Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7503 articles
Browse latest View live

Ambulance calls surge with ageing population

$
0
0
SCDF says half-year figure is highest in 15 years, will increase fleet to cope
By Lim Yi Han, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

More ambulance calls were made to the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) in the first six months of the year, driven by an ageing population.

Mid-year statistics released by the SCDF yesterday showed that its emergency medical services responded to 81,686 calls between January and June this year, a 7.4 per cent increase over the same period last year. This half-year figure is also the highest in 15 years.

The SCDF attributed the spike to the growing demand for ambulance services from an ageing population. To cope, it will increase its fleet of emergency ambulances from 50 now to 80 by 2018.

Emergency calls made up about 94 per cent of the total calls responded. Of those, three out of every four were medical-related.

About 4 per cent - or 3,453 - were non-emergency calls - more than double that in the same period last year. The rest were false alarms.

The SCDF also urged the public to treat its staff with respect.

In the first half of the year, there were 10 cases of SCDF staff being physically or verbally abused while attending to patients.

The culprits included the patients themselves, or their family members. There were six such cases in the same period last year.

Noting that its emergency medical services personnel save lives by providing critical emergency care, the SCDF warned that it does not condone abuse against its officers, and will lodge police reports against culprits.

Separately, private ambulance operators have also seen greater demand for their services.

Hope Ambulance Service operations manager Simon Low said calls went up by about 20 per cent this year. Its clients are mostly elderly, and the calls are for non-emergency cases such as hospital visits for routine check-ups.

As the population greys, community support is crucial, said Mr Kavin Seow, director of Touch Community Services' home-care service.

The elderly should be connected to relevant agencies such as seniors activity centres near their homes so a "tight network" of support is in place, he said.

"Many of the elderly live alone and may not receive much-needed help, if at all, in a timely manner," he noted.

Mr Seow added that the most common emergency situations are a result of falls or medical-related. The elderly should install home modifications for safety, such as hand rails, he advised.

The SCDF also urged the public to visit its website for information on how to tell if a situation is an emergency medical case, even though the percentage of non-emergency calls "remained low".

It said: "Such calls could place unnecessary strain on the SCDF's emergency medical services resources and deprive those who are in genuine need of emergency medical assistance."



The right attitude for a happy life

$
0
0
By Gary Hayden, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

When it comes to leading a happy and fulfilled life, attitudes are more important than circumstances.

This is the core message of the first self-help manual, Enchiridion, which is a collection of practical precepts from the second-century Greek-speaking philosopher Epictetus.

What does Epictetus mean when he says that attitudes are more important than circumstances?

Well, imagine that you have a certain amount of money. What decides whether that amount of money is enough?

The money isn't going to tell you, says Epictetus.

Only you can decide.

Some people lead contented and happy lives on a modest amount of money. Others feel discontented and miserable on the same amount. So, precisely the same circumstances can make you happy or miserable, depending on your attitude.

We can't control our circumstances, says Epictetus, but we can control how we respond to these circumstances.

Bad things will happen to us every day. Often, these are small things. But, small or not, if we dwell upon them, they will make us feel grumpy and discontented.

"If the weather keeps us from travelling," says Epictetus, "we sit down, fret, and keep asking, which way is the wind blowing?

"(If it is) from the north, that's no good. When will it blow from the west?" This is foolish. Fretting and complaining will never change the weather. It will only disturb our peace of mind.

What should we do then?

We should do whatever is within our power to improve things, and then accept our circumstances calmly and cheerfully.

But this is not an easy thing to do. It takes practice.

Epictetus says: "We should discipline ourselves in small things, and from these progress to things of greater value.

"If you have a headache, practise not cursing.

"Don't curse every time you have an earache. I'm not saying that you can't complain, only don't complain with your whole being."

TRYING CIRCUMSTANCES

With practice, claims Epictetus, we can learn to live happily and contentedly under even the most trying of circumstances.

For example, after a bereavement. When a loved one dies, it is, of course, a very sad affair. But Epictetus insists that it need not ruin our lives.

The philosopher illustrates this point by discussing the Greek hero Achilles, who went to pieces following the death of his beloved friend Patroclus.

According to Epictetus, Achilles' problem wasn't the fact that his friend died. After all, there are plenty of people who don't fall to pieces when their friends die.

Achilles' problem was his attitude. His problem was that he chose to lament.

He chose not merely to mourn, but to mourn with his whole being.

People die. That is the way of the world. We have to accept it. And what is more, we have to learn to accept it calmly and cheerfully.

To the modern reader, this may sound harsh. But really, it isn't.

The idea isn't that we should become emotionally detached from our family and friends.

We should cherish them and care for them while they are alive.

Neither is the idea that we should forget about our loved ones once they are gone.

We can cherish their memories.


But what we shouldn't do is to direct our attention and our energies upon the thought that their death is bad.

Often, when people become anxious or depressed following an upsetting event of any kind, it is not the event itself, but their own response, that is the problem.

Epictetus put it like this: "It is not events that disturb people, it is their judgments concerning them."

Gary Hayden is a philosophy and science writer.


The kind Singaporean uncle

$
0
0
Singaporean uncle's kind act towards foreign labourers in train goes viral
Thousands 'like' Facebook post of man telling foreign workers to keep their seats
By Melody Zaccheus, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

A kind act by a Singaporean "uncle" towards three foreign labourers has been lauded by netizens in a Facebook post that went viral overnight.

It has also sparked a discussion on how Singaporeans treat foreigner workers in their midst.

Singaporean's kind act towards foreign labourers in train lauded. str.sg/Z7ANDirecting his comments to one of the trio...
Posted by The Straits Times on Monday, August 24, 2015


On Monday evening, Mr Rimy Lau, 68, encouraged the workers in an off-peak train to keep their seats after they tried to give them up to Singaporean commuters. "Hey, you can sit down," he said. "You don't always have to give up your seat, especially not to men on the train. You come here to build our homes, so you can sit also, you know?"

His action, captured in a Facebook post by this reporter, who was in the same carriage, has gone viral.

The post itself has been shared more than 15,000 times by users and organisations such as the Singapore Kindness Movement (SKM). Its page chalked up about 14,000 likes and an online Straits Times story on the act reached more than 800,000 users and has been shared about 30,000 times.

People recounted similar experiences of foreign workers offering their seats to Singaporeans - often with little acknowledgement. Praising Mr Lau on Facebook, corporate trainer Faith Sudharman, 43, wrote: "Proud of this Singaporean uncle!"

SKM general secretary William Wan believed that the post resonated with Singaporeans. He said: "We have to gather in common spaces such as buses and trains very often. In these circumstances, we are neighbours by chance, but can become friends by choice."

Mr Bernard Menon, executive director of Migrant Workers' Centre, said people are increasingly concerned about the conditions and treatment of migrant workers.

Foreign worker Saravanan Samidurai, 28, initially appeared puzzled by Mr Lau's interaction, but eventually broke into a smile and took a selfie with him. When asked how he felt about Mr Lau's gesture, Mr Saravanan said he was happy.

He added: "Mr Lau is such a kind and friendly person. My Indian friends gave me a lot of instructions to give up my seat to Singaporeans, but Mr Lau asked me to sit. Singaporeans are actually very nice."

Mr Lau, who was a housekeeping supervisor at the Regent Singapore hotel, said he learnt that the construction workers from India were new to Singapore and on their way to Admiralty. He said: "They were so kind-hearted. They wanted others to sit down. I told them that it was not necessary as there was still space in the train, and they are new here with a long ride ahead."

Mr Wan said the incident highlights the need to put aside racial and economic class discrimination. He said: "The uncle appreciates Mr Saravanan's contribution to Singapore because he works hard - not because of his occupation or the colour of his skin."

Ms Debbie Fordyce, executive committee member of human rights group Transient Workers Count Too, agreed.

She said the fact that people were amazed by the interaction shows that there is still some way to go in recognising migrant workers as "people who are deserving of a seat and deserving of gratitude and re-cognition for their hard work".

To Mr Lau, it was about making them feel welcome. He said: "They come here to work. This is how we can take care of them."





Singaporean uncle's kind act towards foreign labourers in train goes viral
By Melody Zaccheus, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

We often see foreign labourers giving up their seats on public transport to Singaporeans. Some of us might mumble a "thank you" and gratefully slip into the seat while others might reject their offer and look away.

On Monday (Aug 24) however, Mr Rimy Lau, 68, did a little more in an act that has been roundly praised online. He encouraged three construction workers in an off-peak train in the evening to keep their seats after witnessing them scoot aside to make way for some Singaporean commuters.

Directing his comments to one of the trio who spoke the most English, he said: "Hey you can sit down... You don't always have to give up your seat, especially not to men on the train. You come here to build our homes so you can sit also you know?"

His action, captured in a Facebook post by this reporter who was in the same train carriage as them, has gone viral. The post has been shared more than 8,700 times. Organisations such as the Singapore Kindness Movement have also shared it - the movement's page chalked up more than 10,000 likes in the span of three hours on Monday night.

People who commented on the posts praised Mr Lau for his inspiring act and recounted similar experiences of foreign workers rushing to offer their seats to Singaporeans - many a time with little acknowledgement.

The worker, Saravanan Samidurai, 28, initially appeared puzzled by Mr Lau's interaction with him. But when he understood, he broke into a wide smile, whipping out his mobile phone for a selfie with Mr Lau.

Mr Lau, who has worked as a housekeeping supervisor at the Regent Singapore hotel for 20 years, said he learned that the workers were new to Singapore. Here for their third day, they had told him that they were on the way to a construction project in Admiralty.

Speaking to The Straits Times, Mr Lau said; "They were so kind-hearted… They wanted others to sit down. I told them that it was not necessary as there was still space in the train, and they are new here with a long ride ahead before they would reach their destination."

This reporter also witnessed Mr Lau dishing out advice on how to navigate Singapore's transport network. He homed in on the Little India MRT station and shared with them some bus routes.

He also said that Mr Saravanan could contact him "any time" if he needed help.

Praising Mr Lau, Facebook user "Joshua N Faith Sudharman" wrote: "Proud of this Singapore uncle!"

Another user Patricia Wong wrote: "A great reminder to be kind and polite to the many foreign construction and cleaning workers who are helping us build and clean our homes and roads - we can all start by acknowledging them with a smile or greeting or thank you."

Mr Lau, a bachelor, said the workers shook his hands and waved goodbye to him after he got off at Ang Mo Kio where he lives.

"They were lost at Raffles Place and I saw someone ignoring them as they asked for directions to get around. As Singaporeans we should be courteous and help out when we can.

"They come here to work. This is how we can take care of them," he said.


Bigger Baby Bonus and Medisave grant for newborns

$
0
0
Measures aimed at making it easier for couples to look after their children and support them, says Grace Fu
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

The Baby Bonus cash gift for children of married couples will be increased by $2,000, bringing the amount they will receive to at least $8,000.

It will be given to parents in two stages: the first when the child is 15 months old, and the rest at 18 months.



The Medisave grant for a newborn will be raised as well, by $1,000 to a total of $4,000, which will help pay for the child's MediShield Life premiums and other medical expenses. The full grant will be given to all Singaporean babies, regardless of whether their parents are married.

These extras for Singaporean babies born on or after Jan 1 this year will be given out from next January.

These details were released by Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Grace Fu yesterday, after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the measures on Sunday.

"The package is really to make it easier for couples to look after their children, support them on their journey," said Ms Fu, who oversees population issues.

Previously, the first two children of a married couple got $6,000 in cash each under the Baby Bonus scheme, while the third and fourth child received $8,000 each.

There was nothing in cash for the fifth and subsequent children.

So, depending on the birth order, married couples will get $8,000 or $10,000 per child in cash from the Baby Bonus scheme.

While the extra sum is handed out on the 15th and 18th month after the child's birth, the original cash bonus will still be given in the first, sixth and 12th month after the child is born.

"Many couples have said that expenses for their children are higher between the ages of zero and 18 months," said Ms Fu, explaining why the Government is spreading out the cash disbursement.

As for extending the cash bonus to unwed parents, she said it was "something we're always discussing with parents, the public and the Ministry of Social and Family Development, and we will always review this".

"But we also have to take cognisance that the values of family, of intact family, are very strong in the community. It's still a very important value for us to cherish and endorse, so this is where a distinction is probably still necessary," she added.

The new Medisave grant will be enough to pay the MediShield Life insurance premiums of the child until he or she reaches the age of 21, said Ms Fu.

Children born overseas can qualify for the grant on the registration of their birth with the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority, or through Singapore's overseas missions.

The extra $1,000 will be paid out from next March.

Until then, eligible children will continue to receive the existing $3,000 grant, which is given out in two instalments.

They will receive a one-off top-up of $1,000 next March.

Married fathers can also get an extra week of paternity leave, for a total of two weeks' leave.

It kicks in immediately for public servants, but is on a voluntary basis for the private sector.

Assistant marketing manager Yong Yong Kang, 26, whose daughter Gwyneth was born in April, welcomed the extra sums. "Monetary assistance from the Government can ease our expenditure on infant formula, infant care centres, diapers and medical care," he said, adding that he had recently paid $95 for a visit to a paediatrician.

He also welcomed the extra paternity leave, saying: "As a first-time dad, I'm always thinking about Gwyneth, so if possible, I want to spend more time with her."

Monetary assistance from the Government can ease our expenditure on infant formula, infant care centres, diapers and medical care.




Announced the details of the Jubilee Marriage & Parenthood Package at a new childcare centre at Sengkang today. We...
Posted by Grace Fu on Monday, August 24, 2015





Extra paternity leave may be mandatory in a few years' time
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

The newly announced extra week of paternity leave is voluntary for now, but may be made mandatory in a few years' time.

This will give companies struggling to cope with the labour crunch and economic restructuring time to adjust, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Grace Fu, who oversees population issues.

Before making the change mandatory, the Government "will discuss it first with employers and unions", she added.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced on Sunday at the National Day Rally that paternity leave will be doubled and is backdated to take effect at the start of this year.

The Government will pay for the extra week of leave, he added.

Yesterday, Ms Fu said employers can apply for reimbursement from the Government from the middle of next year, capped at $2,500 per week.

The Government is encouraging bigger companies to take the lead in offering the extra week, and the public service has come on board.

The Public Service Division said that the public service, Singapore’s largest employer with 141,000 workers, recognised a father’s role in caring for and raising children and would take the lead in implementing the enhanced paternity leave.

The aim is to "set the tone in the employment market", Ms Fu said.

"The labour market is competitive, so if you want to attract better people and retain good staff, you'll have to follow this trend and offer as competitive (employment) packages as possible," she added.

The paternity leave can be taken by default as a two-week block within 16 weeks after the child's birth.

Alternatively, it can be taken any time within a year of the child's birth if agreed on by the employee and employer.

Working fathers are eligible for the extra paternity leave if their employers voluntarily provide the leave, and if they worked continuously for at least three months before the child was born. The father must also be married to the child's mother, and the child must be a Singapore citizen.

A National Population and Talent Division (NPTD) spokesman said more than 21,000 fathers have taken paternity leave as of May.

Paternity leave was introduced in May 2013. The NPTD said more than 40 per cent of fathers with children born that year took the leave.

The NPTD spokesman added that the take-up rate is in line with those of other countries, starting off lower but increasing gradually over time.

Said Ms Fu: "It would be nice to have a take-up rate of another 10 percentage points."




GREAT NEWS: Minister Grace Fu just announced the Jubilee Marriage & Parenthood Package to help out moms and dads. We're...
Posted by Heybaby SG on Monday, August 24, 2015





SMEs applaud changes but worry about rising costs
By Jacqueline Woo and Yvonne Lek, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) here have voiced concerns abut costs climbing as a result of changes announced at the National Day Rally.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced on Sunday that working fathers will receive an extra week of paternity leave, paid for by the Government, if employers opt in under the new scheme.

This means male employees will be eligible for a total of two weeks of paternity leave, instead of one.

Mr Lee also said the re-employment age will be raised from 65 to 67 by 2017.

Industry watchers and local businesses The Straits Times spoke to mostly gave the two changes the thumbs up, but also raised concerns about their implications.

Wages aside, SMEs will have to bear additional costs for their overall staff if they are to offer employees an extended period of paternity leave, noted Mr Kurt Wee, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises.

These include the expense of hiring replacement workers in an environment where the cost of doing business is already "quite high".

"It's good that the scheme is voluntary for now, but we hope the Government will give this measure some serious consideration if it's going to be made mandatory in future," said Mr Wee.

Mr Victor Tay, chief operating officer of the Singapore Business Federation, said smaller-scale businesses, in particular, are "apprehensive of more absence of employees in an already resource-tight environment".

"Some entrepreneurs have pointed out that, with public holidays, personal leave and even national service, employees might be away for up to two months (in a year)."

Ms Stella Tan, human resource manager at food and beverage firm The Soup Spoon, said the move will help "create a happier workforce".

But rising costs continue to be a cause for worry for the company, which is "trying to stay lean" while coping with the chronic labour shortage across the sector.

Ms Connie Kwan, chief operating officer of home-grown chocolate manufacturer and wholesaler Aalst Chocolate, said: "If companies can get tax credits for paternity leave, this will make (the scheme) more attractive to them."

As for the higher re-employment age, Mr Tay said it is a "natural" move in an ageing society to retain the senior workforce, given the country's tight labour situation and limited resources.

"But it takes two hands to clap. Employers can offer re-employment but employees must want to work," he added, noting that most seniors tend to retire instead.

Mr Jerry Lim, chief operating officer of local restaurant chain JP Pepperdine, said: "If senior employees are competent and still able to work, there's no reason for us to not support them, especially in today's labour- starved market."

About 7 per cent of the company's 320-strong workforce are Singaporeans or permanent residents above 65 years of age.

"It also helps because they have knowledge and experience to pass down to younger staff," he said.


$3billion plan to help seniors age well

$
0
0
$3b plan to help seniors live more fulfilling lives
On the cards are active ageing hubs and programmes for learning and volunteering
By Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

In a push to brighten the golden years, a $3 billion five-year plan will give Singapore's seniors opportunities to learn, volunteer and live independently, well after retirement.

The new Action Plan for Successful Ageing will open senior centres for social activities as well as daycare in at least 10 upcoming HDB projects, and launch a free PAssion Silver card with perks for those aged 60 and over. Up to $200 million could also be set aside for ageing-related research.

Announcing the measures yesterday, Health Minister and Minister- in-charge of Ageing Gan Kim Yong said the goal was to help seniors live more fulfilling lives.

"The ageing population need not be a burden to us," said Mr Gan. "In fact, longevity is something that we can celebrate."

There have been similar government-initiated plans for active ageing in the past, for instance in 2010, when $100 million was set aside to keep seniors healthy and involved in their communities.

By 2030, one in five people - or some 900,000 - will be aged over 65. By then, there will be only 2.1 working-age citizens to support each one aged 65 or above, compared with 5.2 as of last year.

In coming up with this action plan, the Ministerial Committee on Ageing, of which Mr Gan is chairman, spoke with more than 4,000 Singaporeans young and old over the past year.

The plan will also launch a National Seniors' Health Programme to address ageing-related health concerns that aims to reach out to at least 400,000 seniors aged 50 or above by 2030.

Active ageing hubs will be built in future Housing Board developments. They will be similar to senior activity centres but larger, said Mr Gan, and incorporate both social programmes and rehabilitation or daycare services.

Other plans on the cards include more elderly-friendly public transport and even therapeutic gardens designed to help seniors who have dementia and stroke.

Ms Peh Kim Choo, director of the Tsao Foundation's Hua Mei Centre for Successful Ageing, said the changes were a breath of fresh air.

In the 1990s and into the 2000s, she said, much of the conversation about ageing revolved around the problems to be caused by the so-called silver tsunami.

"But this time round, it paints a vision. It talks about possibilities for the person growing old," she said.



Ms Anthea Ong, president of the Women's Initiative for Ageing Successfully (Wings), also welcomed the "systemic effort" to reframe ageing as an exciting and productive phase of life.

And if things go according to plan, this will be just the start.

"We hope people will come forward with more suggestions as time goes on," Mr Gan said.

Ms Serena Seah, 58, said activities such as cooking courses could interest housewives with grown children, who would have the time. She attends courses such as line dancing to keep fit and mobile.



Here's a glance at the highlights of the Action Plan for Successful Ageing, a $3billion national plan to help Singaporeans age confidently and lead active lives, with strong bonds with family and community.
Posted by Ministry of Health on Wednesday, August 26, 2015



GE2015: PAP introduces 2 new faces in Nee Soon GRC

$
0
0
Shanmugam on need for new voices
PAP needs candidates who represent each generation, or risks becoming irrelevant
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

The People's Action Party (PAP) must field candidates who give voice to each generation, or risks becoming irrelevant, said Law and Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam yesterday.



"The Parliament has to be representative of those generational changes. Otherwise, you get disconnected," he said at a press conference to introduce the party's candidates for Nee Soon GRC, which he leads.

To that end, Mr Shanmugam has on his slate one of the party's first candidates from an activist background, animal-rights champion Louis Ng, 37.

The vocal chief executive of Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (ACRES) replaces unionist Patrick Tay in the slate, who will run in West Coast GRC instead. The other new face in the group representation constituency is fund manager Henry Kwek, 39, who will be fielded in retiring MP Inderjit Singh's place, while two incumbent MPs, Ms Lee Bee Wah and Associate Professor Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim, round out the team.



Mr Shanmugam said that Mr Ng was one of the "young people who come in representing a new ethos and a changing value system."

He added: "That is the only way a political party can stay well ahead.

"(The new candidates) don't represent the universe of the new generation, but if you look at the younger generation, people are much more interested in causes."

Mr Ng, the father of an 18-month-old girl, said he was keen to join politics as it was "a chance to do more" for both animals and people. In particular, he sees politics as a larger platform to mobilise Singaporeans to volunteer.

Volunteer rates are dropping, he noted, a trend which worries him.

Mr Ng has often found himself on opposing sides with the Government on animal-rights issues, but he said Mr Shanmugam taught him that "change can come from collaboration, not from a fight."

"I think being collaborative provides win-win situations for all," he said, adding that his previous combative tactics yielded ACRES publicity, but was "not very effective in terms of legislative or mindset change".

"We activists have to be constructive. If we 'die-die' want to stand firm on a position, then we cannot progress," he said. "The ball is in our court - it is our job to engage and convince."



Mr Shanmugam also used his two candidates' different profiles to illustrate how the PAP is broad enough to be where "diverse viewpoints meet".

Mr Kwek, who comes from an economics and management background, said that one of his concerns is how Singapore businesses are faring in the uncertain global economic environment.

"Henry comes from a family with fairly extensive business interests (and) runs his own fund management," said Mr Shanmugam.

"When I first met him, I saw a young man who (could) look at the future and, with his economics background, understand immediately the challenges," he said. "I felt someone like that has got to come in (to politics)."

But politics is also about heart, he said, which is why Mr Kwek spent several years making house visits and writing letters for residents in his Chong Pang ward. He was also the branch secretary for two years.

Mr Shanmugam's Chong Pang ward has been the launching pad for several PAP hopefuls in this general election, as it was in the past.

New faces like Chua Chu Kang GRC candidate Yee Chia Hsing and Sembawang GRC candidate Amrin Amin were also first spotted and groomed by Mr Shanmugam.

"I take very seriously this process of bringing in people," he said.

"We need to bring in fresh blood all the time. And unless you at the top actively do it, it won't happen by itself."

The PAP team in Nee Soon GRC is likely to face the Workers' Party (WP) at the September polls.

In 2011, it beat the WP team there with 58.4 per cent of the vote share.








Today, we introduced the PAP team for Nee Soon GRC, for the upcoming GE. Joining me, Assoc Prof Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim...
Posted by K Shanmugam Sc on Wednesday, August 26, 2015





'Most feel Govt has got major social policies right'

By Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

Most Singaporeans feel that the Government has got major social and economic policies right since it began moving towards greater state support, Law Minister K Shanmugam said yesterday, though he added that it did not necessarily mean an increased vote share for the PAP.

Speaking at the introduction of new candidates for the PAP's Nee Soon GRC slate, which he leads, Mr Shanmugam said even though most people acknowledge that the Government is doing its best to respond to long- and short-term issues, local factors and intangibles may still come into play at the coming polls.

Answering a question on how the party would win back the "protest vote" that saw its vote share sink to 60.1 per cent in the 2011 polls, he said economic factors like the 2008 global economic crisis played a role in the 2011 election result.



No incumbent government around the world went through an election in the 2008 to 2012 period without suffering losses, said Mr Shanmugam.

But he emphasised that the PAP Government's shift to the left in social policies was not a "kneejerk reaction" to the elections, echoing a point made by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam in a speech earlier this month, when he said that "the world did not start in 2011".

Referring to the 2007 Workfare scheme which tops up wages of low-income workers, Mr Shanmugam said: "From 2007, those changes were made, and they were made with a view to impending social, demographic, substantive economic change.

"And you see over the last eight years those changes being put in place one at a time."

He recognised, however, that there were issues which the Government acted on, such as resentment over the long wait and high prices for housing, that were "specific to 2011".

"The key is that the Government showed that it is trying its best to deal with the issues that arise," said Mr Shanmugam.

"The critical thing is, have we got the major policies right starting from 2007?"

Given ground reaction, the answer is largely positive from Singaporeans, he said.

Asked about the likely Workers' Party (WP) challengers in Nee Soon GRC, Mr Shanmugam referenced the opposition party's troubled management of the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council.



"What I will say is our town council has never had its accounts qualified. It's always run a surplus because we husbanded the resources carefully. We spent $26 million on helping our residents and nevertheless ended up with surplus," he said.

Both the WP's own auditors and the Auditor-General's Office could not give AHPETC's accounts a clean bill of health.

Mr Shanmugam added: "The voters will have to decide whether they want to subsidise any of the town councils that's in deficit."

"I am sure that issue will come up, because when there's a deficit, as has happened before, one way of covering the deficit is merging it with another town council that has got a healthy amount of money."



 


In my speech at the press conference yesterday, I said that since 2011, I've been the most outspoken MP in Parliament....
Posted by Lee Bee Wah on Thursday, August 27, 2015








Projects of the Govt ' likely to go on as planned'
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

Whether constituency plans will come to fruition if the PAP team is not elected depends on the type of project, said Law and Foreign Minister K.Shanmugam at a press conference to introduce candidates for Nee Soon GRC.

He was responding to a question about whether PAP candidates - many of whom are rolling out constituency plans ahead of the September polls - would fulfil their promises if they were not elected.

Some, like the upcoming Thomson East Coast MRT line which runs through part of the GRC, are "the plans of the Government" and are likely to go on as planned.

But some projects are planned by the town council, and others depend on the extent individual MPs engage the various agencies involved, he said.



Projects by the town council "depend on who runs it, how much money there is, and how well you run it", he said, in a thinly-veiled reference to the ongoing spat between the Government and the Workers' Party-run Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council.

He cited the role played by PAP slate-mate Lee Bee Wah, an engineer, in the design of an upcoming town centre as an example of how some projects are influenced by the working relationship between agencies and MPs.

"We wanted an integrated bus station different from the original plans. So even if it is the Government's plans, you can, in Bee Wah's words, 'fight about it' and make some changes," he said.

This depends on an MP's ability to persuade agencies that such changes are good, he added.

As for whether PAP candidates would stay on to push such plans if they were not voted, he said that it would be up to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the ruling party's secretary-general.

"But I've served here for 27 years, and even the new candidates have been here for several years. And I'm sure we will want to serve the residents."







Adding diversity to team
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

Louis Ng, 37

Occupation: Chief executive of Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (ACRES).

Family: Married to a stay-at-home mum, 38, who also works part-time in ACRES. They have a daughter, 18 months old.

Education: Bachelor of Science in biology from the National University of Singapore, Master of Science in primate conservation from Oxford Brookes University.

Hobbies: Jogging, reading, travelling and watching wildlife.



Why politics?

I'm not leaving the animal movement. In fact, I want to do more. Politics gives me the chance to bring the whole movement up another level.

I can catch pythons and monkeys, but I am also more than that. I want to be the bridge between the Government and the people, and engage and mobilise people for change.

Why you?

As an activist for the last 14 years, I've gained significant experience in how to engage, empower and mobilise people. I've walked the talk and I'd like to bring the experience into politics now. I also bring diversity to the team.

What issues will you focus on?

Animal welfare is a cause I will always champion, if elected. But I also want to encourage volunteerism , as well as promote the positive aspects of parenthood.

It's good that new measures like the increased Baby Bonus and extra paternity leave will be implemented. I want to see how we can go one step further to help support people who want children but are afraid they don't have time to look after them.

Favourite spot in Singapore?

West Coast Park. My daughter loves sitting on the swings there, you push her and she just laughs, it's one of the nicest sounds .

It's also important to have green areas near us so we can rest and relax, and not become this fast-paced city.







Ability to see many perspectives
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

Henry Kwek, 39

Occupation: Executive director of an investment, trading and management consulting company

Family: Married

Education: Bachelor of Arts in Economics, and Masters of Science in Management Science and Engineering from Stanford University

Hobbies: Reading, sports, exploring different cultures



Why politics?

Because I feel Singapore is at a crossroads. On the one hand, we're going into the future with resources former generations could only dream of.

On the other hand, we face a lot of significant challenges, like an ageing population and uncertainty on the global economic front.

How can our society deal with the promises and the challenges? It is important that future generations come forward to be of service.

Why you?

I have a combination of public-sector and private-sector experience, as well as a few years in the grassroots. I think I see things from different sides and that would be useful.

What issues will you focus on?

If the the global economy continues to deteriorate, we must step in quickly because jobs are at risk. One possible way is to launch a cost-cutting committee to look at all the cost factors businesses face.

A second policy is about motorcycle costs. There's room for us to apply what we've done for cars to motorcycles; to distinguish between the average motorcycles used by many Singaporeans, and the Harley Davidsons.

Favourite spot in Singapore?

Casuarina prata shop, which I've been going to from a very young age. I also particularly love the prawn mee in Mayflower hawker centre and the chwee kueh in Sembawang Hills hawker centre.


GE2015: Workers' Party introduces candidates

GE2015: PAP unveils its slate for Marine Parade GRC

$
0
0
ESM Goh seeks clear mandate for Govt's plans
It took Singapore more than luck to have a good government in the last 50 years, he says
By Jermyn Chow, Defence Correspondent, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong has asked voters to give the ruling party a strong mandate to endorse what the current Government has been trying to do.



The 74-year-old, who is fighting his 10th election in Marine Parade GRC, noted that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's government had listened to the people since the last election and accelerated many plans and programmes.

So if Singaporeans are happy with what has been done, they should give the ruling party "a strong mandate to continue with what they are trying to do", said Mr Goh, who handed over the baton to PM Lee in 2004. Otherwise, the electorate will be "repudiating" what the Government has been doing.

The elder statesman is part of the five-member slate in Marine Parade, which was unveiled by anchor minister Tan Chuan-Jin yesterday.

Also in the line-up are incumbent MPs Seah Kian Peng and Fatimah Lateef. Mr Edwin Tong, who was part of Moulmein-Kallang GRC that no longer exists on the electoral map, rounds off the team.



Despite serving for nearly 40 years, ESM Goh told reporters that he is not retiring yet to ensure that there will be smooth leadership transition to fourth-generation leaders like Mr Tan, who is the Social and Family Development Minister.

Noting that governments can be categorised into the good, the bad and the ugly, ESM Goh said it took more than luck for Singapore to have a good government in the last 50 years. "I think it's actually man-made by a group of people who believe in Singapore," said ESM Goh, adding it is important for voters to give a good government a clear mandate.

"We have a good government, don't ever cause disruption to what we have been trying to do, which is national leadership transition and the continuity of good government."

When asked what a clear mandate is, he said that the party never fixes a percentage and "you will see it... hear it when the time comes".

In the last general election in 2011, the People's Action Party (PAP) won 81 of the 87 seats with a total vote share of 60.1 per cent.

This time around, the PAP is likely to be challenged by as many as nine opposition parties in all 89 seats, with the Workers' Party targeting 28 seats, including Marine Parade GRC.

But ESM Goh said that while the opposition would just be "throwing all kinds of distractions", the Government should stick to its own narrative.

"It's not just the track record which (the Government) can show the people, but they have a very good storyline moving forward to excite the new generation, to get them to build Singapore for the next 50 years. So just stay on track on the story."

Likewise, Mr Tan said the PAP government has to stay focused and do what is right for its people.

"So we do not just come alive during the GE. We do not keep quiet on significant and major issues (in Parliament) but only to come and make fiery, inspirational speeches during the hustings.

"It is about consistency, it is about reliability. Our work never stops. So we believe in actions and not just words. Rain or shine, election or no election, I think our track record speaks for itself."



Some of the points I shared when we introduced our team in Marine Parade GRC.WHAT IS THIS GE ABOUT?We are here to...
Posted by Tan Chuan-Jin on Tuesday, August 25, 2015




Credit to opposition? It's just a rooster's boast: ESM Goh
By Jermyn Chow, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

Opposition parties and some Singaporeans believe that having more alternative voices in Parliament after the 2011 General Election led to the Government adopting more redistributive and inclusive policy measures.

Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong yesterday countered this view, likening it to the fable of the rooster which crows when the sun rises. "The rooster goes around boasting that its crowing causes the sun to rise," he said at a press conference to announce the PAP line-up for Marine Parade GRC.

"That's what they are doing."

Asked about this at a press conference to introduce Workers' Party (WP) candidates in the afternoon, WP chairman Sylvia Lim said: "I think we leave it to Singaporeans to judge whether they feel the Government has become more responsive since 2011." The WP won five-MP Aljunied GRC in 2011.

Mr Goh, who was prime minister from 1990 to 2004, said that policies and programmes change over time to adapt to new situations and meet the changing needs of people.

He noted his predecessor, Mr Lee Kuan Yew, was focused on building Singapore's reserves for a rainy day. But when Mr Goh took over in 1990, he assessed there were sufficient reserves and budget surpluses could be shared through schemes like Edusave, Medifund and estate upgrading. And by the time Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong took over, the reserves had grown.

To a question asked during press conference this morning on whether opposition presence in Parliament for the past 4...
Posted by People's Action Party on Tuesday, August 25, 2015


"So it is quite right that PM started, not after 2011, but from the day he took over, to have more schemes to benefit the people," he said.

"After 2011, he did more. But is it because of more people from the opposition in Parliament? Or because the needs of the people have changed? PM understood, you see, that there are many problems: ageing society, aged population, family size being kept small, and so on."

Mr Goh added: "What have they offered? If they have offered alternatives which we adopted, we copied, then you can say we did what they told us to do. They have not done so."

As for the view that more opposition will mean more checks and balances on the Government, Mr Goh said the PAP Government was its "own check".

"For many years, the PAP was the only party in Parliament. Has the PAP gone corrupt in those years?"

Referring to the accounting and financial lapses in the Workers' Party's Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), he said: "You just look at the town council in Aljunied. One term, no check, what happened?"

"The integrity of our leaders, of our MPs, that's where the check comes from. Not this seductive line of check and balance," he added.

"They are seducing the people and if the people are not careful, they get seduced and you know what happens when you are seduced. You will pay a price."

In the 2011 General Election, the PAP team in Marine Parade GRC got 56.6 per cent of the votes against a relatively unknown National Solidarity Party (NSP) team.

This time round, the WP is set to challenge the incumbents, and the GRC is seen as a keenly contested electoral battleground.

Asked about this, Mr Goh said: "Opposition parties come and go like nomads. Nomads will not have interest in the people's welfare. They are looking for plunder."

"In Marine Parade's case, since the 1990s, there were three or four parties which have come and gone. Now a new tribe is coming. Do they really have interest in Marine Parade's people's welfare?"

"I've spent 40 years there. I built up a community," he said, adding he would leave it to voters to decide whether he had done a good job.

As for the prospect of a contest from a stronger WP team, Mr Goh said: "Strength is relative. They are stronger than NSP, there's no doubt about that.

"But there's a certain arrogance in them. They came: NSP, out you go," he added, referring to how the WP brushed aside NSP's intention to contest the GRC.

"Would that same arrogance be able to replace me and my team in Marine Parade? Let them try."



















Strong support for Edwin Tong in Joo Chiat
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

Although Joo Chiat ward will be new to Mr Edwin Tong, he can count on the support of two heavyweights: Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong and Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin.

Mr Tan, leader of the People's Action Party (PAP) team in Marine Parade GRC, made the commitment at a press conference yesterday to introduce the constituency's line-up for the polls on Sept 11.

The media had asked if the team expected a tough fight, now that first-term MP Mr Tong has been moved unexpectedly to Joo Chiat, which the People's Action Party (PAP) won by a whisker in the 2011 general election (GE).

Said Mr Tan: "What we will do is to bring to bear our weight and influence to support Edwin. Not that he necessarily needs it, but (for us) to understand the issues better so that we can also see how best to address some of those concerns."

He stressed that his team works together to solve tougher issues in each other's wards in the five-member GRC, whose boundary was redrawn to include Joo Chiat and exclude MacPherson.

Joo Chiat was a single-seat constituency in the 2011 GE. PAP veteran Charles Chong went in as a newcomer to the constituency and won by getting just 388 more votes than Workers' Party (WP) candidate Yee Jenn Jong.

Yesterday, Mr Tong had mixed feelings about his move. While it is "quite difficult leaving Jalan Besar", he said he was excited at the chance to work with the Marine Parade team.

"Coming to a new place is not easy. There will be a lot of ground to cover, and I will have to work very hard and very fast," said Mr Tong, who was an MP for Jalan Besar in the now-defunct Moulmein-Kallang GRC.

For the past two weeks, he has been walking the Joo Chiat ground, sometimes going down more than once a day, he said.

Taking note of such local municipal issues as estate improvement, congestion, parking and bus services, he said that if elected, his past experience as a town council chairman will be put to good use in dealing with them.

He was chairman of the Moulmein-Kallang Town Council.

Mr Tong also pledged, if elected, to raise broader national issues in Parliament, like the rising cost of living. Joo Chiat residents have told him, he said, that living in private property should not preclude them from getting government help.

ESM Goh, a former prime minister, said Joo Chiat voters may have felt neglected by the government in the 2011 election as they live in private property.

"These people have paid taxes, they are retirees. So they felt ignored. They therefore sent the message 'Please do not take us for granted'."

The Government has since introduced the Pioneer Generation Package, which is not restricted by income or dwelling, he noted. "There are other issues going forward where I would... tell ministers, don't make a distinction."



National Day Rally Special with Lim Swee Say

$
0
0




Breaking down that two-thirds Singaporean core: Lim Swee Say
The Manpower Minister clarifies the number of locals to foreigners in the workforce, and tackles questions on the CPF payout eligibility age and minimum wage.
Channel NewsAsia, 26 Aug 2015

Some have asked if the goal of a two-thirds Singaporean core in the workforce is a realistic one, since Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say said in a recent interview that the Government would hold fast to it.

Currently, residents make up about 62 per cent of the workforce. But this figure includes the construction workforce, where the ratio is one local for every seven foreigners, said Mr Lim.



Clarifying this on Tuesday (Aug 25) in a one-hour live show on MediaCorp's Channel 5, he said that taking only the manufacturing and services sectors into account, the ratio was in fact three locals to every one foreigner.

Of this three-quarters who are residents, he said, "the majority are Singaporeans - so in other words, if you look at these sectors outside of construction and foreign domestic maids, we are about there, at two-thirds," he said.

Helping to maintain this 2:1 ratio has been the tightening of foreign worker quotas and impact of levies. Mr Lim noted the "sharp drop" in Employment Passes since 2012 and in S-Passes since 2014. "Our challenge is, how do we maintain this and yet without running into problems of slow economic growth and high unemployment?”

In the past, a 3-per-cent growth in workforce plus 1-per-cent productivity growth made for 4-per-cent GDP growth. With foreign labour growth slowed to 1 per cent, "if we are not able to increase productivity, 1-plus-1 will only give us 2-per-cent growth every year,” he noted.

And small and medium enterprises - who employ 70 per cent of the workforce - would be most affected. The way out is to help these SMEs through the transition and to grow by becoming lean enterprises, added Mr Lim.

During the forum, Mr Lim fielded wide-ranging questions from members of the public on issues raised in the Prime Minister's National Day Rally speech on Sunday.

VOLUNTARY OPTIONS FOR CPF PAYOUT AGE

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had announced that the re-employment age would be raised from 65 to 67 by 2017.

Some Singaporeans had raised concerns about whether this would lead to changes in the Central Provident Fund (CPF) drawdown age, recently renamed the 'payout eligibility age’. This is the age at which CPF members can start drawing monthly payouts, and will be 65 from the year 2018 onwards.

Mr Lim explained that members would have the option of deferring their payouts, which would see them rising each year they are deferred.

"Starting from next year we are going to offer CPF members the option,” said Mr Lim. “They can exercise, at any age between 65 and 70, when they want to start drawing down their CPF. The longer the delay, the higher the monthly payout.

“Under this framework, Singaporeans today can have the best of both worlds. On one hand they can continue to work for as long as (they like) until 67 and beyond. At the same time, they can defer their CPF drawdown age on a voluntary basis."

"MINIMUM LADDER" VS MINIMUM WAGE

Mr Lim also spoke about the benefits of Singapore's progressive wage model aimed at helping low wage workers upgrade themselves and earn higher incomes. He championed this model and said it is more comprehensive and effective than a minimum wage system that other countries have adopted.

Said Mr Lim: "In Singapore, what we have done was come up with a concept. Instead of having a minimum wage, we have a minimum ladder. In other words, there are various levels of minimum wage. "

For example, "if you're an indoor cleaner, the minimum wage today is S$1,000. If you are doing outdoor cleaning, it's S$1,200. If you are doing machine operations, it's S$1,400. If you are a team leader, it's S$1,600. What we have put in place is progression for low wage workers to move up. At the same time ... through our training or skill upgrading scheme, we will help them progress from one level to another."

ENSURE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE YOUNG

Mr Lim added that the upcoming General Election – which is set for Sep 11 - will be especially important with looming challenges facing Singapore, such as the country's economy, which is in transition, as well as an ageing population.

He said that an important priority in the future would be for Singapore to create opportunities for young people that appeal to their passions and interests - especially with their increasingly high job expectations.

“More and more of them are driven by passion. If we’re not able to create an environment where there are opportunities in many exciting areas that will appeal to them, then they will go somewhere else,” he said. “These are the kind of things that I worry about. Therefore, I think it’s really important to make sure that there is a leadership team in place to lead us forward in the next 15 to 20 years.”

"I hope my grandchildren will grow up in a Singapore where the people, the Government all come together and are able to continue to create the kind of Singapore that we want for Singaporeans,” added Mr Lim.

“Because at the end of the day, Singapore today did not happen by chance. SG50 did not happen by chance. We actually consciously created a Singapore for today. And I hope that generations after generations of Singaporeans will continue that kind of spirit - a spirit of being able to create something out of nothing."


GE2015: PAP introduces East Coast GRC, Fengshan & Punggol East SMC candidates

$
0
0
Singapore faces challenge of 'three peaks': Swee Say
By Jeremy Au Yong, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

The leaders who emerge from the Sept 11 General Election will have to tackle key challenges posed by peaks in Singapore's workforce, population and the elderly.

Calling them the "three peaks", Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say said yesterday that much is at stake at the polls because strategies will have to be found to address the implications of these issues.

"The way we grew our economy in the past... is no longer sustainable. It was the right strategy for the last decade, but it would not be the right strategy for the next decade and beyond," he said.



This is why it is important that voters back candidates who can help take the country forward over the next 50 years, he added.

"It's important to make sure that at the local level, we're electing people who can serve the community at the local level," he said.

"But I think it's even more important for us to put together a team to ensure that we can lead; we can serve Singapore at the national level for the next 10, 20, 50 years."

He was speaking at the People's Action Party's (PAP) Bedok branch, where the PAP candidates for East Coast GRC and Fengshan, the single-member constituency carved out of the group representation constituency, were introduced.

Ending speculation over who it would field in Fengshan, the party named long-time grassroots worker Cheryl Chan, 38. She replaces former minister Raymond Lim, who is quitting politics, and is expected to face a Workers' Party (WP) opponent, who is yet to be named.



The four remaining East Coast GRC incumbents will run again - anchor minister Lim Swee Say, 61, Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry and National Development Lee Yi Shyan, 53, Minister of State for National Development and Defence Mohamad Maliki Osman, 50, and two-term backbencher Jessica Tan, 49. In 2011, they won with just 54.8 per cent of the vote, a nine-point drop from 2006.

Meanwhile, PAP veteran Charles Chong, 62, settled another question by announcing that he will try to take back Punggol East SMC from WP incumbent Lee Li Lian. He issued a statement, breaking from the PAP tradition of holding a press conference.

The WP, Singapore Democratic Party and Reform Party (RP) introduced candidates as well.

While introducing his candidates for West Coast GRC and Radin Mas SMC, RP chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam said the party believes every Singaporean below 16 should get a $300 monthly child benefit, and everyone over 65, a $500 monthly pension.




LEADERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE

We believe that this GE is especially important. Why so? What keeps some of us awake at night? I think if you look at Singapore today, it is a nation in transition. The way we grew our economy in the past... is no longer sustainable. It was the right strategy for the last decade but it would not be the right strategy for the next decade and beyond.

"What keeps us awake at night?"
"This is a nation in transition. The transition is very challenging. The economy is in transition. Our population is also in transition," says People's Action Party candidate for East Coast GRC Lim Swee Say. "I'm committed to do whatever I can to help Singapore through transitions" http://bit.ly/1hgoDVX
Posted by Channel NewsAsia Singapore on Wednesday, August 26, 2015


So the economy is going through a transition, a very challenging one. Our workforce growth will reach a peak at some point in time in the near future. Our population will reach a peak at some point in time in the near future. Our ageing, likewise, will reach a peak in the not-too-distant future - I believe it will be in my lifetime.

So we are confronted with how to overcome these three peaks: the workforce peak, the population peak and the ageing peak.

At the end of the day... it is important to make sure that we are electing people who can serve the community at the local level. But, I think (it is) even more important for us to put together a team to ensure that we can lead, we can serve Singapore at the national level for the next 10, 20, 50 years.

- MANPOWER MINISTER AND PAP CANDIDATE FOR EAST COAST GRC LIM SWEE SAY, on the "three peaks" that Singapore must contend with in a challenging economic transition






Lessons learnt from close fight: Swee Say
By Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

The People's Action Party team in East Coast GRC has learnt lessons from the 9-percentage-point drop in vote share it saw in the 2011 General Election, anchor minister Lim Swee Say said yesterday, and is heading to the coming polls "fighting to win".

Speaking at the unveiling of a PAP slate that many political watchers see as its most politically vulnerable, the Manpower Minister made pitches at the national, local and personal level for voters' support.

At the local level, he said the PAP team has learnt that "people don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care".

"It's not good enough just to know how to solve problems, how to improve situations," he said. "More importantly, you must make sure people on the ground understand we know what they care about, and we care about what they care about."

Besides Mr Lim, the other three in East Coast GRC are Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry and National Development Lee Yi Shyan, 53; Minister of State for National Development and Defence Maliki Osman, 50; and two-term backbencher Jessica Tan, 49.

All are standing for re-election.

The Fengshan division, carved out as a single seat, will be contested by newcomer and long-time grassroots volunteer Cheryl Chan, 38. She replaces retiring MP Raymond Lim.

All five candidates have spent the past four years in "deep engagement" with small groups of residents, explaining new policies and hearing ground concerns, they said.

With this approach, they have seen breakthrough connections with residents, declared Mr Lim, saying that after four years, he feels a bond with his Bedok residents as deep as what he had with Buona Vista residents after 15 years there.

Mr Lim moved from Buona Vista to East Coast GRC in 2011. In that election, the PAP won 54.8 per cent of the vote against a Workers' Party team - its narrowest win for a GRC.

On whether the improvements the team made give credence to the WP's argument that its 2011 showing helped keep the ruling party on its toes, Mr Lim said it has already learnt its lessons. "We make our changes, we make our improvements. We do not need another drop of 5 percentage points for us to continue to improve. In fact, if there's another drop of 9 percentage points, we won't be their MP any more."

Mr Gerald Giam is likely to mount a return challenge in the polls as leader of the WP's slate.

Yesterday, Mr Lim would not speculate on what increased voteshare the slate hopes their deep engagement strategy would yield.

Mr Lim also emphasised this GE's significance at the national level.

Singapore is undergoing a transition, nearing "three peaks" of workforce growth, population growth and ageing, he said.

These would all put pressure on opportunities for economic growth and required adept leadership to steer Singapore through, he said.

Thus, beyond local issues, he said, it is even more important that the PAP be allowed to "put together a team to ensure that we can lead, we can serve Singapore at the national level for the next 10, 20, 50 years".

Looking back, he said that Singapore has succeeded in the last 50 years because of a combination of "good policies and good politics".

The PAP government's policies have not stayed static, but evolved to meet the changing needs of people, he said, citing changes in social policies over the years.

This was made possible by "good politics" - unmired in confrontation between political parties.

Mr Lim, 61, turned personal as he spoke about wanting to complete the work he has started in the Manpower Ministry, which he took over only in May, and to groom a younger successor in Cabinet.

"I believe I still have a lot of energy, a lot of ideas to contribute," he said, adding his decades in the labour movement attuned him to workers' anxieties and aspirations.

"I think there's a lot more that we can do and want to do, especially (in) strengthening the Singaporean core (in the workforce)," he said. "And I really hope the voters of East Coast will give me the privilege."

The PAP now has just one more round of introductions to go - its team for the WP-held Aljunied GRC will be revealed today.





Transport Minister's a thankless job, Mr Lee told Raymond Lim
By Rachel Chang, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew once told former transport minister Raymond Lim that helming the transport portfolio was "a thankless job".

In "quintessentially Lee Kuan Yew fashion", he then added: "But someone here has to do it."



Mr Lim recounted this encounter at the introduction of the PAP's East Coast GRC slate for the coming polls yesterday. He is retiring from politics, and his successor in the Fengshan division, Ms Cheryl Chan, will be making a historic bid as a new candidate in a single-seat constituency.

Mr Lim would not be drawn into why he asked to leave the transport portfolio after five years, nor why his successor, Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew, has announced that he will do the same.

Mr Lui will not be contesting the coming elections, and is leaving politics after nine years - four of those spent helming the transport portfolio. "Transport is a challenging ministry," said Mr Lim yesterday. "I think each transport minister faces his own set of challenges."

During his tenure, the issue was crowdedness on trains because of the rapid rise of the population, while for Mr Lui, it is the reliability of the train network which has come under the spotlight, he said.

"I believe that each transport minister, from Yeo Ning Hong all the way to Lui Tuck Yew, tries his level best to deal with the issues," said Mr Lim. "And in Tuck Yew's case, I'm very sure that, as he said, he gave his utmost. And I wish him all the best."

Mr Lim's strong bond with his East Coast GRC teammates was evident at the introduction session yesterday - his last public appearance with his political colleagues.

He told reporters that it has been an honour and a privilege to be an MP and minister. Mr Lim entered politics in 2001 and was made a minister of state after he was elected. He became a full minister in 2005.

"I've always believed that in life, there are causes much greater than ourselves, and that there's no greater cause than that a man be called upon to serve his country and its people," he said.

While Mr Lim spoke, East Coast GRC's anchor minister, Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say, became teary-eyed. He later said they were "tears of gratefulness to Raymond".



Earlier, Mr Lim Swee Say praised Mr Raymond Lim as a bright, sharp and serious-minded political leader, who built up a strong and committed team of activists in Fengshan.

Mr Lim Swee Say added that he had feared Mr Raymond Lim - a former Straits Times political journalist and founding member of civil society group The Roundtable - was "just another armchair critic".

"But all my doubts disappeared when he stepped forward to serve," he said.





First-timer runs solo in new SMC
Long-term PAP volunteer to contest Fengshan and will likely face WP opponent
By Wong Siew Ying, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

For the first time in nearly three decades, the People's Action Party is fielding a first-time candidate to run solo in a new single-member constituency.

Ms Cheryl Chan, 38, who has been a party volunteer for 10 years, will contest Fengshan, which was carved out from East Coast GRC.

She is the first new PAP candidate to be fielded in a new SMC since the group representation constituency system was introduced in 1988.

She is expected to face an opponent from the Workers' Party who has yet to be named, and the Fengshan contest is already being talked about as a hot contest in this year's general election.

Ms Chan was introduced officially yesterday, putting to rest months of speculation over who would succeed incumbent MP Raymond Lim, who is quitting politics after 14 years.

Mr Lim told reporters at the PAP Bedok branch that she is a new candidate but not an unfamiliar face in Fengshan: "She lived in Fengshan for many years and has been an active volunteer for more than a decade... She knows the ground well."

During this time, Ms Chan was actively involved in branch activities, supported Meet-the-People Sessions and conducted house visits. As chairman of the community club management committee, she also started a befrienders programme for lonely senior citizens.

Political observers said the work she has done and the rapport she established with residents will stand her in good stead against her opponent in the contest for votes.

"If she has been successful, she will have built up a good deal of political capital to tap on," said Dr Gillian Koh, senior research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies.

Questions about Ms Chan's candidacy in Fengshan dominated much of the two-hour press conference, which also jointly presented the PAP's slate for East Coast GRC.

Among them: Why Fengshan was hived off and whether Ms Chan was being offered up as a "sacrificial lamb".

The suggestions were dismissed by Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say, the East Coast GRC's anchor minister.

"I'm aware that out there there's still speculation that Fengshan is being cut off because Fengshan is the weakest link in East Coast GRC. Completely untrue," he said.

He said that in the 2011 General Election, the level of support for the PAP in all five wards of the GRC was "fairly even".

His team won narrowly, beating the WP team by securing 54.8 per cent of the vote.

Mr Lim Swee Say said Ms Chan was being sent to Fengshan because the party has "strong confidence" in her and she was the "best person" for the SMC, given her deep engagement there.

Ms Chan herself was unfazed by who the WP would field, and the talk that the PAP is prepared to sacrifice the SMC to the opposition.

She told reporters that she and her team of activists have worked the ground and are focused on the residents' interest and welfare.

A move into the political arena was the logical next step , she said, adding that she has "full confidence in the team because at the end of the day, it's the residents who really matter to us".

The last time the PAP fielded a first-time woman candidate in an SMC was in 1988. Dr Seet Ai Mee ran in Bukit Gombak, which was formed ahead of the 1988 polls.

Ms Chan's candidacy also appeared to signal a change in the way PAP inducts new blood.

"It may be the PAP trying to explore this new recruitment route of letting long-term party supporters have the chance to stand as candidates in the GE," Dr Koh said.

Sending a woman to Fengshan may also be an astute move.

Said Associate Professor Eugene Tan of the Singapore Management University: "There is much to be said that the PAP's best performers in GE 2011 were both women!"

That year, Dr Amy Khor, now Senior Minister of State, garnered 70.6 per cent of votes at Hong Kah North, fending off Singapore People's Party's Mr Sin Kek Tong. And Ms Grace Fu, now minister, took Yuhua, with a 66.9 per cent vote share, against Singapore Democratic Party's Ms Teo Soh Lung.

Prof Tan said the large number of women contesting in SMCs this year is a sign of the times: that they can hold their own in the political arena and be as competitive as their male counterparts.







Plans to focus on the elderly and needy children
By Wong Siew Ying, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Cheryl Chan Wei Ling, 38

Occupation: Head of Secondary Industries at The Linde Group, a multinational gas and engineering company

Family: Single. She has an older brother.

Education: Master in Business

Administration from MacQuarie Graduate School of Management, Bachelor of Applied Science (Materials Engineering) from Nanyang Technological University

Hobbies: Cooking, reading, jogging and yoga



Why politics?

Volunteer work has always been meaningful and fulfilling for me. But if elected, I'd be able to reach out to an even broader group of people as I can help shape and implement policies.

Why you?

When the party looks for a candidate, they would look for a person with the values the party upholds. I think they found that I would be able to bring extra value to the team.

What issues will you focus on?

Two specific areas: the elderly and less privileged children.

The seniors have contributed a lot to nation-building and they have a wealth of knowledge that is invaluable to the next generation.

I hope to put in place more projects that will be the bridge between the young and the old.

Favourite spot in Singapore?

The community gardens in Fengshan, where the grassroots volunteers and I spend time with residents.





Will Fengshan take some heat off East Coast GRC?
Marine Parade GRC may pose a tougher fight for PAP in the east
By Zakir Hussain, Deputy Political Editor, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Over the past two days, the People's Action Party (PAP) has named its line-ups for two GRCs it won by the closest of margins in the 2011 General Election.

With both Marine Parade GRC and East Coast GRC expecting a tight contest at the Sept 11 polls given the likely strong challenge from the Workers' Party (WP), the PAP has stuck with incumbents in both GRCs.

Two key questions on the minds of voters, pundits and yes, bookies, over the next 15 days will be: Who will win, and by how much?

The contest for both GRCs in eastern Singapore cannot be seen in isolation from equally hard fights expected in two adjacent SMCs carved out by the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee: Fengshan and MacPherson.

The PAP is headed for a far tougher fight in Fengshan than in MacPherson. As a result, the party may find some of the heat cooling off from East Coast GRC, while Marine Parade GRC is headed for a fiercer contest.

Why should the state of play in Fengshan, with 23,404 voters, and MacPherson, with 28,481 voters, matter to its larger neighbours?

Four-MP East Coast GRC has 99,015 voters, and five-MP Marine Parade GRC has 146,087 voters.

Observers note that voters tend to be affected by developments in neighbouring constituencies, just as residents in Aljunied GRC in areas bordering WP stronghold Hougang before 2011 have tended to be more supportive of the WP.

A key factor for some voters in giving the WP its first-ever GRC in 2011 was the fact that they felt the PAP would otherwise win all the other constituencies it contested.

But Singapore voters also appear to prefer gradual, rather than stark, change. And such an effect might just be at work come Sept 11.

As Dr Gillian Koh of the Institute of Policy Studies notes, if the WP fields someone seen to be strong in Fengshan, this "may make voters in other parts of the island think that since Fengshan might fall, the need for an opposition voice in Parliament is satiated".

There will then be less need for them to seriously consider electing non-PAP politicians into Parliament, she adds.

In other words, East Coast GRC voters may well opt to retain their MPs if they feel voters in Fengshan might give the WP a shot.

Will they? When votes were counted in the 2006 and 2011 general elections, counting agents reported that some polling districts that are now in Fengshan SMC saw a lower vote share for the PAP compared to other areas of East Coast GRC, where the PAP garnered 54.8 per cent of the votes against the WP.

Hence some might now believe that the PAP rates its chances of winning Fengshan this year as slim, given that it is fielding a new candidate there - the first time it has done so in a new SMC since GRCs were introduced in 1988.

No candidate or team enters an election expecting to lose, not least the PAP. Indeed, East Coast GRC anchor minister Lim Swee Say said yesterday he has strong confidence in Ms Cheryl Chan, 38, the PAP's candidate in Fengshan.

"Without that confidence, we would not have placed Cheryl in Fengshan," he said. But the party could be just hedging its bets. Even if that were so, the PAP has a strong candidate in Ms Chan, who has been active on the ground there over the past 10 years.

The WP has yet to announce its candidate for the ward, but law firm partner Dennis Tan, 44, who joined the WP after the 2011 general election, has been actively doing house visits in recent weeks.

As for MacPherson SMC, PAP candidate Tin Pei Ling, 31, is a full-time MP who is popular among residents in spite of a rocky start at the 2011 General Election. That year, widespread criticism of her age and inexperience, and over her entering politics on the coat-tails of her teammates, saw the PAP get 56.6 per cent of votes in Marine Parade GRC against the National Solidarity Party (NSP).

However, in areas that have now come under MacPherson SMC, the PAP pulled in more votes in the 2011 elections than in other areas of the GRC, with the exception of Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong's Marine Parade ward.

The WP has not named its candidate for MacPherson, but it could be funeral services company executive Bernard Chen, 29. The NSP has also maintained it intends to contest MacPherson.

How hot might Marine Parade get? The PAP won Marine Parade GRC by a comfortable margin of 18,360 votes in 2011. Without MacPherson, there is no guarantee this may not be chipped away.

The PAP won East Coast GRC by 10,653 votes in 2011 - a drop of 18,405 votes from its margin of 29,058 in 2006. Then, Marine Parade GRC was uncontested.

The PAP teams in both GRCs have been working hard on the ground to engage voters in recent months, especially in Joo Chiat, which as an SMC saw the PAP win by just 388 votes in 2011 and which is now part of Marine Parade GRC.

ESM Goh staying on has further shored up the Marine Parade GRC team led by Social and Family Development Minister Tan Chuan-Jin, and deterred the WP from sending a top leader there.

The WP's team there is set to be led by Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong, with its East Coast team led by NCMP Gerald Giam.

The WP's leaders seem to have calculated that this contest may be a tough one for them as well.

The battle ahead is still set to be tight. But an added factor may yet work in the PAP's favour in both SMCs: some studies suggest a female candidate may well have a slight edge in winning over undecided voters, especially if she has been on the ground far longer.





Charles Chong to take on WP in Punggol East SMC
PAP veteran confirmed as candidate, says he is aware that he is the opposition there now
By Aaron Low, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Veteran politician Charles Chong was confirmed as the PAP candidate for Punggol East yesterday, ending weeks of speculation on whether he will be the person to challenge Workers' Party's (WP's) Ms Lee Li Lian in the single-member constituency (SMC).

The battle will pit one of the People's Action Party's (PAP's) longest-serving MPs against a relative newcomer from WP.

Mr Chong, 62, former MP of single-seat Joo Chiat, has fought in six general elections since he entered politics in 1988. He started in Sembawang GRC, before moving to Eunos GRC, Pasir Ris GRC and Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC.

In the last polls in 2011, he beat WP's Mr Yee Jenn Jong in Joo Chiat by no more than 388 votes. Joo Chiat is now part of Marine Parade GRC.



Unlike his past contests, this is Mr Chong's first in opposition territory, after Ms Lee, then 34, wrested the SMC from the PAP in a by-election in 2013.

She beat PAP newcomer Koh Poh Koon, among others, in a four-cornered fight for the seat vacated by former Speaker of Parliament Michael Palmer, following revelations of his extramarital affair.

Ms Lee got 54.5 per cent of the vote - a result showing a vote swing of 13.5 percentage points to the WP.

Asked about his chances, Mr Chong said they were "50-50".

"I have been here before because part of my old ward, Punggol South, is here," he said. "I see some of the residents who were previously in my ward and they come by to wish me well. But Ms Lee has been here a couple of years and I am well aware that I am the opposition now."

He told The Straits Times that about 40 people have been turning up for his Meet-the-People sessions, a rise from the three to five that came when the meetings were held by the branch chairman.

He believes Punggol East residents are getting a raw deal because it is now part of a town council that is not in good financial shape.

"When the PAP handed the ward over, it was part of Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council which had a surplus," he said. "Do the residents want to subsidise Aljunied and Hougang?"

Punggol East SMC, with Aljunied GRC and Hougang SMC, joined forces and formed Aljunied-Hougang- Punggol East Town Council, whose accounts are found to have lapses.

Mr Chong acknowledged that some residents might point to the cleanliness of the estate and say it is not an issue.But he added: "I spoke to some cleaners in the past week and they said they have been very busy. I asked them why and they said that it is election time."

Finances, however, are an important issue, he stressed. "It is up to us to make it relevant to residents here for them to decide."


More firms join Golden Work Series for seniors

$
0
0
It offers workshops to train them in job skills; 10 new partners bring jobs on offer to 200
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Seniors in the heartland are to get more internships and part-time work opportunities offered through an active ageing programme.

The People's Association (PA) announced yesterday that 10 new companies will join the seven existing ones under its Senior Academy Golden Work Series.

The jobs offered by the new partners - which include POSB bank, Japanese fast-food chain Yoshinoya and Pet Lovers Centre - will add 100 vacancies to the programme, doubling the total to 200.

Launched in April, the Golden Work Series offers job skills-related workshops to seniors, who can then go on to try for internships, and part-time or light work opportunities at companies. They can earn between $5 and $8 an hour from this work. To date, 560 people have signed up for courses and 20 per cent of the available job opportunities have been taken up.

The PA is also expanding the programme from 10 to 15 community centres (CCs). More than 500 seniors attended a programme showcase at Potong Pasir CC yesterday, where they got to try their hand at courses such as mocktail making and basic banking.

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin, grassroots adviser to Potong Pasir and the event's guest of honour, said he felt the programme was especially useful in a mature estate like Potong Pasir. He said: "Many of our elderly, health permitting, would like to carry on working, meet new friends and earn some pocket money."

New partner POSB will use the Golden Work Series to expand its own Active Neighbours Programme from 70 to 90 seniors. These part-time employees assist elderly customers and introduce them to time-saving practices, such as SMS alerts for queueing and using an ATM card instead of a passbook. They can earn about $8 an hour.

POSB managing director Derrick Goh said: "Our elderly customers have taken to these Active Neighbours well, as they see them as their peers. The bank may seem like a cold place, but this makes it a warmer place to do transactions, so they don't feel so scared coming to the branch."

Another new partner, Serenity Spanish Bar and Restaurant, will offer up to 26 service, kitchen and bar vacancies at its two outlets.

General manager Nikko Thalawathugoda said: "We always have a shortage of staff, and this will help us during the peak period of October to Chinese New Year."

Madam P. Indira Thevy, 63, joined a tea appreciation course about three months ago and got a part-time job with tea company Tea Ideas, where she packs tea and recommends brews to customers at roadshows.

Madam Indira, who retired from her job in technology diagnostics seven years ago, said she joined Senior Academy because she was "very bored at home".

"My four daughters give me pocket money, but I want to be able to spend my own money when I go out. It is very enjoyable work."


No link between GBS infection and eating sashimi, says MOH

$
0
0
It responds to claims of a bacterial outbreak from consuming contaminated raw fish
By Amelia Teng, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has not found any links between the Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection and the consumption of Japanese raw meat or fish dish sashimi.

In a Facebook post, it responded to messages circulating by SMS and WhatsApp from an unknown source that claimed a person had died recently from a bacterial infection after eating sashimi over the National Day weekend, and that a professor had been critically ill after consuming salmon sashimi two months ago.

The MOH said its investigation found only an association between the GBS infection and the consumption of "yusheng-style" raw fish sold at food stalls.

It had previously found traces of GBS in some raw fish samples, although it said more cases would have to be studied before a definite conclusion can be made.

In its post on Wednesday, the MOH highlighted that there has been a "significant downtrend" in the number of GBS cases since the middle of last month, when licensed foodshop and food stall holders were advised to stop selling raw fish dishes using Song fish, also known as Asian Bighead Carp, and Toman fish, also known as Snakehead fish.

A weekly average of three cases has been reported in the past three weeks, down from an average of 20 at the start of the year.

The WhatsApp messages warning of a bacterial outbreak from eating contaminated raw fish began circulating last month.

GBS is a common bacterium found in the gut and urinary tract of 15 to 30 per cent of adults, but it does not cause disease in healthy individuals. However, it may occasionally cause infections of the bloodstream, skin and soft tissue, joints, lungs and brain.

Those with chronic or multiple conditions are at higher risk of getting GBS infections.

MOH advised vulnerable groups, especially young children, pregnant women, elderly persons, or people with chronic illnesses such as diabetes, to continue to exercise caution by avoiding raw ready-to-eat food.

Madam Amy Quek, 57, a sales manager, said she received the latest message from her sister-in-law on Wednesday. "The messages seem to indicate that the rumours about such poisoning are true... so I've asked my family to lay off raw fish and meat for now."

Media researcher Michael Netzley said it is common for such messages to "spread like wildfire" because of their emotionally charged content and the fear that the rumours may be true.

"Even though there's no conclusive evidence (to link sashimi consumption to the infection), most people think - better safe than sorry, given that raw fish is such a common food item here," said Dr Netzley, the academic director of executive development at Singapore Management University.



MOH has been alerted to another Whatsapp/SMS message being circulated today about Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection...
Posted by Ministry of Health on Wednesday, August 26, 2015



War veterans commemorate 70th anniversary of the end of World War II

$
0
0
Unforgettable images of World War II
Survivors and veterans share memories at ceremony to commemorate 70th anniversary of the end of the war
By Melody Zaccheus, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Major (Retired) Ishwar Lall Singh still remembers the shrill whistle of Japanese bombs falling through the sky and the sound of artillery fire thundering past.

The sight of dead bodies, crawling with maggots on the streets of Singapore, is another unforgettable World War II image.

Commemorating 70 Years Since the End Of World War II
While we celebrate a proud half century of independence this Singapore50, we also remember a very poignant landmark in our history some 20 years before our independence- when the Second World War officially ended in Singapore. The resilience and courage that our veterans displayed during World War II was recognised at the ceremony to commemorate the end of World War II yesterday. Many of those who experienced the war are no longer with us, but their tenacity lives on in the fighting spirit that their succeeding generations have exemplified in the decades since. From our Founding Fathers who overcame the early challenges of independence, to our Team Singapore athletes who recently overcame all limitations to excel above all expectations at SEA GAMES 2015, the greatest tribute we can pay to our forebears who lived through World War II is to live our lives in keeping with the values they stood so valiantly for. #70thAnniversaryWWII #LestWeForget
Posted by Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth - MCCY on Friday, August 28, 2015


The 86-year-old recounted his experiences at an event yesterday to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the end of the war.

"I saw many dead people. With very few able to lend a helping hand, many died due to lack of proper care, food and medicine. There was no one around to clear their bodies," said Maj (Ret) Singh.

"Scabies, malaria and dysentery were common ailments that afflicted the whole population."



The ceremony, which was attended by war survivors, veterans and Inter-Religious Organisation representatives, included a segment in which Cultural Medallion recipient Professor Edwin Thumboo read a poem he wrote about growing up during the war.

A minute's silence was observed as well.

The National Heritage Board event was held in the City Hall Chamber at the National Gallery Singapore - the former Municipal Building.

It was where British Admiral Lord Louis Mountbatten, the Supreme Allied Commander in South-East Asia, accepted the surrender of the Japanese forces in the region on Sept 12, 1945.

The ceremony yesterday was officiated by Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong.

Maj (Ret) Singh said that as part of war propaganda, people were told to gather in open fields dressed in white "to avoid being bombed during air raids".

He also recalled having to bow to Japanese soldiers.

Twice a month, he would visit the Singapore General Store in Serangoon Road to buy a 15kg bag of atta flour to make chapati (a flat bread), where he would bow deeply to a sentry on duty whenever he passed.

"When I did not have a load to carry, I would cut across the many side roads to Mandalay Road to reach Serangoon, just to avoid the sentry post," he said.



In his speech, Mr Wong said such memories and accounts, as shared by Maj (Ret) Singh and Prof Thumboo, are part of Singapore's history.

He said: "As we look back, let us never forget the lessons we learned about the importance of peace and stability across nations, and the price that comes with violence and conflict."

Mr Wong said that strong bilateral ties exist between Singapore and Japan today and that it was possible to move on with "sincerity and largeness of spirit on both sides".




70 years ago, on 15 August 1945, Japan announced its surrender. This marked the end of World War II and the occupation...
Posted by Lawrence Wong on Thursday, August 27, 2015





There was a time when Singapore was war-torn and ruled by the Japanese. That was during World War II which not many...
Posted by cyberpioneer on Thursday, August 27, 2015





The bonds that bind military veterans
By Lester Hio, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Bonds between military men are hard to break.

Since 2008, several members of 81 Squadron, a unit of the British Royal Air Force disbanded in 1970, have been holding annual gatherings here where they swop stories of their time in service as well as hold a simple ceremony for their fallen comrades.

Four former technicians met up at the Tiger Tavern at the Tiger Brewery in Tuas last weekend: Mr Al Taylor, 79, Mr Eddie Tan, 75, Mr Derek Yeo, 69, and Mr Mohamed Haniffa, 68.

"What binds us together is the camaraderie, which is special to all of us here, and everyone I've talked to who have been in the squadron," said Mr Taylor.

The squadron was based in Seletar camp before being relocated to Tengah.

"These two," said Mr Haniffa, pointing to Mr Tan and Mr Yeo, "have not met in 40 years. But on the day of the reunion, they were talking and calling each other like old friends. It was like the 40 years did not exist."

The squadron has an illustrious history in World War II, and was known for helping the Russians fend off the Nazis and clearing parts of the North African skies of Nazi planes.

Its local history starts after the war, when the unit was moved to Singapore and turned into a photo reconnaissance unit charged with gathering aerial footage of South- east Asia.

It stayed here from 1946 to 1970 and captured footage of a changing Singapore during a time of upheaval.

"81 Squadron left behind something tangible," said Mr Taylor. "The legacy of the squadron is its photos and maps of Singapore in the past, which have been left behind for heritage and historical use."

The reunions started when Mr Taylor, who was born in Britain and migrated to Australia in 1992, received an e-mail from local map researcher Mok Ly Yng, 48, inquiring about some old photos in 2008.

He flew to Singapore to meet Mr Mok, and subsequently decided to contact former squadron members online.

More than 450,000 aerial photos are known to have been taken by the squadron. They can be accessed through the National Archives of Singapore.

"There are immediate post-war photos, followed by photos of a recovering Singapore in the 50s, and the first few years of an independent Singapore," said Mr Mok.

"They provide a snapshot of Singapore's past. It's a visual record of heritage and history, to trace where old buildings, old kelongs (fishing villages) were and how they looked like."


How not to dismantle a meritocratic system

$
0
0
Learn from Britain, and avoid the mistakes it made when it overhauled a merit-based system and ended up with a system criticised for dumbing down examinations.
By Calvin Cheng, Published The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

The recent debate on elitism and meritocracy in our education system struck a chord. As children of the 1970s, my friends and I grew up in a generation when social mobility was highest. We went through an education system which allowed the children of lower-income parents to climb the socio-economic ladder if they did well in school, and make a better life for themselves than their parents and grandparents.

The thought that this meritocratic pillar of Singapore society is under threat, and that there are people calling for it to be dismantled, frightens me to the core. The speech by Mr Chan Poh Meng, the principal of Raffles Institution (RI), a school that traditionally takes in the highest academic performers, warning that RI is becoming more elitist, has focused attention on when meritocracy ends up breeding elitism.

Here, the experience of Britain can be instructive. Singapore's education system, with its O and A levels, is after all based on the British system.

In 1958, British sociologist Michael Young published a satire on society that described a future where a new elite, the "meritocracy", rose to rule over an underclass. This new ruling class, unlike the old aristocrats of Britain, legitimised their power not through bloodlines but on merit and on achievement, and, in particular, academic achievement.

At the heart of the satire was the criticism of the then British tripartite education system, which is what the current Singapore education system is based on. The idea was that students, regardless of background, should have access to an education. They would be empowered by placing them in schools with different curricula that suited their needs.

This was done by streaming (a term no doubt familiar to Singaporeans) students into three tiers of state-run schools, through a national exam for all 11-year-olds called the Eleven-Plus examination. At the top were grammar schools for the top Eleven-Plus scorers; followed by secondary technical schools, which trained children in mechanical subjects; and secondary moderns, which trained children for less-skilled jobs and "home management". Two separate secondary school examinations were offered to students of different abilities - the General Certificate of Education (GCE) O levels for the more academically inclined, and the Certificate of Secondary Education (CSE) exams for the less.

Mr Young, in his book, argued that if this were allowed to continue, and with most grammar school students coming from more well-to-do, middle-class families, not only would inequality be renewed (which the tripartite system tried to solve by breaking the class-by-birth social system), it would increase and lead to revolution.

Singapore in 2015 seems to find itself in a similar juncture as Britain in 1958, as far as discussion on education goes. It was noticed in 1958 in Britain that the students at grammar schools were increasingly middle class; it was feared that society would be divided into well-educated, well-off elites lording over a working class trapped generation after generation in the secondary modern schools. The British press called them the "eggheads and the serfs"; Singapore, on the other hand, has its "scholars and farmers".

LESSONS FROM WHAT HAPPENED NEXT

If Singapore is truly at this "what next" juncture, what the British government did in the following decades would be instructive not for what it did right, but what it did wrong - it threw the baby out with the bathwater.

In 1958, the Labour government dismantled the tripartite system, and announced that there would be "grammar school education for all".

Streaming and the Eleven-Plus examination were abandoned. Over time, as streaming had been abolished, the GCE O levels were found to be too hard for a large proportion of students, and the CSEs too easy, and so the O levels were scrapped and merged with the CSEs to form a new qualification called the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE), which was pitched in between the two.

Much later on in 1992, and in another analogous situation to present-day Singapore, the desire of the populace for more easily attained degrees, for those who did not meet the requisite academic standards, was met by converting polytechnics into "new universities".

The results were disastrous for British education and society.

First, without streaming and the Eleven-Plus, schools were unable to group students of similar learning ability together to teach efficiently. Teachers often had to teach to the lowest common denominator, leaving academically stronger students bored. Financially, it required more resources as more teachers were required to teach students who were unable to learn with their academic peers in the classrooms.

Second, the well-to-do parents, as people with financial resources always do, were forced to find a way to circumvent the system.

"Grammar schools for all" proved to be hollow political rhetoric when instead of levelling up, all schools levelled down. Well-to-do parents started sending their children to private schools which, before the abolition of streaming, found it hard to compete with free, high-quality education. This ironically solidified the class-stratification in Britain, with the wealthy taking their children out of the state school system completely, leaving a whole segment of society growing up completely insulated from the rest.

Third, until today, the GCSEs are controversial ,with many lobbying for the reinstatement of the O levels, which Singapore retains.

Critics have blamed these diluted qualifications for a decline in overall academic standards in Britain, with employers criticising this dumbed-down examination for failing to teach basic skills.

Fourth, the proliferation of universities increased the number of graduates by decreasing the worth of a degree. Students who should not be at university found themselves with degrees, but no jobs.

SINGAPORE CONTEXT - WHAT NEXT?

At this juncture, we should pause and take note of the similarities with Singapore's current dilemma.

There have been calls for the abolition of the PSLE, our version of the Eleven-Plus. There have been calls for the abolition of streaming in schools. We are tearing our hair out over the possibility that our best schools have become "middle class" schools. Parents continue the paper chase for degrees, and resist the Government's cry to look beyond them.

The truth is that social stratification and elitism are complex socio-economic issues that cannot and must not be blamed on the education system alone. Unlike the British, we must not overreact and dismantle an entire education system that has served us well for 50 years, when the problems have to be solved by a variety of policies that empower the lower-income on the job, housing, health and cost-of-living fronts.

The Ministry of Education itself has also been tweaking the system effectively without destroying its foundations.

School fees continue to be highly subsidised, no matter what school our students go to. Lower-income children will never be denied a place in schools such as RI or Hwa Chong Institution because they cannot afford it. PSLE results will be announced in bands rather than an aggregate score, to discourage chasing of the "final mark".

Instead of deluding ourselves by dumbing down examinations, excellence must still be pursued while, at the same time, making room for different definitions of success - schools for sports and the arts have been established in recognition of this.

And the Government has been setting an example to show that skills rather than degrees should be awarded - those in the civil service and, now, teachers will be given equal pay for equal work, whether one is a graduate or not.

These are steps in the right direction. But the truth is that social mobility cannot be preserved at the same rates as before, as Singapore develops.

Parents from previous generations who have done well will have more financial, social and cultural resources to help their children do well. What Singapore must continue to do is make sure access to schools remains open, and that students have the opportunities to learn and interact across the socio-economic strata in school.

The Government will have its work cut out, not least because the problems the country faces, which are developed-country problems, have no easy answers.

But one thing is for sure: meritocracy, despite its roots in British satire, must continue being one of our core organising principles in Singapore. We must not, like our former colonial masters, throw the baby out with the bathwater.

The writer is a media entrepreneur and a former Nominated Member of Parliament.


K. Shanmugam's dialogue at the Singapore Press Club

$
0
0
Singapore cannot exist in a cocoon
Republic is affected by what happens in neighbouring Malaysia and Indonesia, says Shanmugam
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Singapore enjoys good relations with Malaysia and Indonesia, but Singaporeans need to be more aware of trends and developments in these countries, Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam said yesterday.

His remarks came four days after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said Singaporeans should pay attention to the world around them.



In a speech to media professionals, Mr Shanmugam said the Malaysian economy is not doing too well, even as Malaysia is grappling with rising racial, religious and political polarisation, as well as a weakening economy. These trends may have serious implications for Singapore's own economy and social cohesion, he said.

"Anyone who thinks that 700 square kilometres can exist by itself in a cocoon, unaffected by international or regional economic or sociopolitical issues, clearly doesn't understand how Singapore functions," he said in a speech titled Small State Diplomacy: Challenges And Opportunities For Singapore.

Any economic problem in Malaysia will be a serious issue for Singapore as the two countries are closely linked, he said at a two-hour session organised by the Singapore Press Club and held at the Singapore Press Holdings' auditorium.

While Singaporeans may see the current weak ringgit as a good thing, Mr Shanmugam disagrees. "When your neighbour's economy is in such a state, and your neighbour is your second-largest trading partner, it doesn't benefit us," he said.

He argued that Malaysia's challenge in the medium to long term is to move away from relying on its extractive industries and lift its economy to the next level.

But it needs an educated population to do it, he said, a requirement that highlights another long-term problem: Malaysia's schools are not racially integrated.

Chinese children attend Chinese-medium schools, while Malay children go to mainstream schools "which are becoming more and more Malay and Islamic". "From a very early age, the Malay and Chinese population are apart. How will they integrate later?"

This underlies Malaysia's second problem of rising racial polarisation, seen in how its race-based political parties are increasingly under strain, Mr Shanmugam said.

He highlighted the widening political divide among races, with the opposition Democratic Action Party dominated by ethnic Chinese, while Umno grows more powerful in the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition.

He noted that high-level Umno leaders, but not the leadership, are openly pushing for a fully-Malay government, arguing that as Malays form 65 per cent of the population, there is no need for the Malaysian Indian Congress and Malaysian Chinese Association as in the current coalition government. Also, talk of Umno combining with Parti Islam SeMalaysia has become mainstream as well.

Closely tied to the increasing salience of race is Malaysia's rising Islamisation, Mr Shanmugam said. Broad sections of the Malay population support the adoption of Islamic laws and assess their political leaders in terms of how Muslim they are.

"An honest politician, an upright politician, will find it very difficult to talk about a united Malaysia that is more integrated. The political dynamics are such that he will have to play to the Malay ground," he said.

The Islamisation "has gone past the tipping point now", he added.

Prime Minister Najib Razak is under pressure from his political opponents, said Mr Shanmugam. This weekend's Bersih rally is shaping up into a confrontation between the authorities and the organisers who insist on defying orders.

The upshot is that Singapore will be affected by these trends, Mr Shanmugam said.

One, if investors view Malaysia as not completely stable, they may decide not to invest in Singapore.

Two, with the global stock market uncertainty, anything that creates economic investment uncertainty will be a "double whammy" for Singapore.

Three, as race and religion are emotional issues, Singapore's social fabric may feel the ripple effects.

As for Indonesia, its economy is underperforming compared to its potential, and political players have made many attempts to play to a strong streak of nationalism, Mr Shanmugam said. For instance, illegal fishing is dealt with dramatically, by sinking foreign boats in Indonesian waters. Indonesia has also said it will not renew its investment guarantee agreement with Singapore, which is set to expire next year.

Singapore, he noted, is an easy scapegoat for some parties on issues like extradition, and that it is allegedly a haven for corrupt Indonesians. Both countries have signed an extradition treaty but Indonesia's Parliament has refused to ratify it, and Indonesian officials let some of these "corruptors" travel freely in and out of their country, he said.

Singapore wants to see Indonesia prosper, Mr Shanmugam said, but added: "The level of economic cooperation will inevitably be affected if nationalism takes a wrong turn."





Some in Singapore 'could be influenced by other countries'
By Goh Sui Noi, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Singapore up to now has not had to think about how its foreign policy might upset the domestic constituency, said Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam.

But this could change as recent events have shown that sections of the population can be influenced on ethnic or other considerations.

And while the domestic constituency matters in that foreign policy has to be in the people's interest, the considerations of small sections of the population may not necessarily be in the larger, broader interests, he said in his talk to the Singapore Press Club yesterday.

Mr Shanmugam cited as an example an event organised by the World War II History Research Association on Aug 15 to mark the end of the war, that was attended by Ms Sim Ann, Minister of State for Education and Communications and Information. After she left, the association reportedly read out an open letter to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe protesting against his Cabinet's reinterpretation of Japan's pacifist Constitution.

The event was reported by China's Xinhua news agency, which also reported an adviser to the association as saying Mr Abe's statement the day before, in which he echoed apologies for the war made by past leaders, was insincere.

Yet, Singapore's position on this issue is factual and clear, neither pro-Japan nor pro-China.

Mr Shanmugam noted that the association had good links with the Chinese Embassy here.

"Sections of our Chinese population may understandably ask, why are we taking a position that is not more pro-Chinese?" he said. "But sometimes that can be an induced viewpoint from a small section."

He gave as an example China's active outreach programme in Singapore's Special Assistance Plan schools, "bringing our children to China, to teach Chinese history, which is fine with us". However, "if it goes beyond teaching history, then it becomes an issue", he added.

He also noted that in Parliament, questions were already being asked, whenever things happened in Gaza, that try "to paint (the) Government as pro-Israel". Yet, on the Palestinian issue, the Singapore Government is strictly neutral and provides more aid to the Palestinian government than the Malaysian and Indonesian governments combined, he said.

He said ethnic groups other than the Chinese were also capable of being influenced by other countries such as India. "This was quite an issue for us in the 1960s. It became less of an issue in the 70s, 80s, 90s."

However, with the Internet and greater connectivity, it could become an issue again, "and then have an impact on foreign policy".





Singapore won’t pay tax on its Johor waterworks: Shanmugam
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Singapore will not pay the raised land assessment tax on its Johor waterworks as a matter of principle, said Minister for Foreign Affairs and Law K. Shanmugam yesterday.

The authorities of Kota Tinggi district had sought late last year to double the tax on the Johor River Waterworks, which is owned by national water agency PUB.

The revised rate was more than double that of the next highest rate in the entire Kota Tinggi district, and this new rate was applied to a tax category created solely for the PUB.

At a dialogue yesterday, Mr Shanmugam explained why he chose to lay out Singapore's stance on the issue in Parliament last week, a decision he had thought hard about.

"The water agreement doesn't allow for these sorts of treatments. If I keep quiet about doubling it, tomorrow they might quadruple it," he told media professionals at the event organised by the Singapore Press Club.

In Parliament, he had said PUB is not obliged to pay the tax under the 1962 Water Agreement, which governs the PUB's operations in Johor.The agreement gives Singapore the right to draw water from Johor River up to 250 million gallons daily, or 1.14 million cubic m a day, with Johor entitled to a daily supply of treated water in return.

Underscoring the gravity of the issue, Mr Shanmugam said: "They've issued us further notice saying we are late in payment. If one is bloody-minded about it, I suppose they can seek to levy execution on our waterworks, and then things will get really interesting."

He said: "In a normal legal case, if you don't pay tax, somebody goes and attaches and tries to take over the property. We'll have to see whether they want to treat this as a normal case of non-payment and then we'll have to say what our response will be."

The agreement is valid till 2061 and is guaranteed by the governments of Singapore and Malaysia in the 1965 Separation Agreement.

On Sunday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong highlighted how vulnerable newly independent Singapore had been, with nearly all its water coming from Johor back then.

Mr Lee said at the National Day Rally: "Every now and again, when an issue arose with Malaysia, some crazy politicians would threaten to turn off the tap, to get us in line."

In fact, said Mr Shanmugam, Malaysian opposition Parti Keadilan Rakyat's deputy chairman in Johor, Mr Jimmy Puah, had criticised the water agreement just last week.

Mr Puah had said Singapore continues to draw 250 million gallons of raw water a day from Johor despite water rationing in the state, Mr Shanmugam said.

"The implication of his statement is obvious... It's powerful rhetoric. They don't care whether we suffer," he added.

The PUB said in a statement last week that it has been supplying an extra five to six million gallons of potable water a day to Johor during its dry spell, since Aug 14.

But should Mr Puah's rhetoric and criticism of the Malaysian government take hold, Mr Shanmugam said, "then you will expect the Barisan Nasional government to have to react to it". "How will they react? We don't know."

He reiterated Singapore's position that both countries have to comply with the treaty, but added: "Treaties are only useful to the extent that you can make them work."





'Adroit diplomacy needed to tackle pressure from big powers'
Minister says Singapore will face increasing pressure from US, China, Japan to take sides
By Goh Sui Noi, Senior Writer, The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Singapore, being a small state, will face increasing pressures to take sides from the major powers in the region - the United States, Japan and China - as they adjust their three-way relationship and as the South China Sea has become a "proxy" in that adjustment, Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam said.

China's long-term objective is to be the dominant power in East Asia, noted Mr Shanmugam, who is also Law Minister, at a Singapore Press Club talk yesterday.

It "makes no secret" of its desire to exclude the US from the region, he said, pointing to Beijing's new mantra of "Asia for Asians".

But the US, the current dominant and resident power, does not like being challenged, he noted.

Added to this rivalry is Japan, a security ally of the US with its own complex relationship with China and its desire to play a more active role in the South-east Asian region in response to a rising China.

China is working towards its objective chiefly by building economic linkages with countries in the region, including its One Belt, One Road initiative and the setting up of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).

But it has also escalated the pace of reclamation in the South China Sea. While other claimant states have also built facilities on the disputed islands, a recent Pentagon report said some 1,200ha had been added since last year, so that in 20 months, China has reclaimed 17 times more land than all other claimants had in the last 40 years.

Neither have the Chinese denied that they will place military features on the reclaimed land, for example, a runway on Fiery Cross Reef. "There can be no doubt that China's build-up is to achieve the capability to control sea lanes in the South China Sea," he said, adding that China probably would not block commercial maritime traffic.

In naval terms, the Chinese are far behind the Americans, but they do not like US ships coming so close to their territory, so they are relying on the concept of deniability, hesaid. Having missiles and other military installations on these land features would give serious pause to any US naval commander.

However, this has got the Americans concerned about freedom of navigation and access for its navy, and they have been reacting by sending reconnaissance planes very close to the reclaimed islands.

Singapore, he noted, had been calling for the dialling down of tensions that have risen as a result of the increased rivalry between the major powers in the region.

And while Singapore enjoys good relations with China as well as Japan and the US, "I'm not sure if we have the luxury of space as we had in the past of being friends with everyone", said Mr Shanmugam. In the next few years, "because of their competition, they, as major powers are wont to do, will soon be talking to us in terms of 'either you're with us or against us'", he said.

He noted earlier in his speech that the US had tried to stop Singapore from supporting the AIIB, citing concerns over its governance, but Singapore was one of the first countries to support it because there was a need for capital to build the region's infrastructure.

He said Singapore's response to the major powers would be that the Republic would act in its interests.

However, Singapore, being small and dependent - including on the US for defence technology, and on the Chinese and Japanese for trade and investment - will "always be subject to pressure". "We're going to come into an even more interesting phase of our foreign policy where I fully expect that we will be subjected to far more pressure than we have been, and it's going to require fairly adroit diplomacy and the strength and willpower within Singapore (to overcome it)."

The core of Singapore's diplomacy is having a strong defence, he noted. But Singapore has also built regional mechanisms like Asean to maintain peace and resolve disputes. At the global level, it has tried to create a huge footprint through taking an active role in various United Nations-related organisations.

Nearer home, Singapore has good ties with its two closest neighbours, Malaysia and Indonesia. However, the increasing Islamisation in Malaysia and nationalism in Indonesia bear watching, he said.





Law and Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam to make police report over 'inaccurate and seditious' Facebook post
The Straits Times, 28 Aug 2015

Law and Foreign Affairs Minister K Shanmugam says he intends to lodge a police report against independent scholar Sangeetha Thanapal on Friday for a Facebook post he called "inaccurate and seditious".

He said her post - which has since been taken down - had misrepresented remarks he made at a Singapore Press Club talk on Thursday on how regional trends can affect Singapore.

"What Ms Thanapal wrote is inaccurate and seditious, and attributes to me sentiments that I do not hold and have never held," he said in a Facebook post last night.

"I intend to file a police report about this tomorrow."

He added: "She unfortunately twisted what I had said and suggested that I was an 'Islamophobic bigot who thinks Malay-Muslims are a threat'. I had not said anything like that."

I have been asked about a Facebook post by Ms Thanapal regarding my comments at a Singapore Press Club event on 27...
Posted by K Shanmugam Sc on Friday, August 28, 2015


Ms Thanapal, 33, took her post down less than an hour after Mr Shanmugam's post was put up at around 8pm. She also said she was seeking legal advice.

Mr Shanmugam, responding on her Facebook at about 11.15pm, said he held "no personal animosity" towards her, and said he would be happy to speak to her.

Shortly afterwards, she responded saying: "I am very sorry for all that has happened. The post took on a life of its own, and came out differently from how I intended. Thank you so much for agreeing to speak with me. I will make myself available anytime you wish to do so."

Mr Shanmugam then asked for a telephone number and said he would contact her today. As at midnight, there was no indication in the exhanges about whether he would still file a police report.

When Mr Shanmugam first posted about Ms Thanapal's remarks, he said the point he actually made at the event was that the Malaysian education system was not good for integration.

"The Chinese leadership in various local areas in Malaysia want to maintain control over the Chinese population. It suits them to have Chinese students go to Chinese schools instead of mainstream Malaysian schools. And the schools are more Chinese (because they are effectively single race)," he wrote.

"At the same time, many mainstream schools in Malaysia are becoming more Malay (because the students are largely Malay) and Islamic (e.g. through the way some principals and teachers handle matters) which discourages the Chinese from going into those schools. So you end up with having more Malays going to mainstream schools, and more Chinese going to Chinese schools. As a result, the different races are kept apart from a young age."

Ms Thanapal's Facebook post appeared to take issue with Mr Shanmugam saying that mainstream schools in Malaysia were "becoming more Malay and Islamic".

She wrote: "The only reason you would consider this important enough to make statements about, is if you are an Islamaphobic bigot who thinks Malay-Muslims are a threat."



Law and Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam intends to file a police report about a Facebook post that he said was inaccurate and seditious. More here http://str.sg/Z7j2
Posted by The Straits Times on Friday, August 28, 2015





Our Retirement Journey - Let’s Think About It

$
0
0
Let’s Think About It: Our Retirement Journey
27 Aug 2015

Should there by a retirement age or a range of retirement ages? Is a comfortable retirement possible?

What's the rule of thumb for retirement saving? Watch “Let’s Think About It” Gurmit Singh, Gerard Ee, Henry Tay and Stephanie Phua will share views and stories with Minister Chan Chun Sing on their retirement plans and journey.























What would you like your children to be when they grow up? A CEO, a talented athlete, or a famous actress?Watch “Let’s...
Posted by Gov.sg on Friday, August 28, 2015




Related

Let's talk about living and dying well, today

$
0
0
People should talk to loved ones in advance about how they want to die. Such conversations are always too early - until one day when they might be too late.
By Raymond Ng, Published The Straits Times, 29 Aug 2015

Death and dying engender complex emotions in people. To some, death is a remote event far removed from life's daily pursuits or a taboo subject to be avoided, yet, to others, there is peaceful acceptance of death as a final chapter of the natural cycle of life.

As a palliative care physician treating patients with advanced illness, I have witnessed an entire gamut of emotions and reactions to death and dying.



However, my first personal experience with death was not with my patients.

It was when my mother died when I was 18 years old. She had advanced ovarian cancer and battled the disease for five years through multiple operations and cycles of chemotherapy.

Those years were like a blur as we tried to have a normal family life, and I coped by burying myself in my studies. Though she grew cachectic and weak and was literally wasting away nearing the end, death was a taboo subject which never surfaced in our conversations. It just hit one day when I received a phone call during my basic military training at the army camp. It was only then that I knew she had died and was gone forever. My mother died without the family's presence and with a certain degree of pain in the final stage. My only goodbye was a tender kiss on her cheek as she lay lifeless on her bed.

Perhaps my parents wanted to shield us from the spectre of dying, or perhaps her doctor didnot adequately prepare us. Death and dying were issues that we did not talk about. It was not just about death and dying, there were many things I would have liked to say to or ask her, if only I knew.

After my mother's death, I entered medical school and found my way into palliative care some years after graduation. My experience with my mother was one of the reasons why I chose this speciality. Many have asked if it is a depressing practice. Personally, it has been a rewarding experience of professional and personal growth. I have been privileged to journey with many patients in their final act of life and to be let into their life stories and deepest thoughts.

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING

Through these experiences, I have also become an advocate for advance care planning (ACP), or what most would commonly understand as end-of-life conversations. ACP is a voluntary process in which people discuss, state and document their values and wishes regarding future medical care, in the event that they are incapacitated from making decisions on their own.

In a developed country like Singapore, most people will die after experiencing a chronic, progressive and, ultimately, fatal illness. When patients are seriously ill, they are frequently incapable of making important end-of-life decisions. In those circumstances, without knowing what loved ones would have wanted, caregivers may face intense stress and feel burdened when making decisions in consultation with doctors.

ACP is not just suitable for patients with advanced illness; it is suitable for everyone, in any state of health or illness. Even when one appears to be in the pink of health, one cannot predict when medical catastrophes might suddenly strike. In this epoch of rapid medical advancement, we are technically successful in prolonging life, often with variable outcomes in terms of quality of life. For example, a person who is clinically brain dead with no reasonable prospect of neurological recovery can be kept alive on life support for a considerable period of time.

With a rise in the consumer- and patient-rights movement as well as landmark cases, the ACP movement began in the West. By the 1970s, most states in the United States had passed legislation enabling patients to record end-of-life wishes. In 1996, the advance medical directive (AMD) Act was enacted in Singapore. It allows a person to sign a legal document in advance, informing his doctor that he does not want the use of any extraordinary life-sustaining treatment to prolong his life in the event he becomes terminally ill and unconscious and where death is imminent for him.

CONVERSATIONS BEYOND FORMS

Early efforts at ACP were focused on completing advance directives, also known as living wills, stating what decisions should be made for their health in the event they are ill and incapacitated from making decisions. However, completing forms alone has limitations, and recent efforts are focused on framing and implementing ACP as a deep, reflective and iterative conversation, a communication process between patients, their loved ones and their healthcare professionals. Documents, such as the AMD, are only one aspect of the broader framework of ACP. Even when preferences are documented, they can be verbally revoked by the patient at any time and should be constantly reviewed.

Within the last two decades, there is gathering evidence that ACP as a process increases patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, improves surrogates' understanding of patients' goals and preferences, reduces post-bereavement stress and depression in family members, reduces use of potentially burdensome treatment, as well as improves quality of life near the end of life.

It is also known that patients desire autonomy over end-of-life decisions and expect their physicians to initiate these conversations. Locally, in 2009, the National Healthcare Group end-of-life task force invited the faculty of Respecting Choices from Wisconsin, US, to train healthcare professionals in ACP facilitation and implementation.

In 2011, the Agency of Integrated Care (AIC) was designated by the Ministry of Health(MOH) to be the agency to coordinate and disburse funds to various regional health systems to implement ACP.

Since then, pilot projects in ACP have sprung up in various hospitals, nursing homes, hospices and community hospitals and home medical care teams. There are ongoing efforts at training ACP facilitators, engaging and raising awareness of ACP among healthcare professionals, patients and their caregivers, as well as setting up processes and systems to capture and honour outcomes of ACP facilitation.

Nevertheless, there are barriers to ACP practice and potential misconceptions. Some people, including healthcare professionals, may view the subject as taboo. Some clinicians fear that broaching ACP takes away hope and will send the wrong message to patients. Patients may also not be open to ACP, especially when they are better and do not see the need to make plans. Some may also confuse ACP with euthanasia.

MELISSA'S STORY

My personal experience in facilitating ACP with my patients is far removed from the myths and controversies swirling around it. ACP is about finding out what living well means to each unique individual, his or her values, deepest thoughts, joys, beliefs, as well as fears and concerns. It is not about death and dying, it is about helping each patient to live well and to preserve his or her dignity, until the very end.

Melissa (name changed to maintain confidentiality) was a patient who I looked after for two years from the time she was diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer. She was near death at diagnosis but responded well to targeted therapy in cancer treatment. During the two years she was on treatment, we controlled her pain and she was able to enjoy time spent and overseas trips with her family. However, predictably, her cancer cells became resistant to the drug and started to spread further.

During one of my conversations with her, she spoke of how living well meant being able to spend time with her family.

She shared her hopes of seeing her first daughter marry well and her second daughter graduate from school the following year.

She spoke of her fear of pain, of being in a prolonged vegetative state, as well as fear of being a burden to her family.

If she were to deteriorate despite a trial of treatment, she would not want aggressive interventions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation or to be hooked to a ventilator.

She nominated one of her sisters as her healthcare proxy as this sister was level-headed and better able to make decisions under duress. Through this heartfelt conversation, her family was able to understand what really mattered to her.

Her condition deteriorated soon after and she died in the hospital in the presence of her family. When I attended her wake, I discovered her family had carried out her wishes with regard to what she would wear, the photo to be used and her preferred colour theme of white. She wanted her funeral to be a celebration of her life and her transition to a better place.

She chose a niche in the columbarium that overlooked a bench, where her daughters could sit and feel her love bathing them from above.

Current efforts at ACP are focused on patients with advanced illness and chronic disease in hospitals as well as in most community hospice care services.

If you are a patient at any of the public hospitals, you can ask your doctor about ACP. ACP may then be carried out by your doctor or anyone else who may be trained, such as a nurse or a social worker.

At this stage, while ACP is implemented in pilot projects with seed funding from MOH, there is usually no extra charge to the patient when it is done.

Though most relevant then, broaching ACP when one is seriously ill is not the most ideal. It is often too early, until it is too late.

Talking about end-of-life choices is difficult, but we do not have to wait for a crisis before having the conversation. There is a need for a culture shift when it comes to death - discussions about it have to be de-stigmatised. ACP conversations should be normalised and embraced early, conducted out of hospital settings and at the dinner table, as a process of communication between ourselves and our loved ones.

If one is not a patient of any hospital and does not have access to an ACP facilitator, one can download ACP workbooks freely available on the Internet and start the process of discussion with loved ones. One useful resource to browse for more information is the website www.livingmatters.sg, which is set up by AIC.

Nothing puts life in sharper perspective than death. Someone once said that it is when you learn to die, that you learn to live. Having end-of-life conversations do not hasten death. On the contrary, these discussions allow us to reflect what really matters to each one of us and to communicate so to those who matter to us.

Dr Raymond Ng is the Clinical Lead for Advance Care Planning and Consultant in Palliative Care at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, member of the National Healthcare Group.


Singapore 'most at risk of facing high water stress'

$
0
0
It tops list of 167 nations likely to face shortage in 2040: World Resources Institute
The Straits Times, 29 Aug 2015

WASHINGTON • The world's demand for water is likely to surge in the next few decades against the backdrop of climate change and a rapidly growing population.

Thirty-three countries, including Singapore, have been singled out as those likely to face extremely high water stress in 2040 in a report by the World Resources Institute (WRI), a think-tank in Washington.

Singapore was ranked first among the countries at the highest risk of high water stress in 2040, alongside Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, San Marino, the United Arab Emirates and the Palestinian Territories, according to the report, which evaluated 167 nations.

The ranking was based on an index measuring competition for and depletion of surface water, such as lakes and rivers, each decade from 2020 to 2040. Singapore was ranked as one of the highest risk countries in each decade.

"The good news... is countries can take actions to reduce that stress and the risk associated with how they manage water resources," said Ms Betsy Otto, director of the WRI's Global Water Programme, citing Singapore as an example of a state that uses innovative methods to manage water resources.

Singapore relies heavily on imports from neighbouring Malaysia, but has well-founded plans for enhancing future supply and self-sufficiency. Large reservoirs are found even in the country's most built-up areas and the recently built US$226 million (S$317 million) Marina Barrage is among the highlights of the nation's water management plan.

In the WRI rankings, the Middle East was identified as the least water-secure region in the world, with limited surface water and high demand. It draws heavily on groundwater and desalinated sea water, and faces "exceptional water-related challenges for the foreseeable future", the WRI report said.

One measure likely to become more common in the Middle East and elsewhere is water reuse systems that recycle waste water.

"It doesn't make a lot of sense to treat water to a potable standard, allow it to be used by households and then essentially throw it away," Ms Otto said.

Singapore has a system in place for water recycling as part of its Newater programme.

Some Middle Eastern countries already rely on desalination, a technique to remove salt from sea and groundwater. These and other highly water-stressed nations may also need to move away from producing their own food because agriculture gobbles water, Ms Otto noted.

Saudi Arabia, for example, has said its people will depend entirely on grain imports by next year.

Large economies such as the US, China and India face risks of their own, with water stress projected to remain roughly constant through 2040. However, parts of the countries - such as the south-western US and China's Ningxia province - could see water stress increase by 40 per cent to 70 per cent.

The report also highlighted water resources as a potential source of conflict, citing Syria as an example.

"With regional violence and political turmoil commanding global attention, water may seem tangential. However, drought and water shortages in Syria likely contributed to the unrest that stoked the country's 2011 civil war.

"Dwindling water resources and chronic mismanagement forced 1.5 million people, primarily farmers and herders, to lose their livelihoods and leave their land, move to urban areas, and magnify Syria's general destabilisation," the report said.

"The problem extends to other countries. Water is a significant dimension of the decades-old conflict between Palestine and Israel," it added.

REUTERS


Jobs and skill mismatch

$
0
0
Are non-graduate jobs 'upgrading' to give the graduates who do them more autonomy?
By Craig Holmes, Charoula Tzanakou, Daria Luchinskaya and KenMayhew, Published The Straits Times, 29 Aug 2015

In an ideal world, everyone investing in their skills through education and training would enter the labour market and find a job which took full advantage of those skills. Concerns that this has not been the case for successive cohorts of university graduates are longstanding, particularly in Britain following the rapid expansion of the higher education sector in the early 1990s. However, there is wide disagreement about the extent of the problem, or how much it has changed over the past decades.

It is commonplace to hear people refer, often interchangeably, to "over-education", "under- employment", "over-qualification", "over-skilling" and "under- utilisation". But ultimately these terms apply to two aspects of graduate work: Whether a person needs to possess a degree to get a job, and whether they need the skills learnt through studying for a degree to actually do the job.

Given the increase in the number of graduate applicants for jobs, it should not be surprising to find that more and more jobs require a degree to get through the recruitment process. As the Higher Education Funding Council for England has pointed out, 65 per cent of recent graduates report that having a degree was either a formal requirement or an advantage in securing jobs once out of university.

The more substantial issue is whether the job, once secured, requires skills learnt at university, or if the degree was simply a way for employers to screen candidates. All too frequently, the two points are conflated.

BRITAIN AND THE REST OF EUROPE

In a report we produced for the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, we used two European surveys to indicate how different countries compare when it comes to producing jobs that require "graduate-level" skills. In both surveys, Britain does appear to have a relatively high proportion of its graduate workforce in jobs that don't require such skills.

By one measure, nearly 60 per cent of British graduates, of all ages, working in 2010 were in jobs which did not require the completion of a degree. However, as we argued in the report, these types of self-reported survey data have some real problems.

It is hard, for example, to work out when skills were actually developed during the long course of education, and almost impossible to say whether they would have been produced anyway if individuals had taken a different route into the labour market.

We could, as many labour economists have done, look at the wage differences between graduates and non-graduates. The large and persistent gap between the two, even as graduate numbers increase, suggests demand for them has also risen, but this could equally be due to rising demand for graduate skills or changes in employer screening and recruitment practices.

Through recruitment, graduates out-compete non-graduates for the available better-paying jobs, pushing the average wages of non-graduates downwards.

WHAT IS A GRADUATE JOB?

It is therefore important to look at the work graduates are actually doing. Of course, the notion of a "graduate job" is difficult to define. The most recent data on the destination of university leavers shows that 75 per cent of graduates are working in professional, managerial, associate professional and technical occupations, which implies one in four has started his working life in lower-skilled jobs.

The bigger point is that it is not correct to equate the higher-skilled occupational groups with graduate jobs. In the mid-1990s, only around 20-25 per cent of workers in managerial, associate professional and technical occupations were graduates - this rose to around 40-45 per cent by last year.

For the graduates entering occupations where once there were largely non-graduates, we need to see evidence that something is changing in the content of the job - that it is upgrading and requiring more skill - to argue that their graduate skills are being utilised and that the existing routes into these jobs were not just as effective (as well as being cheaper).

'UPGRADING' JOBS

To do this, we use data from the Workplace Employment Relations Survey on one aspect of jobs - the amount of autonomy, discretion and influence employees have over their work - to capture the skill requirements of a particular occupation. We looked at how this has changed over time (from 1998 to 2011) and, crucially, how it differs for graduates and non-graduates in the same types of jobs.

What we found is that graduates' use of skills across the labour market was mixed, leading to a range of different outcomes.

There are a number of occupations which we could characterise as "upgrading" to accommodate extra graduates - these were where autonomy was increasing and was greater for graduates compared to non-graduates. But many other occupations, where the share of graduates had increased, did not fit this description.

For some occupations, graduate autonomy was falling relative to the occupation as a whole - indicating that graduates were taking on lesser-skilled jobs as a consequence of increased competition. For others, decreases were in line with absolute falls in autonomy across the occupation - which we call deskilling. There are also a number of types of work where graduates had less autonomy than non-graduates, suggesting that graduate skills might actually be mismatched to the requirements of those occupations.

Craig Holmes is Lecturer in Economics at University of Oxford; Charoula Tzanakou is Research Fellow, Warwick Institute for Employment Research at University of Warwick; Daria Luchinskaya is IAS Early Career Fellow at University of Warwick; and Ken Mayhew is Emeritus Professor of Education and Economic Performance at University of Oxford

This article first appeared in conversation.com, a website of analyses from academics and researchers.


Targeted GST Voucher criteria benefit Singaporeans

$
0
0
Mr Stewart Christopher Bernard ("Exclude home value from GST Voucher criteria"; Wednesday) asked whether overseas Singaporeans are eligible for the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Voucher and also suggested removing the Annual Value (AV) component as a criterion to determine eligibility for the scheme.

The GST Voucher scheme is aimed at benefiting less well-off Singaporeans who incur GST on their living expenses in Singapore. To identify those permanently residing overseas, we have used the place of residence registered with the Government.

If we discover that an individual appears to be living overseas permanently but continues to have his registered place of residence in Singapore, we conduct further inquiries to reassess his eligibility for the GST Voucher.

The use of both income and the AV of one's residence as criteria for a person's eligibility for the GST Voucher is not perfect, and does not capture every individual's situation accurately.

But it provides us with a fair and practical basis to administer a large national scheme, reaching 1.6 million beneficiaries.

Among Singaporeans with the same income, those who live in private homes are generally better off than those who live in HDB homes. Likewise, those with no income (such as retirees and housewives) living in higher-end homes are generally better off than the same group living in lower-value homes.

The current AV threshold of $21,000 covers 80 per cent of homes in Singapore, including all HDB flats and some private properties. Nonetheless, we recognise that not all Singaporeans living in homes in the top 20 per cent of the AV range are well-off, and some may experience instances of financial hardship.

The best way to help them is not by changing the rules across the board.

We can instead use more flexible forms of support, such as ComCare, which allows for a more detailed assessment of a person's situation.

Low-income families may approach their nearest Social Service Office for an assessment of their needs.

We thank Mr Bernard for his feedback and will continue to review the criteria for the GST Voucher scheme regularly.

Lim Yuin Chien
Director, Corporate Communications
Ministry of Finance
ST Forum, 29 Aug 2015





Exclude home value from GST Voucher criteria

Every year, the Government gives Goods and Services Tax (GST) Vouchers to eligible Singaporeans to help them with their expenses.

However, I am puzzled about the criteria for receiving this voucher.

For instance, if a Singaporean has a Singapore address registered in his identity card, but is living overseas and owns property there, is he eligible for the voucher?

It is frustrating that some parents who are unemployed and living with their children in a private house are also not eligible for the voucher, because the annual value of the home exceeds the limit.

Even Singaporeans living in rented private homes are not eligible for the voucher, even though they do not own the property.

Perhaps the Government should not include the annual value of a property as a criterion for the GST Voucher.

Stewart Christopher Bernard
ST Forum, 26 Aug 2015


Viewing all 7503 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>