, and it will have some impact on our own industries, particularly those that are reliant on aviation and tourism."

At some point - perhaps over the next four to five years - the pandemic will pass and the economy will slowly recover, Mr Wong added.

But Mr Gan cautioned that the next pandemic could take place in that time.

He urged Singaporeans to keep up the good hygiene habits they developed over the past year, adding: "Before we celebrate... you have to always be vigilant that the next pandemic is just a short distance away."





'He's literally on my speed dial': Lawrence Wong, Gan Kim Yong on working together to fight COVID-19
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2021

If there is one thing Health Minister Gan Kim Yong has learnt about Education Minister Lawrence Wong, it is that he is a decisive man.

"I look at the way he discusses and raises issues and makes decisions," said Mr Gan, 61.

"Once the facts are clear, we will have no ifs and buts. Just move, and get it done."


And for Mr Wong, 48, his senior colleague has been a "great mentor" with whom he has worked closely since both men became co-chairmen of the multi-ministerial task force tackling the pandemic.

"He is literally on my speed dial. I disturb him all the time because, after all, I am coming in cold," Mr Wong said, referring to how he was relatively new to the healthcare scene.

The ministers were speaking to reporters on Tuesday at a media conference to mark one year of Covid-19 in Singapore.

They had been asked how their impressions of one another had changed over the last 12 months.

"Somehow, I don't know why, I have been tied to Kim Yong in different ways, even before Covid-19," Mr Wong responded.

He succeeded Mr Gan as the PAP Community Foundation's management council chairman in 2015, and took over his role as the Singapore Labour Foundation's chairman in 2018. Mr Gan guided him in both transitions, said Mr Wong.


Part of his role as co-chairman of the task force involves thinking out of the box, he added, as he is not within the Health Ministry (MOH).

"From time to time, I will just call him up, brainstorm, throw up ideas," said Mr Wong.

"And he is always open-minded... helping me to understand better what the science is, what MOH's opinion is, and then together we have been able to think through and brainstorm, and come up with solutions together."

To that, Mr Gan added that he was "very happy" to be working with "a very decisive co-chairman".








Related









Singapore to enter Phase 3 of Re-Opening on 28 Dec 2020; COVID-19 vaccines will be free for Singaporeans

COVID-19 safe management measures tightened from 26 January 2021; senior citizens to be vaccinated from 27 January, starting with pilots in Ang Mo Kio and Tanjong Pagar

$
0
0
Visitors per household capped at 8 per day from 26 Jan; Chinese New Year visits limited to 2 other households

COVID-19 vaccination for seniors to begin from 27 Jan at Ang Mo Kio and Tanjong Pagar; national roll-out for elderly begins mid-February

More than 60,000 people in Singapore have received COVID-19 vaccines as of 22 Jan
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2021

From Tuesday, Jan 26, all households will be able to host a maximum of eight guests a day, as part of stepped-up measures to combat rising Covid-19 infections ahead of Chinese New Year.

Individuals are encouraged to limit themselves to visiting at most two other households daily, and stick to visiting only family members during the festive period, Education Minister Lawrence Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force handling the Covid-19 crisis, said yesterday.

Three coronavirus clusters have emerged since Singapore entered phase three of its reopening on Dec 28, when households were permitted to receive up to eight guests at any one time.

But increased social interaction during the year-end period has contributed to the rising number of community cases, said Mr Wong.

"With more human activities, there is an increased chance of transmission of any infectious disease," he added. "That is why we are very concerned. Because compared to, say, a month ago, our vulnerability has increased, and the situation can escalate very rapidly, especially with the likelihood of more interactions and activities taking place over the Chinese New Year period."


People will still be allowed to gather outside in groups of up to eight. However, the Government will be stepping up spot checks at restaurants, malls and other crowded venues. Tough action will be taken against individuals and operators caught flouting rules.

The authorities will also conduct a surveillance testing exercise for stallholders, shop owners, restaurant workers and food delivery workers operating in and around Chinatown. The two-day exercise will start on Feb 8. The authorities will reach out to these groups with further details.

"While there has been no evidence that these community groups are at higher risk of infection, the Ministry of Health will be offering tests to them as they are expected to interact more frequently with other members of the public during this time,"the ministry said in a statement yesterday. It added that the Government will fully bear the costs of these tests. "We strongly encourage all individuals in the identified community groups to come forward for testing."


When asked why the new rules were being put in place relatively far ahead of Chinese New Year, which falls on Feb 12, Mr Wong said it was a pre-emptive move.

"Based on the recent cases that we have seen, based on the concerns highlighted earlier that we are seeing increased signs of complacency in the community about the transmission risk, we think it is timely to make a pre-emptive move now and not wait till Chinese New Year," he said.


He pointed out that Singapore saw a spike in Covid-19 cases after Chinese New Year last year, with many clusters linked to festive gatherings. These included the large cluster linked to a dinner at Safra Jurong, as well as a family get-together in Mei Hwan Drive.



The minister was also asked if people could pay multiple visits to the same home in a day, or if two different families could visit the same home at the same time.

"I think the rules are very clear," Mr Wong replied. "We never set any stipulations on timing, or length of visits, but it is eight distinct individuals within a day to a particular household."


But beyond that, he appealed to Singaporeans to abide by the spirit of the new rules, which aim to reduce social interactions and limit the spread of the coronavirus.

For example, visiting someone multiple times a day could increase their risk of being exposed to the virus, Mr Wong said.

"For every rule that we set, please do not try and optimise your maximum gain around the rule, as though this is something that you could... gain some additional benefit out of," the minister added.

"Because in the end... by having more exposure, more interactions... you are putting yourself and your loved ones at risk."




















Senior citizens to be vaccinated from 27 January 2021, starting with pilots in Ang Mo Kio, Tanjong Pagar
By Justin Ong, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2021

Singapore will begin Covid-19 vaccinations for those aged 70 and above from next Wednesday, Jan 27, starting with pilot schemes in Ang Mo Kio and Tanjong Pagar, where larger numbers of seniors live.

Between 5,000 and 10,000 of them in each of the two housing estates will be invited to get vaccinated, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said yesterday.

"Depending on the response, we may increase or reduce the number. Soon after the pilot... we will begin to roll out to other areas, other precincts progressively," said Mr Gan, who is co-chair of the multi-ministry Covid-19 task force.


Singapore's nationwide vaccination effort kicked off on Dec 30 last year, with healthcare and other front-line workers.

The plan, as part of what Mr Gan called the "largest vaccination exercise in our history", is to have enough vaccines for all citizens and long-term residents by the third quarter of this year.


Seniors and other vulnerable groups are a priority given that they are at the greatest risk of being afflicted with severe com-plications should they contract Covid-19.

Two vaccination centres will be set up by Feb 1 at Teck Ghee and Tanjong Pagar community clubs.

But from Monday, seniors in the two areas will be able to book appointments to be vaccinated at polyclinics, Mr Gan said.


The Ministry of Health (MOH) said seniors will receive letters inviting them to book their slots. This can be done either online or at selected community centres near them. Volunteers, including those from the People's Association, will conduct house visits and tap existing grassroots events to answer queries and help seniors book appointments if necessary.

Those who need extra help can call the MOH hotline.

The two pilots will help the ministry iron out operational processes before it proceeds to scale up nationwide, with vaccinations to be progressively extended to all other seniors from the middle of next month.


MOH added that more vaccination centres will be set up over the next few weeks to ensure that all seniors can conveniently receive their vaccinations at a centre near where they live. These will be located in high population catchment areas or along public transport routes for greater accessibility.

Tender documents issued by MOH earlier this week revealed that it was seeking to appoint a vendor to set up 36 centres from next month.

Last week, Mr Gan said eight vaccination centres would be set up by the end of next month.
















Coronavirus Chinese New Year: Toss the yusheng but don't toss aside that face mask
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2021

Singaporeans should be prepared for a quieter, more subdued Chinese New Year, and continue to abide by existing rules on dining out, Education Minister Lawrence Wong said yesterday.

This means face masks should be worn when tossing the traditional yusheng, with no accompanying recitation of the usual auspicious phrases.

"There should not be any singing or loud shouting or talking during a meal," said Mr Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force tackling the pandemic.



The minister warned that enforcement checks will be stepped up at food and beverage outlets, shopping malls and other crowded public venues, with strict penalties for those found in breach of the rules. Individuals can be fined or prosecuted in court, while business owners can have their operations suspended.

The Government has tightened rules on household visits ahead of Chinese New Year, in a pre-emptive move to minimise the number of social interactions and prevent the spread of Covid-19.

From Tuesday, all households will be able to receive only up to eight unique guests a day, while individuals are encouraged to cap their visits at two households a day.

The minister noted that many places which have been successful in controlling infections so far - such as Taiwan and Hong Kong - are also putting in place restrictions on Chinese New Year celebrations. China is also imposing curbs.

"Let us be mentally prepared that Chinese New Year this year will not be the same as before," Mr Wong said. "It will be quieter, it will be more subdued, and we will have to be more disciplined in how we go about our daily activities and interactions."

When asked how the authorities will enforce the new rule on household visits, Mr Wong said that enforcement officers will do random spot checks.


Neighbours of those in breach of the rules may also contact the authorities, he said, noting that this happened on several occasions during the circuit breaker period.

"We know it is not easy to enforce," he said. "It may not be 100 per cent, because you can't have people everywhere, in every home, checking 100 per cent of the time. But we will get feedback from residents themselves, we will be doing random checks."

Mr Wong was also asked whether the Government had other rules or guidelines on Chinese New Year customs, such as the exchanging of oranges or gifting of red packets.

It is impossible to enforce rules on interactions that take place within a home, he replied.

People are encouraged to meet virtually rather than in person, and give electronic red packets instead. "Really, it is up to individuals themselves to do their part and cooperate with these advisories," he said.


The key thing is to protect the elderly, who are most vulnerable to the virus, added Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, who co-chairs the task force.

This means observing basic hygiene measures such as washing one's hands before giving oranges or red packets.

"Exercise caution," Mr Gan said. "Always bear in mind the safety of the seniors... so that you do what you can to protect them."


Ms Elsie See, who works in the garment industry, said her family is planning to make phone calls instead of house visits this year, as her relatives are quite old.

"All of us come into contact with a lot of people as part of our jobs on a daily basis, so we wanted to play it safe and not take any chances," the 29-year-old said.

But student Thomas Tan, 21, admitted to being slightly disappointed by the news, as he had hoped to visit more friends during the Chinese New Year period.

"I won't be able to catch up with everyone like I normally do, but I think the measures are reasonable as we should focus on combating the virus instead of getting sucked into festivities," he said.

Additional reporting by Cheryl Tan










More than 60,000 people in Singapore have received first dose of COVID-19 vaccine
Drive to ramp up in coming weeks; situation being monitored to ensure adequate supply
By Hariz Baharudin, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2021

Singapore's Covid-19 vaccine programme will kick into high gear in the coming weeks, with more than 60,000 people having received their first doses of the jab, said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong.

While delays are expected for vaccine shipments due to supply issues, the Government is monitoring the situation closely to ensure there are enough jabs for all Singaporeans and long-term residents by the third quarter of this year.


Mr Gan, co-chair of the multi-ministerial task force tackling the pandemic, said at a media briefing yesterday that about 10,000 individuals received their vaccine doses on Wednesday, and more will be doing so soon.

"These numbers are expected to rise substantially in the coming weeks, as we continue to ramp up our vaccination capacity and operations while maintaining the highest standards of safety," he added.

In a statement, the Ministry of Health (MOH) said 39 staff at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases have already received their second dose of the vaccine. This means that they have completed the full vaccination regimen, and will have built up maximum protection in two weeks' time.

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine - the only one approved here to date - requires two injections, given 21 days apart.

MOH said there will be some delays in the shipments of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine because of upgrading works at Pfizer's manufacturing plant in Belgium.

Mr Gan said one particular shipment has been delayed, but is still scheduled to arrive in time for the vaccination programme.

But he added that disruptions from time to time should be expected, due to uncertainties that remain surrounding the global vaccine roll-out.

He pointed out that manufacturers might divert some of their supplies to other areas that may need vaccines more urgently due to huge outbreaks. Vaccine production and logistics arrangements could also be interrupted, he noted.

Singaporeans should thus not wait to get vaccinated and do so as soon as they are given the chance.

"When your turn comes for the vaccination, please do make an appointment early, because there will always be a possibility of a disruption as we go along, as we move forward," he said.

Singapore is expecting more Covid-19 vaccine deliveries in the next few months, including from American biotechnology firm Moderna and China's Sinovac.

Asked for an update on the review of these vaccines, MOH's director of medical services Kenneth Mak said a decision is expected soon on one of the vaccines under evaluation, which he did not name.

"The other vaccine, I understand we are still clarifying further details with the company that produces the vaccine," he added. "We are hopeful that if we are able to get all the information necessary for evaluation, then HSA (Health Sciences Authority) can complete its review process and then give approval for the other vaccines as well."


Asked about the side effects experienced by those who have been vaccinated here, Prof Mak said the Government has received some reports of "adverse effects" as they arise. It is currently compiling reports on these and submitting them to its vaccine expert panel for review and recommendations.

In general, the majority of side effects reported in various countries that have launched vaccination programmes have been very mild, he said.

These include pain, redness, swelling, soreness of the muscles, as well as fatigue and fever.

"Many of these symptoms in fact reflect the body's immune system responding to the vaccine dose that has been injected in them, and there will be some that may have more serious side effects which include allergic reactions of a variety of different grades of severity."

The authorities are still compiling and organising the data, and will give an update when ready, Prof Mak added.


On vaccine passports - proof of vaccination usually for travel purposes - Education Minister Lawrence Wong said Singapore is still studying the matter.

For example, the Government will consider reducing the quarantine requirement if it is proven that those inoculated are immune and cannot transmit Covid-19 to others. This would apply to foreign visitors and returning Singaporeans who have received their jabs.

"But these are still early days. We are still studying the data and the evidence very carefully before we make any decisions on this matter," Mr Wong said.










Range of factors will determine if further measures are needed
By Rei Kurohi, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2021

The multi-ministry task force tackling the pandemic will look at a range of indicators and not just a single factor when determining if further restrictions will be implemented ahead of Chinese New Year.

These indicators will include the number of daily new Covid-19 cases, especially those that are unlinked, the cases found among patients who see doctors for acute respiratory infections, and the latest situation and assessments, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong.

Speaking during a media conference yesterday, Mr Wong, who co-chairs the task force, said he felt a sense of deja vu as the questions raised about the factors that might lead to measures being stepped up were similar to last year's.

"We look at the prevailing safe management measures and compliance with the safe management measures. If people are keeping to the measures, then it gives us some confidence that there is discipline, there is control, and people are complying," he said.

"But if there is a lot of non-compliance, then there is again a cause for concern. So, we look at this range of different measures, and based on the overall assessment, based on the latest situation and assessments, we will then consider whether or not additional restrictions or measures might be necessary."

Mr Wong reiterated that priority for vaccination will go to healthcare and front-line workers at border checkpoints as they are more at risk. This group includes airport and maritime workers as well as those involved in wholesale markets who interact with delivery riders coming from Malaysia.

"These workers who are in our new front line, they are the ones who are doing essential work to keep things going, to keep life going in Singapore, but they are exposed to travellers... and therefore, they are at risk of bringing the virus into the community," he said.

Mr Wong acknowledged that it will not be easy to enforce some of the new measures.

Citing the enforcement of the rule allowing households to receive up to eight distinct visitors a day, he said it is much harder to enforce a rule on visiting only up to two households outside one's own a day.

"Therefore, it will be an advisory, and we are strongly advising everyone (to comply)," he said.

He said in previous instances when the Government strongly advised Singaporeans to take certain precautions, such as the advisory on exercising or buying groceries alone, during the circuit breaker last year, many Singaporeans understood the importance and cooperated.

"Again, for this new advisory, we call on everyone to cooperate and to do their part to help us keep the infection under control so that together, we can avoid having to impose further drastic measures down the road," added Mr Wong.







Over 500 truck drivers tested for COVID-19 at checkpoints on day 1 of new measure, all negative: MOH
By Justin Ong, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2021

More than 500 truck drivers have been tested for Covid-19 at Singapore's two land checkpoints since a new requirement kicked in at 9am yesterday, with all results coming back negative, said the Ministry of Health's (MOH) director of medical services Kenneth Mak.

Compulsory antigen rapid tests (ART) were rolled out at the Tuas and Woodlands checkpoints for cargo drivers. Tests will be conducted at random in this initial phase, and extended to all truck drivers and those accompanying them in the coming weeks. Only those who test negative can enter Singapore.


Associate Professor Mak was responding to a question which cited reports of delays at the checkpoints on the first day of testing, at a media conference by the multi-ministry task force for Covid-19 yesterday.

Prof Mak said testing operations had been observed as being conducted relatively smoothly. The Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) and various sector leads will continue to refine processes to ensure minimal disruption to businesses and drivers, and for testing to continue without causing too much delay at the checkpoints, he added.


The new requirement is in line with Singapore's strengthened border controls in response to new virus variants and a worsening global situation. All travellers - including Singapore citizens and permanent residents - must take a Covid-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test when they arrive in Singapore, with effect from tomorrow.


PCR tests are slower but more sensitive compared with the ART being carried out on truck drivers, which can return results in about 30 minutes.

As ARTs are less accurate, drivers will be advised to take a confirmatory PCR test within 72 hours of returning home if the ART is positive. If this PCR test is negative, they can re-enter Singapore.


Education Minister Lawrence Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force, reiterated yesterday that the authorities were taking no chances at Singapore's borders. He acknowledged that the number of imported Covid-19 cases in recent days was quite high.

Since mid-December last year, the daily figure has been in the double digits, compared with fewer than 10 imported cases a day between October and November last year.


Scientists have said this was to be expected, with Singapore lifting border restrictions and the success of measures to screen out infections.

Visitors from Brunei, China, New Zealand, Vietnam, Australia and Taiwan have been gradually allowed into the country in an easing of restrictions, which was also extended to new work permit and S Pass holders across all sectors to alleviate the manpower shortage faced by businesses.

But Mr Wong said the spike in imported cases was not due to more travellers coming into Singapore - a number which has stayed relatively constant.

"It is a reflection of the increase in the infection rate around us," he explained. "Because of the higher prevalence, we are seeing a higher incidence of cases amongst the number of travellers who come through our borders.

"We have put in place a pre-departure test to screen out some of them, but that is still not effective enough because the virus may be incubating. They may test negative overseas but when they come through, they turn positive."

Mr Wong added: "For those travellers who are coming in, we continue to keep the measures tight by having the stay-home notice requirement and making sure that they are in quarantine, and then testing them at the tail end of the quarantine. So, those border measures remain tight, remain secure."













Work from home to stay as default to lower office transmission risk
Tripartite partners issue update after review of safe management measures at workplace
By Goh Yan Han and Cheryl Tan, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2021

Working from home should remain the default arrangement to minimise the risk of Covid-19 transmission at offices, the labour movement, employers' union and Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said yesterday.

The Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF), National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and MOM said they jointly reviewed whether there was a need to adjust safe management measures at the workplace after Singapore moved to phase three of its reopening last month, but decided it was safer to have people working from home.


Their update comes amid a rise in the number of local Covid-19 cases, some of whom are currently unlinked and have led to the formation of community clusters arising from workplace interactions.

As at yesterday, the number of new cases in the community had increased from two cases the week before to 21 cases in the past week.


The tripartite partners also reminded companies not to organise gatherings and social activities such as lohei or Chinese New Year meals, as these are not work-related activities and would not be allowed.

The statement added that even with the current workplace safe management measures, peak-hour travel on public transport this month still increased by 11 per cent over travel in November last year.

Under current advisories, employers must implement flexible work hours so that at least half of all employees start work in the office at or after 10am, to avoid a peak-hour travel crush.

Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung said in a Facebook post yesterday that Covid-19 has led to people using technology to work smarter "and demonstrated that even as more people return to office to work, the peak hour rush and crush is totally unnecessary".

He added: "Covid-19 is an opportunity to shift our travel-ling habits."

Current guidelines also require employers to ensure that those whose jobs can be done from home continue to work from home for at least half of their working time. For example, someone with a six-day work week can be in the office for up to three days a week.

In addition, employers must ensure that no more than half of those who can work from home are in the office at any one time.

Meetings should also be held virtually as much as possible.


In yesterday's statement, the tripartite partners called on employers to implement staggered work hours more extensively.

"The public sector has contributed to this effort by enabling staff to adopt flexible workplace arrangements, such as hybrid working arrangements, flexible workplace hours and staggered start times," they added.

In his post, Mr Ong said the Transport Ministry is doing its part. Land Transport Authority officers can report to work at 7.30am or 10am, or work from home for at least 50 per cent of the time. The ministry too has similar practices.

"This spreads out the load on our buses, trains and roads. It makes rides safer and better," Mr Ong added.


The tripartite partners also said that the SNEF and NTUC will continue to consult closely with MOM to assess when further adjustments to safe management measures (SMM) can be made.

"While we understand the desire for more physical workplace interactions, we urge employers and employees to stay vigilant in the fight against Covid-19. The prevailing SMM requirements are vital to continue safe reopening for the economy," they said.

Mr Kurt Wee, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises, told The Straits Times that the continuation of existing measures was prudent and necessary, given the Covid-19 situation.

He noted that businesses have become accustomed to work-from-home arrangements, although those requiring more face-to-face interaction with customers may be affected.

"The whole workforce and business ecosystem has adapted and is prepared to ensure vigilance over safe distancing measures, and everybody is quite mindful that... we will have to adhere to these restrictions to get over any blips or cluster outbreaks," he added.










Related












Singapore to enter Phase 3 of Re-Opening on 28 Dec 2020; COVID-19 vaccines will be free for Singaporeans

COVID-19 challenges and 3 resets: Lawrence Wong at IPS Singapore Perspectives Conference 2021

$
0
0
Pandemic calls for 3 major resets in society: Education Minister Lawrence Wong
Singapore should aim to emerge fairer, greener and more united
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 26 Jan 2021

The Covid-19 pandemic has set the stage for Singapore to undertake three major "resets" which could help it emerge from the crisis a fairer, greener and more united country.

This entails combating inequality and ensuring social mobility, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong yesterday. It also means building a greener economy that is more environmentally sustainable, and fostering a renewed sense of solidarity, he added.

Speaking at the Institute of Policy Studies' Singapore Perspectives conference which is themed "Reset", the minister noted that it could take four or five years before the world sees the end of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Singaporeans will have to be prepared to live in an acutely changed world, he said.

To do so, he spelt out three "resets". Singapore has to first reset its social compact by tackling inequality and keeping society fluid and mobile. All over the world, the pandemic has widened the gulf between the haves and the have-nots, he said.


In Singapore, the Government has always aimed to reduce inequality and ensure a meritocratic system, Mr Wong added. To that end, a balance has been struck between free markets and state intervention, with policies tilted towards the lower income.

When the pandemic hit, the country drew on its reserves to save jobs and help those who were hardest hit to tide over.

These temporary measures will taper down this year as the economy improves. However, the pandemic has created added impetus to strengthen the social support system.

"There will be a permanent shift towards further strengthening of our social safety nets, to protect the disadvantaged and vulnerable, and we will have to work out how this will be sustainable over the longer term," said Mr Wong, who is also Second Minister for Finance.

He stressed as well the importance of uplifting children from birth, stressing that meritocracy "must not ossify into a hereditary system, where the condition of your birth determines the outcome of your life".

Schools with a higher proportion of students from disadvantaged backgrounds would get more help and resources, including some of the most committed teachers and principals, to help all students achieve their potential, he said, noting that he has made it a point to visit these schools since joining the ministry.

On the topic of sustainability, the minister pointed out that Singapore is already one of the greenest cities in the world. It is also the only one to completely freeze the growth of its vehicle population, and one of the few to have closed its water loop.

"But we must go further and build on what we have done to achieve cleaner growth and greener mindsets," he said.


Mr Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force tackling the crisis, noted that the pandemic has also intensified divisions in many countries. While easy access to information has been a boon, it has also meant people now can access raw, instant, unfiltered information, including falsehoods and conspiracy theories.

"So the irony is despite the overwhelming ease of access of information, we are living in a 'golden age of ignorance', he said, warning that as more extreme views take hold, forging a consensus and governing is made more difficult.

The answer is for societies to forge a stronger sense of solidarity, he said, noting that one of Singapore's founding leaders, Mr S. Rajaratnam, had referred to the Islamic thinker Ibn Khaldun's concept of "asabiyyah", or the bonds in a community, which are vital to its sense of cohesion.

Concluding, Mr Wong said: "I am confident that we will prevail and emerge stronger from this crucible. And I do not say this lightly. I speak from my own conviction of seeing the best of Singaporeans over the past year, in the face of adversity and very tough conditions."










COVID-19 pandemic could last four or five years: Lawrence Wong
Singaporeans have to be prepared to live in an acutely changed world
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 26 Jan 2021

It could be four or five years before the world sees the end of the Covid-19 pandemic and the start of a post-pandemic normal, said Education Minister Lawrence Wong.

In setting out this timeframe, he noted that the world is likely to encounter many more bumps along the way in handling the crisis.


While the availability of Covid-19 vaccines will progressively restart global travel, getting the world vaccinated will not be quick or easy.

This means that for the rest of this year - and perhaps a good part of next year - Singaporeans have to be prepared to live in an acutely changed world, Mr Wong said in a speech at the Institute of Policy Studies' Singapore Perspectives conference yesterday.

"The rules around wearing of masks, upholding of safe distancing measures and avoiding crowded places - these will continue to be part of everyday life," he added.

On possible bumps ahead, the minister cited how initial research suggests that current vaccines may not be so effective against the South African mutant strain of the virus.

In a positive scenario, the world ends up developing a vaccine that works against all strains of the coronavirus. Alternatively, vaccination ends up looking like a flu jab, where a new formulation is created on a regular basis.

In the worst case, the world remains always a step behind an evolving virus, he said. "And the bottom line is that we live in a shared world, and no one is safe until everyone is safe."

No one can tell what the post-coronavirus world will look like, although some positive changes may arise, Mr Wong said.

He gave the example of how spittoons and public spitting were seen as unsanitary after the 1918 influenza pandemic.

Similarly, in Singapore, the pandemic has prompted greater awareness of hygiene habits and social responsibility. Even so, some old habits - such as handshaking - may die hard, he said.

"Each time there is a pandemic, there is a call to say, 'Let's have different forms of greeting in order to reduce the risk of transmission,'" he added, noting that this happened when Singapore faced the severe acute respiratory syndrome crisis in 2003.

"But somehow, humans being what we are, we have always gravitated back towards some form of human contact."


In a crisis like this, the natural tendency is to extrapolate the worst from one's immediate circumstances, Mr Wong said. For instance, some have predicted that digitalisation will precipitate a move towards decentralised living arrangements, rendering cities obsolete.

But history contains multiple examples of cities that bounced back after pandemics, he noted.

For example, 14th-century Florence flourished after the bubonic plague and launched the Renaissance movement. American cities such as Chicago and New York also saw a boom in the 1920s, after the 1918 pandemic ravaged the country.

"And the reason this happens is that cities are not just buildings and monuments," Mr Wong said. "They are fundamentally about the people who dwell in them, and humans are, by nature, social animals."

Humans are also adaptable, and therefore have the ability to shape their future, he added. "Let's think of the crisis as setting the stage for a software update - a reboot of sorts after the tremendous damage inflicted by the virus."










Singapore can be more relevant as a hub if it responds well to COVID-19 crisis: Lawrence Wong
By Justin Ong, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 26 Jan 2021

When international investors and the broader global community think about having some presence in Asia, Singapore ought to be the first answer that comes to mind.

Education Minister Lawrence Wong yesterday expressed optimism for such a scenario in a post-Covid-19 future, but cautioned that Singapore's ability to gain relevance as a hub would also depend on it responding well to the ongoing coronavirus situation.

He was speaking at a dialogue chaired by Straits Times editor Warren Fernandez, as part of the Singapore Perspectives conference organised by the Institute of Policy Studies.

Mr Fernandez, who is also editor-in-chief of Singapore Press Holdings' English, Malay and Tamil Media Group, had noted that the pandemic-precipitated trend of remote work meant that international corporations could engage employees anywhere in the world, leading to implications for Singapore's hub status.

But Mr Wong, who is also Second Minister for Finance, said that some form of physical presence would still be needed in a "new normal".

"We are not going into a world where it's all just machines, and we stop having face-to-face interaction," he said. "It has not happened across human history and it's unlikely to happen going forward because... humans are fundamentally social animals."

He alluded to the same point earlier when noting that a fully work-from-home model was not doable.

"You cannot function effectively without that human collaboration… you do need a chance for people to come together," he said.

But neither should things go back to the way they were, he added, urging employers to embrace more flexible, hybrid arrangements blending face-to-face and remote work.

Mr Wong later stressed, in response to a question from the audience, that Singapore was in a far better and stronger position to fight Covid-19 today.

He pointed to improved testing and tracing capabilities and "more importantly", the vaccination programme now under way.

"That's a game changer," said Mr Wong, who also co-chairs the multi-ministry task force on Covid-19. "No doubt there is uncertainty with supply, but we have done our best to procure as much as we can. So what we need to do really is to tide through from now until the point when everyone in Singapore is vaccinated."

He also sought to address concerns about the high number of imported Covid-19 cases in recent days.

"We have not increased our travellers coming into Singapore," Mr Wong explained, adding that the two largest sources of travellers are construction workers - to fulfil contractors' needs - and foreign domestic helpers who perform caregiving duties for Singaporeans.

He said numbers have gone up because the prevalence and incidence rate of the disease is higher now, with the virus raging in countries everywhere. Mandatory pre-departure tests for travellers are also not foolproof as the virus may be incubating, leading to negative results for arriving persons who later test positive.

Hence the need for precautions such as a stay-home notice requirement to isolate them from the community, said Mr Wong.

At the end of the dialogue, he was also asked by Mr Fernandez what made him so sure that Singapore could come out for the better in the wake of the pandemic.

For Mr Wong, the answer lay in the tremendous spirit and resilience of Singaporeans rallying together.

Acknowledging the surreal experience of the world coming to a standstill in facing what some have called the "crisis of a generation", he said he was fortunate to have had a front-row seat to how Singaporeans responded to the situation.

He singled out the outbreak in the migrant worker dormitories - "our darkest hour last year" - and how the public and private sectors came together to set up community care facilities in double-quick time.

"We said it would be impossible, but they made the impossible possible," said Mr Wong. "Sometimes, just a few people can change the course of history and change the trajectory in a crisis. This was one of those moments.

"That's why I say I don't speak lightly when I believe with conviction that Singapore can emerge stronger from this crisis."










Education system aims to uplift all, by starting from young
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 26 Jan 2021

Singapore wants to have an education system for life, rather than one that front-loads learning when a person is young, or treats education like a "conveyor belt for the job market".

Outlining these fundamental shifts in the country's education model, Education Minister Lawrence Wong pointed to the SkillsFuture movement, which allows people multiple entry points to reskill, upgrade and improve at various ages.

He added that the Government intervenes early in order to preserve social mobility.

At present, Singapore is making substantial investments in pre-school education to ensure children of all income groups can benefit from quality programmes, he said in a speech on Monday (Jan 25) at the Institute of Policy Studies' Singapore Perspectives conference.

It is also looking further upstream, at the prenatal stage, where the well-being of a pregnant mother can have lasting effects on a child's development.

"Early intervention is effective and we are going all out to do more on this front," added Mr Wong, who became Education Minister after the general election last July.

He added that he has been making it a point to visit schools with a larger proportion of children from lower-income families or disadvantaged backgrounds.

These schools are getting more resources so that these children can get more support, Mr Wong said. This includes learning in smaller classes and exposing students to a variety of programmes - such as learning journeys and public speaking - in order to nurture soft skills.

More allied educators, counsellors and welfare officers are also being deployed, especially for students with special needs, he added.

"We want to ensure we continue to uplift these students and help them achieve their full potential."

Beyond such policies, a broader mindset change is needed, he said, noting that societies today place too much of a premium on cognitive abilities, and do not sufficiently value those engaging in other forms of work.

"As a result, merit has become narrowly defined by academic and cognitive abilities," Mr Wong said. "But in fact, there's a wide range of abilities and aptitudes needed for societies to thrive - we need the craft skills of artisans and technicians; the creativity and imagination of artists; and the human touch of those doing care jobs."

He noted that the pandemic has again thrown the spotlight on this imbalance, and that the country has to ensure that remuneration is fair for essential workers.

This is why Singapore is rolling out the progressive wage model across various sectors, and reviewing polytechnic and Institute of Technical Education pathways to ensure that graduates get better jobs with higher pay and good career progression.

"If we attach more value in terms of prestige and income to people who excel across a wide range of fields and not just cognitively, incomes will naturally spread out more evenly across society," he said. "And we will go a long way in advancing our cause towards a fairer and more equal society."







Yes, there is racism, but Govt committed to improving situation: Lawrence Wong
By Justin Ong, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 26 Jan 2021

Is there still racism in Singapore today? A resolute "yes, of course" was Education Minister Lawrence Wong's answer yesterday during a dialogue at the Singapore Perspectives conference organised by the Institute of Policy Studies.

But he also affirmed the Government's commitment to improving the situation - and to avoid at all costs the sowing of identity politics in the country.

Mr Wong was responding to former senior minister of state Zainul Abidin Rasheed, who asked whether he saw multiculturalism and multiracial cohesion as a big issue, and if Singapore was equipped to handle changes in future.

"It is a big issue. Let's acknowledge it," said Mr Wong. "But is the situation today better than it was 10 years ago, 20 years ago? I would say it is too.

"But is it perfect? No. So our aim must be to continue trying to reduce the imperfections, year after year after year."

This includes reviewing and evolving policies such as ethnic integration quotas in housing and race-based self-help groups, said Mr Wong. "None of these should be cast in stone or regarded as sacred," he added.

"We must do our very best to ensure that identity politics that is polarising never gets a chance to take root in Singapore," he said.

"When that happens, it really fuels the worst tendencies in people; it breeds hostility and divisions."


Earlier, dialogue chairman, Straits Times editor Warren Fernandez, asked Mr Wong how modern-day ideas being rapidly propagated through social media, such as "woke" culture and cancel culture and privilege, could be better understood in Singapore's context.

Mr Wong, who was previously Minister for Culture, Community and Youth, said access to new information was good but not without risk.

Citing conspiracy theories and falsehoods as dangers, he said: "These ideas tend to sharply divide people into different social and political tribes… You become very resistant to hearing from the other side. You self-select information to reinforce your own blind spots and biases."

He said schools would continue efforts in cyber wellness and helping students navigate the Internet.

He also agreed with Mr Fernandez's observation of the inherent tension in managing Singapore's diversity and plurality, while trying to achieve greater unity.

The key, said Mr Wong, was to build consensus around a common good and common destiny for Singapore - regardless of individual, aspirational or political differences, and rather than the alternative of a contentious society where it is every man for himself, or with groups lobbying for their own interests.

Here, the Covid-19 pandemic has presented a silver lining of an opportunity, he added.

"A crisis like this does force us to reflect more deeply on what our shared values are," said Mr Wong. "What kind of life do we want for ourselves and our children? What is that purpose in our limited duration on this planet? What would we like to achieve?

"And if that reflection in Singapore leads to a coming together of shared values... I think we will be able to move forward better, faster and with a renewed sense of purpose."







COVID-19 challenges and 3 resets: Lawrence Wong
At the Institute of Policy Studies Singapore Perspectives Conference 2021 yesterday, Education Minister Lawrence Wong, who is also co-chair of the Multi-ministry Taskforce on Covid-19, highlighted three resets that must be made in policy thinking, lifestyles and mindsets. Here are edited excerpts of his remarks:
The Straits Times, 26 Jan 2021

The theme of the conference is aptly titled Reset. There's still great uncertainty about how the coronavirus will reshape our society in the coming years. But there is no doubt that Covid-19 is the most serious crisis the world has faced in a long time. The virus has already changed our world, and we have to be prepared for more changes to come.

I think it's useful to think of these changes over different timeframes. For this year and maybe even a good part of next year, we must be prepared to live in an acutely changed world, meaning that the rules of wearing masks, upholding safe distancing rules and avoiding crowded places will continue to be part of everyday life.

Beyond that, the availability of Covid-19 vaccinations will progressively restart global travel. But getting the world vaccinated won't be quick or easy. It will take time for vaccines to be manufactured and distributed, and even longer before the world gradually builds up immunity.


Post-pandemic world

What will this new post-Covid-19 world look like? No one can tell. Some positive changes will certainly arise.

In Singapore, the pandemic has prompted greater awareness of hygiene habits and social responsibility. Singaporeans have become more conscious about washing and sanitising their hands.

In a crisis like this, the natural tendency is to extrapolate the worst from our immediate circumstances. For example, some predict that digital technologies will accelerate the move towards less dense living and working arrangements, and render cities obsolete.

But predictions about the decline of cities, I think, are premature. Throughout history, pandemics have not dampened the waves of urbanisation nor the flourishing of innovation taking place in cities everywhere.

After the yellow fever pandemic hit Philadelphia in 1793, Thomas Jefferson said this would "discourage the growth of great cities in our nation". Now look what happened in the United States after that. After the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, we saw the Roaring Twenties and a boom in major cities like Chicago and New York City. If history is a guide, it has shown that cities can bounce back from catastrophe and emerge stronger than before.

The reason this happens is that cities are not just buildings and monuments, they are fundamentally about the people who dwell in them. Humans are by nature social animals. We are naturally drawn to participation, collaboration and social interactions. We are also adaptable and capable of adjusting to new situations.

So we have the ability to shape what our future looks like, and as suggested by the theme of the conference, let us think of this crisis as setting the stage for a software update - a "reboot" of sorts after the tremendous damage inflicted by the virus.

Beyond the immediate task of protecting lives and livelihoods, I would like to highlight three resets that we must make in our policy thinking, our lifestyles and our mindsets, even as we tide over the immediate season.

A fairer and more equal society

First, we must reset our social compact to emerge as a fairer and more equal society. The pandemic may be indiscriminate about who it infects, but its impact is anything but equal. It has in fact widened the gulf between the haves and the have-nots.

Globally, we see poorer segments of society paying a heavier price - be it in terms of economic impact or access to healthcare. That's why governments all over the world have had to spend huge sums to help their people cope.

In Singapore, it's always been at the top of the Government's agenda to reduce inequality and ensure a meritocratic system that works for the good of all.

We recognise that markets are incredibly powerful - they inject dynamism, transform societies, and give people from all backgrounds a chance to better their lives.

But free markets have their flaws. They create anxieties and stresses about technological change and foreign competition, and we see a continued stretching of incomes and wealth.

So we need a combination of open markets and effective state intervention - to level the playing field at the starting point, provide support and buffers for every citizen to help them bounce back from setbacks, and to equip them to excel in an uncertain environment of global competition and technological change.

We started this journey more than a decade ago when we tilted social policies actively in favour of the lower-income group, for example, through Workfare, and through a whole range of support programmes in education, housing and healthcare, and more recently by providing more retirement assurance through the Silver Support Scheme.

Income inequality in Singapore as measured by the Gini coefficient has in fact been trending downward.

Last year, we rolled out a significant package of emergency measures. We are luckier than most countries in that we do not have to borrow to fund these measures. We were able to draw on our reserves to save jobs and tide over the Singaporeans who are hardest hit. These temporary measures will have to be tapered down this year as the economy improves, and to ensure our finances remain sustainable.

But the impact of the pandemic has created added impetus to strengthen our social support system. So there will be a permanent shift towards further strengthening of our social safety nets to protect the disadvantaged and vulnerable, and we will have to work out how this will be sustainable over the longer term. The bottom line is that we aim to give Singaporeans more assurance in an uncertain post-Covid-19 world.

Beyond tackling inequality, we must keep our society fluid and mobile. Meritocracy in Singapore must not ossify into a hereditary system where the condition of your birth determines the outcome of your life. How do we achieve this?

We start by intervening early and uplifting our children from birth. That's a key focus and priority for me in the Ministry of Education. That's why we're making significant investments in pre-school. We want to make sure you don't need expensive private enrichment classes. Instead, all can benefit from quality programmes in Ministry of Education (MOE) kindergartens and across our anchor and partner operators, where fees are kept affordable and regulated.

We're now looking at the earliest years of childhood, even at the pre-natal stage, where the well-being of a pregnant mother can have lasting effects on a child's development. Early intervention is effective, and we are going all out to do more on this front.

We are continuing this strong support in schools. Since joining MOE, I've made it a point to visit schools with a higher proportion of students from lower-income and disadvantaged family backgrounds. Some of our most committed and dedicated principals and teachers serve in these schools.

We are giving them more resources so they are able to provide additional support for their students - for example, learning support in smaller pull-out classes. And beyond academic support, exposure to a whole range of different activities and programmes, so that it's not just about improving their academic results but also nurturing soft skills, for example, through public speaking, through learning journeys, through overseas trips.

We are also deploying more allied educators, counsellors and welfare officers to support students, especially those with special needs.

We are also making fundamental shifts in our model of education. We don't want to front-load learning when someone is young, or treat education as a conveyor belt for the job market.

Instead, we want to have a system of education for life, which is what we are doing through our national movement, SkillsFuture. We want to have multiple entry points across the age distribution and across the entire skills spectrum.

Besides intervention in education, a broader mindset change is required. Societies everywhere today place too much of a premium on cognitive abilities, and do not value sufficiently those engaging in other forms of work.

As a result, merit has become narrowly defined by academic and cognitive abilities. But in fact, there's a wide range of abilities and aptitudes needed for societies to thrive - we need the craft skills of artisans and technicians; the creativity and imagination of artists; and the human touch of those doing care jobs.

And the pandemic has thrown a spotlight on this imbalance. We've come to better appreciate the contributions of our essential workers, who help to keep our lives going - our allied health workers, contractors, security guards, food and beverage operators, transport workers, just to name a few. We must honour them for their work and accord them the dignity and respect they deserve.

And that's why we are pushing on with moves across different jobs through our Progressive Wage Model. We are also reviewing Institute of Technical Education and polytechnic pathways to ensure graduates from these institutions get better jobs with higher pay, good career progression, and a strong foundation for lifelong learning.

If we attach more value in terms of prestige and income to people who excel across a wide range of fields and not just cognitively, incomes would naturally spread out more evenly across society, and we will go a long way in advancing our cause towards a fairer and more equal society.

A greener Singapore

Second, new habits from the pandemic show us that we can and must push for a greener Singapore. When human activity came to a standstill this year, carbon emissions around the world dropped significantly.

As the economic activities begin to pick up, we have to figure out a way forward. We cannot go back to the status quo ante. Aside from dealing with the crisis of the pandemic, climate change will be the existential emergency of our time. We must build a greener economy and society that is more environmentally sustainable.

This idea of sustainability is not new to Singapore. We are one of the greenest cities in the world. We are the only country in the world to freeze the growth of our vehicle population. We are one of a few countries to have closed its water loop, and to re-use every last drop of water. But we must go further and build on what we have done to achieve greener growth and greener mindsets.

So we are deploying more renewable energy like solar power, we are exploring regional power grids and investing in new capabilities like hydrogen and carbon capture, utilisation and storage. We are transforming our industries to be more sustainable and investing in research in new energy- and resource-efficient technologies.

Beyond that, we have other ambitious plans. We are going to phase out vehicles with internal combustion engines and have all vehicles run on cleaner energy. We are making sustainable living a key feature of all Housing Board towns - where they incorporate features to reduce energy consumption, recycle rainwater and cool our towns. We will significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions and seek to achieve net zero emissions as soon as we can.

Sustainability can also be a new source of competitive advantage and open up new opportunities for growth and job creation. There is potential for Singapore to be a carbon trading and services hub in Asia, for example, in areas like sustainability consultancy, verification, carbon credits trading, and risk management.

We can also be a leading centre for green finance in the region and globally.

The greatest promise of going green, however, is not what it will mean for us today. It's about building for the future - for our children and the next generation. We must embark on a sustainability movement, so that we can leave Singapore in a better shape for our future generations, just as previous generations have done for us.

A stronger spirit of solidarity

Finally, one silver lining in Covid-19 is that it can present an opportunity for us to strengthen our sense of social solidarity.

Throughout history, we've seen societies rise and fall. What is it that enables some societies to thrive, while others go into decline? It's a big question.

One of our founding leaders,

Mr S. Rajaratnam, used to ponder over this, and he would refer to the ideas of 14th-century Islamic philosopher and historian Ibn Khaldun, who wrote about the concept of asabiyyah - it's an Arabic word that describes the bond that exists in a community. In his view, it's this sense of community and solidarity that explains the rise and decline of society.

When a community starts out, everyone is prepared for austerity and discipline together, people are prepared to make sacrifices for the common good, and society prospers. But as life becomes more comfortable, this sense of solidarity is weakened. People lose their social anchors and seek to advance their own individual interests. When that sense of community and common purpose is eroded, things start to fall apart.

In fact, before we were struck by Covid-19, there were already powerful forces chipping away at social cohesion - both here and in countries everywhere. Even today, in the midst of this pandemic, there are significant minorities around the world who think that Covid-19 is a hoax and does not really exist. This is a pandemic where 100 million have been infected and more than two million have died. When we do global surveys, it is not just 1 per cent or 2 per cent, it's a significant percentage who think it is a hoax.

And this is the great irony. We are living in an age where everyone can access information so readily. People can access raw, instant, unfiltered information from multiple sources, and unfortunately, salacious falsehoods and conspiracy theories tend to gain circulation over facts. So the irony is, despite the overwhelming ease of access to information, we are living in a "golden age of ignorance".

We are also seeing the downgrading of expertise because experts are seen as out-of-touch elites, and expert knowledge is sometimes portrayed negatively as a conspiracy by the elites to perpetuate their dominance.

With easy access to information, everyone can claim to be an "expert".

In a way, this is healthy, as experts do not always get things right, and you do need to have some level of questioning. But when you disregard expertise altogether, that's when the trouble starts. Or when we have a tendency to view expert advice from the narrow prism of our own social and political tribes - we end up self-selecting information to support and reinforce our own points of view. As a result, it makes it very hard to find consensus.

At the same time, going through a crisis like this can lead to renewed strength. Because we are forced to reflect deeply on our own values, we develop a more acute sense of shared memories and common destiny. We go through difficulties together, and we forge a stronger sense of group solidarity and social cohesion.

So which path will apply to Singapore? How will the pandemic change us? I am confident that we will prevail and emerge stronger from this crucible. And I do not say this lightly. I speak from my own conviction of seeing the best of Singaporeans over the past year, in the face of adversity and very tough conditions.

I've seen front-line workers both in the public and private sectors giving their all, round the clock. I've seen many ground-up initiatives - people stepping out of their comfort zone to look out for the vulnerable, and to help those in need. And I've seen the resilient attitude that Singaporeans have shown, affirming the values we have nurtured since the founding of our nation.

This renewed sense of solidarity is critical as we recover, and it will enable us to build a better society together. And that's why the Government is intentionally creating more opportunities for our citizens and stakeholders to be part of the decision-making process - including in policy and implementation.

Through the Emerging Stronger Conversations, we are bringing together Singaporeans to share their hopes for a post-Covid-19 society and discuss how we can partner them to get there. We are also strengthening our engagements with young people on the SG Youth Action Plan, starting with their vision of Singapore in 2025.

We are convening more Alliances for Action - action-oriented coalitions with a mix of government, community and business stakeholders to solve our problems and co-create solutions together.

We hope all this will pave the way for much higher levels of participation in shaping our future Singapore together.


Hard truth

We've just crossed the one-year mark in our fight against Covid-19. This fight is far from over. There are still many uncertainties ahead of us.

Even as we focus on the immediate battle at hand, we must look ahead to the task of resetting for the future. My hope is for Singapore to emerge as a fairer, greener and more equal country, with a much stronger spirit of solidarity and shared purpose.

We all know the hard truth from this crisis: Singapore remains a perpetually vulnerable country. We are ultimately a tiny little red dot. Many things can still go wrong which we have no control over. For example, we cheer that we have managed to procure vaccines for everyone in Singapore. But anything can go wrong with the manufacturing, distribution or even disruptions in the supply chain.

But crisis has also shown that we are not without our resources and resolve - we have the nimbleness, ingenuity and gumption to solve our problems and move forward. Most of all, we have seen that as "one united people", we can achieve exceptional things together. So that's how, as one united people, we can realise our aspirations and ideals, and build a better Singapore together.


16-year-old Singaporean detained under ISA for planning terrorist attacks on two mosques

$
0
0
He aimed to kill Muslims here with machete on March 15 anniversary of Christchurch attacks in New Zealand
By Lim Min Zhang, The Straits Times, 28 Jan 2021

A 16-year-old Singaporean student has been detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) after the authorities uncovered his plans to attack two mosques and kill worshippers in Singapore on March 15 - the second anniversary of the Christchurch terror attacks.

A Protestant Christian of Indian ethnicity, he is the first detainee to be inspired by far-right extremist ideology and the youngest person detained under the ISA for terrorism-related activities to date, said the Internal Security Department (ISD) yesterday.


The secondary school student was found to have made detailed plans and preparations to conduct terrorist attacks using a machete at the two mosques, the ISD said.


He had chosen Assyafaah Mosque in Sembawang and Yusof Ishak Mosque in Woodlands as his targets because they are near his home, it added. He planned to rent a BlueSG car to travel between the two sites and had watched videos on operating an automatic transmission vehicle.

Influenced by the Christchurch attacker Brenton Tarrant, the youth had mapped out his route, bought a flak jacket, intended to buy a machete on online marketplace Carousell and wanted to live-stream his planned massacre.

"He was self-radicalised, motivated by a strong antipathy towards Islam and a fascination with violence," said ISD, adding that he had also watched the live-streamed video of the terrorist attack on the two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, and had read the attacker's manifesto. Tarrant, a white supremacist, gunned down 51 people in the attacks on March 15, 2019.


The Singaporean youth also watched Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) propaganda videos, and came to the erroneous conclusion that ISIS represented Islam, and that Islam called on its followers to kill non-believers, said ISD.

ISD said it was clear from his plans and preparations that he was influenced by Tarrant's actions and manifesto, such as how he planned to carry out the attacks on the anniversary of the Christchurch attacks, and had intended to modify a tactical vest he bought online such that the attack could be live-streamed from a mobile device.


Mr Shanmugam told reporters: "How do we weed out or find out every single person who wants to do something like this? I have asked ISD and the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth to engage the religious organisations to be more vigilant across the different religions, and advisories have been issued to religious organisations to strengthen their crisis preparedness to be more alert."

The minister added that the youth will be rehabilitated, instead of treating him as a criminal, charging him and putting him in jail. "So here, with rehabilitation, my hope is that after a number of years, he can be released and carry on with his life."


ISD said its investigation so far indicates that the youth had acted alone. There was also no indication that he had tried to influence anyone with his extreme outlook or involve others in his attack plans.

Religious leaders issued calls for solidarity yesterday.

The National Council of Churches of Singapore said it wanted to assure the Muslim community that it remained committed to defeating hatred and violence. "We will not be deterred from our common goal to build harmony and cohesion in multi-religious Singapore society," it added.

















Rise of right-wing extremism in Singapore worrying, says Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam
Issue is part of larger wave sweeping globally and it will be a long battle
By Fabian Koh‍, The Straits Times, 28 Jan 2021

The rise of right-wing extremism creeping into Singapore is a worrying development, and is part of a larger wave sweeping across the world, said Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam yesterday.

He was commenting on the case of a 16-year-old Singaporean student who was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) last month for plotting to attack Muslims at two mosques here on the second anniversary of a terror attack in Christchurch, New Zealand.

The Protestant Christian of Indian ethnicity was influenced by Christchurch shooter Brenton Tarrant, and is the first ISA detainee to have been inspired by far-right extremist ideology.

"It was quite chilling," Mr Shanmugam told reporters at the Home Team Science and Technology Agency, noting that the youth had planned the attack expecting that he would be killed by the police while executing his plans. "And he was prepared to die."

"Violent impulses, I've said this many times, are not restricted to any particular racial group or religious group. It can occur amongst anyone. It's really a question of being exposed to hate speech and then being influenced by it."

He said Singapore's strategy has been to engage with community and religious organisations on maintaining religious and racial harmony, as well as use the ISA to pick up radicalised individuals before they can cause any harm.


If the attack had succeeded, it would likely have incited fear and conflict between different racial and religious groups in Singapore, Mr Shanmugam noted.

Making the point that such extremism is not restricted to one particular group, he pointed to terrorists who claim to act in the name of Islam, as well as right-wing extremists with hateful manifestos.

He cited Norwegian far-right terrorist Anders Breivik, who killed 77 people in 2011, and American white supremacist Dylann Roof who killed nine black parishioners in South Carolina four years later.

Both of them influenced Tarrant, who on March 15, 2019, killed 51 people at two Christchurch mosques.

"And Tarrant inspired this boy whom we picked up. It is sad, I would say, that it's come to this, the world has come to this. And it's also creeping in into Singapore," said Mr Shanmugam.

He noted that the storming of the United States Capitol in Washington by right-wing protesters on Jan 6 was seen by many in that segment "both as a symbolic victory and a strategic defeat which they need to learn from". This issue is going to be a "long battle" for the world and Singapore, he added.


Mr Shanmugam also flagged another worrying trend - that seven people under the age of 20 have been picked up under the ISA since 2015, after getting radicalised through the Internet. Four have been detained, while three were served with restriction orders.

While the police have considerably enhanced their counter-terrorism response capabilities since the November 2015 attacks in Paris to focus on responding quickly to terror incidents and on areas that are prone to attacks, it will not be easy to prevent attacks like the one the 16-year-old youth had planned every single time, he cautioned.

The minister credited the ISD for being "extremely effective in picking out these people so that the attacks haven't even taken place".

To weed out more of such cases, he said the ISD and the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth are engaging religious organisations across the different religions to be more vigilant.

Advisories have also been issued to these groups to strengthen their crisis preparedness.

"We can only say thank goodness we are not like many other parts of the world; otherwise, instead of standing before you and saying that we have detained him (the youth), I will be saying, 'I'm very sorry that this has happened, this is another dastardly attack', and people will be putting flowers in memory of those who had been senselessly killed... It's the state of the world that we are in," he added.

Mr Shanmugam held up the latest case as an example of why Singapore takes a tough stance against hate speech of all forms including songs, saying that it has "real-world consequences" as it leads to the demonisation of other people.

"Our population has confidence that the Government is in the middle, and we protect you, regardless of who you are, whether you are Muslim or Christian," he said.

"You are a human being, and your sexual inclinations don't matter, we protect you, and we make sure that there can be no violence. So that is a guarantee that this Government has always given."






















16-year-old detained under ISA for planning mosque attacks to receive religious, psychological counselling while in detention
By Fabian Koh‍, The Straits Times, 28 Jan 2021

The 16-year-old student who was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for planning terrorist attacks on two mosques will receive Christian religious counselling to correct the radical ideology he has imbibed.

The Protestant Christian of Indian ethnicity will also go for psychological counselling to address his propensity for violence and vulnerability to radical influences, said the Internal Security Department (ISD) yesterday.

He will be granted family visits, and an aftercare officer will be assigned to his family to provide social and financial help if needed, the ISD added.

Arrangements have also been made for him to continue his studies, which include preparing him for national examinations, while he is in detention, said ISD

A mentor will also be assigned to the youth - the first ISA detainee inspired by far-right extremist ideology - to guide him towards pro-social behaviours.

Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said Singapore's approach of providing religious counselling to radicalised youth is better for their rehabilitation than charging and imprisoning them.

The 16-year-old youth is the youngest person to date to be dealt with under the ISA for terrorism-related activities.

"There's a reasonable expectation, that he, like many of the other boys, would eventually understand what their religion is about, and can actually get rehabilitated," Mr Shanmugam told reporters.


Legally, there is no minimum age for a person to be dealt with under the ISA. Due to the youth's age, special safeguards were taken during the investigations and detention, said the ISD. For example, his mother was present during the interview prior to his arrest.

Family visits were also allowed for him during the 30-day investigation period, although such visits are typically not allowed in the first 30 days.

Mr Shanmugam noted that Singapore adopts a consistent approach to rehabilitation, regardless of an individual's race or religion.

He cited the example of the Religious Rehabilitation Group, which was set up after the 9/11 terror attacks, to explain how the counselling takes place. The group, formed by Islamic scholars and teachers, receives some administrative support from the Government but operates independently.

It counsels the detainees and explains to them what the religion is really about and where they have gone wrong in their understanding of their religion, he added.

Some detainees were released after two years, he said, noting that rehabilitation will take longer for those who are fixed in their views and continue to believe in violence.


Flagging how seven people under the age of 20 have been picked by the ISA since 2015, Mr Shanmugam said: "They accessed the Internet, they get self-radicalised."

He added that the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth are aware of this trend. The ministries are putting in a lot of effort to address the issue, which is why there are fewer such cases here compared with other places.

But he also sounded a word of caution: "There is this tide that's coming in. I want to be realistic about it. We will do our best, society does its best, parents do their best.

"But, nevertheless, you must expect that increasingly, because it is so prevalent elsewhere, across religions - not just any specific religion - you must expect those influences to seep in, somewhat. We can just do our best to try and make sure that we're not overwhelmed."













Australian white supremacist Brenton Tarrant killed 51 people in Christchurch mosque attacks
The Straits Times, 28 Jan 2021

Australian Brenton Tarrant killed 51 people and injured 40 after he opened fire at worshippers at two mosques in the city of Christchurch in New Zealand on March 15, 2019.

The white supremacist, then 28 years old, stormed the Al Noor mosque armed with semi-automatic guns and shot at Muslims gathered there for Friday prayers, killing 44.

This was filmed from a head-mounted camera and streamed on Facebook as he headed to Linwood Islamic Centre about 5km away and killed another seven people.


Tarrant, born in New South Wales to a father who was a garbage collector and a mother who was a teacher, had moved to New Zealand in 2017 and started planning attacks against the Muslim community.

In his 74-page manifesto titled The Great Replacement which he published before the attack, he wrote that he wanted to ensure a future for white people, and described the immigration of non-European people to Western countries as "white genocide", among other things.

Tarrant described himself as "a regular white man, from a regular family" and said he did not hate foreigners or Muslims who lived in their "homelands".

But he said immigrants were invaders who colonised other people's lands.


He was sentenced to life in jail without parole last August - the first terrorism conviction in New Zealand's history.

The New Zealand judge who sentenced him had said the sentence was not enough punishment for the "wicked" crimes.

He said Tarrant had shown no remorse and that no matter how long he spent in prison, it would not be long enough to atone for his crimes.












Related

Singapore starts COVID-19 vaccination exercise for seniors on 27 Jan 2021; almost 100,000 people have had jab so far

$
0
0
Singapore starts COVID-19 jabs for seniors, with Ang Mo Kio, Tanjong Pagar residents receiving shots
By Yuen Sin and Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 28 Jan 2021

The vaccination drive for the elderly got under way yesterday as seniors in Ang Mo Kio and Tanjong Pagar began receiving Covid-19 jabs at polyclinics and the community vaccination centre at Tanjong Pagar Community Club.

The pilot scheme will eventually be expanded to seniors in other precincts.

With some clutching appointment cards, they began streaming into the polyclinics from as early as 8am to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who visited Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic, said he was glad that the vaccination process for seniors there was running smoothly, with more than 200 having made appointments to receive vaccine jabs at the polyclinic yesterday.

"So far, everybody who has booked those slots has turned up. Very few no-shows. So I think that people are taking it seriously and in the right spirit," he said.


More than 120 also got vaccinated at Outram Polyclinic yesterday. In all, close to 100,000 people have been vaccinated here since the drive started last month, up from over 60,000 as at last Friday.

Housewife Chin Mee Jung, 71, said she was nervous before her appointment at Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic. But she received her jab without any hiccups.

"It wasn't painful, and it will be even scarier if I did not get vaccinated and end up contracting the virus," said Madam Chin.

Madam Lee Oi Lin, 70, was also initially apprehensive but decided to get vaccinated at Outram Polyclinic for her own protection.

"Actually, I was a little worried at first because I am a senior," the retiree said in Mandarin, adding that she has high blood pressure and high blood sugar.

"But after thinking about it, I still decided to get vaccinated."


Mr Mohamed Haniffa Mohamed Ali, a 64-year-old security officer, also received the vaccine at the Outram site yesterday.

Both his daughters - one is a nurse and the other works as a screener in a hotel - have been vaccinated.

"I consulted them and they said 'Father, go ahead'," he said.

However, a senior, who wanted to be known only as Mr Ho, said he was advised not to take the jab after turning up at Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic for his appointment, as he had previously developed allergic reactions to a painkiller.

"The staff at the polyclinic had asked very detailed questions about my medical history. Though I can't take the jab today, it is better to be safe than sorry, in case there are complications," the 73-year-old said in Mandarin.


Between 5,000 and 10,000 seniors in Ang Mo Kio and Tanjong Pagar will receive letters inviting them to book appointments to get vaccinated, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said last week. This number may increase or be reduced, depending on the response.

The pilots in the two towns will help the Ministry of Health iron out any operational issues before it scales up the programme nationwide, with vaccinations to be progressively extended to all seniors from the middle of next month.

Vaccines will also be offered to seniors at the community vaccination centre at Teck Ghee Community Club in Ang Mo Kio, which will be set up by Feb 1.

Each of the 24 towns here will have one community vaccination centre by end-March at locations like community centres.


PM Lee said seniors have told him that Silver Generation Ambassadors have been visiting them to provide information on the vaccines.


"It is good for you, it is safe, it is free, and will help all of us," he said.














Senior couple in first batch to get COVID-19 vaccine urge others to get theirs 'so that we can all be safe'
By Ivan Kwee, The Straits Times, 28 Jan 2021

Madam Tan Choon Kiat, 71, and her husband Goh Chin Heng, 75, never hesitated about whether to take the Covid-19 vaccine.

When the couple first learnt about the benefits of the vaccine from watching the news, they knew they should get vaccinated.

"It's not just us - everyone should take the vaccine as soon as possible, so that we can all be safe," Madam Tan said in Mandarin.

The duo received their vaccines yesterday at Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic, under a pilot scheme that offers vaccinations to seniors in Ang Mo Kio and Tanjong Pagar.

The couple were pleased with the vaccination process, saying it went smoothly from start to end.

Mr Goh said in Mandarin: "The nurses at the polyclinic were polite, and the polyclinic was very orderly. When it was my turn, I didn't even feel the needle when the nurse gave me the jab."

The couple spent 30 minutes under observation at the polyclinic, in line with precautionary measures in case of any adverse reactions.


The pair, who have a history of medical conditions, said they did not experience any side effects as they went about their day, having breakfast at a hawker centre nearby before walking home.

They live with their two sons in a Housing Board flat located a 15-minute walk from Ang Mo Kio town centre.

Mr Goh, who used to work as a bus inspector, said: "Our children were a little worried at first, but after hearing that we were okay, they were relieved."

Since the pandemic began, he and his wife have left their home only when necessary.

"The vaccine is like insurance for when we have to go out, but we must still continue to take care of ourselves and wear our masks," said Mr Goh.










PM Lee Hsien Loong urges Singaporeans to guard against new clusters during Chinese New Year
Celebrate differently this year to avoid risk of super-spreader event and a lockdown, he says
By Yuen Sin and Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 28 Jan 2021

Singaporeans have to take precautions as they celebrate the upcoming Chinese New Year amid the coronavirus pandemic, to guard against the risk of new clusters forming, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday.

On his part, he will be having a small celebration at home. PM Lee said: "I am going to do my usual visits to essential workers who are still working away during this period... Then I will celebrate Chinese New Year with eight visitors - not more - from the family."


Speaking to reporters during a visit to Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic, where vaccinations for seniors aged 70 and above kicked off yesterday, PM Lee stressed that there remains a danger of a super-spreader event occurring during the festivities.

Chinese New Year, he noted, involves people visiting one another in large numbers, just like other festivals. "You have food, you have drinks, you have a good time, you gamble together... Each time you do that, there is a risk."

The Government is able to keep things under control if one or two cases emerge, he added.

"Five, six, seven cases in a cluster, if we are lucky, we work very hard, we trace hundreds of people, we can squeeze it down."

But if a few dozen clusters emerge, then there is a very real risk that Singapore may go back to the situation in March and April last year, when cases spiked. "We had to lock down with a circuit breaker, and that's a very high and disruptive cost for all of us in Singapore to pay."

Rather than take that risk, Singaporeans can restrain themselves, and celebrate Chinese New Year differently this year to keep Singapore safe, PM Lee added.


Under new measures announced by the Covid-19 multi-ministry task force, only up to eight visitors are allowed per household each day.

Individuals are advised to visit a maximum of two households daily.

Diners should also avoid shouting auspicious phrases when engaging in lohei, or the tossing of yusheng.

PM Lee said: "When you lohei, please do it in your hearts. If you must have the sound, there are very good apps - you press the button and they will say the right words for you."

He also said he hopes everybody will understand that this will not be a normal Year of the Ox. "Celebrate it in the right spirit but keep ourselves safe, so that perhaps a year from now, when the Year of the Tiger comes around, we would be roaring like a tiger."

PM Lee, who received his first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine on Jan 8, said he will be receiving his second dose tomorrow. Apart from his arm feeling slightly sore for the first two days, he did not have any side effects.

President Halimah Yacob also got the jab on the sidelines of a visit to Outram Polyclinic yesterday. "The process was quick, simple and not painful at all," she wrote in a Facebook post afterwards.


She urged Singaporeans to take the vaccine when it becomes available to them, adding that a high level of vaccination coverage will maximise protection for the population and minimise the proportion of people still susceptible to Covid-19.

Madam Halimah added that the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore's position is that Covid-19 vaccines are permissible for use by Muslims.

"By taking the vaccination, we will not only protect ourselves, but also our loved ones against Covid-19, as we need to safeguard our family members and friends," she said.



































How we fool ourselves - from forgeries to COVID-19 denial

$
0
0
How is it that top art experts or millions of voters can fail to spot outright fakes? Consider the power of wishful thing.
By Tim Harford, Published The Straits Times, 1 Feb 2021

They called Abraham Bredius "The Pope", a nickname that poked fun at his self-importance while acknowledging his authority. Dr Bredius was the world's leading scholar of Dutch painters and, particularly, of the mysterious Dutch master Johannes Vermeer.

When Dr Bredius was younger, he'd made his name by spotting works wrongly attributed to Vermeer. In 1937, at the age of 82, he had just published a highly respected book and was enjoying a retirement swan song in Monaco, when former Dutch MP Gerard Boon paid a visit to his villa.

Mr Boon, an outspoken anti-fascist, came to Dr Bredius on behalf of dissidents in Mussolini's Italy. They needed to raise money to fund their escape to the United States, he said. And they had something which might be of value.

He unpacked the crate he had brought out of Italy. Inside it was a large canvas, still on its 17th-century wooden stretcher. The picture depicted Christ at Emmaus, when he appeared to some of his disciples after his resurrection, and in the top left-hand corner was the magical signature: IV Meer.

Johannes Vermeer himself! Was it genuine? Only Dr Bredius had the expertise to judge.

The old man was spellbound. He delivered his verdict: Christ At Emmaus was not only a Vermeer, it was also the Dutch master's finest work. He penned an article for The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs announcing the discovery: "We have here - I am inclined to say - the masterpiece of Johannes Vermeer of Delft. Quite different from all his other paintings and yet every inch a Vermeer."

OVERCOME BY EMOTION

He added: "When this masterpiece was shown to me, I had difficulty controlling my emotions."

That was precisely the problem.

Christ At Emmaus was a rotten fraud, of course. But although the trickery was crude, Dr Bredius wasn't the only one to be fooled. Mr Boon had been lied to as well: he was the unwitting accomplice of a master forger. Soon enough, the entire Dutch art world was sucked into the con. Christ At Emmaus sold to the Boijmans Museum in Rotterdam, which was desperate to establish itself on the world stage. Dr Bredius urged the museum on and even contributed. The total cost was 520,000 guilders - compared to the wages of the time, well over US$10 million (S$13.3 million) today.

Emmaus drew admiring crowds and rave reviews. Several other paintings in a similar style soon emerged. Once the first forgery had been accepted, it was easier to pass off these other fakes. They didn't fool everyone but, like Emmaus, they fooled the people who mattered. Critics certified the forgeries; museums exhibited them; collectors paid vast sums for them - a total of more than US$100 million in today's money. In financial terms alone, this was a monumental fraud.

It is also a puzzle. Vermeer is revered as one of the greatest painters who ever lived. He painted mostly in the 1660s, and no more than 40 of his paintings were thought to have survived. The discovery of half a dozen new Vermeers in just a few years should have strained credulity. But it did not. Why?

The paintings themselves provide no answer. If you compare a genuine Vermeer with the first forgery, it is hard to understand how anyone was fooled, let alone anyone as discerning as Dr Bredius.

Emmaus is a drab, static image. The yellow-sleeved arm of a disciple seems more attached to a table than to his body, like a prank prosthetic. Christ's eyelids are droopy and strange - distinctive markers of the forger's style. And yet this picture fooled the world.

Why were people so gullible? And, as we gaze back through time at an entire community falling for an obvious con, is there a lesson we should learn today?

FROM TRUMP TO VIRUSES

Those questions are why I find the Emmaus forgery so fascinating. In recent years, I have seen people believe that former US president Donald Trump is the perfect person to clean up corruption in politics; that the British government "holds all the cards" in Brexit negotiations with the European Union; that Covid-19 is no worse than flu and that if we only lifted lockdowns, it would fade away.

There are certain things that large numbers of people believe, despite the most straightforward evidence to the contrary. I wanted to understand why we work so hard to fool ourselves.

In 2011, then behavioural economist Guy Mayraz at the University of Oxford conducted a test of wishful thinking. He showed his experimental subjects a graph of the price of wheat rising and falling over time. He asked each person to make a forecast of where the price would move next and offered them a small cash reward if their forecasts came true.

Dr Mayraz had divided his experimental participants into two categories. Half were told they were "farmers" who would be paid extra if wheat prices were high. The rest were "bakers" who would earn a bonus if wheat was cheap.

The subjects could earn two separate payments, then: the first for making an accurate forecast; the second, a random windfall if the price of wheat happened to move in their direction. Yet Dr Mayraz found that people tended to forecast what they hoped would happen. The farmers hoped that the price of wheat would rise and they also predicted that the price of wheat would rise. The bakers both hoped and predicted the opposite. This is wishful thinking in its purest form: letting our reasoning be swayed by our dreams.

MOTIVATED REASONING

It's one of many studies demonstrating what psychologists call "motivated reasoning". Motivated reasoning is thinking through a topic with the aim of reaching a particular conclusion. Sometimes it's a conscious process, as with a lawyer in the courtroom or a candidate in a political debate. Often it is as instinctive as the sports fan's limitless capacity to blame the bias of the referee.

I could see wishful thinking in operation over and over again during the pandemic last year. To pick just one example, there was a moment in the summer when people started to realise that sometimes tests for Covid-19 had a false positive rate: they would flag the disease even when it wasn't there. From that dangerous little piece of knowledge came a comforting theory: as the first wave passed in Europe, perhaps the virus was gone completely. A few commentators loudly declared that there would never be a second wave. When infections ticked up again, they claimed these were just false positives.

This story never really made much sense. False positives exist but why would they increase? And then hospitalisations rose too. Then deaths. A few people kept shouting about false positives. The rest of us could see the sad truth. It seems tragic and ridiculous in hindsight. But let's not feel too smug.

If the truth is painful enough, we are all capable of clutching at comforting falsehoods. Political diehards find ways to ignore the painful experience of electoral defeat, from Mr Jeremy Corbyn's much-mocked claim after badly losing the 2019 general election in the United Kingdom that on many issues "we have won the arguments", to Mr Trump's far more malevolent assertion that the US presidential election was rigged. Tens of millions agree.

Wishful thinking isn't the only form of motivated reasoning, but it is a common one. A "farmer" wants to be accurate in his forecast of wheat prices but he also wants to make money; a political activist wants the politicians she supports to be smart and witty and incorruptible. She'll ignore or dismiss evidence to the contrary. And an art critic who loves Vermeer is motivated to conclude that the painting in front of him is not a forgery but a masterpiece. It wasn't Emmaus that fooled the world. It was wishful thinking. And we might continue to be fooled to this day had the forger not been caught out by a combination of recklessness and bad luck.

THE UNRAVELLING

The unravelling began with a knock on the door of 321 Keizersgracht, one of Amsterdam's most exclusive addresses. It was the evening of May 29, 1945. The war in Europe was at an end.

Outside stood two soldiers from the Allied Art Commission. The door swung open to reveal an artist and art dealer named Han van Meegeren. The Dutch had just endured the near starvation of what they called the "hunger winter" but the visiting soldiers could see that at 321 Keizersgracht, there was plenty of everything.

And Van Meegeren owned more than 50 other properties scattered across the city. At 738 Keizersgracht, a 15-minute stroll away, he hosted regular orgies at which prostitutes were offered the chance to grab a fistful of jewels in the hallway as they left. Where had the money come from for all this?

The soldiers thought they knew. A masterpiece by Johannes Vermeer, The Woman Taken In Adultery, had been found in the possession of Hermann Goering, Adolf Hitler's right-hand man. The paper trail led back to Van Meegeren, as did several other transactions involving other Vermeer paintings. Where had he obtained these Dutch treasures?

Van Meegeren was in serious trouble: treason could carry the death penalty. After days of furious denials, he cracked.

"Idiots! You think I sold a Vermeer to that fat Goering? But it's not a Vermeer. I painted it myself."

He claimed the others, too - including Emmaus. Many biographies have been written about Van Meegeren - including authoritative accounts by Edward Dolnick and by Jonathan Lopez, on which I have relied in retelling the story. But the more I studied the story, the more I found my gaze drawn instead to Dr Bredius, the art critic who first fell for the fraud. Van Meegeren is fascinating because he seems unique. But Dr Bredius is compelling for the opposite reason: his mistake is all too typical.

Dr Bredius' stumble is much more than a footnote in the history of art. It can teach us why we buy things we don't need or become infatuated with the wrong kind of romantic partner. It explains why we vote for politicians who betray our trust, fall for implausible theories about the coronavirus and repeat statistical claims that even a moment's thought would tell us cannot be true.

Dr Bredius knew more about his chosen subject than most of us will ever know about anything - and yet he was fooled.

Recall that he wrote: "I had difficulty controlling my emotions." That was a truer statement than he knew. When we are trying to interpret the world around us, we need to realise that our expertise can be drowned by our feelings.

LEARNED FOOLS

Wishful thinking enabled Dr Bredius' seduction, but there was more to his error than the mere hope of finding one more Vermeer. He had published a number of conjectures about a mysterious gap in Vermeer's painting career. Might Vermeer have been working on biblical paintings, perhaps? Dr Bredius fondly speculated about a link with the Italian master Caravaggio. Van Meegeren was a forger who understood his victim all too well. He created Emmaus to confirm all Dr Bredius' theories. When Dr Bredius saw the picture, he didn't just see a painting. He saw proof that he had been right all along.

The French satirist Molière once wrote that "a learned fool is more foolish than an ignorant one". Modern social science suggests that Molière was right.

In 2006, the political scientists Charles Taber and Milton Lodge looked at motivated reasoning about gun control and affirmative action. They asked people to evaluate various arguments for and against each position - and they found, as you might expect, that their subjects' political beliefs interfered with their ability to dissect the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments in front of them.

More surprising was that the process of reading the arguments pushed people further towards political extremes. This was because they grabbed on to arguments they liked and quickly dismissed the rest. Even more striking was that this polarising effect was stronger for people who already knew a lot about civics and politics. These well-informed people were better at cherry-picking the information they wanted. More information and more expertise produced more strongly motivated reasoning.

This effect is most apparent in views on climate change in the US: not only is there a huge gap between Democratic and Republican supporters over how concerned they are about climate change but the gap also grows wider among Republicans and Democrats with higher levels of education and scientific literacy. Greater knowledge does not guarantee convergence on the truth; when coupled with motivated reasoning, it can simply provide fuel for polarisation.

THE TRIAL

The authorities responsible for bringing Van Meegeren to justice unwittingly helped make his story world-famous. Forensic chemists quickly verified that, as Van Meegeren claimed, the paintings were hardened with Bakelite and aged with India ink. But prosecutors also challenged Van Meegeren to prove that he was the forger by painting a picture in the style of Emmaus. And of course he did, taking the opportunity to charm some journalists along the way. One breathless headline reported: "He Paints for His Life".

Newspapers in the Netherlands and around the world couldn't tear their gaze away from the great showman. By the time the trial came, in 1947, the charge was forgery, not treason. When Van Meegeren himself took the stand, he explained that he had only forged the art to prove his worth as an artist and to unmask the art experts as fools.

"You sold these fakes for high prices," admonished the judge.

"Had I sold them for low prices," quipped Van Meegeren, "it would have been obvious they were fake".

Peals of laughter rang out. Van Meegeren claimed that he hadn't done it for the money, which had brought him nothing but trouble. It is a bold statement from a man who hosted wild sex parties while Amsterdam starved. But the newspapers and the public were just as spellbound as Dr Bredius had been.

Found guilty of forgery, Van Meegeren was cheered as he left the courtroom. A Dutch opinion poll found that he was one of the most popular men in the country.

And that was the end of Van Meegeren's adventure. A few days after being sentenced, he was admitted to hospital with heart trouble. He died shortly after. For a while, there was even talk of putting up a statue.

WHAT CAN BE DONE

Any of us is capable of falling for a lie. There is no guaranteed method of keeping ourselves safe - except to believe nothing at all, a corrosive cynicism which is even worse than gullibility.

But I can offer a simple habit of mind that I have found helpful. When you are asked to believe something - a newspaper headline, a statistic, a claim on social media - stop for a moment and notice your own feelings. Are you feeling defensive, vindicated, angry, smug? Whatever the emotional reaction, take note of it. Having done so, you may be thinking more clearly already.

So what is your emotional reaction to the story of the clever forger who fooled the experts and scammed the Nazis? Van Meegeren's early biographers fell in love with him. More recently, we have learnt the truth.

Jonathan Lopez's book, The Man Who Made Vermeers, is one of few to focus on the demonstrable fact that this likeable rogue was a Nazi. The circumstantial evidence is suggestive enough. Van Meegeren had prospered mightily under Nazi occupation. You don't get to act like that in German-occupied territory unless you've made friends with a few Nazis. But it is the documentary evidence that is really telling. The most vivid is Teekeningen 1, a grotesque anti-Semitic book illustrated and published by Van Meegeren. A copy was hand-delivered to Adolf Hitler, with a handwritten dedication in artist's charcoal: "To my beloved Führer in grateful tribute - Han van Meegeren."

It was found in Hitler's library.

What would have happened if this shocking discovery had emerged before Van Meegeren's trial?

The discomfiting truth is that it did. A Dutch resistance newspaper published the news and Van Meegeren waved it away, claiming that he had signed hundreds of copies of the book and the dedication must have been added by someone else. It's a ludicrous excuse. But people wanted to believe it. Wishful thinking is a powerful thing.

Caught in a scandal, a modern-day Van Meegeren would say "That's not my voice on the tape", or call the story "fake news". And their supporters would agree. It seems that if you show people a trickster with a sense of humour, a penchant for mocking experts and the capacity to land a few blows on a hated enemy, they will forgive a lot. What they cannot forgive they will find ways to ignore. Recent experience has only reinforced that lesson.

The facts about Van Meegeren seemed obvious enough. But facts are not the only thing that shape our thinking. Abraham Bredius was right all along when he wrote, "I had difficulty controlling my emotions."

So do we all.







Singapore approves Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine; first shipment to arrive around March 2021

$
0
0
Health Sciences Authority's review of clinical data shows it is 94% effective
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 4 Feb 2021

Singapore has approved American pharmaceutical company Moderna's coronavirus vaccine for local use, with the first shipment expected to arrive around next month if all goes according to plan.

The vaccine will be progressively rolled out for individuals aged 18 and older, said the Ministry of Health (MOH) yesterday.

Singapore is the first Asian country to approve Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine, which is the second one to be given the green light here after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was approved last December.

More vaccines from both companies will continue to arrive over the course of the year, MOH said.

In a separate statement, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) said its review of the clinical data has shown that the Moderna vaccine is 94 per cent effective, with the benefits outweighing the risks.

In other words, the vaccine led to a 94 per cent reduction of symptomatic Covid-19 infections in vaccinated individuals, compared with a similarly sized group of unvaccinated people.

This data was based on a clinical trial of 30,000 people conducted in the United States. Trial participants ranged in age from 18 to 95 years.


The Moderna vaccine requires two doses administered 28 days apart, while the Pfizer vaccine's two doses are taken 21 days apart.

The Moderna vaccine can be stored at a regular freezer temperature of minus 20 deg C, whereas the Pfizer vaccine must be stored at minus 70 deg C.

Both vaccines "teach" the cells in the body to make a protein that triggers an immune response to produce antibodies to fight the virus. Reported side effects from both vaccines are similar and include pain, swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle ache, fever, chills, vomiting and joint pain after vaccination.

These reactions are generally associated with vaccinations, and typically resolve on their own after a few days, HSA said.


The vaccine has received interim authorisation under the Pandemic Special Access Route, which means Moderna has to monitor the longer-term efficacy of the vaccine in order to determine how long it protects against Covid-19. It must also follow up on the safety of the vaccine for a longer period of time.

Singapore's expert committee on Covid-19 vaccination, which carried out an independent review of the Moderna vaccine, said yesterday that it is satisfied with the vaccine's safety and efficacy.

Its safety profile is consistent with the standards set for other registered vaccines used in the immunisation against other diseases.

However, the committee cautioned that pregnant women and severely immuno-compromised people, as well as those under 18, should not take the vaccine yet.

Singapore aims to have enough vaccines for citizens and long-term residents in the country by the third quarter of this year, although it may take until the end of the year to get the whole population inoculated. Vaccination is voluntary and free.

Singapore has signed advance purchase agreements with Pfizer, Moderna and Sinovac, and is in confidential talks with other companies.


MOH said more than 175,000 people had taken their first dose of the Pfizer vaccine as at Tuesday, with around 6,000 in this group having taken the second dose. "In two weeks' time, they will be adequately protected against Covid-19," it added.

The ministry urged locals to get vaccinated in order to protect themselves and their loved ones, as well as those in the wider community who cannot be vaccinated due to medical reasons.

The expert committee also pointed out that Singapore remains at risk of a surge in coronavirus cases even though the local virus transmission rate is low.

"Therefore, it is important that we achieve as comprehensive a coverage of Covid-19 vaccination as possible across the entire population," it added.














Side effects for Moderna COVID-19 vaccine similar to Pfizer's
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 4 Feb 2021

Side effects for the newly approved Moderna Covid-19 vaccine are similar to those reported about the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which is currently being used here.

They include pain, swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle ache, fever, chills, vomiting, and joint pain after vaccination.

Some symptoms, such as fatigue, headaches and muscle and joint aches may be more severe in a small number of people, said the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) yesterday.

But it added that these side effects typically resolve on their own within a few days, stressing that the vaccine's benefits outweigh the risks.

"These symptoms are reactions generally associated with vaccinations and expected as part of the body's natural response so as to build immunity against Covid-19," it said.

The HSA has granted interim authorisation for the Moderna vaccine under the Pandemic Special Access Route, which facilitates access to new vaccines, medicines and medical devices during such crises.


It is approved for use in people aged 18 and up, and involves two doses taken 28 days apart.

But certain groups of people - such as pregnant women or the severely immunocompromised - should not get the jab. This is because safety and efficacy data is not yet available for these groups.

The HSA said a small proportion of people will suffer severe allergic reactions upon vaccination, as is the case for all vaccines.

They could include people with a history of anaphylaxis, as well as those with severe or multiple allergies to medicines and food. These groups should not get the vaccine, it said.


The Moderna vaccine has an efficacy of 94 per cent - slightly lower than Pfizer's 95 per cent. This data was gleaned from a phase three clinical trial of 30,000 people aged between 18 and 95.

It means the vaccine led to a 94 per cent reduction of symptomatic Covid-19 infections in a vaccinated group of people, as compared with a similarly sized group that was not vaccinated.

The HSA said the vaccine's safety profile was "generally consistent with other registered vaccines used in immunisation against other diseases".

HSA chief executive Mimi Choong added that her organisation has applied "the same rigorous evaluation processes, as with all vaccines, to ensure that the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine has met the required high standards of quality, safety and efficacy".

As a condition of it receiving interim authorisation, Moderna has to monitor the longer-term efficacy of the vaccine to determine how long it can protect people against Covid-19.

It will also have to follow up on the vaccine's safety over a longer period of time, in order to determine its full safety profile.

At present, available data shows that the Moderna vaccine is effective two months after both doses of the vaccine are completed, with "no signs of waning protection".

The HSA said it will continue to review the data in order to ensure that the benefits of vaccination continue to outweigh the risks.

Interim authorisation can be terminated at any time, for example, if new data shows that the vaccine poses too high a risk.


Commenting on the new vaccine, Professor Teo Yik Ying, dean of the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health at the National University of Singapore, said it diversifies the supply chain of vaccines into Singapore.

"Given the recent developments on how vaccine supply may be disrupted due to production issues and shifting needs globally, it is important for every country to build up a robust supply pipeline, to avoid over-reliance on a single producer which may invariably affect national vaccination strategies."

























Related




COVID-19 safe management measures tightened from 26 January 2021; senior citizens to be vaccinated from 27 January, starting with pilots in Ang Mo Kio and Tanjong Pagar





4,600 public rental-flat families became HDB home owners over the past 5 years through various housing schemes, grants and Home Ownership Support Team

$
0
0
By 2023, around 1,000 families will be offered the same help by HDB
By Michelle Ng, The Straits Times, 8 Feb 2021

About 4,600 families in public rental homes have become home owners of Housing Board (HDB) flats over the past five years through various housing schemes and grants.

By 2023, around 1,000 families will be offered help by HDB to do the same.

Among the 4,600 households, three in four bought a flat directly from HDB while the remainder bought a resale flat on the open market, said HDB yesterday.

More than half of these rental households bought a three-room flat while a quarter bought four-room flats, it added.

About two-thirds of the rental households that bought a flat had tapped housing grants such as the Enhanced CPF Housing Grant (EHG), which was introduced in September 2019 and dispenses up to $80,000 in grants to eligible buyers.

Others had also tapped the previous Additional CPF Housing Grant and Special CPF Housing Grant, which gave up to $40,000 in grants each. These two grants have been replaced by the EHG.

Families with at least one child below the age of 18 who live in public rental flats, and who had previously bought a subsidised flat, can also buy a two-room flexi flat through the Fresh Start Housing Scheme.

Close to 100 families have been placed on the scheme since it started in December 2016, the Ministry of National Development said in a written parliamentary reply last Monday.

There are currently around 50,000 households living in public rental flats.

By 2023, around 1,000 rental households, preliminarily assessed to have the potential and are ready to buy a flat, will be contacted by HDB's Home Ownership Support Team (HST), said HDB.

Factors such as income stability and the household's ability to afford a flat are taken into consideration when HDB makes such assessments.

The HST was set up in 2019 to guide public rental families through their home ownership journey, from planning and budgeting their flat purchase to the time they collect the keys to their home.

As at the end of last year, the team had contacted 654 rental households.

Of these, 50 families have booked flats and 177 families should be ready to apply for a flat in the next one to two years.

The remaining households are in the process of assessment or are not ready to apply for a flat in the near term.

The team will continue to track the progress of the remaining households and help them move on to home ownership, where feasible, said HDB.


Technician Jumali Remin, 43, is among the 4,600 families who are now HDB flat owners.

He and his wife, a childcare educator, and their five children aged between one and nine years old, moved into a four-room HDB resale flat in Punggol last month. They had sought guidance from the HST early last year.

"Initially, we were a little hesitant about whether we could afford a four-room flat, but after working out our finances and budget with the team, we were glad to learn that we could afford one," he said.

"We never imagined we would one day be able to own a flat… It was something we have dreamt about for a long time."

Madam Mehroo Nisha Banu Mohamed, 33, who works part-time as a SafeEntry officer and her husband, a security officer, have booked a three-room Build-To-Order flat in Tengah which will be ready in 2025.

Until then, the couple and their three children - aged seven, 11 and 14 - will live in their two-room rental flat in Bukit Merah.

She said: "Initially, we were not sure whether we could afford to buy our own flat… But with the (HST's) assistance, we understood where we stand and what we could afford."







Singapore Green Plan 2030 to change the way people live, work, study and play

$
0
0
Singapore poised to take green leap forward
New sustainability initiatives launched to change how people work, study and play
By Audrey Tan, Science and Environment Correspondent, The Straits Times, 11 Feb 2021

Singaporeans look set to lead much greener lives by 2030, with new sustainability initiatives launched to change the way they work, study and play.

The Singapore Green Plan 2030, released by five ministries yesterday, will chart the country's way towards a more sustainable future, "building back better" as it recovers from the fallout of Covid-19.

The plan seeks to inform all aspects of development here - from infrastructure, to research and innovation, to training programmes.


"The comprehensive plan will strengthen Singapore's economic, climate and resource resilience, improve the living environment of Singaporeans, and bring new business and job opportunities," said the ministries in a joint statement. The Ministries of Education, National Development, Sustainability and the Environment, Trade and Industry and Transport are driving the initiative.

Under the Green Plan, at least 20 per cent of schools here will be carbon-neutral by 2030.

Adults, too, will work in greener buildings, since there are plans to raise the sustainability standards of buildings. People will be encouraged to commute in a less carbon-intensive way - cycling paths will triple in length by then, and the rail network will be expanded to 360km, up from the 230km today.

This infrastructure will be built within a city cloaked in green, with more initiatives to help nature seep into the heartland.

For instance, more nature parks will sprout up over the years. By 2030, there will be a more than 50 per cent increase in nature park land where people can go hiking or birdwatching.

Even the fossil fuel haven of Jurong Island will be transformed into a "sustainable energy and chemicals park".

Behind the scenes, research and innovation in low carbon alternatives will continue, even as programmes such as the new Enterprise Sustainability Programme are rolled out to help firms develop capabilities in this area.

More details on these initiatives will be given during the Budget next week, and in the subsequent Budget debates.


Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in a Facebook post that the Green Plan will build upon Singapore's past sustainability efforts.

"We need to ensure a Singapore for our future generations. All of us have to work together, and make Singapore a bright green spark for the world," said PM Lee.

The Green Plan follows a robust debate in the House earlier this month on the need for Singapore to speed up efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change.

Co-founder of the Singapore Youth for Climate Action Nor Lastrina Hamid said that while many initiatives in the plan have been announced before, she was heartened that multiple ministries were involved in the Green Plan.

Ms Lastrina added that she hopes to see more regular engagement between the Government and civil society and the general public, to help the plans materialise.






















Green Plan offers new jobs, areas for economic growth
Singapore aims to be carbon services hub, centre for green finance and sustainable tourism destination
By Rei Kurohi, The Straits Times, 11 Feb 2021

Jurong Island will be a sustainable energy and chemicals park by 2030 as part of Singapore's push to make industrial production processes and energy usage greener and improve energy efficiency.

The Republic also aims to develop itself into a sustainable tourism destination as well as a carbon services hub and a centre for green finance to facilitate sustainability efforts in Asia.

In a statement announcing an inter-ministerial Green Plan yesterday, the Government said Singapore's sustainability efforts will bring new business opportunities.

The Green Economy, one of five key pillars of the new Green Plan, aims to seek green growth opportunities to create new jobs, transform Singapore's industries and harness sustainability as a competitive advantage, the statement said.

This also entails ensuring that new carbon-intensive investments brought into Singapore are among the best-in-class in terms of carbon and energy efficiency.


Other initiatives include strengthening Singapore as a location for both global and local companies to develop new sustainability solutions for Asia through research and development in areas such as sustainable packaging, decarbonisation, waste upcycling, urban farming and water treatment.

New technologies for carbon capture, utilisation and storage will be developed and trialled, and the potential of low-carbon hydrogen and other emerging technological approaches to decarbonisation will be studied.

The Government will also support local enterprises to adopt sustainability practices, solutions and standards, enhance their resource efficiency and tap new business opportunities in sustainability, the statement added.

The Green Plan is spearheaded by the ministries of Education, National Development, Sustainability and the Environment, Trade and Industry, and Transport.


The Government has also reiterated its plan to review the carbon tax by 2023, a move that MPs on both sides of the aisle in Parliament have strongly supported.

During a Feb 1 debate on a motion calling on the Government to bolster its climate efforts, many MPs called for the carbon tax to be raised significantly and for the review to be brought forward.

Kebun Baru MP Henry Kwek, who spoke during the debate about how Singapore can help other countries reduce their carbon emissions, said the initiatives announced in the Green Plan are bold and will be impactful.

"I look forward to a sharp debate on the Green Plan in the upcoming Budget season," he said, adding that he was encouraged by the announcement of the Green Plan Conversations with members of the public that will "bring everyone into the fold", build trust and rally Singaporeans to change the way they live.


On the plan to make Jurong Island more sustainable, Mr Kwek said it would be "overly simplistic" to see Singapore's petrochemical sector solely as a carbon emitter.

"We must also consider that if our petrochemical companies exit Singapore to minimise cost, it is quite possible they will move to a different location with even less robust carbon emission standards," said Mr Kwek.

"A balanced approach will be to acknowledge that Singapore provides essential manufacturing services, including petrochemicals, to the rest of the world, and the way we discharge our duty is to ensure that our petrochemicals companies achieve world-class energy and carbon efficiency."

Mr Anders Nordheim, senior vice-president of Asia sustainable finance at the World Wide Fund for Nature Singapore, said Singapore is well positioned to be a hub for green finance and the issuance of sustainability-themed securities given its robust banking sector and large asset management sector.

But Mr Nordheim said the Republic will face fierce competition in its bid to become an Asian green finance hub from Hong Kong, which launched a strategic plan on green finance in December last year. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has also been issuing green bonds since 2019.













Related

Singapore Budget 2021: Emerging Stronger Together

$
0
0
$11 billion set aside to fight COVID-19, $24 billion to help Singapore emerge stronger from crisis
DPM Heng Swee Keat unveils Budget to tackle current crisis, with eye on future challenges as well
By Linette Lai, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

Against a backdrop of global uncertainty amplified by the pandemic, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat yesterday delivered a Budget finely balanced between providing immediate help to sectors under stress, and investing in Singapore's long-term future.

The $107 billion plan - the first full Budget in the Government's new term - includes an $11 billion Covid-19 Resilience Package. This will help safeguard public health and support the workers and businesses that need help, with extra money going to the hardest-hit sectors, such as aviation and tourism.

The Jobs Support Scheme, which helped stave off retrenchments last year, will be extended until September, but in a more targeted and tapering way. This will cost $700 million.

Job seekers also got a helping hand, with another $5.4 billion set aside for a fresh injection into the SGUnited Jobs and Skills Package. This is on top of the $3 billion set aside last year and will support the hiring of 200,000 locals through the Jobs Growth Incentive and provide up to 35,000 traineeship and training opportunities this year.

In addition, Mr Heng pledged to allocate $24 billion across the next three years to enable Singapore's firms and workers to emerge stronger from the crisis.


The country's investments to equip its people to seize opportunities and help businesses innovate are what distinguish it from others, said Mr Heng, who is also Finance Minister.

"While last year's Budgets were tilted towards emergency support in a broad-based way, this year's Budget will focus on accelerating structural adaptions," he added in a speech that lasted just over two hours and underscored the need to make the country's businesses and workers future-ready.

Mr Heng announced that the salaries of nurses and other healthcare workers, who have been on the forefront of the fight against Covid-19, will be enhanced, with details to be disclosed later.


He also unveiled a $900 million Household Support Package of utility grants and GST and cash vouchers to help all families, but targeted most at lower-to middle-income households.

And in line with Singapore's long-term goal to become a more sustainable society, measures will be introduced to encourage the adoption of electric vehicles, with green bonds to be issued on select public infrastructure projects.


In a Facebook post last evening, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said: "While grappling with the pandemic, we must not neglect the future. Hence the Budget has many items that build our capabilities and competitiveness. When the sun shines again, we must be ready to seize the new opportunities."

All these measures mean that Singapore will see a Budget deficit of $11 billion, following last year's deficit of $64.9 billion.


Running a fiscal deficit to support targeted relief is warranted in the immediate term, given the unprecedented impact of Covid-19, Mr Heng said. But Singapore's recurrent spending needs in areas such as healthcare will continue to rise, and the country must meet these needs in a "disciplined and sustainable way", he said, adding that beyond this crisis, "we must return to running balanced budgets".


Singapore will tap its reserves to fund the $11 billion Covid-19 Resilience Package. But Mr Heng pointed out that the nation expects to utilise only $42.7 billion of past reserves for the last financial year, against the $52 billion that had been provided for.

This means the total expected draw over two years will amount to $53.7 billion - a net increase of $1.7 billion from what Singapore expected to draw from its reserves to respond to the crisis. President Halimah Yacob has given her in-principle support for the draw, he added.


Singapore's spending needs mean the impending GST hike, slated to take place some time between next year and 2025, will happen "sooner rather than later". Its exact timing will depend on Singapore's economic outlook, Mr Heng said, adding that the country will not be able to meet rising recurrent needs without the increase. He reiterated that $6 billion has already been set aside under last year's Budget to defray the impact of this tax hike on the majority of Singaporean households by at least five years.


Petrol duties have also been raised for the first time in six years, and take place with immediate effect, with road tax rebates in place to cushion the impact of this hike.

From January 2023, GST will also be extended to low-value goods to ensure a level playing field for local businesses to compete effectively.

In order to finance long-term infrastructure such as new MRT lines that will benefit both current and future generations, the Government will also issue up to $90 billion in new bonds under a law to be tabled later this year.

On the topic of foreign manpower, Mr Heng said foreigners with the right expertise are a welcome complement to Singaporeans in areas where the country is short on skills. But foreign worker quotas will be tightened in the manufacturing sector, where the local workforce has to deepen its skills.


"The way forward is neither to have few or no foreign workers, nor to have a big inflow," he said. "We have to accept what this little island can accommodate."

Singapore expects its revenues will be able to support projected expenditure from all proposed measures as the economy recovers.

But this assumes the global Covid-19 situation comes under control by next year, said Mr Heng. Otherwise, the Government will seek the President's consideration to again tap past reserves.


"We have carefully thought through the different scenarios. While we expect recovery in Singapore and globally, there is a wide cone of uncertainty," he added.

"Even if the economic and fiscal situation turns out to be worse than expected, we must still press on to invest in new areas, so as to ride on the structural changes, transform and emerge stronger as an economy, and as a people."























Budget 2021: Six ways for Singapore to emerge stronger
In his Budget statement yesterday, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat outlined six ways in which Singapore can emerge stronger from the crisis. Rei Kurohi and Prisca Ang capture his key points.
The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021


1 Boosting COVID-19 defences

Tackling the pandemic remains a key area of focus, and an $11 billion Covid-19 Resilience Package will focus on immediate and ongoing recovery efforts.

Of this sum, $4.8 billion goes towards public health and safe reopening measures, including testing, clinical management and contact tracing, and vaccination for everyone living in Singapore.

Another $700 million goes to extending the Jobs Support Scheme to help firms retain workers, but with support gradually tapering off.


The hardest-hit sectors, like aviation and tourism that now get 50 per cent wage support, will see this lowered to 30 per cent for April to June, and 10 per cent for July to September. Sectors like food services and retail, currently getting 30 per cent support, will see this reduced to 10 per cent for April to June.

The worst-hit sectors will continue to get more targeted support to preserve their capabilities, with an extra $870 million for the aviation sector.

Taxi and private-hire car drivers will be supported by the $133 million set aside for the Covid-19 Driver Relief Fund, and $45 million will be set aside for the extension of the Arts and Culture Resilience Package and the Sports Resilience Package.




2 Ramping up business innovation

Economic transformation is key to creating jobs and opportunities for Singaporeans, and $24 billion will be allocated over the next three years to help businesses and workers recover.

A key focus is restoring physical connectivity, and investments will be made in on-arrival testing and biosafety systems, such as the Notarise and Verify systems being developed by GovTech with the private sector to verify Covid-19 test results and vaccination records.

Businesses will also get support with innovating and collaborating beyond Singapore's shores through government investments in three platforms.

A pilot Corporate Venture Launchpad will co-fund corporates building new ventures, and an Open Innovation Platform will match companies and public agencies with solution providers and co-fund the prototyping of new systems, such as for monitoring workers' health. The Global Innovation Alliance will be enhanced to catalyse partnerships with major global innovation hubs, with the network of 15 cities currently growing to more than 25 over the next five years.

A Singapore Intellectual Property Strategy 2030 is also being developed to support businesses in commercialising their innovations.


The Government will also step up risk-sharing arrangements with providers of capital and give grants to support businesses to innovate, transform and scale up. Start-ups can tap enhanced support; mature enterprises, including SMEs, will get help co-funding the adoption of digital solutions and new technologies; and large local firms will be able to tap a new funding platform - that the Government and Temasek will each invest $500million in - to transform and expand.




3 Helping workers hone skills

An additional $5.4 billion will be allocated for the second tranche of the SGUnited Jobs and Skills Package to support the hiring of 200,000 locals this year and provide up to 35,000 training opportunities.

Of this, $5.2 billion goes to extending the Jobs Growth Incentive hiring window to end-September, to support companies in growth sectors, with more for those hiring mature workers, persons with disabilities and former offenders.

The SGUnited Skills, Traineeships and Mid-Career Pathways programmes will also be extended till March 31, 2022.


A new Innovation and Enterprise Fellowship Programme will support about 500 fellowships in areas like cyber security, artificial intelligence and health technology over the next five years.

Salaries will also be enhanced for nurses and other healthcare workers, and government support for wage increments for locals will be supported with the extension of the Wage Credit Scheme for a year.

The Capability Transfer Programme that supports the transfer of skills from foreign to local workers will also be extended till end-September 2024.

And to help the manufacturing sector skill up, the sub-dependency ratio ceiling for S Passes in the sector will be reduced from 20 to 18 per cent from January 2022 and to 15 per cent from January 2023.




4 Strengthening social cohesion

A $900 million Household Support Package will continue short-term relief for eligible households, including a one-off GST Voucher - Cash Special Payment of $200 in June, and a GST Voucher - U-Save Special Payment of $120 to $200 in April and July, or an additional 50 per cent, for eligible HDB households.

Service and conservancy charges rebates will also be extended for another year.

In addition, every Singaporean child below 21 will get a one-off $200 top-up to their Child Development Account, Edusave Account or Post-Secondary Education Account.

All Singaporean households will also get $100 in Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers to be used at heartland shops and hawker centres.


Looking further ahead, over $200 million more will go to supporting companies that raise their retirement and re-employment ages above the prevailing statutory ages, and that offer part-time employment to older workers who request it.

ComLink - which helps low-income families in rental housing - will be expanded significantly over the next two years to cover 14,000 families, up from 1,000 now. An Inclusive Support Programme will provide early intervention support for children with special needs.


To encourage charitable giving, the 250 per cent tax deduction for donations will be extended by two years, and $20 million will be set aside for a new Change for Charity Grant to match donations raised by businesses that encourage customers to donate while making purchases.

Another $50 million will be set aside for a matching grant for the CDC Care and Innovation Fund, to support bottom-up initiatives that address community needs.




5 Building a sustainable home

Following the launch of the Singapore Green Plan 2030 last week, $60 million will be set aside for a new Agri-Food Cluster Transformation Fund to lift productivity and food resilience.

Another $30 million will be set aside over the next five years to incentivise the switch to electric vehicles, including the installation of 60,000 charging points at public carparks and private premises by 2030. Electric cars will be made more affordable with the lowering of the additional registration fee floor from $5,000 to $0 from January 2022 to December 2023. Road tax bands will also be adjusted.

Petrol duties will also be raised by 15 cents per litre for premium grade petrol to 79 cents a litre, and by 10 cents a litre to 66 cents a litre for intermediate grade petrol.

The Government will take the lead on sustainability, by committing public agencies to more ambitious goals under the GreenGov.SG initiative, and issuing green bonds on select public infrastructure projects. Up to $19 billion worth of public sector green projects have been identified, including Tuas Nexus which will integrate waste and water treatment facilities.

A new Enterprise Sustainability Programme will also be launched to help enterprises use resources more efficiently and develop new green products and solutions.

Singaporeans with ideas for sustainable development are also encouraged to step forward and the Government will support ground-up projects.


6 Managing our finances

While this Budget will see an $11 billion draw on past reserves for FY2021 to fund the Covid-19 Resilience Package, the Government does not expect to use $9.3 billion of the $52 billion draw previously approved for FY2020.

Therefore, the total expected draw on the reserves over the two financial years totals $53.7 billion - or an additional $1.7 billion over what it expected to draw to respond to the crisis.

But Singapore's fiscal situation is expected to be tighter in the years ahead, and a few measures will be needed.

The hike in goods and services tax (GST) rate from 7 per cent to 9 per cent will be needed between 2022 and 2025, and sooner rather than later, subject to the economic outlook, if Singapore is to meet rising recurrent spending needs, especially in healthcare. Its impact will, however, be cushioned by the $6 billion Assurance Package announced in last year's main Budget.

At the same time, GST will have to be paid on lower-value goods bought online and imported by air or post from Jan 1, 2023, to ensure a level playing field for local businesses.


The Government also intends to issue new bonds under a proposed Significant Infrastructure Government Loan Act (SINGA) to finance major, long-term infrastructure investments that benefit current and future generations, such as MRT lines and infrastructure to protect against rising sea levels like tidal walls. The borrowing limit will be set at $90 billion as a safeguard.

And if the need arises, should the economic and fiscal situation turn out worse than expected, the Government will seek the President's consideration to use past reserves to support economic investments in new areas, as this will enable Singapore to ride on structural changes, transform and emerge stronger.










GST hike to 9% will happen between 2022 and 2025, 'sooner rather than later', says DPM Heng
By Lim Min Zhang, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

The planned goods and services tax (GST) increase will take place between next year and 2025 - sooner rather than later and subject to the economic outlook, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday.

The planned hike, from 7 per cent to 9 per cent, was announced in Budget 2018. Mr Heng had said in last year's Budget that the hike would not kick in this year, in view of the economic conditions then.

That has not changed, he said in his annual Budget speech.


Without the increase, Singapore will not be able to meet its rising recurrent spending needs, particularly in healthcare, he said.

"While we are fortunate to be able to tap our reserves to respond to the Covid-19 crisis, it is not tenable for the Government to run persistent budget deficits outside periods of crisis," he said.

He reiterated the Government's commitment that the overall taxes and transfers system will remain "fair and progressive", with a previously announced $6 billion Assurance Package set aside to cushion the impact of the hike when it takes place.

The package will effectively delay the effect of the GST rate hike for the majority of Singaporean households by at least five years, he said. For lower-income Singaporeans, the offset will be higher, with those living in one-to three-room Housing Board flats receiving about 10 years' worth of additional GST expenses incurred, he added.

GST on publicly subsidised education and healthcare will continue to be absorbed fully.

No finance minister likes to talk about tax increases, especially with a raging pandemic going on, he said. "But we do this because we plan for the long term and do not shy away from explaining to fellow citizens why we need to make tough but necessary decisions to ensure we have enough to provide for our nation's future."

The country's fiscal situation is expected to get tighter in the coming years, he said. The Government had already expected a structural increase in recurrent spending needs before Covid-19, especially in areas such as healthcare.

Government spending on healthcare has tripled within a decade, from $3.7 billion in FY2010 to $11.3 billion in FY2019, he noted. "Singaporeans have often expressed the desire to better care for our seniors with quality yet affordable health and aged care services. This is possible only if we can muster the resources to do so," he said.

He added that Covid-19 has also raised the economic uncertainties for citizens and workers, which calls for stronger social safety nets to protect those who are disadvantaged or more vulnerable. This will mean higher recurrent spending going forward.


Mr Heng said the Government has maintained the principle that recurrent expenditure should be funded by recurrent revenue. This ensures that spending is responsible and fair for current and future generations.

The entire system of taxes and benefits is a progressive one, he added. Last year, the top 20 per cent of households by income paid 56 per cent of the taxes and received 11 per cent of the benefits, he said. The bottom 20 per cent paid 9 per cent of the taxes and received 27 per cent of the benefits.


On GST, he said that based on past collections, more than 60 per cent of net GST borne by households and individuals come from foreigners living here, tourists and the top 20 per cent of resident households. The last GST hike, from 5 per cent to 7 per cent, took effect in 2007.
















Singapore to impose GST on low-value goods bought online imported by air or post from 2023
By Sue-Ann Tan, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

Low-value goods bought online and imported by air or post will be subject to the goods and services tax (GST) from Jan 1, 2023.

Even non-digital services that are imported for consumers, such as those involving live interactions with overseas providers of fitness training, counselling and tele-medicine, will attract GST.

This will help level the playing field for local businesses to compete effectively, said Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat.

Low-value goods that are worth $400 or less, and imported via air or post, are currently not subject to GST to facilitate clearance at the border, but the tax is paid on such goods bought here.

All goods imported via land or sea are already taxed, regardless of value.


He noted that other jurisdictions have already implemented or announced plans to impose the equivalent of GST on such goods.

"Overseas suppliers of goods and services will be subject to the same GST treatment as local suppliers," he added.

This new taxation will be effected through the Overseas Vendor Registration regime, which requires overseas suppliers and electronic marketplace operators that make significant sales of digital services to local consumers to register for GST.

These registered suppliers and operators will then charge GST on their sales of low-value goods that are delivered over air or post to local consumers.

Shoppers will have to pay the GST when they buy from these overseas suppliers, just as they will be charged when they buy such items from local businesses.

Meanwhile, local GST-registered businesses here will have to self-account for GST when they import such goods as well and pay the tax.

GST was extended to cover all imported digital services in Budget 2018, and kicked off from Jan 1 last year. These include video and music streaming services, apps, software and online subscription fees.


Online sales made up 11 per cent of Singapore's total retail takings in December last year.

A spokesman for e-commerce platform Lazada said: "Lazada supports the Government's commitment to build a trusted e-commerce economy that protects the interests of consumers and businesses.

"We will comply with local tax regulations and collaborate with legislators on digital tax initiatives that equitably benefit all relevant stakeholders, including the small and medium-sized enterprises that sell on our platform."


Consumers and experts said this tax will not stop the online shopping trend, but will create a more level playing field for local and overseas sellers.

EY Asean indirect tax leader Yeo Kai Eng said: "GST will be an additional cost for online shoppers, but online shopping is also convenient and the prices can still be very attractive. It will not deter them."

Mr Lam Kok Shang, head of indirect tax at KPMG in Singapore, added: "With more businesses now gravitating away from selling via bricks-and-mortar means and moving onto online platforms or marketplaces, the imposition of GST on low-value goods places overseas sellers of goods and local businesses on a level playing field."

Ms Esther Yeoh, 25, a teacher, said: "There are companies in Singapore that try to produce those same goods or sell them, so it is a good thing to support local businesses and make it a habit."










Public healthcare workers to get pay rise
By Salma Khalik, Senior Health Correspondent, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

Public healthcare workers will be getting an increase in their salaries soon.

This pay rise will apply across all public healthcare institutions, including hospitals and polyclinics, as well as publicly-funded long-term care service providers, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday.

Even support care staff can look forward to more take-home pay.

Paying tribute to these dedicated workers, Mr Heng said: "Our healthcare workers have, over the years, been working hard to provide us with the highest quality of care.

"Since Covid-19 hit, their exemplary commitment has shone through. Once again, let me express our deepest appreciation to all healthcare workers for your dedication in fighting the pandemic," he added.

But even beyond the pandemic, the healthcare sector is expected to continue to grow as the population ages.

It is a sector that provides many good skilled jobs "that are noble, meaningful, and make a difference to Singaporeans", said Mr Heng.

Details will be given during the debate on the Ministry of Health's budget for the year.


In 2014, nurses had their pay increased by between 5 per cent and 20 per cent, following recommendations by the National Nursing Taskforce.

At that time, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong had said: "Nurses play a very important role. They are on the front line; they are on the ground. They are the backbone of our healthcare workforce."

Doctors, dentists and allied healthcare professionals also received pay increases that year.

The pay for nurses went up again in 2015 to make the profession more attractive.







$11 billion Resilience package to help Singapore bounce back
Three-pronged approach will safeguard public health, and support workers, businesses and sectors under stress
By Salma Khalik, Senior Health Correspondent, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

A total of $11 billion will be set aside for a Covid-19 Resilience Package which will support a three-pronged approach to help Singapore bounce back from Covid-19.

It will address immediate needs to safeguard public health and reopen the economy safely, support workers and businesses, and target specific sectors under stress, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday.

"The global economy is projected to recover to pre-Covid-19 levels this year, but the recovery is uneven across countries and sectors," he said.

"The Singapore economy is projected to grow between 4 per cent and 6 per cent, with some sectors growing well, and others remaining under stress."

The $11 billion will be used to support the recovery process.

Of this, $4.8 billion will go towards safeguarding public health, including providing everyone who is eligible with free vaccination against the virus.

The national vaccination programme and the medicines for those infected will cost $1 billion.

The bulk of the money allocated to public health - $3.1 billion - will be used for testing, clinical management of those who become sick, and contact tracing to identify people who might have become infected, to prevent spread and clusters forming.

Another $5 billion will be used to support workers and businesses, with the lion's share of $2.9 billion going to the Jobs Support Scheme.

Singapore has already committed $25 billion to this scheme, supporting more than 150,000 employers for up to 17 months.

Of the $2.9 billion allocated to the Jobs Support Scheme, $700 million was announced yesterday, while $2.2 billion had been promised in August last year.

Said Mr Heng: "As the situation improved, I tapered support for sectors that were recovering well, and extended support to harder-hit sectors."

The third tranche of $1.2 billion will be used to support specific sectors that have been especially badly hit by the fallout from the pandemic.


The aviation sector will get $870 million. Another $45 million will go towards helping the arts and culture, and sports sectors; and $133 million has been set aside for the taxi and private-hire car drivers under a relief fund announced in December. But these measures alone will not be enough to secure Singapore's future because "the Covid-19 pandemic has triggered global shifts on the economic, social and political fronts, on a scale arguably greater than the 1929 Great Depression".

"It has set off new domains for competition and cooperation," said Mr Heng, who promised to pump in $24 billion over the next three years to "enable our firms and workers to emerge stronger".

The changing competitive landscape, rising inequalities and importance of sustainability "are all mega-shifts, that will continue to reshape the world".

What will distinguish Singapore from other countries recovering from the pandemic are the investments in the future.

He said: "We will invest in our people, so they can bounce back and be ready for opportunities that arise; and we will invest in our businesses, so they can innovate, build deep capacities and seize growth opportunities.

"Singapore must never stop thinking of the future, even as we respond swiftly to meet current needs. This is how we stay exceptional, and staying exceptional is how we survive," he said.


Efforts will span several years and build on the transformation push started five years ago with the industry transformation maps.

The idea was for integration of the different restructuring efforts, and to deepen partnerships between Government and industry.

The maps span a diversity of activities from healthcare and education to transport, retail and manufacturing.

But the immediate focus, Mr Heng said, is to grow a vibrant business community, help businesses to transform and grow, create new opportunities and redesign jobs.







Jobs Support Scheme to be extended by up to 6 months
Up to 30% in subsidies for wages paid from April to Sept by firms in worst-hit sectors
By Hariz Baharudin, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

Wage subsidies under the Jobs Support Scheme (JSS) will be extended by up to six months to help businesses that remain badly hit by the Covid-19 pandemic to retain workers, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday.

The subsidies - which range from 10 per cent to 30 per cent - will cover wages paid from April to September for companies in sectors worst hit by the crisis: aviation, aerospace and tourism.

For firms in other industries that have been hit hard, including food services, retail, marine and offshore, as well as arts and entertainment - the extension will be from April until June.

The new tranche of wage subsidies, which will cost the Government $700 million, will offer targeted support to sectors that continue to be hard hit, Mr Heng said in his Budget speech.

Under the scheme, the Government pays a portion of the wages of employees who are Singaporeans or permanent residents.

The tiered subsidies apply to the first $4,600 of gross monthly wages paid to each employee.

The co-payment is widely seen as the biggest lifeline for businesses and workers amid the pandemic.

With the new extension, firms in sectors that need the most support - aerospace, aviation and tourism - will receive 30 per cent of wages paid from April to June in September. They will also receive 10 per cent of wages paid from July to September in December.

Those in the next tier, which includes food services, retail, marine and offshore, as well as arts and entertainment, will receive 10 per cent of wages paid from April to June. They will receive this payout in September.

Mr Heng said: "Even as our economy recovers gradually and some sectors grow well, some other sectors remain stressed. I will tailor support to maintain resilience and support growing areas."

He added that over $25 billion has been committed to the JSS, which has supported more than 150,000 employers for up to 17 months.


The scheme, which was first introduced in the Budget in February last year, had subsidised between 25 per cent and 75 per cent of wages paid for 10 months.

It was to cover wages paid until August last year, with the final payout made last October.

But this was extended to offer additional payouts - between 10 per cent and 50 per cent of wages - in March and June this year for the relevant firms.

Mr Heng noted that the pandemic continues to affect many of Singapore's workers and businesses, and the JSS was introduced with a clear goal to protect jobs and help firms retain local workers.

As things got better for Singapore, the support was tapered off for sectors that were recovering well, while those harder hit received more help.

Mr Heng said the current tranche of subsidies will continue to cover wages up to next month for most sectors, and added that he was encouraged to see companies taking the initiative to upskill their workers.

"I am heartened that many employers have managed to retain and reskill their workers," he said.

Employers can refer to the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore's JSS website for more details on the computation and payment schedule.







Aviation sector to get $870 million in additional support, extended cost relief
By Toh Ting Wei, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

The aviation sector will get additional support and extended cost relief to the tune of $870 million, given that the volume of international air travel remains a tiny fraction of what it was.

The sector is expected to remain badly affected this year, and re-covery will take some time, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday.

The funding for the sector will come under the $11 billion Covid-19 Resilience Package.

Additional funding drawn from a separate $24 billion fund to help firms and workers emerge stronger will be invested in on-arrival testing and biosafety systems, said Mr Heng. This will help secure Singapore's position as a key aviation hub in which both travellers and employees trust.

"Airports will be differentiated by their capabilities in securing public health and enabling safe travel," Mr Heng added. "They will need digitalised systems and the ability to effectively reroute people and goods."

One example of work on this front is the Government Technology Agency's collaboration with Temasek-founded start-up Affinidi.

The two organisations are working together to develop software that can quickly verify digital Covid-19 test result certificates and vaccination records.

An app developed by Affinidi is now being trialled by Singapore Airlines (SIA) to verify health documents produced by travellers.


But Mr Heng cautioned that Covid-19 has reshuffled the global web of connectivity.

For example, the total number of passengers passing through Changi remains at about 2 per cent of pre-Covid-19 levels as at end-January.

"I expect the aviation sector to use this lull to sustain and upgrade its capabilities, and to prepare for the recovery," he added.

SIA said yesterday that the support measures will bolster its efforts to get through the pandemic, and thanked the Government for its support.

The land transport sector was also flagged for additional support by Mr Heng. He said $133 million has been set aside to continue with the Covid-19 Driver Relief Fund announced earlier.

Eligible drivers will get $600 a month from January to March this year, and $450 per month from April to June.


ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR ARTS AND CULTURE, SPORTS

The arts and culture as well as sports sectors have also been "deeply affected by the pandemic", Mr Heng said yesterday.

Hence, the Government will extend the Arts and Culture Resilience Package and Sports Resilience Package to support businesses and self-employed people in these sectors.

A sum of $45 million will be allocated to extend and enhance the support packages, said Mr Heng. He added that the enhancement will support capability development and sector transformation, among other goals.

"We look forward to activities resuming, with greater vibrancy."

More details will be disclosed next week when debate begins on each ministry's budget.










$24 billion to help firms, workers adapt to global changes
Funds will go towards business transformation and building vibrant innovation ecosystem
By Choo Yun Ting, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

Around $24 billion will be spent over the next three years to help companies and workers adapt to changes in the global landscape brought on in part by the pandemic.

The funds will go towards building a more vibrant business sector and innovation ecosystem, helping businesses to transform and scale up their operations, and creating opportunities for workers.


Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday that Singapore must deepen its position as a global-Asia node to emerge stronger from the Covid-19 crisis.

That will involve working to restore the country's physical connectivity with the rest of the world, expand its digital connectivity and deepen its capacity to collaborate and innovate with global partners.

PLATFORMS FOR INNOVATION

Singapore will invest in three platforms to help companies innovate and collaborate on a global scale, to help them remain competitive.

The Corporate Venture Launchpad will be piloted this year to drive innovative ventures, providing co-funding for companies to build new ventures through pre-qualified venture studios.

"This is especially useful for larger businesses which want to rekindle a start-up mindset within their organisations," Mr Heng said.

He noted how BCG Digital Ventures, a venture studio, has collaborated with food and agricultural giant Olam to build a farmer services platform.

The platform, Jiva, will help farmers in developing countries increase crop yield, access credit and connect directly with buyers.

The venture not only helps meet rising global food demand, but also uplifts farmers' incomes, Mr Heng said.

In addition, the Open Innovation Platform, a crowdsourcing initiative, will be enhanced to increase the speed and scale of digital innovation through new features such as a discovery engine.

This will enable the platform to make automated recommendations as it helps to match problems faced by companies and public agencies with solution providers.

The platform also co-funds prototyping and deployment of solutions.


Enhancements will also be made to the Global Innovation Alliance, which helps to catalyse cross-border collaboration between Singapore and major global innovation hubs.

The network has 15 links to cities, including Bangkok, Jakarta, London and San Francisco, and will be expanded to more than 25 cities over the next five years.

It will be given a boost by the Co-Innovation Programme, which will support up to 70 per cent of qualifying costs for cross-border innovation and partnership projects.

The Singapore Intellectual Property Strategy 2030 is also being developed to support companies in commercialising the fruits of their innovation and help them in areas such as protecting and managing their intellectual property.

Strong connectivity will help businesses plug into global and regional supply chains and industry clusters, and deepen innovation partnerships, said Mr Heng, who is also Finance Minister.


Singapore has been stepping up its connectivity with South-east Asian nations, he said, noting that the region has significant growth potential.

Among efforts to strengthen its links in the region is the inaugural South-east Asia Open Innovation Challenge, which was launched last December. It drew participation from companies in countries such as Indonesia and Thailand.

"We will continue to work closely with our Asean members, to enhance digital connectivity and cyber security, and to get ready for the fourth Industrial Revolution, building on initiatives such as the Asean Smart Cities Network," Mr Heng said.

Singapore will also continue to enhance its infrastructure investments in the region, through projects such as Nongsa Digital Park in Batam, which facilitates collaboration between Singapore companies and technology talent in Indonesia, he said.













Support for hiring of 200,000 locals this year under Jobs Growth Incentive
Extra $5.4 billion allocated for jobs, skills; up to 35,000 traineeship, training opportunities will be on offer too
By Calvin Yang, Correspondent, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

The SGUnited Jobs and Skills Package is being revved up to support the hiring of 200,000 locals this year through the Jobs Growth Incentive, and provide up to 35,000 traineeship and training opportunities.

The initiative - launched last year to tackle the anticipated labour market fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic - is a key pillar in the country's industry transformation.

Almost 76,000 individuals had been placed in jobs, traineeships, attachments and skills training as at the end of last year.

The Jobs Growth Incentive, which encourages companies to bring forward recruitment through wage subsidies, led to the hiring of an estimated 110,000 local job seekers within two months of the scheme's implementation.

"Looking ahead, as companies and industries transform, and new growth areas emerge, our people will need to have the skills and agility to move. To emerge stronger, our people will need new knowledge and skills," said Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat yesterday.


An additional $5.4 billion will be allocated to a second tranche of the Jobs and Skills Package, on top of the $3 billion allocated last year.

The bulk of this - $5.2 billion - will be allocated to the Jobs Growth Incentive to extend the hiring window by seven months, to the end of September.

The extension will give firms hiring eligible locals up to 12 months of wage support from the month of hire, while those taking on mature workers, people with disabilities and former offenders will be given up to 18 months of enhanced wage support.


Support for other components under the Jobs and Skills Package, such as the SGUnited Skills, SGUnited Traineeships and the SGUnited Mid-Career Pathways programmes, will be extended for workers who require additional help before landing a job.

Mr Heng also announced that the National Research Foundation will be supporting about 500 fellowships under the Innovation and Enterprise Fellowship Programme over the next five years to meet the needs in areas such as cyber security, artificial intelligence and health technology.

It will work with a range of partners, including accelerators, venture capital firms and deep tech start-ups.

The minister said: "As we head into a more technologically intensive and innovation-driven economy, we must also groom leaders in innovation and enterprise, especially in deep technology areas."


He noted the importance of skilled human capital in Singapore's next phase of transformation: "Enabling our people to have access to good jobs and job opportunities is the purpose of developing a strong economy. A vibrant economy creates the jobs and opportunities for our people to be at their best."

He said the employment landscape is evolving, pointing out that a digital, innovation-driven economy means that businesses will need highly skilled workers and deep talent. Singaporeans, therefore, will need to have both broader and deeper skills and creativity.

Mr Heng also noted that the workplace is changing, with the pandemic forcing people to work from home and adopt new ways of collaborating with others.

However, he urged Singaporeans not to be fearful, adding: "There are many strengths in Singapore that will enable us to create good jobs here. But to access these, we have to learn and adapt."
















Singapore households to get $900 million support package, including $100 CDC vouchers
It includes vouchers to help families defray expenses, as well as GST vouchers and S&CC rebates
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

A $900 million Household Support Package will be introduced for families amid the uncertain economic situation in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat announced yesterday.

The package includes vouchers that each household can use to defray expenses and support local businesses, as well as service and conservancy charge rebates and goods and services tax (GST) vouchers.

About 1.3 million Singaporean households will receive $100 Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers that can be used at participating heartland shops and hawker centres. More details on this will be announced by the CDCs later. To fund this, an additional grant of $150 million will be provided to the CDCs.


"Singaporeans' sense of unity and discipline in observing the precautionary measures such as safe distancing and mask wearing has enabled our progress so far in combating the pandemic. The discipline and understanding of our local merchants and hawkers have also been important.

"However, they have been quite affected by the safety measures, especially during the circuit breaker," he noted.


Eligible Singaporean households in Housing Board flats will also receive rebates to offset service and conservancy charges over the year, said Mr Heng.

About 950,000 Singaporean households will be able to receive these rebates, which will offset between 1½ and 3½ months of the charges, over four quarters - in April, July, October and January next year.

About 1.4 million lower-income Singaporeans will also get an additional GST Voucher - Cash Special Payment of $200 in June, on top of the regular GST Voucher cash payout.


About 950,000 households will also get additional utilities rebates of between $120 and $200 under the GST Voucher - U-Save Special Payment that will be credited in April and July. This means they will receive 1½ times their usual annual rebate.

Singaporean children below the age of 21 will also get an additional $200 top-up to their Child Development Account, Edusave account or Post-Secondary Education Account which can help fund education-related expenses. This will benefit about 780,000 children.


Mr Heng said the package comes on top of immediate relief and support measures introduced for families and workers over five Budgets last year, including the Solidarity Payment, Covid-19 Support Grant, Temporary Relief Fund and grocery vouchers for lower-income groups.

"This Household Support Package provides some support to all families, with lower-to middle-income families receiving more," he said.


Mr Heng also said Singaporeans have supported one another amid the pandemic, and stayed united in the face of adversity.

"Social cohesion does not happen naturally. Even before Covid-19, many societies were facing sharp divisions due to widening inequalities, increasing diversity of interests and voices, and growing distrust. The pandemic has deepened the cracks in many societies," said Mr Heng, adding that Singapore is not immune to these challenges.

"We must continue to strengthen our social fabric, and reject forces of division and discord."






















New $60 million fund to boost food production by harnessing tech
Use of technology could cushion agriculture sector from the impact of climate change
By Audrey Tan, Science and Environment Correspondent, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

Some $60 million will be set aside for a new fund to help farmers better harness technology in local food production, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday.

"Technology is a game changer and will open new possibilities. We harnessed technology to overcome our water and land constraints, and will do the same for climate change," he said.

The symptoms of climate change include more frequent extreme weather events, which could disrupt global supply chains and threaten global food production.

But the use of technology could cushion the agriculture sector from erratic rainfall patterns and climbing temperatures.

The new fund, called the Agri-Food Cluster Transformation Fund, will replace the existing Agriculture Productivity Fund, said Mr Heng, who is also the Finance Minister.


The Agriculture Productivity Fund is administered by the Singapore Food Agency and was set up in 2014 to help farmers boost yields and increase production capabilities.

More details on the new fund will be announced by the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) during the debate on its budget, said Mr Heng.

The Singapore Food Agency is an agency under MSE.

In his speech, Mr Heng cited Eco-Ark, a high-tech fish farm off the Changi coast. Eco-Ark is a floating fish farm built by the Aquaculture Centre of Excellence with funding support from the Agriculture Productivity Fund.

"With advanced aquaculture technologies, Eco-Ark is able to produce 20 times more output than the average in coastal fish farms. This improves our food resilience, as part of the 30-by-30 goal," Mr Heng said.

This 30-by-30 goal refers to Singapore's target of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs through locally farmed food by 2030 - up from less than 10 per cent today.​

The offshore farm, with a total capacity of 96 tonnes, is able to produce 166 tonnes of fish a year - about 20 times more than the minimum level set for coastal fish farms in Singapore.

Unlike a typical kelong where fish are reared in open-net cage-farming systems exposed to the open sea, the fish at the Eco-Ark swim in tanks isolated from the currents.

This means the fish - which include species such as barramundi, red snapper fingerlings and groupers - are safe from threats of open-cage farming, such as oil spills as well as plankton blooms, which, by depleting water of oxygen, caused massive fish deaths in 2014 and 2015.

Noting that sustainability is a journey, not a destination, and that technology would advance over time, Mr Heng said: "Costs and benefits of projects will change, as climate cost is factored in and as technology advances.

"We must continue to stay open and adaptive, and carefully balance our development objectives with sustainability considerations."


Professor William Chen, the Michael Fam Chair professor in food science and technology at Nanyang Technological University, said that while government funding support was important in getting farmers to adopt technology, other factors - such as consumers' receptivity to local produce - were also crucial.

But he added that the renaming of the fund to include agri-food instead of just agriculture could mean that less conventional types of technology, such as farming insects for food, or cultivating meat in bioreactors, could be eligible for funding.

"This much broader scope is better aligned with Singapore's 30 by 30 goal. Taken together, we should see more food sources for greater food security in Singapore," he said.










Petrol duties raised for first time in six years
Motorists will be given rebates on road tax and additional petrol duty to help offset the pump hike of up to 23%
By Choo Yun Ting, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

Motorists will now have to pay more at the pump, as petrol duties were raised for the first time in six years yesterday.

Announcing the hike which took immediate effect, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said motorists will be given road tax and additional petrol duty rebates to help offset the higher costs.


The duty for premium grade (98-octane and above) petrol will be raised by 15 cents a litre to 79 cents a litre - a 23 per cent increase.

The duty for intermediate grade (92-octane and 95-octane) petrol will be raised by 10 cents a litre to 66 cents a litre, an 18 per cent hike.

Petrol duties were last raised in 2015 - by 20 cents a litre for premium grade petrol and 15 cents a litre for intermediate grade petrol - to encourage less car usage and reduce carbon emissions.

Mr Heng said the higher petrol duties are meant to encourage Singaporeans to reduce their vehicle usage as part of the country's broader sustainability push, which includes measures to promote early adoption of electric vehicles.

Most of the expected revenue increase from the petrol duties will be given out through rebates for petrol and petrol-hybrid vehicles, he said, adding that around $113 million has been set aside to cushion the hike.

Motorcycles will get a 60 per cent road tax rebate for a year. Those who own bikes with an engine capacity under 400cc will get up to $80 of additional petrol duty rebate, depending on the engine capacity.

Taxis and private-hire cars will be given a 15 per cent road tax rebate for a year and $360 of additional petrol duty rebate over four consecutive months for ac-tive drivers.

Goods vehicles and buses will be given a 100 per cent tax rebate for a year, while cars using petrol will be given a one-year tax rebate of 15 per cent.

All road tax changes will apply for a one-year period from Aug 1 this year to July 31 next year.

For example, the owner of a mass-market sedan such as a 1,598 cc Hyundai Avante with a fuel consumption of 5.4 litres/ 100km would pay about $631 in road tax for the one-year period from Aug 1, as compared with the usual $742 a year - some $111 in savings.

Assuming that the vehicle uses intermediate grade petrol and clocks an annual mileage of 20,000km, the car owner's additional fuel cost would be around $110, which would be offset by the road tax rebates for the year.


Both road tax and additional petrol duty rebates will be disbursed automatically to eligible recipients. The Land Transport Authority will release further details on the additional petrol duty rebates in April.

The rebate measures will help offset one year of petrol duty increases for taxis and motorcycles, and about two-thirds of petrol duty increases for commercial vehicles and cars, said Mr Heng.

In a Facebook post, he said raising petrol duty rates was one of the hard choices that had to be made in this year's Budget.

The move builds on Singapore's efforts over the years to reduce vehicular emissions, he said, adding: "The reality is that combating climate change will require difficult trade-offs in the years ahead."


Motorcycle owner Muhammad Irsyad, 22, said raising petrol duties during the pandemic was harsh. "I can't say I am not affected, but I would probably feel its impact only in the long run," the full-time national serviceman added.

Marketing executive Cheryl Phua, 57, said the higher petrol duties may factor into her decision to switch to a more fuel-efficient vehicle. "Since petrol prices would be higher, I think I would consider a hybrid car for my next vehicle."

Associate Professor Simon Poh of the National University of Singapore's business school noted that sustainability is emerging as one of the Government's long-term goals. "Hiking the petrol duty to discourage car usage and encourage drivers to switch to electric cars helps to promote a green environment. This is in line with Singapore's intention to cooperate with other countries in combating climate change," he said.

Additional reporting by Deepa Sundar










Cost of owning electric vehicles to be lowered to boost early adoption
By Toh Ting Wei, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

More measures will be rolled out to narrow the cost of owning an electric vehicle (EV) compared with petrol and diesel vehicles to encourage drivers to make the switch.

Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said yesterday that the minimum Additional Registration Fee (ARF) for electric cars will be lowered to zero from January next year to December 2023.


Currently, all car buyers have to pay at least $5,000 in ARF, regardless of the tax rebate a car is entitled to. Based on current prices, the change would see tax rebates fully cover the ARF of the Renault Zoe and MG ZS electric cars.

Mr Heng said lowering the ARF floor will enable mass-market electric car buyers to maximise tax rebates from the Electric Vehicle Early Adoption Incentive.

Road taxes for electric cars will also be revised such that a mass-market electric car will have a road tax comparable with that of an internal combustion engine equivalent, Mr Heng added.

More details will be announced when MPs debate the budgets of various ministries from next week.

These moves are the latest in a series of measures by the Government to speed up the phasing out of vehicles running purely on fuels here.

As part of the inter-ministerial Singapore Green Plan 2030 announced last Wednesday, the Government said it would revise Singapore's multi-layered vehicle tax structure to "make it easier to buy and own" EVs.

EV incentives were enhanced just last month, when bigger rebates under the Vehicular Emissions Scheme as well as the Electric Vehicle Early Adoption Incentive kicked in. Together, they give an electric car buyer as much as $45,000 in tax breaks.

The road tax formula was also revised to make it less onerous for electric car owners.


In terms of infrastructure, the Government will more than double the targeted number of public EV charging points, from 28,000 to 60,000 by 2030.

Mr Heng said yesterday that $30 million will be set aside over the next five years for initiatives related to EVs, such as measures to increase the number of charging points at private properties.

The various measures will help reshape Singapore's transport footprint towards cleaner transport, he added.


Mr Raymond Tang, managing director of Yong Lee Seng Motor, welcomed the measures. But he hopes more can be done to promote the financial and environmental benefits of EVs.

"Customers do not know how it is better than conventional vehicles and they are also worried about whether they can find enough charging points," he said.

"It is hard for dealers to bring in EVs if there is no demand."
















Managing our finances: Singapore to draw on reserves for 2nd year to fight COVID-19
$1.7 billion will be combined with unused $9.3 billion from 2020 to fund relief measures
By Tham Yuen-C, Senior Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

For a second year in a row, Singapore will dip into its past savings to pay for measures needed to fight Covid-19, with a draw of $1.7 billion on the reserves.

The amount will be combined with $9.3 billion that was drawn last year but not used, with all $11 billion going towards funding the Covid-19 Resilience Package.

Altogether, the expected draw on the reserves over the two financial years will come up to a total of $53.7 billion.

Announcing this in his Budget statement yesterday, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said running a fiscal deficit to support targeted relief was warranted in the immediate term.

Even as Singapore's economy reopens, there are badly hit sectors like aviation that are still in the doldrums and segments of society that still need help.

At the same time, public health measures have to continue in the global battle against Covid-19, with success uncertain.

Explaining the decision to fund the Covid-19 Resilience Package by tapping the reserves, Mr Heng noted that the measures were extraordinary and temporary.

He said: "This is the second consecutive financial year where we will be drawing on our past reserves. This is necessary, given the exceptional circumstances we are in.



He also said that President Halimah Yacob has given her in-principle support for the move.

In a Facebook post yesterday, Madam Halimah said Mr Heng briefed her and the Council of Presidential Advisers last month.

She said she agreed with the Government's proposal, given the exceptional circumstances, and had approved, in principle, the use of $11 billion from the reserves to fund the short-term relief measures.


"After Parliament has debated the Budget, I will formally consider the proposal before giving my assent to the Supply Bill," she said.

"The road ahead is going to be challenging and uncertain. We must remain resolute in our fight against Covid-19.

"At the same time, the post-Covid-19 world presents us with new opportunities in innovation and transformation. How we continue to respond to the crisis will determine our future."


Over five Budgets last year, the Government had proposed a draw of up to $52 billion on the reserves to tackle the challenges brought by Covid-19, but used only $42.7 billion.


Mr Heng said that as people and businesses here had adapted effectively to the situation, the Government was able to bring the pandemic largely under control and did not need to spend as much on some of the public health measures as it had anticipated.


Casting his gaze ahead, he said the Government's priorities in the medium to long term are to invest strategically for growth, press on with economic transformation and lay the groundwork to position Singapore for the future.

He reiterated the need to balance between immediate and long-term needs, making it clear that Singapore would have to return to running balanced Budgets beyond the current crisis.

"It was fiscal prudence and discipline that allowed us to accumulate our national reserves, which has enabled us to respond decisively to this crisis," he said.


He noted that Singapore's recurrent spending needs had already been going up before Covid-19 hit, and that the fundamental drivers of these fiscal trends have not changed.

They include an ageing population, maturing society, and growing healthcare and social spending.

Stressing the importance of meeting such structural needs in a disciplined and sustainable way, he said: "Our fiscal approach must strike a careful balance between addressing our immediate needs and meeting our longer-term structural needs in a responsible manner."










Expansionary Budget set to run up deficit of $11 billion
By Choo Yun Ting, The Straits Times, 17 Feb 2021

The Budget will continue to be expansionary for financial year 2021, with an expected deficit of $11 billion, or 2.2 per cent of Singapore's gross domestic product.

This is because an $11 billion Covid-19 Resilience Package has been marshalled to tide Singaporeans and businesses over the coronavirus pandemic, said Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat yesterday.

Last year's expansionary Budget is expected to result in Singapore's largest deficit since independence, with an overall deficit of $64.9 billion, or 13.9 per cent of gross domestic product.

"The deficit is driven by lower revenues due to dampened economic activity and the significant expenditures needed to mount a decisive response to Covid-19," said Mr Heng, who is also Finance Minister.

Measures rolled out in this year's Budget will help Singapore emerge stronger, by pressing on with economic and workforce transformation, strengthening its social compact and building a sustainable future for its people, and will impart a considerable fiscal boost to the economy, he added.


REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR 2021

Revenue for this year is projected to hit $76.6 billion, which is $12 billion or 18.6 per cent more than the previous year's revised estimates.

This is largely due to higher corporate income taxes, goods and services tax and other taxes such as foreign worker levies. But this increase will be moderated by lower personal income taxes.

Betting taxes are expected to go up by about 30 per cent to $2.4 billion.

Meanwhile, the ministries' expenditures are projected to come in at around $102.3 billion, some $8.3 billion or 9 per cent higher than revised 2020 estimates.

This is largely due to heavier spending on healthcare, transport and defence, which is partly offset by lower trade and industry spending as well as national development expenditures.

Transport spending will go up by $3 billion, or 37.8 per cent, with the resumption of construction activities and higher provisions for Covid-19 relief measures, especially for the hard-hit aviation sector, which will receive additional support and extended cost relief amounting to around $870 million.

In addition, healthcare spending will also go up, mainly due to the growth in patient subsidies with the opening of new facilities, ramping up of capacity ahead of the opening of the Woodlands Health Campus, and increasing demand for health and aged care services as Singapore's population ages.

On the flip side, trade and industry spending is expected to come down with the tapering off of economic relief measures.

BOOST FROM NET INVESTMENT RETURNS

The Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC) continues to be the largest contributor to government coffers, and is expected to bring in some $19.6 billion this year - a 7.8 per cent increase over last year.

The returns from Singapore's invested reserves have been the single largest source of government revenue since 2016, outweighing tax revenue sources such as corporate and personal income taxes and the goods and services tax.

The NIRC comprises up to 50 per cent of the net investment returns on net assets invested by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, GIC and Temasek, the three entities which manage and invest Singapore's reserves, and up to 50 per cent of the net investment income derived from past reserves from the remaining assets.


























Related
Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>