Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live

Online article is 'fake news': MOE

$
0
0

Australian Teacher Magazine pulls out article MOE called 'fake news'
Managing editor of publication apologises 'without reservation'
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 30 Aug 2017

Australian Teacher Magazine yesterday withdrew an article which was labelled as "fake news" by Singapore's Education Ministry (MOE), and apologised "without reservation".

The article, which was published in its August issue and was widely shared, had quoted MOE director-general of education Wong Siew Hoong as telling an international conference here in May that Singapore is "building compliant students just as the jobs that value compliance are beginning to disappear".

But MOE on Monday described the statements in the article, written by Mr Walter Barbieri, as "completely false" and " fake news". According to his Linkedin profile, Mr Barbieri is the director of eLearning at St Peter's College in Adelaide.

In the interest of "full transparency", MOE yesterday released an unedited video and the transcript of Mr Wong's 35-minute speech he delivered on the first day of the National Institute of Education's (NIE) Redesigning Pedagogy international conference.

Mr Grant Quarry, Australian Teacher Magazine's managing editor, told The Straits Times yesterday that it is investigating the matter and has been trying to contact the author for clarification.

In the interim, the report's webpage on EducationHQ, which publishes the magazine, was updated with an editor's note explaining why the article had been withdrawn.

"In the light of the evidence presented, and in the absence of alternative evidence to support the author at this stage, EducationHQ has withdrawn the story and apologises without reservation for any offence caused," said the note.



Mr Barbieri did not respond to queries from The Straits Times.

In his article, he had claimed that Mr Wong compared Singapore's stellar academic results in 2015's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) with the data on student well-being and innovation in the economy, which placed Singapore in the lowest quartile.

According to the article, Mr Wong attributed Singapore's PISA success to standardised test drilling and a culture of compliance, and said at the conference: "We've been winning the wrong race."

The online article chalked up about 3,500 shares earlier this week. The earlier print version of the article had also mistakenly attributed the quotes to Minister for Education (Schools) Ng Chee Meng before it was edited and attributed to Mr Wong instead in the online article.

According to the transcript and video recording provided by MOE, Mr Wong did not refer to the PISA rankings - which Singapore students topped for reading, mathematics and science - in his speech. Instead, Mr Wong said that the literacy levels of Singapore students have "improved tremendously".

"They are now reading, writing, speaking in a very high level. They are learning their mathematics well, they're able to solve a lot of mathematical problems very competently," he added.

NIE said that this was the only speech that Mr Wong gave at the conference and that no other speakers had made comments similar to what was purported in the article, to the best of its knowledge.










Writer: Quote attributed to wrong speaker
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 31 Aug 2017

The author of an article containing statements that the Ministry of Education (MOE) has branded as "fake news" maintains that they were said but he might have attributed them to the wrong person.

In a statement published on the website of EducationHQ Australia yesterday, Mr Walter Barbieri, a freelance contributor with the publishing company, apologised but stood by his article.

He said: "I wrote the article in good faith and did not intend to cause any offence.

"I maintain that the words quoted were delivered at the conference, and convey my genuine apologies if I have attributed them to the wrong speaker."



Mr Barbieri's widely-shared article, published in the August issue of Australian Teacher Magazine, which comes under EducationHQ, had quoted MOE director-general of education Wong Siew Hoong as telling a conference here in May that Singapore is "building compliant students just as the jobs that value compliance are beginning to disappear".

On Tuesday, MOE said that the statements were false and Mr Wong had not delivered those comments. It also released a full transcript and video recording of his speech.

The conference organiser - the National Institute of Education - had said that no other speakers had made comments similar to what was purported in Mr Barbieri's article, which EducationHQ withdrew online on Tuesday.

Mr Barbieri, the director of eLearning at St Peter's College in Adelaide, did not provide evidence indicating that the statements had indeed been made by a speaker at the conference. He did not respond to queries from The Straits Times.

In its statement, EducationHQ acknowledged that the quotes were wrongly attributed to Mr Wong, and apologised. It also said that it will be publishing a correction for the print edition of the article, which had wrongly attributed the quotes to Education Minister (Schools) Ng Chee Meng, in its next edition of the magazine.

Additional reporting by Daniel Ong












Article carrying MOE remarks on Singapore's 'culture of compliance' is fake news, says MOE
Ministry says director-general's purported remarks on compliant students in Singapore are false
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 29 Aug 2017

The Ministry of Education (MOE) has decried as "fake news" a series of statements purportedly made by its director-general of education that attributed Singapore's educational success to "standardised test drilling and a culture of compliance".

An article in the August edition of Australian Teacher Magazine made the rounds online yesterday, when it published comments reportedly made by MOE's director-general of education Wong Siew Hoong at an international conference about three months ago.

Written by Mr Walter Barbieri, the article claimed Mr Wong had juxtaposed Singapore's stellar academic results in the 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) study with the data on student well-being and innovation in the economy.

The article said that data for the latter two categories placed Singapore in the lowest quartile.

The PISA study, conducted by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), polled 540,000 students from 72 countries and economies.

The results on student well-being were released recently. It emerged that the anxiety levels of the 5,825 15-year-old Singapore students polled were significantly higher than the OECD average.

For instance, 66 per cent of students across all OECD countries said they were worried about poor grades. Among Singapore students, 86 per cent said they were.

Results from the study that were released last year ranked Singapore's students No. 1 for mathematics, science and reading.

According to the article, Mr Wong said to more than 1,500 delegates at the National Institute of Education's Redesigning Pedagogy conference: "We've been winning the wrong race."

It said he attributed Singapore's PISA success to standardised test drilling and a culture of compliance, and said that Singapore is "building compliant students just as the jobs that value compliance are beginning to disappear".

A video recording that The Straits Times obtained of his 30-minute speech showed that he did not make the remarks attributed to him. It is not clear if he made other speeches then.



The comments were reproduced by local news site Mothership.sg. Last night, the MOE said in a comment on Mothership.sg's Facebook post that Mr Wong did not make the statements in the article.

"This is fake news," said MOE.

"We are disappointed that your website would circulate such false comments. We would appreciate it if you could remove the article immediately or at least print a correction."

MOE has also asked Australian Teacher Magazine to take down the article, or print a correction.

The magazine and Mr Barbieri did not respond to The Straits Times by press time.

















Facebook to reject ads from pages touting fake news

$
0
0
The Straits Times, 30 Aug 2017

SAN FRANCISCO • Facebook has said pages that make a habit of linking to bogus news stories will no longer be able to advertise on the world's leading online social network.

The move is the latest shot fired by Facebook in its war against "fake news" used to deceive instead of enlighten.

"If pages repeatedly share stories marked as false, these repeat offenders will no longer be allowed to advertise on Facebook," product managers Tessa Lyons and Satwik Shukla said in a blog post.

"This update will help to reduce the distribution of false news which will keep pages that spread false news from making money."

The social network already does not allow ads that link stories determined to be false by third-party fact-checkers.

Ms Lyons and Mr Shukla said: "False news is harmful to our community. It makes the world less informed and erodes trust."

Fake news became a serious issue in last year's US election campaign, when clearly fraudulent stories circulated on social media, potentially swaying some voters.

Concerns have been raised since then about hoaxes and misinformation affecting elections in Europe this year, with investigations showing how "click farms" generate revenue from online advertising using made-up news stories.

"We've found instances of pages using Facebook ads to build their audiences in order to distribute false news more broadly," Ms Lyons and Mr Shukla said.

Facebook and Google have been working to curtail, or at least flag, stories crafted to deceive instead of enlighten. Google earlier this year added a fact-checking tag to search results globally, its latest initiative to help curb the spread of misinformation and "fake news".

The new tags, to be used in all languages for users worldwide, use third-party fact-checkers to indicate whether news items are true, false or somewhere in between.

The feature debuted about the same time that Facebook added a new tool in news feeds to help users determine whether shared stories are real or bogus.

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE









Related
Blocking Ads from Pages that Repeatedly Share False News

SEA Games 2017: A- grade for Team Singapore after record away performance of 57 gold, 58 silver and 73 bronze medals

$
0
0
By Jonathan Wong, The Straits Times, 30 Aug 2017

KUALA LUMPUR - Following a record-breaking overseas performance by the country's national athletes at the Kuala Lumpur SEA Games, Team Singapore were given a grade of A- by chef de mission Milan Kwee and his team of officials.

The Republic won 57 gold, 58 silver and 73 bronze medals in Malaysia, surpassing the previous high-water mark from 10 years ago in Korat, Thailand when national athletes brought home 43 golds, 43 silvers and 41 bronzes.

Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday (Aug 30) to wrap up Singapore's results at the 29th edition of the biennial Games, Kwee said: "It has been a brilliant display by Team Singapore in Kuala Lumpur with debutants punching above their weight, seasoned athletes delivering as expected and surprises in bowling, golf and cycling which gave everyone something to delight in.

"A best away medal haul and the second-best ever performance by Team Singapore at the SEA Games - this is one performance Singaporeans can be proud of."



Singapore had sent its biggest away contingent of 560 national athletes with 303 in their first Games and 71 winning medals.

Overall, they set 15 Games records, 13 Singapore records and achieved 29 personal bests.

A total of 16 sports won golds, the second highest spread in Singapore's history at the Games. In 2015 on home soil, 18 sports accounted for the record 84 golds.

Singapore Sports Institute chief Toh Boon Yi said: "From a sporting Singapore perspective, this is encouraging. We see more and more people participating, putting time and energy in sporting pursuits. Even winter sports we have people taking it up.

"These are good signs that suggest sport is growing in the lives in Singaporeans."

Among the significant breakthroughs were a first men's cycling title in 20 years, a first golf men's team gold in 28 years while figure skaters Yu Shuran and Chloe Ing bagged the nation's first winter sports gold and silver winter sport Games medals.

Winter sports made its debut at the Games with ice hockey, speed skating and figure skating among the 38 sports offered in Malaysia.

Singapore participated in 35, skipping weightlifting, volleyball and sepak takraw.



Hosts Malaysia emerged as overall champions with 145 golds, displacing defending champions Thailand (72 golds). Vietnam were third with 58 titles, one ahead of fourth-placed Singapore. Indonesia, who will host next year's Asian Games, were fifth with 38 golds.

The next SEA Games will be held in the Philippines in 2019.

Kwee said: "Overall, we are pleased with the efforts and performance of Team Singapore and glad that this has been a safe and successful outing.

"While the team did well, there were also improvements to be made and so we feel an A-minus grade is befitting.

"We hope their results at the 29th SEA Games will be an indication of bigger things to come."

The next two major Games are the Commonwealth Games in Gold Coast next April and the Asiad three months later.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong also commended the athletes and supporters in an Instagram post on Wednesday night.

In a Facebook post on Wednesday evening, Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin celebrated the Singapore spirit that was on show in the Kuala Lumpur games.

He shared inspiring stories about Singapore athletes, commended the efforts of the coaches and support staff behind the scenes, and Singaporeans who travelled across the Causeway to support the nation's athletes.


























































 






 




Enhanced Screen for Life starts 1 Sep 2017; 1.8 million Singaporeans to get letters on cheap health screening

$
0
0
Those eligible pay $5 at most to get tested for up to five diseases
By Salma Khalik, Senior Health Correspondent, The Straits Times, 31 Aug 2017

Letters are being sent out in batches to 1.8 million Singaporeans aged 40 years and older, inviting them to go for health screening for up to five diseases by paying $5 at most. All the letters will be sent out by the year end.

The Enhanced Screen for Life, announced by Senior Minister of State for Health Chee Hong Tat during the parliamentary debate on his ministry's Budget in March this year, starts tomorrow.

Under it, all eligible people can be screened for diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol levels. Woman can be screened for cervical cancer, and people aged 50 years and older can test for colorectal cancer.

The screening, which is free for pioneers, costs $2 for those with the Community Health Assist Scheme card, and $5 for others. The screening includes a consultation with a doctor when the results are known, and can be done at more than 1,000 general practice clinics in the scheme.

Mr Chee told The Straits Times: "The aim of enhancing Screen For Life is to encourage Singaporeans to go for regular health screening, so that any problems can be detected early and better managed with appropriate intervention.

"Together with healthy eating and regular exercise, this is part of our collective efforts to keep Singaporeans healthy and lower the risk of diabetes and other chronic diseases."

Ms Jacqueline Enoch, 47, a manager at the Singapore Green Building Council, plans to go for the screening with her husband, also aged 47, and her mother, 77.

Her mother has high blood pressure and diabetes, but has not been tested for colorectal cancer. She was persuaded to go for screening after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong encouraged people to do so in his National Day Rally address.

Ms Enoch herself has not gone for a pap smear to check for cervical cancer since her second child was born 17 years ago.

Explaining her reasons, she said: "The cost is rather high. And we have to personally go to the polyclinic to make an appointment, then go again for the test."

The scheme allows her to take the test at a general practice clinic, which she finds very convenient.

While all 1.8 million people will get the invitation letters, some like Ms Enoch's mother will not need to screen for everything since she already knows of her chronic conditions and is being treated for them.

However, there are still many who are unaware that they might be suffering from some of these conditions.

The 2010 national health survey found that more than half of those with diabetes did not know of it, more than one in four were not aware they had high blood pressure, and 44 per cent found out they had high cholesterol levels for the first time because of the survey.

The ministry hopes the offer of free or cheap screening will alert people with chronic conditions to become aware they have them, and encourage them to take steps to keep their conditions under control.

The subsidised screening is available every three years for those who have no known chronic ailments.


Solar-ready roofs for new HDB blocks

$
0
0
18 projects earmarked so far for redesigned rooftops that will ease solar panel installation
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 2 Sep 2017

The Housing Board is reaffirming its commitment to promote sustainable living by redesigning the roofs of new blocks so solar panels can be more easily installed.

As of now, 18 projects have been earmarked, including ongoing projects in Punggol, Bidadari and Bukit Batok.

The HDB, with its stock of 10,000 blocks, is a prime candidate to harness solar energy. It said yesterday new blocks with at least 400 sq m of rooftop space will be "solar-ready". Essential block services like water tanks will be situated to optimise available rooftop space, and support structures and electrical infrastructure for the panels will be catered for.

It will also review other projects currently under construction to see if solar-ready roofs can be incorporated into their designs.

The redesigned rooftops eliminate the necessity for further renovation, reducing the time taken for panels to be installed from 40 days to 25. The cost of installation is also about 40 per cent less.

The HDB has pledged to install solar panels in 5,500 blocks by 2020. This would generate clean energy to power 55,000 four-room flats, or 5.5 per cent of the total number of flats, every year. Carbon emissions will also be cut by 132,500 tonnes a year.

As of July, 944 HDB blocks have had solar panels fitted on their roofs that fully power common services for the estates, like lifts and water pumps. Excess solar energy is channelled to the national electrical grid. Currently, there is enough to power about 10,000 four-room flats each year.

The HDB told The Straits Times not all projects will be handed over to town councils with solar panels installed, as sufficient demand has to be aggregated before a solar-leasing tender is called.

Energy experts welcomed the move. Said Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore deputy chief executive Thomas Reindl: "The future is very bright for solar in Singapore. Beyond 2020, the contribution of solar photovoltaic systems to the total energy consumption of Singapore could be as high as 20 to 30 per cent."















No big cost savings yet, but solar panels vital for energy goals
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 2 Sep 2017

It is unlikely that new HDB block rooftops, designed to make the installation of solar panels faster and cheaper, will translate to lower conservancy fees for residents any time soon.

Nevertheless, MPs and residents told The Straits Times that solar- ready rooftops - which the Housing Board announced yesterday would be incorporated into all new projects - are necessary in ensuring that Singapore's energy goals for the long run can be met.

Currently, 944 of Singapore's 10,000 HDB blocks have solar panels. HDB, which embarked on its solar capability journey in 2008, hopes to install panels on 5,500 blocks by 2020.

Mr Lim Biow Chuan, chairman of the Marine Parade Town Council, said the 110 blocks with solar panels in his GRC have resulted in some cost savings, though not significant enough to lower service and conservancy charges (S&CC).

This is because the bulk of a town council's funds still go to cleaning costs and lift maintenance, he said.

He added: "Of course, everyone wants lower fees. The question is whether it is sustainable to upkeep the estate in the long run. With so many lifts, I think it is quite difficult to do so."



Another reason conservancy fees are unlikely to come down is the cost of installing and maintaining solar panels.

While town councils do not bear the costs upfront - private developers of solar panels do - the capital outlay is substantial and will have to be recovered over time through selling excess electricity generated to the grid, said Nee Soon GRC MP and engineer Lee Bee Wah.

Under HDB's solar leasing model implemented in 2011, town councils purchase solar power generated by the panels at a rate not higher than the retail electricity tariff. Meanwhile, companies recover costs by selling the excess electricity that is not used to power common services like lights and lifts.

Excess solar energy enough to power about 10,000 four-room HDB flats is exported to the grid every month, HDB said.

Mr Ang Wei Neng, chairman of the Jurong-Clementi Town Council, pointed out that using more renewable energy sources would help slow down the rate of S&CC increases in the near term. The bulk of town councils raised their fees in June, with a second increase set to take place next year.

"The town council and residents benefit by not having to pay to light up the corridors and common areas, which are costs that can add up over the years," Mr Ang said.

By 2020, Singapore hopes to attain 350 megawatt peak, the maximum amount of solar power that can be generated under optimum conditions.

This means that, in theory, about 5 per cent of Singapore's energy needs can be met via solar energy. In reality, given the possibility of cloudy or rainy days, this would yield enough output to fuel only 1 per cent of the country's total energy consumption.

But the Government is looking beyond 2020 and at raising the adoption of solar power here to 1 gigawatt peak, through technological improvements and more panels, among other things.

Eco-Business managing editor Jessica Cheam noted that Singapore can achieve more on the solar capability front, especially as costs of installing panels decrease.

"Although the global economy - including Singapore's - is still reliant on fossil fuels in the short term, it is encouraging to see both the public and private sectors making efforts to accelerate the transition into renewable energy. It makes both economic and environment sense," she said.

The pilot for solar-ready roofs began at the six-block Punggol Edge, which resident Delson Lee welcomed. But he also hoped that any cost savings would be passed on to residents. "The cost savings may not be significant now, but we are talking about 20 years from now. Depending on how great the savings are eventually, I think residents should be entitled to rebates every one or two years," he said.



Related
HDB Rolls Out Solar-Ready Roofs for Easier and Faster Installation of Solar Panels

Food waste: Food for thought for students

$
0
0
10 schools join move to cut waste by turning it into compost; assembly talks on topic held
By Samantha Boh, The Straits Times, 2 Sep 2017

As he slid plastic gloves onto his hands, 11-year-old Ray Yap inspected the large containers of dirty plates, bowls and cutlery lined up beside him on trolleys.

Then he frowned. He had spotted a plate with leftover food on it.

Ray had been tasked with an important mission a month ago: help his school Greendale Primary cut its food waste.

That plate reminded him that he needed to redouble his efforts at the next recess starting at 9.45am.

For the next half-hour, Ray and his friends Kellyn Loh, 10, and Triparna Poddar, 11, stationed themselves beside the plastic containers, reminding pupils to dump their leftovers into special green bins.



The three pupils, members of the environmental science club, held the bins open for their peers, and even helped to pick up food which had fallen on the floor.

The leftover food will later be turned into compost using a food-waste digester, in a process that takes about 10 hours.

Greendale Primary's environmental education adviser, Mr Edwin Chee, 41, a science teacher, said the school started a food-waste reduction programme last month.

It is among 10 primary and secondary schools that were leased food-waste digesters by the National Environment Agency (NEA) for two years under the Love Your Food @ Schools Project. The machines were installed in May.

Food waste accounts for about 10 per cent of the total waste generated in Singapore, but only 14 per cent is recycled.

Last year, more than 790,000 tonnes of food was wasted - equivalent to two bowls of rice per person a day.

As of last month, all 10 schools have introduced programmes to reduce food waste. These include assembly talks on the topic and recycling food waste using the digester.

At Greendale Primary, members of the environmental science club and Primary 5 and 6 pupils are rostered to participate in the programme, which also involves weighing the food waste collected at the end of every recess.

A teacher will then pour the waste into a food-waste digester, which uses microbes to convert it into compost, to be used to fertilise the school's gardens.

Canteen vendors also chip in by segregating their food waste. They also ask pupils if they want smaller portions.

Said Mr Chee: "Changing the mindset and habits of pupils and staff was an initial challenge and we had an uphill task to get them involved... but there has definitely been improvement and the evidence is in the food waste collected."

The school has cut the amount of food waste it generates daily from 17.9kg to less than 10kg.

Similarly, Dunman High School has reduced the amount of food waste it produces from 20kg to 16kg per week since last month.

At Dunman, the programme is led by a class of Year 4 students through the school's values-in-action programme, where students put core values into action through community service.

The students put up food waste-reduction posters around the school and continually encourage their peers to segregate their food waste. They are also mentoring Year 2 students to help weigh and then deposit the discarded food into the food-waste digester.

The compost is used on school grounds and also shared with St Hilda's Community Services Centre, which caters to the elderly.

Siah Bing Ze, 15, who is chairman of the class, said the experience has taught him that even small actions mean something.

"I didn't know I could make a difference, even impact an entire school," he said.

NEA said it hopes the project will encourage other schools to kick-start their own food waste-reduction initiatives. It added that it will consider relocating and leasing some of the food-waste digesters to other schools for another two years, after the current project ends.

But for now, those involved are happy to do their part to cut food waste, even if it means sometimes getting their hands dirty.

Ray from Greendale Primary said it is an interesting process where he gets to learn about recycling.

His fellow environmental science club member Triparna added: "Maybe over time, we won't need to remind our friends to separate their food waste any more."









St John's Island launches first curated trail, guided tours

$
0
0
Wildlife, history part of new trail on St John's Island
2.8km trail has signboards and covers various ecosystems such as mangroves, coastal forests
By Kok Xing Hui, The Sunday Times, 3 Sep 2017

Primary school pupil Leah Thorpe, 11, spent yesterday morning walking around St John's Island with her mother and sister, listening to stories about the island's history, habitats and wildlife.

The family was one of the first to walk along a new island trail curated by the National Parks Board (NParks).

Leah's mother, housewife Olivia Tay, 47, said the tour was very informative, while Leah piped up that her favourite part of the trail was the pufferfish in the mangrove exhibit.

"And the kapok trees, the bugs and the cats along the way," she said.


NParks launched the island trail yesterday. It is 2.8km long with signboards along the trail to tell visitors about the island.

The trail's 15 stations take visitors through various ecosystems on the island, including mangroves, coastal forests and intertidal zones. Wildlife in the area include hawksbill turtles, Indo-Pacific humpbacked dolphins, great- billed herons and many heritage trees.

At the launch, Second Minister for National Development and Home Affairs Desmond Lee said he was happy about this development on St John's Island, which is located about 6.5km south of the main island of Singapore.

"The centre of gravity of our conservation approach cannot be to keep people away from nature. Instead, we want to instil a sense of wonder and appreciation among Singaporeans for our green and blue areas," he said.

Alongside the trail is a new volunteer-run guided walk that will take 45 guests around St John's Island on a 90-minute tour. This will be on the first weekend of every month, starting from next month.

Meanwhile, exhibits at the Sisters' Islands Marine ParkPublic Gallery on St John's Island - once a quarantine centre for new migrants with infectious diseases - have also been given a new lease of life.

The centre, which receives more than 100 visitors a month, now has a 5m-long mangrove mesocosm, a tank that holds wildlife found in mangroves. The tank can also mimic the actual tides in the mangroves.



There are also aquariums featuring corals and giant clams, a 2m-long viewing pool with sea anemones, starfish and clown fish, and a virtual-reality headset that takes viewers on a dive.

Mr Lee also announced the formation of the Friends of the Marine Park community, which includes boaters, divers, scientists and fishermen, who will work on projects to conserve the island.

For example, dive professionals will help to maintain the dive trail and develop guidelines for kayakers entering the park.

Visitors to St John's Island can get there via a 30-minute ferry ride from Marina South Pier that departs every two hours from 9am to 3pm on Saturdays, and from 9am to 5pm on Sundays. On weekdays, the ferry departs at 10am and 2pm.














Related
NParks launches the first curated trail and guided walk at St John’s Island

Singapore to cut workplace fatality rate to below 1 per 100,000 workers by 2028

$
0
0
Plan to halve workplace fatalities
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 4 Sep 2017

Singapore aims to reduce workplace fatalities to less than one death per 100,000 workers in 10 years' time.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the new target yesterday, saying it can be achieved through the three-way partnership between the Government, employers and unions; as well as by encouraging companies to use technology to improve safety.

The current target of 1.8 deaths per 100,000 workers was set in 2008, and achieved in 2014, but the rate crept up to 1.9 in 2015 and last year.



Singapore saw five deaths per 100,000 workers back in 2004, Mr Lee noted at the official opening of the World Congress on Safety and Health at Work yesterday.

But a comprehensive series of measures, including a new Workplace Safety and Health Act introduced in 2006, helped bring down the rate to 1.9 last year, he said.

The new target will put Singapore on a par with countries such as the Netherlands, Britain, Sweden and Finland, which have workplace fatality rates of below one death per 100,000 workers. "We will have to work hard, but I am confident that we can achieve the new target," Mr Lee said.

Moving to workplace health, he added: "The prevalence of work-place illnesses and chronic conditions is itself a problem that should be addressed." He cited conditions like hearing loss and respiratory diseases, which "can be prevented with a little bit of effort".

But even as the Government continues to introduce new rules and incentives to nudge companies to make workplaces safer, Mr Lee made it plain that more regulation alone will not solve the problem.

Ultimately, companies should take a holistic approach to workplace safety and health. "It is impractical to add new regulations each time there is a workplace accident," he said. "Beyond a point, more rules will result in heavier burdens, but not greater safety."

























$2 million government fund to tackle traffic fatalities at work
It will cover research into solutions that address key causes such as driver fatigue and blind spots
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 4 Sep 2017

A $2 million government fund has been set up to pay for research into technologies that can help reduce the number of workers killed in traffic accidents.

The fund will cover research into solutions that address the main causes of fatal traffic accidents at work - vehicle blind spots, unsafe driving practices, and driver fatigue.

Companies and research institutions will receive up to 70 per cent funding to devise such solutions, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said in a statement yesterday.

Traffic accidents were the top cause of workplace fatalities between 2013 and last year, claiming 82 lives. More than half, or 57 per cent, of the accidents happened in worksites while the rest occurred on public roads.

The ministry is calling for proposals from today, for submission in November. The winning projects will be announced in March next year.

The fund is part of a broader plan announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday to encourage companies to make workplaces safer through technology.

"Technology can help to reduce human errors which cause workplace accidents," said Mr Lee.

He noted that some transport and logistics companies have already installed devices to monitor driving habits.

"If the driver is falling asleep, an alert will be triggered, the seat will vibrate and the driver hopefully will wake up," he said.

At his National Day Rally two weeks ago, the Prime Minister had outlined how Singapore's Smart Nation plan will create jobs and improve daily living.

Yesterday, he said using technology to improve workplace safety and health is part of the national plan to become a Smart Nation.

Besides promoting the use of technology to improve workplace safety and health, the MOM is also reaching out to smaller companies that may lack resources to roll out workplace safety programmes.

It will set up a Total Workplace Safety and Health Service Centre in Woodlands by the end of this month, to give advice to smaller firms and help them implement programmes to boost safety at work.

The pilot centre, which will run for two years, will help about 300 companies employing 3,000 workers in the Woodlands East Industrial Estate. It will provide free services like consultations and talks.

The 300 companies are mainly in the metal works, food manufacturing and construction sectors, the MOM said.

"If this approach works well, we will set up more of these centres in other industrial areas in Singapore," said Mr Lee at the official opening of the 21st World Congress on Safety and Health at Work yesterday.



The congress was jointly opened by Mr Lee, International Labour Organisation (ILO) director-general Guy Ryder and International Social Security Association (ISSA) president Joachim Breuer.

In their speeches delivered before Mr Lee's, Mr Ryder and Dr Breuer spoke about the vision of reducing workplace fatalities and injuries to zero worldwide.

About 3,500 delegates from more than 100 countries are in Singapore until Wednesday for the congress, which is held every three years. It is the first time the congress is held in South-east Asia.

Besides meetings and workshops, the congress also has activities such as a safety and health exhibition, and a short film competition on preventing workplace deaths and injuries.

The competition has drawn eight Singapore entries - seven films and a multimedia presentation. Some are expected to win awards when the winners are announced today.

The Asean labour ministers also met to discuss workplace safety on the sidelines of the congress yesterday. They later issued a joint statement pledging their commitment to improve workplace safety for workers in the region.











IPPT for Seniors: Fitness test for seniors to gauge frailty, health risks

$
0
0
Seniors take 'IPPT' to ward off health crises
Tests gauge strength, flexibility and balance; detect risks that could land them in hospital
By Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 5 Sep 2017

If getting grandma to run 2.4km is out of the question, get her to try the 10m walk instead.

A team of local experts has come up with an "IPPT" for seniors, similar to the Individual Physical Proficiency Test for the uniformed services.

Called IPPT-S, or IPPT for Seniors, the test has nine stations - to measure flexibility, strength and balance. These include a modified sit and reach, as well as grip strength and walking tests.



The set of tests is being used as a screening tool to pick up frail, elderly people before health crises, such as falls, land them in hospital.

It was developed by a team of doctors and allied health professionals from Singapore General Hospital and Sengkang General Hospital.

As people age, their bodies deteriorate and become more frail, said Associate Professor Ng Yee Sien, who is a rehabilitation physician at both hospitals.

This may manifest as feelings of weakness or exhaustion, or even significant weight loss over the course of a year. "But the progression is very subtle and hard to pick up," Prof Ng said. "It's difficult to recognise until the occurrence of a crisis."

Often, this results in the person being admitted to hospital. It can be a long time before he returns to full health.

Prof Ng and his team hope to avoid this by working with grassroots organisations - such as senior activity centres - to carry out the screening test for seniors who are still relatively healthy.

Those who take part must also complete a questionnaire to assess elements such as their nutritional status and quality of life.

The test will be made available to those who are 55 and above, can walk on their own, and pass a separate pre-screening assessment.

The team conducted a pilot in June and July involving around 100 people in Sengkang. It hopes to reach at least 2,000 seniors over the next three years.

One of those who have already taken the test is Mr Loy See Wee, 68, who passed all nine stations with flying colours.

Said the retiree, who runs every day: "I did as much as I could (during the test). I realised that I don't have enough muscle (strength) because I train only for stamina and don't carry weights."

He added that he would work on this by doing chin-ups or push-ups.








Related
Enhanced Screen for Life starts 1 Sep 2017; 1.8 million Singaporeans to get letters on cheap health screening

Enterprise Singapore: IE Singapore, SPRING to merge and form new agency to help firms develop capacity, go global

$
0
0
Enterprise Singapore, from merger of SPRING and IE Singapore, will allow firms to grow faster
By Yasmine Yahya, Assistant Business Editor, The Straits Times, 6 Sep 2017

As companies no longer have the luxury of learning to walk at home before running overseas, the Government has set up a new agency to speed up their growth process.

Enterprise Singapore, born by merging International Enterprise Singapore with SPRING Singapore, will help local firms bulk up and go global fast in this era of disruption.

The merger, which kicks in next year, will combine IE's expertise in helping companies venture overseas with SPRING's skills in developing capacity, Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S. Iswaran said yesterday at the official opening of the Singapore Business Federation's (SBF) new Robinson Road office.

"With tighter domestic constraints, external demand will be an even more important driver of growth," he noted.

"Our companies must be able to respond nimbly to political and economic shifts, shorter technology cycles and business model disruptions. They must have extensive networks internationally, superior capabilities, innovative products and strong brands to compete in this globalised digital economy."

Enterprise Singapore will be able to support local firms in these efforts, Mr Iswaran said.

It could, for example, give a manufacturing firm a grant to raise its production capacity, while developing an export strategy for its increased output.

Start-ups will not only benefit from the capability development support that SPRING has been providing, but also be plugged into IE's international networks, he said.

Mr Png Cheong Boon, Second Permanent Secretary for the Ministry of Trade and Industry, will be concurrently appointed as the chief executive (designate) of Enterprise Singapore. He had previously served as the chief executive of JTC Corporation and SPRING.

Meanwhile, the Competition Commission of Singapore will take over SPRING's oversight of consumer protection, letting Enterprise Singapore focus on businesses.

Mr Iswaran stressed that the merger "is not about downsizing or rationalisation", adding that the new entity will have about 900 staff - the combined strength of IE and SPRING's existing headcounts.

Businesses and trade associations welcomed the merger, with the SBF noting that the move is consistent with what it has called for in recent years.

"I am sure one plus one will be more than two in this case," said SBF chairman Teo Siong Seng.

"Today, a company would have to go to SPRING to apply for productivity schemes, then to IE for help going overseas. You have two officers helping the same company on issues that may overlap. By bringing them together, a company would be looked after by one agency as it grows."

Mrs Xu Run Machen, managing director of household goods distributor Xu Run Holdings, recalled how IE helped her when she wanted to open an office n Shanghai. But she was too busy to apply for SPRING grants. "I had time only to work on expanding overseas," she said.

"I think with this merger, Enterprise Singapore can do both - they can help companies with grants and... take the initiative to help them look at international opportunities. I think that will be more effective than having two agencies do different things."










New agency a 'one-stop shop' to help firms grow
Business community cheers merger of SPRING and IE Singapore, saying it will add convenience
By Kok Xing Hui, The Straits Times, 6 Sep 2017

These days, Singapore entrepreneurs are thinking big: They want to do well locally and also move into overseas markets quickly. So, having one government agency to help local companies meet both goals makes sense.

This was the sentiment of the local business community on yesterday's announcement that SPRING Singapore and International Enterprise Singapore (IE Singapore) will merge to form Enterprise Singapore.

The merger will take effect in the second quarter of next year.

In fact, the Singapore Business Federation said it had for years been calling for one authority to champion the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across the whole of government.

Such a move also reflects the current business climate, with "start- ups and young people who are really trying to go (overseas) to look for opportunities, to actually look for new markets", said SBF chairman Teo Siong Seng.

Businesses told The Straits Times that the merger would make it more convenient for them when dealing with the Government, and that Enterprise Singapore can give them more holistic advice on both local and foreign expansions.

Announcing the merger yesterday, Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S. Iswaran said: "Through Enterprise Singapore, start-ups will not only benefit from the capability development support that SPRING has been providing, but they will also be plugged into IE's international networks."

Said Mr Kurt Wee, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises: "If you step into IE, they would work with you on some programmes, and if they find that you have some domestic capabilities that need to be developed, IE would pass you to SPRING. Or if you started with SPRING, they would hand you over to IE if you wanted to embark on internationalisation. Essentially, you would deal with two agencies."

Mr Shamir Rahim, president of the Singapore Malay Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said the new agency would make it "seamless" for his 500 or so members.

He said companies often receive grants from SPRING to build up capabilities so they can eventually go overseas with IE Singapore, adding that it would be easier if both were handled by one agency.

Mr Shabbir Hassanbhai, director of metal recycling firm Indo Straits Trading Company, said: "The merger means businesses will not have to run around to get things done. I hope this means we can cut down on the steps one goes through to get assistance."

Enterprise Singapore can take the initiative to help companies locally and overseas, said Mr R. Dhinakaran, president of the Singapore Retailers Association.

"The officer in charge can hold the SME's hand. He can say, 'Okay, this is a good product. Why don't you apply for this and that scheme? We will support you in these matters, and why don't you also expand in this market - we have an office there and they can guide you.' It is a one-stop shop," he added.















Related
MTI: Enterprise Singapore to grow stronger Singapore enterprises

Tan Chuan-Jin to be Speaker of Parliament from 11 Sep 2017

$
0
0
Tan Chuan-Jin to become new Speaker of Parliament, Desmond Lee to helm Ministry of Social and Family Development
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 6 Sep 2017

A member at the core of the fourth-generation political leadership, Mr Tan Chuan-Jin, 48, will be the new Speaker of Parliament.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will nominate him for the post when the House sits on Monday.

The decision, PM Lee said yesterday in a Facebook post, was a very difficult one as it meant "losing an effective and activist minister".

But he said Mr Tan stood out as the best choice for the post vacated by Madam Halimah Yacob, 63, who resigned on Aug 7 to contest this month's presidential election.

"It was not easy to find a suitable replacement," PM Lee said. "As Speaker, Chuan-Jin will have to preside over parliamentary debates and ensure fair and full discussion of national issues. Chuan-Jin has the temperament and personality for this role." He added: "Chuan-Jin remains an important member of my team, though in a different role."

The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said in a statement: "PM Lee has briefed PAP MPs on his nomination and received their full support."



Many Singaporeans were surprised by the move, and Dr Gillian Koh of the Institute of Policy Studies noted that many expected a senior backbencher to fill the post.

Mr Tan will resign as Minister for Social and Family Development, as the Speaker cannot be elected from among MPs who are office holders.

Taking over the ministry's helm from Monday is Mr Desmond Lee, 41, who will remain Second Minister for National Development.

Mr Tan said he was glad to accept PM Lee's nomination and hoped fellow MPs would support it. He said: "Good ideas can come from both sides of the House, as does good intent. In fact, they abound throughout the length and breadth of our society. Our duty must be to harness these for the common good."

PM Lee also singled out Mr Tan's deep interest in social issues and helping the disadvantaged. He will continue to oversee SG Cares, the movement to build a caring society.



Mr Lee said Mr Tan has left him "very big shoes to fill". Mr Lee will no longer be Minister in the PMO and Second Minister for Home Affairs.

Minister in the PMO Josephine Teo, 49, will take over as Second Minister for Home Affairs. She will remain Second Manpower Minister, but will no longer be Second Minister for Foreign Affairs.















Tan Chuan-Jin 'always had a heart for the less privileged'
By Priscilla Goy, The Straits Times, 6 Sep 2017

Ask observers what Mr Tan Chuan-Jin has achieved as Minister for Social and Family Development in the past two years, and the replies come thick and fast.

He started KidStart to help children from disadvantaged families level up. He helped push for unwed mothers to get 16 weeks of paid maternity leave, like married mothers, instead of eight weeks. He also worked to raise the profile of pre-school teachers.

Mr Seah Kian Peng, who chairs the Government Parliamentary Committee for Social and Family Development, said: "He is very passionate about social causes. It will be a waste if that passion and conviction cannot be put to good use.

"Chuan-Jin has always had a heart for the less privileged, which includes the poor and elderly, but also people from broken families and single mothers."



Yesterday's announcement that Mr Tan would resign from his ministerial post took observers in the social service sector by surprise, but they said they were glad he would still be involved in the sector in other ways. Mr Tan, 48, will be nominated as Speaker of Parliament by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong when the House sits on Monday.

But he will continue to oversee SG Cares, a national movement that encourages volunteerism, and be appointed adviser to the National Council of Social Service, where he is currently its patron. He will also continue to lead Marine Parade GRC.

Chiltern House principal Iris Lim said she appreciated Mr Tan's efforts to raise the profile of pre- school teachers. For instance, from this year, childcare centres could close for an extra half-day. Last week, he joined pre-schoolers in performing the song, You Are My Sunshine, to pay tribute to pre-school teachers. The video was posted on his Facebook page on Teachers' Day.

Ms Lim said: "I think that allowed teachers to know that he appreciates all of them, and it narrowed the distance between the teachers and the Government. He is quite a down-to-earth person."

Other people in the social service sector also said he was approachable, and has engaged the community.

Mr Keh Eng Song, former chief executive of the Movement for the Intellectually Disabled of Singapore, said Mr Tan's Facebook posts can attest to how well he engages the public. "Detractors aside, it does come across that he continues to engage regardless," said Mr Keh.

Mr Tan has written on Facebook on topics ranging from the cinnamon buns his daughter baked to why some working adults still need financial aid.

Disabled People's Association president Nicholas Aw said: "Mr Tan shared with me his experience of trying to navigate pavements using a wheelchair. His frank sharing about how difficult it is in some areas showed me that he is willing to admit when there is more work to be done."

Despite the progress, some work remains to be done, said others.

Mr Desmond Lee, 41, now Second Minister for National Development, will take over from Mr Tan at the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF).

Ms Jolene Tan, the Association of Women for Action and Research's head of advocacy and research, said: "Mr Tan's tenure at MSF saw important movement towards achieving inclusion for single-parent families.

"We hope Mr Lee will build on this to tackle the challenge of housing for single-parent families, which he is well placed to do given his experience in the Ministry of National Development."





Tan Chuan-Jin well qualified for Speaker role, say colleagues
Tan Chuan-Jin has right temperament and instincts: Chan Chun Sing
By Charissa Yong and Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 6 Sep 2017

Minister Chan Chun Sing yesterday said outgoing Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin has the qualities to be the new Speaker of Parliament.

"The Speaker's role is a critical one. Going forward, we have many complex challenges to overcome as a nation. We expect more vigorous debate in a House with more diverse views. We need someone with the stature, temperament and the right instincts to conduct parliamentary proceedings," Mr Chan said in a Facebook post.

He also wrote: "I have known Chuan-Jin for over 30 years. We were schoolmates, army mates and then Cabinet colleagues. I know his temperament well and I am confident he will do his best as Speaker."

Mr Chan is the Government Whip in Parliament and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office.

Both he and Mr Tan are among the next generation of core leaders.

As the Speaker would not have a direct role in policymaking, Mr Chan was asked whether Mr Tan's appointment was a step down.

His reply: "We have never considered it in that perspective. We have always considered ourselves as a team, and each of us has different strengths and weaknesses, and each of us will be required to play different roles at different stages of our development."



Mr Chan was also asked if the move meant Mr Tan was no longer part of the next generation of core leaders. He said: "All of us in Government do different things, perform different roles, each according to our strengths.

"Regardless of our position, our common aim is to serve Singapore to the best of our abilities. From what I know of Chuan-Jin... he will continue to serve to the best of his abilities."

Mr Tan stressed similar points when asked the same questions at a community event last night. He said: "There are many different roles and many different pathways that we all have to take. (But) I would say we are all running in the same race. And the end outcome we are all working towards is... you have to make things better for Singaporeans."

Later, he added in an e-mail to The Straits Times: "I have always taken the approach that any job or responsibility is meaningful. It is how we approach it and how we make the most of it.

"Throughout my life, I have never bargained or negotiated on where I get posted to. I embrace the opportunities and put in my very best."

Mr Tan is the second Cabinet minister to be nominated Speaker.

In March 2002, Mr Abdullah Tarmugi resigned as Minister for Community Development and Sports to be nominated to the post. He was then 57 years old and had been a minister for nine years.

He was Speaker for nine years until he retired from politics in 2011.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday lauded Mr Tan's contributions at the ministries he helmed.

He pinpointed Mr Tan's deep interest in social issues, like helping the needy and disadvantaged families, when he led the Ministry of Social and Family Development, and championing the cause of low-income workers while at the Manpower Ministry.

At the Ministry of National Development (MND), "Chuan-Jin built good rapport with the heritage, nature, environmental and animal welfare groups", said PM Lee.

"I am glad he has agreed to continue advising MND on these issues, and to oversee SG Cares, after he becomes Speaker," he added.

Mr Tan is also president of the Singapore National Olympic Council.

This is an elected post, not a government appointment, PM Lee added, and expressed the hope that "he will keep on leading and inspiring our sporting fraternity, as he did recently at the SEA Games".











Shuffles towards Singapore's fourth prime minister
By Gillian Koh, Published The Straits Times, 7 Sep 2017

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced a Cabinet reshuffle. This is the third since the start of this parliamentary term in January last year.

The first was in October last year when the notable shifts were the promotion of Mr Ong Ye Kung and Mr Ng Chee Meng to full ministers.

The second, at the end of April, or four months ago, saw Mrs Josephine Teo and Mr Desmond Lee become full ministers and Dr Lam Pin Min, Dr Janil Puthucheary, Dr Koh Poh Koon and Mr Chee Hong Tat promoted to senior ministers of state. Mr Teo Ser Luck, a mayor and senior minister of state, it was announced, would step out of public office.

What we have just learnt is that PM Lee has nominated Mr Tan Chuan-Jin to be the next Speaker of Parliament. Replacing him at the helm of the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) will be Mr Desmond Lee.

In explaining his decision, PM Lee emphasised that Mr Tan remains an "important member" of his team though in a different role, which means that the switch-out is intentional, rather than one of expediency - it is not to fill a gap temporarily.

In fact, PM Lee's statement that Mr Tan has the "temperament and personality" for the role of Speaker strengthened the impression that his decision was very much based on considerations of Mr Tan's intrinsic qualities. Mr Tan was acknowledged for having strong networks in the social and sports sectors that remain valuable to that governing team.

Those who have been studying the process of leadership renewal will conclude that Mr Tan is out of the running to be Singapore's fourth prime minister, leaving the main contenders to be Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing, Mr Ong and Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat. While the role of Speaker is an important institutional and ceremonial one, it does not involve taking the lead in giving strategic input on policymaking in government.

Many would have thought that the position of Speaker, vacated now by Madam Halimah Yacob stepping down to make a bid for the presidency, would be filled by a senior backbencher, so this is indeed a surprising move.

This is the second such surprising move with regard to those who have been identified as candidates for the position of Singapore's fourth prime minister - those who are in their 40s and were pulled out of leadership positions elsewhere and quickly placed into ministerial positions soon after a general election.

The first was when it was announced that Mr Chan would move from being minister at the MSF to become deputy secretary-general at the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and a Minister without portfolio in the Prime Minister's Office in January 2015.

However the difference is that at the same time that Mr Chan became secretary-general , his predecessor, Mr Lim Swee Say, moved from NTUC to head up a "mainboard" ministry - the Ministry of Manpower, thereby setting the precedent for the reverse move.

Does anyone think that the same reverse move could happen to Mr Tan - from Speaker back to Cabinet?

Another key development from yesterday's announcement was that Mr Desmond Lee and Mrs Josephine Teo have been firmly installed among the corps of fourth generation (4G) Cabinet leaders.

These moves signal progress in the leadership renewal process. Some personalities move up, others move out.

These whet public appetite for further clarity on who will be the next premier - the hot topic at many a lunch and dinner conversation since the General Election in 2011, the first election when it was declared that the hunt was on for the 4G leaders.

Indeed, bigger moves are due - the serious candidates for premiership are likely to be shifted into the position of deputy prime minister by the end of this parliamentary term.

However, these conversations tend to revolve around who "they" will choose, as if no one else has a say in the matter apart from the tightest inner circle of leaders of the ruling People's Action Party. Is that true? What might be the considerations that feed into that choice, and who decides?

In this age of great uncertainty where the consensus on how the global economy, international governance and geostrategic politics should work is fraying, the notions of who is a good leader for a small state like Singapore are also being redefined. Our leaders' steady and skilful management of Singapore's relationships with key powers will become increasingly critical.

While it is often said that all politics is local, in recent months, from discussions on Singapore-China relations, we know that that dictum may not be quite so true in Singapore. Singaporeans are judging our leaders, fairly or unfairly, by how they think our government handles that.

While the Cabinet is always a team and therefore a composite of different strengths and qualities, the question is who will be that leader of leaders. That will be defined by what are the present and future challenges we face as a country, and who can win the confidence of Singaporeans to lead us through to that future - this is where the public comes in.

Will Singaporeans prioritise our external interactions and prefer someone with strategic acuity and international standing or is a visionary innovator and risk-taker who leads the country in new directions?

Or will they prioritise a domestic focus and prefer someone who is more deeply embedded in local networks, delivers excellent public services and empowers Singaporean changemakers in industry and society to be the world-beaters?

A frequently asked question is: Will it matter what race this person is? Who can forget that our founding prime minister, the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, said that he set aside his preferred successor because of his race? And we will be reminded that the current Prime Minister justified the upcoming reserved presidential election by saying that politics in Singapore is not post-racial. This, too, is an issue that lies at the doorstep of ordinary Singaporeans to resolve.

Our conceptions of governance and political leadership shape the decision on who that fourth PM will be. We cannot dodge that responsibility. But if we recognise it, it also means we have that further responsibility of seeking to grasp what our national interests are before we judge who best represents those and who we can have confidence in.

In October last year, PM Lee said that building a leadership team is one of his top priorities. To what extent will those choices be just his; his potential successors'; or ours as ordinary Singaporeans?

The writer is deputy director (research) at the Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore.


Singapore faces a grim labour future as population ages rapidly: Oxford Economics

$
0
0
Singapore faces double whammy in labour supply: Study
By Jacqueline Woo, The Straits Times, 7 Sep 2017

Singapore has the most to fear from an ageing population among Asia-Pacific nations, according to a new study.

It noted yesterday that the country faces a double whammy: a shrinking workforce coupled with slower progress than its Asian neighbours in getting more people into the labour market.

The report by Oxford Economics said Singapore's labour supply will shrink by 1.7 percentage point in the 10 years through 2026, and by 2.5 percentage points in the following decade, after accounting for changes to the participation rate.

This will make the country the worst hit out of a dozen economies in the report, even though it was Japan that has recorded the biggest workforce decline over the past 10 years.

The report said almost all Asian nations will face demographic challenges over the next two decades, while policy measures or efforts to boost labour participation rates - such as by drawing more women or the elderly into the workforce - will only partially limit the impact.

Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea came up the worst on a metric that looked at the amount by which the decline in growth of the working-age population cannot be offset by higher labour participation rates.



The massive decline expected in Singapore's working-age population growth from 2027 will be due in part to less immigration after a recent policy shift, added the report.

It will take a while before the pain affects some countries. Thailand's workforce, for instance, will barely shrink over the next 10 years, but is expected to drop by 1.1 percentage point each year in the decade after.

Japan's workforce is likely to remain unchanged from now until 2026, due to labour market reforms that include more women and higher participation by senior citizens, even as its working-age population shrinks by 0.7 per cent a year.

But there are limits to how much various groups' participation rates can rise, and so its labour supply growth is expected to fall in the following decade.

Mr Louis Kuijs, head of Asia economics at Oxford Economics, who wrote the report, noted its projections can be used to provide an indication of how much economic growth will come under pressure in Asia in the coming decades. A 1 percentage point decline in workforce growth would mean a fall in gross domestic product growth by 0.5 to 0.67 percentage point.

"With the demographic challenge looming on the horizon, Asian economies better start preparing," said Mr Kuijs.

Singapore's ageing population has long been flagged as a major challenge to the economy. It means higher healthcare expenditure and a decline in the domestic labour force, which will affect growth, said Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat at an event last month.

DBS economist Irvin Seah told The Straits Times the key thing for Singapore to focus on is to "change the way we grow the economy".

"It shouldn't simply be driven by labour or capital injections, but by innovation. We have to grow the economy in a smarter way, and the Government has been taking steps to do that, to restructure the economy," he said.

Mr Seah believes Singapore remains attractive as a destination for human capital and businesses, given its status as an international hub for finance, shipping and other activities. It also helps that Singapore has more flexibility in terms of immigration policy compared with other countries in the region.

"Simply focusing on the demographic trend doesn't paint the whole picture (for Singapore's future). Much will really depend on how we plan ahead and how we take action today to mitigate against the challenge of an ageing population."










Singapore to be hardest hit in Asia by fall in working population growth: Report
By Kelly Ng, TODAY, 6 Sep 2017

While Japan had the biggest slump in its workforce in Asia over the last 10 years, Singapore has the most to fear from an ageing population over the next two decades, based on projections by an international research house.

As a result of a shrinking workforce and slower progress than Asian neighbours in getting more people into the labour market, the Republic is expected to face a "massive decline" in its working age population growth by 2036, "in part because of less immigration after a recent policy shift", said the report, which was published on Monday (Sept 4) by Oxford Economics.

The report noted that several economies such as China, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong have already felt the impact of demographic changes over the past decade, "and adjusted and responded to them, to varying degrees".

In contrast, Singapore posted a "whopping" 2.4-per-cent growth in its working-age population on average annually between 2007 and last year. As a result, it could be the hardest hit in the next 20 years: Compared to the previous decade, Singapore's labour supply growth - after accounting for projected changes to the participation rate - will shrink by 1.7 percentage points yearly between this year and 2026, and by 2.5 percentage points annually in the subsequent decade. This would be the worst among 12 economies covered in the report, which was written by Mr Louis Kuijs, who heads the Asia Economics team at Oxford Economics. The report estimated that a 1 percentage point decline in labour supply growth would shave off a half-point to two-thirds of a percentage point in gross domestic product growth.



Commenting on the report, economists interviewed by TODAY said it showed a "stark reality" of an issue that the Singapore Government has been trying to address for some years now, through measures such as encouraging automation and raising the re-employment age. Nevertheless, they stressed that there was no need for alarm, as Singapore's policymakers are aware of the shrinking workforce and the repercussions, and are "actively pursuing interventions", as labour economist Randolph Tan put it.

Assoc Prof Tan, who is from the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS), noted that the report presented only "one of several plausible scenarios". "Even though I believe the forecasts are useful as a warning of how bad things can get, there are several things we can do to produce a much better outcome. (For instance), Singapore can take advantage of our size instead of being constrained by it…and re-model ourselves to allow a small workforce to work smarter and more effectively," he said.

The decline in Malaysia, Hong Kong and China will be less than 0.4 percentage point yearly between 2017 and 2026, and less than 1 percentage point a year in the subsequent decade. While Japan's economic growth has been hit by demographic challenges in recent decades, the country's rising labour force participation will help ease its labour crunch in the next 10 years, with growth expected to pick up by 0.9 percentage point yearly. Rising participation is also expected to offset the decline in the working population in Indonesia, India and the Philippines. Along with Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea are the economies that would be "worst affected", the report said.

Speaking to TODAY, Mr Kuijs suggested that the Republic continue to explore ways of making work more attractive for seniors and women, such as ensuring that day-care facilities are widely available within or near to workplaces.

The Government's Population White Paper, which was published in January 2013, warned of a shrinking labour force. The paper projected the old-age support ratio - which is the number of working-age citizens for each citizen aged 65 and above - to fall to 2.1 by 2030, from 5.9 in 2012. A "smaller, less energetic workforce" would dampen business activity, and cause job and employment opportunities to shrink, it said.

In recent years, Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say has also stressed that the labour market here will remain tight, and unless Singapore can get the most out of its manpower, it would become a major bottleneck of growth in the future.

After years of surging foreign manpower growth, the Government has - since 2011 - moved to tighten the inflow of immigrants in its bid to reduce reliance on low-cost foreign labour.

The Government has made clear on several occasions that it will not perform a U-turn on its stance. Still, some of the analysts felt it may be time to re-look these policies, but they cautioned that it must be done in a "politically sensitive manner". CIMB Private Banking economist Song Seng Wun said: "We must ensure that there is enough room and infrastructure to support immigration before turning up the foreign labour tap."

SUSS economist Walter Theseira pointed out that without immigration, the natural rate of population growth in Singapore is "effectively zero". "However, the timing and extent of such a shift depends very much on both infrastructure and political acceptability of immigration," he said.Technology has been touted a key to solving the labour crunch, with the Government heavily investing in measures to encourage automation and better use of technology across various industries.

Dr Theseira said: "For example, if autonomous vehicles were widespread, we would have tens of thousands of taxi and private hire drivers… who would be looking for employment… While the total labour supply wouldn't change, getting them interested in other jobs could really boost effective labour supply." 








RISING50: Indonesia, Singapore mark 50 years of bilateral ties

$
0
0
Two countries are neighbours by geography but partners by choice, says PM Lee
By Francis Chan, Indonesia Bureau Chief, The Straits Times, 8 Sep 2017

Singapore and Indonesia marked 50 years of diplomatic ties at a Leaders' Retreat yesterday by declaring they would remain "trusted partners, RISING together".

While RISING - RI for Republic of Indonesia and SING for Singapore - was coined by diplomats to mark the jubilee, the leaders of the two nations also declared a desire to be friends for the long haul.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, in his toast at an Istana lunch in honour of Indonesian President Joko Widodo, said that while the two countries are neighbours by geography, they are partners by choice, and both are committed to broadening and deepening cooperation.

He noted earlier that generations of leaders from both sides had taken a long-term and win-win approach to cooperate for mutual benefit and solve problems amicably and rationally. "As a result, today we have a strong partnership based on mutual trust and respect," he said.

His words were echoed by President Joko, in Singapore for his second retreat with PM Lee in as many years, as the two leaders look to take ties forward. "We are neighbours by God's will, by geography, but we are and always will be good neighbours and close friends by choice," said Mr Joko. "To this end, it is essential to always ensure that our next 50 years of cooperation is one that is based on mutual trust and mutual confidence, and brings equal and mutual benefit to our peoples."



The leaders held a "four-eye" meeting before a high-powered Indonesian delegation sat down with their Singapore counterparts for bilateral talks yesterday morning.

Mr Lee said he and Mr Joko had a "good meeting", and believes their countries can do more together.

"Our bilateral relationship can only continue to deepen and benefit our two peoples if it is supported by close rapport between the leaders," he said. "I am therefore glad that President Jokowi and I have a constructive working relationship."

The leaders also noted the strong existing cooperation in trade, investment and tourism, and affirmed both sides' readiness to start talks on a new Bilateral Investment Treaty.

Mr Lee said at a joint press conference earlier that he appreciated Mr Joko's personal efforts in tackling forest and land fires, and expressed Singapore's commitment to work with Indonesia to address the transboundary haze issue as well as on counter-terrorism.

On regional cooperation, Mr Joko reiterated the importance of the two countries in ASEAN. They were two of the five founding members when ASEAN was formed in 1967.

"Next year, Singapore will become the chair of ASEAN. I have expressed Indonesia's support for Singapore's chairmanship," said Mr Joko. "ASEAN unity and centrality must always be our chief concern so that ASEAN remains relevant for its members and its people."

Mr Joko said that while the future holds many new challenges, he was "glad that the discussion... with PM Lee was focused on our cooperation ahead, including the development of the digital economy".

Nine memoranda of understanding were signed, including one between the Singapore Civil Defence Force and Indonesia's National Disaster Management Authority.

Singapore and Indonesia have reaped the benefits of close cooperation in the past 50 years, noted Mr Jonathan Chen, an associate research fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

"Although the political landscape of both countries has changed since, both continue to pursue a strong bilateral relationship based on shared interests, be it in the context of regional organisations like ASEAN or cooperation in trade, business and growth," said Mr Chen.

Both also stand to gain more by their complementarities than their differences. "If this can be achieved, it is likely that the next 50 years of bilateral ties will be just as celebrated."



Bilateral ties go sky-high
By Lim Min Zhang, The Straits Times, 8 Sep 2017

Twenty fighter jets cut through the Marina South skyline in the shape of the numeral "50" yesterday, capping off one of the highlights of the golden jubilee celebrations between Singapore and Indonesia.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Indonesian President Joko Widodo were at the Marina Bay Cruise Centre to witness the fly-past, which was conducted by the air forces from both sides to mark 50 years of diplomatic relations between the two neighbours.

The combined fly-past was the largest and most complex one that the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) has conducted with any foreign air force to date.



Building on the strong defence ties, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen also announced a new exercise yesterday between the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) and Indonesia's armed forces (TNI).

Called the SAF-TNI Counter-Terrorism Table Top Exercise, it will take place from Nov 27 to 30.

In a Facebook post, Dr Ng also said the combined celebrations "reflect the strong defence ties forged through years of engagement and cooperation against common challenges".



After the fly-past, four of the participating RSAF F-16s landed in Roesmin Nurjadin Air Force Base in Pekanbaru, Indonesia.

RSAF Chief of Air Force Mervyn Tan, who was on board one of the RSAF aircraft in the fly-past, said in Pekanbaru: "I think the fly-past really is a testament to the skill as well as the professionalism of the pilots of both our air forces.

"But more important than that, I think it underscored the trust and mutual understanding between the personnel of both our air forces."



His counterpart, Chief of Staff of the TNI-AUHadi Tjahjanto, who was on board one of the Indonesian F-16s, said: "I believe the military cooperation between TNI-AU and the RSAF will be everlasting, and we will always support each other."

The RSAF and TNI-AU started having exercises together in 1980. Since then, they have engaged in a wide range of exercises and activities such as visits, professional exchanges and cross-attendance of courses.





Room for more collaboration with Indonesia: PM Lee
Economic links can be boosted in sectors like tourism, infrastructure and digital economy
By Grace Leong, The Straits Times, 8 Sep 2017

Singapore has long been Indonesia's top investor, and that fruitful collaboration can be strengthened in sectors such as tourism, infrastructure and developing a digital economy, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday.

Mr Lee noted that the need for deeper economic links between both countries has grown more significant as technological disruption opens up new opportunities, even as it generates uncertainty and fierce competition for companies.

He told the Singapore-Indonesia Investment Forum that companies here have expertise that complements Indonesia's development priorities in infrastructure development in the transport and energy sectors, for instance.



The event at the Marina Bay Cruise Centre, which is part of efforts to mark 50 years of diplomatic relations between Jakarta and Singapore, attracted more than 600 business leaders and government representatives of both countries.

With more than 2,000 Indonesian businesses already operating here, Mr Lee said he was pleased that Indonesian President Joko Widodo is actively promoting investments from Singapore.

"We both have promising start-up companies, investors, entrepreneurs and companies in this sector see many opportunities to collaborate," he added.

"For example, we have jointly established start-up networking platforms like EV Hive and Block 71 in Jakarta to cross-fertilise ideas."

Mr Joko told the forum: "We are witnessing a historic boom in e-commerce companies in Indonesia. Today, we have several unicorns, or digital start-up companies, with a valuation of US$1 billion (S$1.34 billion). And given the size of our domestic market, we will have many more in the years to come.

"Twenty years ago, Batam was for Singapore what Shenzhen was for Hong Kong."

But today, Batam could serve as a "digital bridge" between Singapore and many of Indonesia's fast-growing digital communities in Jakarta, Bandung, Yogyakarta, Bali and other cities.

Deeper bilateral and economic cooperation between Singapore and Indonesia in growing sectors such as tourism and infrastructure was also highlighted at the forum.

PM Lee said that both leaders will open discussions on a new bilateral investment treaty, which "will strengthen investors' confidence that Indonesia is open and ready for business and foreign investment".

Attracting more infrastructure investment in cruise tourism is one key area.

Mr Lee noted: "Larger ships are coming into service. These ships will need new infrastructure, especially larger ports, berths and marinas. With this infrastructure in Singapore and the right infrastructure in place across the region, new cruise routes and itineraries can be opened up."

Mr Joko noted that both countries see "great opportunity in marine tourism".

"The continuing rise of hundreds of millions of people in China, India and the Asia-Pacific into the global middle class is leading to a tourism boom of historic proportions," he added.

He said his government has implemented a programme called 10 New Balis to transform 10 cities into priority tourism destinations modelled after Bali's success.

"There is tremendous opportunity for Singapore in the next 12 months as airports (such as) the Silangit airport in Lake Toba... will be converted to international airports," added Mr Joko.

"We look forward to many new airline routes being launched between Singapore and these new tourism destinations."

Singapore Business Federation (SBF) chairman S.S. Teo said more Singapore businesses are looking to explore opportunities beyond Jakarta and Java, given that other cities in central and eastern Indonesia are still growing rapidly and are less saturated.

Yesterday's forum was organised by the SBF, the Economic Development Board, International Enterprise Singapore, the Indonesian Embassy, Indonesia's Investment Coordinating Board and the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
















RISING together
The Straits Times, 8 Sep 2017

RISING50 is an amalgamation of "RI" for the Republic of Indonesia and "SING" for Singapore, while 50 refers to the half century of warm and friendly bilateral ties they have enjoyed since 1967. To mark the milestone, a series of activities was organised in Singapore yesterday around the theme of "Trusted Partners, RISING Together".





TREE PLANTING

A "RISING Tree" was planted by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and President Joko Widodo in the Learning Forest at the Singapore Botanic Gardens. The sunda oak tree is native to both Singapore and Indonesia.


NEW STAMPS AND BOOK

A joint stamp issue by SingPost and Pos Indonesia features coral reefs of both countries; and a commemorative RISING50 book was launched by the Indonesian Embassy in Singapore.


HISTORIC FLY-PAST

Fighter jets from the air forces of Singapore and Indonesia flew together in a joint fly-past that featured "arrowhead" and "50" formations, in a historic first.


'FOUR-EYE' MEETING

PM Lee and President Joko held a "four-eye" meeting to take stock of bilateral relations as well as discuss how the two countries can deepen cooperation.


NINE MOUS SIGNED

The two leaders witnessed three MOUs signed by Singapore's Education Ministry - on education cooperation with Indonesia's Ministry of Education and Culture; on higher education cooperation with the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education; and on vocational education and training with the Ministry of Industry.

They also witnessed the signing of an MOU on disaster risk management between the Singapore Civil Defence Force and Indonesia's National Disaster Management Authority.

Of the other five MOUs, one was a liquefied natural gas deal between Pavilion Energy, Keppel Offshore and Marine, and Indonesia's state energy firm Perusahaan Listrik Negara.





OTHER UPCOMING PLANS

Singapore will set up a polytechnic in the Kendal Industrial Park joint venture in Semarang to train workers, while PM Lee and President Joko also affirmed both sides' readiness to start negotiations on a new Bilateral Investment Treaty to further strengthen economic cooperation.


IPS Forum on the Reserved Presidential Election

$
0
0
Reserved elections 'critical as president serves unifying role': Shanmugam
Post may be called into question if president always comes from the same race, says Shanmugam
By Elgin Toh, Insight Editor, The Straits Times, 9 Sep 2017

The changes to the elected presidency to ensure multiracial representation are important because of the president's role as a "unifying symbol of the country", Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said yesterday.

Without amendments to reserve elections for minorities, this symbolic role may be called into question - especially if "the president, term after term, comes from a single race", he added.

He acknowledged that some Singaporeans do not agree with the idea of reserved elections - but he noticed many would come around after being given the full facts.

Still, this is an issue on which "reasonable people can differ" he said, adding: "The fact that we were able to talk about it, debate it... in a way it helps strengthen the overall multiracial fabric."

Mr Shanmugam was speaking at an Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) forum on the reserved presidential election.

He covered a range of issues related to the presidency, including the stricter qualifying criteria for private-sector candidates and how a candidate's race is determined.



His remarks come as Singapore gets ready to elect its next president on Sept 23. Only Malay candidates can take part in this election, under new laws that reserve the election for a community, if no one from that community has been president for the last five terms.

The minister also disclosed the initial plans were to reserve elections for two groups: the Malays, as well as Indian and Other communities. But feedback from the Chinese ground prompted the inclusion of Chinese reserved elections.

"When we discussed it with our MPs, past MPs, the Chinese intelligentsia, the Chinese media, the reaction was quite clear. If you have reservations for the Indians and the Malays, you better have reservation for the Chinese," he said.

On the president's symbolic role, Mr Shanmugam noted it has been part and parcel of the presidency since independence.

When the roles of safeguarding past reserves and the integrity of the public service were added to the presidency in 1991, the symbolic role was not "abrogated", he said, adding that in Britain, the most important role of the queen is also to represent and symbolise the nation.

The minister also cited evidence that race remains a factor when Singaporeans vote, making it harder for minority candidates to be elected president.

A survey by IPS and Channel NewsAsia last year showed among the Chinese, 96 per cent accept a Chinese president, but only 59 per cent accept a Malay president.

Such race differences are common worldwide, but many countries prefer a laissez-faire approach on race by the government. Some of them, including Germany and Britain, have in recent years acknowledged that such an approach has not enhanced integration.

In contrast, Singapore takes an interventionist approach, in the belief that leaving things to nature is dangerous because "the powerful forces (in society) are centrifugal", he said.

Interventions in Singapore include the introduction of group representation constituencies, race quotas in public housing and the outlawing of speech that hurts racial or religious sentiments.



Reserved elections are another step in this direction, he said, as he slammed critics for labelling these multiracial policies "the nonsense of 'race'".

This interventionist approach works, he said, noting: "You look at the state of our race relations in Singapore. I am prepared to compare that record against any other country. Compare it against the best in class. Our record speaks for itself."

A forum participant asked if the role of prime minister could be reserved for minorities, too.

Mr Shanmugam said there is a spectrum, ranging from complete laissez-faire to reservations for all posts. Singapore has chosen "a mixed system", with some reservations, he said.

"Whether you want to go all the way is a question of... what is doable, what the people will accept and also whether you need it... to strengthen our multiracial environment," he said.




















Govt prepared to pay political price over changes to Elected Presidency: Chan Chun Sing
By Lianne Chia, Channel NewsAsia, 8 Sep 2017

It will be a “hard journey” to convince people about the need for changes to the Elected Presidency and the Government will pay a political price but it is prepared to, said Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Chan Chun Sing on Friday (Sep 8).

Speaking at an Institute of Policy Studies forum on the Reserved Presidential Election, Mr Chan stressed that as a young nation, Singapore had to evolve its systems to adapt to its circumstances – not just to meet the “here and now” but also to anticipate and pre-empt challenges that may arise in the future.



Mr Chan asked those at the forum to raise their hands if they thought the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) had and will pay a political price over the recent changes to the Elected Presidency, and the debate surrounding it, including the hiatus-triggered model to ensure minority representation

Noting the agreement of many in the hall, Mr Chan said: “Why, then, did we do this?”

“If we are all good politicians, we won’t and we shouldn’t do it,” he said. “No good politician would sacrifice his political capital for a problem that may arise in future generations. Most good politicians in the world would try to preserve their political capital for themselves to manage their current problems.”

“There are many conspiracy theories out there,” he added. “But for every conspiracy theory that is out there, I have a very good answer for you.

“If it has to do with an individual, then there are many other ways,” he said. “And if it is for political gain, then surely we are not achieving it as you have rightly pointed out.”



A POLITICIAN VERSUS A POLITICAL LEADER

To explain, Mr Chan related a story about a conversation with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, which he said taught him the difference between a politician and a political leader.

“We asked ourselves - PM, do we need to do this now? Because we had anticipated it would be a hard journey to convince people and we would pay the political price, at least in the short term,” said Mr Chan. “PM Lee’s answer will forever be etched in my mind, and that distinguished a politician from a political leader.

“He said 'Yes, we are likely to pay a political price. Yes, we may not have a problem here and now, but what if we have a problem 20 or 30 years from now? Will the fourth, fifth or sixth generation of leaders have the liberty, and the luxury of time and space for them to put in place a system?'” said Mr Chan.



Mr Lee, he added, had taken it upon himself to put in place a system to pre-empt potential issues from arising in the future. “Not for himself, not for his political capital, but always thinking about what this country needs,” he said. “We are prepared to pay the political price, because we think the future of our country is much more important than any political capital that we may have.”

Mr Chan stressed that it was a “very difficult decision” to make, but the Government owes it to the future generations to put in place systems to prevent issues.

“If the issues don’t arise in future, then we will be very happy and proud. And we have done our little bit for the future of Singapore to be better,” he said. “But we will not be able to face the future generations if we have not done what we can within our means to establish the foundations for them to be even more successful than us.”



IMPORTANT TO HAVE MECHANISM THAT ALLOWS CHANGE: JANIL PUTHUCHEARY

Another issue that was highlighted at the forum was how the race of prospective candidates can be defined, and what constitutes a Malay individual.

The upcoming Presidential Election, set for Sep 23, will be reserved for candidates from the Malay community.

Under the changes to the Elected Presidency, prospective candidates have to submit a Community Declaration form to the newly established Community Committee to certify that he or she belongs to the community which the election has been reserved for.

During an earlier session of the forum, the following hypothetical scenario was painted: A person who is born a Malay and is seen as such, later converts to Christianity. Will the committee determining the person’s eligibility turn him down on that basis?

In response, Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information Janil Puthucheary, who was part of the ministerial dialogue, stressed the importance of having a mechanism that “leaves open the possibility of change over time”.

He drew a comparison between the current set-up – having a combination of a self-declaration of one’s race followed by the acceptance of that declaration by a community – and with getting “absolute clarity” by putting the definitions of race into the Constitution.

“If we took the view that the Constitution needs to provide absolute clarity at this point in time ... it would mean then that there would be no opportunity to have a change without making a constitutional amendment,” he said. “We’d have to go back to Parliament every time - if there was a combination of inter-marriage that we had not foreseen, to pass a law and redefine if this person is Malay or Indian enough.”

Dr Puthucheary added that currently, while the definition of racial identity is left ambiguous, the process is clear. “So what you have is a mechanism for the process of selection of candidates to reflect what the community sentiment is,” he said. “The mechanism also leaves it open for someone in the same position to then be accepted at a later time when the sentiment has changed.”

He explained further: “The trade-off is that you get the particular individual, having that decision made about them ... if you don’t qualify as being Malay, it is seen as excluding that person.

“But that person is still eligible to stand in the open election. And that opportunity to always stand - that will always be a channel. You have the same chances in the open election as anyone else.”





Pre-empting a potential problem down the road

Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing on why the Government introduced the reserved election system:

"No good politician will sacrifice his political capital for a problem that may arise in future generations. Most politicians will try to reserve their political capital for themselves to manage their current problems.

We had a conversation with PM Lee. We asked: PM, do we need to do this now?

We anticipated that it will be a hard journey to convince people and we will pay the political price, at least in the short term.

His answer was simply this: Yes, we are likely to pay the political price. Yes, we may not have a problem here and now. But what if we have the problem 20, 30 years from now? Will the fourth, fifth, sixth generation have the luxury of time and space to put in place a system?

He took it upon himself, as the political leader, to put in place a system to pre-empt potential issues from arising in the future. For the country. Not for himself, not for his political capital, but always thinking of the country first."










Walkover or not, 'president represents all Singaporeans': Janil Puthucheary
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 9 Sep 2017

Whether Singapore's next president is elected in a contest or a walkover, he or she must be a president for all Singaporeans, said Senior Minister of State Janil Puthucheary.

But Dr Janil said he did not have an answer to whether a contested or uncontested election was better, a question he was asked during an Institute of Policy Studies forum yesterday on the reserved presidential election.

Mr Zainul Abidin Rasheed, a former senior minister of state who was at the forum, noted that the reserved election was introduced to make all Singaporeans feel included.

But it had "opened a can of worms", and discussions during the forum showed there is "a lot of division among Malays, among non- Malays", said Mr Zainul.

To avoid such divisions, he asked, was it better to have a contest or not have a contest?

It was not lost on the forum's participants that the election, to be held on Sept 23, may be a walkover, as two of the three presidential hopefuls do not immediately meet the criteria to run for the highest office in the land.

Former Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob is the only one who will automatically get the nod.

"The nominees are there, the process is there, we will have to see what happens," said Dr Janil, who is in the Ministry of Com- munications and Information, as well as Education.

His fellow panel member, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing, addressed a similar question on how to reconcile people's desire to vote with the possibility that the stricter standards now may see only one person qualifying.

The decision is for the Presidential Elections Committee to make, said Mr Chan.

But he argued that ensuring a contest should not come at the expense of relaxing the eligibility criteria for any single group.

"I can understand Singaporeans' aspirations to have a contest and more people contesting. But I don't think Singaporeans would like to have different rules for different races," said Mr Chan.

This would shift the balance too far in favour of multiracialism, without sufficient regard for meritocracy, he added.





Presidential Election 2017: Question of who is Malay continues to be raised
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 9 Sep 2017

As Singapore gets ready for its first presidential election reserved for Malay candidates, the question of who is a Malay has surfaced.

The issue was the focus of a panel at the Institute of Policy Studies forum on the reserved election, with speakers noting that the three presidential hopefuls continue to be dogged by doubts about their race.

They have declared themselves members of the Malay community, but some note Mr Farid Khan's identity card states he is Pakistani, and Madam Halimah Yacob and Mr Salleh Marican have Indian fathers.

Under the Constitution, a person is a member of the community he considers himself part of, and if he is accepted as such by the community, with a Community Committee making this call.

Ancestry, said ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute fellow Norshahril Saat, is a point that has cropped up in online discussions on what makes a person a Malay. But, he said: "If you follow ancestry strictly, then no candidate would qualify as a Malay. Inter-ethnic marriages have made this perspective irrelevant, and it is difficult to find a pure Malay."

Another view is that a person is Malay if he speaks Malay, follows Malay customs and is Muslim. Dr Norshahril said in Singapore, there are many sub-ethnic groups - such as Javanese - subsumed under the Malay category. "What binds them together is religion, language and Malay culture. Some Indian Muslims and Pakistanis associate themselves with Malays. They speak the language, practise Malay culture and the Malays accept them as such."

But law professor Kevin Tan asked whether a person born into a Malay family who decides to leave Islam would be accepted as a Malay. Dr Norshahril said: "I am not sure if the community is ready. If you look at the sentiment on the ground today... you must be a Muslim."

Lianhe Zaobao editor Goh Sin Teck said questions have also been raised when it comes to defining a Chinese. Religion does not play a definite role, and "the fact that you can't speak a word of Chinese doesn't mean you are not Chinese".

Asked by a participant if a person can identify as belonging to two races, Prof Tan said to laughter: "So long as you are accepted by the communities of those two races."





'Okay' to hold election after end of term
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 9 Sep 2017

Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing said yesterday that having an election after the end of President Tony Tan Keng Yam's term is not unconstitutional.

Law professor Kevin Tan had cited Article 17(b) of the Constitution, which says that if there is a sitting president, an election cannot be held more than three months before his term expires. Prof Tan took this to mean that an election held after the end of a sitting president's term is unconstitutional.

Dr Tan's term ended on Aug 31, before the Sept 23 election. Council of Presidential Advisers chairman J.Y. Pillay is the Acting President.

Mr Chan replied: "It is not that you must hold it within three months before the end of term. You cannot hold it more than three months before the end of term."

This is meant to prevent the Government from prematurely turfing out a president and making him a lame duck, said Mr Chan. He added that this year's delay was a "one- time reset" to prevent the campaign clashing with National Day festivities. Parliament's support for the move was also sought and received.





Applications by 2 foreign Christian preachers to speak in Singapore rejected, both had denigrated other faiths
By Elgin Toh, The Straits Times, 9 Sep 2017

Two foreign Christian preachers, who applied for short-term work passes to speak in Singapore, have been denied entry.

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said the reason is that the duo had made "denigrating and inflammatory comments of other religions" in the past.

Its statement came after Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam cited the cases at a forum earlier yesterday. Mr Shanmugam said the Government takes "an equal approach" to all religions.

"Just as I have banned Muslim scholars or preachers from coming into Singapore, the most recent banning has been (for) Christian preachers. They were very Islamophobic in their statements outside of Singapore, and we decided we will ban them," he said.



One of the preachers described Allah as "a false god", and called for prayers for those "held captive in the darkness of Islam", MHA said.

He also referred to Buddhists by a Hebrew word - Tohuw - meaning "lost, lifeless, confused and spiritually barren". The Straits Times understands this is American preacher Dutch Sheets.

The other preacher referred to "the evils of Islam" and "the malevolent nature of Islam and Muhammad". He called Islam "not a religion of peace", "an incredibly confused religion", interested in "world domination" and "a religion based on... adhering to uncompromising and cruel laws often focused on warfare and virtual slavery".

Such teachings are unacceptable in multiracial, multi-religious Singapore, said MHA.

Running down of religions or the spreading of ill will among religions is not allowed, so as to safeguard Singapore's social harmony and cohesion, it added.



The two preachers had applied to the Manpower Ministry for their Miscellaneous Work Passes, which are for foreigners who speak at seminars and religious workers.

The granting of such passes is "a privilege accorded to a foreigner and not an entitlement", said MHA.

Mr Shanmugam also said that a review of the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act is under way.










ESM Goh Chok Tong: Terror threat closer than Singaporeans think; LKYSPP academics should offer constructive criticism, build trust with govt leaders

$
0
0
ISIS already active in region and individuals here have been self-radicalised, he warns
By Danson Cheong, The Straits Times, 9 Sep 2017

The scourge of terrorism is closer than Singaporeans think, said Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong yesterday.

The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terror group is already in Marawi, he noted, and could possibly establish itself in Myanmar's Rakhine state, where Muslim Rohingya refugees are fleeing fighting between the military and militants.

These developments, coupled with the presence of self-radicalised individuals here, means Singaporeans need to prepare themselves for an eventual terrorist attack, he said.

The Home Affairs Ministry had announced the arrests of two Singaporeans under the Internal Security Act a day earlier, the latest in a string of terrorism-related arrests this year.

Speaking at a dialogue to mark the 13th anniversary of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Mr Goh stressed that the real challenge would come after a terror attack.

"What will that mean for race relations - that's No. 1. If as a result of (an attack) race relations become fragile, broken, collapsed, then the terrorists would have achieved their purpose," he said.

He listed terrorism as one of two future challenges Singapore would face, in response to a question during the dialogue at the National University of Singapore.

The other challenge is how to get young Singaporeans to "accept politically", slower growth in their incomes, he said, given that Singapore will no longer see high economic growth of 8 to 9 per cent. This means incomes may grow at a slower rate of 2 to 3 per cent, but salaries will start from a higher base, he added.

"If we can't convince you on that and if you have a change in government, and people think life will get better, I can tell you that life will get worse, very quickly, because the new government still will not be able to produce 5 to 6 per cent growth," he said.

During the hour-long dialogue, Mr Goh spoke candidly on a wide range of issues, often with a dose of humour that drew laughter from the auditorium of 300 students, faculty and alumni.

He also shared personal experiences, like how the 2003 SARS crisis was the most frightening challenge he faced during his tenure as prime minister from 1990 to 2004.

He highlighted the importance of forming personal relationships with other world leaders, citing how he and then United States President Bill Clinton agreed to have the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement following a midnight golf game in Brunei in 2000, after an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Leaders' Meeting.

Mr Goh, who chairs the LKY School's governing board, also urged the school to find ways to offer added value to the Government in future. "I find that as the Government, I am not getting my money's worth," he quipped, saying the school has to offer alternative viewpoints and shape thinking on policies.

"But unfortunately, the dean will say 'it's very sensitive, you know'," added Mr Goh, to laughter from the audience.

LKY School dean Kishore Mahbubani, who chaired yesterday's dialogue, replied: "I speak from personal experience."

Professor Mahbubani had drawn flak from former colleagues in the Foreign Ministry and Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam in July, after saying in a commentary that Singapore should behave like a small state and avoid getting tangled in affairs beyond its borders.

Said ESM Goh: "To be fair no leader likes to be criticised... but to do it constructively, you must build up that trust between one another."

As the dialogue drew to a close, Mr Goh turned the tables and asked Prof Mahbubani about Singapore's biggest challenge in future.

Prof Mahbubani said the political philosophy that "worked very well" in Singapore's first 50 years may not work as well in future.

"In many ways we are changing, and Singapore is becoming more open... and that process of continuous change is what I see as the biggest challenge," he said.














Offer constructive criticism, build trust with govt leaders, ESM Goh tells LKYSPP academics
By Kenneth Cheng, TODAY, 9 Sep 2017

While academics from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) should offer the Government critical alternative views, they should do so constructively and build trust with political leaders, Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said on Friday (Sept 8).

Speaking at the LKYSPP’s 13th anniversary dialogue session, Mr Goh, who became the school’s governing board chairman in April, said that the LKYSPP, having reached a “comfortable” size, is in a good place to examine how it can “provide greater value-add to policymaking”.

He said the Government is not getting its “money’s worth” in terms of ideas being contributed by the LKYSPP.

“I want to get this flow-back to the Government. It’s a good tool (and) you must’ve very good opinions, you must be able to challenge the thinking of the Government in some areas,” Mr Goh added.

While he did not refer expressly to recent episodes in which the Government called out the school’s academics, including its dean Kishore Mahbubani, over remarks they made publicly, the Emeritus Senior Minister said: “To be fair, no leader likes to be criticised ... neither do I. But do it constructively. You must build up that trust between one another.”

On several occasions in recent months, government leaders have slammed comments by LKYSPP academics.

In July, Professor Mahbubani’s commentary arguing that small states such as Singapore must always behave as such and refrain from commenting on matters involving great powers drew sharp rebuttals from Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam and diplomats, among others.

In April, a Facebook post by LKYSPP’s associate dean Donald Low also led to a rebuke from Mr Shanmugam, who said the academic’s comments had “seriously misconstrued” the statements the minister had made in an interview with TODAY, with regard to considering public opinion when deciding on criminal sentences.

Mr Low later apologised.

While Mr Goh said the school has done well since its inception, he acknowledged that “we want to do better”.

First, the link between theory and practice should be burnished, he said.

Noting the need to go beyond public-policy theories, Mr Goh said the school should find ways to better meld the experience and lessons of its many “practice professors” with vast experience in the public service with its professors’ academic lectures.

Pointing out that foreign delegations turn to the LKYSPP to study Singapore’s public policies, Mr Goh said the school has a “front-row” seat. To this end, it introduced a compulsory module for all its master’s students this year, giving an overview of Singapore’s policies.

Besides tapping the expertise of former officials, Mr Goh said the school could also consider inviting current senior civil servants to serve as “practice fellows”.

“This integration of theories and practice will set the school apart from other public-policy schools,” he added.



FAIR TREATMENT FOR ALL

In Friday’s dialogue, attended by 300 students, alumni and academics, Mr Goh, asked how the LKYSPP and the Government’s Civil Service College can be bridged, said formal links between the two institutes to share ideas and collaborate are in the offing.

Right now, there are interactions and sharing of case studies between them, but these are done informally, he added.

Fielding a question on how race and ethnicity have figured in Singapore’s success, Mr Goh said Singapore’s approach towards public-housing ethnic quotas, if tried in other countries, would have seen the Government thrown out or sparked riots.

But Singapore set out to take this approach “from day one” to treat all races fairly and justly.

He also cited the example of religious buildings in the early years. Christians, for instance, could pay the market price for land to build churches, but the Muslim community, which was then poorer, faced greater difficulty.

“As the Government, you (had) to make sure that (there are) places to go and worship. But how do you do that and yet not attract unhappiness from the other religious groups?” he asked.

Hence, the Government reserved sites for them, so tenders were not necessary, but the community still had to pay market prices.

To help them do this, a Mosque Building Fund was set up, with Muslims contributing a small sum from their monthly wage to build mosques in their housing estates.

This allowed the Government to balance the interests of all the religious communities, Mr Goh said.

SINGAPORE AS A CATALYST

Asked whether Singapore can maintain its position in South-east Asia amid the emergence of neighbouring countries such as Indonesia and Thailand, Mr Goh said the Republic can serve as a “catalyst” to establish a “smart” or “digital Asean” by helping neighbouring nations go digital and connecting the countries’ economies.

This will allow start-ups, entrepreneurs and innovators in the region to compete against China.

While Singapore would not be a base for these start-ups, a “multi-super-corridor”, or an “Asean Silicon Valley”, could be set up through links between the various countries.

“It can be done ... Singapore can, therefore, play a role of being a catalyst. We have got the resources (and) can help Indonesia to build up its digital capabilities if necessary,” he added.

In response to another question, Mr Goh also singled out terrorism and sustaining high economic growth yet changing the mindset of younger Singaporeans to accept a slower pace of economic growth, compared with decades past, as the main challenges for the country going forward.

He then turned to Prof Mahbubani, who moderated the dialogue, and asked the academic about the biggest challenge that will confront Singapore.

Prof Mahbubani said the country has created one of the most successful middle-class societies, and has a top-notch education system and a “globalised” population.

“The political culture in Singapore has got to change and adapt to this new environment ... The philosophy of governing Singapore that worked very well in our first 50 years need not necessarily work well in the next 50 years,” added Prof Mahbubani.

“That process of continuous change is what I see as the biggest challenge.”









Reserved Presidential Election part of Singapore's multiracialism policy: ESM Goh
Channel NewsAsia, 8 Sep 2017

Reserving a Presidential Election for candidates from a particular minority community is part of Singapore's multiracialism policy, said Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong on Friday (Sep 8).

Speaking at a dialogue session to mark the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy's (LKYSPP) 13th anniversary, Mr Goh noted that the reserved election this year is "quite unpopular with a large proportion of the population because it goes against the principle of meritocracy".

He added, however, that Singaporeans should understand why the Government is doing this.

Mr Goh said Singapore has been successful in managing race and ethnic relations because it "started very early from day one", citing the ethnic integration policy for public housing as an example. The policy helps to ensure an ethnic mix in HDB estates to help promote racial integration and harmony.

"We have succeeded because we started very early from day one. Everybody is equal and yet you know their differences. We try and make them equal in result when we can – on a fair and just principle basis," Mr Goh said in response to a question about how Singapore has been able to manage race relations.



When asked about the potential crises Singapore could face in the future, Mr Goh said: "Terrorism is closer than you think."

He noted that pro-Islamic State (IS) militants are already in Marawi in the southern Philippines, and IS "may have a chance to establish itself in Rakhine state in Myanmar".



In Singapore, it was announced on Thursday that two Singaporeans were arrested in July under the Internal Security Act for terror-related activities. "Those whom we have arrested - a handful - but how many are out there, we don't know," said Mr Goh who is also chairman of the governing board of LKYSPP.

"The Government is already passing the message – more or less trying to condition all of us – (that) it's not a question of if a bomb or truck will be driven into some crowded place in Singapore, it’s a question of when.

"The big worry for us in reaction is not the bomb per se, it's the aftermath. What would that mean for race relations? If race relations become fragile, broken, collapsed, then the terrorists would have achieved their purpose."











Related

Singapore's exceptional founding fathers: Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Keng Swee and S. Rajaratnam

$
0
0
The day I lectured on Marx to Goh Keng Swee
Intellectual curiosity, coupled with ruthless realism, was a trait shared by three of Singapore's founding fathers: Lee Kuan Yew, Goh Keng Swee and S. Rajaratnam
By Kishore Mahbubani, Published The Straits Times, 9 Sep 2017

When Singapore turned 50 in August 2015, I wrote a column for the Huffington Post to say that Singapore was the most successful nation in human history. Surprisingly, this column was not challenged. What I could not do in that column was to explain why Singapore was extraordinarily successful.

The answer is quite simple. By a sheer accident of history, we ended up with exceptional founding fathers, perhaps as exceptional as those of America. The three most outstanding were Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Dr Goh Keng Swee and Mr S. Rajaratnam.

However, it must also be quickly noted that there were other important leaders in the team, including Mr Lim Kim San, Mr Eddie Barker, Mr Hon Sui Sen and Dr Toh Chin Chye. One real tragedy of Singapore is how little most young Singaporeans know about them, even the three most outstanding. This is why I want to write a book about them.

The best way to begin writing a book is to start the process of thinking and talking about the subject as soon as possible. This is the real goal of this column. I want to begin the process of putting down my preliminary thoughts on what made these three men truly great. My hope is to get a lot of feedback from friends and people who have also worked with these three great men. I have a few good private stories to share. I hope to get a few more stories in the hope of producing rich, three-dimensional portraits of these three men.

Let me emphasise that the three men were very different in many ways. Those who have worked with them can attest that Mr Lee could be fearsome, Dr Goh could be gruff and Mr Rajaratnam could not be more affable.

Their minds were also different. Mr Lee was one of the shrewdest political creatures to be born on planet earth. Dr Goh was a brilliant economist. Mr Rajaratnam had a literary bent. One of his short stories was published in A World Of Great Stories: 115 Stories, The Best Of Modern Literature alongside the works of such luminaries as Ernest Hemingway, James Joyce and Jean-Paul Sartre.

Yet, despite these great differences, they shared some key qualities. Let me mention three.

INCESSANT CURIOSITY

What I remember best in my encounters with all of them were the questions they would continually pose to me. All three seemed to have an inexhaustible supply of questions. It reflected the curious minds that all three had. Mr Lee was at his best during the brainstorming sessions he would invite us for, at meetings or over lunch, in the Istana.

In the mid-1990s, after Mr Lee had stepped down as prime minister, he would invite Professor Tommy Koh, Professor Chan Heng Chee and me to the Istana every few months for lunch. The lunches would last a long time, partly because Mr Lee enjoyed consuming a lot of fruit after lunch. One of his favourite fruits was pomelo from Thailand.

At these brainstorming sessions, Mr Lee would ask a lot of questions about international developments. There was no doubt that he was well-informed. However, he always wanted to hear alternative views so that he could double-check.

One of his most memorable statements, which I have quoted often to my staff at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, was: "Before I do something, I check, double-check, triple-check, and then I check again."

The mid-1990s was also the period when Singapore lost its easy access to the White House. I was present when Mr Ronald Reagan warmly welcomed Mr Lee to the White House. I was also present when his successor, Mr George H. W. Bush, told a private gathering in St Petersburg, Russia, that the greatest leader he had ever interacted with was Mr Lee. However, the young Bill Clinton had little interest in Singapore or its leaders then. So we did our best to try to understand him.

One of the first things Mr Rajaratnam told me when I joined the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1971 was: "Don't tell me things you think I want to hear; tell me things I should hear, even if they make me uncomfortable."

Mr Lee adopted the same attitude in private sessions.

Dr Goh demonstrated his curiosity in an unusual way. In the mid-1970s, after Vietnam had fallen to the communists, Dr Goh, as defence minister, initiated a course on Marxism for all senior Mindef officers. Since I had just done my master's degree in philosophy, specialising in Karl Marx, at Dalhousie University, Halifax, in 1975, Dr Goh invited me to fly down from my post at the Singapore High Commission in Kuala Lumpur once a week to deliver a lecture on a different aspect of Marxism for six weeks.

Dr Goh would sit in the first row and listen to me, together with more than 100 officers. It was an intimidating sight. As I pranced all over the stage, I noticed Dr Goh frowning more and more as I kept talking. Fortunately, my permanent secretary, Mr Chia Cheong Fook, was in the room. When I asked him after the lecture why Dr Goh kept frowning at me, he replied: "Kishore, that is a very good sign. When he frowns, it means that he is listening carefully to you."

I was relieved.

RUTHLESS REALISM

Another quality they had in common was a ruthless dedication to finding the real truths, the hard truths. They were acutely aware that as a small state, Singapore would get its head bashed very quickly if it nurtured any illusions about the world. Hence, they were very careful and deft in managing relations with great powers.

After Vietnam fell, Singapore, like the other non-communist founding members of ASEAN, was deeply concerned about the aggressive spread of communism in South-east Asia.

This is also why Dr Goh initiated the series of Marxism lectures. At the same time, Singapore did not want to pick any unnecessary fights with the superpower patron of Vietnam, the Soviet Union.

Mr Rajaratnam visited Moscow in 1976. I was happy to go along as the most junior member of the delegation, which, by a strange coincidence, included two men who would subsequently become presidents of Singapore: Mr Ong Teng Cheong and Mr S R Nathan. Mr Rajaratnam was received warmly by the legendary foreign minister of the Soviet Union, Mr Andrei Gromyko.

If my memory is correct, Mr Rajaratnam told Mr Gromyko that while Singapore was anti-communist in its domestic policies, it was not anti-communist in its foreign policies. It wanted to have friendly relations with all powers. Singapore welcomed American naval vessels. It also welcomed Soviet naval vessels. Indeed, the Soviet Union probably did more trade with Singapore than with any other ASEAN member state. Maintaining good relations with all great powers was a key precept of Singapore's foreign policy.

PRAGMATISM

It is well known that none of these three men were religious. If there was any trait that they worshipped, it was the culture of pragmatism. Dr Goh demonstrated this best with his study of the Meiji reformers who had pragmatically transformed Japan and led to its emergence as the first great Asian power. Dr Goh admired these reformers immensely, as he noted in his Harry G. Johnson Memorial Lecture, which he delivered on July 28, 1983, at the Royal Society, London, on the topic Public Administration and Economic Development in LDCs (least developed countries).

This is what he said of the Meiji reformers: "The country having been temporarily pacified, Iwakura (Tomomi) set off in 1871 on a two-year world tour with 54 proteges. They all knew they had to come to terms with the West and they decided to see at first hand how things worked there. What they saw astonished and impressed them. They understood that what was necessary was a total overhaul of their society… On the whole, the Japanese chose Western gurus wisely. Their education system was modelled on the French centralised system, but it was combined with American methods of curriculum development… They also adopted the German system of civil-service recruitment through examination. They undertook a thorough study of Western systems of jurisprudence and constitutional law before formalising their political system in the Meiji Constitution in 1889."

Mr Rajaratnam was equally pragmatic. At a Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Foreign Ministers' Meeting I attended in Luanda, Angola, in 1985, the Malaysian delegation - at the instruction of then Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad- wanted the NAM to come out with a common position on Antarctica.

In principle, Tun Dr Mahathir's position was correct. The untapped natural resources of the vast Antarctic should belong to humanity, not to the great powers which had the means to tap them. As a matter of principle, we should have supported Dr Mahathir. However, Mr Rajaratnam gave strict instructions to our delegation to remain silent. Looking back, Mr Rajaratnam's pragmatism was wise.

These are only a few stories, from personal experience, which illustrate the incessant curiosity, ruthless realism and pragmatism of these three great men. There must be hundreds of similar stories that others who worked with them would have. It would be a tragedy to lose them. I hope that readers who have similar stories will come forward with them. Many future generations of Singaporeans could learn valuable lessons from these stories. They will also help to explain why Singapore was extraordinarily successful in its first 50 years.

The writer is dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore and co-author with Jeffery Sng of The ASEAN Miracle: A Catalyst For Peace.









Thousands of jobs opening up in healthcare sector

$
0
0
Half of 9,000 jobs for PMETs, and many are suitable for mid-career workers: Amy Khor
By Salma Khalik, Senior Health Correspondent, The Straits Times, 11 Sep 2017

The growing healthcare sector will provide thousands of jobs in the coming years, including many suitable for older mid-career people who might have no experience in the field, said Senior Minister of State for Health Amy Khor.

The Sengkang General and Community hospitals opening next year, and five new polyclinics in the next three years, will need 9,000 more people - half of them professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs), she said.

Dr Khor is overseeing efforts to match Singaporeans to jobs in healthcare, one of five sectors identified by the Government as being affected by disruptive technology but which also have significant potential for growth. The other industries are infocomm and media; wholesale trade; professional services; and financial services, and efforts are under way to help workers make the switch to these sectors.

In an interview with The Straits Times, Dr Khor said the Government sees the healthcare industry as part of the solution to the rise in long-term unemployment, especially for older people and PMETs.

PMETs, who represent half the workforce, have been hardest hit by the tepid job market. They made up almost two-thirds of people unable to find a job within six months of becoming unemployed.

And the number of people facing such long-term unemployment rose by a third, from 12,700 in 2015 to 17,000 last year.

Older people, who form more than two-thirds of the unemployed, face greater difficulty in finding a job, with thousands of those in the long-term unemployed group being PMETs aged 40 and older.

Dr Khor said: "We're particularly interested in the 40-plus (age group) simply because they have a harder time making a career switch. We want to make the transition a little easier."

Fresh graduates entering the sector need not worry that mid-career people will deprive them of jobs. "Even with improved technology and workflow processes, the overall numbers are still positive," she said.



The variety of job openings in healthcare includes therapists, care coordinators and centre managers, although the bulk will be in nursing. Much of this growth is due to the ageing population.

Dr Khor admits a drawback in workers wanting to switch to healthcare is the long training needed. Nurses spend two years in the classroom and two years training on the job.

To make it less painful, the Professional Conversion Programme to help workers make a mid-career switch gives them an allowance of up to $2,420 a month, depending on the job and their work experience. The course fee, which could top $40,000, is either heavily subsidised or fully funded.

While this would be less than their last-drawn salary, it would not be fair to pay them the full salary of someone who is working full time, she said. On the plus side, they would get a steady job in a sunrise industry where the demand for their services will remain significant in the foreseeable future.

She said the number of people converting to nursing went up from 21 a year over the last three years, to 34 in April this year.

Aside from helping job seekers learn skills for available roles, she will also work with employers on funding support. Incentives for employers who provide workers with on-the-job training could top $4,000 for up to six months. An employer who takes in a registered nurse for two years of on-the-job training is given $16,000.









Ministry of Health to invest $12 million to develop community care workforce
By Daniel Ong, The Straits Times, 5 Sep 2017

There will be more scope for those interested in a community healthcare career, which includes disciplines such as social work and speech therapy.

The Ministry of Health is investing close to $12 million over the next four years to grow this workforce - through the Community Care Manpower Development Award.

This new award is a consolidation and expansion of the Agency for Integrated Care's (AIC) scholarships and awards. The agency oversees the community care sector here, which includes nursing homes, senior care centres and day rehabilitation facilities.

Under the new award, a wider range of healthcare disciplines will be covered. In addition to degree and post-graduate programmes, the award will now also cover entry-level qualifications. Furthermore, it has been extended to staff from all community care organisations, including private ones.

The $12 million boost to the sector was announced by Senior Minister of State for Health Amy Khor on Tuesday (Sept 5), at a ceremony to present the award to the pioneer batch of about 30 recipients.

More than 70 other recipients of AIC's previous community care scholarships also received their awards at the event at the Ng Teng Fong General Hospital auditorium.

Said Dr Khor: "Building future skills at all levels of the community care workforce is critical to addressing the changing needs of an ageing population.

"From clinical areas like geriatric nursing and mental health to non-clinical areas like IT and community engagement, the demand for new skills will rise."



Dr Khor said recruitment efforts have resulted in more than 450 locals successfully finding employment in the sector over the past year.

She highlighted other programmes to support community care staff in enhancing their skills and careers.

The Institute of Technical Education will be offering a Work-Learn Technical Diploma in Rehabilitation Care from next April. Trainees in this programme will be able to work and study at the same time.

The Community Care Traineeship Programme provides on-the-job training for new support care staff.

And the Senior Management Associate Scheme allows professionals to make a mid-career switch into community care in managerial roles in areas such as operations, administration and information technology. This scheme welcomed its second batch of 27 associates in June, said Dr Khor.

She also stressed the need to improve productivity, given tighter manpower constraints amid rising demand for healthcare services.

She said that the ministry has been working with providers to enhance work processes, leverage technology and adopt shared services.

As of March, more than 60 community care providers have tapped the Healthcare Productivity Fund and undertaken more than 100 productivity improvement projects, said Dr Khor.

"With good training programmes for new entrants, and greater opportunities for existing staff to pursue further studies and develop their careers, seniors will benefit from better standards of care. I hope to see more individuals choosing to join community care, and more employers joining us in our efforts to grow and develop the sector."


Can Singapore Fall?: The Accidental Nation by Lim Siong Guan

$
0
0
IPS-Nathan Lectures by Mr Lim Siong Guan: Lecture I (“The Accidental Nation”)


Intangibles underpin Singapore’s success, says pioneer public servant Lim Siong Guan
By Elgin Toh, Insight Editor, The Straits Times, 13 Sep 2017

Singapore's success is built on intangibles such as honour and a drive to overcome its smallness, former head of the civil service Lim Siong Guan said in a lecture yesterday.

A continued emphasis on these same intangibles is the country's best hope in avoiding the decline as seen in many nations, he added.

On honour, he noted that Singapore's reputation for being trustworthy is crucial in its dealings with the world: "We are a country and a people who honour our word."

Internally, honour has also been critical, he said. "It is about Singaporeans honouring each other, appreciating our social differences, our diversity, and at the same time seeking strongly to maintain social harmony as a common good for all."

These two aspects of honour form a big part of the Singapore brand name, he added, noting that the London consultancy Brand Finance ranked Singapore as the top nation brand in 2016, ahead of Switzerland and Japan.



Mr Lim was giving the first of three lectures as the Institute of Policy Study's (IPS) fourth S R Nathan Fellow for the Study of Singapore. Former S R Nathan Fellows include Mr Peter Ho, also a former head of the civil service, ambassador-at-large Bilahari Kausikan and Banyan Tree executive chairman Ho Kwon Ping.

In his introduction of Mr Lim, IPS director Janadas Devan said he belonged to a "very select" group of pioneer public servants who are not as well-known as political leaders like Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Dr Goh Keng Swee, but whose "contributions to Singapore are as great as those of the political leadership".

Mr Lim was permanent secretary in the defence, education and finance ministries. He had also been group president of sovereign wealth fund GIC.

Yesterday, he noted that when Mr Lee died in 2015, some associated the founding prime minister's legacy with the physical transformation of Singapore.

Mr Lim, a former principal private secretary to Mr Lee, felt the physical was not as important as the intangible, like a determination to overcome Singapore's smallness. This included refusing to be weak.

He recounted what Mr Lee taught him about dealing with foreigners: "Always look the foreigner in the eyes. Never look down... Conduct yourself as his equal."

Another way Singapore overcame its size was by leapfrogging the region and treating the whole world - and its bigger markets - as the Republic's economic hinterland.

Warning against complacency, Mr Lim also cited signposts of decline from an essay - The Fate Of Empires - by British historian John Glubb. Singapore would do well to avoid these markers, he said.

One marker is increasing self-centredness. "Many Singaporeans have possibly observed a decreased sense of public duty," he said, adding there is a growing "desire to grow and retain individual wealth".

Another is more talk, without corresponding action. He noted the "increase in discussions, debates and arguments, especially on social media, without a focus on action or leaving the action as something for others to do".

He warned against becoming a welfare state - also a Glubbian signpost of decline. This might begin as "collective responsibility" for the individual's welfare, but end up as "collective irresponsibility" owing to its spendthrift nature, he said.










Lessons for Singapore on the rise and fall of empires
TODAY, 13 Sep 2017

When Singapore became independent in August 1965, it was an accidental nation, unplanned in its creation and unexpected in its survival, said former top civil servant Lim Siong Guan. The question now is what kind of nation Singapore wants to be in the coming years and whether its people have what it takes to carve out a new age, added Mr Lim in an IPS-Nathan lecture on Tuesday (Sept 12).

In the first of a three-part lecture series, he discusses the social challenges Singapore’s economic prosperity has brought. This is an excerpt from the speech by Mr Lim, who was previously head of the civil service and Group President of GIC.

The Chinese have a saying: “Wealth does not last beyond three generations”. After celebrating its 50th year, Singapore is moving into its third generation. Will Singapore’s wealth and stability last?

Sir John Bagot Glubb (1897–1986) was a British soldier, scholar and author who led and trained Transjordan’s Arab Legion between 1939 and 1956. After his retirement from the British army, he wrote a profound essay, The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival, which analyses the life-span of great nations, from their genesis to their decline.

Glubb notes that, over the past 3,000 years... most great nations do not last longer than 250 years (or 10 generations), and many last much shorter periods of time.

The stages of the rise and fall of great nations seem to be as follows and he says all the empires he analysed went through the same (seven) stages.

FIRST, THE AGE OF PIONEERS

A small nation, treated as insignificant by its contemporaries, suddenly emerges and conquers the world. Pioneers are ready to improvise and experiment: “Untrammelled by traditions, they will turn anything available to their purpose. If one method fails, they try something else. Uninhibited by textbooks or book learning, action is their solution to every problem.”

The second stage of expansion consists of more organised, disciplined and professional campaigns. Methods employed tend to be practical and experimental.

Let us then consider the Age of Conquests. The nation acquires the “sophisticated weapons of old empires” and a great period of expansion ensues. The principal objects of ambition are glory and honour for the nation. The conquests result in the “acquisition of vast territories under one government”, thereby birthing commercial prosperity.

So we come to the Age of Commerce (the third stage).

The main purpose of this era is to create more wealth. Courageous initiative is displayed in the quest for profitable enterprises all around the world.

But the acquisition of wealth soon takes precedence over everything else. The previous objectives of “glory” and “honour” are but “empty words, which add nothing to the bank balance” for the people. This is the period of time when values start shifting from the self-sacrifice of the initial pioneers to self-interest.

Thus we come to the Age of Affluence.

Money causes the people to gradually decline in terms of courage and enterprise.

Wealth first hurts the nation morally: “Money replaces honour and adventure as the objective of the best young men … the object of the young and ambitious is no longer fame, honour or service, but cash.”

The divide between the rich and the poor increases, and the wealth of the rich is flaunted for people to see. People enjoy high standards of living and consume in excess of what they need.



The transition from the Age of Conquests to the Age of Affluence is a period that Glubb calls “High Noon”.

While the immense wealth of the nation impresses other nations, this period reveals a change from service to selfishness and defensiveness.

Describing the change, Glubb says that during this period, “enough of the ancient virtues of courage, energy, and patriotism survive to enable the state successfully to defend its frontiers. But beneath the surface, greed for money is gradually replacing duty and public service”.

As for defensiveness, the rich nation is no longer interested in glory or duty, but is preoccupied with the conservation and maintenance of its wealth and luxury. Money replaces courage, and subsidies are used to “buy off” enemies.

Next comes the Age of Intellect. During this stage, wealth is no longer needed for necessities or luxuries, and there are also abundant funds for the pursuit of knowledge.

Business people that made their wealth in the Age of Commerce seek fame and praise of others by endowing works of art, patronising music and literature, and founding or endowing institutions of higher education.

It is ironic that while civilisations make advancements in science, philosophy, the arts and literature ... history shows us that every period of the decline is characterised by the expansion of intellectual activity.

Why is this so?

The answer is NATO — No Action, Talk Only. Intellectualism leads to discussion, debate and argument, which is often seen around the world today. But this “constant dedication to discussion seems to destroy the power of action”.

The most dangerous by-product of this Age of Intellect is the birth and growth of the notion that human intellect can solve all the problems of the world, when in fact the survival of the nation really depends on its citizens.

So finally we come to the Age of Decadence and Decline.

Decadence is a mental, moral and spiritual disease that disempowers its people to the extent that they do not make an effort to save themselves or their nations because they do not think that anything in life is worth saving.

The Age of Decadence comes about because of the following factors: An extended period of wealth and power; selfishness; love of money and loss of a sense of duty.

It is marked by defensiveness, pessimism, materialism, frivolity, an influx of foreigners, the welfare state and a weakening of religion.

Let us consider each of these characteristics.

Defensiveness: People are so consumed with defending their wealth and possessions that they fail to fulfil their duty to their family, community and nation.

Glubb also notes that another remarkable and unexpected sign of national decline is civil dissension and intensification of internal political hatreds. Various political factions hate each other so much that instead of sacrificing rivalries to save the nation, internal differences are not reconciled, leading to a weaker nation.

Pessimism: As the nation declines in power and wealth, universal pessimism invades its people and accelerates its decline.

Materialism: People enjoy high standards of living and consume in excess of what they need.

Frivolity: As the pessimism invades its people, people start to think: “Let us eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.” The people forget that material success is the result of courage, endurance and hard work, and spend an increasing part of their time indulging in sex, leisure, amusement or sport. The heroes in declining nations are the athlete, the singer or the actor; not the statesman, the general or the literary genius.

Influx of foreigners: In his essay, Glubb also observes that one frequent phenomenon in the decline of cities is the influx of foreigners. Foreigners are attracted by affluence, and take on jobs which often the citizens do not want to do themselves.

But they can be weak links in the society for various reasons, such as: they will be less willing to sacrifice their lives and property for the nation and they form communities of their own that protect their own interests above that of the nation.

Glubb states that, just by being different, they tend to introduce cracks and divisions in the society.

The important point is that the citizens themselves would have to stand up for the nation, because they cannot leave the defence of the nation to foreigners.

The welfare state: As history shows, the decline of a nation is often preceded by a tendency towards philanthropy and sympathy.

The welfare state is just another milestone in the life story of an ageing empire in decline.

Weakening of religion: Glubb defines religion as “the human feeling that there is something, some invisible power, apart from material objects, which controls human life and the natural world”. Religion does not only mean institutionalised faith, but represents a set of moral values which in turn influence social norms. Without morality, men are more likely to snatch than serve, and the spirit of self-sacrifice is weak.

The nation is characterised by defensive-minded militaries, decaying morals, loss of religion, frivolous consumption of food, entertainment, sex and the complete focus on individual interests.

WHERE IS SINGAPORE?

You may be wondering at this point: Glubb’s essay is about empires — could it apply to a small state like Singapore?

Glubb mentions in his essay that “if the small country has not shared in the wealth and power, it will not share in the decadence”. Has Singapore shared in the wealth and power?

If we accept that Glubb’s essay is possibly applicable to Singapore, which stage is Singapore in?

Based upon social observations of increased materialism and consumerism, could it be that Singapore has experienced its “High Noon” and is somewhere between the ages of Affluence and Decadence?

While the immense wealth and growth of our nation has “dazzled other nations”... there is a growing defensiveness and desire to grow and retain individual wealth.

As Glubb described in his essay, the Age of Affluence is one where “the object of the young and ambitious is no longer fame, honour or service, but cash”. Does that describe Singapore in some way?

Singapore also registers certain markers of the Age of Intellect, which is a stage where there are abundant funds for the pursuit of knowledge.

Another sign that Singapore could be thought of having reached the Age of Intellect is the increase in discussions, debates and arguments, especially on online social media, without a focus on action, or leaving the action as something for others to do.

Please do not get me wrong. I am not here to make judgments on what is good or bad about our individual choices; I am only making observations on where many Singaporeans seem to be, and what implications these portend if we think Glubb has a relevance for Singapore. It is interesting to note that in the rise of nations to the Age of Affluence, it is the striving for economic wealth that was the prompt motivator. And in the social decline and decay which followed in the empires, it is affluence that was the prime enabler.

Thus affluence is at the root of both the rise and the fall of the nations, as one empire gives way to another that is more energetic, more imaginative and more determined to establish the strength and influence of their nation.

Of the seven characteristics of the Age of Decadence, we could note that there are already signs of at least five of them in Singapore, namely:

1. Defensiveness

2. Pessimism

3. Materialism

4. Frivolity

5. Influx of foreigners

Of the remaining two characteristics, the “welfare state” and the “weakening of religion”, we could note that:

Welfare state: In Singapore’s early years of nation-building, the emphasis in its social policies was self-reliance. But in recent times, there has been a shift to collective responsibility.

While the Government has been quick to emphasise that this shift to collective responsibility does not mean self-responsibility is less important, this shift could be a slippery slope if the people and the Government were to let their guard down, and collective responsibility slowly takes on the face of collective irresponsibility.

Weakening of religion: While a Pew Research Centre study had found Singapore to be the world’s most religiously diverse nation in 2014, the Singapore Census, which is done every 10 years, shows that the number of citizens who do not profess to have a religion has been increasing.

Glubb’s observations are, of course, by no means predictive. But we can benefit at least by being reflective over it.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

I began my lecture by explaining why Singapore was the Accidental Nation. We achieved independence, which was unplanned and unexpected. But we survived and we succeeded for 50 plus years. Can our future be our conscious decision to work towards a specific strategic end?

What I have presented to you is a way to think about the future.

Is the decline Glubb wrote about inevitable and unavoidable? Can we choose to make the future? Can we start again a new Age of Pioneers? I think it is a choice we have. But we can keep talking and never make a choice. That would be another accident — this time of our choosing, or at least of our incapacity to choose.

I well remember my first meeting with Mr Lee Kuan Yew when he was Prime Minister and I was his Principal Private Secretary.

He told me that in the course of my work, I would be dealing with foreigners, and advised: “Always look the foreigner in his eyes. Never look down. You are dealing with him as a representative of Singapore. Conduct yourself as his equal.”

As I look back, I plainly see that in this wise instruction lay the reason for what has made Singapore so much of what it is — well regarded by the world, respected, self-aware, pushing always against the boundaries of possibilities.

“Don’t be weak” was never absent from his mind.

So where do we go from here? The striving for affluence drove the rise of successful nations. But affluence also facilitated their fall. The rise was mostly economic; the fall was mostly social.

These are the critical questions for Singapore: What kind of Singapore do we want in the next 10, 20, 50 or 100 years?

Can there be a way to begin a new Age of Pioneers and thereby ameliorate the effects of the Age of Decadence and Decay (extrapolating from Glubb’s model in the rise and fall of nations)?

These are the questions I look forward to addressing in my next two lectures. We have reached the status of a First World Economy. What is the First World Society we would wish to see? What would be right for Singapore and Singaporeans, not just for the current generation, but for the generations to come?

In the end, it is the kind of society we want to be and the sustainability of such a society that are the crucial issues.


Halimah Yacob is Singapore's First Female President; First Malay Head of State in 47 years

$
0
0

I want to be president for all: Halimah Yacob
First woman and second Malay to hold office will be sworn in today as Singapore's eighth head of state
By Royston Sim, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

Madam Halimah Yacob yesterday pledged to be a president for all Singaporeans, after she was elected unopposed in the first election reserved for Malay candidates.

She will be sworn in as Singapore's eighth president at the Istana today, and create history by becoming the country's first woman president and only the second Malay to hold the office after founding president Yusof Ishak.

The former Speaker of Parliament was the only candidate who qualified to stand for election, after the Presidential Elections Committee ruled out businessmen Salleh Marican and Farid Khan for failing to meet constitutional criteria.

Returning Officer Ng Wai Choong declared her President-elect in a walkover around noon - drawing loud cheers from about 700 supporters at the People's Association Headquarters in Jalan Besar.



The move to raise the qualifying criteria for candidates and reserve this year's election, coupled with the absence of a contest, had drawn fierce criticism from some quarters.

Madam Halimah, 63, acknowledged doubts about the reserved election in her speech yesterday.

"Although this is a reserved election, I am not a 'reserved' president," she said. "I am a president for everyone, regardless of race, language, religion or creed."

She later told reporters: "Election or no election, my promise is to really serve everyone. I will serve with great vigour, with a lot of hard work, with the same passion and commitment that I have served... for the last four decades."

The nation's eighth head of state came from humble beginnings, helping her mother sell nasi padang from a pushcart.



After joining the National Trades Union Congress as a legal officer in 1978, she rose through the ranks to become its deputy secretary-general, gaining a reputation as a tireless champion of workers' rights.

She became an MP in 2001, was appointed Minister of State for Culture, Community and Youth in 2011, and elected Speaker in 2013.

More than 500 unionists were at the nomination centre to support her yesterday, many decked out in orange - the colour she chose for her campaign to represent unity.



Madam Halimah said her election as a Malay president "shows very positively" how Singaporeans practise multiracialism - that everyone has a chance to become president.

Her becoming the nation's first female president sends a serious message about gender diversity, she added. "Every woman can aspire to the highest office of the land, if you have the courage, the determination and the will to work hard."

Flanked by her husband, retired businessman Mohamed Abdullah Alhabshee, 63, and proposer, Singapore Business Federation chairman Teo Siong Seng, she thanked her supporters and all Singaporeans for their good wishes.

Madam Halimah - who said yesterday that she would continue living in her Housing Board flat in Yishun - urged Singaporeans to stand together to confront the challenges facing the nation.

"I ask that you focus on the similarities we have, and not on our differences," she said, stressing that the country has to stay united.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said she will bring to the presidency her experience of working with Singaporeans from all walks of life, and championing workers and disadvantaged groups.

He called her yesterday to congratulate her. In a Facebook post, he wrote: "The president is the apex of our political system and the symbol of our multiracial, multi- religious nation. I am confident that Madam Halimah will fulfil her role with distinction."


























Singapore's multiracialism not just a slogan: Halimah
Having second Malay president shows everyone is given opportunities, regardless of race or religion, she says
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

That Singapore has its second Malay president - after 47 years - shows multiracialism is not just a slogan, said Madam Halimah Yacob, who was yesterday elected unopposed in the country's first reserved presidential election.

In a speech to several hundred supporters, she said: "I believe that this is a proud moment for Singapore. This is a proud moment for multiculturalism, multiracialism, for our society.

"This shows that multiracialism is not just a slogan - something that is good for us to say, something for people to hear. It means that it really works in our society, that everyone has a chance to reach the highest office of the land."

This is not just good for now, she added. It will also be good for generations to come because it shows "very positively how Singapore practises multiracialism".



Her supporters gathered at the open field in the midday sun at the nomination centre, the People's Association Headquarters, cheering her on with whistles and clappers.

Multiculturalism was on display at the field, where a sea of supporters mostly dressed in orange - the colour Madam Halimah chose for her campaign as it represents unity - whooped with joy as the 63-year- old was declared President-elect.

A sizeable majority came from the unions, where Madam Halimah spent more than three decades fighting for workers' rights - first as legal adviser, before rising to be deputy secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress.

Others travelled across the island from heartland wards where she served as MP or represented a diverse array of community groups.

Women in orange tudungs and Buddhist monks in saffron robes alike braved the hot sun as Madam Halimah delivered her speech in English and Malay.

Singapore has not had a Malay president since its first head of state Yusof Ishak, who took office in 1959 and died midway through his third term in 1970 at the age of 60.

The reserved presidential election was introduced this year following changes to the Constitution to ensure that members of all communities have a chance to become president from time to time.



Madam Halimah said in her Malay speech that Singapore having its second Malay president is proof that everyone is given opportunities, regardless of race and religion.

"This is a good example for Singapore. It shows that if we are given opportunities, if there is support, then regardless of race, we will reach a state we aspire to," she said.

Various community groups extended their congratulations to her yesterday. The Singapore Malay Youth Library Association (Taman Bacaan) said it believed she has what it takes to unify Singaporeans from all walks of life.

Similarly, the Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations noted that the head of state serves as the "embodiment of our nation's harmonious multiracial identity". It said: "The Chinese community is confident that under Madam Halimah's capable leadership, Singapore will continue to prosper and progress as one united nation."

Madam Halimah told reporters that a central message in her speech at her inauguration today will be on the core values of multiracialism and meritocracy, which have brought Singapore to where it is today and which are dear to her.






Gender diversity not just tokenism, says President-elect
With determination and hard work, every woman can aspire to highest office: Halimah
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

The sound of a glass ceiling shattering reverberated around the People's Association Headquarters at 12.10pm yesterday, when Madam Halimah Yacob declared to her supporters: "I stand before you as the first female president of Singapore."

A roar of approval greeted the figurative breakthrough. And the loud cheers seemed to lift Madam Halimah as her serious face broke into a wide smile.

"I can see that many of our sisters here are delighted. I delight with you," said the 63-year-old, beaming as she placed her hand over her heart.

She added that her new post "shows that this is not just tokenism, that when we talk about gender diversity, we are not just chanting slogans, but that we really mean it".

"Every woman can aspire to the highest office of the land, if you have the courage, the determination and the will to work hard," she said.

Singapore has had only three women full ministers in its modern history, and 23 of its 100 MPs today are women.

Madam Halimah's historic achievement was hailed by the Singapore Muslim Women's Organisation (PPIS).

Its president Rahayu Mohamad, 50, said in a statement: "Madam Halimah has shown us that there is no limit to what we, as women, can accomplish."

Madam Rahayu acknowledged that Madam Halimah's resignation as Speaker of Parliament, MP and member of the People's Action Party's top decision-making body was a loss to the representation of women in Parliament.

But "as the first female president, Madam Halimah will continue to be an inspiration to the women of Singapore, especially our future leaders, who will be encouraged to take on new challenges, embrace leadership roles and contribute to nation- building", she added.

The Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) also congratulated Madam Halimah in a Facebook post.

It urged her to speak up for gender equality, adding: "We also hope that more will be done to improve access to politics for all of Singapore's women."

Ms Rahayu Mahzam, 37, a Jurong GRC MP who oversees the Bukit Batok East ward Madam Halimah used to helm, said: "While we see more successful women now defying norms, the harsh reality is that there are still people who doubt a woman's capability."

But she was confident that Madam Halimah would once again set new standards and redefine society's perception of a woman.

"Regardless of the circumstances that led to her presidency, she worked hard to get to where she is - to attain that respect and stature," said Ms Rahayu.

"Her humble background never stopped her, and that is inspiring. She is the epitome of the principle that if you are willing to work hard, you can achieve a lot," she added.





PM Lee Hsien Loong confident Halimah Yacob will fulfil role with distinction
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said he is confident that Madam Halimah Yacob, who will be inaugurated today as Singapore's eighth president, will fulfil her role with distinction.

"I hope all of us will support her as our next president," he said in a Facebook post yesterday, three hours after Madam Halimah was declared President-elect.

"I look forward to working with her to serve Singaporeans and the nation."



PM Lee said he had called Madam Halimah to congratulate her, and cited her record of serving the public as a unionist, community leader, MP, minister of state and Speaker of Parliament.

"She will bring to the presidency her long experience working with Singaporeans from all walks of life, and championing workers and disadvantaged groups," he said.

It has been a whirlwind month for Madam Halimah, a long-time public servant who resigned from her political posts last month to contest the presidential election.

She has, in the week since announcing her bid, been preparing for her campaign and assembling a team. On Monday, she was the only presidential hopeful declared eligible to contest the reserved presidential election by the Presidential Elections Committee.

Yesterday, Mr Lee said: "The president is the apex of our political system and the symbol of our multiracial, multi-religious nation. I am confident that Madam Halimah will fulfil her role with distinction."



Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam also took to Facebook with fond words for Madam Halimah, his former teammate in Jurong GRC.

Madam Halimah was an MP in the constituency for 15 years, before moving to Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC for the 2015 General Election.

Working with her in Jurong was a privilege, said Mr Tharman, who noted that she was a source of strength to the people around her.

"What I have always liked about Madam Halimah is her uprightness and sheer human decency.

"She takes a genuine and personal interest in people, especially when things go wrong for them, and works to put things right. No matter who they are," he said.

And her life - "her determination to rise from a very humble start, working hard to achieve her aspirations and always wanting to do good for others" - inspires, added Mr Tharman. "It is the Singapore story, and what it must always be."



Added Communications and Information Minister Yaacob Ibrahim: "There has been much discussion about the elected presidency. Now it is time for us put aside our differences, rally behind President-elect Halimah as she embarks on the important task of building a stronger Singapore."





PM Lee thanks Farid Khan, Salleh Marican
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

As he congratulated incoming president Halimah Yacob yesterday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong also took the opportunity to thank the two men who offered themselves as potential candidates.

Mr Farid Khan, 61, chairman of a marine services company, and Mr Salleh Marican, 67, chief executive of a property company, were informed by the Presidential Elections Committee (PEC) on Monday that they did not qualify to contest.



Neither had helmed a company with at least $500 million in shareholder equity in the most recent three years, a key requirement for private sector candidates.

In a Facebook post, Mr Lee noted that it could not have been easy for them to decide to contest, given the media attention and public scrutiny they would face.

"They respected the Constitution and conducted themselves with propriety and decorum. They did not confuse people with wild promises that exceeded the remit of the president, which had happened before," he said.



He also thanked them for accepting the PEC's decisions, saying: "This is the way to make our democratic processes work properly and in the interest of Singaporeans."

Communications and Information Minister Yaacob Ibrahim also thanked Mr Farid and Mr Salleh for stepping forward. Dr Yaacob, who is also Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs, said: "I hope that they will continue to contribute to the community and serve Singapore."





Although this is a reserved election, I am not a reserved president: Halimah Yacob

I look forward to working very closely with you, and I believe we can do good together, and I invite you to do good together with me

First of all, I would like to thank all my supporters who are present here today. I am very appreciative and deeply grateful to all of you for your presence here today - members of the trade unions, community groups, religious groups and also members of the public.

I know you have been waiting here for a few hours and it is really hot under the sun, so thank you.

I am really very grateful to you because you have taken time off from your work and made the effort to come all the way here.

I (also) want to say from the bottom of my heart a very big thank you to all Singaporeans, for your support, your encouragement and your good wishes.



Over the last two weeks, I have been walking the ground very extensively. I have met many Singaporeans from all backgrounds, young, old, in many, many places. I have spoken to them and I am so heartened. I am really very grateful for their good wishes, their encouragement and their support.

Many of you not only gave words of encouragement and support, many of you patted me on the back too. Many of you also hugged me. And many of you told me you would support me even without me asking or saying anything. That warmed my heart tremendously and also made my journey here to the nomination centre all the more pleasant... So, once again, thank you to all Singaporeans. Thank you, Singaporeans.

I feel really very blessed as I start my journey.

I know some have doubts about the reserved election. I want to tell you as your President-elect: I promise to work with everyone. I am president for everyone and I intend to serve all without hesitation.

I also want to tell you that although this is a reserved election, I am not a reserved president. I am a president for everyone, regardless of race, language, religion or creed. I represent everyone. My duty remains only to Singapore and Singaporeans. My duty remains only to you.



Although there is no election, my commitment to serve you remains the same. There is no diminution, even by one bit, of my desire to serve you.

In fact, my resolve to work hard, to work tirelessly and with great sincerity is even greater. These are values which I hold very dear, when I perform my public duties, my public service, and it means even more to me now that I have become your President-elect.

I also stand before you as a second Malay president in 47 years. I believe that this is a proud moment for Singapore. This is a proud moment for multiculturalism, for multiracialism, for our society.

This shows that multiracialism is not just a slogan, something that is good for us to say, something for people to hear. It means that it really works in our society, that everyone has a chance to reach the highest office of the land.

This is not just good for now, but good for generations to come because it shows very positively how Singapore practises multiracialism.

I also stand before you as the first female president of Singapore.

I can see that many of our sisters here are delighted. I delight with you because it shows that this is not just tokenism, that when we talk about gender diversity, we are not just chanting slogans, but that we really mean it.

Every woman can aspire to the highest office of the land, if you have the courage, the determination and the will to work hard.


Dear Singaporeans, we have a lot of work to do together. We know, and many of you here who are workers, you know we have both internal challenges and external challenges that we need to overcome. I ask you, dear Singaporeans, now that the election is over, to stand together so we can focus on our core priorities to ensure Singapore remains a great home for everyone.

Dear Singaporeans, no one person or persons can achieve this task. We need every Singaporean to stand shoulder to shoulder to achieve for ourselves the best that we can be. We have not reached the peak yet...The best is yet to come. But the best can be achieved only if we work together so that we can go on improving our lives and those of our children.

I ask that you focus on the similarities we have and not on our differences.

In 1965, when we became independent, no one thought that we could survive. But look at us today. We are Singaporeans, we are in a country that we are really proud of. We have come a long way, but we have an equally long way ahead of us.

No one owes us a living. We owe it to ourselves to build a great nation that we can all be proud of and which we can hand over to our children and grandchildren with great pride. We must stay united. We must beat with one heart. We must move in one direction.

I am deeply humbled to be given this opportunity to serve all of you. I look forward to working very closely with you, and I believe we can do good together, and I invite you to do good together with me.

Thank you very much.

PRESIDENT-ELECT HALIMAH YACOB, in her acceptance speech at the nomination centre yesterday.






The man behind her successful career
By Tham Yuen-C, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

The popular adage that behind a successful man is a woman is also true the other way around for Singapore's first woman president.


Madam Halimah Yacob's husband, retired businessman Mohamed Abdullah Alhabshee, 63, has provided the support she needed to pursue her career.

He would help look after and play with their five children when they were young, shop for groceries and take care of household matters like paying the bills.

Since she announced her presidential bid last month, he has also been her ever-present companion at public events. Today, he will be the first man to become a presidential spouse in Singapore.

Madam Halimah and Mr Mohamed met as undergraduates at the University of Singapore, the predecessor of the National University of Singapore.

They were in different faculties - she in law and he in science - but encountered each other at activities organised by the Muslim Society and at the canteen in the student union house.

"There is a canteen there, you are bound to bump into each other," Madam Halimah had said in an interview last month.

"Of course, he pursued me!"

Although Mr Mohamed was playing the guitar and the drums in a band then, he never invited Madam Halimah to listen to him play and she also never went on her own volition.

But these days, he sings to her new songs that he has learnt.

The couple have five children, two sons and three daughters, between the ages of 26 and 36. Some accompanied their mother to the nomination centre yesterday, but did not talk to the media.

Mr Mohamed, who was described as media-shy by Madam Halimah, has so far not said much to the media.

But when asked yesterday if he was proud of his wife becoming the president, he said with a grin: "Of course!"










Halimah wants to continue living in her HDB flat
President-elect says she has no plans to move out of family home in Yishun
By Tham Yuen-C, Assistant Political Editor and Joanna Seow, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

President-elect Halimah Yacob says she will continue to live in her sixth-floor Housing Board flat, making her Singapore's first head of state to live in public housing while in office.

Shortly after being declared the winner in an uncontested presidential election yesterday, she told reporters that she had no plans to move out of her family home in Yishun.

"I am still staying in Yishun," the 63-year-old said. "It is a very nice, comfortable place, and I have been living there for many years."



Her husband, retired businessman Mohamed Abdullah Alhabshee, 63, added with a smile that there was no need to move, as the flat was "as huge as a penthouse".

The jumbo flat is made up of a four-room and a five-room flat bought on the resale market, and it is where Madam Halimah has lived with her family for more than 30 years. She has two sons and three daughters, aged 26 to 36.

Singapore's past presidents had lived in private housing or at the Istana, and Madam Halimah's decision has raised questions about security arrangements.



Mr Lee Hooi Theng, 68, who is semi-retired and lives in a neighbouring block, doubts Madam Halimah will be able to continue living there "for security's sake and her convenience".

However, police have intensified security measures in the area.

Asked about security, Madam Halimah said: "I will leave it to the security department. I think they know how to secure the area."

The Police Security Command, tasked with protecting government leaders, already had arrangements there when she was Speaker of Parliament before she left to run for president.

Security experts interviewed said threat levels are different for different leaders, and the threat to a head of state is considered higher than that to a Speaker.

Security will have to be beefed up, and more officers and equipment, like surveillance cameras, are likely to be deployed.

Mr Raj Joshua Thomas, 38, president of the Security Association of Singapore, said: "Anything can be secured. It is just a matter of how much inconvenience that might cause to others in the block."

Meanwhile, neighbours are happy to have her in their midst.

Madam Halimah's neighbour from two floors up, student Wan Tian Chong, 24, said it would be "quite cool" if she continued to live there. "Having a president living in your block, that is something you don't see every day," he said.

Madam Halimah sees another advantage to living in her flat: "When I come back from work, I will climb up the six floors, and if I have time, I will climb down."

She added: "The Istana grounds are very big, so that gives me the chance to walk around and exercise further to keep myself fit."


























No let-up in online criticism of uncontested election
By Tham Yuen-C, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

In the end, Madam Halimah Yacob won the presidential election in a walkover, without any need to campaign and fight for votes.

But the run-up to yesterday was still bruising, with some Singaporeans using hashtags like #notmypresident and #hardlymahpresident - a pun on her name - to protest against not being able to vote.



Asked by reporters yesterday if she was ever demoralised during the process, she said that years of public service had taught her to focus on her goals and objectives - the most important being to improve the lives of people.

"You focus on the people you want to serve. That has always been my motto," she said without betraying any emotion about the online vitriol directed at her.

"I focus on how to improve their lives, whether by introducing programmes or helping them, and that will continue to be my emphasis."



Madam Halimah, 63, was the only candidate given the green light to contest the election reserved for candidates from the Malay community. She qualified on account of having held the post of Speaker of Parliament since 2013.

Two other hopefuls - marine services firm chairman Farid Khan, 61, and property company chief executive Salleh Marican, 67 - did not qualify. Neither had run a company with $500 million in shareholder equity for the most recent three years, a key threshold for private- sector candidates.

The uncontested election sparked criticism from some Singaporeans, who took to social media to express their disappointment.

Facebook user Melanie Felicia, commenting on The Straits Times' Facebook page, said: "We weren't even given any chance to vote, so what election?"

While three of the five presidential elections so far have been walkovers, analysts say the anger this time could stem from politics becoming more contentious.

National University of Singapore sociology professor Tan Ern Ser said this was further fanned by social media. "We haven't quite established a stable social compact in the post-Lee Kuan Yew era."



A pervasive view among critics was that fair competition had been made impossible by recent constitutional changes to raise the eligibility criteria for candidates, and to reserve elections for a racial group not represented in the presidency for a period of time.

Twitter user Darryl Kang charged that the Government made so many changes to the Constitution so as to allow Madam Halimah to run uncontested.

Political scientist Lam Peng Er said some Singaporeans, rightly or wrongly, saw the changes as an attempt to block former MP Tan Cheng Bock from running.

Dr Tan narrowly lost the 2011 presidential election to former president Tony Tan Keng Yam in a four-way race. Prior to the 2017 contest being declared a reserved election, he said that he intended to run again.

Yesterday, Dr Tan Cheng Bock congratulated Madam Halimah in a Facebook post, but added that she will "occupy the most controversial presidency in the history of Singapore".

Dr Tan, who unsuccessfully challenged the timing of the reserved election in court, said: "Everyone knew Madam Halimah would win. Still, we looked forward to a poll to tell the Government what we thought about the election."

He added: "We did not get a chance to speak with our vote this round, but the time will come."

Dr Lam, a senior research fellow at the East Asian Institute, said the ruling People's Action Party was aware that it may have to "pay a political price", a point Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing noted during a forum last week on the elected presidency.



Many online critics were not upset with Madam Halimah, but were unhappy with the state of affairs.

A Facebook user by the name of William wrote in The Straits Times Facebook page: "I have no issues with her as a person, but I don't like how she was 'put on the throne' by you- know-who. I don't care what race, religion, gender my president is as long he or she (wins) the presidency fair and square."

Others, like Ms Michelle Tan, urged people to move on from the "unpleasant" election and to "stop using words that hurt not only Madam Halimah and her family, but the nation as a whole".

NUS' Prof Tan said Madam Halimah had "become collateral damage of sorts". "People are not angry with her, but with the new rules."

But, he added, "given her personality and public persona, and if she uses her influence to contribute to enhancing the well-being of Singaporeans, she would make her mark as president".

And while there was little she could do to "heal" divisions, she had "already set the right tone by saying that she would be the president of all Singaporeans".

Dr Lam hoped "some good will come out of this despite reservations and people questioning the Government's motivations".

Having Madam Halimah, who is from a minority community and wears a tudung, "sends a signal to our neighbours that Singapore is a bona fide multicultural society".

"We should wish her all the best and keep an open mind," he added.















Social media abuzz over walkover
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 13 Sep 2017

The election for the president may be all but over, but online, the debate on the outcome rages on.

Some are unhappy about the lack of a contest, even if they think Madam Halimah Yacob, the only eligible candidate, might make a good president.

This group yesterday spoke up on social media under the hashtag #notmypresident.

They were countered by another equally vocal group - #halimahismypresident, which urged Singaporeans to rally round their next president.

Social service professional Saleemah Ismail, 48, wrote: "I am jumping for joy that we will be having a true champion of the people as our president."

What is perhaps pertinent in the online storm is that several who wanted a contest were quick to add that they have nothing against 63-year-old Madam Halimah, who they say was an able and popular politician.

What they found hard to stomach was the walkover. Undergraduate Kyle Malinda-White, a 25-year-old Malay, said: "I am not rejecting Madam Halimah - she is a strong woman who has what it takes to win votes. She has been elected legally."

He added: "I am questioning the decision to raise the barrier of entry for private-sector candidates... Now, we have an elected president whose mandate is in serious question, not because of her but because of the process."

The two contenders deemed ineligible to contest the election were company chairman Farid Khan, 61, and chief executive Salleh Marican, 67.

Both did not meet the key requirement of helming a company with $500 million in shareholder equity in the most recent three years.



Law graduate Rio Hoe, 25, who runs the sociopolitical blog Consensus SG, said Singaporeans were "robbed of the dignity" of voting for their first Malay elected president, and also the first female one "in the history of our country, which would have been a momentous occasion for minority rights and women's rights". He added: "What would have been a democratic milestone is now besmirched with the ugly stain of an uncontested election."

His post was shared by dozens, including local blogger Lee Kin Mun, better known as mrbrown.

Workers' Party politician Yee Jenn Jong, a former Non-Constituency MP, held similar views. Like several netizens, he said the online storm was not the best start to her presidency.

He wrote in a blog post that it was unfortunate she would not be going through an election.

"In an already very controversial election reserved only for Malays, it would have restored some of the lost moral authority by her winning against credible opponents through popular votes," said Mr Yee.

Several also pointed out that Singaporeans unhappy with the outcome had many opportunities to speak up during the 20-month-long review of the elected presidency.

They could have made submissions to the Constitutional Commission, or disagreed openly after parliamentary debates or at public forums, they said.

Some, like former Nominated MP Calvin Cheng, focused on those who failed to step forward to contest the election.

His Facebook post read: "What I am disappointed in is that there were clearly other candidates who could automatically qualify but didn't put themselves forward."

He did not name anyone, but said they included Malays who were former ministers or corporate bigwigs."Why didn't they step up? The presidency is the highest office in the land in protocol, and when duty calls, one would have thought that good men and women will answer," said Mr Cheng.










Nomination Day: A historic event under the midday sun
No grandiose proclamations, just a simple and heartfelt speech from Halimah
By Wong Kim Hoh, Senior Writer, The Straits Times, 14 Sep 2017

The clock on the wall read 10.30am. A middle-aged Chinese man in a white T-shirt, baggy olive shorts and well-worn sandals sat outside Soon Ho Eating House in Block 803, King George's Avenue, nursing a mug of black coffee.

On occasion, he would tear his eyes away from his smartphone and gaze lazily across the road at the security personnel and small crowd outside the People's Association Headquarters.

Asked if he planned to join them to await the arrival of Madam Halimah Yacob and the historic announcement of her presidency, the man - who declined to give his name - snorted.

"No need to vote, so no need to be there also what!" he said.

His indifference was in stark contrast to Mr Koh Heong Hwee, 70, who brought a box filled with cardboard plaques bearing Madam Halimah's image, put together by some friends from Buona Vista Community Club.

The irrepressibly friendly former cabby pointed to his wife Goh Lian Choo, 76, who was carrying a box of orange gerberas.

"She had a valve replacement, I had a bypass. Both of us have had heart surgery, so our hearts are very open," he joked with a loud guffaw. "We accept Madam Halimah and are very happy to have her as our first female president."

Madam Latipah Mohd Noor, 57, who works in patient care at the National Heart Centre, couldn't agree more. A volunteer at Taman Jurong, she worked with Madam Halimah when the latter was an MP for Jurong GRC.

"Perempuan boleh," she said, using the Malay phrase which means "women are capable".

"It is time we have a female president. Women do so many things, they run the household, they raise kids, they work. Madam Halimah has proven herself," said the chatty woman who drove to the event with 13 of her friends, including Madam Noriah Saniman, 72, and Madam Fatimah Mimi, 59, both of whom wore bright orange tudungs. Orange, representing unity, was the colour chosen for Madam Halimah's campaign.

Madam Latipah is aware of the unhappiness in some quarters that this presidential election was reserved for Malays, and that there was no contest. "It is not her fault. The Malay community is not big and not many people stepped forward," she said with a shrug.

Perhaps it was the searing 33 deg C heat. Or the divisiveness of the contest and the fact that it was a walkover. But yesterday's historic event was a lot less boisterous than campaign and victory rallies at general elections.

Former marketing executive Yap Weng Seng, 57, said he would have attended the event if Madam Halimah had won in a contest. "She is very well regarded and she would have stood a good chance of winning. I just don't like the whole idea of a reserved election."

The around 700 people who turned up included members of some 45 unions who went to show their support for the former deputy secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress.

The day began for Madam Halimah at her Yishun flat, where she met relatives and supporters before going to the NTUC Centre in a black sedan. From there, she and key members of her campaign team made their way to the nomination centre, where she submitted her papers.



When she emerged on stage at noon, the crowd - rendered listless by the sweltering heat - suddenly found new vigour. They rushed across the field to hear her speak, unfurling banners and umbrellas, brandishing fans - both old-fashioned and battery-operated - as well as whistles.



Singapore's second Malay president eschewed grandiose proclamations, opting instead to deliver a simple but heartfelt speech. She was weighed down by an avalanche of garlands when she walked into the crowd after her speech.

Former oil refinery technician Ho Kin Tong, 75, was glad he attended the event. "It really doesn't matter if the president is Chinese or Malay, man or woman, as long as he or she is a good president. Just give Madam Halimah time, I am sure she will prove herself."


















Halimah Yacob only one to get eligibility certificate, set to be Singapore's next President
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 12 Sep 2017

Madam Halimah Yacob is set to be Singapore's eighth president and its first woman head of state this week, in the country's first presidential election reserved for candidates from the Malay community.

The 63-year-old former Speaker of Parliament was the only presidential hopeful declared eligible to contest by the Presidential Elections Committee (PEC) yesterday.

"Whether there is an election or not, my passion and commitment to serve the people of Singapore remain the same," she told reporters.

She collected her certificate of eligibility at the Elections Department in the afternoon, shortly after witnessing the election of her successor as Speaker in Parliament.

The PEC's decision all but concludes a process that began when Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong mooted a review of the elected presidency early last year.

A Constitutional Commission recommended changes to guarantee minority representation in the highest office in the land as well as to tighten eligibility criteria in keeping with the economy's growth.

Having held a key public office - the post of Speaker of Parliament - since 2013, Madam Halimah was the only one of three Malay hopefuls automatically eligible to run.

All three were issued certificates by the Community Committee confirming that they belong to the Malay community.



But the PEC informed the other two - marine services firm chairman Farid Khan, 61, and property company chief executive Salleh Marican, 67 - that they did not qualify to contest. Neither had helmed a company with $500 million in shareholder equity for the most recent three years, a key threshold required for candidates relying on their private-sector experience.

Mr Salleh showed his letter from the PEC to The Straits Times. In rejecting his application, the six-member panel said it was unable to satisfy itself that he had "the experience and ability" comparable to a chief executive of a company of that size and complexity.

The PEC noted the shareholders' equity of Mr Salleh's company, Second Chance, averaged about $258 million, a sum "considerably below the minimum" required under the Constitution.

Mr Farid declined to disclose his company's financials, but its value is believed to be much lower. He declined to show his letter from the PEC to the media.

Both said they were disappointed not to be given the go-ahead - but thanked their families and supporters for their support over the past few months, and said they would continue to serve Singaporeans.

Under the law, the decision of the PEC - chaired by Public Service Commission chairman Eddie Teo - is final and not subject to appeal or review in any court.


The uncontested election drew mixed reactions from observers, who welcomed Madam Halimah making history as the country's first woman president and the first Malay head of state in 47 years.

Institute of Policy Studies deputy director Gillian Koh said: "Madam Halimah is a double minority - not only is she a Malay-Muslim individual, but a female."

But Dr Koh felt "the statement of our acceptance of diversity would have been all the more powerful if there had been an open contest".

However, political science professor Bilveer Singh of the National University of Singapore questioned the value of having a contest for a contest's sake: "Being elected through a walkover does not undermine or delegitimise the winner."

Tomorrow, Madam Halimah will turn up with her proposer, seconder and at least four assentors at the People's Association HQ in King George's Avenue to file her nomination papers.

If all is in order, she will be declared president-elect shortly after nominations close at noon. She will then take her oath of office on Thursday, which will mark the start of her six-year term.





















Halimah vows to do her best for Singapore
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 12 Sep 2017

Madam Halimah Yacob, set to become Singapore's next president after she was declared the only eligible candidate, yesterday assured Singaporeans that being elected in a walkover will not lessen her commitment to serving them.

"I promise to do the best that I can to serve the people of Singapore, and that doesn't change whether there is an election or no election," she told reporters after collecting her certificate of eligibility from the Elections Department. "My passion and commitment to serve the people of Singapore remain the same."

Since announcing her presidential bid last month, the 63-year-old has been dogged by questions on her perceived legitimacy in the event of a walkover, particularly as only candidates from the Malay community can stand in this year's presidential election.

The reserved election for the presidency, following changes to the Constitution last year to ensure the highest office in the land is reflective of Singapore's multiracial society, continues to spark controversy.



Asked how she plans to unite the nation, Madam Halimah said: "I would like to encourage Singaporeans to work together with me so that we can work together for a united Singapore and a much stronger Singapore. This is a journey that we must take together."

She was flanked by six key supporters, including National Trades Union Congress president Mary Liew, and was wearing an orange tudung - a colour she has been wearing in recent weeks, chosen for her campaign as it represents unity.

Asked what the reserved election means for the Malay community, Madam Halimah said the reasons have been debated extensively, adding: "The process may be a reserved election, but the president is for everyone, for all communities - regardless of race and religion."



The former Speaker, who resigned to stand for president, has long been seen as the front runner in the race, being the only hopeful to automatically qualify as she has spent at least three years in a key public office.

Tomorrow, Madam Halimah will have to turn up with a proposer, seconder and at least four assentors at the People's Association headquarters to file her nomination papers between 11am and noon.

Shortly after nominations close, she will be declared president- elect, and will take her oath of office the following day.

"I will now focus on preparing for the nomination on the 13th, and that will require some work as well," she said, adding that she would hold a press conference after submitting her nomination papers.

"I have met many Singaporeans in the past couple of weeks, and I feel grateful for the support and encouragement," she added.





 






 






 



Observers happy for Halimah Yacob, but disappointed at no-contest for first reserved presidential election
Some observers say there may be legitimacy issues, but others feel the bar should not be lowered
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 12 Sep 2017

Singapore's first reserved presidential election all but ended before even getting off the ground, following yesterday's announcement that only Madam Halimah Yacob qualifies to run for office.

Although the 63-year-old is still required to submit her papers on Nomination Day tomorrow, the presidential bids of her potential rivals - Mr Salleh Marican and Mr Farid Khan - have ended. Both men failed as their applications for the certificate of eligibility did not pass muster.

Observers and MPs interviewed said the denouement was an expected, if anticlimactic, end to months of public consultations and forums as well as parliamentary debates about the review of the elected presidency.

From the start, Madam Halimah's name was floated as a possible candidate and, soon, she became the front runner. But they also had mixed feelings about the outcome, acknowledging disappointment at the likely walkover while welcoming the Presidential Elections Committee's decision not to lower the bar.



Many Singaporeans had hoped for the chance to choose their president, said Chua Chu Kang GRC MP Zaqy Mohamad. "On the one hand, I am very happy for Madam Halimah, as she would make a very good president. But many Singaporeans were hoping for a contest because they felt they had a democratic right to vote."

ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute fellow Norshahril Saat noted that electoral contests give winners an element of legitimacy and voters the chance to know candidates better through their campaigns.

"A section of Singapore will be upset by the news. But there are certain standards to meet and it is good to disqualify those who did not meet them," he said.

Neither Mr Farid nor Mr Salleh qualified under the newly amended stricter criteria. Their companies fell far short of the $500 million shareholder equity threshold spelt out in the Constitution.

Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) deputy director Gillian Koh said: "If the Presidential Elections Committee were to award individuals who ran companies that are clearly below that explicit $500 million mark, they would have to explain in detail how their experience made up for the shortfall."

This decision must be viewed as credible and able to be upheld, she said, adding: "The credibility and legitimacy of the system are at stake."

IPS senior research fellow Mathew Mathews said: "It would have been problematic for our ideals of meritocracy if the bar had to be lowered to accommodate a minority community, so that there could be a contest."

With no contest in sight, some will question Madam Halimah's legitimacy as president, particularly those who believe others could have qualified in a less restrictive race.



Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan said: "Madam Halimah, when elected, will have to bear the burden of doubts about her legitimacy. It is unfair, but these perceptions are there.''

Still, she did qualify according to the system, and this is what really matters, Dr Mathews said.

Experts said Madam Halimah can take a leaf from the late president S R Nathan's book. "She should continue her efforts to touch people's hearts and minds. She can be like Mr Nathan, who won in walkovers but is remembered as the people's president," said Dr Norshahril.

Mr Nathan was elected uncontested in 1999 and 2005.

Observers like Professor Tan said the outcome should prompt more eligible people from all races to step forward and run, whether in an open or reserved election.

"I hope this will be the first and last reserved election. We can be the beacon of multiracialism especially without the need for a reserved election," he added.





This won't stop me from serving people: Farid Khan
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 12 Sep 2017

Presidential hopeful Farid Khan is disappointed that he did not qualify to run for president, but he has also accepted the decision.

The 61-year-old was told yesterday afternoon that the Community Committee has accepted that he belongs to the Malay community, but the Presidential Elections Committee did not find him eligible to run.

"I wish to thank Singaporeans, my family and friends for their overwhelming support since I first announced my decision to contest," Mr Farid said in a statement shortly after the Elections Department (ELD) announced its decision at 5pm yesterday.

"Unfortunately, it is not meant to be," he added.



Despite the setback, Mr Farid said that his bid for the presidency, announced in July, was nevertheless "a meaningful journey and a wonderful experience".

He added: "Although I am disappointed by the committee's decision, it will not stop me from continuing to serve the people. As before, I will continue to serve to the best of my abilities."

Mr Farid's campaign manager Borhan Saini declined to disclose why Mr Farid did not qualify.

The ELD said it had informed presidential hopefuls why they did not qualify, and it was up to them whether they wanted to disclose the reasons publicly. The Straits Times understands that Mr Farid did not meet the requirement that candidates from the private sector must have been the top executive of a company with at least $500 million in shareholder equity in the past three years.

Mr Farid is the chairman of marine sector services company Bourbon Offshore Asia, a subsidiary of French multinational marine company Bourbon.






Salleh Marican eyes second chance at next polls
By Danson Cheong, The Straits Times, 12 Sep 2017

Over the years, Mr Salleh Marican grew his small tailor shop to a $250 million property and investment holdings firm and made a name for himself as a self-made businessman.

But yesterday, the 67-year-old fell short in his bid to run for the presidency, as the Presidential Elections Committee (PEC) found he was ineligible to stand for election to the highest office in the land as he did not meet the criteria required for a candidate from the private sector.

The PEC laid out its reasons for rejecting Mr Salleh in a letter to him yesterday.

The letter, which was shown to The Straits Times by Mr Salleh, said that while Second Chance Properties was profitable during his tenure as its chief executive from 1999 to the present day, its shareholder equity - which averaged $258 million in the last three financial years - was considerably lower than the threshold required.

Hopefuls from the private sector are required to have run a company with at least $500 million in shareholders' equity for the most recent three years.



Speaking to The Straits Times yesterday evening at his home near Upper East Coast Road, Mr Salleh said he was sad and "very disappointed".

"The reason is very vague, very general, they find that I cannot, I don't have the ability to manage a $500 million company. This is very subjective," he said.

"In business, it is (also about) luck, if let's say tomorrow... I have $500 million, maybe if property price goes up, I am actually the same person."



He offered PEC testimonials from people who have dealt with him in business and who believed he had what it takes to manage a $500 million company.

"I explained that from $8,000 of capital, from a small tailor shop, I have grown the business to $250 million, and along the way I have learnt much, I have gone through failures and setbacks and still all this somehow did not convince them," said Mr Salleh.

The PEC's decision is final and is not open to an appeal.

Mr Salleh said he would continue to run his business and contribute to society in other ways.

And while he wished Madam Halimah Yacob well, he also said this was not the end of the road for his presidential ambitions.

"I hope that I can grow this company in the next six years, and if I can meet the $500 million criterion six years later, I will try again, in an open election. I believe in second chances. I believe I will give myself a second chance," he said.










Halimah Yacob's neighbours welcome president from HDB heartland
By Danson Cheong, The Straits Times, 13 Sep 2017

Mr Lee Swee Seng has run his HDB provision shop in Yishun Avenue 4 for 17 years, and in all that time, Madam Halimah Yacob and her family have been his loyal customers.

Mr Lee, 53, sees her family members almost every day - his iEcon minimart is the closest shop for them to pick up groceries such as bread and beverages.

But with his neighbour set to be Singapore's next president, Mr Lee, like many of Madam Halimah's neighbours, is feeling a mix of emotions. "This is very special because she will be Singapore's first woman president, and we are very proud that someone like her who lives in an HDB flat in Yishun could become president," he told The Straits Times yesterday in Mandarin.

Madam Halimah's election to the highest office in the land would most probably see her move out to a more easily secured residence.

The former Speaker of Parliament had said publicly that should she be elected, she intended to continue living in her HDB home.

She, however, had also acknowledged that she might have to move owing to the challenges of keeping a president safe and secure in a public housing estate.



For her neighbours, this would mean missing a friendly face in the lift, and warm chats in the void deck. Newspaper vendor G. Dabamani, 54, said Madam Halimah would often ask how she was doing and if she was benefiting from government policies like Workfare.

"We are sad because we might not be able to see or talk to her in the lifts anymore. If she stays here, I would be so proud - my president lives in the same block as me!" said Madam Dabamani.

Safety officer Henry Lim, 57, will miss seeing someone he knows as a hardworking champion of the people who has no airs.

"She is very friendly, humble and down to earth. She doesn't behave like a VIP," said Mr Lim, who has lived in the estate for over 20 years.

The 12-storey HDB block built in 1987 has been home to Madam Halimah, 63, and her family for more than two decades. She has lived there throughout her 16-year political career - she became an MP in 2001, was appointed Minister of State for Community Development, Youth and Sport in 2011, and elected Speaker of Parliament in 2013.



Her home of two adjacent HDB flats, bought on the resale market, is nestled in a cluster of HDB blocks and tucked away in a neighbourhood that looks like any other. The corridors are cluttered with the everyday items of HDB life - bicycles, potted plants and school shoes.

Apart from CCTV cameras perched on the walls near her unit, there is nothing to suggest the block houses an important leader who will be Singapore's head of state.



Residents say Madam Halimah has always been low-key, and security in the area is discreet.

But this might change when Madam Halimah becomes president-elect today. Last evening, policemen in plain clothes were seen stationed at the foot of her block and patrolling the area.

Mr Lee said: " I would understand if she doesn't live here after becoming president... but what is special about her is whether she was an MP, Minister of State or Speaker, she was living here, among us."










Halimah: 'Heartland President'
The Straits Times, 13 Sep 2017

More than 1,000 unionists, former constituents and members of the public will turn up at the People's Association (PA) Headquarters in King George's Avenue this morning to support Madam Halimah Yacob as she files her nomination papers for the presidential election.

These include residents from her former wards of Bukit Batok East and Marsiling, where she was MP for the past 16 years.

The 63-year-old will be elected unopposed as she was the only contender declared eligible to run by the Presidential Elections Committee on Monday, having been Speaker of Parliament since 2013.

She and her team members will gather at NTUC Centre this morning before heading to the PA Headquarters, the designated nomination centre, to submit her papers.

Shortly after noon, returning officer Ng Wai Choong will declare her the president-elect.

Madam Halimah will then address supporters, many of whom will be in orange - a colour that represents unity.

In a handwritten note posted on her Facebook page last night, she thanked Singaporeans for their strong show of support for her. She added she was deeply touched by the words of encouragement and good wishes from many people.

"I will serve Singapore and Singaporeans with great passion and commitment. I invite you to join me in making Singapore a great place by Doing Good, Doing Together," she said, referring to her campaign slogan.

Yesterday, residents in the Yishun neighbourhood where she has lived for over two decades - throughout her 16-year political career - seemed excited at the prospect of having someone from the HDB heartland representing them in the Istana, although some wondered if they might see less of her, given her new role.













President Halimah Yacob takes oath and makes history

$
0
0
Inauguration of the 8th President of the Republic of Singapore, Madam Halimah Yacob





First woman president also symbolises Singapore's multiracial dream, says PM Lee Hsien Loong
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

History was made at a quarter past six yesterday evening, with the inauguration of Singapore's first Malay President after 47 years, and its first woman head of state.

Looking solemn in a peach-coloured headscarf, President Halimah Yacob, 63, took her oath in the Istana state room, flanked by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon.

Her rise to the highest office of the land reaffirms Mr Lee Kuan Yew's vow in the very early hours of independence on Aug 9, 1965, that Singapore "would not be a Malay nation, a Chinese nation nor an Indian nation", PM Lee said in an address to 200 guests.

When this pledge was made, the nation had a Malay head of state: Encik Yusof Ishak, who died in his third term in 1970, at the age of 60.



"President Yusof Ishak symbolised, visibly, that though we had been forced out of Malaysia primarily because we were a Chinese-majority city, independent Singapore would never in turn suppress its own non-Chinese minorities. We chose the nobler dream: A multiracial, multi-religious Singapore."

"Madam President, half a century later, you symbolise, visibly, that Singapore will persevere with this dream," PM Lee said, adding that this has become more urgent in the light of regional and global trends.

"In an age when ethnic nationalism is rising, extremist terrorism sows distrust and fear, and exclusivist ideologies deepen communal and religious fault lines, here in Singapore, we will resist this tide.

"Here, the majority will make extra efforts to ensure that minorities enjoy equal rights. That is something special, precious and fragile.

PM Lee said this is why Parliament has members from all ethnic groups. Now, the nation will regularly have heads of state who are, like President Benjamin Sheares, Eurasian, like President S R Nathan, Indian; like President Tony Tan, Chinese, and like President Halimah Yacob, Malay, and a woman.

This was the "compelling reason" the Government amended the Constitution to reserve the presidency for a community that has not held the post for five terms, he added.



Speaking after PM Lee, Madam Halimah welcomed the move to preserve Singapore's multiracialism.

"I am proud that I belong to a country that does not just say it is diverse, but lives out this diversity every single day," she said, adding that while strides have been made, it remains a constant work in progress.

"We need guideposts to help us along this journey," she added, as she addressed the palpable disquiet of the past week over her walkover in the first reserved election.

"I know that some Singaporeans would prefer to achieve this without needing reserved elections. I respect their views," she said.

"Like them, I look forward to the day when we will no longer need to rely on the provision to have reserved elections, and Singaporeans naturally and regularly elect citizens of all races as presidents."

"Today, I want to assure all Singaporeans that as your President, I will serve every one of you, regardless of race, language or religion."

PM Lee noted that the life story of the veteran unionist and former Parliament Speaker reflects the Singapore Story.



Madam Halimah said her life story is a testament to Singapore's meritocracy, a shared value the presidency embodies, together with multiracialism and stewardship.

"I have seen how much we can achieve by working together. Now, as President, my duty is to unite the people, to overcome the many challenges ahead of us, together.

"I pledge to continue this journey of service to our country. I call on all Singaporeans to join me in this endeavour," she added.






















President Halimah's life reflects the Singapore story: PM Lee
He speaks of her journey from hardship to success, and giving back to society
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

Madam Halimah Yacob's father died when she was eight, and she spent her school years juggling studies with work to help her family get by.

Even so, she became the first in her family to enter university, then devoted four decades of her life to public service, speaking up for the vulnerable.

Yesterday, as she was sworn in as Singapore's eighth president, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong noted that her life story - from "hardship and deprivation" to success and giving back to society - reflects the Singapore story.

"Your life story symbolises the sort of society that we aspire to be, and reminds us that the Singapore story is one of hope and opportunity," he said during a speech at the Istana.

"In Singapore, no matter where we begin in life, if we work hard, we will have ample chances to do well. And when we make good, we have a responsibility in turn to help others around us."



Madam Halimah, in her speech, attributed this to meritocracy.

Her story is not an uncommon one in Singapore, she said, and similar stories have played out all over the island.

"We firmly believe that anyone who works hard should be able to realise his or her full potential, and make valuable contributions to society," she added. "I have strong personal convictions about our meritocratic system because without it, I would not be here today."



Recounting how her mother had brought her and her four siblings up single-handedly, Madam Halimah said they experienced poverty and hardship, struggling daily to survive.

"Fortunately, I was growing up in Singapore," she said.

Despite her family circumstances, a good education was within her reach as she had the support of family, teachers and the community, and also worked hard.

"That enabled me to launch my career in the public service, and later to give others in need a helping hand," she said.

That this is possible is something special and precious to the country, she added.

Her experiences are also an affirmation of Singapore's multiracialism, she said.

She grew up in Selegie House, in a multiracial neighbourhood, and attended the Singapore Chinese Girls' School, studying alongside classmates of all races.



In the unions, where she worked for over three decades, she helped workers regardless of their race.

When she became MP, she looked after the needs of Singaporeans of all races and religions.

The foundations of multiracialism were laid in Singapore's early years and have helped to build a diverse yet cohesive community, said Madam Halimah.

She noted that Singapore's founding fathers, including President Yusof Ishak, understood that multiracialism was not about ignoring or erasing differences between ethnic groups.

"Instead, they recognised our diversity and took steps to reassure every community that they were a unique and valued part of our society," she added.

She also said she was glad that multiracialism was not just enshrined in the national pledge, but also entrenched in key national policies like housing, education and security.

As a result, integration in housing and schools is now part of the social landscape, she said.

"Had we left them on their own, they might have taken a different direction."

But she added that every generation faces new challenges to the country's multiracialism.

"Every generation must update our institutions to strengthen our shared values. And every generation needs champions who care deeply about multiracialism and fight to uphold and realise this ideal," she said.



She pledged to be a President for all Singaporeans, regardless of race, language or religion.

Mr Lee said he had no doubt that Madam Halimah will unify all Singaporeans, like Mr Yusof did.

"You, too, will strengthen our sense of nationhood. You, too, will be our President," he said.















President Halimah vows to exercise independent judgment
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

President Halimah Yacob pledged yesterday to exercise independent judgment in her role as steward of Singapore's reserves and the integrity of the public service.

"In exercising my custodial powers, I will use my independent judgment, consulting the Council of Presidential Advisers, and working closely with the Prime Minister and the Government," she said in her inaugural speech after she was sworn in as President at the Istana.

Besides being a symbol of national unity, the President holds the second key to Singapore's hard- earned reserves and has the power to approve or block key appointments in the public service.

Madam Halimah addressed these aspects of her role when she spoke on stewardship, a value shared by Singaporeans and embodied by the presidency.

She said Singaporeans have benefited from the hard work of earlier generations and inherited a prosperous and well-developed city, a clean and efficient system, and strong shared values.

"Now, it is our responsibility to steward this island nation well, so we can pass on to future generations a better country, a more robust system and a stronger commitment to our values," she said.

This includes taking care of an ageing population and growing healthcare needs, preparing workers and businesses for new jobs and opportunities, and dealing with divisive forces sweeping the world - including the twin threats of extremist terrorism and Islamophobia.



To plan for the future and build for the next generation, Singapore has to invest in its economy and people, Madam Halimah said.

She said projects in infrastructure, education and healthcare as investments will improve the lives of Singaporeans, make them more productive and create more opportunities for the next generation.

"But they also cost billions of dollars. Budgets will be tight," she added. "We need to grow our economy so as to generate more resources to afford these programmes and investments. We will also need to husband our reserves carefully."

These reserves have been built through the hard work and careful stewardship of successive governments and generations of Singaporeans, she said, adding: "Income from the reserves is an important source of government revenue. But the reserves themselves must not be used, except for very good reason."

Another asset is an honest and capable public service, which enables Singapore to do well as a nation and hold its own against international competitors, Madam Halimah said.

"I will do my duty to ensure that new appointments to critical posts measure up to our high standards of integrity and ability. The public service must maintain its high quality and standing in order to continue to serve Singapore well," she added.



Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said Madam Halimah's wealth of experience in public service would have prepared her for these duties.

He said she would have to make independent judgments, taking full advantage of the advice of the Council of Presidential Advisers, when exercising her custodial powers.

"At the same time, the President has to work closely with the Government for the two-key mechanism to function properly. I look forward to establishing such a relationship with you, just as I did with your predecessors," he added.











Time to rally behind President: ESM Goh Chok Tong
By Danson Cheong, The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

While there have been some rumblings over the process through which Madam Halimah Yacob won the presidential election, Singaporeans should unite and rally behind her now that she has been elected President, Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said yesterday.



In a Facebook post, ESM Goh addressed the unhappiness that has been brewing online over the election, saying that while the election process was "highly controversial", Madam Halimah was not a controversial figure.

"Halimah did not dream of being a President but will serve with full heart now that she is. The focus so far has been on process, but we should not let whatever unhappiness weigh down her duties," said ESM Goh.

"We expect our head of state to be a unifying figure, but we must also do our part to help the President succeed."

Madam Halimah was elected unopposed in the first presidential election reserved for the Malay community.

Her two rivals, businessmen Salleh Marican and Farid Khan, were disqualified from contesting as they did not meet the threshold for candidates from the private sector.

On her part, Madam Halimah has promised to be a President for all Singaporeans.



ESM Goh, who was prime minister when Madam Halimah quit NTUC to join politics in 2001, said he had persuaded her to leave the labour movement so she could serve all Singaporeans. He said he had tracked her performance over the years.

Madam Halimah also chaired the PAP Seniors Group committee, where he had personally observed her sincerity to help the elderly.

ESM Goh said: "Her motivation, dedication and desire to serve and help others are not skin-deep. I have no doubt that she will gain the respect and support of the people as a humble, down-to-earth and sincere President with a big heart for all, regardless of status, wealth, abilities, race or religion."






















New head of state tours Istana grounds
By Desmond Foo, The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

President Halimah Yacob is considering making the Istana grounds more accessible to Singaporeans.

Madam Halimah, 63, mentioned this after she went on a tour of the Istana yesterday morning ahead of her inauguration as Singapore's eighth head of state.



She met Istana staff and was briefed on the organisation of the Istana. She also visited the President's Office, recently vacated by her predecessor Tony Tan Keng Yam.

She then took time to go on a guided tour of the gardens, including the Istana Villa, Sri Temasek and the Military Guard House.


Speaking to reporters after her tour, Madam Halimah said she was thinking of making the Istana grounds more accessible to the general public.


For instance, elderly volunteers could be invited to tend to the Istana's herb gardens, and help harvest its fruits and spices, she said.


Children could also be invited onto the grounds for picnics, in addition to the Istana Open Houses on certain public holidays.


"I understand that we must also preserve the dignity of the Istana, but taking that into consideration, could we also make the Istana a little bit more accessible to people? It is a beautiful place," she said.




The former Speaker of Parliament was declared president-elect on Wednesday, following a walkover in the first reserved election for Malay candidates.

Asked about the online criticism over the uncontested election, Madam Halimah called on Singaporeans to stay united and focus on the internal and external challenges facing the nation.

"I urge Singaporeans, let's work together, stay united. We have not seen the best for ourselves yet. Let's see what we can do to achieve the best for ourselves and for our children and our grandchildren," she said.

She is the country's first Malay president in 47 years, and Singapore's first woman president.











Inauguration of President Halimah Yacob: China, US among those who send congratulations
By Danson Cheong, The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

China and the United States are among the foreign governments that congratulated Madam Halimah Yacob yesterday on becoming Singapore's eighth president.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying said that China attaches great importance to relations with Singapore, an important member of the ASEAN bloc, said state news agency Xinhua.

It reported Ms Hua as saying that China is ready to work with Singapore to develop the partnership of all-round cooperation in keeping with the times.




The American government, in its congratulatory letter to President Halimah, said the US shares a strong and time-honoured strategic partnership with Singapore.

"We look forward to working together and continuing our cooperation on our shared interests in the region and worldwide," its State Department said in a statement.


President Halimah is Singapore's first woman president and the first Malay president after 47 years.


Noting her achievement, Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-Wen congratulated her on becoming Singapore's first woman president, the Taiwanese Foreign Ministry said in a statement.


Ms Tsai also said she was looking forward to working with President Halimah to deepen and expand relations between Singapore and Taiwan.


Meanwhile, two community groups in Singapore said that President Halimah was both a symbol of multiracialism and an inspiration to Singaporeans.


Mr Roland Ng, president of the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said he was looking forward to President Halimah unlocking greater economic opportunities abroad for Singapore companies.


"Madam Halimah signifies Singapore's successful multiracialism, which will help to sustain a stable environment conducive for our businesses," he said.


Mr K. Barathan, chief executive of the Singapore Indian Development Association, paid tribute to the President for her 40 years of public service, first with the labour movement, then later as MP, minister of state and Speaker of Parliament. He said she was an "inspiration to every Singaporean".


He added that he was confident she would continue to lead with passion, dedication and vigour.


"Under your leadership, we can foster a stronger and more cohesive nation that can only grow from strength to strength," he said.






President Halimah's inauguration: Don’t overlook this key moment in Singapore’s history
A Malay woman, with her unique qualities, overcame very long odds to be president
By Elgin Toh, Insight Editor, The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

In August 1954, a girl was born in her family home in Queen Street.

She was named Halimah Yacob.

Months later, Singapore held its first Legislative Assembly election. Of the 75 candidates who ran in 1955, only two were women. Both were Chinese, and both lost their contests. And of the 25 men elected, just three were Malay.

What were the odds, then, that a Malay girl, born in August 1954, could one day set foot in Parliament, become Speaker and ultimately be elected Singapore's President? Very long odds, indeed.

When Madam Halimah was sworn in as President yesterday evening, history was made.

The point is presented starkly here because there is a genuine danger we might overlook the significance of this moment - given the controversy surrounding the election.

It is important to acknowledge the controversy: There is a sizeable segment for whom an election reserved for candidates of one race is fundamentally flawed. The lack of a contest compounded the issue for this group.

The changes to the elected presidency, and the timing of the changes, have been debated. The Government has explained the need for the change. The debates will continue for a while longer.

But none of this should take anything away from the momentous nature of Madam Halimah's election and her remarkable journey.

Imagine a country that makes it through the qualifiers of the football World Cup for the first time in history. Defying all predictions, it then goes all the way to the final.

In the final, after 90 minutes of nail-biting play without a goal, the referee, in the game's dying seconds, awards that country a penalty kick, in a 50-50 call that could have gone either way. The team scores. It lifts the World Cup in its maiden outing.

The contention over the penalty will not go away easily. Pundits will argue its merits, maybe for years.

But such discussions do not detract from the remarkable World Cup run achieved by that country.



And so it is with Madam Halimah's historic election.

The changes to the presidency were hotly debated, but they were also somewhat beyond her control. Indeed, she knew of the risk to her own reputation, given how some disagreed with the changes, but she chose to step forward anyway.

Madam Halimah has faced formidable obstacles at every stage of her life. She worked hard to overcome them.

Any number of things could have led to a different outcome.

She could have dropped out ofschool to supplement the income of her widowed mother, who sold nasi padang to raise five children on her own.

As a woman lawyer in a labour movement dominated by blue-collar men, she could have been taken less than seriously.

As a headscarf-donning Muslim politician, she could have found it harder to connect with the non-Muslim majority.

As Speaker of Parliament, she could have shunned the public scrutiny of a presidential run.

At each stage, her unique qualities saw her through. These included her determined nature, her personal warmth, her genuine concern for the weak and her heart to serve the public.

In a parallel universe, Madam Halimah could so easily have not become president. But she has.

Not a long time ago - as recently as 2012 - there was no woman in Cabinet. Today, there are two: Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Josephine Teo. Now, there is also President Halimah Yacob.

As we pause to reflect on the import of this moment, we should, as a nation, challenge ourselves further: How long do we have to wait for a woman to be prime minister, or for someone from a minority race to be prime minister?

When that day comes, every child - boy, girl, Malay, Indian, Chinese, or of any race - can grow up believing that anything is possible under the Singapore sky.

Meanwhile, the fight to shatter glass ceilings continues.

The fight involves individuals waking up each morning and doing their best to realise their potential.

But the fight also involves ensuring a level playing field.

The reserved election is at times framed as a compromise of meritocracy - in order to advance multiracialism.

But if one accepts that the nature of Singapore's elections is unmeritocratic to begin with, because voters systematically discriminate against minority candidates, then affirmative action is not a compromise of meritocracy. It is in fact a desirable and necessary move to enable a truer meritocracy.

If a key role of the president is to be a unifying symbol of the nation, Madam Halimah personifies it. For she represents not just multiracialism, but also the progress of countless Singaporean women since the 1950s.

Above all, her incredible journey symbolises the journey of a country that itself overcame impossible odds to make something of its tiny existence.

As Madam Halimah begins her first full day as President today, the striving continues - for her, for millions of Singaporeans, and for this most improbable nation.





Speech by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong
A symbol of Singapore's dream to be nation for all races
The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

We are here this evening to witness the inauguration of Madam Halimah Yacob as the eighth President of the Republic of Singapore.

Madam President, congratulations on your election. Your story reflects the Singapore Story - how we have come this far together, and what we aspire to be as a nation. You have overcome difficult challenges in your life. Your early years were of hardship and deprivation. But you studied and worked hard, to get a good education and a steady job to support your family. In time you achieved success, but you never forgot the poverty of your childhood. You went out of your way to help those in need, and enable many others to succeed as you yourself have done.

Your life story symbolises the sort of society that we aspire to be, and reminds us that the Singapore Story is one of hope and opportunity. In Singapore, no matter where we begin in life, if we work hard, we will have ample chances to do well; and when we make good, we have a responsibility in turn to help others around us.

Madam President, you bring to the presidency a heartfelt concern for your fellow citizens, a strong sense of duty, and a sterling record of public service.

As a unionist, you championed workers' interests. As a social activist and community leader, you cared for the underprivileged, and groups in need of special help. As a Member of Parliament, you worked with residents to solve their problems and brought people together to build a community.

As a minister of state, you worked with youth groups to engage their energies and idealism, improved childcare services to support working mothers, and enhanced support for the disabled by setting up the Centre for Enabled Living, which later became SG Enable.

As the Speaker of Parliament, you were even-handed and fair to all MPs, encouraging robust debates on national issues, while maintaining decorum and order in the House.

Your wealth of experience in public service has prepared you for your new duties. The President has important custodial powers over the nation's past reserves and key public service appointments. When exercising these custodial powers, you have to make independent judgments on the issues before you, taking full advantage of the experience and advice of the Council of Presidential Advisers. At the same time, the President has to work closely with the Government, for the two-key mechanism to function properly. I look forward to establishing such a relationship with you, just as I did with your predecessors.



However, there is one significant difference between being President and your previous posts. Hitherto, you have been fighting the good fight - in the unions, in the political arena, in the governing party. Now as President, you have to be non-partisan and above the political fray. The highest office in the land, the President is the symbol of the nation. As the President, you have to be the unifying figure of our nation and represent all Singaporeans. I am confident that you will adapt to this new role, and perform it with distinction.

Madam President, you are the first Malay to become President since our first president, Encik Yusof Ishak, 47 years ago. You are also the first Malay to be elected President since it became an elected office in 1991, and the first President elected since the major constitutional changes last year. You are also our first female President.

Your swearing-in today is therefore a significant moment in our history. Today, we reaffirm the pledge that Mr Lee Kuan Yew made on Aug 9, 1965, in the very first hours of our independence, that this would not be a Malay nation, a Chinese nation nor an Indian nation. Everybody would have his place, equal, regardless of language, culture, religion.

When Mr Lee made this pledge, we had a Malay head of state. President Yusof Ishak symbolised, visibly, that though we had been forced out of Malaysia primarily because we were a Chinese-majority city, independent Singapore would never in turn suppress its own non-Chinese minorities. We chose the nobler dream: A multiracial, multi-religious Singapore.

Madam President, half a century later, you symbolise, visibly, that Singapore will persevere with this dream. This has become all the more urgent considering the trends in our region and the rest of the world. In an age when ethnic nationalism is rising, extremist terrorism sows distrust and fear, and exclusivist ideologies deepen communal and religious fault lines, here in Singapore we will resist this tide. Here, the majority will make extra efforts to ensure that minorities enjoy equal rights. That is something special, precious and fragile. That is why we make sure that Parliament always has representatives from all ethnic groups. And now we will regularly have a head of state, the symbol of the nation, who can look like president Benjamin Sheares (a Eurasian), president S R Nathan (an Indian), president Tony Tan (a Chinese), and President Halimah Yacob (a Malay and a woman). Indeed, that was the compelling reason the Government amended the Constitution last year.

Madam President, Encik Yusof Ishak was the president of all Singaporeans, regardless of race, language, religion or gender. You too will unify all of us. You too will strengthen our sense of nationhood. You too will be our President.





Multiracial society a work in progress: President Halimah Yacob
The Straits Times, 15 Sep 2017

Madam Halimah Yacob says, as she is sworn in as Singapore's first woman head of state, that she welcomes moves to ensure presidents come regularly from every ethnic group.

Prime Minister, Chief Justice, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.

I am honoured by this opportunity to serve as the eighth President of Singapore. It is a heavy responsibility and I will do my best. I will discharge my duties faithfully in the best interests of Singaporeans and Singapore.

From the bottom of my heart, I want to thank all Singaporeans for your support. I am deeply touched by your good wishes and words of encouragement. Over the last few weeks, I have met thousands of Singaporeans from all walks of life, all ages and all races. Many of you shared with me your hopes and dreams for Singapore. I am energised and motivated by your conviction and enthusiasm. We are all united by our deep love for Singapore, our desire to see Singapore do well and our determination to make it a great home for all Singaporeans.

I wish especially to mention the labour movement, with whom I have worked very closely for many years, and from whom I have learnt much about compassion and comradeship. I know that these lessons will help me in my new role. I would also like to thank the many community, social and business organisations which have worked with me all these years. I look forward to our continued partnership.

The presidency is the highest office in our land and is a key institution in our democracy. It unifies our nation by embodying our shared values as a people - multiracialism, meritocracy and stewardship. These values are even more important today, guiding us as we find our way forward in a troubled and uncertain world. Let me speak about each of them in turn.



MULTIRACIALISM

First, multiracialism. Our first president, Encik Yusof Ishak, together with our other founding fathers, established the foundations of multiracialism during Singapore's formative years. They understood that multiracialism does not mean ignoring or forcibly erasing differences between ethnic groups. Instead, they recognised our diversity, and took steps to reassure every community that they were a unique and valued part of our society. I am glad that our founding leaders went beyond enshrining multiracialism in our National Pledge, to entrench it in key national policies like housing, education and security.

With these strong foundations, we have been able to build a diverse yet cohesive community. I grew up in Selegie House, in a multiracial neighbourhood. I attended Singapore Chinese Girls' School, and I had classmates and friends from all races. In the unions, I served workers regardless of their race. As a Member of Parliament, I took care of the needs of Singaporeans from every race and religion. I am proud that I belong to a country that does not just say it is diverse, but lives out this diversity every single day.

We have made great progress building a multiracial society over the years, but we also know that this endeavour is a constant work in progress. We need guideposts to help us along this journey. For example, integration in housing and schools is now part of our social landscape. Had we left them on their own, they might have taken a different direction. Every generation faces new challenges to our multiracialism. Every generation must update our institutions to strengthen our shared values. And every generation needs champions who care deeply about multiracialism and fight to uphold and realise this ideal.

Therefore, I welcome the recent moves to protect our multiracial identity by ensuring that our presidents will regularly come from every ethnic group, including the minorities. I know that some Singaporeans would prefer to achieve this without needing reserved elections. I respect their views. Like them, I look forward to the day when we will no longer need to rely on the provision to have reserved elections, and Singaporeans naturally and regularly elect citizens of all races as presidents. Today, I want to assure all Singaporeans that as your President, I will serve every one of you, regardless of race, language or religion.

MERITOCRACY

Meritocracy is another of our core values. We believe that all Singaporeans should have the opportunity to get a good education and a good start in life, regardless of who your parents are, or where you come from. We firmly believe that anyone who works hard should be able to realise his or her full potential, and make valuable contributions to society.

I have strong personal convictions about our meritocratic system, because without it, I would not be here today. I lost my father when I was young; my mum singlehandedly brought up my four siblings and me. We experienced poverty and hardship first-hand, struggling to survive every single day. Fortunately, I was growing up in Singapore. Even though my family was poor, I could get a good education by working hard, with the strong support of my family, teachers and the community. That enabled me to launch my career in the public service, and later to give others in need a helping hand.

My life story is not uncommon in Singapore. Many of you have stories similar to mine, or know someone who has. This is something special and precious to Singapore. As President, I will build on the good work of president S R Nathan and president Tony Tan. I will use the President's Challenge to uplift the less privileged in our society. Beyond giving immediate help, we must also assist needy families to prepare for the challenges of tomorrow. I thus welcome the Government's plans to make major investments in early childhood education, to get those from humble backgrounds off to a good start, ready to do well in our meritocratic system. I also welcome the major investments in skills upgrading, to help their parents earn more and enjoy better job security.

STEWARDSHIP

The last core value I want to speak about is stewardship. We have inherited a prosperous and well-developed city, a clean and efficient system, and strong shared values. In all this, we are beneficiaries of the hard work of earlier generations. Now it is our responsibility to steward this island-nation well, so we can pass on to future generations a better country, a more robust system and a stronger commitment to our values.

Stewardship includes taking care of one another, and working together to solve the problems we face today. Socially, we have to take care of our ageing population and growing healthcare needs. Economically, we have to prepare workers and businesses for new jobs and opportunities. And in terms of security, we must deal with divisive forces that are sweeping across the world, including the twin threats of extremist terrorism and Islamophobia.

But stewardship also means planning for the future, and building for the next generation. We must invest in our economy and our people. This includes infrastructure and hardware, but also education and healthcare.

All these programmes and investments will improve our lives, make us more productive and create more opportunities for our next generation. But they also cost billions of dollars. Budgets will be tight. We need to grow our economy so as to generate more resources to afford these programmes and investments. We will also need to husband our reserves carefully.

The President holds the second key to our reserves, and to key appointments in the public service. In exercising my custodial powers, I will use my independent judgment, consulting the Council of Presidential Advisers, and working closely with the Prime Minister and the Government.

Our reserves have been built up through the hard work and careful stewardship of successive governments and generations of Singaporeans. Income from the reserves is an important source of government revenue. But the reserves themselves must not be used, except for very good reason.

Our honest and capable public service is a precious asset that enables us to perform well as a nation, and hold our own internationally against bigger and better-endowed competitors. I will do my duty to ensure that new appointments to critical posts measure up to our high standards of integrity and ability. The public service must maintain its high quality and standing, in order to continue to serve Singapore well.

UNITY

Ladies and gentlemen, in my previous roles, I have seen how much we can achieve by working together. Now, as President, my duty is to unite the people, to overcome the many challenges ahead of us, together.

I pledge to continue this journey of service to our country. I call on all Singaporeans to join me in this endeavour. Our goal must be to leave behind a better Singapore for future generations. We must measure our success not just by how well we do for ourselves, but by whether we enable the next generation to do even better. Let us commit ourselves to this task, and together create a brighter future for all Singaporeans.











Related
Halimah Yacob is Singapore's First Female President; First Malay Head of State in 47 years
Presidential Election 2017: Nomination Day on Sep 13, Polling on Sep 23
Halimah Yacob to run for President
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>