Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live

NTU's new sports hall The Wave built using mass engineered timber

$
0
0
Push for more efficient building techniques
By 2020, four in 10 projects will benefit from new methods that require fewer workers
By Charmaine Ng, The Straits Times, 25 Apr 2017

Singapore hopes to multiply the number of buildings it will churn out using more efficient techniques that require fewer workers.

By 2020, four in 10 construction projects, including Housing Board flats, will use these newer technologies - up from the current one in 10.

Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong announced the target yesterday, saying existing methods are not sustainable in the long term. They are labour intensive and would lead to a "far larger pool of foreign workers than we can possibly accommodate in Singapore".

"The shortage of workers ends up becoming a bottleneck and a constraint in our development - we end up having to defer projects," he said at the launch of a new sports hall at Nanyang Technological University (NTU).



The sports hall, called The Wave, is made mostly of mass engineered timber. Parts are prefabricated, speeding up construction, while yielding a 25 per cent savings in labour.

In particular, the 72m-long, wave-like roof was put together by only 14 workers in about three weeks. Conventional methods would have taken 30 workers and up to three months to complete, said Mr Kang Choon Boon, managing director of B19 Technologies, the contractor for The Wave.

Mr Wong said if Singapore adopts similar technologies, many more projects can be carried out with the same number of workers. Public agencies will take the lead in adopting these technologies.

Many public agencies are already doing so for their projects, said Building and Construction Authority (BCA) chief executive officer John Keung.

But industry insiders say achieving the Government's goal would be an uphill task.

For one thing, the new technologies are more expensive. For instance, The Wave cost $35 million to construct. Traditional methods may require more workers, but are cheaper.

Already, the construction sector - the worst performing in Singapore, forecast to grow just 0.3 per cent this year - is watching its bottom line closely. Small contractors, in particular, have been hit hard by a slowdown in business volume and tighter manpower constraints.

Singapore Contractors Association president Kenneth Loo reckoned that it will take more than three years to achieve the Government's aim. "While some of our members are ready, it will take some time to build up across the whole industry," he said.

For costs to come down, more companies must use the technologies, said the BCA, which has the $800 million Construction Productivity and Capability Fund to subsidise such initiatives.

"This is a demand and supply problem," said Dr Keung. "When you have more of such projects, you have an economy of scale and, over time, costs will definitely come down."










Cost stands in the way of efficient building techniques
By Charmaine Ng, The Straits Times, 25 Apr 2017

Key challenges have to be overcome before the construction industry can meet the target set by the Government - to quadruple by 2020 the number of projects that use more efficient technologies.

The biggest is the high costs involved for contractors, including the buying of machinery and computer software, training of staff and, in some cases, costs incurred for storing and transporting prefabricated units to the site, said Singapore Contractors Association president Kenneth Loo.

This is particularly so for small and medium-sized enterprises, he added.

Property consultant Nicholas Mak of SLP International said: "If it is cheaper to use the traditional method, they will use the traditional method. And if construction costs are higher, these will be passed down to the property owner."

To defray some of these costs, the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has committed around $450 million out of about $800 million from the Construction Productivity and Capability Fund as at the end of last year. The fund was introduced in 2010.

More than 9,000 companies, about 90 per cent of which are small and medium-sized firms, have benefited, a BCA spokesman told The Straits Times.

In February, a $150 million Public Sector Construction Productivity Fund was also set up to allow government agencies to implement innovative building methods for construction projects.

On top of the prefabricated mass engineered timber used in Nanyang Technological University's new sports hall, other time- and manpower-saving construction methods include prefabricated pre-finished volumetric construction, which involves building modules in factories before assembling them on-site; structural steel, which is fabricated in factories before installation on-site; and modular mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems, which involve prefabricating and joining mechanical pipework and fittings off-site.

But the assembling of prefabricated components is another challenge as it often requires a high level of precision to prevent problems, such as water leakage and other construction defects, said Mr Mak.

With a projected 60 per cent of demand in the construction sector in the next few years set to originate from the public sector, BCA head John Keung said the Government must rise to the challenge of adopting new construction technology.

"Public agencies must walk the talk, must take the lead in driving this change," he said.




Related
​​NTU opens The Wave, a mega sports hall built using sustainable technologies​
BCA: More support and incentives to transform built environment sector -pdf

Couple who bullied old man at Toa Payoh hawker centre arrested

$
0
0
Hawker centre quarrel: Couple arrested for causing public nuisance
Arrest of couple in Toa Payoh hawker centre dispute reflects intense public interest in case: Lawyers
By Shaffiq Idris Alkhatib, The Straits Times, 27 Apr 2017

In a move that lawyers said reflected the intense public interest in the case, police have arrested a couple, believed to be the ones seen quarrelling with an older man in a hawker centre, for causing public nuisance.

A video clip of the incident had been posted online, sparking negative reactions.



In a statement, police said officers arrested a 46-year-old man and a 39-year-old woman on Tuesday. They had allegedly used offensive language and force against a 76-year-old man at a hawker centre in Toa Payoh Lorong 8.

Police received reports about the case on Sunday and the couple's identities were established through follow-up investigations.

Investigations are still ongoing.



Lawyers told The Straits Times yesterday that arrests for causing public nuisance are not common.

Mr Raphael Louis from Ray Louis Law said officers could have arrested the couple because the case had attracted a lot of public attention - most of it negative.

"Moreover, the case was between a relatively young couple and an elderly man, who is a vulnerable victim," he added.

Another lawyer, Mr Rajan Supramaniam from Hilborne Law, shared his view. He said: "Causing public nuisance is not a serious offence. However, there has been a lot of public interest in this case and so a warrant was issued for the couple to be arrested after the police conducted their investigation."

Mr Supramaniam said a person convicted of causing public nuisance has performed an act that has annoyed the public or disrupted the public peace. This includes using vulgar language and shouting in public.

Mr Louis said the police will likely consult the Attorney-General's Chambers, which will then decide if the couple should be charged in court.



The online video, lasting a minute or so, showed a woman and an elderly man exchanging words over a table at the hawker centre.

Her companion is later seen walking into the scene and, as he does so, knocking into the older man, who falls against the tabletop.

A woman claiming to be the old man's daughter has hit out at the couple's treatment of her father.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday morning, Ms Caroline Ng said she learnt about the April 21 incident after reading several online posts and watching a video of it.

She wrote: "No words can express my outrage and disgust... What I find unbelievable is for the entire two days, my dad never for once mentioned a word of it."

Those convicted of being a public nuisance can be fined up to $1,000.





























































































MINDEF: National service has to be universal and fair to ensure Singaporeans' support

$
0
0
Letting those abroad avoid it or choose when to serve would undermine institution, it says
By Selina Lum and Aaron Chan, The Straits Times, 27 Apr 2017

National service duties must be applied to all Singapore men fairly and equitably, the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) made clear in a statement yesterday after a court ruling to enhance the punishment of three men who had defaulted on their NS obligations.

"If we allow Singapore citizens who are overseas to avoid NS or to choose when they want to serve NS, we are not being fair to the vast majority of our national servicemen who serve their country dutifully, and the institution of NS will be undermined," said a MINDEF spokesman.

The principles were spelt out by then Defence Minister Teo Chee Hean in 2006 following public debate over the punishment meted out to defaulters who evade their NS obligations. Mr Teo had noted that only about 0.5 per cent of those liable for NS each year fail to register for NS. An average of 12 NS defaulters a year are charged in court.

On Tuesday, the High Court panel referred to the principles when it allowed the prosecution's appeal for harsher sentences for the three men, one of whom got close to the maximum of three years' jail for completely evading his obligations.

The court decision was met with approval by parents whose sons are due to enlist.

Mrs Tricia Koh , 46, who has two teenage sons, said: "I feel it's harsh, but it does send a strong message, especially to the parents... Parents have to take responsibility in ensuring that their children know the severity of the situation if they default."

Ms Stephanie Lim, 52, said her 18-year-old son, now in a boarding school in Britain, will return to enlist next year.

"We have not considered any option other than for him to come back," said the homemaker, whose older son had returned to serve NS while the family was in Hong Kong.

Parents of boys who are studying overseas for two years or more have to provide a bond for $75,000 or an amount equivalent to half the combined annual gross income of both parents, whichever is higher.

However, others say harsher penalties will likely deter defaulters who are overseas from returning to Singapore to face the music.

The mother of a 23-year-old NS defaulter was certain her son will not return to Singapore following the ruling. The 55-year-old general manager of a pharmaceutical company, who wanted to be known only as Madam Tan, has lived in Hong Kong for nearly 30 years.

An older son, now 27, also did not serve NS.

Lawyer Laurence Goh is acting for three NS evaders who have been awaiting the outcome of the appeals before deciding whether they want to return to Singapore.

One of them, who is still able to serve NS, wants to return but his parents want him to finish his degree in Australia, said Mr Goh.

The other two, who are no longer liable for NS as they are past the age of 40, have good jobs overseas but want to return to see their aged parents.

"It's a Catch-22 situation. It is deterrence for those thinking of defaulting, but also for those who are already overseas," said Mr Goh.

Lawyer Amolat Singh noted that with the new ruling, some factors previously thought to be relevant in sentencing no longer carry as much weight.

For instance, defaulters used to get sentencing discounts if they perform well during their eventual NS stint. However, Mr Singh said he will still cite these factors "because it's a plus point".

Mr Singh said he has no soft spot for overseas defaulters in a dilemma about coming back. "You live with your choices," he said.

Additional reporting by Abigail Ng




















High Court imposes heavier sentences on 3 NS defaulters
Chief Justice highlights deterrence as key sentencing focus to ensure those called to serve do not evade duty
By Selina Lum, The Straits Times, 26 Apr 2017

In a clear signal that the courts will not tolerate national security being undermined by those who ignore the call to serve national service (NS), the High Court ruled that the "worst" category of NS defaulters - those who do not serve their obligations at all - will face close to the maximum of three years' jail.

This came as a three-judge panel allowed the prosecution's appeals for heavier sentences for three men, two of whom are brothers, who had dodged NS for varying durations.

Singaporean men have to register for national service when they reach the age of 16½ years and are obliged to serve up to the age of 40.

Ang Lee Thye, 43, who evaded NS for 23½ years - the longest possible under the Enlistment Act - was jailed for two years and nine months. He is serving his original two-year jail term and will now have to serve a longer one. He was 41 when he returned to Singapore from the US and was therefore no longer subjected to the Enlistment Act.

Sakthikanesh Chidambaram, 26, who evaded NS for five years, six months and 17 days, was jailed for 10 weeks, up from three weeks.

Vandana Kumar Chidambaram, 23, who evaded NS for three years, four months and two days, was jailed for seven weeks. His initial sentence was a $6,000 fine.

Both brothers completed serving full-time NS last year.



In response to queries on the cases, the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) said on Wednesday that it takes a firm stand on those who commit offences under the Enlistment Act, adding that each case comes with its own circumstances which the Court will consider in deciding on the sentence.

"It is important that NS has the support and commitment of all Singaporeans. To achieve this, we have to adhere to the fundamental principles of universality and equity in NS," said a MINDEF spokesman.

"If we allow Singapore citizens who are overseas to avoid NS or to choose when they want to serve NS, we are not being fair to the vast majority of our national servicemen who serve their country dutifully, and the institution of NS will be undermined.”

The spokesman also touched briefly on the three cases.

For Ang, MINDEF said that despite being advised to return to resolve his offences, the defaulter "chose to return to Singapore at an age when he could no longer be called up for NS at all, evading his NS obligations completely".

For the brother, MINDEF said Sakthikanesh said he was aware of his NS obligations but chose to complete his university studies in India before returning to serve NS while Vandana was similarly aware of his NS obligations, as his father was in contact with the Ministry of Defence.

"Despite being aware of their NS obligations, they chose to evade NS to pursue their studies first," said the spokesman.

In considering the appeals, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said a key sentencing focus is deterrence to ensure those required to serve NS "do not evade their obligations or opt to postpone them to a time or on terms of their own choosing or convenience".

"Were it otherwise, over time, the attitude that national service can be done on one's own terms will weaken our national security and this is simply intolerable," he said.

The court said it will adopt, in a modified form, the sentencing approach suggested by the prosecution. Details of the framework will be elaborated on in due course.

The prosecution, represented by Solicitor-General Kwek Mean Luck, argued: "Lenient treatment of NS defaulters can invoke strong feelings of unfairness on the part of those who serve when called upon, and undermine public commitment to the institution of NS." He called for a signal to be sent to those who "game the system" that NS evasion will be met with stiff penalties.

He suggested a sentencing framework based on three categories. In cases where the default period exceeds two years but the defaulter is able to serve full-time NS in a combat role and reservist in full, he suggested a starting point of two to three months' jail.

At the other end, for those who evade NS for more than 20 years and are unable to serve full- time NS and reservist, he suggested a starting point of three years. For a default period of about 10 years or if the defaulter is unable to serve full-time NS in a combat role and reservist in full, he suggested two years' jail.

The court said that even if a defaulter performs well when he eventually serves NS, it is not a strong factor to get a shorter sentence.




The NS defaulters
The Straits Times, 26 Apr 2017


ANG LEE THYE, 43

He left Singapore with his family for the United States at the age of 14 in 1987. He did not respond when told to register for national service.

In 2009, he told the Central Manpower Base (CMPB) he would return only if he received "reasonable fines". In 2013, a month before his 40th birthday, he said he wished to return. He reported to the CMPB in January 2015 at the age of 41.

Default period: 23½ years
Initial sentence: Two years' jail
Current sentence: Two years and nine months' jail



SAKTHIKANESH CHIDAMBARAM, 26, AND VANDANA KUMAR CHIDAMBARAM, 23

Their Singaporean mother, who settled down in India, came back to Singapore to give birth to them in 1991 and 1993 respectively.

She took them back to India when they were still infants. They visited Singapore occasionally.

In 2008, Sakthikanesh was told to register for national service, but he left for university education in India. He returned to Singapore in April 2014 after completing his studies, and enlisted for NS in September that year. He has since completed his NS.

Default period: Five years, six months and 17 days
Initial sentence: Three weeks' jail
Current sentence: 10 weeks' jail

In May 2010, Vandana was told to register for NS. However, he returned to Singapore only in June 2014. He enlisted for NS in August that year. He has since completed his NS.

Default period: Three years, four months and two days
Initial sentence: $6,000 fine
Current sentence: Seven weeks' jail



Related
MINDEF reply to ST Media Query On Enlistment Act Offenders

Singapore is world's top maritime capital for 3rd consecutive time: Menon Report 2017

$
0
0
It is first for shipping; ports and logistics; and attractiveness and competitiveness, says report
By Ann Williams, The Straits Times, 27 Apr 2017

Singapore has once again clinched overall top place in a ranking of the world's maritime capitals.

It placed Singapore No. 1 in three categories: shipping; ports and logistics; and attractiveness and competitiveness.

Norwegian consultancy Menon Economics, which compiles the annual report, said the country was placed second in maritime technology and fourth in the final category, finance and law.

Significantly, Singapore jumped three places from fifth last year to second position in maritime technology, underlining its efforts in technology and research.

The consultancy looked at 24 objective indicators and garnered survey responses from more than 250 industry experts. Singapore was also ranked first overall in the report's 2015 and 2012 surveys.

The report also made predictions about the world's leading maritime capitals five years ahead, with most experts believing that Singapore will remain the most important city, with many noting its strong capabilities to handle digital transformation in the industry.

It noted that Singapore topped the shipping, and ports and logistics categories due to its strategic location, its position as an important centre for commercial management, and for having the world's second largest port.

The country ranked first in overall attractiveness and competitiveness, thanks to the ease of doing business here and the Customs procedures.

According to the report, 70 per cent of the experts polled regarded Singapore as one of the three most attractive cities in the world for relocating their headquarters, and also identified it as one of the maritime capitals most prepared and ready to adopt digitalisation.

Mr Andrew Tan, chief executive of Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA), said the accolade "will spur us to work harder to make Maritime Singapore the global maritime hub of choice".

MPA's efforts to ensure Singapore remains a leading maritime hub include leading the Sea Transport Industry Transformation Map with industry stakeholders. The aim of the initiative is to drive innovation and productivity, and to equip the local maritime workforce with necessary skills to take on higher value-added jobs of the future.





 












Social divide in schools: Are lavish birthday parties in the classroom OK?

$
0
0
Children are vulnerable to comparisons but barring displays of wealth in school may not work in this age of social media.
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 27 Apr 2017

In The Necessary Stage's classic play Those Who Can't, Teach, which casts the spotlight on life in a typical secondary school in Singapore, there is a scene in which a student, Teck Liang, contemptuously lashes out against his working-class father, a fishmonger.

He scornfully questions why his father must work in a market, and does not wear a tie and jacket to work in an office. Unlike a wealthier classmate, Raymond, Teck Liang's father cannot afford to buy him Nike shoes, nor does he own a car or condominium unit. These differences fuel Teck Liang's sense of shame and self-hatred.

It has been more than 20 years since the play was first staged, but its stark illustration of how the classroom often serves as the setting in which children's eyes are opened to the realities of socio-economic difference remains relevant.

A recent move by at least six primary schools here to shield students from the effects of inequality by issuing guidelines against extravagant birthday celebrations - involving sweet treats and goodie bags - has sparked debate.

While schools explained that this would deter comparisons between the haves and have-nots and avoid situations where parents feel pressured to spend on their children whether or not they could afford it, some have dismissed the move as excessive mollycoddling.

After all, why deprive children of a chance to commemorate an event that only rolls around once a year? Others argue that since the practice of birthday celebrations has become common at the pre-school level, there is no reason to discourage them in primary schools.

A TIME AND PLACE FOR EVERYTHING

Just to be clear, there is no national ban on birthday parties in schools. Those primary schools that have guidelines to discourage extravagance have implemented the new rules with a light touch.

Parents, for example, were reminded that they could mark such occasions at home with friends and family. Other schools, like Riverside Primary in Woodlands, emphasised that birthdays can be celebrated meaningfully with a song in class, without the trappings of materialism.

As public institutions, schools play an important role in communicating and inculcating values through their practices.

Take the wearing of the school uniform, a practice that has been in place since before independence. By enforcing a standard dress code, schools send a symbolic message that students are all equal in the school environment, and reduce comparisons between students based on the brands and provenances of their clothes.

While more schools have been relaxing guidelines in recent years, with quite a few now allowing students to wear branded sports shoes provided they conform to a particular colour scheme, they have also been careful to communicate that such concessions are a privilege.

AGE AND SOCIAL STATUS

At a young age, markers of income disparity - whether in terms of appearance, material possessions or even something as innocuous as whether one has the ability to hand out birthday party favours - are "experienced keenly in the school, the centre of students' social and educational lives", noted Associate Professor Irene Ng from the National University of Singapore's (NUS) Department of Social Work.

It may also snowball into something more distressing for students, according to NUS sociologist Tan Ern Ser, who said that problems of stigmatisation and bullying of students who are less well-off may exist. These may not always be picked up because they "may be misconceived as a behavioural and disciplinary matter", rather than a matter of social difference, such as bullying behaviours displayed by cliques formed on the basis of similar socio-economic background.

Previous interviews conducted by The Straits Times demonstrate how students are affected by such differences.

Those from less well-off families in independent schools recounted how buying branded goods and treating people to meals or events become prerequisites for "being cool" in school. One even shared an anecdote about a student who lived in public housing but who lied and said she lived in a condominium and also stole money to "treat" others so as to keep up appearances.

Some experts are of the view that children have not developed the maturity or vocabulary to discuss the meaning and impact of social differences, and yet are able to recognise such differences.

Singapore Children's Society chief executive Alfred Tan noted that guidelines against displays of material wealth in school are a first step in reducing comparison and pressure. But unlike Singapore's early days, when enforced uniformity in schools had more concrete impact beyond merely establishing a veneer of equality, it is now difficult to shield children from such comparisons in this age of social media.

He suggested that schools seize instances where such comparisons arise as an opportunity to teach children about social differences and inculcate values. "We don't want to stigmatise one group or patronise another (by introducing too many rules). At the end of the day, I believe (open discussion) will benefit everybody."

Such discussion, said Prof Tan, should not harp on socio-economic difference, "but point to inclusiveness and equality of opportunity".

Pasir-Ris Punggol GRC MP Zainal Sapari, who sits on the Government Parliamentary Committee for Education, concedes that it can be difficult to strike a balance between introducing such guidelines in schools and maintaining flexibility.

As a student from a low-income family, he had once looked upon his schoolmates' branded shoes with envy when the school allowed them to be worn for weekend events. When Mr Zainal later became a principal at Mayflower Primary School, a post he held from 2003 to 2009, he disallowed his pupils from holding costly birthday celebrations, and from bringing mobile phones to school, to discourage comparisons.

"But such rules will change over time. Each school has a different mix of students from various socio-economic backgrounds, so it depends on the comfort level of the school community," said Mr Zainal, who does not believe it would be productive for the Ministry of Education (MOE) to issue a top-down directive on such matters.

After all, such guidelines "may not be the best way to teach (students) that there is income disparity in society," he said. At the end of the day, what schools have to do is create a safe environment for students to learn, where they are free from unwanted pressures, he added.

Mr Tan of the Singapore Children's Society suggested that MOE strengthen its collaboration with parents, and guide them on how to teach their children to navigate and overcome socio-economic differences.

If children get their values right in terms of looking beyond face-value attributes such as social status or wealth at an early age, it will be more beneficial in the long term, he said.

If the subject of social disparity does surface, discussing it, even among children, need not be a daunting task. For example, the use of tools like children's books or role-playing can help ease children into sensitive discussions and reflection about such differences and how groups that are marginalised can be included.

With Values in Action now part and parcel of most primary school programmes, taking extra time out to encourage deeper reflection on issues like inclusion will equip pupils with skills for life as they progress further in their education journey, and become exposed to people from backgrounds that are even more diverse.















Birthday blues in primary schools
Some parents insist on gifts and sweet treats but schools prefer no-frills events
By Yuen Sin, The Straits Times, 18 Apr 2017

No goodie bags, no sweet treats and no gifts. Instead, a simple birthday song sung in class should suffice.

Some primary schools are laying down the law on birthday festivities in schools, saying they should be kept to "no frills" celebrations.

This, they say, will curb concerns about food allergies and the consumption of junk food. Just as important, it prevents pupils from making comparisons between the haves and the have-nots.

The Straits Times found that at least six schools have issued such guidelines in recent years. They are: Dazhong Primary School, Pei Chun Public School, Geylang Methodist School (Primary), Oasis Primary School, Springdale Primary School and Riverside Primary School.

The Ministry of Education has no policy on the matter and allows individual schools to decide.

But some parents are unhappy about it, arguing that they celebrated their children's birthdays in pre-school and that they should be allowed to continue the custom in primary school.

MANY REASONS FOR SAYING 'NO' TO PARTIES

Housewife Betha Bhanu Valli Kalyani, 36, who has a son in Primary 2 in Springdale Primary, used to mark birthdays with him in pre-school by distributing goodie bags containing toys and tidbits to his classmates, in addition to ordering balloons and a cake.

"A birthday rolls around only once a year, and he used to have celebrations in kindergarten, so I don't see why he is not allowed to do so now," she said.

Ms Geraldine Tan, 41, who has a son in Primary 2 at Holy Innocents' Primary School, said his school does not discourage such celebrations. Making comparisons "is part and parcel of life, and shielding children from that is a little excessive", said Ms Tan, who is self-employed.

But the schools say that they have their reasons for saying no.

In a circular sent to parents in January, Oasis Primary in Punggol told parents not to organise birthday celebrations within the school.

As these celebrations "invariably involve food", there are concerns that this may trigger food allergies, principal, Mrs Ong-Chew Lu See, wrote in the circular.

"There is also a concern that the pupils will start to compare between the haves and the have-nots. While we want our students to build quality relationships within the class, we do not want to encourage comparison among them," she added.

That same month, Springdale Primary in Sengkang also told parents to avoid giving birthday goodie bags or gifts to other pupils in school, after receiving feedback from parents.

Such guidelines have been in place at Riverside Primary in Woodlands since it opened in 2013. Instead of celebrating through cakes, gift packs or other items which are brought to school, pupils' birthdays will be marked through "simple and meaningful" practices like singing a birthday song in class, the school said.

Birthday celebrations do not come cheap.

Advertisements for pre-school birthday celebrations quote prices of around $400 for a party for 20 children, including decorations like bunting and personalised party favours. In addition to stationery sets and cupcakes that feature popular cartoon characters, some services even offer customised story books with characters named after each child that will receive the book.

Riverside Primary's principal Sharon Siew said parents have largely approved of the guideline on simple birthday celebrations, which promotes a healthy lifestyle by reducing the junk food that pupils consume, and cultivates a "culture of simplicity and appreciation", she said.

"Some parents show their love by wanting to celebrate their birthdays in a bigger way, but others love their children in simpler ways... Parents have said that this avoids comparison (of material wealth) among pupils," she told The Straits Times.

Civil servant Nur Azlina, 36, who has a daughter in Primary 2 and son in Primary 1 in Riverside Primary, likes the school's "no frills" stance.

She recounted how her son's classmate had given out customised pencil cases inscribed with the name of each child during a birthday party in kindergarten, and he had asked her if they could do something similar for his birthday.

"Children already start making comparisons at a young age and it makes things difficult for parents who come from different family backgrounds," said Madam Azlina.


Cabinet changes: Josephine Teo, Desmond Lee promoted to full ministers from 1 May 2017

$
0
0
Cabinet changes will 'consolidate front bench of tomorrow'
Four ministers of state also moving up to strengthen core team of tomorrow's leaders
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 28 Apr 2017

Mrs Josephine Teo and Mr Desmond Lee will be promoted to full ministers in the latest round of Cabinet changes, which observers say will consolidate the front bench of tomorrow.

Four ministers of state will also be promoted to senior ministers of state: Dr Lam Pin Min, Dr Janil Puthucheary, Dr Koh Poh Koon and Mr Chee Hong Tat. They will continue in their current ministries.

Dr Lam will also be appointed Senior Minister of State for Transport.

The changes are part of leadership renewal, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said yesterday.

They take effect on May 1.

Political watchers said the newly promoted ministers will add to and strengthen the core team of fourth- generation leaders. Said ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute research fellow Mustafa Izzuddin: "The Prime Minister and his generation of ministers are building a team that can provide the necessary support to the next PM so the next lap of Singapore's political leadership will continue to be a team effort."

Both Mrs Teo, 48, and Mr Lee, 40, will be ministers in the PMO.

Mrs Teo will also be Second Minister in the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and will give up her appointment in the Ministry of Transport.

She will continue to oversee population matters, assisting Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean.

Mrs Teo's promotion means that for the first time, Singapore will have two women as full ministers in the Cabinet. The milestone was not lost on Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu, currently the only woman Cabinet minister, who hailed it as "yet another step forward for women in Singapore".

Mr Lee will be Second Minister in his present ministries: the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of National Development. He will be one of the youngest full ministers in recent years.



Experts called this Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's way of enlarging and strengthening the pool of leadership, without throwing in the rookie ministers at the deep end.

"This is a cautious pace of leadership succession," said Institute of Policy Studies deputy director Gillian Koh. "You don't see the standing down of senior members of the Cabinet, and you have the youngest set double-hatting a lot."

Observers saw Mrs Teo's move as a sign that she may be groomed to be the next manpower minister, especially given her past experience working in the labour movement.

Mrs Teo herself said of her MOM appointment: "It feels like I'm coming home to Singapore's unique brand of tripartism at this critical juncture for our workers."

As for the new senior ministers of state, all have been in office for under three years: Dr Lam since August 2014, Mr Chee since October 2015, and Dr Janil and Dr Koh since January last year.

Observers say this steep trajectory signals that they could become ministers if they prove themselves.

Additionally, parliamentary secretaries Low Yen Ling and Faishal Ibrahim will be promoted to senior parliamentary secretaries in their current ministries: Trade and Industry, and Education for Ms Low, and Education and Social and Family Development for Dr Faishal.

Minister of State Sam Tan will take on the foreign affairs portfolio, in addition to his current ones in MOM and the PMO, while Parliamentary Secretary for Home Affairs Amrin Amin will take on an additional post in the Health Ministry.

Minister of State for Manpower Teo Ser Luck will step down from office on June 30 and return to the private sector, at his request. His term as mayor of North East District ends on May 26, but he will still be an MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC. Tampines GRC MP Desmond Choo will replace him as mayor.

The four other mayors - Dr Mohamad Maliki Osman, Dr Teo Ho Pin, Ms Denise Phua and Ms Low - will be reappointed on May 27.




















Four new senior ministers of state tipped for bigger roles
Speed at which they have moved up the ranks a sign they are being groomed for ministerial positions: Observers
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 28 Apr 2017

The rapid pace at which four ministers of state have been promoted to senior ministers of state is a sign that they are being groomed for ministerial appointments, political observers said.

The quartet are Dr Lam Pin Min, Dr Janil Puthucheary, Dr Koh Poh Koon and Mr Chee Hong Tat.

Their move up the ranks of political leadership from May 1 was announced by the Prime Minister's Office yesterday.

Dr Lam, who will be Senior Minister of State for Health, will take on the additional portfolio of Senior Minister of State for Transport.

The other three men, who juggle two portfolios each, will stay at their current ministries.

Dr Lam, 47, was the first of the four to enter politics in 2006 and was a backbencher until he was appointed Minister of State in 2014, while Dr Janil, 44, entered politics in 2011 and took office last year.

Dr Koh, 45, and Mr Chee, 43, were elected in 2015.



The rate at which all four have moved up the ranks is noteworthy, said observers. ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute fellow Norshahril Saat said: "They have been seen as high fliers. Their promotion reflects their performance in the last few years."

Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan cited Dr Janil, Dr Koh and Mr Chee - who in the space of 18 months or so rose from being minister of state to senior minister of state - and said: "They obviously have shown themselves to be equal to the task."

"Their trajectories are rather steep. Certainly, the assessment is that they are being groomed for bigger things," he added.

"The promotions, coming swiftly, reflect the pressing need to ramp up the renewal as the leadership handover draws closer.

"They will be taking on bigger challenges. For now, they are assessed to be able to be part of the core team in the 4G (fourth-generation) leadership."

The speed at which politicians are given ministry portfolios is generally seen as an indicator of their potential. Dr Koh and Mr Chee, who were elected to Parliament in 2015, went from being MPs to senior ministers of state in about 20 months.

Mr Chee, previously second permanent secretary at the Ministry of Trade and Industry, had resigned from the civil service less than a month before the September 2015 General Election.

Barely a month after he was elected that year, he was appointed Minister of State for Communications and Information, as well as Health in October.

The appointment of Dr Koh as Minister of State for Trade and Industry as well as National Development came about three months later, in January last year. The colorectal surgeon made a bid to enter politics in 2013, but was defeated in the Punggol East by-election.

As for Dr Janil, he was appointed Minister of State for Education as well as Communications and Information in January last year. The former paediatrician, however, entered politics in 2011 and spent a term as a backbencher. Associate Professor Tan noted that he "has made strides since he became an office holder".

Political observers added that the appointment of four new senior ministers of state sets the groundwork for significant changes to the Cabinet in the coming years.

They indicate that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his ministers are nurturing a larger pool of talent to consider for Cabinet positions and this points to the impending retirement of some senior ministers before the next general election, said Dr Norshahril. The election is due by April 2021.

These positions are valuable training ground, and are an important avenue allowing politicians to be groomed for ministerial positions and to prove themselves worthy of such roles, said observers.

As Institute of Policy Studies deputy director Gillian Koh pointed out, the new Cabinet appointments and other promotions show that "there's a lot of talent being nurtured right now".

National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser said of the four new senior ministers of state: "They are probably future ministers in waiting, while being exposed to different ministries and under assessment."









Desmond Lee youngest minister at age 40
By Danson Cheong, The Straits Times, 28 Apr 2017

At 40 years of age, Mr Desmond Lee will be the youngest full minister in the current Cabinet.

He will be Minister in the Prime Minister's Office from May 1, and continue in the Home Affairs and National Development ministries as Second Minister.

Mr Lee's political journey, which began in 2011 when he entered politics as a backbencher in Jurong GRC, has seen him rise rapidly.

In 2013, he was made Minister of State for National Development. He was promoted to Senior Minister of State in 2015, and took on the additional portfolio of Home Affairs.

Before Mr Lee, the youngest to be made full minister among the fourth-generation leadership was Mr Lawrence Wong, who was 41 when he was made Minister for Culture, Community and Youth.



When asked yesterday, Mr Lee - the son of former Cabinet minister Lee Yock Suan - said he was "humbled to be able to serve".

He would focus on three main areas in his new roles - transforming the built environment sector, partnering the community to conserve Singapore's national heritage, and tackling security threats such as terrorism, cybercrime and drugs.

A lawyer by training, Mr Lee helmed significant legislative changes recently. He fronted a Bill that grants the Government more regulatory powers over town councils last month, and argued for changes to the law to protect the reefs at Sisters' Islands Marine Park in February.

Dr Shawn Lum, president of Nature Society (Singapore), said Mr Lee has a unique ability to bring diverse groups of people together to have frank, open discussions. "He really takes the time to learn the issues from the stakeholder's point of view. He's a lawyer by training, not a biologist, but he made it a point to learn what the issues were, in order to understand us," he said, adding that Mr Lee would bring this unique skillset to a much wider group of people with this promotion.





Two women ministers in Cabinet for first time with Josephine Teo's promotion
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 28 Apr 2017

For the first time, Singapore will have two women ministers in the Cabinet.

Senior Minister of State Josephine Teo, who will be promoted to full minister on May 1, will join Culture, Community and Youth Minister Grace Fu as the second woman in the now 22-strong Cabinet.

Mrs Teo, 48, will be Minister in the Prime Minister's Office (PMO). She will also take on a new portfolio as Second Minister for Manpower, a field not unfamiliar to the former assistant secretary- general of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC).

It was the last job that Mrs Teo, who entered politics in 2006, held before she was appointed Minister of State in 2011.

Her new portfolio will have her working again with her former boss, Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say.

Mr Lim was the NTUC secretary-general during her years in the labour movement. She had also worked under him during her 10 years at the Economic Development Board, which Mr Lim headed in the 1990s.



Mrs Teo said in a Facebook post yesterday: "He has always been a generous mentor and we enjoy good chemistry. We've discussed some areas of focus and I will share more in due course."

A PMO statement said Mrs Teo will continue in the Foreign Affairs Ministry, as Second Minister, and help Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean in overseeing population matters.

MPs and women groups said her promotion brings women one step closer to having equal representation in leadership positions, including in politics.

Said Ms Fu on Facebook: "It was a matter of time before more female colleagues will join me."

She added: "This signifies yet another step forward for women in Singapore. I hope to see more women fulfilling their aspirations and taking on leadership roles, regardless of their line of work."

Said Ms Jolene Tan of the Association of Women for Action and Research: "It is important to not just remove formal barriers to equal representation, but also promote it actively."

Some believe Mrs Teo's appointment as Second Minister for Manpower could pave the way for her to helm the ministry one day.

It would be "a nice fit, given her background", said Dr Gillian Koh of the Institute of Policy Studies.

"The other route is for her to take over as secretary-general of NTUC and for (labour chief) Chan Chun Sing to get back to mainstream government work."










Teo Ser Luck to explore start-up sector after leaving public office
By Joanna Seow, The Straits Times, 28 Apr 2017

Minister of State for Manpower Teo Ser Luck plans to go into the start-up field as he returns to the private sector after stepping down from public office on June 30.

He also steps down as mayor of North East District after his term ends on May 26, and wants to spend time with his family and continue his journey in the private sector, he said in a Facebook post yesterday.

"I plan to build, create, invest or help start-ups and businesses. Some are tech-related, while others will be in products or services which I'm passionate about. Business aside, I'm glad to continue to serve you as an MP," said Mr Teo, who has represented Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC since 2006. He was general manager of DHL Express Singapore before he entered politics and was made parliamentary secretary for the then Community Development, Youth and Sports Ministry that year.



In his post, he thanked residents, friends and colleagues for their good wishes and support, saying the decision to leave office was one he had "made and thought through for a while".

He said: "Truly appreciate that PM agreed to my request."

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong thanked him for his "valuable services to the Government", highlighting his active role in promoting small and medium-sized enterprises at the Manpower and Trade and Industry ministries. Mr Teo was minister of state for trade and industry from 2011 to 2015, and in 2015 took on his Manpower Ministry portfolio.

Mr Teo also promoted youth participation, corporate social responsibility and sports, launched the Singapore National Games and made a major contribution to the inaugural Youth Olympic Games in 2010.

He initiated the cycling plan, and installed lifts for overhead bridges and wheelchair access for buses at the Transport Ministry. "As mayor, he worked with the other mayors on many innovative and meaningful flagship programmes," the Prime Minister's Office added.

Tampines GRC MP Desmond Choo, who will take over as North East District mayor, said he hoped "to continue to build on the firm foundation that (Mr Teo) has built up over the years".















K. Shanmugam rebukes academic Donald Low over remarks misrepresenting his comments on criminal sentencing

$
0
0
The Straits Times, 28 Apr 2017

Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam yesterday rebuked academic Donald Low for misrepresenting his comments about considering public opinion when deciding on criminal sentences.

Mr Low, an associate professor at the National University of Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, had written a Facebook post on Monday in response to an interview Mr Shanmugam gave to Mediacorp freesheet TODAY.

In the TODAY article, Mr Shanmugam had said criminal penalties should reflect public opinion, but that this does not equate to bowing to public pressure.

Mr Low then wrote: "No la, how can this be right?... We want our elected representatives to make laws impersonally and dispassionately, after proper deliberation and debate... Making laws on the basis of public opinion is populism by another name.

"If criminal punishments are to reflect only public opinion, why bother having judges do sentencing? Just run an opinion poll each time someone has been convicted."

In a Facebook post yesterday, Mr Shanmugam said some have assumed that he was suggesting sentences in individual cases should be dictated by public opinion.

He then took aim at Mr Low's comments, which "have seriously misconstrued what I actually said".

First, the minister said his remarks "had nothing to do with how individual cases should be decided and what sentences should be meted out by judges".

Sentencing has always been the exclusive province of the courts and judges - who decide based on the prescribed laws, the facts and precedents, he said.

Rather, Mr Shanmugam said his remarks covered factors that the Government should take into account when deciding what conduct should be criminalised, and the appropriate range of penalties that should be meted out for different categories of offences.

Second, the minister said he had earlier made clear that public opinion, while relevant, cannot be the sole or decisive factor in proposing legislation.



Mr Shanmugam added that "it is surprising that some like Donald misunderstood what I meant", as the TODAY article had clearly set out the considerations that he said the Government should consider in deciding on legislation.

"Government should consider what is right, what is fair, and it should also take into account the weight of public opinion," he said.

For instance, if an overwhelming majority of the public does not consider some conduct to be criminal, that sentiment is relevant when deciding whether to criminalise such actions, Mr Shanmugam added.

It would be wrong for the Government to simply follow public opinion in all situations, as it can sometimes be inaccurate due to a lack of understanding of the facts, he said.

However, public opinion is still relevant, the minister added.

"If some law completely lacks public support, and the Government is not able to persuade the public on that law, then that particular law, over time, could become difficult to enforce," he noted.

Mr Shanmugam said such considerations have long been the basis on which laws are passed in many countries, including Singapore, and "are not some new-fangled theory".

He added that academics such as Mr Low have every right to make criticisms, especially on issues of public importance.

"But to be meaningful, and sensible, it will be first useful to read and understand what has been said, before jumping in to criticise," Mr Shanmugam said.

"Otherwise the commentator does no credit to himself or his institution. Particularly an institution which carries Mr Lee Kuan Yew's name," the minister added.















* Donald Low sorry for remarks on Shanmugam interview
The Straits Times, 29 Apr 2017

Academic Donald Low has apologised to Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam for his comments on an interview that the minister gave Mediacorp freesheet TODAY.

Mr Shanmugam had written a lengthy Facebook post on Thursday night rebuking Mr Low for misrepresenting his remarks about considering public opinion when deciding on criminal sentences.

In his own Facebook post yesterday, Mr Low shared the apology he sent to Mr Shanmugam via e-mail.

"I agree with your Facebook post and I apologise if I have caused you any trouble or offence," said the associate professor at the National University of Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.

In the TODAY article "Penalties for crime must reflect public opinion: Shanmugam", the minister had said criminal penalties should reflect public opinion, but added that public opinion cannot be the sole or decisive factor in proposing laws.

Mr Low then commented that "making laws on the basis of public opinion is populism by another name".

In his e-mail message, Mr Low clarified that his post was mainly a reaction to the headline of the article, which he felt did not represent Mr Shanmugam's position accurately.

"I had read the piece in full, but didn't give your comments sufficient attention in my post. I apologise for that," Mr Low wrote.

He added that he meant to point out that public opinion, even taken as a factor in criminal punishment, is "highly contingent, often irrational and subject to sudden changes".

Mr Low said his post was not directed at Mr Shanmugam or the minister's comments in the article. Rather, it was his take on what was wrong with a criminal justice system based on public opinion.

"But I accept that my post, in the context of the TODAY article carrying your comments, might be viewed as a criticism of you or your comments. That wasn't my intention at all," Mr Low added.
















Penalties for crime must reflect public opinion: Shanmugam

The law will lose credibility otherwise, but it does not mean govt is bowing to public pressure
By Kelly Ng, TODAY,  24 Apr 2017

How society feels about the punishment meted out in criminal cases has to be something the Government must pay heed to, but this does not equate to bowing to public pressure, said Law Minister K Shanmugam.

This is because, if penalties do not reflect the weight of public opinion and people do not find them fair, the law would lose its credibility and would not be enforceable, he added.

“You enhance the penalty (for a certain law) to reflect what people feel is the right penalty, what conduct should be more severely punished — that is not bowing down; that is understanding where the weight of public opinion is,” said Mr Shanmugam in an exclusive interview with TODAY last week.

He added: “(Paying attention to public expression) is important because these people represent the ground feelings ... Penalties and criminal laws can only be enforced if people believe that they are fair and that certain conduct ought to be made criminal ... Otherwise they lose credibility.”

Reviews of laws for a string of offences have been announced by Mr Shanmugam, who is also Minister for Home Affairs, in recent days, including some in high-profile cases that attracted close public attention, and even outcry.

For instance, he directed his ministries to relook the sentences for sex offenders such as Joshua Robinson, a mixed martial arts instructor who had sex with two 15-year-olds and showed an obscene film to a six-year-old.

The American was sentenced to four years’ jail, which was deemed too light by some — an online petition calling for a harsher sentence has since garnered almost 30,000 signatories.



In a Parliament sitting earlier this month, Mr Shanmugam said reviews of the laws relating to the abuse of foreign domestic workers was also being conducted.

While he did not cite any specific cases, news of the review came in the wake of a Singaporean couple who starved their maid, causing her weight to plunge from 49kg to 29.5kg in 15 months. The man was sentenced to three weeks’ jail and a S$10,000 fine while his wife was sentenced to three months’ jail.

Public outcry over penalties in individual cases do not necessarily lead to a review of the laws, Mr Shanmugam stressed, noting that reviews have been announced by ministries for laws in cases that did not attract any public attention.

Drugs, drink-driving, and false and malicious allegations against public officers are some offences that have been flagged recently for review.

He said: “Even without public expression, when I see a sentence (and if) I see these needs to be looked at ... (where) I feel need a review, I announce them. And that is our job.”

But, he noted: “When there is a reaction to a sentence by the public, as in the Joshua Robinson case, then I think it is important for us as policymakers to sit down and understand why people are upset ... It is important because these people represent the ground feelings — they are mothers, they are sisters, they are people who want their children to be safe.”

He added: “But it doesn’t mean automatically you agree with it. You must assess it, whether it is also fair. So, there are two parts to it — one, whether it is fair; two, what does the public believe is right.”

In a similar way to how he had urged the public against personal attacks on the High Court judges who recently reduced the sentences of six City Harvest Church leaders for misappropriating church funds, Mr Shanmugam said the announcement of reviews for laws should not be taken as an indictment of the work of the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC).

The Public Prosecutor can only apply the law of the day and it is up to the Government to decide what the laws and penalties ought to be, he noted.

“It is the task of the Government to decide what is the appropriate legislative provision. And that is the mixture of ... what is fair, what is right and also where is the weight of public opinion.”

A deputy public prosecutor, who declined to be named, had reservations about reviews being announced soon after a case concludes in court.

“When the Government says these things, it ties our hands,” he said.

A former prosecutor, who wanted to remain anonymous, said that while public perception is a “relevant” concern, it “must not be the overriding consideration”.

“Otherwise we may run the risk of undermining the rule of law with mob justice ... In my view, it would help if the AGC engages the public more actively and explains its decisions,” said the lawyer, who is now practising in a private firm.

“This way, concerns of bowing to political pressure of public opinion would be allayed to some degree.”

Lawyers TODAY interviewed agreed there was nothing wrong with public uproar leading to legislative reviews.

Mr Sunil Sudheesan, president of the Association of Criminal Lawyers of Singapore, said: “The Government ultimately is a servant of the people. And if people are legitimately outraged (over a particular court sentence), then it should be of concern to the Government.”

He added that the Ministry of Law reviews a whole host of laws, noting “it just happens there has been a number of high profile cases lately”.

Legislative reviews are also a “product” of a more vocal and involved citizenry, said Mr Sudheesan. “I hope and trust that the engagement between the authorities and the public carries on for a long time ... The public should continue to speak up.”


Herd immunity and how health choices affect those around you

$
0
0
Those who refuse to have their children vaccinated bring harm to their community
By Chong Siow Ann, Published The Straits Times, 29 Apr 2017

In the midst of World War II, the film industry in Hollywood started a nightclub called the Hollywood Canteen, which offered free food and entertainment to American servicemen and women. It was staffed entirely by volunteers from the entertainment industry, including the big stars of that time - one of whom was film and stage actress Gene Tierney.

Tierney, who was then pregnant, came down with rubella following her only appearance at the Hollywood Canteen and she subsequently gave birth to a baby girl who was brain damaged, severely underweight, and both deaf and blind. Years later, Tierney met a woman who was a big fan of hers, who professed that she had gone to the club that night to meet her despite being in quarantine with rubella. "Everyone told me I shouldn't go," she said, "but I just had to go. You were my favourite."



In children and adults, rubella (or German measles) is usually a relatively mild and self-limited infection - but its effects on a foetus are devastating, especially if the infection occurs early in pregnancy. If it does not result in miscarriage, it can result - as in Tierney's daughter - in congenital rubella syndrome where the baby is born with a slew of problems, including eye defects, deafness, heart deformities, microcephaly and intellectual disability.

Congenital rubella syndrome is now rare owing to the perinatal screening of women for their immunity against rubella and the successful immunisation programme in Singapore.

The rubella inoculation is given together with those for measles and mumps in the form of the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine, and because measles vaccination is mandated under the Infectious Diseases Act, the vaccination rate for these three diseases has been kept high.

The widespread adoption of vaccinations has been one of the greatest public health measures and has saved countless millions of lives round the world. Its success - which has both protected most people in developed countries from these terrible infectious diseases and made them innocent of their ravages - has shifted the fears instead to the risks of the vaccinations. While there are risks and side effects to these vaccinations, these are minimal and minor; the vaccinations today are never as dangerous or as risky as contracting the infections that these vaccinations seek to prevent.

FEAR FACTOR

Admittedly, there is something scary and menacing about the act of inoculation, with the loaded syringe making its inexorable way towards our bodies. And when the "needle breaks the skin", writes Eula Biss in her long essay On Immunity, it is "a sight so profound that it causes some people to faint, and a foreign substance is injected directly into the flesh", and "the metaphors we find in this gesture are overwhelmingly fearful, and almost always suggest violation, corruption and pollution". The terror is of this "foreign substance" causing havoc inside us - either by overwhelming our immune defences or poisoning us with some toxins, and causing all sorts of imagined conditions.

Much of these fears about vaccination started in 1998 when British doctor Andrew Wakefield published a paper in prestigious medical journal The Lancet that claimed a causal link between the symptoms of autism and the MMR vaccine. At a press conference, he said there had been an increase in the incidence of autism following the introduction of the MMR vaccine.

The media storm that followed fanned waves of panic among parents and led to a precipitous drop in vaccination rates in Britain and the United States. Consequently, there were outbreaks of measles and mumps that left tens of thousands of children stricken across the US, Canada and Europe, and resulted in deaths.

Mr Wakefield's study was subsequently found to be flawed and fraudulent. His medical licence was revoked and the article was retracted by The Lancet - but the damage was done. Despite many other studies that found no link between the MMR vaccine and autism, the animus towards the vaccine persists to this day, particularly in the US where there is an active and vociferous anti-vaccine movement with its entrenched culture of paranoia that sees a conspiracy between the medical establishment, the pharmaceutical companies that make these vaccines, and the government.

President Donald Trump had waded into the fray during his election campaign, expressing and tweeting - either out of political expediency or real conviction - his belief about vaccinations' ties to autism. To have the president of the world's most powerful country - most powerful in science as well - espousing such "alternative facts" is to legitimatise these fringe conspiracy theories.

Most people tend to put a great deal more weight on their own experiences or on anecdotes drawn from the lives of others, and/or bits and pieces gleaned from the Internet. The danger here is the likelihood of confusing association of two events with causality.

"My science is named Evan and he's at home. That's my science," declared American actress and strident anti-vaccine activist Jenny McCarthy, whose son Evan has autism that she has linked to his vaccination. She has also proudly declared that she acquired her knowledge about vaccination from the "University of Google".

Debunking and rebutting with scientific facts do not work as research has shown; it actually hardens the conviction of believers and spreads familiarity with these falsehoods and misconceptions. And such beliefs can have bad consequences.

COMMUNITY HEALTH

Vaccination protects not just the individual but also the community. Epidemics happen when a pathogen spreads from a person to many others in a multiplying manner; but when enough people in that community are vaccinated against that disease, those unvaccinated people are generally protected as the pathogen will have problems moving from one host to another, and will cease to spread.

This is the scientific concept of herd immunity that speaks of our interdependency when we live in a community and where our physical health (and lives) depend on the choices that others make. And to attain herd immunity in a population, public health experts say there must be at least a 95 per cent vaccination rate.

Although there is no overt anti-vaccination movement here, there are parents who do not get their children vaccinated: The number of measles cases in Singapore nearly tripled last year compared with the previous year, and 14 out of the 50 cases occurred in children who had missed their MMR vaccination.

Parents who do not want their children vaccinated are probably wanting to play it safe, but ironically they are putting their children at risk of being infected with measles - a disease that is so contagious that 90 per cent of those who have been exposed and are not immune will be infected, and this can lead to encephalitis and death. But it is not just measles alone that should be of concern; there is also mumps, which can cause deafness and even death, albeit rarely; and there is rubella.

While most pregnant women today ought to be immune against rubella, there are some who would not be able to mount that response or where the resistance would go down with time - rendering them and their babies inside them vulnerable.

The only thing to do is to hope they do not get infected - by staying away from anyone who might have rubella - but with half of people with rubella having no symptoms and hence not even knowing that they are infectious, that can be difficult.

From a particular perspective, it is not right that parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated should make such potentially harmful decisions for their children, who do not have the agency to decide for themselves; and it is also not right that they are putting other children, other vulnerable adults and unborn babies in harm's way.

There is a literary coda to Tierney's tragic twist of fate: Agatha Christie was to later use this in her detective novel, The Mirror Crack'd From Side To Side, where she had a pregnant American film actress being unwittingly infected with rubella by a woman seeking her autograph, and which led to the birth of a disabled child. When the actress found this out years later, she murdered the woman with a daiquiri spiked with poison.

Tierney did not kill her fan but she was severely depressed for many years.

The writer is vice-chairman of the medical board (research) at the Institute of Mental Health.



Migrant worker goes from painting condos to boss of own company

$
0
0
He went from penniless migrant worker painting condos, to living in one as boss of his own company
By Wong Kim Hoh, Senior Writer, The Sunday Times, 30 Apr 2017

Mani Malaichamy proudly surveys his Kaki Bukit office, filled with barrels of paint in different colours, before opening the door to show me his new 2.4 litre, white Toyota Harrier.

"I really believe God gave me everything," he says, eyes darting to a poster of Ganesha, the Hindu elephant god, pinned to a wall.



The 47-year-old, who shelled out $420,000 to buy the office two years ago, is referring to the glorious way his life has panned out: An Indian migrant worker who arrived penniless in Singapore 20 years ago but defied great odds to found a painting company which pulled in $2.6 million in revenue last year.

"But I have a second 'god', Mr Ang Ah Teng," says the managing director of MMM Contract Services.

Mr Ang is his former employer, a man who, he says, taught him everything he knows and encouraged him to spread his wings.

The youthful looking Mr Mani speaks fractured English in an almost Singaporean accent.

The youngest of seven children, he is originally from a small village near the town of Tirrupatur in Tamil Nadu.

His parents were poor rice farmers who often had to borrow money when droughts destroyed their crop. To supplement their income, the family also reared goats.

Growing up, he remembers going to the fields with his school books to be a human scarecrow to frighten birds. "I finished school at 17. After that, no more studies. One thing, no money. Another thing, have to help the family," says Mr Mani who completed his secondary education at a village schol.

Jobs were not easy to come by.

For some time, he worked as an assistant in a provision shop in Chennai. He also had a stint teaching illiterate seniors to read and write under a programme by India's Ministry of Education.

When there was no work, he helped out on the farm.

"In a kampung, no need much money because no need to spend. We planted our own rice and vegetables; we didn't need to buy a lot of things," he says.

But he dreamt of getting a job which would pay well enough for him to build a house and help his parents pay off their loans.

"My two elder brothers did not help the family after they got married. I wanted to make money to help my parents and so that my sister could get married," says Mr Mani, who has four sisters.

He wanted badly to come to Singapore.

"There were many agents in my village recruiting workers to work here," he says.

The only snag was the hefty commissions they charged.

When he was 28, his brother-in-law - then a migrant worker in Singapore - cobbled together $4,000 and arranged for an agent to find Mr Mani a job here.

The gregarious man remembers the day he landed in Changi Airport. "I saw everything very nice and very beautiful. The Chinese people at the airport said my name very different. The smell here also very different," he recalls with a laugh.

His employer was a property development company in Marine Parade. Instead of a construction site, he was dispatched to the office of one of the company's new condominium developments in Bukit Timah.

"That's because I could speak a little bit English. The other workers could not," he explains.

His job included painting and fixing minor defects in the condo units. The company allowed him to sleep at the site office.

"I was very happy because I was alone. No one to disturb me. At night, I could read," says Mr Mani who devoured Rapidex, a popular series of English coursebooks for Tamil speakers.

He was paid $18 a day, and could earn a few more doing overtime.

"I worked every day, from Monday to Sunday, from 8am to 7pm, and until 10pm if there was overtime. My pay was about $600 a month, I don't go out except on Sunday evenings when I finished work. I went to Serangoon to talk to friends and relatives from my village," says Mr Mani, who saved money by cooking his own meals on an electric cooker in the carpark outside his site office.

Because he was so prudent with his spending, he paid back the $4,000 to his brother-in-law in a little over a year. He also set aside some to take English classes at a school for foreign students in Orchard Road.

Occasionally, he also handed money to an agent to take home to his parents in India.

On the advice of his boss, he got himself certified by the Construction Industry Development Board not long after.

After four years here, he returned home to India to get married. By then, his daily pay had gone up to nearly $30.

"I was already 32, so must get married mah," he says, using the Singlish word often used to express something which is obvious.

The marriage was arranged by his parents. His wife, Madam Mamathy, 40, has a Master's in Commerce from Alagappa University.

"But she never worked. Many women are very educated but never work, very common in India. I only saw her once before we got married, when she was 12 years old," he says.

That he was not as highly educated was not an issue.

"It's nothing. She and her parents know I have talent, and that I would make money and take care of her. They know what I can do, they know I can learn things very fast," he says proudly, without a hint of conceit.

It took him eight months and another agent to find a higher paying job in Singapore. By then, his wife was pregnant with their first son.

"I had to come back. I had only enough money to get married but not to buy a house. I also had to pay for my sister's marriage," he says.

His new employer was ATC Painting Specialist, owned by Mr Ang.

Mr Mani's resourcefulness and eagerness to learn earned him many opportunities.

"I did many things. I was driving a lorry, fetching workers, collecting cheques, making payments, supervising, taking care of projects," he says animatedly, adding that he also took a three-month course to get certified as a safety officer.

"My boss made me a supervisor. Every year, increase in pay, and bonus," adds Mr Mani, who sent the bulk of his pay to his wife in Chennai.

Unlike his colleagues who lived in hostels, he preferred to sleep in his company's paint shop.

"I liked (being) alone. I don't like to join them... quarrel, quarrel. Anyway I parked my company lorry there, so it's easy for me," he says.

Mr Ang, 53, says that his employee fell sick often when he first joined the company.

"I think he was not used to the weather. But he's hardworking. If he wasn't, I wouldn't have hired him. I taught him a lot, and he was not a bad learner," he says.

By 2005, Mr Mani was earning nearly $3,000, enough for him to get an S Pass, granted to middle-level foreign workers. Mr Ang also advised him to apply for dependent's passes for his family.

"Actually, I wanted to start a business in Chennai. I already bought a small piece of land. I wanted to build a two-storey house, use the bottom for a shop and live upstairs. But my boss encouraged me to try and apply for my family to come to Singapore."

He did, successfully. In 2006, they became permanent residents.

His journey, he says, did not happen without sacrifices.

"I worked so hard. I didn't see my elder son till eight months after he was born. I could only afford to go back once every five years.

"When my father died in 2004, I did not even go back. I just went to a corner and cried. I was doing an urgent project. And I was scared that if I went back, I would lose my job. That was what happened to my father, who worked in Sri Lanka. When my grandfather died, he went back to India but after that, he lost his job in Sri Lanka."

When his wife and elder son Arul Prakash, now 15, arrived in 2005, they lived in a one-room rental flat in Bukit Merah.

A few years later, he bought a three-room HDB flat in Bedok on the resale market. His younger son Areesh Prasanth was born in Singapore in 2010.

Getting his PR gave him the confidence to act on his entrepreneurial dreams. "I know I could come out and do business. I know my customers, I know how to apply for workers. But I thought of my boss, he taught me everything. Without him, my family would not be here with me."

Mr Ang, however, encouraged him to strike out on his own.

Mr Mani says: "He said, 'You go out and fight. If you are not successful, you can come back.' Where to find boss like that? Even I cannot be like that. I was so happy I cried," he says.

With his boss' blessings, he started MMM (his initials as well as those of his father and wife) in 2007 while still working at ATC. He accepted small jobs painting houses and bungalows at night and on weekends.

Three years later, he quit ATC, put $10,000 of his savings and plunged into his business full-time. He hired two workers, and got himself a second-hand motorcyle to run around on.

An interior designer got him his first major contract, worth $150,000, to paint a factory in Woodlands.

"I'm very lucky. All my Singaporean customers have been very good to me. They like me and give me a lot of jobs," says Mr Mani who now has 26 staff, including a couple of Singaporeans. He has another electrical services company.

Even Mr Ang passed him contracts, including one to paint Greendale Secondary School in Punggol. Since then, Mr Mani has landed contracts to paint several other schools including Marymount Convent and CHIJ Katong Convent.

Asked why he went out of his way to help his former employee, Mr Ang says: "It's very simple. I'm growing old. There's also a lot of work to go around. If he can chiong, let him do it," he says, using the Hokkien word which means to take risks. "You cannot keep everything for yourself. Anyway, if he's successful, I'm happy for him."

Mr Mani has taken a leaf from his boss' books on how to treat staff. He organises company trips to Malaysia and invites them over to his home for meals often.

"When you treat them well and become their friend, they will be so happy to work for you," he says.

He and his family have adapted happily to life in Singapore.

"When I first came to Singapore, the smell of durian made me want to vomit. But now I love it so much. I also love eating mee goreng for breakfast every day," says Mr Mani, who worships at Senpaga Vinayagar Temple in Ceylon Road and is active in the Parents' Support Group at Temasek Secondary School where Arul is a student.

He has, he says, worked extremely hard for what he has but sometimes finds it hard to believe he has come so far. Last April, he and his family moved into a $1.2 million condo in Pasir Ris.

He says: "I used to paint condos but I never dreamt I would one day live in one."









Age of golden workers: Many seniors working into 80s and 90s to stay active

$
0
0
Many seniors are working into their 80s and 90s in a bid to stay mentally and physically active
By Benson Ang, Lifestyle Correspondent, The Sunday Times, 30 Apr 2017

Mr Henry Lim, 81, hangs out by the swimming pool and tennis courts four to five days a week, but instead of lounging around, he is working.

A facilities assistant at Mandarin Gardens condominium in Siglap, he registers residents who want to use facilities such as the gym, swimming pool and tennis and squash courts.

“I like my job because it lets me meet people. I treat my colleagues and the residents like my friends and I like to make friends,” he says.

In the past, he was a transportation and taxi coordinator as well as an operations assistant at a local sports club. The grandfather of three and father of two daughters started his current job in November. Mr Lim, whose wife, 78, is retired, says: “I work to keep myself busy. I don’t need the money.”

Like him, many seniors are working beyond retirement age – some into their 80s and 90s. While some need the money to survive, others work to stay mentally and physically active.

Currently, the retirement age is 62, but employers must offer re-employment to eligible staff who turn 62, up to the age of 65.

From July, the re-employment age will be raised to 67 to provide more opportunities for workers who want to continue working as long as they are healthy.

The workforce in many countries is getting older and Singapore is no exception. According to Ministry of Manpower figures, the number of employed residents aged 70 and older has risen from about 16,000 in 2006 to about 43,000 last year.

The Sunday Times found six people aged 80 and older who are still working. Among them are Madam Goh Gwek Eng, 93, a McDonald’s employee; Mr Seng Lee Fong, 90, a part-time bartender at Tanglin Club in Stevens Road; and Madam Chan Woh Hoong, 88, a kitchen assistant with restaurant chain Han’s Cafe, who joined as a cleaner about 30 years ago.

The seniors who agreed to be interviewed said they did not need the money and chose to work because they wanted to stay active.

Non-governmental organisations, however, highlight that some elderly workers might, in fact, need the income to get by.

Ms Julia Lee, director of the department of social work at Touch Community Services, says: “From our observation, there are many seniors who are still working because they may need the money to supplement their little savings and to keep up with the rising costs of living.” She adds that many of them work as coffee shop assistants, hawker centre cleaners and security guards.

Member of Parliament Seah Kian Peng, who chairs the Government Parliamentary Committee for Social and Family Development, tells The Sunday Times: “There will be elderly who work because they actually need to, but prefer to say they are doing it not for money, but to keep themselves occupied.

“Some give their answers because of pride. Some are indeed not being supported by their children, but prefer... not to approach them for help.

“Some do not want to turn to social service offices or family service centres for help. And certainly, some just shy away and do not want to be interviewed.”

This group, however, is probably not very large , he adds. “Most people who need help are being assisted by various agencies, such as the Government, charities and religious organisations.”

Figures from the Ministry of Social and Family Development suggest that the number of needy elderly in Singapore is rising.

From financial year 2012 to 2015, the number of elderly households – with main applicants aged 70 and older – receiving short- to medium term assistance from ComCare rose from 1,627 to 2,464.

ComCare’s short-to-medium term assistance provides financial help for a temporary period to individuals who are unable to find work for some time.

Over the same period, the number of elderly households receiving long-term assistance from Com- Care also rose, from 2,310 to 2,585.

Such assistance – also known as public assistance – helps people who are permanently unable to work and support themselves, as well as have limited family support.



Casual worker Lim Swee Ee, 90, is fortunate and does not fall into this group. In fact, she refuses to accept a salary. The Singaporean, who has been serving customers at the Khian Guan Goods trading store at Albert Centre in Bugis for the last 20 years, says: “I’m old, what can I do with money? I will accept only food as my ‘salary’.”

She adds: “I am very happy interacting with customers – finding out what they want and helping them.

“I know I can retire, but I don’t want to. If I stop working, I think my brain and body will shut down.”

Doctors say that from a medical, standpoint, there is no research to suggest an age at which it is advisable to retire. Whether one should continue working depends on one’s physical and cognitive functionality, and the type and intensity of one’s work, they say.

Dr Pang Wee Yang, a consultant who specialises in geriatric medicine at Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, says: “There is no reason to believe a person suddenly loses his ability to function effectively on the stroke of midnight on his or her 67th birthday.”

Associate Professor Reshma A. Merchant, head of National University Hospital’s division of geriatric medicine, notes that of people aged 65 to 69, only 3 per cent are considered “frail” and 63 per cent are considered “robust and healthy”. This is based on her research on the prevalence of frailty in the western region of Singapore. Of those aged 75 and older, only 9 per cent are considered “frail”.

“A few of my patients continue to, mwork in hawker centres and have remained relatively healthy in their 80s.”

One of them, in his 90s, even learnt a new language, she adds.

Ms Helen Lim, founder and chief executive of Silver Spring, a job matching site for mature workers, says there are benefits to working beyond 80. “Working helps them keep dementia and loneliness at bay. More m importantly, it gives them a sense of purpose and independence.”

While doctors generally agree that employment contributes to better physical, cognitive and psychological well-being, some qualify that such positive effects are not exclusive to working.

Dr Pang says: “Such effects can just as effectively be reaped from non-work activities. It really boils down to what, or where, one finds meaning in life.”










Working since he left school at Primary 2

Since September 2015, Singaporean Koh Kow Yin, 83, has been working at Third Place cafeteria in Tuas. He is a full-time catering assistant there.

"All my friends are dead or retired. Many ask me why I am still working. I tell them it just makes me happy.

"I am not short of money. But if I do not have a job, I will have nothing to do and would feel so restless.

"I currently work five hours a day, from Monday to Friday. I cut and prepare fruit - such as watermelon, papaya and starfruit - for customers.

"This cafeteria is operated by Select Group, a company that provides food services, and I also prepare fruit platters for other staff cafeterias under the group.



"I am a grandfather of three and have two sons, aged 60 and 59, and a daughter, 57, with my first wife who died six years ago.

"My second wife, Madam Ong Ah Sim, 65, is a dishwasher in the same cafeteria as me.

"We live in a one-room Housing Board flat in Boon Lay.

"Since leaving school at Primary 2, I have always been employed.

"In the 1950s and 1960s, I worked at an army camp canteen. In the 1970s and 1980s, I was a mechanic, fixing and maintaining machinery used for carpentry and aeroplane parts.

"When I turned 67 in 2001, my then-employer let me go because its insurance no longer covered me.

"I then became an office cleaner for 14 years, after which I was again let go because of my age.

"That was when I came to Third Place for a walk-in interview and was hired.

"I am back to preparing food for customers. And I like it.

"I guess whether to work or not really depends on whether it makes you happy.

"I think most people my age would not want to work. But for me, being employed helps me stay active and keeps me occupied.

"My eyesight is poorer than before and my movements are slower, but I have no health problems. So as long as my body lets me, I want to keep working."


May Day Rally 2017: Jobs, jobs, jobs

$
0
0

PM Lee: Jobs must be a key focus for Singapore to thrive
Next generation of ministers to work as a team and lead drive to transform economy
By Joanna Seow, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Jobs must be a key focus for Singapore to stay relevant and thrive in a more challenging global economy, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said at the May Day Rally.

He outlined three key strategies yesterday: Creating new jobs, finding alternative jobs for displaced workers, and training workers to grow in their jobs to prepare for the future.

Leading the charge to implement plans to ensure key industries can transform and create jobs is the next generation of ministers.

Mr Lee announced that Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat will be chairman of a Future Economy Council. On it are ministers S. Iswaran, Chan Chun Sing, Ong Ye Kung and Lawrence Wong, and a number of younger ministers.

Their task is to implement the recommendations of the Committee on the Future Economy, which in February released its report on how Singapore can prepare for the long term, including through Industry Transformation Maps.

Mr Lee said the council's work will take time, beyond the current Government's term. It is also a chance for younger ministers to work as a team, as their generation will be leading Singapore forward.

He noted that while the mood for Labour Day celebrations was better than last year's, risks remained, like that of a global trade war.

Singapore's unemployment rate may rise further as the country faces pressures similar to those in other developed countries - industries restructuring, the workforce ageing, and older workers who lose jobs taking longer to find new ones.

"We have got to understand this trend but, at the same time, we have to work hard to resist it, to keep our workers in jobs," he said.



The first strategy of creating new jobs entails bringing in new businesses and investments and upgrading existing companies. This has been Singapore's winning formula for 50 years, for without a business-friendly climate, there will be no new jobs, Mr Lee noted.

He cited recent projects like Google's new campus and its work to help train small and medium- sized enterprises to go digital.

Second, workers who lose their jobs, especially professionals, managers, executives and technicians, must be helped to find alternative ones. Various schemes have been expanded to match workers to jobs and help them switch, but workers should be open-minded and flexible, he said. Employers have to be open to hiring mature workers too.

Third, workers must get support to upgrade their skills and knowledge, as fellow workers elsewhere are catching up fast.

Mr Lee cited how union leaders on a visit to Chengdu, China, were struck by how driven workers there were. He said: "Unless we are as hungry as them and as determined as them to upgrade ourselves, and willing to put in as great an effort, our cheese will be stolen."

"We have to make that effort, we have to strive and we have to keep our position," he added.

Mr Chan, the labour chief, said the labour movement was reaching out to help a wider pool of workers beyond union members.

The strong three-way partnership between unions, employers and the Government is a key strength for Singapore, said Mr Lee, enabling it to transform its economy time and again to stay relevant.

"If we strengthen the tripartite system and remain united," he said, "we can overcome the challenges and emerge stronger."









Unemployment low but set to creep up: PM Lee
Singapore facing similar pressures as other developed countries, like restructuring and ageing workers
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

The unemployment rate in Singapore is much lower than that in other developed countries, but it is expected to increase, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday.

Addressing over 1,500 union leaders and guests at the May Day Rally, he outlined how pressures faced by developed economies are being felt here too.

The unemployment rate in March was 2.3 per cent, up from 2.2 per cent in December.

"In other developed countries, typically, the unemployment rate is between 5 and 10 per cent," he said.

"Our unemployment rate will gradually tend to creep up."

"We are feeling the same pressures as the other developed countries," Mr Lee added. "The industries have to continue restructuring, our workforce is getting older. Older workers who lose jobs tend to take longer to find new jobs and to get back into the workforce."

Even as Singaporeans have to understand this trend, at the same time, "we have to work hard to resist it, to keep our workers in jobs".

Mr Lee noted that Singapore is in a situation where youth unemployment, like adult unemployment, is low too. The average unemployment rate for local workers below 30 years old was 5 per cent last year, down from 5.1 per cent in 2015.

Many countries' youth unemployment rate shot up and stayed high after the 2009 global financial crisis, causing serious social problems.

Mr Lee said that in Singapore, graduates from the Institute of Technical Education, polytechnics and universities do not take long to find jobs because the schools prepare students for the job market and work with employers to tailor the curriculum to what the industries need.

"It did not happen by accident," he said. "We prepare the workers even before they graduate."

But while unemployment and youth unemployment are low, Mr Lee noted that the Singapore economy faces challenges.

While global growth is looking up, there are risks for the country, he said.

Meanwhile, Singapore's gross domestic product grew 2 per cent last year and the official growth forecast for this year is 1 per cent to 3 per cent. "There is a good chance growth this year will exceed last year's 2 per cent," said Mr Lee.

Growth is uneven and not every sector is doing well, but overall the economy is improving, he added.

"Restructuring is a continuing process and it is not a painless one," he pointed out.

The number of workers made redundant rose last year. "This year, even with better growth, we expect a steady trickle of redundancies."

He also noted that it is inevitable that some workers will be displaced as companies restructure - hence the need for unions, employers and the Government to work together to help create and find jobs for displaced as well as future workers.

Responding to his speech, union leader Jessie Yeo said external factors that affect employment are beyond workers' control.

But how companies treat workers when they restructure can be managed, said the executive secretary of the Metal Industries Workers' Union and Singapore Port Workers Union.

"Companies and unions can work together to help minimise the pain to workers during (economic) transition," she said. But employers must take the lead, she added.















PM Lee accepts Donald Trump's invitation to visit Washington
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has accepted an invitation from United States President Donald Trump to visit Washington, and hopes to make the trip this year.

Mr Lee said at the May Day Rally: "I just had a good phone call with President Trump last night. He invited me to go to Washington. I have agreed, and I hope to do it some time this year."



The White House, in a statement on the call, said both leaders affirmed their commitment to the close partnership between the US and Singapore. "This partnership is marked by thriving trade and investment, robust security cooperation, and close collaboration on regional and global challenges," it said, adding that Mr Trump invited PM Lee to the White House to further strengthen ties.

In his rally speech, Mr Lee noted confidence in the US economy had picked up. But he also outlined how the US' tougher stance on trade - forgoing a multilateral, win-win approach to embrace a win-lose view instead - posed a risk to global trade.

Mr Lee said the US is focusing on bilateral trade balances, targeting countries it has a deficit with.

He told his audience that as unionists, they would understand this was negotiation. "If you talk tough and you win a better deal, that is good. But if you talk too tough and as a result, you sour the trust, relationship, and cooperation, then that is a lose-lose outcome."



Other countries and their leaders have for now said they want to stay open to trade, Mr Lee said, citing China, Germany and Japan.

But if this harder US line leads to countries getting into a tit-for-tat on trade, "then things can turn sour very quickly", cautioned Mr Lee.

"The US has a big trade surplus with Singapore. Therefore, our relations with the US are fine. Because we don't look at it as win-lose, we look at it as win-win," he said.

"We continue to be very good friends with the US. But because our economy is so dependent on trade, if a trade war breaks out, even if we are not directly involved, it's going to hurt our economy," he said. "And we have to be prepared for this."




Looking for jobs? Unions will help, but be flexible
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

The unions will help workers keep their jobs and assist retrenched workers to find new jobs.

But workers looking for jobs have to be open-minded and flexible too, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

They have to be willing to try something new, not just new jobs with new employers, but also new careers in different industries, Mr Lee said in his May Day Rally speech.

"Take up courses, reskill and if you get a job offer, consider it carefully," he said. "It will not be an easy process, but the labour movement is with you."

Mr Lee pointed out that unions and the Government are creating opportunities for workers of various age groups. "Whatever age you are, do not stop trying," he said.

Besides workers, Mr Lee also urged employers to come on board. "Work with us. Unions are doing their part, so must you," he said.

He urged employers not to just recruit new graduates but to give older workers a second chance as well. "Older workers bring with them maturity and experience. Grey hair is quite good," said Mr Lee, drawing laughter from the crowd. The public sector is taking the lead in hiring mature workers, he noted.

On its part, the Ministry of Manpower will develop professional conversion programmes for both entry-level and mid-level jobs.

The Government will also support employers with reskilling programmes, said Mr Lee.

A "good portion" of the wages of workers who undergo work trial with companies will be borne by the Government, Mr Lee noted.

"We help to pay the wages. So give it a try," said Mr Lee to employers.

"If the tripartite partners work together, we will transform together, adapt together and grow together," he added.





Grey hair is good - more firms urged to hire mature workers
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Grey hair is good, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday as he encouraged more employers to hire mature workers.

The public service is leading by example, he added.

Almost one in two civil servants hired by ministries last year was a mid-career professional, manager, engineer or technician, fresh statistics from the Public Service Division (PSD) show.

Of these, 21 per cent, or 1,653 people, were aged 40 and above.

Statutory boards are doing likewise, the PSD added in a statement.

For instance, the Land Transport Authority hired 285 mid-career PMETs aged 40 and older in the last two years - a fifth of their hires.

Older PMETs are particularly vulnerable to being laid off as the economy restructures, or to losing their jobs to technology and cheaper and more competitive workers abroad.

The national Adapt and Grow programmes help these workers switch sectors and find new jobs, Mr Lee said. Throwing its weight behind the programme as Singapore's largest employer, the public service said it values mid-career PMETs for their maturity and experience.

It also outlined what it was doing to help workers switch industries.

New mid-career hires go through professional training by the respective public agencies, or by the Civil Service College.

For instance, the Ministry of Education's kindergarten teachers undergo conversion training at Ngee Ann Polytechnic, and get a relevant diploma before starting work.

Additionally, Workforce Singapore (WSG) works with other agencies to facilitate the hiring of suitable mid-career PMETs to meet the needs of the public sector, for instance, its current shortage of engineers. WSG will also create professional conversion programmes together with public agencies.

Last year, a third of the 1,000 Singaporeans who found new jobs through these programmes were in areas related to the public sector.

They include social workers, healthcare employees, and early childhood educators.




Heng Swee Keat to lead Future Economy Council with younger ministers
Future Economy Council's transformative task a chance for 4G leaders to work as a team: PM
The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat will take over the helm of a national council overseeing skills and innovation from Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the change in his May Day Rally yesterday. The Council for Skills, Innovation and Productivity (CSIP) will also be renamed the Future Economy Council.

Also on the council are Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S. Iswaran, National Trades Union Congress secretary-general Chan Chun Sing, Minister for Education (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung, Minister for National Development and Second Finance Minister Lawrence Wong, and other ministers and ministers of state - especially the younger ones.

"I am putting them in charge of this strategic effort. It is a deep transformation. It will take time. It will extend beyond this term of government," Mr Lee said.

"It is an opportunity for the younger ministers to work closely together as a team, strengthen their bonds with employers and unions, and with each other, and show Singaporeans what they can do. It is their generation of leadership who will have to work with Singaporeans to take the country to new heights."

Observers said the team of 4G or fourth-generation ministers that Mr Lee has put in charge of Singapore's economic transformation - a hot-button issue amid slowing growth and concerns over jobs - will be key members of the next leadership.

Mr Heng was the intuitive choice for council chairman, said Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan. Having chaired the Committee on the Future Economy (CFE), Mr Heng is familiar with its recommendations which outlined strategies to acquire skills, innovate and transform in a more challenging economic landscape.

Associate Professor Tan added: "Mr Heng can be regarded as the economic czar in the 4G leadership and so he's best placed for the task of engineering the transformation."

Observers said the appointment also signals that Mr Heng, who suffered a stroke in May last year, is back in the thick of things.

The Future Economy Council is also expected to be a valuable platform for younger leaders to cut their teeth on economic matters.

ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute fellow Norshahril Saat said the council and the latest Cabinet changes, are "the strongest indication yet of leadership renewal picking up pace".

He noted that finance and trade and industry are among the most important portfolios, and that both Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong and Mr Lee have overseen these areas.

Mr Lee is also signalling that the future economy endeavour is one where Singapore cannot fail in - hence the strong team of ministers to get the job done, said Prof Tan. "It's an attempt to enhance confidence of employers, unions, and investors that Singapore is determined to be the economy of choice," he said.

The tripartite CSIP was set up last year to lead efforts to develop skills for the future, and boost productivity and innovation. The CFE, co-chaired by Mr Iswaran in Mr Heng's absence, has also consulted widely and released its report.

Mr Lee said the CFE's recommendations, including Industry Transformation Maps for how businesses and workers in 23 key sectors can thrive, need to be implemented to take Singapore's economy forward.

Mr Heng told reporters yesterday that the council will look at how the ideas in the CFE report can best be implemented. More details will be announced when ready.

He said the council will focus on two areas: tackling issues that can uplift the entire economy, such as in the areas of skills and productivity, and innovation and internalisation; and tailoring responses to the needs of each industry.

"To transform the economy, we will need everyone - workers, employers, Government - to work closely together," he said.










NTUC training fund for skills upgrading hits $100m mark
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

A total of $25 million has been raised for a National Trades Union Congress training fund to help workers upgrade their skills, said labour chief Chan Chun Sing.

As the Government will match each dollar raised by three dollars, this means the NTUC Education and Training Fund has $100 million to date. This is halfway to its $200 million target.

Investment income from the fund will be used to subsidise course fees for union members for more than 3,200 training courses, capped at $250 a year.

Mr Chan said yesterday that such skills upgrading is crucial to help workers cope with structural changes like technological disruptions, which can mean that "career transitions will become the norm".



Speaking at the May Day Rally, he said the fund will also be used to develop quicker ways of creating courses to keep workers up to date with current trends.

Today, it can take a year or more to roll out a module. This includes three to six months to figure out market demand, another three to six months to curate a syllabus, and a few months more to get workers to go for training.

But this speed at which the courses reach people is "just too slow for the new economy", said Mr Chan, who is a Minister in the Prime Minister's Office.

He painted a picture of workers having apps through which they could download "bite-sized" modules a day or two after an event.

Referring to mobile games, he said: "If you can imagine Pokemon Go, Candy Crush, when a new module is launched every few days, can you imagine the same kind of gamification for learning?"

NTUC will work with 14 institutes of higher learning to offer such bite-sized, modular courses.

He also stressed that NTUC must continue to reinvent itself, and unions cannot be the only way the labour movement reaches workers.

Unions are one of five prongs of the labour movement, said Mr Chan as he illustrated this strategy with a picture of a starfish with five arms. The four other groups the NTUC wants to reach are:

• Professions and professionals, managers and executives;

• Small and medium-sized firms;

• Freelancers and the self-employed; and

• Migrant workers and foreign domestic workers.

Freelancers are not recognised as employees in many other countries or entitled to enjoy the labour movement's benefits, he noted. "We do not let semantics stop us in Singapore. As long as they collect a pay cheque, we will reach them."

The NTUC has embarked on a drive to stay relevant by representing more workers and reaching a wider range of Singaporeans.

To this end, NTUC's social enterprises are exploring an integrated set of services such as healthcare and eldercare for Singaporeans from cradle to casket.

For instance, insurance provider Income and supermarket chain FairPrice can help with a baby's needs. "We want that relationship to continue as they grow up," said Mr Chan, adding that NTUC's social enterprises could also serve young children, working adults and seniors.





PM Lee's May Day message: Economy picking up but jobs remain a concern
Workers, businesses and Government have to work together to ensure jobs for all, he says
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 1 May 2017

Singapore's economy is picking up and may do better than it did last year, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday.

Total employment - the number of workers in jobs - is expanding, he noted in his annual May Day message to workers.

However, there are more retrenchments and unemployment is also creeping up, he said.

This mixed picture shows an economy in transition, and workers, businesses and the Government have to do their part and work together to ensure jobs for all, he said, as he gave an overview of global conditions.

Singapore's economy grew 2 per cent last year, and the United States, Europe, Japan and emerging economies are seeing an upswing.

But Mr Lee said prospects for international trade remain uncertain as the US' attitude has changed. He cited how when Group of Twenty finance ministers met recently, they could not renew their standard pledge to keep global trade free and open as the US objected.

"We will have to watch how other countries react to this US stance. If they, too, adopt win-lose approaches to trade, the result will be more protectionism, which will hurt everybody," he added.



Mr Lee's message comes as the Ministry of Manpower said last Friday that unemployment rose to 2.3 per cent in March, up from 2.2 per cent in December.

"As the economy matures, I expect that to creep up," Mr Lee said of the unemployment rate, noting that other developed countries have unemployment rates of 5 per cent or higher.



Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say warned in a May Day message last Friday that unemployment here has risen and could rise further.

This is because some sectors in the economy are still struggling with structural changes, a concern that union leaders shared with PM Lee when they met last month.

Mr Lee said businesses are restructuring to adapt to changing conditions. "Some existing jobs are being lost even while we are creating more new jobs," he said, as he outlined steps that need to be taken.

"Our response should be to work hard to keep up our growth. Our economy can no longer grow at 5 to 7 per cent, but we can still achieve 2 to 3 per cent growth by improving our productivity," he said. "Two to 3 per cent is a good growth rate for our current stage of development. It will mean we can continue creating new jobs and improving our lives."

He added: "We must also work harder to help workers stay employed and find replacement jobs if they become unemployed."

This task of helping workers cope with an economy in transition and find jobs is a tripartite effort, he said, referring to the three-way partnership between unions, employers and the Government.

Mr Lee said businesses must be willing to change, adopt new technologies, expand overseas and seize opportunities out there.

"Our workers must be adaptable, keen to upgrade and reskill themselves, when necessary, changing careers to secure good jobs," he added.

The Government will take the lead and give full support to employers and workers, Mr Lee pledged.

He cited schemes such as SkillsFuture, job-matching and professional conversion programmes for workers and those retrenched.

The Government is also paying close attention to PMEs - professionals, managers and executives - worried about losing jobs, he said. PMEs have borne the brunt of recent retrenchments.

"The Government is always on the side of workers, but we make sure we are business-friendly and support our businesses to grow so that we have jobs for all," he said, wishing all a happy May Day.

Mr Lee will deliver his annual May Day Rally speech today.





PM Lee Hsien Loong's conversation with union leaders






Unions helping laid-off workers switch industries
They are being retrained for sectors that are still hiring, say union leaders
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 1 May 2017

As some sectors of the economy go through difficulties, jobs are being lost. But other sectors are growing, resulting in uneven job prospects.

Amid this uncertainty, union leaders are helping retrenched workers to switch sectors, the leaders said at a recent dialogue with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

For example, retrenched workers in the battered offshore marine, oil and gas sector are being retrained for jobs in the aerospace sector, which is still hiring.

"Some of the skills from the offshore marine (sector) are still portable," said Ms Sylvia Choo, executive secretary of the Singapore Industrial and Services Employees' Union, which represents aerospace workers.

She was among eight National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) union leaders who took part in the April 18 dialogue at Mediacorp with PM Lee.

A video and a transcript of the closed-door session were released by the Prime Minister's Office yesterday, ahead of May Day today.



At the session, the union leaders from sectors such as marine, port and financial services shared their worries and hopes concerning job prospects in their sectors.

The most downbeat was the offshore marine, oil and gas sector. It is in a "very painful situation", with about 1,500 workers retrenched from unionised companies in the last two years, said Mr Mah Cheong Fatt, executive secretary of the Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Employees' Union.

"For the first three months (this year), unionised companies retrenched about 200 workers... We are looking at another few hundred," he added, saying the union has been trying to arrange job fairs to introduce them to other sectors.

Responding, Mr Lee said: "Our first priority should be to help them find another job."

Companies in the aerospace sector are still hiring, noted Ms Choo. One, GE Aviation, recently started a professional conversion programme for mid-career hires, and among the 15 participants was a man in his early 50s, she said.

And while jobs in the offshore marine sector are dwindling, the ports sector saw a turnaround.

"Things are looking a lot brighter (now) than in the last one to two years," said Ms Jessie Yeo, executive secretary of the Singapore Port Workers Union. "Barring unforeseen circumstances, the next six months, we ought to be very busy."

She added that the union is working with PSA to keep up productivity and stay ahead of competition.

"We are always reminded that people are waiting to eat our lunch," she quipped, to which Mr Lee replied: "You must make sure you steal someone else's lunch."



Mr Toh Hock Poh, NTUC's secretary for financial affairs and president of the Metal Industries Workers' Union, recounted his recent visit to a factory in Chengdu, China.

It was fully automated and workers are hired not to operate machines but to maintain them. It has 12,000 workers, its own dormitory, shops, a police station and even certification for workers issued by a local institute, showing how far manufacturing has advanced in China, he noted.

Said Mr Lee: "Our firms need to be able to go in this direction. You cannot have such huge firms in Singapore, but you need to be able to be as flexible, as spry and adaptable."

In response to a comment from Young NTUC's Ms Zuhaina Ahmad that young people's expectations need to be managed, Mr Lee said this was something that had to be worked on. "You must always want to do better but you cannot always want to hope for the sky, and that is the challenge," he said.










May Day weekend of fun and games for migrant workers
By Janice Tai, The Straits Times, 1 May 2017

Migrant worker Govindasamy Sakthivel, 28, batted, hurled and fielded balls for 10 straight hours on a field in Soon Lee Road yesterday.

Never mind that he had to put in long hours as a construction worker in the past week. "I'm not tired at all. I'm very happy because we get to play against others only once a year," said Mr Sakthivel from India, captain of his cricket team from construction firm Dragages Singapore.

They faced a team from steel recycler NatSteel Holdings in the finals of the annual Cricket Challenge, organised by the Singapore Contractors Association yesterday. It was a close match but Mr Sakthivel's team emerged champions.

It was one of several events held by companies and non-profit groups over the long May Day weekend to recognise the contributions of Singapore's migrant workers.

Over at the Westlite Papan dormitory in Jalan Papan, a group of 5,000 migrant workers was treated to a feast of local delights such as curry chicken and satay yesterday. Organised by accommodation provider Centurion and non-profit groups Project Chulia Street and HealthServe, the event included games, free check-ups and a health talk.

This morning, a group of Bangladeshi workers will launch a poetry book on the experiences of foreigners in Singapore, at a book fair at Jurong Penjuru 2. The Singapore Bangladesh Society and dormitory operator MES & JPD Housing are behind the event, which includes a comedy show.

Yesterday, advocacy group Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics issued a statement appealing to the authorities, companies and unions not to overlook low-wage migrant workers who may be victims of the economic downturn. It put out some recommendations on how migrant workers could be protected.

"We should allow workers who have not been paid because their companies are insolvent to be compensated their full salaries from foreign worker levies or from forfeited security bonds," said its acting executive director Jolovan Wham.

"We also need to ensure that employers have considered hiring retrenched migrant workers before approving new work permits from those abroad."





What Singapore is doing about jobs, jobs, jobs
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong addressed many Singaporeans' top concern in his May Day Rally yesterday - jobs. As companies restructure, some workers will be displaced. The unemployment rate, which has crept up to 2.3 per cent, is likely to rise further, but workers will get help to find replacement jobs and upgrade their skills, he said. Below is an edited excerpt of his speech.
The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Today, I would like to explain some of what we are doing to continue to prosper.

It comes down to three things - jobs, jobs and jobs. Three different ways of thinking about jobs. One, creating new jobs by bringing in new businesses and investments, and expanding existing businesses. Two, finding replacement jobs for workers who have lost their jobs or are out of work, and need work. Thirdly, jobs for future workers. Training students and training workers to grow in their jobs. To do something different, bigger, and more productive in the future.

First of all, we are helping businesses to create new jobs, new companies, new investments; upgrading and expansion of existing companies. That has been our winning formula for 50 years because if we do not have the new companies, if we do not have a business-friendly environment where people want to come, there will be no new jobs. The Economic Development Board has been working hard to get multinational corporations to invest in Singapore. Let me give you a sample of projects we have opened recently.

In electronics, Micron invested $5.4 billion and expanded its fabrication plant at North Coast Drive - 500 jobs.

In IT, Google opened a new campus in Mapletree Business City: 1,000 Googlers there. Google is also training 1,000 small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) business leaders on how SMEs can go digital, so helping to transform the economy.

In chemicals, it is a mixed picture. Some plants consolidating but others expanding, investing and we are still getting new projects. Evonik broke ground for their second plant on Jurong Island to provide methionine, an amino acid for animal feed - an $800 million investment, 150 jobs.

At the same time, we are helping SMEs upgrade themselves, go overseas, expand, and build new capabilities; not just the high-tech companies, but also traditional companies. At one National Day Rally, I talked about bak kwa in Ginza. Today, let me tell you about a Singaporean company called Grandluxe.

It was started 75 years ago - in 1942 - as a bookbinding workshop along Mohamed Sultan Road. People used to send reports and papers to such workshops to be bound into volumes, with hard covers or even leather bound. Workers would do this by hand. Grandluxe expanded into the printing business, set up a factory in Jurong, printing stationery, notebooks; but now with the Internet, reports are published online. Nobody binds old reports anymore. And with smartphones, people buy fewer diaries and notebooks. The old business was shrinking. The company decided to change their business model. They turned bookbinding into a premium craft and started a new company called Bynd Artisan - no longer a printing and binding factory but a retail experience.

A customer goes to the shop, picks his materials, and skilled bookbinders will personalise a beautiful leather-bound notebook for you. You can watch them working, and admire their skills. Bynd Artisan is now doing well, selling to the world. This has given long-time employees like Ms Tan Buay Heng a new lease of life. Forty years ago, she started as a production operator, manually binding books. Today, she is a craftsman, personalising leather notebooks for customers, conducting workshops and training younger craftsmen. And she is now also managing a retail branch!

What Bynd Artisan has accomplished, Spring Singapore and IE Singapore are helping other SMEs to do, to reinvent themselves and find new niches where they can grow. Ms Tan Buay Heng's story - from production operator to retail branch manager - can become the story of other workers.

REPLACEMENT JOBS

Second, we are helping workers who lose their jobs find alternative jobs, especially professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs).

Because businesses have to restructure to survive, and because technology is disrupting everything, we have redundancies even as our economy grows. We are particularly concerned about sectors which are not doing so well. We have expanded several schemes under Adapt and Grow - professional conversion programme (PCP), career support programme for our PMETs, and enhanced work trial support for the rank and file. An alphabet soup of programmes. Brother (Lim) Swee Say is trying all sorts of things.

Let me illustrate what we are doing with actual examples, told to me by union leaders and U Associates.

Brother Mah Cheong Fatt (executive secretary of Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Employees' Union) is from the offshore and marine industry. The industry is experiencing tough times now.

For the last two years, no new orders. From the last peak, offshore and marine have lost about 30,000 jobs. Foreign workers were the first to be let go, so our own workers did not bear the brunt of the redundancies. But some local workers have also been affected; last year, about 1,000; this year, we are looking at another few hundred.

Foreign workers who lose jobs can go back to their home countries. For local workers, this is home. What do we do for our brothers and sisters? Our first priority is to help them find another job. With the offshore and marine industry as it is, it is difficult to find replacement jobs in the same sector, but other sectors like transport and aviation are growing, and need workers with similar skills. They can take the engineers from offshore and marine, with some retraining.

So sister Sylvia Choo, who is the executive secretary of Singapore Industrial and Services Employees' Union, and brother Edwin Khew, who is the president of the Institute of Engineers Singapore, are working with brother Cheong Fatt to organise job fairs to help offshore and marine workers find new jobs in aerospace and transport engineering. It is a bold move for workers to switch to a new industry but some are willing to try and have succeeded. This is not just about schemes and programmes, but walking with workers every step of the way.

We organise job fairs, set up stalls, and give out pamphlets. But we also go beyond that. Brother Desmond Choo told me about a recent job fair he organised at Our Tampines Hub - very successful, 750 showed up. At the fair, he noticed one person walking around the stalls for some time, seemingly lost. He went three rounds, but didn't talk to anyone. So Desmond went up to him and asked: what is the matter? You have not stopped anywhere. The man said he was lost and did not know what job will fit him. So Desmond counselled him, found out he was a shipyard material handler and matched him with a laundry operator. What Desmond did, is what we want to do for every displaced worker. Each one is an individual, our brother or sister, not a statistic.

And this is what the labour movement is about - why brother (Chan) Chun Sing calls NTUC an "unusual labour movement". NTUC takes care of those who have jobs, and helps them keep their jobs. For those who have lost their jobs, NTUC helps them get replacement jobs. For those who are still in school, NTUC works with the Government and business to keep this economy going so they will have jobs when they graduate.

Unions elsewhere don't think about the jobless, and especially the young who have yet to enter the job market. In many countries, youth unemployment rose after the financial crisis, and has stayed stubbornly high. And among those who are working, many are underemployed. Even in South Korea and Taiwan, with economies similar to ours, many young people have either given up looking for jobs or taken on part-time work. Yet, in Singapore our youth unemployment rate remains low. Once you graduate, whether from Institute of Technical Education (ITE), polytechnics or universities, you can find a job quite easily. That did not happen by accident. It is because we make sure our schools prepare our young properly for the job market.

ITE, polytechnics and universities emphasise on-the-job training, and work with employers to tailor the curriculum and internship programmes. NTUC is also engaging new graduates to set them on the right path. It has set up the NTUC Youth Career Network which mentors youth by offering career guidance and prepares them for job applications. In fact, we have a NTUC-PA Youth Career Network Skills Marketplace here, which I hope you will visit after the rally.

The network has attracted many passionate volunteers. Sister Zuhaina is one of them. She has been coaching mentees, polishing up their CVs, preparing them for interviews, giving them confidence to pursue their interests. I thank volunteers like Zuhaina - she embodies the spirit of helping each other succeed.

Similarly, we are creating many opportunities for all our workers, young and not-so-young, so do not stop looking and trying! But please - be open-minded and flexible. Be willing to try something new - not just new jobs with new employers, but also new careers in different industries. Take up courses, reskill. If you receive a job offer, please consider it. It will not be an easy process but we are walking this journey with you.

We also need employers to come on board - do not just recruit new graduates, give mature workers a second chance. Older workers bring with them maturity and experience.

The public sector is leading by example. We are expanding our Adapt and Grow scheme. Many government agencies - Land Transport Authority, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health - have been hiring mid-career PMETs, including mature workers. We have launched several PCPs to convert mid-career workers and we will do more, especially for the mature ones. So I urge employers: work with us. Unions are doing their part; so must you.

The Ministry of Manpower can develop PCPs for both entry-level and mid-level jobs, and support employers with reskilling programmes. The Government will pay a good portion of the wages of the workers you take on during the conversion period.

If the tripartite partners pull together, we will transform together, adapt together and grow together.

GROWING IN JOBS

Third, we are supporting all our workers to grow in their jobs, that is, upgrading them. We must take worker upgrading very seriously. Workers in other countries know they need to keep on learning to keep their rice bowls; they are hungry. Brothers Hock Poh and Arasu, and sister Jessie recently discovered how hungry they are when they went to Chengdu to visit smart factories.

These were highly automated plants, not sweatshops, no shop floors full of workers operating machines. Now, one worker oversees 20 machines, troubleshooting when necessary. However, it was not the machines, but the workers who left a deeper impression on them. The Chinese workers work hard and train hard; they live in dorms, and at night in their spare time, they log on to their accounts and do e-learning.

So workers in other countries are constantly upgrading. We had better put in as great an effort or more. If we think that we do not have to push ourselves further, that we do not have to work hard, we are kidding ourselves.

That is why we have been working so hard on SkillsFuture. The good news is we have a good head start. The International Monetary Fund considers SkillsFuture one of the most comprehensive skills development programmes it has seen.

Last year, I had a dialogue with Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) students, and met several mature students who have been upgrading. One of them was Adelene Teck. She worked as an occupational therapist for 20 years and decided to upgrade herself at SIT. As a mature student, she told me her classmates are like her children!

I asked SIT how she is doing. They tell me Adelene is about to finish her one-year programme, and looking forward to going back to work to apply her new skills. That is what all of us need to do - we are never too old to learn!

These are our plans to transform our economy and grow our jobs. At the centre of this effort are our Industry Transformation Maps (ITMs). They were a major Committee on the Future Economy (CFE) recommendation. We are going industry by industry, focusing on specific things we can do in each industry, coming up with well-thought-out plans to upgrade and improve. Through ITMs, businesses can stay viable and thrive - and keep the jobs they have and create new ones.

For example, the logistics industry. It is a big contributor to our economy; together with transport, it employs nearly 250,000 workers. The prospects are bright because of technology, robotics and data analytics. NTUC is in this too, through FairPrice. FairPrice's new distribution centre is equipped with an Automated Storage and Caddy Pick System, the first such system in the Asia-Pacific.

Many other logistics companies are expanding. We intend to create another 2,000 PMET jobs in logistics in the next five years! But to do that, everyone will have to play his part. Employers must invest in technology, train up workers, unions must work with employers, identify where the new jobs will be, and help workers get new skills. And the Government will support companies to adopt new technology and workers to get training. This is tripartism in action.

And it is not just logistics which will have an ITM. We are doing this for many different sectors, 23 in all, covering a large part of our economy, 80 per cent!

We are going to take this one step further. Last year we set up a tripartite council, the Council for Skills, Innovation and Productivity. The council was chaired by brother Tharman (Shanmugaratnam), who was leading the SkillsFuture effort. Since then the CFE, led by brothers (Heng) Swee Keat and (S.) Iswaran, has completed its report. It is a comprehensive plan to take our economy the next step forward. Now we need to implement the CFE's recommendations, including the ITMs, to make the transformation happen. I have asked brother Swee Keat to take over from Deputy Prime Minister Tharman as chair of council. We will rename it the Future Economy Council.

Swee Keat will work with brothers Iswaran, Chun Sing, (Ong) Ye Kung, Lawrence (Wong), and other ministers and ministers of state, especially the younger ones. I am putting them in charge of this strategic effort. It is a deep transformation which will extend beyond this term of government. It is an opportunity for them to work closely together as a team, strengthen their bonds with employers and unions, and with each other, and show Singaporeans what they can do. It is their generation of leadership who will have to work with you to take this country to new heights.

Our unique tripartite partnership is the secret to why we have been able to transform our economy over and over again. Starting from our nation-building years when we had to industrialise, through the British withdrawal from their bases here in 1971, when we were faced with the prospect of tens of thousands of Singaporeans losing their jobs; through our first major recession in 1985, when workers had to accept deep Central Provident Fund cuts to reduce business costs; through the Asian Financial Crisis, Sars, the dot.com bubble bust, the global financial crisis.

Each time the challenges we faced seemed daunting, sometimes even overwhelming. But each time we pulled together, adjusted course, made sacrifices, helped each other, and forged ahead. We will no doubt face further challenges ahead, even severe ones but if we strengthen our tripartite system, and remain united, if the labour movement remains strong, to take care of our workers and give them a sense that they are co-owners in our system, if all segments of society - workers as well as employers, managers and professionals as well as foremen and the rank and file - sacrifice equally when sacrifice is called for, and share in the fruits of success when we do well, I am confident we will overcome the challenges and emerge stronger.

Each one of us, with one another for one another, for Singapore. That is the way we make sure that every May Day we will have good reason to celebrate. That is the way we can make good things happen and create a bright future for our children.


Mental health cases treated at polyclinics

$
0
0
They make mental health or dementia care accessible and reduce the stigma for those afraid to go to IMH
By Joyce Teo, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Housewife Ng Guat Hua, 64, who suffers from anxiety, had previously sought help at a hospital whenever she had an anxiety attack.

But now, she goes to a polyclinic near her home for help.

Meanwhile, Mr Steven Tan (not his real name), 63, seeks treatment for depression at Queenstown Polyclinic.

Though the service at the polyclinic is run by the Institute of Mental Health (IMH), he said it felt more reassuring to go to a neighbourhood clinic rather than a hospital.

In recent years, it has become easier for people with mental conditions, whatever their age, to seek help at a polyclinic nearby.

By 2021, one in two polyclinics will have mental health or dementia clinics or both, the Ministry of Health (MOH) announced in March. This is part of its plan to strengthen community mental health care over the next five years.

This expansion will make mental health and dementia care more accessible, said a joint statement from MOH and the Agency for Integrated Care.

Polyclinics offer subsidised primary care. There are two healthcare groups - National Healthcare Group and SingHealth - which run polyclinics.

Currently, seven out of the 18 polyclinics in Singapore offer mental health services. The first such clinic opened at Geylang Polyclinic in 2003, followed by Queenstown Polyclinic in 2008.

More mental health clinics, as well as five clinics offering dementia care services, have opened at various polyclinics since 2012.

The latest polyclinic to do so is in Jurong, which started its Health & Mind Service last year.

It is clear that there is demand for such services at polyclinics.

For instance, the two mental health clinics in Outram and Tampines saw more than 3,000 cases from July 2013 to the end of last year.

The mental health services at polyclinics treat common problems such as depression, insomnia or anxiety disorders. An MOH spokesman said: "These patients typically have co-morbid chronic physical conditions, which make them vulnerable to developing mental health issues."

They are referred from the general pool of polyclinics for further assessment and care, he said.

BETTER ACCESSIBILITY

But the better accessibility to care is not just a matter of distance.

Dr Wei Ker-Chiah, chief of IMH's department of community psychiatry, said: "There is also less stigma attached to seeing a doctor at a polyclinic. Patients benefit from the management of co-morbidities of medical conditions, such as diabetes and high blood pressure."

Most of the polyclinics' mental health services operate once or twice a week and do not see walk-in clients. Patients must be referred.

Only IMH's satellite clinics, which operate five days a week, accept patients who are not referred. But they have to make an appointment.

Each of the clinics is managed by a multi-disciplinary team, comprising family physicians, nurses, medical social workers and psychologists, said the MOH spokesman.

At some polyclinics, doctors are guided by hospital specialists. At SingHealth polyclinics, for example, doctors work with psychiatrists from Singapore General Hospital or Changi General Hospital. These patients have mild to moderate conditions.

Those with severe depression, anxiety disorders or insomnia will still have to be seen at IMH or the psychiatric departments of restructured hospitals, said the SingHealth spokesman.

The IMH satellite clinics have a multi-disciplinary group of IMH specialists, including occupational therapists and community psychiatric nurses.

The more common mental health conditions seen there are schizo- phrenia, depression and anxiety disorders, said Dr Wei.

"Treatment includes the use of medication and psychological therapies, which are tailored to the patient's needs," he added.

Charges at the polyclinic mental health clinics are similar to consultation fees at polyclinics. For example, a consultation with a family physician may cost around $24 to $30.

The increased provision of community mental wellness care is beginning to bear fruit.

Dr Winnie Soon, a family physician and consultant at Ang Mo Kio Polyclinic, said the early detection and management of mental health issues have helped to reduce the stigma associated with the illness. It has also encouraged people to seek help for their condition.

Dr Wei said: "By focusing on prevention and creating more awareness of mental health issues and avenues of help, we can address the needs of patients earlier. We can also detect and manage problems before they become more severe."




Mental health clinics

ANG MO KIO POLYCLINICHealth & Mind Service (No walk-ins, referrals only)

JURONG POLYCLINICHealth & Mind Service (No walk-ins, referrals only)

WOODLANDS POLYCLINICHealth & Mind Service (No walk-ins, referrals only)

OUTRAM POLYCLINICHealth Wellness Clinic (No walk-ins, referrals only)

TAMPINES POLYCLINICHealth Wellness Clinic (No walk- ins, referrals only)

GEYLANG POLYCLINICCommunity Wellness Clinic (By appointment only, call 6389-2200)

QUEENSTOWN POLYCLINICCommunity Wellness Clinic (By appointment only, call 6389-2200)





IMH scary? Visit a community wellness clinic instead
By Joyce Teo, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Mr Steven Tan (not his real name) took on a new job a year ago, after leaving the company where he had worked for more than two decades.

It was a similar operational role but he had to deal with a new environment, culture and colleagues.

"I had a phobia communicating in Mandarin. I was putting a lot of pressure on myself," said Mr Tan. "I gradually developed depression, but I didn't realise it at that time."

The 63-year-old's work anxieties affected his sleep and appetite. He also suffered from constipation.

He said: "I'd wake up every hour or two at night. I couldn't think straight and everything seemed to go wrong. I was like a zombie."

Three months ago, he went to see a doctor, who diagnosed him with depression. Mr Tan said: "I thought it was just insomnia, due to my age. I didn't believe him."

The doctor advised him to talk to a psychiatrist.

Mr Tan went to Bukit Merah Polyclinic and the doctor there referred him to the community wellness clinic at Queenstown Polyclinic.

At first, the doctor had suggested the Institute of Mental Health (IMH), but Mr Tan refused to go there.

"IMH is an alarming name," he said, referring to its reputation as a place for people with all sorts of mental illnesses. "I told them my case was not that serious."

At the community wellness clinic, Mr Tan was treated by a psychiatrist who was "caring and frank with what she thought about my condition".

He learnt from her that he was feeling the way he did because he was depressed.

He said: "The medicine she gave was spot on and worked on the first night. I had a good sleep for seven to eight hours."

Mr Tan will soon be attending a follow-up session at the same community wellness clinic. He said he was grateful that care was easily available at a polyclinic.

"It takes a lot of courage to go and see a psychiatrist," he added.


Polytechnic Foundation Programme: Fast-track poly scheme gives students a boost

$
0
0
First batch of Polytechnic Foundation Programme graduates delivers encouraging results, says MOE
By Calvin Yang, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

The pioneer batch of students who got into polytechnics through a fast-track scheme has set the bar high for its juniors.

Some have gone on to top their cohorts, while others have won awards for outstanding performance in various fields.

They are the pioneers of the Polytechnic Foundation Programme (PFP), which is offered by all five polytechnics to prepare Secondary 4 Normal (Academic) students for direct entry into diploma courses.

The year-long programme offers a practice-oriented curriculum with modules taught by polytechnic lecturers and allows students to skip Secondary 5 and the O levels.

The first batch of some 800 PFP students, who were placed on the programme four years ago, will graduate at various polytechnic ceremonies this month.

The Ministry of Education (MOE) told The Straits Times that the first PFP batch has performed well. It added that some students will be receiving institution-level awards and prizes in recognition of their holistic achievements.

While it would not give figures on how the cohort performed, the ministry cited "encouraging results from our pioneer PFP batch".

MOE said "students enjoy similar education and development opportunities in the polytechnics", regardless of their admissions pathway.

Among the many PFP graduates who have done well is Republic Polytechnic's Clive Chia Chun. The 21-year-old, who studied electrical and electronic engineering, topped his cohort with a perfect 4.0 grade point average (GPA). He will receive the Lee Kuan Yew Award for Mathematics and Science given to the top technology or computer science graduates.

It was not all rosy, though. At the end of Secondary 2, he had to transfer from the Express to the Normal (Academic) stream at Chung Cheng High School (Yishun).

"I failed my exams and I hated going to school," he said.

In fact, he got through the N levels five years ago "by memorising everything". He later applied for the PFP, allowing him to skip Secondary 5.

Mr Chia, who hopes to enter a university after his national service, said the programme was a fresh start for him. "I was determined to do my best and not be a failure like I was in secondary school," he added.

PFP students are given provisional places in diploma courses. They will secure their places if they pass all their PFP modules.

At Ngee Ann Polytechnic, 132 students from the first PFP cohort will graduate. Nine of them are gold or silver medallists of their course. These medals are awarded to outstanding graduates of each course.

At Nanyang Polytechnic (NYP), 163 students from the first PFP batch will graduate this year, with 15 getting top awards. Nearly half (44 per cent) of this pioneer cohort have made it to the director's list - by excelling academically in the semester at least once during their three-year diploma programme.

The polytechnic said PFP students generally do very well when they move on to their first year as they take domain-specific foundation modules designed to help them adapt to their diploma studies.

"Many have outperformed their O-level peers," it added.

NYP animation student Rebecca Lou, 20, who opted for the PFP despite acing her N levels, felt the alternative route would allow her to pursue her passion earlier. "I love animations. They were a huge part of my childhood," she said.

The former Anderson Secondary student graduates this month with a GPA of 3.96, and will receive the Lee Hsien Loong Award for outstanding all-round achievement. She has received at least five job offers from companies such as The Walt Disney Company Southeast Asia and Infinite Studios.

She said the PFP allowed her to adjust to the polytechnic system ahead of her peers. "It has definitely given me more than just a head start. It worked as a more relevant and exciting pathway to my dream course," she said. "If I came in by any other way, I would have turned out a little different."















Course made him more confident, articulate
By Calvin Yang, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

He had opted to do an engineering diploma, but was told during a medical screening that the course might be too strenuous for him.

Mr Mohamed Najulah, who was born with brittle bone disease and uses a wheelchair, decided to take up a business information technology diploma instead.

The former Queensway Secondary Normal (Academic) student was keen to explore how business and information technology could be used to help others. He enrolled in Singapore Polytechnic as part of the pioneer cohort of the Polytechnic Foundation Programme (PFP).

That turned out to be a blessing in disguise. The 21-year-old is now one of the poly's top students and will graduate with a grade point average of 3.89 out of 4.0.

Mr Najulah, who will be awarded the Chua Chor Teck gold medal, said he could not have come so far without the PFP, which allows students to skip the O levels to do a one-year programme that prepares them for a diploma course.

"It allowed me to transition seamlessly into my course," he said. "Without this alternative pathway, I would have to take my O levels, and I may not do as well to meet the entry requirements."



The programme helped nurture his speaking, writing and presentation skills. "Going through the PFP allowed me to be more confident, outspoken and articulate during presentations and group work."

The aspiring software developer will pursue an information systems degree at the Singapore Management University in August.

"Application development is not restricted by physical capabilities, and provides the freedom and ability to convert what I think mentally into reality," he said.

Mr Najulah described his poly experience as a roller-coaster ride, filled with ups and downs. But he will always remember the help offered by his peers.

"As I am a wheelchair user, I would never forget the moments when my friends and classmates assisted me to get to my lessons and lectures," he said. "It might be a simple act, but it meant a lot to me."





'Stepping stone' to pursue passion for IT
By Calvin Yang, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

Prior to taking his N-level examinations five years ago, Temasek Polytechnic (TP) student Eyo Wei Chin was set on the Institute of Technical Education.

The then Secondary 4 Normal (Academic) student, who was barely passing his subjects, reckoned that if he made it to Secondary 5, it would still be tough for him to scrape through the O levels.

But the former Pasir Ris Secondary student did well at the N levels and decided to go for TP's cyber and digital security diploma course via the Polytechnic Foundation Programme (PFP) instead.

The year-long PFP allows students to skip Secondary 5 and prepares them for the course they are interested in.

This month, the 21-year-old will graduate with a perfect 4.0 grade point average. The awards he will receive include the Lee Kuan Yew Award, which is given to the top technology or computer science polytechnic graduates.



Mr Eyo, who has a keen interest in information technology, said the PFP gave him the "stepping stone" to do well in school. Under the programme, he went through modules that covered research skills, project work and programming.

"It allowed me to interact with my lecturers, explore the school and make friends," he said. "I was able to better focus on my course work when I started the diploma course."

His only concern at the start was that he did not have an O-level qualification. "I wondered how universities or the industry would react," he noted. "But things have worked out well."

Mr Eyo, who will further his studies locally after his national service, said: "The PFP gave me a direct path to pursue my passion for IT, and also allowed me to meet like-minded students, who inspired me to work harder in my studies."






Top student felt 'slightly inferior initially'
By Calvin Yang, The Straits Times, 2 May 2017

When she stepped foot into polytechnic four years ago, Ms Rachel Tan did not know what to expect.

After all, the former West Spring Secondary Normal (Academic) student was in the pioneer cohort of students who got in through the Polytechnic Foundation Programme (PFP). It allows students to skip Secondary 5 and the O levels.

"When I first came in, I felt lost and worried for my future because no one seemed to have heard of the PFP," said the 20-year-old, who did a biomedical engineering diploma at Ngee Ann Polytechnic.

"There were also no seniors with similar experiences whom I could approach for guidance."

But that year-long preparatory programme allowed her to adjust to poly life, ahead of her peers who entered through the O-level route.

"I slowly started to realise that while the foundation courses were challenging, they allowed me to learn about my strengths and weaknesses," she said. "I was able to figure out aspects of engineering that I enjoy learning."

Ms Tan eventually topped her cohort, and will be graduating this month with a grade point average of 3.95 out of 4.0.

She will receive the Biomedical Engineering Society (Singapore) gold medal and prize for her performance, among other awards.

Ms Tan said she felt "slightly inferior initially" when she started her three-year diploma programme alongside students who got in through their O-level results.

But she added: "While my peers were still spending their first few weeks trying to adapt, I was able to focus on the lessons immediately."

The PFP also prepared her well with the skills needed. For instance, she recalled a lab session where students had to do soldering, and was pleased that she had learnt about the process in her foundation year.

Ms Tan, who plans to further her studies after graduation, said: "The PFP gave me the opportunity to build a stronger foundation, and assured me that I am no different from other students."


Secondary 5 studies less popular as new paths to poly open

'New model of governance needed' for Singapore to thrive: Peter Ho

$
0
0
IPS-Nathan Lectures 2016.17: Lecture III - The Paradox of Singapore and the Dialectic of Governance

Ex-civil service head says success depends on Govt working well with businesses, society
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 4 May 2017

Unlike the top-down approach taken in the past, Singapore's future success hinges on the Government working well with businesses and society, said former head of the civil service Peter Ho yesterday.

"The view that 'the Government knows best'... is increasingly challenged in today's world, in which citizens and businesses can easily gain access to much of the information that governments used to monopolise in the past," he noted.

Given the new situation and other changes in the environment, Mr Ho argued that a new model of governance is needed.

He made the point in his third lecture as a Institute of Policy Studies' S R Nathan Fellow for the Study of Singapore, a position that requires fellows to give their ideas on public policy and governance in a series of lectures.



Singapore is already a leader in public policy, so it is no longer enough for policymakers to simply copy and adapt a model of governance from elsewhere, he said.

"For many of the emergent issues that we have to deal with, Singapore will have to evolve its own strategies and approaches."

He boiled down the reason for a new governance model to three factors.

One, the unfavourable conditions at Singapore's birth continue today, despite its success as a sovereign city-state.

"Our success in overcoming them may well have masked the deep challenges that remain, and remain mostly undiminished. This is the paradox of Singapore," said Mr Ho, a senior adviser at the think-tank called Centre for Strategic Futures.

These include Singapore's small size, making it vulnerable to climate change and rising seas, and its water scarcity, which not many Singaporeans grasp fully, he said.

Even Singapore's status as the world's second busiest container port is not secure, he told an audience of about 200 officials and students at the National University of Singapore.

The country is constantly being put to the test by regional competitors or technological advances like 3D printing, which will reduce the need to move goods.

Two, the world is complex and fast-changing, a challenging state addressed by Mr Ho in his previous two lectures.

This complexity means that trade-offs when deciding on public policies are much more difficult to make, because each option may lead to unintended consequences.

Three, citizens and businesses today have far higher expectations of the Government than before.

One reason is that after people's basic needs of food and housing are met, they demand that their more complex needs, like being empowered to reach their full potential, be addressed, he said, referring to Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

Another reason is that today's young adults, who are more educated, have known only the affluence and success of Singapore.

"What persuaded their parents and grandparents will not wash with the third generation," Mr Ho said, adding that fresh arguments and new ways are needed to communicate with this generation.

The Government can design better policies by looking at issues from the citizens' perspective, compared to using "the usual top-down approach", he added.

To its credit, the Government has found ways to engage the private sector and is starting to take engaging people seriously, he said during the question-and-answer session.

Mr Ho pointed to how the Government consults the business community in its wide-ranging economic reviews, and spent a year listening to people in its 2013 Our Singapore Conversation feedback drive.

But engaging people early is important, he said.

It is not as if they do not understand that decisions have to be made and which may not please everyone, he added.

"What they want is to be involved in the process, and it means the Government must engage early, not late in the day."











Little Red Dot or the Apple of Nations?
This is an excerpt from a IPS-Nathan lecture by Peter Ho, senior adviser to the Centre for Strategic Futures. The former head of civil service is the 2016/17 S R Nathan Fellow for the Study of Singapore. He talks about how citizen empowerment and changing expectations require governments to adapt. They must shift from a model of delivering 'government to you' and 'government of you' to 'government with you'.
The Straits Times, 5 May 2017

In 2010, my friend, the futurist Peter Schwartz, described Singapore as the "Apple of Nations".

He was not using apple in its idiomatic form, but favourably comparing Singapore as a nation to Apple the company, which was then - as now - an inspiring paragon of innovation.

Apple is famous for its innovative and revolutionary products. Many think that this year, Apple will become the first trillion-dollar company in terms of market cap.

It was high praise from Schwartz. But of course, it begs the question of whether we can truly be the Apple of Nations, or whether we are in reality just a Little Red Dot.

Schwartz, who is no rosy-eyed admirer of Singapore, also warned: "The difference between Apple and Singapore is that the people of Singapore don't know how good they have it. They don't know just what a remarkable entity has been created here. They don't share yet that sense of passion that the people at Apple do."

This concern was echoed in Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's 2016 National Day Rally speech, when he said: "What I would like to have is that we be blessed with a divine discontent - always not quite satisfied with what we have, always driven to do better.

"At the same time, we have the wisdom to count our blessings so that we know how precious Singapore is and we know how to enjoy it and to protect it."

BIG GOVERNMENT VERSUS SMALL GOVERNMENT

Thrust into an unwelcome and unwanted independence (in 1965), the Singapore Government was in a hurry to turn the precarious situation around, and to transform Singapore into a "modern metropolis", in the matchless pledge of Mr Lee Kuan Yew in 1965.

So, it is not surprising that in the beginning, governance in Singapore was characterised by big government - if you will - through strong regulation, seeking compliance with policy rules, and maintaining as efficient a system as possible, in order to get things moving and to get them done.

Through this approach, the Government embarked on a number of major initiatives that helped to lay the foundations for Singapore's prosperity and stability.

These included a massive public housing programme; heavy investments in infrastructure - in public transport, our port and airport; and an activist, government-led approach to attract foreign investments and build up the capabilities to support higher value-added activities.

In these and many other policy domains, the visible hand of government was as critical as the invisible hand of markets.

The Government's interventions enabled new markets and industries to develop. They also helped to ensure that economic growth throughout the 1970s and 1980s benefited all segments of the population.

GOVERNMENT VERSUS GOVERNANCE

Today, citizens and businesses alike have far higher expectations of government than before. Access to information has increased dramatically in scope and speed as a result of the Internet revolution.

Social networking platforms like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have empowered citizens to express their views. Virtual communities are beginning to shape the debate and context of public policy issues.

The view that "government knows best" that perhaps characterised the situation in the beginning is increasingly challenged in today's world, in which citizens and businesses can easily gain access to much of the information that governments used to monopolise and control in the past.

THE FUTURE OF GOVERNMENT IN SINGAPORE

Today, the quality of government in Singapore is routinely listed at the top of a host of global rankings. That Singapore is already operating at the leading edge in many areas of governance means that it is no longer enough for Government policymakers just to copy and adapt from elsewhere.

For many of the emergent issues that we have to deal with, Singapore will have to evolve its own strategies and approaches. To achieve real breakthroughs, the Government will have to depend more and more on its own innovations.

And as a result, the Government will have to assume new levels of entrepreneurship with its attendant risks and uncertainties. A government that explores will also at times have to sacrifice some degree of efficiency in service of discovery. And it will need to become expert at conducting bounded experiments.

Indeed, the emergent, complex issues of the 21st century suggest the need for a new paradigm in governance - one that is Whole-of-Government, networked, innovative, exploratory and resilient in the way it confronts the challenges of our time - challenges rooted in complexity and accelerating change.

What is the appropriate model of governance for Singapore going forward?

The coming years will see a growing need for governance - which requires collaboration across the public, private and people sectors - rather than government acting as the sole, or dominant, player.

Today, the Government faces a myriad of complex public policy issues in which the trade-offs are much more difficult to make, because each could lead to unintended consequences and risks. Many of these public policy issues exceed the capacity of government working alone. Instead, they require the active contribution of private and people sectors.

A government-centric approach focused on efficiency and productivity will likely give way to a broader approach that leverages on the collective capacity of non-government actors, in order to achieve results of higher public value and at a lower overall cost for society.

How government interacts with the private and the people sectors will in turn determine how big a role each of these sectors will play. It is often overlooked that the Singapore Government has been a world leader in the engagement of the private sector.

A succession of five economic reviews - the Economic Committee of 1986, the Committee on Singapore's Competitiveness of 1998, the Economic Review Committee of 2003, the Economic Strategies Committee of 2008 and, most recently, the Committee on the Future Economy of 2016 - saw the public and private sectors coming together every few years to produce far-reaching policy recommendations for Singapore's long-term economic competitiveness.

FREE MARKET VERSUS MARKET INTERVENTION

A major factor that determines the size of our government has been our belief that free market forces should determine prices and economic outcomes. This is the approach that is the foundation of small government.

But in Singapore, faith in the market has not been uncritical or absolute.

Instead, the Government recognises that in certain cases, unfettered market forces can result in excessive volatility, negative externalities and under-provision of merit goods, like education, as well as public goods, like defence.

The economist Dani Rodrik outlined a framework that can be usefully applied to understanding how Singapore has chosen to blend the work of markets and government.
- First, the Government has sought to enable markets. This includes ensuring rule of law, property rights and public infrastructure - functions that most governments perform. In Singapore, enabling markets has also included industrial policy and capability development, subjects of some controversy in policy circles around the world, especially among proponents of small government that believe in the laissez-faire approach.
- Second, the Government has sought to regulate markets. This includes supervision of the financial sector, competition regulation and taxation of negative externalities, such as high charges for car ownership and road usage, and sin taxes on alcohol and tobacco products - and maybe in future, taxes on sugary drinks. But a key feature of Singapore's approach has been the shift towards lighter regulation accompanied by risk-based supervision, most recently exemplified by MAS' (the Monetary Authority of Singapore's) fintech regulatory sandbox.
- Third, the Government has sought to stabilise markets. This is the bread and butter of macroeconomic management. Singapore's basic approach in monetary and fiscal policy is not far different from global practices. But its efforts to address asset price inflation and credit crises are interesting examples of targeted interventions that harness market forces.
- Fourth, the Government has sought to legitimise markets. Globalisation, free trade and open markets lead to significant dislocations. Some of the sharpest debates over the role of governments centre on this: To what extent should governments facilitate adjustments, redistribute incomes or provide social safety nets, so as to maintain public support for market-oriented policies?
ENGAGING THE PEOPLE SECTOR

Complementing government and markets is the role that society will play in tackling the great challenges and wicked problems of the 21st century.

A key part of this governance process will be growing mutual engagement between the public and people sectors.

In his 2011 National Day Rally, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong underscored the importance of such engagement, pointing out that the nation needs to "harness diverse views and ideas, put aside personal interest and forge common goals". This is especially important because people's expectations have changed - and are changing, continuously.

WHY EXPECTATIONS ARE CHANGING

I think there are a couple of reasons for this development. The first reason is that as government policies lead to improvements, the needs of the people change in tandem.

This is explained by Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Maslow's proposition was that after the basic physiological needs of a person are met, more complex psychological needs will have to be fulfilled.

At the top of this hierarchy of needs are the need for self-actualisation, which is to realise the individual's potential, and transcendence, which is helping others achieve self-actualisation.

So, if you accept this proposition, then after government has delivered on the basic needs of food, security, shelter, transport and health, expectations of the people are going to change, not in demanding more of the basic needs, but in fulfilling their more psychic needs in the upper reaches of Maslow's hierarchy, including social, emotional and self-actualisation needs.

The challenge for governments everywhere is that success in delivering the material goods of life - housing, food and so on - is no guarantee that it can be successful in delivering "the good life", however defined.

I suppose the reverse is true as well, although it is hard to imagine the good life without the basic necessities of liveability.

THIRD GENERATION SINGAPOREANS

The second reason is what I term the third-generation effect. Singapore is now 51 years old and into its third generation of Singaporeans. The first generation of Singaporeans lived through the turbulence and uncertainties of Merger and Separation. The next generation started life on a firmer footing, but at the same time imbibed from their parents a sense of the vulnerabilities. But the third generation of Singaporeans have known only the affluence and success of Singapore.

For them, the uncertainties of the 60s and 70s are abstractions from their school history books. When their grandparents speak of the turmoil and danger that they experienced, they shrug their shoulders because it is an experience outside theirs. Of course, they are hardly to blame for this, and they certainly need not apologise for it.

Singapore's founding generation made the sacrifices in order that their children and grandchildren would enjoy peace and prosperity.

But clearly, what persuaded their parents and grandparents will not wash with the third generation. But as long as we are all in this together - and I hope that they feel they are in this together - the hopes and dreams of our youth must also appreciate the tough realities that endure. By all means, dream, but dream with your eyes wide open.

So, communicating to the third generation will require fresh arguments and different approaches.

PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT

Citizens today feel empowered, because of the social media and higher levels of educational achievement. Indeed, Singaporeans today are much better educated than their grandparents. In 1965, the cohort participation rate for university education was a minuscule 3 per cent. Today, it is 30 per cent.

The non-profit group Ground Up Initiative (GUI) points precisely to how attitudes are changing in Singapore. GUI operates a 26,000 sq m "Kampong Kampus" space in Khatib, with the aim of reconnecting urbanites to the natural environment. The group's founder, Mr Tay Lai Hock, said: "I think the top should set the example, but I also believe, you first and foremost, must take responsibility for your own life...Don't blame anybody. Don't blame the Government... I have a choice to decide that even though they have made this policy, I don't want to be a victim of their policies."

THE BUKIT BROWN CASE STUDY

In 2011, the Land Transport Authority announced plans to construct a road that would cut through Bukit Brown, the oldest cemetery in Singapore. Heritage groups protested, while the Government maintained its position on needing land in land-scarce Singapore.

When Bukit Brown Cemetery was placed on the World Monuments Watch in 2013, one member of the group All Things Bukit Brown said: "I hope it shows that we are serious, that we want a seat at the table, just so we can present what we have heard from the community, what we have heard from the people who have encouraged us... You want development, but let's have a discussion, perhaps."

The Government has to deal with an electorate that feels empowered, demanding and actively seeks participation. In this regard, Our Singapore Conversation, launched in 2013, signalled the Government's commitment to listening to the people's views.

THE CASE OF THE MISSING PM2.5

By looking at issues from the perspective of end-users - namely the citizen - the government is able to design better policies than if they were just developed using the usual top-down approach.

During the 2013 haze, experts had advised the Government to consider releasing another indicator besides the Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) readings: the PM2.5 readings, which measure particles smaller than 2.5 microns. This is because PM2.5 particles greatly affect people with heart disease, as well as children and the elderly.

When the haze began, the Government published the three-hour PSI readings and 24-hour PM2.5. But netizens and doctors pointed out that the PSI did not factor in PM2.5 readings as air quality indicators.

Members of the public also expressed concern that the PSI values appeared different from what they had observed. Singaporeans even resorted to taking their own real-time air quality readings with commercial equipment.

The Government said at first that it would be confusing for the public to have too many figures to read.

But in the end, because of persistence of the public, NEA (the National Environment Agency) began providing more information on PM2.5, and from June 20, 2013, publishing the PSI and PM2.5 figures hourly, six days after the haze began. And eventually, from April 1, 2014, Singapore moved to an integrated air quality reporting index, with PM2.5 incorporated into the PSI as its sixth pollutant parameter.

GOVERNMENT WITH YOU

I have spent some time explaining how and why society in Singapore is evolving, and how government itself has to evolve in tandem. Put simply, it means a shift from the paternalistic and interventionist "government to you" and "government for you" to "government with you".

The imperative is for government to move towards a collaborative approach to policy-making, and be prepared to connect, consult, and co-create with the people and the private sectors.

Peter Ho's fourth and final IPS-Nathan lecture, titled The Future: Governance, Unintended Consequences and the Redemption of Hope is on May 17.


Say you're sorry: How to suss out an insincere apology

$
0
0
A chicken rice chain owner, airline CEO and church pastor have been in the news recently, apologising for their own or their organisations' mistakes. How do you say sorry like you really mean it?
By David Chan, Published The Straits Times, 6 May 2017

Many countries, Singapore included, have seen celebrities, politicians and other public figures apologising for causing hurt and violating public trust.

Ordinary folk and leaders of organisations too may find themselves having to apologise - for inappropriate behaviour, making claims that turn out to be false or misleading, or for insensitive remarks.

As the recent slew of social media episodes (a chicken rice chain owner who insulted a taxi driver, a couple's outburst at an elderly man at a hawker centre) show, offending acts and comments can be caught on video and shared rapidly, generating public outrage.

Conversely, when someone caught in such an episode apologises and tries to make amends, as the chicken rice chain boss did by giving away packets of chicken rice to taxi drivers, that apology is also likely to receive wide public exposure.

Then there is the case of the United Airlines chief executive, whose initial apology after a passenger was dragged off a flight earned him only opprobrium, and the church pastor who apologised to his congregation for "all the hurt, all the disappointment and all the painful ordeals you've been through" and for his "unwise decisions".



So what is the psychology of an apology, and how does one decide whether, how, where and what to do to apologise?

First, some common-sense observations. Whether publicly or in private, it is difficult to say sorry sincerely to someone we have offended or wronged. Being sincere requires us to say what we mean, and mean what we say. Many of us procrastinate, and then we regret not apologising earlier or at all, adding to the regret from offending in the first place.

Some apologies are effective while others are disastrous. Then, too, there is the response to the apology: Some are accepted. But others we have wronged and apologised to may be unable or unwilling to let go and move on.

SAYING SORRY IS GOOD FOR YOU

But if it is so difficult, why apologise?

Research shows that a sincere apology has concrete benefits to yourself beyond preventing retaliations or repercussions.

When we sincerely apologise, we do so because we believe it is the right thing to do, and not just because it is a social nicety or obligation. Apologising sincerely therefore fulfils our need to be congruent with our personal beliefs.

A sincere apology does not just meet a need or reduce guilt. It is empowering because we experience the courage to overcome our resistance to admit wrongdoing and say sorry. It develops self-respect and enhances self-esteem by allowing us to behave in an authentic way.

Finally, no one enjoys apologising. A sincere apology is a humbling and learning experience. It serves as a powerful reminder not to repeat the mistake in future.

SINCERELY SORRY

How then to apologise sincerely?

Legal requirements may constrain or even dictate the wording of an apology. But many situations do not involve legal issues, and the offending party can decide whether to apologise and how to.

Research has identified the features of sincere and effective apologies. Let us call them the "Seven Rs of a Repairing Apology".
- Recognise. Understand and recognise the damage done. Do not trivialise a serious wrongdoing by calling it a judgment error, unbalanced decision, a blunder or an administrative lapse, especially when it involves integrity or other values.
- Reflect. See things from another's perspective and empathise with the person or group hurt. But do not be presumptuous and say you know how the person feels or apologise for the person's feelings. The emotions you highlight may not be the most important ones, or what the person is experiencing. Some emotional words may even sound condescending or cynical. Focus instead on your own actions. It is more accurate and appropriate to say "I am sorry to have said hurtful things" than to say "I am sorry to have caused you anger and embarrassment".
- Regret. Reveal and express your genuine regret and remorse.
- Responsibility. Explain what happened but admit your wrongdoing without giving excuses. "I should not have done that, but I was irritated by what was happening around me" is a classic "but" apology that makes things worse. By attributing the cause to an external factor beyond your control, you will be seen as shifting blame, not taking responsibility. Instead, just say: "I should not have done that. I hurt you by doing that and I am really sorry."
- Request. Ask for forgiveness and express hope that your apology will be accepted.
- Redeem. Make amendments. Do something concrete and positive to reduce the damage caused and signal your desire to reconcile and repair the relationship.
- Resolve. People you hurt want your assurance that it w ill not happen again. So it is important to resolve not to reoffend and repeat similar wrongdoings, and let the offended party know this. This "resolve not to repeat" is critical and most people, researchers included, have not paid enough attention to it.
Most well-intentioned apologies only express regret and request for forgiveness. By themselves, these two features are not very effective because they are the basics expected in any apology. We need to go beyond those words and take action: recognise, reflect, take responsibility, redeem and resolve.

Research shows that sincere apologies can reduce stress and contribute to mental and physical health for both parties, especially when the apology is accepted. When we receive a sincere apology, we should let go and move on.

But the benefits of accepting apologies apply only to sincere apologies, not insincere ones. We need to distinguish between the two and understand the different psychological processes involved.



IDENTIFYING INSINCERE APOLOGIES

For many of us, sorry seems to be the hardest word. But some say it readily, with varying degrees of sincerity. So when responding to an apology, a reality check is necessary.

Caution is most needed when we receive crafty apologies. These come convincingly from street-smart sweet talkers, or swindlers who con people.

In crafty apologies, there is more to saying sorry than meets the eye. The apologies are not genuine. They are calculated, deceptive moves to serve some self-interest or advance hidden agendas.

Their real purpose is to induce specific feelings in the offended person or the audience to garner sympathy that is otherwise undeserved, or mobilise action that otherwise would not occur. They deny, detract and cover up motives and wrongdoings that are more severe than what is being apologised for.

Such apologies are more than insincere. They are ill-intentioned. They are manipulative strategies, and especially powerful when used by someone with a bewitching charisma but a bad character.

I suggest four ways to help discern and detect insincere apologies that are ill-intentioned.
- First, look out for inconsistencies and contradictions between what the apology says and what the actions show.
- Second, revisit your assumptions and faith in the person apologising, when many individuals disagree with your assessment, especially when they are diverse people who are not in your in-group.
- Third, consider the possibility that your previous assessments were limited and earlier conclusions were incorrect, especially when trustworthy individuals make strong negative judgments about the person apologising.
- Fourth, identify the connection, and disconnection, between the person's actions and his espoused values, and reflect on how the actions and values match your own values. In the long run, manipulative apologies will likely backfire. This is because it is difficult to hide the contradictions showed up in subsequent actions, which reveal much more than words in the apology.
Another reason is that when the apology is accepted and the manipulative person gets away with it, he is emboldened to offend again. Repeatedly committing similar offending acts makes further apologies ineffective and reveals the falsity of the initial apology.

Although the truth may eventually show up, much damage could be caused before that happens. So it is important to discern and not adopt the simplistic attitude that all apologies should be accepted.


It is often politically incorrect or socially undesirable to not accept an apology. We do not want to appear as "non-forgiving". But to forgive is not a virtue to be equated with mercy, compassion or gracefulness when it is done blindly.


When there is clear and severe wrongdoing, and especially when the wrongdoer is unrepentant and manipulative, uncritically accepting an apology and exalting so-called forgiveness has many unintended negative consequences.


One negative consequence is the belief that the wrongdoing is condoned or denied when it is forgiven. It reduces the moral standing of the person who forgives, and increases perceptions of moral hypocrisy when he promotes other virtues.


Another consequence is it discourages discernment and inadvertently aids more people to fall into manipulative traps.


Finally, it tarnishes the reputation of innocent others who are associated with the wrongdoer or the forgiver because they are members of the same group. The group could be one based on a common cause, a profession, a political party or a religion. Eventually, it could erode the credibility of the group's value system . This "individual to group" effect can happen easily. It is basic psychology that people are quick to make generalisations.


Scientific research can help us apologise sincerely and effectively, and repair trust violation. But it cannot provide value-based judgment in a specific case on whether it is right to apologise, what to apologise for, and when to do so.


Answers to these questions are for the parties involved to determine. They will depend on the context, including the issues, interactions and individuals involved.


But there are lessons to be learnt. Everyone makes mistakes. We all need to decide on what to apologise for and when, and learn to apologise effectively.


We should also learn to be gracious in receiving and responding to an apology, but discern true apologies from crafty ones.


Above all, say sorry sincerely, and accept apologies appropriately. It is well worth it on both ends, for the well-being of the offender and the offended.


The writer is director of the Behavioural Sciences Institute and professor of psychology at the Singapore Management University.











Remote rehab removes hassle of visiting therapist: Smart Health TeleRehab

$
0
0
Pilot scheme lets patient do prescribed drills at home, with data transmitted to therapist
By Audrey Tan, The Straits Times, 6 May 2017

With a sensor strapped to his arm, Mr Chin Tian Loke, 72, mimics a video playing on an iPad and lifts his arm above his head. At this, the voice from the iPad congratulates him: "Sensational!"

Mr Chin, a retired odd-job worker, is not playing a game. He is undergoing physiotherapy to strengthen his limbs after a fall that broke his tailbone last November.

The Touch Home Care patient is among the first to try out a novel healthcare system - Smart Health TeleRehab - announced yesterday by healthcare technology agency Integrated Health Information Systems (IHiS).



The system aims to make physiotherapy as convenient as possible by allowing patients to exercise at any time of the day, in the comfort of their homes.

This could encourage more of them to attend rehabilitative therapy and reduce their chances of getting readmitted to hospital.

All that is required are an iPad and two sets of sensors - which will be loaned to the patient by the healthcare institution - and an open mind.

Believed to be the first of its kind, Smart Health TeleRehab will enable Mr Chin's physiotherapist to keep tabs on his exercise regime remotely. Each exercise session is recorded and saved to a digital cloud, which his therapist views within two working days.

Depending on how Mr Chin performs the exercises, his therapist can either increase the level or difficulty or video call to guide him. If required, she will pay him a home visit within the week.

Smart Health TeleRehab is currently being used by 11 patients at two healthcare providers - Touch Home Care and NTUC Health.

But 12 more players - including Changi General Hospital, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital and SPD (formerly known as the Society for the Physically Disabled) - will come on board by the end of this year.

An estimated 1,000 patients are expected to benefit from the pilot programme by the end of next year.

IHiS' latest initiative follows its April roll-out of a video call system for medical consultations to six public healthcare institutions that enables patients to consult experts from their homes.

"With the increasing incidence of chronic diseases, shortage of healthcare professionals, and the availability of more intelligent technologies, healthcare is a prime sector that can benefit from Smart Nation initiatives," said Professor Atreyi Kankanhalli, from the department of information systems at the National University of Singapore's School of Computing.

Mr Chin, who has been using TeleRehab for about two weeks, said he has been doing his exercises almost daily instead of waiting three weeks for a session at Ng Teng Fong Hospital.

Mr Chee Hong Tat, Senior Minister of State for Health, yesterday visited Mr Chin at his home.

He said: "Patients will benefit from greater convenience, cost savings and better outcomes. Therapists and therapy service providers will also benefit from the productivity improvements."

The cost of such sessions can vary, depending on factors such as the subsidies a patient qualifies for.

But as a gauge, at Ang Mo Kio Thye Hua Kwan Hospital, which will run the programme from next month, a patient can expect to pay between $3 and $50 for a Smart Health TeleRehab session.

In comparison, a patient has to pay more than $80 for a session at the centre (excluding transportation costs), or more than $160 for a therapist to visit him at home.





 





New system set to ease therapist manpower crunch
The Straits Times, 6 May 2017

Comprising an iPad Air and two sensors that can be strapped to a person's neck and arm, the new Smart Health TeleRehab system looks like a newfangled gaming device but it could revolutionise rehabilitative therapy in Singapore.

"We want to improve productivity in the healthcare sector, because we have an ageing population and a shrinking local workforce. We need to make good use of our healthcare manpower," Mr Chee Hong Tat, Senior Minister of State for Health, said yesterday.

Last year, there were 2,579 occupational and physiotherapists in Singapore. Figures show that 53,000 patients had to undergo physiotherapy in 2014 - a number expected to grow with time.

An initial study found that the telerehab system could help therapists reap productivity gains of more than 30 per cent. A telerehab session takes about 52 minutes, compared to the 80-minute session usually held at a patient's home.

Touch Home Care physiotherapist Vivian Lim, 31, estimates that the use of such a system could help her see up to seven patients a day, compared to five currently.

Dr Adrian Yeow, senior lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences' School of Business, said the programme could address the relative shortage of trained therapists.

"It also enables patients who would previously find it inconvenient to attend such sessions to benefit from the treatment. In the long run, it could also help reduce medical costs as such treatments may be useful in preventing future injuries."




Singapore Navy's 50th Annivesary: PM Lee Commissions First Littoral Mission Vessel RSS Independence

$
0
0

Strong navy needed to keep trade flowing: PM Lee
He says Singapore has built a maritime force that is admired at home and respected abroad
By Charmaine Ng, The Straits Times, 6 May 2017

Singapore needs a strong maritime force as an island nation that depends on trade as its lifeblood, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday, as the navy celebrated its 50th anniversary and commissioned a new warship.

That was why Singapore's pioneers decided to build up the navy soon after the Republic gained independence in 1965.

"Because we traded with the world, and the sea was - and still is - our lifeline," said PM Lee, before commissioning the navy's first littoral mission vessel (LMV) at Changi Naval Base.

"We needed a strong maritime force to protect our sovereignty, defend us from seaborne threats, and keep trade - our lifeblood - flowing."

Singapore's maritime sector contributes about 7 per cent to the nation's gross domestic product. It is home to over 130 international shipping groups and more than 5,000 maritime establishments, making it one of the world's busiest ports.



PM Lee noted how the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) is now a fighting force equipped with technologically advanced hardware, including submarines, frigates, maritime patrol aircraft, and unmanned vessels and aircraft - a far cry from its inception on May 5, 1967, at Telok Ayer Basin with just two seaworthy wooden ships and a third ship moored as its headquarters. "(It is now) a navy that is admired at home and respected beyond our shores," he said.



Joining the fleet was the first locally designed and built LMV, RSS Independence, which became fully operational after a ceremony witnessed by some 1,700 past and present navy personnel and guests.

These included Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, Chief of Defence Force Perry Lim, Chief of Navy Lai Chung Han and eight former navy chiefs, including DPM Teo.

The warship - launched in July 2015 - is the first of eight LMVs to be commissioned and tasked to replace the fleet of 11 Fearless-class patrol vessels by 2020.

As part of the golden jubilee celebrations, PM Lee also launched an RSN50 commemorative book and an art mural depicting Singapore's maritime heritage alongside the navy's progress, by colouring the crescent moon in gold.

He also sealed a time capsule comprising artefacts symbolic of the RSN's key achievements over the years; it will be opened on the navy's 75th anniversary in 2042.

Items in the capsule include a framed poster of the ports of call during the navy's first round-the-world voyage, a replica of the new LMV and a book compilation of the aspirations of navy personnel for the next 25 years.



With the commissioning of RSS Independence marking a new milestone, the men and women of the navy carry a vital task in continuing its proud history, said PM Lee. "It is now your duty to sail the ships of the next-generation navy, and keep Singapore safe and secure, in peacetime as in war," he told them.

Rear-Admiral Lai yesterday pledged the navy's continued dedication to protecting Singapore's waters, as he thanked the Government and Singaporeans for their trust and support over the years.

"On our golden jubilee day today, we, men and women of the navy, recommit ourselves to defend our country and the security of our waters," he said.



















PM Lee pays tribute to pioneers who steered fledgling navy
He hails their determination and resourcefulness in building the navy
By Chong Zi Liang, The Straits Times, 6 May 2017

As a young sailor training overseas in the 1960s, now retired Second Warrant Officer Osman Abdullah used to endure a term of derision aimed at Singapore's nascent maritime force.

"They called us a toy navy," he said.

Yesterday, looking out at the modern warships docked at Changi Naval Base, he broke into a wide grin as he recalled that old taunt.

"Now you see, the toy navy is coming up," he said with satisfaction. "I'm very proud to see the navy grow like that."

Mr Osman, 86, was one of the pioneers at the Singapore Navy's golden jubilee celebrations, during which Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong recounted its humble beginnings.



Fifty years ago to the day, the Navy Ensign was first hoisted at Telok Ayer Basin, the site of modern-day Shenton Way, to form the Singapore Naval Volunteer Force.

Made up of just a handful of volunteers from the Singapore Division of the Malayan Royal Navy Volunteer Reserve and the Singapore Women's Auxiliary Naval Service, "it was a makeshift force", said Mr Lee.

One of those with the women's auxiliary service, Ms Iris Ng, said she was a telephone operator, connecting calls through a manual switchboard in the 1960s while on land.

Out at sea, she learnt to navigate and read the compass of a ship, and did maintenance duties, too.

"The floorboards were wooden and we had to polish the copper railings with Brasso to make them shine," recalled the 77-year-old.

Addressing more than 1,700 past and present naval officers yesterday, Mr Lee paid tribute to that early generation of sailors, saying: "What our pioneers lacked in technology and resources, they made up for in their determination and resourcefulness."

And so naval officers were sent abroad to Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada to train and gain operational experience.

"They acquired and passed down the art of seafaring and the skills and discipline of seamen," he said.

The navy's hardware was also progressively improved, starting with six patrol craft in 1968. It then gradually broadened its range of vessels with missile gunboats, landing ship tanks, minesweepers and missile corvettes.

These efforts paid off in 1975 when the organisation was renamed the Republic of Singapore Navy, and became one of the three services - along with the army and air force - in the Singapore Armed Forces. Today, it is a full-fledged navy complete with submarines, frigates, maritime patrol aircraft, and unmanned vessels and unmanned aircraft.

The men and women who don its uniform have also been tested in real operations, Mr Lee added, as they have carried out anti-piracy missions in the Arabian Gulf, search-and-rescue operations after aircraft incidents, and coordinated patrols in the Malacca Strait.

Because of these achievements, it is now "a navy that is admired at home and respected beyond our shores", Mr Lee said.



Joining this modern fighting force is the first navy ship completely designed and built in Singapore.

Mr Lee commissioned the littoral mission vessel RSS Independence into service yesterday. It is the third ship to bear the name Independence after its two predecessors, a patrol craft and another patrol vessel, retired from service.

Mr Lee acknowledged the crews of the first and second Independence ships, as well as the pioneers who turned up to mark the navy's 50th birthday.

"Your presence honours the new RSS Independence and its crew, and reminds us what the navy is about: not just capable ships and up-to-date technology, but fighting spirit and dedication to the nation," he said.
















RSS Independence evokes memories for retired officer
By Charmaine Ng, The Straits Times, 6 May 2017

Hearing the name RSS Independence once again yesterday, as the navy's first littoral mission vessel (LMV) was commissioned, 1st Warrant Officer (Ret) Kalvinder Singh felt a profound sense of pride.

For the 65-year-old retired naval officer, the name carries two years of memories of a tough but fulfilling life patrolling Singapore's seas on board the first patrol craft RSS Independence, as a naval combat system specialist from 1973.

"The name is very close to my heart. After so many years, the fact that the name Independence still exists in the navy - I feel really proud to hear it again," he said.

The patrol craft, one of six pioneer warships bought by the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) in 1968, was the first naval vessel named Independence. The second was a patrol vessel commissioned on Aug 22, 1998.

Yesterday, the name lived on in the newly commissioned first-of- class LMV, locally designed and built by the RSN and the Defence Science and Technology Agency.



Compared with the RSS Independence of today, life on the patrol craft back then was tough, said 1WO (Ret) Singh, who now works in property management.

"There were very few ships, so we had to do a lot of patrolling out at sea. We could spend four days out at sea, and, on the way back home, they would tell us to continue patrolling again," he said.

But despite the long spells at sea, he enjoyed the thrill and excitement of each deployment.

One memorable incident was the Laju ferry hijacking in 1974, when the RSS Independence was placed on standby in harbour in Pulau Brani. For a few days, 1WO (Ret) Singh and his crew had to live on the patrol craft, not knowing when or whether they would be deployed.

During the crisis, he said, they were in a state of uncertainty, not knowing what would happen. "We were waiting for directions from HQ on whether to go or not to go," said 1WO (Ret) Singh, adding that they were not deployed in the end.

He also served on missile gunboats and a County-class landing ship tank during his 37-year naval career, which ended with his retirement in 2007.

If given the chance now, he said, he would choose to serve on a navy ship again in a heartbeat.

"To be on board a ship with a crew who all worked in a team together - that was one of the most beautiful things (in my life)."















Singapore Navy's highest-ranking female officer Jerica Goh: Charting new territory for women on the high seas
By Charmaine Ng, The Straits Times, 5 May 2017

When Colonel Jerica Goh was a junior officer in her 20s, she faced a taboo about women in the engine room of a ship.

"On one ship, I was told that girls were not allowed to walk through the engine room because it's pantang," said Col Goh, 42, using the Malay word for "taboo".

"They said the ship, being 'female', might get jealous and offended."

But as she recalled the memory, Col Goh, who joined the Republic of Singapore Navy in 1993, shrugged it off as a "funny story".

"At that time, I thought, if I was not allowed to go through the engine room, then I won't take charge of that ship when I am on duty," said Col Goh, who is now the head of the Naval Training Department.

In her 24 years in the navy, that was the only incident where she was treated differently because of her gender, she said.

Since then, Col Goh has risen up the ranks and is now the highest-ranking female naval officer.

As the Singapore Navy celebrates its 50th anniversary today, Col Goh is a living embodiment of an aspiration penned in a time capsule 25 years ago by a fellow female naval officer- to have female officers command ships and units.

The wish, which was made by then Lieutenant Phoon Chiu Yoke, was revealed when the capsule was opened in January this year.

Seven years after Lt Phoon made the wish, Major Tay Poh Ling became the first female commanding officer of a ship.

Later, in 2013, Col Goh became the first female commanding officer (CO) of a frigate when she took charge of RSS Supreme - the navy's most advanced warship.

Since 1999, there have been about 10 female commanding officers of naval ships, including Col Goh.

Female navy personnel now make up about 8 per cent of staff.

As CO of RSS Supreme, Col Goh led a search-and-rescue operation for AirAsia Flight QZ8501 in December 2014 - which was a challenging mission, she said.

For 10 days, the RSS Supreme surveyed the Java Sea, sometimes in rough conditions, for debris and survivors from the plane, which had vanished with 162 passengers and crew members.

"A few times, we were quite lucky that everyone on the launched boats returned safely."

Based on her experience, Col Goh said that on a ship, gender matters little. "In the end, it's about how we coordinate activities, the ships, resources and fight the war. It's more about decision-making skills than physical ability," she added.





Navy marks 50th year with time capsule
It contains wishes and hopes for the RSN in the next 25 years, along with artefacts, and will be opened in 2042
By Charmaine Ng, The Straits Times, 5 May 2017

Having a first female chief of navy and training systems using virtual reality - these hopes and aspirations of the men and women of the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) will be sealed in a time capsule by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong today.

It is part of celebrations marking the navy's 50th anniversary today, which is also known as Navy Day.

These 800 wishes submitted by navy personnel for the RSN in the next 25 years have been compiled into a book, which will be put into the time capsule, along with artefacts that highlight the RSN's key achievements since its silver jubilee in 1992.

The time capsule, shaped like a typical compartment on board a naval ship, will be placed in the Navy Museum in Tanah Merah Coast Road.

Other items include a framed poster of the ports of call during the navy's first round-the-world voyage, called Sail Navy 2000, on the RSS Endurance.

Following the RSS Endurance's maiden deployment on Navy Day in 2000, led by then commanding officer, Colonel (Ret) Siow Chee Khiang, it visited nine ports and sailed through the Panama and Suez canals.

The voyage lasted four months and covered 25,000 nautical miles.

Another artefact is a replica of the Independence-class Littoral Mission Vessel - locally designed and built warships which are expected to fully replace the Fearless-class patrol vessels by 2020.

The capsule will be opened when the navy turns 75 in 2042.



In January, the RSN opened a time capsule that was sealed 25 years ago in 1992, with about 200 aspirations for the navy to achieve by this year.

To date, the navy has surpassed these aspirations, said Rear-Admiral Timothy Lo, chairman of RSN50, "because of the great work of the men and women of the RSN who have served our nation with dedication and distinction".

For example, one wish made by then Staff Sergeant Loy Joon How was for the navy to have "formidable coastal and strike capabilities against three-dimensional threats".

This was achieved in 2007, when the navy acquired the Formidable- class frigates.

The navy also fulfilled another aspiration from its 25th anniversary - for ships to carry rotary-wing aircraft - when RSS Endurance, the first Endurance-class Landing Ship Tank, was commissioned in 2000.

The new wishes include one from a Ms Jessline Lim, hoping for a female chief of navy.

Another submission by Military Expert 4A Lim Jin Hua reads: "I hope to see that we have advanced in tandem with technology. We will be using VR as part of our training... where we can use VR to simulate a virtual battlefield."

Col (Ret) Siow, 55, hopes the navy will continue to have the ability to accomplish what it sets out to do in the next 25 years.

"It will be a constant challenge, as the world becomes more complex," he said.





30 foreign warships to mark RSN's 50th birthday
Largest gathering of naval vessels here and public activities among events planned
By Charmaine Ng, The Straits Times, 1 May 2017

Singapore will this month play host to the largest gathering of naval vessels, as part of celebrations for the navy's 50th anniversary.

From May 7, led by the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN), about 30 warships from 20 countries will make their way to the Republic from the Malacca Strait and South China Sea. Participating countries include China, the United States, Japan, Malaysia, Russia and Australia.

As part of the group sail, the warships will take part in the Western Pacific Naval Symposium Multilateral Sea Exercise, where Singapore will lead in exercising the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea.

The code was signed in 2014 by 21 members of the Western Pacific Naval Symposium, which includes China and eight Asean countries. It guides how military vessels should react to situations to reduce the risk of incidents at sea.

After arriving in Singapore, the warships will take part in the International Maritime Review on May 15 - a show of strong ties forged in the RSN's 50-year history, said RSN50 organising committee deputy chairman Saw Shi Tat.

"This is the first time that the Singapore navy is organising the International Maritime Review," Colonel Saw told reporters last Friday. "The scale... is testament to the friendships we have forged with friends and partners all over the world."

With President Tony Tan Keng Yam as the reviewing officer, the event will comprise a parade, a land review of the warships in harbour, and a sea review of warships at the anchorage.

During the review, Changi Naval Base will be officially named RSS Singapura - Changi Naval Base. More than 4,000 guests and participants will be present, including over 30 chiefs of navy and directors-general of coast guards.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will commission the navy's first Littoral Mission Vessel (LMV) on Friday, which marks 50 years since the Singapore naval ensign was first raised at Telok Ayer Basin on May 5, 1967. The vessel, named Independence, is the first of eight LMVs locally designed and built here.

A time capsule of items marking the RSN's achievements since its silver jubilee in 1992 will be sealed, such as a poster of the ports-of-call during the RSN's first voyage around the world in 2000, and a replica of the Independence-class LMV.

Events are lined up for the public, including storytelling sessions by men and women of the navy for children, and rope-tying workshops at selected Safra clubs during the June school holidays. In November, the public will get to tour navy ships, view equipment and weapons, and interact with navy personnel.

"The navy's development over the past 50 years has closely mirrored the development of Singapore," said Col Saw. "And in its golden jubilee year, all can be proud of the navy's achievements and contributions that it has made to the defence of our country."











Related
Singapore Navy's Golden Jubilee: PM Lee Commissions First Littoral Mission Vessel RSS Independence

New NKF hotline 1800-KIDNEYS launched to help spread awareness

$
0
0
NKF hotline to spur early action to avoid kidney failure
One-stop resource centre to raise awareness as part of war on diabetes
By Ng Jun Sen, The Sunday Times, 7 May 2017

With five people in Singapore losing the use of their kidneys every day, simply building new dialysis centres is not enough to cope with the growing number of patients.

The key, instead, says National Kidney Foundation (NKF) chairman Koh Poh Tiong, is education and early intervention - so patients do not reach that stage at all.

To help Singaporeans take charge of their health, the NKF yesterday launched a new hotline as a "one-stop resource centre" to spread awareness about kidney failure, part of the measures it is collaborating on with the Government to support the war on diabetes.

The hotline - 1800-KIDNEYS (5436397) - is manned by four operators who speak the four main languages, as well as dialects.

Mr Koh revealed this new initiative at the opening ceremony of the new Le Champ-NKF Dialysis Centre in Bukit Panjang. The new centre's 16 dialysis beds will be able to serve 96 kidney failure patients, helping to relieve the crunch in the other centres nearby.

"At the current rate, it will be a far greater challenge for us in the future to build more centres, especially with an ageing population," he said. "I would prefer if Singaporeans can look after themselves better by watching their health and exercising regularly... Prevention is better than cure."

North West District Mayor and Bukit Panjang MP Teo Ho Pin, who attended the event, said this centre will help improve the quality of life of patients living in the area, but the overall outlook is worrying.

He pointed out that there were more than 6,200 patients in 2015, compared with 3,700 in 2006. And the NKF's 31 dialysis centres, which help around 4,000 patients, are operating at full capacity.

Singapore ranks first in the world for diabetes-induced kidney failure, as well as fourth and fifth for the number of existing and new cases respectively, he added. "With more than one million seniors aged 65 and above by 2030, many of whom have one of three chronic illnesses - high blood pressure, high cholesterol or diabetes, it is indeed a very worrying trend," said Dr Teo.

Diabetes, which every two out of three NKF patients suffer from, and high blood pressure are the two leading causes of kidney failure, while cholesterol can also clog the renal arteries.

Another seven new NKF centres will open by 2020, including a mega dialysis centre in Jurong West that can take in around 1,200 patients.

This is all part of the charity's strategy to tackle the growing numbers. NKF is the largest kidney dialysis provider here. But it is not "future-proof", stressed Mr Koh.

Hence, the need for prevention.

Mr Koh said the charity received more than 1,000 calls at its various departments last month. Anyone can call the hotline to learn more about the disease, or ask about NKF's programmes and services or the admission process and criteria.

Those with fund-raising ideas or who want to explore possible collaborations with NKF can also call.

When asked about the hotline, retiree and NKF patient Law Ching Nge, 77, said: "The new number is easier to memorise."


Investment Scheme or Scam: Better safe than sorry

$
0
0
Resist urge to invest in too-good-to-be-true schemes that promise unsustainable returns
By Lorna Tan, Invest Editor/Senior Correspondent, The Sunday Times, 7 May 2017

It sounds like a surefire winner - buy plots of cheap land overseas and get your money back, plus a tidy profit once they are sold off to developers.

Or this one: Buy agarwood trees that would eventually be harvested for their valuable timber and oud oil that is used in fragrances and spas.

Yet another is a so-called oil bunkering scheme that probably had nothing to do with oil. It was sold as a financing arrangement with promises of high, regular payouts and capital back after a specified period that could be as short as eight months.

And in another investment scheme that turned sour, retail investors were persuaded to park their hard-earned savings with financial experts who would trade stocks or forex on their behalf.

Besides the above, several firms, including Genneva Gold, Gold Guarantee, Profitable Plots and Sunshine Empire, have surfaced in recent years at the shady end of the Singapore financial service sector.

All these schemes were offered with low initial investment sums and attractive returns over short periods.

But big losses can also come with the territory, as many Singaporeans can attest.

The uncertainty and high risks of such schemes seem obvious, yet many here come a cropper when their investments in these schemes turn sour.

The increasing number of retail investors caught out and the millions of dollars lost have caught the attention of the authorities.



A "Beware! Investment Scams" programme organised by MoneySense and the Securities Investors Association Singapore was launched last month to alert investors about the pitfalls of too-good-to-be-true schemes.

The authorities in the United States, Canada and other jurisdictions have also warned of the risks involved in fraudulent binary option trading, reflecting a growing worldwide problem.

In a nutshell, a binary option is a type of option contract that references an underlying instrument such as shares and currencies, where the payout will depend entirely on the outcome of a "yes or no" (binary) proposition.

When the binary option expires, you will receive a predetermined cash payout if you have predicted correctly. If not, you lose your entire investment.

Several victims of these schemes told The Sunday Times that they got greedy in their hunt for yield amid a period of low interest rates.

As their stories below attest, the scams - and the related dangers - come in all shapes but there are common elements as well.

One ruse, as investors have found out the painful way, is to ensure that those who got into a scheme early broke even in a short period of time, so as to encourage them to pile in more money in a bid to earn bigger returns.

Such investment scams are usually managed by people who hold meetings in posh offices and hotels, which boosts their public image and lend credence to their products.

Some investments appear to provide some form of insurance, which investors wrongly believed could protect their capital.

Many of these investors then invited family members and friends to participate, partly because there are commissions to be earned when they refer fresh candidates and partly because they truly believed the schemes were bona fide.

UNDERSTANDING YOUR RISK PROFILE

We all hate to make a loss and the feeling is worse if you had been duped into a scam.

It is vital to recognise that financial losses affect us differently. This can be attributed to our emotional make-up, the resources at hand to make money again and how deep our pockets are.

And while some are able to withstand great volatility and still sleep well at night, others are risk-averse.

If you are risk-averse, it means that even if the investment loss is small, it can be an emotionally draining experience that may impact your health.

It is prudent to understand your risk profile. So besides analysing the risk-reward reality and conducting due diligence before any investment, ask yourself : Can I take the volatility, can I afford to invest, and, finally, do I need to invest?

One 55-year-old investor who put almost $40,000 into an oil bunkering scheme, expecting 15 per cent monthly returns over eight months, recalled how stressful the experience had been for her. In her case, her nightmare began after receiving just two payouts.

When the payouts dried up, dark thoughts consumed her mind and she went through an emotional roller coaster with feelings of anger, rage and depression, and countless sleepless nights. She also despaired as it was a friend who had referred her to the scheme.

She was subsequently diagnosed with Stage 2 breast cancer. After surgery and six weeks of radiotherapy, she counted herself fortunate that her condition has stabilised and she is on a five-year anti-hormonal pills regime.

INVESTING WITH MONEY YOU CAN AFFORD TO LOSE

A 45-year-old investor borrowed $400,000 from a credit line as the principal sum for her investment in a scheme. When the scheme collapsed, the monthly interest portion of the debt was a staggering $8,000, which devastated her.

Another took a loan from his 25-year endowment insurance plan to fund an investment. If he had not taken the loan against the policy, the potential maturity proceeds would have been about $100,000 when it matured last year.

Instead, his maturity proceeds were just $20,000. This means that the premiums he had saved in his insurance policy for the past 25 years had gone down the drain.

ONCE BITTEN BUT NOT TWICE SHY

The adage "once bitten twice shy" does not hold true for some retail investors. One medical doctor admitted to me that he had lost his money twice to schemes that turned out to be run in a Ponzi-like manner.

In a Ponzi scheme, people are enticed into investing by the promise of high returns. The returns, however, are paid out of funds from new investors entering the scheme. It all goes swimmingly until the flow of funds dries up when the operator is unable to get enough new investors to pay off the older ones, and he flees with the money.

Another investor in her 60s had parked more than $500,000 in binary options but has not been able to withdraw any returns nor her capital.

To make matters worse, she lost more money when she tried to retrieve her money through an overseas agency that claimed to have helped other binary option investors trapped like her.

In her bid to recover her retirement savings, she had responded to an individual who claimed to work for an international police agency who linked her up with a hacker.

She forked out $10,000 on the hacking software but nothing has materialised. In addition, she is considering legal help from the US but has been told to pay a high initial fee.

BACK TO BASICS

A former classmate has been encouraging me to sign up for an overseas-based scheme where so-called professional traders will deal in blue-chip US stocks on my behalf. It is not regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

The initial investment sum is US$10,000 (S$14,035) and my friend claimed the trades have made him richer by achieving about 7 per cent monthly net returns.

He also earns commissions by referring investors to the scheme; his parents and siblings have joined.

I declined his invitation to invest.

For me, it's back to the basics of disciplined saving, making prudent investments steadily and preserving my wealth.

I used to get very excited when I heard of investments with potential high returns.

Over the years, I have learnt to protect myself by inculcating a habit of working out the worst-case scenario. I also ask myself before making any investment if I really need to take the risk.

Better safe than sorry.


Better insurance coverage for maids from 1 Oct 2017

$
0
0
Foreign domestic workers to be better insured against accidents under new rules starting Oct 1
Premiums likely to rise by between $7 and $15; coverage across insurers will be standardised
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 8 May 2017

Employers will have to provide better insurance coverage for their foreign maids under new rules that kick in on Oct 1.

They will need to buy personal accident insurance policies with coverage of at least $60,000, up from $40,000 now, Minister of State for Manpower Sam Tan said yesterday at a May Day carnival for maids organised by the labour movement.

With the higher coverage, annual insurance premiums are expected to go up by between $7 and $15.

Coverage across insurers will also be standardised to ensure all maids get the same protection throughout their employment in Singapore.

Personal accident protection for maids was last reviewed in 2008. Mr Tan said the NTUC's Centre for Domestic Employees (CDE) - set up last year - had been asking the Government to do another review as domestic helpers' salaries, as well as the cost of living in their home countries, have increased since then.

"The current level of protection... is no longer sufficient in the event that an accident happens and the foreign domestic worker is no longer able to provide for her family," said Mr Tan. Some employers have also asked if more can be done to protect the families of injured maids.

Different insurers now provide different coverage for personal accident insurance. Some spell out a narrower definition of accidents and have more exclusions. This means some workers get compensation for certain accidents while others do not - even though the circumstances and injuries are the same.

From Oct 1, theMinistry of Manpower (MOM) will stipulate that personal accident insurance for maids must cover any sudden, unforeseen and unexpected incident that results in permanent disability or death. Insurers will not be able to impose exclusion clauses other than what the MOM specifies, such as pre-existing conditions and suicide.

Another change to the rules will clarify the period of insurance cover for maids: this must be from the date they arrive in Singapore till the date they return home at the end of their employment contact.

If a maid changes employers, the existing insurance coverage should last until the day the new work permit is issued, said Mr Tan.

To speed up the compensation process, maids and their legal representatives will be able to file claims with insurers, instead of relying on their employers to do so. If they are unable to do so, an MOM-appointed representative can act for them.

Mr Tan said the changes help employers to better protect their maids at a slight increase in premiums, and give maids greater peace of mind. He also thanked maids for their dedication and support, which he said had allowed Singaporean families to better manage their responsibilities at home.

"We trust that these changes will further facilitate a harmonious working relationship between employers and their foreign domestic workers," he added.

CDE chairman Yeo Guat Kwang said the centre was happy with the raised minimum coverage, noting that maids' starting salaries had risen from an average of $300 in 2012 to $550 last year.

The CDE also urged the Government to consider raising the minimum $15,000 medical insurance coverage, he added. This has not changed since 2010.

There are more than 230,000 foreign maids working in Singapore, and rules have been progressively ramped up to better protect them.

Employers will have to buy personal accident insurance policies with the new requirements when they apply for or renew work permits from Oct 1.

Further details of the changes will also be sent to employers and employment agencies, and will be available on the MOM's website.














Maids, employers cheer boost to accident coverage
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 8 May 2017

Indonesian maid Dewie, just 1.4m tall, has to tiptoe on a chair to reach the ceiling fan in her employer's living room whenever she cleans it.

A close shave two months ago has her cheering now the increase in minimum accident insurance coverage for maids, which will go up from $40,000 to $60,000 on Oct 1.

Ms Dewie, who is 29 and goes by one name, had lost her balance then and toppled backwards onto the armrest of a sofa - narrowly avoiding a hardback chair nearby.

She shudders to think what would have happened if she had broken her back.

"I try my best to be careful, but accidents can happen. So it's good to have more money for my family. It can help them if I'm gone," said Ms Dewie, who was at the labour movement's inaugural May Day celebration for maids yesterday.

Employers interviewed by The Straits Times said the enhanced insurance would ease their concerns.

"If my maid was hurt, I would also worry about how her family would cope," said sales manager Sarah Goh, 48, whose maid is from the Philippines.

She was pleased to hear that insurance coverage will be standardised, so maids are not short- changed when insurers decide not to cover certain accidents.

With the changes, annual premiums are expected to go up by between $7 and $15, but Ms Goh said the "small amount can go a long way in helping my maid and her family".

Organisations working with maids also cheered the improved protection, but noted that it would help only in cases of death or permanent incapacity.

The Centre for Domestic Employees (CDE) hopes to see a review of medical insurance next.

CDE chairman Yeo Guat Kwang said that while the centre has handled only a handful of "compensation" cases since its launch last year, "we can't just wait for the number to grow".

Insurance will help maids, their families, and their employers better cope with the unexpected, he said.

Minister of State for Manpower Sam Tan said at the May Day celebration that his ministry was reviewing the medical insurance policy for maids and would announce its findings "at the right time".

Meanwhile, non-governmental organisation Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2) urged that the Work Injury Compensation Act be extended to maids so they can be entitled to benefits such as medical expenses and paid medical leave.

Under the Act, the compensation limits for death and permanent incapacity are also higher, said TWC2 president Noorashikin Abdul Rahman.

But in 2008, then Minister of State for Manpower Gan Kim Yong had explained that it would be better for maids to be covered under insurance instead of the Act because the nature of their work "makes it difficult to determine whether the injury is sustained as part of the work or otherwise".










Related
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>