Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live

Coping in the face of adversity

$
0
0
By Lee Wei Ling, Published The Sunday Times, 20 Jan 2013

The photograph in The Straits Times showed a man standing in a room with a wet floor, and two other men with their backs to the camera mopping up the mess. The headline read: "Top artist's works damaged in blaze."

I scrutinised the man in the centre. He seemed to be grinning but his eyes showed no signs of mirth. Indeed, his eyes had a sad expression.

Mr Tan Swie Hian is one of Singapore's most successful painters. There was a fire in a unit neighbouring his at Telok Kurau Studios. He did what he could. He grabbed six works from his collection - including a painting of my parents, Mr and Mrs Lee Kuan Yew - and fled.

When the firemen came, they doused the fire with water. In the process, several other works in his studio were ruined. The artist couple in whose unit the fire had begun - Mr Anthony Chua Say Hua and his wife Hong Sek Chern - fared even worse. They lost more than 1,000 of their works, the product of over 30 years of faithful creation.

I was intrigued by Mr Tan's facial expression in the photograph and wondered what he was thinking about. "Mr Tan had called his friends to help him clear up the mess and said that he did not have the heart to check the damage to his works," The Straits Times reported. I guessed his smile was a stoic attempt to hide the pain he felt over the destruction of his works.

Through contacts I managed to get his telephone number and called him. We spoke for 30 minutes.

It was not a smile of happiness, he confirmed. Rather, it was ku xiao, a "bitter grin". He had posed for the photographers with that grin to hide his sadness.

Just last month, one of his paintings sold for $3.7 million. But what was destroyed by fire and water did not represent just a financial loss to Mr Tan. What upset him was the destruction of his artistic creations.

He had put his body and soul into creating them. Even if he were to try to replicate them in the future, they would not bear the freshness of spontaneous creation.

He told me that he had been painting a scene of my parents together when they were students at Cambridge University. Although he had grabbed that painting as he ran out of the studio, it had already been partially damaged. He later told The Straits Times wryly: "The painting has gone through the baptism of fire."

I quoted to him two lines from one of my favourite poems, Rudyard Kipling's If: "If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster/ And treat those two impostors just the same…"

He agreed that he had no alternative but to just carry on. Crying over spilt milk was a waste of time and effort.

All of us have experienced the equivalents of "triumphs" and "disasters", though not perhaps on as dramatic a scale as Mr Tan, Mr Chua and his wife have. As difficult as it is, each of us must learn to cope with "those two impostors just the same".

When I failed a postgraduate examination in 1982, it seemed to me my world had collapsed. In 1995, when I developed peripheral neuropathy, I read extensively about it and imagined the worst-case scenario. More recently, I have had new health problems.

There are moments when I feel enormously frustrated with my ill health. But at other times I try to stay positive with the following thought: None of us knows our tomorrow. Indeed, the very next moment may bring either triumph or disaster.

My next moment may be less certain than the next moments of most other people. But I can choose to either wallow in despair, paralysed by uncertainty, or live each moment as fully as I can, never putting off till the next what I can do now.

Perhaps because I have been facing my present ailment since 2006, I have come to terms with it. Perhaps with time I can learn that true detachment that scripture tells us is the mark of wisdom.

After all, what are these losses that we suffer in life - creations destroyed, health lost - but advance lessons that we can't take any of this with us when we die.

The writer is director of the National Neuroscience Institute.




Punggol East By-election campaign - 20 Jan

$
0
0
'Vote for whoever can serve you best'
Heng says by-election is not about getting more opposition into Parliament
By Leonard Lim, The Straits Times, 21 Jan 2013

THE People's Action Party works hard not because of opposition presence in Parliament, but because it takes its responsibility to Singaporeans seriously, said Education Minister Heng Swee Keat yesterday.

He was responding to comments made by Mr Low Thia Khiang at an election rally last Saturday, where the Workers' Party chief urged Punggol East residents to vote for the opposition to make the PAP work harder.



Mr Low had pointed to a slew of policy changes in areas such as housing and health care, instituted since the 2011 General Election, as evidence of the impact his party has had.

Calling on voters not to be "misled", Mr Heng retorted: "We are working hard because we want to serve our people, not because of opposition members in Parliament.

"Our responsibilities are to our people and to do our best to create a better future for all."

He added that it is an "important responsibility" to improve the lives of Singaporeans, to build a better future for the young, and to take the country forward.

"We take this responsibility seriously."

He offered some examples from his own ministry, saying that the Government has invested and improved the education system over the years, even when there was no opposition in Parliament. "As Education Minister, I am very clear that we will do our very best to help every child get as good an education as possible.

"I will work hard to support our teachers in our schools to bring out the best in every child," he told reporters at a community event in his Tampines GRC constituency.

Mr Heng also challenged Mr Low's argument that having more opposition MPs would make the PAP work harder.

He said: "Well, maybe that's the basis on which the Workers' Party operates and the basis on which it is motivated.

"If that is the case, I think voters should look at what the various MPs have done, and what they have contributed in their constituencies and in Parliament, and I think they will come to the conclusion that they should vote for the PAP to make the Workers' Party work harder for you."

The ruling party, he added, "has not and will not" take voters' support for granted.

Calling the PAP's candidate, Dr Koh Poh Koon, sincere, hard-working and dedicated, the minister said the colorectal surgeon would work hard to meet residents' needs and improve lives.

On a broader level, Mr Heng said Dr Koh would also work with ministers to convey his feedback.

Mr Heng said it is important to understand what the Punggol East by-election is about.

Reiterating a point made by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong last Saturday, he said the election was not about voting more opposition into Parliament, but rather electing the right candidate who can best serve the residents of Punggol East.

He added: "Voters should cast their votes based on who is the best person who can serve them, and not for them to serve the interests of an opposition party."


GETTING IT RIGHT
Voters should cast their votes based on who is the best person who can serve them, and not for them to serve the interests of an opposition party.
- Education Minister Heng Swee Keat



'Vote to help strengthen WP'
Low says a stronger party will make a difference to lives of Singaporeans

By Tessa Wong, The Straits Times, 21 Jan 2013

THE Workers' Party yesterday urged Punggol East voters to help strengthen the opposition party by sending one more WP representative into Parliament.

This was the response of party chief Low Thia Khiang and candidate Lee Li Lian to the advice by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to voters to vote for what they believe in, rather than tactically.

A stronger WP will make a difference to the lives of Singaporeans, especially voters of the single-seat ward, as the Government will work harder, said Ms Lee.

During a morning WP walkabout, Mr Low was also asked about PMLee's remarks last Saturday that the WP's elected MPs have neither objected to the Government's agenda nor offered alternative proposals of their own since 2011.

"I'm pleased that what all the PM had to say about the WP is to lament that we have not done enough in Parliament," Mr Low replied.

He declined to comment further, saying he would speak about it at the coming two WP rallies.

Last Saturday, referring to the so-called "by-election effect" where voters support the opposition knowing that the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) is already in power, PM Lee said it would pose a problem if everyone did so to "get two people to look after me".

A two-for-one proposal - of an opposition MP and a PAP challenger - is often used by opposition parties to win votes.

Yesterday, Mr Low said: "I noted what PM said, and I would urge the Punggol East voters and residents to vote for Lee Li Lian and send her into Parliament to strengthen the WP."

Ms Lee said that having one more WP parliamentarian, in addition to the existing six elected and two Non-Constituency MPs, would add to their impact.

"One more WP MP means we have more voice, more airtime and more questions to ask, that would definitely make a difference," she said.

The WP would also be able to push the Government harder, she said.

If elected, she said, she would speak up on topics such as the cost of living, welfare for the elderly and family-related issues.

When asked about Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean's remarks last Saturday that he was glad "the WP agrees PAP's new policies are good", she agreed that it had some good policy changes but she cited only one: the extension of bus concessions to the elderly in 2011.

There were other areas that still needed to be improved, she said.

"I think they should further look into paternity leave, really materialise it, instead of (saying) 'keep looking into it, keep looking into it'," she added.

On tactical voting, Ms Lee said voters have the power to voice their unhappiness against the ruling party.

In a similar vein, party chairman Sylvia Lim added that "people will make their own decision based on their own calculation".


RESPONSE TO PM'S ADVICE
I noted what PM said, and I would urge the Punggol East voters and residents to vote for Lee Li Lian and send her into Parliament to strengthen the WP.
- Workers' Party chief Low Thia Khiang



PAP man lists what he can do for voters in new flier
By Leonard Lim, The Straits Times, 21 Jan 2013

PEOPLE'S Action Party (PAP) candidate Koh Poh Koon started handing out a new flier on the campaign trail yesterday, providing a quick summary of his plans if elected as MP.

Entitled "Punggol East Update" and printed only yesterday, the A4-sized flier lists the various plans he has spoken about so far.

The ideas are categorised under target groups such as families, the elderly and the low-income.

For senior citizens, Dr Koh pledged to introduce integrated elder-care facilities, health screening and more covered linkways.

Previously, the 40-year-old's fliers contained simple messages to voters appealing for their support. He adds in the new flier examples of how Punggol East residents' needs have been met - through more childcare places, for instance.

"I hope that you would give me a chance to continue the good work, and to do even more, as your MP. Let's transform Punggol East into 'A Home with a Heart'."


Yesterday, Dr Koh also elaborated on plans for a wellness centre for the elderly and more health screening programmes, as he made a pitch to elderly voters.
The centre and programmes would be located at void decks or a new community centre slated to be built on an empty plot of land behind Rivervale Plaza mall.

Turning to infrastructure in the ward, he said more benches and resting points would be added so that senior citizens can take a break when walking between their homes and malls.

Dr Koh, who spoke to reporters outside St Anne's Church, canvassed for votes from worshippers. He continued to pound the ground alone yesterday, but other MPs supported the PAP campaign by fanning out around Punggol East to knock on doors.
Today, Dr Koh, the commanding officer of a battalion, is expected to pause his campaign for a few hours as he goes back to camp to address his 400 men. He will promise to return for the second half of the two-week reservist stint once campaign and post-Polling Day activities are over.


'A HOME WITH A HEART'
I hope that you would give me a chance to continue the good work, and to do even more, as your MP. Let's transform Punggol East into 'A Home with a Heart'.
- Dr Koh's new flier



Should an MP's gender matter?
By Tessa Wong, The Straits Times, 21 Jan 2013

WORKERS' Party (WP) candidate Lee Li Lian and her People's Action Party (PAP) rival Koh Poh Koon yesterday weighed in on whether the gender of an MP should matter to voters.

Speaking to reporters during the WP's walkabout at Rivervale Plaza, Ms Lee said she believes women "have a different point of view when we look at different things, that would add on to the value".

"I believe as women, we have a more personal touch, we probably would be able to understand the problem better," said the sales trainer.



Ms Lee, 34, is the sole woman in the four-cornered Punggol East by-election.

Besides the PAP's Dr Koh, 40, she is fighting the Singapore Democratic Alliance's Mr Desmond Lim, 45, and the Reform Party's Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam, 53.

But Dr Koh, a colorectal surgeon, countered yesterday that gender should not matter, and asked voters to cast their ballots based solely on the capabilities of the candidate instead.

"All MPs should take care of different segments of the demographic equally well," he told reporters after greeting parishioners outside St Anne's Church.

"So I think the selection should not be based on gender per se. I think even at this present moment, we are all trying our best to take care of different segments: women, children, the elderly and the youth as well."

Their comments came one day after party chairman Sylvia Lim urged voters to support the opposition party's candidate so as to send another WP woman into Parliament.

Speaking at the opposition party's first election rally for the Jan 26 polls, Ms Lim said there are already many male MPs from the PAP.

Besides Ms Lim, the only other opposition woman in the House is Non-Constituency MP Lina Chiam of the Singapore People's Party. Of the 98 Members of Parliament, 24 are women, with 18 from the PAP and four being Nominated MPs.



'Green soldiers' to spread SDA election videos
By Jermyn Chow, The Straits Times, 21 Jan 2013

GREEN-SHIRTED volunteers of the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) will fan out across the Punggol East ward from today to disseminate up to 30 election video clips of candidate Desmond Lim.

The clips will be sent wirelessly to residents over the next few days, said Mr Lim.

"Watch out for the green soldiers," he told reporters as he went door to door yesterday to ask for residents' support.

Each video clip, lasting up to seven minutes, will feature Mr Lim and other SDA members raising issues such as cost of living.

They will also unveil plans to make health care more affordable for the elderly, he said.

Mr Lim, 45, who is an engineer with a telco, declined to elaborate on how the videos will be transmitted wirelessly, saying he did not want to "reveal my game plan to my rivals".

But he let on that residents will be able to view the clips on their computers, tablets and smartphones. He will also post them on the Internet.

IT analysts say Mr Lim could be sending the videos to mobile gadgets via wireless, Bluetooth or 3G access.

Mr Lim said cost was a key reason he ditched an outdoor rally - scheduled for last night - for the video clips. He is the only candidate who has not held a rally.

The video clips cost about $300 - a token sum charged by volunteers who produced them - in contrast to the more than $20,000 needed for an outdoor rally, he said.

"I want to catch the attention of the new generation of voters and can do so only with fresh, innovative ideas," he said.

Mr Lim, who contested Punggol East in the 2011 General Election, also on the SDA ticket, touted himself as a man of ideas as he attacked his rivals for making policy proposals that are "not new".

For instance, he said, People's Action Party candidate Koh Poh Koon's idea of setting up a wellness centre for elderly residents and building more rest stops like benches mirrored his proposal at the 2011 polls of setting up stress management corners for seniors.

Mr Lim also proposed removing the cap on the amount of Medisave funds that those aged above 81 can use to pay for private insurance premiums.

There is currently a limit of $800 per policy per year. The limit for those aged 81 and above is $1,150 per policy per year.

Mr Lim said: "My plan will ensure that the old can stay healthy and remain adequately covered by the insurance without having to overburden their children."

Punggol East By-election: SDA Online Rally

$
0
0



SDA rolls out Singapore's first "online rally"
By Hetty Musfirah, Channel NewsAsia, 21 Jan 2013

In an elections first, the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) has conducted Singapore's first "online rally", in a series of videos uploaded onto video-sharing site YouTube.

"The SDA has always been a leader in innovation. In the 2011 General Election, we were the first to have a live SMS Q&A segment in our rallies. Today, we are the first in the history of Singapore to do an online rally to reach you in the comfort of your homes and offices," said Harminder Pal Singh, before introducing Punggol East by-election candidate Desmond Lim.

Speaking for about two-and-half minutes, Mr Lim urged voters to vote for the individual candidate and not someone with the backing of a dominant party. He said such backing cannot guarantee loyalty and performance of the candidate. 

He said that at the end of the day, it all boils down to the character of a candidate to get things done.

Mr Lim added that history has shown that being backed by a dominant party will not prevent the candidate from making mistakes. 

"At the end of the day when the fanfare is over, what counts is the individual. The individual and his values is what you should be voting for, for history has shown that big backing has not prevented major falls from surfacing. It is the person's commitment, his values, his strengths and his persistence that will keep your dreams alive." 

The SDA said that it will be posting at least 10 video clips throughout its campaign to reach out to voters online. 

The videos, which will be in English, Malay and Chinese, will address national and local issues.




Party chief attacks PAP and WP
In video, Desmond Lim pledges to check both in Parliament if elected
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

SINGAPORE Democratic Alliance candidate (SDA) Desmond Lim has attacked both the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) and Workers' Party (WP) for letting voters down.

"Big names cannot guarantee loyalty and performance," said the SDA chief in an online video released on YouTube yesterday.

In the six-minute clip, he set himself apart from the PAP and the WP by pledging to check both parties in Parliament, if elected.

He said: "Why restrict the voices in Parliament to two? Where is the system of checks and balances with two dominant parties in action?"

He pleaded with Punggol East voters to look beyond the small size of his party and support him for his commitment, stressing that he did not bail out of the ward despite his poor showing in the 2011 General Election.

The video last night is the first in a series the SDA promised to put online in what it billed as Singapore's first online election rally.

The party posted a second video last night. In it, Mr Lim pitched himself as the only candidate in the by-election with the experience to run Punggol East town council, if elected.

Mr Lim, a former protege of veteran opposition MP Chiam See Tong, was a town councillor at Potong Pasir.

More videos on health care, housing, public transport and education policies are in the pipeline, said Mr Lim. The party produced the series of clips instead of holding a rally to save money. But the first instalment last night was delayed by about 90 minutes. It came online at 7.30pm, not 6pm as announced.

Mr Lim told reporters his campaign team will ensure the distribution of videos does not run foul of election laws. In 2011, rules were relaxed on political campaigning on the Internet and social media during election time.

At 10pm yesterday, the videos attracted more than 800 views.

Armed with the videos, Mr Lim's green-shirted volunteers will invite residents today to view the clips on smartphones by scanning barcodes on fliers or using Bluetooth wireless technology.

Aside from the videos, Mr Lim continued his campaign offline.

Yesterday, he greeted residents at Kangkar LRT station in the morning, visited HDB flats and distributed fliers outside North Spring Primary in the afternoon.

There, he crossed paths with Reform Party candidate Kenneth Jeyaretnam and they locked arms in a display of solidarity. He told reporters he encouraged Mr Jeyaretnam not to be intimidated and distracted by the threats the latter had received. "I have been through it before," he said.

Mr Jeyaretnam told The Straits Times that he appreciated Mr Lim's encouragement, adding: "It was kind of him."














Related

Punggol East By-election campaign - 21 Jan

$
0
0
Aiming to be part of change from within
Koh feels Govt is already moving in the direction he thinks is right
By Goh Chin Lian, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

AS HE dashes from house to house, ringing doorbells, shaking hands and handing out fliers, two things quickly become clear about Dr Koh Poh Koon.

First, the 40-year-old People's Action Party (PAP) candidate is still very new to the world of politics and second, that he is in a real hurry to establish himself in Punggol East.

He tends to run, not walk, between houses as he tries to connect with as many of the 31,649 voters as he can. The relentless pace is possible because Dr Koh is something of a fitness junkie, with his grassroots volunteers often finding themselves trailing behind him.



Almost everything about his journey into politics has been on a compressed schedule.

Invited to tea with the PAP in the middle of last year, it seemed that the original plan was to field him in the next general election.

But last month, after former Speaker of Parliament Michael Palmer resigned, he was asked to consider running. He got the confirmation on a Saturday a few weeks later and by Wednesday, he was introduced as a candidate.

His friends tried to dissuade him, fearing a tough fight and that he would have to toe the PAP line on policies that he disagreed with.

To him, however, the PAP government is a good one that has already set in motion policy changes since the watershed 2011 polls.

"If the Government is already in the midst of change and it is moving in a direction that I think is the right direction, then it's better to be involved in the process of change from within," he said one Saturday night after a long day of campaigning.

He is candid, sometimes to a fault, prompting his wife to pronounce him "too straight" for politics.

Indeed, Dr Koh is frank enough to say that he believes Singapore should have more single-member constituencies, so that the seat will be better earned through a fight.

"That's not to say that in a GRC the engagement is going to be less, but that can be something that theoretically people can leverage and say: 'You keep riding on the shoulders of giants, then you sit there and do nothing, you will still get in.'"

Indeed, despite being a political greenhorn, he has spent a large chunk of his campaign ploughing a lone furrow. PAP heavyweights have dropped by to support him but he still does most of his walkabouts in small groups.

But he stresses that "this is me" is not the message he is trying to send. He explained that he had said it in jest earlier when asked about a slogan.

Still, his straightforward nature comes across to the residents he encounters.

"He's quite forthcoming," was the impression teacher Gopal Bahavani, 36, had.

His first rally speech last Friday was polished and confident and generally well-received. Businessman Raymond Pang, 42, said: "He has the calibre and is willing to stand up and be counted. He could achieve more besides being an MP."

Few in the PAP were surprised when Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong indicated that Dr Koh could be an office-holder in the future.Party activists who pounded the ground with him think he is friendly and sincere while his former colleague at the Singapore General Hospital, PAP MP Chia Shi-Lu, said he is "a straight talker with no airs".

His busy campaign schedule means that Dr Koh is not keeping up with his rigorous fitness regimen. He used to run 10km on Sundays and do 30 chin-ups daily before he showered, on the bar he mounted in his toilet.

His family - wife Jessica, a gastroenterologist, and two daughters aged nine and four - have largely shied away from the limelight, save for turning up at his rally.

On a drive to his party branch last Friday, the two doctors talk about what they normally do, exchanging medical notes and discussing the schedule for the week ahead. When they pull up in a carpark, he thanks her, reminds her to drive safely and gets out of the car. Before he shuts the door, he pops his head in and kisses her.

And then he is off and running again.



Candidates react to baby boosters
By Leonard Lim, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

MEETING the demand for childcare was the focus of the candidates in the Punggol East by-election yesterday, as they reacted to the swathe of new government measures to encourage citizens to marry and have babies early.

The People's Action Party's Dr Koh Poh Koon gave his views on Facebook, saying that the measures "will go some ways to help young couples who wish to have children".

He added: "However, we should do more to reduce the hassle of childcare arrangements and the stress of putting our kids through school to comprehensively address the concerns of couples thinking of starting a family."

Workers' Party's Ms Lee Li Lian also welcomed the new measures while reiterating her stand that there needs to be more "affordable and quality infant and child care that is conveniently located".

A similar point was raised by Singapore Democratic Alliance's Mr Desmond Lim, who said the lack of affordable childcare facilities was a "big obstacle".

The Government is expected to announce further moves, aimed at improving the childcare sector, tomorrow.

Both Dr Koh and Mr Lim have pledged to increase childcare facilities in Punggol East if elected.

The policy changes announced yesterday span larger baby bonuses, increased subsidies for fertility treatment, priority for couples with young children in the queue for new flats, as well as paternity and adoption leave.

During a walkabout earlier in the day, where he spent some time with a PAP Community Foundation kindergarten class, Dr Koh picked out paternity leave as a key part of the slew of measures.

"Having some paternity leave goes in some way to signal that this is important, and that parents, be it father or mother, have a role to play," he said.

Ms Lee also lauded the paternity leave and added that the WP manifesto had suggested at least six days of paid leave for fathers.

She went on to say that while she was glad families would have a higher priority for flats, her top concern was still affordability.

Reform Party chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam meanwhile criticised the new measures and said he disagrees with a lump sum baby bonus. He wants it replaced with continuous support for families.



Banking on her heartland girl charm
By Andrea Ong, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

WALKING briskly in black kitten heels, Ms Lee Li Lian cuts a striking figure as she clicks her stilettos around the Housing Board blocks in Punggol East.

She looks residents straight in the eye while smiling and greeting them in English, Mandarin or dialect.

She shakes each hand firmly, sometimes paired with a pat on the shoulder.

But she is a woman in a hurry. Alone among the four candidates, the Workers' Party (WP) contender has set herself the goal of visiting "100 per cent" of the 127 Housing Board blocks in Punggol East.

"I really have to get going," she said, when stopped by The Straits Times during her house visits last week.

Yet, despite the race to hit 127, the 34-year-old sales trainer has been able to maintain an air of calmness.

At the WP's first rally last Saturday, while other speakers were seen flipping through notes before they spoke, she sat serenely as camera lights flashed.

When she took the podium, she did not refer much to her script when she spoke up on behalf of young families.

But it is her heartlander girl charm which many have noticed.

At a foodcourt last Friday, an old man came up to her, shouting "Ho seh liao!" while miming a hammering motion.

With her trademark gap-toothed smile, Ms Lee laughed and said: "Gam sia, gam sia!" (Hokkien for "thank you").

Of the four candidates, Ms Lee comes closest to the main demographic being courted in the ward. A large number of Punggol East residents are young, middle class white-collared men and women.

She has opened up about her wish to start a family and the factors that couples like her and her husband must consider, such as rising costs and childcare.

She has also blogged previously about suggestions like legislating paternity leave and giving single parents the same public housing benefits as married ones.

When the WP team stops for a meal, young to middle-aged women with children in tow frequently approach Ms Lee for a photograph, addressing her familiarly.

Later, as the team goes past Rivervale Primary School just as school ends, they get stuck in a crowd of parents and excited children as she is kept busy shaking hands and posing for photos.

Many remember her from her previous run in the 2011 General Election.

Some residents, however, wish she would do more.

Civil servant Hardy, 43, thinks the WP has done a good job and likes Ms Lee's agenda.

"But if she could bring up education for special needs children, that may make up my mind," said the father of three.

But while Ms Lee is comfortable and open with residents, she is more guarded with the media.

In line with the WP's usual practice, Ms Lee has kept her campaign low key, declining to allow media coverage of her house visits to protect residents' privacy.

She is supported by a tight- knit group of volunteers, including husband Jacky Koh, 36, a telecommunications consultant.

But Ms Lee is usually the first face residents recognise when the blue-clad team appears. She keeps her smile on throughout the day, never seeming to flag.

Ms Lee even powered on ahead of party leaders at a recent market visit, instead of having them flank her. But WP leaders Low Thia Khiang and Sylvia Lim seemed happy to let her run her own show, walking leisurely in the background while greeting residents.

At last Saturday's WP rally, Ms Lim asked voters to elect another woman opposition MP.

"She can do something which I can't do," said Ms Lim. "She can run in high heels!"



SDA holds online rally
By Amir Hussain, TODAY, 22 Jan 2013

Instead of just being a check on the People’s Action Party-led government, the Singapore Democratic Alliance’s (SDA) candidate for the Punggol East by-election, Mr Desmond Lim, yesterday sought to offer himself as a check on the “two dominant parties”.

“You want democracy? Then why restrict the voices in Parliament to two? Where is the system of checks and balances with two dominant parties in action?” Mr Lim asked in his first online rally video posted on YouTube. “Empower me to make sure those highly-paid representatives are earning their keep. Let democracy reign.”



The video was among two clips posted last night. The first was shared on the SDA’s by-election Facebook page an hour later than scheduled as Mr Lim said his team “needed a little more time to get (the video) duly trialled and tested”. TODAY understands that the clips were posted late as the SDA had not declared to the Elections Department of Singapore its intention to do so as part of election advertising, as required by the Parliamentary Elections Act. The party had to submit its declaration before it could post the videos.

The 45-year-old Lim plans to produce at least 10 rally clips of between seven and 10 minutes duration. He had said that cost was a key reason for making the SDA the first party here to hold an online rally.

In the first six-minute-long video, Mr Harminder Pal Singh, who led the SDA’s team in contesting in Pasir Ris-Punggol in the 2011 General Election and who is assisting in Mr Lim’s by-election campaign, noted: “There are many impending issues today, including better childcare support, safer living spaces and sustainability of incomes.”

And in his latest flyer to residents, Mr Lim said he plans to review existing childcare facilities, study the possibility of increasing traffic lights and designated pedestrian crossings to enhance road safety, and increase interaction and bonding among residents.

Asked why voters should choose the SDA over other parties that have more resources to implement similar plans, Mr Lim told TODAY: “Experience has shown that (resources) do not guarantee performance on the ground. There are many unresolved matters in Punggol East and deliverables (are) not achieved. This tells you that ... it is the candidate who makes the difference.”

Alluding to the resignations of former Members of Parliament Michael Palmer and Yaw Shin Leong, Mr Lim said in the first video: “Big names cannot guarantee loyalty and performance. At the end of the day when the fanfare is over, what counts is the individual. The individual and his values should be what you should be voting for.”

Similarly, Mr Singh noted the “exit of prominent players who succumbed to personal challenges in their political careers”, and asked viewers: “Who is here to stay?”

Mr Lim had contested in Punggol East in the 2011 General Election and received 4.5 per cent of the valid vote.



RP's Jeyaretnam happy with campaign progress so far
Channel NewsAsia, 21 Jan 2013

As the by-election campaign passed the half-way mark, Reform Party's candidate for Punggol East, Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam, said he is happy with the progress so far in terms of feedback and reach.

Mr Jeyaretnam told reporters after his house visits on Monday morning that he is satisfied with the party's first rally on Sunday.

He said he has received a lot of positive feedback.


His party has distributed leaflets to all flats in the ward.

The Reform Party chief has also covered 25 blocks during his house-to-house visits.

The Reform Party is expected to hold its second and final rally either on Wednesday or Thursday.

Mr Jeyaretnam said he will focus on plans for the constituency in his speeches.

Marriage & Parenthood Package 2013

$
0
0
The big push for more babies
New package of measures will raise yearly spending to $2b
By Jessica Cheam, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

SINGAPORE is banking on a wide range of meaures to persuade citizens to marry and start families. These are targeted at working couples, those who already have children but do not have homes yet, as well as those struggling to conceive.


The package announced yesterday will see government spending on pro-family measures rise from $1.6 billion a year to $2 billion.

And there is more to come: measures to address parents' concerns about the availability, quality and cost of child care will be announced tomorrow.

Singaporeans have not been replacing themselves since 1975 and the total fertility rate (TFR) has plunged to 1.2 in 2011, well below the replacement rate of 2.1.

With the raft of new measures, the Government hopes to see the TFR rise to 1.4 or 1.5. That would boost the average of 36,000 babies born each year by another 6,000 to 9,000 annually.



Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who oversees population matters, said at a press conference yesterday: "It's not really the amount of money that's important (but) the kind of signals we're sending, the kind of help and support we're giving families."

The new measures address couples' practical concerns in five areas: housing; conception and delivery fees; the cost of raising children; work-life concerns; and paternity leave. And they are targeted at specific groups.

The housing measures, for example, help couples who have gone ahead and started families before getting their flats. Now, they will get priority for the HDB's Build-to-Order and Sale of Balance flats, and can rent flats from the HDB at discounted rates while waiting for their flats to be ready.

The baby bonus cash gift goes up by $2,000 to $6,000 for the first two births and $8,000 for the third and fourth births.

All newborns will receive a $3,000 Central Provident Fund Medisave grant for health-care needs, and from March 1, the MediShield scheme will cover neonatal and congenital defects.

Couples with problems conceiving will receive higher subsidies for fertility treatments, even if they already have one child.

To help working couples balance the demands of job and family, parents of children aged seven to 12 will each get two days' childcare leave. Such leave is now available only to those with younger children under seven years old.

There are new maternity benefits for women employed on a contract basis. And pregnant working women will be protected from retrenchment and unfair dismissal throughout their pregnancy.

From May 1, fathers will get one week of government-paid paternity leave and, if they wish, they can also take a week of their wives' paid maternity leave.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Grace Fu said Singaporeans want to marry and start families but have other priorities such as jobs and financial stability.

"Part of the goal of the Government is to try to put marriage and parenthood back up on the list, to stress that it's not something that you can wait for for too long, because there's always a sweet spot for doing this, for getting married, getting to know people," she said.


Priority is to 'grow citizen core'
By Rachel Chang, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

WHEN it comes to population policy in Singapore, the most fundamental goal is to grow the core of citizens.

So regardless of what else is done, the main thing is to encourage citizens to marry and have more children, said Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who oversees the population issue.

"And this is the starting point of all that we do," he said yesterday, introducing the enhanced $2 billion-a-year Marriage and Parenthood package. The stubbornly low birth rate among Singaporeans is the reason the country has a population challenge, he said.



Estimates put last year's total fertility rate at 1.28 to 1.3 - an increase from 2011's 1.2 - due to a "mini Dragon Year effect" when more Chinese couples had babies in the auspicious year.

But the rise was smaller than the bounce previous Dragon years had produced, he noted.

If there is no improvement in the birth rate, the citizen workforce will start to decline by 2020 and the citizen population by 2025 if there is no immigration.

The new suite of measures is the first and most important part of the Government's population road map, said Mr Teo.

Two other components will follow. They will be on providing good education and good jobs, and on maintaining a high-quality living environment.

Mr Teo set the scene at yesterday's press conference which was attended by six office-holders from four ministries. This, he noted, illustrated the scope of the new package.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong later posted on Facebook that he hoped the new measures would "encourage more couples to start planning, and we will see more babies soon".

Mr Teo was also asked if he thought Punggol East residents, who are in the midst of a by-election, would welcome the improved incentives. He said he hoped so, but added that the by-election was "not a factor in consideration". He said the Government had been discussing the measures for almost a year.





7,000 new flats for parents with young kids
Housing Board sets aside that many BTO units for them this year

By Daryl Chin, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

MARRIED couples with young children can take their pick of new Housing Board flats from a stock of at least 7,000 units reserved for them this year.

This will be the allocation from the 23,000 Build-to-Order (BTO) flats being planned for this year in mature as well as non-mature towns, said a Ministry of National Development (MND) spokesman.

She was elaborating on the new selection process for parents under the revised Marriage and Parenthood package announced yesterday and which takes effect immediately.

Now, 30 per cent of flats in new BTO projects will be kept for parents who have not received a housing subsidy and whose child is younger than 16.

But this is just part of the total stock. The other part will be made up of unsold flats in soon-to-finish BTO projects. As many as 50 per cent of these units will be set aside for them. The MND is unable to provide immediate figures.

Before the new Parenthood Priority Scheme, the HDB selection process distinguished only between first-time and second- time buyers, with at last 85 per cent of new flats reserved for the first-timers.



Explaining the new move, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said young parents can be given priority because there are enough new flats for each and every first-time buyer.

Another reason he gave is the growing number of engaged but yet-to-marry couples getting a flat during balloting when they can wait, while some married couples with young children are not as lucky although they want a home immediately.

"There's enough flats for all first-timers now, let us recalibrate and let those who are married with children go ahead," he said.

Mr Khaw is confident the change will allow young parents to ballot "almost certainly within this year" for a flat, as they form fewer than half of all first-time buyers applying for HDB flats.

Besides priority in buying, the new Parenthood Provisional Housing Scheme will make it easier - and cheaper - for young parents to rent. HDB will offer 1,150 three- and five-room flats in Ang Mo Kio, Bedok, Jurong West and Queenstown for rent.

These are primarily HDB flats emptied for the Selective En bloc Redevelopment Scheme (Sers), where old blocks of flats are redeveloped to optimise land use.

The rents of these unfurnished flats range from $800 to $1,900 a month, depending on location and size. This is up to 40 per cent below market rent.

Young parents like assistant project manager Mohammad Shahrul, 28, cheered the changes, saying they were timely.

He, his homemaker wife and their two sons, aged six and four, live with her parents, who own a four-room flat in Jurong West.

In the past four years, he balloted three times but failed to get a flat in the same estate as his parents-in-law.

"I want to be near them so that I can look out for them and they can take care of my children," he said. "I hope things would go my way this year."

Analysts interviewed foresee the changes will encourage couples to have children earlier.

Realtor Eugene Lim said the changes could draw demand away from the HDB resale and rental market. "This will set the stage for a long overdue price correction in the resale market."



Higher subsidies for fertility treatments
By Tham Yuen-c, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

COUPLES looking to science to help them conceive will get more help financially, with increased subsidies for fertility treatments.

The subsidy will now also be made available to couples who already have children, and will cover in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment using frozen embryos. Before, only treatment using fresh embryos was covered.

IVF cycles sometimes yield extra embryos. These spare embryos are frozen and can be thawed to be implanted later in what is known as a frozen cycle.


The subsidy will now cover up to 75 per cent of treatment costs for Singaporean couples undergoing the procedure. Singaporeans married to permanent residents will be eligible for a 55 per cent subsidy, while those married to foreigners will get 35 per cent.


Ms Sandy Tan, 36, who declined to use her real name, said it means an additional option for those like her who have already exhausted one cycle of fertility treatment.

"The subsidies cover only up to three cycles, so if they now cover frozen cycles, it means we have three more chances," said the scientist, who just had her embryos transferred yesterday at the National University Hospital in her second round of IVF treatment. She did not get pregnant after the first round last year.

Others, like Ms Joanne Wee, wondered if limiting it to public hospitals would only disadvantage those who are already trying to battle time.

The 39-year-old marketing executive put off having a second child for eight years, only to find that age had caught up with her, making conception difficult.

"Cost is definitely a factor," she said.

Her first round of IVF last year in a private hospital cost her and her husband $15,000. But she did not get pregnant.

"The subsidies will be helpful to those who are not in such a rush. I'm turning 40 later this year, so I cannot wait any more," she said, adding that the wait at public hospitals was longer than at the private hospitals.



Bigger baby bonus, plus Medisave grant
By Tham Yuen-c, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

HAVING a child is not all about the money, but new parents will still be getting more of it in the Marriage and Parenthood Package announced yesterday.

Married couples, with children born on or after Aug 26 last year, will receive a bigger baby bonus and a grant for their child's Medisave account. With these gifts, they start out on their child-rearing journey with at least $9,000.

Part of it will be in cash, from the bigger baby bonus which will be paid out more quickly as well.

The bonus for couples having their first or second child goes up to $6,000 and for the third and fourth child, $8,000 - this is $2,000 more than before.

They will also be given in three instalments, with 50 per cent handed out when the child is born, instead of the current four equal instalments.

Bank executive Han Kwang, 34, who is expecting twins in May with wife Vanessa Ng, 32, who also works in a bank, said people will not have kids just for the bigger bonus but it will make things easier for those who do. "For us, it's $14,000, so it will definitely come in useful. Diapers and milk powder cost quite a lot."

But others, like Dr Wang Lushun, 31, said the entire baby bonus does not go far in defraying the costs of raising a child here.

The doctor, whose lawyer wife gave birth last week, said: "What's more useful is that they are enforcing more time off from work for parenting duties."

Parents will also receive help with health-care costs, with a $3,000 Medisave grant for newborns. The money can be used to pay for medical expenses such as vaccinations and outpatient treatment and MediShield premiums.

MediShield coverage will also be extended to include congenital and neonatal conditions, with all Singaporean children diagnosed after March 1 this year eligible for cover. This new coverage was most useful, in the eyes of Mr Han, who had been hoping for it.

"There have been a lot of cases of twins who are born premature and need to be put in the neonatal intensive care unit. This can cost up to $1,000 per child, per day. That was definitely a concern for us," he said.

"The grant might not be able to cover everything, but it's a step in the right direction," he added.



New dads to get guaranteed week off
Paternity leave paid for by Govt 'sends signal' dads should play greater role
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

MARRIED fathers will get a guaranteed week off work to spend with their newborns - paid for by the Government.

Currently only dads working for companies that offer paid paternity leave get such a benefit. But such leave will soon become mandatory, and will extend to fathers who are self-employed.

Announcing the change yesterday, which comes after years of lobbying by pro-family groups, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said it sends a signal that fathers should be more involved in raising their children.

The leave will be given to fathers of children born on or after May 1 this year. Its value is capped at $2,500, including Central Provident Fund contributions.

But employers are also encouraged to voluntarily offer the paternity leave to employees with children born on or after Jan 1 this year. They will be reimbursed by the Government.

To qualify, the father must have served his employer for at least three months before the birth of his child, who must be a Singapore citizen.

If the child's mother qualifies for the current 16 weeks of government-funded maternity leave, the father may also take one of those weeks, if mum agrees.

Housewife Teresa Tay, 29, called it a good and useful move. She and her husband, financial business owner Andy Lim, 36, are trying for a second child.

Their son, Darius, is a year old.

But Ms Tay noted that many fathers may not be able to make use of the paternity leave due to work commitments. "Many of my male friends who are fathers and work in banks, for example, can't afford to take leave because there is so much work to be done. If they take the leave, the work will pile up and they have to clear it anyway," she said.

Nonetheless, the move is a strong signal from the Government that a father plays a major role in his child's development, said Mr Josh Goh.

The assistant director in recruitment firm The GMP Group said: "It's definitely a welcome measure. These days, a lot of fathers want to be there when their child is born. Even though it's just one week, it helps because that first week is critical."

Employers said that the length and flexibility of the paternity leave struck the right balance. It is to be taken within 16 weeks of the child's birth, or over a one-year period if employer and employee agree.

In a press statement yesterday, the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) welcomed such flexibility and said it was glad employers' concerns had been heard.

SNEF president Stephen Lee also noted that maternity leave had been kept at 16 weeks, which was helpful to employers, given the tight labour market.



Maternity benefits for women on short-term contracts
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

SOME 3,000 married women employed on short-term contracts are expected to benefit each year from new government maternity payouts.


The benefit is equivalent to the government-paid portion of maternity leave and calculated based on the mother's income in the 12 months before childbirth. It is capped at $10,000.

The move provides these working women with some income in the months after the birth, when they are unable to work.

This group of women did not previously qualify for maternity benefits, noted National Trades Union Congress assistant secretary-general Cham Hui Fong.

For example, if they had given birth after their work contract ended, they would receive nothing from that employer.

She said: "But now, any working woman will be covered. Whether you're self-employed, freelancing or permanently employed, you will at least have these government maternity benefits."

These women form about 15 to 17 per cent of those who work on contract, she added.

Other new measures to help working couples balance work and family commitments include an extension of protection for expectant mothers from retrenchment and unfair dismissal.

Employers will now have to pay a pregnant employee maternity benefits if, at any point of her pregnancy, she is retrenched or dismissed without sufficient cause. This is to discourage employers from cutting costs by not paying pregnant employees maternity benefits.

Parents of children aged seven to 12 will now each get two days of government-paid childcare leave a year. Previously, only those with children aged seven and below were entitled to six days of childcare leave.

In another first, married women who have adopted infants will now get four weeks of mandatory paid leave.

The leave must be taken in the 12 months after the child is born.

These new measures take effect on May 1 this year.



Ministers give their takes on the measures

NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT MINISTER KHAW BOON WAN
On the move to reserve 30 per cent of new Build-to-Order flats for couples with children below 16 years old:

"It is fair and reasonable to do this re-adjustment since there are enough flats for all first-timers.

So, let us recalibrate and let those who are married and have children go ahead of those who are applying under the fiance scheme.

Once we have cleared the backlog of those married with kids, then we can go to the next group - which is, married but kids coming."


DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER TEO CHEE HEAN
On the significance of the Marriage and Parenthood package:

"Singaporeans are the core of society, and the best and the most fundamental way to build a stronger Singaporean core is to encourage marriage and parenthood.

So regardless of whatever else we do to deal with the population challenge, the core and the most fundamental thing that we want to do is to encourage Singaporeans to marry and have more children and this is the starting point of all that we do."


MINISTER IN THE PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE GRACE FU
On getting young Singaporeans to prioritise marriage and parenthood:

"The key message from Singaporeans is that many of them do plan to get married. But at the moment, there are many other options in their lives: career, financial stability. These feature very high up on their priority (list).

Part of the goal of the Government is to try to put marriage and parenthood back up on the list, to stress that it's not something that you can wait for for too long, because there's always a sweet spot for doing this, for getting married, getting to know people."



Package sends pro-family, gender-equal message: Experts
By Rachel Chang, The Straits Times, 22 Jan 2013

THE enhanced Marriage and Parenthood package goes beyond financial incentives to send a social message, said observers and experts yesterday as they cheered the measures.

To them, the message is this: the Government prizes a pro-family and gender-equal environment as much as it does a competitive, business-friendly climate.



"The immediate intent of the policies was to make it easier for people to get married and have kids," said National University of Singapore sociologist Paulin Straughan.

"But the second intent was to set the ideological tone, to say very boldly that the Government stands behind family formation."

"Compared to 2008, the measures are much bolder," said National Family Council chairman Lim Soon Hock, referring to the last time the Marriage and Parenthood package was revamped.

"It is more than financial incentives now, it's also trying to create a supportive and convenient work environment for parents."

The week of government- funded paternity leave, plus the ability for women to share one week of their maternity leave with their husbands, sends a powerful message, said Ms Anita Fam, chairman of Marriage Central's advisory board.

"It's a recognition that parenting is a shared role."

National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) assistant secretary- general Cham Hui Fong saw the entrenchment of paternity and parental leave as "a significant milestone in promoting work-life harmony in working families", and one that recognised fathers' roles as primary caregivers.

Ms Helen Lim-Yang, board member of voluntary welfare organisation I Love Children (ILC), welcomed the provision of two days of child-care leave for parents of children aged seven to 12.

Previously, only parents of children below seven years old were eligible for child-care leave.

This is a "long-term approach" which will encourage young couples, she said.

"Handouts help a couple initially with a newborn. With this, couples thinking of starting a family can see that, yes, there is help all the way down the road."

But there were areas where observers wished that the Government had dared to go.

Ms Cham said the NTUC wants to see the right of parents to ask for flexi-work arrangements, especially if they have children with special needs, to be entrenched in guidelines if not written into law.

The National Family Council's Mr Lim said that the measures to meet the housing needs of couples with young children did not get to the nub of the problem.

Such couples can now rent affordable flats from the Housing Board while waiting for a new flat to be built.

"This helps only those who already have kids," he noted. "But couples actually don't start families because they don't have access to public housing."

Allowing young couples who have not yet had children to rent flats as well would help, he said.


New Medifund Junior scheme set up

$
0
0
MOH pumps additional $10 million over five years to help needy children with healthcare costs
Channel NewsAsia, 22 Jan 2013

From March, the Ministry of Health (MOH) will set aside S$8 million annually under a new Medifund Junior scheme to help needy Singaporeans defray their children's healthcare bills.

The scheme, applicable to children aged below 18, will require an additional S$10 million in Medifund assistance over 5 years, to supplement current funds. The ministry will review whether the amount is sufficient thereafter, said the MOH in a statement.


Needy families will be able to draw on Medifund Junior for help with their children's healthcare bills at public hospitals, said the ministry.

"By creating Medifund Junior, MOH can target more financial assistance for sick children from needy families. This will also help defray costs incurred by children diagnosed with congenital or neonatal conditions before 1 March 2013," said the ministry.

From March, MediShield coverage for congenital and neonatal conditions will kick in. All Singaporean newborns born on or after March 1 will be covered, without having to be assessed for pre-existing conditions, if their parents do not opt them out.

All existing policyholders will automatically receive coverage for any congenital conditions diagnosed on or after March 1, 2013. This extension will be implemented together with previous MediShield enhancements announced earlier.

To support Singaporean families pay for their child's MediShield premiums and defray other healthcare expenses, the government will set up a Medisave account and deposit a one-off Medisave grant of S$3,000 over two tranches for all newborn Singapore citizens born on or after August 26, 2012.

The KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) puts up on average 400 Medifund applications a month.

95 per cent of these applications are usually successful with families getting assistance from Medifund.

However, as Medifund is targeted at lower income families, the middle income families are usually left out as they don't meet the criteria.

"Some of them, even though they are from the middle income families, some of the bills can be quite costly. So for these large bills, we are giving the hospitals more flexibility under the Medifund Junior to be able to help these middle income families," said Health Minister Gan Kim Yong.

Healthcare institutions will assess the out-of-pocket expenses by the needy families and their family resources before offering them assistance under this new fund.

Needy children diagnosed with congenital or neonatal conditions before 1 March will also be able to use the new fund to help defray costs. These include stays at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at KKH.

Ms Mavis Teo, a medical social worker at KKH, said: "For example, a couple with a newborn child with congenital problems and this is a dual-income family with an average income of about S$4,000...if (the child stays) in NICU and it costs them about S$20,000 to S$30,000, we would be able to help them to cover some of the medical expenses for the NICU stay."

For those with more serious premature cases or those with neonatal or congenital conditions, hospital stay may range between one month and six months, and on the average bills can be anything from S$10,000 to S$60,000.

In extremely rare cases, babies with severe complications needing multi-stage surgeries and treatment, medical expenses may even exceed S$100,000.

The hospital's NICU, which also treats premature babies, will be expanded.

Doctors at the KKH say that its NICU is usually run at full capacity due to the rising number of admissions in the past few years.

As such, the unit will undergo renovation and see its bed capacity rise from the current 24 to 40 in the next five years, making it the largest facility in the region.

Associate Professor Samuel Rajadurai, a doctor at KKH, said the incidence of premature babies has gone up by 10 to 13.5 per cent over 20 years.

A number of factors have led to this phenomenon, including the older age of mothers and better monitoring of mothers during their pregnancies.

The hospital also plans to expand its outpatient as well as ambulatory services and increase the number of beds.





Baby ICU stretched to the limit
More babies born with problems now than before, says KKH doc
By Salma Khalik, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2013

A RISE in the number of children born prematurely or with health problems is stretching Singapore's top neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) to the limit.

KK Women's and Children's Hospital's (KKH) 24-bed unit is running at 100 per cent to 120 per cent occupancy, said the hospital's head of neonatology.

Associate Professor Samuel Rajadurai said the proportion of children born with neonatal problems has gone up from 10 per cent 20 years ago to 13.5 per cent now.

Prof Rajadurai puts this down to many factors, such as an increase in older parents and more babies being born through assisted reproduction. These mean a higher risk of babies being born prematurely or with congenital problems.

Thanks to improved medical technology, babies who are born at 24 weeks at KKH can be saved. The normal gestation period is 38 weeks.

He said staff are having to push in more cots to cope with the high demand or transfer babies to the children's ICU if there are vacancies - although the hospital has enough portable equipment for the extra infants.

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong yesterday visited the site at KKH where an expanded neonatal ICU is being built.

This will add eight more beds by May, with space for another eight beds in five years' time.

"Today they're really stretched. Even with the lower birth rates, we're seeing many children with complex problems. We want to make sure the capacity is sufficient and we also need to plan for the future," said Mr Gan.

Prof Rajadurai said medical technology has improved which allows more premature babies to be saved. KKH is where many women in Singapore who have "high-risk pregnancies" turn to.

It is also the referral centre that other maternal hospitals turn to for their complex cases, said Prof Rajadurai.

As a result, about 3 per cent or 4 per cent of babies born at the hospital suffer from congenital anomalies like malformed heart, intestines and nervous system.

The ICU for neonates - babies up to a month old - is already the biggest and busiest in the region, he said. And it gets 5 per cent to 10 per cent more patients every year.

Last year, it treated 450 babies of whom about 200 were born weighing less than 1.5kg. Another 1,500 required special care before discharge.

Among the more common problems are general infections, jaundice, which may require blood transfusion if severe, and breathing difficulties.

The hospital operates highly sophisticated equipment, such as an extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator which will do the work of an infant's lungs and heart. The baby's blood is taken out, cleaned, given oxygen and returned to the body by the machine, which takes the stress off the child's organs and allows them to develop properly.

KKH also has a device that can do 600 breaths for the baby in a minute.

Around 93 per cent of infants who go through the neonatal ICU survive.

Most are discharged quickly, though the more serious ones may stay anything from one to six months, chalking up bills that could exceed $100,000.

Said Prof Rajadurai: "The majority of the babies, both pre-term and those with congenital malformations, do well and live normal lives."


Punggol East By-election: WP Rally, 22 Jan

$
0
0



Not workable for Opposition to unite: Low
By Teo Xuanwei, TODAY, 23 Jan 2013

The fractious nature of Opposition politics here and the management of town councils came to the fore last night at the Workers’ Party (WP) rally, as its leaders tackled two hotly debated issues for the first time since the by-election was called in Punggol East.

Following charges of “arrogance” levelled at the WP for rejecting the overtures of other Opposition parties to negotiate a pact for the by-election, WP chief Low Thia Khiang said that, in today’s political situation, to have all Opposition parties coming together as one political force is an “unworkable concept”.

WP Chairman Sylvia Lim also brought up the People’s Action Party (PAP) town councils’ sale of computer software to Action Information Management (AIM), as she charged that since the WP took over town council management in Aljunied, she has seen that town management had become political to the point that residents may be used as “pawns for political gain”.

Speaking in Mandarin, Mr Low explained why his party decided to go its own way by pointing to how fractures in the Singapore Democratic Party in the ’90s had resulted in disarray in the Opposition camp, which, in turn, caused voters to lose confidence in opposition parties.

“The WP insists on going its own way ... not because of arrogance or lack of respect for other parties, but to prevent history from repeating itself, and from letting people down again,” he said.

Not only is the Opposition a complex camp with different personalities, leadership styles, and ideologies, Mr Low said parties would also have their own ambitions and views of doing things. “If the Opposition camp can unite, then Singapore wouldn’t have so many political parties today,” he said.

Mr Low also responded to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s criticism that the WP did not have serious views or alternative suggestions.

He said that expecting a party with six elected MPs to come up with alternative policies is “unrealistic”. Mr Low also listed issues that each of the WP MPs had raised since stepping into Parliament in 2011.

In response, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean posted on his Facebook page about two hours after the WP rally: “In his speech, (Mr Low) has listed all the subjects the eight WP MPs (including two Non-Constituency MPs) raised. But what is more important is that WP has avoided taking a stand on major issues, for example, population or foreign workers where tough trade-offs are needed.

“Have they offered credible alternatives on the best way forward? If not, having another WP MP will not help the quality of debate and decision-making for Singapore.”

At the WP rally, Ms Lim said the party’s taking over of town management in Aljunied GRC had given it access to documents to show how the PAP town council had been managing towns. Without elaborating, she said that a few contracts which the town council had signed allowed for termination of services should the town council land in Opposition hands.

Ms Lim also raised issues with the AIM transaction, for instance, how the PAP town councils deemed it fit to sell the computer software to a company with S$2 in paid-up capital.

In response to media queries, Coordinating Chairman of PAP Town Councils Dr Teo Ho Pin reiterated, among other things, that AIM — which is fully owned by the PAP — was awarded the contract after an open tender and the company “did not make any financial gains” from it.

Dr Teo also repeated that it was Aljunied-Hougang Town Council that terminated the contract with AIM, and that its high arrears had nothing to do with AIM or the changeover of the IT system. The “key issue (is) the performance of the town councils and how well they are managed by the WP”, he added.







Town councils 'used to trip up opposition'
Sylvia Lim alleges that residents may become pawns for political gain
By Andrea Ong And Tessa Wong, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2013

WORKERS' Party (WP) chairman Sylvia Lim charged last night that town council management has become a political avenue to "trip up" the opposition, even at the expense of residents.

"It has gotten to the point that residents may become pawns for political gain or simply collateral damage," she said.

Speaking at the WP's second rally, she said she had encountered a few town council contracts that could be terminated if the composition of the council changed.

"Is the clause there - in case constituencies are lost by the PAP - to trip up the incoming opposition MPs?" asked Ms Lim, who chairs the WP-run Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC).

"And do they want to trip us up so much that they do not consider the possible disruptions and suffering inflicted on the residents?" she asked.

She raised as an example the termination of AHTC's computer software contract by IT company Action Information Management (Aim) after the 2011 General Election. Pulling the plug on AHTC's computer system was like "sending soldiers to battle but removing the ammo when they're in the field".

Operations would have ground to a halt if the WP had not drawn on its old Hougang Town Council system, she said. Aim, owned by the People's Action Party (PAP), bought the rights to the 14 PAP-run town councils' computer software in 2010.

The WP had raised the issue of the Aim sale last month to explain why it did not get a banding for corporate governance in a government report card on town councils. AHTC did not submit an auditor's report in time because it needed to change its computer system, said Ms Lim then.

She has since locked horns with Aim and the PAP town councils. They argued that extensions were readily granted to the WP who had asked for the termination in the first place - a point Ms Lim has disputed.

The saga has led to a government review of the Aim transaction as well as the "fundamental nature" of town councils.

Yesterday, Ms Lim argued the episode illustrated the importance of political competition in furthering public interest.

The Aim sale, for instance, surfaced only when AHTC took over from the PAP-run Aljunied Town Council after the WP won the GRC in 2011, she said.

Calling her AHTC experience "eye-opening", she noted that it was the first time an opposition party had been able to dig into documents showing how the PAP town councils have been managing Housing Board estates.

"While many of the systems and processes were sensible, there were other aspects that show how political town management had become," she said, adding that residents could become political pawns.

Ms Lim filed an adjournment motion to present the issue in Parliament but withdrew it after the review was announced. The WP felt it was in the public interest to wait for the review's outcome before taking up the matter further, she said, adding: "This episode illustrates the way WP works."

She also addressed criticism that the WP used the Aim issue as an excuse for its report card performance. Ms Lim said the WP had been "simply obsessed" with taking over the town council with minimal disruption since 2011, but felt it owed residents an explanation for the audit delay.



Key issue is WP's management of town council: PAP
DR TEO Ho Pin, the coordinating chairman of the People's Action Party (PAP) town councils, responded to Workers' Party chairman Sylvia Lim's rally speech during which she raised the Action Information Management (Aim) issue.


- Aim was awarded the contract after an open tender by PAP town councils, to centralise software to maintain the current IT system and help develop a new system.
- The transaction brought benefits and savings to the town councils. Aim did not make any financial gains from the transaction.
- It was the Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) which terminated the contract, and not Aim.
Ms Lim herself has admitted that the AHTC's arrears are high, and that this has nothing to do with Aim or the changeover of the IT system, and that the AHTC could do better.

This is the key issue - the performance of the town councils, and how well they are managed by the WP."
















Punggol East By-election campaign - 22 Jan

$
0
0
Go by what candidates can offer: DPM Teo
He urges residents to compare Koh's comprehensive plan with that of others
By Goh Chin Lian, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2013

DEPUTY Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean yesterday called on Punggol East voters to compare the plans People's Action Party (PAP) candidate Koh Poh Koon has to offer with those of other candidates, as he sought to focus the campaign on the man himself.

He said: "Poh Koon basically is a man with a comprehensive plan for Punggol and he will get it done. I hope that residents will compare what Poh Koon has to offer together with what other candidates can offer."

He was speaking to reporters with Dr Koh by his side, holding a flier that set out the candidate's plans for the constituency.

These include expanding or adding new childcare centres, and setting up study areas for youth, integrated elder-care facilities and a job placement centre.

Also on the list: pushing for feeder bus services, exploring options for more wet markets and coffee shops as well as building a new community club.



DPM Teo also gave another reason for voting in Dr Koh: The constituency will gain from working with the larger Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC under the PAP, where he is the team leader.

The GRC has cooperated with the constituency on projects and he looked forward to working with Dr Koh as "one big Pasir Ris-Punggol family", he said.

Earlier, both men and Minister of State Teo Ser Luck welcomed children heading for class at a PAP Community Foundation kindergarten. They later canvassed for votes at Rivervale Plaza, from shop owners and customers at a wet market and two foodcourts.

His call to compare the candidates and their plans contrasts with the Workers' Party's pitch to voters to give it one more seat because the PAP is already in power.

Asked about the WP's stance, he said: "Well, that's not a new argument. They use it all the time."

DPM Teo noted that residents have received Dr Koh well.

"I think they will find that he is a very down-to-earth person, listens, good sense of humour too. And he will work hard for them."

He declined to comment on criticism levelled by some opposition supporters at the WP.

But he rejected suggestions that recent announcements, such as the plans to expand the MRT network and pro-family measures, were to supply additional firepower for the PAP campaign.

"These are things which have been in the works for a long time. I hope it will benefit Singaporeans as a whole," he said.

Mr Teo also acknowledged that the PAP faces a "keenly contested campaign", adding: "Poh Koon is taking it very seriously, so is the party. We will reach out to every voter. We will take the vote seriously and we want to make sure that we can serve them well in the future."

The aim is to reach out to every voter and household, he added, before the campaign window closes on Friday, the Cooling-Off Day.

Nee Soon GRC MP Lee Bee Wah, who was among the seven PAP MPs who went from flat to flat yesterday, told The Straits Times the contest would be fierce. "It's expected to be a very tough fight based on ground feedback. I would like to help my comrade," she said.



DPM Teo rebuts WP chief
RazorTV, 23 Jan 2013

Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said that while Workers' Party MPs have raised issues in parliament, they avoided taking a stand on major issues such as population or foreign workers.

DPM Teo was responding to WP secretary-general Low Thia Khiang, who defended his party's performance in parliament at a rally on Tuesday, after recent comments by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong that the opposition party does not have alternative policies and strong views.

He said in a Facebook post that the opposition party had avoided taking a stand on major issues where tough trade-offs are needed, while PAP MPs have offered more constructive suggestions. PAP MPs were prepared to take a stand, and speak for measures, even difficult ones.

DPM Teo added that voters should also ask which candidate has the best plans and can serve them best.


During the WP rally, Mr Low said that while there is a group of professionals and academics working behind the scenes with WP MPs to scrutinise government policies, it was premature and unrealistic to expect only six MPs to form an alternative government.

He also highlighted the issues that WP MPs have raised in Parliament since October 2011, such as flooding and drainage, childcare, immigration and infrastructure, pricing of drugs at public hospitals, housing, high rental costs, foreign manpower, public transport, and taxi and COE bidding.

Workers' Party will be holding its third and final rally on Jan 23, 2013, from 7pm to 10pm, at the open field in front of Block 183C, Rivervale Crescent.

The PAP will hold its second rally at the open field in front of Block 128C Punggol Field Walk on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 from 8pm to 10pm.



Koh said 'no' to PM at first
By Leonard Lim, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2013

SOON after Punggol East MP Michael Palmer quit politics last month, Dr Koh Poh Koon received a call to go to the Istana to meet Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

He knew what was on the agenda: Would he stand as the People's Action Party's candidate in the single-seat constituency?

Dr Koh, who had been invited to a PAP tea session in the middle of last year, quickly consulted friends and family.

Many told him not to take the plunge into politics.

"Everyone felt that it was hard to be yourself and be honest, and still do good," Dr Koh, a colorectal surgeon, told The Straits Times yesterday.

A self-described "troublemaker", he had criticised certain government policies during a meeting with PAP leaders.

Friends were concerned that agreeing to wear the PAP whites would require him to toe the party line, even when he disagreed with it.

He shared their fears: "I don't want to change. I don't want to do populist politics. I want to do real work."

That was the reason he told Mr Lee politely at their meeting that he felt he was not suitable for the task. But the Prime Minister, who is the PAP's secretary-general, asked him to think about it, related Dr Koh.

The 40-year-old had intended to return and say "no" again. He was, however, wracked by guilt over the next few days.

"I thought by saying 'no', I would sleep better. The whole week before that, I was struggling with the answer.

"I felt I had turned my back on society, and that I was being selfish," he said, pausing often and struggling to describe his inner conflict.

Since his school days, he said, he had felt a strong sense of wanting to serve Singapore. He has been involved in grassroots work since 2002, and is a battalion commanding officer for his reservist duties.

He discussed his concerns with his wife, also a specialist doctor, thought hard about it and decided to say "yes" to Mr Lee.

"She knows what kind of person I am. That if the button is pressed today, I will say goodbye to my family, take my gun, and go. Serving the country is a higher calling," said the father of two daughters, aged four and nine.

"Saying 'yes' would be the harder thing, but it would be the right thing. I could sleep better."

Since his unveiling as a PAP candidate a fortnight ago, he has been criticised online.

He was initially demoralised. "Even my wife said, 'See, you want to help people, but they don't want your help'."

But he has come to terms with the fact that there will always be negative remarks, and now pays less attention to them.

He maintains he will continue to be himself. "I'm hoping that with time I will not change. If I do, I'll have no more value being here."



Underdog with derring-do instincts
By Tessa Wong, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2013

A GIANT shark-shaped balloon bearing Mr Desmond Lim's smiling face might well have been floating around Punggol East by now, if he had his way.

"But I wasn't sure the police would allow it," said the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) candidate on a recent walkabout. As it turns out, the law would frown on it as illegal election advertising.

Such campaign ideas are not new to the man. From his latest "online rally" to the superhero ant mascot Sinpo who could obliterate high taxes during the 2011 General Election, the engineer can be counted on to come up with unusual ideas.

The quirky, derring-do instincts have driven him back to Punggol East, despite garnering only 4.5 per cent of the vote in the general election and losing his deposit of $16,000. Others may be embarrassed by the poor showing. But Mr Lim, 45, turns it into his campaign message.

Holding up his clasped hands, he greets residents in Mandarin: "Hello, I'm Desmond Lim. I'm back again. I didn't do so well the last time, so please consider giving me your vote now."

Some residents say they like his underdog indefatigability. "He is very sincere. Even though he didn't succeed last time, he still wants to serve us," said Mrs Susie Wong, a 48-year-old housewife.

But ask them if they would elect him as their MP and they are not so sure. Their main concern is whether he can deliver on promises like a new hawker centre, bicycle paths and childcare centres.

Said cargo worker Ali Hussain, 40: "Mr Lim is enthusiastic. But his party is not as established as the People's Action Party or the Workers' Party. At least they have experience running estates."

Others say his small walkabout team of about six helpers, compared to the larger entourages by bigger parties, do not inspire confidence.

Mr Lim is aware that the SDA brand does not have the same heft as other parties. So he touts his credentials in Potong Pasir Town Council, where he was former opposition MP Chiam See Tong's right-hand man. Mr Lim helped run the council for 14 years, before leaving in 2010 after a spat with Mr Chiam and his wife.

Now, it is his turn in the spotlight, the one whose face adorns election posters or perhaps even a shark-shaped balloon.

That is why he has not given up on Punggol East. Said Mr Lim with a grin: "I'm moving forward now, and there will always be a place for me in life."



Message to voters most important: Desmond Lim
TODAY, 22 Jan 2013

Responding to the negative online reaction to his rally videos posted on YouTube, Singapore Democratic Alliance Secretary-General Desmond Lim said the “most important thing” is that his message is being conveyed to voters.

“Everything is about the learning curve. We will listen to it and work on it,” said Mr Lim, who is the party’s candidate for the Punggol East by-election. "The most important thing is that my message is conveyed to the masses."



The party has posted four clips of Mr Lim’s online rally so far, tackling issues such as childcare and healthcare. The 45-year-old Lim plans to produce at least 10 rally clips.

His first two videos, posted online yesterday evening, have garnered more than 84,000 views. The other two were posted online this morning and as of 1pm have nearly 500 views.

Online reaction has been harsh, with many criticising Mr Lim’s poor command of the English language.

Speaking to the media today on the sidelines of his campaign, Mr Lim said: “I’m learning just like everyone else. Most importantly, never give up. We need to be sincere and have the heart to serve.”

He added that it is a “great achievement” for the party to have been able to launch the videos in a short period of time.

If he is elected, he will "first and foremost" have the people's interest at heart, said Mr Lim.



No typical day as schedule stays fluid
By Joyce Lim And Robin Chan, The Straits Times, 23 Jan 2013

AFTER the morning rain, the sun is now beating down on a group of men dressed in yellow tees as they knock from door to door.

At every door that opens, one of them steps forward, offers a faint smile and a whiff of a British accent: "Hello, I am Kenneth Jeyaretnam. I am J.B. Jeyaretnam's son."

That is how he wants to be known, as the son of the late opposition veteran. But don't vote for him because of that, he insists.

"Vote for the Reform Party because you believe in our policies. We have the best policies for you," he says.

For the first time since his return to Singapore to begin a political career in 2011, Mr Jeyaretnam is finally in the national spotlight. In 2011, he contested and lost in the barely noticed sleepy race in West Coast GRC.

Punggol East is his chance to establish his profile, to get the needed support to enter Parliament.

The odds are not in his favour. Unlike the well-oiled machinery of the People's Action Party and increasingly, the Workers' Party, the Reform Party (RP) relies on a core team of of six people. They are an energetic motley crew.



Schedules are fluid and events are often re-interpreted as much by choice as circumstance. So, a discussion with "grassroots" on his five-year plan for the ward turns out to be a lunch at Rivervale Mall's foodcourt with just one resident - his assentor.

Thus, there is no typical day on the RP campaign trail. Once, Mr Jeyaretnam arrives half an hour late. His cabby had lost his way.

Then, while trying to take the LRT train from Kangkar to Rumbia station to greet residents, he finds his ez-link card is out of money, and the top-up machine is down. He fiddles around for a one-way fare, as everyone waits and watches. "I was charged 80 cents more," he grumbles.

The Cambridge-educated economist is trying to fit in, adjusting to the toils of campaigning.

A Facebook comment about his posh accent elicits a detailed explanation from him that it is his linguistic legacy from the English-educated Tamils who left Jaffna in Sri Lanka for Singapore in the late 1800s.

"I am as proud of my own heritage as I am proud of our Republic's cultural diversity," he says.

His atypical background, including his persistent criticism of a pledged billion-dollar international loan, is jarring to some, but others find themselves drawn to him. They are curious why he has chosen this path when his younger brother Philip is happily in the mainstream with his legal career.

Engineer Hui Kong Meng, 46, is the only one to drop by at RP's residents' feedback session on Monday. He wanted to meet the candidate in person, impressed by his vigour and passion, and his "well-researched" views on "deep national issues".

But it was not to be. The weather had felled Mr Jeyaretnam. He stayed home nursing a flu.


Boss Mum

$
0
0
She once thought she had to forgo her career ambitions to start a family. Now IBM chief and mother of four Janet Ang is proof you can have both
By Alicia Wong, TODAY, 19 Jan 2013

It is a somewhat incredible revelation, but Janet Ang stresses that it is no joke: Every time she gave birth (four in all), she got a promotion at work.

“So much so, after my fourth (child), people ask me: ‘So how, are you going to have another one?’” the IBM Singapore boss says, laughing loudly. “I say: ‘I certainly hope after my track record I don’t need to have another child to get promoted!’”

Indeed, the vivacious, straight-talking tech veteran has stamped her mark on the company, rising from a systems engineer post when she joined in 1982 to Managing Director in 2001. After a stint at Lenovo, she was re-appointed MD of IBM Singapore in 2011.

But as we chat over lunch at The St Regis Singapore, it is apparent that Ms Ang — who is 53 but actually “forever 39” — is more than just a career mum. She sits on several boards, including the Singapore Chamber of Commerce and Industry in China. As part of her community involvement, the Catholic keeps her Sundays busy with church work.

At a time when young couples debate the feasibility of work-life balance and the merits of starting a family while building their career, the ambitious Ms Ang stands as a role model for those who want to “have it all”.

MAKING CHOICES

The high-flyer — who on Thursday shared her experiences at the National Family Council’s CEO Breakfast Roundtable on embracing families in business— is quick to point out that her journey has not been “a piece of cake”. With an end goal in mind (to be a “good mother, a good wife, a good IBM-er”), one has to be disciplined and make choices, she outlines.

Unexpectedly, one of her earlier choices had been to forego climbing the corporate ladder for her family. Believing she could only “do well in one or the other”, the National University of Singapore business administration graduate had told her boss: “Don’t promote me, I am getting married.”

He laughed it off and congratulated her. Later when she was on honeymoon, a fax came in: She had been promoted from systems engineer to manager.

“I chose marriage — I want to have a family. But fortunately, IBM is enlightened,” she laughs. It then boiled down to making choices, such that her time was used most effectively.

EVERY IMPORTANT MOMENT

“I don’t hang around with my kids doing nothing, but I don’t miss their important moments in school,” says Ms Ang. She prides herself on having attended her four daughters’ most important concerts and parent-teacher conferences. When she has to miss out on the “not so important” events — as we speak, her youngest daughter is giving a poetry recital in class — she relies on photographs or videos.

“Having more kids will not hold you back. It does mean we have to be more disciplined,” she says. “In those early days, would I be wrong to say I have to sacrifice by not always having my hair tip-top, not going for a manicure, pedicure any time I like?”

Another sacrifice: Sleep. “I thrive on five hours of sleep. Good enough,” she says. “You’ve got to be able to make those choices. When people talk about work-life balance … I don’t think it’s a reasonable thing to expect balance. It’s really (about) effectiveness.”

She adds: “Sometimes, at home, I will say: ‘Okay, come, lets go do this and this and this,’ and they will say: ‘Oh, mum, don’t run IBM at home!’.”

5AM WORK DAYS

Still, if not for Ms Ang’s stellar time management skills, she may not have even got married. Recounting the long hours she used to put in at the office, Ms Ang asked rhetorically: “How are you going to get married if you don’t have time to ‘pak-tor’ (date)?”

So she made a choice. Regardless of whether she had completed her work, come 6.30pm, she would shut down the computer, pack up and leave for dinner with her then-boyfriend.

What he did not know was that the next morning, Ms Ang would wake up before the crack of dawn and be at work by 5am. After a year of courtship, the couple married in 1989. “I was thinking, gosh he has proposed, I’m getting married, how am I going to do this?”

Thankfully, IBM soon introduced the home terminal programme, which allowed her to install a modem and computer to work at home.

MR MUM

After tying the knot, her husband, Mr Anthony Cheah, played a crucial role in supporting her decision to be a working mum. He gave up his job when Ms Ang received her first international assignment and the family moved to Tokyo in 1998.

“Since then, he has been Mr Mum. So I must say I could not have done this without him. Tony has been super,” she enthuses. “He cooks very well, he likes hotel management, so you can imagine … (he) organised all of us!”

She adds: “One must admit, if my husband had not been supportive, what would have been my choice? I think you know my answer lah.”

Deviating from the traditional family set-up of the man as primary breadwinner came with its challenges.“My eldest daughter, then four or five years old, would ask, ‘Daddy, why are you at home’? So I think it was a little bit uncomfortable for my husband at the time.”

People were also calling her husband “Mr Anthony Ang”. To which she would retort: “Hello, hello, I am Mrs Janet Cheah!” She tried to change her surname but she was already known as Janet Ang professionally. “Then double barrel: Ang-Cheah. Mrs Janet Ang-Cheah (red car, in dialect), no way!” she chortles.

On a slightly more serious note, she adds: “Was my dad or mother-in-law a bit more worried? Definitely.” But they were also supportive, she states.

THE CASE FOR FAMILY

Ms Ang is also thankful for the support she gets at work. “At every step of the way, the organisation had a part to play,” she says.

“If it did not let me have flexi-time to take off, take my kids to the doctors, or for parent-teacher conferences, would I have chosen to stay with this company? Maybe not.”

And that is exactly the message the MD, who sits on the executive committee of The Employer Alliance, tries to tell companies — that there is a business case for offering family-friendly policies, namely the war for talent.

To attract good employees, companies must be able to support their work-life integration, she stresses. “If a family is broken down, they (the employees) take their problems to work.”

Among IBM’s pro-family initiatives are activities organised for employees’ children and take-the-kids-to-work days. “It’s really an exciting time for HR now,” Ms Ang notes, citing options such as job rotation opportunities to suit employees at different life stages.

Quoting from organisational guru Charles Handy’s The Empty Raincoat, she notes how companies can also tap the growing pool of part-time professionals when employees are on leave.

WALK THE TALK

The key challenge to implementing work-life balance measures is that a “whole systemic change” is needed. Leaders need to “walk the talk”, she says.

This means not asking employees where they are if they are telecommuting; or pulling a face (jokingly or not) when an employee reveals she is pregnant.

To provide employees with flexibility, bosses must move away from a “time-based expectation” of having employees at their desk nine to five, and focus instead on “outcomes”.

At the same time, employees have to be responsible in behaviour and output. “Don’t go AWOL,” instructs Ms Ang. Ultimately, it boils down to mutual trust; a “compact” between manager and employee.

What of smaller firms, where an employee going on leave means more work for everyone else, fuelling potential unhappiness? Sharing what some SMEs have told her, Ms Ang agrees with them on creating an “environment where employees feel part of the family”.

Then, instead of being resentful, they celebrate for one another if, say, a colleague is going to have a baby. Studies show higher rates of productivity if colleagues are friends. “That’s called team building,” she says.

FAMILY TRADITIONS

The down-to-earth Ms Ang is, at the same time, a self-confessed optimist — “I always see everything as doable” — and appreciative, stressing repeatedly that she is “blessed”.

An engaging conversationalist who needs little prodding, she expounds on diverse topics, including advice on domestic help (which she believes is “another relationship that has got to be nurtured”).

Asked if there is anything she would have done differently, she takes some time to ponder before concluding: No regrets, but she is still contemplating if she has “put my family traditions all in place”. They are “one way to keep the family together,” says Ms Ang, whose two elder daughters, aged 21 and 18, are now studying in the United States

One of the Cheah family traditions: Every child who turns 12 gets a holiday with her parents. This year, their youngest turns 12 on Valentine’s Day.

Says Mum: “She has decided — somewhere in Scandinavia.”

Why my wife is a stay-home mum

$
0
0
It may not be the wisest financial move, but can you really put a price on hands-on parenting?
By Jerry Foo, TODAY, 19 Jan 2013

My wife and I are both the eldest child in our families, so both sets of parents were overjoyed when our baby was born. They were less thrilled when we told them that after my wife was done with her maternity leave, she might go on an extended stretch of no-pay leave — or even put her career on hold indefinitely — to take care of Emma.

As one of the Grandmas put it: “You mean you don’t want me to take care of your baby?”

I grew up in my grandmother’s care, and had my domestic helper for company at home when I was older. My wife, too, grew up in the care of her relatives. The concept of the stay-at-home parent is definitely not something we were brought up with — so why are we even considering such an arrangement?

It’s something I can’t quite explain. Did my own childhood experience convince me that I wanted something different for my child? I did not have a terrible childhood growing up in the care of someone other than my parent, and I‘m sure many of you didn’t either.

Maybe it’s idealism, the thought of raising our own children right from the start, so that we can better bond with them, and bring them up the way we want to. But then again, I wouldn’t say that children not raised in such a manner come out wrong.

Nothing conclusive there. Yet here we are — me at work, the wife likely to stay at home with Emma for a couple more years. And looking around, we’re far from the only ones to make this decision. Why are more and more parents of our generation forgoing our careers, bucking the trend our parents started?

SPENDING ON HER MEANS LESS SPENDING ON US

It seems to me that modern society’s culture of consumption is in conflict with the financial demands of raising a child. We are bombarded with advertisements urging us to spend more on the latest gadgets, holidays, beautiful houses, fast cars. The world talks about the economy in terms of how it grows — letting it remain at its current size is bad, we must always have more, produce more, acquire more.

Used to be you had kids to continue the family line, safe in the knowledge that your children will take care of you in twilight years. Now we have mandatory retirement funds to make sure we don’t starve when we’re old. Children now need to be supported for a good many years before they become economically productive. Throw in a year or two of touring the world after graduation and this extends to more than two-and-a-half decades of parental funding.

In 2011, the median monthly income in Singapore was S$3,249, according to Manpower Ministry data. So the average stay-at-home parent is giving up S$3,249 a month for the privilege of 24/7 supervision of his or her children. Over 20 years, that’s almost S$800,000 — which could buy you a brand new two-room condo unit in the suburbs.

It’s money you could have spent on yourself. Children will lower your standard of living, reduce the number of gadgets and fast cars you can accumulate. So why on earth would anyone deprive themselves of the chance to consume more stuff by quitting theirs job to look after their kids?

DOLLARS AND SENSE

If you take the emotion out of the consideration, the decision on whether to have a parent stay at home to look after the children should be a clear-cut one. As long as the cost of “substitutionary” parenting — be it childcare, tuition, domestic help, nannies, grandparents — is lower than the income earned by the parent, then the parent should return to work.

Where the math gets hazy is calculating the intangible cost of someone else taing care of your kid. Or, as I heard someone put it, she quit her job to raise her children “because it’ll be cheaper than bailing them out of jail in the future”.

Then there is the cost of living: Can a single working parent earn enough to cover all the expenses a family of three, four, five will incur?

But again, that’s not as straightforward an equation as it would appear. What standard of living are we talking about here? Are you willing to sacrifice having a car, designer goods, yearly holidays? Is a home near an MRT station a need or a want?

Some might argue that they need to return to work to earn more money in order to have the “best” for their children, including plenty of enrichment activities and even homes near marquee schools.

I need to spend more now so my kid will earn more in the future, the argument goes. But the flipside to the argument is that not having both parents’ steadying hand in their lives could prove more detrimental than any benefits a good school might offer. Besides, is that the full measure of a child? How much they will earn in time to come?

WHAT PRICE ALWAYS BEING THERE?

We’ve been talking dollars and cents, but the reality — for me at least — is that what’s at stake is not money, but time.

This will sound simplistic, but for me, having the time and opportunity to watch your child grow, being there for every milestone, is a privilege that is worth the loss of income.

When I look at photographs of Emma when she was a day, or a week old, and I look at her now — she is about two months old — I am astonished at how quickly she grows and changes. My daughter will never again look like how she does today. For all the money you make, you can’t buy back time.

Unfortunately, my wife and I are not landowners with income streams from investments or fixed assets, so only one of us will have the privilege of watching Emma grow. Still, better one than none.

So we have decided that my wife will take on the burden and privilege of being a stay-at-home parent. Having saved up some money in the preceding years, we are prepared to tighten our belts for a few years so that my wife can take up parenting full-time (at least until our car’s COE is up for renewal ... what was I saying about standards of living again?). That gives my wife a few more years to figure out if she really wants to be a stay-home mum for the really long-term.

The financial insecurity and the loss of income will be significant. But it buys us time with child — something which we believe is well worth the (loss of) money.

Jerry Foo is a Digital Media Correspondent at Today.

Higher subsidies for child, infant care

$
0
0
By Monica Kotwani, Channel NewsAsia, 23 Jan

From April, 120,000 households with young children will benefit from a new subsidy framework aimed at making childcare and infant care more affordable.

Acting Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing announced the new framework after a visit to YWCA Child Development Centre on Wednesday.

All parents will continue to receive a basic subsidy of S$300 a month for childcare and S$600 for infant care services.

Eligible families using full-day programmes will see an increase in their current child care subsidies of at least S$100 and infant care subsidies of at least S$200, with lower-income families receiving more.

The final maximum total subsidy could be as high as S$740 for full-day childcare, and S$1,140 for full day infant care programmes. However, they are subject to a minimum co-payment sum that parents must pay out-of-pocket.

For example, a lower-income household with a monthly income of S$2,500 and below will get an extra S$440 for a basic full-day childcare programme. This will bring its total subsidy to S$740, subject to a minimum co-payment by parents.


The additional subsidy will replace the Centre-Based Financial Assistance Scheme for Child Care (CFAC), which provides child care-related financial assistance for families earning S$3,500 and below.

Up to two-thirds of households will benefit.

Mr Chan said this will mean more affordable access to childcare for the low and middle income households.

He said: "Those at the lowest income bracket may be able to have access to childcare for as low as a few dollars a month. In general, every family will spend [around] three to seven per cent of their household income on childcare fees, and this would put us in the top half of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) affordability index."

Mr Chan said the subsidies will cover a large part of costs, as the median cost of a full-day childcare programme in an HDB estate is about S$615.

Families that exceed the monthly household income of S$7,500, can still apply for additional subsidies based on their household's per capita income.

This will be determined by calculating the gross monthly income for the household, and divided by the number of family members living in the household.

Lower-income families earning S$3,500 or less can also apply for the S$1,000 start-up grant, which can be used to cover initial costs of placing a child in the centre -- for example, paying a deposit, registration fees and uniforms.

The new subsidies come after other measures were announced on Monday as part of the government's Marriage and Parenthood Package. These include bigger and more generous baby bonuses as well as paternity leave.

As for concerns that higher subsidies would result in childcare operators increasing fees, Mr Chan said this would be closely monitored.

He said: "This risk will be much higher if we have applied a universal subsidy across the board. We are really focusing the help on lower- to middle-income families, and the risk of childcare operators raising prices universally is mitigated.

"On top of that, the other ways we can manage the price rise are through attracting better quality anchor operators, which I will announce in the second quarter of this year, and also to look at the kind of quality programs that they conduct. We will also be expanding the number of centres and increase the pool of teachers available in the sector."



The new subsidy framework will increase the government's investment in child and infant care by S$105 million and bring the total budget for government spending in this area to about S$360 million for financial year 2013. This will come into effect from April 1.

Punggol East By-election: WP Rally, 23 Jan

Punggol East By-election campaign - 23 Jan

$
0
0
Koh will be strong voice in the House: Halimah
By Leonard Lim, The Straits Times, 24 Jan 2013

NEW Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob gave a strong endorsement of People's Action Party candidate Koh Poh Koon yesterday, saying she is confident he would be a strong voice in the House.

Speaking to reporters after joining Dr Koh on the campaign trail in the morning, she said: "Every Member of Parliament who is elected is expected to do his job vigorously to pursue what he is most passionate about, to bring about a difference to the lives of Singaporeans."

She said she was confident that if he was elected, Dr Koh would pursue issues which he believed in with rigour and passion, including those related to the elderly, the poor, or families and children.

She also observed that the 40-year-old had put in "tremendous" effort to connect with residents, and many already knew him. "That speaks volumes. To connect over just a few days is not easy."



The colorectal surgeon was introduced as a candidate just two weeks ago and has been going on walkabouts and pressing flesh in Punggol East every day since.

Madam Halimah, who had previously developed a reputation as a spirited backbencher who raised issues related to the elderly and the poor, spoke readily about Dr Koh.

However, she did not want to be drawn into an ongoing debate on the parliamentary performance of Workers' Party (WP) MPs.

The Jurong GRC MP would only say: "Everyone has to develop his own style, his own niche, and you need to pursue these interests vigorously."

The debate over the WP's performance in the House was prompted by remarks made by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong while on a visit to Punggol East last Saturday. He said he had not seen "strong opposition or alternative proposals from Non-Constituency MPs (NCMPs) or elected opposition MPs".

At a WP rally on Tuesday, its chief Low Thia Khiang defended the party's record, citing a list of issues it had raised, and added that the eight WP parliamentarians had done their share of questioning of policies.

To a question on the controversy over town councils that was also aired at the WP rally, Madam Halimah noted that PM Lee has already called for a review.

She said: "I think that residents should be assured that when the PM himself says an investigation will be done, it will be done."





PAP candidate 'energised' by party support
By Goh Chin Lian, The Straits Times, 24 Jan 2013

AS THE battle for Punggol East enters its final lap, Dr Koh Poh Koon said yesterday that more residents knew what he stood for as his visibility had grown.

"The residents have warmed up considerably, over the last few days the visibility of who I am, what I stand for and what I'm championing, have become much clearer," the PAP candidate said.

He added that he felt energised by the support of party members, who have turned up in increasing numbers in the past few days to help the colorectal surgeon and political greenhorn canvass for votes in the four-cornered fight.



Law and Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam, Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin and Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob went on block visits yesterday.

About 30 Members of Parliament, including Lee Bee Wah (Nee Soon GRC), Denise Phua (Moulmein-Kallang GRC) and Seah Kian Peng (Marine Parade GRC), have helped to distribute fliers. And last night, as the Workers' Party (WP) rally was going on, about 400 activists from party branches across Singapore congregated in the north-east constituency to knock on doors and garner support.

"With the support of the rest of the party members, I feel much more energised. I think the momentum is really going very strong," Dr Koh said.

When asked about the show of support, he said: "This is a reflection of us as a party, we are a team, there's people always working together.

"At the beginning, the intent was to let the residents see me as a person, get to know me first.

"When the sensing is that they start to know me and recognise me as the candidate, we now have them all coming to touch base and show the solidarity of the party."

Meanwhile, he welcomed the announcement of more government subsidies for childcare while continuing to stress the need to increase capacity in the sector. As he had done previously in his campaign, he suggested looking into funding child and infant care operators so as to increase the supply of such services.

"My concern is that if the operators are not given the necessary support, then just by providing funding for the parents is not going to make any more places available for them to send their kids to," Dr Koh, 40, told reporters after a walkabout.

He added that it was not just about building more centres, but also training more teachers: "We can build more infrastructure, but we do need... the people, the software behind the hardware to deliver the education, to deliver the personal touch to the children."

Separately, Mr Seah objected to WP MP Png Eng Huat mocking Dr Koh's name at a rally on Tuesday. Mr Png said Koon means sleep in Hokkien.

When asked, Dr Koh said he recognised that emotions could run high during the hustings and that it was probably said in jest.

He said that the campaign has maintained a "very gentlemanly tone" and hoped it would continue to be so. "At the end of the day we are electing people as Members of Parliament and we do need to maintain decorum."




Unity possible, say most opposition leaders
By Jermyn Chow And Andrea Ong, The Straits Times, 24 Jan 2013

OPPOSITION leaders disagreed with Workers' Party (WP) chief Low Thia Khiang that unity among them is inconceivable, arguing that it is possible if parties put their mind to making it a reality.

Said Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) chief Desmond Lim, who is going up against the WP in the Punggol East by-election: "It is about compromise, give and take, and finding a common ground among everyone."

His own party was founded in 2001 as an alliance of four parties, but now comprises just the Singapore Justice Party and Singapore Malay National Organisation (PKMS).

The National Solidarity Party (NSP) pulled out in 2007, citing the need for more room to grow, while SDA's former chairman Chiam See Tong pulled his Singapore People's Party out in 2011, after failing to bring the Reform Party into the alliance.

NSP president Sebastian Teo argued that unity does not have to go the way Mr Low has in mind.

Nor does it need to be a formal alliance like the SDA, which his party left in 2007 as it wanted more space to grow.

"Unity doesn't have to be narrowly defined and can have different meanings," he said.

At the very least, parties can adhere to the concept of unity by just agreeing "to avoid competing with each other", he added. "That is the minimum requirement to show that opposition parties are heading towards (unity)."

Mr Low had said at the WP's Tuesday rally that opposition unity is an inconceivable concept given the diversity of personalities and beliefs in the opposition camp.

He argued that forcing people of different characters together would lead to ugly splits which could dent their hopes of winning at polls and disappoint Singaporeans hoping for a strong political force to check on the People's Action Party (PAP).

Mr Benjamin Pwee, acting secretary-general of the Democratic Progressive Party, said he was "disappointed to hear WP's unwillingness to together work towards opposition unity".

Unity need not mean "total oneness", he said, adding: "Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater."

Mr Pwee favours a loose alliance or network among the parties - an idea he had pursued in the past with former presidential candidate Tan Jee Say.

But both Mr Lim and Mr Teo acknowledged that personalities may be a major obstacle - a point raised by Mr Low.

"Politics is very complicated, with people of different personality and agenda. Ego is another factor too," said Mr Teo, citing a Chinese saying about how two tigers would find it hard to co-exist on the same mountain.

Reform Party chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam, who is also contesting in Punggol East, was the lone voice agreeing with Mr Low.



He said he believes in competition, and added: "We have different ideologies.

"We should compete on our ideologies, the quality of our messages, our policies, our candidates and their effectiveness in Parliament."

He said the "chope-ing mentality" of parties - their perceived right to return to areas they have contested - is a "ridiculous notion".



Man arrested for online threat
By Toh Yong Chuan, The Straits Times, 24 Jan 2013

POLICE have arrested a 23-year-old man for making an online threat against Reform Party chief and Punggol East candidate Kenneth Jeyaretnam.

The man is being investigated for criminal intimidation under the Penal Code, the police said last night. No other details about the suspect were revealed.

If found guilty under the Penal Code, the man faces a fine or a jail term of up to two years, or both. The jail term may be extended to 10 years if the threats are more vicious, such as those involving death or grievous hurt.

Yesterday's arrest came after Mr Jeyaretnam made a police report last Friday that his wife and son in London had received e-mail threats after he announced he was contesting in the by-election. He declined to comment on the arrest last night.

After eight days of campaigning, Mr Jeyaretnam was upbeat about his chances in the four-way race in Punggol East, saying: "There is a good chance of us winning."

Asked if he was worried about losing his deposit, he replied without missing a beat: "That hasn't even entered my calculations - the possibility of losing my deposit. I am the best qualified of the candidates, by a long way."

Last night, his party planned a Meet-the-People Session at the void deck of an HDB block in Rivervale Drive. Mr Jeyaretnam was present, but no residents turned up. After waiting for an hour, he left to knock on doors instead.

The Singapore Democratic Alliance stepped up its door-to-door campaigning last night too, but candidate Desmond Lim declined to rate his chances.


Punggol East By-election: RP Rally, 24 Jan

Punggol East By-election: PAP Rally, 24 Jan


Govt to spend S$700m to boost MRT access and lower noise

$
0
0
By Hetty Musfirah, Channel NewsAsia, 24 Jan 2013

The Government will spend close to S$700 million to make transport nodes more accessible, elderly friendly and conducive for commuters.

The plans mapped out in the new Land Transport Master plan, were announced by Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew today.

One of the new initiatives, Walk2Ride, will make it easier for more commuters to walk to MRT stations.


The Land Transport Authority will build sheltered linkways within a 400 metre radius from all existing MRT stations, compared to the current 200 metres.

The LTA will also link up developments within a 200 metre radius of all bus interchanges, LRT stations and high usage bus shelters

In all, some 200 kilometres of linkways will be added islandwide by 2018 – more than four times the existing 46 kilometres today.

The project is expected to cost some S$330 million and will begin from 2014.

Currently, sheltered linkways are built to link only to schools, healthcare institutions and other transport nodes like bus stops and taxi stands. But under Walk2Ride, shopping, leisure, commercial and residential areas will also be linked.

More pedestrian overhead bridges will also become more elderly and wheel-chair friendly.

The LTA has reviewed the provision criteria to build more lifts at such bridges. These include those located within 200 metres of MRT stations and 100 metres of LRT stations.

Some 40 bridges which qualify have been identified for further feasibility studies.

A budget of about S$60 million has been set aside to install the lifts from 2014. Half will be completed by 2016 and the remaining by 2018.

Another S$300 million will be spent on installing some 20 kilometres of noise barriers along elevated MRT tracks.

Since September, the LTA has been measuring noise levels at 455 residential flats located close to such tracks.

And in some locations, the noise levels were found to have exceeded the National Environment Agency’s guideline of 67 decibels.

Mr Lui said residents living close to MRT viaducts, such as those in Simei, Marsiling and Dover, can expect noise levels to be reduced by above five to 10 decibels.

It intends to start installing the barriers from end this year and complete them by 2020.

End of love affair with property?

$
0
0
Not quite, when the dream of living in one home and renting out another will persist. That's because CPF rules favour property purchases, and Singapore's status as a booming city undergirds prices.
By Ignatius Low, The Straits Times, 24 Jan 2013

WHEN the latest round of property cooling measures was announced two Fridays ago, I swear I could hear a faint hissing across the island.

It wasn't the sound of property agents collectively expressing their annoyance, or even the sound of air starting to escape from the inflated property market. To me, it was the sound of the simultaneous extinguishing of a dream that lives in the hearts and minds of tens of thousands of Singaporeans.

That dream is to be rich enough to invest in a second property, to be a landlord and have a tenant pay rent.

And then have that rental income be the first step in achieving the ultimate fantasy in this time-starved, stressed-out nation: to stop work, play golf or go to the spa all day, and collect rental streams coalescing into a steady gurgle of passive income that is the envy of relatives and friends.

For those who actually have the capital to embark on such a journey, 2013 has started on a frustrating note.

Want to invest in a condo unit? Now you have to put down 25 per cent cash, not 10 per cent like before. Another change means you can only take a maximum 50 per cent bank loan.

And even if you had all that cash lying around, a new stamp duty rule means you are 7 per cent in the red even before you have left the starting line.

Meanwhile, the Government has roadblocked investments in industrial property, the "it" investment of the last couple of years. Flip an industrial property too quickly now and you get taxed - up to a whopping 15 per cent.

By some accounts, the rule changes have had a chilling effect on Singapore investors.

A consumer banking head told me last week that when his bank holds its yearly forum for premier customers, his staff are usually peppered with questions about the property market. Last week, there were hardly any.

It is a sign of the times. This year, people receiving annual bonuses and seeking investment options have been left wandering around like zombies, rudderless and muttering about near-zero per cent deposit rates.

Some are rushing to take a bite of anything in the property market that looks remotely investible.

A recent launch of riverside residential units near the soon-to-be-refurbished Battersea Power Station in London was reportedly sold out in one weekend.

A friend who went to the launch told me it was like a fish market. Never mind that the area the development is in - Nine Elms - is largely industrial land that will take a few years to realise its potential.

This week, there were reports of a massive queue to buy shop units in Alexandra Road. With curbs on both the residential and industrial sectors, people are turning to the only sector left without curbs - commercial and office space.

These scenes of chaos make me wonder if the Government can ever really have the right policy tools to flog this crazy property addiction out of the Singapore investor. Is it a lost cause?

One problem is simply that property is one of the easiest investments to understand. But there are other reasons for this addiction that are more structural in nature, and these will take considerable time and effort to undo.

The Central Provident Fund (CPF) system in Singapore, for example, has long biased investors towards property.

CPF savings constitute a big proportion of the average middle-class investor's investment capital, and the rules are set up in such a way that CPF savings can be withdrawn relatively easily to buy property.

This has been a basic building block of the Government's hugely successful home ownership drive, of course, but the same easy rules apply even if the withdrawals are not for property ownership but for property investment.

CPF savings can be used to pay mortgage instalments, but rental returns can be pocketed as cash. Any capital gain can also be pocketed as cash - minus only the interest payable on CPF amounts withdrawn.

So for many investors, a property investment offers the perfect opportunity to "withdraw" savings from one's CPF account before retirement.

On the other hand, CPF rules dictate that the returns on investments in stocks and other financial instruments - whether dividends or capital gains - have to go back into the CPF account, to be locked up until retirement.

There are also stricter caps on withdrawals for investments in stocks and gold, for example. As a result, many see an investment in property as far superior in the short term.

But what about the long term?

Here, the other big "structural" factor feeding property addiction comes into play. It has to do with Singapore's ascent to First World status in the last three or four decades.

As the country became a more and more attractive place for foreigners to live and work in, the property market reaped the benefits. And Singapore is also physically a small city state, with limited land.

So while, yes, there have been ups and downs, people from every age group generally have a happy story to tell about how well their property investments have fared. The Sunday Invest section of this newspaper is full of them. In a way, they made the right bet on their home market and invested in its success.

I remember, as a young officer starting work in the civil service in the late 1990s, berating my parents for investing in a two-bedroom leasehold condo unit in Bukit Panjang shortly before the 1997 Asian financial crisis.

The timing could not have been worse. They were more than one-third underwater then and struggling to hold on to their tenant, who was paying just $1,000 a month in rent.

I told them that they should have invested their CPF savings in a portfolio of professionally managed unit trusts assembled by a trained financial planner, as I had done.

More than 15 years later, they are sitting on a capital gain of over 50 per cent, plus all the rental income they received more or less uninterrupted.

And me? Let's just say I think twice these days about reminding them of my views.

Unless the CPF rules change, or the country itself goes through a Japan-style period of economic stagnation, investors in Singapore will continue to hold on to their dream and the property addiction will never go away.

I dare say that even in the current climate, people will find a way around the rules.

Perhaps 2013 will see the start of investors inking agreements to share and buy a property, just as they did during the luxury property boom five years ago.

The question for policymakers is whether there is anything fundamentally wrong with this.

Yes, there is a real risk that property investors are exposed to economic downturns that could cause prices and rentals to suddenly crash. Interest rates could go up sharply and render them unable to service their mortgages.

Speculative buying in the market should also be weeded out every now and then so that the property "flippers" don't chase prices up for their own sake and hurt the genuine investor in the process.

But while policymakers need to act, it is ultimately a question of balance and degree.

It is one thing to stamp out imprudent behaviour, and the political heat may be on now to stop the seemingly inexorable rise in property prices.

But should rule changes go so far as to have the effect of forcing investors to disfavour one asset class over another?

One can only hope that Singapore's property-mad investors are being given the appropriate advice on the alternative property and financial investments that they might be channelling their money into.

And that there will be more happy stories to tell in the years to come.

Cobbler square

$
0
0
Dying trade still drawing customers, including well-heeled, with low prices
By Melody Zaccheus, The Straits Times, 25 Jan 2013

FINGERS matted with glue and grime, seven elderly men sit, hunched forward, replacing soles and mending the linings of worn-out shoes belonging to Singapore's shuffling masses.

They work quietly amid fast- footed crowds at what has become known as Cobbler Square.

These men have been working under the shade of large beer umbrellas next to People's Park Food Centre since the 1980s.

There used to be 22 of them, but now just seven - in their 60s and 70s - remain in a sunset industry, said cobbler Poh Kay Ching, 62.

"The rest have died and this business will die too when we go," said Mr Poh, who has been at the square since 2008.

In their heyday, cobblers used to work along five-foot-ways in spots such as the old Clyde Street near Kampong Glam.

Most were Chinese although a few Indians and Malays also took up the trade.

Then, they provided essential and affordable shoe-repair services in the 1950s, when many Singaporeans switched from wearing clogs to modern footwear, said the National Heritage Board's director of heritage institutions Alvin Tan.

The square in Chinatown was a natural choice, with its regular stream of crowds passing by to get to their favourite hawker stalls and to shop at the nearby OG department store.

Although shoe-repair and key duplication chain shops such as Mister Minit and Master Fix Services initially threatened the local trade, many customers still flock to the makeshift kiosks.

Some are regulars, but most say they come because of the low prices. Replacing heels, for instance, still costs $2 - the same as 30 years ago.

Cobblers said prices have stayed the same so regulars will return. They added that their profits are dependent on the number of customers, rather than the prices they charge.

Depending on the size, a pair of shoes can also be reinforced for between $3 and $5, much cheaper than at chain stores, where prices start at about $7 for the same service. Replacing heels at these outlets can cost up to $11 or more.

Even the well-heeled patronise the cobblers' makeshift kiosks, bearing bags of brand-name footwear in need of a fix. Besides people who work in the business district, the cobblers count towkays, tai-tais, teenagers and even tourists among their clientele.

Mr Peh Soon Meng, 44, a trade compliance analyst, said he once spent $80 replacing the soles of a pair of shoes at a chain store. It would have cost him just $16 at a cobbler, with as good workmanship, he said.

"I've since been making my way to Chinatown from my office at Raffles City to drop off my shoes whenever they need repair," he said.

"The cobblers are really indispensable and an integral part of our culture. They also do a fantastic job in less than an hour."

He added that he has no qualms about sending his expensive dress shoes to a cobbler, having once repaired a pair of $300 leather shoes at Cobbler Square.

The cobblers said they do not need a licence by the authorities to operate.

They also said clustering at the square makes for better visibility and a shared customer pool, which is why they see no reason to be overly competitive with one another.

Mr Poh said his earnings - which average between $1,000 and $1,300 a month - help to supplement the income of his family in Indonesia. "If I don't work, there won't be any food on the table."

For the most part, business is brisk for Mr Poh, whose spot is less than 5m from Chinatown MRT station.

"Business has been good the past couple of years. We do well when the economy is down because people would rather repair their shoes for a few dollars than spend on new ones," he said.

The cobblers see about 30 customers and mend more than 20 pairs of shoes a day.

There are also cobblers who work to fund their pastime and leisure activities.

Take Mr Lim Wen Shen for instance. Although the 75-year-old has eight children, he prefers to be self-sufficient and earn his own pocket money.

He told The Straits Times that he uses his income to pay for trips to Japan, Thailand and China with his friends. "I don't think I will retire any time soon," he said.

"I like being independent and I don't see any need to take money from my children."

Some cobblers, such as Mr Yamaguchi Taro, have broken away from the group at the square to build up their own client base elsewhere.

The 64-year-old is a familiar face at Yishun Bus Interchange, while Mr Kwan Hoon Hang, 78, is a fixture at Toa Payoh North.

Both said they prefer serving their own customers at their respective spots, although they are in the loop of what is happening at Cobbler Square.

Mr Taro, for instance, said he exchanges tips with his peers at the square on the best suppliers to patronise.

"I used to be at the square about 20 years ago, but I don't like the idea of having to constantly compete with others for business," he said.

Mr Taro, who picked up the trade when he was 12, said he will continue mending shoes at the bus interchange for another decade or so.

It is the same for Mr Kwan.

He said: "I can't read, so I can't have an office job. I don't know the roads, so I can't drive a taxi. Since this is the only job I can do, I might as well do it well. And I won't stop until I'm tired."

Soft heart, strong will

$
0
0
New Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob tells Susan Long how she went from selling pushcart nasi padang and almost getting expelled from school to one of the highest offices in the land.
The Straits Times, 25 Jan 2013

AT ONE Marina Boulevard, a new security guard stopped Madam Halimah Yacob at the entrance one morning. He wanted to know what she was there for. She said she worked in the building. "Ah," he concluded. "You're the cleaner."

He was taken aside by his supervisor. But the then deputy secretary-general of NTUC just laughed off his assumptions. "It's become a standing joke in my family," she recounts, eyes crinkling.

In 1999, she became the first Singaporean elected to the International Labour Organisation (ILO) governing body, which sets labour standards for 174 member countries. Her international colleagues, who voted for her, told her she had "broken many glass ceilings all at once" - as an Asian, a woman at that, and furthermore, one wearing a tudung.

The 58-year-old newly appointed Speaker of Parliament's life has been an exercise in debunking stereotypes. When she entered politics in 2001, post-Sept 11, few could see past her headscarf, which fringed thick glasses and a solemn mien. But the tiny tudung dynamo, as she came to be known, taught Singaporeans to look past appearances. She won over many with her steadfast devotion to low-income families, single mothers, the elderly and the disabled, groups she spoke up for and helped over decades variously as a unionist, volunteer, Member of Parliament and junior minister.

At NTUC, where she spent 33 years, she started the Back-to-Work programme, which helped thousands of women learn new skills and re-enter the workforce. At the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), she worked almost two years developing home-based care for the frail elderly and conceptualising a training and employment agency for those with special needs.

Her crowning achievement was passing the history-making ILO Convention on Decent Work for Domestic Workers in 2011, which enshrines a day off, adequate rest and other benefits for maids. To reach that consensus , she lets on that whenever she led week-long sessions at the ILO in Geneva, she was so busy marshalling arguments and support that she often slept no more than three hours a night. At her final ILO Workers Group meeting in 2011, she received a rare standing ovation, says fellow unionist and Nominated MP Mary Liew.

On the domestic front, Mr Mohd Yusof Ismail, 55, chief executive of Ain Society, says Madam Halimah's most visible achievement is refashioning the tudung. "She is an inspiration to all Malay-Muslim women, that you can practise your faith, maintain your roots and live out your values.

"She is demure and soft-spoken but firm. Once she locks onto something, she really goes for it."

The former minister of state never relies on official feedback channels alone but keeps her ears planted to the ground, he adds. At MSF, she would visit voluntary welfare groups at least twice a week to find out their problems in implementing policies.

Thus, the hands-on Jurong GRC MP reveals that it was with regret that she gave up her ministerial post - as a constitutional requirement - to preside over Parliament. "I tell you what's my biggest challenge becoming Speaker," she confides. "I love going to the ground, talking to people. I had to go through a very deep thought process."

Finally, she reconciled herself to it, thinking that the Speaker's role, while structured, is "very defined", "its larger purpose is to serve Singaporeans".

She intends to "meaningfully project" her new role and stamp her own identity on it. She is grateful that NTUC, Mendaki and the National Council of Social Service have appointed her as adviser, giving her avenues to continue to pursue her social causes.

Ponteng queen

HER starkest memory of childhood was when her father died of a heart attack when she was eight. An aunt told her and her four older siblings: "Your life will be tough. Remember, even if you have only five cents, learn to share it with one another." Soon after, they were thrown out of government quarters - her father was a government watchman - and rolled out mats nightly to sleep in the living rooms of relatives.

Every morning, for the next decade, she awoke at 5am, helped her mother buy ingredients at the market, darted off to school, then returned to help her mother sell nasi padang. They operated from an illegal pushcart plying Shenton Way, dodging policemen, till they got a hawker stall licence.

She led a "stressful" double life - going from hawking to Singapore Chinese Girls' School (SCGS), where children pulled up in fancy cars. She was only one of a few minority girls there. Her fees were often unpaid and her homework not done.

She scraped through primary school but almost got expelled during Secondary 2. It became "too trying" to cram homework into a long day of wiping tables and washing dishes that ended past 11pm. She became a "ponteng queen", cutting classes with impunity. Finally, the SCGS principal warned her that if she kept it up, she would be booted out.

She panicked, fearing that she would then have to spend every waking moment at the stall - "a worse punishment". So she showed up at school and started studying on the bus between stops and at the stall between orders. She made it to the University of Singapore's law faculty - the only one in her family to go to university.

On matriculation day, with $5 in her pocket and unable to afford any joining fees, she "ran away" from all the society recruiters. Classified as an Indian-Muslim after her father, she had gone to university on a "leap of faith", not knowing where her fees would come from. At the last minute, a $1,000 annual bursary from the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore came through. Her brother, who had started work as a prison officer, chipped in with $50 a month. Every term break, she worked as a library clerk to make up the rest of her living expenses.

Upon graduation in 1978, she became a legal officer with NTUC to represent workers and "fight for a just cause". Her peers felt she had shortchanged herself. "I had a hard time every time I met friends from law school. Whenever they asked 'what are you doing' and I said 'I'm with NTUC', they would assume it was NTUC FairPrice and go, 'oh, the supermarket'."

Two years after graduation, she married her university sweetheart, Mr Mohammed Abdullah Alhabshee, now 58, a physics major. They started married life in a rented room, then lived with relatives, before they bought their own five-room flat in Tampines for $75,000. They moved into the spartan, unrenovated flat, and had five children in steady succession. "One thing my mother taught me is, no matter how poor you were, never borrow money," she relates, adding that she paid for everything in cash, till she had to travel to Geneva extensively for work and applied for her first credit card in her mid-30s.

Having it all

SHE learnt that a woman can have it "all" - a demanding career, five children, volunteer work, three terms in politics and counting - but only with help from her mum, extended family and her businessman husband, who debunked gender roles and worked from home mostly at night.

She also learnt that rallying a network of support is possible only if "we invest in our emotional bank accounts and develop relationships with family".

When babysitters bailed, she could count on her elder sisters to help out, two of whom now live with her, as does her mother. Her late mother-in-law, who was bedridden, lived under the same roof for five years till she died in 1999.

That was why 30 years ago, they bought two adjacent five- and four-room flats in Yishun, and knocked down the dividing wall, to reinforce to their children the importance of communal living and taking care of elders.

In her household, everything is family-sized and common property. "The idea of sharing is very important to me. You do not buy things just for yourself. You buy things to share with everybody."

She has not had a maid for several years now because she "never really got over the feeling that it's not a relationship of equals". Everyone does their own chores, launders their own clothes and changes their own sheets, herself included.

She is less concerned with how successful her two sons and three daughters, now aged 22 to 31, are at school and work, and more with "what underpins their success in years to come". But she strenuously refuses to reveal any details about her husband and children, beyond saying that they are "proud of me but don't want to be defined by me".

What saddens her most is that young people today decide whether to marry or have children based on cost. Her richest comfort, she confides, is coming home to children who follow her example by going to the door, taking her bag, and asking her how her day went. "Can you imagine going home to a house with nothing in it but all the things you have bought, and there's nobody, no warmth, no affection?" she says with a shudder.

If there is one thing she has learnt, it is that "you cannot live life fulfilling your own needs only". "It's only when you help to fulfil other people's needs and lives that you find your own fulfilment."

Her mother, Madam Maimun Abdullah, now 88 and with dementia, remains the heroine of her narrative. "I call her the Axe brand generation. For every illness, be it a cut, stomach ache or tooth ache, she uses Axe brand oil. She expects very little from others, believes this is her lot in life and she should just make the best of it."

She has only gratitude - no regrets - for her rough start, which gave her hard-headedness, her soft heart and her values that propelled her to one of the highest offices in the land. "It shapes you - the discipline, the hard work, the fierce self-reliance. For me, the more loaded the dice is against me, the more I grit my teeth and never say die. If I had the roof collapsing on me, the next thing I will be thinking about is how do I get it off my back and move on."


Halimah on...

Her tudung

"People can hold all the stereotypes they want, it's basically how you live your life that's important. Don't be inhibited by constraints others put on you. Just continue to contribute and be taken seriously in your own right. People will assess you based on outcomes, with or without a tudung. Over time, they will just accept you for who you are."

Glass ceilings

"I find that sometimes it's not just a Malay-Muslim community thing but also gender. In meetings, when there are a lot of male voices, women tend to be quiet. I always tell my women union leaders: "Look, you have an opinion. Speak up, you have something to contribute, you can make a difference." I think it's the same with the Malay community, we need to feel comfortable in our own skin, confident of what we are, who we are, to begin with."

Whether a woman can 'have it all'

"I think you've got to prioritise what you want in life. For me, earlier in my career, we didn't have much money or even a home. But I wanted to have a family so of course my career took a slower track to develop and grow. Another thing: Set realistic goals. Whatever you do, keep it simple."

Climate change: What do we owe the future?

$
0
0
Later generations will want to know why we made the choices we did
By Simon Chesterman, Published The Straits Times, 26 Jan 2013

THE bush fires that continue to savage Victoria and New South Wales today, on Australia Day, have driven another nail into the coffin for climate change sceptics: Temperatures on the ground are literally off the charts.

Previously, temperatures in Australia rose no further than 50 deg C. Recently, meteorologists had to add two new colours - deep purple and pink - to maps showing temperatures around the country. At one point, an area the size of Tasmania was deep purple - the heat had hit 50-54 deg C.


This development is consistent with other data indicating rises in temperature around the planet.

The first 12 years of the 21st century are among the 14 warmest years on record - anyone under the age of 27 has not lived through a month when global temperatures were not above average.

There is no longer serious doubt that the planet is warming and that we are responsible.

Even in the United States - the last bastion of climate change denial - suffering through Superstorm Sandy as well as the hottest year ever last year seems to be having an effect.

Earlier this month, a draft of the US National Climate Assessment was released. It states clearly that the transformation in the environment is "due primarily to human activities, predominantly the burning of fossil fuels".

The political winds could be changing too. Safely re-elected, President Barack Obama said more about climate change on Monday, in his second inaugural address, than he did during his whole campaign last year and most of his first term. The rhetoric was calibrated to appeal to Republicans, as he called on them to preserve that which was "commanded to our care by God".

Where there is doubt, however, is what we should do about climate change.

There are two main approaches.

The first is mitigation, which focuses on reducing the use of fossil fuels and on the search for alternatives. At an individual level, we should continue to reduce, re-use and recycle. At the national level, Singapore's efforts to promote energy efficiency and the use of public transport are laudable.

But the limited impact at the global level has seen extreme approaches such as geo-engineering - large-scale efforts to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere or deflect sunlight - move from science fiction to science journals.

More fatalistic or realistic, depending on your position, is adaptation. In other words, we learn to live with hotter climates, higher sea levels and more frequent extreme weather events.

In an oft-invoked metaphor, people talk about the slow-boiled frog. Supposedly, if you drop a frog in boiling water, it will jump out. If you put it in cold water, however, and slowly raise the temperature, it will not see the danger and will be cooked to death.

(As it happens, experiments along these lines - yes, scientists have actually tried it - show that frogs jump out as the temperature rises. In contrast, a frog dropped in boiling water will not jump out - it will die.)

Still, the metaphor is helpful in that it raises the question of how we can know so much about the impact we are having on our ecosystem, yet do so little to stop it.

Climate change is an example of what is sometimes termed a collective action problem. The classic study is the Tragedy Of The Commons, which examines the over-use of common grazing land in mediaeval Europe. Even though it harmed everyone when the shared fields were degraded, it was in each individual's narrow economic interest to exploit the shared resources to the maximum extent possible.

In the absence of coordination - for example, through government regulation or spontaneous acts of cooperation between individuals - everyone suffers.

Coordination can be compelled or encouraged by calling upon the enlightened self-interest of individuals.

In the case of common grazing land, this approach might involve putting limits on usage.

Applying it to climate change is particularly difficult because the effects are incremental and delayed. Many of us enjoy the benefits of an advanced economy and the use of fossil fuels, but will not suffer the adverse consequences. Those will be borne by our children and generations yet to come.

So what obligations, if any, do we owe these future inheritors of the planet - in particular, those who do not yet exist?

The concept of inter-generational equity attempts to address this problem. It proposes that each generation has an obligation to pass the planet's natural resources to the next in at least as good a condition as we received them.

We do not inherit the world from our ancestors, as another saying goes: We borrow it from our children. (The saying's Native American origins also appear to be apocryphal.)

In practice, such efforts would call for an approach to sustainability that preserves natural capital across generations. It would put maintaining that capital above economic growth and, not surprisingly, it is unpopular with most governments.

In its place, a "weak sustainability" model has been developed by economists that allows for substitution between human and natural capital. Certain natural resources might be allowed to diminish, for instance, if the net impact on human welfare is not negative.

Thus, we are not obliged to spend vast amounts of resources saving one animal from extinction, when those resources could be used to increase access to drinking water or sanitation in poor countries.

One example of this model is Norway's Government Pension Fund. Built up from surpluses in the petroleum sector, the fund was designed to ensure that the benefits of windfall profits from oil and gas would not be limited to Norwegians born while hydrocarbon resources were available.

Such a model is not an option for many other countries, of course.

So what do we owe the future? At the very least, we owe future generations candour about the choices we are making today to preserve our way of life at the expense of the environment we bequeath to the generations yet to come.

We can also educate ourselves about the risks and what we can do as individuals and communities. This approach has characterised Australia's response to bush fires in recent years: taking precautions and taking responsibility, rather than simply hoping to be evacuated when disaster strikes.

As a father, I wonder if - 20 years from now - children will ask their parents a question similar to the one asked in Europe in the late 20th century: "What did you do during the War?"

In the mid-21st century, that question will be: "While the ice caps were melting and the temperatures rising, what did you do?"

I'm confident that "I wrote an article for a newspaper" will satisfy no one.

The writer is the dean of the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law.

Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>