Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7503 articles
Browse latest View live

GE a time to 'strengthen ties between PAP and people'

$
0
0
Lawrence Wong says the partnership is a key factor in S'pore's success over past 50 years
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong sees the coming election as an occasion for Singaporeans to think about whether they want to strengthen the partnership between the People's Action Party (PAP) and the people.



Mr Wong sees this relationship as a key factor behind Singapore's success in building a nation over the past 50 years, he told reporters at a session to announce the ruling party's line-up for Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC at the election.

"It is a partnership that's built on trust, on the people trusting in the PAP leadership, on the PAP upholding its values of acting for and serving the people," said Mr Wong.

"As Singaporeans think about what choice to make for... not just the next five years, but the next five years and beyond, the question is: Do we want to strengthen this special partnership and build an even better Singapore?"

The election is expected to be called soon, and Mr Wong said it is not just about building on this partnership as a nation - but to give the PAP a mandate to do more for residents within their estates too.

"We certainly hope that we will have the support and mandate from Singaporeans," he added at Block 3, Marsiling Road, alongside a block party for residents.



Mr Wong, 42, co-anchors the slate in the new four-MP GRC with Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob, 60. Joining them are first-term incumbent MPs Ong Teng Koon, 38, who teared up as he recounted how he had helped a needy family, and Mr Alex Yam, 34.

They will likely be challenged by the Singapore Democratic Party.

Said Mr Wong: "We come in with a track record that has been built up over the years. This GRC may be new, but the areas (it covers) have been under the stewardship of the PAP for many, many years."

As he charted the development of estates in the new GRC - from Marsiling's transformation from rubber plantations and kampungs to Yew Tee and its farming village past - Mr Wong said the changes "mirror the success of Singapore".

His team's plans include building on the area's heritage, improving transport connectivity, and introducing more programmes to help the disadvantaged.

It is also a team that brings together experience and youth to look after young and old residents, he said.

Mr Wong is a first-term MP for West Coast GRC, and Madam Halimah has been a Jurong GRC MP for the past 14 years. Both were deployed to contest the new GRC after electoral boundaries were announced on July 24, and have been walking the ground since then.

Mr Ong's Woodgrove ward and Mr Yam's Yew Tee ward are part of this GRC, which also includes retiring MP Hawazi Daipi's Marsiling ward as well as new housing developments in both Woodlands and Yew Tee housing estates.

If elected, Mr Wong said their first priority would be to form a new town council and set up offices that are convenient to residents.

Madam Halimah said she visited all 456 units in the block on Thursday night, and told residents she heard their aspirations, and that the team will put in place programmes for them.



Asked if her role as Speaker meant she could not speak up for residents in Parliament, she said much of the work of an MP was work on the ground "that includes following up with the relevant ministries and agencies" on issues.

"I will be doing the work to represent them as best as possible and it need not be in the public eye... No ministry has felt that I am less rigorous or vigorous... when I was Speaker over the last two years," she said.





Dishing out new level of service
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

As the People's Action Party (PAP) announced its candidates across the island in the past 10 days, they unfailingly spoke about serving the people.

Yesterday, the four-member team for Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC went a step further.

While a three-man band serenaded about 200 pioneers with a repertoire of golden oldies, Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob, Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong and backbenchers Alex Yam and Ong Teng Koon picked up serving spoons to dish out plates of food to the residents.

The lunch at the void deck of Block 3, Marsiling Drive, a block of rental flats, preceded a formal introduction of the PAP team that hopes to win the support of Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC residents in the coming elections.

Explaining the reason for picking the spot and event, Mr Wong said: "In a way, it reflects what we want to do in our GRC.

"We will have that spirit of service for the residents - to be able to have more programmes to reach out to residents in need... and make sure that, within the GRC, we continue to care for and look after all our residents."

This year, the PAP has bucked its custom of announcing candidates at the party's headquarters in a relatively formal setting.

The venues for its flurry of announcements have been a mixed bag, ranging from coffee shops and branch offices to homes for the elderly and void decks.

Yesterday, Mr Lim Biow Chuan took a stroll down memory lane at an exhibition with Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin, before announcing he would defend Mountbatten SMC.

Mr Lim, a two-term MP, mingled with residents at the "Memories of Mountbatten" exhibition, which looks at how the town has changed over the years, while children played traditional games, including hopscotch.

Meanwhile, Senior Minister of State for Health and Manpower Amy Khor chose a void-deck setting to announce that she will stand once more in Hong Kah North SMC.

She was at Block 325, Bukit Batok Street 33, where she spoke to a group of elderly residents who gather regularly to make items such as artificial flowers or friendship bands.








Amy Khor and Lim Biow Chuan to stay put
By Walter Sim and Melissa Lin, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

Two incumbent People's Action Party (PAP) MPs in single-member seats yesterday said they will stay put to defend their respective constituencies at the general election.

Senior Minister of State for Health and Manpower Amy Khor - PAP's top scorer at the 2011 polls with 70.6 per cent of the vote - will contest Hong Kah North SMC.

Two-term MP Lim Biow Chuan will contest Mountbatten SMC, where he got 58.6 per cent of the vote in 2011.

Dr Khor, 57, and Mr Lim, 52, have represented residents in their wards for 14 and nine years respectively. Both expect to face challengers from the Singapore People's Party (SPP) at the coming polls.

Dr Khor told reporters she is not taking anything for granted, despite her strong mandate in 2011 against the SPP's Mr Sin Kek Tong.

"Every election is a new election. It's like a test. I have to start from zero and work my way up," she said. "I will campaign very hard to earn the strong support and confidence of residents."

She also unveiled a five-year plan for the ward at an exhibition at a void deck in her constituency.

A total of 44 HDB blocks will undergo the Home Improvement Programme by 2020, while two precincts of 40 blocks will come under the Neighbourhood Renewal Programme. Residents can also look forward to new linkways, fitness corners and playgrounds. The upgrades will cost over $80 million, which is to be split between the HDB and the town council.

She also plans to train more volunteers to visit the homes of elderly residents, especially those living alone and those over 65 who request such visits.



In Mountbatten, Mr Lim's candidacy was announced by Social and Family Development Minister Tan Chuan-Jin outside the PAP branch office.

Mr Tan, the anchor minister for Marine Parade GRC, praised Mr Lim for his work as chairman of the Marine Parade Town Council, which also looks after Mountbatten SMC.

"Some of the estates in the town council are getting older, and how you administer the sinking fund is really important," he said.

Mr Tan added that Mr Lim meets residents up to five times a week, and has been vocal in Parliament, and "dogged" in lobbying for greater focus on character development in schools, concession fares for polytechnic students, and the lemon law to better protect consumers against defective products.

Mr Lim said he would "want to continue to influence policies so that we can have a kinder and more compassionate society".

He promised more covered linkways and upgraded amenities, and to improve access to public transport for private estate dwellers, who form half his constituents.

He is likely to be challenged once again by lawyer Jeannette Chong- Aruldoss, now with the SPP.

Said Mr Lim of the contest: "I always welcome competition, it keeps you on your toes."



Tin Pei Ling goes from rocky start to running solo in MacPherson

$
0
0
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

On her political debut four years ago, the People's Action Party's (PAP) youngest candidate was ridiculed online, slammed as immature and seen to be riding on the coat-tails of then-Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, who led the Marine Parade GRC team.



But yesterday, Ms Tin Pei Ling, now 31, exuded quiet confidence and maturity as she introduced herself to the media as the PAP's candidate for the resurrected single-seat MacPherson constituency.

"Back then, in 2011, I was a newbie. There are things that I may not have done that well," she said.

"But this time, as someone who has been in MacPherson for four-plus years, having been familiarised with the issues and lives of the people... I think I'm better-placed to represent the people of MacPherson, to help them in their day-to-day issues and give them a voice in Parliament."

The absence of members of her former team, such as Mr Goh or Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin, further underscored that Ms Tin was fighting her own battle.

It was her first public appearance since giving birth to her first child barely a fortnight ago, in defiance of the traditional month-long confinement period.

As she fielded questions for 45 minutes, the only concession to her condition were cushions on her plastic chair. She expects "to be back in full action soon".

But she is not likely to face a straightforward fight, with the Workers' Party and National Solidarity Party set to contest the seat.

But, Ms Tin said, her team will prepare for however many opponents that may appear.

Though she will stand as a lone candidate, she does not stand alone. At the session in the party's MacPherson branch, she was flanked by four party activists.

The unprecedented move was in recognition of the hard work put in by her volunteers, she said.

"In MacPherson, a lot of the things I do, I don't do it alone. I do it with the support of my team."

Support from her team and her family helped her overcome the hostility she faced in 2011, she added. "It was a very rocky and, I would say, painful start."

In her four years as the ward's MP, she introduced schemes such as the MacPherson Care Fund to help elderly residents cope with medical bills, and a milk powder scheme for low-income families with young children.

If re-elected, one cause she will advocate is equal paid maternity leave for single mothers, who currently get eight weeks against 16 weeks for married ones. "Single mums... should be given equal maternity leave so that their kid, like any other Singaporean child, will have the best chance in life."

Being a new mother has also given her new experiences and insight into issues young families may face, she added. But she will not take her son, Ng Kee Hau, on the campaign trail: "I'm not trying to win sympathy votes."

My team and I have dedicated ourselves to serving the residents of MacPherson and to making a positive impact in Their...
Posted by Tin Pei Ling on Friday, August 21, 2015


Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, the party's organising secretary, said on Facebook last night that he had told her to pace herself when the hustings start.

He also said he viewed footage of her media event: "She looks positively glowing - motherhood becomes her.''




National Solidarity Party's Steve Chia says he will not contest MacPherson SMC, citing online abuse. http://str.sg/Z7ix
Posted by The Straits Times on Saturday, August 22, 2015






Wow. Interesting language here. "...WP will send a strong candidate and take down MacPherson SMC and take KateSpade...
Posted by Tan Chuan-Jin on Saturday, August 22, 2015



Singapore 'has built a first-rate education system': Heng Swee Keat

$
0
0
And Govt has ensured that all Singaporeans have access to varied pathways
By Sandra Davie, Senior Education Correspondent, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

Over the years, Singapore has built a first-rate education system that offers many choices and pathways to young Singaporeans from primary to university level and, more recently, even through continuing education that helps workers hone their skills and expertise, said Education Minister Heng Swee Keat.

The Government has also ensured that all Singaporeans have access to these varied pathways, regardless of their family background or starting point.

Mr Heng, who has held the education portfolio since he entered politics in 2011, sketched out to The Straits Times how the education system has been built up, "layer upon layer" - in every school, at every level and no matter what the child's starting point is.

He took pains to show how learning, for example, is not just confined to the classroom but also includes music and sports and programmes to build character. This also helps to equip students with skills needed to navigate a more complex and uncertain world.

He pointed out the variety of pathways available to students - from the Integrated Programme schools to the Singapore Sports School to the School of the Arts.

With the recent initiative to build deep expertise and skills in workers, there are even more pathways for those pursuing post-secondary studies, through the Earn and Learn programmes where they gain qualifications while working in companies.

He stressed it was a "student-centric" system that recognises that every child is different, and it is all about helping them discover their strengths and interests.

He also sketched out the various efforts by the Government to enable children from disadvantaged backgrounds to level up and progress through the system.

These include the Ministry of Education kindergartens where one- third of the places are reserved for children from low-income families, as well as the learning support programme in English and Mathematics for students lagging behind.

The Government takes this aspect of building "high averages through the system more seriously than any other school system in the world", he said. Almost all schools here are publicly funded and almost all school teachers and leaders are employed by the ministry, which can deploy them to the schools where they are most needed.

All this has helped to build a system with "high averages" across the board, he said pointing to the Programme for International Student Assessment figures which show that, in Singapore, a large proportion of those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds perform better than expected.

This has been built on the strong literacy and numeracy foundation laid in previous years, he said.

"And this is in sharp contrast to many school systems around the world where a different minister comes in, a different party comes into power, and then you have a new policy that is very disruptive.

"You need very thoughtful long- term strategic thinking and to monitor the results of the changes every step of the way. And there is no substitute for very dedicated implementation. That is our strength."

He stressed that there should be no let-up in the pursuit of excellence - it should be "part of Singapore's DNA", but added that there is a need to broaden the definition of excellence and to recognise everyone for achieving his personal best.

He said that the pursuit of excellence must also be coupled with a sense of purpose and gratitude, so that Singaporeans will contribute back to society.

To sum it all up, he went to describe what lies at the heart of the education system.

"It is really about the child and how do we help the child be successful in life.

"Not just in the material sense but in leading a purposeful life," he said.





















Uni for poly grads seeking degrees set for major expansion
Minister wants SIT to have central campus to house its growing student population
By Sandra Davie, Senior Education Correspondent and Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

The Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT), set up to offer degree opportunities to polytechnic graduates, will be expanded to offer more courses and take in up to 3,000 students a year by 2020, up from this year's intake of 2,000 students.

To house the much bigger student body, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat has called on the Government to allocate space for the university to build a central campus.

Currently the university, set up in 2009, runs its courses at its satellite campuses in the five polytechnics. Its offices are in Dover Road. "Given the expansion of SIT and the nature of SIT courses, such a campus will also enable active interaction and engagement among students, and between students and their community and industry partners."

Mr Heng made these comments during a wide-ranging interview with The Straits Times, in which he touched upon the different educational choices and pathways that are now available to all Singaporeans - irrespective of their family backgrounds and starting points.

In this context, he mentioned the "distinctive" model of education being developed by both SIT and SIM University (UniSIM), Singapore's sixth university which launched full-time degrees last year, offering over 200 places in marketing, finance and accountancy.

This year, UniSIM added a human resource management degree and increased its intake to 288. It has been offering part-time degrees for working adults since 2005.

Mr Heng said SIT, which offers over 30 degree courses, can be nimble in launching "niche degrees" to plug specific needs in industry. "Its graduates will have interesting pathways and career opportunities."

The two universities offer an applied learning approach where classroom learning is integrated with real-life, on-the-job application through work attachments.

"Students can learn theory in the classroom and apply it at the workplace, and take the issues and challenges they have at the workplace back to the classroom."

While SIT concentrates on science and technology, UniSIM's programmes focus more on business, management and human services.

This year, a record 15,000 polytechnic graduates and A-level school-leavers entered the six universities here, raising the cohort's entry rate to university to 32 per cent, up from 30 per cent last year.

Mr Heng said the goal was to hit a 40 per cent cohort participation rate by 2020, and most of the additional places will come from the expansion of SIT and UniSIM.

Including part-time degree programmes offered at UniSIM, the cohort participation rate in 2020 is likely to hit 50 per cent.

But Mr Heng emphasised that with the SkillsFuture initiative, courses and programmes should be seen as "a means of building knowledge and skills, which can be deeply internalised and become a part of one's strength", instead of a chase for qualifications.





Parents, pupils will get time to adjust to PSLE changes
By Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

The makeover of the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) is still some time away, with the announcement to come next year at the earliest, said Education Minister Heng Swee Keat.

Parents and pupils will be given enough time to respond and adjust to the changes when they are implemented, he added.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had said two years ago in his National Day Rally speech that the high- stakes exam would be revamped, and the aggregate T-score done away with.

Instead of getting a score out of 300 points, pupils will get grade bands - similar to how students get graded from A1 to F9 for the O levels or A to E for the A levels. The grades will then be converted to points to be used for admission into secondary schools.

Mr Heng said the Ministry of Education (MOE) is already putting diverse programmes in place in primary and secondary schools to meet the needs of different children. For instance, each secondary school has to develop two distinctive programmes by 2017 to cater to students' interests.

"It is about choosing the school that has the programme, the emphasis and the fit, rather than about that one school that you must go to," he said.

Recent SkillsFuture initiatives - such as the Earn and Learn programme for polytechnic and Institute of Technical Education graduates as well as the introduction of modular courses at the post-secondary level - also aim to send a message to parents and students that the emphasis is on lifelong learning and helping students enter their areas of interest, said Mr Heng.

"Some of us may take a longer pathway to reach our peak. Some of us may take a shorter pathway, and some will take a path less travelled and go do something completely different," he said.

"There are many good pathways and I don't need to cram at just the PSLE level and say that I must get into that one school."

The MOE is still in the process of implementing programmes in secondary schools - especially in neighbourhood schools - to create differentiation, said Mr Heng.

These initiatives to create a more diverse secondary school landscape, with different schools offering different niche areas, will come before the PSLE revamp.

"Some parents believe that a certain school will help their child succeed better... It will take some time for this mindset to change," said Mr Heng, adding that the end goal is not just about grades, but also about finding success in life.





Initiatives in place to ensure poor students get help to succeed
By Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

Stories of poor students who make good and enter top schools may be harder to come by these days, but the Ministry of Education (MOE) has put in place initiatives to ensure that every child is given the resources to succeed, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat said.

While rich parents can send their children to more tuition classes which may translate into better exam scores, the education system here is one that ensures even the less privileged children are not deprived of opportunities, he said.

"I will say that we are probably one of the very few systems where if a child has the ability, he will not be held back because there were no opportunities," he said, citing subsidised support programmes that self-help groups such as Sinda and the Chinese Development Assistance Council provide as an example.

Mr Heng added that well-educated and well-resourced parents are able to give their children a head start in their early childhood years. But his ministry will work to ensure that children who are not born to such environments are not left out.

"I cannot stop parents (from doing that) but I can have MOE kindergartens where I can hire good teachers to help our kids so that they don't lose out," he said.

The MOE-run kindergartens, a pilot started last year, place strong emphasis on bilingualism and children are exposed to both English and their mother-tongue languages daily.

Mr Heng's remarks come after Raffles Institution (RI) principal Chan Poh Meng made a hard-hitting speech on how the school now largely caters to the affluent segment of the population and is at risk of becoming insular.

Mr Heng, an old boy of RI, said the broader message of Mr Chan's speech was about gratitude.

"Students who have had the opportunity to study in RI, and indeed any of our schools, should give back to the community, and feel grateful for the opportunities they've been given," he said.

Mr Heng added that these messages apply not only to RI, but also to all schools here.

"The broader message is quite in line with our focus on character and citizenship education and our values-in-action programme. So I hope the discourse is not about one or two schools," he said.

Initiatives are in place to ensure that schools do not become closed circles, Mr Heng added. For example, in the Primary 1 registration exercise, 40 places must be allocated to children with no ties to a school. There is also the independent school bursary scheme, which offers subsidies to low-income students in independent schools.

"We are expanding opportunities right across the system. There are many opportunities for everyone regardless of their strengths, interests and pace of learning, because we have such diversified pathways," he said.


350 local Tamil literary works digitally archived

$
0
0
Public can now access 50 years of material in public libraries and on NLB's BooksSG portal
By Ng Huiwen, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

Tamil writers and poets hailed a "proud moment" for their community yesterday after a heritage group completed the task of digitally recording 350 local Tamil literary works.

The public can now easily access archives of 50 years of local Tamil literature, ranging from published novels to poems to short stories.

“We must ensure we preserve the literary works of today’s generation for future generations. I hope too that these books...
Posted by Ministry of Finance (Singapore) on Saturday, August 22, 2015


Launched by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office S. Iswaran yesterday at the National Library Building, the Tamil Digital Heritage Collection features 80 prominent Tamil writers and poets such as Mr P. Krishnan, Ms Jayanthi Shankar and Mr KTM Iqbal.

"The digital collection has given our Tamil literature books of the last 50 years not only a new lease of life but also a long lease of life," said Mr Tharman, who is also Minister for Finance. "The memories of our writers will seed new memories in the next generation and spur new imagination and new writings."

The Tamil Digital Heritage Group first mooted the project in 2013, in partnership with the National Library Board (NLB). About 100 Tamil authors and teachers helped to annotate the 350 books, while more than 250 volunteers worked with NLB staff to proofread some 50,000 pages of literary works.

The heritage group's chief coordinator Arun Mahizhnan said: "We wanted to offer something to Singapore that will last well beyond the time of SG50 celebrations. This digital collection will serve generations to come and sets an example of citizen efforts."

Mr Iqbal, 75, who received the Cultural Medallion award last year, agreed, calling it a "proud moment for Singapore and the Tamil literary community".

"It gives local literature a permanent presence in our country's cultural history," he added.

"Young writers and poets can read and learn from these works, while teachers will be able to use them in classes in secondary schools and even universities."

The local poet has 10 literary works digitised in the collection.

The collection is now available in public libraries and on the NLB's BooksSG portal.

The project was also supported by the National Heritage Board, the National Arts Council and the National Book Development Council of Singapore.


Construction of Oasis Terraces underway in Punggol

$
0
0
Located next to the Oasis LRT Station, the neighbourhood centre will house childcare centres, the Punggol Polyclinic, a community plaza, as well as retail and dining facilities under one roof.
By Calvin Hui, Channel NewsAsia, 22 Aug 2015

Residents in Punggol can look forward to a new generation neighbourhood centre in Oasis Terraces. When completed in the first half of 2018, it will house childcare centres, the upcoming Punggol Polyclinic, a community plaza as well as retail and dining facilities, all under one roof.

Located next to the Oasis LRT station, by Punggol Waterway, the development follows a decision by the Housing and Development Board (HDB) in recent years to start building neighbourhood centres again in newer HDB towns.

At its foundation-laying ceremony on Saturday (Aug 22), National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan noted that Oasis Terraces is being built with the needs of residents in mind. HDB had held focus group discussions with residents.



Said Mr Khaw: "This place called Oasis Terraces ... It is designed by us, built by us, planned by us and we make great effort to make sure it is something that suits what the residents need.

"And that's why, together with the local MPs and advisors, we make great effort to reach out - small groups, consultation, focus group discussions - to find out from you residents, (because) you will be living here. Presumably you will be making use of the neighbourhood centre. What do you want? What tops your wishlist?"

A Punggol North resident, 68-year-old Madam Doreen Poh, said she was looking forward to the centre: "We mentioned that we would like to see a polyclinic here, a hawker centre, and a comprehensive childcare centre - a building by itself, like a primary school. So that there are suitable and complete facilities for the little children being taken care of there."

Oasis Terraces has been shortlisted as a finalist for the 2015 World Architecture Festival for its unique design concept for mixed-use development. It is one of several new developments in Punggol Town.

Also speaking at the ceremony, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean - who is a Member of Parliament for the Pasir Ris-Punggol Group Representation Constituency - noted that efforts are underway to ensure there are enough amenities to meet the needs of residents moving to Punggol, especially young families.

"There is more to look forward to," he said. "The new Waterway Point Mall will be ready by the first quarter of next year. Three more primary schools and childcare centres will open in 2016. We launched one yesterday in Punggol, with 500 places for children.

"The Safra clubhouse will be ready by 2016, co-located with the new regional sports centre, which will be ready by 2019, all integrated with the beautiful Punggol Waterway. There will be a new CC in Punggol West."

HDB is building three other such neighbourhood centres - one more in Punggol and one each in Sembawang and Hougang.


Inclusive Playground at Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park opens

$
0
0
Kids in wheelchairs now can swing with the rest with opening of inclusive playground
By Ng Huiwen, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

For 13-year-old Phoebe Chua, who has congenital muscular dystrophy, the days of watching others have a turn at the playground are over.

She was one of 44 beneficiaries who enjoyed special play equipment unveiled at Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park's inclusive playground yesterday. It includes a wheelchair-accessible swing and merry-go-round, designed in consultation with therapists and children of special needs from six voluntary welfare organisations.

The Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park (BAMKP) inclusive playground was officially opened by Minister for Social and Family...
Posted by NCSS Singapore on Saturday, August 22, 2015


Officially opened by Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin, it is one of 11 inclusive playgrounds to be built across Singapore by 2017.

"As we begin to build a better society, a lot of it is about being inclusive," Mr Tan said in his opening address. "It may seem like just a playground, but we all know how important play is in the development of our children."

The playground at Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park is a collaboration between the National Council of Social Service (NCSS) and the National Parks Board (NParks).

It is supported by the Care & Share Movement, with donations from individual donors as well as corporate partners such as Shaw Foundation, SMRT Corporation and children's charity Variety.

Also in the pipeline under this movement are playgrounds at Pasir Ris Park, West Coast Park and two in the HDB heartland.

NParks will open six more playgrounds at Admiralty Park, Jurong Lake Gardens, Choa Chu Kang Park, Sengkang Riverside Park, Sun Plaza Park and East Coast Park.

"Today is Phoebe's first time on the merry-go-round and I feel very happy and touched to see her playing with the other kids," said Phoebe's mother and full-time caregiver Doris Loh, 47.

The first of its kind here, the merry-go-round is fitted at ground level and has safety gates to stabilise the wheelchair. It includes two other seats for able-bodied children.

A ramp provides access to the swing for wheelchair users and comprises safety locking features at the sides and back. It also comes with a regular seat to allow any child to play.

"Interaction between children of special needs and their peers is a fundamental building block of our society," said NCSS' director of service planning and development Anjan Kumar Ghosh.

"It is through play that we can build that cohesiveness and connection, and experience the fun and joy of being in a community."



SUPER BIG THUMBS UP! :)2 years ago, Fazlin Abdullah saw two sisters playing at the playground. One has Multiple...
Posted by Tan Chuan-Jin on Saturday, August 22, 2015



NSP's Steve Chia hounded out of politics by online trolls

$
0
0
NSP decides not to contest MacPherson
Party suffers another blow with Steve Chia pulling out from race and resigning
By Lim Yan Liang and Walter Sim, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

The National Solidarity Party (NSP) seems to have made another U-turn, this time reversing its controversial decision to contest the MacPherson single-seat ward at the coming polls.

This about-face, a second by the NSP since Wednesday, threatens to throw the party - which had set out earlier to unite the opposition - into disarray before the next elections widely expected to be held next month.

The party is still without a secretary-general after acting chief Hazel Poa quit last Wednesday over its central executive committee's decision to renege on an opposition-wide pact to avoid three-cornered fights by steering clear of MacPherson single-member constituency (SMC). The NSP now appears to have also lost a potential candidate for the polls.

This after council member Steve Chia took to social media yesterday to declare that he will not be contesting MacPherson SMC or any other constituency in the coming general election.

His premature withdrawal appears to stem from online flak he drew after the NSP said last Wednesday that it would contest MacPherson afterall. This even though it had said a week earlier that it would bow out of the ward and leave the Workers' Party (WP) to contest against Ms Tin Pei Ling of the People's Action Party (PAP).

The SMC was recently carved out from Marine Parade GRC.

Shortly after the announcement, Mr Chia - a former Non-Constituency MP and NSP secretary-general - started dropping hints on Facebook that he would be fielded in the ward. He may have also been singled out for criticism because it was widely believed that he was a key player behind the internal powerplays that led to his party's shocking U-turn last Wednesday on MacPherson and Ms Poa's resignation in protest against the move.

In a post on his Facebook page titled "The Trolls have won", Mr Chia blamed online criticism for his decision to pull out of MacPherson even before he was officially unveiled as the party's candidate.

"With this notice I am announcing that I will not be standing for this coming #GE2015 and will not be contesting in #MacPhersonSMC anymore," he said in the post.

"It is with anguish and deep sadness that my lifelong ambition to be the people's spokesman in Parliament ends today."

Mr Chia also included a link to a website that purportedly presents a profile of him, including details about a nude photo scandal he was embroiled in when he was an NCMP in 2003. "The site was not set up by me...," he said. Some facts in it were not correctly written, he added without elaborating.

A similar website on NSP president Sebastian Teo also surfaced yesterday. It featured images of old newspaper clippings about his previous entanglements with the law dating back to the 1970s.

Mr Teo could not be reached last night and Mr Chia declined to comment further on the matter.

Analysts say this latest debacle has put a dent in the NSP's credibility for the coming polls, and voters may not take kindly to a party whose house is not in order.

Some, like political scientist Derek da Cunha, say that while it was entirely NSP's prerogative to contest MacPherson, the party must realise there would be negative consequences for such a move.

"NSP will likely take heat from opposition supporters online and perhaps even offline for this flip-flop," he said.

Political analyst Bilveer Singh added that by backpedalling, the NSP came off looking especially bad, given that it was the party that led the all-parties talks intended to eliminate three-cornered fights for votes in the first place.

"Whatever the actual impact, it gives the opposition a bad name in this country," he added.




National Solidarity Party's Steve Chia says he will not contest MacPherson SMC, citing online abuse. http://str.sg/Z7ix
Posted by The Straits Times on Saturday, August 22, 2015




Does anyone know why TOC deleted their article on Sebastian Teo's Days of Corruption?
Posted by Thoughts of Real Singaporeans on Sunday, August 23, 2015




WP don't even have to say anything. All it did is unleashed their WP online trolls. The WP proxies did the dirty work....
Posted by Fabrications About The PAP on Saturday, August 22, 2015




National Solidarity Party's Steve Chia confirms he will not be contesting coming General Election, and MacPherson SMC. #sgelections
Posted by Channel NewsAsia Singapore on Saturday, August 22, 2015





Residents 'are not for horse trading'
By Aw Cheng Wei, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Residents should not be treated as votes and horse traded between political parties during election season.

That is the view of Social and Family Development Minister Tan Chuan-Jin, who was speaking to reporters yesterday after a walkabout in Tai Keng Gardens.

"Competition (at the polls) allows residents to have choices, and it also keeps (MPs) on our toes to stay focused on what's important, which is the people, not about horse trading."

Wow. Interesting language here. "I can only wish WP will send a strong candidate and take down MacPherson SMC and take...
Posted by Tan Chuan-Jin on Saturday, August 22, 2015


His comments come after the National Solidarity Party (NSP) drew flak for its recent U-turn to contest in MacPherson SMC, and, in the process, reneging on a pact it made with other opposition parties. The agreement to avoid three-cornered fights at the coming general election was made after two rounds of "horse trading" talks between opposition parties, hosted by the NSP earlier this month.

MacPherson SMC used to be under Marine Parade GRC, but it was carved out as a single-seat ward for the next polls.

Mr Tan, who is part of the team in Marine Parade GRC, said he has always welcomed competition in his constituency. "For us... work didn't start because the elections are coming," he said. "It just never ceased, and we keep improving where we can."

The People's Action Party has yet to announce its full line-up for Marine Parade GRC, but Mr Tan added that he is "looking forward" to Associate Professor Fatimah Lateef's continued service as part of his team. "She has been working the ground here for many years, she knows the residents by name."



PAP unveils candidates for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, Tampines GRC and Holland-Bukit Timah GRC

$
0
0
PAP introduces 2 new faces in Pasir Ris-Punggol team: Ex-defence chief Ng Chee Meng, Sun Xueling
By Chew Hui Min, The Straits Times, 22 Aug 2015

The People's Action Party (PAP) has introduced two new faces in the six-member Pasir Ris-Punggol team for the coming election.

They are former defence chief Ng Chee Meng, 47, and Temasek Holdings investment director Sun Xueling, 36, also known as Soon Sher Rene.



Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean announced the line-up at the PAP Punggol North Branch at Edgedale Plains on Saturday morning.

The others on the slate are Mr Teo, Minister of State and Mayor Teo Ser Luck, Mr Zainal Sapari, and Dr Janil Puthucheary.

Ms Penny Low, 48, announced that she was stepping down after three terms as MP in the GRC.

Current Pasir Ris-Punggol MP Gan Thiam Poh, 51, has joined the Ang Mo Kio team after his Punggol South ward was absorbed into the GRC in the recent boundary changes.

Mr Ng retired from the Singapore Armed Forces on Aug 18, and is seen as a potential office-holder.

The three-star general is the highest-ranking Singapore Armed Forces officer to join the PAP to date.

Ms Sun started helping out at grassroots events in Buona Vista in 2001 before she joined Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC.

In the 2011 election, the PAP team fielded in Pasir Ris-Punggol polled 64.8 per cent against a Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) team.

The SDA has said it will be contesting there again in the coming election.







Ex-defence chief to focus on meritocracy
PAP's prominent new candidate wants to champion social mobility issue if elected
By Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

Meritocracy is a key policy that potential fourth-generation leader Ng Chee Meng wants to champion, but without it being "taken to the extremes or too narrowly defined".

The former defence chief, the People's Action Party's (PAP) highest-profile new candidate for the next general election, said without meritocracy here, he and his brothers from "an average family without networks" would not have had the opportunities they had.

Two of his brothers are top public servants and former military leaders. Mr Ng, a three-star general, is the highest-ranking military officer the PAP has inducted into politics. But Singapore's current stage of development requires a refining of the workings of meritocracy, said Mr Ng, adding that "there's no easy solution that we can just put on the table".

He said: "But we must come together to do our different parts... so we can provide this support to make a more equal starting platform for our kids."

He told reporters after his introduction in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC that he wants to champion the issue of social mobility if elected.

National debate over how elitism may undermine meritocracy was ignited in recent weeks, after Raffles Institution principal Chan Poh Meng said the school has become a middle-class one that largely caters to the affluent. All eyes were on Mr Ng, 47, yesterday as the PAP introduced more candidates for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, Tampines GRC and Holland-Bukit Timah GRC.

At these sessions, party leaders argued that political stability and the PAP Government's ability to plan for the long term were the most effective bulwark against the excesses of meritocracy.

Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, who anchors Tampines GRC, said "our education system seeks to bring out the best in every child, regardless of their starting point, regardless of their financial background". The Government's commitment to broadening the pathways of excellence and ensuring that no child is deprived due to financial disadvantage is "something we've built up over many, many years".

"This is in sharp contrast to many education systems around the world where there is no sense of the long term and no strategic direction," Mr Heng said.

In Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, where Mr Ng and Temasek Holdings investment director Sun Xueling were introduced, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said young Singaporeans want an environment where they can maximise their potential.

"The way to achieve this really is to have a good, strong, stable team to take Singapore to the future, work together and build a brighter future for all of us," he said.

"I think you don't have to look very far around the region and even in developed democracies where continual conflict in the political arena actually brings paralysis, a lack of ability to plan for the long term and multiple U-turns and changes of course. That actually creates many problems for young people who wish to have a society in which they can grow."

The PAP has introduced all its candidates, except those for four group representation constituencies - Aljunied, East Coast, Marine Parade and Nee Soon - and two single-member constituencies of Fengshan and Punggol East.

These are all constituencies either facing a contest from, or which are held by, the Workers' Party. When asked about this, Mr Teo said: "All will be made known in good time."





Officers-turned-politicians 'same same but different'
By Jermyn Chow, Defence Correspondent, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

They may all be military men, but each of the Singapore Armed Forces officers brought into politics to make up Singapore's fourth-generation leadership is quite different, said Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean yesterday.

What they share is loyalty, integrity, a commitment to serve and an understanding of the constraints and opportunities that Singapore faces, he said.

DPM Teo, 60, who was a navy rear-admiral before joining politics in 1992, said: "I think each of us comes in and we are quite different."

For example, few remember that Mr Teo and Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say "grew up in the crucible of the SAF" together, he noted, because they have such different personalities.

They are "same same but different," he joked, borrowing from Mr Lim's famously colloquial phrases.

Speaking after introducing former chief of defence Ng Chee Meng, 47, as one of the new candidates in his Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC slate, Mr Teo said there is a "good reason" why the PAP gets good candidates from the public service.

While it draws new faces from a wide range of backgrounds, those from the public sector "have shown, over a period of time, capability and ability to work with others and to care for Singapore," he said.

"They derive their happiness and satisfaction from the happiness and satisfaction of others - not the bottom line of a company," he added.

DPM Teo, the PAP's first assistant secretary-general, will anchor the six-member team.

Besides three other incumbent MPs - Mr Teo Ser Luck, Mr Zainal Sapari and Mr Janil Puthucheary - the slate has two new faces, Mr Ng, 47, and Temasek Holdings investment director Sun Xueling, 36.

As a three-star general, Mr Ng is the highest-ranking officer to join the PAP and stand for elections.

Cabinet ministers Tan Chuan-Jin and Chan Chun Sing were also former generals who were brought into the fold in the last General Election in 2011.

When asked how he might deal with the danger of groupthink among him and his political colleagues, Mr Ng said: "All of us have unique life experiences (and) I think we bring unique perspectives.

"Even while we were in the SAF, we spoke our minds, we shared our views.

"And the only common thing that binds us together is a common desire to serve, to achieve the best outcomes."

The best way to deal with the possibility of groupthink is to remain alert to it, listen actively to differing views and consult widely from different sectors, he said.

Mr Ng will be taking over the spot of MP Penny Low, who is retiring from politics after 14 years.

Thanking Mr Teo, grassroots leaders and residents, Ms Low, 48, said: "In the last 14 years, I've been humbled by the many occasions where our team came together to discuss issues cohesively and resolve them on the ground.

"I've learnt much and the success of Punggol New Town is indeed something which is a result of the teamwork."





Finding the best way forward where no man is left behind
By Jermyn Chow, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

Ng Chee Meng, 47

Occupation: Former Chief of Defence Force

Family: Married with two daughters

Education: Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from the United States Air Force Academy, Master of Arts degree from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University

Hobbies: Reading, sports, spending time with the family, going for walks and cycling. Also a big football fan.


Watch this short introduction video of Mr Ng Chee Meng 黄志明 who was introduced as part of PAP Pasir Ris - Punggol GRC team.Get breaking news, live updates, and exclusive content, on the go, please click: http://bit.ly/pap_link_up
Posted by People's Action Party on Saturday, August 22, 2015


Why politics?

When Mr Lee Kuan Yew passed away, I had the opportunity and the privilege to see how Singaporeans came together, united as one people, to thank Mr Lee for his years of contributions to Singapore. That unity is derived from good leadership and good politics. So when I was asked to consider joining politics, it was about how to continue this overarching framework of unity that gave Singapore our success.

Why you?

I've always believed in working with people to bring the best ideas and different perspectives together to find the best way forward. This is needed especially given Singapore's development in a very complex world today.

What issues will you focus on?

Social mobility. I grew up in an average Singaporean family with four brothers. My parents showed me the value and the importance of hard work. Our meritocratic system afforded me the opportunities. I see social mobility as a key enabler to afford our children, and their children, a chance to aim for a brighter future. I would like to see that we are more inclusive and we leave no man behind.

Favourite spot in Singapore?

Home. After a long day's work, I go home to my family to enjoy their warmth, their care and their love.





A Singaporean born and bred
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

After she appeared at a Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC grassroots event earlier this month, People's Action Party candidate Sun Xueling, 36, was targeted by xenophobic netizens who thought she was a Chinese national because of the hanyu pinyin spelling of her name.

The third-generation Singaporean, who is also known as Soon Sher Rene, was born here and raised by her grandmother who encouraged her to volunteer and help the needy. She met her Beijing- born husband while studying in London. He became a Singapore citizen six years ago.

Soft-spoken and articulate, she said: "What's important is he took an active step to become a Singaporean. He was attracted to the values and dynamism we have here."

She hopes to change the minds of those who are less than welcoming of new citizens, saying: "They want to become Singaporeans because they love this place and want a role in building the country."

The investment banker has a young daughter and hopes to push for more support measures for parents. Her political career has been more than a decade in the making.

As an undergraduate, she started volunteering at Buona Vista and, in 2004, aged 25, she spoke at the PAP's 50th anniversary rally.

Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean revealed the party considered fielding her in 2011. But she was working in Hong Kong and thinking of having children.

Ms Sun said she was engaged in party activities even before 2011. Of her time in grassroots activities, she said: "It has made me a much better person. When you try to solve other people's problems, your own dim in significance."





Give families adequate support: It has real impact on productivity
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

Sun Xueling, 36

Occupation: Investment director at Temasek Holdings

Family: Married to an IT entrepreneur, 37. They have a daughter aged two.Education: Bachelor of Social Sciences (Upper Honours) in Economics from the National University of Singapore and a Master of Science from the London School of Economics.

Hobbies: Reading and swimming



Why politics?

Being involved in the community puts you in touch with local issues, which is important. But politics is a way to do more, because you have the arena and ability to debate issues, not just for the constituency, but also on the policy-making front.

Why you?

Grassroots work taught me compassion and how to see the world through my fellow man's eyes.

What issues will you focus on?

I want to ensure families have adequate childcare and eldercare, and help young mothers sustain fulfilling careers. I understand what many families go through.

It's not just about putting more infrastructure. Knowing that your child is taken care of gives working mothers confidence to pursue their career and passions. That has real impact on productivity.

Favourite spot in Singapore?

Changi Airport. It represents adventure. When I return, it reminds me of home.








Desmond Choo: 'I had asked to stay in Hougang'
He lost two elections in the single-seat ward and will now run as Tampines GRC candidate
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

People's Action Party (PAP) candidate Desmond Choo, who lost twice to the Workers' Party (WP) in Hougang in two separate elections, had wanted to remain in the single-seat ward.

When pressed on what he had told party leadership about where he wanted to be fielded in the upcoming election, he said: "I definitely asked... to stay."

But he had to respect the party's decision to field him in Tampines GRC instead, said the 37-year-old.

"I believe the party makes the best decisions on behalf of the residents," he said.

The PAP's Hougang candidate this time is Mr Lee Hong Chuang, 45, a senior IT manager.

Mr Choo stood in Hougang during the 2011 General Election but lost to WP candidate Yaw Shin Leong. After Mr Yaw was sacked by the WP in 2012 over his silence in an alleged extramarital affair, Mr Choo stood in the by-election.

But he lost again to the WP's candidate, this time Mr Png Eng Huat.

Mr Choo's campaign slogan during the 2012 by-election, "Always here for you", was seen as a reference to Mr Yaw's sacking from the WP and flight from Singapore.

Yesterday, when asked about the perception that he is not keeping his campaign promise to Hougang residents, Mr Choo replied: "Since 1991 when PAP lost in Hougang, it has continued to be there for Hougang residents."

On the prospects of an easier campaign in Tampines GRC compared with Hougang - a WP stronghold since 1991 - the director of the youth development wing in labour movement NTUC said: "After going through two setbacks, you will never take any place for granted."

He said he will use his unionist background in helping residents. "Anyone who has employment needs can come to me, I will try to provide the best assistance possible," he said.

Mr Choo and his wife Pamela are expecting their first child in October. The soon-to-be first-time father also wants to champion the cause of young families, including balancing work demands and family commitments and having access to childcare facilities.

Mr Choo's fellow new face in Tampines GRC is Ms Cheng Li Hui, 39, who recounted her "simple but comfortable" childhood. "I was fortunate to have progressed in the environment the Government nurtured and this led me to believe in contributing back to society," said the daughter of a shipyard painter.

She started volunteering during Meet-the-People sessions in Bukit Panjang in 2003 and began under-studying outgoing Tampines GRC MP Mah Bow Tan in Tampines East this February. She added that she was passionate about active ageing and healthy living: "Through my interactions, I feel our seniors would like to continue to be active participants in society and have much to contribute."

Additional reporting by Charissa Yong




http://tdy.sg/1MDLhDn - Former National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan, who had announced that he will not be contesting next General Election, thanks the residents and his team. "My work here in Tampines is done," he says.
Posted by TODAY on Friday, August 21, 2015




Mah Bow Tan leaves politics after 27 years as MP
By Charissa Yong, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

The political career of one of Singapore's longest-serving ministers, Mr Mah Bow Tan, has drawn to a close, after he passed the baton yesterday to his successors in Tampines GRC.

"My work here in Tampines GRC is done after 27 years as an MP," said Mr Mah, 66, at a press conference to introduce the candidates for the constituency.

Mr Mah was National Development Minister from 1999 to 2011.

Public housing prices and shortages were hot button issues in the run-up to the 2011 General Election. Mr Mah was re-elected to the GRC that year but stepped down from the Cabinet.


VIDEO: Education Minister Heng Swee Keat thanking Mr Mah Bow Tan for his years of service. http://tdy.sg/1MDLhDn #TampinesGRC(Video: Angela Teng/TODAY)
Posted by TODAY on Friday, August 21, 2015


Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, who entered politics in 2011, will lead the GRC into the next election as Tampines' anchor minister.

"It's a heavy responsibility. But I have a very good team, and we have the whole (People's Action Party) supporting us," he said in Mandarin. "I have great confidence that we can serve residents very well."

Mr Heng was part of the PAP team which won Tampines GRC with 57.22 per cent of the vote in GE 2011, a drop of more than 10 percentage points from its 2006 showing. It was up against the National Solidarity Party, which has said it will again send a team to Tampines GRC at the coming polls.

Mr Heng dismissed suggestions that he was reaping "political dividends" from the Our Singapore Conversation national feedback exercise he helmed in 2013, saying it "helped deepen our appreciation of the issues of concern to people, understand the challenges ahead and our hopes for the future".

As for Mr Mah, his political career has been eventful, beginning in 1984 when he ran against opposition politician Chiam See Tong in Potong Pasir, and lost.

In the subsequent 1988 election, Mr Mah was elected to Tampines GRC where he served six terms.

He also held the post of Minister for Communications from 1991 to 1999, where he oversaw the implementation of the Certificate of Entitlement and Electronic Road Pricing schemes. He was concurrently Minister for the Environment from 1993 to 1995.

The PAP is fielding new face Cheng Li Hui, 39, in Mr Mah's ward of Tampines East.

Also exiting Tampines GRC - and politics - this round is Ms Irene Ng, 51, who has said she is proud of the causes she championed as a three-term backbencher.

These include more help for seniors and low-income workers, as well as better cycling spaces.





'Keep retirees involved in society'
By Charissa Yong, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

Cheng Li Hui, 39

Occupation: Deputy chief executive of Hai Leck Holdings, a public-listed engineering company founded by her father who now is its chairmanFamily: Single. She is the third of five siblings. 

Education: Masters of Applied Finance from Macquarie University and Bachelor of Arts in economics and statistics from the National University of Singapore


Hobbies: Brisk walking and exercising in the gym


Why politics?

From being a girl scout to assisting at Meet-the-People sessions since 2003, helping people has been such an integral part of my life. In a way, politics is the next phase. Whether it's volunteering or working in the office, I interact with a lot of people. I'd like to think I'm not too bad at interaction and that's really important.


Why you?


I'm hard-working and have a lot of passion and heart for the people. I also have management skills.


What issues will you focus on?


Active ageing. For some, it can be quite a drastic switch from being busy working to being suddenly retired. When we're done with working life in our 60s, we're likely to be looking at another 20-plus years in society. Through my interactions (with residents), I feel our seniors would like to continue to be active participants in society. If we can enable society to provide opportunites for our retirees, to contribute as they can, this would give them a more meaningful life and benefit everyone. This is something I hope to promote and drive.


Where is your favourite spot in Singapore?


Just last week I was sitting on a bench by the Singapore River after a meeting and I was looking at Fullerton Building. That has always been my favourite building. I like the architecture, especially at night when the lights are switched on.








Vivian-led team to defend seats
By Yeo Sam Jo, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

The incumbent People's Action Party (PAP) MPs for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC and Bukit Panjang SMC yesterday assured residents of new facilities, more greenery and better connectivity, as they announced they would stay and defend their seats at the general election.

These include a new polyclinic and hawker centre in Senja, a fresh community garden trail and nature park in Bukit Panjang and more covered pedestrian walkways, they said in unveiling the Holland-Bukit Panjang Town Council's Town Improvement Plan for the next five years.

Also in the pipeline are new train stations on the upcoming Downtown Line 2, a new slip road connecting Senja Road to the Kranji Expressway, and a new boardwalk and multi-purpose stage around Bukit Panjang's Pang Sua Pond for community activities.

The Holland-Bukit Timah GRC team is led by Environment and Water Resources Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, and includes Minister of State for Communications and Information; and Education Sim Ann, and backbenchers Christopher de Souza and Liang Eng Hwa.

To care for you, protect your families, invest and build our collective destiny together - Sim Ann, Liang Eng Hwa,...
Posted by Vivian Balakrishnan on Friday, August 21, 2015


All four confirmed yesterday that they will defend their seats at the general election. Dr Teo Ho Pin will also defend Bukit Panjang SMC.

All five seats are set to be contested by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) led by Dr Chee Soon Juan.

In the 2011 General Election, Dr Teo secured 66.3 per cent of the votes in Bukit Panjang SMC against SDP's Alec Tok. The Holland-Bukit Timah GRC PAP team won 60.1 per cent of the votes against an SDP team led by former civil servant Tan Jee Say, who now leads the Singaporeans First (SingFirst) party.

Dr Balakrishnan said yesterday that while Singapore has achieved much in the past 50 years, a lot still needs to be done, citing the country's ageing population as one of the huge challenges ahead.

Describing his team as "time-tested" and "experienced", he said voters have to decide "who they trust to look after their future"."Character, integrity, honesty - these are non-negotiable for the PAP."

Asked whether the town improvement plans, which some see as carrots, were part of the PAP's strategy, he said: "These are not carrots. These are carefully thought out, consulted plans with our residents... It is a report card and an opportunity for our residents to judge our performance.

"It's not about promises. Words are cheap. But can you deliver? Can you do what you say?"

Ms Sim said she felt residents saw the team as "energetic problem solvers" and "people with a passionate vision for what the community can do", and hoped they would "let us maintain that momentum".

The MPs also attended the opening of a new PAP Community Foundation Sparkletots pre-school in Segar Road. The centre, which has a niche programme in creative arts, aims to meet rising demand for childcare services in Bukit Panjang.











Minister Grace Fu to stay with Yuhua ward at GE
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Grace Fu will defend her single-seat ward of Yuhua at the next general election, and aims to "continue the journey" with residents she has represented for nine years.

She announced this at the People's Action Party's Yuhua branch office last night, before attending a National Day dinner:

"We hope to continue to make Yuhua a very happy place to live in, and I hope that the residents will give me another opportunity to serve them."

She declined to detail specific plans for Yuhua, but said that residents hoped to keep it like "a little kampong they're familiar with, despite the changes".

Yuhua has experienced a development boom, with new malls and the Ng Teng Fong General Hospital near Jurong East MRT station.

Ms Fu has served in Yuhua since 2006, when it was part of Jurong GRC. It became a single-seat ward at the 2011 polls, when she defeated the Singapore Democratic Party's Ms Teo Soh Lung, winning 66.9 per cent of the vote. The SDP said it intends to contest there again.

Ms Fu welcomes that: "Yuhua residents deserve a good contest... I think they deserve to know what the various options are, what the PAP will offer them and what the SDP will offer them."

At the dinner, she paid tribute to founding prime minister, Mr Lee Kuan Yew, who died in March, listed programmes in place, and announced that two precincts have been selected for the Home Improvement Programme, while three blocks are slated to get lifts on every floor.



Leadership renewal

$
0
0
PAP fielding new blood in 'safe' wards so that such candidates can build trust and affection of constituents
By Rachel Chang, Assistant Political Editor, The Sunday Times, 23 Aug 2015

The People's Action Party's leadership renewal process at the highest echelons of the Government is facing unprecedented difficulty.

Former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, in an interview about his succession in 1990 for a National Day supplement this year, put it this way: "The fourth-generation leadership team is being put in place, but a new leader of the team has yet to emerge. It is getting urgent."

Leadership Renewal
Mr Lee Kuan Yew speaking on leadership renewal. [The most significant imprint we can leave is not by hanging on to office, but through the way we hand over the power to govern. We have exercised power as trustees for the people, with an abiding sense of our fiduciary responsibility. Our honour, our sense of duty made us exercise power scrupulously. We have curbed, restrained, and prevented any distortion of policies which would have been inevitable, if the personal interests of the few in charge were allowed full rein. This is the case in many new countries. When those in office regard the power vested in them as a personal prerogative, they inevitably enrich themselves, promote their families, favour their friends. The fundamental structures of the modern state are eroded, like the supporting beams of a house after termites have attacked them. Then the people have to pay dearly and long for the sins and crimes of their leader.]Vote wisely to ensure there is succession and a good team that is ready to take over in due time. Don't vote for people who are in it for the fame and glory or who will enrich themselves or favour their friends.
Posted by Singapore Matters on Saturday, August 22, 2015


It is instructive to compare the current moment with how the issue of succession played out through the first, second and third generations of political leadership.

By 1980, a full decade before Mr Lee Kuan Yew would actually step down, all the contenders who could potentially succeed the independence-generation founding fathers were firmly in place in the Government. They included Mr Goh, Dr Tony Tan, Mr Ong Teng Cheong, Mr Lim Chee Onn, Dr Ahmad Mattar and others. Most already had several years of politics under their belts.

In 1984, they decided among themselves that Mr Goh would be the next PM; he began running day-to-day government businesses a few years later.

Similarly, PM Lee himself had been identified as Mr Goh's successor and served as his deputy for his entire premiership.

PM Lee is now 63, and has been at the helm for over a decade. We can expect this coming general election to be his last at the head of the ruling party. If it is not, the PAP's renewal process has derailed.

Yet, only half of the fourth-generation leadership are in place in the Government at present, with the bulk of them - Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, labour chief Chan Chun Sing, Social and Family Development Minister Tan Chuan-jin, Culture, Community and Youth Minister Lawrence Wong - having entered politics in 2011.

Former civil servant Ong Ye Kung was to join them, but he was not elected by Aljunied GRC voters.

The significance of Mr Ong's loss has not been dwelled on as public attention was rightly focused on the exit of Foreign Minister George Yeo, who led the PAP's Aljunied team.

But Mr Ong's failure to enter politics on time, in line with the renewal plan, has deeply influenced the ruling party's new-blood strategy.

With renewal facing the roadblock of political pluralism, new candidates, especially potential fourth-gen leaders, must now be deployed differently if the PAP is to keep its plan on track.

The ruling party has begun rolling out its slate of candidates for the coming election.

One trend has become clear: In all constituencies where the Workers' Party (WP) is contesting, there are almost no new PAP faces - and no potential new ministers at all.

Despite the presence of veteran backbenchers for whom the time may be right to retire - like Dr Lily Neo in Jalan Besar, Associate Professor Fatimah Lateef or Mr Seah Kian Peng in Marine Parade, or Ms Jessica Tan in East Coast - PAP leaders have evidently decided that no chances can be taken with renewal. These MPs have been allowed - or in some instances, asked - to stay on, rather than make way for a new candidate.

Meanwhile, almost all its new faces have been bundled away from constituencies where the WP will contest, as that is the only electoral threat that the PAP takes seriously.

Of its potential fourth-gen ministers, former top civil servant Chee Hong Tat will contest in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, Mr Ong has moved into Sembawang GRC, and former top military chief Ng Chee Meng will be fielded in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC.

The one thing all these constituencies have in common? A non-WP contest.

These chess moves perhaps belie the renewal pitch emphasised by party leaders in the opening beats of the PAP's campaign.

Party organising secretary Ng Eng Hen, who was the first to introduce new candidates in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC last week, said political succession could unfold only with Singaporeans' support: "If the country feels that the candidates we put up can measure up to those responsibilities and capabilities required of ministers, then we would have the succession plan."

Singaporeans' support may be essential, but by fielding its new blood in safe seats, the PAP is ringfencing political renewal from the vagaries of electoral sentiment.

It is not the only political party whose rhetoric dwarfs its actions. Behold the scrambling that opposition parties have been doing in the past few weeks to avoid three-cornered fights for fear of splitting the opposition vote in the constituencies they contest.

If the will of Singaporeans were really trusted by politicians, elaborate manoeuvring to channel this will to match their best interests would not be necessary.

But this is politics.

Historical evidence shows that the political renewal pitch has never really worked that well for the ruling party, at least in comparison with the classic sources of its appeal based on track record, policy successes and governing integrity.

These are the major reasons for its political success, and are the factors behind the "enlightened self-interest" of Singaporean voters in keeping the PAP as one of the longest-ruling political parties in the world. This enlightened self-interest does not extend to helping the ruling party ensure its own renewal.

Through Singapore's political history, even in the decades that the PAP's dominance went beyond what it is today, factors like the perceived unlikeability of the candidate, or a broad desire for pluralism, have proven more powerful than the renewal pitch.

In 1984, founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew touted then-new candidate Mah Bow Tan's ministerial potential, told voters he would be "more than an MP", and compared his O-level results favourably to that of his Singapore Democratic Party opponent Chiam See Tong.

Mr Chiam won, and Mr Mah entered Parliament only in the next round in 1988, as a candidate for Tampines GRC. He did indeed become a minister.

Similarly in 2011, Aljunied voters hardly took notice of Mr Ong's ministerial potential. And in the 2013 Punggol East by-election, PM Lee's comment on candidate Koh Poh Koon's office-holder potential had little effect on voters leaning towards the WP.

In its deployment strategy for the coming election, it is evident that the PAP has cottoned on that renewal is a party priority not necessarily shared by the electorate at large.

That is perhaps for the best.

It is asking too much for voters to take PAP leaders' word for it that the new candidates they are fielding - barely known to their residents or to the public at large - are essential for the nation's survival and success.

Better that these young leaders prove themselves in Parliament and in office, and build a real bond of their own with voters on the national stage.

After all, that's the way a prime minister should be made - not by blessings from party elders in private tea sessions, but through affection and trust earned from an electorate over time.






Politics at 50: Leadership renewal -RazorTV



National Day Rally 2015

$
0
0
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's National Day Rally 2015 Speech - English, Malay, Mandarin




PM: Keeping Singapore special for the next 50 years
Multiracialism, self-reliance, mutual support and strong Govt-people bonds are key factors
By Zakir Hussain, Deputy Political Editor, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong used his SG50 National Day Rally last night to remind Singaporeans of what it took to make Singapore succeed and what is needed to keep it special for the next 50 years.

He had no video clips or special effects as he paid tribute to the pioneer leaders and citizens who strived from 1965 to defend a suddenly independent Singapore, turn vulnerability into strength and remain united despite challenges.

It has been an exhilarating journey, he declared, adding that three factors helped Singapore get to where it is today: the determination to be a multiracial society; a culture of self-reliance and mutual support; and keeping the faith between the Government and the people.

He said the same elements were needed if Singapore is to celebrate SG100 from a position of strength.

Last night's Rally was held at the Institute of Technical Education's College Central in Ang Mo Kio. As always, Mr Lee spoke first in Malay and Mandarin, but there was a surprise before his speech in English.



Singer Kit Chan appeared on stage to deliver a soulful rendition of Singapore's best-loved National Day song, Home, dedicating it to founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, who died in March, aged 91.

PM Lee noted that just two weeks earlier, the Padang had reverberated with the strains of the same song, as National Day Parade spectators sang along heartily.

He said the Golden Jubilee parade was much more than a big birthday bash. It celebrated the resolve to make Singapore succeed despite the odds and go from Third World to First.



He noted that policies to foster multiracialism - from making English the working language to ethnic integration in HDB estates - helped encourage communities to come together and were a key factor for Singapore's success.

"Some people may think that racial and religious harmony is not a problem any more and that I am making too much about this, but they would be wrong," he said. "Race and religion are always sensitive matters, especially for us, and in some ways more complex and difficult to handle than 20 years ago because religiosity has gone up."

Stressing the importance of self-reliance and mutual support, he said the ethos of a "rugged society" had to be ingrained in the young.

Especially crucial was the strong bond between the Government and people over the past 50 years. The Government, PM Lee said, did not shy from hard realities, and people trusted it to have their interests at heart as they supported it.

He cited the tough issue of land acquisition in Singapore's early years when land was needed to build homes, industrial estates and later, the MRT network. It was tough on landowners who suffered financial loss, and resettled families whose lives were disrupted.

"But if the Government had not done this, we could not have housed our population, we could not have transformed Singapore," he said. "There were sacrifices, but in the end, it was for the common good and everybody benefited."

New tough issues will come up - such as immigration and the need for foreigners in the workforce - a difficult issue because people have strong views, and every option for dealing with it has a downside.

"Whichever option we choose, it will involve some pain. But I believe that I am doing what Singapore needs and what best safeguards your interest," he said.

"It is my responsibility to make this decision, to make this judgment and then to act on your behalf. And having acted on your behalf, to account to you for the results and for the reasons why I decided the way I did. I owe it to you. You've elected me."

He said as a little red dot, Singapore had to be alive to its external environment. "South-east Asia is an exciting place to be, but also a rather dangerous place to live," he said.

A strong Singapore Armed Forces, successful economy, good diplomats and leaders all help to safeguard the country's interests.

Singapore has to be special, "a shining red dot", he added. "If we are soft and flabby, we are going to be eaten up. We have to be rugged, to have that steel in us. If we are divided, whether along racial lines or class lines, we can't survive."

For Singapore to continue to do well, a strong sense of national identity is also key. "After 50 years, this faith, this sense of togetherness and purpose, is stronger than before," he said, as he cited instances when the Singapore spirit shone.

"Fifty years ago, our challenges seemed insurmountable," Mr Lee added. "Fifty years on, our challenges are still formidable but they are far from insurmountable."



Returning to the Parade at the end of his speech, he recounted how he went down to the Padang to meet the youngest performers.

"They were in high spirits, their faces shone with excitement and hope. I thought to myself: These are the faces of the future of Singapore. 50 years from now, SG100... I hope they will be back at the Padang celebrating again, remembering SG50, congratulating one another on how much they have done, on how far they have come and looking at more young, radiant faces of children and many grandchildren and singing Majulah Singapura."





SG50 is not the end, but the beginning. Singapore has come far since independence and together, we can scale many new...
Posted by Lee Hsien Loong on Sunday, August 23, 2015






Lee Kuan Yew told friends: Singapore will be even better 50 years from now
By Rachel Chang, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

No one can be sure what Singapore in 50 years will be like.

But there is one opinion that all Singaporeans would have liked to have heard, noted Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong last night, and that was founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew's.

At the National Day Rally, PM Lee gave a glimpse into what Mr Lee may have thought of the chan-ces of Singapore making it to its centennial.

In Mr Lee's old age, a group of friends regularly took him out for meals, revealed PM Lee: "Conversation would flow, and Mr Lee would get a chance to see a different bit of the Singapore he had built."

The final meal took place in January this year, shortly before Mr Lee was hospitalised in February.

He died in March, aged 91, of severe pneumonia.



PM Lee read out a letter that one member of the group had written to him, describing the final dinner.

It read:

"As it was the start of 2015, we talked at length about the celebrations for SG50.

"We took turns to encourage Mr Lee to attend as many SG50 events as possible. Actually, we hoped he would be there for the SG50 National Day Parade.

"Mr Lee listened to our exhortations, but stopped short of saying yes to our suggestions.

"At each of our gatherings, it had become a tradition to ask Mr Lee 'Will there be a Singapore many years from now?'

"Once, Mr Lee said 'Maybe'.

"On another, Mr Lee said 'Yes, if there is no corruption'.

"This was classic Mr Lee - ever-believing in Singapore, yet

ever-cognisant that there was always work to be done, that we should never take things for granted. Continuing with our tradition and in the spirit of SG50, that evening we asked him 'Will there be a Singapore 50 years from now?'

"Mr Lee's answer took us all by surprise. That evening, for the first time, Mr Lee said: 'Of course there will be… even better!'"





When's the general election? 'Soon'
By Tham Yuen-C, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong stopped short of revealing the date, but gave notice last night that the general election will be held "soon".

After 50 successful years since independence, Singapore is at a turning point as it embarks on the next 50 years of nationhood, he said.

"Soon, I will be calling for election, to ask for your mandate to take Singapore into our next phase," he told the nation in his National Day Rally speech. Speculation over the date of the election has been growing, given the many signs that it is imminent. The ruling People's Action Party has been introducing candidates in quick succession in recent days, and opposition parties have completed talks on avoiding three-cornered fights.

Describing the general election as critical, Mr Lee said: "You will be deciding who governs Singapore for the next five years but, much more than that, you will be choosing the team that will be working with you for the next 15 to 20 years.

"You will be setting the direction for Singapore's next 50 years. You will be determining the future of Singapore."

He said Singaporeans must ask themselves what the future will hold, and sketched two scenarios.

Would Singapore become an ordinary country with intractable pro-blems, with slow or negative growth, overspending that puts a heavy burden on the young, and gridlocked government unable to act? Or would it remain special, with a multiracial society streng-thened by diversity, not splintered by divisions, a rugged society where people strive to do their best yet look out for others, and Singaporeans living up to being "one people, one nation, one Singapore"?

Mr Lee said: "If you are proud of what we have achieved together and look forward to the future that we are building, please support me, please support my team."






Income ceilings up for buyers of new HDB flats, executive condos; grants increased
Low-income households to benefit as well, with two-room flats 'even more affordable'
By Janice Heng and Yeo Sam Jo, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

More Singaporean households will be eligible to buy new Housing Board (HDB) flats and executive condominiums (ECs) as income ceilings for both are being raised, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced in his National Day Rally speech last night.

An existing housing grant for middle- and lower-income households will also be made available to more homebuyers, and the grant amount will be increased.

"HDB flats will always be affordable and accessible to all," said Mr Lee, as he announced changes to help homebuyers across the income spectrum.

Firstly, more high-income households will be able to buy public flats.

The household income ceiling is currently $10,000 for new HDB flats and $12,000 for ECs.

These are being raised to $12,000 for HDB flats and $14,000 for ECs. The last time ceilings were raised was four years ago.

But incomes have since risen, noted Mr Lee.

The backlog of first-time buyers has also been cleared, after 100,000 HDB flats - the equivalent of four Clementi towns - were launched in the past five years.

"Most first-timers can now choose a flat in a non-mature estate on their first try," noted Mr Lee.

The Government is, therefore, raising the income ceilings for both HDB flats and ECs.

One of those who will benefit is bank compliance officer Sheila Yeo, 26, who hopes to get a flat with her boyfriend, a 27-year-old customer service manager. Their combined incomes are just $100 over the current $10,000 ceiling.

"I'm happy that they've raised the ceiling as I don't have to go through the appeals process. It's very troublesome," said Ms Yeo, who tried unsuccessfully to get a Clementi flat in May.

But she worries that applying for a flat will be more competitive now.

Mr Ku Swee Yong, chief executive officer of real estate firm Century21, also notes that possibility, saying: "This will increase the pool of applicants and competition may be tougher."

For middle-income households buying a new flat for the first time, more will now qualify for the Special CPF Housing Grant (SHG).

This grant is currently available to households earning up to $6,500, covering half of all households.

It will now be extended to those earning up to $8,500, such that two-thirds of households qualify.

R'ST Research director Ong Kah Seng said the change is a good move that is likely to benefit many young working adults.

He does not expect it to increase competition too much, as the newly eligible buyers are likely to have aimed for a BTO flat to begin with.

Low- and middle-income households covered by the SHG will also get more, as the maximum grant goes up from $20,000 to $40,000.

But this varies with income, with lower-income families receiving bigger grants. For instance, a median-income household that would previously receive $10,000 in SHG will now receive $30,000.

For low-income households, two-room flats will become "even more affordable" with the doubled SHG, said Mr Lee.

"Now with these latest changes, even if you earn below $1,000, but you hold a stable job and you contribute to CPF regularly, you can still afford a two-room flat."




The Ministry of National Development (MND) and the Housing & Development Board (HDB) introduced three new measures to...
Posted by Ministry of National Development on Monday, August 24, 2015





New proximity grant for non-first-time buyers too
By Yeo Sam Jo, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

A new housing grant will be introduced to further help families live closer together.

The Proximity Housing Grant will go to those buying a resale flat with or nearer to their parents, or near their married children.

It will be available to all Singaporean households including non- first-time buyers, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday during his National Day Rally speech.

"Parents often would want to stay with or near their married children. So that the grandparents can enjoy their grandkids, and the adult children can help to look after the old folks as they age," Mr Lee said.

He added that the Ministry of National Development will announce details of this grant soon.

The Housing Board already has incentives for families to live closer or together.

Currently, parents and their married children who apply to live with or near each other have up to 30 per cent of new flats set aside for them under the HDB's Married Child Priority Scheme.

The Multi-Generation Priority Scheme also sets aside a portion of flats for married children and their parents applying for units in the same BTO project.

Meanwhile, first-time buyers of resale flats now enjoy a grant of up to $40,000 if they move in with their parents, or if their parents or married children live in the same town or within 2km.

PropNex Realty chief executive Mohamed Ismail Gafoor said the new grant promotes "pro-family cohesiveness".

"Such a grant will also come in handy, given current market conditions," he said, referring to weak HDB resale prices.

But IT consultant Brenda Lee, 27, who is looking for her first flat with her fiance, described the new grant as "bad news". She said: "We now have to fight with non-first timers for resale flats in mature estates. The greater demand might drive up prices, too."





Rental flat boost for families with kids
By Yeo Sam Jo, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Families with children in public rental flats will soon get more help to buy their own homes.

A Fresh Start Housing Scheme will be introduced to help second-timer rental households own a two-room flat. These are families who previously bought a flat but sold it and now live in a rental unit.

Announcing this scheme yesterday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the two-room flats will come with shorter leases and stricter resale conditions, in order to make them more affordable.

He described this group of households as "more tricky to help", as they have enjoyed Housing Board subsidies before and might find it tough to afford another flat.

"Also, these households often have many different problems - jobs, relationships, children's education, sometimes drugs.

"I am very concerned about the future of this group because, without help, they may be permanently out of reach of getting a flat of their own. And they will be trapped in poverty and their children will be affected."

There will also be a Fresh Start Housing Grant to help such families purchase their new flat, along with counsellor support. But the grant is "not without conditions", and will be given only if the families show they are determined to get back on their feet, said Mr Lee. "It shows our philosophy - that in Singapore, we will help you, but you must help yourself, and we don't want anybody to be left behind."

He also noted that Malays are "over-represented" in public rental flats, and was concerned about their future and their children.

Senior social worker Alvin Chen, 34, called the Fresh Start scheme and grant a "practical solution".

He said: "Owning a flat would give them stability and a sense of achievement. It would encourage them with a new headstart to work hard and keep owning their flat."

Rental households who have not owned a flat before will also benefit, Mr Lee said, pointing to the Housing Board's new Two-Room Flexi Scheme, which offers shorter lease options for elderly households. The doubling of the maximum Special CPF Housing Grant will also render two-room flats more affordable, he said.

All this is good news for tenants like Mr Gurmit Singh, who is 60. He lives in a two-room rental flat in Toa Payoh with his wife, who is a part-time babysitter, and two teenage daughters. They used to own a three-room unit in Serangoon, but moved out in 2009 after struggling to pay their mortgage.

"This is like a second chance," said Mr Gurmit, who is unemployed owing to a medical condition. "Without help, people like me won't be able to move out. It is really for the children. We want a more conducive environment for them to grow up in." But he hopes the scheme can include three-room flats. "I can't afford it now, but I dream of owning a bigger flat."





Population: 'Extra push' to help couples have babies
New measures aimed at boosting family support, easing costs for young families
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Couples who want to have children will get an extra push to do so through a raft of measures aimed at boosting family support and easing the costs of raising a child.

These measures are: A new housing grant to help them live nearer their parents, an enhanced Baby Bonus package, an increased Medisave grant for newborns, and an extra week of paternity leave.

"Having a child is a major responsibility but we will help you because every Singaporean child is precious to us," said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday in his National Day Rally speech.

Children ensure Singapore will have a future, he said. "In fact, our children are why we want Singapore to have a future - for them."

Although Singapore's low birth rates have been a perennial worry, things have been looking up.

Showing a graph of the number of babies born in the past 15 years, Mr Lee said the 33,200 births last year were the highest in 10 years.

It was all the more remarkable because last year was not a Dragon year, considered the most auspicious zodiac sign by the Chinese. But last year saw as many births as in 2012, the last Dragon year.

"I expect that this year, we will have about the same number as 2014," Mr Lee said, adding that 129 babies were born on National Day itself this year, the highest since 2007.

"These are the statistics, but what I see directly when I go around confirms this. Nowadays, I often see families who have lots of kids, and they are proud and happy that they have many children."

It is therefore a good time to give families and their efforts to have babies an extra push, he said.

"I know it is a serious decision... You sacrifice your time, your sleep. You have to buy milk powder, diapers. And parenting goes on for many years, well after your children have supposedly grown up," said Mr Lee, a father of four, before he listed the policy changes.

First, there will be a new Proximity Housing Grant to encourage couples to live closer to their parents.

Every Singaporean household is eligible. They will receive the grant when buying a resale flat with or near their parents, or when parents buy near their married children.

Second, the Baby Bonus scheme, which includes cash for newborns and childcare subsidies in a co-savings account, will be enhanced.

The bonus amount will be raised to help cover more of the child-raising costs during the child's infancy, said Mr Lee. It will also be given to every child. Previously, it was given to a married couple's first four children.

"This provides more support to parents with larger families, and reflects our attitude that every child is valued in Singapore," he said.

Third, newborns will get a larger Medisave grant. The higher grant will be enough to cover the child's new MediShield Life premiums until age 21, and also to help with healthcare expenses like recommended vaccinations, said Mr Lee.

Fourth, fathers will get two weeks of paternity leave, double the existing one week, and backdated to take effect at the start of this year. Mr Lee said the public sector - Singapore's largest employer with 143,000 people on its payroll - will start the ball rolling.

For other employers, the extended paternity leave will be voluntary for now, to give bosses time to adjust. The Baby Bonus and increased Medisave grant will also take effect from Jan 1 this year. "I hope this will help many more couples to experience the joy of parenthood," said Mr Lee.

Speaking to reporters after the Rally, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Grace Fu, who oversees population issues, said she hoped the added support will send "a strong signal to young couples to consider having families, and bigger families".

The tweaks are the result of consultations with young couples. But the goal, she added, is to recognise the high costs of raising a child, not to lift the total fertility rate, which was 1.25 children a woman last year.

Additional reporting by Rachel Au-Yong





Newborns to get bigger Medisave grants and Baby Bonus
By Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

All babies born from Jan 1 this year will get a more generous Baby Bonus package and larger Medisave grants, the details of which were announced yesterday.

This is to help offset the cost of raising a child here, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong during last night's National Day Rally speech.

"I hear mothers telling me that milk powder is expensive," Mr Lee said. "Well, if that is so, this will be a little bit of assistance."

Sharing the "promising" number of babies born last year - some 33,200 - he added that the move is also meant to encourage young Singaporeans to keep up the good work in having babies.

Said Mr Lee: "I think this is a good time to give our families-and-babies efforts an extra push."

Effective from Jan 1 this year, the expanded Baby Bonus scheme will cover all the children in a family, rather than just the first four.

Said Mr Lee: "This will provide... more support to parents with larger families, and also reflects our attitude that every child is valued in Singapore."

Each newborn will also get more money credited into his or her Medisave account to cover the higher MediShield Life premiums when the scheme starts in November, until they reach age 21.

Currently, annual premiums for the basic MediShield are $50 for those under 21.

After transitional subsidies for the compulsory health insurance scheme are phased out in 2019, this group will have to pay between $98 and $130 a year.

The bigger Medisave Grant for Newborns will also go towards defraying other healthcare expenses for children, such as recommended vaccinations.

Housewife Sarah Yeo, who gave birth to her first child a month ago, welcomed the improved Baby Bonus package.

"Having a kid is not cheap," said the 29-year-old.

"It will help to reduce our financial burden, and we won't be so tied down by money considerations."

She added: "This is especially so because I'm not working, and my husband is the only one supporting the family."

Additional reporting by Choo Yun Ting





Paternity leave raised to 2 weeks
By Linette Lai and Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Working dads will start getting an extra week of paternity leave fully paid for by the Government, bringing the total to two weeks.

This is in recognition of the important role they play in every family, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong during yesterday's National Day Rally speech.

"Fathers play a very important role in bringing up children," he said. "You have to do your part. If it is just the mother's responsibility to care for and raise the children, I think (she) will decide enough is enough."

To give employers time to adjust, firms will join the new scheme on a voluntary basis for now.

"We will implement this, but the companies have to agree to give the leave," he said. "So we will not force the companies, for a start."

The civil service, he added, will be one of the first to offer new fathers this extra week.

Paternity leave was first introduced in 2013, as part of the Government's enhanced Marriage and Parenthood Package.

Civil servant Alan Shui, whose son Alzander was born in February, welcomed the news. "When your wife gives birth, she will be very tired, so it is better if you have another pair of hands to help," said the 26-year-old.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Grace Fu, who oversees population issues, said details will be announced later this week, but noted that the Government will encourage the "more enlightened" companies first.

"Critical mass will set the tone," she said. "The labour market is competitive and we hope that with some big employers leading the way, others will have to follow in order to attract and retain talent."

She said that the enhanced package of benefits - including the bumped-up Baby Bonus - is not so much to increase Singapore's fertility rate, but a recognition of the high costs of raising a child here.

"What we are doing is to create a supportive environment, from financial support to childcare arrangements, to arrangements in the office," said Ms Fu.





Giving young couples help to start families
By Aaron Low, Deputy News Editor, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

If there is one group that benefits most from last night's National Day Rally, it has to be young couples.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's two main areas of focus for policy changes this year dealt with housing and population, and both sets of changes promise to go some way in encouraging couples to think about starting a family or have more babies.

For most young couples, there are three big considerations - buying a home, managing costs associated with raising children, and finding help to care for the children when they go out to work.

Mr Lee addressed all three points when he announced changes affecting families last night.

For housing, he made sure more people are eligible for new flats by raising the income ceiling from $10,000 to $12,000, thereby ensuring that affordable public housing becomes available to more couples.

At the same time, he promised to enhance the Baby Bonus scheme, which now gives $6,000 for the first two children and $8,000 for the third and fourth children. The cash gift will not only become bigger but those with bigger families will get it for all babies, not just the first four.

There will be more relief as the MediShield Grant for Newborns, to help cover health insurance and medical expenses, will be made more generous - enough to cover Medishield Life premiums up to the age of 21.

These moves will go a long way to help parents take care of the basic necessities for their infants, and worry less about medical bills.

The third and, arguably, most important worry couples have when they consider having a baby is getting help with childcare.

On this front, Mr Lee moved to do two things: doubling paternity leave to two weeks and introducing a Household Proximity Grant.

Having two weeks of paid paternity leave sends a strong signal, that men have to do their part in bringing up baby.

This will also let them get more involved early.

Similarly, the new Proximity Housing Grant scheme will encourage couples to move nearer their parents, or vice-versa. For most young parents, grandparents are the preferred caregivers, provided they are healthy and willing. Living close by also means that when the time comes, it will be easier for children to care for their ageing parents.

Taken together, the measures Mr Lee announced are welcome improvements to Singapore's pro-parenthood package.

But will they have the intended effect of raising Singapore's dismal fertility rate?

The Total Fertility Rate, which measures the average number of children a woman will have over her lifetime, dipped from 1.6 in 2000 to 1.25 last year, one of the lowest in the world. A country's population replaces itself if it has a TFR of 2.1.

More worryingly, there is evidence that pro-baby policies might be losing their effectiveness as couples start to take the financial incentives for granted.

An Institute of Policy Studies survey of 2,000 respondents, released earlier this year, showed that carrots like the Baby Bonus cash gift and maternity leave are having less of an effect in boosting birth rates.

PM Lee acknowledged this when he said that the Government is working not just to give practical help but also to change social attitudes by encouraging more child-friendly workplaces, for instance.

There is evidence that these moves have started to take effect.

Mr Lee said the number of babies born last year was the highest in a decade, a promising sign that the pro-family policies of the past decade are taking effect. He added that this year's baby numbers are likely to be as good as last year's.

Last night's announcements build on this foundation, by making sure that for young couples, there is help at every stage, from alleviating the costs of delivering the baby, to giving parents those first few weeks and months of leave to spend with their newborn, and even giving couples subsidies for a home in which they can bring their children up in.

For some young couples, there could be even more help in childcare. Many young parents continue to complain that there is a lack of reasonably priced quality childcare facilities to help them take care of their children while they work. The Government has done much in recent years to ramp up infrastructure and manpower to boost this area, the effects of which could be seen some years down the road.

To be fair, however, these policies can only go so far in persuading people to have more children.

As Mr Lee said: "But at the root of this is not policies. It's people - families and their children. Our families are what make life meaningful for many of us."

Earlier this year, my wife and I discussed having Baby No.3 because we have grown to love children so much.

It will not be without much personal sacrifice. In all likelihood, one of us will have to leave our job because we do not like the idea of having a maid to care for our kids.

The new measures, though welcome improvements, will not help us decide to go ahead right away, and we will still have to think hard.

Ultimately, the government can do only so much to get couples to have babies. The latest measures are better than anything we've seen so far, in creating the conditions to help us make a good decision.






Re-employment age will rise to 67 by 2017
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Older workers who want to continue working after turning 65 will be able to do so within two years.

The re-employment age will be raised to 67, with the law to be updated by 2017, announced Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the National Day Rally yesterday.

Giving a definite timeframe for the first time, Mr Lee said the timing was the result of negotiations between unions, employers and the Government. The Government has been mulling over the move since last year.

"From the workers' point of view, 65 may be too early to stop work. Workers want us to raise the re-employment age," said Mr Lee.

"They want to keep working for as long as they are healthy.

"They say 'If I sit at home and do nothing, I will go ga-ga'."

Singapore introduced the idea of re-employment three years ago. While the official retirement age is still 62, bosses must rehire healthy workers who have performed satisfactorily until they reach age 65, or give them a one-off payment.

While it is still too early to judge, the policy seems to be working well so far, said Mr Lee. "Unions and workers were happy, employers have accepted it, they are adjusting and starting to benefit from it."

With two years to go for the next age hike to kick in, companies will have time to work out arrangements so that the older workers can contribute and not be a burden to their employers, he said.

The issue has always been a contentious one, with unions fighting to increase the age till which workers must be hired, while some employers resist the change.

It took 19 years for the Government to raise the retirement age from 55 to the current re-employment age of 65. The impending change is part of an action plan that a Ministerial Committee on Ageing, headed by Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, is putting together.

The details of the plan, which aims to make Singapore a model of successful ageing, will be announced soon, said Mr Lee.

The labour movement yesterday hailed the move, with National Trades Union Congress deputy secretary-general Heng Chee How telling The Straits Times that older workers have been wanting more legal teeth to their appeals to companies to hire them for longer.

"The labour movement has negotiated hard with tripartite partners for this over the past few years," he said. "The focus now must be for all companies to get ready for the enhancement."

Mr Lee, who devoted a section of his speech last night to older Singaporeans, pledged that the elderly will always have a place in the country. "We honour them because they brought us here, they brought us up, and they will always have something to contribute to Singapore."

He spelt out the steps taken by the Government to recognise and help senior citizens. The Pioneer Generation Package was one, he said, adding that it was introduced to express gratitude to those who have contributed to building Singapore.

The $8 billion package provides subsidies to help Singaporeans aged 65 and above last year pay for their healthcare costs for life.

Mr Lee stressed that the Government has made "an extra effort" to reach out to these pioneers, including visiting every one of them in their homes.

Those who are "not quite as old" as the pioneers were not forgotten, he added. Some 528,000 Singaporeans aged 56 and above who do not enjoy Pioneer Generation Benefits will get special annual Medisave top-ups of $100 or $200 annually from last year to 2018.





HOW SINGAPORE GOT HERE

What Jubilee NDP said about Singapore
It celebrated Singaporeans' resolve to survive and thrive as one united people, says PM
By Jermyn Chow, Defence Correspondent, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

The Golden Jubilee National Day Parade at the Padang was "not just a birthday bash" to mark the country's 50th year of independence.

It was, in fact, an occasion at which Singaporeans were celebrating "something far greater", said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his National Day Rally speech last night, outlining three reasons.

For one thing, the parade celebrated Singaporeans' resolve to defend themselves and survive over the last 50 years.

After Singapore was thrust into independence in 1965, the Republic started out with only two infantry battalions "in a rough neighbourhood", said Mr Lee to the audience at ITE College Central in Ang Mo Kio. "But our pioneers were determined to defend ourselves. We built the SAF (Singapore Armed Forces)."

Within four years, Singapore unveiled a few of its fledgling units in the 1969 parade, like the Hunter aircraft and Alouette helicopter flying the flag, as well as 18 AMX-13 tanks in the first mobile column. "Singaporeans cheered. Everyone understood what it meant and it wasn't just Singaporeans who took note," Mr Lee said, adding that some of Singapore's first defenders took part in the vintage parade segment in this year's National Day show.

NDP 2015 Mobile Column
Look at how far we have come. PM Lee recounted the jubilee celebration during the opening address of his National Day Rally speech. From the 18 tanks in our first mobile column to 179 vehicles that made up the mobile column this year - with 9 vehicles carrying 9 families of different generations who have served in the SAF and Hometeam - we have progressed tremendously. #SG50#SAF50#ndrsg
Posted by cyberpioneer on Sunday, August 23, 2015


He singled out some of them present at the rally, including Lieutenant-Colonel (Retired) Swee Boon Chai, from the first batch of officer cadets, and Major (Retired) Ibrahim Bulat, who trained Singapore's first national servicemen. "They were older, greyer, but their spirit remained undaunted."

Mr Lee also paid tribute to those in this year's NDP mobile column, which featured three generations of servicemen in the SAF, police and old Fire Brigade.

The SG50 parade celebrated how Singaporeans turned vulnerability into strength, said Mr Lee, adding that Singapore started off with no hinterland and a weak economy.

While the Republic relied on its entrepot trade, its neighbours were building their own ports and "sought to bypass us". Workers then were unskilled, and anxious about their future. But Singapore was "determined to make the world our hinterland", said Mr Lee. The Government worked with employers and the worker unions and created "the best workforce in the world".

Back then, people also lived in cramped and squalid slums, with no modern sanitation and no utilities, and nearly all of Singapore's water supply came from Johor. And when an issue arose across the Causeway, "some crazy politician would threaten to turn off the tap to get us in line", said Mr Lee.

But HDB flats were built, making Singapore a First World metropolis.

Singapore also "didn't die of thirst", he said, as it cleaned up its rivers and dammed them up to become reservoirs. "Our whole island became a catchment area."

Singapore also invented Newater, which was launched at the NDP in 2002, and the nation "toasted our success, 'Huat Ah!'", Mr Lee quipped, drawing applause from the audience.

Finally, the NDP celebrated how people embarked on the journey as "one united people" to take Singapore from Third World to First.

When Singapore separated from Malaysia, "we were not yet one people", said Mr Lee. "Memories of the race riots were fresh and raw. The minorities were uncertain of their place in the new country. They saw what had happened in Malaysia. They wondered: Will the new Singapore Government keep its promise of a multiracial society?

"But 50 years on, we celebrate as one united people. On National Day, when the siren sounded, we stood and recited the Pledge together. Regardless of race, language or religion, we sang Majulah Singapura!"









'Do not call me Mr Prime Minister'
By Zakir Hussain, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Two days after Singapore became an independent nation in 1965, then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew held a press conference with Malay journalists.

Before asking his first question, a journalist addressed Mr Lee as "Tuan Perdana Menteri" - Mr Prime Minister.

Mr Lee immediately replied: "Please do not address me as 'Tuan Perdana Menteri', but just as usual, 'Saudara Lee' (Comrade Lee).

"It is not necessary. I am not a Syed, like Syed Jaafar Albar. I am a common man, a small man." The late Syed Jaafar was an ultra who whipped up Malay emotions against Mr Lee.

Yesterday, in recounting the anecdote in his Malay speech at the National Day Rally, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the late Mr Lee's remark "set the tone for our society in Singapore".

"That we will be equal, egalitarian. That we will work side by side, that we will build Singapore together," PM Lee added. "That is how our journey began."

PM Lee also recalled an earlier press conference on Aug 9, 1965, when Mr Lee Kuan Yew had promised all Singaporeans they would have an equal chance to progress.

The late Mr Lee had said: "We are going to be a multiracial nation in Singapore. We will set an example. This is not a Malay nation, this is not a Chinese nation, this is not an Indian nation.

"Everyone will have his place, equal: language, culture, religion."

Fifty years on, PM Lee said Singapore has become "a harmonious, multiracial society, egalitarian and successful".





Malay/Muslim community 'integral'
Group has contributed significantly to Singapore's harmony and progress: PM
By Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

The Malay/Muslim community has made enormous progress in the past 50 years and can be proud of its achievements, especially in helping to build a cohesive multiracial society, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday.

Speaking in Malay at the start of the National Day Rally, PM Lee lauded the community's growth and its efforts in nation-building.

"The Malay/Muslim community is an integral part of Singapore," he said, adding: "And they have contributed significantly to our nation's harmony and progress."

He said: "The Government appreciates the community's contributions and strong support. Let us continue the strong cooperation we have established over the years. Let us continue to write the Singapore story by strengthening our harmonious, multiracial community ."

In highlighting the community's contributions, PM Lee paid tribute to veterans such as master potter Iskandar Jalil, who received a Meritorious Service Medal, and former senior minister of state Sidek Saniff, who spoke at the funeral of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. He said Mr Sidek started off opposing a few government policies, but in the end still called the late Mr Lee a friend.

"Mr Lee succeeded in building an inclusive, multiracial society as he promised from the beginning. Fifty years on, I am touched and proud to see many Malays, especially the young, expressing heartfelt love for Singapore openly," said PM Lee.

"They appreciate and uphold our multiracial society."

The community has much to be proud of today, he added.

Malays are represented in every part of Singapore society. "When we look for promising professionals to field as candidates, we find many successful Malays in different fields - lawyers, bankers, educators, engineers, SAF officers."

While the Malay/Muslim community is constantly instilling a culture of self-reliance, it has kept the spirit of "gotong royong", said PM Lee.

It rallied together, setting up self-help groups such as Mendaki and the Association of Muslim

Professionals.

The Government has supported the community's progress strongly by providing resources and advice, and offering the leadership of Malay/Muslim ministers and MPs.

The community has also benefited equally from national policies in areas such as housing, education and healthcare, PM Lee added.

Most Housing Board dwellers own their flats but a small group still lives in rental public flats. "Within this group, Malays are over-represented," he said.

Many of them are young Malay families with marital and financial problems, he said. "I am concerned about their future, especially that of their children. They may be trapped in the poverty cycle throughout their lives."

These families should be helped to start anew if they are determined to put their lives in order, he said. "We should help them own flats again, to provide their children with a more stable environment."

Later, in his English speech, he announced a scheme to help such families own their homes.

Second Minister for Home Affairs and Foreign Affairs Masagos Zulkifli said the Malay community has progressed with the nation, but held firm to its identity.

"We've been able to practise our religion, preserve our language and culture and yet participate actively in the Singapore story," he said.

"We're a community that can balance our interests and the needs of religion with those of our nation."





Group 'created something uniquely Singapore'
By Walter Sim, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

The late Zubir Said composed Singapore's National Anthem, Majulah Singapura. But less known to the people is his Semoga Bahagia, which celebrates Children's Day.

It is such songs, slowly being forgotten, which inspired the establishment of The Teng Ensemble in 2009.

"We wanted to promote a type of Singaporean sound that we felt was lacking here," said the group's sheng player, Mr Yang Ji Wei.



The group was mentioned by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his Mandarin speech during the National Day Rally yesterday, as one which "injects new elements into traditional culture and created something uniquely Singapore".

Besides delving into Singapore's heritage for inspiration, the ensemble also marries the sounds of Eastern and Western instruments.

It is the performing arm of Chinese instrumental music events and education firm The Teng Company. But the performers do not see themselves as "Chinese musicians".

"When we were growing up, we were influenced by many genres," said Mr Yang, 34, adding that the ensemble comprises alumni of Anglo-Chinese School (Independent).

Catch the six-member ensemble on YouTube at www.youtube.com/user/thetengcompany








Passion for Chinese culture among youth
By Walter Sim, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Pop singers JJ Lin, Stefanie Sun and Kit Chan studied at English schools but that did not stop them from becoming Mandarin pop superstars, with fans across Greater China.

Similarly, younger ministers and MPs are effectively bilingual and can explain policies in Mandarin.

These people, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday, illustrate the success of Singapore's bilingual policy.

Mr Lee made the point as he paid tribute to the Chinese community, including its teachers who have inspired students' interest in Chinese language and culture. "They work tirelessly to lay the foundation of the language for our bilingual young, who can find opportunities in Greater China, and have done well," he said in his Mandarin speech at the National Day Rally.

He added that he is heartened to see many young people passionate about Chinese culture, showing it through the arts, such as theatre and music. Chinese orchestras, for example, have been thriving. The Marsiling Chinese Orchestra counts among its founding members a Malay erhu player, he said.

Young musicians like the Teng Ensemble have also succeeded in creating a uniquely Singaporean sound by injecting new elements into traditional culture, he added.

Charting the many ways the Chinese community has played a role in nation-building, from Singapore's early years to today, he praised entrepreneurs of businesses big and small for their contributions.

Since the colonial years, many have seized opportunities to build businesses and create jobs, driving economic progress in the country. They also built schools, set up clan associations and helped the poor.

Today, they are still active in donating to schools and supporting clan associations, said Mr Lee.

"They also help other ethnic groups, and help to strengthen social cohesion," he added.

He cited the 15-year-old Chinese Community Liaison Group for helping to foster closer bonds in the community. Led by Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing, the group has come up with a slew of new ideas for engaging citizens.

Among other things, it is working with the Chinese media on programmes like an eight-episode talk show, called Ministerial Coffee Talk, produced by Singapore Press Holdings' Chinese Media Group.

The media, too, has played a role, both in explaining government policies to non-English speakers, and in "keeping the language alive" through the years.

Mr Lee pledged that the Government will help the various ethnic communities preserve their respective cultural roots.

Thanking the Chinese community for its enthusiastic response to the Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre, which will be completed next year, he said it will ensure that Chinese culture will be passed on to future generations.





Adventure learning to go on despite Sabah quake tragedy
By Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

The Sabah earthquake in June which claimed the lives of 10 people from Singapore, mainly pupils from Tanjong Katong Primary School (TKPS), is a tragedy that will take a long time for Singapore to get over.

But adventure learning programmes will still go on with the necessary safety precautions, as they help to "bring up a generation who will grow up tough and able to work closely together", Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in his National Day Rally speech yesterday.

Schools encourage students to play sports, and organise adventure learning and character education programmes as they help toughen the character of students and teach them about working with others, he said.

His father, the late former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, had also exhorted the importance of being a "rugged society", said PM Lee.

"We don't use that term quite so often any more, but our people must still be robust and tough, able to take hard knocks, always striving to be better.

"But a rugged society doesn't mean every man for himself. We are strong even though we are small, because we are strong together."

On June 5, a 6.0-magnitude earthquake struck Mount Kinabalu and killed 18 people.

Ten of them were from Singapore - seven pupils and two teachers from TKPS, as well as an adventure camp guide attached to the school.

Eight teachers and 29 pupils from TKPS had gone on its annual Omega Challenge - a seven-year- old programme where pupil leaders scale Mount Kinabalu with the help of their teachers and adventure camp guides.

The programme had been successful, said PM Lee, adding that former pupils who had gone on similar trips had spoken about how much they benefited from it.

"Tragically, on their most recent expedition to climb Mount Kinabalu, the Omega Challenge group was caught in an earthquake," he said.

"We all mourned them and grieved with their families. We held a national day of remembrance. It will take us a long time to get over this tragedy. But life goes on and it's important that we move on.

"And I know that the other TKPS (pupils) and teachers who were on this trip are courageously doing so," said PM Lee.





CHALLENGES AT SG50

Singapore must 'be alive' to outside environment
It has to be vigilant over external events or risk being overwhelmed by them, says PM
By Wong Siew Ying, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Singapore needs to "be alive" to its external environment even as it attends to domestic concerns - or the country's survival will be at risk, stressed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

It was a point he made in both English and Mandarin speeches at the National Day Rally yesterday, saying he had "spoken too little" about the issue in recent rallies because of the focus on affairs at home.

Today, Singapore enjoys good relations with its neighbours, said Mr Lee, but he cautioned that this may not always be the case. "Even in the next 10 years, we cannot be sure. Certainly, in the next 50 years, nobody can rule out instability, tension, or even war in Asia."

He said Singapore needs to be vigilant over external events and stay on top of developments, or risk being overwhelmed by them. And that is a "fundamental reality for a 'little red dot'".

Instability in its closest neighbour Malaysia, for instance, will affect Singapore, which is closely watching developments there.

Among Malaysia's worries is the threat of terrorism, noted Mr Lee. The authorities have arrested nearly 100 Malaysians suspected of having links to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria terrorist group. Even some members of Malaysia's armed forces have gone to the Middle East to join the fight, he said.

Incidents like the recent riot in Low Yat Plaza between Chinese and Malays have also raised concerns about racial tensions, which could spill over into Singapore.

Money politics is another worry, said Mr Lee, with Malaysian Premier Najib Razak having just set up a national panel to develop laws on "political funding with integrity".

"These are Malaysia's problems. Fortunately, we are a different country, having separated from them 50 years ago," said Mr Lee.

"But our two societies and our two economies remain very closely intertwined, so their problems can easily become our problems.

"If Malaysia is troubled, unstable or divided, it will affect our economy, our society and our security too. And the closer we work with them, the more we are concerned that things go well for them."

Relations with Indonesia, the largest country in South-east Asia, also bear watching, and Mr Lee said he looks forward to continuing good relations with Indonesia under President Joko Widodo.

However, he noted a common Indonesian view about Singapore: "that we are a small neighbour that is enjoying undeserved success at their expense".

He gave the example of a senior politician who told an Indonesian publication that he would consider apologising for the haze only if Singapore and Malaysia are thankful for the oxygen they enjoy from Indonesian forests 11 months a year.

Another example, which Mr Lee cited in his Mandarin speech, was of an Indonesian official's view that Singapore must know its place and meet the demands of "big brother" Indonesia - just as minority Chinese Indonesians do for the majority.

Mr Lee said such comments may not reflect the Indonesian government's view, but Singapore has to take note of them. "It's a deep-seated mindset - that a little red dot should know its place in the world - and this mindset will not disappear for a long time."

Singapore also has to watch its relations with the major powers - the United States, China and Japan - all of which the Republic is friends with.

"People are amazed and asked how this is possible." The answer: adroit diplomacy and that the three have been at peace with one another.

But, Mr Lee asked, what if relations among the powers sour and Singapore is pressed to take sides? "Countries will press us to take sides... You are either with us, or against us. Which are you?

"These are imponderables and risks which we have to be aware of, and which Mr Lee Kuan Yew was very concerned that Singaporeans may not be adequately aware of, and wanted to speak about even into his extreme old age," he said.

The Prime Minister said Singapore must maintain the advantages that enabled it to maintain its security and standing in the world. These include: a strong Singapore Armed Forces, a successful economy, and good diplomats and leaders who can defend Singapore's interests abroad.





Good ministers advance Singapore's interests abroad
By Wong Siew Ying, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Having good ministers has helped advance Singapore's interests abroad, and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong made special mention of two office-holders who helped showcase the country's worth internationally.

Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say lifted the mood of participants at an International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conference dinner earlier this year.

Ministers at the event shared the problems their countries faced, such as slow job growth, youth unemployment, stagnating wages and widening income gaps.

"It was a very miserable dinner," PM Lee said to laughter from the audience. "Swee Say, never one for a miserable dinner, decided to turn the discussion around to focus on solutions and not problems. He did it in the way only Swee Say knows how."

Mr Lim, who attends the Geneva gathering every year - previously as labour chief - told them about the three "D" challenges: Jobs Deficit, Skill Deficit and Quality Deficit.

By the time Mr Lim finished talking about three "F" opportunities that countries wanted - Jobs of the Future, Skills of the Future and Careers of the Future - everyone at the dinner was smiling.

Solving the problems, though, required strengthening the partnership between the three "P"s - partners Government, unions and employers, Mr Lim said, as he explained this unique Singapore approach. "When Swee Say finished, the mood in the room had lifted. Everyone was discussing solutions," said PM Lee. "The Director-General rounded up the discussion and proposed 'three cheers for Singapore'."

Environment and Water Resources Minister Vivian Balakrishnan too had Singapore playing a key role at last year's United Nations climate change conference in Lima, Peru. In doing so, he contributed to securing a positive deal to combat climate change at the gathering.

Dr Balakrishnan was not just the Singapore delegation chief, but also had the role of "Friend of the Chair". That meant being an honest broker working behind the scenes to bridge gaps between different countries in the complex negotiation.

PM Lee said Dr Balakrishnan was effective because he was competent and had mastered a very complicated brief. He also had a strong team of officials working across ministries and adopting a national perspective.

And in the process of reaching a good outcome at the conference, he and the officials also protected and advanced Singapore's interests.

"That was Team Singapore at work," PM Lee said.





Measures in place to ease woes of higher living costs
But good policies cannot alleviate the costs that come with changing lifestyle habits
By Walter Sim, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Good policies are in place to help ease the burden of the rising costs of living for Singaporeans, but these cannot mitigate the costs owing to changing lifestyle habits, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said.

"As Singapore progresses, lifestyle habits and consumption patterns change. People, too, now have higher aspirations," he said in his Mandarin speech at the National Day Rally yesterday.

Suggesting reasons for some Singaporeans feeling the pinch, he noted that more households are using air-conditioners and other electrical appliances.

"In the past, only one or two in 10 households owned an air-conditioner. Now, it is seven or eight in 10. As they use a lot of electricity, utility bills are going up."

Another example he gave is the prevalence of smartphones. In the past, when each household owned only one phone, the monthly bill was about $7.50. "But now, everyone in a household may own a smartphone, which can result in quite a sizeable sum."

Mr Lee raised the issue of growing costs of living as it was a concern of a listener of a Chinese radio talk show that the Prime Minister had participated in.

He said the Government has in place measures that alleviate the costs of basic necessities such as food, transport, healthcare and housing.

Businesses are encouraged to keep the costs of daily necessities and groceries affordable.

Citing the FairPrice chain of supermarkets, he said it sells as many as 30 brands of rice, of which 10 are house brands.

Offering consumers choices - including house brands of good quality - is a good way to help people cut their expenses, he said.

With many eating out often, he said the Government is not only building more hawker centres, but also adopting different operating models to keep costs affordable.

Some will be managed by cooperatives or social enterprises, he said, citing the new centre at Ci Yuan Community Club in Hougang Avenue 4, which has seen long queues.

Its stalls sell at least two food items at $2.80 or less. And of the 40 cooked food stalls, 10 operate round the clock.

Another 19 hawker centres will be built in the next 12 years, adding as many as 800 stalls.

In transport, Mr Lee noted the 1.6 million commuters who qualify for concession cards. They include polytechnic students who got on the scheme last year.

To celebrate SG50, the Government is giving people aged 60 and older $50 for public transport.

But he noted that pay rises have outpaced transport fare increases in the past 10 years. "So, objectively speaking, this burden has not increased for the majority of commuters."

In healthcare, measures such as the Pioneer Generation Package and MediShield Life are being rolled out to help reduce costs.

The Pioneer Generation Card has helped the elderly save money, from "tens of dollars to see a doctor in the past, to a few dollars now". Some trips to the dentist are also free.

"Some have yet to use the card, but because they have it, they have peace of mind," he said.

Meanwhile, housing prices have stabilised in recent years owing to cooling measures and an increased supply of homes.

"More grants and subsidies have also enabled almost every family to own a Housing Board flat," said PM Lee, adding that schemes are to be introduced to let households earning below $1,000 own a flat .

"These examples show the Government has rolled out measures and policies to reduce the burden on citizens," he said. "But these only solve half the problem."

It is reasonable for people to want better and more comfortable lives, PM Lee said, but they must accept that this will inevitably result in higher expenses.

"Not all cost factors can be resolved through good policies," he said.





PLANS FOR SINGAPORE

New Punggol campus for SIT
Singapore Institute of Technology's intake to rise to 3,500 over the next five years
By Sandra Davie, Senior Education Correspondent, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

The Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT), set up for polytechnic graduates, will become Singapore's university in the north-east and be integrated with the creative industry cluster that will rise up there.

SIT, which now runs its courses at its satellite campuses in the five polytechnics, will have a centralised campus in Punggol, announced Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong last night. Residents there will get to use SIT's facilities, including classrooms, workshops and a multi-purpose hall.

"We have Punggol 21 Plus. With SIT, it will be Punggol 21 A-Plus," he said, drawing laughter from the audience gathered at ITE College Central in Ang Mo Kio to listen to his National Day Rally address. Punggol 21 Plus refers to the plan to transform the former fishing village into a model town for 21st century living.

Mr Lee also announced that SIT's yearly intake will rise to 3,500 over the next five years, up from this year's intake of 2,000 students in over 30 courses. This is in line with the Government's promise to enable 40 per cent of each age group to study for full-time degrees in the six local universities.

Mr Lee did not say when the Punggol campus will be ready, but said it will be linked by bridges to the creative industry cluster that will be built by developer JTC across the road.

"Students can easily go from classroom to workplace and apply what they learn, and companies can go to SIT to get help if they need some new idea or some problems solved," said Mr Lee, highlighting SIT's distinctive education model which integrates work with study.

SIT aims to nurture "best-in-class specialists" - graduates with deep knowledge and skills in a particular field - and requires students to spend eight months to a year on a work-study programme designed to be more in-depth and structured than traditional attachments.

Mr Lee said SIT's focus on applied learning is in line with the Government's SkillsFuture initiative to build deep skills and expertise in Singaporean workers.

He cited SIT graduate Chen Zhangkai, 27, who went from the Institute of Technical Education (ITE) to polytechnic and then SIT, as a prime example.

Earlier this year, the Government announced several schemes under the initiative, including the Earn and Learn Programme where ITE and polytechnic graduates can further their qualifications while working.

"SkillsFuture will produce more success stories like Zhangkai," said Mr Lee, but quoted a Chinese proverb to stress that it is a long-term endeavour. "We are planting for the long term, planting seeds now to bear fruit many years from now."

Two Punggol residents interviewed welcomed SIT's move there, saying higher education institutions are now mainly in the west.

The National University of Singapore, SIM University and Nanyang Technological University have their campuses in the western and north-western parts of the island; while SMU has a campus in Bras Basah. The Singapore University of Technology and Design opened its campus in Changi in May.

Said Mr S. Suppiah, 35, a manager, who lives in Punggol and has two children in primary school: "It is good that the Government is spreading the higher-education institutions around."



When contacted, SIT president Tan Thiam Soon said the university is extremely grateful for the land.

He said: "SIT's Punggol campus will be borderless and integrated with the surrounding community and industry, providing a vibrant learning environment which underpins the applied learning pedagogy that we are developing.

"We will work closely with all the relevant agencies as well as community groups to ensure that the campus becomes a beacon for industry, adding vibrancy to Punggol and turning it into a true university town."




At the National Day Rally, PM Lee Hsien Loong announced that SIT will have a new main campus in Punggol.The new campus...
Posted by Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) on Sunday, August 23, 2015






From playing truant to creating 3D animation for TV
By Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

He had always enjoyed doodling in his younger days, but Mr Chen Zhangkai, 27, never thought of it as a viable career option.

"Drawing was one of those things that would make people say, 'Oh, you can't earn money from that'," he said.

It did not help that his studies did not excite him.

Then a Normal (Technical) student in Loyang Secondary School, Mr Chen frequently got into trouble for fighting and playing truant.

He eventually entered the Institute of Technical Education (ITE), where he enrolled in a digital animation course, a move that turned his life around for the better.

"I remember reading about the course in a brochure and thinking to myself that it sounded interesting," said Mr Chen.

"It was in ITE that I realised there's so much more to drawing and so many options I could explore. That was the first time I felt I was doing something I enjoyed and I was able to do it well."

He obtained good grades and was accepted into Nanyang Polytechnic. Later, he went on to the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT), the country's first university for polytechnic graduates.

Mr Chen graduated last year with a digital art and animation degree from the DigiPen Institute of Technology, which collaborates with SIT.

Yesterday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong shared Mr Chen's story in his National Day Rally speech to illustrate how the Government is creating more opportunities and pathways for different groups of students to excel.

"(The SkillsFuture initiative) will produce more success stories like Zhangkai's. There are always opportunities, no matter where you are, to upgrade and do better," he said.

He also announced SIT's plan to expand its annual student intake to 3,500 in 2020, up from the current 2,000.

The university has a strong focus on applied learning, which works well for students who prefer hands-on learning, and work attachment programmes to help them gain skills relevant to the workplace.

Mr Chengot an internship when his final-year project impressed the director of an animation studio.

He continued working in the firm for about eight months after graduating from SIT, before moving to another animation production firm.

He now creates 3D animation for a TV series for children.

The oldest of three sons of supermarket workers said: "This is my dream job. I really don't know where I'd be if I weren't given all these opportunities."





Madrasahs to get boost for secular subjects
Teaching of such subjects to be enhanced; awards for students who shine in these areas
Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Singapore's madrasahs, or Islamic religious schools, will get a boost in their teaching of secular subjects such as mathematics and science.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday pledged the Government will work with the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (Muis) to strengthen the teaching of these subjects.

It will also give financial aid to improve the skills of these teachers, and fund awards for students who do well in them.

"It's important for our religious scholars and leaders to have a good grounding in non-religious subjects," Mr Lee said in his Malay speech. "It prepares them to guide Singapore's Muslims to live in a modern, technological society."

While the Government will help with secular subjects, it will leave religious education in the hands of Muis and the community.

Mr Lee said he was happy to see that standards have improved.

The Government's support in strengthening the madrasah sector was welcomed by Mr Razak Lazim, Muis' senior director of madrasahs.

He said that while madrasahs have played a key role in nurturing leaders and teachers who understand the multi-religious and multiracial context, they have also turned out students who have succeeded in fields like medicine.

This, said Mr Razak, is a testament to the fact that the schools produce students with a strong grounding in secular subjects too, and who are ready "to contribute to the modern economy".

Later, Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Yaacob Ibrahim said the madrasah is an important institution to the community and is part of Singapore's secular society.

Proficiency in secular subjects is an important requisite for its graduands "to operate in our secular environment'', he added.

He also sees the community welcoming the Government's help for madrasah teachers, whose proficiency especially in the teaching of secular subjects has been a longstanding concern.

"We don't have the resources of the Ministry of Education," he said.

Mr Lee, in underscoring the Government's support for Islam's vital role in the community, said the community needs religious leaders who have grown up here and understand the society.

Also, they have to be familiar with Singapore's history and multi- religious context and appreciate the importance of tolerance and "give-and-take" among the different communities here, he added.

This will help shape a Singapore Muslim identity. Mr Lee said: "Because of the presence of such religious leaders in Singapore, we have protected ourselves from the threat of violent extremism.

"The Government will continue to work with and support the Malay/Muslim community in these efforts, and all the other communities should support them too," he added.

He thanked the Religious Rehabilitation Group, which counsels terrorist detainees, and the community for taking a united stand against violent extremism.

A decade ago, when the Jemaah Islamiah plot to bomb key installations in Singapore was discovered, "we handled it as one people", he said."We did not divide into Muslims and non-Muslims."

While race and religion are always sensitive matters in Singapore, he said they are in some ways more complex and difficult to handle now, with increasing religiosity and the virulent spread of extremist ideology.

"As a multiracial and multi-religious society, we are always at risk of deep fault lines opening up," he said, "and must never take our present happy state of affairs for granted."





WHAT IT WILL TAKE TO KEEP SINGAPORE SPECIAL

Next team must be 'ready in the wings'
PM Lee credits achievements to cooperation between Govt and people, calls on S'poreans to back his team
By Tham Yuen-C, Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday held up what was effectively a report card on what the Government had promised, and delivered, over the past 10 years.

The targets were met and he credited the achievement to the cooperation between the Government and the people, saying: "We did this together. We had a vision, we believed in it, and together, we realised our dreams."

He also called on Singaporeans to continue to back him and his team, and urged them to help determine the next generation of ministers who will lead Singapore into its next 50 years.

Speaking at his 12th National Day Rally, PM Lee harked back to the promises made at previous National Day Rallies and cited examples to show that the Government made good on them.

Singapore has built more beautiful, affordable homes, strengthened social safety nets, created more pathways for children to achieve success, and transformed the city and Marina Bay, he said.

He listed examples such as the development of Punggol in the Punggol 21 project, the introduction of schemes such as universal health insurance MediShield Life and Workfare Income Supplement, the building of more universities and specialised schools, and the upcoming upgrade of Changi Airport.

"In the last 10 years, we have written another chapter of the Singapore story," he added.

"We put brick on brick, we climbed step by step, we kept Singapore special, delivered results for Singaporeans."

PM Lee said this was achieved by building on what the country inherited from its earlier leaders.

He noted how Singapore's founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, who died in March, worked with his team of pioneer generation leaders to plan beyond their terms and even beyond their lifetimes.

They nurtured the next generation of leaders and Singaporeans, and also taught their successors to do the same, said PM Lee.

He said his team had likewise been planning for leadership succession over the past 10 years, adding: "My team and I take very seriously our responsibility to make sure that Singapore lasts beyond us."

While the current governing team has served Singaporeans "to the best of our ability", and Singaporeans have got to know the team well, PM Lee said its core members are already in their late 50s and 60s and will not be around forever.

This is why the next team must be "ready in the wings", he added.

He said the nucleus of Singapore's future Cabinet has already been drafted over previous elections.

The ministers making up this group have taken charge of important programmes such as the year-long Our Singapore Conversation consultation exercise and the SG50 celebrations, and have also served in different ministries, including difficult ones, he said.

He also said they have connected with Singaporeans of all ages, and have participated in major decisions that the Government has made.

But he urged Singaporeans to continue to support him and his team.

Last night he said that he would call an election "soon", to help complete the next-generation leadership team.

"We need to reinforce them, to round out the team, to give Singapore the best possible chance of succeeding into the future. And that's what I need to do in the next election," he said.









DELIVERED, AS PROMISED
The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the Government has delivered on its promises in the last 10 years, including:

BUILDING MORE BEAUTIFUL HOMES PEOPLE CAN AFFORD

• Transforming Punggol 21 into the model town for 21st-century living with a man-made waterway and new housing estates.

STRENGTHENING SOCIAL SAFETY NETS

• Introducing Workfare income supplement for low-income workers, Silver Support for the elderly poor, and ComCare for needy Singaporeans.

• Building new hospitals such as the Ng Teng Fong Hospital that opened in June.

• Making healthcare more accessible through the Community Health Assist Scheme that subsidises visits to the doctor, and the upcoming MediShield Life universal health insurance.

CREATING MORE PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN TO SUCCEED

• Opening Northlight and Assumption Pathway specialised schools that take in those who failed the Primary School Leaving Examination.

• Starting the School of The Arts, Singapore Sports School and School of Science and Technology to cater to varied talents.

• Building new universities such as the Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore Institute of Technology, and UniSIM.

TRANSFORMING THE CITY

• Building park connectors and waterways in the Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters programmes by the Public Utilities Board.

• Upgrading Changi Airport with a mixed-use Jewel complex as well as Terminals 4 and 5.

• Transforming Marina Bay with developments such as Gardens by the Bay.





Mourning for Mr Lee 'defined Singapore spirit'
By Rachel Chang Assistant Political Editor, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

The Singapore spirit shone the brightest when founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew died in March, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday.

Speaking at the Golden Jubilee Rally, PM Lee recounted how the historic week of shared mourning and celebration of Mr Lee's life, after his death at age 91, "brought out so much in us".

As the screen behind him flashed scenes of half a million people queueing for up to 10 hours to file past Mr Lee's casket, PM Lee noted how patient and generous Singaporeans were during the long wait.

"People queued patiently and let children and seniors through. Businesses provided free chairs and refreshments to those queueing up. Volunteers helped out, distributing umbrellas, food, drinks."

"For all of us, this was a historic moment, shared as one Singapore family," he said. "We were mourning Mr Lee's passing, but also affirming what he stood for, and celebrating what he had achieved."

The week of mourning was a prime example of how the Singapore spirit, after 50 years, is no longer undefined and amorphous, but shines with a sense of faith, purpose and togetherness, said PM Lee. And nowhere was this clearer than on the day of Mr Lee's funeral.

"That day, something changed in us," said PM Lee, recalling the thousands of people lining the streets in the pouring rain to witness his cortege pass and how "teardrops and raindrops fell together".

"Our shared moment of sorrow bonded us," PM Lee said. "Now we don't have to struggle to find words to define the Singapore spirit or what being a Singaporean means. Now we know that we are Singaporean."

In the most sentimental moments of the Rally, he described how the Singapore spirit has ignited during times of celebration and sorrow, success and crisis.

It shone as local athletes made Singapore proud at this year's SEA Games, like when sprinter Shanti Pereira won Singapore's first 200m sprint gold in 42 years, or when marathon runner Ashley Liew slowed down to help his competitors find the correct route.

It shone when people came forward to distribute masks to the needy during severe haze in 2013; when people rushed forward to jointly lift a truck pinning a man down; when Singaporeans living in Bangkok contacted the embassy to offer help after a bomb went off last week.

Later in the speech, as PM Lee brought his Rally to a close, he returned again to Mr Lee.

At the National Day Parade (NDP) earlier this month, Mr Lee's chair stood empty, with a sprig of the orchid named for him placed on the seat.

At the parade and especially during the video segment that paid tribute to Mr Lee, "we could sense Mr Lee's spirit with us, and in us", said PM Lee, adding that Mr Lee would have been proud of what he had built, if he had seen the NDP.

"Now he is no longer here with us, we are on our own, but we are ready," said PM Lee.

"Our resolve to defend ourselves is unquestioned. Our spirit and confidence is robust. Our unity and identity as a people has never been stronger."

Two moments from this year's parade were especially memorable for him, PM Lee said.

One was singer Kit Chan's performance of the classic Home, during which the entire crowd sang together so loudly that "we could hear ourselves".

The second moment came after one of the performances, a segment titled "Onwards" featuring primary school pupils.

PM Lee said that he went down to the Padang afterwards to meet the young performers, whose faces "shone with excitement and hope". "I thought to myself, these are the faces of tomorrow's Singapore," he said.

He expressed the hope that at Singapore's centennial - SG100 - they would be back at the Padang, aged about 60 years old.

He hoped they would remember SG50, and congratulate one another on how much they had done, and how far they had come.

And they would be looking at the young, radiant faces of their children and grandchildren - shining with excitement and hope - and singing Majulah Singapura.





Entering post-LKY era stronger and with confidence
By Lydia Lim Associate, Opinion Editor, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

"We are on our own, but we are ready," said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong near the end of his speech, in words that summed up what SG50 has been about - a year of bidding farewell to founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew while, at the same time, taking stock and celebrating the Singapore that exists today.

Those nine words mirror the message the elder Mr Lee had to give a shaken populace during the "moment of anguish" on Aug 9, 1965 - that ready or not, Singapore was out of Malaysia and on its own.

Almost every Singaporean has seen the video clip that shows him breaking down as he mourns the failure of the merger he had worked for all his adult life until that point.

But at that same press conference, Mr Lee Kuan Yew had gone on to assure Singaporeans of all races, in words the Prime Minister reiterated last night in his speech in Malay: "We are going to be a multiracial nation in Singapore. We will set an example. This is not a Malay nation; this is not a Chinese nation; this is not an Indian nation. Everyone will have his place, equal: language, culture, religion."

That was the starting point for a newly independent Singapore 50 years ago. Indeed, that determination to be a multiracial society is one of three factors that have made possible today's Singapore, PM Lee told his audience at ITE College Central

last night. The other two are a culture of self-reliance and mutual support, and a political system in which the Government keeps faith with the people.

Singapore has put words into action, acting decisively to enshrine multiracialism through language, education and housing policies, and through electoral measures such as group representation constituencies to ensure minorities will always be represented in Parliament.

It has created an ethos where if a person works hard, he should do well and if he does, he is expected to help others.

Its Government has a track record of being honest and doing right by the people. In return, Singaporeans "expect the Government to perform, trust the Government to have their interests at heart, support the Government and its decisions, and even in tough times, therefore, we can act decisively together".

In his assessment, Singapore - unlike many other countries - has succeeded in getting it right in all three areas.

That is a contentious claim, to be sure, and, in this current political climate, is sure to draw criticism from some quarters.

But as befits the leader of the political party that has governed Singapore continuously since 1959, PM Lee believes that success in the next 50 years will be as much about continuity as about change. It will rest on applying old principles in new contexts to meet fresh challenges.

Issues involving race and religion, for example, are in some ways more complex and difficult to handle today than 20 years ago because people in many societies, including Singapore, are taking religion more seriously.

More are also exposed and vulnerable to extremist ideologies, he said.

Of course, these three founding principles are inextricably tied to the choices made by the Old Guard ministers and the pioneer generation of Singaporeans who worked with them to build the nation in its early years.

Of the three ministers of that generation who are alive today, only one - Mr Othman Wok - was able to attend last night's Rally, the first since the death of Mr Lee Kuan Yew in March. It was Mr Lee who had delivered the very first National Day Rally speech in August 1966 and made the address an annual event.

So much of Singapore's first half-century has been marked by questions about whether this nation, which the elder Mr Lee led and shaped with such passion and precision, would survive him. Foreign and local critics alike once revelled in predicting doom after he departed the scene or, at the very least, a radical overhaul of its political system.

Last night, PM Lee staked his stand against such doubters and shakers of the status quo.

"Those people who feel daunted and think Singapore's best days are behind us - they are wrong!" he said. On the contrary, Singapore enters the post-Lee Kuan Yew era with confidence and stronger than ever before.

"He is no longer here with us, we are on our own, but we are ready," he said. "Our resolve to defend ourselves is unquestioned. Our spirit and confidence is robust. Our unity and identity as a people has never been stronger".

At the end of his speech, PM Lee recalled what to him were the two highlights of the Golden Jubilee National Day Parade held at the Padang.

The first was when the whole crowd joined Kit Chan in singing the hit national song Home.

The second was when he met the children involved in one of the performances and saw their faces shining with excitement and hope. They are the ones who will be around for SG100 when Singapore marks 100 years of independence, and PM Lee said he hoped "they will be back at the Padang celebrating again, remembering SG50, congratulating each other on how much they have done and how far they have come."

To the Singaporeans alive then, Mr Lee Kuan Yew may be but a distant memory. But if an independent Singapore still exists, one that is multiracial, self-reliant and well governed, they will know him by his legacy.





Not just an SG50 Rally, an election rallying call too
By Chua Mui Hoong Opinion Editor, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

This was billed as an SG50 National Day Rally, an evening of celebration by a nation and the Government that has led it, in a steadfast relationship for 50 years.

It was a rally in the sense of rally as a verb: to get people to come together.

But it was hard not to think of it also as a rally in the sense of a noun: a political event where people get together to support or oppose something. Like, you know, an election rally.

This Rally speech will thus be viewed as both a speech to unify, and one that prepares the ground for an election.

To be sure, there were many unifying moments in this Rally speech. Kit Chan singing the much-loved National Day classic song, Home. The recollection of milestones in the year: founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew's death, aged 91, on March 23 and the week of National Mourning; the Sabah quake that killed seven Singapore students, two teachers and a guide; SEA Games triumphs.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's Malay speech lauded the achievements of two Malay pilots, one a helicopter pilot and the other a fighter jet pilot. The television camera trained on one of them in the audience, beaming with pride. In one short anecdote, he put paid to an old grouse about Malays in sensitive combat positions in the armed forces.

In his English speech, I was moved when PM Lee spoke about dinner with a rabbi, a Muslim leader and a Sikh leader. Each was served a meal according to the dietary restrictions of his faith - but they sat at the same table and shared fellowship.

I loved the photo of the Jubilee twins Charlotte and Colette. And that there were 129 babies born on Aug 9, Singapore's 50th National Day. (If that pace kept up through the year, that would be 47,085 babies born this year, up from the 33,000 born last year.)

It was a moving Rally and PM Lee's energetic delivery, with many photographs to go with his anecdotes, would have engaged the audience watching the live broadcast on television at home.

He framed the story of Singapore's "exhilarating journey" from Third World to First well.

What does SG50 celebrate? First, the resolve to survive. Second, turning vulnerability into strength. Third, staying united as a country, bringing different cultures together, building self-reliance and mutual support, and keeping faith between people and government.

Mr Lee spent more time than usual on the external environment, reminding Singaporeans that the country remains a small city-state in a volatile region in South-east Asia, with neighbours who don't always play nice.

This might have been because it's election season, of course. The People's Action Party knows what its core strengths and appeal lie in: the hard issues of defence, foreign relations, and maintaining law and order. Not even ardent opposition supporters necessarily want these handed over to untested hands.

He also praised two ministers for their work in international diplomacy: Mr Lim Swee Say for his work with the International Labour Organisation and Environment and Water Resources Minister Vivian Balakrishnan for his influence in a recent United Nations Climate Change Conference.

Subtext: Singapore needs quality ministers who can defend Singapore's interests and keep the flag flying high overseas. Only the PAP has such talent, and they deserve your support.

Perhaps mindful of the need to shore up support from its traditional base of older voters, to balance the influx of young voters, Mr Lee thanked the pioneer generation several times for their efforts in building a nation.

He also tried to soothe an old hurt - those who had lost their homes or land when the Government used the Land Acquisition Act to buy over land at below-market rates after Independence.

He acknowledged their financial and other loss, explained the moves were necessary so Singapore could house its population and thanked them for their sacrifice for the common good.

Subtext: We appreciate you, seniors, all of you. You sacrificed for the nation and we are grateful.

PM Lee also recounted promises he had made and fulfilled and ticked them off one by one, in the areas of housing; increased social support; education; and a transformed cityscape including Marina Bay. He told Singaporeans:

"We did this together! We had a vision, we believed in it, and together, we realised our dreams. In the last 10 years we built on what we inherited. We put brick on brick, we climbed step by step, we kept Singapore special, delivered results for Singaporeans."

He then switched to election rallying mode, and appealed to the nation to give him the mandate to bring in a new team of leaders.

Singapore was at a turning point and the coming election is critical, he said. "You will be deciding who's governing Singapore for the next five years; but much more than that, you will be choosing the team who will be working with you for the next 15-20 years. You will be setting the direction for Singapore for the next 50 years.

"If you are proud of what we have achieved together, if you support... the future that we are building, then please support me, please support my team, because my team and I cannot do anything just by ourselves.

"We have to do it with you in order to do it for you... so that we can keep Singapore special for many years to come, another 50 years."

The Rally will disappoint those hoping for election-season handouts. An extra week of paternity leave, a more generous Baby Bonus and housing grants, and a rise in income cap for subsidised housing, will be welcomed by many. But there was no mass handout like the Progress Package of yore, when the Government gave up to $800 per citizen close to election time.

Having prepared for this election since the last one ended, the Government has little need for last-minute handouts or sudden overhaul of policies.

Just an appeal to the good sense of voters: Judge us by what we have done and are doing and want to do. And vote in a team that can lead the nation into the next decades.

If that sounded like a speech on the eve of an election, perhaps it was. In 1991, Mr Goh Chok Tong delivered his first Rally speech as PM on Aug 11. Parliament was dissolved on Aug 14, and polls set for Aug 31.

This time round again, it might be a mere matter of days before the writ of election is issued, and the General Election (GE) is called. If so, then the SG50 Rally will become the first GE2015 rally.





Kit Chan sings Home in tribute to Mr Lee
By Goh Yan Han, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Kit Chan paid tribute to the late founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew at the National Day Rally last night, as she became the first local singer to perform at the annual address.

Chan, 42, sang Home - the song she has become synonymous with - just before the start of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's English speech.



In brief remarks before her performance, she said she was happy to have been involved in the nation's Golden Jubilee celebrations, and added she was thankful for the opportunity to do something she had not been able to do in the earlier part of the year.

Referring to the death of Mr Lee Kuan Yew in March, she said it "left all of us (Singaporeans) quite shocked and bereaved".

"As a singer, I felt compelled to pay a tribute to the late Mr Lee, through something I do best, which is through a song."

She said: "I hope that we can all continue to sing this song for many years to come and that it will always serve to remind us that no matter what our differences, we'll always be united by the fact that we call Singapore our home."


Reactions to National Day Rally 2015

$
0
0
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's National Day Rally 2015 Speech - English, Malay, Mandarin


PM's Rally speech about more than just elections
MPs and political watchers polled say his pitch to voters was restrained
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

It was billed as an SG50 rally, to take stock of how far the country had come as well as where it might be heading.

But coming in the midst of much talk of an impending general election, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's speech on the Government's achievements and plans for Singapore also struck some as being a clear pitch to the voters for their support at the polls.

Political watchers interviewed yesterday, however, noted that PM Lee had taken pains to do it with some finesse.

They lauded Mr Lee for the restraint he showed in his speech on Sunday. Though he asked Singaporeans to "support (his) team", he did not use words like "vote" or "People's Action Party", they said.

MPs like Mr Hri Kumar Nair did not think the Prime Minister was engaging in electioneering.

Pointing to the policy changes announced at the Rally, such as enhanced measures to encourage parenthood and raising the re-employment age, the MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC said these have been raised in Parliament many times.

"The problem is that people think that anything announced before an election is for an election. But you must measure the Government's track record, and not just what it does three or six months before the general election,'' he said.

Mr Lee said at the Rally that elections would be called "soon''.

Other MPs argued that it was inevitable to recall the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew's legacy as it was the first Rally without him. PM Lee had evoked the memory of the late Mr Lee in his Malay, Mandarin and English speeches. While the week of national mourning in March had an impact on many, law don Eugene Tan said the references could be seen as trying to gain political mileage; similarly, in giving "due recognition to the pioneers, who've been a traditional vote bank for the PAP".

But Tampines GRC MP Baey Yam Keng said it would have been strange to omit the late Mr Lee from the speech, as he was instrumental in building the country's successes in the last 50 years.

"The party knows that there would be a backlash if it was seen to be exploiting his death. But the late Mr Lee was and is a symbol of the PAP and Singapore; even if there wasn't an election this year, I'm sure he would have been mentioned," Mr Baey said.

PM Lee had also urged Singaporeans to "be alive" to their external environment, or risk the country's survival. Ongoing troubles in Malaysia and Indonesia could affect the country, he said. It was a topic he had "spoken too little" about in recent rallies because of the focus on domestic affairs, he added.

As the PAP tends to do better at the polls in times of economic uncertainty, some had accused PM Lee of scare-mongering.

No, said Chua Chu Kang GRC MP Zaqy Mohamad: "What Mr Lee mentioned were facts and market realities. Perhaps, recent developments caused him to speak up: The last few months has seen an acceleration of developments in our neighbours, like the ringgit dropping."

Institute of Policy Studies senior research fellow Gillian Koh said the PAP can have its cake and eat it: "They can introduce measures that address long-term concerns, but which also have the right political signature, especially just before an election." For example, a new scheme to help second-timer rental households buy a flat will address the opposition's criticism that Singapore is not an egalitarian society, she noted .

Dr Koh also said the Rally could have taken a more partisan tone.

"PM Lee could have attacked the Workers' Party (WP) by talking about clean governance and being corruption-free, but he didn't," she said, referring to the ongoing spat between the WP's town council and the Government.

Rather, his electioneering was fairly subtle, in noting the diplomacy skills of Environment and Water Resources Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say, she said.

"The subtext is: Let's not lose another minister."

People who watched the Rally on TV or read about it told The Straits Times they saw PM Lee's speech more as an update on where the country stood at this juncture than an election appeal.

Said business development executive Jerr Lim, 46: "It was a summary update of what was done during Mr Lee Kuan Yew's era, and how PM Lee wants to continue that legacy."

He was among 20 people interviewed who welcomed the housing and parenthood measures. But more can be done, they added .

Still, some like financial adviser Melissa Tan, 29, found other aspects of the Rally moving, especially when Kit Chan sang Home.

"I was at the National Day Parade and I feel that Singaporeans have found an identity with the passing of Mr Lee Kuan Yew," she said.

The part of PM's message that resonated with teacher Noryn Abdul Wahab, 44, was: Singaporeans need to continually improve for the country to stay ahead.

Additional reporting by Lydia Lam














Good news for older workers
By Toh Yong Chuan, Manpower Correspondent, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

Within two years, older workers who want to keep working after turning 65 will be able to do so.

By 2017, the Government will update the law to raise the re-employment age from the current 65 to 67. After the higher age ceiling kicks in, bosses must rehire healthy workers who have performed satisfactorily until they reach age 67, or give them a one-off payment.

The move fulfils a target that the Government set 22 years ago. From as far back as 1993, the Government had made it clear that it wanted Singaporeans to be able to work until 67. Then Labour Minister Lee Boon Yang said in Parliament that the plan was to raise the retirement age to 67 within seven to 10 years, or 2003.

This target would be missed by more than a decade. But there are some reasons for this.

The issue of hiring older workers has always been a contentious one between workers and employers. While workers want to keep working, employers naturally worry about the higher costs and lower productivity associated with an older workforce.

The re-employment age was set at 65 less than four years ago, in January 2012. Raising it too fast risks firms not being able to cope with the change. If pushed too hard, they may even stop hiring workers in their late 50s altogether, for fear of having to continue hiring them in their 60s.

While the re-employment age is set to increase to 67 by 2017, the retirement age remains at 62.

Re-employment after retirement is a relatively new concept. What it means is that workers turning 62 have the choice of retiring or to continue working until the re-employment age ceiling.

Put another way: No company can force its workers to stop working when they turn 62, or fire those who do not want to retire. At the very least, employers have to give them one-off payments if they cannot offer them re-employment contracts.

Older workers have reason to cheer.





Opposition takes aim at 'election speech'
By Walter Sim, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

Opposition leaders hit out at Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's National Day Rally as an election speech, even as they welcomed some of the initiatives he outlined on Sunday.

The sole opposition MP who attended the rally, Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) Lina Chiam of the Singapore People's Party (SPP), said Mr Lee had raised many issues.

"He was also campaigning for his party in his speech, dishing out more goodies to Singaporeans. In a way, it seems to be an election speech," she said.

Mr Lee had announced measures for Housing Board home buyers as well as parents and, towards the end of his speech, said: "Soon, I will be calling elections to ask for your mandate to take Singapore into this next phase of our nation-building. And this election will be critical."

Workers' Party (WP) MPs did not attend the rally, citing a clash with a party National Day dinner, and did not reply to requests for comment.

But WP NCMP Yee Jenn Jong, in a Facebook post, welcomed the announcement of a centralised campus for the Singapore Institute of Technology. "Look forward to SIT playing a key role in the development of our local talents," he wrote.

Mrs Chiam's SPP and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) also praised parts of Mr Lee's speech for addressing pressing challenges.

Mrs Chiam supported PM Lee's announcement on raising the re-employment age from 65 to 67 by 2017. She also agreed with his call for Singaporeans to be aware of their external environment.

"We have destabilising forces around the region," she said, echoing Mr Lee's remarks that developments in neighbouring countries and the wider region could affect Singapore.

"Yes, I get it that MRT breakdowns are frustrating. But I hope we can work with the next group of leaders, PAP or otherwise, to tackle long-term issues," she said.

Meanwhile, DPP chief Benjamin Pwee commended PM Lee for taking steps such as raising paternal leave from one week to two weeks, and supporting madrasahs, or Islamic religious schools, to strengthen the teaching of secular subjects such as mathematics and science.

"We also affirm PM's mention of LKY's historic remarks on equality for all, and call on the PAP Government to provide equal opportunities and equal benefits to all Singaporeans, regardless of race, language, culture or religion," he said, using the popular acronym for first Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew .

But the SPP and other parties aimed the bulk of their reactions to the rally speech at PM Lee's comments on immigration and foreigners, which several party leaders said had strained infrastructure in transport and healthcare, and hurt the social fabric.

Mrs Chiam acknowledged the need to balance many competing forces in developing population policy, and agreed with PM Lee that, for example, Singaporean workers want less competition from foreigners while companies want foreign worker quotas to be relaxed.

She added that while she wants to put Singaporeans first in policies, the skill sets and productivity of local workers have to be improved.

And in order to deal with transport matters in the wake of capacity issues and train breakdowns, Mrs Chiam suggested that the "critical" role of transport minister - which Mr Lui Tuck Yew will relinquish when the new Cabinet is formed - be assumed by the prime minister or a deputy prime minister.

She also touched on leadership renewal, saying the SPP was focused "on building a strong pipeline of talent" but would not "push these talented individuals out prematurely".

Leaders of four other parties said the speech could have placed greater focus on challenges such as population and immigration policy, areas they will likely focus on during their election campaigns.

The Singapore Democratic Alliance cited the top-end forecast of the Population White Paper put out by the Government in 2013 to discuss a sustainable population with a strong core, and asked: "Will we still be truly Singapore at 6.9 (million)?"

People's Power Party chief Goh Meng Seng focused on immigration, saying the issue of population growth had "reached a dangerous social boiling point".

Reform Party chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam said PM Lee's comments on the external environment and call for greater resilience were hints of failed domestic policies.

Singaporeans First secretary-general Tan Jee Say said the updated policy measures "just scratch the surface" on providing a strong safety net for Singaporeans, and added: "It's more of the same."





What the PM did not talk about: The economy
By Devadas Krishnadas, Published The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong talked of a great many things during his National Day Rally speech. What he did not talk - much - about was the economy.

However, the economy is the bedrock on which all grand plans to finance increased spending on social programmes and public infrastructure rest. It is important that this be understood and accepted by Singaporeans. Equally, they should confront the brute reality that Singapore's economy does not exist in a vacuum. Ours is a contingent economy dependent both on how the large economies perform and on how relevant we can make ourselves to them.

Seven years out from the Great Financial Crisis, and the global economy is still in a slow growth mode and slowing further.

Europe is in political and economic disarray. Japan is getting ever deeper into debt and the expensive gamble of Abenomics seems increasingly unlikely to pay off.

The United States, though much improved since its nadir in 2009, cannot seem to break out from its marginal growth curve.

China - the great emergent market hope - has equity markets quivering with fears of a structural slowdown while its Bric companions - Brazil, Russia and India - have all lost much of their lustre.

These phenomena have a marked impact on the performance of the Singapore economy. The initial gross domestic product forecast for this year had been 2 to 4 per cent growth. This would have been respectable. However, the Ministry of Trade and Industry has since revised that projection to just 2 to 2.5 per cent.

Further, the Singapore economy is showing increasing signs of entering a technical recession - this is when there are two successive quarters of contraction. The knock-on effects on employment, wage growth and consumption factors should not take long to make themselves felt.

Singapore's Consumer Price Index (CPI) - the measure for inflation - is forecast to decline 0.21 point from now until the first half of next year. This moderation in the CPI is small comfort.

It is likely an indicator of falling underlying demand as well as downward price corrections in the property and car purchase markets, both of which are due in part to government policy - the cooling measures and expanded quota for Certificates of Entitlement respectively.

We need to confront the reality that the Singapore economy is sailing into headwinds that are strengthening and probably enduring.

The fall in the price of oil to just US$40 (S$56) a barrel reflects long-term market sentiment that demand is weak and will stay that way for some time.

The sustained contraction in our manufacturing sector should inject doubt over its viability in the longer term.

While financial services remain a source of strength, the barriers to entry in employment are high and only a small number of Singaporeans can expect to make a career in this highly competitive industry.

What does this mean?

Singapore businesses need to seek out non-traditional sources of growth. We need to adventure to frontier markets such as East Africa. Economies such as Rwanda, Uganda, Kenya in West Africa and Angola in the south of the continent are growing fast. There are political, policy and infrastructure risks in all these economies. However, gone are the days when Singapore companies can expect an easy flow of business. They can also no longer expect to make reasonable returns by accessing "comfortable" advanced economies since these are all experiencing marginal growth, if any at all. It is time for us to saddle up for the new frontiers of growth and be prepared to deal with the uncertainties as part of the price of chasing growth.

Singaporean workers need to be prepared to support that spirit of economic adventure. They need to be willing to relocate and work in various parts of the world - not all of these being convenient choices. But if our companies cannot rely on Singaporeans to support expansion, then Singaporeans should not be surprised if foreigners step in to do so.

In the longer term, though, Singaporeans need to be prepared for lower growth coupled with higher volatility as the norm. This means reduced job security and greater pressure to up- or re-skill to meet changing market demands. This is neither caused by the Government nor the result of foreign labour input. It is a simple fact of the nature of the global economy. We need to stop blaming others and start owning our own economic destiny.

The writer is chief executive officer of Future-Moves Group.




Reflecting on Singapore's place in the world, post-National Day Rally.
Posted by Inconvenient Questions on Tuesday, August 25, 2015





The old age-productivity gap is a myth
By Kanwaljit Soin, Published The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

When I was a Nominated Member of Parliament about 20 years ago, there was a lot of discussion in Parliament about increasing the retirement age to 67 within the following few years. However, it has taken more than two decades for this fact to become a reality: Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced on Sunday that the re-employment age will be raised to 67, with the law to be updated by 2017.

One reason for the delay is that many employers and organisations are reluctant to hire older workers because of the increasing gap between pay and productivity - wages increase with age, while productivity does not keep pace.

However, there is conflicting evidence for this. Academics Jan C. van Ours and Lenny Stoeldraijer from the Institute for the Study of Labour in Bonn, Germany, published a paper in 2010 which found little evidence of this gap.

The paper also found that older workers are thought to be more reliable and have better skills than average workers, although they also incur higher healthcare costs, are less flexible in accepting new assignments and may be less suitable for training.

Professor Axel Boersch-Supan from the Munich Centre for the Economics of Ageing debunks the myth that older workers are not as productive as younger ones. He says that based on 1.2 million observations, age and experience beat youth and inexperience.

He urged countries with an ageing population to "exploit unused labour capacity" as the top priority if they want to see continued economic growth. According to him, health decline is very slow between the ages of 60 and 69, "so there is no age penalty for productivity in changing the retirement age from 65 to 67".

A 2014 paper published in the Journal Of Gerontology by Lowsky D. J., Olshansky S. J., Bhattacharya J. and Goldman D. P. found that 85 per cent of Americans aged 65 to 69 report no health-based limitations on paid work or housework. Similar trends are evident in other parts of the developed world.

Thus, it is possible and feasible for older workers to extend their working lives. This proposal often meets with resistance from society and policymakers because of ageism and misconceptions about old age. However, the benefits of continuing to work in old age are immense both for the individual and society.

Some studies of healthy ageing suggest that older adults who are engaged in paid or unpaid work have lower mortality rates, are less likely to experience various physical and mental illnesses, and are more likely to have a strong sense of identity and well-being. There are also protective effects against cognitive decline.

For many people, retirement at 65 is not economically feasible. In the words of Stanford economist John Shoven, "the reality is that few workers can fund a 30-year retirement with a 40-year career". Societies can also ill afford to finance longer and longer retirements.

There are changes in the ageing brain that make it ideal for work in creative areas. We, therefore, should be promoting not retirement but transition at age 65 when older people can express themselves in a creative domain for the betterment of themselves and of society.

Thus policymakers and societies should consider raising the retirement age (except for manual workers with physically demanding jobs) or abolish it altogether.

Older people should be given the option of working part-time or retraining for other types of work, including participation in the creative domain.

In societies of longer lives, work life can be made longer only if the work that is done is bearable and hopefully meaningful for the worker. Some changes that will help to prolong work life and manage age diversity at the workplace are:
- Develop suitable vocational training paths, especially for those over 40. Lifelong learning has to be the norm for all. The SkillsFuture initiative introduced in Singapore recently should address this need.
- Offer occupational prospects and mobility to all age groups, based on age diversity. Have more horizontal mobility to let people move horizontally within roles, without having to move up or down hierarchies, so that different generations can work together.
- Improve workplace safety and health and well-being, leading to a longer and sustainable worklife.
- Recognise the value of experience and human capital to the organisation and organise the transfer of skills between generations.
Policymakers, employers, unions and society need a paradigm shift in attitudes towards age and wage earners. A life course perspective to work, employment, training and welfare is essential to build a society for all ages.

The writer is a former Nominated Member of Parliament and a former president of Women's Initiative for Ageing Successfully (WINGS). She is 73.




PM Lee Hsien Loong spoke on hot-button issues during his National Day Rally, such as housing, population and education. Three IPS researchers give their take on what PM Lee's speech meant to them.
Posted by IPS Commons on Monday, August 24, 2015













NDR 2015: Exhilarating journey from Third World to First

$
0
0
Excerpts from Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's National Day Rally speech on Sunday evening. He stresses the core principles that held the nation together in the last 50 years and highlights what's needed for the next 50 years.
The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015



Two weeks ago, on the 9th of August, we celebrated our Golden Jubilee with a parade at the Padang. For everyone who took part at the Padang, at the Floating Platform, around the Bay, watching at home or overseas, that night was something special to remember. It was not just a birthday bash, we were celebrating something far greater.

First of all, we celebrated our resolve to defend ourselves and to survive over the last 50 years. We started out at Independence with only two infantry battalions in a rough neighbourhood. But our pioneers were determined to defend ourselves - we built up the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF). Within four years, we paraded a few of our units on National Day in 1969. Overhead, we had one Hunter aircraft and one Alouette helicopter flying the Singapore flag. In the mobile column, we had 18 AMX-13 tanks, which were appearing in public for the first time and Major Goh Lye Choon was a second-in-command. Singaporeans cheered, everyone understood what it meant and it was not just Singaporeans who took note.

Fifty years later, our pioneer servicemen kicked off the SG50 vintage Parade.

Above us, instead of one Hunter fighter, we had 20 F-16s, flying across the Padang forming the number 50. A Chinook helicopter flew the flag, escorted by two Apaches and Colonel Goh Lye Choon, now retired, was once against the second-in-command of the mobile column, this time on a Leopard tank. That is him.

Behind Lye Choon, 178 vehicles rolled past the City Hall steps. Tanks, artillery, AA missile launchers, special ops vehicles, Hazmat vehicles and completing the mobile column we had nine vehicles carrying nine families.

They were the pioneers who had served in the SAF and the Home Team and they were on parade with their children who are presently serving and, in two cases, with their grandchildren too.

Secondly, on National Day, we celebrated how we had turned vulnerability into strength. We started off with no hinterland and a weak economy. We depended on our entrepot trade, but our neighbours were building their own ports and sought to bypass us. Our workers were unskilled and anxious about their future but we determined to make the world our hinterland. And the tripartite partners worked together, worked hard to create the best workforce in the world. The Government, the employers and the unions, we worked together. Business Environment Risk Intelligence (Beri) every year ranked us No. 1 in the world. And with that workforce, we made PSA and Changi the best in the world.

We were a poor Third World country; people lived in cramped and squalid slums, no modern sanitation, no utilities, but we built HDB flats to house all of us and made Singapore a First World metropolis and our beautiful home.

Nearly all our water came from Johor and every now and again, when an issue arose with Malaysia, some crazy politicians would threaten to turn off the tap, to get us in line - but we did not die of thirst. We cleaned up our rivers, we dammed them up to become reservoirs, we built Marina Barrage and turned Marina Bay into Marina Reservoir. Our whole island became a catchment area. We invented Newater and on National Day 2002, we toasted our success, "Huat Ah!"

Thirdly, we celebrated our journey from Third World to First as one united people. When we separated from Malaysia, we were not yet one people, memories of the race riots were fresh and raw. The minorities were uncertain of their place in the new country. They saw what had happened in Malaysia, they wondered, will the new Singapore Government keep its promise of a multiracial society? But 50 years on, we celebrate as one united people. On National Day, when the siren sounded, we stood and recited the Pledge together - regardless of race, language or religion. We sang Majulah Singapura.

WHAT GOT US TO SG50

What an exhilarating journey these 50 years have been. How did we get here? I will put it down to three factors. Firstly, we determined to be a multiracial society. Secondly, we created a culture, a culture of self-reliance and also mutual support. And thirdly, we kept faith between the Government and the people.



Multiracialism

First of all, multiracialism. We separated from Malaysia because we believed in this ideal of a multiracial society. We believed that before race, language and religion, we should first and foremost be Singaporean. That was the fundamental reason for our foundation as a country. So we came down hard on chauvinists and racial extremists. We built HDB estates where all the different races lived and mingled together. There are no segregated ghettos in Singapore. We made English our working language and gradually all our schools shifted to teaching in English. We created group representation constituencies (GRCs) so that minorities would always be represented in Parliament and, this way, we encouraged all the communities to come together and yet gave each community space to maintain their own cultures and their own ways of life. When delicate and awkward issues arose, we dealt with them together.

For example, when we discovered the Jemaah Islamiah group planning to set off suicide bombs in Singapore after 9/11, we handled it as one people; we did not divide into Muslims and non-Muslims.

At the same time, we made the effort to bring everybody together and to ensure that every community could hold its own and not be left behind. So we set up self-help groups, the communities did, starting with the Council for the Development of Singapore Malay/Muslim Community (Mendaki), later the Singapore Indian Development Association (Sinda), then Chinese Development Assistance Council (CDAC) and the Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP) and the Eurasian Association. The Government supported them and so we progressed together.

Therefore, for SG50, every community in Singapore is celebrating because every community has progressed with the nation. And each group is celebrating with the other groups because we are one united people.

I have attended many SG50 celebrations this year, a Catholic Jubilee Mass at the Indoor Stadium, the SG50 Kita National Day Observance Ceremony here in this campus, led by the Malay/Muslim organisations but with other groups participating, a Buddhist celebration at the Indoor Stadium, a Protestant prayer event at the National Stadium, a joint concert organised by the Taoist Federation, the New Creation Church and others at the Star Performing Arts Centre.

Here you see one of the items - a Chinese gongfu group performing with the silat group. One function.

At one dinner, I had sitting around my table representatives of all the world's major religions and I posted the picture on Facebook. It showed the Rabbi of Singapore together with the Mufti of Singapore and Mr Gurmit Singh, a Sikh leader who was then chairing the IRO, the Inter-Religious Organisation. Each had different dietary rules, each was served food that met his religious requirements, but nothing stopped them from having a meal together and being friends together. In fact, they took a selfie together, which I also posted on Facebook.

Only in Singapore!

Some people may think that racial and religious harmony is not a problem any more and that I am making too much about this. But they would be wrong. Race and religion are always sensitive matters, especially for us, and, in some ways, today, more complex and difficult to handle than 20 years ago, because religiosity has gone up.

Many societies, people are taking their religion more seriously, happens in developed countries like US, Britain, Australia, Germany where you see racial and religious tensions. Happens in Singapore too, not tensions but people taking religion more seriously and everywhere people exposed and vulnerable to extremist ideologies, like the jihadist ideology of ISIS. We are a multiracial and multi-religious society and we are always at risk of deep fault lines opening up and we must never take our present happy state of affairs for granted.

Self-reliance and mutual support

The second factor of our success, after multiracialism, is our culture of self-reliance and mutual support. We knew right from the start that to strike out and blaze a path on our own, everyone had to pull their weight and be counted, we could not afford free-riders and that is why Mr Lee Kuan Yew exhorted us over and over again to become a rugged society.

We do not use that term quite so often any more, but our people must still be robust and tough, be able to take hard knocks, always striving to be better. No one owes us a living and we have to make our own way forward in the world. But a rugged society does not mean every man for himself. We are strong even though we are small because we are strong together. The ethos of our society is clear: If you work hard, you should do well and that is good for you and we should cheer you and celebrate it, but, at the same time, if you do well, we expect you to help others and everyone has to work together so that we succeed as one Team Singapore.

We have got to inculcate this ethos in our young people too. And that is why we encourage our children to play sports to experience losing and winning together. That is why we send them on adventure learning and character education.

To OBS, Outward Bound Singapore in Pulau Ubin, and also on overseas expeditions, so that they can toughen themselves up and learn to work with one another as a team. When I was in Secondary 4, my principal sent me to OBS - the experience made a deep impression on me.

Nowadays, students have many more opportunities to go for adventure learning, here and also abroad. Tanjong Katong Primary School (TKPS) had a very successful programme, the Omega Challenge. It has been going on for seven years; the students who have been, have testified to how much they benefited from it. Tragically, on their recent expedition to climb Mount Kinabalu, the Omega Challenge group was caught in an earthquake. Seven students, two teachers and a guide died. We all mourned them and grieved with their families, we held a National Day of Remembrance. It will take us a long time to get over this tragedy but life goes on and it is important that we move on. And I know that the other TKPS students and teachers who were on this trip are courageously doing so. We have to go on with the adventure training, we will take the necessary safety precautions but we must keep pushing our limits to bring up a generation who will grow up tough and able to work closely together.

Trust and good government

The third factor for our success is that we have kept faith between the Government and the people. We have built up this bond between the Government and the people over the past 50 years. The Government has kept its promises, what we said we would do, we did do. We have kept our politics honest, we insisted on high standards of integrity in public life, no corruption, no dishonesty. We are also honest when it comes to policies and when it comes to the choices that we have to make. We do not shy away from hard realities, we do not sugar-coat difficult issues. We do right by Singaporeans. In turn, our people expect the Government to perform, trust the Government to have their interests at heart and support the Government and its decisions to work for the common good. And even in tough times, we can act decisively together.

It was like this with our pioneer generation, for example, on the issue of land acquisition. The Government needed land to build HDB new towns around the island to house our people. To build industrial estates like Jurong to create jobs for our people. Later on to build the MRT network to move people around. So the Government passed laws to acquire land not at the market price, without paying market prices. It was tough for the landowners who suffered financial losses, sometimes more than once. It was tough for the households who had to be resettled, lives were disrupted, thousands, maybe tens of thousands, had to change their livelihoods. But if the Government had not done this, we could not have housed our population and we could not have transformed Singapore, so there were sacrifices but, in the end, it was for the common goal and everybody benefited and I thank all those who sacrificed for this common goal.

Even in recent times, we had to do tough things together. During Sars in 2003, we passed laws urgently on a certificate of urgency to quarantine people at home, to prevent community spread and we will ring you up and ask you to turn up on your camera to show that you are still there. Singaporeans understood this was necessary and they accepted it. Recently, South Korea had a serious outbreak of Mers but they had problems quarantining people. It was not so easy for them to get people to cooperate. There was one case, where a person was missing from her home, they knocked on the door, no answer, telephone no answer, tracked her down via her handphone. She was several hundred kilometres away, playing golf. You can pass the laws but people have to cooperate.

From time to time, new tough issues will come up and we will need your support to deal with them. One tough issue which we already have and which will be with us for a long time to come is immigration and foreigners.

It is a very sensitive matter, not an easy thing to talk about, even at the National Day Rally and Singaporeans understandably have strong views about it. The Government has heard them, we have adjusted our policies, upgraded our infrastructure, slowed down the inflow of foreign workers, tightened up on permanent resident (PR) and citizenship applications, made sure that Singaporeans are fairly treated at work.

But on foreigners and immigration, there are no easy choices. Every option has a cost, has a downside. If we close our doors to foreign workers, our economy will tank. Companies would not have enough workers. Some will close down and our own people working in these companies will lose their jobs. Also we need foreign workers to build our homes and schools, to meet our daily needs, we need foreign domestic help. So we cannot close our doors completely.

On the other hand, if we let in too many foreign workers, our society will come undone. Singaporeans will be crowded out, workplaces will feel foreign, our identity will be diluted and we just cannot digest huge numbers. Therefore, we have got to find something in between, make a right trade-off but, even in between, there is a cost and there is a price and there is a pain.

Companies will still find their costs going up, they will have to pass some of these costs on to consumers. Things would not be as cheap. Companies will have to pass up opportunities too. When they can see the opportunities but cannot get the workers, many companies will not be able to expand. And yet because some foreign workers will still be coming in, there will be Singaporeans who will feel that Singapore is changing too fast and will resent having to compete with non-Singaporeans. Whichever option we choose, it will involve some pain.

But I believe that I am doing what Singapore needs and what best safeguards your interest. If I did not believe that, I would not be doing it. It is my responsibility to make this decision, to make this judgment and then to act on your behalf. And having acted on your behalf, to account to you for the results and for the reasons why I decided the way I did. I think I owe it to you. You have elected me. This is my duty, I cannot shirk it.

CHALLENGES AT SG50

These principles have brought us here - multiracialism, self-reliance and mutual support, keeping faith between the Government and people. These principles have made us special. They are not so easy to do. Easy to say, not so easy to do. Very few countries have got this right but, by and large, we have got it right.

And Singapore has to stay special because if we are just a dull little spot on the map, a smudge, we are going to count for nothing. We have to be a shining red dot. If we are soft and flabby, we are going to be eaten up. We have to be rugged and we have to have that steel in us. If we are divided, whether along racial lines or class lines, we cannot survive. We have to stand as one united people, we have to progress together.





SG100 needs a nation of lion-hearted leaders and citizens

For Singapore to continue to do well, we must have that resolve to defend this land. We must have that will to make Singapore endure and to prevail and we must stand as one united people, regardless of race, language or religion.

After 50 years, this faith, this sense of togetherness and purpose is stronger than before. The Singapore spirit ignites when we celebrate our successes together. When our athletes made us proud at the SEA Games, like Shanti Pereira who won our first sprint gold in 42 years, or Ashley Liew, the marathon runner. After the other runners took a wrong turn, he slowed down and waited for them to catch up and showed sportsmanship and class.

The Singapore spirit shines when we help one another in times of need. When we were beset by severe haze in 2013, many people came forward to distribute masks and help the less abled. When a man was run over by a truck recently, people rushed forward to push the truck, lift it up and help the man out. After a bomb exploded in Bangkok last week, Singaporeans living in Bangkok contacted the embassy to offer help.

Our spirit shone brightest when Mr Lee Kuan Yew passed away.

Hundreds of thousands lined up, day and night, to pay their respects at Parliament House and at many community tribute sites. Mr Lee's passing brought out so much in us. People queued patiently, they let children and seniors through, businesses provided free chairs and refreshments to those queueing up, volunteers helped out, distributing umbrellas, food, drinks, and when the gun carriage carried Mr Lee on his final journey from Parliament House to the University Cultural Centre, tens of thousands lined the streets and then it started to rain. What do we do? Everyone stayed put. It was like the 1968 National Day Parade when it poured on the Parade after it had formed up.

The funeral procession started on time into the pouring rain. I was deeply moved to see the crowds stand their ground paying their last respects to Mr Lee. Teardrops and raindrops fell together. For all of us, this was a historic moment shared as one Singapore family.

We were mourning Mr Lee's passing but also affirming what he stood for and celebrating what he had achieved. That day, something changed in us. Our shared moment of sorrow bonded us. Now we do not have to struggle to find words to define the Singapore spirit or to say what being Singaporean is. Now we know that we are Singaporean.

TEAM SINGAPORE

Fifty years ago, our challenges seemed insurmountable. As a small country, we could easily have flickered and faded into the darkness of history. But our pioneers were made of stern stuff, they were galvanised. Many born elsewhere but decided to make Singapore their home and their lifelong passion. They dug in their heels and built a nation together.

Fifty years on, our challenges are still formidable but they are far from insurmountable. Those people who feel daunted and think Singapore's best days are behind us, they are wrong.

Our best days will always be ahead of us, provided we continue to have a strong team, a team of lions and the lion-hearted, leaders and the people.

We have had such a good team so far, started with Mr Lee Kuan Yew and his colleagues, together with the pioneer generation, who built Singapore and made sure that Singapore would thrive beyond them. They handed over to Mr Goh Chok Tong and the second generation of Singaporeans 25 years ago now.

Our generation inherited Singapore from them and, together, we took Singapore further forward to reach SG50.



A NEW CHAPTER

In the last 10 years, we have written perhaps, another chapter of the Singapore story. If you have been following my National Day Rallies, you will know what we have done together.

We said we would build more beautiful homes that Singaporeans could afford, and we did.

This is Punggol 21. This is the view from Dawson, I think it is taken from the air terrace, I went up to take a look, the city rejuvenated. We have continued the kampung spirit. During Ramadan, neighbours break fast together along HDB corridors. All over the island, volunteers have beautified our shared spaces with Communities in Bloom.

We said we would strengthen our safety nets, and we did.

We introduced Workfare, Silver Support, ComCare, we built new hospitals - Ng Teng Fong Hospital has opened since my last Rally. Community hospitals have also opened, this is Ren Ci, and Yishun Community Hospital will soon be ready.

We have made healthcare more accessible and affordable. We have CHAS (Community Health Assist Scheme) the blue card and the orange card. And we have the PG (pioneer generation) card. With MediShield Life, Singaporeans have lifelong healthcare coverage. We helped each other too, going door-to-door delivering milk powder and food to needy families. Seniors have kept active, exercising to stay fit and healthy as they age.

We said we would create more pathways for children to chase rainbows, and we did.

We built NorthLight and Assumption Pathway for students who failed their PSLE, because we believe in our young and we will never give up on them. We built the School of the Arts, the Sports School, the School of Science and Technology to cater to varied talents. We built first-class campuses for our ITE colleges, including ITE College Central, where we are now. We built new universities, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT), UniSIM.

If they were not first-class institutions, Chen Long (Jackie Chan) would not have given us these beautiful old Chinese buildings to be part of SUTD. But, we are special and we will keep it so.

We said that we would transform our city, and we did.

Changi Airport is upgrading, Project Jewel, T4 and T5 are coming up. The Gardens by the Bay are an iconic and popular attraction. We have beautiful park connectors and ABC waterways, like Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park. I took Prime Minister Tony Abbott there, the Australian PM, to show him how Singaporeans live and the natural environment that we all enjoy. I think it is worth showing off Bishan- Ang Mo Kio Park. Our volunteers have been active too, preserving nature and heritage on Pulau Ubin, keeping our rivers clean.

We said we would transform Marina Bay, and we did.

This was Marina Bay in 2005 with Marina South still empty land and at my Rally that year, I promised you that by our Jubilee year, Marina Bay would be special and this is Marina Bay today. We did this together. We had a vision, we believed in it and, together, we realised our dreams.

In the last 10 years, we built on what we inherited. We put brick on brick, we climbed step by step, we kept Singapore special, delivered results for Singaporeans.

How did we do that? Mr Lee and his team planned beyond their terms, beyond their lifetimes. They nurtured the next generation of leaders and the next generation of Singaporeans. They taught their successors to do the same and this is what my team and I have sought to do for the last 10 years.

We have served you to the best of our ability, you have got to know us well, we have walked this SG50 journey together with you.

My team and I take very seriously our responsibility to make sure that Singapore lasts beyond us. My core team are already in our late 50s and 60s. We will not be around forever and we must have the next team ready in the wings.

The nucleus is there - brought in at the last elections and earlier. They have taken charge of important programmes like Our Singapore Conversation, like SG50 as well as different ministries, including difficult ones.

They have connected with Singaporeans young and old and participated fully in the major decisions which we have made. But we need to reinforce them, to round out the team to give Singapore the best possible chance of succeeding into the future. And that is what I need to do in the next election.

Singapore is at a turning point.

We have just completed 50 successful years. Now we are starting out on our next 50 years of nationhood.

Soon, I will be calling elections to ask for your mandate to take Singapore into this next phase of our nation-building.

And this election will be critical.

You will be deciding who is governing Singapore for the next five years but, more than that, you will be choosing the team who will be working with you for the next 15-20 years. You will be setting the direction for Singapore for the next 50 years. You will be determining the future for Singapore.

What will this future be?

Will Singapore become an ordinary country, with intractable problems, slow or even negative growth; overspending; heavy burdens for our children; gridlocked government, unable to act? There are so many examples around the world.

Or will Singapore always stay special for our children? A multiracial society strengthened by diversity, not splintered by divisions. A rugged society where everyone strives to do his best, but looks out for his fellow men, a people who live up to our song One People, One Nation, One Singapore.

If you are proud of what we have achieved together, if you support what we want to do ahead, the future that we are building, then please support me, please support my team, because my team and I cannot do anything just by ourselves.

We have to do it with you in order to do it for you. In fact, we have to do it together, in order to do it for all of us, to do a good job for Singapore, so that we can keep Singapore special for many years to come, another 50 years.



Can I be sure that Singapore will still be doing well, still be special, come SG100? Nobody can be sure. Nobody can promise that we will all live happily ever after.

We all have our hopes and fears, our views and our guesses. One opinion that I know everybody would have liked to know was Mr Lee Kuan Yew's. He is gone now, but some friends did ask him this question not too long ago.

In his old age, a group of friends would regularly take Mr Lee out for meals. The conversation would flow, and Mr Lee would get a chance to see a different bit of the Singapore he had built. The last time they had dinner together was in January this year, shortly before he was taken to hospital. After Mr Lee died, one of the friends wrote to me, describing what happened. Let me read her letter.

"As it was the start of 2015, we talked at length about the celebrations for SG50. We took turns to encourage Mr Lee to attend as many SG50 events as possible. Actually, we hoped he would be there for the SG50 National Day Parade. Mr Lee listened to our exhortations, but stopped short of saying yes to our suggestions. At each of our gatherings, it had become a tradition to ask Mr Lee, 'Will there be a Singapore many years from now?' Once, Mr Lee said 'Maybe.' On another, Mr Lee said, 'Yes, if there is no corruption.'

"This was classic Mr Lee - ever believing in Singapore, yet ever cognisant that there was always work to be done, that we should never take things for granted. Continuing with our tradition and in the spirit of SG50, that evening we asked him, 'Will there be a Singapore 50 years from now?' Mr Lee's answer took us all by surprise.

"That evening, for the first time, Mr Lee said, 'Of course, there will be… even better!'"

Mr Lee did not make it to the SG50 NDP. But we were happy to have the three surviving ministers who signed the Separation Agreement at the Parade. Encik Othman Wok who is here with us this evening and Mr Ong Pang Boon and Mr Jek Yeun Thong. They sat in a place of honour, next to Mr Lee's chair. When we watched the video tribute to Mr Lee, we were all moved. We could sense his spirit with us, and in us. Mr Lee would have been proud of what he had built, if he had seen the NDP.

Now he is no longer here, we are on our own, but we are ready. Our resolve to defend ourselves is unquestioned. Our spirit and confidence is robust. Our unity and identity as a people has never been stronger. At the NDP, we showed the world what stuff Singapore is made of.



For me, there were two special moments in the memorable Parade. One was when Kit Chan sang Home. She sang beautifully, she always does. But what most amazed me was the singing from the crowd. All round the Padang, we could hear our voices lustily singing. "This is home, truly" and never before have we done that.

The second moment was after the Parade. The last item, the kids were in bright LED costumes putting on an energetic and spectacular performance. I went down to the Padang afterwards to meet them. They were in high spirits. Their faces shone with excitement and hope.

I thought to myself these are the faces of the future of Singapore. Fifty years from now, SG100, they will be about 60 years old - still vigorous with many more active years ahead of them.

I hope they will be back at the Padang celebrating again, remembering SG50, congratulating one another on how much they have done and how far they have come and looking at more young, radiant faces of children and many grandchildren and singing Majulah Singapura!


Ringgit sinks below 3 to the Singapore dollar for first time ever

$
0
0
Rush as ringgit falls to RM3 to S$1
By Marissa Lee , Jose Hong and Yvonne Lek, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

Customers flocked to the money changers to snap up ringgit yesterday after the Malaysian currency crossed the psychological threshold of three to the Singapore dollar.



A snaking queue had formed at Crante Money Changer in People's Park Complex when The Straits Times visited during lunch hour.

Most customers were exchanging amounts of around $200 to $300 as they expected the ringgit to fall further.

The ringgit went off sale in some places as money changers opted out of the market, fearing they would get their fingers burned in the light of the ringgit's violent price swings in recent months.

"It's very volatile. Today we don't want to buy, don't want to sell because people are expecting three ringgit (to one Singdollar). We didn't bring in much stock because if we did and couldn't sell it, we'd make a big loss. We'll bring some in tomorrow," said Mr Mohamed Rafeeq, owner of Clifford Gems & Money Exchange at Raffles City.

The ringgit crossed the three-to-one line at around 9am yesterday, taking its cue from the crash in stock markets across Asia that followed China's surprise yuan devaluation two weeks ago.

The ringgit fell about 1.4 per cent yesterday to settle at 3.0166 to one Singdollar - and leaving it down 19 per cent from a year ago.

"My relatives in Malaysia are suffering... Their children are studying in the polytechnics here and they have to give them pocket money, but when they change it into Singdollars, they don't get a lot," retiree May Koo, 59, told The Straits Times at People's Park Complex.

The cheaper ringgit has also prompted a 32-year-old civil servant who owns a land plot in Iskandar to revise his retirement plan. "The low ringgit makes it more feasible for me to build a retirement house, because if I sell (the land) now, I'm not going to get back the money," said the man, who wanted to be known only as Mr Yeo.

And while Singaporeans may enjoy a psychological lift when they cross the border to shop this weekend, the tourism story looks less cheerful the other way around.

"Malaysia and Indonesia, whose currencies have weakened against the Singdollar, account for more than a third of tourist arrivals into Singapore. Our hospitality sector will be hurt if their currencies bring them less bang for their buck," said CIMB economist Song Seng Wun.

But analysts believe the ringgit will not stay at this level for long.

"Markets have been in overshooting mode because of the convergence of negative news - falling oil prices, political turmoil, China," said UBS Wealth Management foreign exchange strategist Tan Teck Leng. "In the long term, the ringgit is really undervalued and such a level should not persist on a 12-month basis."





Singapore businesses in Malaysia rattled by ringgit's fall
By Marissa Lee, The Straits Times, 27 Aug 2015

The ringgit's startling fall left some Singapore businesses in Malaysia fearing a repeat of the 1997 Asian financial crisis is looming.

Take home furnishings boss Chan Chong Beng. When he signed contracts three months ago to deliver carpets and wallpaper to his Malaysian clients, the ringgit was about 2.69 to one Singdollar.

"By the time we collected the money, it was over three (ringgit) to a dollar. We didn't expect it to go so steep! That easily takes off 15 per cent of our net profit," said Mr Chan, who heads Goodrich Global.

Contracts sealed in Malaysia have traditionally been denominated in ringgit, a practice that is hard to change despite the currency market volatility around the world. Malaysian firms have been less willing to denominate the contracts in Singdollars, added Mr Chan.

To be sure, the divergence between the two currencies has never been this sharp: just five years ago, the Singdollar was equivalent to 2.30 ringgit. Fifty years ago, the two currencies were on a par.

But the ringgit has shed 20 per cent in value over a year as the commodities-exporting nation suffers a prolonged oil price rout and brewing political turmoil. As of 8pm last night, one Singdollar could buy 3.0356 ringgit. The Malaysian currency had weakened briefly to as much as 3.05 ringgit to one Singdollar in the morning.

"The signs of a crisis are quite imminent. In 1997, it was something like this," said Mr Chan.

But analysts are more sanguine, noting that firms today are much less exposed to United States dollar debt. "This is not a repeat of 1997. Most corporates across Asia today are more well-diversified in their funding," said Credit Suisse senior currency strategist Heng Koon How.

And while the weak ringgit and rupiah point to Malaysia and Indonesia having the worst foreign reserve metrics across Asia, reserve ratios across the rest of the region are much more robust than in 1997, Mr Heng added. So while traders in the import and export game may have to revise their business models, other firms are not deviating from their growth plans. "In the consumer space, it's business as usual," said Sakae Holdings chairman Douglas Foo. "The fundamentals in the country are still sound, so we continue to look for good sites to expand. The weaker ringgit impacts our financial statements but in reality, we don't realise the losses because we're not taking the money out of the country."





Slide of ringgit and rupiah: What's the impact?
Both the ringgit and rupiah have come under pressure in currency markets, continuing to fall to record lows. Our correspondents in Kuala Lumpur and Jakarta take stock of the impact of the currencies' slide.
The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015


Exports, tourism dip despite fall
By Shannon Teoh, Malaysia Correspondent in Kuala Lumpur

Some retailers in Johor are ringing up more sales but Malaysians studying overseas say they have had to tighten their belts, both the result of the embattled ringgit.

However, exports and tourism - two sectors that usually benefit from a cheaper domestic currency - have dipped in a worrying sign.

With the ringgit falling below the psychological level of three to the Singapore dollar, Johor's state government expects an extra RM50 billion (S$16.6 billion) to flow into its economy from Singaporean tourists and Malaysians working in Singapore.

Johor Premium Outlets has seen more Singaporean shoppers, according to its chief operating officer Jean Marie Harry.

"The reasons are obvious. It's about the strength of their dollar," he was quoted as saying by the Malay Mail.

The ringgit has traded around 4.2 to the US dollar in the past week and is Asia's worst-performing currency in the past year - a situation attributed to worsening global demand for Malaysia's exports, China's yuan devaluation, plunging commodity prices and questions surrounding Prime Minister Najib Razak's continued leadership.

Despite the fall, which has surpassed most forecasts for this year, Malaysians have largely been shielded from imported inflation as most trade partner currencies have also weakened against the dollar and transportation costs have eased due to lower fuel prices. The June producer price index saw imported inputs up just 0.6 per cent from a year ago.

"For most businesses in Malaysia, their fuel costs are higher than currency costs," MIDF Amanah Investment Bank's head of research Zulkifli Hamzah told the Bernama news agency.

Datuk Seri Najib said yesterday that the impact from the current economic troubles was cushioned by "unpopular and painful" reforms implemented by his administration, adding that the situation "would be worse" if the reforms had started only now.

A Bloomberg poll of analysts showed the ringgit averaging 4.27 next year.

For some sectors, the ringgit's fall has not been good news.

A cheaper currency usually attracts more tourists, but tourist arrivals were down 8.6 per cent in the first quarter year-on-year, with those from China falling a whopping 27 per cent.

Meanwhile, exports have not benefited from lower commodity prices. While the fall has helped to keep inflation low, it has hammered Malaysian businesses that produce palm oil and petroleum products or work downstream in these major sectors.

Government-linked Felda Global Ventures, the world's largest crude palm oil producer, recorded just RM92.69 million in profit from its palm oil business in the first half of this year, less than a third of the figure in the same period last year.

State petroleum company Petronas, Malaysia's only Fortune 500 company, saw its second-quarter earnings dip by 47 per cent to RM14.6 billion, with oil prices now nearly 60 per cent lower than a year ago.

Both Felda and Petronas, which accounts for nearly a third of government revenue, said they expect more difficulties to come.

Malaysian exports fell 2.2 per cent in the first half of the year, shrinking the trade surplus.

The weak ringgit means Malaysians studying overseas have had to rethink their budgets.

Even those on scholarships say they have to economise.

"I still have to tighten my belt," said Mr Eekmal Ahmad, 35, adding, "my savings... seem so small now that I may have to punch more holes in my belt".




Indonesia moves to contain panic
By Zubaidah Nazeer, Indonesia Bureau Chief in Jakarta

For the third time in two days, property consultant Anjelin Dian joined a queue in downtown Jakarta yesterday to change her US dollars into rupiah, which has fallen about 12 per cent so far this year.

"When the rupiah plunged even further on Monday, I thought this was the best time to change some US dollars and keep the cash for expenses over the next few months," she told The Straits Times, adding that she had changed nearly US$10,000 (S$14,200).

Money changers have reported longer-than-usual queues since the Indonesian currency fell to about 14,000 against the US dollar on Monday. It fell to as low as 14,085 yesterday, the weakest since the Asian financial crisis in 1998.

Similar queues could be spotted at banks, while travel agencies here say they are seeing a drop in bookings for year-end holidays.

Asia's second-worst-performing currency this year after the ringgit took a further beating in Black Monday's global sell-off.

As Finance Ministry and central bank officials announced a slew of measures to contain the panic, President Joko Widodo reached out using social media.

"Come, let's work together to overcome the weakening rupiah by buying local products," he tweeted on his official Twitter account.

The weakening rupiah comes amid a slowdown in the Indonesian economy, which grew at under 5 per cent in the first two quarters of the year, the slowest pace in six years.

The slowdown is mainly due to the sluggish economy of China - Indonesia's biggest trading partner - which has led to lower demand for commodities such as coal.

In Indonesia, imported goods have become expensive, with some goods costing up to 50 per cent more. Consumer spending has shrunk in line with the bleak outlook, leading to growing dissatisfaction with the government.

In an attempt to shore up support and exert control over the economy, Mr Joko reshuffled his Cabinet two weeks ago, replacing his economic and trade ministers.

On Monday, he gathered governors, mayors and other local leaders and instructed them to spend their budgets before the end of the year to help spur the economy.

To soften the latest blow to the rupiah, the Finance Ministry said it would buy back government bonds to calm the market.

Central bank chief Agus Martowardojo urged exporters to sell off their foreign currencies to create a balance in the country's foreign exchange condition.

Some sectors, such as textiles, are worried as they depend on imports of raw material.

Mr Ade Sudrajat, chairman of the Indonesian Textiles Association, said the weak rupiah has made the sector less competitive as 80 per cent of its raw materials are imported. "It not only affects the price of our goods but also raises the risk of job cuts," he said, citing how 36,000 workers have lost their jobs since the start of the year.

Dr Martin Panggabean, chief economist at IGIco Advisory, said Indonesia's stronger banking sector ensures that there will not be a severe situation as in 1998.

"This is panic-driven, so the central bank has the right approach, which is, don't intervene too much," he told The Straits Times.

"What the government needs to do now is to convince the market that its banking sector is sound, limit the liquidity rush and manage the volatility instead of strengthening the currency," he said.

Referring to countries that have spent millions trying to prop up their currencies, he said: "In this kind of situation, however much you pour into the market, it is going to go into a black hole."


ASEAN award for contributions to regional community building

$
0
0
By Audrey Tan, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

The ASEAN Secretariat is offering a Singapore citizen or organisation a US$10,000 (S$14,000) cash grant towards that person's or group's efforts in regional community building.



The inaugural ASEAN People's Award, announced yesterday by Minister for Foreign Affairs K. Shanmugam, aims to recognise those who are contributing in areas ranging from economic integration to volunteering.

"Our efforts to bring our peoples closer together will work out in the medium to longer term," he said in his speech at the annual ASEAN Day Reception at the Shangri-La Hotel last night. "So long as we persevere, we will get closer to our goal - a vibrant, fully integrated ASEAN Community. To this end, each ASEAN member state will be conferring an ASEAN People's Award. "

Nominations open from 8am today on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website, and will close at 6pm on Sept 6.

Mr Shanmugam said "everyone has a role" in establishing a regional community. For its part, he said the Government conducts events like yesterday's ASEAN Day Reception, and promotes the region within schools.

The award could also raise ASEAN's profile in Singapore.

A new ASEAN study found that young people here are generally ambivalent about the body.

Results released yesterday showed that while more than 80 per cent of the 4,600 undergraduates polled across the region had a strong ASEAN identity, Singaporean respondents exhibited an "ASEAN- ambivalence".

Mr Shanmugam said: "Building a national identity is still a work in progress, let alone... a supra-national identity but still we have to try. Because as one community, we can achieve so much more."

Dr Yeo Lay Hwee, a senior research fellow from the Singapore Institute of International Affairs think-tank, told The Straits Times that a strong regional identity could spur member nations to find solutions to common problems, such as transboundary haze, climate change and migration issues.

She added: "When we all feel like we are part of this region, we can work together to find solutions for the common problems we face."

Yesterday, Mr Shanmugam echoed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's call at Sunday's National Day Rally for Singapore to "be alive" to its external environment even as it attends to domestic concerns.

Citing the recent Bangkok blast that claimed the life of 34-year-old Singaporean Melisa Liu, he said: "Non-traditional threats and challenges are also at our doorstep. ASEAN will need to confront these challenges head-on."



Spoke at a reception yesterday to celebrate ASEAN's 48th anniversary. A big piece of the ASEAN story is about forging...
Posted by K Shanmugam Sc on Tuesday, August 25, 2015



Helping those with acquired disabilities

$
0
0
Two schemes offer aid, including rehabilitation, job training, job matching and other pre-employment help
By Kok Xing Hui, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Last Friday, technician Tan Hwee Boon, 50, had his hands amputated after a bout of food poisoning and its treatment led to gangrene. He also needs to have his feet amputated in about two weeks.

Despondent, the father of two teenagers had told The New Paper that he was not sure what he could do for a living.

People who acquire disabilities halfway through life and can no longer do the same job, such as Mr Tan, may draw comfort from two schemes set up in the last year or so to help them.

The Transition Programme for Employment was piloted in June last year and aimed at people below 50 who have spinal cord injuries or strokes. The scheme is delivered by the SPD - formerly the Society for the Physically Disabled - and puts clients through rehabilitation, job training and counselling, and then job matching.

It has since taken in 63 clients and matched nine to jobs.

The other programme, iEnable, was launched in April last year and is helmed by SG Enable, a government-established agency formed to provide services for people with disabilities.

iEnable attaches a case manager to each client to help repair clients' confidence, support them emotionally, prepare them for job interviews, and get them a new job with an employer who understands their needs. It has taken in 51 clients and helped 19 get jobs.

While there are no national figures on people with acquired disabilities losing employment, SG Enable said there are about 300 patients suffering from spinal cord injuries and amputations discharged from hospitals every year.

Acquired disabilities can arise from severe stroke, traffic accidents, or diseases such as diabetes, which may require amputation. Those with new disabilities sometimes cannot carry out the same jobs. There were 6,567 stroke cases in 2013 and studies done in other countries show that only 20.7 per cent remained employed after a stroke, with half of these having had a change of jobs.

Depending on a person's financial situation, iEnable can help him get aid for his daily basic needs and offer pre-employment assistance such as buying new work clothes and helping with transport fees, training and job interviews.

iEnable currently relies on medical social workers from 10 public and community hospitals to refer clients with acquired disabilities to it.

"The range of jobs available is wide. They include PMET (professionals, managers, executives and technicians) positions, (and openings for) laboratory assistants, recruitment consultants, finance executives, administrative assistants, packers, cleaners and kitchen help," said Ms Ku Geok Boon, chief executive officer of SG Enable.

She said that SG Enable already has more than 200 jobs for people with disabilities listed in the Open Door Programme job portal.




Sometimes, mishaps do happen in life, and some of us would inadvertently end up being disabled – could be amputations,...
Posted by Tan Chuan-Jin on Monday, August 24, 2015





He lost hearing, but found footing
By Kok Xing Hui, The Straits Times, 24 Aug 2015

Mr Anthony Loh, 52, was heading home from church in 2012 when he suddenly felt dizzy and could not keep his balance.

He rested in bed at home, but felt the ceiling was spinning. His elderly mother rushed him to hospital, where Mr Loh was found to have lost his hearing. Four months later, he went for cochlear implant surgery.

It helped him to hear again, but life was hardly the same. "I was depressed and self-conscious about the implant," he said in Mandarin.

The device works by sending sounds through a magnetic transmitter worn at the back of the head directly to an implant inside the head, which sends signals to the brain.

It was hard to get used to. Voices sounded different. Even now, he cannot distinguish voices if more than one person talks at the same time.

He found himself becoming angry more often and broke up with his girlfriend of three years.

His father also suffered a stroke that year.

Depressed, Mr Loh later quit his job as a graphics designer at a signage company in March 2013 because he found the stress unmanageable.

For 1-1/2 years, he was jobless and hardly left home, embarrassed about the implant.

He drained his five-figure savings to pay for household expenses, as well as his father's and his medical bills. It was social worker Brian Khor from the iEnable programme who helped him back to his feet, said Mr Loh.

"The financial assistance helped, but you know how they always say that you've got to teach a man to fish? In the early days, Mr Khor watched me cry and listened to me. Then he forced me to leave the house so that I'd get used to being seen with the implant," said Mr Loh.

He gradually regained confidence and his mood improved. iEnable matched him to a part-time job as a quality control officer at Singapore Post, with Mr Khor accompanying him for interviews to provide support and make sure his employer understood his condition.

He said: "Without SG Enable's help, I really don't know where I'd be today. Perhaps staying at home, still jobless. My dad died last month and while I'm sad, I'm stronger now and coping better than when I lost my hearing."



Proximity Housing Grant: $20,000 grant to help families live closer together

$
0
0
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

All Singaporean families buying a Housing Board resale flat near or with their parents or married children will receive a new $20,000 grant, regardless of their income levels and whether they have received housing subsidies before.

Eligible singles now get $10,000 if they buy a resale flat with their parents.

Details of the Proximity Housing Grant (PHG) and other housing policy changes were released by the Ministry of National Development and HDB yesterday, after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the moves on Sunday.

Kicking in yesterday, the new grant is the latest move to help families live closer together.



Under the PHG, resale buyers receiving a subsidy for the first time get $10,000 more than under the previous Higher-Tier CPF Housing Grant. Singles get $5,000 more than before. The Higher-Tier grant will be discontinued.

The PHG is open to previously ineligible buyers, including owners of private property, though they must sell it within six months of buying the resale flat. Buyers can get the PHG only once. Grant recipients and their parents or married children must live near or with each other for at least five years afterwards.

Property experts believe the grant could boost transaction volumes in the sluggish resale market. But R'ST Research director Ong Kah Seng added: "It is unlikely to have a major impact on resale prices as (loan curbs) can effectively curb lifting of prices by sellers."

At Sunday's National Day Rally, Mr Lee also announced the higher income ceiling of $12,000 for HDB flats and $14,000 for executive condominiums (EC).

"The raising of the income ceiling is welcome news to us," said operations manager Ken Lee, 30, who is applying for a Build-to-Order (BTO) flat with his accountant girlfriend, 27. Their combined pay is $1,000 above the old $10,000 ceiling.

The new income ceilings, effective from yesterday, are not just for new homes, but also for the CPF Housing Grant for resale flats and the tiered CPF Housing Grant for ECs.

This will likely boost resale transaction volumes but prices are unlikely to spike, said ERA Realty key executive officer Eugene Lim.

The income ceiling for singles buying new two-room flats has been raised accordingly from $5,000 to $6,000.From the BTO launch next month, the maximum Special CPF Housing Grant will be $40,000, up from $20,000. Together with the existing Additional Housing Grant of up to $40,000, low-income first-time BTO buyers could get up to $80,000 in grants.

For two-room flats where the grant amount exceeds 95 per cent of the BTO price, buyers pay 5 per cent in cash or CPF savings. For instance, they pay only $3,750 for a $75,000 flat.

Any excess grant amount can be used to pay for optional items such as flooring, or go into buyers' CPF.

Additional reporting by Yeo Sam Jo









The Ministry of National Development (MND) and the Housing & Development Board (HDB) introduced three new measures to...
Posted by Ministry of National Development on Monday, August 24, 2015










More flat buyers? Supply can be tweaked
Khaw: Govt's control means higher income ceiling will not result in more competition
By Yeo Sam Jo, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

Applicants for new Housing Board flats and executive condominiums (ECs) need not worry about greater competition now that the income ceiling has been raised, as supply can be tweaked accordingly, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said yesterday.

"We have leverage over the supply and we can always adjust the supply - expand and reduce as necessary," he told reporters at the HDB Hub in Toa Payoh.

Mr Khaw was responding to concerns about whether the higher income limit would create more competition, as more buyers qualify to apply for Build-to-Order (BTO) flats and ECs. From yesterday, the income ceiling for Singaporean households to buy new flats and ECs was raised by $2,000, to $12,000 and $14,000 respectively.

Mr Khaw said this change had not been possible three years ago as the authorities were still addressing a demand backlog for BTO flats.

"Now that we've cleared the queue largely, I think it's (a good time)," he said.

Asked if EC developers might raise prices as more buyers qualify under the new income ceiling, Mr Khaw again pointed to the Government's supply control.

"It's like a tap," he said. "If I were an EC developer... I would think three times. Many of them I know are thinking about adjusting (the prices) downwards to meet the increased supply of ECs versus the demand that has now largely been satisfied."

The Ministry of National Development (MND) and HDB said 21,000 families benefited from the last income ceiling rise in 2011.


Minister for National Devlopment Khaw Boon Wan dismisses suggestions that the policies to help more people better afford a home are being rolled out now in view of the upcoming General Election.He was speaking to the media this morning as the HDB unveiled details on measures announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at his National Day Rally last night. http://bit.ly/1Jf9iyl #ndr
Posted by 938LIVE on Sunday, August 23, 2015


Mr Khaw also dismissed notions that the latest housing policy changes were timed just ahead of the coming general election (GE).

"If you have been watching what we've been doing since I entered MND more than four years ago, we've been making adjustments, practically every year, because my objectives are quite clear: That home ownership is a very important part of the governance of Singapore.

"But as society evolves, salaries adjust, you need to adjust the policies as we go along," Mr Khaw said, adding that the focus shifts across different groups each time.

"So that is how I approach the problems. And has it got to do with GE? I could not care less when the GE is. But problems need to be resolved."

He also stressed that housing policies are "never at the expense of the lower-income group".

"Even as we extend upwards to the higher-income group, we are also improving or enhancing the subsidy for the low-income group. What it means is that, in totality, more Singaporeans get to benefit from housing subsidies. "

Mr Khaw added that an upcoming scheme to help rental families buy their own flats again will require "a lot of thinking through".

The Fresh Start Housing Scheme, announced during Sunday's National Day Rally, will target families with young children who used to own a flat, but sold it and now live in public rental units.

They will be offered two-room flats with shorter leases and stricter resale conditions.

The public and social work agencies will be consulted on the details of the scheme.

Mr Khaw said: "We are not ready for implementation yet, but it's something that I'm confident we'll be able to sort out for implementation over the next few months, which means probably next year."





New scheme offers fresh start to families living in rental flats
By Kok Xing Hui, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

A new scheme for families living in rental units after being forced to sell their flats can help them move out of poverty, social workers have told The Straits Times.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the Fresh Start Housing Scheme at Sunday's National Day Rally to help second-timer rental households own a two-room flat.

He also suggested a Fresh Start Housing Grant to help such families purchase their flats, as well as providing counselling for issues such as jobs, relationships, education and drugs.

However, the grant would be "not without conditions".

Experts believe that home ownership will encourage families to develop more stable employment and relationships, as well as keep their children away from unsavoury influences which rental-flat environments can bring.

While the details are still being worked out, Mr Lee said the two-room flats will come with shorter leases and stricter resale conditions to make them more affordable.



Ms Petrine Lim, principal social worker at Fei Yue Family Service Centre, believes that flat ownership will take housing woes out of the equation and allow families to focus on fixing other problems.

She said: "It's only right that (the flats) have stricter resale rules so the families cannot revert to the same cycle of selling the flat and moving back into rental units. It's only fair so the problem is less likely to recur."

Mrs Shelen Ang, head of research and development at charity Focus on the Family Singapore, said: "It is encouragement that they won't be stuck in this cycle of poverty."

Ms Denise Phua, an MP for Moulmein-Kallang GRC, who chairs the Government Parliamentary Committee for Social and Family Development, said that many of the families being targeted for assistance could have sold their first flats because of financial hardship or divorce.

While the Housing Board and the Ministry of National Development said yesterday that the scheme will target families with young children, some urged the authorities to consider helping divorcees as well.

Awwa Family Service Centre director Edwin Yim said divorcees with children often end up living with extended family members, lacking the autonomy to build their own family culture or discipline their children.

"The children would learn from other children and the extended family members would also give instructions to the children," he said.

Social workers backed the safety nets associated with the scheme and grant, such as stricter resale conditions and how the grant, if introduced, would include counselling, among other conditions yet to be specified.

"It is not just about owning a flat again. It is the whole scheme of things to help these families deal with any recurring issues," said Mrs Ang.

Mr Donald Han, managing director of property consultancy Chestertons Singapore, suggested a shorter lease of about 30 years compared with the usual 99 years on a HDB flat.

"These parents would likely be in their 40s, so in 30 years, they would be in their 70s and would have their children to support them, or they could have upgraded (their flats) by then," he said.

National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said yesterday that he is confident details for the scheme can be sorted out over the next few months so implementation can begin next year.

Additional reporting by Yeo Sam Jo






Divorcee longs for a place to call her own
By Kok Xing Hui, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

Madam Nor, a divorcee pushed into rental housing, cheered on Sunday night when Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that he wanted to help previous home owners own a property again.

The 36-year-old part-time admin assistant, who asked to be identified by only her first name, sold her three-room flat in 2010 when the family could not make loan payments. Since then, her housing situation has been thrown into disarray.

At her lowest point, Madam Nor and her four children - now aged nine, 10, 11 and 12 - bunked in with her sister's family, and the 13 of them squeezed into a two-room rental flat for a year.

She was later put on the interim housing scheme, run by the Housing Board, in 2012, paying $210 a month to use one bedroom.

Things eased last December when she was granted a two- room rental unit in Ang Mo Kio for $230 a month.

Still, Madam Nor longs for a place to call her own.

"$230 for a rental flat; I might as well top up a few hundred and own my own property," she said.

The rent, coupled with utility and service and conservancy charges, sets Madam Nor back almost $600 a month when she earns just $1,000.

She could not get subsidies for another flat despite having $80,000 in her Central Provident Fund because she had already taken two HDB concessionary loans with her former husband.

At the National Day Rally on Sunday, Mr Lee announced the Fresh Start Housing Scheme, which Madam Nor hopes to benefit from. The scheme targets those in rental flat households with young children who used to own flats and want to buy a flat again. There could also be a grant to help pay for the two-room flats if families show they are putting their lives in order, Mr Lee said.

Madam Nor said having a home outside of rental units will allow her to go for upgrading courses in peace. Currently, she worries about the company her children keep when she is away, as the rental block's neighbourhood is rife with fighting, drinking and loiterers. "I'm at work but wondering where they are, calling to make sure they are at home and safe," she said.

"I really hope I can have my own property. At least, whatever happens to me, my kids have my property to fall back on. In Singapore, who doesn't want their own property?"








Fillip for ECs could hurt mass market condos' demand
By Rennie Whang, The Straits Times, 25 Aug 2015

The changes to the eligibility income ceiling announced on Sunday could ignite demand for executive condominiums (EC) and intensify the competition for mass market private homes.

Developers of mass market apartments and ECs are targeting the same group of buyers, so experts expect the battle for sales to be stepped up.

"The same group of eligible buyers have the option to purchase ECs, and buyers today are already taking more time to decide compared with a year ago," said Cushman & Wakefield research director Christine Li.

"Mass market condos on the market could find it even harder to attract buyers."

Property agencies spent yesterday fielding enquiries from potential EC buyers, some of whom had been ineligible under the old income ceiling rules, said PropNex team director William Lim.

Mr Mohd Ismail, PropNex chief executive, said that many people at recent EC launches - including The Brownstone, The Vales and Sol Acres - had booked units even though they were ineligible at the time and had lodged appeals with the HDB.

"With (Sunday's) announcement, all these people will benefit."

The income ceiling for new HDB flats and ECs has been raised by $2,000 each to $12,000 and $14,000 respectively, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said at the National Day Rally on Sunday. The changes kicked in yesterday.

MCL Land's Sol Acres, which launched last Saturday, has sold 249 units. "There should be more sales in general from the enlarged pool of eligible buyers," said the company's chief executive Koh Teck Chuan.

Qingjian Realty head of sales and marketing Donald Ng said while more people who had been ineligible have been visiting the company's developments' showflats recently, "everyone will have to work hard to see how we can translate those leads into sales".

Knight Frank executive chairman Tan Tiong Cheng said the policy move would certainly take away some demand for mass market homes.

"For new families and owner-occupiers, an EC is the logical choice between the two asset types, given the savings - a difference of about $300 per sq ft, which could be more than $250,000 - and that you are getting the same location, more or less the same product," he said.

"The only difference is that there are fewer restrictions in the private property market and more variety."

More expensive mass market homes, and those not near MRT stations, are expected to suffer more. A new or well-maintained completed private home priced below $1,000 per sq ft might not be as affected - the price differential is too narrow and buyers may prefer to forfeit their privilege to buy an EC, said Savills Singapore research head Alan Cheong.

"But if the pricing is in the $1,000 to $1,200 psf range, the relative gap to ECs in the $800 psf level is relatively large and may influence some to look at ECs instead."

Overall, prices for both segments may not move much. While private developers will price sensibly to get sales, there is a limit to how much they can cut given higher land costs, said ERA Realty key executive officer Eugene Lim.

Experts also noted that the bulk of EC buyers do not usually earn more than $10,000 a month and often rely on parents' savings for their purchases, so a higher income ceiling may not substantially change the buyer profile. Those earning more than $10,000 have many options and may have other aspirations, they said.




Did you know? - To help more extended families live close by for mutual care & support, and to help more Singaporeans...
Posted by Ministry of National Development on Tuesday, August 25, 2015






Did you know? - To help more extended families live close by for mutual care & support, and to help more Singaporeans own a HDB flat, the Government has introduced new measures.Let's look at what's available:
Posted by Ministry of National Development on Wednesday, August 26, 2015




GE2015: Polling Day on Sept 11

$
0
0
Singapore goes to the polls on Sept 11
It's the first time since 1997 that a general election will be held on a weekday
By Zakir Hussain, Deputy Political Editor, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

Political parties and their supporters swung into action yesterday, after President Tony Tan Keng Yam dissolved Parliament and news followed that the general election would be held on Sept 11.

At People's Action Party (PAP) branches and opposition party offices across the island, activists finalised their candidate line-ups and worked to ensure that campaign flags, posters and, especially, nomination papers would be in order.

Nomination Day will be next Tuesday, Sept 1, with the minimum of nine days to campaign before Cooling-off Day on Sept 10. Polling Day will be a public holiday.

It is the first time since 1997 that a general election will be held on a weekday. Some PAP activists said holding the polls on Sept 12 would have clashed with community events planned for the last day of the Chinese Seventh Month.



The widely anticipated news came two days after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said at the National Day Rally that he would be calling the elections soon, and that they would be a critical one for the country. Yesterday, he underlined his message that this general election is about renewing and reinforcing the PAP's slate in Parliament to give Singapore the best leadership team to take the country forward.

"I called this general election to seek your mandate to take Singapore beyond SG50, into its next half century," he said in a Facebook post. "You will be deciding who will govern Singapore for the next five years. More than that, you will be choosing the team to work with you for the next 15-20 years, and setting the direction for Singapore for the next 50 years."

The elections, Singapore's 12th since independence, are likely to be the first since 1963 to see the PAP challenged in all seats.

As many as nine opposition parties have indicated that they will put up a fight in all 89 seats across 16 group representation constituencies (GRCs) and 13 single-member constituencies (SMCs). The largest opposition party, the Workers' Party (WP), has said that it is targeting 28 seats.

The elections will be the first in 60 years without the presence of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, who died in March.

Observers said the timing may be to the PAP's advantage, given the positive sentiments from the Golden Jubilee celebrations and the unprecedented expressions of solidarity in the week of national mourning following Mr Lee's death.

The polls will also take place against the backdrop of global economic uncertainty, with international markets routed in recent days. The full-year growth forecast for Singapore itself has been revised downward to 2 per cent to 2.5 per cent.

There are rising concerns too over global security and, indeed, Polling Day will be on the anniversary of the Sept 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States. The snap 2001 elections called here after those attacks and amid a global recession saw the PAP's vote share surge by 10 points from 65 per cent in the 1997 polls to 75.3 per cent.

The 2006 General Election, the first led by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, saw the PAP get 66.6 per cent of the vote. But the 2011 election proved a watershed, when a rising opposition tide tapped into simmering discontent over housing affordability, immigration and cost of living issues to drag the PAP's vote share down to 60.1 per cent.

That election saw the WP winning its first GRC, ousting a high-powered PAP team led by Cabinet minister George Yeo. The WP retained Hougang SMC at the polls and went on to win Punggol East SMC in a by-election in 2013.

Since 2011, the Government has embarked on a range of policy measures - some of which had been in gestation before the polls - to address voter concerns, and analysts say this year's elections will show how its efforts have been received.

Said Dr Gillian Koh of the Institute of Policy Studies: "The GE will be a good measure of voters' sentiment on whether the Government has helped citizens access and afford the key essentials in life: if they think the Government has dealt with the immigration issue that was also tied to higher costs and congestion, and if they feel that the Government has, in the last four years, given them a stronger sense of security and assurance about work, family life and developing a fair and inclusive society."

However, she felt a segment of voters would also hold the view that it is important to have some opposition representation in Parliament "to ensure that the Government is indeed responsive to the needs and concerns of Singaporeans".

This is a theme the opposition parties can be expected to use to appeal to voters. The Singapore Democratic Party began introducing its candidates yesterday, and the WP will do so from today.

The PAP has announced its line-up in all but four GRCs and Fengshan and Punggol East SMCs. It will name its teams for Marine Parade and Nee Soon GRCs today.

Yesterday, Mr Lee said that strong support from Singaporeans is critical for the country to move ahead in a challenging environment and to stay special.

"Here many races live in peace, and many from humble homes make good. We will surely meet challenges ahead, but whatever the world throws at us, as one people, we will overcome," he said on Facebook.

"If you are proud of what we have achieved together, and support what we want to do for our future, please support me and my team. We have to do it with you, in order to do it for you, and for Singapore. Together, we can keep Singapore special for many years to come."




This morning I advised the President to dissolve Parliament and issue the Writ of Election. Nomination Day will be...
Posted by Lee Hsien Loong on Tuesday, August 25, 2015










10 issues for GE 2015
By Aaron Low, Deputy News Editor, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

Even before the first speech on the hustings has been delivered, several issues, both old and new, have surfaced in recent weeks among the political parties in Singapore.

How have the older issues evolved since the last General Election (GE) in 2011 and will new issues dominate GE2015?

1. LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has cast this GE as one in which the next generation of leaders will be decided.

"More than that, you will be choosing the team to work with you for the next 15-20 years, and setting the direction for Singapore for the next 50 years," he said in a Facebook post yesterday.

His remark came soon after the issue of the Writ of Election, a legal document that sets the election process in motion.

It was also a theme he touched on in his National Day Rally speech, when he noted that he and some of his Cabinet colleagues were in their late 50s and 60s and "will not be around forever". This is why the next team of leaders had to be "ready in the wings".

2. ECONOMY

China's decision to devalue its currency has wiped out more than US$5 trillion (S$7 trillion) from stock markets around the world in the past two weeks and is threatening to create another global financial storm.

Voters will head to the polling stations under these dark clouds and a domestic economy that looks set to grow at an insipid rate of between 2 per cent and 2.5 per cent this year.

For the ruling party, the threat of an economic downturn might serve to focus minds on how the PAP government has been the stable pair of hands that successfully navigated the country through previous recessions.

3. SECURITY AND EXTERNAL THREATS

Similarly, external threats are also likely to weigh on the minds of voters as the election campaign season approaches.

Worries over the growing influence of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria terrorist group as well as the rising political instability in Malaysia are two external threats that loom large, say analysts, who pointed to the symbolic timing of Polling Day: Sept 11.

"Sept 11 is a good international backdrop. Why? Most of the First World countries will be remembering the tragic events of 9/11 in 2001," said associate professor Alan Chong of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. He added that PAP could use the occasion to remind voters about the types of external threats Singapore faces and tell them to vote wisely.

4. IMMIGRATION

The presence of foreigners remains a sensitive issue, PM Lee acknowledged in his Rally speech on Sunday, noting that there were no painless solutions to this challenge of immigration. The country needs foreign workers to keep the economy humming, but had to manage the flow carefully to address public unease over the inflow. Immigration and foreign workers were hot topics in the last GE, with many Singaporeans complaining they were crowding locals out of jobs, MRT trains and buses. While the Government has taken steps to stem the flow of foreigners and address housing and transport woes, this issue remains the PAP's "Achilles' heel", said Singapore Management University (SMU) law professor Eugene Tan.

5. TRANSPORT

Much has been done to fix the public transport problems, with the building of new train lines and addition of hundreds of new buses on the road.

But a massive breakdown on the North-South and East-West MRT lines last month, combined with crowded trains every morning, only serve to remind people that the efforts to fix the system are yet to prove effective.

6. HOUSING

After a concerted push to ramp up the supply of new Housing Board flats, alongside fresh measures to cool the housing market, complaints about costly homes are far fewer now compared to five years ago.

But, as National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said in a recent interview, his "mission" to fix the housing situation is not yet complete.

Some Singaporeans still worry they cannot afford an HDB flat, while others wonder if the cooling measures could affect their property values in the long run.

7. COST OF LIVING AND THE WAGE GAP

A pet topic of opposition parties at rallies, the rising cost of living has been a major complaint among voters for many years.

This election will be no different, with renewed focus on Singapore becoming expensive, especially for the lower-income groups.

Tied to it is the widening income gap and whether enough has been done to narrow it.

Said SMU law don Eugene Tan: "It's not just about people paying more. The deeper unhappiness is the sense that economic growth and wealth have not been equitably shared."

8. AHPETC

One issue the PAP is likely to focus on is the Workers' Party's management of the town council looking after the constituencies it won at the last election.

In the past year, the PAP has been on the offensive. Its heavyweight ministers took turns to press WP in Parliament to account for mismanaging the finances of Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC).

The WP retorted that it has been transparent in giving information, and accused the PAP of politicking.

Expect fireworks on this one in the campaign ahead, analysts said.

"From the PAP's perspective, this issue relates to integrity and competence, but WP may cast it as the absence of a level playing field for opposition parties," said National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser.

9. CHECKS AND BALANCES

If there is one strong argument for why people should vote opposition, it is that there is a need for checks on the dominant party in power.

In GE2011, there was a fear that with WP chief Low Thia Khiang and Singapore People's Party chief Chiam See Tong leaving their single seats for bigger group representation constituencies, there would be no opposition in Parliament.

Today, with the changed political landscape of WP holding seven seats, the debate is whether voters should give it even more seats.

Will its slogan of Towards a First World Parliament and call for more checks still hold sway now that voters have seen them in action?

10. WILD CARDS

Election campaigns in the past have always thrown up a fair share of surprises, from a defamation suit against Singapore Democratic Party's leaders on the eve of GE 2006 to a PAP potential candidate being dropped at the last minute.

This year, will personalities like SingFirst's outspoken chief Tan Jee Say make headlines? Or maybe a surprise candidate could show up on Nomination Day and disrupt various parties' well-laid out plans.

Much will depend on the events that unfold over the nine-day campaign.









GE2015: Top concerns likely bread-and-butter issues, immigration, say observers
Observers say these issues are the ones most voters have on their minds
By Pearl Lee and Lydia Lam, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

Bread-and-butter issues and immigration are likely to be at the top of the minds of most voters when they head to the polls on Sept 11.

Political observers say that concerns such as the rising cost of living, transport, housing, the economy, jobs and immigration, which is widely regarded as a key hot-button issue, are set to loom large at the hustings.

"The foreign talent issue is still there, especially for PMETs who want to see a greater reduction (in the level of foreign labour here)," said National University of Singapore political scientist Reuben Wong, using the acronym for professionals, managers, executives and technicians. "They will probably also have to deal with the whole debate about the transport infrastructure here... I'm sure the opposition will raise that at their rallies."

The view that voters will probably be focused on issues close to home comes as the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) and the largest opposition party, the Workers' Party (WP), have tried to frame the general election in a different way.

The PAP has sought to highlight accounting and financial lapses at the WP's Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) in recent years over the past few months. Several ministers have also said that the polls are about putting in place the right leaders to take Singapore forward. The WP's retort, however, has been to call on voters to elect more opposition MPs to ensure a more responsive government.

But experts say these issues may not be the game-changer that both sides are hoping for them to be. In fact, an over-emphasis on the AHPETC debacle may even backfire on the PAP, said Singapore Management University's Associate Professor Eugene Tan. "There may come a point when voters feel patronised and feel PAP is dictating to them how they should feel and respond to it," said Prof Tan, who feels the issue of leadership renewal may also not be high on voters' minds.

Institute of Policy Studies senior research fellow Gillian Koh has a different take. She noted that top issues cited by respondents in an IPS survey in the wake of the 2011 General Election included having efficient government, dealing with cost of living, having a check and balance in Parliament and the need for different views in Parliament.

And she feels that the election will be a good measure of voters' sentiment on some of these counts, including whether the Government has helped them "access and afford the key essentials in life" and given them "a stronger sense of security and assurance about work, family life and developing a fair and inclusive society".

News of the coming election also came as no surprise to eligible voters The Straits Times spoke to after the election date was announced.

Many, like Mr Robin Tan, 33, say they hope issues such as those relating to transport and cost of living will be raised during the hustings, which start on Sept 1. "I'd like to see how the Government will ease transportation woes, such as the breakdowns and congestion in the trains," said the IT manager.

Others such as financial consultant Geoffrey Ying, 44, are looking forward to hearing candidates speak on issues like heritage conservation. "There's a need to do something to conserve some places such as Bukit Brown because they're important to Singapore," he said.

As for Polling Day falling on Sept 11, the date came as a surprise to some who had expected it to be on Saturday, Sept 12. The past three general elections were on Saturdays.

Whether it is Sept 11 or 12, civil engineer V. Krishna, 79, is just glad the date is out. He said: "It's good that it's coming because over the last month we've had a lot of announcements and unveiling of candidates."Bank officer Marvin Quak, 27, said: "The date doesn't really matter. What matters is the election results."

Additional reporting by Goh Yan Han and Choo Yun Ting









Candidates' election deposit set at $14,500
It is $1,500 lower than sum in last general election, but same as in 2013 by-election
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

The election deposit for each candidate contesting in the coming polls next month has been lowered to $14,500 - a decrease of $1,500 from the $16,000 required in the last general election.

The new sum was announced by the Elections Department (ELD) in a statement yesterday.

The ELD also told The Straits Times that the change was in line with the candidate deposit for the Punggol East by-election in 2013, when it was also set at $14,500.

The general election deposit amount was last raised - from $13,500 to $16,000 - in 2011.

Under the Parliamentary Elections Act, each candidate's deposit is 8 per cent of the total allowances paid to a Member of Parliament in the preceding year, rounded to the nearest $500.

The deposit, however, will be forfeited if a candidate in a single- member constituency or a team in a group representation constituency receives less than 12.5 per cent of the votes in their constituency.

Singapore Democratic Alliance chief Desmond Lim Bak Chuan lost his deposit twice in two elections contesting in Punggol East - first in the 2011 General Election and then in the 2013 by-election held there.

Both times he was the worst performer in three-way fights.

The election deposit can be made at the Accountant-General's Department or at nomination centres before noon on Nomination Day.

The ELD also listed the nine nomination centres where the candidates will hand in their papers for contesting, according to their respective constituencies.

They will have to do so on Nomination Day, next Tuesday.

Nomination papers can be collected from today at the office of the Returning Officer at the ELD.

The department is open between 9am and 5pm from Monday to Friday, as well as between 9am and 1pm on Saturday.

Soft copies of the nomination paper can also be downloaded from the Elections Department website http://www.eld.gov.sg/





Ng Wai Choong to announce election results on Polling Day
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

Senior civil servant Ng Wai Choong will announce the results of the upcoming polls after the last ballot is cast and all votes are counted.

The Energy Market Authority (EMA) chief executive was appointed Returning Officer by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in April 2013, soon after People's Association chief executive Yam Ah Mee left for the private sector.

Mr Yam, now managing director at Sembcorp Design and Construction, became an overnight celebrity for his deadpan delivery of the 2011 election results.

Mr Ng, 49, was deputy secretary for policy at the Ministry of Finance before he was appointed to helm the EMA.

As Returning Officer, he will supervise elections in Singapore, including the Sept 11 polls.

Apart from announcing the results, he will also oversee the conduct of the polls and head the army of officials who will run the polling stations and count ballots.

He was the group assistant returning officer in the 2011 General Election, the presidential election in August that same year and the Hougang and Punggol East by-elections.





GE2015: Can PAP crack its performance paradox?
Its impressive policy record will likely be hammered by an opposition keen to claim credit for achievements
By Lydia Lim, Associate Opinion Editor, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

Now that Polling Day is set for Sept 11, the focus shifts to the next P - how well the parties have performed.

That, in turn, informs voters' views on who they think can best represent them over the next five years.

But what is the relevant timeframe to assess past performance?

Is it the People's Action Party's (PAP) 50-year track record of leading Singapore since independence in August 1965?

Is it the 10-year record of the team under Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who has been at the helm since May 2004?

Or is it the four-year record of the opposition, which won its first group representation constituency in the watershed General Election (GE) of May 2011?

As the party that forms the Government, the PAP has been on the offensive in seeking to define the terms by which political performance should be judged.

The timing of this election helps it make its case that good governance is vital to Singapore's survival and success. Both the year-long Golden Jubilee celebrations and the week of national mourning in March for founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew have brought to the fore how far this nation has come in the past 50 years - under PAP leadership.

At the National Day Rally on Sunday, PM Lee highlighted the bond between the Government and people over the last 50 years as one of three factors that enabled Singapore to get to where it is today.

"The Government has kept its promises, what we said we would do, we did do. We have kept our politics honest, we insisted on high standards of integrity in public life, no corruption, no dishonesty.

"We are also honest when it comes to policies and when it comes to the choices that we have to make. We do not shy away from hard realities, we do not sugar-coat difficult issues. We do right by Singaporeans," Mr Lee said.

He also held up the achievements of his team in the last decade - in strengthening safety nets, in housing, healthcare, education and in beautifying the city.

On the upcoming GE, he said: "This election will be critical. You will be deciding who is governing Singapore for the next five years; but more than that, you will be choosing the team who will be working with you for the next 15-20 years. You will be setting the direction for Singapore for the next 50 years."

At the same time, the PAP leadership has sought to debunk the opposition's claim that having it in Parliament keeps the Government responsive and accountable to voters.

Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam was the most explicit in doing so, in a speech he delivered 10 days ago to the Economic Society of Singapore. In it, he made the argument that the most remarkable aspect of Singapore's development is not economic growth per se but inclusive growth that has seen incomes grow across the board, with measures in place to moderate inequality and keep social mobility high.

"I recognise of course that there is some political cunning in saying that this all came about because of GE 2011. I'm sorry, it didn't. The world did not start in 2011," he said.

"We made very clear our intentions and motivations well before 2011, made clear that it was a multi-year strategy, and step by step, starting with the kids, through working life, and into the senior years, we have been moving towards a more inclusive society. We intend to continue on this journey, learning from experience and improving where we can. But this is a far more important agenda than a reaction to 2011," he added.

Mr Tharman is right; the world did not start in 2011.

But the reality is that the politicisation of many Singaporeans did. And from their perspective, the Government's responsiveness in areas of deep public discontent - whether buses and trains, property prices, healthcare costs or foreign worker inflows - is due in part to the presence of the seven opposition members voted into Parliament since 2011, the largest number since independence.

If such sentiments hold sway among swing voters - who, according to a 2011 Institute of Policy Studies survey, now form the largest bloc at 45 per cent of the total - then the Workers' Party (WP) may still be in a political sweet spot. It remains the PAP's only real rival at the polls.

During the 2011 campaign, WP chief Low Thia Khiang asked voters to elect opposition MPs to serve as co-drivers because "without co-drivers, Singaporeans keep getting taken for a ride".

Do voters still find such an argument persuasive? Even if some are disappointed by the WP's performance in Parliament or have doubts about its ability to manage a town council, others may believe that what the opposition party needs is yet more electoral support to help it grow and strengthen.

For the PAP, this state of affairs results in a performance paradox it may well find hard to crack.

Its team of ministers has worked hard to address the hot issues of GE2011. They have put more buses on the road, improved train capacity, ramped up the supply of new flats and cooled prices, moderated the inflow of foreign workers and introduced generous healthcare subsidies for pioneers and those on lower incomes, with lifelong medical insurance coverage to kick in for all from November. That is an impressive policy record.

But what will it yield in terms of votes? Will voters applaud what the Government has done? Or give the credit to the opposition? We'll know on Sept 12.


The normalisation of the political cyberspace since the 2011 GE

$
0
0
By Tan Tarn How, Published TODAY, 26 Aug 2015

One key question concerning the upcoming election is how the “political Internet” in Singapore has evolved since the last election in 2011.

The answer: In the last four years, the biggest change is the “normalisation” of political cyberspace. By that, I mean that the online world has become more like the “normal” offline world, where there is a wide range of views with most opinion clustering round the centre.

It has happened in these ways:

a) While the early Internet was almost exclusively used to express anti-government and anti-ruling party sentiments, the political Internet in Singapore is now home to a much wider spectrum of political views and players, and this is even more so since 2011. The alternative sites such as The Online Citizen (TOC), TR Emeritus and Yawning Bread are still around, but have been joined by new players. What’s more, some of these new and influential websites are politically in the centre such as Mothership, The Middle Ground and Inconvenient Questions. They are best called independent mainstream sites — “independent” in contrast to Singapore Press Holdings and MediaCorp (though some of their financial backers are not known publicly), and “mainstream” in offering news very similar to SPH and MediaCorp, though slightly more critical of the government. At the opposite end to TOC are new strongly pro-government/PAP sites such as Fabrications Against the PAP, Fabrications Led by Opposition Parties, and Singapore General Elections 2016 (slogan “Singapore is vulnerable. We cannot afford to fail. We need proven leaders.”)

b) The independent mainstream websites are giving the anti-establishment ones a run for their money. Mothership trumps The Online Citizen in readership, according to the figures provided to me by both sites.

Indeed, the surprise is that TOC’s readership slumped from 1 million page views a month during the 2011 election to a fifth that, though it has since climbed back to almost that number. The Middle Ground, set up only in June as a reincarnation of the defunct Breakfast Network, has reached an impressive 300,000 views a month. The Real Singapore, before it was asked to shut down earlier this year and reborn as States Times Review, was the most popular political non-mainstream media political site, though a big question was whether people read it for entertainment rather than for true or serious political news or useful insights.

c) The online websites of the mainstream media such as The Straits Times and Channel NewsAsia continue to dominate as online sources of political news. They have more readers than the alternative news sites. They were also more trusted than alternative news sites for election news, as we found in an IPS study in 2011.

d) Social networking sites are so pervasive that platforms such as Facebook are used by Singaporeans of every political persuasion. The comments on Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s page are overwhelmingly supportive rather than critical of him. When Mr Lee Kuan Yew died and during the height of Amos Yee’s saga, ordinary citizens (or at least pro-Mr Lee) came out in large numbers. Furthermore Facebook is a conduit for many articles from both independent and established mainstream media, therefore cementing its reach.

e) The popularity of politicians online reflect their popularity offline. Prime Minister Lee’s over 800,000 likes dwarfs Mr Low Thia Khiang’s 22,000+ and Dr Chee Soon Juan’s 6,000+. Almost all MPs and other politicians have Facebook pages.

f) There is increasing financial backing and hence professionalisation of the websites, especially the mainstream ones. The Middle Ground has four full-time journalists and two staff in the business end. Inconvenient Questions has seven staff and outsources its video production. Mothership is able to pay a handful of full-time staff and has a budget to advertise. The Middle Ground and Inconvenient Questions are led by ex-professional mainstream media journalists. The Online Citizen struggles to get funds, paying its staff rates that range from “semi-formal to exploitative”, according to one of its editors Howard Lee. Inconvenient Questions, The Middle Ground, Six-Six and Must Share News have formed a GE Online Alliance to pool resources.

g) A number of sites offer articles that are completely one-sided (that is, totally ignoring the different perspectives in an issue) or loaded with emotive language. But the more serious sites are rather balanced and level-headed, irrespective of where they stand in the political spectrum, as my colleague Carol Soon and I found in a recent study. That is, partisanship has not stopped them from being “rational” (an example of a partisan media outlet that is rational would be The Straits Times). Being rational and partisan makes sense, because the best way to convince others of one’s argument is to be rational rather than to rant.

h) Since 2011, Singaporeans online are more willing to speak against the government, said editor Richard Wan of the alternative website TR Emeritus in an email to me. This willingness to speak up against the government is but a reflection of a similar trend offline. But it should be noted people are also more willing now to speak up for the government online. In the past, supporters of the government would practically be shouted at into silence. Overall, the willingness of speaking up for or against is part of the normalisation process where the online world becomes more and more like the offline one.

Tan Tarn How is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. This commentary first appeared in IPS Commons.


Online vitriol gives rise to dismay among politicians

$
0
0
By Ng Jing Yng, TODAY, 25 Aug 2015

To politicians, social media these days is a double-edged sword. While it is a valuable tool for engagement, retiring People’s Action Party Member of Parliament (MP) Ellen Lee is among those who have rolled up their sleeves and got their hands dirty, only to be disappointed by how falsehoods circulated online can undo years of good work by not only themselves, but also those before them.

Ms Lee, who entered politics in 2006, cited the Central Provident Fund (CPF) as an example. She said while many accept that the CPF system is largely beneficial to Singaporeans, opinions were being swayed online by lies. “Those who try to reason will be flamed and regarded as pro-government,” she said. People are just receiving information online whether it is true or not, she lamented.

Announcing her decision to step down earlier this month, Ms Lee said then that the atmosphere for politicians had changed. Speaking to TODAY, she stressed that her frustration with cyberspace did not contribute to her decision to leave politics.

Nevertheless, she said she had been on the receiving end of some criticism online. She tried to track the source of these negative comments on Facebook, but found that some had been posted via fake accounts, she added.

Veteran PAP MP Inderjit Singh, who has also announced his retirement, said he had encountered his fair share of online vitriol, including people who use vulgarities. Nevertheless, he felt that these experiences were a minority. He added that he does not respond to every single criticism. Instead, he would try to determine if the ground sentiment corroborates with the feedback online.

Like Ms Lee, he said it is important for more of those who have been silent to speak up, so the discourse online would be more balanced.

PAP MP Alvin Yeo, who is stepping down after two terms, said that even though he does not have a Facebook account, his friends would notify him of negative online comments about him. To him, it is important to discern what is genuine feedback and to stay focused on his work as a politician.

Following the announcement that Mr Lui Tuck Yew will step down as Transport Minister, some of his Cabinet colleagues spoke out against the vilification and mocking of him online.

Not only have politicians from the ruling party borne the brunt of online attacks. With people posting negative comments on the Facebook page of Mr Desmond Lim’s company, the online harassment of the Singapore Democratic Alliance chairman has become so bad that he said on Facebook last week that if the situation continues, it might lead him to quit his job or leave politics.

Since an edited version of one of his old campaign videos went viral earlier this month, Mr Lim has been ridiculed for his command of English. While he accepts that there will be detractors, there is no need to make him lose his livelihood and affect his family, he told TODAY. “Is this the way we want politics to be? Who else will dare step forward to contest?” he asked.

Over the weekend, two National Solidarity Party leaders, Mr Sebastian Teo and Mr Steve Chia, were disparaged by anonymous posts put up on the Internet. Mr Teo has yet to comment on the remarks, while Mr Chia has decided not to stand in the coming election for the sake of his family.

People’s Power Party chief Goh Meng Seng said that most of the time, he would ignore the attacks unless they contain lies that smear his reputation or affect his family. He said the worst he had to face was people spreading rumours many years ago about him having a mistress. The rumours stopped only after he threatened the culprit who had started the rumour with legal action, he said. “It really should be about the contest of ideas and clean policy debate. There is no need to get ‘dirty’,” he said.

The WP’s potential new candidate Daniel Goh, who is active on social media, said he would usually respond to online criticism “not to defend (his) stance as such, but to ensure the view is truly tested in debate”. He would admit readily if he is wrong, he said.

Political observers and analysts felt the “harsher” political climate might deter people from going into politics, but aspiring politicians have little choice but to take it in their stride.

Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan noted that the placid environment for politicians in the past was more of an anomaly. Still, he said: “Certainly, we don’t want a toxic social-media environment either ... So, there is much to be said for keeping our political scene a healthy one, where there is free and responsible discourse, debate and engagement. If we don’t, we will be cutting our noses to spite our own faces.”


Jurong Region Line may be extended to join Circle Line

$
0
0
Engineering studies being done; extension would give residents in the west another way to get to CBD
By Christopher Tan, Senior Transport Correspondent, The Straits Times, 26 Aug 2015

In what may be his last public announcement, Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew said yesterday that the planned Jurong Region Line - a medium-capacity MRT line serving the west - could be extended southwards to join the Circle Line at Haw Par Villa station.



Mr Lui, who is leaving politics after the elections, said the new 20km line, with some 16 stations, will also stop at the North-South Line's Choa Chu Kang station and at Jurong East to link up with the planned Singapore-Kuala Lumpur high-speed rail terminus, the future Cross Island Line and the Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

Mr Lui said engineering studies are currently being done on the Jurong Region Line. The line is estimated to be ready by 2025, while the extension - if found to be feasible - will be completed by 2030.

Mr Lui said the new line will serve areas like Choa Chu Kang, Jurong East, Jurong West, the new Tengah town, Boon Lay as well as NTU.

Its so-called West Coast Extension, roughly 7km long, "will allow those who use the Jurong Region Line a direct connection into the new downtown, Marina Bay and the area around it", he added.

"Those living in the western area will have two avenues to get to the CBD - along the existing East-West Line to City Hall, and also using the Jurong Region Line connecting to the Circle Line into the downtown area," Mr Lui said. This will be possible when the final stage of the Circle Line - a 4km stretch linking HarbourFront station to Marina Bay station to make a complete circle - is completed by 2025.

Mr Lui said the project will make life more convenient for those who live and work in the west, and at the same time "add redundancy and resilience into the (rail) network", so that when there is a breakdown on one line, commuters can switch to an alternative line without travelling too far.

Mr S. Iswaran, an MP for West Coast GRC, said the West Coast Extension "will be a very welcome piece of news" to residents in private and Housing Board estates in Pandan Gardens, Teban Gardens and the West Coast areas.

Mr Iswaran said while he wants the engineering studies to be done properly, he and his fellow West Coast GRC MP Foo Mee Har will be "encouraging the Ministry of Transport and LTA (Land Transport Authority) to expedite this project".

Yesterday, Mr Lui also viewed two new link bridges at Clementi MRT station. Installed with two escalators and a lift each, the bridges connect commuters from both sides of the road to the station concourse. Mr Lui said they were part of a plan to upgrade older stations to make them more accessible.

Plans are also under way to expand the platform area at 16 older stations to accommodate a fast-growing commuter population. The minister said this would require the removal of some station furniture, reconfiguration of the platform layout, and extending the floor to "slab over some of the void spaces, especially where the escalators come up and down".

Asked what he would be doing after he leaves politics, Mr Lui reiterated that he was leaving without any plans.

"I've no plans. I don't intend to make any plans until I've handed over to the next transport minister, whoever he or she may be.

"I think right now, I just want to stay focused."




Residents in the West, guess what are we doing to improve rail connectivity from the west to the city? We are studying...
Posted by Land Transport Authority – We Keep Your World Moving on Tuesday, August 25, 2015





Visited the newly upgraded Clementi MRT station this afternoon. One of our “pioneer” stations since 1988, Clementi...
Posted by Lui Tuck Yew on Tuesday, August 25, 2015



Viewing all 7503 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>