Quantcast
Channel: If Only Singaporeans Stopped to Think
Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live

Modified NAPFA test for pre-national service students from 2015

$
0
0
Pull-ups give way to push-ups in Napfa test for pre-enlistment
By Amelia Teng, The Straits Times, 7 Nov 2014

MALE students in junior colleges, Millennia Institute, polytechnics and the Institute of Technical Education (ITE) will be tested with push-ups instead of pull-ups for the National Physical Fitness Award (NAPFA) test, from January next year.

The Ministry of Education (MOE) said yesterday that this change is in line with the modifications in the Individual Physical Proficiency Test (IPPT) announced earlier by the Ministry of Defence. The change is meant to make it simpler for servicemen to train for the test and keep fit.

The new IPPT for servicemen, which will kick in next year, will have just three categories: the 2.4km run, sit-ups and a new category - push-ups.

The other existing stations - standing broad jump, shuttle run and pull-ups - will be removed.

Currently, the NAPFA test, which students take every two years, comprises six items that assess different aspects of overall fitness.

For post-secondary students, these are sit-ups, pull-ups for males and inclined pull-ups for females, sit-and-reach, standing broad jump, shuttle run and 2.4km run or walk.

The MOE said there is no change to the NAPFA test for primary and secondary students, and female students in junior colleges, Millenia Institute - which offers a three-year A-level course - polytechnics and the ITE.

These students will still be tested through pull-ups and inclined pull-ups.

Third-year Ngee Ann Polytechnic student Clarence Ching, 19, who prefers push-ups to pull-ups, said: "You can train for push-ups almost anywhere, but for pull-ups, you have to find the bar or install one at home.

"Push-ups also require less effort than pull-ups, although both are difficult in their own ways."



Task force to tackle youth drug problem

$
0
0
Students, NSFs, adults in their 20s will be focus of multi-agency group
By Amir Hussain, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

THE growing problem of drug use among Singapore youth is of such concern that a multi-agency task force is being formed to tackle the issue head on.

It will look at how to deal with the drug threat among students, full-time national servicemen and young adults in their 20s, and will consider measures ranging from preventive education to detection, enforcement, counselling and rehabilitation.

This was revealed yesterday by Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs and Foreign Affairs Masagos Zulkifli, who will co-chair the task force.

Mr Masagos said there were several trends that are particularly worrying. Young abusers tend to use cannabis, methamphetamine, or New Psychoactive Substances - mistakenly thinking these drugs are less harmful and addictive than "traditional" drugs such as opium or heroin.

The trend has been made worse by the legalisation of some of these drugs, such as cannabis or marijuana, overseas. Just this week, Oregon and Alaska in the United States became the latest states to legalise its recreational use.

"Second, we are concerned with increasingly liberal attitudes towards drugs," said Mr Masagos.

While most people hold a negative attitude towards drug abuse, a greater proportion of those aged 17 to 21 are more likely to think that "it's all right to try drugs for a new experience".

This is according to a National Council Against Drug Abuse survey conducted last year.

"Popular movies and TV normalise drug use while various online sites, forums and social media advocate the legalisation of cannabis for recreational use," said Mr Masagos.

The Central Narcotics Bureau has also recently detected clusters of young drug abusers, who tend to be classmates or who may have got to know each other through other activities, Mr Masagos said.

The number of drug abusers arrested has been rising since 2006. Last year, there was a 2 per cent increase from 2012. But the numbers are far more alarming when it comes to young people.

Over the past decade, the number of drug abusers under 20 who were arrested increased by an average of 7 per cent each year. For those aged between 20 and 29, the figure was 11 per cent.

The task force, which will also be co-chaired by Minister of State for Education Sim Ann, will include government agencies and community partners, including the Singapore Anti Narcotics Association (SANA). More details will be announced at a later date.

Speaking yesterday at an annual dinner organised by SANA to celebrate the contributions of its volunteers, donors and community partners, Mr Masagos said the drug situation here remains challenging. But he added that the Government will uphold its "zero-tolerance approach".

Mr Masagos also praised the work done by SANA's Drug Abuse Prevention Committees, which were formed in 1979 to spread the anti-drug message.

He said SANA, which will look for 200 more volunteers to extend its reach, will start support groups for female ex-offenders and families of inmates in April next year, among other initiatives. And with the support of CNB and the Singapore Prison Service, it will also set up a drop-in centre to keep ex-offenders from going back to drugs.

Singapore Aftercare Association director Prem Kumar said the rise in the number of drug abusers could lead to a "chain reaction".

He said: "Younger people are much more impressionable. If there is an upward trend among young adults, the spread of drug abuse to others in their group of friends will be higher."


'Eyes & ears' on ground pick up vital signals

$
0
0
Volunteers trained to spot signs of mental illness get help for residents
By Kash Cheong, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

WHEN an 80-year-old woman said her neighbours threw oil on her window, Kembangan Chai- Chee (KCC) grassroots volunteers initially thought it was a case of unhappy neighbours.

And when they visited her, they found a dark and untidy house - but no signs of oil.

"She appeared incoherent when she spoke, so we suspected something else was wrong," said Ms Eileen Teo, one of 128 grassroots leaders in the constituency trained to spot signs of mental illness.

They flagged this case for discussion at a meeting with the Agency for Integrated Care (AIC), the Institute for Mental Health (IMH), the Housing Board and other on-the-ground agencies.

It was decided that social workers should visit the woman, suspected by doctors to be suffering from mild dementia and delusions.

This is one of about 50 cases KCC grassroots leaders have highlighted under the WeCare@KCC initiative which helps to support needy residents and those with mental illness. Most are discovered through meet-the-people sessions, where sometimes residents with an unkempt appearance or disturbing behaviour turn up. House visits then follow.

Grassroots representatives play a crucial role in tackling mental health issues, Manpower Minister and Marine Parade GRC MP Tan Chuan-Jin told The Straits Times. "They often act as the 'eyes and ears' on the ground, highlighting cases to the experts for help," he said.

The multi-agency meetings every two months have also helped cut through red tape.

Before, Ms Teo had to write to a multitude of agencies - IMH for mental health problems, the police if it involves a public nuisance case, and different social services to seek help for the resident.

"It could be up to 10 agencies. It was frustrating as each agency will work on matters within its own purview," she said. "But now, we meet, e-mail, WhatsApp each other, so everyone is on the same page."

Close cooperation has also made the work of mental health professionals easier.

Dr Kelvin Ng from IMH's community psychiatry division said: "If we know a patient goes to the seniors activity centre to have lunch, for example, we can ask staff there to look out for him, remind him to take his meds or come for appointments."

Grassroots groups interested in setting up networks can approach the AIC, it said. MacPherson already has a similar network.

Dr Tan Weng Mooi, AIC's community mental health division chief, said it aims to "deal with potential clients before they become a harm to themselves or others".




'Agents' of resolution

IN A recent case, an old woman with mental health problems was disturbing strangers and neighbours, who highlighted the issue to grassroots leaders.

The woman did not want to get mental health treatment, and her family members did not want to get involved.

Various agencies including the Institute of Mental Health and grassroots leaders managed to resolve this impasse through discussions, and by working closely.

They got consent from a family member to let them take the woman to IMH for treatment on the family's behalf.


Raising wages in a way that pays off - with productivity

$
0
0
Labour chief on how Progressive Wage Model benefits workers and country
By Joanna Seow, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

UNIONS in other countries are mainly concerned with pushing for wage increases, but in Singapore the labour movement advocates raising wages sustainably.

That is why productivity is such a key focus because that is the only way to justify rising salaries, labour chief Lim Swee Say said yesterday.

"You will not find anywhere in the world where a labour movement is such a key advocate for productivity," said the secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC).

"But in Singapore we recognise that the wage increase can be sustained only if it's supported over the medium and long term through productivity gains."

The Inclusive Growth Programme is one of the key planks NTUC uses to encourage firms to embark on measures to improve productivity, and $62 million has been committed as of September.

NTUC's Employment and Employability Institute, which administers the fund, said the money goes to over 1,500 projects to benefit 77,000 workers.

These include a more efficient dishwashing machine for Clean Solutions' centralised washing area at Tiong Bahru Hawker Centre, which can wash seven times as many dishes per hour than before.

Another firm which benefited is Kimly Food Holdings, which operates FoodClique at Singapore Institute of Management. It installed a $23,000 conveyor belt system carrying dirty dishes from the seating area to the dishwashing area. This reduced the time needed to clear 360 tables from 90 man-hours to 54, said general manager Vincent Chia.

Some 10 workers using the system will see their basic salaries rise by 15 per cent.

"The wonderful thing is we managed to improve productivity through this, so there is no need to increase charges for the stallholders," said Mr Chia.

Such wage increases on the back of productivity gains have encouraged Mr Lim, who is also Minister in the Prime Minister's Office.

More workers have benefited since the Progressive Wage Model was implemented in the cleaning sector, he said. But he cautioned: "If we are not able to achieve a breakthrough in the productivity ladder, the wage ladder and job ladder will be constrained."


Paying in coins? There are legal limits

$
0
0
By Yasmine Yahya, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

YOU do not have to accept a pile of 10-cent, 20-cent or 50-cent coins in payment of a debt.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) pointed out yesterday that there are legal limits when it comes to paying with small change. It means that you can reject coins used to settle an amount in excess of these limits and even take civil action against the payer to recover the debt.

The MAS statement follows two recent high-profile incidents involving people settling debts - and a few scores in the process - by using large amounts of coins.

In the first case, early last month, cellphone store Mobile Air at Sim Lim Square tried to give a customer a refund of more than $1,000 in coins.

In the second case, on Tuesday, Mr Lester Ong Boon Lin, a customer of car dealer Exotic Motors, left $19,000 worth of coins as payment at the car showroom. It was a particularly toxic form of protest, given that the change had a strong odour of fish.

Mr Ong, said to be the son of a famous nasi lemak franchise owner, had been ordered by a court a few months ago to pay the amount to Exotic Motors.

The MAS said yesterday that "a payee has no obligation to accept coins beyond the legal tender limits set out in the Currency Act".

The legal tender limit for coins of denomination below 50 cents is $2 per denomination. For 50-cent coins, the limit is $10. However, there are no limits for payment in $1 coins. That would mean that 19,000 $1 coins would not have breached the legal tender limits.

"The payee has the right to reject coins used to pay any amount in excess of the limits. In such a case, the payer continues to owe the payee the remaining debt," the MAS added.

"The payee may take civil action against the payer to recover the debt."

New challenges in shift to aspirational economy: ESM Goh

$
0
0
Need to pursue compassionate policies and still be competitive
By Pearl Lee, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

AS SINGAPORE runs up against new social challenges, it will need more local social science researchers to understand the country's situation, conduct applied research and offer possible policy solutions, Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said yesterday.

Speaking at a gala dinner to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the National University of Singapore's (NUS) economics department, Mr Goh said the social sciences will help the country look beyond gross domestic product and boost the holistic well-being of individuals and community.

There is a shift towards "an aspirational economy", or one that supports intangible goals such as family relationships, work-life balance, health, a sense of community and a network of friends, he told about 300 academics, alumni and students.

"An aspirational economy assures us of our basic needs and material comforts and, at the same time, continuously generates growth and opportunities which enable us to pursue our higher-order aspirations," said Mr Goh.

Such an economy sets the stage for social science research to make a big impact, he said, as it will allow Singapore to remain competitive while pursuing compassionate policies. Mr Goh also called for social science researchers to take note of local realities. For instance, economics researchers should work on empirical questions relevant to Singapore, rather than esoteric ones or abstract concepts.

This point was also brought up by Professor Julian Wright, who heads the economics department. "It is critical that what we teach is differentiated, locally relevant, and more interactive," he said.

Some changes are in place for the economics department.

From next year, economics honours students will for the first time be able to specialise in a topic, in areas such as quantitative economics or financial and monetary economics.

The department will also introduce a compulsory module where award-winning lecturers from different fields are invited to address real-world economic questions.

At the event at National University of Singapore Society Kent Ridge Guild House last night, Mr Goh also launched a student-led economics mentorship programme, a collaboration between the NUS Economics Alumni and NUS Economics Society. Current economics students can learn from and be mentored by graduates of the course.

Mr Tan Tai Kiat, an economics department alumnus who started the programme, said: "Looking back on my student days, I think I would have appreciated such guidance."

Second-year economics student Pius Tan, 22, landed an internship at an oil and gas company last year through people he met from the scheme. "It allows us to build up a professional network," he said.





Singapore's economy must 'evolve' to support higher order aspirations: ESM Goh
By Wong Siew Ying, Channel NewsAsia, 8 Nov 2014

Emeritus Senior Minister (ESM) Goh Chok Tong has said that the Republic has a distinguished past but the economy must evolve to support higher order aspirations.

He was speaking at the 80th anniversary dinner of the Economics Department at the National University of Singapore on Friday (Nov 7). The dinner was attended by some 300 academics, alumni and students.

According to Mr Goh, an aspirational economy is one that assures Singaporeans of basic needs and material comforts, while at the same time, generates growth and opportunities to enable them to pursue higher aspirations.

In addition to income and wealth, other factors clearly matter to Singaporeans' sense of emotional well-being and life satisfaction, Mr Goh added. These include solid family relationships, good work-life balance, good health, a sense of community, a strong network of friends, participation in arts and sports, volunteerism and contribution to charity.

"An aspirational economy will still need to remain competitive. This requires a qualitative shift in our skills and mindsets. It innovates and creates to push boundaries of productivity and competitiveness, and open up new areas of opportunity,” Mr Goh said.

“It embraces setbacks as an essential ingredient for eventual success, it encourages critical debate and exchange of ideas. And it values and nurtures local talent, while staying open to foreign talent. To prepare for such a future, we must stay teachable, so that we can constantly adapt and contribute,” he added.

LIFE SKILLS JUST AS IMPORTANT AS HARD SKILLS

Mr Goh noted that an aspirational economy is not just about hard skills. He said: "We will also need to hone our life skills and instincts. It is not sufficient to have just brainy people in an aspirational economy; we also need people who can build, manage, sell and serve.”

Mr Goh said the SkillsFuture Council will oversee continual learning and training efforts to ensure that people have the skills and mindsets to thrive in the aspirational economy.

But besides staying competitive, an aspirational economy should also foster empathy and compassion. Mr Goh said more can be done to instil "compassionate meritocracy as the cornerstone of Singapore".

BALANCING THE YIN AND YANG OF AN ASPIRATIONAL ECONOMY

He added that the Government's "new way forward" for Singapore balances the yin and yang of an aspirational economy.

Other than tackling economic issues, it also focuses on ensuring inclusive growth through programmes like WorkFare and the Progressive Wage Model for cleaners and security guards.

The Government has also committed resources to schemes like the Pioneer Generation Package and MediShield Life. Mr Goh said Singaporeans are also doing a lot more for each other as volunteerism has almost doubled in the past decade.

"Compassion and competition are the yin and yang of an aspirational economy. Individual drive and team competitiveness enable Singapore to grow and prosper but compassion breathes soul into our economic machinery and tempers the individualistic nature of meritocratic competition. It gives meaning to our economic pursuits and our lives,” he said.

Last year, the Government dedicated close to half - or 7 per cent of GDP - of its total spending, including special transfers, on social needs.

Mr Goh added that social sciences can play a bigger role in advancing Singapore as an aspirational economy. The Government is considering how to make a bigger push in the area of social sciences research that can yield dividends for Singapore. To this end, he said the Government will need to engage academia more to initiate joint research projects, fund research and share data.

Mr Goh said: "The bottom line is that we need to produce more local social science researchers who will put in the effort to understand our own circumstances, conduct applied research and offer possible policy solutions."


PAP must deliver good leadership for S'pore: PM

$
0
0
On party's 60th birthday, he reminds members to stay true to its roots
By Tham Yuen-C, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

AS SINGAPORE charts a different path in a fast-changing world amid the rising aspirations of its people, the need for good leaders at the helm remains an unyielding constant, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday.

And providing this leadership is a responsibility he wants the People's Action Party (PAP) to shoulder for the country.

If it fails, Singapore will be in "deep trouble", he said at a celebration marked with symbols of the PAP's birth 60 years ago.

Partly encircled by the nation's current and past leaders, PM Lee told 700 PAP members gathered at Victoria Concert Hall that serving Singapore is a duty they cannot shirk or decline.

"No matter what the odds are and what circumstances we find ourselves in, the PAP will always be on Singapore's and Singaporeans' side. The PAP will always do its best for Singapore and Singaporeans," he said.

It was a call resounding with significance. Not only was last night's event held where the PAP was founded in 1954, but PM Lee also made the call on a stage recreated to look just like it did when the party was formed and spoke through the same microphone then party chief Lee Kuan Yew had used on that fateful day.

Sharing the night of commemoration were the senior Mr Lee, Singapore's first prime minister, and his successor Goh Chok Tong, as well as former MPs, branch leaders, party cadres and Cabinet members.

PM Lee urged the members to remember how the party got to where it is. It never gave up on the country, nor would it do so in the future, he indicated.

Whether in fighting for self-rule from the British, battling the communists or negotiating the merger and separation from Malaysia, the party never faltered, he added.

It also shifted gears and successfully took Singapore from Third World to First.

PM Lee noted many political movements elsewhere had failed at nation building because it was not the same as mobilising people or agitating for independence.

Since Singapore's independence, the PAP has led the country through various crises, including the severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the 2008 global financial meltdown.

"We won the trust of the voters and the mandate to serve Singapore in every successive general election since then... and we will win the next one, too," PM Lee said to loud applause.

He urged PAP members to hold fast to the party's fundamental ideal of building a just and equal society. They must also serve with humility, he said.

Later, he paid special tribute to the party's pioneers, in particular Mr Lee Kuan Yew. He said the older Mr Lee not only founded the party and turned it into a national movement, but he also guided it to build modern Singapore.

He also thanked the party's activists for serving the ground, taking care of residents, mobilising support and keeping the PAP close to the people.

To commemorate the event, PM Lee launched the book PAP 60, Forward Together, which chronicles 60 defining moments in the party's history.


Calling on members to pledge themselves anew, PM Lee said: "We must develop new leaders, keep the party vigorous and strong, close to the people, continuing to win their support and enjoying their trust... (and) lead Singapore to greater success."








Lee Kuan Yew takes to stage where he founded PAP
Party members give standing ovation to pioneer activists
By Charissa Yong, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

FOR a full minute last night, Victoria Concert Hall reverberated with applause as 700 members of the People's Action Party (PAP) stood and cheered founding father Lee Kuan Yew.

They rose to their feet and applauded as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong paid tribute to the party's pioneer activists and leaders for their hard work throughout the party's 60-year history.

"Most of all, we are grateful to Mr Lee Kuan Yew, our first secretary-general who founded the party, made it a national movement, led it to build Singapore and continued building it beyond the founding generation of leaders," said PM Lee, who, as party chief, gave the address at the PAP's 60th anniversary celebration.

Taking to the same stage he stood on six decades ago at the founding of the PAP, the elder Mr Lee waved in acknowledgment.

The 91-year-old was flanked by the party's central executive committee members and others from the pioneer generation of MPs.

They included Singapore's first Home Affairs minister Ong Pang Boon, Mr Mahmud Awang, who co-founded the National Trades Union Congress, former senior parliamentary secretary Chan Chee Seng and former Ang Mo Kio MP Yeo Toon Chia.

PM Lee paid tribute to these party leaders and other "key lieutenants" of Mr Lee Kuan Yew such as Dr Goh Keng Swee, Mr S. Rajaratnam, Mr Othman Wok, Dr Toh Chin Chye and Mr Devan Nair.

He also thanked the activists for serving on the ground, taking care of residents and keeping the party close to the people.

In another reference to the party's history, PM Lee said: "In July 1965, a crucial by-election was held in Hong Lim.

"Today, in Hong Lim Green Speakers' Corner, people make all kinds of speeches - the world will not change. But in those days, in Hong Lim Green, you have a rally, the place is filled, and everybody knew that Singapore's future depended on them."

Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong, who chairs the organising committee for the PAP's 60th anniversary celebrations, also spoke on the importance of the party's past, which "holds lessons for the present and future".

Outside the hall, where photographs of the party's defining moments in history were exhibited, the atmosphere was one of celebration, happy reunions and nostalgia.

Former MP Wan Hussin Zoohri, 77, said: "The party has a new generation today. Tonight, they are being transported back to the 1950s when the party was first formed, to reflect that it is because of that inauguration that we are here today.

"It is good to return to that and let the young generation be conscious of the first generation of leaders, who were flag-bearers."

Said Sembawang assistant branch secretary Goh Peng Hong, 46, of the chance to meet the party's pioneers: "To see them in person is very meaningful for younger activists like myself.

"Their early years were one of struggling to make Singapore the safe, harmonious place it is today. I am inspired by their energy."



Party activists share hopes and thoughts
By Rachel Au-Yong, The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

THE first walkover was a relief. But each successive uncontested election in her Kaki Bukit ward made People's Action Party (PAP) activist Normah Ahmad, 62, increasingly worried.

By the time the 2011 General Election rolled around, Kaki Bukit ward - absorbed into Aljunied GRC after being part of Eunos, East Coast and Marine Parade previously - had been untested for some 20 years, and the party lost the GRC to the Workers' Party.

Even as PAP activists redouble efforts on the ground, with community programmes and social assistance schemes, Ms Normah, an activist since 1980 and former chair of Kaki Bukit's Women's Wing, thinks winning back Aljunied GRC will not be easy.

"Realistically, it will be a very tough fight to dislodge the Workers' Party," she was quoted as saying in a 158-page book launched to mark the PAP's 60th anniversary.

Titled PAP 60, Forward Together, the book charts milestones in the party's journey since 1954.

It also features the quiet work of six activists, including Ms Normah, in working the ground. She said last night that the PAP must be more proactive in engaging residents as fewer instinctively turn to it for help.

Also featured is NTUC industrial relations officer Jagathishwaran Rajo, 27, a political science major at university, who says in the book that he was one of the few who spoke up for the Government in class:

"It has become glamorous nowadays to be anti-government, anti-PAP and anti-establishment. My honours year thesis title was 'End Of PAP dominance?'

"We do have to think about whether the days of very high percentage of votes are over. After all, in developed countries, it is very rare now to get a majority. So, this is maybe the new normal - more debate, more contest, but also more new ideas."

That is why the Young PAP branch chair in Zhenghua ward in Holland-Bukit Timah GRC thinks it is important for the young to take politics seriously: "It is normal for young people to care for their country, and indeed to play a large role in the party."

In the book, veteran activist Png Wee Chor, 74, agrees that young people have a part to play. Since 2011, he has seen more of them helping at his Kampong Chai Chee ward in East Coast GRC.

He, too, got involved at a young age. In 1956, at age 16, he was pushed through a window after a pro-independence rally went out of control. He needed 13 stitches on his leg. "Battles for a good cause attract the young - that was true when I was young, that is true now. In my time, the cause was freedom and anti-communism. But at the bottom of it all, it was the dream of a good life."

The book is not for sale to the public, but will be distributed to the 87 PAP branches. Copies signed by the three secretaries-general of the PAP - Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Mr Goh Chok Tong and Mr Lee Hsien Loong - will be sold at $10,000 and $20,000, with proceeds going to charity.



Barry Desker: No single interpretation of the past

$
0
0
Long-serving diplomat Barry Desker, 67, and retiring dean at influential think-tank, the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, gives Tham Yuen-C a history lesson, referencing Tan Pin Pin's controversial film. He also questions the value of free trade deals and the rankings chase, discusses terrorism and casts a foreign-policy eye at how Singapore will be affected by its largest neighbour, Indonesia, changing presidents.
The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014


Over the Tan Pin Pin film To Singapore, With Love, and the launch of the Battle For Merger book, there has been discussion about versions of history. You graduated with a first-class honours in history at the former University of Singapore. Is there a correct version of the past?

There is no one interpretation of the past. There is a dominant interpretation of history, but this will be challenged by revisionist interpretations. So each generation writes and revises its own history. The tendency is that historians reflect the age in which they live, so you're present-minded and looking at the past, consciously or unconsciously, with the spectacles of the present.

The debate that we see (reflects that) we live in an era of greater political contestation. Therefore you will find that there will be challenges to the interpretation of history that most Singaporeans accepted.


So what should people make of these versions?

It is essential to remind a younger generation that life wasn't as simple as it is sometimes made out to be - 50, 60 years ago, we lived in a much more contestable environment where there were serious divergences of views.

The problem with Tan Pin Pin's film is that there is no sense of the debate that took place, that the views put forward by those interviewed were opposed by those who went on to govern Singapore. They presented themselves in the film in the best possible light as victims, with no one questioning their version of the past.

Our failure has been in underestimating the importance of history. Very few students in Singapore today even read history at the upper secondary level. We have grown up as a generation without an understanding of where we come from, what has led to the Singapore that is today. Whereas if we had been open to the varieties of historical interpretations which exist, and we were more aware of where we have come from, we will be much more sympathetic to the situation and challenges today. As well, we would probably in some areas be more questioning.


Indeed, Singaporeans are often reminded by the Government about how vulnerable the country is, race riots and fight against communists, et cetera. Do you see Singapore as still being as vulnerable as before?

We are less vulnerable today because we're more capable, we have greater control of our destiny. From the military perspective, we used to depend on the Malaysian army and the British military forces, but now we have the Singapore Armed Forces.

In 1965 we didn't have the people to take up our cudgels internationally. At the beginning, the foreign service was made up of anyone who had some international exposure and our earliest diplomats like former president S R Nathan learnt on the job. Today we've built up that capacity.


Speaking of history, you were with the foreign ministry for more than 20 years, from 1970. What was it like being a foreign officer of a young nation?

Very challenging. One year after I joined MFA (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs), I became the head of the South-east Asia section, taking over from someone 20 years older. It was a tough learning exercise. Quite a number of people fell by the wayside very quickly.

When we accompanied the prime minister or ministers on visits, our delegations were very small. Singapore was a much poorer country and we didn't send as many staff, so you had to figure out the way things should be done very quickly. If you weren't adaptable, you dropped out or were cast aside.


You were sent to Indonesia in 1976 as embassy counsellor. Why did you choose to go there?

The Foreign Ministry decides postings. I chose to be an Indonesian specialist even as a graduate student, specialising in South-east Asian studies, including the study of Bahasa Indonesia. I also studied Dutch in order to be able to read Indonesian documents, as many leading Indonesians of the post-war generation were educated in Dutch.

From a Singapore perspective it was, and is, important. As Indonesia is a neighbour and the largest country in South-east Asia, I felt that it was critical that we developed some in-depth knowledge on the country.


How do you think Indonesia will do under its new management?

The election of Jokowi (Joko Widodo) as president is a significant development. He is the first president of Indonesia who does not come from "the establishment". He is a person who is capable and charming, and relates well with people.

Even though he is not someone with the experience of government, a number of the people in positions of authority are people with experience, and they will be part of the next Cabinet.


And how do you see this affecting Singapore-Indonesia relations?

I'm hopeful of a good relationship with the Jokowi administration. He is familiar with Singapore. Both his children studied in Singapore, one at MDIS (Management Development Institute of Singapore) and the other at Anglo-Chinese School (Independent). He's had business links with Singapore with his furniture (exporting) business. He's someone who, when he was governor of Jakarta, decided to learn from Singapore when they wanted to build a subway system.

But with a democratic Indonesia, where a government needs to respond to popular sentiments, the likelihood of differences of views between Singapore and Indonesia will exist. It will not be like during the Suharto era when relations were excellent, because you could manage relations through the relationship of Suharto and Lee Kuan Yew. It will be a much more dynamic relationship we will have now.


What will be the implications for Singapore?

The management of bilateral relations will pose a challenge. There will be ups and downs but I am confident that we are dealing with an Indonesian leadership with whom we can work with.


In a piece for The Straits Times, you said some foreign-policy sacred cows should be done away with. What are they?

We give too much credence to ranking exercises. For example, looking at universities, we pay what seems to be excessive sums of money just for the branding to be associated with foreign universities. It does suggest a lack of confidence. If our universities are top class, why do we insist on sending top scholarship students abroad at the undergraduate level? Why must a liberal arts college be set up with co-branding from an American university?

(And) we may have gone overboard with supporting preferential trading agreements, or free trade agreements (FTAs). A lot of FTAs are only good for winning people kudos. I'm not just talking about Singapore, but a lot of the trade agreements reached in the East Asian region give you a feel-good impression, but the actual trade-enhancing benefits are actually quite minimal. It's the same as signing a joint communique at the end of a presidential visit - it looks good for the government signing the agreement, the bureaucrat doing the work.

It may have the benefit of improving the relationship between the parties, but it doesn't mean you're actually going to bring significant trade benefits.

Instead, there is a case for promoting plurilateral agreements (agreements between more than two countries) at the World Trade Organisation, where the gains are actually greater.


You have been dean of RSIS - and its predecessor, the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS) - for 14 years. Why did you decide to step down now?

We have matured and someone else needs to come in. If you're in an organisation for too long, you will not see the issues and problems which exist. It is useful to have a fresh person to come in to take a different look at the organisation and to bring it to the next level. (Replacing Mr Desker are two people - an executive deputy chairman will now take care of the think-tank side, former high commissioner to Malaysia Ong Keng Yong; and the academic side is under new dean Joseph Liow.)


RSIS started out with a focus on security issues, but has become more well-known for its expertise in terrorism-related research. How did this come about?

When I joined IDSS, I noticed there was a need to build up expertise in political Islam. I had some background in it because of my interest in Indonesia, and I saw it as a coming challenge in the region. I felt a think-tank devoted to issues of interest to Singapore should be aware of the regional environment, so we looked at the relationship between Islam and politics in Malaysia and Indonesia.

We had arranged for a programme for the second half of 2001 on it, then the 9/11 attacks on the United States happened, and we seemed to be way ahead of everybody else because we were already bringing scholars in Islam and specialists in Afghanistan and on the Taleban to talk about these issues. Funding then became available for research in this area and it was on this basis on which we later built an expertise in terrorism and counter-terrorism.

But terrorism is only one of the areas in which RSIS has expertise. We are a leading centre for research on Asia-Pacific security, issues related to defence studies and national security, non-traditional security issues such as the environment, food security, energy security and international trade.


What is the role of think-tanks?

(We) play a role in policy evaluation and initiation. We consider possible alternative policies as well as their costs and consequences.

In East Asia, what often happens is think-tanks undertake policy-relevant research and the intention is to influence the debate on what policies regional institutions should take. Think-tanks are likely to be more effective when challenges to policy orthodoxy are more accepted and where it is recognised that innovation and change are essential if the country is to benefit from emerging regional and global developments.


So it is similar to a diplomatic role?

Think-tanks like RSIS that focus on international affairs engage in networking with counterparts.

For example, RSIS is a member of the Council of Councils, a grouping of the top 25 think-tanks globally which work on international issues. In the region, we serve as the secretariat for the Network of Asean Defence institutions, which is a Track Two organisation (non-governmental organisations that engage in unofficial interactions that could have an impact on diplomacy) that provides inputs for the Asean Defence Ministers Meetings.


It is true that think-tanks have greater freedom than a government to comment on issues. What about with RSIS?

As an institution, we do not take a position, but provide an avenue for the exchange of views and the discussion of issues. On the South China Sea, for example, we have become the place where South-east Asians, as well as the Chinese, Japanese and Americans have commented on the issue.

As the protagonists debate the issue on our platforms, they are forced to take into account the positions of other parties while their positions are scrutinised by others. The oceans are our lifeline but everyone recognises that we do not have any claims in the South China Sea.


Various ministers emphasise the importance of foreign policy and looking outwards. Why is this important?

For a small country like Singapore, where trade is three times the gross domestic product, one has to be aware of the world around. It is important to also recognise that we're part of the region even as we become more globalised and have relationships around the world. Singapore is not an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, we have to build a relationship with our neighbours at the same time as we have strong relationships with the major powers.


But how would a regular joe relate to that?

This is the difficulty, because the process of foreign policy is essentially elitist, so it's very hard to translate this to a person in the heartland.

When we realise that our jobs depend on international trade or manufactured goods which are exported, (and) the crucial role of the logistics sector, the role of our port and airport, then the man or woman in the street can relate to the importance of foreign policy.

Regional or international crises remind us that we are not isolated and will be affected by the world around us. The average person worries about how it affects him or her.




Fall of the Berlin Wall, 25 years on

$
0
0
Vast improvements in many areas but failure to integrate Russia a dark strategic blunder
By Jonathan Eyal, Europe Correspondent, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

No one present in the German capital when the Berlin Wall fell 25 years ago today would ever forget the experience. The uncontrollable cries of joy from family members reunited after decades of enforced separation, the spontaneous hugs between complete strangers; even the most hardened cynic could not fail to be moved.

Nor did anyone doubt the huge strategic significance of the event. For the Wall was more than just fortifications, mines and electrified barbed wires; it was the hated symbol of Europe's divisions, a monument to the Cold War which, over four decades, arbitrarily forced nations around the world to decide whether they belonged to the Soviet-led "East" or the US-led "West". Once that Wall collapsed, everyone instinctively realised that the world had changed: This was raw history in the making.

Yet few analysts - myself included - predicted then how much Europe would be transformed by that experience, or also how deep the divisions between Russia and the rest of Europe would remain. The story of the past quarter-century is one of a huge European achievement as well as a monumental strategic failure, rolled into one.



The tourists who now rush to have themselves photographed next to the few slabs of concrete still standing from the Wall cannot possibly realise what a horrible significance it had for the Germans.

The repulsive sight was not so much the Wall itself, but the dilapidated, boarded-up houses around it which gave the place the ghostly feel of an abandoned movie set, the Achtung Minen - "Attention, Mines" - signs which would suddenly pop up in the middle of a street or a park, and the constant barking of the ferocious dogs kept by East German border guards.

And then, there were the simple wooden crosses scattered everywhere on the Western side, marking the spots where young Germans who tried to flee were mowed down by East German machine guns. The black-and-white photograph which still haunts Germany today is that of Peter Hechter, then aged 18, who, hit by bullets, was left to bleed to death on the barbed wire, with tearful West Berliners on the one side watching in frustrated impotence while East German border guards simply ignored his anguished pleas for help.

My abiding memory is of an elderly East German woman who, on the night the Wall fell, decided to take a stroll into the West. The East German border guards still manning checkpoints asked to see her identity papers. "I'll show you nothing," she shouted at them. "Get out of my way; this is my country, and there is no border here." The guards looked away; she and millions of ordinary Germans like her simply trampled over Europe's dividing lines.

Yet the Wall was crumbling years before it actually fell for, although it kept people in, it could not repel the flow of ideas and technology. East Germany did everything possible to create a separate national identity: its hormone-injected gymnasts routinely scooped medals at the Olympics. However, its people still believed themselves to be part of the wider German nation, indistinguishable from their Western brethren.

The East German regime also tried every propaganda trick to instil pride in the country. But East Germans ignored this altogether by watching West German television instead. As people used to joke at the time, they lived in East Germany during the day, and in West Germany each evening, as they settled before their TV screens.

Although few analysts grasped this 25 years ago, the fall of the Wall was an early indication of two facts which are now commonplace: that no physical barrier is effective in the age of electronic media, and that there is no substitute for good governance.

Weeks after the Wall fell, communism was largely gone from the rest of the European continent. And 18 months after that, the Soviet Union itself collapsed.

The psychological impact was immense, and not always positive. As nations under siege, the East Germans and their other communist East European neighbours developed a unique community spirit. The extended family network was its bedrock, and the smallest achievement was greeted with huge satisfaction. Food was scarce and local goods were shoddy, but the community spirit was strong.

Yet all this was shattered by the advent of the market economy. The younger generation was offered plenty of opportunities as Western investment transformed the region. But the older generation was not only rendered unemployed, but unemployable as well.

Eastern Europe's economies were exposed to massive competition from the West. One year after the Wall collapsed, most of the local manufacturing sector disappeared. The first signs of democracy were, therefore, accompanied by the biggest fall in personal wealth since World War II. Wealth disparities between the old "East" and the rest of Europe still remain, and nowhere are these divisions - which the Germans call "a wall in the head" - more apparent than in Berlin itself.

Still, it will be churlish to deny the vast improvements which have taken place. Germany is a united nation, at ease with its neighbours. The Europeans may grumble about immigration from Eastern Europe, but for any European aged under 25 today, national borders are just a fiction. A war is unthinkable now, in a continent which generated two world wars in the last century. And although the recent economic crisis has left deep scars, Europe is far more prosperous than it was a quarter of a century ago; Poland, for instance, is six times wealthier than when it was ruled by communists in 1989.

The shockwaves from the fall of the Wall reverberated worldwide. In some places - like North Korea - the event heightened fears that any political reform will destroy the ruling elite; arguably, it was the fall of the Wall which persuaded leaders in Pyongyang to accelerate the development of nuclear weapons as their own impenetrable bulwark against collapse.

But in many other countries, the Berlin Wall episode was evidence of the inevitable need to open up markets and release people's ingenuity. Soon after the Tiananmen Square bloodshed, Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping relaunched his country's economic reform programme precisely because he understood that his government's legitimacy could not come from the gun, but from a prosperous economy.

Yet, in one respect, the Europeans failed spectacularly - in the task of integrating the Russia which emerged from the rubble of the Soviet Union. Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet leader who allowed East Germany to unite with West Germany, is still hailed by Europeans as a liberator. But in Russia itself, he is dismissed as, at best, a bungler. The late Boris Yeltsin, the man who took over Russia after Gorbachev, was also once a European hero for his efforts to integrate his country into the new Europe; now he is viewed by ordinary Russians as just a drunken fool.

Much of this was probably unavoidable. Given their troubled past, the East Europeans remained suspicious of Russia's designs, and wanted the West's protection as quickly as possible. Russia itself did nothing to atone for its occupation of Eastern Europe; to this day it refuses to acknowledge that it was responsible for many crimes. And, despite the Russian complaints, Europe did try its best to establish good relations with Moscow.

Nevertheless, it is a fact that all these efforts failed. Russia today is exactly where it was a century ago: both part of Europe and outside it, not an outright enemy, but not a friend either. The collapse of the Wall was one of Europe's greatest triumphs, the only example in history when an entire empire disintegrated with barely a shot fired in anger. But it did not result in a truly united continent.

For in one East German city, a young Soviet secret service officer watched helplessly as the Berlin Wall collapsed that night 25 years ago, and vowed to himself that, one day, he would avenge the humiliation by proving to the world that Russia was still a great nation which, if not loved, should at least be feared.

That young officer was Vladimir Putin. Today, he is Russia's President.











About the wall
- On Aug 13, 1961, a 155km-long barbed wire fence was erected overnight by East German troops between East and West Berlin, to stop the mass exodus of East Germans to the West.
- Some sources said it was ordered by East German leader Walter Ulbricht, others pointed to Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev.
- One segment was later rebuilt into a 3.6m-high, 106km-long concrete wall with manned guard posts. There were nine border crossings to allow West Germans and foreigners to enter the East.
- East Germans were not allowed to cross the border. Some 155,000 East Germans crossed over to the West from January to Aug 13, 1961.This figure shrank to 51,000 in 41/2 months after the Wall was erected.
- At least 389 people died trying to cross the Wall, many shot by border guards.
- In the 1980s, East Germans started protesting against the government, calling for freedom and democracy.
- Then US President Ronald Reagan visited the Wall in 1987 and challenged Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to tear it down.
- Half a million people joined a demonstration for democracy in East Berlin on Nov 4, 1989.
- On Nov 9, 1989, it was announced on TV that the border between East and West would be opened immediately. Thousands of East Germans thronged the wall and guards were forced to let them through, marking the "fall" of the Wall.
- The physical wall was officially demolished only in June 1990. East and West Germany were formally reunited on Oct 3 that year.






The idea of Asia

$
0
0
By Bilahari Kausikan, Published The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

ASIA is a political and not just a geographic concept; it is politics that defines geography.

Asia as a political concept has a history stretching back to at least the late 19th century. I want to focus on the most recent phase in the evolution of the concept of Asia that began in the early 1990s. The notion of Asia that arose in the early 1990s was entangled with, and indeed can hardly be distinguished from, the debate over Asian values that not coincidentally arose at the same time. This is a debate that is far more often talked about than understood. As someone who played a minor role in it, let me give you my perspective.

Geopolitical concerns were the main reason. By the end of the 1980s, the potential for geopolitical complications was high, arising from a combination of factors: the end of the Cold War; consequent Western/American triumphalism; China just beginning to take off as a serious challenge to the West; both US and China freed from constraints of a de facto anti-Soviet alliance, and an inexperienced US administration - until President Bill Clinton was elected in 1993, Democrats had been out of power for 25 years except for the untypical four years under President Jimmy Carter which even Democrats were eager to forget - that seemed more than merely inclined to structure its relationship with China on the basis of the promotion of democracy and human rights. This is the one area that the Chinese leadership would never compromise, as the 1989 Tiananmen incident clearly demonstrated. But Tiananmen also encouraged the new administration to take a hard line towards China. During the campaign, Mr Clinton accused his predecessor of "coddling dictators".

Why were we concerned? US-China relations are the most important axis of East Asian international relations, affecting the entire region.

When they are stable, the region is calm; when US-China relations are roiled, the entire region is unsettled. And the approach towards China apparently preferred by the new administration promised a rocky ride for the entire region so we entered the debate to try to encourage a more complex view of the issue. No one was under any illusion that we could change minds. Our aim was the modest one of buying some time for the passions of a new administration to cool and common sense and the imperatives of realpolitik to prevail. In the meantime, if the new administration needed to work their campaign rhetoric out of their system, it was better that they had a broader target than just China.

The immediate locus of the debate was developments leading up to the 1993 Vienna Conference on Human Rights, particularly the Asian Group preparatory meeting held in Bangkok in April 1993. Article 8 of the Bangkok Declaration that emerged out of that meeting was the eye of the storm: "(Ministers and representatives of Asian governments) recognise that while human rights are universal in nature, they must be considered in the context of a dynamic and evolving process of international norm setting, bearing in mind the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backgrounds."

The Bangkok meeting was split on the core issue of the universality or otherwise of human rights and democracy as a political form, the basic division being roughly between the more Western oriented members like Japan and South Korea, and countries like Iran and China, with the majority somewhere in the middle. I played a role in drafting the language of Article 8 which was eventually accepted as a compromise. The approach I took was historical and the text was intended to be, and indeed I still believe is, no more than a simple statement of fact. The idea of "democracy", always a protean term, has evolved, as has the definition of specific rights. And they will continue to change in response to specific developments and not necessarily only in one direction either. Most rights are essentially contested concepts, even something as fundamental as the right to life as evidenced by debates over capital punishment and abortion. Different states of the US have different views on abortion.

Of course all countries hold some values in common, but the commonalities are at such a high level of generality that they generally prescribe nothing of practical significance for how different countries formulate specific policies to solve specific problems or organise themselves. The empirical evidence of our senses is that diversity rather than universality is the most salient characteristic of the world we actually live in as distinct from the world regarded through ideological lens of one sort or another.

To cut a long story short, eventually common sense did prevail and the US and China began again to deal with each other as great powers usually do, that is, pragmatically. US-China relations are too complex to be otherwise. In fact the very complexity of the US-China relationship, the necessity of balancing the multiplicity of interests that characterises the relationship, against each other, sets up a dynamic that propels a movement towards the centre. And this holds true whether one starts from the first premise of human rights and democracy as did the first Clinton administration, or from the first premise of the reality of strategic competition, as did the first George W. Bush administration.

The only questions are how long it will take to reach equilibrium and what collateral damage the two major powers and the rest of us will have to endure in the process. Once common sense reasserted itself, we - and most other countries - ceased to play an active role in the debate which was then of interest primarily to the chattering and scribbling classes who did not really understand what the debate was really about in the first place.

More nuanced debate

HOWEVER, we are now in the midst of a renewed debate over the idea of Asia in a different and I think more complex form. It is no longer a relatively simple debate over values, but a more nuanced debate over the architecture that will define East Asia. Again the geopolitical driver is US-China relations. Washington and Beijing are currently groping towards a new equilibrium, a new modus vivendi, in their relationship with each other and with other countries in East Asia. Post-World War II East Asia was very largely an American creation because it was the US that provided the stability that was the foundation of the growth that is the most salient common characteristic of an otherwise highly diverse region. In this sense the US is an East Asian state or at least an Asia-Pacific state, a concept that now shares a very large common space with the idea of Asia.


But there is now a consensus across the region that while the US is still a very necessary condition for stability, it is no longer a sufficient condition and the US presence needs to be supplemented - supplemented, not supplanted - by some new architecture to preserve stability for growth. This consensus is shared by both China and the US. The extremes of containment of China and displacement of the US from East Asia are both impossible and Beijing and Washington understand this, even though their rhetoric sometimes suggests otherwise. The search for this new architecture is the core strategic issue for our region. No one knows what shape it will take or how long it will take to establish this new architecture, although I think it will be a work of decades and not just a few years. But US-China relations will certainly be the central pillar around which any new architecture will eventually be erected, and when Washington and Beijing reach a new modus vivendi, a new concept of Asia will emerge and we will all have to live with it.

At present, the main choices are between an essentially Sino-centric architecture built around the Asean Plus One Dialogue with China with elements of the Asean Plus Three incorporated, or a more open construct built around the East Asia Summit. But these are by no means the only choices and the situation is still evolving.

Nor have the major actions been consistent. The "new model" of great power relations that China has proposed and the US not entirely rejected, at least implies a legitimate place for the US in East Asia although the specific contours of that place are yet to be determined. But at the same time Chinese leaders have also tried to promote a new security concept based on the principle that Asian problems should be resolved only by Asians. Who is to be regarded as "Asian" is still ambiguous, perhaps deliberately so. No one as yet really can predict the final architecture.

Asean is at the centre of this and has been able to establish platforms that could play a supplementary role in channelling US-China relations in more predictable and constructive directions, because US and Chinese interests intersect in South-east Asia; Asean is a relatively neutral body friendly to both; and both the US and China find it useful to use these Asean-created platforms. This minimal role is useful but will not be the decisive factor.

The most important decisions are going to be made in Washington and Beijing, not in Asean capitals or even in Tokyo, New Delhi, Seoul or Canberra. Still it is better to play even such a secondary role than just be a helpless spectator. Whether Asean can continue to play even such a role depends on whether it can remain relatively neutral and that in turn depends on the future of its integration project, particularly economic integration.

The adjustments between the US and China that will have to be made are manifold. I want to focus on just one aspect that I think is most germane to the subject of our discussion. This is what can be termed the psychological factor. China's re-emergence as a major power has been disquieting to many in the West because it challenges in a very fundamental way the Western myth of universality. That myth could only be sustained by a Western dominance that is now ebbing. Yet universality is a mode of thought that the West inherited from its monotheistic and teleological Christian traditions, but is now deeply embedded in even the most secular of Western societies. That mode of thought is not going to disappear even if real power is being redistributed.

The idea that certain political forms are the necessary result of certain historical processes and correlated with certain types of economic systems is one that China fundamentally challenges because in China capitalism flourishes without liberal democracy, and unlike say, Japan, China only wants to be China and has no real desire to be an honorary member of the West.

Of course, the Western view is both parochial and ahistorical. It is parochial because it generalises a universal from the very unique historical contingencies that resulted in the Western form of democracy; ahistorical because it misreads even the West's own history - every Western country was capitalist long before it was ever either liberal or democratic in the sense that the term is now understood by the West.

These are not abstract intellectual considerations because in recent times the claim of the universality of certain values and political forms has been used to justify military interventions to change regimes in North Africa and the Middle East. Of course, no one really believes that China is going to be subject to such kinetic interventions which have been deployed only against the weak, and of course much of Western and specifically American rhetoric about human rights and democracy is only that - mere rhetoric. Yet it is also an essential part of the American sense of self and is never ever going away, even if its most ridiculous and extreme forms - such as the idea that history had come to an end - are now smothered in an embarrassed silence. It is at the very least an additional complication to the already complex adjustments that are under way in US-China relations.

Nor are all interventions military, and East Asia, Singapore included, has experienced more than its fair share of various Western attempts to influence the domestic politics of states. In any case, the words of a great power echo far more loudly than may be intended and not every Western leader sufficiently understands that words spoken for domestic reasons or to preserve amour propre can have strategic consequences.

This is particularly so because this is perhaps a more than usually delicate phase of China's development. Never before has so far-reaching an economic and social transformation affecting so many people been experienced in such a relatively short time.

But rapid change is inevitably internally destabilising and China's history has taught China's leaders to fear most those historical moments where external uncertainty coincides with internal unrest. This is such a period. Beijing is now embarking on a second and more difficult stage of reforms that must loosen the centre's grip on the economy in significant ways, while preserving the rule of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Can it be done? One should hope so because the alternatives are all probably worse, but no one really knows, least of all China's leaders, although their determination should not be under-estimated.

So under these circumstances, incautious rhetoric about Hong Kong or Xinjiang or expressions of support for the Dalai Lama, among other things, may resonate in Beijing in ways unintended by Washington.

The Chinese too do not always understand that the words of a great power can have unintended consequences.

The CPC now relies upon nationalism to legitimise its rule, for the simple reason that nobody believes in communism as an ideology. Contemporary Chinese nationalism is a complex phenomenon made up of several strands, among them pride in China's achievements and a sense of destiny in reclaiming China's historical place in East Asia. More than other kinds of nationalism, contemporary Chinese nationalism is outwardly directed. This must be so because the CPC's attitude towards China's imperial past and even its own revolutionary history and such episodes as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution and even towards Mao himself is ambivalent. The CPC's version of Chinese nationalism must primarily be directed outwards lest awkward questions be asked internally about the CPC itself.

There is no doubt that many injustices were done to China during the period that every Chinese schoolchild knows as "a hundred years of humiliation". Does China mean to rectify all of them? By what means? If not, how will it choose between multiple "injustices"? China is increasingly citing history rather than international law to justify its sovereignty claims in the East and South China Seas. This causes great anxiety across the region. China has such a long history that it can be used to justify almost anything. Big countries are always going to arouse a degree of anxiety in small countries around its periphery. This is true of all big countries everywhere throughout history. Big countries have a duty to reassure that China has only partially fulfilled. And the anxieties that China has aroused complicate the adjustments between the US and China that are under way.

Several Asean countries are moving closer to the US; Japan is reinterpreting its Constitution to allow it to conduct more robust military activities. No country ever gives up sovereignty claims willingly. It is inevitable that both the Japanese and the Chinese are not going to stop air and sea patrols in disputed areas in the East China Sea. The US and China are not going to stop patrolling and surveillance activities in the South China Sea. Nor will those Asean countries that have claims in the South China Sea stop doing what they must to protect their claims. Japan is a US ally, indeed its principal ally in East Asia. No one is looking for trouble, but the risk is of conflict by accident, not war by design. Yet the highly nationalistic public opinion that the CPC both uses and fears is a political reality that the CPC cannot ignore and may lead it in directions it does not intend. There is a danger that if an accident occurs, the CPC may become trapped by its own historical narratives.

Let me conclude with one final point. I am not a great believer in the idea of a clash of civilisations. Nor do I believe that the adjustments that are under way in East Asia can be understood by simplistic slogans like "Asia rising, the West declining". The patterns of trade, finance and investments and the production chains that have developed as a result of Asian growth are too complex to be defined by geographical dichotomies. For the last 200 years, the key issue faced by the non-Western world is how to adapt to a Western-defined modernity. The most successful examples of adaptation are East Asian. Since the 1911 overthrow of the Qing Dynasty, China has undergone a series of Westernising political experiments of which the current blend of communism with the market economy is the most recent and the most successful. Communism too is a Western ideology, and we should not lose sight of the fact that both liberal democracy as practised in the West and CPC rule formally conceptualised as the "dictatorship of the proletariat" have the same intellectual roots and are both legitimate heirs to the 18th-century political philosophy that locates sovereignty in the notion of "the people" rather than in Divine Right, bloodline or some other principle. Indeed, except for a handful of countries mainly in the Middle East, almost all political systems today validate themselves by some variant of that 18th-century political philosophy. We may have preferences for one variant or another, but it is difficult to say in abstract that one is more legitimate than another. In the realm of practical statecraft, success is the ultimate virtue; and success in statecraft must first of all rest on economic success.

The writer is Ambassador-at-Large at Singapore's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where he was permanent secretary. This is extracted from a speech at the Singapore Writers' Festival.


Home-spun cloth an emblem of national pride

$
0
0
By Nirmala Ganapathy India Correspondent In New Delhi, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

When Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Ahmedabad in September, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi presented him with an off-white khadi vest, which Mr Xi promptly put on after removing his jacket and tie.

Mr Modi, wearing a similar vest, then took his guest on a tour of the Sabarmati Ashram, where independence icon Mahatma Gandhi and his wife Kasturba lived for many years.

Khadi refers to hand-spun and hand-woven cloth, but in the hands of Gandhi, it signified a freedom movement against the British.

Among the personal items that Mr Xi saw at the ashram was the charkha, or spinning wheel, that Gandhi used to spin khadi as part of a campaign to boycott foreign- made goods, especially those from Britain, and to promote self-reliance. India gained independence in 1947.

Now, in the 21st century, khadi is getting a fresh and equally high-profile push under Mr Modi.

The Prime Minister, who took office in May, boasts a wardrobe filled with khadi vests and kurta pyjamas in colours ranging from soft pastels to bright hues.

Not only that, he has been urging the people of India to buy khadi.

In a radio address on Oct 3, a day after Gandhi's 145th birth anniversary, Mr Modi called on all Indians to buy at least one khadi item, be it a bedsheet or a handkerchief, to help the nation's weavers.

"If you buy khadi, you light the lamp of prosperity in the house of a poor person," he said.

Even before Mr Modi's call, khadi was seeing a resurgence, thanks partly to a "makeover" by the country's top designers.

They include Rajesh Pratap Singh, who launched a khadi denim line of jeans this year. Levi's launched its first khadi range in a "purple shade of natural indigo". These khadi jeans, jackets and shirts retail for 5,000 rupees (around S$106) to 15,000 rupees.

"Each piece is marked with the name of the person who hand-wove the cloth and the place where it was woven," said Mr Jonathan Cheung, a senior vice-president for global design at Levi Strauss.

Khadi - woven from natural fibres (mainly cotton, but also silk and wool) - is no humble cloth. It costs three times more than factory-made fabric.

A metre of the ultra-soft white muslin khadi can command as much as 1,500 rupees, while khadi with a rougher texture can be had for 200 rupees.

Designer Gaurang Shah, who unveiled a khadi line at the Berlin and New York fashion weeks in 2011, calls it one of the world's most versatile fabrics.

"A (khadi) sari can be worn in summer and winter," said Mr Shah, whose line includes saris, flowy dresses and layered tunics.

"Demand is increasing," he said, adding that khadi has become as popular as silk. He has adopted a village of 150 to 160 weavers in southern Andhra Pradesh to make khadi for him.

Overall sales of khadi, spun by hundreds of thousands of poor weavers in remote villages, have risen by 6 per cent a year.

According to the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, khadi sales reached 10.8 billion rupees in 2013-2014, up from 10.21 billion rupees in 2012-2013.

Even Gandhi's granddaughter feels that appreciation for the cloth has perhaps surpassed what was seen during the Gandhi days.

Ms Tara Gandhi Bhattacharjee, who is now in her 80s, grew up wearing only khadi, and is committed to promoting the home-spun cloth.

"It is stunningly aesthetic, comfortable on the skin, and it is handicraft. We are keeping a legacy alive," said Ms Bhattacharjee, who revealed that fabrics in her house are "99.9 per cent khadi".

At the newly furnished Khadi Gramodyog Bhavan in Delhi's Connaught Place, part of a chain of popular government shops selling khadi across the country, sales have increased since the Prime Minister made his "buy khadi" call.

Sales for last month nearly doubled to 59 million rupees from 30 million rupees for the same period last year at this outlet and seven other government shops in Delhi.

The shops have already chalked up 700 million rupees in sales so far this year, eclipsing last year's 350 million rupees.

"The popularity of khadi has grown, as has public awareness that it is a natural fibre that keeps warm in winter and cool in summer," said Mr S.P. Singh, the director and resident representative of the Khadi and Village Industries Commission.

Even so, growing awareness aside, this popularity is still confined to a small segment of Indian society.

The reason has to do with economics.

In today's wholesale market, a metre of mill-made cotton cloth costs from 35 rupees to 40 rupees. In contrast, a metre of "basic" hand-spun khadi goes for between 110 rupees and 130 rupees.

Khadi also has an image problem - it has been the cloth of choice for India's political class, currently a discredited lot following a series of corruption scandals.

Mr Rajneesh Raghava, who runs a consultancy firm, became a khadi "convert" five years ago. The 32-year-old, whose father is a farmer, said he first learnt about Gandhi and khadi in school.

"People say khadi is expensive, but that perception is wrong because you can get different ranges. It is much cheaper than some goods available at the malls," said Mr Raghava, who had a silk khadi jacket tailored recently for a wedding.

"Any Indian who is patriotic should go at least once (to a khadi shop)," he added.


A safe place for sick kids to learn, play

$
0
0
Highly sanitised centre caters to children who cannot go to normal day-care centres
By Calvin Yang, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

When she was two, Nur Zahra Nadiah was not allowed to play with her siblings when they displayed mild flu symptoms.

She had been diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, which left her with a weakened immune system.

"I was sad because I was sick and couldn't play with them," said Zahra, who kept to herself as a result.

Now six, she exudes far more confidence. Not only is her cancer in remission but, since attending Arc Children's Centre in 2012, she also has a group of five friends, all of whom have cancer or other life-threatening illnesses, to bond with and share secrets.

Zahra is among 110 seriously ill children whom the centre has helped in the three years since it opened. All of them were referred by the National University Hospital and KK Women's and Children's Hospital.

"Medical bills are hefty, and parents have no choice but to go back to work," said Ms Geraldine Lee, 57, Arc's manager and one of five founders. "But these children often have low immunity, and they can't go to normal day-care centres... Some of the parents choose to send their kids back to the hospital playrooms because they had no other safe place to go."

Arc's founders decided to fill the gap. Their centre has since been taking in children with life-threatening conditions, including leukaemia, brain tumours and bone cancer. Most are between the ages of two and seven, but the centre also accepts those who are well into their teens.

The fees are set at $10 each day, and the centre offers subsidies for those who cannot afford it.

These children, and their siblings, get to learn and play within a highly sanitised indoor environment. The centre, which is fitted with air ionisers and cleaned every morning with hospital-grade disinfectants, provides meals, formal education and enrichment activities such as taekwondo, yoga, and speech and drama.

"Parents are concerned that their child might be unable to catch up when they start primary school, so we offered a few hours of learning to ensure that they do not fall behind their peers," said Ms Lee, adding that there are no exams and tests at the centre.

"The activities have to give these children some sort of a balance, and take their mind off their illness."

Arc has experienced its share of tragedy. Over the three years, eight children have died due to their illnesses, including an eight-year-old boy who succumbed to leukaemia two weeks ago.

"For the older children who knew him, they were devastated," said Ms Lee. "But we have to move on. At least they know that he doesn't have to suffer any more."

She added that the children draw courage from their friends at the centre. "The kids are no longer afraid of going back to the hospitals for treatment, because they have friends who are going through the same thing," Ms Lee said.

Last Sunday, the centre held its annual charity gala lunch at Pan Pacific Hotel to cover its expenditure, which is about $550,000 yearly, and raise funds for bigger premises.

The 204 sq m open-concept centre in Kim Keat Road is running out of space. Currently, 89 children attend Arc, compared to 43 in 2012.

Between 1997 and last year, there have been about 90 new cases of children with cancer each year - with leukaemia being the most common, followed by cancers affecting the brain.

"There will be a growing need for this service," said Ms Lee. "We need a bigger space to accommodate more children and do more activities... These children need the space to express themselves. A bigger place will help them in their recovery."

Sunday's charity event, which was attended by Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, raised $480,000.

Under the National Council of Social Service's Care and Share movement, eligible donations received this year will be matched dollar-for-dollar by the Government.

Zahra's mother, Madam Azirah Zakaria, said the centre has changed their family's life. "Before sending her to Arc, I had to be beside her all the time. But the centre has helped her to become more independent."

After seeing the progress her daughter made after two weeks there, the 31-year-old housewife allowed her three other children aged two, nine and 13 to tag along during their school holidays, and often volunteers her time to care for other children at the centre.

"I thought I was alone in my struggle but there are other parents who have gone through similar experiences," said Madam Azirah. "We are like one big family. Their kids are like my kids. We support each other, especially when their child isn't doing too well."





$1 billion spent on tuition in one year

$
0
0
Figure is almost double the $650m spent by families 10 years ago: Survey
By Theresa Tan, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

Singapore's tuition industry is now worth more than a billion dollars.

The latest Household Expenditure Survey found that families spent $1.1 billion a year on tuition - almost double the $650 million spent a decade ago and a third more than the $820 million spent just five years ago.

The Department of Statistics, which polled more than 11,000 households between October 2012 and September last year, released the latest survey in September.

The average household spending on tuition rose from $54.70 a month 10 years ago, to $79.90 in the latest survey.

The department told The Sunday Times that along with spending more, there were also more households in the latest study - 1.2 million compared with 993,000 a decade ago.

Associate Professor Jason Tan of the National Institute of Education noted that tuition is no longer meant only to help weak or failing students pass their exams.

"Tuition has morphed into this huge industry to keep one's child ahead of the rest," said Prof Tan, who is doing a study on the perception of tuition. "Many tutors teach ahead of the school curriculum, so that the child has a competitive edge. Even students in the Gifted Education Programme have tuition."

He pointed to tuition programmes that have sprouted up to cater to students of varying abilities and for different purposes. These include classes to help pupils get into the Gifted Education Programme and courses to prepare students for entrance tests and interviews for the Direct School Admission scheme, which allows schools to accept students not just based on academic ability, but also on their talent in sports and the arts.

Given the growing size of the tuition industry and the numerous players ranging from fast-growing chains of tuition centres to one-man operations, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore has begun auditing tuition centre bosses and private tutors. It has found under-declaration of income to be a "common problem".

A growing number of tuition agencies attest to Singapore's ever-expanding demand for tuition.

There are 850 tuition centres and enrichment centres registered with the Education Ministry now, up from 800 last year and about 700 in 2012.

And some of these centres have expanded into chains.

Mind Stretcher Learning Centre, for example, grew to have 21 branches in just 12 years and now has at least 10,000 students, said co-founder Alvin Kuek.

He said the amount spent on tuition has grown in the past decade as tutors are also commanding higher salaries now - up to 50 per cent more - given the intense competition in the market for tutors. Hence, fees have gone up.

Mind Stretcher charges an average of $150 a month for group tuition in one primary school subject.

This is up from about $90 when the centre was started 12 years ago.

Manager Eddy Tan, 50, spends $1,800 per month on tuition for his three children, aged between 11 and 16.

He said: "My children asked for tuition as they felt they could not catch up in school. They said their teachers teach too fast.

"Everyone I see has tuition. So if you don't give your children tuition, they may lose out. It's the kiasu mentality."





Taxman checks on tutors, claws back $2.3 million
Under-declaration of income is common, IRAS finds in audit of 120 centres, tutors
By Theresa Tan, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

The taxman has clawed back more than $2.3 million in unpaid taxes and penalties from private tutors and tuition centre proprietors who under-declared their income.

An ongoing audit of players in the billion-dollar tuition industry has found under-declaring income to be a "common problem".

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) has audited more than 120 tuition centre owners and tutors over the past few years, and its biggest catch so far is a tuition centre owner who under-reported his agency's income by about $3.6 million over seven years.

He earned between $400,000 and $800,000 a year, but declared only $50,000 to $150,000.

His agency has two full-time tutors and hired up to 10 part-timers, depending on the number of students enrolled. As he came clean after IRAS wrote to him and asked him to review his tax submissions, he was not taken to court. But he had to pay a penalty twice the tax under-reported. In all, he paid almost $2 million in taxes and penalties.

IRAS regularly picks specific groups of self-employed individuals to audit to deter tax cheats. In recent years, it has checked on doctors, property agents and maid agents, among others. It recovered $3.2 million in taxes and penalties from over 130 doctors audited, The Straits Times reported last year.

In its tuition industry checks, IRAS found that besides under-declaring income such as from tuition fees, some agencies also omitted other sources of income, such as from the sale of course materials and registration fees.

Some tutors and centre owners also claimed for their personal expenses, such as personal phone bills, when these are not income tax deductible. Others made claims for business expenses based on estimates, without proper documentation.

IRAS is currently auditing about 50 more cases.

Industry insiders told The Sunday Times that top tutors can earn $1 million or more in a year. They estimate there are up to 20 such millionaire tutors here. These tutors specialise in teaching one subject, holding classes for up to 50 students at a time with rates that go up to $90 an hour per student.

But the average full-time tutor earns between $3,500 and $6,000 a month, those interviewed say.

But how much a tutor earns is really anyone's guess, as those who work from home do not issue receipts, unlike tuition agencies.

Contrary to popular perception, a tuition agency may not necessarily be a money spinner, said co-founder of Mind Stretcher Learning Centre Alvin Kuek.

He said: "I get offers to take over failing tuition centres all the time. The industry is very competitive and you have to constantly improve and add value for students or they will go to another person."

He has four friends who used to hold finance or engineering jobs and who started tuition agencies hoping to make their pot of gold. All failed within a few years, he said.

Meanwhile, IRAS tracks down tax evaders through various ways, including tip-offs.

In one case, a member of the public alerted IRAS that a man in his 40s was giving tuition from his home. The tutor had declared his income as between $30,000 and $40,000 a year when it was actually between $100,000 and $150,000.

He under-declared his income by more than half a million dollars over five years. He also paid his wife almost $50,000 a year for administrative work, a sum IRAS found "excessive". In the end, he had to pay taxes and penalties of close to $110,000.

An IRAS spokesman stressed that all tutors and agencies have to put in place a record-keeping system so that their income tax declarations are supported with the required documents, such as receipts, accounting records and bank statements.

"We want to encourage those who have freelance income from tuition and have yet to report them in their past income tax returns to come forward to voluntarily declare such income to us," the spokesman said.

"Voluntary declaration of omissions will result in a much lower penalty than omissions discovered by IRAS."





REWARDS FOR WHISTLE-BLOWERS

Whistle-blowers who report tax cheats can get a reward of up to $100,000 or 15 per cent of the tax recovered. The reward is paid if the tip-off leads to unpaid tax being recovered.

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) said the informants' identities will be kept secret.

Those with information can send an e-mail to ifd@iras.gov.sg or go in person to the Investigation and Forensics Division at IRAS, Revenue House, 55, Newton Road.





The millionaire tutor
By Theresa Tan, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

Mr Phang Yu Hon, 47, is a tuition millionaire and shows his income tax records readily to prove how much he earns and what he pays in taxes each year.

It took just two years for him to double his income from about half a million dollars in 2009 to $1 million in 2011.

All from teaching physics, and mostly to students from top schools such as Raffles Institution, Hwa Chong Institution and National Junior College - many already doing well, but keen to make sure they continue scoring As.

Mr Phang runs physics.com.sg, and is its only tutor. He says the secret to his success lies in running group sessions for 30 or more students at a time, and doing it all himself.

That, and a reputation that has kept students coming even as his fees rose to between $380 and $720 for four two-hour lessons.

Mr Phang was candid in describing his income to The Sunday Times, showing his tax records.

He recalled the year his income crossed $1 million and he had to pay taxes of $186,000. "My heart ached when I had to pay my tax bills. I can buy a Mercedes-Benz (with that sum)," he said.

But he said he was happy to pay more tax because he was earning a lot more. "I never imagined I would be so successful. It is beyond my wildest imagination," he said.

The former Raffles Institution student graduated from the National University of Singapore with first-class honours in electrical engineering and started working as an engineer.

He was earning $4,000 a month in his last job as a consultant, but longed to be his own boss and tried several businesses, including a tuition agency, where he matched tutors with students and received a commission.

Although he never trained to be a teacher, he discovered he had a flair for teaching when he had to step in for some of his tutors.

In 1997, he started tutoring full-time. In his first year, he earned less than $10,000. But over time, more students came.

In 2002, he decided to teach students in groups, instead of individually. That was when he saw his income balloon.

By 2008, he was earning about $20,000 a month. A year later, his earnings doubled, and just kept growing. As his reputation grew, he raised his fees. The number of students doubled.

Over the past two years, his income was an average of $830,000 a year.

Mr Phang has about 200 students, and he conducts lessons in a Bishan shophouse, with about 30 students in each class.

He works about 40 to 50 hours a week - 18 hours teaching, and the rest preparing for lessons, writing assessment books and doing his paperwork.

About two-thirds of his students are from top schools, and most are from upper middle-class families.

"Some students are already getting an A, but they come to me to make sure they continue getting As. Others want to improve their grades to get an A," he said.

About 10 to 20 per cent seek coaching above their level in school just to challenge themselves.

One boy not from a top school is Raphael Loh, 16, a Secondary 4 student at Whitley Secondary.

He went to Mr Phang last year when he was scoring Bs and Cs in school. With tuition, he started getting As and found himself working harder on physics.

He said being surrounded by top performers in his tuition class also spurred him on. His tuition costs $400 a month.

Although he is sitting the O levels, he started taking tuition in junior college level physics this year out of interest. He won a silver medal at this year's Singapore Junior Physics Olympiad, a national competition. He was the only neighbourhood school student to win a gold or silver medal.

Raphael said: "I was not motivated to study previously and I didn't pay attention in school, so my grades suffered. But as my parents paid so much for tuition, I would be wasting their money if I didn't pay attention during tuition."


Kampung Kampus: Eco-friendly site to take root in Khatib

$
0
0
Non-profit group secures plot for project to nurture leaders and build kampung spirit
By David Ee, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

A non-profit group that has drawn thousands of volunteers with its philosophy of living in harmony with the earth and people, now has a larger space to do even more.

Ground-Up Initiative (GUI) has secured 26,000 sq m of land at the former Bottle Tree Park in Khatib for what it calls a "Kampung Kampus", to nurture leaders through urban farming, craftsmanship, arts and heritage, and to build a kampung spirit.

When it is ready in about two years' time, the eco-friendly site will include organic farming plots, camping grounds, an amphitheatre, a heritage centre and a prototyping zone for people to design useful technologies such as solar lamps.

The project is expected to cost GUI $6 million, which it hopes to raise from government grants and by offering its popular educational programmes to schools and corporations.

The group has 12 full-time staff and has attracted 35,000 volunteers since 2008 to help with farming, composting, carpentry workshops and making organic food, among other activities.

It had earlier looked as if GUI would have to move from its rent-free base in the former Bottle Tree Park, after the lease secured by the supportive former management expired this year.

But the group has been thrown a lifeline: Chong Pang Citizens' Consultative Committee (CCC) is leasing the land from the Government for community use for six years, and is subletting it to GUI at a "very soft rental", said Minister for Foreign Affairs and Law K. Shanmugam, an MP for Nee Soon GRC, at the site's ground-breaking ceremony yesterday.

GUI founder Tay Lai Hock told reporters that the group is paying a monthly rent of "close to five figures".

Mr Shanmugam said that to help keep the rental low, Chong Pang CCC offered to become the tenant on the basis that the area would be used for community projects.

He said that while letting the non-profit group use the site would mean less income is earned, and there were competing uses for the land, "you can't put a money value" on how GUI's work benefits people.

"We were impressed because of the amount of energy and enthusiasm that young people show for this," Mr Shanmugam said.

"Beyond looking at things from a commercial perspective, it brings people very much in touch with something that they yearn for in an urban environment like Singapore - nature, doing things with your hands, a spirit of self-reliance."

Mr Tay said: "In the past six years, I have seen so many families and young people come up to me to thank me for building a space like this. It provides a breathing space and safe place for many to experience their sense of purpose and empathy for Singapore, the earth and humanity. It makes us feel like human beings again."

The former Bottle Tree Park had restaurants and a fishing pond, with tenants paying monthly rents of about $15,000.

The remaining land there will be leased by China-based Fullshare Group, which secured the lease in July with a tender bid of $169,000 a month. The company, which invests in health care and international trade businesses in Singapore, is expected to turn the area into a leisure park attraction, with restaurants and activities such as camping and fishing.



From Silicon Valley to Wow Kampung
By David Ee, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

All his staff call him the "kampung chief", and he certainly looks the part.

Mr Tay Lai Hock, the grizzled, grey-haired founder of Ground-Up Initiative (GUI), prefers to go barefoot when walking around the group's base at the former Bottle Tree Park in Khatib.

But the energetic 51-year-old has a more alien past. He was a successful sales and marketing executive for 11 years, working for a Silicon Valley-based employer in the United States and earning a five-figure monthly salary.

He gave it all up in the early 2000s to travel the world for four years. Enroute, he lived in organic farms and eco-villages in Spain, Morocco and New Zealand, and was inspired to begin something similar in Singapore.

GUI started in 2008 with just a handful of members. Over time, its "village" base at the former Bottle Tree Park - granted rent-free by the supportive management - grew into 7ha of farming plots, fruit trees and a workshop.

Today, the ragtag outfit is no more. It has expanded quickly as schools and firms were attracted to its educational programmes that emphasise connecting with nature, the earth and people.

It now has an innovation arm, a social enterprise called Sustainable Living Lab, to add to its educational arm known as Wow Kampung.

Its volunteers hail from Singapore and around the world, and include civil servants, social workers, chefs and bank executives.

Last year, Mr Tay was given an Inspiration Of The Year award from global think-tank Challenge:Future.


Big Idea No. 10: Downsize the PIE

$
0
0
Need a car in 2065? Don't buy a private car. Use a smartphone app to find a shared one. Preferably driverless.
By Kishore Mahbubani, Published The Straits Times, 8 Nov 2014

MY BIG Idea No. 10 in this series of essays on Singapore's future is easy to remember but hard to implement: "Downsize the PIE."

This idea came to my mind when I saw a huge sign along the Pan-Island Expressway (PIE) saying "Upsize the PIE".

It was a clever play on words.

It is always good to increase the size of the pie, literally speaking. However, in land-scarce Singapore, how could we possibly celebrate the fact that we are expanding road space?

Every square metre we give up for road usage means a square metre less for a more environmentally friendly use. Already, Singapore uses up to 12 per cent of its land for road usage, probably one of the highest in the world.

Can we reduce road space in Singapore? Yes, we can!

With the arrival of new technology and new systems of transportation, we can have an alternative dream for Singapore.

To put it simply, my dream for Singapore is to reduce the number of vehicles from one million to 300,000.

Indeed, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) study has concluded the following: "Results suggest that an Automated Mobility-on-Demand (AMoD) solution could meet the personal mobility needs of the entire population of Singapore with a fleet whose size is approximately 1/3 of the total number of passenger vehicles currently in operation.

"Moreover, a financial analysis indicates AMoD systems are a financially viable alternative to more traditional means of accessing personal mobility."

To achieve this dream, we have to make three big changes.

All these big changes are possible. However, they will only be possible if we slip out of our comfort zones and think outside the box. In short, we have to think and dream big like the founding fathers of Singapore. If they had not done this, Singapore would not have succeeded.

Let us go back to this tradition and dream big and dream bold.

Remove cars as status symbol

THE first big change we can and should make is to the attitude of Singaporeans towards car ownership. In theory, people buy cars for transportation purposes.

In practice, people buy cars also for status reasons. Many Singaporean middle-class families believe that they have not "arrived" until they own a car.

Right now, it is also true that people buy cars because they are the most convenient form of transport in Singapore. This is why I own a car now.

However, if I could rely on a smartphone app that will get me a car immediately whenever I need it, it would make no rational sense to own a car in Singapore.

Is this possible? Of course, this is possible! Indeed, this is what Uber is promising to do if it eventually builds up a sufficiently big fleet of cars.

Since we can replace private car ownership with smartphone apps, we need to get a strong signal from the people of Singapore that they are prepared to abandon the purchase of cars if an alternative system is created.

Indeed, in a separate article I am writing for a volume on Singapore in the next 50 years, I say that we can switch the entire car population of Singapore to the Google-type driverless cars.

And guess what? There will be fewer traffic jams with driverless cars, because computer-driven cars behave more "rationally" than people-driven cars.

Let me also add here that people's lives will become more convenient if they make the switch to driverless cars.

All the time spent on looking for parking will be saved. All the space spent on parking will be saved. Doesn't this sound like heaven?

Rewarding driving

TO ACHIEVE this heaven, the second big change we need to make is in our public policies on cars.

In theory, our public policies are designed to curb car ownership and reduce road usage.

In practice, there has been a perverse result. We have ended up creating an ecosystem of transportation that rewards, rather than penalises, car owners.

It is such a pleasure to drive in Singapore because there are no Bangkok-style traffic jams.

We have also spent billions of dollars on tunnels (like the Marina Coastal Expressway and the Central Expressway) and flyovers to make it even easier to drive here.

In retrospect, was it wise to use so much public money to build a road infrastructure that eats up scarce land and rewards car ownership? Was it wise to "upsize" the PIE?

These are hard questions we need to answer as we try to create an alternative heaven in Singapore. Can our public policies change? Yes, they can.

The Singapore Government has long prided itself on the fact that it has tried to find efficient "market" solutions to public policy problems. Since road space is scarce, we have created "road pricing". This is a good policy.

Since we cannot have too many cars on the roads, we auction certificates of entitlement which are needed to register private vehicles. This is also a good public policy. These public policies should continue.

However, we can change one public policy. All over Singapore, we have roadside spaces set aside for future road expansion.

These pocket-sized pieces of land should be progressively handed back to the National Parks Board to create new pocket-sized parks. This will make Singapore even more beautiful.

Bring free market to taxi services

CAN we also try market solutions for our taxi system? In the early years of Singapore, it was wise to set up taxi cooperatives (like NTUC Comfort) to create safe and reliable taxi services.

And if they can compete, we should allow them to carry on. However, as of now, they can only compete if we regulate and artificially control the number of taxi companies and taxis on the road.

Our taxi policies are more akin to Soviet-style central planning rather than a free market solution.

We even regulate what the taxi drivers can charge.

As a result, we have one of the most absurd taxi pricing systems in the world.

It is so complicated that the average consumer cannot understand how it works. This is a natural result of Soviet-style central planning.

Let us therefore be bold like our founding fathers and allow free market "creative destruction" to work in the taxi market.

Instead of trying to protect existing companies, we should allow market forces to have free rein.

By free rein, I mean free rein. Let us try out the Uber concept in full: Let us allow each car owner to lease his or her car for trips.

Let us allow a willing buyer and a willing seller to determine the price of each trip. Competition will drive prices down.

If modern algorithms can allow Uber to create a system of "dynamic pricing", we should allow all taxi companies to create "dynamic pricing".

It would, of course, be unwise to allow one taxi company to dominate the market.

We should encourage all the global market players in the taxi industry - such as Uber, Hailo, Easy Taxi and GrabTaxi - to set up shop in Singapore and allow free competition to reign. What will happen?

At first, there may well be chaos. Prices will plummet.

Over time, the market for "taxis" will find an equilibrium and Singapore consumers will find that if they have a smartphone app, they can get a car any time and anywhere in Singapore under any weather condition (including heavy rainstorms) within five minutes, at a price they can decide to say "yes" or "no" to.

We will create an alternative ecosystem of transport which will no longer make it rational to own a private car in Singapore.

Pure free market economies will create this result. Each day I own a car in Singapore, I am creating a hole in my pocket.

This is because there is a daily drip of dollars from my pocket to pay for depreciation costs, interest costs, road taxes and parking fees. This daily drip will happen even if I do not use my car at all.

However, if we switch from car ownership to smartphone apps, this daily drip will stop. What would a rational person do if he or she is presented with this choice?

In the above paragraph, I am making a selfish and self-interested argument for not owning a car.

Altruistic reasons

THE third big change we have to make in Singapore is to appeal to the higher-order altruistic and idealistic side of Singaporeans. All human populations are the same.

Singaporeans have the same proportion of idealism as other citizens. If each one of us can find a relatively painless way of saving our small and imperilled planet, we would do so.

We all have in us a desire to save the world.

How can we save the world? One of the biggest trends in our world is urbanisation.

Indeed, massive urbanisation is taking place, much of it in Asia.

In 1990, there were 10 megacities, of which five were in Asia.

By 2010, there were 21 megacities, of which 10 were in Asia.

The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs has predicted that in 2030, there will be 41 megacities, of which 23 will be in Asia.

It is truly shocking that all the new cities in Asia believe that the only way to progress is to allow uninhibited car ownership.

In the past, Bangkok was the only South-east Asian city with massive traffic jams. Now, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur and Manila have joined Bangkok.

Even Beijing and Shanghai have followed suit.

We need one city in Asia to demonstrate that we can build a great city without encouraging private car ownership.

The only city in Asia that can provide this moral and idealistic leadership in this field is Singapore. We have the will and means to create an alternative transport ecosystem. When that happens, we will become a "city on the hill", to borrow from a well-known American expression.

I would therefore like to conclude with one simple suggestion.

When we celebrate our 50th anniversary next year and when we announce our goals for the next 50 years, let us announce a simple idealistic goal: Singapore will become a society with zero private car ownership by 2065.

We may not achieve it in full, but we will have a lot of fun being bold and experimental in our car transport systems along the way.

We will also demonstrate that, like our founding fathers in 1965, we can dream big.

And in 2065 (or probably earlier), there will be a sign saying "Downsize the PIE".

The writer is dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, NUS, and author of The Great Convergence: Asia, The West, And The Logic Of One World.




Sustainable Singapore Blueprint 2015

$
0
0
Towards a 'car-lite', zero-waste Singapore
Govt commits $1.5b to plans covering power, waste management, transport and more
By Feng Zengkun Environment Correspondent, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

Singapore will commit $1.5 billion over the next five years to lead the country towards a greener and more sustainable future.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced this yesterday as he outlined wide-ranging plans to turn Singapore into a "car-lite" and zero-waste nation.

These include an electric car-sharing pilot scheme, using Ang Mo Kio and Tampines to test-bed ideas to encourage cycling, and underground pipes to whisk away rubbish in new Housing Board estates, reducing the need for garbage trucks.

Neighbourhoods will also become "eco-smart", through the use of solar panels to power common facilities for instance.

Pointing to Singapore's 50th birthday next year, PM Lee said "it's a good time to celebrate our clean and green efforts for the (last) 50 years, and to chart a vision for the future", as he launched a year-long Clean and Green Singapore 2015 campaign at an event in Choa Chu Kang.

He also revealed an ambitious Sustainable Singapore Blueprint 2015. The 112-page document updates the original 2009 blueprint which sets out Singapore's targets and strategies for sustainable development until 2030, to ensure the country remains an oasis for everyone.

The latest blueprint, which more than 6,000 people contributed to and took into account local and global developments in technology, sets wide-ranging targets over 15 years, from increasing how much Singapore recycles, to its air quality, even to the amount of skyrise greenery.

For the first time, separate recycling goals for households and industry have been included, in a bid to get more residents to do their share. Last year's non-domestic recycling, which includes the work done by industries, was 77 per cent.

But for households, it was just 20 per cent, pulling down Singapore's overall recycling rate to 61 per cent. The aim is to bring the overall rate up to 70 per cent by 2030, but that means getting households to do much more.

Ms Melissa Tan, chairman of the Waste Management and Recycling Association of Singapore, believes this is possible if "more is done to raise awareness".

This means getting the message through to the elderly, for instance.

National University of Singapore transport researcher Lee Der Horng also lauded the new car-sharing scheme - which he said kills two birds with one stone.

It would not just reduce the number of cars on the road, but also solve the problem of people not wanting to buy eco-friendly electric cars due to their prohibitive costs. As of September, there was just one pure electric car on the roads here.

"We can't keep building more roads for more cars," said PM Lee, hoping that Singapore can learn from other cities, such as Copenhagen, where cycling is a way of life.

He recalled a 2009 visit to the Danish capital, where he saw people cycling in the freeze of winter.

"They made their city cycling-friendly, with lanes, ramps, and other infrastructure... there, cars have regard to bicycles and give way. We have to learn from these examples... and... pilot ideas to see how we can get them to work in Singapore."

PM Lee also made it clear yesterday that it would take all Singaporeans working together to hit the new sustainability targets.

He recalled how the first Keep Singapore Clean campaign in 1968 took a similar "massive effort".

Police and health inspectors advised people against littering while patrolling, fliers were displayed in coffee shops, bus shelters and offices, and the campaign slogan was even printed on cinema tickets.

"We have built a home... we can be proud of. But we must do more as our environmental challenges grow," he said, highlighting how climate change led to prolonged dry weather between January and March.

"Fortunately our lives were not disrupted as we ran our desalination plants at 100 per cent and increased our Newater output to meet our needs," he said.

"But we cannot become complacent as the climate is changing and we must expect more such extreme episodes."

PM Lee, who also presented Heritage Tree Dedication Awards to Singapore Press Holdings, City Developments and Sembcorp Industries for their contributions to the Garden City Fund, was encouraged that many Singaporeans are already organising themselves to do more for the environment.

"Look around and ask yourself: what can I do to make our environment better?"



Sustainable Singapore Blueprint launched
Second edition of blueprint sets out national vision for a sustainable future
By Laura Elizabeth Philomin, TODAY, 8 Nov 2014

Maintaining green spaces and reducing reliance on private car transportation for a liveable home, creating a “green economy” and increasing domestic recycling for a sustainable city, and greater community engagement.


Unveiled at the launch of the year-long Clean & Green 2015 Campaign today (Nov 8) by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the blueprint mapped out the government’s vision to commit S$1.5 billion over the next five years to create a more liveable and sustainable future.

Environmental challenges stemming from climate change - like the Singapore’s longest drought in recorded history in February this year - are expected to grow, said Mr Lee. “We cannot become complacent, because climate is changing and I think we must expect more of such extreme episodes - more droughts, more heavy rains at different times - and we must be able to cope with it."

It is the second blueprint on sustainable development after the first one was released in 2009. Statistics compiled by the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources (MEWR) showed that Singapore was mostly on track to meeting the original 2030 targets set in the 2009 blueprint. The SSB 2015 will see these 2030 targets stretched further, especially for indicators where Singapore had already exceeded the original target. 

One such area is the amount of skyrise greenery or rooftop gardens. Originally set at 50 hectares by 2030 in the 2009 blueprint, Singapore had 61 hectares in 2013 and will see a new target of 200 hectares in the latest blueprint. 

Other initiatives to enhance green spaces include maintaining public cleanliness and planning parks such that nine in ten households will be within a 10-minute walk from a park. While the length of park connectors has grown steadily from 113km in 2009 to 216km in 2013, it will be further expanded to 400km by 2030.

Continuing the 2009 blueprint’s focus of encouraging greater use greener modes of transport, the SSB 2015 has included introducing features in existing towns to create a more conducive environment for walking and cycling.

Because building more roads for more cars is not a viable option, Mr Lee said: "We want a solution in Singapore where the roads are clear, where there are many alternative for people to travel and to travel in a green and sustainable, and efficient and convenient way."

Under the National Cycling Plan announced last month, the length of cycling paths will be expanded from the current 213km to 700km by 2030, along with intra-town cycling networks that will be piloted in Ang Mo Kio and Tampines. 

In addition, new and upcoming MRT lines will increase the length of rail network from 178km to 360km so that 80 per cent of households – compared to the 58.5 per cent in 2013 – will be within a 10-minute walk from a train station.

Other plans to reduce the usage of cars also include introducing driverless vehicles, piloting an electric car-sharing scheme and creating more car-free zones in the city through roads closures for public activities like at Haji Lane and Ann Siang Road. 

With domestic recycling rates much lower than industrial recycling, improving household recycling was also addressed by introducing more facilities such as centralised chutes for recyclables in all new HDB flats and Pneumatic Waste Conveyance Systems in more towns. 

Initiatives to raise adoption of solar power and other sustainability practices in Singapore-based companies were also outlined to create a “green economy”. The number of “green jobs” is also expected to grow with more demand for expertise and research in areas like improving energy and water efficiency, and pollution and waste reduction. 

Underpinning the initiatives in the SSB 2015 was the focus on greater community engagement commitment to environmental awareness. As part of the review of the SSB 2009, MEWR had conducted public consultations and surveys with about 6,000 participants. Findings from the survey showed that 78 per cent of respondents were concerned about environmental issues and almost nine in ten believed caring for environment is the community or individual’s responsibility. 

To that end, the SSB 2015 intends to support community projects to enliven community spaces and foster stronger community stewardship over caring for the environment and sustainable living practices. For a start, the blueprint aims to grow the number of active green volunteers from over 1,000 to 5,000 by 2030, as well the number of Community in Bloom Gardens from over 700 to 2,000.

Stressing the importance of more people stepping forward to do their part for the environment, Mr Lee said the government provide the infrastructure but individuals also have a responsibility.

"We can build a better transport network, but we have to adjust our commuting lifestyles and habits. HDB can build more convenient chutes for recycling, but households have to use them and practice the 3R’s - reduce, reuse and recycle,” he added. "So together, we have to develop new norms if we’re really going to succeed in being clean and green."







Pick up after yourself, create more bright spots
By Lim Yan Liang, The Sunday Times, 9 Nov 2014

It will take some time to persuade "spoilt" Singaporeans to clean up after themselves, according to the man helming a movement to do just that.

"We can't change Singapore as a society overnight," said Mr Liak Teng Lit, chairman of the Public Hygiene Council, which leads the Keep Singapore Clean Movement.

Citing countries like Japan, where citizens take the initiative to keep common areas clean, Mr Liak lamented that Singaporeans are "so spoilt", being used to town council and hawker centre cleaners picking up after them.

"But hopefully we can change things bit by bit," he said yesterday at the opening ceremony of the year-long Clean and Green Singapore 2015 campaign.

Mr Liak is hoping two community initiatives that were launched alongside the campaign will teach Singaporeans to be more responsible for their own waste.

The first is an expanded Bright Spots Challenge, which aims to increase the number of litter-free "bright spots" in Singapore from 300 now to 500 by the end of next year.

First launched in 2012, the initiative invites people and organisations to adopt communal spaces and keep them clean, turning them into "bright spots" to be emulated.

"I'm hoping that with all these bright spots, good behaviour will grow and spread outwards, and also convince the sceptics," he said.

One such bright spot is Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, where Mr Liak was chief executive officer before becoming group chief executive of Alexandra Health in 2012.

Nine in 10 people who eat at the hospital's food court return their trays, whether they are staff, patients or residents, Mr Liak noted.

"Where there is some peer pressure and social norms for you to do things in a certain way, it works."

The other initiative is the No Waste Days Challenge, which encourages Singaporeans to make a pledge not to waste food and to use fewer disposable items.

Members of the public can make pledges at Clean and Green Singapore carnivals that will be held islandwide this month. They can also upload photos of themselves being eco-friendly on social media.

The National Environment Agency said it aims to collect 50,000 photo submissions and pledges by June next year, and is urging companies to make donations to charitable causes when certain milestones are met.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday called on individual Singaporeans to do their part in helping to make Singapore cleaner and greener, noting that each Singaporean now generates nearly 1.5 tonnes of waste a year.

While the Government can build better public transport and more chutes for convenient recycling at home, it is up to each person to adjust their commuting and recycling habits, he said.

SG50: New trees, ECP light-up to celebrate S’pore’s greenery

$
0
0
More planting, landscaping along expressways and in CBD among NParks’ plans
By Neo Chai Chin, TODAY, 10 Nov 2014

The Republic’s green spaces will be part of its 50th birthday celebrations next year, with roadside greenery to be spruced up, more trees to be planted and public events to be hosted at parks.

From the third quarter of next year, the iconic rain trees along a 3.4km stretch of East Coast Parkway (ECP) that greet travellers from Changi Airport will be specially lit up to showcase their beauty at night.

Additional planting and landscaping will also be done along the ECP and four other expressways, as well as major roads in the civic and Central Business District, said Minister of State (National Development) Desmond Lee yesterday as he announced the National Parks Board’s (NParks) SG50 plans.

Free concerts will be held at six parks and gardens here — starting with Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park next March — with local talents performing jazz, classical and contemporary music as well as xinyao. The other parks hosting concerts include Admiralty Park in May and the Singapore Botanic Gardens in August.

And 50 Community In Bloom groups will come together to create five garden displays at the HortPark from March. A mass tree-planting exercise will take place next September and October, with 5,000 more trees to be planted at the park connectors, parks and nature ways.

Mr Lee was speaking at the launch of the Jurong Spring Nature Way, a 5.3km route from Jurong Lake Park to the Western Catchment area that aims to attract more birds and butterflies through specific trees and shrubs planted. The endangered native Yellow Cow Wood tree, for instance, is a host plant for several butterfly species such as the Archduke and Short Banded Sailor, while the Small-leafed Oil-fruit tree bears fruit eaten by birds such as the Yellow-vented Bulbul and Pink-necked Pigeon. The nature way, which winds through largely residential areas, is one of eight here with a combined length of 43.3km.

NParks deputy chief executive Leong Chee Chiew said the nature ways would allow everyday encounters with birds and butterflies, such as on walks home from the MRT station.

Jurong resident Thilagar Ragavan, 13, welcomed the possibility of seeing more wildlife but hoped existing species of beetles and other insects would not be affected. His friend, Gangababu Giry Thara Prasath, 15, said the sightings could spur an interest among the youth to know more about various animal species.

Asked how roadside greenery would be enhanced for SG50, Dr Leong said more varieties of trees would be planted — similar to what has been done along newer roads — to create a more natural look. And where roads have been widened, NParks tries to replant big specimens to get back the mature greenery as quickly as possible. “When you remove mature trees, there’s going to be a gap between the removal of the tree and eventual growth of a new plant,” he explained.

The special lighting of the stretch of the ECP would showcase the sculptural beauty of the rain trees, said Dr Leong, who is also Commissioner of Parks and Recreation. “We’ll be quite careful about how bright (the lights) should be and where (they) should point and so on … we will try our best to make it pretty without being overwhelming,” he said.

Meanwhile, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Grace Fu said she hoped to see more corporations step forward to participate in the SG50 celebrations. Speaking at the Great Eastern Women’s Run organised by the insurer yesterday, Ms Fu commended the firm’s move to offer free insurance for Jubilee-year babies next year.

“I’m happy to see that many corporates are stepping up. SG50 shouldn’t be the Government’s way of celebrating the Jubilee year. It should be everyone in Singapore, all corporates stepping in and doing their part. We hope more companies will also join in,” she said.







Focus group discussions to gather views on CPF changes

$
0
0
The Straits Times, 10 Nov 2014

A SERIES of focus group discussions will be held over the next few months to gather views from the public on how to enhance the Central Provident Fund (CPF) system.



The feedback will help the CPF Advisory Panel, which is studying potential changes to the CPF system, better understand the needs of Singaporeans, a Manpower Ministry statement said yesterday.

The discussions will zoom in on four aspects of the CPF review:
- How to adjust the Minimum Sum beyond 2015;
- How to enable members to withdraw more CPF savings as a lump sum upon retirement;
- How to give members an option for CPF payouts that are initially lower but rise with time to help keep pace with inflation; and
- How to offer more flexibility for members to use private instruments to supplement or replace the CPF Life annuity scheme.
Details of the sessions, including how to sign up, are available at www.cpfpanel.sg.

Members of the public are also welcome to provide feedback on the areas under study by e-mailing cpf_panel@mom.gov.sg.


S'pore, Chinese troops wrap up Nanjing war games

$
0
0
By Jermyn Chow, Defence Correspondent In Nanjing, The Straits Times, 10 Nov 2014

THE People's Liberation Army (PLA) of China and the Singapore Armed Forces wrapped up their biggest joint war games to date, in which 140 troops from both sides teamed up to fire their weapons and practise battle manoeuvres.

The exercise, codenamed Cooperation, was the third in a series and played out over Nanjing's rugged terrain, in an area the size of Pulau Ubin.

It is the first time that both armies are putting their infantry troops through conventional land warfare scenarios, stepping up the intensity of the joint military drill.

The previous two exercises in 2009 and 2010 were based on anti-terror drills that tested how 120 soldiers from both sides responded to chemical and explosive threats, among other missions.

This time round, foot soldiers went through their paces in a series of missions, which included shooting practice and clearing obstacles.

The nine-day drill, which started on Nov 1, culminated in a combined live-firing exercise that saw Singaporean and Chinese soldiers fighting alongside each other, firing live rounds to take out hostile targets. They were backed up by three of the PLA's main battle tanks.

The PLA's mortars also fired rockets that screamed towards targets in quick succession, creating huge puffs of smoke and dust.

All in, the troops pounded 84 targets with 7,000 small-arms rounds.

The sound and fury of the 45-minute mock battle was witnessed by Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, who attended yesterday's closing ceremony at the Xingli training area. Also present was the Nanjing military region commander, General Cai Yingting.

Brigadier-General Lim Hock Yu, the army's Chief of Staff - General Staff, said the wide range of training activities allowed troops to "understand each other better and forged stronger friendships between both armed forces".

Dr Ng, who is in China for a week-long visit that will end this Friday, thanked Gen Cai for hosting the Singapore troops, saying that the joint exercise builds good and close military ties between both sides.

"There are very few things that forge closer ties than charging up the hill together, sleeping in the same barracks, bathing in cold water together and eating food together," he said.

Gen Cai said this year's joint exercise has taken Sino-Singapore ties to "new highs" as it has improved the camaraderie among the troops who "fight shoulder to shoulder in the battlefield".

China has participated in joint training exercises with other countries in the region, such as Australia, Indonesia and Thailand. Engaging the PLA in such interactions could help build bilateral relations with China and cooperation among these countries.









S'pore to step up defence relations with China: Ng Eng Hen
By Jermyn Chow, Defence Correspondent In Qingdao, The Straits Times, 12 Nov 2014

SINGAPORE will find ways to step up military ties with China, on the back of the mutual confidence both nations have built up over the years, said visiting Singapore Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen.

Although Singapore has a small navy, its Chinese counterpart knows that the Republic is a "good friend" and that bilateral relations are strong, Dr Ng said.

"We treasure each other's confidence... and we will continue to find ways to step up defence relations." He was speaking to reporters yesterday after touring the Qingdao naval base, the headquarters of the People's Liberation Army Navy's North Sea Fleet, on the fourth day of his China trip.

Dr Ng, who was accompanied by senior military officers and defence policy makers, met the northern fleet's chief of staff, Rear-Admiral Wei Gang, and also checked out the Chinese navy's latest missile corvette, Fushun. The 89m stealth warship, which went operational four months ago, features anti-ship cruise missiles and anti-submarine torpedos, among other weapons.

Noting that the Chinese navy only opens up its newest warship and weapons to "selected guests", Dr Ng said: "It speaks of a PLA Navy that is confident of its abilities and also very professional in its military outlook."

The North Sea Fleet, one of China's three naval fleets, is responsible for the Yellow Sea and coastal areas in north-east China. The fleet has also contributed ships to counter-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden.

In 2012, Dr Ng visited the South Sea Fleet, which is based in Zhanjiang, Guangdong province.

Rear-Adm Wei said the northern fleet and the Republic of Singapore Navy are "old friends", with sailors and ships involved in multilateral sea drills, and calling at each other's ports. Moving forward, the North Sea Fleet will continue to build "strategic trust" with its Singapore counterpart.

For instance, the fleet is in the midst of selecting the first PLA Navy officer to be positioned in a Singapore-based maritime security watch group, the Information Fusion Centre, which is housed in the Changi Naval Base.

Sino-Singapore military ties have grown over the years since the PLA and the Singapore Armed Forces inked an agreement to formalise bilateral defence activities in 2008.

Last Sunday, both armies wrapped up their biggest joint war games to date, with 140 infantry troops from both sides teaming up to fire their weapons and practise battle manoeuvres.

Tomorrow, Dr Ng will deliver a speech on the Asian Century at the PLA National Defence University in Beijing.









PM Lee at CapitaLand's China-Singapore Dialogue 2014

$
0
0




PM Lee confident TPP can be done by early 2015
Small issues remain and all countries need to make push in final stretch
By Rachel Chang, In Beijing, The Straits Times, 10 Nov 2014

PRIME Minister Lee Hsien Loong has expressed confidence that the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal can be completed by early next year, as media reports said it is set to miss its year- end deadline.

"If not this year, then we should be able to make it early next year," Mr Lee said here last night. "There are some small issues remaining but everyone knows it's the last 100m. We need to make a push."



Mr Lee was attending a gala dinner to celebrate Singapore property giant CapitaLand's 20th anniversary of operations in China and was asked during a dialogue about the high-standard trade pact. The TPP has missed several deadlines for completion as countries such as Japan have baulked at removing agriculture sector protection.

This morning, Mr Lee is scheduled to attend talks at the United States Embassy with leaders of the other 11 TPP countries.

Hopes had been high for a breakthrough at the session, but US Trade Representative Michael Froman yesterday ruled out any "major announcement".

Leaders of the 21-member APEC grouping are gathered in Beijing for the annual summit.

Asked by media group Caixin's chief editor Hu Shuli last night if US President Barack Obama's Asia visit would spur a breakthrough, Mr Lee replied in Mandarin that "to push TPP forward, you don't need to come to Asia".

"TPP's problems are domestic factors in each country," he said. "Can you persuade domestic sectors to accept greater foreign competition? With this, you have the chance to enter other countries' markets, and consumers also benefit. So the decisive factor for the TPP is whether each country can make the decision and say, we will seize this. It is hard to do, but we hope we can do it."



There is also significant domestic resistance in the US to the trade deal, but Mr Obama has made its completion a priority for his trade agenda.

Mr Lee also voiced support for a Free Trade Area for the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP), a broader goal that China is pushing at this year's APEC. Its establishment would spur the lowering of trade barriers in Europe and the US, because it is the nature of trade agreements to build in momentum, he said.

He noted APEC itself was established 25 years ago because the then General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Gatt), a global trade body, was mired in disagreement. APEC's creation spurred countries to complete Gatt negotiations, he said.

Earlier in the day, Mr Lee met Chinese President Xi Jinping on arriving in China.

Calling Singapore a country that has "created one miracle after another" in its development, Mr Xi told Mr Lee that Sino-Singapore ties have always been one step ahead of China's ties with other ASEAN countries.

The two countries are exploring a third government-to-government project in China's western region, and Mr Xi said China would respect Singapore's views on what the project would entail and where it would be located.

Mr Lee congratulated Mr Xi on China's hosting of the 25th annual APEC summit and on "steering the meeting towards a substantive outcome".

China and Singapore will mark the 25th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations next year. Mr Xi is scheduled to make a state visit to Singapore as will Singapore President Tony Tan Keng Yam, to China.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that during their 30-minute meeting, Mr Xi and Mr Lee also exchanged views on the situation in Hong Kong as well as regional and international developments.

At the dialogue, Mr Lee addressed Singapore's joining of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), a new China-led multilateral lending institution that will support infrastructure investment in developing Asian countries.

US pressure reportedly got countries such as South Korea, Australia and Indonesia to stay away from the AIIB.



Asked if Singapore was concerned that it is one of just a few rich countries to sign on to the AIIB, Mr Lee said that Singapore would have joined the AIIB regardless of its stage of development.

"AIIB has value because developing countries need huge amounts of infrastructure investment," he noted, adding that Indonesia is likely to join the bank and that South Korea and Australia have not ruled out membership.











CapitaLand 'to continue China journey'
By Rennie Whang And Rachel Chang, The Straits Times, 10 Nov 2014

CHINA will continue to be a core market and key driver for CapitaLand in its growth strategy, especially in integrated developments, president and group chief executive Lim Ming Yan said yesterday.

The developer is on track to complete 50 projects across Asia in the next three to four years, worth a total of about $36 billion on completion. More than half of them will be in China.

Speaking at a gala dinner in Beijing to celebrate the firm's 20 years in China, Mr Lim said CapitaLand is targeting 12 new integrated developments in Asia over the next three years, about half of which will be in China.

In his speech, he recalled the firm made its first foray into China during the 1998 Asian financial crisis. The building of Raffles City Shanghai, then the largest single investment made by a Singapore firm in China, was successful, and it became a bellwether for CapitaLand's operations there.

"We feel duty-bound to provide a platform for the joint development of China and Singapore," said Mr Lim.

The celebrations included a China-Singapore Economic Development Dialogue, with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong as guest of honour and keynote speaker.

Mr Lim said CapitaLand will continue to sharpen its focus on five city clusters: Beijing and Tianjin; Shanghai, Hangzhou, Suzhou and Ningbo; Guangzhou and Shenzhen; Chengdu and Chongqing; and Wuhan.

"Strong bilateral ties have helped pave the way for CapitaLand's growth in China in the past two decades," he said.

"We were among the first few foreign real estate firms to enter the market, (and) have since progressed in tandem with China's urbanisation and development."

He said the company will invest further in well-located sites there to grow its pipeline of integrated developments, shopping malls and commercial and residential developments. "We will continue to actively contribute to China's economic reform and sustainable development," he said.

About 300 guests, including senior government officials, bankers, business leaders and industry experts, attended the gala dinner and dialogue.


Viewing all 7506 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>