Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live

Singapore and the United States - reliable partners

$
0
0
By Vivian Balakrishnan, Published The Straits Times, 29 Jul 2016

Next week, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will make an official visit to Washington, DC at the invitation of President Barack Obama.

This is a rare honour. The last time a similar invitation was extended was in 1985, when President Ronald Reagan invited Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

This year, we celebrate 50 years of excellent diplomatic relations with the United States. The US values Singapore as a reliable friend and close strategic partner in South-east Asia.

Singapore and the US have a shared commitment to a stable, peaceful and prosperous Asia-Pacific within an open, inclusive, balanced and rules-based regional architecture.

When we established diplomatic relations, Singapore was a newly independent nation facing profound economic challenges and the imminent threat of militant communism. The US' stabilising presence in South-east Asia provided security and time for Singapore and other non- communist countries in the region to develop and prosper in a free market.

Investments by American companies helped to create many high quality jobs for Singaporeans, provided access to modern technology and entry to markets in developed countries. This gave Singapore a significant head start in globalisation.

Today, the US remains our largest foreign direct investor, with over 3,700 American companies headquartered here.

Building on the US-Singapore free trade agreement, we are its largest trading partner in South-east Asia. Despite our small size, we are the fourth-largest Asian foreign direct investor into the US.

We are also parties to the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, which will help to anchor the American economic and strategic presence in the region.

Defence and security constitute another key pillar of our partnership. Our armed forces regularly participate in US-led joint exercises and several of our air force detachments are deployed in the US. We also facilitate the US' presence in the region through the use of some of our facilities. We signed an enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement last year and are looking at new areas of cooperation such as cybersecurity and counter-terrorism.

We work closely on regional platforms such as Apec, the Asean Regional Forum and the East Asia Summit. We also cooperate on the US-Singapore Third Country Training Programme to provide technical assistance to other Asean countries.

Beyond these official links are the personal ties between our people. Artists, academics, scientists, students, businessmen and everyday Singaporeans and Americans have helped to advance this friendship in their own unique ways.

For instance, many Americans study in Singapore, and even more Singaporeans study in the US. Our universities have concluded tie-ups with American institutions, such as the National University of Singapore's collaboration in the Yale-NUS College and Duke-NUS Medical School; the collaboration between SUTD (Singapore University of Technology and Design) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; the Culinary Institute of America's partnership with the Singapore Institute of Technology; and the joint music degree offered by the Yong Siew Toh Conservatory of Music and the Peabody Institute of Johns Hopkins University.

Both countries have much to offer each other. As Singapore seeks to become a Smart Nation, there will be even more opportunities for collaboration in innovation with American entrepreneurs, tech firms and data scientists.

The recent launch of the Global Entry programme for Singaporean visitors to the US and American visitors to Singapore will help to facilitate these people-to-people exchanges.

In the last 50 years, we have built a strong relationship grounded on mutual trust and understanding.

As friends, we do not have to agree on everything. Occasional differences are discussed openly and constructively.

Prime Minister Lee's visit will be an excellent opportunity to celebrate this special partnership and help cement the enduring friendship between our people for the long term.

Dr Vivian Balakrishnan is the Minister for Foreign Affairs.







PM Lee's trip to the US is the first official visit by Singapore PM since 1985
By Chong Zi Liang, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong arrives tomorrow in the US capital Washington for a six-day official visit that is a first by a Singapore prime minister since 1985.

The visit coincides with the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries and underscores their close and longstanding partnership, the Prime Minister's Office said in a statement yesterday.

US President Barack Obama will welcome Mr Lee at an official arrival ceremony at the White House South Lawn on Tuesday before their meeting in the Oval Office.

Later that day, Mr Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama will host PM Lee and his wife to a state dinner, an honour accorded by the Obama administration to only 11 other occasions in eight years. Four of them were for Asian countries: India, China, South Korea and Japan.

During his stay, Mr Lee will meet several senior members of the United States government.

On Tuesday, at the State Department, Vice-President Joe Biden, his wife Jill and Secretary of State John Kerry will host a state luncheon for Mr and Mrs Lee.

Secretary of Defence Ashton Carter will host PM Lee to lunch on Monday, the day after his arrival, and there will be separate meetings between him and Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John Brennan.

The Prime Minister will lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arlington National Cemetery on Monday. He will also speak at a reception jointly hosted by the US Chamber of Commerce and the US-Asean Business Council that day.

Earlier, on Sunday, he will meet Singaporeans at a National Day reception in the Singapore Embassy.

Mr Lee's visit provides an opportunity for both countries to renew and expand bilateral cooperation, the Prime Minister's Office said.

The Obama administration has made considerable effort in building ties with Asia in pursuit of its strategy to rebalance its military and diplomatic interests towards the region.

In February, a special Asean-US summit was held in California which Mr Lee attended. During his week-long working trip, he also met the chiefs of US technology giants such as Apple and Facebook.

But his upcoming official visit is special. It will be the fifth such visit by a Singapore prime minister. The previous four were made by founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew in 1967, 1973, 1975 and 1985.

Accompanying PM Lee next week are Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S. Iswaran, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing, and Acting Minister for Education (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung.

Three MPs will also be in the delegation: Mr Christopher de Souza, Ms Rahayu Mahzam and Nominated MP Chia Yong Yong.

In Mr Lee's absence, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean will be the Acting Prime Minister.








Related

Barack Obama to host PM Lee Hsien Loong to state dinner at White House in August

People's Association unveils advanced courses for seniors

$
0
0
Programme includes cooking, craft or staying healthy, as well as community work
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

The People's Association (PA) is stepping up its efforts to help senior citizens stay active as they age.

From September, it will offer a dozen advanced courses for seniors to learn more about cooking, craftwork or staying healthy. They will be available over six months and add to a total of 36 hours of lessons.

The programme includes doing community service as well and is open only to those who have completed the basic programme.


Those who finish the programme will get an Advanced Certificate in Senior Wellness, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday.


Some of the courses are tie-ups with institutions of higher learning and industry associations, like a course on problem-solving by the National University of Singapore.


The new programme was unveiled by Mr Lee, who is also PA's chairman, at a ceremony for seniors who had completed the basic level.


The 375 seniors are the second group to complete the PA's Senior Academy basic programme. Last year's batch had 250 people.


The academy, which opened its doors in February last year, has seen over 6,000 people sign up for courses as diverse as cooking, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and playing the ukulele.


The new programme is available at 20 community centres and open to Singaporeans and permanent residents aged 50 and older.

PAssion Card members pay $50 and $80 for the basic and advanced courses respectively, while non-members pay $62 and $92.

Seniors can also use SkillsFuture Credit for the advanced courses.



PM Lee said he was encouraged by the seniors' enthusiasm. He quipped: "Normally when I attend graduation ceremonies, they are for kindergarten pupils."

He added: I hope everyone will continue their learning journey."

Mr Ng Hon Wing, 81, who finished the basic programme, said the TCM massage class was his favourite. "If you don't learn, you'll be left behind," added the part-time senior radiographer at Singapore General Hospital,

Housewife Suriati Budiman, 53, who also got her basic certificate yesterday, was thrilled at donning the graduating gown and mortarboard for the first time.

The O-level certificate holder had seen her two children, aged 33 and 30, graduate from university several years ago. "I feel so proud that it is my turn now," she said.

Her biggest takeaway from the programme: "I made new friends."






Tolerance alone is not enough

$
0
0
By Devadas Krishnadas, Published The Straits Times, 29 Jul 2016

Singapore recently marked Racial Harmony Day. In the midst of the events at schools and in the community, many seem unaware of the reason for the choice of date.

July 21, 1964 was the date of the largest race riots in Singapore, primarily between Malays and Chinese. Thirty six people were killed, nearly 600 injured and, in the aftermath, some 3,000 were arrested.

Racial harmony for a high-pressure, heterogeneous society such as Singapore is an existential consideration. We place emphasis on the need for tolerance between races. This is laudable but, I would argue, is too low a standard for our needs today.

Tolerance is a condition where different ethnicities or religions may either have a weak understanding of one another, or actively dislike and yet mutually agree to put up with one another.

Often, this tolerance is both superficial and limited to public arenas.

The causes for the race riots in 1964 were low trust between the races and the politicisation of race and religion in the context of the fraught politics of the Federation of Malaysia. Singapore had then already a 150-year history as a multiracial society - one where the different communities tolerated one another but often lived separately even if they had to interact daily for practical reasons. The standard of tolerance failed spectacularly then when tensions erupted.

The fear is that tolerance today may mask simmering issues and that when tensions erupt, conflict can emerge even amid a climate of "tolerance".

We must perennially push for a much higher threshold of harmony.

What do we need to ensure social stability? At one level, we need empathy. Empathy is a higher standard than tolerance. Empathy asks that we put ourselves in another's place - to walk in their shoes and see the world through their eyes.

A precondition for empathy must intuitively be that the different races interact routinely and that one's social circle include representatives from the broad mix of communities. We can conduct simple tests to determine if, individually, we meet this precondition. One test is to look at our favourite contacts in our mobile phones. How many of these are people from outside your ethnic or religious community?

Another test is whether, and how often, we interact with different communities beyond the shared public space. In other words, how often do we get invited, or are we invited, into private spaces - homes, places of worship and family events - of those from different communities?

The answers to these tests would be more honest and meaningful than the once-a-year events organised in schools, however well-meaning these may be.

Beyond empathy, we need to uphold political values and shared values that bind us as a nation.

To cement the notion of nationhood, there must be a political and value space which goes beyond differences of ethnicity or religion. This is a hard ask and explains why nation building is the work of generations.

This is where I would argue we need recourse to some form of intolerance. Ironically, while tolerance is too low a standard, intolerance can be helpful. As a nation, in our public deliberations and policies, we can be intolerant of views and personalities which try to divide us, which strive to make places exclusive to certain beliefs and practices.

We should be intolerant of those who harbour hate and prejudice. We must be intolerant of the casual slights, the majority privilege, the easy stereotyping of races. We must never be accepting that some are better than others by measure of their ethnicity, language or religion. Nor should we think of ourselves better or worse by measure of wealth.

A set of national, political values that stresses empathy for one another, and that is intolerant of racism or values detrimental to our cohesion, can help us forge a sense of belonging to the Singapore nation, and the Singapore tribe.

Humans are naturally tribal and relativistic beings. Yet we must find ways to expand our identity to the level of the Singapore tribe and not that of any particular segmented community.

The Singapore tribe has a real chance to demonstrate to the rest of Asia, indeed the world, that multiracial societies can coexist and thrive.

We can be proof that diversity is a social strength and not a cause of division. We can prove to ourselves that the things that bind us together are far more meaningful and powerful than any force which tries to separate us.

The Singapore tribe is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. There will be setbacks and disappointments to come.

For Singapore to continue, we must persevere beyond these setbacks. It will require work on the part of every community and every individual Singaporean. There must be a conscious choice to reach beyond what we know and to overcome our own prejudices.

The Singapore tribe must be open. Our tribal lines must be permeable to newcomers. We will survive not because we build walls but because we build bridges to the rest of the world.

The challenge for the Singapore to come will not be met by flag-waving but by flagging our meaning to one another.

We must do so not only on July 21 or Aug 9 of each year. We must signal in small and larger ways that we trust and need one another.

Singapore's tribalism requires an acceptance that an intrinsic part of our identity is our diversity and that we are not just less without it; we are not even Singaporeans.

The writer is the CEO of Future-Moves Group, a management consulting firm.


Singaporean detained under Internal Security Act for glorifying ISIS, inciting violence

$
0
0
Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff, detained under ISA for promoting violence and ISIS, radicalising others
44-year-old's postings exploited religion to legitimise terror, radicalising at least 2 citizens
By Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

A Singaporean who actively spread radical ideology online, incited violence and radicalised at least two fellow citizens has been detained under the Internal Security Act.

Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff, 44, had been living in Australia for 14 years, after leaving Singapore with his family shortly after run-ins with Muslim leaders and the authorities.

But when he returned here on July 1, he was arrested for terrorism-related activities, the Ministry of Home Affairs said yesterday.

Zulfikar made many Facebook posts that promoted and glorified terror group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and its violent actions like the beheading of its captives, "while exploiting religion to legitimise the terrorist activities of ISIS", it said.

"He has further exhorted Muslims to take up arms and wage militant jihad in places like the Middle East, Palestinian territories, Myanmar and the Philippines," it added.

His postings led to at least two Singaporeans becoming radicalised.

He also planned to hold training programmes to persuade young Singaporeans to join his extremist agenda of replacing Singapore's secular, democratic system with an Islamic state, using violence if necessary.

In a Facebook post last night, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said it was fortunate that the security agencies caught him before he could do more harm.

"Such extremist, violent beliefs have no place in our multiracial and multi-religious country," he said. "The Government will be alert to spot such individuals, but we need everyone's help to uphold and protect our harmonious way of life."

Zulfikar started becoming radicalised as early as 2001 after reading hardline materials, supporting groups such as Al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiah, and advocating that Muslims take up arms in Afghanistan after the Sept 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States.

In 2002, he was in the news for challenging mainstream Muslim leaders and agitating for primary school girls to be allowed to wear the headscarf in national schools.

In the same year, he resettled his family in Australia. He joined hardline group Hizbut Tahrir and kept contact with radical preachers.



Zulfikar cultivated an Internet following by forming an online group called Al-Makhazin - Arabic for "the magazine" - in 2013. He used Facebook to create platforms purportedly to counter the Western media.

But the true intent of these pages was to agitate on Muslim issues in Singapore to spread his ideology.

"Zulfikar has admitted that he had an ulterior motive for setting up a Facebook page called Al-Makhazin Singapore which he used as a platform to agitate on Muslim issues in Singapore and attack some Singaporean Muslims who did not share his views," said the ministry.

"His real agenda was in fact to provoke Muslims in Singapore into pushing for the replacement of the democratic system with an Islamic state in Singapore," it added.

He also said he hid his ulterior motive from the Singaporean members of Al-Makhazin Singapore.

Zulfikar, who made several trips here between 2002 and 2014, revealed that he had taken up Australian citizenship, the ministry said.

He also got state grants and unemployment benefits in Australia.

The two Singaporeans he radicalised are security guard Muhammad Shamin Mohamed Sidek, 29, who was detained last July; and businessman Mohamad Saiddhin Abdullah, 33, who got a Restriction Order this month that limits his movements.

"The Government takes a very serious view of efforts to undermine Singapore's constitutional democracy, and will take firm and decisive action against any person who engages in such activities," said the ministry.

The director for religious policy at the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (Muis), Dr Nazirudin Mohd Nasir, called on his community not to let extremist views take root as they will destroy social harmony. "For Muslims in Singapore, there is neither incompatibility nor contradiction between practising Islam and living in Singapore," he added.









ISA DETENTIONS




Preaching extremism 'dangerous, pernicious'
Shanmugam: Those who incite others to commit violence more dangerous than those seeking to do physical harm
By Chong Zi Liang, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

Individuals who preach extremism and influence others to commit violence are more dangerous than those who seek to inflict physical harm on others, Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said yesterday.

Calling these ideologues' actions a "dangerous, pernicious influence", he said Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff, who was detained this month for terrorism-related activities, sought to turn ordinary Singaporeans into terrorists. "He really wanted to brainwash Muslims in Singapore to reject the democratic nation state and instead have an Islamic caliphate," Mr Shanmugam told reporters following the announcement of the arrests under the Internal Security Act (ISA) yesterday.



Zulfikar, 44, radicalised two Singaporeans: security guard Muhammad Shamin Mohamed Sidek, 29, who was detained last July, and businessman Mohamad Saiddhin Abdullah, 33, who was issued a Restriction Order this month.

Mr Shanmugam's comments were underscored by Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who said in a Facebook post that the Government will take firm action against anyone who agitates to divide Singaporeans or sow conflict here through religious extremism.

 
Mr Shanmugam, who is also the Law Minister, said there is a clear difference between advocating a cause through social activism and glorifying terrorism under the cover of religious freedom and freedom of speech.

Zulfikar, who migrated to Australia with his family in 2002, had made several postings on social media supporting the actions of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

"Radicalising people, recruiting people to go and fight overseas, glorifying ISIS and taking steps to say there should be an Islamic caliphate in Singapore - that, for us, crosses the line," Mr Shanmugam said. He disclosed that the authorities had been watching Zulfikar for some time to gather evidence. They could not act earlier because he was overseas. He was arrested when he came to Singapore this month.

The minister pointed out that Zulfikar had no qualms about collecting unemployment benefits in Australia. "He apparently was on the dole there, so he was getting money from the Australian taxpayer while criticising the democratic, secular system which was feeding him."

He also noted that a 17-year-old male put on a Restriction Order this month is the first madrasah-educated person to be arrested for terrorism-related activities.

The youth became radicalised after accessing online pro-ISIS videos, websites and social media posts.

Mr Shanmugam stressed that people should not have the impression that there is a problem with madrasahs or the Muslim community.

"The mainstream of our Muslim community and... of our madrasah community are Singaporeans. They believe in the ideals of Singapore, just like our Chinese Singaporeans, Indian Singaporeans," he said.

What needs a closer watch, he added, is the extremist influences and teachings sweeping the region. He was sanguine about Singapore's approach in detaining radicalised individuals. Of the 81 detained since the Sept 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, two have relapsed.

One of them is Muhammad Fadil Abdul Hamid, 27, who was detained in April for wanting to join a terror group like ISIS. He had been detained in 2010 but was released on a Restriction Order in 2012.

Said Mr Shanmugam: "When you rehabilitate and you release, obviously you're taking a risk... you hope they go on to lead meaningful lives but you must understand that there could be relapses."




















Detainee first made headlines in 2002
By Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff's detention under the Internal Security Act this month is his latest brush with the authorities and the law.

The controversial figure has agitated on Muslim issues in the past, and sought to sow discord.

He first made headlines in 2002 as head of fringe group Fateha. After Singapore announced the arrest of 13 members of the Jemaah Islamiah regional terror network early that year, he said the Government had prompted their intentions by "aligning itself so closely to the United States and Israel".

He sparked a confrontation that many Muslim Singaporeans were critical of, when he urged some parents to insist that their daughters attend school in tudung, or headscarves, contrary to the policy of having a common uniform.

Zulfikar hosted politicians from Malaysia's Parti Islam SeMalaysia and went to Malaysia to speak on the issue and draw international attention to it. His approach drew criticism from Muslim leaders.

 
After police began looking into possible criminal defamation of then Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew and Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Yaacob Ibrahim in Zulfikar's online postings, he left for Australia with his family.

He became a research fellow with Monash University, and led an organisation called the Association For Democracy In Singapore that purported to push for free speech.

It counted opposition figures such as J. B. Jeyaretnam, Singapore Democratic Party chief Chee Soon Juan and former Workers' Party election candidate Tang Liang Hong among its advisers.

In 2013, Zulfikar, who had enrolled in a PhD programme in international relations at La Trobe University, set up the Al-Makhazin website and linked Facebook groups to champion what he saw as issues affecting Muslims.

As it turned out, the site was a front to spread his radical agenda: to replace Singapore's democracy with an Islamic state, even as he remained in Australia, the Ministry of Home Affairs said yesterday.

When an Islamic religious teacher launched the controversial Wear White campaign in 2014 against homosexuality and the annual Pink Dot event by the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, Zulfikar was among the loudest supporters of Wear White.

After the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) proclaimed its caliphate that year, Zulfikar openly displayed support for the group and its military advances on Facebook, and radicalised at least two others.

He also uploaded a photograph of himself with five of his six children in front of a black flag associated with ISIS, mimicking a pose adopted by the group's fighters.

And he joined hardline group Hizbut Tahrir, which seeks to unify all Muslim countries into a caliphate.

He also kept company with radical preachers, including Australia's Musa Cerantonio, who has inspired foreigners to fight in Syria, and British-born Anjem Choudary, who faces trial in Britain over terrorism charges - while reportedly getting grants and benefits from the Australian government.








Detained Singaporean a controversial, outspoken figure
By Jonathan Pearlman, For The Sunday Times In Sydney, The Sunday Times, 31 Jul 2016

During his 14 years in Australia after migrating from Singapore, Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff became known as an outspoken and occasionally controversial figure who promoted Muslim causes, such as halal exports and Islamic finance, before falling out with some local community leaders.

Two of his friends interviewed by The Sunday Times expressed surprise at his detention in Singapore on terror-related charges earlier this month.

On Friday, Singapore's Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said that Zulfikar, 44, a Singaporean who also took up Australian citizenship, had been detained under the Internal Security Act. He was arrested on July 1 when he returned to Singapore for a visit.

The ministry said he had actively spread radical ideology online, incited violence and radicalised at least two Singaporeans. It said he had made many Facebook posts that promoted and glorified terror group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and its violent actions.

The detention made headlines in Australia yesterday.

The authorities in Australia have not commented on the case or on whether they were involved in any investigation into Zulfikar.

"The Australian government is aware of the Singaporean Government's press statement that Mohamad Shariff Zulfikar has been arrested in Singapore for terrorism-related activities," a spokesman for Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade told The Sunday Times last night.

"Consular officials are seeking to provide assistance to Mr Mohamad Shariff. However, Singapore does not recognise dual nationality, and Mr Mohamad Shariff is being treated as a Singaporean citizen. For privacy reasons, no further comment will be provided on this case."

The Australian Federal Police would not comment yesterday on whether it had investigated Zulfikar or had any involvement in his arrest in Singapore.

"We don't comment on individuals," a spokesman said.

A close friend in Melbourne, who did not want to be named, said Zulfikar recently claimed that he did not believe he would face trouble if he returned to Singapore.

The friend said Zulfikar "has strong views and that may put people off". "It is a bit of a shock," said the friend, who is active in the Muslim community, of the arrest.

After leaving Singapore for Australia, Zulfikar spent his initial years in Melbourne as a researcher at Monash University before working at a business promoting halal products. He helped to organise a conference in Melbourne in 2007 to promote efforts to encourage Australian halal exports across the region, giving numerous interviews on the topic to local media.

He also worked in Islamic finance, doing sales and marketing from 2004 to 2006 for the Muslim Community Cooperative of Australia. He is well known in the Muslim community in Victoria state, where there are about 150,000 Muslims, who make up some 3 per cent of the population. The close friend said: "He has been under the radar (in Melbourne) for the last four or five years. He had some personality clashes with community leaders."

In recent years, there have been numerous terror attacks and alleged plots in the state capital Melbourne, as well as in Sydney, mainly involving radicalised teenagers.

MHA said Zulfikar embarked on the path of radicalism as early as 2001 and joined hardline group Hizbut Tahrir in Australia. The global organisation, founded in Jerusalem in 1953, seeks to replace the system of nation-states with a caliphate.

In recent years, Zulfikar has been completing a PhD in international relations at La Trobe University in Melbourne and is believed to have been in his final year of studies.









Ministers, community leaders warn of terrorist ideology spreading online
Yaacob urges Singaporeans to be alert to those who seemingly support terrorism - quick action is critical
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

By exhorting others on Facebook to fight for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), radical ideologue Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff "sat on an armchair in Australia and flagrantly sacrificed the lives of the gullible", said Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli yesterday.

That was reprehensible and irresponsible, said Mr Masagos in a Facebook post on Zulfikar, whose detention under the Internal Security Act was announced yesterday.

Mr Masagos was among several ministers and community leaders who commented on Zulfikar's arrest, saying it highlights the danger of terrorist ideology spreading on social media.

Said Minister for Communications and Information Yaacob Ibrahim: "No country can fully block the Internet and prevent what comes in. What is more important is the resilience and cohesion of the nation and our people."

 
Dr Yaacob, who is also Minister- in-charge of Muslim Affairs, said that Singaporeans must be alert to those who seemingly support terrorism in whatever form.

This is because quick action by citizens to report any potential threats to the authorities is critical for combating the spread of extremism.

Singaporeans should also not hesitate to condemn terrorist groups that employ violence in the name of Islam, he added.

Zulfikar was also denounced as a wolf in sheep's clothing by several Muslim leaders.

Said Mr Masagos: "His radical view of Islam is cloaked with quotes that looked religiously sound to those looking for answers to life."

He urged Muslim Singaporeans to be wary of such views that appear sound but find little traction with most Muslim scholars.

Instead, they should confer with properly qualified scholars who have always stressed the importance of resolving conflicts in a peaceful manner, he said. "We should immediately... turn away from those who incite anger and violence in every sentence they post."

Dr Nazirudin Mohamed Nasir of the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore, said the path to radicalisation begins with sympathising with radical ideologies.

"We must always seek answers from credible sources. This becomes even more important when information is readily available from open sources such as the Internet and social media," he said.

 

Minister for Family and Social Development Tan Chuan-Jin pointed out that "it's one thing to not support the government of the day but it's another to undermine one's own country".

He added: "To seek to establish radical ideology here is to destroy the very basis of what we exist for - which is to build a Singaporean Singapore, regardless of race, language or religion."

Community leaders also said it was important to speak out immediately against extremist posts and false teachings.

Responses should be loud, said Association of Muslim Professionals chairman Abdul Hamid Abdullah. "If you're confident it is not Islam, correct it on the spot. If you remain silent, your inaction may contribute to the dissemination of wrong information."

Mr Ahmad Tashrif Sarman, 29, assistant secretary of the Bukit Batok Inter-Racial and Religious Confidence Circle, said every bit of response to such social media posts helps. "If we leave them alone, they become more radical."

Culture, Community and Youth Minister Grace Fu called on Singaporeans to stay united and not let extremism poison the relations between people of different religions.

"Let's stand together with our Muslim friends, as one united people, to keep Singapore safe for all," she wrote on Facebook.

Bishop Wee Boon Hup, vice-president of the National Council of Churches Singapore, said: "Most Singaporeans, whether of faith or not of faith, know this is the view of a few disaffected individuals."

Inter-faith relations here are strong, he added. "Over the years, we have built enough trust in each other to weather this kind of event."





Man detained again, restrictions for teen
By Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

Six years ago, Singaporean Muhammad Fadil Abdul Hamid was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for planning to engage in armed violence.

He was released from detention in 2012 and placed on a Restriction Order (RO), which limited his movements and activities.

However, Fadil, now 27, relapsed and was detained under the ISA again for two years in April this year. He intended to join a terror group like the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and take up arms in Syria, the Ministry of Home Affairs said yesterday.

The ministry also announced that a 17-year-old male Singaporean, who recently graduated from a madrasah here, was issued with an RO for two years this month.

The youth, who was not named, is the first known graduate of a local madrasah to be radicalised in a manner that required action to be taken against him.

In Fadil's case, the then full-time national serviceman had surfed the Internet for militant material and videos, and made contact with radical ideologue Anwar Al-Awlaki and an Al-Qaeda recruiter who encouraged him to fight in Afghanistan.

After his release, he made some progress in reintegrating into society, but he became drawn to radical online material again, the ministry said. "He became convinced that partaking in the violence in Syria was 'justifiable jihad' and harboured the intention to fight alongside ISIS militants in Syria.

"He had to be detained to prevent him from pursuing his violent agenda," the ministry added.

As for the 17-year-old former student, the ministry said investigations showed he had become radicalised online from accessing pro-ISIS videos, websites and social media.

"He became convinced that ISIS' violent actions were justified and harboured the intention to fight for ISIS in Syria in the future where he was prepared to die a martyr. He had sought out other like-minded individuals online, and also tried to influence his friends with his pro-ISIS views," the ministry said.

"Despite their advice and objections against ISIS, he persisted in his support for ISIS," it added.

He was placed on RO "to prevent him from going further down the path of radicalism and violence".

Those on RO are not allowed to move house, change jobs, travel abroad or make public statements without permission from the Internal Security Department's director.

Meanwhile, two other radicalised Singaporeans have shown improvement, the ministry said.

Self-radicalised lawyer Abdul Basheer Abdul Kader, 37, who was arrested abroad in 2007 and detained again in 2012 as he tried to travel to Syria to fight, was released conditionally on a suspension direction in February this year after the authorities said he no longer posed a security threat that needed preventive detention.

The RO placed on Rijal Yadri Jumari, 35, a former member of the Jemaah Islamiah (JI) cell in Pakistan aimed at grooming JI leaders, was also allowed to lapse in March.

He was detained under the ISA from March 2008 to March 2012.

At present, there are 20 persons in detention and 22 on ROs.





Don't even 'share' extremist views: Yaacob Ibrahim
Singaporeans must learn to assess what online material should be rejected, says minister
By Joanna Seow, The Sunday Times, 31 Jul 2016

The detention of a Singaporean who spread terrorist ideology online is a reminder to not just reject such messages, but also to be careful when encountering such material online.

Communications and Information Minister Yaacob Ibrahim, speaking to reporters at a National Reading Day event yesterday at the National Library Building, said that even the sharing of such information is dangerous.

Dr Yaacob, who is also Minister-in- Charge of Muslim Affairs, explained: "Our position must be when we come across something online which we think is egregious, which doesn't conform, we just delete it or just don't share it - we can just move on. Once you begin to share, you seem to be promoting it and that's not very healthy for us."

His comments came a day after it was revealed that 44-year-old Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff had been spreading radical ideology online, including support for terror group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, and had radicalised at least two other citizens. He used Facebook to create platforms purportedly to counter the Western media. But the true intent of these pages was to agitate on Muslim issues in Singapore to spread his ideology.

Dr Yaacob said it is easy for people, including children, to stumble across extremist information on the Internet, which is "thriving" with such material.

Since it is impossible to police every website, people must be resilient and able to assess on their own the things they see, be it terrorism, pornography or other online material, he added.

"You may be reading it and then you spread the ideology because you think it's nice to read. That's where the danger starts, that's where you begin to cross a very sort of soft line where you actually may not be out there in the theatres of war... but we are basically promoting that ideology by sharing it and that's what we want to prevent from happening," he said.

Once people begin to entertain the idea of terrorist ideology, "you are basically sailing very close to the wind", he told reporters.

He said that the authorities have been monitoring the online situation, and are keeping tabs on people who subtly promote terrorist ideology in their writings or blog posts.

"We will continue to work with our community leaders, with our religious leaders, to ensure that the message of Islam - that we know is a religion of peace - gets embedded in the hearts and minds of fellow Singaporeans so that when they go onto the Internet, which you cannot block, they know what is right and what is wrong," he added.

At a separate event, Parliamentary Secretary for Home Affairs Amrin Amin said he believes the Malay/Muslim community supports Zulfikar's detention and urged Singaporeans not to take the country's carefully built peace and harmony for granted and to work to preserve them.

"We need to pay attention to what our youth and we as well read on the Net," he said.

"We need to get involved in citizen activities so we know our neighbours and know what it really means to live in harmony."

Speaking on Friday, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam stressed how Singapore has spent decades building tolerance, acceptance and appreciation across religious and racial lines, and ensuring that minorities feel they have a stake in the country.

This includes policies that encourage different races to live alongside one another in Housing Board flats, adequate parliamentary representation through the group representation constituency system and fair participation in other aspects of life, including business and academia.

He said: "Now, we also have to say a big 'no' to extremism and all teachings that tend towards extremism. Otherwise, the ground would become fertile for extremist teachings to be absorbed, and then for terrorism."








Battle against extremism: Singapore takes a ‘different approach’ on race, religion: Shanmugam
So far, it has worked but global events show the allure of radicalism remains potent: Shanmugam
By Chong Zi Liang, The Sunday Times, 31 Jul 2016

Singapore's management of ethnic and religious differences has dampened the lure of extremism in the country, but global events show the allure of radicalism remains very potent, said Minister for Home Affairs and Law K. Shanmugam.

In recent months, there has been a wave of terrorist attacks in Europe, and France, in particular, has been hit hard.

This has led some to ask "Why France?", Mr Shanmugam told reporters on Friday when the Government announced that four men have been arrested under the Internal Security Act for terrorism-related activities.

While he stressed that he does not have the answer, he noted the "slightly different approach" France and Singapore take on race and religion.

He compared four key areas, even as he acknowledged that France - a large country with a long history - is unlike Singapore.

For instance, French official documents do not record the ethnic identity of its citizens. In Singapore, identity cards state the race of an individual and some Singaporeans have asked about the need for it. "Many people say, in the IC why are they saying 'race'...why not just say Singaporeans?" he said.

Although Singapore has somewhat succeeded in forming a Singaporean identity, he said ethnic differences have not gone away.

"They are not going to go away any time soon. Let's recognise them and then let's see how we work on them to achieve a higher ideal," he added.

Singapore also forbids the denigration of religion that many Western countries allow in the name of freedom of speech.

"We will not, for example, allow the kind of religious satire that publications can put up, of Catholic nuns engaging in sexual acts or burning of the Quran, in the US under the framework of freedom of speech,'' Mr Shanmugam said.

He added: "Such publications won't be allowed. Burning of religious books will not be allowed. So we take a stricter approach."

Also, Singapore's housing policies prevent ethnic enclaves from being formed. "We live in mixed communities and that's part of our ethnic integration policy - active intervention by the state," he said.

Such ethnic enclaves are found in many countries, including France, but "whether that resulted in these attacks, I can't say", he stressed.

Singapore also ensures adequate representation of different communities, he said, adding that minorities must feel they have a stake in society and fair participation in all aspects of life, including politics, business and academia.

Singapore's group representation constituency (GRC) system guarantees that minorities are represented in Parliament. "If you had a Parliament that did not have that representation... minority communities will feel different about their say and stake in what's happening."

Based on these fundamentals, Singapore has spent decades building tolerance, acceptance and appreciation across religious and racial lines, Mr Shanmugam said.

It is still a work in progress.

He added: "Minorities must not feel shut out unfairly. Meritocracy is important, but they must not feel that there are other factors at play that keep them out."

Community and religious leaders also subscribe to "a common vision for Singapore and a Singaporean identity and subscribe to a secular elected government".

Despite the progress, the fight against extremism is ongoing, he said, adding: "Now, we also have to say a big 'no' to extremism and all teachings that tend towards extremism. Otherwise, the ground would become fertile for extremist teachings to be absorbed and then for terrorism."

Returning to the question of why terrorists are targeting France, he said: "I'm in no position to say but we do some things differently from France based on our history, our geography, our culture. And, so far, it has worked for us but the currents sweeping across the world are very powerful and we are going to face challenging times."







Related
MHA: Detention and Releases under the Internal Security Act
MHA: Additional Comments on the Detention & Releases under the Internal Security Act

Social Cohesion & Mobility - Let’s Think About It

$
0
0
Let’s Think About It – Social Cohesion & Mobility
28 July 2016

Is it possible to be racially blind? Can we see beyond our differences when our views clash?

Social mobility is a very important part of the Singapore identity.

In this episode of “Let’s Think About It”, Sujimy Mohamad, David Chan, Divian Nair and Lisa Marie White share their views and stories on social cohesion and mobility in Singapore with Speaker of Parliament Mdm Halimah Yacob.






























'Sexualised' uni orientation camps spark fierce debate

$
0
0
Parents worried but undergrads say they are old enough to decide
By Yuen Sin and Jeremy Koh, The Sunday Times, 31 Jul 2016

The brouhaha over university orientation camps and whether they have become too "sexualised" has sparked a fierce debate.

The issue prompted the National University of Singapore (NUS) on Friday to suspend all such camps.

Many undergraduates are upset. They said they are old enough to decide what is appropriate for them, and do not need parents and the authorities breathing down their necks. They added that most activities follow guidelines, and while some "black sheep" push the limits of good taste - it is not fair to tar everyone with the same brush.

But there is some concern over these camps after a New Paper report highlighted how the activities include re-enacting rape scenes. There were also complaints about sexually suggestive cheers such as "itai itai yamete", which in Japanese means "it hurts, it hurts. Stop".

Acting Education Minister (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung weighed in on the issue on Wednesday last week, and called some of the activities "reprehensible".

On Tuesday, NUS said it would take "strong disciplinary action" against those found responsible, and added that it did not "condone any behaviour or activity that denigrates the dignity of individuals, and that has sexual connotations".

But after student leaders were briefed on what was acceptable at the camps, a video showing a male and female getting dunked in a pond in Sheares Hall still surfaced online. Then came the suspension, affecting six NUS camps.

Two student groups - the G Spot from Yale-NUS College and the Gender Collective, an independent group from NUS - in a joint statement said students were "disappointed". "To suspend all (student-organised) activities is... no less than throwing the baby out with the bathwater and will negatively affect the experiences of all incoming freshmen."

'MOST FOLLOW RULES'

An NUS graduate, who was part of the organising committee for a hall camp in 2012, said the Office of Student Affairs (OSA) imposes strict rules for camps, and there is the added threat of suspension or expulsion. Activities are also vetted.

A Singapore Management University (SMU) spokesman also said rules on separate sleeping arrangements between males and females during camps are strictly enforced, and there are also guidelines that ask that physical contact between the sexes be kept to a minimum during activities.

Freshmen who have attended university camps in the last two months said the bulk of activities usually involve team-building games. Those involving physical contact do not have sexual overtones. But what happens after "official" orientation activities ends every day is tougher to control, the graduate said. This is when groups decide on games such as "Truth or Dare", which involves forfeits.

These include things like making a girl perform a pole-dance in front of a boy, or answering questions such as who in their group they would prefer to sleep with.

A female undergraduate who attended a hall camp last month said one game involved a catwalk session, in which groups design their own costumes. One male undergraduate was topless, and had a ketchup bottle positioned at his groin area. This sort of thing made her uncomfortable but the rest of the camp was fine, she added.

Orientation leaders insisted that those uncomfortable with any event can sit it out. A third-year NUS student, who wanted to be known only as Karen, has attended five camps as a freshman and a senior.

She said perceptions of university games being sexualised should not extend to the whole of NUS. "When the activities require forfeits, seniors will not force a freshman to do them if they are shy." Another student who attended a NUS faculty camp said when a girl was uncomfortable with doing the pole dancing, two guys decided to do it instead.

"It's supposed to be amusing, and I don't feel like there were negative undertones as the focus was on bonding. It is the orientation leaders' responsibility to set the boundaries clearly."

A freshman at SMU's School of Social Sciences, said she was asked during camp to answer who in her group she would have sex with.

Other questions included: "If you were in a threesome with someone, who would it be?"

"I took it very lightly. We bonded really well, we shared jokes, we were able to tease each other." If anyone felt uncomfortable answering a question, the group would choose another question, she added.

PEER PRESSURE

But some undergraduates said it is sometimes difficult to say no.

A third-year Nanyang Technological University student who attended a camp run by a club in 2014 said she was labelled "uptight" when she criticised games that "reinforced the viewpoint that all females are damsels in distress".

She said: "During Secret Pal, all the girls had to do was to doll up and sit in their own chalets, while the guys needed to perform tasks before they were allowed to meet the girl for a 'date'."

Mr Delane Lim, chief executive of Agape Group Holdings, which conducts talks and youth camps in schools, said peer pressure is a very serious issue. "Young people sometimes don't have the courage to say no because they are scared to be labelled conservative or 'chicken'."

Dr Raymond Cheong, from the Children/Youth Learning and Counselling Clinic, said youth who feel very awkward in social situations or who have been bullied in the past may continue with games despite their discomfort with them because they are afraid of being ostracised if they opt out.

"We should respect others. Some people may not complain, but they may not be okay with (the activities)."

There also seems to be some confusion on the role of such camps. Are they to allow people to get to know one another as part of networking efforts, or are they to encourage both sexes to get more comfortable with each other?

The Social Development Network (SDN) has previously offered funding to sponsor orientation camps.

Student leaders said they were urged to include activities that had a better mix of males and females, and which involved a certain level of interaction - but not "inappropriate physical contact".

Responding to queries from The Sunday Times, the SDN said it has stopped funding university camps and events since January this year.

But one NUS graduate said such sponsorships meant some organisers "felt compelled" to include activities that get both sexes to touch each other "more".

The use of cheers and activities that touched on rape was especially worrying, experts said.

Clinical sexologist Martha Tara Lee said the instances of lewd and disrespectful games could be partially due to the lack of comprehensive sexuality education that emphasises consent.

"Since sex is considered a sensitive taboo, making exaggerated shows of bravado about sex might seem 'adult' but in reality, it is an overcompensation of their own ignorance and discomfort around sex," she said.

Reports on games or forfeits that take on a sexual slant - such as guys doing push-ups over girls - go as far back as 2008.

The G Spot and Gender Collective urged NUS to introduce long-term measures "to foster a culture of respect and consent" to help address the underlying issues.

These include a workshop on understanding consent, sexual respect and violence, and developing a more rigorous feedback mechanism between students and staff.

HOW MUCH CONTROL?

Still, the idea of too much oversight has upset undergraduates. Even before the suspension, and after the issue was highlighted in the press, one student organiser of an NUS residence hall camp said he was told that games cannot involve any body contact.

For instance, a game in which boys and girls had their hands tied together was scrapped.

"It's not really that the games were that bad. It's just that, with the negative press lately, they felt, better safe than sorry," said another student organiser.

An SMU fourth-year student said: "Such rules are a desperate move to pacify parents. People at university are adults. If there are staff members keeping watch all the time, you will be micro-managing students. What is the point of organising activities yourself?"























NUSSU apologises for 'indecent' freshman orientation games
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 1 Aug 2016

The beleaguered students' union of the National University of Singapore (NUS) has broken its silence about reported sexualised activities at orientation camps it organised.

In an official statement that was posted on its Facebook page yesterday, the NUS Students' Union (NUSSU) apologised to the freshmen who had gone through such activities, which it called "indecent, reprehensible and not condoned".

Stressing that such activities were not endorsed by NUSSU or any of its constituent clubs or committees, it added that it was helping the university with investigations.

Last Friday, the university suspended all orientation activities, following a New Paper report about increasingly sexualised orientation games, some of which involved the simulation of rape scenes.


In its post, NUSSU said it had not been consulted regarding the suspension. "The hard work of our organising committees and volunteers should not have been sacrificed due to the errant behaviours of some students."

NUSSU said that the camp's organising committee had had its proposals subjected to "strict and thorough scrutiny" by NUS beforehand, and that the activities in question "clearly fell outside the scope of activities" it had in mind.

NUSSU also said that it had received several reports of its students being called names and harassed by members of the public.

The "inappropriate behaviour of a few errant students", it reiterated, "is not an accurate and conclusive representation of the entire NUS undergraduate population of over 28,000".

"The union would like to seek the public's understanding and we sincerely appeal to you to refrain from extending such treatment to our students."

It stressed that student welfare remains its top priority, and said that it would work together with faculty and non-faculty clubs to see how it could still welcome freshmen despite the recent developments.

It added that it would also work with NUS in "restoring the faith in all student-led events, to identify and rectify the issues arising from the surfaced inappropriate cases while not compromising the interest of our students".











Dinner at the White House

$
0
0
Next Tuesday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will be hosted to a state dinner by US President Barack Obama. The writer recalls the last time a Singapore PM attended such a dinner in 1985.
By Tommy Koh, Ambassador-At-Large at Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Published The Straits Times, 30 Jul 2016

The most important address in Washington, DC is 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. It is where the White House is located. It is both the official residence and office of the president of the United States. Every president since John Adams, the second president, has lived in the White House. In 1814, the White House was burned to the ground by British troops and it had to be rebuilt. This occurred during the now-forgotten war between England and the United States which began in 1812.

A White House state dinner is a grand occasion, combining pomp, elegance and symbolism. US President and Mrs Barack Obama will host a state dinner in honour of Prime Minister and Mrs Lee Hsien Loong on Tuesday, Aug 2. PM Lee is on an official visit to the US from July 31 to Aug 5. The last time a Singapore prime minister was hosted to a White House state dinner occurred in 1985 when President and Mrs Ronald Reagan hosted a state dinner in honour of Prime Minister and Mrs Lee Kuan Yew.

During his eight years as president, Mr Reagan hosted 35 state dinners. In contrast, President Obama has hosted only 12 state dinners to date. The reason is that he prefers to entertain at lunch and have dinner with his two teenage daughters. The state dinner on Aug 2 is, therefore, very significant. It reflects the high regard which the President of the US has for the Prime Minister of this small country.

LEE KUAN YEW'S 1985 VISIT

I was the Ambassador of Singapore in Washington, DC in 1985. I would like to share some reflections about Mr Lee Kuan Yew's visit that year, about the elegant dinner at the White House and about his address to a joint meeting of the US Congress. I would also like to compare and contrast the political situations in the US in 1985 and 2016.

Mr Reagan and Mr Lee Kuan Yew were mutual admirers. This surprised many people because they seemed so different. Mr Lee was cerebral, Mr Reagan was intuitive. Mr Lee was a workaholic, Mr Reagan was not. People forget, however, that they were similar in some important ways: they were strong leaders with vision and con- viction and they trusted each other.

In 1985, I advised Mr Lee to fly from Singapore to London and from London to Boston before going to Washington. I wanted Mr Lee to overcome his jet lag by spending the weekend at Harvard University. I arranged for several professors to brief him on aspects of America that he was interested in. It also gave him an opportunity to reconnect with several professors he had befriended during his sabbatical at Harvard in 1968.

Mr Lee and his delegation flew from Boston to Washington on Monday, Oct 7, 1985, in a US aircraft, landing at the Andrews Air Force Base. That evening, Mr Lee's good friend, Dr George Shultz, the US Secretary of State, hosted him and his delegation to an early dinner on a boat. We cruised along the Potomac River and had a beautiful view of the city and its monuments.

THE BIG DAY

Tuesday, Oct 8, was the big day. The ceremonial welcome for Mr Lee took place on the lawn of the White House with President Reagan and Prime Minister Lee standing on a dais. It was a beautiful autumn day with a clear blue sky and very comfortable temperature and humidity. There were some celebrities at the function, including actor Sylvester Stallone. I had to explain to Mr Lee who he was.

Following the ceremony, the two delegations held a meeting. I remember that on that occasion, President Reagan's mind was focused on only one issue, the crisis in the Philippines over protests against President Ferdinand Marcos. He listened very carefully to Mr Lee's advice.

Secretary of State Shultz hosted a splendid lunch for PM Lee and his delegation at the US State Department. In the afternoon, Mr Lee called on the Vice-President, Mr George H.W. Bush. Mr Bush would succeed Mr Reagan as the 41st President of the United States.

ENTERTAINING IN STYLE

President and Mrs Nancy Reagan liked to entertain and they did it with style and elegance. Mrs Reagan would take personal charge of the dinner, supervising the menu, choice of wine, flower arrangement and entertainment. She had asked whether Mr and Mrs Lee had a favourite singer. Mrs Lee requested Frank Sinatra. He was unfortunately not available and Mrs Reagan chose Peggy Lee to sing for us.

The evening began with cocktails for the Reagans and the Lees at a room on the second floor.

At the appointed hour, they came down a spiral staircase and formed a receiving line. All the guests invited to the dinner would be greeted by President and Mrs Reagan and Mr and Mrs Lee before being escorted to their seats in the dining room.

The dinner was attended by a microcosm of the American elite: leaders of government, Congress, judiciary, business and culture. Because President and Mrs Reagan began their careers as actors, there were many guests from the world of entertainment. I remember Mr Lee asking me who were the actor, Michael J. Fox, the singer, Natalie Cole, and the model and actress, Raquel Welch. President Reagan proposed a toast to Mr and Mrs Lee. Mr Lee reciprocated with a toast to President and Mrs Reagan. The toasts were warm, personal and witty.

After the dinner, we adjourned to an adjoining room where we were serenaded by Peggy Lee. The concert ended at 11pm.

Before the dancing began, Mr and Mrs Lee and the whole delegation departed for their hotel, leaving Mr Kishore Mahbubani (at that time Singapore's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York) and me and our wives to defend the honour of Singapore on the dance floor. The party ended at midnight.

Next morning at breakfast, Mr Lee asked me whether it was important for an ambassador to know how to dance. I said it was very important. He was not convinced and asked why. I said that on the previous evening it gave me an opportunity to embrace some of the most powerful women of Washington.

ADDRESS TO CONGRESS

Oct 9, 1985 was a proud day for Singapore. On that day Prime Minister Lee was invited to address a joint meeting of the US Congress.

In 1985 as today, America was suffering from a protectionist fever. Today, China is viewed as the enemy. In 1985, Japan was the enemy. There were over 300 Bills in the US Congress dedicated to protecting the US market.

Showing great courage, Mr Lee argued that free trade contributes to world peace and protectionism will lead to conflict and war. He said: "Protectionism and retaliation will shrink trade and so reduce jobs. Is America willing to write off the peaceful and constructive developments of the last 40 years that she had made possible?"

Mr Lee concluded with the following appeal: "It is inherent in America's position as the pre-eminent economic, political and military power to have to settle and uphold the rules for orderly change and progress... In the interests of peace and security America must uphold the rules of international conduct which rewards peaceful cooperative behaviour and punishes transgressions of the peace. A replay of the depression of the 1930s, which led to World War II, will be ruinous for all. All the major powers of the West share the responsibility of not repeating this mistake. But America's is the primary responsibility, for she is the anchor economy of the free- market economies of the world."

THE U.S. TODAY

Mr Lee's message to the US Congress is even more important today than in 1985. The US is suffering from another bout of protectionist fever. Globalisation, free trade and trade agreements have become dirty words in America. It is very worrying that the two candidates for the US presidency, Mrs Hillary Clinton and Mr Donald Trump, have declared their opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

It is unprecedented for the Republican Party, which has historically championed free trade and globalisation, to choose a presidential candidate who is opposed to both.

The future prospects of the world, not just in trade and commerce but also for peace and stability, will be greatly affected by the outcome of the US election in November.

The writer served as Singapore's ambassador to the United States from 1984 to 1990.








Flowers and friendship at Tuesday's state dinner
PM Lee will be first South-east Asian leader to be given this honour by Obama
By Melissa Sim, US Correspondent In Washington, The Sunday Times, 31 Jul 2016

A burst of yellow orchids and roses, symbolising friendship, will welcome Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife at the White House State Dinner on Tuesday - marking the 13th state dinner or official visit of the Obama administration and the first held in honour of a South-east Asian leader.

Hosted by President Barack Obama and Mrs Michelle Obama, the event will celebrate the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between Singapore and the US.

"State visits and state dinners are an opportunity for the United States to reaffirm our ties and our friendship with America's most important and closest partners around the world and Singapore, clearly, is one of our strongest, closest and most reliable partners," said Mr Dan Kritenbrink, senior director for Asian Affairs at the National Security Council.

Leaders from only four Asian countries - China, Japan, South Korea and India - have been given this honour under the Obama administration. "Prime Minister Lee's visit clearly reflects the vitally important role that Singapore plays in the (US) rebalance to the Asia-Pacific," said Mr Kritenbrink.

During the visit, Mr Kritenbrink said, the two leaders will highlight the economic and strategic importance of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, demonstrate their close cooperation on issues such as law enforcement, cyber security, global health, maritime security and combating climate change, and discuss ways to "further grow our strong defence relationship and further strengthen our close ties between our two people".

Introducing the menu for the evening, White House executive chef Cris Comerford said she incorporated many Asian ingredients in the evening's fare.

"We used green papaya, chillies, lemongrass, ginger, palm sugar, coconut milk, wonderful fruits like soursop. The pandan is one of my favourite... so I was able to use a lot of different varieties of Singaporean ingredients in this menu," she said at a media preview.

The first course will be a Maryland blue crab salad, which the chef says is a more summery play on Singapore's chilli crab, followed by a salad featuring heirloom tomatoes and lime basil from the White House Kitchen Garden.

American Wagyu beef tenderloin will be served as the main course, drizzled with a lemongrass demi-glace sauce.

The show-stopper, however, is likely to be the dessert course called "A Festive Gathering", where the motif of roses and orchids will once again make an appearance.

Executive pastry chef Susie Morrison said 2,500 sugar petals were used in the 20 handmade displays - honouring flowers from both the US and Singapore - and will be served to every table with an assortment of pastries. There will also be a separate course of peach sangria cake.

About 200 guests are expected to attend the sit-down dinner in the East Room, followed by a performance in the State Dining Room by American singer-songwriter Chrisette Michele.









Official Visit by PM Lee Hsien Loong to The United States of America

$
0
0
The Obamas honor the Prime Minister of Singapore at their 12th White House State Dinner







A toast to 50 years of US-Singapore friendship
By Jeremy Au Yong, US Bureau Chief, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

The friendship between Singapore and the United States was celebrated on Tuesday night, as President Barack Obama hosted Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the first White House state dinner in Singapore's honour in three decades.

The strong bilateral relationship that has grown since diplomatic ties were formally initiated 50 years ago had already been on display through much of PM Lee's official visit to the US capital, but the glamorous black-tie dinner proved to be the climax.

As they toasted each other, both leaders lauded the enduring ties and looked forward to continued collaboration.


"Let's continue to build something special together," Mr Obama said as he raised a glass, borrowing a call PM Lee made last year to Singaporeans when he was sworn in after the General Election. "Onward, Singapore - Majulah Singapura. Onward, America. Cheers. Yam seng."




While making a toast to Mr Obama, PM Lee hailed the American President's leadership, adding that he was struck early on by Mr Obama's emphasis on Asia.

"I remember my first meeting with you at the Senate. It was May 2007. You were in the midst of a hard-fought presidential campaign, and not yet the front runner for the Democratic nomination. But I was struck by your focus, your informed interest in Asia and your desire to cement America's role in it," he said.


As he praised America's ideals such as openness and generosity of spirit, Mr Lee said he hoped the US would remain engaged in Asia.


He said: "You seek to build a world where countries can prosper together. You make common cause with others to fight the problems which plague mankind, be it extremist terrorism, poverty, Ebola or climate change. That is why 70 years after the Second World War, America is still a welcomed power in Asia."


Nearly 200 of Washington's leaders - alongside some from Wall Street and Hollywood - attended the state dinner. Singapore is the first South-east Asian country to receive such an honour under the Obama presidency.










Leaders pay tribute to deep bilateral ties
Obama, PM Lee give speeches reflecting strong personal rapport, express confidence US-Singapore ties will endure
By Jeremy Au Yong, US Bureau Chief In Washington, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

When US President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong raised their glasses at the state dinner on Tuesday night (yesterday morning, Singapore time), it was a toast to not just the depth of current bilateral links, but also the strong personal rapport between the two leaders.

In tributes that each lasted about seven minutes, the two spoke warmly of each other and even threw in a few jokes.

Just as he did during the arrival ceremony earlier on Tuesday, Mr Obama liberally littered his remarks at the dinner with Singaporean references and colloquialisms.

He started his toast by acknowledging the recent inclusion of hawker stalls in the Michelin food guide. "We all know how seriously Singaporeans take their food. In Singapore, even the street vendors - the hawker stalls - earn Michelin stars - which creates some pressure this evening," he said to laughter from the audience of nearly 200.

"We were tempted to offer each of you a Singapore Sling or some chilli crab. However, for those of you who know its unmistakable scent - which never seems to go away - you'll understand why we are not serving a fruit known as durian here in the White House."



When it was his turn to take to the podium in the White House East Room, Mr Lee landed punchlines of his own.

He spoke of how former US ambassador Steve Green was crucial in teeing up the midnight golf game between former Singapore prime minister Goh Chok Tong and former US president Bill Clinton that eventually led to the US-Singapore free-trade agreement.

Noting that Mr Clinton was serving his last term then, he quipped that this "shows what can be done even during lame duck periods".

But the biggest laughs came when Mr Lee took a jab at conspiracy theories about Mr Obama not being born in the United States.

While announcing Singapore's gift of an orchid hybrid named Dendrobium Barack and Michelle Obama, he said: "This is a hybrid of breeds native to Singapore and Hawaii, where the President was born - most of us believe."

Jokes aside, both leaders also expressed confidence that US-Singapore ties would endure.

Mr Lee said America has much to offer Singapore.

"Singapore admires America's dynamism, vibrancy and capacity for self-renewal. These qualities attract the best and brightest from around the world," said Mr Lee.

"This is something that Singapore hopes to emulate as we seek to tap this spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship."

Mr Obama, in turn, said the bond between the two countries goes beyond geopolitics.

Noting that the first American representative to Singapore - a planter named Joseph Balestier - still has a road named after him, he said: "It's a reminder that as we pursue a more peaceful and prosperous order in the Asia-Pacific, our partnership is rooted in more than strategic interests. We're bound together by history, by family and by friendship."

The ceremony, which ran for nearly four hours with political leaders, corporate chiefs and TV stars in attendance, capped off Mr Obama's 12th state dinner and the first one he has granted in honour of a South-east Asian country.

After their meeting earlier on Tuesday, Mr Lee and Mr Obama faced the press, both advocating strongly for free trade.

And while Mr Lee declined to weigh in on the US election when asked, he said he hoped cooler heads would prevail after the polls in November.

"Our experience of American elections, presidential elections, has been that many pressures build up during the election campaign. And after the elections, in a calmer, cooler atmosphere, positions are re-thought, strategies are nuanced, and a certain balance is kept in the direction of the ship of state. It doesn't turn completely upside down."


















VIPs, celebrities attend state dinner
Some 200 guests present; attention paid to detail of room design, with musical entertainment rounding off the night
By Melissa Sim, US Correspondent In Washington, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

It was a glitzy affair attended by not just political and corporate bigwigs, but also actress Keri Russell and actor Matthew Rhys, as well as Amy Tan, author of best-selling novel Joy Luck Club.

The state dinner, honouring 50 years of diplomatic relations between the United States and Singapore, began with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Mrs Lee arriving in a black limousine at the North Portico of the White House, where they were received by US President Barack Obama and Mrs Michelle Obama.

The men wore black tuxedos while the women were a picture of elegance - Mrs Lee in a gold and red kebaya matched with a red shawl, and Mrs Obama in a strapless ivory-coloured dress by Brandon Maxwell, singer Lady Gaga's fashion director.



As the Marine Corps band struck up a tune, the two couples descended the grand staircase of the White House, pausing briefly at the foot of the stairs for official photographs before heading off to dinner.

Close to 200 guests packed the East Room where dinner was held and which was decorated with yellow orchids and roses, a symbol of the friendship between the US and Singapore.



Flickering candles and a large spray of flowers adorned a feature wall, forming a grand backdrop for the head table, where PM Lee and Mrs Lee were seated.

Much attention was paid to detail as the yellow flower motif was used throughout the room, from the pattern of the table cloth to the projected lighting design on the ceiling.

Midway through dinner, violinists entered the room and played the tune of popular Malay folk song Di Tanjong Katong, prompting many to whip out their cameras to capture the moment. Among them was Acting Minister for Education (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung, who posted the video on his Instagram account.

Mr Lee's Facebook page also offered a 360-degree look at the state dinner, just as he was raising a toast and the cameras were clicking incessantly.



More musical entertainment rounded up the night as the guests filed into the State Dining Room, where chairs were tightly packed.

Mr and Mrs Lee had front-row seats as American singer-songwriter Chrisette Michele opened her segment with the song Be OK.

As guests bobbed to the music, the 16th president of the US, Abraham Lincoln, observed the proceedings from his portrait on the wall. Touching his chin in what must have been conceived as a pensive posture, he looked quizzically at the immaculately dressed guests gathered before him, before the evening drew to a close.


By Melissa Sim, US Correspondent In Washington, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

Singapore and the United States announced a slew of measures to boost cooperation, including an agreement to work more closely on cyber security and a US-Singapore scholarship programme.

Both Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and President Barack Obama welcomed these new initiatives during a meeting in the Oval Office on Tuesday, and noted the growing cooperation in areas such as climate change and counter-terrorism.

The new scholarship would fund summer exchange programmes for 50 Singaporean and 50 American students over the course of the next five years.

A new memorandum of understanding signed between the two countries would also bring about regular information exchanges and the sharing of best practices on cyber security.

It commits both parties to "conduct joint cyber-security exercises and collaborate on regional cyber capacity-building and cyber security awareness-building activities", according to a statement.

These announcements came on a day when trade - in particular, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal - dominated a joint press conference at the White House.



Both leaders advocated strongly for the deal, with Mr Obama spending nearly 20 minutes laying out his argument.

First, he said the 12-nation trade pact "knocks out 18,000 tariffs that other countries place on American products and goods".

"If everybody agrees that we're going to have lower tariffs, that's good for American businesses and American workers. And we should want that, we should pursue it," said Mr Obama.

Second, he said the TPP strengthens labour and environmental agreements in partner countries.

"We're raising standards for workers in those countries, which means it's harder for them to undercut labour standards here in the United States. The same is true for environmental standards," he said.

Appealing to liberals opposed to the deal, Mr Obama added: "If you care about preventing abuse of workers, child labour, wildlife trafficking, overfishing and the decimation of forests, all those things are addressed in this agreement."

Both Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and her Republican opponent Donald Trump have said they oppose the TPP, but Mr Obama remains resolute.

"Hopefully, after the election is over and the dust settles, there will be more attention to the actual facts behind the deal and it won't just be a political symbol or a political football," he said.



Adding to Mr Obama's argument, Mr Lee highlighted "the other side of the economic benefit" not only for producers but also for consumers in America.

"I am spending, I am consuming, I am importing and, because it's freed up trade, I am getting a wider range of products, of services, of opportunities, which will improve my livelihood," he said.

He also made it clear that America's reputation is at stake if it drops the deal, saying that America's partners had to "overcome some domestic political objection, some sensitivity, some political cost to come to the table and make this deal".

"And if, at the end, waiting at the altar, the bride doesn't arrive, I think there are people who are going to be very hurt, not just emotionally, but really damaged for a long time to come," said Mr Lee.

The TPP would point the world in the right direction.

"If you set the wrong direction, maybe in the next 50 years, some time, you will turn around, but it will cost you many years and the world will have to pay quite a high price," said Mr Lee.

US Vice-President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry held a state luncheon for Mr Lee after the press conference.



























Singapore a solid-rock partner, says US President Obama
Bilateral ties with the US have remained strong through the years, says PM Lee
By Jeremy Au Yong, US Bureau Chief In Washington, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2016

President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong hailed the 50 years of diplomatic ties between their two countries at the White House yesterday (Aug 2), highlighting the many ways the two sides contribute to each other and the common values they share.

In brief remarks during a grand welcome ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House, Mr Obama called Mr Lee and Singapore "solid-rock partners".

"Today, our friendship and shared interests bring us together in common pursuit of a common vision - a peaceful and prosperous Asia-Pacific and a more secure world," he said. "As the United States has rebalanced our foreign policy to the Asia-Pacific, Singapore - and Prime Minister Lee, in particular - have been solid- rock partners."

He also reiterated remarks he made in an interview with The Straits Times where he referred to Singapore as an "anchor" for US presence in the region.



The President littered his speech with Singaporean-isms, referring to "rojak" when talking about Singapore's multicultural society and "uncles and aunties" when addressing some 2,000 people gathered for the ceremony.

"In the United States, we call ourselves a 'melting pot' of different races, religions and creeds. In Singapore, it is rojak - different parts united in a harmonious whole," said Mr Obama. "We're bound by the belief that no matter who you are, if you work hard and play by the rules, you can make it."



In his remarks, PM Lee talked about how far ties have come in the decades since founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew first visited the US in 1967, as well as the US' role in Asia's development.

Said PM Lee: "Almost 50 years later, the world has completely changed. The Cold War is long over, and the threat of communism has disappeared. Asia is at peace, though tensions are not entirely absent... America's endurance, policies and actions have contributed greatly to this current peace and prosperity."

He also noted that the strong ties have withstood many political changes. "Singapore's own ties with the United States have remained steadfast through nine US presidents - five Republican and four Democratic - and three Singapore prime ministers," he said. "We will maintain these bipartisan links with whichever party wins the elections in November."



As he has done on previous visits to the US, PM Lee stressed the importance of the US being engaged in Asia. He also reiterated calls he made on Monday to US industry and business leaders for the US to ratify the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade pact.

"I know that America has many preoccupations, both at home and abroad. Some Americans are anxious and frustrated with economic uncertainty and the uneven results of globalisation, trade and foreign engagement. But the US has many interests, investments and friends in the region. These strengthen the United States. Singapore fervently hopes that the US will stay engaged and maintain its indispensable role in the Asia-Pacific," he said.



The TPP dominated the joint press conference following the two leaders' meeting in the Oval Office. Mr Obama reiterated his support for it and Mr Lee thanked the President for continuing to support it.

Asked how he intends to push it through as the presidential nominees oppose it, Mr Obama quipped: "Right now, I'm president and I think I have the better argument."

In a joint statement with Mr Obama, PM Lee said Singapore will step up its contribution to the fight against terror in Iraq by sending a Singapore Armed Forces medical support team to the country.























PM Lee gets warm welcome at White House
2,000 people wait in summer heat to cheer his arrival and attend grand ceremony
By Jeremy Au Yong, US Bureau Chief, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2016

Some 2,000 people stood on the South Lawn of the White House waving little Singapore and US flags as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong was welcomed by President Barack Obama in a ceremony full of pomp and grandeur.

The ceremony started with Mr Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama greeting Mr Lee and Mrs Lee as the Singapore leader and his wife emerged from their car that had pulled up to the White House.

Then, as the two leaders stood on a purpose-built stage, the military band played the Singapore national anthem. At the same time, a 19-gun salute was fired.

Mr Lee and Mr Obama then inspected a guard of honour.



Yesterday's ceremony also included a parade by members of the US Army's Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps, dressed in 18th-century colonial uniform.

The ceremony was not all solemn, however.

After inspecting the guard of honour, the two leaders drew cheers from the crowd as they mingled and shook hands with those who had waited hours in the summer heat for the ceremony.

The weather in the American capital has been so hot in recent days that the joint press conference of the two leaders - normally held in the Rose Garden - was moved indoors.

Those who attended the ceremony said the wait was well worth it.

Said Mr Ian Chung, 30, a Singaporean living in Washington who waited 11/2 hours: "I'm happy to be here and to be part of such a historic moment in Singapore's history."















PM Lee urges Americans to support TPP
Speech to business leaders part of busy day that includes visits to Pentagon, Arlington cemetery
By Melissa Sim, US Correspondent In Washington, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2016

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement would help the United States secure its economic interests and its place in the world, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told US officials and business leaders in Washington, DC, urging them to lend their voices to support the deal.

Speaking at a reception hosted by the US Chamber of Commerce and US-Asean Business Council on Monday, Mr Lee acknowledged that the politics is difficult in an election year but said that ratification of the 12-nation pact would be a "clear statement" of US "commitment and confidence in our region".

"Asian countries want America to be engaged. We need to know that this engagement will be sustained and we need to know that agreements will be upheld and that Asia can depend on America," he said.

He also dismissed the idea of re-negotiating the deal, saying that "every one of the TPP signatories has had to make sacrifices in order to accept the TPP agreement".

"Nobody wants to re-open the process, with no prospect of doing better and every chance of having it fall apart," he said.

The landmark trade deal, which includes countries such as Singapore, the US, Japan and Malaysia, was agreed to last year after a prolonged negotiation process. The deal now awaits ratification by the domestic legislatures of the participating nations.



Given that this is an election year in the US, ratification by the US Congress has long been considered among the most uncertain. Both Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton have said they oppose the deal.

President Barack Obama, however, told The Straits Times in an interview that he "remains committed" to the trade pact.

Reiterating the many strategic and economic advantages that the deal holds for the US, Mr Lee said: "Improved market access will mean cheaper products for consumers and more exports for manufacturers. Incorporated in the TPP are provisions on human rights, intellectual property protection and safeguards for labour and the environment. There will be strong standards that will support innovation and benefit many US technology giants."



Strategically, he said, the deal would add substance to the US rebalance to Asia, which he stressed cannot be just about the military and the Seventh Fleet of the US Navy. "There are no winners, only losers with protectionism. Economic development across the world will be blocked; less interdependence means the clear advantage of cooperation and interdependence over conflict and war will be weakened," he said.

He then added: "As Americans say, you have to be at the table, or be on the menu."

Responding to a question on China's position on its claims in the South China Sea after the international tribunal ruling last month, Mr Lee said he did not think the Chinese had changed their policy as a result of the decision.

Once countries have taken positions, to have them "walk back from those and say 'well, it's not quite so absolute and it wasn't so clearly mine after all', I think we have to wait a long time to see that happening - very few countries do it", he said.

He added, though, that he did not think any of the claimant countries would want to "push it to the brink". "They have interests, they have claims, they would want to maintain them, but nobody wants to go to war," he added.

Earlier, Mr Lee met US Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, Defence Secretary Ash Carter and Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker.

He also laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arlington National Cemetery.

A 19-gun salute rang out and Singapore's national anthem was played by a military band as he arrived. To mark his visit, Mr Lee presented a memento - a figurine of a soldier against the Singapore flag - which he said in a Facebook post "symbolises the warm friendship and strong defence ties shared between Singapore and the US".

Following the wreath-laying, Mr Lee was received at the Pentagon with an enhanced honour cordon featuring all five branches of the US military. A US military band played Majulah Singapura before the Prime Minister and Mr Carter.



Both the Arlington cemetery and the Pentagon are in Virginia state and about 10 minutes' drive from the White House in Washington, DC.

The two military ceremonies set the tone for an official visit by Mr Lee that features ceremonies reserved for the US' closest partners.

Around the White House, streets were lined with Singapore and US flags, and two large flags also adorned the ornate Eisenhower building that houses the offices of the US administration staff.

On the sidelines of Mr Lee's visit, a memorandum of understanding was signed between Singapore and the US to establish a platform to help companies from both countries work together to pursue opportunities in third-party markets.

The climax of the visit is the state dinner on Tuesday night (this morning, Singapore time) in Washington.









Singapore sending medical team to Iraq
By Shea Driscoll, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2016

Singapore will step up its contribution to the fight against terror in Iraq by sending a Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) medical support team to the country.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong made the announcement in a joint statement with United States President Barack Obama yesterday.

The medical support team will take care of both soldiers and civilians injured in the battle against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen elaborated in a Facebook post last night. Soldiers from the new Army Deployment Force (ADF) will join the medical support team for force protection, he added.



The ADF is a rapid response anti-terrorist unit the size of a battalion that comprises highly trained soldiers with niche capabilities.

"As long as terrorist groups gain a foothold in any country, they can radicalise others from all around the world, including Singapore. This is why Singapore joined the fight against terror in Afghanistan, and now against ISIS in Iraq and Syria," Dr Ng wrote.

The SAF's Imagery Analysis Team has been deployed to the Combined Joint Task Force Headquarters in Kuwait since last September.

Singapore had also sent 492 SAF servicemen to Afghanistan during a six-year deployment to the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force that included medical support.

























PM Lee marks National Day early in US
He joins US-based Singaporeans for celebration at the Republic's Embassy in Washington, DC
By Melissa Sim, US Correspondent In Washington, The Straits Times, 2 Aug 2016

National Day came early in Washington DC, as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Mrs Lee celebrated Singapore's 51st birthday with more than 500 guests at the Republic's Embassy on Sunday.

Speaking to the guests at the start of the evening, PM Lee said: "We have much to celebrate because we have spent 50 years together and are now embarking on the next 50 years - the second half century of our nation-building journey."

The Prime Minister is in the United States for an official visit and will be hosted by US President Barack Obama and Mrs Michelle Obama at the White House for a state dinner today.

This is the first time a South-east Asian leader will be given this honour by the Obama administration.

"The fact that there are so many Singaporeans here in America... shows how wide and deep our relations are, not just between the governments and companies but also the people," said PM Lee, who spent most of the evening speaking to Singaporeans and taking selfies with them.



When speaking to students, PM Lee would ask about their experience in the US and whether they intended to stay or return to Singapore to work.

Ms Jyostna Subramaniam, 22, a student at Georgetown University, said she wanted to gain some experience overseas but would ultimately return home. When she told Mr Lee that she spoke Arabic, he said: "We need people like that, we don't have enough Arabic speakers."

Members of Parliament and Cabinet ministers at Sunday's celebration included Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S. Iswaran, Minister at the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing and Acting Minister for Education (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung. They will also form part of the delegation attending the state dinner today.



PM Lee and some of the delegates are staying at Blair House, the guest house of the US President, which has been a home away from home for visiting foreign dignitaries such as Queen Elizabeth II and Mr Nelson Mandela.

Madam Rahayu Mahzam, an MP for Jurong GRC, said she is proud that the Singapore delegation includes representatives from different communities.

"It shows our leadership is inclusive... we never take diversity for granted and we are able to showcase that as we travel," she said.



As National Day songs played in the background, many tucked into Singapore favourites such as chicken rice, satay and mee siam.

Said Mrs Salwa Salim-Perry, 32, a Singaporean business owner who moved to the US just two months ago: "It feels so good to be here, to hear people speaking Singlish around me, I feel like I'm connected to home again."























Official visit a sign of US emphasis on Asia, not just Singapore: PM Lee Hsien Loong
By Jeremy Au Yong, US Bureau Chief, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

WASHINGTON - The warm welcome and state dinner that Singapore received in Washington is a reflection of the emphasis that the United States puts on Asia, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

He told reporters that Singapore sees the visit as more than simply an indication of the strong ties between just Singapore and the US.

"It so happens that we are the ones invited, but it's not just because they are friends with Singapore, but Singapore is in the Asia Pacific and America values the Asia Pacific, and values all its friends in the Asia Pacific. I think that's how it should be seen, and that's how we in Singapore see it," Mr Lee on Wednesday (Aug 3) told the Singapore media in an interview at the end of his visit to the US.

The decision by the White House to grant Singapore the rare honour of a state dinner had been a matter of some interest among the Singapore media, with the likes of CNBC running articles explaining how such a small country was chosen. Singapore is the first South-east Asian country to be given the honour.

In an interview with The Straits Times ahead of PM Lee's visit to the White House, President Barack Obama had also cast the significance of the event in light of his administration larger Asia policy.

He said that the visit reflected the important role Singapore plays in his administration's Asia rebalance, adding that he considered Singapore an anchor for US presence in the region.



On Wednesday, PM Lee also told reporters that he was heartened that Mr Obama continues to stay committed to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement despite the political difficulties.

"My one vivid memory of him is that, every time we had an Apec (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) meeting, he would be pursuing the TPP progress and pressing the leaders to move faster in order to conclude the TPP. And each time we would have a gathering of TPP members, we did it in Japan, Hawaii, and every subsequent meeting, and each time he's personally pushing, and fully committed," he said.

"And even here, in the middle of an election campaign, busy with his domestic issues and many other things, and looking towards the end of his term, he's still pushing hard for the TPP, to complete the last few steps and get ratified in the US, and become a reality."

Mr Lee added that Singapore would do what it can to help advocate for the deal.

On the broader Singapore-US ties, Mr Lee said that things are going smoothly but he also wanted to ensure ties could be sustained in the future.

"I think there are many good things going, and we have to take it step by step, but at the same time be able to sustain it into the next generation of leaders, which is one of the reasons why, on this trip, I've brought along some young MPs and young ministers," he said.

Members of the Singapore delegation included Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, Industry Minister S. Iswaran, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing, Acting Education Minister Ong Ye Kung, and Members of Parliament Christopher De Souza and Rahayu Mahzam.

PM Lee was also asked about the condition of former president S R Nathan.

He said: "I have not got the latest updates, but I think his condition is stable, I had spoken to his daughter and Mrs Nathan when I arrived here in Washington, to express my concern and good wishes, and our thoughts and prayers are still with him and his family."









Related

Syndicate bringing in illegal workers smashed: Manpower Ministry

$
0
0
Suspected mastermind, workers from China among 44 people nabbed in islandwide operation
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 3 Aug 2016

A syndicate which used bogus jobs to trick the authorities into approving work permits for Chinese nationals has been smashed.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) arrested 44 people in an islandwide operation over two days last week.

They include the syndicate's suspected mastermind, a Chinese national in his 30s, who was nabbed in his Ubi office.

He was among six alleged members of the syndicate who were arrested, along with 38 workers from China who were picked up at dormitories or construction sites.

MOM is still investigating the total number of workers the syndicate brought in to work illegally.

In the last five years, MOM has taken enforcement action against an average of 20 employers each year for such illegal importation of labour.

MOM shed light on how such syndicates operate. They typically set up shell companies, which have no real business operations.

"Fall guys", with no actual knowledge of what the company does, are hired as directors. Their SingPass accounts are used to make fraudulent work pass applications.

The shell companies then obtain the quota to employ foreigners by pretending to hire "phantom" local workers.

The syndicates also collect large amounts of kickbacks from the foreign workers brought in. Many workers, said MOM, willingly pay for the chance to get a work pass to stay in Singapore, and thus conspire with the syndicates.

Advocacy groups say they have seen workers fork out amounts that exceed $14,000. They are then released to find their own employment via illegal means.

Foreigners who work without valid passes face a fine of up to $20,000 or up to two years in jail or both, unless MOM determines they were victims.

Ms Debbie Fordyce, executive committee member of foreign worker advocacy group Transient Workers Count Too, said some workers are willing to pay high kickbacks and risk stiff penalties as they could get paid two or three times more if they find their own work.

"Where they come from, there is such desperation. People would put their lives at risk if they could just get that bit of money to send home," she said.



Those convicted of illegal labour importation could face a jail term of between six months and two years, and a fine of up to $6,000 per charge. Caning is also involved in more severe cases.

Employers who hire foreign workers seeking illegal employment face a fine of between $5,000 and $30,000, and/or up to a year's jail.

Main contractors with illegal workers at their worksites are liable to be fined up to $15,000 and/or jailed up to a year. They will also be barred from hiring foreign workers.

Singapore Contractors Association president Kenneth Loo said some construction firms, which are short of labour or need to complete a project quickly, might be tempted to take on illegal workers.

"But that's no excuse," he said. "It's just like stealing, it's a crime. The penalty is very strict and I think the industry knows this. It doesn't pay in the end."







Related
MOM dismantles syndicate involved in the illegal importation of labour

President Tony Tan stresses support for polys, ITE

$
0
0
Dr Tan saddened by claim that he didn't back funding for vocational education as minister
By Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

President Tony Tan Keng Yam said yesterday that he was saddened by a recent claim that he was not supportive of funding vocational education when he was Education Minister.

"I did not make any such remarks. The claim is very hurtful because when I was a Cabinet minister, the education of children was very close to my heart," he said.

"For that reason, when I was Education Minister, I increased support for the education of all students, with a particular focus on children in polytechnics and ITE, or what was then the VITB," he added, referring to the Vocational and Industrial Training Board.

"It is, therefore, very sad that such a thing should be said about me," Dr Tan told reporters on a visit to Spectra Secondary School in Woodlands.

He made the comments when asked for his response to remarks by architect Tay Kheng Soon. Mr Tay had told a forum organised by the Singapore Democratic Party last month that Dr Tan was not supportive of increased funding for polytechnics and the Institute of Technical Education (ITE).

Mr Tay claimed Dr Tan had made the negative comments to his brother, the late Dr Tay Eng Soon, who was Senior Minister of State for Education from 1988 to 1993 and oversaw vocational education. Dr Tan was Education Minister from 1980 to 1981, and 1985 to 1991.

Mr Tay's remarks were dismissed by former Senior Minister S. Jayakumar yesterday.

Professor Jayakumar told The Straits Times: "It is absurd. I never heard Tony Tan make disparaging remarks about poly and VITB students. On the contrary, whenever we discussed polys and VITB in Cabinet or pre-Cabinet, I recall that as Education Minister he always made a strong plug for government support for these institutions."

Mr Lee Yock Suan, who became Education Minister after Dr Tan, similarly said he saw first-hand Dr Tan's efforts to improve opportunities for poly and ITE students.

"He initiated the move to establish Nanyang Polytechnic and upgrade VITB to ITE," said Mr Lee.

"I knew from my conversations with him that he felt deeply that they should be given every opportunity to succeed in life. This is, therefore, not a man who would have made the remarks that have been attributed to him," he added.

The Ministry of Education (MOE) said yesterday that Dr Tan oversaw major developments in the poly and ITE sector as Education Minister. "In anticipation of increasingly larger cohorts of post-secondary students and growing manpower needs, Temasek Polytechnic and Nanyang Polytechnic were set up in 1990 and 1992 respectively," a spokesman said. VITB was also upgraded and rebranded as ITE, a full- fledged institution focusing on technical and vocational education, in 1992.

The spokesman added that from 1986 to 1992, government spending per student rose 48 per cent in the polys, and 58 per cent in the ITE. At the same time, enrolment shot up by 68 per cent in the polys, and 21 per cent in the ITE.

Yesterday, Dr Tan, when touring Spectra, visited English, maths and science classes. Spectra is one of two schools for students in the Normal (Technical) stream who are less academically inclined.

Dr Tan also visited facilities such as a retail room modelled after a FairPrice supermarket, and a hospitality room that looks like a hotel room. Students learn vocational skills like mechanical servicing on top of English, their mother tongue and maths. He was impressed by the customised and down-to-earth education and added: "The students are all very lively, very happy and learning a great deal."

He said schools like Spectra provide different pathways to success. "It's not just one narrow road where if you fall off, you are finished. There are many alternate ways. MOE and the Government will always be there to help you."













CPF review: New CPF LIFE plan with Escalating Payouts and Lifetime Retirement Investment Scheme recommended

$
0
0
CPF Advisory Panel Part Two Recommendations - 3 Aug 2016







New CPF Life plan offers rising payouts
Scheme provides buffer against inflation in exchange for lower or delayed initial payouts
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

A new retirement plan to help Singaporeans cope with the rising costs of living in their golden years is in the works, after the Government yesterday accepted fresh recommendations to improve the Central Provident Fund (CPF) scheme from an advisory panel.

In its second and final set of proposals, the CPF Advisory Panel also suggested creating a new, low-cost investment scheme which will give more options to investors who want to invest their CPF funds for higher returns but may not know how to do so.

"If I had to encapsulate what we're trying to do in one line: We are providing more choices to give you more control over your retirement plan," said panel chairman Tan Chorh Chuan.

The new CPF Life plan, which adds to the current two, will see monthly payouts increase by 2 per cent every year to keep pace with inflation. But those who opt for this CPF Life plan with "escalating payouts" will start with payments that are about 20 per cent lower compared to the current default plan.

Under the default option, the CPF Life Standard Plan, a CPF member with about $80,500 in his Retirement Account at age 55 can expect to receive $720 a month when he turns 65 for the rest of his life.

If the member chooses the new plan, he gets just $560 at the start. But the monthly payout will increase every year.

By the time he is 75, his monthly payments will reach $680. And when he is 87, his monthly payments will be $860 a month.

Those who want higher initial payouts under the new scheme can either top up their CPF Life premiums, or delay the starting age for payouts up to age 70.

The plan has been configured in this way to ensure that the system remains sustainable, said Prof Tan.

The panel, which was appointed in September 2014, came up with the latest proposals after consultations with industry players and more than 1,000 Singaporeans over focus-group discussions, telephone polls and through written feedback.

Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say yesterday accepted the recommendations on behalf of the Government and thanked the panel for its work. Noting that the panel had been given a complex task, he described its recommendations as "both elegant in their simplicity and far-sighted".

He added that the Government will "proactively promote awareness and understanding of these new CPF options so that members can make informed decisions to better meet their retirement needs".

The Ministry of Manpower and CPF Board will work towards implementing the recommendations in stages, which panel members said could take "a few years".

NTUC assistant secretary-general Cham Hui Fong welcomed the recommendations, saying they were "in line with our call to provide members with more options and flexibility" to better meet different retirement needs.

The 13-member panel submitted the first set of recommendations, including allowing lump-sum withdrawal at age 65 of up to 20 per cent of CPF savings, in February last year and they have been implemented.










Simpler investment scheme to grow retirement nest egg
Govt accepts proposal to offer low-cost investment option for CPF members
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

Central Provident Fund (CPF) members who want to take bigger risks to grow their nest egg, but lack the time or know-how to do so, can look forward to a new, simplified retirement investment scheme.

The Government yesterday accepted a proposal from an advisory panel that the CPF Board introduce a low-cost investment option for its members.

The Lifetime Retirement Investment Scheme (LRIS) would offer a smaller number of well-diversified funds, which do not need active management.

This is because an existing high-risk investing option has not helped many members realise returns superior to CPF interest rates.

Panel member Christopher Tan, chief executive of financial advisory firm Providend, called the scheme a "game changer" for CPF investments.

He said: "For the longest time, there have been members who don't have regular experience investing their CPF, because they don't have the time or knowledge, and it is also very expensive."

Another panellist, Mr Ng Cher Yan, managing partner of auditing and accounting practice Plus LLP, noted that a majority of CPF members met the savings threshold for this scheme, and this figure was likely to increase in the future.

Six in 10 active CPF members aged 45 today have Special Account (SA) savings in excess of $40,000, he said. This is expected to go up to nine in 10 in 2030.


The LRIS aims to bridge the gap between leaving one's savings in the Ordinary Account (OA) or SA, and putting them into the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS), a higher-risk option more suitable for savvier investors.

CPF members can currently invest their OA and SA savings above the first $20,000 and $40,000 respectively through the CPFIS, which has more than 200 funds to choose from.

At the end of last year, $25 billion was invested through the CPFIS. A further $105 billion remains to be invested.

The panel recommended that the LRIS funds should not be managed actively, which would incur higher management fees, but passively by a single administrator.

Because the CPFIS operates under a retail model, investment fees are high - as much as 3 per cent for sales charges - and this significantly erodes returns.

These costs could be reduced by aggregating a "critical mass of assets" from many members, said National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School practice professor of finance Joseph Cherian.

He added that returns are also affected when inexperienced investors "churn", or buy and sell their investments frequently. The new scheme should have measures to prevent such "churn", he said.

The panel engaged consulting firm Mercer to study models such as static risk funds and life-cycle planning, in which the exposure to risk is reduced the closer the investor gets to retirement.

It advised the Government to establish an expert investment council to set up and implement the LRIS.

It also suggested that the Government review the CPFIS so it can be better targeted at experienced investors.















CPF review: New annuity plan 'unlikely to attract most retirees'
By Rachel Au-Yong and Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

A new annuity plan that will give Central Provident Fund (CPF) members increasing payouts each year is not likely to find favour with the majority of retirees, said MPs and academics yesterday.

The reason: The initial payouts from age 65 will be about 20 per cent lower than those of the default plan offered by the CPF Board.

Two groups, in particular, will find the new CPF Life plan unattractive. These are the active seniors who want more cash in hand for their social activities, and those who have less non-CPF savings.

MP Foo Mee Har, chief executive of the Wealth Management Institute, questioned the attractiveness of a plan that requires a "pay cut" when compared with the CPF Life Standard Plan, which gives a fixed payout every month. "It's quite a big sacrifice because, at that age, you're probably still active and want to do more, like travel," she said.

The plan, announced yesterday by the CPF Advisory Panel and accepted by the Government, will give "escalating payouts" of 2 per cent a year to keep pace with the rising cost of living.

MP Liang Eng Hwa, who chairs the Government Parliamentary Committee for Finance and Trade and Industry, felt that the lower income who have little personal savings or family support would need bigger payouts from the start to cope with daily expenses.

Their sentiments have been anticipated by the advisory panel, which said it is likely that a minority would take up the new plan when it is ready in a few years' time.

Still, it is useful for those who want payouts to keep pace with inflation but are unwilling or do not know how to set aside sufficient funds, said SIM University economist Walter Theseira.

Subsidies could be given to bring the initial payouts up to the starting level of the standard plan but such a move would ultimately be borne by the taxpayer, he added.

The other change from the advisory panel is for a low-cost private investment scheme for investors with an appetite for risk but little time or know-how to delve into it.

This new Lifetime Retirement Investment Scheme (LRIS) was welcomed by academics and industry experts because it is an alternative to leaving one's savings in the risk-free Ordinary and Special CPF accounts and investing them under the current higher-risk CPF Investment Scheme.

It is an attractive option, especially for younger investors who can bear more risks, said Mr Marcus Kok of PwC Singapore.

But the LRIS is "not fail-safe" and the investor must be prepared to shoulder some risk, said Nanyang Technological University economics head Euston Quah.

Economist Chia Ngee Choon of the National University of Singapore called for investors to be given clear and simple information on the LRIS investment strategies and the investment record of the fund administrator, which has yet to be picked.

Labour MP Zainal Sapari suggested that future reviews should look at ways to encourage members to top up the accounts of their non-working spouses.





She is ready to take initial hit for escalating payouts
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

Some might blanch at the idea of starting with lower payouts from their Central Provident Fund (CPF) accounts upon retirement.

But Madam Salamah Abdoll, 55, is willing to take an initial hit in return for escalating payouts that can help combat a rising cost of living in later years.

A new CPF Life plan was mooted yesterday to help Singaporeans cope with inflation through payouts that increase by 2 per cent every year.

The trade-off is that the payouts, which begin at age 65, start at about 20 per cent lower than they would with the standard annuity plan.



Madam Salamah, a mosque manager for nine years, said a lower initial payout would not be a problem. She said: "I plan to still be working when I am 65, if my health permits. If I have income, I won't need a higher payout."

She currently earns about $3,300 a month, and has less than $100,000 saved in her CPF account.

She suffers from chronic conditions such as high blood pressure. "I would rather keep my CPF money in reserve first and get more later, in case I need more money for my bills later on."

The mother of four children, aged 14 to 32, said her desires for her autumn years are simple, as she has accomplished much of what she wants to do in life.

"I have gone on my haj pilgrimage, I have visited some other countries as a tourist. I am comfortable where I am.

"I am not a high-risk investor. As long as I have some money to rely on, I think I am content."






Earlier proposals
The Straits Times, 4 Aug 2016

In the first part of its review in February last year, the Central Provident Fund (CPF) proposed the following:

• CPF members could now choose to lock away a basic sum of $80,500, a higher sum of $161,000 or an enhanced sum of $241,500 at age 55, instead of meeting a standard minimum sum. Members will get higher monthly payouts if they opted to receive them later.

• Members got to withdraw up to 20 per cent of their savings at 65.

• Basic retirement sums for Singaporeans turning 55 from 2017 to 2020 were to be increased by 3 per cent for each cohort, to account for inflation.

• Higher CPF contribution rates for older workers





New CPF schemes open up more options: Lim Swee Say
They offer members more flexibility but also keep system simple enough to understand
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 5 Aug 2016

Central Provident Fund (CPF) members have now been offered more options for their retirement needs, Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say said yesterday.

They can choose between fixed payouts and one that starts lower but keeps rising. There is also a new investment option for those who seek higher returns on their CPF funds, but may not have the time or know-how to invest on their own.

The changes also keep the system simple enough for the public to make a suitable choice, he told reporters a day after the Government accepted ideas from an advisory panel to improve the CPF scheme.

"In the past, we may have offered you laksa and chicken rice, and now we offer you nasi lemak. If you ask me, is laksa better than chicken rice or nasi lemak, it all depends on what you are looking for," he said.

"All these options are good, but you have to find the one that is most suitable."

One new option is a CPF Life plan that gives escalating payouts to keep pace with inflation. Monthly payouts will go up by 2 per cent every year, but payments start at about 20 per cent lower than those of the current default plan.

"We will probably be able to put the escalating payouts in place in the next couple of years," said Mr Lim. It will take "a bit longer", he added, to implement the new, low- cost investment scheme that the panel also introduced.

The Lifetime Retirement Investment Scheme (LRIS) opens up a new option for investors, he said.

Speaking to reporters at the launch of a central kitchen for eight Indian restaurant operators, Mr Lim said the LRIS might have "tremendous impact in the future" as it plugs a gap in existing investment options.

On the one hand, he said, members are guaranteed risk-free interest for their Ordinary and Special accounts. On the other, they have the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS), a higher-risk option that requires more financial knowledge to manage and is also costlier.

"There is a growing number of CPF members who feel they can strive for higher returns than the risk-free ones, but don't have the time, expertise or know-how to manage their private investments.

"This is a simple scheme for individual investors which is less costly and less time-consuming," he said.

He said that it is an "immediate priority" to spend time ensuring the smooth implementation of the panel's recommendations.

More will also be done to explain the changes to the public so they can make suitable choices.

Industry experts like Mr Marcus Kok, principal pension consultant for PwC Singapore, welcomed the LRIS as a boon for younger members, who can take on more risk.

But, he said: "If you are five years away from retirement age, it might be better to just let the money sit in your retirement account."

Aon Hewitt Wealth Management executive director Shikha Gaur said members should "understand what these options mean for them and how they supplement a retirement plan that has been well thought through".


Golden spending in the silver years

$
0
0
By Sumit Agarwal, Jessica Pan, and Qian Wenlan, Published The Straits Times, 5 Aug 2016

A familiar fact of life is that expenditures rise as we enter into working adulthood, spurred in part by our need to live well, supported by higher disposable income. However, when we retire into our grey years, there is no more active monthly income generated to fund such expenditure.

In fact, research demonstrates that if we track the life cycle consumption of an individual, it follows a "hump" shape with expenditure peaking in middle age and then declining in the years that follow.

While it is not surprising that retirement curtails expenditure, what is more insightful is an understanding of whether the decline in consumption is consistent across the basket of goods and services. This will bear implications on, say, how to help retirees cope with their silver years - something critical in an ageing society like Singapore; or what businesses are likely to thrive for this burgeoning pool of retirees.

Using financial transactions of 180,000 customers from a leading bank in Singapore between April 2010 and March 2012, we compared how Singaporeans spend across different age groups. Besides monthly statement information on checking account and credit/debit card spending, the data also furnished information on expenditure across product categories.

MIDDLE-AGE CONSUMPTION

Singaporeans follow the typical hump-shaped life cycle consumption pattern observed in past research. However, we observe that the life cycle pattern of spending across different product categories differs.

In particular, post-middle age Singaporeans spend much less on apparel/small durables, dining and entertainment/services than their younger counterparts.

However, although their supermarket spending and transportation/travel are less than younger Singaporeans', the difference is modest.

Examining credit card and debit card spending separately across age groups reveals that while monthly credit card spending exhibits the predictable hump-shaped pattern, debit card spending is largely the same across Singaporeans under 50 years old.

But those aged 50 to 70 spent more on their debit card than those under 50. Older Singaporeans appear to be shifting their mode of payment from credit card spending in their earlier years to an increasing reliance on debit card spending in their later years.

POST-RETIREMENT CONSUMPTION

To see how retirement affects our consumption, we paired each retired individual in our sample with a similar non-retired individual based on observable characteristics such as age, race, gender, marital status, income, account balance and housing type. We then compared how consumption differs between the retired and matched non-retired individuals.

On average, the retired Singaporean spends 12 per cent less each month compared to the matched non-retired individual.

But this effect of retirement on consumption varies considerably across product categories. The largest decline is in travel and transportation, but the other categories such as supermarket shopping, dining, entertainment and services remain unchanged.

FOOD SHOPPING

However, such card spending may mask reality as cash expenditures are not accounted for. Thus, we used a second dataset involving detailed panel survey data on consumer grocery spending from January 2008 to December 2010 for 371 Singaporeans.

This provided rich information on grocery spending, including shopping venue, the number of items purchased in each shopping trip, and detailed product-level purchase information such as price and brand.

We find that home food purchase also exhibits the familiar hump-shaped pattern, that is, the dollar amount spent on food declines as one approaches retirement. Strikingly, there is little evidence that older Singaporeans buy fewer items than younger Singaporeans. Regardless of whether they are working or retired, they buy the same number of food items.

However, the composition of the food items differs. Older Singaporeans spend relatively more time shopping than younger Singaporeans. They spend more on food at the fresh market and on store brand products. Their expenditure on high-end supermarket and on store brand products was less than younger Singaporeans, suggesting that there is a substitution - as we retire and have more time, but less disposable income, we substitute higher price items with cheaper alternatives that require more time spent in purchasing.

Our findings on food expenditure suggest that demand for fresh produce will rise as more Singaporeans retire.

Our pasar or wet markets will need to be spruced up as not only are more retirees likely to shop there, but they are likely to be there for longer periods of time, or more frequently with smaller purchases each time. Wet markets should therefore ensure floors are not slippery and precautions are installed for safer and easier navigation. The possibility of home delivery is also not inconceivable.

Store brand products are to be encouraged as they provide the affordability benefit that retirees look for. Supermarkets such as FairPrice are heading in the right direction, with more house brands from toilet paper to cleaning detergents offered.

Senior citizens still buy the same number of food items as before. However, with less disposable income, they spend less, on average by 12 per cent compared to those still working. For retirees in the lower income bracket, they are likely to be the hardest hit with a greater reduction in expenditure.



Policymakers may consider providing some subsidy to help senior citizens tide over retirement, particularly those in the lower income group. Our findings were discussed with policymakers involved in the Silver Support Scheme, which announced that the Government is giving the bottom 20 per cent of retirees quarterly cash subsidies up to $750.

While giving cash disbursements on a regular basis to the worst hit is one option, there are alternatives. The goods and services tax may be waived on necessities that retirees buy or retirees may be given a special discount card.

Finally, the present credit card rules requiring a minimum income may need to be relaxed, so retirees can make use of credit cards and carry less cash, making them less vulnerable to robbery.

And especially for those who are more tech savvy, the current trend towards smartphone payments such as Apple's Wallet may engender policy changes regarding credit card eligibility for senior citizens.

Sumit Agarwal is Low Tuck Kwong Professor of finance at the National University of Singapore Business School where Qian Wenlan is an associate professor of finance. Jessica Pan is assistant professor of economics at NUS.


Plot to attack Marina Bay with rocket from Batam foiled

$
0
0
Six terror cell members nabbed; leader was planning attack on Singapore
By Arlina Arshad, Indonesia Correspondent In Jakarta, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2016

The terror threat facing Singapore took on a more menacing face yesterday after six militants were arrested in Batam.

Police said their leader had been planning a rocket attack on Marina Bay together with a Syrian-based Indonesian ISIS militant. The six men in Batam had been kept under watch for a while before they were arrested by Indonesian police in an early-morning raid.

Singapore Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said on Facebook: "Our security agencies have been coordinating closely with the Indonesian authorities to monitor the activities of this group and to apprehend those involved.

"We are grateful for the good cooperation by the Indonesian authorities and their actions to apprehend the group."

In response to this threat and the prevailing security situation, police and other agencies have been stepping up inland and border security measures, said Mr Teo. "This development highlights the seriousness of the terrorism threat to Singapore," he said.



Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said the six "were thinking of attacking Marina Bay with rockets", and "this shows how our enemies are thinking of different ways of attacking us".

He drew a parallel with Molenbeek, the Belgian town from which terrorists planned their assault on Paris last November and, in a series of coordinated attacks, killed 130 people. "There are several possible Molenbeeks around us from which attacks can be launched on Singapore. These include the Riau Islands," he said.

The islands are a short boat ride from Singapore and include Batam, where the six members of a little-known terror cell called Katibah GR, or Cell GR, were picked up yesterday by Indonesia's elite counter-terrorism unit Densus 88 along with the local police.

Five of those arrested work in electronics factories and one at a bank. They are between 19 and 46 years old. Their leader, Gigih Rahmat Dewa, 31, was nabbed at his house, where he lived with his wife and baby.



Indonesia's national police spokesman Boy Rafli Amar told reporters in Jakarta that Gigih "had planned to launch a rocket from Batam to Marina Bay Singapore".

He had planned this with Bahrun Naim, an Indonesian militant believed to have been fighting alongside the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria in the Syrian city of Raqqa.

Police said Gigih took orders from Bahrun, and among their plans was to attack public areas.

The two men were also part of the larger terror narrative unfolding in Indonesia. The cell was suspected of harbouring Uighurs, the Muslim ethnic group from China, some of whose members have joined extremists in Indonesia. It had also received funds to send fighters to Syria.

Mr Shanmugam said that in addition to lone wolves and radicalised groups, the terrorist threat to Singapore now also came from those seeking to come in through its checkpoints and those who would try to launch attacks from just outside.

Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said: "We should assume that there may be more plots, other terror cells on the lookout for ways, and new munitions to penetrate our defences. Terrorism is a global problem and no country is immune."




















Terror arrests in Batam

Singapore was aware of terror cell: Shanmugam
DPM Teo says police and other agencies have stepped up security measures in Singapore as well as at its borders
By Pearl Lee and Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2016

Singapore was aware of the group of militants based in Batam who were planning to attack Marina Bay, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said yesterday.

The news that such a plot was being hatched so close to Singapore's borders was no surprise, he added in reply to media queries after the Indonesian police arrested six members of the militant cell in Batam.

Mr Shanmugam had, in recent months, raised concerns about terrorists targeting Singapore from abroad, and who could try to enter the country or locate themselves just outside the country.

"Our small size increases these risks," he said yesterday.

Apart from plotting the attack, the cell's leader, 31-year-old Gigih Rahmat Dewa, was helping Indonesian fighters travel to Syria and was receiving funds from Syria-based militant Bahrun Naim for attacks.

Both Mr Shanmugam and Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who is Coordinating Minister for National Security, noted that Singapore's security agencies and their Indonesian counterparts had coordinated closely to monitor the activities of the group and apprehend those involved.

The ministers said they were grateful for Indonesia's cooperation and enforcement action.

Mr Teo said on Facebook that the police and other agencies have stepped up security measures in Singapore as well as at its borders.

"This development highlights the seriousness of the terrorism threat to Singapore, and the importance of the SG Secure national movement," he added.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will launch SG Secure next month. It aims to mobilise Singaporeans to be more conscious of security, respond to a terror attack and stay united as a society after an attack.

Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a Facebook post that the arrests are a reminder that Singapore has to stay vigilant and keep improving its defence systems.

"Since 9/11, the SAF has paid very close attention to aerial threats and has upgraded our air defence systems," he added, stressing the need for people to stay united.

Security analysts like Mr Jasminder Singh of the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research said the arrests are a reminder of the need to stay vigilant in the face of the terror threat.

Mr Singh said that while the actual risk of a successful rocket attack on Marina Bay is debatable, the threat of terrorism remains real given Singapore's strong stance against terrorism and the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) group.

Referring to remarks Mr Lee made on an official visit to the United States this week, he said: "As Prime Minister Lee mentioned, Singapore being a target is not new - whether or not we are part of the US-led coalition against ISIS - because of what we represent: A harmonious multiracial and multi- religious country."

The arrests underline the importance of intelligence sharing among governments in the region, he noted. But a population that is alert to suspicious and radical activity is also needed to deter an attack.

This is why Ms Susan Sim, vice-president for Asia at security consultancy The Soufan Group, said SG Secure is crucial.

"It is a way to teach us to practise situational awareness so we don't remain complacent or become paranoid, but can contribute meaningfully to keeping ourselves and everyone else around us safe," she said.

Singapore's low crime rate and high level of safety may lead some to assume that attacks may not happen here. But Ms Sim noted that recent incidents in Germany and France, where attackers used knives and a truck respectively, show "the modus operandi of a terrorist is limited only by the imagination".

"You don't need sophisticated tools to launch an attack," she said.

Reverend Bobby Lee, secretary of the Geylang Serai Inter-Racial and Religious Confidence Circle, said people need to realise that today's peace "has to be guarded".

"The public needs to realise that it is not just the police's duty to protect us. We can't think that we'll just leave such matters to the experts," he said. "We have to have fortitude, be aware and remain vigilant."















Notorious militant's link to arrests
By Arlina Arshad,Indonesia Correspondent, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2016

Indonesian militant Muhammad Bahrun Naim, whose name came up after yesterday's arrests in Batam, has been in the news since 2010, when he was arrested for illegal possession of ammunition.

He is now said to be fighting alongside the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in the Syrian city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the terrorist organisation.

The 32-year-old is believed to be a leader among militants in the Katibah Nusantara, a South-east Asian military unit under ISIS that recruits militants from Indonesia, Malaysia and other parts of the region.

Yesterday, the Indonesian authorities said that Bahrun and Gigih Rahmat Dewa, the leader of a Batam cell who was arrested, had plans to attack Marina Bay in Singapore.

In March, Singapore's Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said in a speech that Bahrun was well-known to security agencies in the region, and was actively encouraging militants to launch attacks in Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore.

In November 2010, Indonesian police's elite counter-terrorism unit, Densus 88, arrested Bahrun and seized hundreds of bullets from his home.

He was jailed for 21/2 years. The court, however, found insufficient evidence to pursue terror charges.

He disappeared after he served his time, and police believed he went to Syria. But he remains in close contact with domestic terror cells and militants in Indonesia.

Bahrun is from Pekalongan in Central Java, and worked as a computer technician and ran an Internet cafe in the city of Solo. Gigih is from Solo, also in Central Java.

Police believe Bahrun masterminded the brazen attack in Jakarta in January which killed eight people. A police spokesman said at the time that Bahrun had sent money back to Indonesia to finance the attack.

Bahrun was believed to have also taught Nur Rohman, the suicide bomber who blew himself up near a police station in Solo on July 5, to build bombs. A police officer was injured in the attack.

Indonesian police spokesman Agus Rianto yesterday said Bahrun had sent money to Gigih to finance radical activities. "Gigih was to carry out attacks on several places on Bahrun's order," he added. These include suicide attacks targeting public places and police offices.

In a Telegram exchange with Reuters news agency on Nov 24 last year, Bahrun said there were more than enough ISIS supporters to "carry out an action" in Indonesia. "Just waiting for the right trigger," he reportedly said.

Not long after that Telegram exchange, intelligence officials began to pick up talk in social messaging chatrooms that an attack on Indonesia was imminent.

In the same exchange, Bahrun said he enjoyed life in Syria.

"I move around, depending on where our emir orders us to go. It's good here in Syria.

"There's electricity, accommodation, water, and it's free. The services provided by them are good, cheaper than in Indonesia."











Ringleader of little-known Cell GR
By Arlina Arshad, Indonesia Correspondent, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2016

Suspected Indonesian militant Gigih Rahmat Dewa is the ringleader of a little-known local terror cell called Katibah GR, or "Cell GR".

Indonesian police arrested him - along with his wife and baby - as well as five other cell members in raids on various locations on Batam Island yesterday.

Police said that besides having had plans "to launch a rocket from Batam to Marina Bay Singapore", he was also said to have received and channelled funds for radical activities, and helped Indonesians make the trip to Syria, via Turkey, to fight with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants.

The 31-year-old Solo native is said to be working for an elec- tronics factory in Batam. He has been living in a house belonging to his older brother on the island since 2011.

The family kept to themselves and did not attend community gatherings, a neighbour, Ms Sundari, told reporters yesterday.

She also said the police told her they have seized some items from his house, including "a bomb which has already been assembled".










Marina Bay rocket attack plot from Batam 'not to be taken lightly'
Experts say it is a 'real possibility' and if successful, would have been a 'big achievement' for terrorists
By Arlina Arshad, Indonesia Correspondent, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2016

News of an Indonesian militant plot to fire a rocket to hit Singapore's Marina Bay may seem like a far-fetched idea to some, but terror analysts say it is a "real possibility" and a threat not to be taken lightly.

And if the leader of the little- known terror group, Katibah GR or "Cell GR", from the holiday island of Batam had succeeded in doing so, it would have been a "big achievement" for supporters of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in the region.

"Singapore is well known for being very careful and has very tight security. Terrorists hope to break it down. The attack, if launched successfully, would result in very strong resonance," terrorism expert and Aceh university lecturer Al Chaidar told The Straits Times. "It would be an important win, like the attack on the World Trade Center in the US."

The group, led by 31-year-old factory worker Gigih Rahmat Dewa, comprises more than a dozen people and is "fairly new", having been set up around 2014, Mr Al Chaidar said.

Analysts told The Straits Times that the group is linked to radical ideologue Aman Abdurrahman, who police said had a hand in plotting the Jan 14 terrorist attack in Jakarta, which killed eight people.

Aman was long suspected to have a role in the attack on the capital which was carried out by four militants under Indonesia's Jemaah Anshar Khilafah terror network.

Indonesian police said yesterday that Gigih and a Syria-based Indonesian militant, Bahrun Naim, had plans to attack Marina Bay in Singapore. Bahrun officially pledged himself to ISIS in 2014 and travelled to Syria last year after becoming a disciple of master recruiter Aman.

Indonesia's security forces are focusing on domestic terror networks and smaller militant cells trying to take over the mantle from Jemaah Islamiah (JI).

Analysts noted that some of the group members rounded up are young - with the youngest being 19 - so they are "definitely not" recruits from JI.

They added that they were "surprised" to learn that the Batam cell was plotting to attack Singapore as its interest was really to fight alongside ISIS in Syria.

However, Mr Al Chaidar said rumours have swirled that Gigih's group planned to hijack a boat and launch a homemade missile towards the Marina Bay area from sea, he said.

"They are not militants talking big. They do have the expertise since they have had industrial and technical jobs before. It's not impossible," he said.

Early last month, two chilling letters were sent by local mail to the Singapore offices of ferry operators Horizon Fast Ferry and Batam Fast, by a militant group called Kelompok Islam Insaf, threatening to strike popular tourist destinations such as Tanjung Pinang and the Nagoya Hill mall in Batam.

Indonesian police in the Riau Islands said a week later that the bomb threat no longer posed any immediate danger and lowered terror alert levels. That was likely how the police uncovered the Batam cell, Mr Al Chaidar said.

Mr Taufik Andrie, a terrorism expert from the Institute for International Peace Building, told The Straits Times that Batam is a "hub" or gathering spot for Indonesian militants wanting to join the battle in Syria. Gigih's cell acts as a "connector", helping them to make the trip illegally through Malaysia and Singapore.

He said Singapore is being targeted as it is considered to be "part of a global coalition against ISIS, even if the Singapore Government did not send people to directly fight in Syria".

He said "it has been a while" since he last heard about plots to attack Singapore. The last time was in 2002, when the Singapore authorities revealed that Yishun MRT station had been the target of a bomb plot by a terrorist cell.

Mr Taufik said he has not heard of terrorists wanting to launch an attack by firing a rocket, whether to Singapore or anywhere in Indonesia.

He said it is unlikely that a rocket could "fly across" from the Batam mainland to Singapore - whether hand-held or mounted on a vehicle - due to the distance of some 25km. But he warned that an attack from sea is "highly possible".

"We must remain vigilant and alert. We cannot underestimate them. After all, they are extremists. If they really want to do it, they will put in the effort," he said.

"Every terrorist threat is important," he added.

Analysts said the authorities in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore must step up joint sea patrols in the common waterways, as well as secure illegal ports in remote areas such as Aceh. Regular spot checks must also be carried out on boats.

Indonesia has been the target of several terror threats in recent months, including lately from the East Indonesian Mujahidin extremist group.










'Military-grade rocket needed' to hit Singapore from Batam
By Jeremy Koh, The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2016

Hitting Singapore from Batam would have required a military- grade rocket and complex calculations, said a military observer.

Though it is not known what kind of rockets the suspects planned to use, weapons and equipment editor Kelvin Wong of military publication IHS Jane's told The Straits Times they would likely have needed a military-grade rocket able to travel the distance of around 25km between the Indonesian island and Singapore. If they were building their own rocket, fine calculations would have been required.

"Building a rocket requires a high level of physics," he said. "There are also quite a lot of variables they need to account for - like wind direction, the launch angle, how much propellant to put in the rocket."

Given the distance to Singapore, the suspects would also have needed rockets more powerful than the homemade Qassam ones fired by Hamas and Palestinian militants at Israel which have a maximum range of about 12km.

Reaching Singapore from Batam would require more powerful weaponry such as Katyusha-style, Grad and Chinese WS-1E rockets.

But S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies research fellow Wu Shang-su highlighted the possibility of attackers launching a rocket from a boat nearer to Singapore, possibly putting Marina Bay within range.





Batam's terror links
The Straits Times, 6 Aug 2016

August 2015

Dwi Djoko Wiwoho, director of the Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board's licensing office in the Riau Islands, and his wife leave their house in Batam to join the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

He was to return to work from leave on Sept 1.


February 2016

Four Indonesian followers of radical ideologue Aman Abdurrahman are deported from Singapore.

They had planned to use Batam and Bintan islands as transit points for others heading to the Middle East to join ISIS.


July 12, 2016

Indonesian police lower the terror alert levels in the Riau Islands after raising it following a bomb threat the previous week. A little-known militant group, Kelompok Islam Insaf, had sent two letters by local mail to the Singapore offices of ferry operators Horizon Fast Ferry and Batam Fast on July 4, threatening to strike tourist destinations such as Tanjung Pinang, Nagoya Hill mall in Batam, and key ports in Batam and Bintan.


Mid-July 2016

Indonesian intelligence is alerted that several Uighurs, a Turkic-Muslim ethnic group in China's western region of Xinjiang, have entered the Riau Islands province. Uighur militants have been known to link up with extremist groups in Indonesia.


Aug 5, 2016

Indonesian police arrest six suspected militants in Batam.

The purported leader of the cell had plans to use a rocket to attack Marina Bay.


Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's 2016 National Day Message

$
0
0






Unity key to the future, says PM Lee in National Day Message
He outlines three challenges and the ways they can be tackled
By Janice Heng, The Straits Times, 9 Aug 2016

Singapore's national unity is under threat from global forces, but Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is confident that Singaporeans will "hold together and succeed".

In a solemn yet hopeful National Day Message on TV yesterday, he underlined how Singapore's harmony was hard-won, set out three new challenges it faces and ways it can resist the forces and be different.

"Half a century ago, when we embarked on our nation-building journey, we could not yet call ourselves 'one people'." But despite the odds against going it alone, Singapore made it, he said.

Perhaps to underscore the point, Mr Lee delivered his message from the new SAFRA clubhouse in Punggol, Singapore's newest Housing Board estate, providing a visual emphasis of the tremendous progress made.

Citizens now enjoy homes of their own, growing incomes, good education and - most importantly - racial and religious harmony, he said.

"Never forget how rare and precious this harmony is, how much courage and toil went into creating it, and how much effort it takes to sustain this miracle.

"What we have here is remarkable, especially considering the state of the world today," he added as he outlined three challenges ahead.

First, extremist terrorism could tear Singapore apart, he said, noting recent attacks in Europe, the United States, Malaysia and Indonesia by terrorists inspired by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Singapore is being targeted too, he added, asking if Singaporeans can stand together if an attack occurs.

Second, globalisation and technological change require industries to innovate and worry workers facing competition not just from abroad, but also from computers and robots. Can Singaporeans continue to progress together and share widely the fruits of growth, he wondered.

Third, societal changes are putting pressure on Singapore's political system, which "has thus far delivered good government, stability and progress". His question: How to ensure Singapore continues to have clean and constructive politics, and avoid populism or political gridlock.

Other countries with similar challenges have seen politics turning divisive, said Mr Lee. Extreme parties have gained support "by expressing voters' anger at their leaders, and frustration with the way things are", he said, citing Britain's vote in June to leave the European Union.

Despite the upheavals in these countries with more resources and longer histories, Mr Lee is confident Singapore can be different.

"First, with terrorism, we acknowledge the threat honestly," he said.

Muslim Singaporeans are unafraid to take a stand against terrorism, and non-Muslim citizens distinguish between " peaceful Muslim fellow citizens and jihadist terrorists".

Second, the Government invests in Singaporeans, supports companies' efforts to compete and strengthens social safety nets.

"Finally, to ensure good government, we are keeping our politics constructive and updating our political system," he said, pointing to the move towards smaller group representation constituencies and single-seat constituencies, as well as making the elected presidency "a more effective unifying institution and a stabiliser".

Still, the most fundamental factor in keeping Singapore exceptional is a shared resolve to stay united and tackle challenges together, he said.

He pointed to reasons for his optimism. Last year's Jubilee celebration, he said, strengthened a sense of identity. The Government, unions and companies are working together to uplift workers and the economy, and Singaporeans are doing their part to care for one another.

Unity, concluded Mr Lee, is "more than a warm, fuzzy feeling". "It is the iron resolve to hold together, despite the challenges, despite the sacrifices we have to make."

He urged people to reflect on what this unity means this National Day. "Let us renew our commitment to Singapore and to one another."










Punggol chosen as location for PM Lee's National Day Message
By Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 8 Aug 2016

Picturesque Punggol will form the backdrop of this year's National Day Message, as it showcases the next 50 years of Singapore, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday.

In a Facebook post, PM Lee said he is always on the lookout for a good venue to record the annual message, and has chosen the newly opened SAFRA clubhouse in Punggol this year.

"You can see and experience the Singapore that we are building together in the next 50 years - the beautiful Punggol Waterway, the new HDB homes and the young families strolling or exercising along the park connector," he said.

In a behind-the-scenes photo on PM Lee's Facebook page, he is seen dressed in a blue shirt and recording the message, with Punggol Waterway Park and the area's new Housing Board flats in the background.

Last year's Golden Jubilee National Day Message was recorded at Victoria Theatre and Concert Hall.

The message, which usually focuses on economic issues, is normally recorded ahead of time and telecast on the eve of National Day. PM Lee said he recorded this year's message before his official visit to the United States last week.



Yesterday, he attended his first National Day dinner of the year with about 1,300 residents of his Ang Mo Kio GRC and fellow MPs Koh Poh Koon, Gan Thiam Poh and Darryl David. Mr Yeo Guat Kwang, a former MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC, was also present.

They were treated to song and dance performances by students from schools in the estate. The military band from Bowen Secondary School played the National Anthem, and children from a PCF Sparkletots pre-school led the audience in reciting the National Pledge.

At the event, PM Lee thanked Mr Yeo for his contributions as an MP and grassroots leader for the past 20 years.

Mr Yeo, an MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC from 2011 to last year, had been active in grassroots work since 1996. He was part of the People's Action Party team that lost in Aljunied GRC in last September's General Election.

PM Lee presented Mr Yeo a book containing photographs and newspaper clippings of initiatives started by the former MP.

"It's a very meaningful gift," said a visibly touched Mr Yeo.

Viewers can watch PM Lee's National Day Message in English on Channel NewsAsia at 6.45pm tonight. It will be shown in Malay on Suria at 8.30pm, in Mandarin on Channel 8 at 8.45pm, and in Tamil on Vasantham at 9pm.

All four will be uploaded on the YouTube channel of the Prime Minister's Office after the telecasts.



















Prime Minister's National Day message

Iron resolve to hold together
That's what Singapore needs as it crosses 50 and celebrates its 51st National Day.
The Straits Times, 9 Aug 2016

This is the transcript of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's National Day Message 2016 delivered yesterday.

My fellow Singaporeans.

Half a century ago, when we embarked on our nation-building journey, we could not yet call ourselves "one people". We found it hard to imagine how we would survive on our own, let alone progress together.

But despite the odds, we made it. Last year, in SG50, we celebrated how far we had come. Singaporeans now own and live in beautiful homes. Our incomes and our lives have improved year after year. Our children receive good education and have bright futures.

Most importantly, our different races and religions live together in harmony. We share common spaces, and celebrate one another's festivals. In January, I celebrated Pongal with my Indian friends. At Chinese New Year, I exchanged mandarin oranges with non-Chinese friends. During Ramadan, I joined many iftars and enjoyed the bazaar at Geylang Serai.

Only in Singapore.

But we did not start out as "one people". Never forget how rare and precious this harmony is, how much courage and toil went into creating it, and how much effort it takes to sustain this miracle. What we have here is remarkable, especially considering the state of the world today.



FRESH CHALLENGES

Our journey to become ever more united continues. While we have made great strides, new challenges lie ahead. Let me name three of them.

One, we have a harmonious multiracial society, but extremist terrorism can tear our society apart. In recent months, terrorists inspired by ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) perpetrated attacks in the US, Europe, Turkey, Bangladesh and, closer to home, in Malaysia and Indonesia. There will be more.

We know Singapore is also being targeted. We have detained self- radicalised Singaporeans and foreign workers. If a terrorist attack were to occur here, will we stand together, or will we fall apart?

Two, economic growth has benefited us all, but our economy is at a turning point. Globalisation and technological change are disrupting our work and our way of life. Entire industries are being forced to innovate or perish. Our workers worry about their jobs. They face competition not only from workers elsewhere, but also from computers and robots. Can we continue to progress together, and share widely the fruits of growth? Will our children have a brighter future?

Three, our political system has thus far delivered good government, stability and progress. But our society is changing, and our unity will come under new strains. How do we make sure Singapore continues to have clean and constructive politics, and effective and stable government? How do we avoid the pitfalls of populism or political gridlock?

Other countries, facing similar challenges, have run into trouble. In multi-religious societies, terrorism has caused distrust and tensions. In many advanced economies, growth is disproportionately benefiting a minority of the population. In cities across the world, graduates struggle to find jobs and young couples can't afford homes.

As a result of all these challenges, politics in many countries has become divisive and angry. Voters lose faith in moderate parties in the political centre. Extreme views and parties gain support - not by offering better solutions, but by expressing voters' anger at their leaders, and frustration with the way things are. The Brexit referendum was a vivid example.

How can Singapore be different?

Can Singapore resist these forces? Other countries have more resources and bigger hinterlands, longer histories and stronger identities. And yet they have run into trouble. Can Singapore be different? I believe that we can.

First, with terrorism, we acknowledge the threat honestly. Muslim Singaporeans are not afraid to take a forthright stand, to condemn terrorist attacks and the perverted ideology of the perpetrators. And non-Muslim Singaporeans distinguish clearly between their peaceful Muslim fellow citizens and jihadist terrorists. Thus we stand together, and strengthen trust in our multi-religious society.

Second, to enable us to prosper together, we are investing in every Singaporean. We are expanding and upgrading pre-schools, to give every child a good start in life. Our schools cater to different talents so that every student can realise his potential and dreams. SkillsFuture will help everyone to upgrade themselves and master valuable new skills. We support companies' efforts to transform themselves, and to innovate through R&D, so that we can create new jobs in a changing world economy.

To help us cope with more uncertain conditions, we have strengthened our social safety nets. Hence the Pioneer Generation Package, Workfare, MediShield Life, CPF Life and, now, Silver Support. We will ensure that our schemes are sustainable, because our children must not be burdened with debt.

Finally, to ensure good government, we are keeping our politics constructive and updating our political system. Singaporeans are coming together to solve problems and get things done, from developing Pulau Ubin to charting our future economy. We are fine-tuning our electoral system, to make GRCs (group representation constituencies) smaller and create more SMCs (single-member constituencies). The Constitutional Commission is studying improvements to the Elected Presidency, to make it a more effective unifying institution and a stabiliser.

However, the most fundamental factor in keeping Singapore exceptional is not good plans or adequate resources; it is whether we remain united. It is our shared resolve to tackle challenges together that determines whether we succeed, and whether our children have a brighter future.

I am confident that we will hold together and succeed. SG50 strengthened our sense of identity and nationhood. Our tripartite partners are working closely to upgrade our workers and our economy. Our housing estates are integrated communities where people not only live together, but also know their neighbours, celebrate each other's festivals, and keep an eye out for one another. Many Singaporeans spend time with the elderly and the disadvantaged, and help the disabled get around.

This year, many Singaporeans have participated in SGfuture and launched projects to make Singapore better - to become a more caring community, to encourage one another to learn and share skills, to build a cleaner and smarter home. These projects all reflect the spirit of service, the willingness to commit time and energy to make a better home for all.

This is what unity means. It's more than a warm, fuzzy feeling. It's the iron resolve to hold together, despite the challenges, despite the sacrifices we have to make. It was our forefathers' determination to be "one united people, regardless of race, language or religion", that drove them to transform Singapore over the last 50 years. This same resolve will carry us through the next 50.

This National Day, I hope each of us will reflect on what this unity means. Here, at SAFRA's new Punggol clubhouse - where I am speaking - you can see the Singapore that we are building together. The HDB homes, the Punggol Waterway, the NSmen and their families, the community - all testify to how much we can achieve when we work as one.

Let us renew our commitment to Singapore and to one another. This is where our families and friends live. This is where our future and hopes are. They are precious to us. They are worth defending with our lives.

Happy National Day!


More unionised firms re-hiring staff over 65: NTUC

$
0
0
Nearly three-quarters of these companies are retaining such workers, ahead of new law
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 9 Aug 2016

With less than a year to go before the re-employment age is raised, unionised firms are pulling ahead of the pack, with nearly three-quarters already re-hiring older workers over 65.

The number of unionised companies doing this has nearly doubled from a year ago, the labour movement revealed yesterday.

The Government announced in April that the re-employment age would be raised from 65 to 67 from July 1 next year. Currently, companies are obliged by law to offer eligible workers re-employment when they turn 62, and they can stay in work until they are 65.

Among the 1,400 unionised firms, 1,016 are keeping older workers on beyond 65, up from 585 last year.

National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) deputy secretary-general Heng Chee How called this "very good progress".

Speaking at an NTUC roadshow in Chevron House yesterday, he said he expects unionised firms to be ahead of non-unionised ones in preparations for the new law.

But while NTUC's efforts will focus first and foremost on firms in the union fold, he added: "We are more than happy to advise non-unionised companies."

Of the 1,016 unionised companies which re-employ staff over 65, 183 have a written policy to re-employ up to 67, up from 102 last year.

Asked why most of these companies are still re-hiring on an ad hoc basis instead of setting down re-employment policies in writing, Mr Heng suggested: "Perhaps they want to get more guidance and more information."

He hopes that a new handbook on re-employment, which NTUC launched yesterday, would help more companies to "do it early, and do it right".

The book was given out at the roadshow, which was attended by an estimated 2,000 people. It will also be made available to all union leaders and human resource departments in all unionised companies.

Unionist Philip Lee said some employers still struggle to reconcile themselves with the costs of re-employment, such as higher medical fees or the seniority-based wages that older workers command.

"But they forget they are paying for experience," said the general treasurer of the Singapore Industrial and Services Employees' Union.

He added that companies also need to put more effort into redesigning jobs to make work lighter for older employees.

One such worker is former machine operator Sng Boon Huay, 75, who has worked at electronics manufacturer Mitsui High-Tec for 36 years. The company chose to let her stay on after she reached retirement age.

Previously, her tasks included lifting heavy materials, but for the past four years, she has been assigned to lighter work.

She receives the same pay as before her re-employment, although she has had her leave cut from 17 days to 15.

The great-grandmother said in Mandarin: "I want to keep working there as long as my health permits. I don't want to stay at home.

"My four children have their own families to support, and I don't want them to give me pocket money. I'd rather earn for myself."



SGfuture public engagement report

$
0
0
Call to Singaporeans: Take active part in shaping future
Govt working on more ways to allow greater participation in various areas, say ministers
By Chong Zi Liang, The Straits Times, 9 Aug 2016

Two of the core members of Singapore's next-generation leadership have a message for Singaporeans: The Government is making changes so people can play a bigger role in shaping the country's future.

Ministries and government agencies have begun work behind the scenes to come up with more opportunities and platforms that will allow greater participation by Singaporeans in areas such as policymaking and solving problems, said Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu and Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Chan Chun Sing.

"We want all government agencies to have that DNA, the instincts, to frame the issues together with people before we look for solutions and work on a project together," Mr Chan said.

He was speaking to reporters yesterday after the launch of a report on the SGfuture public engagement exercise, which he co-chaired with Ms Fu.

What had come out strongly in the 121 dialogue sessions was the desire of people from different segments to work together in the next phase of the country's development, said Ms Fu.

She revealed that the feedback received built on the findings of the earlier Our Singapore Conversation exercise in 2013 and set the Government thinking about how it can evolve in engaging Singaporeans.

"The model of governance, the relationship with the people, has to be adjusted, and I think this is the cue," she said.

The result, as Mr Chan described it: "We want to start a movement whereby Singaporeans come forward to do something together. So it is not just about a dialogue, a conversation, but it is a movement to create the capacity for us to achieve together... It is the start of a movement, really, to get our whole country ready for the next 50 years."

One example of this deeper collaboration between the Government and people is a new national volunteer movement, which will be launched by the year end, said Ms Fu, breaking the news yesterday.



Many of the 8,300 participants in the SGfuture series, which ran from November to last month, expressed a wish to help the elderly, children from disadvantaged families and people with disabilities. SG Cares was born as a result of that, she added.

The movement will see three ministries - Social and Family Development, Culture, Community and Youth, and Health - working with volunteers and voluntary welfare organisations alike.

The aim is to better channel volunteers where they are needed so they have a more meaningful experience, and to help voluntary welfare organisations derive maximum benefit from these resources, said Ms Fu, adding that more details will be revealed at a later date.

Both ministers also said this new way of working together will require a more active citizenry "coming together, identifying the project, working together".

Making a pitch for Singaporeans to come forward, they said one benefit is the greater sense of ownership that will come with participation. People will also be more aware of the deeper issues underlying national policies and the difficult compromises the Government sometimes has to make, added Ms Fu.

Mr Chan said: "We all have partaken in the solution-seeking, and it is also our joint responsibility to stand up for this solution. There will be trade-offs, there will be compromises between different interest groups, but we all share the same responsibility."



Although the SGfuture engagement sessions have wrapped up, those who want to contribute can look forward to the $25 million Our Singapore Fund, which will be launched on Thursday.

First announced in this year's Budget, it seeks to support projects that promote unity and build national identity.

Those who want to apply for Our Singapore Fund can go to www.sg

The report on the SGfuture dialogue series can be read online at www.sg/sgfuture/report

















National Day Parade 2016

$
0
0
Singapore celebrates 51 years of independence at NDP 2016






Looking to a brighter future, together
Singapore's 51st birthday bash sends out a signal of inclusiveness as parade returns to Kallang
By Yeo Sam Jo, The Straits Times, 10 Aug 2016

Singaporeans have long marked Aug 9 by singing National Day songs with one voice. At this year's parade, they went one step further by hand-signing the lyrics together.

Last night's parade - the first in Kallang in a decade - was symbolic in signalling the nation Singapore aspires to be: where everyone, including those with disabilities and the disadvantaged, is embraced.

Some 150 participants with special needs led the 55,000 spectators at the National Stadium in signing along to the classic songs Home and Count On Me, Singapore.

The signers, from seven voluntary welfare organisations, had special needs ranging from visual and hearing impairments to physical and intellectual disabilities. The crowd gestured in unison, a poignant call for Singaporeans to be more caring and inclusive as a society.



Yesterday's celebration of 51 years of independence was also the first at the National Stadium after the former stadium was torn down 10 years ago. The audience did not miss a beat in celebrating this return with ripples of red and white, leaping to their feet and roaring as the Kallang Wave swept through the very arena where it was born.

This year's venue, with its closed domed roof, meant favourites like the freefalling Red Lions and fighter jet displays had to be shelved. But there were new surprises.

Giant suspended props and aerialists dazzled the audience, who were awed by a gripping re-enactment of the Singapore Stone legend. Actors representing forefathers from various civilisations who sank roots here then twirled around in colourful ethnic costumes.

True to the theme, Building Our Singapore Of Tomorrow, the show cast its gaze to the future. Drones, flying dancers in LED suits, laser lights and giant floating buildings bathed in 3D projections dominated the stage, in a testament to the country's commitment to innovation.

At one point, a flying unicorn and a young boy, symbols of Singapore's dreams for the future, soared above the crowd.

"I was really impressed with all the 'floating' props. It was something different," said company director Jessica Ang, 45.

Singapore's 25 athletes competing at the Olympic Games also took part, sending their greetings via a video link from Rio de Janeiro.



The night ended with bursts of fireworks both inside the stadium and above the Kallang Basin.

Security was stepped up at the parade, amid a heightened threat environment in the region.

Engineer Terence Ng, 56, who was at the parade with his mother, wife and daughter, hopes the country will remain united should a disaster strike. His National Day wish: "May we stick together through the good and bad times."














 





NDP 2016 AT THE HUB: THE PAST

'There's a hero in each and every one of us'
By Seow Bei Yi, The Straits Times, 10 Aug 2016

Actor Rizman Putra Ahmad Ali may have played Malay folk hero Badang, a man of super strength, at this year's National Day Parade, but he considers himself "shy and reserved" in real life.

"He is the go-to person when you're in trouble... a leader... I'm a normal person in real life," said the mild-mannered 38-year-old in an interview with The Straits Times before Aug 9.

But last night, Rizman transformed into Badang, whom he calls "our own superhero".

According to folklore, Badang was a village fisherman who defeated a water ghost. In return for its freedom, the ghost promised to grant Badang any wish.

Badang wished to become stronger than any other man and the ghost agreed - on the condition that he had to eat whatever it threw up.The wish was granted.

He used his power to help his villagers and was later made a court warrior by the king of ancient Singapore. His fame spread far and wide. In a duel with a strong man from another kingdom, Badang lifted a giant boulder that had been sitting on a hill for centuries and flung it into the sea - it landed at the mouth of the Singapore River. A fragment of the rock, called the Singapore Stone, now sits in the National Museum.



Rizman, who brought Badang to life, is experienced in physical theatre - which emphasises the use of physical movement, as in dance or mime, for expression. The visual artist-turned-theatre practitioner also sings in a band and has taught drama and dance, as well as directed plays in the past 22 years.

"It's a dream come true," he said of playing Badang. A Peter Pan fan as a child, he said: "I've always wanted to fly when doing a performance. I think it's very surreal."

Overcoming his fear of falling, he soared to around 30m in the National Stadium yesterday, shattering a "giant boulder".

Rizman, who watched old Malay films about Badang as a child, hopes that this "unheard tale" will encourage more youth to dig deeper into local heritage and culture. "I think it's a very important tale but people have forgotten all about it. It will create conversation for two generations, perhaps," he said.

It certainly did for his family members, who were surprised and proud when he told them about his role in the NDP.

Rizman hopes to inspire his audience with the Singapore Stone story. He said: "It's about strength, resilience and courage. We need all of that as individuals - the times now are very testing."

He added: "I think there's Badang in each and every one of us... You have to be brave, be fearless, face the world on your own sometimes, face all the challenges."





NDP 2016 AT THE HUB: THE PRESENT

'It's not scary at all'
By Olivia Ho, The Straits Times, 10 Aug 2016

Minejima-Lee Kai is only seven, but he was already stealing hearts at the National Day Parade (NDP) as he rode a glittering rainbow unicorn through the air.

Oohs and aahs sounded throughout the darkened stadium during the parade's third act, as the unicorn, suspended from the stadium roof and twinkling with LED lights, galloped skywards in slow motion.

Kai, clad in a star-spangled onesie with an aviator's cap, rode the aluminium beast in a harness with nary a trace of nerves.

Even though the unicorn rose to a height of 30m - about nine storeys - he remained undaunted, sometimes even taking one hand off the reins to wave to the crowd.

"It's not scary at all," he told The Straits Times. "It's really exciting."



Kai follows in the tradition of other NDP child stars, such as Natanya Tan, who was also seven when she co-sang the National Day theme song in 2012.

To prepare for his role, he spent 16 hours in flight training, and rode the unicorn more than 10 times.

The unicorn itself took three months to design, and another three months to construct. Weighing 175kg, it measured 2.7m in height and 3m in width.

It sparkled with 14,000 LED lights. "That's why I like my unicorn so much," said Kai, "because it lights up, which is very cool."

The Stamford American International School student has never been afraid of heights, and in fact has wanted to fly since he was four years old.

An avid young sportsman, he loves indoor skydiving. He also practises taekwondo, wushu and rock climbing.

Being part of the show left him so thrilled it was difficult to put him to bed afterwards, said his parents.

His mother Naomi Minejima, 40, who runs a children's concept store in Tanglin Mall, said she had no qualms about leaving their only child's safety in the hands of the NDP team. "I watched them at work, and they were very precise."

His father, writer and blogger Benjamin "Mr Miyagi" Lee, 47, admitted he was hesitant about the stunt at first, mostly because he himself is afraid of heights.

But this was soon eclipsed by the pride he felt every time Kai took to the air.

He said: "I'm just so happy, so very happy."





NDP 2016 AT THE HUB: THE FUTURE

'Floating city caught the imagination of creative team'
The Straits Times, 10 Aug 2016

Singapore's skyline of the future took shape within the National Stadium yesterday, in the form of a "sky city" that hovered in the air.

In an other-worldly sequence, 15 clusters of buildings, including iconic landmarks such as the Changi control tower, the Esplanade and Gardens by the Bay, floated up above the stage as performers in glimmering outfits glided across on electric personal mobility devices, bathing the scene in a luminescent blue.

The song Rise, composed and sung by local songwriter Don Richmond, gave the scene an ethereal atmosphere, with pulsing opening beats that segued into warm, soothing vocals.



Mr Kenny Wong, 49, the show's technical director, said the segment was inspired by discussions after the SG50 celebrations last year.

"There were loads of speculations about the future city, and what Singapore will be like. One of them was a floating city, which caught the imagination of the creative team," he said.

The team had to work within the confines of the stadium, figuring out how a sky city could be attached to the roof, "which can hold only a certain amount of weight", he added. It took nine months to design the sky city, the most challenging and elaborate set of aerial props in the show.

Another two months were required to construct the props, which are made from lightweight aluminium and wrapped in fabric.

Each cluster of buildings weighed about 250kg to 340kg. They were loaded onto carts that needed to be pushed into position before the act.

The props were then attached to the aerial system, which had been rigged up to the stadium's domed roof to support their movement.



Full-time national serviceman Yap Te Rong, 20, one of the show management ground personnel, said that coordination was crucial.

As the movement of the hoists on the aerial system run on preset timings, they had to attach the aerial props in time lest the hoist lifted up into the air without a prop attached.

"You won't have another chance, and you will spoil the show," he said.

They also had to be mindful and keep clear of the trapdoors - three of them opened during this sequence for other building clusters to rise up.

But all the effort was worth it for Mr Yap when he saw the sky city come together amid the cheers of the crowd and the sparkling lights in the stadium.

"It's quite an amazing feeling. It's a fascinating, futuristic show."





Dazzling show of light - from stage and stands
The Straits Times, 10 Aug 2016

As the stadium went dark during a segment of the show, the spectator stands lit up with lights from 55,000 LED wristbands.

Dazzling light displays featured prominently in this year's parade, but much of the technology that electrified the show was not noticed by the audience.

For instance, some 20 infrared transmitters dotted the roof of the stadium, broadcasting signals that made spectators' LED wristbands flash and change colours in synchrony.

The light-up extended past the parade - organisers activated the wristbands'"impact mode" after last night's show so that they would continue to glow whenever they are shaken, until the batteries go flat.

In Act 4, spectators were treated to the visual spectacle of dancers clad in vests studded with hundreds of LEDs.



Each dancer had a unique "address" controlled by a wireless system, which was programmed to create visual patterns on stage by assigning different colours to different dancers.

Another 14,000 LEDs were used on the show-stealing unicorn - 3m long and almost as tall - floating dreamily around the stadium interior.

There were also radio-controlled drones twinkling with mysterious LEDs levitating magically in midair, undulating in a sine wave to the beat of the music.

Yet LEDs were only part of the story, with more powerful technology used to project animated images on the Sky City and other giant props.

An army of cameras tracked the precise three-dimensional positions of the props and fed the data into powerful computers, which computed the coordinates and re-projected the 3D images in real time to follow the props accurately as they swayed and rotated.

The room where all of this was orchestrated was nestled behind panoramic windows on the upper levels of the stadium.

Here, scores of engineers and designers closely monitored rows of computer screens and the stage itself, ensuring that NDP 2016 would be a night to remember.





A place for all in Singapore
The Straits Times, 10 Aug 2016

No one knows what kind of society Singapore will be in 2065 on its 100th birthday, but it should have a place for the likes of Bryan Cheong.

This year's National Day Parade featured the 10-year-old in a prominent role in a live skit as one of the four grandchildren of Grandpa.

Unlike the other three, Bryan uses a wheelchair because he has cerebral palsy. He also has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. When asked about his dreams, he said: "I want a special playground for kids in wheelchairs."

This segment underlined how this year's parade aimed to highlight the message of inclusivity.



For the first time, 150 special needs participants led the 55,000-strong crowd in song-signing to two popular tunes.

They came from seven voluntary welfare organisations spanning a wide spectrum of special needs, including hearing and visual disabilities and physical and intellectual disabilities.

In the "song-signing" segment, the audience was invited to follow sign language cues to Home and Count On Me, Singapore.



It was meant to be a unifying gesture that reflects the kind of society the country wants for the future - one where everyone matters and no one is left out, said the parade's executive committee.

Throughout the show, the theme of including people with disabilities in society came across strongly.

A film that envisioned what it will be like for a family living in "Sky City" - a futuristic city that embraces modernity and technology - was screened. Central to that story of Singapore's future was how children in the family befriended a child with special needs.

They took the child to a special museum where language was not a barrier and where paintings by special needs people were exhibited.

The paintings were actual artworks by special needs beneficiaries from Touch Community Services, recreated in a larger-than-life format through a performance by the Singapore Soka Association.

Mr Quek Swee Hai, 51, was one of the special needs participants who took part in the song-signing segment. He lost the use of the right side of his body after suffering a stroke in 2005.

Said Mr Quek: "At first, I did ask them if I could take part in the song-signing because I can use only my left hand. They gave the green light and I knew I had to make full use of what I can do."



















 








The world loves refugees, when they're Olympians

$
0
0
By Roger Cohen, Published The Straits Times, 10 Aug 2016

The world is moved by Team Refugees at the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. They are greeted with a standing ovation at the opening ceremony. United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon, not a man given to extravagant displays of emotion, is all smiles.

United States President Barack Obama tweets support for the 10 athletes in the team who "prove that you can succeed no matter where you're from".

Ms Samantha Power, the American ambassador to the UN, posts a video on Facebook in which she speaks of the world's 65 million displaced people - the largest number since World War II - and says they "are dreaming bigger because you're doing what you're doing".

Who could fail to be moved? These are brave people. They have fled anguish in search not of a better life, but of life itself. In general, you do not choose to become a refugee because you have a choice, but because you have no choice. Like Yusra Mardini, the 18-year-old Syrian refugee from a Damascus suburb, who left a country that now exists only in name, and reached Germany only after the small boat bringing her from Turkey to Greece started taking on water in heavy seas. She and her sister Sarah dived into the water and for more than three hours pushed until it reached the island of Lesbos.

In Rio, Mardini won her heat in the 100m butterfly, but did not advance due to her inferior time. Still, hers is a remarkable achievement.

Yes, the world is moved by Team Refugees. Yet, it is unmoved by refugees.

They die at sea. They die sealed in the back of a truck. They die anonymous deaths. Fences are erected, walls mooted. Posters decry them. They represent danger and threaten disruption. They are freeloaders. They are left in festering limbo on remote Pacific islands. There is talk of a threat to "European civilisation" - read Christian Europe. There is talk of making the US great again - read making the US white again.

Rightist political parties thrive by scapegoating them. Nobody wants refugees. They could be terrorists or rapists. They sit in reception centres. The US has pledged to take in at least 10,000 Syrian refugees in the current fiscal year. In the previous four years, it had admitted about 1,900. This is a pittance. About 4.8 million Syrians have fled their country since the war began.

One Western country, Germany, has shown political courage commensurate with the challenge and thrown open its doors. Having plumbed the depths of depravity, it knows a moral imperative when it sees one.

The world loves Team Refugees - the two swimmers from Syria, the two judokas originally from the Democratic Republic of Congo, the marathoner from Ethiopia, the five runners from South Sudan. It admires Rami Anis, a Syrian swimmer now living in Belgium. His hometown is Aleppo, cravenly abandoned by the West to bombardment by Russian forces. Russia strolled into Syria when it realised, after several years of war, that the US would not lift a finger.



Yes, let's cheer the refugee team in Rio, the first of its kind, but not with empty words, and not to assuage our Syrian consciences.

They walk now under an Olympic flag. They want the flag of a homeland. Mr Thomas Bach, the president of the International Olympic Committee, said: "We want to send a message of hope for all refugees in our world."

But after the fanfare, will anyone remember?

The world is being pulled in two directions at once. The force of globalisation, of nomadic humanity, of borderless cyberspace has engendered an equally strong counterforce of nationalism, nativist politics and anti-immigrant bigotry.

The two trends are poised in a tense equilibrium.

I lived in Brazil for several years. It is a generous country. Perhaps no other nation has such a mestizo culture, such ingrained habits of mingling. It feels right that this outreach to Team Refugees should have happened in Rio, a city of miscegenation and openness.

The glorification of Team Refugees and the vilification of refugees coexist. How can they? It's the old principle: Not in my backyard.

"We are getting better and we are getting worse at the same time," Paul Auster, the novelist, told me. "And at the same speed."

I am reminded of the words of my friend Fritz Stern, the distinguished historian who died this year. "I was born into a world on the cusp of avoidable disaster."

He continued: "The fragility of freedom is the simplest and deepest lesson of my life and work."

Freedom cannot be built on exclusion and hatred. It is a universal human right. Brazil and the International Olympic Committee have given the world a glimpse of the humanity and aspirations of each refugee.

Perhaps, after all, we are getting better faster than we are getting worse, and barriers will continue to fall - but not through words alone.

NEW YORK TIMES


















Shanmugam: South-East Asian countries need to step up cooperation to fight extremist terrorism

$
0
0
By Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 11 Aug 2016

Countries in South-East Asia need to step up cooperation to fight the threat of extremist terrorism, Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam said at the International Meeting on Counter-Terrorism in Bali.

He called on governments in the region to work together on various fronts, including sharing intelligence and research and analyses on terrorists and security risks.

"We need to establish a common understanding of the security threats facing us, the challenge of home-grown terrorists, including those who are newly radicalised, those who return after fighting in conflict zones, and those who were previously in custody but have since been released," he said.

He added that meetings like yesterday's were important platforms for countries to learn best practices and come up with a set of "agreed approaches which will give greater impetus to the common fight".

The threat of an attack hit home last week when six people were arrested in Batam. The cell leader had planned to fire a rocket at Singapore's Marina Bay.

"When arrested, they had no rockets, and it was not clear they could have gotten rockets," said Mr Shanmugam. "But the intent was there. Firearms were seized from them."

This episode, recent attacks in Malaysia and Indonesia, and the move by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terror group to produce a newspaper in Malay demonstrate the "clear threat" facing the region, he added.

Observers note that as ISIS loses territory in the Middle East, it may shift its focus to South-east Asia and step up its activities, he said.

Turning to Singapore, he outlined five components of its counter-terrorism strategy. Two hard security aspects - stepped-up vigilance through patrols and closed-circuit TV coverage, and the response of security forces following an attack - are "necessary but not sufficient", he said.

The other three components - countering extremist ideology, promoting community vigilance and international cooperation - are equally important, he added.

He highlighted the importance of SG Secure, a national movement that will be launched by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong next month. It aims to get people to be aware of their security, and stresses the importance of staying united as a society in the event of a terror attack.










Move to swop biometric info on militants across borders
Singapore holds talks with KL and Jakarta to enhance cooperation on security issues
By Wahyudi Soeriaatmadja, Indonesia Correspondent In Nusa Dua (Bali) and Lim Yan Liang, The Straits Times, 11 Aug 2016

Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia yesterday agreed that the systematic exchange of biometric information like fingerprints on known militants and terror convicts is a key priority in the fight against terrorism.

Singapore Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam, at separate meetings with his counterparts from both countries, also agreed that regular sharing of best practices in deradicalisation and countering violent extremism was a top priority, his ministry said in a statement.

The meetings come after Indonesia arrested six people in Batam last Friday over a terror plot to launch an attack on Singapore's Marina Bay using a rocket.

In his meeting with Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Mr Shanmugam discussed ways to further enhance cooperation between regional security and intelligence agencies.

Mr Shanmugam discussed similar concerns with Indonesia's Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Wiranto, whose officials also updated him on the recent arrests in Batam.

"We have been cooperating with each other," Mr Shanmugam told reporters. "But as tactics evolve, we need to also meet and discuss."

They were at a one-day International Meeting on Counter-Terrorism in Bali, where officials from 23 countries discussed ways to counter foreign terrorist fighters and their movement across borders.



Security agencies are concerned about the threat posed by more than 1,000 fighters from South-east Asia who have joined terror group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), as well as by several hundred terror convicts in Indonesia whose jail terms end in the next few years.

Indonesia's National Counter-Terrorism Agency chief Suhardi Alius told the conference that the Bali terror attacks in 2002 that killed 202 people, and those in 2005 that killed 20, were "the result of" Jemaah Islamiah (JI) members training in Afghanistan in the 1990s. He said: "The government does not want this to recur with the return of Indonesians from Iraq and Syria."

Last month, Malaysia said its immigration department was working closely with Indonesia to prevent returning fighters and terror convicts from entering its borders.

Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia have adopted biometric passports for their citizens, and have biometric capture capabilities as part of their border control systems.

Yesterday, Singapore's Home Affairs Ministry said exchanging biometric data is crucial to deter and detect terrorists crossing borders.

"Given the transnational nature of terrorist networks and the attraction of ISIS propaganda, it is critical to deny terrorists ease of movement across borders and new recruits from among prisoners being released," it added.

Professor Rohan Gunaratna of Singapore's International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research said systematic exchange of biometric data is key. He cited how several JI members fled Singapore and travelled in the region after a 2001 crackdown on the group, before being nabbed.

"Counter-terrorism cooperation between Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia is critical for the stability and security of all three countries," he added.

The Bali meeting also discussed ways to counter extremist messages online, which have enabled groups like ISIS to attract new recruits, as well as ways to stem the flow of terror funds and weapons across borders.










World terror experts vow to fight terrorism together at Bali meeting
They vow to boost enforcement, cooperate in managing borders to prevent terrorist movement
By Wahyudi Soeriaatmadja, Indonesia Correspondent In Nusa Dua (Bali) and Arlina Arshad, Indonesia Correspondent In Jakarta, The Straits Times, 11 Aug 2016

Top security officials from around the world yesterday vowed to strengthen law enforcement and cooperate in managing borders to counter terrorism that "respects no national boundaries".

More effective management of airports, seaports and other border crossing points is needed, they said, as "the global war on terror enters a new chapter" with growing threats from the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) extremist network.

"Ministers underlined the importance of effective control of states over their borders to prevent cross- border movement of terrorists and their goods, funds and material," said a statement released at the close of the International Meeting on Counter-Terrorism in Nusa Dua, Bali, yesterday.



The officials also condemned the heinous acts of terror that have struck a number of countries, including Indonesia, and reaffirmed their commitment to combat terrorism "in all forms and manifestations".

The full-day conference, hosted by Indonesia and jointly organised with Australia, brought together 140 representatives from 23 countries, including Singapore, the United States, Russia, China and Malaysia, as well as Asean, Interpol and the United Nations.

Among them were the US Department of State's acting coordinator for counter-terrorism Justin Siberell, Singapore's Minister for Home Affairs and Law K. Shanmugam, and Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

Indonesia has been the target of several terror threats in recent months, and counter-terrorism police have launched a crackdown on people with suspected links to ISIS.

A Jan 14 terrorist attack in Jakarta killed eight people, and a July 5 suicide attack near a local police station in Solo city killed the bomber and injured a policeman.

Just last Friday, Indonesian police nabbed members of a little-known terror cell called Katibah GR or Cell GR, including its leader who plotted to fire a rocket from Batam at Singapore's Marina Bay.

Indonesian Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Wiranto said officials have "agreed on the importance of prevention efforts across borders in a comprehensive manner".

"These efforts include the prevention of terrorist movement, the abuse of the cyberworld for terrorist purposes, trafficking of weapons and cross-border funding," he said.

"If we do not cooperate, we would be beaten by the terror network."

During the meeting, the officials demanded measures to cull the supply of weapons to terrorists, including small arms, light weapons and deadly materials to build explosive devices.

Officials also raised concerns over the ease of access to information on the Internet, which allows terrorists to spread their propaganda, recruit new members and "lone wolves", and teach them how to make bombs or explosive devices.

They also noted that the advance of information technology could ease the transfer of funds to terror groups to support their cells in conducting attacks in other countries.

"Therefore, ministers are encouraged to strengthen concerted efforts to develop counter-narratives, involving private sectors and civil society while respecting the rule of law and human rights," the statement added.

In his keynote speech, Indonesian Vice-President Jusuf Kalla said "terror attacks take lives, impact the economy and hurt a country's image".





Terror groups increasingly channelling funds into South-East Asia
The Straits Times, 11 Aug 2016

NUSA DUA (Bali) • Security ministers from the more than 20 countries meeting in Bali have been told that groups such as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) are increasingly channelling funds into South- east Asia to finance terrorism.

A regional risk assessment jointly done by Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Australia also warned that the use of charities and non-profit groups to support terrorism was rising.

Indonesia's financial intelligence agency - the PPATK - estimates that foreign sources transferred more than US$763,000 (S$1 million) to fund terrorism in the country between 2014 and last year.

"Given only small sums are required to stage a deadly attack, even modest amounts of funding from foreign terrorist groups pose a significant risk to the region's security," the assessment said. "The cross-border movement of cash is the highest-risk method of moving terrorism funds across the region."

The assessment also said porous land borders and close maritime boundaries allow extremists and terrorist networks in parts of the region to move funds across borders with ease, adding that poor visibility over cash smuggling routes compounds the problem.

Mr Scott Stewart, vice-president for tactical analysis at US-based private-sector security firm Stratfor, said that while the regional terrorism threat had fallen a notch since the Bali attacks, cells with the ability to conduct small-scale attacks using pipe bombs and firearms remained a concern. "They have really been able to take out a lot of the experienced terrorist cadre," he said by phone.

While it did not take much to carry out a small attack, Mr Stewart said part of limiting that threat was following the money. "If the money is allowed to flow in freely, that is going to give them a lot more latitude to not only pay recruits, (but also) to bribe officials, acquire the raw materials to construct bombs, buy cars, safe houses and other things," he said.

The report called for deeper intelligence cooperation and strengthening domestic and regional frameworks to help underpin efforts to counter terrorism financing. It also warned that small funds sent through the banking and remittance sectors were hard to distinguish from ordinary transactions.

Addressing the increase in the frequency and severity of terrorist attacks globally in a speech at the summit yesterday, Australian Justice Minister Michael Keenan said individuals unknown to the authorities were becoming radicalised and carrying out violent attacks.

"International terrorism will be generational; it will confront us for decades to come," he said. "We must work closely and in collaboration with regional and global partners to disrupt terrorism financing and to combat this threat. Large terrorist organisations such as ISIS rely on networks and facilitators enabled by criminals, corrupt officials and others co-opted or wilfully blind to their endeavours, both within and outside their territory."

WASHINGTON POST










Related
The International Meeting on Counter Terrorism, Bali - Intervention by Mr K Shanmugam, Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Law

Hillary Clinton promises to kill the TPP; Donald Trump calls Barack Obama the 'founder of ISIS'

$
0
0
Hillary Clinton on TPP: "I oppose it now, I’ll oppose it after the election, and I’ll oppose it as president."


























Viewing all 7504 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>